Clemmonsville Rd, W-S (3)

Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Project Review Form
Project Number: 10-0100 County: Forsyth Date Received: 09/12/2009
Due Date: 10/21/2009
Project Description: Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact - City of
Winston-Salem working with NCDOT for the proposed Clemmonsville Road
project in Forsyth County. TIP No. U-2923--

3 K. M m tcate a ow:
C I ro?e?s emg review.
Regional Office Regional Office Area In-House Review
Asheville Air - Soil & Water - Marine Fisheries
_
_ Fayetteville Water - Coastal Management _ Water Resources
Mooresville Aquifer Protection - Wildlife - Environmental Health
_
_ Raleigh Land Quality Engineer ? Wildlife - DOT VI"ASolid Waste Mgmt
Forest Resources - Radiation Protection
Washington -
_ Land Resources Other
Wilmington -
- Parks & Recreation
Winston-Salem
Water Quality
?.-`= Watmgiiality=DOT _

- Air Quality
Sign-Off/Region:
ouse Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
No objection to project as proposed. - No Comment
Insufficient information to complete review - Other (specify or attach comments)
If you have any questions, please contact:
Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator at [e-mail]
- t: r 1 9 2009

Clemmonsville Road (SR 2747) Improvements
from
Old Salisbury Road (SR 3011)
to
South Main Street
Forsyth County
State Project 9.8091853
TIP Project U-2923
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
State Environmental Assessment / Finding of No Significant Impact
North Carolina Department of Transportation
And
City of Winston-Salem
For further information contact:
Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD
Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
APPROVED:
'611361,99 rl?
Date Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD
?U? Manager, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch

Clcmmonsville Road (SR 2747) Improvements
from
Old Salisbury Road (SR 3011)
to
South Main Street
Forsyth County
State Project 9.8091853
TIP Project U-2923
State Environmental Assessment / Finding of No Significant Impact
Document prepared by Earth Tech for NCDOT and 4hrr??j?y of Winston-Salem:
Earth Tech of North Carolina, Inc. ?tnd?.FN
=,?,ry9R,?n
B
City of Wi n Salem
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Clemmonsville Road (SR 2747) Improvements
From Old Salisbury Road (SR 3011) to South Main Street
Forsyth County
State Project 9.8091853
TIP Project U-2923
State Environmental Assessment / Finding of No Significant Impact
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTMENTS
The City of Winston Salem will take over maintenance of Clemmonsville Road from
South Main Street to Old Salisbury Road, pending City Council approval (see the
April 28, 2009 letter included in the Appendix). Pending the Winston Salem City
Council's approval, Clemmonsville Road will be transferred from the State system to the
City system.
Fourteen foot wide through lanes are proposed as shared use lanes to accommodate
bicyclists.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will use Best Management Practices
for the protection of surface waters. All standard procedures and measures will be
implemented to avoid and minimize environmental impacts.
14W
Clemmonsville Road (SR 2747) Improvements
From Old Salisbury Road (SR 3011) to South Main Street
Forsyth County
State Project 9.8091853
TIP Project U-2923
SUMMARY
1. Type of Action - This State Environmental Assessment / Finding of No Significant
Impact has been prepared for the widening of SR 2747 (Clemmonsville Road) from
SR 3011 (Old Salisbury Road) to South Main Street. The design and construction of the
proposed project is being administered by the City of Winston-Salem, but the project is
included in and being funded through NCDOT's Transportation Improvement Program.
2. Description of Action - The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT),
Division of Highways, and the City of Winston-Salem propose to widen Clemmonsville
Road (SR 2747) in Winston- Salem from Old Salisbury Road (SR 3011) to South Main
Street (See Figures 1 and 2). The total proposed project length is 1.9 miles. The
proposed project would widen existing SR 2747 (Clemmonsville Road) to three lanes to
accommodate left-turn movements. In addition, intersections would be improved by
providing larger turning radii and reworking intersections to eliminate offsets.
Roundabouts are proposed at the ramp termini of the Peters Creek Parkway interchange
and at the intersection of Sides Road and Clemmonsville Road. In addition, the project
would accommodate bicyclists through the provision of wider through lanes for shared
motorist / bicyclist use.
This project is included in the 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP). Right-of-way acquisition is scheduled to begin in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2009,
and construction is scheduled to begin in FFY 2011. The TIP cost estimate for the project
is $9,940,000, which includes $315,000 for preliminary engineering, $2,325,000 for
right-of-way, and $7,300,000 for construction.
3. Alternatives Considered - Project U-2923 is a Transportation Systems Management
type of improvement. As such, no new location alternatives were considered. The No-
Build Alternative was considered, but it was rejected since it would not address the
congestion and delays caused by lack of left-tum lanes on the existing facility. A five-
lane facility was also considered but rejected because of the high level of impacts to
homes and businesses along Clemmonsville Road.
4. Summary of Environmental Effects - The proposed project is part of the mutually
adopted 2030 Winston-Salem Urban Area Long-Range Transportation Plan. The
proposed project will not impact any farmland, streams, wetlands, or threatened or
endangered species. The project will not relocate any businesses, but will relocate an

Table of Contents
SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... ii
1. Description of Proposed Action ............................................................................ ... 1
A. General Description .............................................................................................. .. 1
B. Historical Resume and Project Status ................................................................... .. I
C. Right-of-Way and Construction Costs and Schedule ........................................... .. I
II. Purpose and Need for Project .............................................................................. 2
A. Purpose of Project ................................................................................................. .. 2
B. Need for Project .................................................................................................... ..2
1. Description of Existing Conditions ................................................................... .. 2
2. Transportation and Land Use Plans .................................................................. .. 5
3. System Linkage/Travel Time/Access Need ...................................................... .. 7
C. Benefits of Proposed Project ................................................................................. .. 8
III. Alternatives .......................................................................................................... ..9
A. Preliminary Study Alternatives ............................................................................. .. 9
I. Alternative Modes of Transportation ................................................................ .. 9
2. Transportation Systems Management (TSM) ................................................... .. 9
3. Do-Nothing Alternative .................................................................................... 10
B. Detailed Study Alternative .................................................................................... 10
C. Recommended Alternative .................................................................................... 10
IV. Proposed Improvements ..................................................................................... 11
V. Environmental Effects of Proposed Action .......................................................... 12
A. Natural Resources ................................................................................................. 12
1. Physical Resources ............................................................................................ 12
2. Biotic Resources ............................................................................................... 12
3. Jurisdictional Topics ......................................................................................... 13
B. Cultural Resources ................................................................................................ 14
C. Section 6(f) ............................................................................................................ 14
D. Farmland ............................................................................................................... 15
E. Social Effects ........................................................................................................ 15
1. Neighborhoods/Communities ........................................................................... 15
2. Relocation of Residences and Businesses ......................................................... 15
iv
L Description of Proposed Action
A. General Description
The proposed project will reduce travel delays on SR 2747 (Clemmonsville Road) in
Winston-Salem, from SR 3011 (Old Salisbury Road) to South Main Street, a distance of 1.9
miles. The proposed project would widen existing SR 2747 (Clemmonsville Road) to three
lanes to accommodate left-tum movements. In addition, intersections would be improved by
providing larger turning radii and reworking intersections to eliminate offsets. Roundabouts
are proposed at the ramp termini of the Peters Creek Parkway interchange and at the
intersection of Sides Road and Clemmonsville Road. In addition, the project would
accommodate bicyclists through the provision of wider through lanes for shared motorist /
bicyclist use. See Figure I for the project's location.
B. Historical Resume and Project Status
The project was initiated in the mid 1990s by NCDOT, resulting in a State Environmental
Assessment approved on December 15, 1997. The preferred alternative in that document was
a five-lane roadway along the existing alignment.
Input from representatives of the City of Winston-Salem was received as a part of the review
of the 1997 document. Their concerns focused on the property and neighborhood impacts that
would result from widening to a five-lane roadway. In lieu of the five-lane improvements, the
City of Winston-Salem suggested the Department widen SR 2747 (Clemmonsville Road) to a
three-lane section with some additional intersection improvements, as is currently proposed.
Although these improvements will not provide the same benefits to through motorists that a
five-lane section would, the three-lane roadway will accommodate traffic volumes better than
the existing two-lane facility and can be constructed without major impacts to the surrounding
neighborhoods and community.
C. Right-of-Way and Construction Costs and Schedule
This project is included in the 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
Right-of-way acquisition is scheduled to begin in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2009, and
construction is scheduled to begin in FFY 2011. The TIP cost estimate for the project is
$9,940,000, which includes $315,000 for preliminary engineering, $2,325,000 for right-of-
way, and $7,300,000 for construction. The project cost estimate was updated during the
preparation of this environmental document. Construction of the three-lane improvements is
anticipated to cost $5,700,000. Adding anticipated right of way costs ($2,325,000), the total
project cost is anticipated to be $8,025,000.
I ,
(3) Right-of-Way and Access Control
Based on on-site inspections, the right of way on Clemmonsville Road varies from 40 to
60 feet. There is no control-of-access along SR 2747 (Clemmonsville Road).
(4) Speed Limit
The existing posted speed limit is 35 miles-per-hour. Near the western end of the project,
there is a school zone speed limit of 25 miles-per-hour during posted times.
(5) Intersections4nierchanges
Intersections at SR 3011, Sides Road, Brewer Road, Konnoak Drive, and South Main Street
are signalized. There is an interchange at NC 150 (Peters Creek Parkway). All other
intersections are stop sign controlled.
(6) Railroad Crossings
There are no railroads or railroad crossings along the project.
(7) Structures
Bridge Number 107, which carries SR 2747 (Clemmonsville Road) over NC 150, is 185 feet
long with a clear roadway width of 28 feet. The bridge was constructed in 1956 and has a
sufficiency rating of 80 on a 100 point scale. The bridge is not considered structurally
deficient. There are no box culverts crossing under SR 2747 (Clemmonsville Road) within
the project limits.
(8) Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities/Greenways
There are no existing sidewalks along SR 2747 (Clemmonsville Road). SR 2747
(Clemmonsville Road) is not designated as a bicycle route.
(9) Utilities
The proposed project is expected to have an impact on utilities. The following utilities are
located within the project corridor: water and sewer (City of Winston-Salem), electricity
(Duke Power), natural gas (Piedmont Natural Gas), phone (AT&T), and cable TV.
c) School Bus Usage
Currently, a total of 99 school buses travel on SR 2747 (Clemmonsville Road) twice daily.
d) Traffic Operations
The vehicle capacity of a roadway facility is the maximum number of vehicles which can
reasonably be expected to traverse a point or a uniform section of a lane or roadway during a
given time period under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions. Capacity analysis
examines these roadway sections during peak volume periods, usually a.m. and p.m. rush
hours. Highway capacity is expressed in vehicles per hour (vph). As traffic volumes near the
capacity of a roadway, travel delays increase.
3

