20160393 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20190923

Mitigation
L.
Project
Information
UpI(
ID#*
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review 09/23/2019
Completed Date
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/23/201, -
Version *
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r` Stream r- Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Matt Butler
Project Information
Existing 20160393
(DWR) (nunbers only no dash)
ID#:*
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Maple View
County: Orange
Document Information
r Yes r
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing 1
Version: (nunbersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Maple View Bank Parcel MY3 Report.pdf 10.54MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:

MAPLE VIEW
NURTRIENT OFFSET SITE
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

MONITORING YEAR 3 REPORT

Provided by:

Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-829-9909

September 2019

Maple View Monitoring Year 3 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2019
1

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 2
1.1 Project Location and Description .............................................................................................. 2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................ 3
2.0 Project Area – Pre-Construction Condition Summary ............................................................................ 3
3.0 Bank Site Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Restoration Plan ............................................................................................................................... 3
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots ............................................................................................................ 4
3.3 Photo Documentation ....................................................................................................................... 4
4.0 Monitoring Conditions ............................................................................................................................ 4
5.0 Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation ................................................................. 4 Appendix A: Site Maps Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2.1: Conservation Easement Area Figure 2.2: Vegetation Plot Locations Figure 2.3: As-Built Exhibit Figure 3: 2018 Re-Planting and Encroachment Areas Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data Table 2: Plant Species Summary Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Appendix C: Visual Assessment Data Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets Appendix E: Memos MY1 Remedial Action Memo MY2 August 2018 Landowner Conservation Memo

Maple View Monitoring Year 3 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2019
2

1.0 Introduction 1.1 Project Location and Description

EBX-EM, LLC (an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC) acting as the Bank Sponsor, is
pleased to provide this As-Built Report for the Maple View Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank (“Bank”).
This Bank is designed to provide nutrient offset mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to
development within the Upper New Hope Arm of the B. Everett Jordan Lake watershed in the Cape Fear
River Basin. This project is in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B.0240 and the Cape Fear Riparian Buffer
& Nutrient Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) made and entered into by EBX-EM, LLC acting as the
Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) on
October 9, 2009 and modified on February 17, 2014. Supporting figures can be found in Appendix A.
The Maple View Parcel is located in Orange County in Hillsborough, NC (Figure 1). Within the Parcel, a
section of Morgan Creek and two unnamed tributaries traverse the site and exhibit diminished habitat value
as a result of past and on-going agricultural activities and impervious watershed conditions. The Parcel is
located within the Upper New Hope Arm of the B. Everett Jordan Lake watershed USGS 14-digit HUC
03030002060070 and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) Sub-basin Number 03-06-
06.

The site is located near the intersection of Green Rise Road and Dairyland Road (SR 1177). The site is on
the south side of Dairyland Road with the main drainage feature flowing west to east. The coordinates of
the site are 35.973056°N and -79.147778°W.

The conservation easement on the Maple View Parcel totals approximately 7.63 acres and includes two
unnamed tributaries. Stormwater runoff from adjacent land flows directly to Morgan Creek. The Parcel is
located in an area dominated by agriculture, livestock, and residential land use. There is a dairy operation
on the north side of Dairyland Road, but a majority of the Parcel is utilized for row-crop production. Land
use in the project area is hay field, row crops, and existing riparian forest. No livestock are on the Bank
Parcel, therefore livestock access is not a concern.

The Maple View Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank provides water quality benefits through elimination of
nutrient intensive agricultural practices and re-forestation of riparian areas that extend out to 200 feet from
the stream channels. The riparian restoration activities within the Parcel results in improved water quality
within the downstream watershed. Unnamed Tributary “A” is a perennial channel which flows in an easterly
direction along the southern project boundary. Unnamed Tributary “B” is a perennial channel which flows
in a southerly direction to its confluence with unnamed tributary “A”. Unnamed Tributary “C” is a
perennial channel flowing in a southerly direction to its confluence with UT-A. Stream Determinations
were verified by DWR staff onsite on July 7, 2015 and in correspondence dated July 16, 2015. Site
viability for buffer mitigation and nutrient offset was determined onsite on July 7, 2015 and in
correspondence dated August 5, 2015.

The Maple View Parcel provides off-site mitigation for development (both existing and proposed)
requiring nutrient offset credits. The nutrient offset credits generated o n this Bank are being
submitted under the terms and conditions of the Cape Fear UMBI modified and signed on February
2, 2014 between EBX-EM, LLC and the Department of Environmental Quality.

