20170537 Ver 2_As Built Report_20190923

ID#* 20170537
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review
Completed Date
09/23/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/23/201, -
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r— Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Brad Breslow
Project Information
Existing 20170537
(DWR) (nunbers only no dash)
ID#:*
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Hannah Bridge
County: Johnston
Document Information
r Yes r
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing 2
Version: (nunbersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Hannah Bridge Bank Parcel As Built Report.pdf 6.14MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:

Bank Parcel Development Plan As-Built Report

Hannah Bridge Mitigation Site

DWR Project # 2017-0537v2

Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201

Prepared By:

Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-829-9909

September 2019
i
Table of Contents

1.0 Project Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Location and Description .............................................................................................. 1
1.2 Project Success Criteria ............................................................................................................. 2
1.3 Project Components .................................................................................................................. 2
1.4 Riparian Restoration Approach ................................................................................................. 3
1.5 Construction and As-Built Conditions ...................................................................................... 4
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance ............................................................................................. 4
2.0 Methods................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.0 Reference ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Appendix A: Site Maps Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View Figure 3: As-Built Plat Figure 4: Erosion and Sediment Control Plans Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data Table 2: Plant Species Summary Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
Hannah Bridge 1 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2019
1.0 Project Summary

1.1 Project Location and Description

EBX–Neuse I, LLC (EBX), an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide
this Bank Parcel Development Plan Report for the Hannah Bridge Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Mitigation Bank (“Parcel”). This Parcel is designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for
unavoidable impacts due to development within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey
(‘USGS’) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC – 03020201). In addition, it also provides nutrient offset
credits in the 03020201 HUC, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, for existing and proposed development
requiring such mitigation. This Parcel is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295, 15A NCAC 02B.0240 and the RES Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Credits (UMBI), made and entered into by EBX-Neuse I,
LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality-
Division of Water Resources (DWR). Supporting figures can be found in Appendix A. The Parcel has also
been designed in concurrence with the Hannah Bridge Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site in the Neu-Con
Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2015-01799). The mitigation plan for the Hannah
Bridge Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank has been approved by the Interagency Review Team (IRT).

The Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately five miles south of the town of Four Oaks, NC
(Figure 1). The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC 03020201150020 and
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin Number 03-04-04. To access the Parcel from
the town of Four Oaks, travel South on NC Hwy 96 and turn left on Green Pasture Road. The coordinates
of the site are 35.380621°N and -78.417107 °W.

When combining the Hannah Bridge Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank with the Hannah Bridge Buffer
Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Bank, the conservation easement totals 46.2 acres and includes unnamed
tributaries, and storm water runoff from adjacent pastures that flow directly to Hannah Creek. The drainage
area of the Parcel is 1.39 mi². The Parcel is located in an area dominated by agriculture, livestock, and
residential land use. A majority of the Parcel was utilized for livestock pasture. Additional land use practices
included the maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation and the relocation, dredging and straightening
of onsite streams has resulted in degraded water quality and unstable channel characteristics.

The Hannah Bridge Mitigation Site was built to provide stream restoration and enhancement on
approximately 8,524 linear feet of streams and wetland restoration, enhancement, and preservation on 16.7
acres of wetlands within the conservation easement through a separate mitigation banking instrument with
the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). RES does not plan to convert any wetland mitigation
credits to buffer or nutrient credit. Riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation of the Neuse riparian
buffer (as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0233) and other riparian areas onsite result in immediate water
quality benefits within the vicinity of the Parcel and include the removal of livestock access to Parcel
streams and reduction in nutrient loads from agricultural land-uses. The riparian restoration activities within
the Parcel also result in improved water quality within the downstream watershed.

Hannah Bridge 2 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2019
1.2 Project Success Criteria

Riparian buffer vegetation monitoring will be based on the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
Level 1-2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.0. Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a
minimum of five years and will be conducted during the fall season with the first year occurring at least 5
months from initial planting. Ten vegetation monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100 m2 in size
and cover at least two percent of the riparian restoration area. Plots were randomly placed throughout the
planted Neuse buffer zones and nutrient offset mitigation area and are representative of the crediting areas.
The following data will be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer),
and grid location. Photos are to be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the
annual reports. The measures of vegetative success for the Parcel will be the survival of at least 4 native
hardwood tree species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of the established stems, established
at a density of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be
included to meet the performance standards. Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so
that none become dominant or alter the desired community structure of the site.

RES must monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval.
Therefore, plots placed within riparian restoration areas that are outside of the mitigation area for buffer
and nutrient offset credits will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Hannah
Bridge Stream Mitigation Plan.

1.3 Project Components

This Bank generates 4.585 acres (199,724.56 ft2) of riparian buffer restoration credits, 0.385 acres (4,907.04
ft2) of riparian buffer enhancement credits via cattle exclusion, 3.41 acres (7,396.49 ft2) of riparian buffer
preservation credits, and 4.79 acres (10,891.71 lbs) of nutrient offset credits. The riparian buffer mitigation
credits generated services Neuse buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201 of the Neuse
River Basin excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The Nitrogen nutrient offsets generated services nutrient
load reduction requirements where payments are authorized in 15A NCAC 02B .0240 within the USGS 8-
digit HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The Sponsor maintains three credit ledgers. One
ledger accounts for buffer restoration credits, one ledger accounts for buffer preservation and enhancement
credits, and one accounts for nitrogen nutrient offset credits. All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on
these credit ledgers. The total potential riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits that the Hannah
Bridge Bank generates are summarized below.

Hannah Bridge 3 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2019
Table 1. Hannah Bridge Mitigation Credits

*According to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (4) and (5), “the area of preservation credit within a buffer
mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25% of the total area of buffer mitigation”.

All riparian restoration in the table above is generated on land determined by DWR as being agricultural.
Therefore, the 4.585 acres (199,724.56 ft²) of Neuse riparian buffer restoration credits shown in the table
above, can be used for either Neuse riparian buffer credits or Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, but not both.
Neither riparian buffer preservation nor enhancement credits can be converted into nutrient offset credits.
The Sponsor must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR prior to any credit
conversions and transfers to the buffer and nutrient offset credit ledgers. With each conversion and transfer
request submitted to the DWR, the Sponsor is to provide all updated credit ledgers showing all transactions
that have occurred up to the date of the request.

1.4 Riparian Restoration Approach

The land use adjacent to most of the streams on the Bank Parcel was pasture. Neuse riparian buffer
restoration was used for riparian buffer credit in cultivated areas while enhancement or preservation was
used in forested areas. All riparian restoration areas were planted from top of bank back at least 50 feet
from the stream with bare root tree seedlings on an 8 by 8 foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680
trees per acre. The buffered channels provide water quality and habitat functions within the sensitive Neuse
River watershed. Rapidly regenerating species and invasive species may develop greater individual species
density and create a less diverse mix. During the site visit on April 16, 2015, DWR determined the upstream
portion of reach TH3 to be a ditch, while the downstream portion was a stream. The portion classified as a
Riparian
Zone
Credit
Type Mitigation Type Existing
Acreage
Used
Acreage
Credit Per
Acre (ft2)Ratio % Full
Credit Mitigation Assets
Riparian
Buffer Restoration 4.585 4.585 43,560 1:1 100%199,724.56 ft² (4.59 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Enhancement via
Cattle Exclusion 0.147 0.147 43,560 2:1 100%3,197.83 ft² (0.07 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Preservation: Subject
Streams 2.717 1.622 43,560 10:1 100%7,065.43 ft² (0.27 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Preservation: Non-
Subject Streams 0.038 0.038 43,560 5:1 100%331.06 ft² (0.01 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Enhancement via
Cattle Exclusion 0.238 0.238 43,560 2:1 33%1,709.22 ft² (0.04 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Preservation: Subject
Streams 0.653 0.000 43,560 10:1 33%0.00 ft² (0.02 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Preservation: Non-
Subject Streams 0.002 0.000 43,560 5:1 33%0.00 ft² (0.00 ac)
4.585 4.585
Zone Credit
Type Mitigation Type Credit Per
Acre (lbs)Ratio
0-100'Nitrogen Restoration 2,273.02 N/A
101-200'Nitrogen Restoration 2,273.02 N/A
TOTAL
3.20
4.79
Buffer Preservation 3.410 1.660
Acreage
1.59
Mitigation Assets (lbs)
3,619.66
7,272.05
10,891.71
includes ratios & reductions
Riparian Buffer Credit
101-200'
Nutrient Offset Credit
7,396.49 ft² (0.30 ac)
4,907.04 ft² (0.11 ac)
199,724.56 ft² (4.59 ac)Total Restoration
includes ratios & reductions
0-100'
Total Enhancements 0.385 0.385
Hannah Bridge 4 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2019
ditch is only viable for nutrient offset credits. All disturbed areas within the easement were planted with
native wetland vegetation and livestock will be excluded with fencing installed along the easement
boundary.

Buffer enhancement occurred in areas where grazing was adjacent to the stream in accordance with the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). This includes areas adjacent to reaches
HB1 and HB4. RES installed cattle exclusion fencing to exclude access to riparian areas and their associated
streams. All fencing was installed to NRCS specifications. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may
require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red maple (Acer rubrum) and
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Minimal maintenance is anticipated due to the past cultivation
history. Buffer enhancement can only generate buffer mitigation credit and is not transferrable into nutrient
offset credits.

HF1 and HF2 are in forested areas where cattle were not observed to be present and are subject to the Neuse
Buffer Protection Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0233 and are therefore generate preservation buffer mitigation
credit under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n) and (o)(5). Preservation activities ensure that the buffer is
permanently protected from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the
functioning of the buffer. Where HF2 flows into an oversized, channelized ditch nutrient credits are
generated. Preservation buffer credits also are generated in reaches HB1, HB3, HB4, and TH3 when
restoration activities occur in forested areas. Buffer preservation can only generate buffer mitigation credit
and is not transferrable into nutrient offset credits.