the left turn lane between intersections will reduce delays that currently arise from motorists
that must stop in the through lanes to turn left into minor streets and driveways.
The proposed roundabout at Sides Street increases vehicle delays above those created by a
traffic signal. However, a roundabout is proposed at this location due to the intersection's
proximity to the Peters Creek Parkway roundabouts and the need to prevent queues from the
Sides Street intersection from interfering with their operation.
e) Other Highway Projects in the Area
There are no highway projects currently under construction near TIP Project U-2923.
TIP Project R-4750 is close to the eastern end of TIP Project U-2923. It upgrades existing
US 52 (Future I-285) to Interstate Highway standards.
2. Transportation and Land Use Plans
a) North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
This project is included in the 2009-2015 TIP. Right-of-way is scheduled to begin in Federal
Fiscal Year 2009, and construction is scheduled to begin in Federal Fiscal Year 2011. The TIP
cost estimate for the project is $9,940,000, which includes $315,000 for preliminary
engineering, $2,325,000 for right-of-way, and $7,300,000 for construction.
b) Transportation Plans
The Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is responsible
for carrying out the transportation planning process in the Winston-Salem Urban Area. The
MPO is an organization consisting of the Transportation Advisory Committee JAC);
Transportation Advisory Committee Staff; the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT); and the various agencies and units of local and State government participating in
transportation planning for the area.
Cooperatively, the MPO works with NCDOT to develop transportation plans, travel models,
highway and collector plans, transit plans, and bicycle and pedestrian plans. In addition, the
MPO works with the State on funding issues for transportation improvements, on project
planning issues, and on issues such as environmental impacts and air quality. The MPO also
works with local governments to coordinate land use and transportation planning.
The project is included in the 2030 Winston-Salem Urban Area Long-Range Transportation
Plan. The long-range transportation plan identifies facilities (including but not limited to
major roadways, transit, and intermodal components) that function as an integrated regional
system. The plan includes both short- and long-term actions that develop and maintain an
integrated, intermodal transportation system that is accessible and that efficiently moves
people and goods. The transportation plan was developed with input from the public and was
coordinated with transportation providers including regional airports, rail-freight operators,
and others within the area. The transportation plan reflects land use, environmental, and
intermodal considerations and provides a financially constrained vision of future
transportation investments.
5
,
A Legacy for Forsyth County, North Carolina, including any specifically related land use
plans, development guides, and the Transportation Plan.
All the area within a zoning jurisdiction of an adopting jurisdiction is divided into zoning
districts within which the use of land and water areas, the location, height, bulk and use of
structures, the provision of parking and loading areas, and other development requirements
are regulated.
The Official Zoning Maps show the boundaries of all zoning districts within the planning
jurisdiction of the adopting jurisdiction.
3. System Linkage/Travel Time/Access Need
a) Existing Roadway Network
SR 2747, classified as an Urban Collector, is connected to the area's arterial network through
US 52 (Future I-285) and NC 150. US 52 (Future 1-285) is functionally classified as an Urban
Freeway/Expressway, and is proposed to be upgraded to Interstate Highway standards.
NC 150 is functionally classified as an Urban Minor Arterial.
b) Commuting Patterns
SR 2747 provides both land access service and traffic circulation within residential
neighborhoods and commercial areas. Traffic data shows there is a directional volume
difference between the morning and evening peak hours.
c) Public Transportation
Public transportation in the project vicinity is provided by the Winston-Salem Transit
Authority (WSTA). WSTA transports 10,000 people daily. They have 27 weekly routes,
operating between 5:30 a.m. and 12:00 midnight Monday through Friday and from 6:30 a.m.
through 6:30 p.m. on Saturday. WSTA provides the following services:
• Fixed Route. WSTA has bus stops throughout the city. Bus stop locations are placed
every few blocks along regular routes. WSTA operates 27 weekday bus routes, 2
connector routes, a park & shuttle route for downtown commuters, a downtown
trolley, 7 late night service routes, and 18 Saturday routes. All routes are wheelchair
accessible, and all buses have bike racks.
• Trans-AID. WSTA provides curb-to-curb service for eligible disabled and elderly
residents of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County.
• Mobility Manager. Any passengers in need of information regarding Fixed-route bus
service times, bus stop location, etc., and eligible persons who wish to use Trans-AID
services to schedule trips in advance of the day they wish to travel can call the
Mobility Management Department. In addition, the service will plan trips for riders.
• West End Trolley. WSTA's Downtown West End Trolley (WET) provides convenient,
inexpensive and nostalgic transportation to the offices, hotels, shops and banks of
downtown Winston-Salem. The Downtown WET runs approximately every 20
minutes, Monday through Friday from 7:20 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
7

III. Alternatives
A. Preliminary Study Alternatives
1. Alternative Modes of Transportation
a) Travel Demand Management (TDM)
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Alternatives provide additional options such as
fringe parking, ride-sharing, high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, use of taxis and other
demand-responsive services, automobile restraints, changes in work schedules, and the like.
TDM actions alone generally do not resolve problems associated with high traffic volumes.
They are most effective when incorporated with other construction projects and land use
policies that meet community goals.
A substantial amount of traffic is accessing residential neighborhoods and commercial areas
in the project area. TDM strategies would inhibit access to the adjacent properties, thus, not
fulfilling the purpose and need of this project.
b) Mass Transit
The only practical mass transit alternative at this time is bus service. Based on historical
ridership trends, it is unlikely that bus service alone would meet the purpose and need.
Features of the Preferred Alternative that would make bus service more attractive in the
project vicinity include:
• Reduced travel times.
• Bicycle accommodations would make WSTA's Bike & Ride service more attractive.
• Reduced congestion.
Light rail transit within a usable distance from the corridor could be a viable option if
incorporated into an extensive and well developed rail transit system. Light rail along the
project's study corridor alone will not accommodate the 2030 travel demand. There are
currently no specific light rail plans in the transportation plans for the Winston-Salem
metropolitan area.
Express lanes are not a viable alternative because of the local nature of travel within the
corridor. In addition, Express lanes would most likely be more environmentally damaging
than the preferred alternative due to their larger footprint.
2. Transportation Systems Management (TSM)
Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Alternatives address short-term, low-cost
operational improvements aiming for a better use of existing facilities. TSM alternatives
include engineering measures such as signal timing optimization, construction of turning
lanes, installation of medians, installation of median openings, median opening closures, ramp
metering, etc. TSM actions alone generally do not resolve problems associated with high
9

