20011043 Ver 1_Complete File_20070413

Draft Stream Mitigation Site Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
.]99: Draft Version 2.1
V?
y ? 1 l7
Evaluator's name(s): 6
Date of Office Review: 1
Other individuals/agencies present:
1. Office Review Information:
Project Name: 7 Monitoring reports available? o
DWQ Project Number: (2f -10413 Problem areas identified in reports? No
ation Project Type (Circle One) Problem areas addressed on site? Yes
(LEO Private Mt. Bank Date(s) of monitoring reports: 2005, 1-006
Project mitigation was constructed for (if

applicable): Year(s) of monitoring: 1
Location of project (narrative): / v SE o E Oe iJ CJAk£ CAb,
Nearest named stream (WQ classification):
County: 4AAfr

River basin:
Approved Mitigation plan available? Yes o
Goal of Mitigation (stream length): I f, Uo0 1 S Buffer Mitigation? Yes No
re g re
/0 95
Zone 1 Acreage
Type of itigationt (circle all applicable) Zone 2 Acreage
estoratio (priority level 40 Creation

nhancem nt Preservation
Dates of Activities m nth/ ear :
Monitoring requirements and frequency: Start of Construction:
JfEGE7AT10,4Aj-715 YA&L-1 ?- v`? riP2i' Construction Completed: o2

I aken
:
Corrective Measures

Date
V e
Ty70-
R 010VAI- 00 ,
l3Fi1 /
Success Criteria:
1.Physical:,?rY9B? PA1 O Itfi b
J
2. Vegetation: 260 ql-
3. Aquatic biota:
zo,?S
1140)v)710P r1oIVGU&D
PE6 POT5 CHAA) y ? ()VR /v OWTOJ70) ?lvh . ?VU?aFRS A0 ?ve?T>O-A)S"
NoJ cox u) 57 &-)T,
II Jc ??4?'A ?d? ?VA/Z?4 ?4 ? rjt.0,0 ?,/lFv? ./1/IU??il1?0-1?/V? ?915
aoMvPt r
The space below may be used to provide any additional, important information that was found
during the office review of information, or to list any additional infofation that needs to be
obtained du;ing, the site visit A,A)6J: I\ Q? rpl?l? T &A
Zoo 1(045
Evaluator's Agency: &)(0,
Date of Field Review: 3
NCa?70? a('-Vg ,VVc?S?7" /?ql//2?
Nd raft page I of 3
11. oata reported trom site visit
Streambank Stability:
Are Streambanks Stable? Yes
If no, provide description and notes regar ing stab stability i??(( Z
??yes 5
A 5110 - SOME 9PAO' r6aSIOP Pi X77
COO-T W
j?C,(? tl I M:l?tlv2
Structures:
?NS
List all Types of structures present on site:
Are the structures stable (e.g. erosion, deposition, etc.)? Yes o
Provide description and notes regarding problematic structures:
Stream Features:
Are riffles and pools appropriately spaced? Yes No
Is the final sinuosity and gradient designed approximately to plan specifications? Yes No
Any evidence of vegetation growing on the stream bed or in the Thalweg? Yes
Percentage of the restoration reach that has: Flowing water. Q X Ponded areas
Describe any stream features that provide evidence of unstable stream reaches (e.g. mid-channel
bars, downstream meander migration, chute cutoff formation, etc.):
SKI* M 11J- NJ??(r M2 i-GLJJtGfRA?'1 C,40M CV Vegetation: Dominant plant species TPA/% cover
Approved Success Criteria: _ 60 C f3C2? 1.
2.
Vegetation planted on site?: No 3.
According to the approved plan? VWK Yes No 4.
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No 5.
Date of Latest planting: 01&,6)n1A L A(/6 ZC Z
Ave trees per acre (buffer)
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas (e.g. buffer width, overall health of
vegetation, etc.)
h1511?f- o Ausrl? CM< 2ra SWl. N L U
1 JJ
O
0A