Maple View Monitoring Year 3 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2019
3

1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The primary goals associated with the nutrient offset restoration plan include improving water quality,
enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat through the creation/restoration of forested
riparian areas adjacent to stream channels within the Parcel. The restoration of natural plant communities
within the Parcel will not only provide stabilization and improve water quality within the easement limits,
but also provide ecological benefits to the entire watershed.

Goals Objectives
1. Improve water quality
2. Enhance flood attenuation
3. Restore wildlife habitat

• Eliminate nutrient intensive agricultural practices
• Re-forest riparian areas, extending out to 200 feet from
stream channels
• Control non-native invasive species to ensure the
establishment of a diverse native plant community
2.0 Project Area – Pre-Construction Condition Summary
The Final BPDP (November 2016) describes the pre-construction conditions on the Maple View site. The
site was planted in April 2016 and post-construction conditions are also described in the Final BPDP.
Additional construction activities since the BPDP approval include supplemental re-planting of 0.23 acres
along the easement boundary, installation of easement signage, and amending the conservation easement
to address DWR comments. The easement edge portion of Maple View that was lacking planted stems was
planted with 150 one-gallon trees. This is an approximate density of 650 trees per acre over the 0.23 acre
area. Additionally, a 0.10-acre area on the eastern portion of the site was replanted with 50 one-gallon trees
and the 0.23-acre replant area was also remarked. Information regarding this can be found in the MY1
Remedial Action Memo in Appendix E. 3.0 Bank Site Conditions 3.1 Restoration Plan
The majority of the site was maintained as a cleared agricultural field for hay and corn production. As such,
these areas required little site preparation other than select herbicide treatment and soil preparation (i.e.
ripped and scarified). The riparian areas were planted with native bare root tree seedlings at a minimum of
8 by 8 foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680 trees per acre. The buffered channels will provide
water quality and habitat functions within the sensitive Jordan Lake watershed. Some areas adjacent to the
forested areas may require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species.

Riparian restoration began at the outer limits of the existing tree lines and extend out to 200 feet from the
top of bank from reaches A, B and C (Figure 2.3). Approximately 3 acres of mature forest will be protected
within the conservation easement, but no buffer or nutrient offset credits will be generated.

DWR staff (Katie Merritt) performed a site inspection on April 10, 2017. At that site visit an area
approximately 0.23 acres along the easement boundary was found to be lacking planted stems (Figure 3)
and additional easement marking, and signage was requested. RES performed these remedial actions in
May 2017. At the end of 2017, RES performed more remedial actions by remarking this area and replanting
50 one-gallon trees in a 0.10-acre encroachment area on the eastern portion of the site. The MY1 Remedial
Action Memo is in Appendix E.

Maple View Monitoring Year 3 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2019
4

3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots

Revegetation of the site includes planting bare root trees and controlling invasive species growth. Piedmont
Alluvial Forest is the target community type for all areas within the project. The community is defined by
Schafale and Weakely (1990). The initial planting of bare root trees occurred during mid-April 2016 and is
described in the BPDP. Initial Plot data is provided in Appendix B. Vegetation plots were installed in
November 2016. 3.3 Photo Documentation

Photo documentation is a key essential to monitoring the success criteria of the Bank Site. Photographs
provide a visual representation of the onsite vegetation conditions. Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
will provide a photograph of each vegetation plot every monitoring year. Photographs are located in
Appendix B. 4.0 Monitoring Conditions
The Site will be monitored for an additional two consecutive years or until the required success criteria
have been met as determined by DWR. The Site is performing as planned and is on track to meeting its
success criteria. Overall the site’s vegetation has established well in Year 3. An abundant amount of
herbaceous ground cover as well as volunteer tree species were present during Year 3 monitoring activities.
The two problem areas that were noted during Year 2 monitoring activities on the Maple View Bank Site
were no long problems in Year 3. The narrow strip of encroachment along the edge of the easement was
replanted in 2017 and monitored through 2018. The gallon trees that were planted have established a well-
defined physical boundary to the easement. The second problem area was another encroachment area near
VP7 where the farmer mowed through the easement along the cornfield about 0.10 acres in size. This area
appeared to be untouched in Year 3 and the trees that were mowed have re-sprouted in 2019. Additional
information on the remedial action and correspondence regarding these areas is in Appendix E. If site
conditions or tree survival rates require remediation, supplemental planting and additional site
modifications will be implemented. DWR will be notified if supplemental planting is to occur within Site.