IV. Proposed Improvements
Roadway Cross-section and Alignment. The proposed roadway alignment generally follows
the existing roadway alignment, although, there are deviations from the existing center line in
order to minimize impacts to adjacent properties and improve intersections. The overall
typical roadway width would be 40 feet, consisting of two through-lanes, 14 feet in width, and
a center turn lane, 12 feet in width. The wide through-lanes are provided to serve as a shared
use lanes for motorists and bicyclists. The proposed typical sections includes curb and gutter
and 12-foot wide berms to accommodate utilities.
Right-of-Way and Access Control. The typical proposed right-of-way width is 68 feet. No
access control is proposed.
Speed Limit. The proposed speed limit is 35 miles-per-hour.
Design Speed. The design speed is 40 miles-per-hour.
Anticipated Design Exceptions. There are no anticipated design exceptions.
Intersections/Interchanges. There will be intersection improvements along the project.
Improvements consist of realignments and controls. Three Roundabouts will be constructed:
two at the Peters Creek Parkway interchange ramp intersections and one at the Sides Road
intersection.
Service Roads. There are no service roads associated with this project.
Railroad Crossings. There are no railroad crossings on this project.
Structures. There is an existing bridge at the Peters Creek Parkway interchange which
carries Clemmonsville Road traffic over Peters Creek Parkway. The bridge has a clear
roadway width of 28 feet. The bridge was constructed in 1956 and has a sufficiency rating of
80 on a 100 point scale. The bridge is not considered structurally deficient. No
improvements to the bridge are proposed as a part of this project.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities. Bicycles would be accommodated with wide (14-foot)
shared-use through-lanes. The project includes construction of 12-foot wide berms behind the
curb. This berm could be used to accommodate future sidewalks. Pedestrian cross-walks will
be provided.
Utilities. There are utility lines in the corridor that will need to be relocated. Present in the
corridor includes water and sewer (City of Winston-Salem), electricity (Duke Power), phone
(AT&T), and cable TV.
Landscaping. Disturbed areas will be landscaped with grass. Special plantings are not
planned at this time.
Noise Barriers. No noise barriers will be incorporated into this project.
A plan view of the proposed project is shown in Figure 2. The typical section is shown in
Figure 3.
3. Jurisdictional Topics
a) Surface Waters and Wetlands
No jurisdictional surface waters or jurisdictional wetlands are present in the project corridor.
b) Permits
It will not be necessary to obtain a permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers for this
project. This project will not require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Department
of Environment and Natural Resources.
c) Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with a federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed
Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section 7
and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The US Fish and Wildlife
Services list three species (list updated January 31, 2008) under federal protection for Forsyth
County. Table 4 lists each species, its status, and biological conclusion.
Table 4. Federally Protected Species in Forsyth County
Common Name Scientific Name Status Biological
Conclusion
Vertebrates
Bog turtle Clemm s muhlenbe ii T(S/A N/A
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis E No Effect
Vascular Plants
Small-anthered bittereress Cardomine micranthero E No Effect
Notes: E Endangered-A species that is threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
Threatened-A species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout
T all or a significant portion of its range.
Similarity of Appearance-Threatened due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for
T(S/A) its protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7
consultation
USFWS - List updated January 31, 2008, Accessed May 23, 2008
A brief description of the characteristics and habitat requirements of each species follows,
along with a conclusion regarding potential project impact. Biologists surveyed the project
area in May, 2008.
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) No Effect
Red-cockaded woodpeckers prefer open park-like pine stands with little undergrowth but may
also be found in dense pocosin where pines (usually over 60 years old) are available for nest
and roost cavities. Longleaf pine is the preferred species in this region although the birds will
utilize other species. The mature pine stands in the project area consist of Virginia pines with
a dense understory of hardwood trees. This type of habitat is typically avoided and would not
serve as either nesting or foraging habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker. In addition, no
occurrences of the red-cockaded woodpecker within the project vicinity were found in the
NHP files. Therefore, it can be concluded that the project will not impact this endangered
species.
13