a : _TOW)0 l0M?S JA) 20{'
S-ILfi PFJJQz (3( ow-Aj o v
Draft page 2 of 3
6t_' aFs"T S? I ? -
l
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no woody vegetation:
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with large areas of bare ground:
Site total % or estimated acreage of unvegetated areas:
Observations on invasive species (type, % cover, etc.)
Gener mment?s)o?npvegetation issues(e.g.?p?lant survival, major concerns, etc):
A&D
Aquatic Biota: /Uo _7 RV1/J ,g 40V )-' W
Is aquatic life present in the channel? Yes No
Description of taxa observed, incl. quantities of individuals and general distribution of rota.
Mitigation Success:
Compared to the mitigation plan, the site is: (circle one)
successful partially successful not *uccessful
List specific reasons for any lack of success for this site:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Notes: Attach site maps showing problem areas and/or important stream features.
Attach digital photographs of representative sites with photo locations shown one. ."site map.
1 Use the definitions in the joint statelfederal stream mitigation guidelines to determine tthe
correct type of mitigation used for this project.
Draft page 3 of 3
April 13 Site Visits
Subject: April 13 Site Visits
From: Eric Kulz <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:40:54 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Kathy:
My notes/comments on the sites we looked at Friday.
Smith & Austin Creeks - Wake County Stability problems were noted in a number of locations on both
creeks. Erosion around root wads was observed at several locations on Austin Creek. An area on the
northwest side of Austin Creek had fescue lawn to the stream bank and appeared to be maintained,
possibly by a homeowner. A possible buffer violation was observed on the south/east side of the creek„
where fill material for a residential lot was within Zone 1 of the riparian buffer, and the deck of the
house was within Zone 2 of the buffer. On Smith Creek, areas of scour and bank erosion were
observed, and mid-channel bars were noted.
In the lower portion of the stream, in the golf course, a cross vain appears to have failed, as fabric was
dislodged and one or more rocks appeared to be missing.
Overall, I am concerned about the stability of the streams, particularly upstream from the road (Smith
and Austin Creeks, on either side of the soccer fields).
UT to Billy's Creek - Franklin County. The biggest issue here was the considerable amouts of sediment
in the stream, presumably from the upstream farm field. I am concerned that this will be an annual
event. As a result of the sediment, the channel dimension is obscured. From what I could tell, the
banks appear fairly stable, although a portion of the channel circumvented a vain in the middle portion
of the project, and the stream has become somewhat overwidened with mid-channel bars. The lower
reach of the stream did not have a good riffle-pool pattern, and consisted mostly of pools.
There are some vegetation issues, even though this is only year one. Bare areas are present from when
cattle got into the conservation easement area. Juncus is abundant, and in places, is growing within the
channel, sometimes filling the entire channel. The sediment in the channel is also exacerbating this
situation. I am concerned that during a dry summer, the channel may be completely filled with Juncus
in places, which could result in the channel relocating following periods of heavy rain.
Despite the sediment in the channel and the fact that this is only year 1, three species of caddisflies
were found in the riffles in the upper and middle portions of the stream.
Hopefully, the sediment will flush out and the channel will stabilize. I don't think any remedial actions
are warranted at this time, but some additional planting may be warranted int he sparse areas in the
future, a the Juncus may need to be controlled at some point.
UT to Tar River - Franklin County The stream channel appeared to generally be stable, except for
some erosion/scour in the lower portion of the stream, and a large problem area at the road culvert at
the upstream end of the project. In this area, considerable erosion has occurred, and a large vertical
bank has been carved, which is continually releasing sediment to the stream (mass wasting). In
1 of 2 4/30/2007 `.41:32 AM
April 13 Site Visits
addition, one failed rock structure was observed approx. 100 feet downstream of the
tributary/stormwater pipe.
Vegetation diversity appeared pretty good, although the tree density was lower in a section of stream
upstream from the tributary/stormwater pipe.
Despite the fact that this is only year 1, two species of caddisflies were found in the riffles in the upper
portion of the stream.
Being that this is year 1, my only recommendation would be to try rto do something with the area
below the road culvert, as there is a high level of erosion occurring here.
UT to Bear Swamp Creek - Franklin County. According to the report 10 rock structures are not
performing as intended. However, no instability problems were observed because of this. The stream
appeared stable, with good riffle-pool pattern,. Some sediment was observed, apparently from
upstream.
Vegetation was very dense, and although pines were abundant, the riparian zone was densely vegetated,
and I don't think it it worth trying to control the pines.
1 species of caddisfly (several individuals) was found in two riffles on the stream.
I would not recommend any work on this stream at this time, and this project looks like it would go in
the "Successful" category.
Hope the comments are helpful.
Eric
Eric W. Kulz
Environmental Specialist
401 Oversight and Express Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
? of 7 n /10/1On7 1 1 •27 e M
a/- /oq3
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
SMITH AND AUSTIN CREEKS
STREAM RESTORATION
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 343)
Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
'1r^
r49
Pemem t? ?
ent
PROGRAM
January 2007
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Smith and Austin Creeks Stream Restoration Site (Site) is located in northern Wake County,
approximately 1 mile southeast of the Town of Wake Forest adjacent to the Heritage Development and
Golf Course. The restored stream reaches extend upstream from Forestville Road near the intersection of
Forestville Road and Rogers Road (Figure 1). The project is located within the Neuse River Basin in
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14-digit Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed
03020201070070 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] subbasin 03-04-02).
The primary goals of the project included the following.
1. Establish stable dimension, pattern, and profile along approximately 11,000 linear feet of
Smith and Austin Creeks.
2. Improve aquatic habitat with bed variability and the use of in-stream structures in Smith and
Austin Creeks.
3. Provide a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area that is highly developed for
residential and commercial purposes.
4. Establish a forested riparian buffer adjacent to Smith and Austin Creeks.
5. Incorporate this project into a watershed management plan.
Sixteen vegetation plots (10 meters square) were established and permanently monumented. These plots
were surveyed in late July and early September 2006 for the 2006 (year 4) monitoring season. Based on
the number of stems counted, the average plot density monitored at this Site is greater than 260 stems per
acre and is considered successful. The average plot density has been measured at 923 stems per acre, or
23 stems per plot for 2006 (year 4) monitoring. The dominant species identified at the Site were green
ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), and river
birch (Betula nigra). Each of the sixteen individual vegetation plots were well-above the success criteria
with 445 to 2227 planted stems per acre.
No vegetation problem areas were noted during year 4 (2006) monitoring. The Site is characterized by
planted seedlings exhibiting various degrees of vigor. Overall, vigor was noted as good or excellent,
although a few seedlings appeared to be lacking vigor as the result of plastic mesh collars installed after
planting or stems that were flatten as the result of flooding from Tropical Storm Alberto in June 2006.
Several of the plastic collars were removed during vegetation sampling.
Twenty-three permanent cross-sections were established after construction was completed for the as-built
mitigation plan. Longitudinal profiles were measured after construction and are scheduled to be
completed in year 1 (2003), year 3 (2005), and year 5 (2007) for a total of four measurements; therefore,
longitudinal profile measurements have not been completed for the year 4 (2006) monitoring report. In
addition, channel substrate is not expected to coarsen over time and is not monitored for success at this
Site. As a whole, the majority of Site riffle cross-sections have decreased in cross-sectional area. This
may result from various factors including beaver activity, high sediment loads, and/or stream adjustments
towards a stable, vegetated, natural channel. Width-depth ratios were similar to previous years with
slightly elevated values in Austin Reach 3. This may result from sediment deposition in a stable, low
shear stress reach with good vegetation establishment; width-depth values are expected to lower as the
banks continue to colonize with vegetation and capture sediment. Pools and associated point bars have
remained relatively stable.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page i
The as-built channel geometry compares favorably with the emulated, stable E/C stream type stream
reaches as set forth in the detailed mitigation plan and construction plans. The current monitoring has
demonstrated dimension was stable over the course of the year 4 (2006) monitoring.
Approximately 85 percent (9300 linear feet) of onsite reaches are characterized by a moderate Bank
Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) and moderate Near Bank Stress (NBS) values for the year 4 (2006)
monitoring period. All values of BEHI and NBS are higher than expected; however, elevated values
result primarily from high levels of sand in the stream bed and banks, which significantly raises
BEHI/NBS values.
Several stream problem areas noted in previous annual monitoring reports were no longer present.
Beaver dams were removed in 2005 from Smith Reach 2; therefore, backwater effects resulting from the
dams are no longer present. In addition, many of the mid-bars present in 2004 have shifted and are
currently point bars. During the current site assessment several areas of bank erosion mostly around root
wads, mid-point bars, and reduced structure integrity/compromised vane arms were noted. Erosion may
be attributed to two bankfull events documented for the year 4 (2006) monitoring period.
In summary, the restoration site achieved success criteria for vegetation and stream attributes in the
Fourth Monitoring Year (2006).
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page ii
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT ...........................................
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND .........................................................................
1.1 Location and Setting .................................................................................
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives ..........................................................
1.3 Project History and Background ................................................................
1.4 Monitoring Plan View ...............................................................................
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS ..........................
2.1 Vegetation Assessment .............................................................................
2.1.1 Soil Data ...............................................................................
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas .....................................................
2.1.3 Stem Counts ..........................................................................
2.1.4 Vegetation Plot Photos ..........................................................
2.2 Stream Assessment ...................................................................................
2.2.1 Bankfull Events ....................................................................
2.2.2 Bank Stability Assessments ...................................................
2.2.3 Stream Problem Areas ...........................................................
2.2.4 Stream Fixed Station Photos ..................................................
2.2.5 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment........
2.2.6 Quantitative Stream Measurements .......................................
3.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................
.................................... i
...................................1
...................................1
...................................1
................................... 3
................................... 5
................................... 5
................................... 5
................................... 5
................................... 5
................................... 5
.................................15
.................................15
........................... ..15
.................................16
.................................17
.................................19
................................. 20
................................. 22
................................. 30
List of Figures
Figure 1. Site Location ...........................................................................................................................2
Figures 2A-2H. Monitoring Plans ......................................................................................................6-13
List of Tables
Table 1. Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives ............................................................................. 3
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History .................................................................................... .. 3
Table 3. Project Contact Table .............................................................................................................. ..4
Table 4. Project Background Table ....................................................................................................... ..4
Table 6. Verification of Bankfull Events ............................................................................................... 16
Table 7. BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates ..................................................................................... 17
Table 8. Stream Problem Areas ............................................................................................................. 17
Table 9A. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Smith Reach 1 ............................... 20
Table 9B. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Smith Reach 2 ................................ 20
Table 9C. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Smith Reach 3 ................................ 21
Table 9D. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Austin Reach 1 .............................. 21
Table 9E. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Austin Reach 2 ............................... 21
Table 9F. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Austin Reach 3 ............................... 22
Table 10. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary ...................................................................... 24
Table 11A. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Smith Reach 1 ....................................... 25
Table 11B. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Smith Reach 2 ....................................... 26
Table 11C. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Austin Reach 1 ...................................... 27
Table 11D. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Austin Reach 2 ...................................... 28
Table 11E. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Austin Reach 3 ...................................... 29
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page iii
Appendices
APPENDIX A. VEGETATION RAW DATA
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables
2. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX B. GEOMORPHOLOGIC RAW DATA
1. Representative Stream Problem Area Photos
2. Stream Fixed-Station Photos
3. Tables B1-B6. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
4. Cross-section Plots and Tables
APPENDIX C. CVS LEVELS 1 & 2 DATA FORMS
APPENDIX D. BEHI & NBS DATA FORMS
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page iv
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting
The Smith and Austin Creeks Stream Restoration Site (Site) is located in northern Wake County,
approximately 1 mile southeast of the Town of Wake Forest adjacent to the Heritage Development and
Golf Course. The restored stream reaches extend upstream from Forestville Road near the intersection of
Forestville Road and Rogers Road (Figure 1). The project is located within the Neuse River Basin in
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14-digit Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed
03020201070070 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] subbasin 03-04-02).
Directions to the Site:
From Raleigh, North Carolina
? Travel north on US Highway 1/Capital Boulevard for approximately 9 miles
? Turn right/northeast on US Highway 1-A for approximately 1 mile
? Turn right on Rogers Road for approximately 1 mile (Note: the downstream end of the project is
located northeast of Rogers Road approximately 0.25 mile before the intersection with Forestville
Road/Heritage Lake Road)
? Turn left on Heritage Lake Road approximately 0.5 mile to parking area at soccer fields on left
The Site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province, within the Northern Outer Piemont
ecoregion. The Site is situated within a rapidly developing area on the outskirts of the Town of Wake
Forest. Housing developments and new housing construction surrounds the Site; a golf course is located
at the upstream end of the Site east of Heritage Lake Road, which bisects Austin Creek on the Site, and a
park with soccer fields is located between Smith and Austin Creeks west of Heritage Lake Road.
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Historically, the Site was characterized by agricultural land. Site streams were channelized in support of
land uses, resulting in low-sinuosity, incised stream channels. Streambanks and bed features were
unstable throughout the Site due to high shear stress and poor riparian vegetation. The location of the
confluence of the two streams was altered as evidenced by old USGS topographic mapping and United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil survey maps, which show Austin Creek flowing into
Smith Creek approximately 2500 linear feet upstream of the current confluence. A large flood in the
early 1990s caused an avulsion to occur, which rerouted Austin Creek to its current downstream
confluence with Smith Creek. A previous landowner completed the avulsion by excavating a channel and
rerouting Austin Creek to the edge of the valley.
Smith and Austin Creeks were restored by traditional alterations to channel dimension, pattern, and
profile, as outlined in Applied River Morphology (Rosgen 1996) with the establishment of a riparian zone
adjacent to the creeks ranging from 15 to 100 feet in width from the top of bank. Stream implementation
consisted primarily of stream restoration (Priority 1 and Priority 2) where feasible (i.e. the floodplain and
easement widths allowed). Stream enhancement occurred on incised channel reaches where pattern
alterations were not feasible due to a narrow valley and/or existing development. Stream enhancement
consisted of excavation of a new floodplain bench at the bankfull stage and installation of structures to
improve bed features and provide grade control. Structures were installed throughout restoration and
enhancement reaches of Smith and Austin Creeks to maintain the restored channel profile (rock cross-
vanes) and to maintain channel pattern (single vanes). In addition, stream banks were revegetated to
provide bank stabilization.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 1