The Maple View Bank Site contains seven vegetative monitoring plots, all of which are monitored and
reported in general accordance with the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS-EEP, v4.2).
Seven (10) by ten (10) meter square plots have been permanently established following completion of the
planting phase and at least two opposing corners have been permanently installed and surveyed for future
use. The plant species, density, survival rates, and the cause of mortality, if identifiable, have been recorded
within each plot. All vegetation plots are sampled and reported annually. The primary focus of the
vegetative monitoring will be solely on the tree stratum, although shrub and herbaceous species encountered
may also be recorded but will not be counted towards the success criteria.

Success criteria is based on the survival of a minimum density of 320 trees per acre after five years of
monitoring. Year 3 vegetation monitoring activities occurred on September 4th. As of Monitoring Year 3,
the Maple View Bank Site yields 717 planted stems per acre and 937 total stems per acre counting volunteer
species. The average stem height was 10.3 feet. Vegetation monitoring data is in Appendix B.
5.0 Jordan Lake Nutrient Offset Mitigation
The Maple View Bank generates 4.54 acres of nutrient offset credits and preserves 3.10 acres of riparian
buffer for a contiguous conservation easement. The total nutrient offset credits that the Maple View Bank
generates are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 2.3.

Maple View Monitoring Year 3 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2019
5

Table 1. Maple View Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset Credit Summary

Buffer
Zone
Mitigation
Type Credit
Type
Total
Acreage
Generated
Credit Per
Acre
Delivery Factors

Zone Delivery
Delivered
Credits
Zone A
(0-200')*
Riparian
restoration Nitrogen 4.54 2,169.26 lbs 9 89% 8,765 lbs
Zone A
(0-200')*
Riparian
restoration Phosphorus 4.54 143.81 lbs 7 71% 463 lbs
Jordan
Buffer
Preservation
n/a 3.10 n/a n/a n/a n/a
*areas within existing forest are
included as Preservation Type Total Delivered Nitrogen Credit 8,765 lbs
Total Delivered Phosphorus Credit 463 lbs 6.0 References
Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Comstock, J.A., Schafle, M.P., McNab, W.H., Lenat, D.R., MacPherson,
T.F., Glover, J.B., and Shelburne, V.B., 2002, Ecoregions of North Carolina and south Carolina,
(color poster with map, descriptive t ext, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S.
Geological Survey (map scale 1 :1,500,00).

NCDENR. 2009. “Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.” Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).

NCDENR. 2010. “N.C. Wetland Assessment Method User Manual Version 4.1.” N.C. Wetland
Functional Assessment Team.

NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.

Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.

Maple View Monitoring Year 3 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2019
6