usefulness and location' can be ensured. The Natural Heritage Program is the designated
administering agency for the LWCF in North Carolina. No properties where Section 6(f)
funds have been used will be impacted by the project.
D. Farmland
The project is wholly within the limits of the City of Winston-Salem, and all land within the
general vicinity of the proposed project is currently planned, zoned and used for urban land
use activities. No farmlands will be impacted.
E. Social Effects
A community impact assessment was conducted for the proposed project. The Direct
Community Impact Assessment Area (DCIA) for the project is shown in Figure 5.
1. Neighborhoods/Communities
The proposed project will result in direct displacements of some single-family homes along
the corridor, but the project is expected to have an overall positive effect on community
stability and neighborhood cohesion. The addition of wide outside lanes to accommodate
bicycles will improve non-motorized mobility in the area. Roadway improvements will
improve traffic flow and property access, while not substantially affecting pedestrian and
bicycle mobility.
The proposed project is not expected to adversely affect community cohesion, create physical
or psychological barriers to neighborhoods, or significantly alter land use patterns.
2. Relocation of Residences and Businesses
The project will require additional right-of-way, resulting in the loss of some portion of
property use adjacent to the roadway. Based on current design concepts, it is anticipated there
will be five residential relocations. One of these relocations is located northeast of the
intersection of Clemmonsville Road and Brewer Road. The other four relocations lie along
the south side of existing Clemmonsville Road, west of Emma Avenue. There are no
anticipated impacts to graves at the cemetery located at Advent Moravian Church.
3. Environmental Justice
Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, there are requirements that protect special
populations from any type of discrimination on the grounds of race, age, color, religion,
disability, sex, and national origin. Along with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice) states that federal programs cannot have a
disproportionately high adverse human health and environmental effect on minority and low-
income populations. Environmental Justice states the equitable treatment of people of all
races, cultures, ages, and incomes during development, implement and enforcement of
environmental laws, regulations and policies. Other special populations may include the
elderly, children, the disabled, low-income people, and minority groups.
15
4. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
There currently are no bicycle facilities or sidewalks along the corridor. The project would
provide wide outside lanes to help accommodate bicycles.
5. Recreational Facilities
The Georgia E. Taylor Recreation Center and associated athletic fields are the only public
recreational facilities along the project corridor. The recreational facilities include a computer
lab, meeting rooms, playground, tennis courts, and softball field. The softball field is located
just west of the Griffith Academy school building and adjoins the existing roadway right-of-
way. There will be no impact to the ball field as all widening through this area is proposed
along the south side of Clemmonsville Road.
Krites Field (private), owned by South Little League, Inc., is located south of the project, east
of Krites Street (see Figure 2B). The proposed project will not impact the use of the baseball
field. However, a narrow strip of right of way (approximately 13 feet wide) will be required
from the unpaved field used as its parking lot.
6. Other Public Facilities and Services
Griffith Elementary School and Griffith Academy are public schools located along
Clemmonsville Road near the western end of the project. Konnoak Elementary School is
located on Renon Road about 1,500 feet north of Clemmonsville Road. There are several
daycare and preschools along the project corridor. The Griffith Elementary School and
Griffith Academy school buildings will not be impacted. Construction of the pavement and
curb and gutter will be contained within the existing right-of-way; however, fill slopes for the
berm behind the curb and gutter will require an easement from the school property.
Five churches are located directly on Clemmonsville Road: First Alliance Church, Advent
Moravian Church, Heavenview United Pentecostal Church, Parkway Baptist Church, and
Rosemont Baptist Church. There is a cemetery next to Advent Moravian Church (noted on
Figure 2).
First Alliance Church is located just west of Old Salisbury Road and will not be impacted.
Advent Moravian Church and adjacent cemetery are located just east of Old Salisbury Road,
and will not be impacted as all widening is planned to take place along the south side of
Clemmonsville Road. Heavenview United Pentecostal Church is across the road from
Griffith Academy, and a narrow strip of right-of-way and some slope easements will needed.
Impacts at this church will be minimal. Parkway Baptist Church, located at the intersection of
Sides Road and Clemmonsville Road, will lose a small triangular area for sight distance at the
proposed roundabout. The project will not affect the Rosemont Baptist Church building, but a
narrow strip of land and slope easements will be required from an area of on-street diagonal
parking that is partly on existing right-of-way and partly on church property. Overall, impacts
to the churches are minimal.
There is a small shopping center with outlying businesses just west of the project beginning at
Old Salisbury Road. A large strip mall development lies along the east side of NC 150. The
project will not impact these strip shopping centers. At the end of the project, there is a small
collection of gas stations and retail at the intersection of S. Main Street. In the northwest
quadrant, a narrow strip of right-of-way varying from one to three feet in width will be
17
Furthermore, as the land and community in the general vicinity of the proposed project is
already developed and well established with a variety of land uses, the widened road will do
little to add to the cumulative effects already in present in the area.
J. Flood Hazard Evaluation
No flood hazard zones are crossed by this project.
K. Traffic Noise Analysis
Traffic noise analysis was conducted to determine the effect the proposed project will have on
noise levels in the immediate project area. This analysis includes an inventory of existing
noise-sensitive land uses and a comparison of the predicted noise levels and existing noise
levels to determine if traffic noise impacts would occur as a result of the project.
The level of highway traffic noise depends on three things: (1) the volume of the traffic, (2)
the speed of the traffic, and (3) the number of trucks in the flow of the traffic. Generally, the
loudness of traffic noise is increased by heavier traffic volumes, higher speeds, and greater
numbers of trucks. Since the project will not add new travel lanes, the overall capacity of the
road will not be altered substantially. Vehicle noise is a combination of the noises produced
by the engine, exhaust, and tires. The loudness of traffic noise can also be increased by
defective mufflers or other faulty equipment on vehicles. Any condition (such as a steep
incline) that causes heavy laboring of motor vehicle engines will also increase traffic noise
levels. In addition, there are other, more complicated factors that affect the loudness of traffic
noise. For example, as a person moves away from a highway, traffic noise levels are reduced
by distance, terrain, vegetation, and natural and manmade obstacles. Traffic noise is not
usually a serious problem for people who live more than 500 feet from heavily traveled
freeways or more than 100 to 200 feet from lightly traveled roads.
Traffic noise impacts occur if the predicted design year noise levels approach or exceed levels
shown for each land use activity category in Table 7. The North Carolina Department of
Transportation defines "approach" as within 1 dBA of the Leq(h) value for the activity
category.
19
When traffic noise impacts are predicted, examination and evaluation of alternative noise
abatement measures for reducing or eliminating the noise impacts must be considered.
Consideration for noise abatement measures must be given to all impacted receivers.
a) Highway Alignment
Highway alignment selection involves locating the horizontal or vertical orientation of the
proposed improvements in such a way as to minimize impacts and costs. The selection of
alternative alignments for noise abatement purposes must consider the balance between noise
impacts and other engineering and environmental parameters. For noise abatement, horizontal
alignment selection is primarily a matter of siting the roadway at a sufficient distance from
noise sensitive areas.
Changing the highway alignment for this project is not a viable alternative for noise
abatement, because noise receivers are adjacent to both sides of the roadway project. A shift
in either the horizontal or vertical alignments would cause greater relocation impacts as well
as impacting the general character of the area.
b) Traffic System Management Measures
Traffic system management measures that limit vehicle type, speed, volume, and time-of-
operations can be effective noise abatement measures in certain circumstances
Traffic system management measures for this project are not a viable noise abatement
alternative. Limiting vehicle type would not be effective due to the low volume of medium
and heavy trucks already using the road. Limiting truck traffic, speed, volume, or time-of-
operations are not viable as they are in direct conflict with the project's purpose of improving
traffic service to all destinations along SR 2747 (Clemmonsville Road).
c) Noise Barriers
Physical measures to abate traffic noise levels can often be applied with a measurable degree
of success by the application of noise barriers to effectively diffract, absorb, and reflect
highway traffic noise emissions. Noise barriers may include earth berms or noise walls.
For a noise barrier to provide sufficient noise reduction it must be high enough and long
enough to shield the receiver from significant sections of the highway. Access openings in the
barrier severely reduce the noise reduction provided by the barrier. It then becomes
economically unreasonable to construct a barrier for a small noise reduction. Safety at access
openings (driveways, crossing streets, etc.) due to restricted sight distance is also a concern.
Furthermore, to provide a sufficient reduction, a barrier's length would normally be eight
times the distance from the barrier to the receiver.
Noise walls for traffic noise abatement would preclude access to adjacent homes and
businesses served by Clemmonsville Road, and thus would not be an acceptable abatement
measure.
d) "Do-Nothing" Alternative
The "Do-Nothing" Alternative will not provide the reductions in travel delays and associated
congestion that will be provided by the proposed project. The increases in traffic noise are
anticipated to be small.
21
limited to, underground storage tanks (USTs), hazardous waste sites, regulated landfills, and
unregulated dumpsites. No asbestos survey was conducted.
Based on the findings of the field reconnaissance and information review, six sites were
identified that may contain USTs (Sites 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 on Figure 8). Current plans
indicate that no additional right-of-way will be acquired from three of these sites. At the
remaining three sites where right-of-way will be acquired, potential environmental concerns
may be present and additional information is needed. These sites are described as follows:
Dallas Brown Garage (Site 3) - At least one, and possibly three, USTs and one former pump
island exist near the garage. A geophysical survey is recommended to determine the number
and location of the tanks. Following the geophysical survey, soil samples are recommended
for analysis if this area of the corridor is in a cut section or right-of-way is purchased in fee
simple.
Frieda's Antiques (Site 4) - Although no visual evidence of USTs was noted, the property
layout may be indicative of a former gas station. A geophysical survey is recommended to
determine if underground tanks are present. Following the geophysical survey, soil samples
are recommended for analysis if USTs are detected and right-of-way is purchased in fee
simple.
Konnoak Texaco (Site 5) - The Konnoak Texaco is an active gas station with four USTs.
None of the USTs appear to be within the corridor, but the pump island located in the
northeast comer of the site is within the sight distance triangle area to be acquired as right-of-
way. Soil sampling and analysis of this area is recommended if this area is in a cut section or
if right-of-way is purchased in fee simple.
VI. Comments and Coordination
A. Citizens Informational Workshop
Three Citizens Informational Workshops or public meetings were held for the proposed
project The first Citizens Informational Workshop was held by NCDOT in 1996. The
meeting was held at Independence High School and presented the project as a five-lane
widening project. Approximately twenty people attended the workshop. During the
preparation of the environmental document, the City of Winston-Salem requested the North
Carolina Department of Transportation consider constructing a three-lane typical section
rather than the five-lane. At the time, the City was concerned that the five-lane typical would
impact too many homes. The scope of the project was subsequently changed, accordingly.
In July 2005, the City of Winston-Salem held a public meeting and presented the three-lane
project concept. Seven written comments were received. Three of these comment sheets
presented support for the additional lane and roundabouts. Other comments included right of
way / property acquisition concerns, the need to replace the bridge over Peters Creek
Parkway, the need for sidewalks, and the need for a traffic signal at Clinard Road.
An additional public meeting was held on March 26, 2009 to discuss the project. The meeting
was held at the Georgia E. Taylor Neighborhood Recreation Center. Approximately 63
people attended the meeting. Seven written comments were received in response to this
23
VII. Basis for State Environmental Assessment / Finding of No Significant
Impact
On the basis of planning and environmental studies conducted, it is determined the proposed
project will not have significant adverse effects upon the human or natural environment. The
proposed project will not impact any streams, wetlands, or threatened and endangered species.
The project will not require a Section 404 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit or associated
Division of Water Quality issued Section 401 Water Quality Certification. No properties
either listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places are located
along the route. Although, five residences are anticipated to be relocated, the proposed
project is not anticipated to result in large-scale land use changes or impacts to the human
environment. Therefore, a State Environmental Assessment / Finding of No Significant
Impact is applicable for this project.
25
o cn -p
.n 0
r
3 N CD
N
CD o
o O
tD
3 ?'. 1 - Q
B CL 0 av
ona?
?0
m T 3 o
D o
_0
cD
CD
A (F
?
' ?
-n
CD p
C: o ?_ ;o x
'D
0
<
` 2.
p
C 14
`

C:

CD W
CD
' )
C) ?
-
Q m
a ml
C p
ID
'TI < C)
=
0 o, o
Q
C 0
? cn N CD fD M
a cn
co o rw 3
?4' r cn

N
(n C? N
a m o ?
CD
0
.-« v CD ?I
N
<

co 5.3
cn
CL m
3
o CD
CD
c?

is-it
-vow
N i
• ? ? '?' ? + I' \ _- 'r. X 'k? x1 r?. T - ? ? r ? i ? {? ?f ? ?_.'- ^ ? .
y ?' ?` r. r 11
?' ih? Ida "? -? '^-ti ti` I? _. _ *',1 i• t Nil
{{ 'L .. •L .r 1+r. 1 ! ill
r.
r?
Y'
N'A
- ------------
F ?, 1
•?.rf"c,la.i?l '?* 11111 ?94 ?u
,PL Rai
IYId1 F5,
. 11I --..??- - ? , ?---?- 1r' ?? t .? t.., .1 :1.?... t.l r ; I I 1 •Il YIY,i. I '
13
Ar,
t j
j iii I 'U ? -id ? ? 1 "I „Y1' /•/ ', ,. ? ? -,
. ' ." 1 y4 _ . i ? ? i°°'• ; .=-•+K+-? _ °r . / - ?-h+-,-w-,•-assaw..? - A???'"?? ' ?r' , -,, ..
ry ? .
19
=A
> t .? ?L r

i P

' o.
C ? ,: '22 ?Yg r?

% 1hlI:1
1
?1 .
a J K,

? 9 •I Y,i
,•xYYyl?¦ I ?fIF , ?•,
- f 1
\ ?r
ti ?l
?r-
nn,
, T •
.. ll 1i1 1 F.
4 1 1t?1, -', ? ? Z
' " ,1 vwrar«r t `? I.. • t ; ?e.I I.'i..aT=.