1.5 Construction and As-Built Conditions

Revegetation of the site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees.
Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping the easement. Coastal Plain Small Stream
Swamp is the target community type and was used for all areas within the project. The community is defined
by Schafale and Weakely (2012). The planting of bare root trees occurred in April and May 2019.
Deviations from the initial planting plan were due to bare root availability. A list of the planted species can
be found in Table 2.
Stream construction activities were completed in May 2019. The site was constructed in accordance with
the Approved Mitigation Plan and associated permits and the construction was approved by the IRT on a
site visit in July 2019. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2015-01799), 401 (DWR # 17-0537), and NPDES Erosion
and Sediment Control Plan (JC# 18-040-P) Permits. There were no easement changes between BPDP
approval and construction. The small change in crediting is due to a more accurate tree line survey being
used to generate the as-built credits. The conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation signs attached to either fences or t-posts. Fences were installed in
areas where livestock is present, and t-posts are used as physical barriers where livestock is not present.

1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance

The Hannah Bridge Baseline Monitoring activities were completed in May 2019. All Baseline Monitoring
data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation and stream interim
success criteria.

Monitoring of the 10 permanent vegetation plots was completed during May 2019. Vegetation tables and
transect data are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MY0 monitoring data indicates
that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities
ranged from 728 to 1,214 planted stems per acre with a mean of 878 planted stems per acre across all plots.
Hannah Bridge 5 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2019
A total of 10 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline
monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average tree height observed was 1.7 feet.

Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project.

2.0 Methods

Vegetation success is being monitored at 10 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry
tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal
conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year.

3.0 Reference

Environmental Banc & Exchange – Neuse I, LLC (2017). Hannah Bridge Mitigation Site – Bank Parcel
Development Plan

Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2

NCDENR. 2009. “Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.” Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).

NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.

Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Fourth Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Appendix A
Site Maps
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, EsriJapan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, ©OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
0 1,000500
Feet
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Hannah Bridge Buffer/Nutrient Site
Johnston County, North Carolina
Legend
Conservation Easement
©Date: 8/5/2019
Drawn by: RTM
Checked by: BPB
Document Path: S:\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Hannah Bridge\MXD\Monitoring\MY0\DWR Figures\Figure 1 Hannah Location Map.mxd1 inch = 2,000 feet
12
18
2
3
6
9
11
14
15
16
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
LEGEND
Date: 9/23/2019 Drawn by: RTM
Document Path: S:\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Hannah Bridge\MXD\Monitoring\MY0\DWR Figures\Figure 2 Hannah DWR CCPV.mxd©
0 300150
Feet
Figure 2
Current Conditions Plan View
Hannah Bridge Buffer/Nutrient Site
Johnston County, North Carolina
1 in = 300 feet
Convservation EasementVegetation PlotWetland MitigationBuffer/Nutrient Credit TypeRestoration, 0-100'Enhancement, 0-100'Enhancement, 101-200'Preservation, 0-100'Preservation, 101-200'Nutrient, 0-100'Nutrient, 101-200'Stream Alignment
HB1
HF2
HF1
HB3
HB2
HB4
TH3
_ �� i�'�cvNarlro rArma a a6wesr+.
2 Au wsrwxx3 eAr raas¢avrAL creuPm NELswrNYNls w
r 131 /rfT m t'64bNL5 rlrnvrol: LY4E55 O1rkRwrsr NOrfA
] eC+ Jrk/rICS Aal SnCaw SW Md S4�i1:
F. Ir+r pLA9NSE C fives 51,16hEf ✓S ro 9Nw IrrE aufFER ZONES
.4PVC QN rNE MGI W sN! aLPrEP ZL1'4d 110 pFLWENR'
OFcLureIN LRES awsnEo At nws nNr.
\• IMF d flSl]1Dlf dwK5 rv1A eLlr+wax 1'AIPPLLIrRw' s�iPw1•r Br PUTS
CONSERVATION EASEMENT • \L yNrr N POINT C.
AREA
e �M �1 �1x
'P
4rAy116roA
fa . 5o CrST PO
INT •b"
,
3
NON -SUBJECT 51REA6
FaESERVATFON
s. s r. ErC.E'PWN Krworwttw'w POINT '9 y
_ s a!
'w Iru ' So' c�Fsrr a^
CONSERVA774N EASEMENT oFrssrr - �+
WCINIrY YAP AREA 4 POINT
rcn' erssEr ,
(fNTr ro scHEJ � `
ly Gi l A. k, 1 #moi
MM N. r40NA S$ N � $ C.P ]If^xm3YM'� JN. C + • ^ +` � //
Od rra]. FO 544 0a a]2 PC Ts I €12[ire x 1NVIrpSC+x ,, • +i �� • !//'��� rfrAK 5awAr
r Od S63a pG ]T] a' G6W a SfiwpYr
y O OB aso, S 357
CA n wrscnt
CONSLRVA77ON EASEMENT
oe au, pC 16 i AREA 3
GREEN PASTURE RD" ao orrsFr I1
NCSR T I SAI F*
NUTRIENT OFFSET CREDIT
LWE it
MITIGATION
ZONE CREDIT TYPE TYPE
AREAIS0, FT.I AREA(ACRES)
0.100 NITROGEN RESTORATION
69.367,DD 1592
101.200 NITROGEN I RESTORATION
139,361.03 3,199
TOTAL NITROGEN OfF5ET5
208,728.03 4,792
E;q,4EMENT LINE TABLE
LWE it
DAEC77DN
0STANCE
Lr
s rrm'Js' w
zsaal'
Lz
s rrzl'si' w
sT9.P1'
L]
s Q67J'16' E
]i.o0'
U
3 aTrd'm' i
M.w'
UI
N M2JP1' w
IASL'
Ld
N W,2'04' w
r18A2'
Ll
s 1517 Fwm f
r34m'
1a
s W5111J" w
ldrr'
IS
s w4Tr9' r
Ia7.P6'
LIG
N a1-r6]r w
Tit",
tri
Saf'ia'If'w
"o'
uY
N rsw'ss-w
slay'
tri
N IrMlr' E
Tr. SP'
114
N Wnla" E
Mor'
—7p5—
N m'39'b' r
ImYO'
C16
S TZ'Jt kw' E
aSAI'
117
5 I
3L9.Ja'
"a
s Tt .:
scm'
Lr6
s Tr'IJYY" r
a0r'
Lso
s ftFm"a1'r
6r.6s`
!?I
s zt°12Yfs' w
PP.as'
T12
s aT1676- w
ro .0,
Lbs
s raP7'YZ' r
Isr,lo'
116
a 11'x s6" w
rs1J'P'
In
N laak'75• w
mm,
ua
5 aTYY'sr w
r4x v'
Ler
s 4i7r4r w
r6Aa9'
EASEMENT LANE TABLE
LN1E ■
PuvEcrtaN
P+srA6YCE
tea
N erJP're' w
rlcr6'
e39
x ar2s3o" w
raw
uP
x rzzs+]' E
7rJ-al'
171
N IZ'Za SJ'r
3sd%'
LS8
N 1TIY'r r- w
IASL'
ULF
x 7mrW w
11.13'
L71
x 1,wls' w
W.",
W
N 7XI W' ■
mm'
W
N 4a91P'Jz' E
'20W
Lo
N 6p'aa'1r• w
r al,
ula
N ITIY'Ir' w
13-61'
LJW
N aT1J' 11II' E
rwYr'
Lw
NrTwo-r
lr,6d'
LIr
N ATsf'+a' r
IA2d1'
Lw
s Ya' vel w
r rdP'
LIS
s drllyY w
IWW
tw
s aTmw w
aw.
1sT
s sT'rY 112" w
ra1.'�'
SY
N YYY]'Jf' F
fwSt'
til
s arm'H' E
'41.07'
Lsf
s ?rzgw* r
14515`
Lel
s 2r'MW- ■
mm,
Lad
s 3r•i w, w
ran'
In
tm
N arr6L1' w
T9.a1'
LH
sWYd'4T-w
no,,
Irl
5 STS679' E
10.01'
PdHNT W TO POINT 9'
EASEMENT LANE
TABLE
l+Nf / auaECAory
PISrANC£
L4z s sTrzxli' E
ZZ.aP'
L17 5 Tf'Je'm E
28.19'
LH S er1739' f
6.f8°
LIs s 61'IS3P' E
w"'
iw s aCPa�P7'r
]I.0'
xfl N dTrrsr r
Zdls'
POINT 'C' TO POINT 'D'
E4,57EMENT LIME TABLE
LYA'E f
DIRECT=
DrSrAWE
Ld5
s a61Pt'6z' E
W,
tsa
s SJ'AY411° r
rax]'
LST
S Jls3A5- E
rill'
tsa
5 6r'Y3`#'r
83.ff'
LJd
s la'rYSa' f
IS.f2'
ISP
N W0 13,' E
17.41"
161
M s.'w'aT• r
YiJ3'
1.�
N fB:S:'W E
-2-f be
IV
N a1`41:TP'r
MIM,
ta4
S 01'1115' r
tY. dT'
!a6
s dx2T'Ss' E
M)9'
cab
5 srm'jo•r
3AIr
"AOL tU9Uq R/W r16NCp LILW rW YGO OFM7 — r { f KI4'
4 od 4#51, AO dr1 .
R y4 44 PA 67, Mi1 1 e 4
m, OFFwr
OIYID GtGt1L +ZRNY '100 o7Y.eT _:. '
11115 AwErvwa>t wILGPLa+� { r � ' ' •, ���: - ` ` '
oe Y9rf, Pc7rz I ! d N + sl w�
oe as PP 141 ' 7 f I s.�'-^ + s '7 w�iW x ar' wear
iluaus me1p. :Y91 ors
. a' • ; 06 ash, sc sds
s zl. w6laws '� M,
Ps r.
Ad +PTs, 'Ig . `,' , . y.► "
" cr- ]a A;
aCa64 Far 6Au144. ,A. y ' oB rTts. aP zie SP ofF5ET
ry,�.4 .I ,xs. PP ma
M 7866, n ooT r. +' Y'� _ IIiQ' OiFS17
m SR PG Ifw r
1 om. y 2X' VFFsf7
cms�JLL> '-.1�+rI's (m,.I ,W, f7t0u +f87
09 71PT, AP r4 L + P - , `
LA1i'1War tfFdCe: ac EAaL amlraN .g4N50rf. JL
DO 7312 mm LPs I. A'Wasuv
FM M r0. �" 7] �5 00 f216 PC 2 i
� 1= PB 1S PG 30
e.P. rrrPwmfA .w ` 1ty'f
tlfAD Mt7 1 Yx •Y �
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
!R5 s r S s AREA 2
WNSERVA77ON EASEMENT 1� . � • W:AREA T r a
11B Sig, iI"i 7di +: - + ~ 'fir I �+ Sa' GFF+r'T
'X81 l a w I rMLL
R� m ±Jra w Im
m 70
50- on`5ET
5 0.P's�'2s' w
S aT7/'75 M J}/ I
6511 Yav j
1
POO' tliYSEI"� , fp0' OIF5rT
i
4,
I
TIE LAWS rA&E
uw 11 PISTANC£
w (rsJ s aTY7°ra• r sass"
LH (rIf N ITIS 11f'r 16.6]'
Lm (rl,i s 5776 SO• W' 6e6a`
too' OFFUT 7
800" OfF3lT
� b
b
1 f Y NPP FIAK a
119 'pe. PG rm
pa JA M M
s 5x1651' w
a6.S3'
SM`pNr LL kxL6r
Alp ,;;
➢ ]d AG 07
ti 0 CR+g0,If/
N/w +- AiCfr LK wwr
�=a?�aslb .y��P
SiA°
{ftJ 1>< faA
.-.- . ALuo6a+c 1YGK+rFr' WL
Lv'WSLwIu nLw
EASfJ1EM ACaEALE vele
�*•*+'^^ • FO'-CL'MrAr LIS FiWr (LWC
�.. COAsd7IArLYf LISPwrlr (O.E)-fACs Nor sI1R1i1iD
lar CC"Kafa)
. durFGA NE4ra W,
MLf r - r. Toa .TIC:
. su Ff6 PItEuwma O-1697
MEA Y - F.6is ACt
AIN)4 3 . r. Par AOS
0- aLIFER l rlfMt {tOt'-zdP7
MGs 4 . J.PIT ACS
MKA S - YOaf AC3
RFfSf}1- la�OrrrCNT OFT5E7 (G -'IV)
C6yylggFqq/q/�y/y�qq
MAIL . w.113 ACY
.....aSl+ MrTMFM wn" (lar-Yo07
-. 11IMPF Er16Lm%xNGIw'(6-fwP
.. aaarm fAWwmwE r 00'-2w)
PC ✓vel pc sIo-I+.1
ft -/WW +e MFPV
ti 0 CR+g0,If/
�6.1a
�=a?�aslb .y��P
SiA°
dcN, r
t_, I L1712
,�fPPI�BR•'N hS�'�,
s1u7ro
1 OF 1
1Il11
q�SA [w
W
Z
a,
cc
Z
L
0
z
t�
Z
t�
J
44
Z
0
LLI
M�
W
CC
Z
0
ul
C
z
ci
i
Q
W
Q
W
cc
Z
a
Z
cc
tY4%
ra
Eust .
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
905 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE
A
KINSTON,
NC 28501
TEL: .[phone]
FAX [phone]
FIRM LIC.
Ij P-0221
EMAIL: surveyor0ma[rixeasf.net
JRA df 8/13/2019 11" - 200'
2015 w
20150044
NNL
11ANNAFI 60100E BUFFER DWG
HANNAH