APPENDIX A Site Maps

0 10.5
Miles
FIGURE 1
Site Location MapMaple View Nutrient Offset Site
Orange C ounty, North Carolina
Legend
Conservation Easement
©Document Path: C:\Users\Admin\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Maple_View\As-Built\Figure 1 - Maple View Vicinity Map.mxdMaple View Nutrient Offs et Site
0 100 20050
Feet
Basemap: Google Earth WMS service, NCMHTD.
Horizontal Datum is North Carolina State Plane NAD 83.
Project limits are approximate.
The parcel data information/property boundaries
depicted on this map is for prospect assessment
purposes only. It is not to be used as final boundaries.
©Date: 6/20/2017
Drawn by: BPB
Checked by: DI
Document Path: C:\Users\Admin\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Maple_View\As-Built\FIGURE 2.1_Aerial_Maple_View.mxdLegend
Maple View Nutrient Offset Sit
FIGURE 2.1
Conservation Easement AreaMaple View Nutrient Offset Site
Orange C ounty, North Carolina
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
VP1VP2VP3
VP4 VP5
VP6
VP7
0 100 20050
Feet
Basemap: Google Earth WMS service, NCMHTD.
Horizontal Datum is North Carolina State Plane NAD 83.
Project limits are approximate.
The parcel data information/property boundaries
depicted on this map is for prospect assessment
purposes only. It is not to be used as final boundaries.
©Date: 6/20/2017
Drawn by: BPB
Checked by: DI
Document Path: C:\Users\Admin\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Maple_View\As-Built\FIGURE 2.2_Vegetation Plots Map_.mxdLegend
"Vegetation Plots
Maple View Nutrient Offset Si
FIGURE 2.2
Vegetation PlotsMaple View Nutrient Offset Site
Orange C ounty, North Carolina
0 100 20050
Feet
Basemap: Google Earth WMS service, NCMHTD.
Horizontal Datum is North Carolina State Plane NAD 83.
Project limits are approximate.
The parcel data information/property boundaries
depicted on this map is for prospect assessment
purposes only. It is not to be used as final boundaries.
©Date: 6/20/2017
Drawn by: BPB
Checked by: DI
Document Path: C:\Users\Admin\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Maple_View\As-Built\Figure 2.3 BB Buffer and Nutrient Restoration Areas Map.mxdLegend
Mitigation Assets
Nutr ient Offset (4.54 (Ac.)
Buffer Preservation -No Credits (3.10 Ac.)
Stream
Maple View Nutrient Offset Site (7.3 Ac. +/-)
Existing Conservation Easem
FIGURE 2.3
As-built Restoration Areas Maple View Nutrient Offset Site
Orange C ounty, North Carolina
0 100 20050
Feet
©Date: 9/17/2018
Drawn by: RTM
Checked by: DI
Document Path: S:\@RES Projects\North Carolina\Cape Fear Buffer & Nutrient\0198 - Maple View\Monitoring\Monitoring Data\GIS\MY2\MXD\Figure 3 - MV 2018 Replant and Encroachment.mxdLegend
Maple View Nutrient Offset Site (7.3 Ac. +/-)
Vegetation Transect
Replant Area
MY1 and MY2 Encroachment
Mitigation Assets
Nutr ient Offset (4.54 (Ac.)
Buffer Preservation -No Credits (3.10 Ac.)
Stream
FIGURE 3
2018 Re-Planting and Encroachment AreasMaple View Nutrient Offset Site
Orange C ounty, North Carolina
R2017 Rep lanted Are a- 0.23 acres2018 Encroachment Arou nd Easem ent Markers
2017 and 20 18 En croachm ent Area - 0.10 acres
Tre e #1
Tre e #82

Maple View Monitoring Year 3 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2019
7

APPENDIX B Vegetation Assessment Data

  Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data  Table 2. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table 3. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Plot #Planted Stems/AcreVolunteer Stems/AcreTotal Stems/AcreSuccess Criteria Met?Average Planted Stem Height (ft)1971 809 1781 Yes 4.02607 0 607 Yes 10.53567 81 647 Yes 7.84526 81 607 Yes 4.95809 121 931 Yes 18.06809 162 971 Yes 12.07728 283 1012 Yes 13.7Project Avg 717 220 937 Yes 10.3PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer rubrum red maple Tree6Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree222Fraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash Tree 171717777666777881012121444761 61 68 61 61 73 55 55 65 47 47 47Juglans nigra black walnut Tree225Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 2020 2Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree111111 4226228227222Platanus occidentalisAmerican sycamoreTree 55566633333310101077710 10 10 44 44 44 44 44 44 46 46 46 51 51 51Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oakTree 222111 111444555555888Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 222222555111 333131313131313141414141414Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree222Rhus glabra smooth sumac shrub 2 1 3Unknown Shrub or Tree22224 24 44 15 15 15 14 14 16 13 13 15 20 20 23 20 20 24 18 18 25 124 124 162 125 125 152 122122 143 126 126 126334333334445445334445559558556777971 971 1781 607 607 607 567 567 647 526 526 607 809 809 931 809 809 971 728 728 1012 717 717 937 723 723 879 705 705 827 728 728 72810.0210.0270.1770.1770.1770.1710.0210.0210.02Stem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRE000003‐01‐000210.02000003‐01‐0007Annual MeansMY3 (2019) MY2 (2018) MY1 (2017) MY0 (2016)Current Plot Data (MY3 2019)000003‐01‐0003 000003‐01‐0004 000003‐01‐0005 000003‐01‐000610.02Maple ViewScientific Name Common Name Species Type000003‐01‐0001

Maple View Monitoring Year 3 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2019
8

APPENDIX C
Visual Assessment Data
Maple View Monitoring Year 3 Vegetation Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 1

Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 3 Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 5 Vegetation Plot 6

Vegetation Plot 7

Maple View Monitoring Year 3 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2019
9