Axiom Environmental, Inc SITE LOCATION Drawn by_ FIGURE
f ? CLF
2126 Will Rowland Pond Drive SMITH AND AUSTIN CREEKS RESTORATION SITE
Willow Spring, NC 27592 paw;
[phone] EEP Project Number 343 Jan 2007
(919) 3413839 fax Year 4 2006 Monitoring Report
Wake County, North Carolina 06-002
The primary goals of the project included 1) establishing stable dimension, pattern, and profile along
Smith and Austin Creeks, 2) improving habitat, 3) establishing a forested riparian buffer, and 4)
incorporating this project into a watershed management plan. Project structures and objectives are
summarized below.
Table 1. Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)

c
Project c Linear
Segment or a. Footage or
Reach ID ° Acreage Stationing Comment
SRl a El P3 875 00+00 to 08+75 Reach SRI includes a mix of P2 and P3,
with a dominance of P2 as indicated in
SRlb R P2 1080 08+75 to 19+55 stationing
SR2 R P1 2618 19+55 to 45+73 Includes 2618 feet of excavation of new
channel at the existing floodplain elevation
SR3 S SS 794 45+73 to 53+67 Erroding reaches were stabilized with root
wads and instream structures
ARl El P3 2581 00+00 to 25+81 Benching, instream structures, and planting
banks
AR2 El P3 526 25+81 to 31+07 Benching, instream structures, and planting
banks
AR3 R P1 2480 31+07 to 55+87 Includes 2480 feet of excavation of new
channel at the existing flood lain elevation
* R = Restoration
EI = Enhancement (Level 1)
S = Stabilization
** P1 =Priority I
P2 = Priority R
P3 = Priority III
SS = Stream Bank Stabilization
1.3 Project History and Background
Completed project activities, reporting history, and completion dates are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)

Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion Data
Collection
Completion Actual
Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
Construction Completion * * August 2002
Mitigation Plan/As-builts Fall 2002 * Fall 2002
Structural Maintenance * * January 2003
Year 1 Monitoring (2003) September 2003 * July 2004
Beaver Removal * * 2005
Year 2 Monitoring (2004) September 2004 * April 2005
Year 3 Monitoring (2005)
Year 4 Monitoring (2006) Dec 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2006
* - Historical project documents necessary to provide this data were unavailable at the time of this report submission.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 3
Contact information regarding project designer, construction, planting contractor, monitoring personnel,
and relevant project background information are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)
Designer Buck Engineering
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
Will Pedersen [phone]
Construction Contractor Shamrock Environmental Corporation
PO Box 14987
Greensboro, NC 27415
Bill Wright [phone]
Riparian Restoration Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Monitoring Performer Axiom Environmental, Inc.
2126 Rowland Pond Dr.
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Grant Lewis [phone]
Table 4. Project Background Table
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)
Project County Wake County, North Carolina
Drainage Area 12.6 square miles at Site outfall (Smith Reach - 3.6
square miles, Austin Reach -8.4 square miles)
Drainage impervious cover estimate (%) < 5
Stream Order Smith (third and fourth), Austin (fourth)
Physiographic Region Piedmont
Ecoregion Northern Outer Piedmont
Rosgen Classification of As-built E-/C-type
Cowardin Classification R3UB2
Dominant Soil Types Chewacla
Reference Site ID
USGS HUC for Project and Reference Project - 03020201
Reference - *
NCDWQ Subbasin for Project and Reference Project - 03-04-02
Reference - *
NCDWQ Classification for Project and Reference Project - C NSW (Stream Index # 27-23-2 and 27-23-3)
Reference -
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed? No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d

listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor Not Applicable
% of project easement fenced 0
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monitoring Report, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 4
1.4 Monitoring Plan View
Monitoring activities for the Site, including relevant structures and utilities, project features, specific
project structures, and monitoring features are detailed in Figures 2A through 2H.
Site features including vegetation, stream dimension (cross-sections), evaluations of bank erosion and
near bank stress, and photographic documentation were monitored in year 4 (2006). Sixteen vegetation
plots were installed in year 4 (2006) and permanently monumented with five-foot metal fence posts,
driven into each of the four corners of the plot, with PVC pipe attached to the origin for ease in plot
location identification. Twenty-three cross-sections, which were installed after project construction and
permanently monumented with PVC pipe were located and measured for year 4 (2006).
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
Following Site construction three 25-foot by 100-foot vegetation plots were measured for the as-built
mitigation plan. Monitoring plots were changed during the following years with eight 10-meter square
plots measured in year 1 (2003), four 10 meter square plots measured in year 2 (2004), and fifty 10-meter
square plots measured in year 3 (2005). Plots were not permanently marked.
During the 2006 (year 4) monitoring period, sixteen 10-meter by 10-meter plots were established and
permanently marked with five-foot metal fence posts. Sampling was conducted as outlined in the CVS-
EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (Lee et al. 2006). The locations of vegetation monitoring plots
were placed to accurately represent the entire Site and are depicted on Figures 2A through 2H.
2.1.1 Soil Data
Soils within the Site are composed of the Chewacla series. Soil data including percentage of clay on the
surface, levels of erosion, and percentage of organic matter are not included in the soil survey for Wake
County. Chewacla series (Aquic Fluventic Dystrochrepts) consists of nearly level, somewhat poorly
drained, moderately permeable soils on floodplains of most streams in Wake County. The depth to the
seasonal high water table is approximately 1.5 feet; the soils are frequently flooded for brief periods.
Natural fertility and the content of organic matter are low (USDA 1970).
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
A plan view illustrating vegetative problem areas was not included in this report due to an absence of
observed vegetative problems. The Site is characterized by planted seedlings exhibiting various degrees
of vigor. Overall, vigor was noted as good or excellent, although a few seedlings appeared to be lacking
vigor as the result of plastic mesh collars installed after planting or stems that were flatten as the result of
flooding from Tropical Storm Alberto in June 2006. Several of the plastic collars were removed during
vegetation sampling.
2.1.3 Stem Counts
Sixteen vegetation plots were established and permanently marked as depicted in Figures 2A through 2H.
The plots are 10 meters square and are located randomly within the Site. These plots were surveyed in
late July and early September 2006 for the 2006 (year 4) monitoring season; results are included in Table
5. No reference area was studied; therefore no comparisons could be made to reference conditions.
Due to the revised monitoring protocol during each year of vegetation surveys, no comparisons of as-built
to the subsequent monitoring years can accurately be made. Therefore, planted species have been based
upon previous annual monitoring reports and percent survival is based on a comparison of as-built (year
0) total stems per acre. The number of "planted" species were based on the experience and judgment of
the monitoring team, and counts for planted species may be influenced by naturally recruited stems.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 5
U) t:
Y a O
13 a:
U fn cn c m ^ ,
c c a) d Q 3 c? ` V
r? ? oZ'
E } > n O E a? m d c ??
Q 0 Z:3 L)
2yL F QOa(c
W 4 W a 06 - N O m 0 C Oa NO o oNZ O a p
? > yg O
J N
N(D
8 ?O
e
N N ?a
53
F
o ?}+00
y ??+00
s a
f
rv?U
U
i y??zZF?f
H'o
O10
O_
of
O °t
i
n
R
3
O
O?
CO
N?
C to
00
NO
OL
Wa
o _
0
o ?°a rn m E
.p
< mm
CJ y
Oy?O
.NOQ
OFZ
w °
dt o
m?E
mLLfn
O C
CL O Y
6 0 0 m
N m C
EL A co
O N N T O L
r d o r p U
a > v _ +
h
4¦II1
o a
a a?
4)
o a m°
.o U
j
coo
>
m
o > H W m
U c U o
m m c p
U m m
U C O O U h
U. IL m m m o
n
J h
y r
Y a
M z (W?
N N ? O
c -t-+ L W
- Ea= z v U) E'?, a ?' 3 N
c??° o c c a o ?. Qo LL
)r?. o o
E > to :_.. E o U f6 d ,? C E>
Z ?r o?-C:
E H : N 0o? C OIL
m oo °
id
O a Z
d
9}
n ?L'A?ti
'p ?O 0 ^ip?4`
E c? 5,?pg
a ?o
I ? o
a.
c
o
a? y
w y ca
s om
W LL
F
Y `y
N 0
N ? y
LrnE
o
N?
0
0
n
m w
C N
L x
U ? c
m f'1 yQi?
A9~ F(_
?g gyp. P
M1 ?
O
a
? °o c
o a o
a ?
o
rn
o
CL
o ? d m
N ? m
a
o m 3 `o
L N O L O
a > v r
b?
c ? Jt f /
o
> m m w
y m > ° 0
o > y W m
U H 2 Y N
o U
o U m z 53x??
.U rn y `o U
LL IL v, m o 54+00
N I?I? ?
ww ww ®® O+oo
d
J
N +?- c) 0- C W
Y a z
U) Fn A (D
C-j
?i O _ _ o 0c QO u.
c o
E t + O
E OU m d.0 ca
cc 0 c a yOO? o C Od m °° °
o G O N aN Z O CL` N No
z w 0_ > .:9
E - Z =o
co } m o
n'o o`
O
h
s'
0 6+00 ///
" / 6 o
m
0 0
Y
E SP. ? a c
yQO c y°??o 0
o m'-o m
+ ° d o
//7'p ? J Q N CO
! Z ? oa 9° NmNa
I ° m ` ?` wma n
a mm
c w °p
m ? ? w n 02
? o ? o y
" ° mar ?x
H d W3a °O
N c mo
> O m°oE o?
mKt/J
Y N ?il U,
N nd m oa
OI aEd x00 me
O da ?m tiry om
m m o 0 o a
3 0,? o Y
y?Na Q;o m.c
G ao o mvi
dy3L ?ma
oodE O om°
p JUCO ti a m
d 3mo?;?
O ?? p
24+00 5+?`
d
>
a ?` 4
c ?O
Q m O
a ° C.
0
o m L C ry5yp%00
w 3 a O a'??o 'LO v
Y ? ti Q
mo E N +`? ? m
m?? m I
'L m
m
E
O U)
CL O Y
o = U {=p O h
o w ; `o m w
ti
L m 2 L O
a > U
co
00
a
E
y Qm vy C
c = c
d c o 3 ?. O
O m
y m > O o o p C1 > f0
>
O y W m wK W N
U w ° d / ?m
o U m = N
c U y co m >
O rn m G L O
O
iL U. 0)
a=i AI ? ®® y~t?e
.c
W
c c
m o 0
c o
?p O L
wa
U
'- m E
mm
L
0
mw Ocs
_? om
rx r
c>1° °'m
O W J
? m
0.1 1
m
m
1 m
1 Y
_ m
m
?p N
X
U?
a
?m
O
d O y
C U
O
a
o m ; `o
L m ? L O
a > U H
c
? O
N C ? O
f0
O > y W M
U N UO y
c U a m m
m
o c ti o U
.? m m v
LL LL U, m
aAA
0
orQ
ar
o r
WK o
A A
Sr
L ¢ p s
m Y O
mma
c 00
_ y
atE
o a E
W O'm umiv
0
p J O
C O a L
p ma
w3
c O '-
N? moE
O m¢m
>d
Y c