O O
a
cf)
on t
m TT

?rl. >y `'

F
I
(D
N -5 3
O N -
O

o m
o M
o
a
=r
*,
$%

n -0
n

D
nL
<
?n° `- TIC r
v
Q -,
o C/)o o CCD
T
C
O 0 C rr
m C CD W (n
C
D
O -9 O
a ?
Z j a
T Q
a
_
p CD
N v cn N c Q
l
K)
N) r
W
c CD s CD
-1
4
4
O p A •t

(D r'

Q
cn
1
1
,
-
n

3 CD N
co cn ^ 3 N
CD CZ CD
O CD
m m

?F1 r?
C
h
?'?'?4 ?? _ ' i .' ?'. ? ' .. ?, `f sue, ?•?Y: w
T - - --
4 AL
IF,
1 M J1 J +,?, \'\ 1
i
v - °l

AilL
- Ott y? ' j? e i
?y `s•H' r A ` f•
? 61 ? I yy?
1 ice,
i
i Milli -

it Z
ma.
0
o a
C/) r ;
cn. n p -
'A
-n 0
CA CD
m
?mo Q ,) Q D
° o
o - ?1 C ccn CD n
cn CD 0 CD
C ri -4 c CD UJ o
(D o n` 00 ED p a O W
° C: - a CD < o m Q
N a Cn N CD (D CL cn
cc 0
rr,j n .fir f r CD I
cn CD
n
cn
=r N N '
-,f II
v CD
co = a 3 N
o CD
m ?-
O m ?...? ,.71 _ - "?'?? I. JY?. 1 • a IT r ,?i ;,.??k 1J?1 »' 1: ? ??'r+,.Ty, /y{'? 7•
+` .. - +,?, t•. III I, ? > .? ? ?M. •y ?, 'll'lIF» ? fl? ?J.. `? r? 4 ?-•''rY. • ?A.
a ?__.?"?•..? , 1 ^? • V ' ,)i .'411 ? ,r
?1L. 1?.,? ??I 11?, • ?E? "l •?tr J 111 j';?, '+i
+r ?. .
11, It
?' ?•.' Y• R,?.?_r??.?? r "ARW
17
? Ise
0) ..? J^ "N.( SN _ "~• - _ M.. y'. r L .+; Y,?. r ?•
rim
'?• l 1 ?I ?l:'?' .'VII : `'tea R, ? ' a i'?? F ?:?`^ - .,?r':? ? ??"' ? ???? ' y>s,,,' ??' ?'iM.?
•r i y. 3 +4 Olt,
*a 4.n
eee, ?
?, cs I ? •? 1x 1 ?+ wr
??yy
r,??xy, 111 '"'?fA • ?_ ?f aR # ?.7a "Mf'.., ?j,? .?,-'.•k* ?, ? ?Y
'T- ??, ? 1?, 1' '?_` A` r-• N C ?'?` w,lp•?`' "Ifs s. ? ,? "?.?"`i .fir.
i &3
'? '?4r" 1S: ra i-' !rr?'aa
•.'? ?M. :F. ?? ' ?+?`+, yR, {rte ?. r ?N '? r?'
??' !f ` ? ;?'. T??? it M ' •` ? - Yi ? _?'iC-•,. .•? ' r '4.1. ? ' C ?.r M `
I
'ti, ?7 T?'•?' ??'.i .,? ?,•. 1? ?`ii,? 4 - ?? .? ?JYIr'*',?I1 '"?.7'P'?,ti? !tom, x,51 ?M.a?a' A??? r ? ;
• ,_"'??:pir. `J ?? },aa?t^?.RI ? .; A.r? ", ..,1F ., J it r a?l? I ???
• 'r J
t Lb . (S
Avow
. ?M1llli•?C e' ?? ..?, `tN+,'I. w ? r 1 '+IY ?'i hl?? i f I ? 'y. - r ?'I f " -
i
;V f iL ; 1
l1 ` ?'#i
I- d?R h,+? I M ? JFd1I .?N?7 ;, )1 ? A t ? 1r? T
?II
AA
M ?
.4? -.. FI if ? ? '.19?' ."? j91? ? ?{q^••• '_ .y_ 'rR ?,.h, a ,
'Y r -. a'^a• ...... ?..,_., W y - N .I? ., .. ?? 1i?111 it Ih amwo
•IBI ? - ? ZL i i Y•LI r -
e
F Fill,
" .-
44
4?,I; `??f1 ?" yy ^l+ N, .i 1, I
y` :?'1"n V?r• '.yt r r' u e ti_ i aw'/??'N?iy it„` .. y?y ..+.' " "?•.'rf" ,_' "'INPw, a
^y.., r° tr .a. 4`' ?d,•r r"1^!*'r" `- t i•'?` W' - "1" •.l.
7 ?,?,..' f F.. "1 ?"4.. _•M ??.+• - 7 '? Y,..T •? _??,1. ^??CCaa44r t* t' __
??1'^ ? •.? AM -y.'1y •? ?' ^•?• ?r s . .W ?? ? ? ic?.?'? 1?'yi-.:?,? ry -<v,..l «e ? "'... ?
a ? ? ? ?, ..` ??4- ik".. ? ? '??•,d.? :?? ? w ? ti :+,??v'G , v??. ?' w .Ill, ' , -...,,? ?- { ? L
4 .. w
? lx . •. '9R???r '? v?h '?. rn;t,:??f1 7J t+... r -c ? ?. ?? ? L
n
0
a
O ?
v

;
0
k
rt CD
0
'0
I
w (n
c
T!
\''
%
U m
-u -0
0
n
a
in -
o aMm
0
CD 1 cfl

c ?-
c C

CD CD ° ° °'
CID
CD C
O < L,)
?- CDW
n "S CD
fD V1 -4
0
C O -?
'i
A. 0 C
CL w
CL c C
0

0
W0
n

? U)
O (D
o°A CD d^ Q r

n? a o
5. 3
00
O C/)

= s ly4 , .
.Itz
:. ? ?. 1Y1i1 d .p.?? .?1+ Il
I I q
r.
1 L. u. ..1 ,
I•? 1 !1111 I ? ?? 1'?
, i
< _I 1`1 11?et
'110# o
y
r
V.- -1jjjjjjW'%,1,hA1
174.
.f?!!'._

?'A, ' ? -1 1? I'61 f

Y 1
4 i _
M 41,0-

4

Y
h

40,J 1
M. ?
? ?I
?- I
J A
ai?
, F7 - "',

1r ill. ._ ?Y ?I
'?„ ' Jka'
!_ a sr
r `
_ - X44- .y; - ? . e'Za,.x ?";e.???'"°F ,* '?91i?a._

I ?A
lk
W .RI
M
1% - 7u

R-
' z
O_
O R
Cl)
7
cn n CD
Z :••' n? cD
o N
O p f?-r C D
O M cn R
co CD F. I
M :3 :3
CD p CD K Ca o = C c CD CD U)i CD
CD O Z° W ?D Vl c CA = 3
C O CD C C C
N?„ Cn C C_ 0 Q 0
cfl O :CJ CD O'
Cf) w? o V n "+ ' cn O
r? CD cn O r
v o cn
5-3
N
O --
O m

?;? _z"1r _ ,'fir `y..? t ??}-,.? T •1.? 1 1 . ..? `? ? ?f,1.. ??r." ?? '"1? a??
?1
??,1+ ?
r
e
•
,
.

?i

106
,;?

?r rwr r•?? ? ? '?
, o, as• ?? ? ? I?, ?
e f? •
4.
rr
1`_
J
)00- =1
0
o
m T
7n• n
-n c:
07
a
N o Z CD
o' ?- D
O o.0 r CD
CD
C: U) CD
o Cfl cn > > C O Ql -n -P (D O cD WO
o ;o M C `C CD CD (D1J (D °
.?
(?D O C a j Q CD N ? = c ? co CD C: 0
CL C) CL
co o a
n
N) Cf) CD CD
W p?j v V7 O O (n
o p CD (n O r
N o a 3 n..
m. 3
N
N
O
O m
?Q 1l 1I
r ? ?;fTTf1?)lll???lj?ll?l?f
l- ?
0
C `? ? --?-- `Saj• and e i
'S6
a ?l
1 ?a
0
cn??\\ L_ ?' $o h St I
Q
(p -
0
1
NC High y150
O chard View Dr
LL I

-- _ II I' ` I

--? o
1
O
l l

Cr ,
f

LT Cr
J Brower Rd ` l
Clinard Ave
- D I
c
I astings Ave
Ronon Rc
? I
0
Skyview Dr
ll r
Southview Dr
ftjQ4?e0
c?
o d
m
? dl
Fleet tit
Brickwood Ct
o
a
v
3
CL
C.
0
n O
0
0
0
i
3
m i_ ^
3 I ? 3 ?
?- _ D -
a d ? I m
o !.f _I a
.5,- aD ae
jQ uosiaputl
US West Highway 52
- - ----------
--- --- -
------
Lexwin Ave IS uleW
rn

m f
1?h03$

M arthurSt m IS
O
a

3 0
r
0

(ID
-0 n CL < (n c

o ° _ _
m? ?
o
CO -

CD
CO

m
T

D
C)
C o n C
CD
CL c? o Z m p
D CI)
(n
CD
rn N
<'> m o CD N
O C
7
?}! 1
v? O (Q O ? I p
N
7 p
?.
-
Cn
(D
C?
i

•
c 6
E cc
N L
Q 3
N ?? ;; r p n a
O o Z a) a) cD O
cn ..
O ?nQ< v d CCD cn
. co cc
-00 - CD \ m C: D = CO c
n CD T o ?_ Z1 Q BCD O N _
O
(D p (D l , 0 n°) '9 CD cr n m O Q
CD CD
LD. b N) (n
C O -• -?
CD C O
?off ~< ?Cc -9 N 3.
O
U) NJ
Wv0
o °_ N Z
a) o CND (D
5' m
O
O CD