APPENDIX D Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets

THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):000003-01-0001
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 4
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 000003-01-0001
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):80
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis2 0.2 0.2 420.0 2.5 a R
Platanus occidentalis4 2.7 0.3 360.0 2.2 e R
Platanus occidentalis5 4.1 0.5 310.0 1.8 h R
Platanus occidentalis6 6.7 0.3 270.0 1.9 n R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica7 9.9 0.3 60.0 w R
Quercus phellos8 9.6 3.0 55.0 v R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica9 7.1 2.9 90.0 p R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica10 2.4 2.7 85.0 d R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica11 0.7 5.7 70.0 b R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica13 3.3 5.9 75.0 f R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica14 7.1 5.8 60.0 q R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica15 9.9 8.5 85.0 x R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica16 9.2 8.5 80.0 u R
Quercus phellos17 7.2 8.6 72.0 r R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica18 5.8 8.6 80.0 m R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica19 3.3 8.5 85.0 g R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica20 1.1 8.5 90.0 c R
Platanus occidentalis256 5.0 0.1 220.0 1.1 k R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica257 7.1 0.2 55.0 o R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica258 8.5 0.2 45.0 t R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica259 4.8 8.6 78.0 j R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica395 4.8 5.9 50.0 i R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica396 5.9 5.9 90.0 l R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica397 8.2 8.5 75.0 s R
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):000003-01-0001
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
# stems:24 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 2
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0001
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:80 °
a k
u
b l
v
c m
w
d
n
x
eo

f
p

g
q

h
r

i
s

j
t

# stems:24
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 3
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 4
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 000003-01-0002
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):80
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis21 0.1 0.1 500.0 4.6 a R
Platanus occidentalis23 5.1 0.2 450.0 4.4 h R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica24 7.1 0.3 140.0 0.5 j R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica25 9.1 0.3 110.0 m R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis26 9.9 0.3 420.0 3.3 o R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica27 8.3 3.0 80.0 l R
Platanus occidentalis28 4.4 3.0 600.0 4.4 g R
Platanus occidentalis29 2.3 3.0 600.0 5.0 c R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica30 2.3 5.6 330.0 3.9 d R
Quercus phellos31 3.9 5.7 65.0 e R
Quercus phellos32 7.6 5.5 50.0 k R
Platanus occidentalis33 9.1 6.0 650.0 8.3 n R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica34 5.7 8.6 280.0 1.9 i R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica35 3.8 8.7 90.0 f R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica36 0.6 8.4 420.0 4.0 b R
# stems:15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*Notes by ID:27-rat damage
31-rat damage/ no leaves
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 4
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):000003-01-0002
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0002
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:80 °
a
k
b
l c
m
d
n

e
o

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:15
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 5
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 4
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 000003-01-0003
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):50
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis37 0.9 1.4 450.0 3.4 c R
Platanus occidentalis38 3.3 0.1 700.0 9.0 f R
Quercus phellos39 8.2 1.2 90.0 i R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica40 9.9 0.3 80.0 l R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica41 8.6 4.0 290.0 2.3 k R
Quercus phellos42 6.9 4.8 88.0 h R
Quercus phellos44 0.3 4.4 70.0 b R
Quercus phellos45 0.3 10.0 40.0 a R
Platanus occidentalis46 1.2 9.7 550.0 5.3 d R
Quercus phellos47 2.6 9.1 90.0 e R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica48 4.4 8.4 120.0 g R DBH?
Fraxinus pennsylvanica49 9.9 6.5 95.0 m R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica50 9.9 9.3 410.0 2.2 n R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica51 8.5 9.8 270.0 2.2 j R
# stems:14 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 6
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):000003-01-0003
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0003
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:50 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:14
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 7
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 4
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 000003-01-0004
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):75
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis53 3.3 1.8 140.0 0.8 c R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica54 5.8 2.0 110.0 g R DBH?
Fraxinus pennsylvanica55 9.5 4.5 142.0 0.4 k R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica57 4.7 4.5 135.0 f R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis59 4.3 7.3 290.0 2.1 e R
Quercus phellos60 5.8 7.3 55.0 h R
Platanus occidentalis61 8.7 7.3 480.0 3.7 i R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica62 9.9 7.4 200.0 0.8 l R
Quercus michauxii63 9.9 9.9 72.0 m R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica64 8.6 9.9 90.0 j R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica66 3.9 9.7 80.0 d R
Quercus michauxii67 0.1 9.9 55.0 a R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica401 2.0 9.7 85.0 b R
# stems:13 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 8
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):000003-01-0004
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0004
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:75 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:13
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 9
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 4
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 000003-01-0005
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):100
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis68 0.2 0.1 1000.0 8.9 c R
Platanus occidentalis69 0.9 0.3 650.0 3.7 e R
Platanus occidentalis70 1.9 0.3 1100.0 9.6 g R
Platanus occidentalis71 3.5 0.4 700.0 5.2 i R
Platanus occidentalis72 5.1 0.3 800.0 5.5 l R
Platanus occidentalis73 5.9 0.2 800.0 6.0 n R
Platanus occidentalis74 6.5 0.5 950.0 9.6 r R
Platanus occidentalis75 7.3 0.4 900.0 9.0 s R
Quercus michauxii76 8.3 2.6 70.0 u R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica77 6.0 1.8 40.0 p R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica78 5.7 3.0 65.0 m R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica79 4.2 2.9 300.0 1.8 j R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica80 1.5 2.9 380.0 2.8 f R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica81 0.4 2.6 140.0 0.7 d R
Liriodendron tulipifera82 0.1 5.6 190.0 1.4 a R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica84 4.3 5.6 50.0 k R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica85 6.3 5.5 260.0 1.4 q R
Platanus occidentalis86 7.4 5.5 1150.0 10.0 t R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica87 5.8 8.4 360.0 2.2 o R
Platanus occidentalis88 3.2 8.5 1050.0 8.9 h R
Quercus michauxii89 0.1 8.5 Missingb R
# stems:21 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 10
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):000003-01-0005
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0005
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:100 °
ak
u
b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g
q