Nw C'M
?rn
.
C C o c
?
v fq i. E OU ?
? Q ? Z? OL
a N yomc
?:
L oN
Z

E
U }
c
- o
W J
a ?
c E N 2.
cao w3
m
m s o
L c o
c moo. mo
omL m¢
O
a
3 E
o¢`
¢s
o m 15xp0
O
WJ
C o
Q 0 J
w? o
N w` 3 srn nwo .
OY' Y r %S#,5 POOL SR-1
O o c O
>d m O
m O
Ivt
0
0
s
m
v
ms
a ^'
cmm
? m
o a .°.
¢ c o
? L
caa
O L
O-r
m E
WOm
o`mE
WJm
SR-1
%Sq,7i" LE SR-t

C O Q
Z
?
a ?3
Q N W
L N
LL
?
y 55
? ?? f0 E
Da Oi N N
C I
C u
> o
cQ?
i
- Z o
m o a
0
m
W
c E
0 0
Y a - c
c ? m
mm
m "
ED v m m
3
m E E c
m
Et
o m
mmUn2
c
? O
0
¢mr
N `L
o ? E
Wmm
XTS#4 POOL SR-t
1 1A
Ss is
T
0
Y a Q
4) z
N cn w c W
UCn ??d ? ` V
C C o ?o QO LL
+? O
Ec0` c
m 7 N =00 6.i c:E >
O Q L Z2 ?
O
L H?
a O 5 coY
06 ? N CD 0 c O?a(0 E o p
??0 p N Z S0 L N N (V
CL 0 C LL d d' ` 1 O Zop
C _ Z o
m o a`
0
m
0
& m -_- C
c w
? v 1O N M y+?°e?` c? O
tx
I co ?
E-L
a? rno
>a
E
F ?
H O
a
y c P
0
N %O
m
a?
> 9
0
0 °\o
M
o co
+ m x
o m can P:? v
?OAtsh +?O ? _
c o m 39 SPA°P?Qttey'A..Y?? m
Lf)
t W c 9
m m z p /+
°maa ry d
Y 3 o E
> P
EmH c 0
0
Moo<
0
a?
?_ N o
> m
0 v
a
o
O
EL o x 0 t
C U m
o rn m m a ? N
a > U H F >
c t !
m
o /
j m m 'm
o ti W m
U o U f%
m
o U CO s 53+00
m ° 440
U. U. CD 5
a ® ® +00
C A ?
b
m I ,
m
J
n?
=F4

c
o
W
H

r"
'

w
w

r?
1 m C ?
U) r
Y n O
N C Z
??
C/ N =? a rn M
?,,, U J M C ?0 m IN
E1 z
d }? m O a o p d QN U-
> W + E OU m ui, E>
?-+ o Z? N L h 0 RICO(DA)
E F LL 4) (D 0 C O 0 0
O Q F N N N
z a? d o
ZO (6
y o a
o
N `
`? m n
m ?
U¢ CL
ZZ ? C
rc F U ?.
O w a w
?p QLLLL ? Q
T it O
OZ
°
1 ?
ryyJ4?S ? 0?
m n y't°J o Q
m `y o lc?
n J0
QO
g O
k
F
c Z
° OF U
O
a WO,Q: O
m'n 5QO° a ? m
SU
M1O pP
00
KO
++f
?i
T 0 0
eF o
C FQ q
m $i
iz
>- W
>d m
o
0
?O
0
a o Y ? ?
U N h
O
a to d m ? o
o ?rn c ? a ?? y+?a
a > U FL- F
0
L X
U v.
a ?
C ?m
O
m ?p
o "
mN
j c
C m p ?' yy
m-
Q y W m >d
N O Y yF
m ° U c
c U m
O ? ? L +
U C ?qN11 ? U
1D ? N L
U. LL fq m ?
® ®
.AA
J
/ Al oCY'
I(/ 4pilQ
y+
Y 0 O
d Z
N C', w
y V
iT) It Co Cc a
C2 -2 ?- C.0
= ` V
C C ?.o r.-
zcQ, 2
98 ?t3
?U E C
° Q Z?YL O??fO E
a (0
a)oo C oit 0 0
L ON ?Z n II l??l
Zo
z
?
?J
H
E
LO
$
0
?f l
a
o °
I ~"p m
?
o ?a m x
'?O ? L w ? V m
ya
? a
? m3 p0 ?m
x
? o 0
? o o / I
m?
pp
x
0
W ^?
m
E
o ?
m
0
^0'A O
a
a =
a j o
t a o m
m?a o ?
;o-
?o
mw¢
vw
p °o
? N
N LN
'OQOd
Pip v R
o c ?m
1 O
o c ? m o°
o ? m A
a rn
O W O N
L I N y
r O
(> L) F-
N
C I
O
LU N
> N 10 N
m W > Q N
+
O > y
an
N O y
m ° U c P
v m
ID
o rn a t v
U C Vl ?••? 3 y .2
LL LL rn co Q ° m a
L
m
A A ®® o c
m ? O ? m
m N U 7
J !A Q Q
°
W r ?
LLI
to w
11
o 0,6
J U
ng ?_
E O
Q l
OLL e?
- ?^ qy a
i rJ
? me m
z o - m m
U Q N
E m
w ? ? m N U a E
m o x o
y co m
o w
W w
s
N m o
m? +
o E a `?
t I
W mQ <? c
y? 0
p N% N
p o
q W
m
m
h I
w
L ?
W J
O -O
O N m
Y 3
C O
m O
co z
m-.
C w
W ?
X
U ?
O a
- m
E m
o c
d o ?e
c c
0
? fn m m °- 0 0
d
O y N C O O
O
L m O L O W a a '
d
> U F H ? o m o
¦ o c
I ( ? o 0 o a m '
?,f( A
v
a
?
N C O m L '., m 0
oc
0 0' E
R c ? ¢? a C ? E o
> m o ?,? c O QL
o o m a c
W co
N N
O Vl j:-
W Y -y NNQ O
U E
c I O? o m
o U
p U m m t ?d N? N o Q Q
m N
O
m >?
U- U. m
U1 ? x
^ ^
J

Y a o

E v
t? ? o
?
'' c c ?o=o
v (A o d Qp
iC?•5 c?
W

Q Om?
fO

E

w ? ?
w
~ a
p ???
? +? y o o
?
C On-
? ?
0 M
0
c ^.
T«S O
Z ? .oN
Z
?.+ ? Q. ? p ?
? a m N (V
Z
= O

a
>
_

?
L
7 x % x x
% x x *
x
%
k
x
x x
%
x
%
x
x
Y
% x
%
?
A
tQ O ? Q\ O M O ? 0 0 0 O N O vl ?O O O h V' -- O r M N O O N ?O ? ? ? 0 0 O 7 ? O b N
N F N . y
j M O?
M
N m
? r % % % % x x x % x % % % % x x x x x x x x x x x x Y Y x

%
L
t
Q C? V7 M ?O ^ ^ 7 7 M M N 7 .-+ 7 N 1( ?