04. M ,.
44.
1 4
I .I.r. I•.r ! ? ?I
•?p. ? ? +• ? ? ? x, ?, • ' ?? ?t"','r ` 1 ..•_ , 7? ??.. .• .ems ? ? ? ? ? ? ..
ai;
J
7- _? J r l n. N J ! -
?OM

1
A

t il 4 :, 1
''
.11111 I 1 5.?I r. `',
?? ?:
??
L ,?111p1{,y1u11??11??',:'r'A7d ? .
?1

I r 1 w
? ,,..y?'? gel •'?? '-
x-
'? 4 I
T
•^' d L ' , J
Ow,

.py 'YII 'p -

m
,..*
jig
'= 4' M ,p ?t.p A\tA 1A I? /i u, f1{'u v-•?.a...y. .I/lrlla ,
?Nj
:. ! J A11 .4? - ?.ET 3u
IoNt
t ir?• ?, 40\?71•?* ? !frNji-.Ail "Y ?q-
r-. _ p q 1. lV ,rt; .
JY, O
Cf) (D
a)) • (a
m' CJ (D
71c?m _ C
CD 0? 3 fl.
Z v Cr) CD a) < p
V (' {' n
n n < 1'I NCD c
ca. D OW
Cep C) O CD n 0 01 O O
n O o) % U O
O Co ?a ?D n
r
C o? W
CD CD
a- cn V
=P 0 C)
0 C/) CD cn
C) -1
W =
? N 4 Z 03 ? t--A --
0 ? 11
CD CD
7 CD N
Co Cn
C)
CD m
CD
ts1? ? ?
• a
i ? a?\
F
owl
_ Mt a? 9?p?,,, !av?' N?•? I'? 41 `Jy'.
M• 1111 .? "? ?.
t. MIX.
•,? 1: ..? .w`ij. •y?..." _ :fir Wis. "? ?' ? ,J?-•?' --?.? ?...?.??-J ??. J ? ^?' ? {y?I J. y .1, "
ti
C _ $"?` ? +'A.. w??r ,..? •?'? u; . 11 ? ;Nppl n.... }1 ? ?fir ? ? ,?yn?,..,?p' .+{ "P,? cr,
1 ? ? "?;, ,(? ?'?? 1 y ?:'•k• t ?'?? r 4 ?? -- , ? Iri ?j1 Jl„SJ ^ ? !1, ?? ,rla??,s?ir _. .?F? ° ?.? 1 ? "7:?,,"•?'?-V:';'I?? ??
_ '? I ty??? w?^' ? T ,.y. "w ? y,,. ?.dA!? 1fpr? f '' `^? 3'?'r, ,??1--?i ?.ry:?--•? ?.-_? p1?`? ????'?,_.. ? -. ?a.
-71
.M .fry' _ -c?.? ? ?;'M?_ ??. ?' - _._'+n:?` _ ? ?, ? .•Sv 1??i'il? -,?'?,'11J ?,? '1..?•t.J ,,f?i??s?,, '"".?. -?•,
41
{ of zi I ,y F Yr i I _ of 11 `.?'4 `?"y
I _i Y .. ?; ,1.• . "F! .'L? f?.. w? ? ? _ J _, ?' 5° ? ?'tl? +f"g'v'yC. ?; ?t".? 1 1 ?'•'
.F war ?I ? a 1. +"_1
"JAN
'MR
"`?'?t'7.. ??°°cc x st?F4?• y J?, i? } I? ? S:' ,?L. ? "Y ?-+^? ;M:
Wy _ 3.L ll'? w 4
C: -0
• ?yy ?•? 7 1 .,,f1?.'U'1 ??f I N ? ?.1•^ •{ ??-?; 11^-I \.- ..??I{RI ? f
.?°•?{r3 ?IS•,. aF _1x, .t; l' N ny 'l '.• ,?.'? °?
r r t?,?r?II? ?` •? Jtll .y14?'.,IF'ySY! y ." ?g `? i:.. ?? I 'll ?.,? W ' ,?..y t m +iiAliH. :?. -
4 )IMP
f ?
o a
cCD m
(D ?c
CD c
CD ?JO'
;u o-
Ana<• VJ n W
Do U) m cD m D o
o ?7 d CD C7 CD -
O
CD p C:) CD 0 C)
?.^ - o p ? n < W =? O O
?
z CD
O O
N cl)
CD C: 0
o Cn ~ < v ca -, ?' -
' i ::p o O -
w? o ? n
m?o m CD
0 u, -
_ N
00 cn
o C
CD CD
CD

0
C
V VI
I _
o

1 Y
-J -
52

1 D
1 ? r ,t T.- -_ i D
? 71
1

---
p 0 2,000 4,000 8,000
- -J _ C Feet

DCIA and DA
Legend 2000 Census Blocks
Clemmonsville Road („R 2747) from

DCIA
20 BG 01
36 BG 02 Old Salisbury Road (SR 3011) to South Main Street
Forsyth County, North Carolina
TIP Project U-2923
TIP U-2923 20 BG 02 37 BG 02 N --
Fi

Winston-Salem _
36 BG 01
37 BIG 04
I` ?'" gure
5

rar ?xw
I
?//?{p??(/?A ,1'
{4{WVA' J- i //?V//7i17AV
AN Ci PA:f_A!Eh' IL
5RAD[T._??NE PROPOSED Tti'PICAL SECTION
n,STR 1, AM-;
1 AVAI\ //AVNA/717
WAR,
KIIVA'7/A AN'
EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION
Typical Cross Section
Clemmonsville Road (SR 2747) from
Old Salisbury Road (SR 3011) to South Main Street
Forsyth County, North Carolina
TIP Project U-2923
Figure
.. ?. 3

<;12AL1E
?'J,NT

_y
N
Begin Project
TIP U-2923

J •
End Project
TIP U-2923
r
sR 21 a71 Y ,-
oaa J1
0
1r I /?
r
r! - ) 52
1
150 0 1,000 2,000
_ t I t t I
Feet
Vicinity Map
Clemmonsville Road (SR 2747) from
Old Salisbury Road (SR 3011) to South Main Street
Winst
` , J ^ Salem Forsyth County, North Carolina 47. TIP Project U-2923
Kernersvil le
4?J?- Figure

a
e
O
•C
b
0
of ?? C ? ';I e
' '? . ?t I?OXSYTH CO UNITY
UA-V'IIJSCJ.V IC''O UXTY
0 2,000 4,000 8,000
Feet
Legend
DCIA
TIP U-2923
Winston-Salem
2000 Census Blocks
20 BG 01 36 BG 02
20 BG 02 37 BG 02
® 36 BG 01 37 BG 04
DCIA and DA
Clemmonsville Road (SR 2747) from
Old Salisbury Road (SR 3011) to South Main Street
Forsyth County, North Carolina
TIP Project U-2923
N e-r- ? _ Figure
,; 5
I?
fA• WW
i
Y/MN????^ 12 Z u• 6 IT 14' Z 12 .1??YMA?V1
IRTRUV4T\ 5' 4' `C' 5' ?. /IAY/M/AV
GRADE IE'hI
POINT
VAR. EXIST PAVEMENT I?
vA` GRADE TO THIS LINE GRADE TO THIS LINE
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION
C
EXIST R / W -VARIES
16'x/- 16'H-
y?? VAR. EXIST. PAVEMENT VAR. EXIST. PAVEMENT
TT w Y //AV4Y/!V
TM1TTNVN //AVGA/AV
E)(ISTING TYPICAL SECTION
Typical Cross Section
Clemmonsville Road (SR 2747) from
Old Salisbury Road (SR 3011) to South Main Street
Forsyth County, North Carolina
TIP Project U-2923
t'` , 3
Figure
4
TIP U-2923
0 1,000 2,000
O 1 1 1 1 I
" Feet
Vicinity Map
I' . u Clemmonsville Road (SR 2747) from
Old Salisbury Road (SR 3011) to South Main Street
Sak on ^ Forsyth County, North Carolina
TIP Project U-2923
Kern c a
m y?co..y N°? °. Figure
? dso?Cainty a ¢ I ` ..s .3 1
APPENDIX
Agency Comments
and
Winston Salem Letter

RECEIVED
Division of Highways
JUN I 1 1008
NreCOng?,Ct100
ProjectDeke(oyrr rend
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resourc'$ ?
State Historic Preservation Office nmen atgn;iyss Breach
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Office of Archives and History
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Division of Historical Resources
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
June 6, 2008
MEMORANDUM
TO: Greg Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT Division of Highways
FROM: Peter Sandbeck ??D/ ?Q f/ - ?C KN2C?6L
e
SUBJECT: Clemmonsville Road, U-2923, Forsyth County, ER 08-1307
Thank you for your letter of May 27, 2008, concerning the above project
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic resources which would
be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
cc: Mary Pope Fun, NCDOT
Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT
Location 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Matting Address: 4617 Mail Service Cxnw, Raleigh NC 276994617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