h
r

is

j
t

# stems:21
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 11
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 4
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 000003-01-0006
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):90
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Fraxinus pennsylvanica90 0.2 0.1 240.0 1.8 a R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica91 1.0 0.1 170.0 0.5 c R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica92 2.5 0.1 135.0 f R DBH?
Liriodendron tulipifera93 8.8 2.7 190.0 0.5 r R
Platanus occidentalis94 8.0 2.7 1000.0 10.1 q R
Platanus occidentalis95 7.0 2.6 800.0 5.5 n R
Platanus occidentalis96 6.0 2.7 800.0 7.9 m R
Platanus occidentalis97 4.7 2.7 750.0 6.4 k R
Platanus occidentalis98 3.5 2.7 400.0 1.9 i R
Platanus occidentalis99 2.6 2.9 1000.0 9.5 g R
Platanus occidentalis100 0.8 2.8 650.0 4.7 b R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica101 3.2 5.7 85.0 h R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica102 4.5 5.7 165.0 0.4 j R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica103 5.3 5.7 130.0 l R DBH?
Fraxinus pennsylvanica104 7.3 5.8 130.0 o R DBH?
Fraxinus pennsylvanica105 9.0 5.7 260.0 1.9 s R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica106 9.1 8.5 120.0 t R DBH?
Fraxinus pennsylvanica107 7.5 8.6 100.0 p R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica108 2.3 8.6 120.0 e R DBH?
Fraxinus pennsylvanica109 1.3 8.7 100.0 d R
# stems:20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 12
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):000003-01-0006
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0006
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:90 °
a
k b
l

c
m

d
n
e
o

f
p

g q

h
r

i
s

j
t

# stems:20
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 13
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 4
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 000003-01-0007
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):100
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Fraxinus pennsylvanica110 1.9 0.3 205.0 1.1 c R
Quercus michauxii111 2.6 0.2 40.0 e R
Platanus occidentalis112 4.4 0.4 800.0 10.0 f R
Platanus occidentalis113 5.3 0.3 450.0 1.5 h R
Platanus occidentalis114 6.1 0.3 800.0 9.5 k R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica115 8.5 0.2 165.0 0.6 n R
Platanus occidentalis116 9.5 0.3 600.0 6.0 r R
Quercus phellos117 8.7 2.8 85.0 q R
Platanus occidentalis118 6.9 3.1 470.0 3.0 l R
Platanus occidentalis119 5.8 3.0 850.0 9.1 j R
Platanus occidentalis120 4.6 3.0 800.0 8.0 g R
Platanus occidentalis121 0.6 3.0 570.0 4.8 b R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica122 5.6 5.9 140.0 0.6 i R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica123 7.5 5.7 95.0 m R
Platanus occidentalis124 8.4 5.7 550.0 2.8 o R
Platanus occidentalis125 8.4 8.7 750.0 7.9 p R
Quercus phellos126 2.2 8.8 70.0 d R
Quercus phellos127 0.1 8.7 90.0 a R
# stems:18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 14
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):000003-01-0007
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0007
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:100 °
a
k

bl
c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g q

hr

i

j

# stems:18
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 15
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.