? ?
C w W M .-. M W ? Vl V7 ^ ^ N ?D O V' 7

?
0
E

7 G
3
?
C C
3
?
C C
3
?
G C
3
?
C C
3
xx?O?
G C
3
?
C C
3
?
G C
3
,,??qOqGG
G G
3
?
C C
3
?
C G
3
O C
3
?
G C
3
?
C
?
?
C C
3
?
C
?
?
C C
3
?
C C
3
?
G C
3
Y
G C
3
O C
3
???O?GG
G C
3
???O?GG
G C
3
yyCOC
G C
3
C
G C
3
O
G C
3
O
G C
3
O C
3
xpO
C C
3
y?O
G C
3
EGG
G C
3
O C
3
x?O
G C
3
??OG
G C
3
y?O
G C
3
C
G C
3
pO
C C
3
C
G C
3
G
G

?
^

pO.

2-
C

^ r 7 N r, ?

d ^ M M M N ^

C
d ^ ? h M ^ r
O
Q
N ^ N M ^ ?
O
C

N
L

'y

V'

N

.-.

00

?O

••

N

..

N
M
O
C
m
L
?
N
7
V7
b
N
O
d
V'
Y1
M
^
N
^
^
C
O O\ ?

O
4 00 N N M N N ?

aV6
w
?
N
O
M
n m
?
C r
O
0.
?

N

N

N

r

N

7
0
r
C
a. O
? ?
L
?
M
?
M
^
M
^
N
^,? O
?
d ?
b0
G ?
c
e+?
L
d
?z
a+ u '" e
C ?
? o
0, g

r d

L O
U a ?' _ a g
aCi• Q
? O
Q O
O Q 0
? 3
p
" '
v n
i 5 `+ Q O ;C Q
a n n
? .Z
? c p
u Z L
O U Q
.0
V1 ? Zf
3 $
?
i ?
a n
u Q
?
? O >
0 Q o Q n U ' •V U Z y
w e Q a a Q ? v v v u v v v

6
' l i m
A
y
c
y
-
3
S
3
3
S
3 I m p
U U n
U N
U O ? Z O
0. 9

O
e gcg
? C
•O d `
.n a1 ? 4 G
A
G O A 'V O •? d
oqg ?°-?
oD
? W N ? C y
o -• ? 3 0 0 .
o y ? E " m°
Slit ° 3
y C ? ? C ? O
o mw m.K ? 3
3 e e ? c ? °0
0 0 0 ? o >
9 'O 's ° d
rJ m n G m? G
C L L ? L °
° U d y. r
? o 0 0 o id Q
R
9 0 0 °o °o c
3 C .N. ?N., ?N., ? m
y ?. N c? R U y
N ? ? y D
Based on the number of stems counted, the average plot density monitored at this Site is greater than 260
stems per acre and is considered successful. The average plot density has been measured at 923 stems per
acre, or 23 stems per plot for 2006 (year 4) monitoring. The dominant species identified at the Site were
green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), and
river birch (Betula nigra). Each of the sixteen individual vegetation plots were well-above the success
criteria with 445 to 2227 planted stems per acre.
Shrub diversity was not particularly high within plots; however, various species would be expected to
colonize the Site over time. Species documented within the shrub layer include eastern baccharis
(Baccharis halimifolia), river birch (Betula nigra), and blackberry (Rebus argutus) with tag alder (Aluns
serrulata), black willow (Salix nigra), and sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) along the stream banks.
The herbaceous vegetation is dense in all plots. An inventory of the. dominant herbaceous species on the
Site was also taken. It should be noted that species composition is seasonally dependant; surveys for
2006 (year 4) were completed in late July and early September. Dominant herbaceous species over the
Site as a whole are listed below:
dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium)
Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense)
thoroughwort (Eupatorium sp.)
rush species (Juncus spp.)
microstegium
sericea lespede
goldenrod spec
polygonum sp
2.1.4 Vegetation Plot Photos
Photographs were taken at all permanent photo points and are included in Appendix A. The photographs
show that vegetation is generally growing well and consists of a good combination of woody and
herbaceous species.
2.2 Stream Assessment
Twenty-three permanent cross-sections were established after construction was completed for the as-built
mitigation plan. Measurements of each cross-section includes points at all breaks in slope including top
of bank, bankfull, and, thalweg. Riffle cross-sections have been classified using the Rosgen stream
classification system. Longitudinal profiles were measured after construction and are scheduled to be
completed in year 1 (2003), year 3 (2005), and year 5 (2007) for a total of four measurements; therefore,
longitudinal profile measurements were not completed for the year 4 (2006) monitoring report.
Longitudinal profile measurements should include thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of low bank;
each should be taken at the head of facets (i.e. riffle, run, pool, and glide) and the maximum pool depth.
The survey will also be used to calculate sinuosity. In addition, channel substrate is not expected to
coarsen over time and is not monitored for success at this Site.
2.2.1 Bankfull Events
Documented bankfull events are included in the table below. Documents for year 0 through year 3 (2002
through 2005) did not provide this data; therefore, data presented prior to year 4 (2006) is limited to
available peak discharge data for a nearby station. Two bankfull events were documented during the year
4 (2006) monitoring period.
• t ineum)
za ea
ies
ecies ovum spp.)
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 15
Table 6. Verification of Bankfull Events
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)
Date of Data Date of Occurrence Method Photo (if
Collection available)
Peak discharge at nearby station** reported for October
January 18, 2007 October 11, 2002 11, 2002 of 523 cfs (bankf ill discharge for station is --
approximately 357 cfs)
Peak discharge at nearby station** reported for October
January 18, 2007 October 13, 2004 13, 2004 of 478 cfs (bankfull discharge for station is --
approximately 357 cfs)
Peak discharge at nearby station** reported for
January 18, 2007 November 12, 2004 November 12, 2004 of 361 cfs (bankfull discharge for --
station is approximately 357 cfs)
Peak discharge at nearby station** reported for June 7,
January 18, 2007 June 7, 2005 2005 of 951 cfs (bankfull discharge for station is --
approximately 357 cfs)
Total of 5.56 inches* of rain reported for June 14, 2006
June 14, 2006 June 14, 2006 resulting from Tropical Storm Alberto; water covered the --
soccer fields between Smith and Austin Creeks
Total of 3.75 inches* of rain reported to fall over 3 days
September 1, 2006 September 1, 2006 (August 30 - September 1, 2006); overbanking was --
observed in several locations along Smith and Austin
Creeks
* Reported at KNCWAKEFI Weather Station on Welcome Drive in Wake Forest.
** Reported at USGS Gage Station 0208732885 on Marsh Creek near New Hope. Marsh Creek at this station has a 6.84 square
mile watershed, which is expected to have a bankfull discharge of approximately 357 cfs based on the North Carolina Rural
Piedmont Curves.
2.2.2 Bank Stability Assessments
Detailed Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) and Near Bank Stress (NBS) assessments were completed
for the year 4 (2006) monitoring report. Results of the assessments are presented in the table below.
BEHI and NBS assessments were not included in the previous monitoring reports and therefore no
comparisons between preconstruction or previous monitoring years can be made.
The majority of onsite reaches are characterized by a moderate BEHI and moderate NBS. Reaches that
are characterized by high or extreme BEHI include a section of the downstream preservation reach (Smith
Reach 3) and sections of the upper extents of Smith and Austin Creeks (Smith Reach 1 and Austin Reach
1). These sections of stream are incised, show evidence of prior bank erosion and tree loss with low
rooting densities and some bare soil exposure.
Approximately 84.6 percent or 9300 linear feet of onsite reaches are characterized by moderate
BEHI/NBS indicating that stream reaches are relatively stable, exhibiting low erosion rates
(approximately 624.5 tons per year). Site BEHI/NBS values indicate a successful stream restoration
project, particularly when the project location is considered; the project is located within a developing,
urbanized watershed that is targeted for restoration (Targeted Local Watershed 03020201070070).
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 16
Table 7. BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)
Time Approximate Very Sediment
Point Reach Linear Extreme High Moderate Low Low Export
Footage* (tons/year)
linear feet (% of total linear feet on Site)
Smith Reach 1 2100 400 1600 100 -- 490.7
%)
(3.6 (14.6%) (0.9%)
Smith Reach 2 2550 -- 25 2
5 -- -- 32.0
(3 (2
2
Smith Reach 3 819 -- ? 4 -- -- -- 58.6
4
Y (
o)
ear 50 2550
(2006) Austin Reach 1 2600 27.6
(0.5%) (23.2%)
Austin Reach 2 500 -- -- 4 00 -- -- 4.3
(
o)
Austin Reach 3 2425 -- -- 2425 -- -- 11.4
(22.1%)
Total 10,994 400 1194 9300 100 624.6
3.6% 10.9% (84.6%) (0.9%)
* The total length/linear footage for each stream reach is approximate.
2.2.3 Stream Problem Areas
Stream problem areas within the Site are depicted on Figures 2A through 2H and are outlined in Table 8.
Several problem areas noted in previous annual monitoring reports were no longer present. Beaver dams
were removed in 2005 from Smith Reach 2; therefore, backwater effects resulting from the dams are no
longer present. In addition, many of the mid-bars present in 2004 have shifted and are currently point
bars. During the current site assessment several areas of bank erosion, mid-point bars, and reduced
structure integrity/failure were identified. Example problem area photographs are included in Appendix
B.
Table 8. Stream Problem Areas
Project Name/Number: Smith and Austin Creeks (EEP Project Number 343)
Feature Issue Station Suspected Cause Photo*
Numbers
Smith Creek
Bank erosion with potential for future 1+50-1+75 Continuation of erosion around tree S1
tree loss
Old bank sloughing 3+10-3+20 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Erosion on left bank of structure 4+00-4+10 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Erosion around structure depositing in center
Mid-channel bar 5 x 25 feet) 4+30-4+55 --
of channel
Mid-channel bar 5 x 10 feet) 5+50-5+60 Sediment deposition in center of channel. --
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tight meander
Erosion on right bank of structure 4+004+10 --
bend
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, erosion
Bank sloughing, root wad loss 6+55-6+90 --
around root wads
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 17
Feature Issue Station Suspected Cause Photo*
Numbers
Smith Creek (continued)

