20010382 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090930

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review:
Date of Report`-??
Date of Field Review: ?1??U??U1 L"1
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
Evaluator's Name(s): ' ' t Y1 ? I
Report for Monitoring Year:
Evaluator's Name(s): 1--kill / t- ciff y-
Weather Conditions (today & recent): t j??C1 ?tfYl t `J,1.no i
Directions to Site: On-site mitig @ mixed-use development; NE of Greensboro; just E of Eckerson Rd exit from US-29; Eckerson
Rd crosses the mitigation reach prior to becoming Reedy Fork Pkwy & entering housing development
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20010382
Project Name: Villages at Reedy Fork
County(ies): Guilford
Basin & subbasin: Cape Fear 03030002
Nearest Stream: Reedy Fork
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream:
Mitigator Type: Private
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland:
Stream: 1820 linear feet
Buffer:
N utr. Offset:
Approved mitigation plan available? le No
Monitoring reports available? No
Problem areas identified in reports? Nd
Problem areas addressed on site? ? 1 No
Project History
Event
Event Date
Report Receipt: Monitoring 4/15/2009
Report Receipt: Monitoring 4/15/2009
Report Receipt: As-Built (5bLr\1C6)4/15/2009
C.on ?ruc?icr? 1012004 - 5
L .1 Ln.s>r l ?? 1 2-1 0 (4
L.( O 1
101 20103 T Z12- (04
----
Mitlgatlon required on site: I -Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved'
20010382-1 1820 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration
HABITAT JOHN T. SOULE
Environmental Scientist
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
ASSESSMENT AND
RESTORATION
PROGRAM, INC. -
Cell: 704.975.0882
Office: 704-841.2841
301 McCullough Drive Fax: [phone]
4th Floor [e-mail]
Charlotte, NC 28262 www.habitatassessment.com
Page 1 of 2
`-`.
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
[MITIGATION-SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful j
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
i
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
@ r-ceo f-V
rr?h,?? n j?,pUJ C?1,Ol?? C? vJl7C? ? j C v?
U
%j?b Y--)

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
j y Stream Mitigation Component Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 1820 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration Component ID: 20010382-1
Description: G --> ?fL (I, ?i&2p
Location within project:
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
STREAMBANK STABILITY - Approved Success Criteria:
6? rs 1, 3 , I`? 3 2 L
Are streambanks stable? Des No ai .? L e` e 2 )
If no, provide description and notes regarding stability issues: _ ?! "?' Q (? ?{ CORNt -L > ac_ CCA_
O
STRUCTURES - Approved Success Criteria:
1?c??k-? i?c?f -F?:; i?-?- ; ?' ?L-? e'er issue
?_?fi v e_ 1.2 cLJ enn / i me n/p? le

,J List all types of structures present on site: 0?_u Are the structures installed correctly? a No
Are the structures made of acceptable material? Yes No
(Unacceptable materials include: railroad ties, concrete with rebar, etc.
Are the structures located approximately where shown on the plan? Yes No
J -in! Are the structures stable (e.g. erosion, deposition, etc.)? ee No
d Provide description and notes regarding problematic structures:
FEATURES - Approved Success Criteria.
Le rti ;ate ?v C??riC? ?c?
Are riffles and pools in approximately the correct locations C4 Lf. l-c P' e No
Is the final sinuosity and gradient designed approximately to plan specifications? es No
Any evidence of vegetation growing on the stream bed or in the thalweg Yes o
Percentage of the restoration reach that has: Flowing water Ponded areas
Describe any stream features that provide evidence of unstable stream reaches (e.g. mid-channel bars,
-!- Q. downstream meander migration, chute cutoff formation, etc.):
--- -- --- --
AQUATIC BIOTA - Approve Success Criteria: r\-vo rvk-?Or
C Q CL C OU . C Z C tYGVY Ck_f C..r,\ (LV > -4 O / ? rE' J°i cLk,l?n r -c l-C}- r
Is aquatic life present in the channel? Ye No r-
Description of taxa observed, incl. quantities of individuals and general distribution of biota. Include a brief
description of the sampling methodology.
?-?C r = 12-1-(cG (red l3/ 3/Poor, 9_T7- (re _41poor?, ?-ew,)? 7
-I z o?g 141 110 8 `} -1 O q
List any remaining aquatic biota issues to address (e.g. erosion, discharges or toxicants, etc.):
r C.pr ?r Ct1v-y-\ tJ?Q Ct+Cn 200I ??o ti? S,?deX
rn??nve43 Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007
O'Ss C' k_ r? c ? ? r ?pc r?
\j(A A? c wa
re e ?e Ck 0-1
Page 1 f 2
ko l.sz.2C? ? S c c.C?t?
t-
Stream Mitigation Component Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:
?
?Jc -?_q b6.y'-w
L 5
- Q t7' l O-kz r\-q ryVc? (? bwF
onArmg report indicates success? (
Average TPA for entire site (per repo
Observational field data agrees? Ye No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover?
Vegetation planted on site?
Date of last planting:
00? , (L")n CYL
?,rL b \ `l"f?1 J ? v i ?! t,t
??11 t oG-' c? C ,
Yes No
® No (`(1 J? ?s V D U?_ .
Vegetation growing successfully? es
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas (e.g. buffer width, overall health of vegetation,
etc.):
0) ? ?"R? ? ??'C)?1 i? ?19? ?t C? ?Jt t ? ?t? ? r`- ? `nC? C? ?C?f1?.>
b5 I
b ??.?? ???? ?? ??,?'r?ti ??-?-?- C?:?Lr? ?,?Q?,'t., ,S?-??'1S?t. ?J'Lc?1LI?'?-- + Ct,?`_.?
J0 &? 6-" 'AKL_ aL
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation: Lc) cq) "C
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas::
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
b ;,L{ rtO-? U, NC_Q - V% ire ?-
List any remaining vegetation iss es to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
?.- OY?r- ln? (? S • iJ1gID- CAW ?_ rC %\,k . e i

MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful

- alb ?Lre_.
i
oa ally successf unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
C_0"-\_ kCJ ?'?itSZ - t`c c J VZ5??5 C' ,(1 tCt_L''f CL(_-WM
r-eL ?Y-'?XAC?6D '-\t; V-41C S vc .? OCI PU ?ie,rd. x k l o
Use the definitions in the joint state/federal stream mitigation guidelines to determine the correct type of
mitigation used for this component.
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and/or important stream features.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/"/ cover
br' r . ?Sm_? ddoel ,silk
S y a'r .?sv- (-ern
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
p
O

(l 1
110
11
In
\? o
\ \ ` dl # O
N
,t o y
~°o O
CY)
P
? Vl
N
\
\
'D

O.
N ?
Y ?

-O
_
C
C
.
t j
v?? •X
? O E
N
3
°o

O to -2
???
?O0
&:?
c
4 o
o
?
C >
- O
lo
N
c (n
.
u O

+
s a-
0
OC33 CL
R\
l•
\

O i ?
°
Z ?
L
U

w 2

o
N
V

O C
O 'p
C

M N
C
L]
C Q
C

N
(D
E
Y
Z ?
a RS
C
0 (D

< O
a_
Z?
x? v
v?
? x m
O 0
I a
0
,aog
i,y. .z CO
U
O
N
a O
ro.,? s... N
b U ?$
^ ?a )
I 0 00 1.
O
N
W .>
3a
J O
O
nrr

F u ?
O a t!"
O
i
e /
\
••\•\Lh\?tc?
\ a\8
now,
?Q
CV
O k
o
Q
to
$ I T
• D ?
it
I o
s
- a a
?1 0
o ?
t
n
OC
? U
O
N
V)
\. ezemf-?re?,no V
.o S n
F ? ? V
4 ? O
y r?i r i ., O. ? ?aarnnir xn° f/
1?
t _ 2 RE VVAy
o s PARK
1-0
0
0
N
R
7
C
(V
-_ 1
Hill, Tammy
From: Karri Cecil Blackmon [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 3:22 PM
To: Hill, Tammy
Subject: RE: DWQ site visit at Reedy Fork mitigation site
Thank you Ms. Hill. 10:00 is just fine. John Soule and Chris Matthews will meet you on site at 10:00 am.
Thanks a bunch!
Karri
Karri Cecil Blackmon
President
Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program, Inc.
301 McCullough Drive, 4th Floor
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Cell: 336.362.6776
Office: 704.841.2841
Fax: [phone]
karr!Ohabitatassessment.com
www.habitatassessment.com
From: Hill, Tammy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 1:27 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: DWQ site visit at Reedy Fork mitigation site
Hello, Karri. Thank you for helping to coordinate a site visit at Reedy Fork. One of the DWQ mitigation staff (either
myself or Eric Kulz) will be able to meet you on Wednesday 9/30. We could arrive around 10AM, but are flexible with
timing depending on your schedule. Please let me know what works best for you.
Thank you, and have a good weekend,
Tammy

Tammy L. Hill
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Quality (401/Wetlands)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-715-9052
[e-mail]
**Please note that my email address has changed!**
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.