20091036 Ver 1_401 Application_20090909

UM ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING SURVEYING
Mr. Ian McMillan
NCDENR DWQ - Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center PA I n SEP 2 9 2009
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
? DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6415 Old Plank Road, High Point, NC 27265
[phone] • Fax [phone] • www.dmp-inc.com
9 ? 1 0 ? ® September 25, 2009
Re: City of Oxford
2009 Sewer System Rehabilitations
Application for 401/404 Certifications
DMP Project 090016 (BF)
Dear Mr. McMillan:
DENR - WATER QUAUTY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER ORAW
On behalf of the City of Oxford, we have enclosed the following items for your review and approval:
Five (5) sets of the PCN Form with attachments;
Three (3) full size and two (2) half size sets of construction plans;
Check No. 045904 in the amount of $240.00 for the review fee;
This project is located in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin and will involve the installation of approximately 2,616 LF of 12"
gravity sewer. in order to replace old and deteriorated gravity sewer lines, and in turn eliminate a major contributor to the
City's 1/1 problem. The sewer line installation will have temporary impacts on approximately 50 LF of streams, 0.021
acres of wetland, 1,370 SF of Zone 1 buffers and 1,250 SF of Zone 2 buffers. Since the purpose of this project is to
replace existing sewer lines, no new flows or growth are being accommodated.
The proposed impacts are in an area that has existing deteriorated sewer lines, as shown on the plans. We are
proposing to re-route the sewer because some of the existing sewer is located along the bank of the channel, and most
of it is within zone 1 buffers. Some of the existing pipe is also laid above ground as a temporary repair measure. We
attempted to route the sewer completely outside of the buffers, but in this case the line would have to be aerial to do so,
so we elected to use ferrous pipe at a shallow depth, as can be seen in the profile views of the enclosed drawings.
We hope that the enclosed information facilitates a timely review. Should you have any questions or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to call our office or email me at mpaciniPdmp-inc.com. We appreciate your
assistance in this matter and look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
uricio M. Pacin*, EI
C: Mr. Larry Thomas, City of Oxford
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE (enc)
File (enc)
aF w A rk-
o?'? 0 9- 1 0 3 6 Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
?-f
o DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: X Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? (under review) ? Yes X No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes X No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes X No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: City of Oxford, 2009 Sewer System Rehabilitations
2b. County: Granville
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Oxford

0
I- L% mrp
2d. Subdivision name: N/A UU Li V LE;
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: P 2 9 2009
3.

sM0' SM WATER j4
y
Ud*
Owner Information WFMAAp
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: ,,,
City of Oxford
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: P.O. Box 1307
3e. City, state, zip: Oxford, NC 27565
3f. Telephone no.: 919-603-1100
3g. Fax no.: 919-603-1107
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent X Other, specify: Engineering Consultant
4b. Name: Mauricio M. Pacini
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Davis-Martin-Powell & Associates
4d. Street address: 6415 Old Plank Road
4e. City, state, zip: High Point, NC 27103
4f. Telephone no.: 336-886-4821
4g. Fax no.: 336-886-4458
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): SC1: N36.3049°, W78.5819°
°
°
SC2: N36.3079
, W78.6031
1 c. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Fishing Creek, Index # 28-11
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW
2c. River basin: Tar-Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing sewer lines in residential areas, lightly wooded.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
No wetlands on sewer corridors.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 60 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Replacement of existing sewer lines which are deteriorated and sources of significant 1/I.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Pipeline installation will be via trenching methods utilizing track mounted excavators and dozers. All proposed channel
crossings will be stabilized immediately upon crossing and wetland areas crossed will be returned to pre- construction
grades and seeded w/native vegetation species.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / X Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: <Under review by Corps>
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Ecosystems
Name (if known): Phil May Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ? No X Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
X Wetlands X Streams - tributaries X Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T