North Carolina
Department of Administration
JUL 0 7208a
maihs? e?a?
Michael F. Easley, Governor Britt Cobb, Secretary
July 3, 2008
Mr. Gregory Thorpe
N.C. Dept. of Transportation
Project Dev. & Env. Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Re: SCH File # 08-E-4220=0365; SCOPING; City of Winston-Salem working with NCDOT for
the proposed Clemmonsville Road project in Forsyth County. TIP No. U-2923
Dear Mr. Thorpe:
The above referenced environmental impact information has been reviewed through the State
Clearinghouse under the provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Attached to this letter are reviewer comments which identify issues to be addressed in the environmental
review document. The appropriate document should be forwarded to the State Clearinghouse for
compliance with State Environmental Policy Act. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to call me at 807-2425.
Sincerely, )
Y e(
Valerie W. McMillan, Director
State Environmental Policy Act
Attachments
cc: Region I
Malling Address. Telephone., [phone]
1301 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27699-1301 State Courier #51-0 1-00
e-mail [e-mail]
Location Address:
116 West Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina

An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
State of North Carolina S Z6
Department of Enuironment-ant9lYatuta,LResourses xavie?;ng_otr?
? / n-D
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW -PROJECT COMMENTS ProjeaNumbec p$_ D3S /nJ DueDa[c^a / 8
to comply with North
After review of this project it has been determined that the ENR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this project
Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form. All applications, information and guidelines
I, relative to these plans and permits arc available from the same Regional Ofce.
Normal Process Time
PERMITS SPECIAL. APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time limit)
P ermit to construct & operate wastewate Irarmart Application 90 days before begin conswction or award of construction 30 days
f
? acilities, Sewer system extensions & sewer systems Cpnwcls. On-site insfrraion.Post-application technical conference usual. (90 days)
n ot discharging into state 5urf3ce'waters.
Application 180days before begin activity. On-Sim inspection. Pre-application
NPDES'- permit todischug;c into surface water and/or conference usual. Additionally, obtampennit to construct wastewater 90-120 days
? 0<rmit to operate and conswc[ wastewater facilities treatment facility-granted after NPDES. Reply time, 30 days after receipt of (WA)
discharging into state surface waters. plans or issue of NPDES permit-whichever is later.
30 days
? Water Use Permit Pre-applicalion technical conference usually necessary (N/A)
Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the 7 days
? Well Construction Permit installation of a well. - (15 days)
Application copy must beserved on each adjacent riparian property owner.
On-site inspection. Pre-applicarion conference usual. Filling may require 55 days
? Dredge and Fill Permit Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of Adminuvation and Federal (90 days)
Dredge and Fill Permit.
Application must be submitted and permit received prior to
Permit to construct & operate Air Pollution Abatement construction and operation of the source. If a permit is required in an 90 days
facil ides and/or Emission Sources as per 15 A NCAC area without lout zoning, then there are additional requirements and
(2Q.O100 thru 2Q.0300) timelizin CQ0113). .
Permit to construe: & operam Transportation Facility as Application must be submitted at least 90 days prior to construction or 90 days
? oer 15ANCAC(2D0800,2Q.0601) modificationofthesource.
Any open burning associated with subject proposal
mustbe in compliance with 15 A NCAC 2D.1900
Demolition or renovations o f swetues containing
asbestos material mustbe in compliance with 15 A 60 days
? NCAC 20.1110 (a) (1) which requires ratification and N/A (90 days)
removal prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control
roup 919-707-5950
Complex Source Permit required under 15 A NCAC
? 2D.0800
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be property addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion &
sedimentation control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality 20 davs
? Section) At least 30 days before beginning activity A fee of $65 for the first acre or any part of an acre An express review option is (30 days)
available with additional fees
!dimentation and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with NCDOT's approved program. Particular attention should be given to (30 days)
deign and installation of appropriate perimeter Sediment trapping devices as will as; stable stonnwater conveyances and outlets.
On-site inspection usual. Surety bond riled with ENR Bond amount varies
with type mine and number of acres of affected land. Any arc mined greater 30 days
? Mining Permit than one acre must be permitted 'Ihe approonam bond must be received (60 days)
before the perinitcan be issued.
On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit exceeds 4 days I day
? North Carolina Butting permit (N/A)
Or-site ipsocc6on by N.C. Division Forest Resources required "ifmore than I day
. l
utting Ptril
B
earance
Special Ground Cl
2 I five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections should be "A)
1
1
i s
i
. w w
counties m coas tal N,C.C. orgz nc Soails
ith requested at leni ten days before actual bum is planned'
90.-_I2o days.__.__._
-"-- []' d Refining Fanlities-'- .NI0. ('1fA)
If permit required, application 60 days before begin construction. Applicant
must hire N.C qualified engineer lo: prepare plans, inspect conswction.
certify construction is according to ENR approved plans. May also require
it under mosquito control Program. And a 404 permit from Corps of
30 days
I ? Dun Salary Permit perm
I Engineers. An inspection of sites necessary to verify Hazard Classification, A (60 days)
minimum fee of E200.00 must accompany ffic application. An additional

- Normal Process Time
(statutory time limit)
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES ar REQUIREMENTS
PERMITS
File surety bond of SS,000 with ENR running to State of NC conditional that 10 days
any well opened by drill operator shall, upon abandonment, be plugged NIA
? Permit to drill exploratory ail or gas well according to ENR rules and regulations.
Application filed with ENR at least 10 days prior.to issue of permit. 10 days
? Geophysical Exploration Permit Application by letter. No standard application form. NIA
Application fees based on structure size is charged. Must include descriptions 15-20 days
? State Lakes Construction Permit & drawings of structure & proof of ownership of riparian NIA

. _ .. .. . ......:. ... ....
.-
to err .
60 days
? 501 Water Quality Certification NIA (130 days)
55 days
? ICAMA Permit for MAJORdevelopment 1$250.00 fee mustaccompany application
? CAMA Permit for MINOR development 550.00 fee must accompany application
Several geodetic monuments are located inar near the project area. If any monument needs to be moved or destroyed, please
? N C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611
Abandonment of any wells, if :equired must be in accordance with Title I5A. Subchapter 2C.0100.
0 Notification of the proper regional off" is requested if "orphan" underground storage ranks (USTS) are discovered during any excavation operation.
22 days
(25 days)
45 days
Compliance wiN I SA NCAC 2H 1000 (Cons tal S(Onmwater Rules) is required. (NIA)
? Tar Pamlico or Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules required.
f O hercmnments(atta additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority)
'lao
Poo
4d
I I U .?
REGIONAL. OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
0 Asheville Regional Office 0 Mooresville Regional Office 0 Wilmington Regional Office
dinal Drive Extension
27 C
2090 US Highway 70 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
NC 28115
Mooresville ar
1
Wilmington, NC 28405
Swannanoa, NC 28778
[phone] ,
[phone] [phone]
0Fayetteville Regional Office 0RaleighRegionalOffice
i
101 Winston-Salem Regional Office
85 Waughtown Street
22S North Greets Street, Suite 714 te
3800 Barrett Drive, Su
°' NC 27107
n-Salem
t
W i
f ayetteville, NC 283.01-5.44.3..--. ....
00 _
[phone] ,
o
ns
[phone]
(910) 433-33
0 Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Michael F Easley, Governor -
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
-
Golsen Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
'C
JUN 2008
offin
DIDA
June 6, 2008
To: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator,
From: Amy Euliss, NC Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Subject: Scoping comments on proposed improvements to Clemmonsville Road in Forsyth County, TIP
U-2923.
Reference your correspondence dated May 27, 2008 in which you requested comments for the referenced
project. Preliminary analysis of the project does not reveal the potential for multiple impacts to perennial
streams and jurisdictional wetlands in the project area.
Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of other streams
and/or jurisdictional wetlands in the area. In the event that any jurisdictional areas are identified, the
Division of Water Quality requests that NCDOT consider the following environmental issues for the
proposed project:
General Project Comments:
1. The environmental document shall provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed
impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. If mitigation is necessary as
required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h), it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized)
mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. Appropriate mitigation plans will be
required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification.
2. Environmental assessment alternatives shall consider design criteria that reduce the impacts to
streams and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives shall include road designs that
allow for treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in
the most recent version of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices, such as grassed
swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins, etc.
3. After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality
Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the
avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent
practical. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules { 15A NCAC
2H.0506(h)}, mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 1 acre to wetlands. In the
event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan shall be designed to replace appropriate lost
functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as
wetland mitigation.
4. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules { 15A NCAC
2H.0506(h)}, mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single
perennial stream. In the event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan shall be designed to
Transportation Permitting Unit
rttV);
1650 Mail service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Sub 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] / Internet httoJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

replace appropriate lost functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be
available for use as stream mitigation.
DWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project.
NC DOT shall address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that maypccur to the
aquatic environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
6. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area shall be maintained to prevent direct
contact between cuing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured
concrete shall not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and
possible aquatic life and fish kills.
7. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction
contours and elevations. Disturbed areas shall be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and
appropriate native woody species should be planted. When using temporary structures the area
shall be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other
mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact allows the area to re-vegetate
naturally and minimizes soil disturbance.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands shall be below the
elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and
20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low
flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures
including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result
in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream
of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ. If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock
or other limiting features encountered during construction, please contact the NC DWQ for
guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit modification will be
required.
9. If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they shall be designed to mimic natural stream cross
section as closely as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation and/or sills where
appropriate. Widening the stream channel shall be avoided. Stream channel widening at the inlet
or outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment deposition that
requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.
10. If foundation test borings are necessary; it should be noted in the document. Geotechnical work
is approved under General 401 Certification Number 3494/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey
Activities.
11. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be implemented
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and
Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250.
12. All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area unless otherwise
approved by NC DWQ. Approved BMP measures from the most current version ofNCDOT