�� �� 1 f t I if ti J 1 1 1(I ��� ;IL —�� '� _ i r r-" - r` / J �• �0 `... w
�
+-1/ ��
I
ia�
�.510.L
K
VNI!
1 �L 133P. pBB,ldd 16{P6 T`Ja -
! : �' • . _ X77 111 / t � J / f �, _, � �r
�� j ! BoaL D
S Ir. ti ,� r f l — �I�r i = ,� i l : ft. . ' l.rrd •,-1 r, TH N.
�IJ } — 11 r'� � / � \ � ` ` I �^ � � r � � �� ! � l .'•�: � :� e O N h N`zFl
}
�\ 1"'
\ -sHER IL
fERESA L,EE
asap -00
u[ NYik�. Jfln4�. JR'C19' '� •- � . •
6676-57; PG ilpfi'--_ • �fti�
.Y
XA
SHERRY M DI I 'r I ,/� r . J r'✓ l J L -' "•Z .` i` ` 1 I, •` , �. • • ��. .Q7W: B1
SHfELIA MA55ENGILL � � : � � � ` � i r.•t/' � 179 .- ; I � � l �� r + -. �_- � : ��. �
ra�9.1�c t�,•PB 38, � �r + , � r I .� �, _� � �, _— � �.,�--f � � f f f } � ) � �� t� � , ,•,',:
vn
PG B� ` 4 ` f � ,�. ��} � F ING. � t ��� /�, L � � i. � y�r n �•:�'�l' � .
J r
EARL E::.
J)K;5 l.�.•.G 27n i
lit � � 1 : �'�' �._ � �- � •� a � ` q'�r ` �, �.._ ������£,` - _- � o —� =--
-
N:
,
N. 'F
SIGNATURE
LEGEND
amsT1NG TREELINE ° 1 Y
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LOQ
PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT LC:. -
SILT FENCE
STAGINGOSTOC4SPJLE AREA
ISLAM
CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMPORARY STREAM/
WETLAND CROSSING
PROPOSED PUMP AROUND LOCATION--►--►�
TOTAL AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 51.2 ACRES
TOTAL AREA OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT! 462 ACRES
WDICKSON
w muniry,n6oa Ilro r. ..q.,.I ..
Try pdamlAn , W,Itu, Rasc•un:rr
omen DeYetopme,rt + Ceommica
720 Corporate Dare
Ralalgly, NC 27697
M 919.782.9495
i11919,762.9G72
wnw.wkd�kaan.cdn
144
D
`$ aOFES3lpr��iys
FULL 8CALE. I'=109
0 '00
x = FU=m�—j
1' = HA
o�
2
a
a
V
a
LL
f
}
� o d
LL
N
9 Iz
� a a
W q
Q F�
Z a z z
5° F
D �N
ua3 = z W Eio
g
W 0 V} U o
S
Od" '.zF W O
Z 2 r
aZ� z �I
= 286iis
a 0 Ota DSe
PROJ. DATE: ."y 7[118
O.C.. 8C
OLr.OATE: YAR M
DRAWING NUMBER:
ESC1
PROJ. NO.:
2015020500

;ljljcp;�
N EARNSGOI
tj
......... C181 (3o WlF Fit N
rz`_ �� ` ? �>, ` �,
V,
E
rG
YI
_J
V.,
EEL'y FI. 7HONY
K
GILL
-7/,
` JAMES BR SENGILL De b v
A
�Toap
Lol)
O
JR. 125
JZ
r
'AMn +11EVI N MASiENCIILL
.ANE s aiwsam MJ�SSENGILL OR
D pa 696
<
A -7%
\7_
<
2
_j
T.ti,
WURA A_.STEWART
DE 656 PG §0
_j . K., m �O �T 5,Ru I
WATER
x If vt_n ---. .. _IA,
Ij P, k
ti
LEGEND
EXISTING TREELtNt r'y_y_y_y_y_y_I
UMITSCFDISTURBANCE -LOD
PROFIOSEDOONSERVA71CNF-ASEMENT —LCE --
SILT FENCC;
STAGINGfSTOCKPILE AREA
CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMPORARY STREAM!
WETLAND CROSSING
PROPOSED PUMP AROUND LOCATION
TOTAL AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 51.2 ACRES
TOTAL AREA OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT: 462 ACRES
T
A
Elk.
14
I.
I jfto'
n't 121 -
Et
j
j
LCE a
x
-oj:iLqaKTe;NJO ON. JR.
T. JOPNSON 116 tB, FIG 278 T
sr'.
L
A
J
NTON. 10HINSPN. JR. LQI S
15 PROHIBITED.
98"I&SON
TransponIriw + Weser Resources
urban Dwolopmwl 1 0aonw�
721) Corpora" Drive
nalelgK NC 27807
"0.782.0985
M 01,15
T-`= -
I v. E .
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1- IGO
100 200
2• -FULL SCALE
z
0
LU
3
0
cc
a¢
z z
r.
0
F
"L
0
co,
0
z
as
!Vl
'Iz
to--
Z
U)uJ
.
a FL
rwv;�
z
,
0
,
JR. 125
JZ
r
'AMn +11EVI N MASiENCIILL
.ANE s aiwsam MJ�SSENGILL OR
D pa 696
<
A -7%
\7_
<
2
_j
T.ti,
WURA A_.STEWART
DE 656 PG §0
_j . K., m �O �T 5,Ru I
WATER
x If vt_n ---. .. _IA,
Ij P, k
ti
LEGEND
EXISTING TREELtNt r'y_y_y_y_y_y_I
UMITSCFDISTURBANCE -LOD
PROFIOSEDOONSERVA71CNF-ASEMENT —LCE --
SILT FENCC;
STAGINGfSTOCKPILE AREA
CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TEMPORARY STREAM!
WETLAND CROSSING
PROPOSED PUMP AROUND LOCATION
TOTAL AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 51.2 ACRES
TOTAL AREA OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT: 462 ACRES
T
A
Elk.
14
I.
I jfto'
n't 121 -
Et
j
j
LCE a
x
-oj:iLqaKTe;NJO ON. JR.
T. JOPNSON 116 tB, FIG 278 T
sr'.
L
A
J
NTON. 10HINSPN. JR. LQI S
15 PROHIBITED.
98"I&SON
TransponIriw + Weser Resources
urban Dwolopmwl 1 0aonw�
721) Corpora" Drive
nalelgK NC 27807
"0.782.0985
M 01,15
T-`= -
I v. E .
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1- IGO
100 200
2• -FULL SCALE
Pnoj-ws:IW20;8
O.C.. sc
O.C. RATE: I AW 2018
DRAWING NUMBER:
ESC2
PROJ_ NO.:
2015020500
z
0
LU
3
0
cc
a¢
z z
0
F
"L
0
co,
0
z
as
!Vl
'Iz
to--
Z
U)uJ
.
a FL
Pnoj-ws:IW20;8
O.C.. sc
O.C. RATE: I AW 2018
DRAWING NUMBER:
ESC2
PROJ_ NO.:
2015020500
LU
3
0
cc
a¢
z z
z6
F
"L
co,
0.
.6z
to--
Z
0,
z
8
z
,
0
,
CSS
O
LU
z
<
z z
L j 'cl)
1:
z 0
<
n
" Om
.5 �JI
Pnoj-ws:IW20;8
O.C.. sc
O.C. RATE: I AW 2018
DRAWING NUMBER:
ESC2
PROJ_ NO.:
2015020500

TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE - FALL
SEEDINGNIXTIITE
SPECIES RATE RLBIACRE)
RYE (GRAIN) 128
SEEDING DATES
MOUNT.'.=3-15-DEC-15
COASTAL PLAIT AND PIEDADNT--AA/D. 115, BEC. 31
$OIL AMEMDIENTS
FOLLOW SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2000 LWACRE GROUND AMIGULTURAL UMESTONE
AND 1.008 LBMACRE iD1Ot0 FERTILITER
MULCH
APPLY A,BGO LBIACRE STRAW AMC HDR STRAW BY TACKNG WITH mrP T. NETTING- OR A
MULCH ANCHORING TOOL ADISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIDHT CAN SS USED M A
MULCH ANCHORING TOOL
MAINTENANCE
RCPAIR AND NEFERTLLZE DAMAGED AREAS 1AMIFDIATFLY TOPORESS WITH 50
CB RE OF NITROGEN IN MARCH IF R IS NECESSARY TO EXTEND TEMPORARY
COVER BEYOND JUNE 1S. OVERSE ED WITH 50 UWACRE KOBE (PEDMONF AND
COASTAL PIAN)
TEMPORARY SEEDING - LATE VVINTERIEARLY SPRING
SEEDINGMIXT11FE
SPECIES RATE JLINACREI
HYELGRUUW 12v
SEEDING DATES
MOUNTAINS -ABOVE YAG FT FEB. ISLOW 56
BELOW 2500 FT PES 1 -MAY 1
PIEDMONT. DEC. m1 AV 1
COASTAL Piuum-DEC. S1MMR. IS
SOLAMEHdENTS
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,000 LBIACRE GROUND
AGRICULTtpi LWE811O11E AND 750 LPACRE 1010.10 FEITILI2E11
MULCH
APPLY AAD LBACRS. STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TALKING WITH ASFHNLT-NETTINGORA
MULCH ANCHORPNG TOOL ADMKTRITHSLADESSETNEMLYSTRAIGHTCANBELrSEDASA
MULCHAHCHORWGTOOL
MAINTENANCE
REFERTIUa IF GROWTH ISNOT FULLY ADEQUATE RESEED. REFEAMUZE AHDMULCH
MMEDIATLY FOLLOWING ERGWOR OR OTHER DAMAGE
EFO51pHCON7RO,.
GENERAL.NOT�B
1 REVIEW CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. ALL PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EROSION
CONTROL STRUCTURES II EROCK CHECK LAMS, SRT FENCE AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTOR ENTRANCES) SHALL BE NSTAA,Fp PRIOR TO
THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE LAND DISTURBNG ACTIVITY
3 CONSTRUCTpl ACCESS AREAS SHOWN ARE TO GUIDE CONTRACTOR DURING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALL COOHDIHATE YAWN
ENGINEER E ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTES WnLi IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF COHSTRVCTIC"
S ALL AREAS 01971 O BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BFSEEDED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS IN THE SEEDNG SCHEDULE SHOWN ON THIS
SKEET
A M1LCH: APPLY 2 TQNSIACRE DRAIN STRAW ON ALL OTHER DISTIRNEEO AREAS
0 EROSION CONTROL.
A INSTALL PEAAYINENT VEGETATIVE COVER AND THE LMD-TERIA EROSION PROTECTION MEASURES OR STRUCTURES AS DIRECTED BY
ENGINEER MOI/ CONSTRUCTION COMPLETNOM APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE PLACED BETWEEN THE
DISTURBED AREA AND AFFECTED WATERWAY AND MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENTLY VEGETATED.
B PROVIDE FOR HANDLING THE INCREASED RUNOFF CAUSED BY CHANGED SOIL AND SURFACE CONDITIONS USE EFFECTRIEME NS TO
CONSERVES EMO ONSHME SOIL CONDITIONS
C. DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTFATES, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED AT WE END OF EACH WORKING KING DAY USE
TEMPORARY PLANT COYER-MaCHING. ANGOR STRUCTURES TO CONTROL RUNOFF AND PROTECT AREAS SUBJECT TO EROSION
IIIJINacONsrRucTwN
D ALL SEDIMENT AND FAOSQH CORTROLS ARE TO RE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AND AFTER ANY STORM
EVENT OF GREATER THAN 05INCHES OF PRECIPITATION DURAN GAMY 244MR PERIOD. MMNTFIIANCE OF 5EOIENT jRAi'PIHG
STRUCiURESSLNLLBE PMFOPAIED ASMECESSARY PERTHESE IISPECTONB ELT FENCINGSNWI BE INSTALLED ASSHOW N ON
PLANS
rI ACTIVITIES
NPORTIONSOF THESDE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTT
E HAVE TEMTION MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED AT THE ENOOf EACH ST
HAVE TEMPOPIS SH ORP AREAS WHERE CONS [xMUNDHAS TE MUST BE ESCEASED A L R EAS WHOUNO COVER M DE HAS BFI
SHOWTN ON THIS SHEET IN AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY CEASED ALL AREAS WHERE FINAL GRADE HAS BETH
ESTABLISHED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STAB11112ED WIMIN ZCALENDAR DAYS
F. OONMAC I ON MAST TAKE WE NECESSARY ACTION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TIRE WW9HNG STATIONS AT EACH ACCESS PONT
TO MINNLM THE TRACKING OF MOO ONTO WE PAVED ROADWAY FROM CONSTRUCTION AREAS DAILY REMOVALOF MUD450ii- AY BE
REWIRED.
6 ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES BI at PfOWRLY MMNTAINED DARING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRIIC-nCW HURL THE GCMPLETION OF
ALL CONSTRVLTK)NACT IESANGALLDISYUMFDAFEM HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AE0ktIpµLCO"TROLDEWICESINYBERfE RED
DURING CONSTRUCTNON N ORDER M CONTROL EROSOI A"D)M OFF SITE SEONAENTAT ION CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE A1.1-
TEMPORARY
LLTEMPORARY CONTROL DEVIDES ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS CCAFLETE AND THE SITE IS 3-MLZED A MMMUM OF 2110 UNEAR FEET OF
STREAM MAY BE DISTURBED AT ANY ONE TIME STABLIM STREAM HANKS NMMECIATELY AFTER GRADING
H EROSION CONTROL WTTMp (ME DETAX- SHEET OII SHALL RE INSTALLED ALONG CONSTRUCTED CHANNEL BANNS FROM
APPROXIMATELY 2 0' W IO•ABOVE TOP OF BANK DOWN TO CHANNEL TOE
N SILT FENCING TO BE INSTALLED ANGLING INDICATED STOCKPILE AREAS TQ PREVENT LOSS OF SEDIMENT. STOCKPLE AREAS MAY BE
RELOCATED UPON APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER
J. ASPHALT TACKIIER SHALL NOT BE USED.
N ALL NECESSARY MEASURES MUST BE TAKEN 70 PREVENT GL TM MASH. AND OTHER POLLUTANTS FROM ENTERING THE ADJACENT
OFF SITE AREAS
L WETLANOMMEAMS CANNOT eE ENCROACHED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES IF NOT APPROVED AS DESIGNATED IMPACT AREAS
M ACTIVITIES MUST AWM DISTURBANCE OF WOODY RPARIW VEGETATION WIMW THE PROJECT AREA TO THE GREATEST "TENT
PRACTICABLE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION MUST RE LIMITED TO ONLY THAT NECESSARY FOR CONMILM OFN OF THE CHANNEL
H HO ONBNTE BURIAL OF VEGETATION OR CONSTRUCTION DEERS WILL BE PERMITTED VEGETATIVE DEBRIS SHALL BE STOCKPILE D AND
DISPOSED OF ONSITE PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
D ANY GRADING BEYOND THE CONSTRUCTOR LILTS SHOWN ON THE PLAN ISA VIOLATION OF THE NOR Ti CAROLINA EROSION CONTROL
ORDINANCE, AND NS SUBJECT TO A FINE
p PLEASE REFERENCE RAN SHEET DETAILS AND NCDENR STANDARDS FOR CONSTMNC TION OF ERO$fON CONTROL MEASURES
O THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAININO ALL EROSION CONTROL hLEASUPES RELATED M THE CONSTRUMOK
SITE
R THE LOCATIONS OF SOME EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY HAVE TO RE ALTERED FROM THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS IF IRNNAGE
PATTERNS CHANGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
5 IF IT IS DETERMINED DURING THE coLIkSE OF CONSTRUCTION THAT WNIFICANT SEDIMENT IS LEAVING THE SATE RDESWE Iii
PROPER IMPLEUENTATCN AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES), THE PERSON FbESPONSIBLE FOR THE RAND
DNSTURBING ACTIVITY IS OBLIGATED TO TATE ADOTNNNL PROTECTIVE ACTION
TRRGHT nM W.KM DICKSON 9 CO., INC. ALL RKJH IN MESEHWELN- HtPT vet
NAMEO-JTYNSO,%P Am EnwGrwFw W SokASOna12W 502OEDORA- Hannah
2016, LNM
IN
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE - SUMMER
SEEDING MIXTURE
SPECIES RATE(LBAACREI
GERMAN! MILLET 40
IN THE PIEDMONT AND MOUNTAINS.A SMALLSFEMMED SUOANGRASS NAY RE
SUBSTITUTED AT A RATE OF W LWACRE
SEETHING DATES
MOUMT-ANS • MAY 15 -AUG. 15
PIEBMDNT • MAY 1•AUO 15
CWSTAL PLAN' APR. I ASHG 15
SOBAMENOAENTS
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,0110 LBIACRE GROUND
AGRKAKTURAL IJMESTOW AND 750 UACRE 10.10-10 FERTLUER.
MULCH
APPLY 0MI-OhNCRE STRAW ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT,
NETTING OR A MULCH ANCHORNM TOOL A DISKW IW BLADES SET NEARLY
STTLAGHT CAN BE USED AS AN ANCHMP40 TOOL
WINTEMANCE
REFERTRAYE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED. FERTDRE AND
MULCH 4MEOWTELY FOLAOWNG EROSION OR OWER DAMAGE
CONSTRUCT�T NNT€5
1 INSTALL ERDSKJN CONTROL MEASURES ASOESCRIBED IN THE EROSION CCNTRt PUN AND NOTES EROSION CONTROL ME/SURESNIVY M PHASED IN TO THOSE AREASOFTME
PROJECT CURRENTLY BEING WORKED LII THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY OR RELOCATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO MAMA Acuu5TMENTS FOR UNFORESEEN FIELD
CONDITOI S SO LONG AS PROPER CONSTRUCTOR IS MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY AND USEFULNESS OF THE PROPOSED MEASURES ALL DISTURBED AREAS ALONG