W1 ?PXT Excavation & ? Yes X Corps
021
0
Stabilization ? No ? DWO .
W2 ? PMT ? Yes ? Corps
?No ?DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.021 ac
2h. Comments: Impacts to this wetland could not be avoided, due to the location of the ex. sewer system which the prop.
System must tie into.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - or
(PER)
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P XT Temp. Exc. & UT to Foundry X PER X Corps
15
40
Stab. Branch ? INT X DWQ
S2 ? P XT Temp. Exc. & UT to Foundry X PER X Corps
20
20
Stab. Branch ? INT X DWQ
S3 ? P ? T Temp. Exc. & ? PER ? Corps
Stab. ? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T Temp. Exc. & ? PER ? Corps
Stab. ? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T Temp. Exc. & ? PER ? Corps
Stab. ? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 50 LF
3i. Comments: Areas of construction corridor within buffers and stream crossings shall be only temporarily disturbed and the
City shall only maintain a 10-foot wide corridor within said areas.
Page 4 of 10
4. Open Water Impacts <None>
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction <None>
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse X Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or impact Stream name mitigation (square feet
(square feet)
Temporary T required?
B1 ? P X T Sewer
Replacement UT to Foundry Branch X? No s 1,370 1,250
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 1,370 SF 1,250 SF
6i. Comments: Buffers shall be re-vegetated with native species upon completion of pipe installation. Impacts have been
minimized as much as possible considering how shallow prop. Line must be. Please refer to profiles on drawings.
Page 5 of 10
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Required stream crossings are proposed to be made as near perpendicular as possible and alignments have been shifted
where possible to minimize impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Banks shall be stabilized immediately following pipe installation. Only minimum required length of stream shall be
impacted.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
? payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
No new impervious surface is being adding.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ® No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project does not include any development, as it is designed to replace existing sewer serving existing homes only.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Proposed project is replacement of existing outfall with ultimate treatment at the City of Oxford WWTP.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
F-1 Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Please find attached map of Granville County species printed from http://www.fws.gov
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ? No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Website
Mark Donham, City Manager S" Z Y
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Area 4 - Oxford Sewer Rehabilitation Date: 5/12/09
Applicant / Owner: DMP/City of Oxford County: Granville
Investigator: Phil May - Carolina Ecosystems. Inc. State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes M No ? Community ID: UR
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes B No Z Transect ID: WA
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes L1 No Plot ID: 102
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant $DecieS Stratum Indicator
1.Liauidambar stvraciflua T FAC+ 9. Parthenocissus auinguefolia V/H FAC
2. Platanus occidentalis T FACW- 10.
3. Acer rubrum T FAC 11.
4. Lieustrum sinense S FAC 12.
5. Rosa multiflora S UPL 13.
6. Rubus sm S 14.
7. Toxicodendron radicans V/H FAC 15.
8. Lonicera ianonica V FAC- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 670/,
Remarks:
Disturbed slope below residential lawns. Invasives like poison ivy dominating understory.
HYDROLOGY
II Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
n Other ? Inundated
El Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks
El Drift Lines
Field Observations: D Sediment Deposits
n Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: Win.) II Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
II Water-Stained Leaves
II Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 1 FAC-Neutral Test
II Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
No hydrology indicators
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Appling-Urban land complex, 2-10% Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Topic Kanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes 7 No II
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0 A 10 YR 3/2 Loam
3 B 2.5 Y 5/3 10 YR 5/3 Few, large Loamy sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
L1 Histosol n Concretions
L1 Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
j] Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No E]
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No JR
Hydric Soils Present? Yes II No JK
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Area 4 - Oxford Sewer Rehabilitation Date: 5/12/09
Applicant / Owner: DMP/City of Oxford County: Granville
Investigator: Phil May - Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes E No II Community ID: Wet
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No N Transect ID: WA
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes [1 No Plot ID: 102
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.Liguidambar styraciflua T FAC+ 9.
2. Platanus occidentalis T FACW- 10.
3. LiQustrum sinense S FAC 11.
4. Toxicodendron radicans V FAC 12.
5. Parthenocissus guinguefolia V FAC 13.
6. Lonicera iaponica V FAC- 14.
7. Impatiens capensis H FACW 15.
8. Carex sp. H 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 75%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
II Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
L] Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other 7 Inundated
0 Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available II Water Marks
II Drift Lines
Field Observations: II Sediment Deposits
Z Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: - (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
IR Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6 in.) Water-Stained Leaves
ID Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 1 (in.) Z FAC-Neutral Test
ID Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Aimling-Urban land complex, 2-10% Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No ?
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0 Al 10YR 5/2 Sandy loam
2 Bl 2.5 YR 5/2 2.5 Y 3/3 Common, distinct Clay loam
10 B2 5Y 4/1 Loamy sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
13 Histosol ? Concretions
II Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor n Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
II Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
J? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 7 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes JK No R
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No II
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes E No II
Remarks:

0
=--.. 111 `?
x
Soil Map-Granville County, North Carolina
(OXFORD NC)
to
F- 38° 20'42"

1
i

F
4
f
38° 16' 32"
USDA Natural Resources
rIfIIIIIIII Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 8/10/2009
National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
n
Map Scale: 1:21,300 if printed on 8 size (11' x 17') sheet ?
1`
N Meters
0 100 200 400 600
Feet
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000