Erosion on left bank of structure
7+00-7+10 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tie in of
S2
structure arm on bend
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tie in of
Erosion on right bank of structure 8+00-8+10 S3
structure arm on bend

Bank sloughing, root wad loss
8+80-9+20 Vertical banks on somewhat tight bend,
S4
erosion around root wads
Bank erosion, sediment input 10+90-11+50 Input from stormwater, tight meanderbend --
Erosion on left bank of structure 12+95-13+05 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Erosion on left bank of structure 14+00-14+10 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tie in of S5
structure arms
Vertical banks on tight bend, erosion around
Bank sloughing, root wad loss 15+50-15+75
root wads --
Bank erosion 17+30-17+50 On outer bend, lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Erosion around structure 18+00-18+10 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation S6
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical
Bank sloughing, root wad loss 18+70-19+00 banks on slight bend, erosion around root S7
wads
Loose sewage pipe below structure 20+20-20+30 Sewage pipe possibly dumped in stream S8
collecting sediment
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical
Bank erosion 21+10-21+40
banks on sharp bend --
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical
Bank sloughing, root wad loss 23+50-23+90 banks on slight bend, erosion around root S9
wads
Widening of stream above and below Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tie in of
24+00-24+30 --
structure structure arms
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical
Erosion around root wad 28+30-28+50 banks on slight bend, erosion around root --
wads
Sediment deposition in center of channel
Very small mid-channel bar 30+90-30+95
behind structure. --
Bank erosion 33+80-34-70 Runoff from adjacent soccer fields --
Sediment deposition in center of channel
Mid-channel bar (- 3 x 15 feet) 36+40-36+55 --
behind structure

Bank erosion, overflow area
46+10-46+60 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical
510-11
ban
banks
Bank erosion, future tree loss 47+6048+20 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical 512-13
banks
Austin Creek
Sediment deposition at stump in center of
Mid-channel bar forming (-1 x 2 feet) 0+20-0+25
channel --
Bank erosion 2+30-2+60 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical --
banks
Erosion on right bank of structure 3+70-3+80 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 18
Feature Issue Station Suspected Cause Photo*
Numbers
Austin Creek (continued)
Bank sloughing, root wad loss 4+304+50 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical --
banks, erosion around root wads
Erosion around structure 4+70-4+80 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, tie in of Al
structure arms
Mid-channel bar (- 3 x 4 feet) 5+00-5+05 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
behind structure.
Bank sloughing, root wad and rock loss Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, near vertical

