20041810 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090325

CY m, t. nr??S
V--+?•?..?
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: 3723k-2,Wq Evaluator's Name(s):
Date of Report. - Report for Monitoring Year:
Date of Field Review: - - Evaluator's Name(s): Other Individuals/Agencies Present: (?f r . 7X [YICLiCl1r?Cn??? rcq. OVA 2>
Weather Conditions (today & recent): L
Directions to Site: coordinate agency review visits with Airport Direcf 4aa fait P_a
?-3re-crt?c i I le- tJ-C_. 21 ?3?
1. Office Review Information: C 2527
Project Number: 20041810 Project History
Project Name: Pitt-Greenville Airport
Event Event Date
County(ies): Pitt
401 Issued 5/25/2005
Basin & subbasin: Tar-Pamlico
Nearest Stream: Tar River
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: WS4,N
i Mitigator Type: Private
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 1.07 acres
Stream:
Buffer:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
- During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
- On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) ((field) Resolved
20041810-1 Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Restoration "I
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: su ce ful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
J
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Restoration Component ID: 20041810-1
Description: relocation of ditch; broad, flat bottom will have WL functions
Location within project:
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
? Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
SOILS - Approved Success Criteria. io/Dlw
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric. List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
Per FAA guidance, only maintained low herbaceous veg Species Story TPA/'/ cover
allowed; annual photos monit growth/success of planted , n , S jec- (fl(?
hydrophytic veg for 5 years; UPL grass (Fescue) planting `-C
OK'ed on sides of ditch, Lespedeza planting OK'ed >50' 0t? -?(ju?9?1?1AU.0 DJlrl?
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report): I ` AA 'k S b r ??y?
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting: lh Cl?-.? LyLt?a'u:LQ a-?-s2..
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No -
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List ntsy maining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Tec niques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Monitoring report indicates success?
Observational field data agrees?
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this n
List any remaining NCWAM issues t &
Coastal
Riverine
Yes No Riparian
Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Non-riparian (drier)
(e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: su ce 'ful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
partially successfu
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
(\?)\- bL& jam- df?- ?N
I unsuccessful
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
-
Additional es related to this c` ^ /o C oln`Yenlt? Or dca? re? , C 1 M--?
CZ5? U)C6*
yroo -Oz
cO"J=(mLan un bum o? -' 66. rn, ?
bpec
3? U_L 9) CarLq red m .
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2