Maple View Monitoring Year 3 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2019
10

APPENDIX E Memos

302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd. Suite 650
Houston, TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400

res.us

December 8, 2017

Katie Merritt
NCDEQ – Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street, Archdale Building 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27620

RE: Maple View – Year 1 Monitoring Remedial Actions Memo

Dear Katie Merritt,

Per the September 29, 2017 email response from Katie Merritt (DWR) referencing the Year 1 Monitoring
Report for the Maple View Bank Parcel, RES is providing a summary for remediation as requested.

1. In the 0.23 acre encroachment area along the easement boundary RES shall conduct a
transect survey documenting height and species type of the trees within the “Replant Area”.
Also RES is to install poles or wire fencing/T-posts as a means of more permanent marking.
On October 12, 2017, RES surveyed a 990 foot transect along the edge of the “Replant Area”
closest to the farm field. RES identified and measured 82 trees. The same trees will be identified
and measured in MY2. Transect data is attached along with a map and photos showing the
transect line. Please note, temporary easement markers (wooden stakes with pink flagging) were
installed for photographic purposes only. Permanent easement markers (T-posts with
conservation easement signs) were later installed on December 7, 2017.

2. In the 0.10 acre encroachment area near Plot 7, RES is to install poles or wire fencing/T-
posts as a means of more permanent marking.
On December 7, 2017, RES installed permanent easement markers around the encroachment area.
The easement markers are T-posts with conservation easement signs attached to them.

RES has performed all requested remedial action items and is requesting the remaining 5% credit release
for MY1 from the Maple View site. Please let me know if you have additional concerns or questions.

Thanks,
Ryan Medric | Ecologist

2
Photo Log
 Transect looking east.

 Transect looking east.

3
 Transect looking west.

 Transect looking east.

4
 Permanent markers installed along 0.23 acre encroachment area.

 Permanent markers installed along 0.23 acre encroachment area.

5

 Permanent markers installed along 0.10 acre encroachment area.

 Permanent markers installed along 0.10 acre encroachment area.

0 100 20050
Feet
Basemap: Google Earth WMS service, NCMHTD.Horizontal Datum is North Carolina State Plane N AD 83.Project limits are approximate.The parcel data information/property boundariesdepicted on this map is for prospect assessmentpurposes only. It is not to be used as final boundaries.
©Date: 10/12/2017
Drawn by: RTM
Checked by: DI
Document Path: C:\Users\rmedric\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\projects\NC\Maple_View\As-Built\Figure 5 - MV May2017Replant.mxdLegend
Vegetation Transect
Replant Area
MY1 Encroachment
Mitigation Assets
Nutr ient Offset (4.54 (Ac.)
Buffer Preservation -No Credits (3.10 Ac.)
Stream
Maple View Nutrient Offset Site (7.3 Ac. +/-)
FIGURE 3
May 2017 Re-Planting AreaMaple View Nutrient Offset Site
Orange County, North Carolina
RReplanted Area- 0.23 acresMissing Ea sement Pole s
En cro achment Area- 0.1 0 a cre s
Tre e #1
Tre e #82

MEMORANDUM

302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110 Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 919.209.1061 tel. [phone] fax

TO: Ryan Medric
FROM: Brian Hockett
DATE: September 17, 2018
RE: Maple View Farms Landowner Notification/Contact
Regarding Ongoing Easement Encroachment

On August 13, 2018 RES (Brian Hockett) contacted Bob Nutter (Land Owner) of Maple View
Farms to discuss the ongoing encroachment issues with the conservation easement. Mr. Nutter
and RES discussed both occurrences (2017 and 2018) that had taken place and how to resolve
the encroachment. Mr. Nutter stated that the reason for removing the posts was primarily to
harvest the crops against the edge of the easement. Mr. Nutter offered to re-install the easement
posts; however, RES declined and re-installed the posts ourselves. Mr. Nutter was also informed
the mowing and driving within the easement was a violation of the easement terms. Mr. Nutter
agreed this problem would be resolved and would not continue.