on banks at four locations 6+00-8+00
banks, erosion around root wads and rocks A2
Migration of stream around structure 8+90-9+00 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, structure at an A3
angle with large drop, tie in of structure arms
Erosion around structure 10+80-10+90 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, structure at an A4
angle, tie in of structure arms
Mid-channel bar (- 8 x 10 feet) 12+10-12+20 Sediment deposition in center of channel
Some erosion around structure 19+30-19+40 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation --
Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, erosion
Loss of root wads 20+40-20+55
around root wad A5
Mid-channel bar (- 5 x 20 feet) 21+70-21+90 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
Erosion on right bank of structure 22+70-22+80 Lack of deep-rooted vegetation, structure at an A6
angle, tie in of structure arm
Mid-channel bar 5 x 20 feet) 27+30-27+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel A7
behind structure
Mid-channel bar 3 x 20 feet) 30+30-30+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
behind structure
Mid-channel bar 4 x 10 feet) 36+40-36+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
Mid-channel bar 3 x 30 feet) 37+20-37+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
Bank sloughing 38+90-39+10 Stormwater runoff from adjacent development A8
Sediment deposition in center of channel from
Mid-channel bar 3 x 12 feet) 39+10-39+20 --
adjacent bank sloughing/stormwater runoff
Mid-channel bar 3 x 6 feet) 41+45-41+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
Mid-channel bar 3 x 20 feet) 43+30-43+50 Sediment deposition in center of channel --
*Problem area photographs: A = Austin, S = Smith
Stream problem areas are relatively infrequent within the Site and are considered minor in respect to the
Site location within an urban watershed, upstream watershed development, and the channel size. Most
problem areas are expected to stabilize over time with further vegetation establishment. Areas of
significant erosion are almost always associated with a tight radius of curvature or turbulence associated
with a root wad. A few areas of erosion are associated with a compromised structure. In general, stream
problems are minor with little to no lateral erosion or head cutting within the Site. Additional inspections
and monitoring of bed and banks up and downstream of root wads or compromised structures is
recommended prior to initiation of proactive maintenance measures.
2.2.4 Stream Fixed Station Photos
Photographs were taken at fixed station photo points and are included in Appendix B. The photographs
show that the stream is generally functioning well with few minor problem areas as discussed above.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 19
2.2.5 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Each stream reach was visually inspected during the year 4 (2006) monitoring period using seven feature
categories and various metrics within each category. Assessment features included riffles, pools, thalweg,
meanders, channel bed, structures, and root wads/boulders. Tables for semi-quantitative assessements of
each reach are included in Appendix B (Tables B1-B6). The mean percentage of performance for
features within each reach are summarized in the tables below. Data for the as-built and years 1 through 3
(2003-2005) were not provided in previous monitoring reports; therefore, no comparison can be made.
Table 9A. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Smith Reach 1 (1986 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
2003 Year 2
2004 Year 3
2005 Year 4
2006 Year 5
2007
A. Riffles * * * * 85%
B. Pools * * * * 86%
C. Thalweg * * * * 93%
D. Meanders * * * * 90
E. Bed General * * * * 98%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc. * * * * 7
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * 0%
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monitoreport, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Table 9B. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Smith Reach 2 (2618 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
(2003) Year 2
(2004) Year 3
(2005) Year 4
(2006) Year 5
(2007)
A. Riffles * * * * 90%
B. Pools * * * * 93%
C. Thalweg * * * * 100%
D. Meanders * * * * 76%
E. Bed General * * * * 99%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc.
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * 33%
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monito eport, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 20
Table 9C. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Smith Reach 3 (794 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
(2003 Year 2
(2004) Year 3
(2005) Year 4
(2006) Year 5
(2007)
A. Riffles * * * * 85%
B. Pools * * * * 78%
C. Thalweg * * * * NA**
D. Meanders * * * * NA**
E. Bed General * * * * 100%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc. * * * * 100%
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * NA
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monitoring Report, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
** - Smith Reach 3 is a large channel that was targeted for stablilization/preservation; this reach is fairly straight with little to no
meanders.
Table 9D. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Austin Reach 1 (2581 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
(2003) Year 2
(2004) Year 3
(2005) Year 4
(2006) Year 5
(2007)
A. Riffles * * * * 76%
B. Pools * * * * 77%
C. Thalweg * * * * NA
D. Meanders * * * * NA
E. Bed General * * * * 99%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc. * * * * 38%
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * 401.
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monit-drh 'Report, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Table 9E. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Austin Reach 2 (526 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
(2003) Year 2
(2004) Year 3
(2005) Year 4
(2006) Year 5
(2007)
A. Riffles * * * * 100%
B. Pools * * * * 100%
C. Thalwe * * * * 100%
D. Meanders * * * * 67%
E. Bed General * * * * 99%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc. * * * * 100%
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * NA
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monitoring Report, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inr- Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 21
Table 9F. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Smith and Austin Creeks (Project Number 343)
Austin Reach 3 (2480 linear feet)
Feature Initial Year 1
2003 Year 2
2004 Year 3
2005 Year 4
2006 Year 5
2007
A. Riffles * * * * 98%
B. Pools * * * * 90%
C. Thalweg * * * * 95%
D. Meanders * * * * 95%
E. Bed General * * * * 99%
F. Vanes / J. Hooks, Etc. * * * * 90%
G. Wads and Boulders * * * * NA
* - Available project documents consisting of the 2003 Mitigation Plan, 2004 (Year 2) Annual Monitoring Report, and the 2005
(Year 3) Annual Monitoring Report do not include this information.
Problem area trends observed during year 4 (2006) monitoring, as described above, included erosion
around root wads with bank sloughing, potential for future root wad loss, and erosion around structure
arms.
2.2.6 Quantitative Stream Measurements
During the year 4 (2006) monitoring period 23 cross-sections were measured (21 onsite and two just
upstream of the Site). Tables for quantitative assessements are included below; these tables include data
from previous years. No cross-sections are located on Smith Reach 3, which was targeted for
stabilization/preservation; therefore, there is no table summarizing morphology monitoring for this reach.
Cross-section plots for the 21 onsite cross-sections for year 4 (2006) monitoring are included in Appendix
B. Longitudinal profiles were measured after construction and are scheduled to be completed in year 1
(2003), year 3 (2005), and year 5 (2007) for a total of four measurements; therefore, longitudinal profile
measurements were not completed for the year 4 (2006) monitoring report.
Success criteria dictate that there should be little or no change in the as-built cross-sections. If a change
takes place it should be determined if the change is to a more unstable condition (downcutting, erosion) or
to a more stable condition (settling, increase in vegetative diversity, deposition along the banks, decrease
in the width-depth ration, decrease in cross-sectional area). The as-built longitudinal profile should show
that bed features are neither aggrading or degrading; however, short-term aggradation/degradation may
occur depending on the peak annual discharge. Bed features should be consistent with those observed in
typical E- and C-type channels. The as-built pattern should not change and the riffle-pool sequence
should remain constant. A significant coarsening of bed materials is not expected due to the sand/gravel
substrate; therefore, bed materials will not be analyzed for stream success.
Permanent cross-sections in the Site are included in Appendix B. Each cross-section is graphically
depicted for as-built through year 4 (2006) for analysis of dimension attributes. Photographs of each
cross-section for year 4 (2006) are included with graphs in Appendix B. As a whole, the majority of Site
riffle cross-sections have decreased in cross-sectional area moving toward a more stable channel. All
reaches classify as E-type or C-type channels. Width-depth ratios are similar to previous years with
slightly elevated values in Austin Reach 3. This may result from sediment deoposition in a stable, low
shear stress reach with good vegetation establishment; width-depth values are expected to lower as the
banks continue to colonize with vegetation and capture sediment. Pools and associated point bars have
remained relatively stable.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 22
The as-built channel geometry compares favorably with the emulated, stable E/C stream type stream
reaches as set forth in the detailed mitigation plan and construction plans. The current monitoring has
demonstrated dimension was stable over the course of the year 4 (2006) monitoring.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 23

N M
N d. --? M
O N .?'+ bA y at G y
N N
G ?" p
O '•' M O pq y .?
N
-
O
N oo M O
•
b 7 0
? a0.i y S
N O c
,
?
? v1 N h
N
r+
' C .
O O
O ?i
? C .
O
O a'
?

A 'x
GeS
06
m

N
M
M
M
Vl
M, •-•
-; M ..+ 0 0 O
-' 7 E
+
b bq p'^ N C y m U y ....
M O
O
•
+
.b by L1, N O
.
Q M M
~ N ,-? d. N C C ?. p N aJ
•m N cC
Q O i .b 0. C d
.di C O ?_
•? N M S O
,
o c y ?o+ a
°
Q i M w
U
bA 'fl
L.?.1 y p O .? O 0 itl
O N Q 0. G
- Om
O O ?" 17
bA k
cl O O
14
A ? N ? ? O
R .?
• ? o b
q ? ? ? C
?C ?
? G
Q U
?
iG ?
?
M
y •p y 7 to 'n
p
iu
D aG '
? 1 b
N
o
p
0.
°

y ( U
N
-
U W cC G O P: .Y
v o° to
'
d
a+ ?G+
L y G_ G
fl •C ;
A .-. O N r O>
?
?
O
0.
O
F4 O 7
7
? p •
°
C
Q U
,
M
a v
v 41
b0 .
E p N 'G C... a •D
O

y w
N
O 9_-
ekd b to a' p
W G
L N Y C C >
u? N' t O
N
Q .
b
9 0 0 P.
G
'i
I O y
?
r

a t0 b N
io N
O a. C? ° •b
0.
7
> i v'
O N C a
O ?•'
G

41 k
R 1
+
O O O
b OD p" N C a>
C
o
N
O
d N O
y
c?'oa
a C a
¢' 0?a
R M

A ti
m d o°

PC
z
?
y
R
o Y y G ° ?r °' s c c 8 a > W
?
_ ' y
¢ A A °o' m s
y o a
°a b i aoi aoi o o y W
r °
WD y a a y ?,
,,
O w
PG o o
' a`°i k
ce
W
'b 00 0. p? U
o >
`° aii
C
? °? c
o
W o
°
R w
W U
o cOa o
o
b ,? y ?, M L
i p
,
o a
i
o °
w Ga W x
U "tz Cw U v
i °

o
d °
?. m

?
01 w a Z
?'
:: C
g Ca
y

p k

w
r.
d R
.Ci y
? •y
C. ?
L R

+?' o

L

F
..
?
is
a>
h
R "O

d
r a A a o: r/
j

O

.-. l° If

.-r
??7ry
/. N /.

kn

O O

O U1
In
.--.
M O
M
/.

+ N
'?y
N
°?
W
l?

:

N

M

00

b

00
en
1 ?
r

ipa
?
p
r.

'r

N

Cl! 1
O
O
N
C
-
0
0 7
ID
N
O
q

'l7' 00 V1 O ? 00 h O
~ ? ?
In C C

O O
O M ? ? ,^ pp M M
q A; v in In

m q
O
V)

O O
O V'1 171 N 00 M O .N,s A

n

M G! ?My
fir pp
N
--?
N
-6
'n
?.,?
l?
00
M oo M M
M O
?O
?„?
0
'I'
^' N
N
M
fV M
V•1 N W
C
CV
N CxC M 00 O? ?O C\ N
N
FF M

N ' N M 'n ?r tr M N T C

00
M ? '? N N ? ? M /. M
O O

7 Vl
; 00
V ? ? ? N ? N ? ?+ k
R ?
L ! a (
M ,.., cV kn
M ,?
C H
O
? rr
O
O . .
M M r
O ,y, V1 l-: M ••? /r r"
e C

? q Psi

C
•?' O
v
M

O?