C W MEL BANKS SHALL M STABILIZED WITH TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH AT THE END OF EACH DAY
2. IN GENETIAL STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO DOWNS7REAM DIRECTION
3 EXISTING YETLAIIDS CANNOT BE ENCROACHED UPON UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES W NOT APPROVED AS DESIGNATED IMPACT AREAS NIGH VISIBILTY FENCINGMUSTSE RACED
AROUND ALL EXISTING WETLANDS TINT ARE LOCATED ADJACENT M CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ANDIOR ME LOCATED WITHIN! THE PROPOSED CAKSFIIWATON EASEMENT
A DURINGSTREAM CONSTRUCTION A.CTIVMES. TIE WARKAREASHLPLL BESTABIL¢EO MINEOIATELY AFTER GRADINGAND AT TIE EMD OF EACH WORKING MY
5 STOCKPILE AREAS AND TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS MAY BE RELOCATED OR ADDED UPON THE MPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER AND OEMLR RALEIGH BECAOIYLL OFFICE SILT
FENCING KV357 BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL STOCKPILE AREAS
B THE PARK TO RESHAPE THE CHANNEL BANKS WALL BE PERFORAED USING EQUIPMENT WORKING FROM THE TOP OF THE EXISTING STREAM BARN, WHERE POSSIBLE
7. CONSTW/CTION EQUIPMENT WALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN THE ACTIVE CHANNEL TO PERFORM! WORK IF POSSIBLE PLATFORMS SHOULD BE USED To CROSS CHANNEL WHERE ACCESS
IN NOT POMMIL.E
a NO MORE CHANNEL SHALL BE DISTURBED THAN CAN BE 51ABRALED BY THE ENO OF THE WMK DAY OR PRIOR TO RESTORING FLOW TO NEWLY CONSTRUCTED CHANNEL SEGMENTS
9 CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TEMPOTNRY CONTROL DEVICES ONCE CONSTRUCTION S COMPLETE AND THE 61TE 15 STAINME0. A MAXIMUM OF 2G0 LINEAR FEET OF STREAM MAY
BE DISTURBED ATANY ONE TIME STABILIZE STREAM BANKS MMIEOMTELY AFTER GRADING
H. ALL EXCAVATED MATERML MUST BE PLACED ARM DESIGNATED STOCKPILE MEAS
11. AT LOCATIONS IN WHICH H THE EXISTING CHANNEL IS BEING MAINTAINED. TEWORARY PUMP AROUND DAMS AND BYPASS PUMPING WILL BE USED TO DE -WATER THE WOR[ AREA AS
DESCRIBED IN THE DETAILS
12. WHEN THE PROPOSED CHANNEL HAS BEEN SUFFICIENTLY STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION. ALL TEMPORARY PUMP ARGJNO DANS WILL BE REMOV ED F ROM THE ACTIVE STREAM
CHANHELANND NORMAL FLOW RESTORED ACCUMULATED SEOWENT SMALL 6E DISPOSED OF IN DESIGNATED SPOIL$AREA$ PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF TV NPOTNRY PUMP MOUND BATA.
11 AT LOCATNONS IN WHICH ROCK STRUCTURES. BOULDER TOE STABBW,TION, AND LOG TOE STABLUEATION ARE CALLED FORM THE PUNS, TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS AND BYPASS
PLWING WALL BE ICED TO DE -WATER THE WORK AREA EXCEPT AT LOCATIONS NN WHICH THE NORMAL FLOW CAN RE DNERTM AROUND THE WORK AREA MTN THE USE OF AN
EXISTING CHANNEL WHEN THE TOE HAS BE EN SUFFICIENTLY $TABIUZED To RESTRAIN EROSION ALL TEMPORARY COFFIN DAMS WALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ACTIVE STREAM
CHANNEL AND NORAPL FLOW RESTORED ACCUMULATED SEGMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF N DESIGNATED SPOILS AREA PRIOR TO REMOVAI. OF TEMPORARY COFFER DAM.
H MATERIAL TWIT N REMOVED FROM THE STREAM WILL BE R-DEPOSTTEO=SIDE OF THE ACTIVE CHANNEL AND ITS FLOOOPUIN
15 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF ALL DISTURBED GRASSED MEAS AT THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL BANKS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WAIN THE $EEDIG AND MULCHING
Smci;FcATDIN AS SHOWN ON PLANS
16 REAFERTI tZE ANDRE-SEED DISTURBED AREAS IF NECESSARY
17 TEMPORARY ANODR PERMANENT IMPACTS TO BUSING WETLANDS SHALL BE AVOIDED TO THE E) TENT POSSIBLE HIGH VISIBILITY FENCING SHALL SE INSTALLED MOUND ALL
EXISTING WETLANDS LOCATED W WM THE PROJECT MFA AmayM ADJACENT TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTP"i!S
16 CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE SELF INSPECTIONS AND MONITORING AS OUTLINED IH THE SELF•NSPECDON AND SELF- MOHRORING COMBINED FORM LOCATED AT
Mfpe IMM IK pan'FpgWpmlgnFryPery/amFral•4R'{•maauI4H1MlMIgI-InMOPMmIIWTan11A THIS FORM SHOUM BE UP TO DATE AND AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIES
STREAM C0149TRUCY40K SEQUENCE,
1 CONDUCT PRE-CMSTFIUCW3N MEETING INCLUDING OWNER. ENGINEER. ASSOCIATED CONTRACTORS, AND OTHER AFFECTED PARTES.
2 OBTAIN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT FROM NCDENR- LAND OUAUTY SECTION AND ALL OTHER APPROVALS NECESSARY TO BEGIN ANIO COMPLETE THE PROJECT
CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL APPROPRMTE PARTE$ PROR TO THE COMMMEINCEMEMY OF CONSTRUCTION CONTACT THE OEMLR RALEIGH REGIONAL
OFFICE AT 859 -MM 4ZOG lB HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY LAND DISTURBING AGTiNTY
N CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL APPROPINWTE PMTWS AHD ASSLONG THAT UIILITER ARE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION
CALL NCME-CALL [PREVIOUSLY ULCCOIAT I-WO4324"FOR UTMUTYLOrATING SERVHCES45HOURS PRIOR Iq COMMMEMCFJAE7/T OFANT YORK [gHTRACipR 9Nll VERFY
LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL F (STING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
S PRIOR TO COr WITIL- CTION, STABILIZED GRAVEL YWRANCElUT AN13 ROUTES OF 1NGRE56 AHG EGRESS SHALL BE ESTABLJSHED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND DETAILS
6 INSTALL ROCK PIPE INLET SEDIMENT TRAPS AND PIPE OUTLET PROTECTION FOR ENTRANCE DRIVE PIPES AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
Y WSTALL TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS AS SHOWM ON PLANS TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD ONLY HE IMS rM-U5D MEN NECESSARY (SEE DETAILS VN SHEET DS)
A PREPARE STAGING ANDSTOCKRUNGARFAS IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON MECCN.STRUCTI7N PLANS ON AS APPROVED BY THE SHOWER ANY EXCESSSPOIL FROM STREAM
CONSTRUCTION $HALL BE USED TO CONSTRUCT CHANNEL PLUGS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
5 ALL PROPOSED CHANNELS AND TEMPORARY AND PER NA NE NT CROSGING$ SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED INA DRY CONDITION VIA OFFLNE CONSTRUCTION WHERE POSSIRM PUMP
AROUND OPERATIONS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO AREAS WHERE THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED EL ALIGNMENTS OVERLAP.
10 INSTALL PULIP AROUND APPARATUS AND OWERW OUS DIKES AT UPSTREAM END OF PROJECT AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES MOVE PUMP AROUND OPERATION DOWNSTREAM.!SEE
DETAIL SOH SHEET M I
I1 CONSTRUCT UPSTREAM PORTION OF THE CHANNEL FIRST, WORKING IN AN UPSTREAM TO DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ETNGINEER
12 ROUGH GRADING OF CHANNEL SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES
13 INSTALL STRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND DETAILS MON. TO FINE GRADING. OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER ON INSTKLATIM OF STRUCTURES
H UPON COMPLETION OF FINE GRADING INSTALL STREAM BANK STANLV TION INCLUDING EROSION CONTROL MATTINGCIRWO MATS ALONG CHANNEL BARKS
15 FLLL AND STABILIZE ABANDONED SEGMENTS OF TIE EXISTING CHANNEL PER DRtECYRNI OF THE ENGINEER
16 ALL IMPERVIOISOIKESANO PUMPING APPARATUS SHALL BE REWOVEDFROM THE STREAM AT THE END OF EACHOAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK M THE CHANNEL
17 DIIRNG STREAM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ME AMA AREA SHALL BE SSABLLEED NLMAEDMIELY AFTER GRADN OMO AT ME END Of EACH WORGNG NAY
15 INSTALL LIVE STAKE- BARE ROOT, AND CGNTMIYERIZED PLANTINGS AS SPECIFIED ON RANTING PLANS
�n1 KAON
r1'AUWIU*y InIRFinIctUTe mrPsuAMUnt
Tramp—iw . Wmi r ReNxKON
Uaw UB Iop—rg H 6eODNJic3
720 Colporele Detre
Raleigh, NO 27807
N19.782.0495
19.782.9672
www.wkdiciWn-
ucTNMLNP raw.
Hlry
a` N CAR0 ?.
? 4g88Ap C�a'�
O g'
7s
25 z
� F
yF �1v¢IN6 ¢¢pia
I
UL
0
a
zz Lu
0 0 0
Q CC z
L74 � d
U
z a
z
0 5
V]
Yl
9000 CC O '
rJ Q DD 2 ci
�yl�
PROF. DATE APA PUTS
p,c.= �
O.C. DATE: !FAY 2!715
M%%MNG NUMBER=
ESC3
mcm-ND.,
20140056.00.RA
GROUND COVER SCNEOi1Lf
Sl7E AREA 0E3Y]4daTAV
STABNJLiWN ME FRA E
5TABR.1Z4PW MF FRAME EPRQP7IM
PElFS47E1P MU SWILM DRONES ANY
SLOPES
7 a05
RDAE
ldTAF DUALITY 1001 (NOWT ZONES
7 AAS
NOW
APPES 5RN]PER RlAY ,f<•f
7 DAPS
E AU°ES ARE i0' GR LESS A' LMPF AAO ARE WT STEEPER'
DdAN 10, 14 OATS ARE AILGW 1
SU ST GO FLA 17D?
14 DAYS
7 DADS FPR ROPES MCA RTF THAN 50 FEET IN LENG714
ALL GF)5l AREAS MiFI SLOPES FIA TM? RUIN
4R
H OATS
M%E PCEPF FOR PERAW1 RS AND NMN ILFIES)
CONSTRUCT�T NNT€5