Construction and Maintenance Activiti es manual such as sandbags, rock her cofferdams and
other diversion structures should be used to prevent excavation in. flowing water.
13. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands and streams.
14. Borrow/waste areas shall avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands
in borrow/waste areas could precipitate compensatory mitigation.
15. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, NC Coastal Region Evaluation of
Wetland Significance (NC-CREWS) maps and soil survey maps are useful tools, their inherent
inaccuracies require that qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to permit
approval.
16. Heavy equipment shall be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in order to
minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams.
This equipment shall be inspected daily and maintained to prevent contamination of surface
waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
17. In most cases, the DWQ prefers the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure shall be removed and
the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed and
restored to the natural ground elevation. The area shall be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. Tall fescue shall not be used in riparian areas.
18. Riprap shall not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner
that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly
designed, sized and installed.

Thank you for requesting our input at this. time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact Amy Euliss at (336) 7714959.
cc: John Thomas, US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Field Office
Federal Highway Administration
Marla Chambers, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
DWQ 401 Transportation Permitting Group
File Copy
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
TO: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DENR
FROM: Marla Chambers, Western NCDOT Permit Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program, NCWRC
DATE: June 17, 2008
SUBJECT: Review of the scoping sheet from the City of Winston-Salem and NCDOT for
improvements to Clemmonsville Road (SR 2747) from Old Salisbury Road (SR
3011) to South Main Street, Forsyth County. TIP No. U-2923. OLIA Project
No. 08-0365, due 06/27/2008.
The City of Winston-Salem and the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) are
requesting comments from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC)
regarding impacts to fish and wildlife resources resulting from the subject project. Staff
biologists have reviewed the information provided on the scoping sheet and have the following
preliminary comments. These comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The NCDOT proposes to improve Clemmonsville Road (SR 2747) from Old Salisbury Road (SR
3011) to South Main Street by widening to a three-lane section with some additional intersection
improvements. There are no known areas of wetlands or surface waters within the project study
area and direct impacts are not anticipated, however, surveys will be conducted to verify this.
The project drains to Salem Creek to the north and South Fork Muddy Creek to the south, both
Class C waters within the Muddy Creek watershed. Salem Creek is on the 303(d) list of
impaired waters.
Secondary and cumulative impacts are our main concern for this project. The project is located
in a highly developed setting. Numerous studies have shown that when 10-15% of a watershed
is converted to impervious surfaces, there is a serious decline in the health of receiving waters
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
02923;-C1ensmons i R6ad - --
Winston-Salem, Forsyth Co. -2- June 17, 2008
(Schueler 1994) and the quality of fish habitat and wetlands are negatively impacted (Booth
1991, Taylor 1993). We encourage NCDOT and the City of Winston-Salem to protect. water
quality and habitat through the use of Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, stormwater
and growth management, and other mitigation efforts. Information on Low Impact Development
practices and measures can be found at www.lowimpactdevelopment.ore,
http://www.epa.pov/owow/nps/lid/lidnatl.odf and http://www.stormwatercenter.net/. Measures
to mitigate secondary and cumulative impacts can be found in the Guidance Memorandum to
Address and Mitigate Secondary and Cumulative Impacts to Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
Resources and Water Quality (NCWRC 2002).
In addition, to help facilitate document preparation and the review process, our general
information needs are outlined below:
Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area, including a listing of
federally or state designated threatened, endangered, or special concern species. Potential
borrow areas to be used for project construction should be included in the inventories. A
listing of designated plant species can be developed through consultation with the
following programs:
The Natural Heritage Program
http://www.ncnhp.org
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1601
and,
NCDA Plant Conservation Program
P. O. Box 27647
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the project. If applicable, include the
linear feet of stream that will be channelized or relocated.
Cover type maps showing wetland acreage impacted by the project. Wetland acreage
should include all project-related areas that may undergo hydrologic change as a result of
ditching, other drainage, or filling for project construction. Wetland identification may
be accomplished through coordination with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE). If the USACE is not consulted, the person delineating wetlands should be
identified and criteria listed.
4. Cover type maps showing acreage of upland wildlife habitat impacted by the proposed
project. Potential borrow sites and waste areas should be included.
Show the extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or fragmentation of
wildlife habitat (wetlands or uplands).
- U-2923, Cremmanville7Raaz
Winston-Salem, Forsyth Co. -3- June 17, 2008
6, Include the mitigation plan for avoiding, minimizing or compensating for direct and
indirect degradation in habitat quality as well as quantitative losses.
7. Address the overall environmental effects of the project construction and quantify the
contribution of this individual project to environmental degradation.
8. Provide a discussion of the probable impacts on natural resources, which will result from
secondary development, facilitated by the improved road access.
9. If construction of this facility is to be coordinated with other state, municipal, or private
development projects, a description of these projects should be included in the
environmental document, and all project sponsors should be identified.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages of this project. If you
have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at [phone].
cc: Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ
Amy Euliss, NCDWQ
Literature Cited:
Booth, D. 1991. Urbanization and the natural drainage system-impacts, solutions, and
prognoses. Northwest Environmental Journal. 7(1):93-118.
NCWRC (North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission). 2002. Guidance Memorandum to
Address and Mitigate Secondary and Cumulative Impacts to Aquatic and Terrestrial
Wildlife Resources and Water Quality. NCWRC, Raleigh. Available:
http://wtivw.ncwildlife.org/pg07_WildlifeSpeciesCon/pg7c3_impacts.pdf. (February
2003).
Schueler, Tom. 1994. The Importance of Imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques.
1:3 (pp100-111).
Taylor, B.L. 1993. The influences of wetland and watershed morphological characteristics and
relationships to wetland vegetation communities. Masters thesis. Dept. of Civil
Engineering. University of Washington. Seattle, WA.
North Carolina Department
Michael F. Easley, Governor
June 4, 2008
MEMORANDUM
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
TO: Gregory J. Thorpe,, DOT Project Development and Environmental Analysis
rp
FROM: Harry LeGrand, IrTatural Heritage Program
SUBJECT: Start-of-Study - Clemmonsville Road, Forsyth County
REFERENCE: TIP Project U-2923
The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, significant
natural heritage areas, or conservation/managed areas at the site nor within a mile of the project area.
Although our maps do not show records of such natural heritage elements in the project area, it does not
necessarily mean that they are not present. It may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The
use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys, particularly if the
project area contains suitable habitat for rare species, significant natural communities, or priority natural
areas.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-715-8697 if you have questions or need further information.
RECEIVED
Division of Highways
JUN 0 6 1000
pteoDRSIC160n
P*dDevelopment and
Environmental Analysis Branch
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 P a Carolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: 919-71r30601lntemet: www.enr.state.nc.us/ENR/ htfra!!?
An Equal Opportunity I Alramative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled 110 % Post Consumer Paper
and Natural Resources

North Carolina Department
Michael F. Easley, Governor
MEMORANDUM
?11N 2008
RECEIVED
smewo OAS
DOA
TO: Valerie McMillan
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee 11?
Environmental Review Coordinator
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
RE: 08-0365 Scoping Improvements to Clemmonsville to South Main
Street in Forsyth County
DATE: June 24, 2008
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources has reviewed the
proposed information. The attached comments should be provided to the
applicant for consideration.
Thank you for the opportunity to review.
Attachments
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 ?i f CSi011115
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us/ENR1 NturQlly
An Equal Oppotx* I Affirmative Adion Employer. 50% RegAW 110 %Post consumer Paper
and Natural Resources

April 28, 2009
Mr. Pat Ivey, P.E.
Division Engineer, NCDOT
375 Silas Creek Parkway
Winston-Salem, NC 27127
Dear Mr. Ivey:
0
WinsmnSM
Pablk Works Department
Engineering Division
cityd%.t.s.].
P.O. B. 2511
W'.a .Sd= NC 27102
U 336.727.8000
Fu 336.727.2361
W .Cityufa .n.g
This letter is. to inform you of the City of Winston-Salem's intention to take over the
maintenance of Clemmonsville Road from South Main Street to Old Salisbury Road, pending
City Council approval. Once the widening of Clemmonsville Road (Project U-2923) is
completed and fmaled, we will ask City Council to approve the transfer from the State system to
the City system.
If you have any questions concealing this, please to not hesitate to contact me at 747-6985..
Sincerely,
-?&Jp4k? 7v
Robert Prestwood, P.E.
City Engineer
CC: Robby Stone, P.E., Streets Director