1 INSTALL ERDSKJN CONTROL MEASURES ASOESCRIBED IN THE EROSION CCNTRt PUN AND NOTES EROSION CONTROL ME/SURESNIVY M PHASED IN TO THOSE AREASOFTME
PROJECT CURRENTLY BEING WORKED LII THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY OR RELOCATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO MAMA Acuu5TMENTS FOR UNFORESEEN FIELD
CONDITOI S SO LONG AS PROPER CONSTRUCTOR IS MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY AND USEFULNESS OF THE PROPOSED MEASURES ALL DISTURBED AREAS ALONG
C W MEL BANKS SHALL M STABILIZED WITH TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH AT THE END OF EACH DAY
2. IN GENETIAL STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO DOWNS7REAM DIRECTION
3 EXISTING YETLAIIDS CANNOT BE ENCROACHED UPON UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES W NOT APPROVED AS DESIGNATED IMPACT AREAS NIGH VISIBILTY FENCINGMUSTSE RACED
AROUND ALL EXISTING WETLANDS TINT ARE LOCATED ADJACENT M CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ANDIOR ME LOCATED WITHIN! THE PROPOSED CAKSFIIWATON EASEMENT
A DURINGSTREAM CONSTRUCTION A.CTIVMES. TIE WARKAREASHLPLL BESTABIL¢EO MINEOIATELY AFTER GRADINGAND AT TIE EMD OF EACH WORKING MY
5 STOCKPILE AREAS AND TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS MAY BE RELOCATED OR ADDED UPON THE MPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER AND OEMLR RALEIGH BECAOIYLL OFFICE SILT
FENCING KV357 BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL STOCKPILE AREAS
B THE PARK TO RESHAPE THE CHANNEL BANKS WALL BE PERFORAED USING EQUIPMENT WORKING FROM THE TOP OF THE EXISTING STREAM BARN, WHERE POSSIBLE
7. CONSTW/CTION EQUIPMENT WALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN THE ACTIVE CHANNEL TO PERFORM! WORK IF POSSIBLE PLATFORMS SHOULD BE USED To CROSS CHANNEL WHERE ACCESS
IN NOT POMMIL.E
a NO MORE CHANNEL SHALL BE DISTURBED THAN CAN BE 51ABRALED BY THE ENO OF THE WMK DAY OR PRIOR TO RESTORING FLOW TO NEWLY CONSTRUCTED CHANNEL SEGMENTS
9 CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TEMPOTNRY CONTROL DEVICES ONCE CONSTRUCTION S COMPLETE AND THE 61TE 15 STAINME0. A MAXIMUM OF 2G0 LINEAR FEET OF STREAM MAY
BE DISTURBED ATANY ONE TIME STABILIZE STREAM BANKS MMIEOMTELY AFTER GRADING
H. ALL EXCAVATED MATERML MUST BE PLACED ARM DESIGNATED STOCKPILE MEAS
11. AT LOCATIONS IN WHICH H THE EXISTING CHANNEL IS BEING MAINTAINED. TEWORARY PUMP AROUND DAMS AND BYPASS PUMPING WILL BE USED TO DE -WATER THE WOR[ AREA AS
DESCRIBED IN THE DETAILS
12. WHEN THE PROPOSED CHANNEL HAS BEEN SUFFICIENTLY STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION. ALL TEMPORARY PUMP ARGJNO DANS WILL BE REMOV ED F ROM THE ACTIVE STREAM
CHANHELANND NORMAL FLOW RESTORED ACCUMULATED SEOWENT SMALL 6E DISPOSED OF IN DESIGNATED SPOIL$AREA$ PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF TV NPOTNRY PUMP MOUND BATA.
11 AT LOCATNONS IN WHICH ROCK STRUCTURES. BOULDER TOE STABBW,TION, AND LOG TOE STABLUEATION ARE CALLED FORM THE PUNS, TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS AND BYPASS
PLWING WALL BE ICED TO DE -WATER THE WORK AREA EXCEPT AT LOCATIONS NN WHICH THE NORMAL FLOW CAN RE DNERTM AROUND THE WORK AREA MTN THE USE OF AN
EXISTING CHANNEL WHEN THE TOE HAS BE EN SUFFICIENTLY $TABIUZED To RESTRAIN EROSION ALL TEMPORARY COFFIN DAMS WALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ACTIVE STREAM
CHANNEL AND NORAPL FLOW RESTORED ACCUMULATED SEGMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF N DESIGNATED SPOILS AREA PRIOR TO REMOVAI. OF TEMPORARY COFFER DAM.
H MATERIAL TWIT N REMOVED FROM THE STREAM WILL BE R-DEPOSTTEO=SIDE OF THE ACTIVE CHANNEL AND ITS FLOOOPUIN
15 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF ALL DISTURBED GRASSED MEAS AT THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL BANKS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WAIN THE $EEDIG AND MULCHING
Smci;FcATDIN AS SHOWN ON PLANS
16 REAFERTI tZE ANDRE-SEED DISTURBED AREAS IF NECESSARY
17 TEMPORARY ANODR PERMANENT IMPACTS TO BUSING WETLANDS SHALL BE AVOIDED TO THE E) TENT POSSIBLE HIGH VISIBILITY FENCING SHALL SE INSTALLED MOUND ALL
EXISTING WETLANDS LOCATED W WM THE PROJECT MFA AmayM ADJACENT TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTP"i!S
16 CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE SELF INSPECTIONS AND MONITORING AS OUTLINED IH THE SELF•NSPECDON AND SELF- MOHRORING COMBINED FORM LOCATED AT
Mfpe IMM IK pan'FpgWpmlgnFryPery/amFral•4R'{•maauI4H1MlMIgI-InMOPMmIIWTan11A THIS FORM SHOUM BE UP TO DATE AND AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIES
STREAM C0149TRUCY40K SEQUENCE,
1 CONDUCT PRE-CMSTFIUCW3N MEETING INCLUDING OWNER. ENGINEER. ASSOCIATED CONTRACTORS, AND OTHER AFFECTED PARTES.
2 OBTAIN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT FROM NCDENR- LAND OUAUTY SECTION AND ALL OTHER APPROVALS NECESSARY TO BEGIN ANIO COMPLETE THE PROJECT
CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL APPROPRMTE PARTE$ PROR TO THE COMMMEINCEMEMY OF CONSTRUCTION CONTACT THE OEMLR RALEIGH REGIONAL
OFFICE AT 859 -MM 4ZOG lB HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY LAND DISTURBING AGTiNTY
N CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL APPROPINWTE PMTWS AHD ASSLONG THAT UIILITER ARE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION
CALL NCME-CALL [PREVIOUSLY ULCCOIAT I-WO4324"FOR UTMUTYLOrATING SERVHCES45HOURS PRIOR Iq COMMMEMCFJAE7/T OFANT YORK [gHTRACipR 9Nll VERFY
LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL F (STING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
S PRIOR TO COr WITIL- CTION, STABILIZED GRAVEL YWRANCElUT AN13 ROUTES OF 1NGRE56 AHG EGRESS SHALL BE ESTABLJSHED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND DETAILS
6 INSTALL ROCK PIPE INLET SEDIMENT TRAPS AND PIPE OUTLET PROTECTION FOR ENTRANCE DRIVE PIPES AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
Y WSTALL TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS AS SHOWM ON PLANS TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD ONLY HE IMS rM-U5D MEN NECESSARY (SEE DETAILS VN SHEET DS)
A PREPARE STAGING ANDSTOCKRUNGARFAS IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON MECCN.STRUCTI7N PLANS ON AS APPROVED BY THE SHOWER ANY EXCESSSPOIL FROM STREAM
CONSTRUCTION $HALL BE USED TO CONSTRUCT CHANNEL PLUGS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
5 ALL PROPOSED CHANNELS AND TEMPORARY AND PER NA NE NT CROSGING$ SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED INA DRY CONDITION VIA OFFLNE CONSTRUCTION WHERE POSSIRM PUMP
AROUND OPERATIONS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO AREAS WHERE THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED EL ALIGNMENTS OVERLAP.
10 INSTALL PULIP AROUND APPARATUS AND OWERW OUS DIKES AT UPSTREAM END OF PROJECT AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES MOVE PUMP AROUND OPERATION DOWNSTREAM.!SEE
DETAIL SOH SHEET M I
I1 CONSTRUCT UPSTREAM PORTION OF THE CHANNEL FIRST, WORKING IN AN UPSTREAM TO DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ETNGINEER
12 ROUGH GRADING OF CHANNEL SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES
13 INSTALL STRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND DETAILS MON. TO FINE GRADING. OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER ON INSTKLATIM OF STRUCTURES
H UPON COMPLETION OF FINE GRADING INSTALL STREAM BANK STANLV TION INCLUDING EROSION CONTROL MATTINGCIRWO MATS ALONG CHANNEL BARKS
15 FLLL AND STABILIZE ABANDONED SEGMENTS OF TIE EXISTING CHANNEL PER DRtECYRNI OF THE ENGINEER
16 ALL IMPERVIOISOIKESANO PUMPING APPARATUS SHALL BE REWOVEDFROM THE STREAM AT THE END OF EACHOAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK M THE CHANNEL
17 DIIRNG STREAM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ME AMA AREA SHALL BE SSABLLEED NLMAEDMIELY AFTER GRADN OMO AT ME END Of EACH WORGNG NAY
15 INSTALL LIVE STAKE- BARE ROOT, AND CGNTMIYERIZED PLANTINGS AS SPECIFIED ON RANTING PLANS
�n1 KAON
r1'AUWIU*y InIRFinIctUTe mrPsuAMUnt
Tramp—iw . Wmi r ReNxKON
Uaw UB Iop—rg H 6eODNJic3
720 Colporele Detre
Raleigh, NO 27807
N19.782.0495
19.782.9672
www.wkdiciWn-
ucTNMLNP raw.
Hlry
a` N CAR0 ?.
? 4g88Ap C�a'�
O g'
7s
25 z
� F
yF �1v¢IN6 ¢¢pia
I
UL
0
a
zz Lu
0 0 0
Q CC z
L74 � d
U
z a
z
0 5
V]
Yl
9000 CC O '
rJ Q DD 2 ci
�yl�
PROF. DATE APA PUTS
p,c.= �
O.C. DATE: !FAY 2!715
M%%MNG NUMBER=
ESC3
mcm-ND.,
20140056.00.RA
Q m
s�
a
x
6
U
❑
W
r
x
0
i
€
soi

Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data
  Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 2. Planted Species Summary

Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary

Common Name Scientific Name Total Stems Planted
Water Oak Quercus nigra 5,500
Overcup Oak Quercus lyrata 4,000
Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 3,500
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 3,500
Willow Oak Quercus phellos 3,000
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii 2,400
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2,200
Tuliptree Liriodendron tulipifera 2,000
River Birch Betula nigra 1,600
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 1,500
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda 1,100
Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica 600
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 500
31,400Total
Plot #Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Stem
Height (ft)
2 1214 0 1214 Yes 1.7
3 809 0 809 Yes 1.7
6 769 0 769 Yes 1.7
9 850 0 850 Yes 1.7
11 809 0 809 Yes 2.0
12 769 0 769 Yes 1.8
14 728 0 728 Yes 1.9
15 1174 0 1174 Yes 1.6
16 809 0 809 Yes 1.6
18 850 0 850 Yes 1.8
Project Avg 878 0 878 Yes 1.7
  Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data  Table 4. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all TBetula nigra river birch Tree 444 555 111 222 222 111 111161616Fraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash Tree 444 222 444 111 444 222171717Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree333 111 111 666 333 999232323Platanus occidentalisAmerican sycamoreTree 444 444 999 444 444 222 1111 1 1 292929Quercus oak Tree 141414131313 888 333 111 444 777111111 777 777757575Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree555 222 111888Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oakTree 111 333 111555Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2333Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree111 222 333 666Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 222 111 111 222 111 444 555 111 171717Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 111 333 111 444 444 444 11118181830 30 30 20 20 20 19 19 19 21 21 21 20 20 20 19 19 19 18 18 18 29 29 29 20 20 20 21 21 21 217217 217777 333 444 888 999 888 555 777 666 6661111111214 1214 1214 809 809 809 769 769 769 850 850 850 809 809 809 769 769 769 728 728728 1174 1174 1174 809 809 809 850 850 850 878 878 87805082019-01-0018Annual MeansMY0 (2019)Current Plot Data (MY0 2019)Scientific Name Common NameSpecies Type05082019-01-0002 05082019-01-0003 05082019-01-0006 05082019-01-0009 05082019-01-0011 05082019-01-0012Hannah Bridge10.0205082019-01-0014 05082019-01-0015 05082019-01-001610.0210.0210.0210.0210.021Stem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRE0.02100.2510.0210.0210.02
Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Hannah Bridge MY0 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 2 Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 6 Vegetation Plot 9

Vegetation Plot 11

Vegetation Plot 12

Vegetation Plot 14 Vegetation Plot 15

Vegetation Plot 16

Vegetation Plot 18

Appendix D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05082019-01-0002
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Apr 2019 Data
source
Notes*
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 1
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05082019-01-0002
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Apr 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.420458
Latitude or UTM-N:35.3780
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):10
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis908 0.3 0.3 81.0 a R
Quercus sp.909 2.5 0.3 57.0 h R
Quercus sp.910 1.1 1.9 70.0 d R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica911 0.3 6.2 55.0 b R
Platanus occidentalis912 1.1 4.8 56.0 e R
Taxodium distichum913 1.9 3.4 41.0 g R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica914 2.8 2.1 57.0 j R
Quercus phellos915 3.9 0.9 42.0 n R
Platanus occidentalis916 6.0 0.7 60.0 u R
Platanus occidentalis917 5.1 2.1 57.0 r R
Quercus sp.918 4.3 3.7 60.0 p R
Betula nigra919 4.0 4.4 57.0 o R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica920 3.4 5.4 58.0 l R
Quercus sp.921 2.5 7.0 63.0 i R
Quercus sp.922 1.6 8.8 64.0 f R
Quercus sp.923 0.4 9.4 51.0 c R
Betula nigra924 3.0 9.5 58.0 k R
Quercus sp.925 3.7 8.1 50.0 m R
Betula nigra926 4.4 6.8 57.0 q R
Betula nigra927 5.2 5.6 54.0 s R
Quercus sp.928 5.9 4.1 33.0 t R
Quercus nigra929 6.5 2.8 18.0 w R
Quercus sp.930 7.2 1.5 28.0 y R
Quercus sp.931 7.7 0.6 25.0 z R
Quercus sp.932 9.7 3.3 32.0 D R
Quercus sp.933 8.9 4.6 22.0 B R
Quercus sp.934 8.0 6.1 70.0 A R
Quercus phellos935 6.9 7.3 50.0 x R
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05082019-01-0002
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Apr 2019 Data
source
Notes*
Quercus sp.936 6.2 8.9 50.0 v R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica937 9.3 9.9 59.0 C R
# stems:30 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 2
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0002
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems
marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a").N
X-axis:10 °
a
k
u
b
l
v
c
m
w
d
n
x
e
o
y
f
p
z
g
q
A
h
r
B
i
s
C
j
t
D

# stems:30
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 3
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 1
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05082019-01-0003
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Apr 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.419435
Latitude or UTM-N:35.3775
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):178
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis939 0.3 0.5 72.0 a R
Platanus occidentalis940 4.1 1.0 62.0 j R
Quercus sp.941 3.0 2.1 50.0 g R
Quercus sp.942 1.8 3.7 55.0 e R
Quercus sp.943 0.8 5.0 65.0 c R
Quercus sp.944 0.6 8.9 31.0 b R
Quercus sp.945 1.5 7.6 41.0 d R
Quercus sp.946 2.8 6.3 30.0 f R
Quercus sp.947 3.9 5.0 55.0 i R
Taxodium distichum948 5.1 4.0 39.0 k R
Taxodium distichum949 6.1 2.7 60.0 m R
Platanus occidentalis950 7.1 1.4 40.0 o R
Quercus sp.951 8.1 0.4 40.0 r R
Quercus sp.952 8.8 4.3 61.0 s R
Quercus sp.953 7.6 5.7 65.0 p R
Quercus sp.954 6.3 7.3 64.0 n R
Quercus sp.955 5.0 8.6 60.0 l R
Quercus sp.956 3.6 9.8 65.0 h R
Taxodium distichum957 7.8 9.8 58.0 q R
Platanus occidentalis958 9.0 8.4 21.0 t R
# stems:20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 4
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05082019-01-0003
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Apr 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0003
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:178 °
a
k

b l
c
m
d
n
e
o
f
p

g
q

h
r

i
s

j
t

# stems:20
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 5
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 1
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05082019-01-0006
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Apr 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.417073
Latitude or UTM-N:35.3801
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):59
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis1010 0.4 0.5 70.0 a R
Quercus sp.1011 3.9 0.9 30.0 i R
Platanus occidentalis1012 2.8 2.2 55.0 g R
Quercus phellos1013 1.8 3.7 45.0 d R
Quercus sp.1014 0.7 5.0 46.0 b R
Quercus michauxii1015 0.8 9.4 53.0 c R
Quercus sp.1016 1.8 7.9 38.0 e R
Quercus sp.1017 2.7 6.7 71.0 f R
Quercus sp.1018 3.9 5.1 30.0 j R
Platanus occidentalis1019 4.7 3.9 61.0 k R
Platanus occidentalis1020 5.6 2.1 76.0 n R
Platanus occidentalis1021 6.2 0.7 57.0 o R
Platanus occidentalis1022 9.3 1.8 60.0 s R
Quercus sp.1023 8.3 3.1 45.0 q R
Quercus sp.1024 6.3 6.2 31.0 p R
Platanus occidentalis1025 5.5 7.5 70.0 m R
Quercus sp.1026 4.6 8.6 20.0 l R
Platanus occidentalis1027 3.6 9.7 66.0 h R
Platanus occidentalis1028 8.3 8.1 61.0 r R
# stems:19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 6
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05082019-01-0006
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Apr 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0006
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:59°
a
k

b
l
c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g
q

h
r

i
s

j

# stems:19
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 7
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 1
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05082019-01-0009
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Apr 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.4151
Latitude or UTM-N:35.3803
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):128
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus michauxii1067 8.8 0.9 65.0 s R
Quercus sp.1068 9.3 4.7 60.0 u R
Quercus sp.1069 8.0 3.6 60.0 r R
Quercus pagoda1070 6.8 2.5 51.0 o R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1071 5.8 1.6 41.0 l R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1072 4.6 0.5 33.0 j R
Quercus michauxii1073 0.4 0.3 58.0 a R
Quercus lyrata1074 1.9 1.7 68.0 e R
Quercus lyrata1075 3.7 3.2 61.0 h R
Quercus phellos1076 5.0 4.2 50.0 k R
Quercus lyrata1077 6.2 5.6 51.0 n R
Quercus lyrata1078 7.6 6.7 52.0 q R
Quercus lyrata1079 9.0 8.1 56.0 t R
Betula nigra1080 7.4 9.9 48.0 p R
Betula nigra1081 6.0 9.1 51.0 m R
Betula nigra1082 4.5 7.9 44.0 i R
Betula nigra1083 3.2 6.6 53.0 g R
Betula nigra1084 2.0 5.3 49.0 f R
Quercus michauxii1085 0.6 4.0 46.0 c R
Quercus sp.1086 0.4 7.4 65.0 b R
Taxodium distichum1087 1.6 8.7 52.0 d R
# stems:21 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 8
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05082019-01-0009
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Apr 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0009
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:128 °
a
k
u
b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

gq

h
r

i
s

j
t

# stems:21
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 9
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 1
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05082019-01-0011
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
May 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.415965
Latitude or UTM-N:35.3807
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):208
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis1108 1.0 0.6 66.0 c R
Platanus occidentalis1109 0.5 2.4 65.0 a R
Platanus occidentalis1110 0.8 5.8 71.0 b R
Taxodium distichum1111 1.3 4.5 63.0 d R
Taxodium distichum1112 1.9 3.1 56.0 f R
Taxodium distichum1113 2.5 1.6 62.0 g R
Quercus sp.1114 3.3 0.2 53.0 j R
Quercus nigra1115 4.6 1.4 51.0 l R
Quercus lyrata1116 3.8 3.4 65.0 k R
Taxodium distichum1117 2.8 5.4 68.0 h R
Betula nigra1118 1.6 7.3 70.0 e R
Liriodendron tulipifera1119 2.9 9.0 50.0 i R
Quercus phellos1120 4.6 8.0 47.0 m R
Quercus phellos1121 5.5 6.1 55.0 n R
Liriodendron tulipifera1122 6.4 4.0 56.0 o R
Platanus occidentalis1123 7.4 2.0 73.0 p R
Liriodendron tulipifera1124 9.5 1.3 54.0 t R
Quercus michauxii1125 9.1 3.6 37.0 r R
Quercus nigra1126 7.5 9.5 54.0 q R
Quercus lyrata1127 9.2 8.9 74.0 s R
# stems:20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 10
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05082019-01-0011
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
May 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0011
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:208 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n
e
o

f
p

g
q

h
r

i s

j
t

# stems:20
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 11
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 1
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05082019-01-0012
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Apr 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.413113
Latitude or UTM-N:35.3814
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):95
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus lyrata1129 7.0 0.8 36.0 n R
Platanus occidentalis1130 8.9 1.8 69.0 q R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1131 9.5 5.0 45.0 s R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1132 8.3 4.5 50.0 p R
Quercus sp.1133 6.7 3.5 40.0 m R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1134 5.1 2.9 49.0 j R
Quercus pagoda1135 3.6 2.1 50.0 h R
Quercus pagoda1136 2.0 1.3 31.0 e R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1137 0.4 0.4 50.0 a R
Quercus sp.1138 0.4 3.4 28.0 b R
Quercus sp.1139 2.4 6.1 71.0 f R
Liriodendron tulipifera1140 5.2 7.1 54.0 k R
Platanus occidentalis1141 7.3 7.1 71.0 o R
Platanus occidentalis1142 9.2 8.2 72.0 r R
Betula nigra1143 6.3 9.5 55.0 l R
Quercus sp.1144 3.2 8.1 71.0 g R
Platanus occidentalis1145 0.4 7.1 64.0 c R
Betula nigra1146 1.0 9.1 50.0 d R
Quercus phellos1147 4.0 9.7 66.0 i R
# stems:19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 12
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05082019-01-0012
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Apr 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0012
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:95°
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g
q

h
r

i
s

j

# stems:19
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 13
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 1
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05082019-01-0014
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Apr 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.412387
Latitude or UTM-N:35.3821
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):136
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Taxodium distichum1174 0.4 0.5 66.0 a R
Quercus phellos1175 0.4 2.2 60.0 b R
Quercus phellos1176 0.4 3.8 62.0 c R
Quercus phellos1177 0.4 5.4 66.0 d R
Taxodium distichum1178 0.5 7.1 31.0 e R
Taxodium distichum1179 0.9 8.7 50.0 f R
Quercus sp.1180 5.0 9.8 57.0 k R
Quercus sp.1181 4.7 8.2 54.0 j R
Platanus occidentalis1182 4.3 5.8 64.0 i R
Platanus occidentalis1183 4.2 3.7 55.0 h R
Quercus sp.1184 4.0 1.4 57.0 g R
Quercus phellos1185 6.7 3.5 65.0 l R
Liriodendron tulipifera1186 7.0 6.2 51.0 m R
Quercus sp.1187 7.5 8.0 65.0 n R
Taxodium distichum1188 9.3 7.4 70.0 r R
Quercus sp.1189 9.1 4.8 59.0 q R
Quercus sp.1190 8.9 2.5 63.0 p R
Quercus sp.1191 8.9 0.4 59.0 o R
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 14
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05082019-01-0014
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Apr 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0014
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:136 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n
e
o

f
p

g
q

h
r

i

j

# stems:18
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 15
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 1
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05082019-01-0015
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Apr 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.416015
Latitude or UTM-N:35.3830
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):330
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1193 8.5 1.2 73.0 w R
Platanus occidentalis1194 9.5 2.0 61.0 A R
Quercus sp.1195 9.5 5.9 44.0 B R
Quercus sp.1196 8.7 5.0 42.0 y R
Quercus sp.1197 7.6 3.9 44.0 v R
Quercus sp.1198 6.6 3.1 42.0 s R
Quercus sp.1199 5.7 2.3 40.0 p R
Quercus sp.1200 4.8 1.4 47.0 m R
Quercus phellos1201 3.8 0.4 49.0 j R
Quercus phellos1202 0.8 0.7 60.0 c R
Quercus phellos1203 1.6 1.5 61.0 f R
Quercus sp.1204 2.7 2.4 48.0 h R
Quercus pagoda1205 3.8 3.6 54.0 k R
Betula nigra1206 4.8 4.7 59.0 n R
Liriodendron tulipifera1207 5.8 6.0 33.0 q R
Liriodendron tulipifera1208 6.7 6.8 48.0 t R
Liriodendron tulipifera1209 7.5 7.8 46.0 u R
Liriodendron tulipifera1210 8.4 8.9 44.0 x R
Liriodendron tulipifera1211 9.1 9.4 49.0 z R
Liriodendron tulipifera1212 9.9 9.9 50.0 C R
Quercus pagoda1213 6.3 9.9 55.0 r R
Quercus sp.1214 5.2 9.2 53.0 o R
Quercus sp.1215 4.1 8.1 57.0 l R
Quercus phellos1216 3.1 7.2 57.0 i R
Quercus phellos1217 2.3 6.2 41.0 g R
Betula nigra1218 1.2 5.3 47.0 d R
Quercus pagoda1219 0.4 4.5 33.0 a R
Quercus sp.1220 0.5 8.1 51.0 b R
Quercus sp.1221 1.2 9.1 55.0 e R
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 16
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05082019-01-0015
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Apr 2019 Data
source
Notes*
# stems:29 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 17
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0015
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems
marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a").N
X-axis:330 °
a
k
ubl
v
c
m w
d
n
xeo
y
f
p
z
g q
A
h
r
B
i
s
C
j
t

# stems:29
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 18
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 1
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05082019-01-0016
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Apr 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.414487
Latitude or UTM-N:35.3830
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):330
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Taxodium distichum1223 1.4 0.8 70.0 d R
Quercus sp.1224 1.0 2.6 50.0 a R
Liriodendron tulipifera1225 1.0 4.5 48.0 b R
Liriodendron tulipifera1226 1.3 6.5 53.0 c R
Betula nigra1227 1.4 8.6 61.0 e R
Quercus sp.1228 3.6 9.4 40.0 k R
Taxodium distichum1229 3.4 7.9 41.0 i R
Liriodendron tulipifera1230 3.4 6.1 50.0 h R
Taxodium distichum1231 2.9 4.2 52.0 f R
Quercus sp.1232 3.1 2.6 68.0 g R
Taxodium distichum1233 3.6 0.9 46.0 j R
Quercus sp.1234 7.0 0.4 60.0 q R
Quercus sp.1235 6.4 1.8 52.0 p R
Quercus sp.1236 6.1 3.8 49.0 l R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1237 6.1 5.6 45.0 m R
Quercus sp.1238 6.1 7.3 25.0 n R
Quercus phellos1239 6.3 9.0 26.0 o R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1240 9.2 9.5 51.0 t R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1241 9.0 7.8 52.0 s R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1242 8.6 5.8 54.0 r R
# stems:20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 19
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05082019-01-0016
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Apr 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0016
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:330 °
a
k

b
l
c
m

d
n
e
o

f
p

g
q

h r
is

j
t

# stems:20
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 20
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 1
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05082019-01-0018
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Apr 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.417931
Latitude or UTM-N:35.3748
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):348
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Liriodendron tulipifera1263 0.4 0.3 50.0 a R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1264 0.6 6.4 60.0 b R
Platanus occidentalis1265 1.2 9.4 72.0 c R
Quercus sp.1266 2.6 7.4 65.0 f R
Quercus sp.1267 1.9 3.5 61.0 e R
Liriodendron tulipifera1268 1.9 1.3 51.0 d R
Liriodendron tulipifera1269 3.2 0.3 54.0 g R
Liriodendron tulipifera1270 4.1 1.7 46.0 h R
Liriodendron tulipifera1271 4.1 2.9 50.0 i R
Betula nigra1272 4.2 4.4 54.0 j R
Liriodendron tulipifera1273 4.9 5.8 58.0 l R
Quercus sp.1274 4.6 7.9 25.0 k R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1275 6.2 9.2 56.0 o R
Quercus sp.1276 6.2 5.3 72.0 n R
Liriodendron tulipifera1277 6.2 2.3 53.0 m R
Taxodium distichum1278 7.6 0.6 40.0 q R
Liriodendron tulipifera1279 8.1 3.2 56.0 r R
Quercus sp.1280 8.1 5.7 53.0 s R
Liriodendron tulipifera1281 7.3 8.3 56.0 p R
Quercus sp.1282 8.3 9.8 52.0 t R
Quercus sp.1283 9.5 1.5 37.0 u R
# stems:21 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 21
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05082019-01-0018
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Apr 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0018
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:348 °
a
k
u
b
l

c
m
d
n

e
o

f
p

g
q

h
r

i
s

j
t

# stems:21
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 22
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.