N

N

M
N

O?
-r

kn
N

O
O

N
O
O
m A
fn r
O
~
~
M
~
O 'f
ry

N

In N

N ~

M oo
'??
ry
?rR
iL d

F 1
6 Fa ii
Z 1
, ? M N V 9

O p y L x p ?+ R i y y t0. q Zi w y Y 41 a . U
W t
a a 3 A 0 „ O b b a?oi b
3 ° y aqi
a aqi
a v1 ° ° ti d

o
L
"
, x ? w N ?
Q on
? N
w w
zj
o
s
U D
oo ,
Q o w 3 o w a o R o pq °

? y ,? y B oa w a x ?
U b c ? ? U ? ° ?.
° oa
o o
d ,q A: c

0 o

U

?
il!

o

Q
"C
R
a
o
w
°??
;?
p
3
z k

c
m o CQ w d q p U
n ? .
d
F r A ? a a z
IIIR m 00 M C -7 b ,y
?'GG
1f! G ? T 00 ?O Vl ',My
O _7 tl
iG •? M -. N 00 00 ?I
Fi
•^
u O
N N O N
C
O
V] ^ M N m 00 00
O N
r O O - e

M N M a r
?y O M ti ? b b ? D1
M lV M o0 1!1 .-
7 W ',Mj N 00 OR r ',My c0

O
iG Imn
Q ?
+ N O
00 ^' N
M 0o
0 R
i >y
"
? ?
' d

m M ^ N 0 v ?" L O O

s°
[, C

V1
+
??•yr
iG
a
r

V'

M
N

M
M

O

M
VI
^"

-• O
v
x O
v

C
I r
W Q\
O
O .-. .-. O M ? C
F. M N M of -In
r
7 r 00 N ,I n
ry
N
?y'?.I
00
!
In CD /. ?
V

q 0+ ? M V ?' M N ? O ? O
C In ?Fy r

? M ^ h N
N C
O
U 0
?
Ch M V
1 ' N CD
O
O
O ^, O ? ,? O? O v M
R v

?'
M
b
?
N
?
O +
??
iG
O

7 M ? O M
r N `o
r- ?`?1 ?'? p++
N ,.., ry Er ??
iG

N
O M
N
N
O
'
?t
O G4 O O
12

'V
U
r
0+0
N

N

r
N

0
^

OO
c:.

d.
N

b

O?

N

C

r
O

`.

m

°

r

00

tC

O

M

O

V
j 4

V ? ;y N N M ao ? ?y C S r N ? cd c0 M O G
/
-•
O W 11
M O
M ?79r1
M
O i4 O

00
O
00
O
r
^ O
x O
v
CIS l? N d• fV M O' N '.' !•1
/
• Q 4

d
N
M ??
ry
C fy
??
?. in b O O? ? iG ?
.I L
O c/1 N M 00 a,
F
C/? G a,
01 Q
• O
O

y M y

y
+
N N
O
N
Op
N
N
O
ri
Q\
a0
O N
?'!
?+
M
C
M
fJ

N

N
A
C M O
O
O
A U
48
N
M
00
rn

O

O
V
]
•
G
?
'
Z O N "I ,? r o O C
"i iG
?r M V '.' M N ?p Lr `

?+ o y
w
K

0
'
w
?
w
Q
w
S s
•?
w
S
s
s

o

c

a?i
V
C i. .'L. O ?'
. •? Ri FLi y N .C ,? ._.. % Syy ,? O
A W O7
U > ctl

is Y y
bD
•°
O
w
d a
c7 CL
a1
c
?
.•O
a^Ci
y
arOi
C
m
.O.
aCi
c=i
v)
O
O
O
y
y
w
,c

a c ° ° ° °? s >
z
y N E
W 3 v w
0] 3
w ?1
a
x c
x i
b a
i 9
c?
h
o o
? w
C1

?
. P. ~ U 0.'
3 w
?
?cG
' ° w ?'
d z k

°'Z ? y
c O
w (? 7i
L"
E
u
01 w

n E a
i a L

`?

' o

?

d
F r A rn o
. o
.
M
M
L
a
z
L
`I
x
t U
a ?
o L
d
U '0
rr nR
?
PC
o °
o
Q ? o

'V c?
'"'
N N \O G
O O
O O
p M 'ct O
M
N kA
M N+ R
L+ Pr N
~ O O
O O ? ?

O
COD
N
N
M
--
C,4
M
'--?
C
N
rn n
O
M
'
N
M
V1 N in
N
O O
O O
O M N

M tn
N
O

O
R

O
..? N X

10

N
•-?
"'
O

M

N
N
N
SFr.
N /.

m
?
'?
" M V'1
N l? M
N 00
M .--i
p 00
M M --
M M O
a c?
a cd
a c .--i
M
l0
,
r
O
V N
N p M
N 01
M O\
°? T
M N .-.
O M
N N R
a cd
a cd
a o N I?
N N
N
y O O
N N 00 ~ ?" c3 cd cC p M N
N
N
O ?
N ? O
N N
M O
N ?
M O OG7
't en
O O
O O
? ? cV ? ?D V7 N (V ? O ? O

N y
S M
" M
r- Iq
m M

N 00

M M M M
n N ,--?
0
d
+
N
c
O
N
?
""'
N
O

M
d.
M
,?
O
a
O
a
7Oi
N A
~ N N
? O O O

i
i
s
6> ?"' G ? +?''-i Cr ... .... ?i 4'''. ? ?" ?i Qti' '?'i •^ ?«+.' 'w\' 4". 4?'i ?''.. 4?+ W ?i O q N ++'
CL m ?
+

Q
C
O
w
CL
CL m
w
N
v
p
b

?
Q
o
a
°'
' V
aLi
O
O
N
N
4
W
a
3 Q
? A A ° ? b b ? w
? ,?
d ? ? ? ? a
b • r?a C)
w ? '' ? ? ° ? ? em

0 u. d 3
N 4
.
U ? ? ? 0 ~ ? O

R

a G

2
?
2
a
i
a
i
.
C
p
a
0 b
o U
w R 3 °
z w y
o
? .y
n °
w ? ...
LOi
.. ..
O
E d n
? k
W L
V
y
d ? y
O fR
" ? 4'"
` r? d
A M a; a d z
`rl
L? y
.? U
a =
o
Q
A C
., ee
d

4 e?
?
o

7 N M N Nkn
00
N N
N M
.-r
N n
O O
Ey h M N M a ? ? li' ?Or 'R
? ? ?r N V? . O Fr O
O y

co
VJ

M

N

N
N
M

O
00
v1
V'
O
O?
•? S
r
?4

?-+
^
? ? ~ O ? ?
N N
M N

O o0 'err ?
N In
iG
?!

O O
O 'ch N

00
N ? M ? l? N N
III---rrr F? /-•

N
?
O
N
?
dM'
?
N
M
M
l?
l?

.-?
y
O
O
O
O\ o
m
N
N
NO
r..
° '

V ?'
-?
N
M
O
M
v1
V
d;
M
oo
p
?N?''!!
[?
O
O o
N.+
cC
cC
cC
p a
o
pp o
C%? N .
•, t ( ? C
F N pN N
y n .. -f
h
R ~ a Wn ~ iG ?' c0 cd t0 o
" pN C.
F V
1
F F
M [? r-l
N
"I 1
M
A C
M
O O
O O

N
N
r-
V'1
N
N O
"`"i
F. C 2 O

?
y
Syr M '""' n O 00 M f
?
O a f.

y 0
+
'.
NO
0
0
0
00
yrN
C
cC
y
H N NN ^ M h
CC C C
0
° q
7
.,
U °
R
~
?
?
't
?
O0
? N
m F

M [? ID

O 4Y E W . 2 ..11 . Cr W' f CL '$'. Q: • ^ 4'''r fir'. C `4r' QJ-+ fir' C+ ;
i ?
i, n
+
CL a
W a ? ° p b ? CG U ? a'"i ? ? o o L ° ? ? w U o
,p
N y
?+ Y
'b " b O O sue. y `'? r3 b w L1. O
a _
? C, O 0.1 O ° O
N 3 41 P'. a? 3 W
a ?
U
o
w
?' 3 x o ? o ? aa
a

x
o
o
w
'?'
?
? 3
Z a
K
L7 12
w o
k" pa
y °? [
; ° °
Z W
? `
? A v? a w d
Q N Q en - h -? M Q
?
I
G v? h Q Q ?° ^ ?'i
Q a ??e+ M b ? M N l?+ 'L 'L
e O iG F
y ? '?y °: ? p N Q ? ? h
C 0
VJ Q l••? ? n ? ^ M ? !+ cV

O Q ?

M
!+ ? (V ?G N
Q Q O
M M M r
h Q
- ?O
Vi N >"
M Q ?' M N ^+ M ^
M V i ° Z 2
°
O f r .
.

•y O
}
'yN'y??
?
Op0
O
?°
O
?
N
?
00
M
Vi ? k+
GG M ^ ? N Q .M. °
^ ? C N
? O

? M T
!
+ "i Q ^ G
,?r^
F °?
M Q
? O
N ?
M vt
? O
M o0
M ? !?+
N ? r O
O?
N vt - ,^
?d
a
id
a
; z ?
. O
u
} N - O
p ?
00
M M N
1
1 p
?
F
M N
?" L' L' O ?' O
p

Y
V G
O
.

Q

M

O

IR

T O

v

i! O

.mow
M N 4 .-. N ? e
T ?
'?
y ?
?
y ?r
!+ M 1? N Q N M ?' /r
?°
M b
W N
N N
Q p a
Q ^
N ??.I
/. ?
p ? W ? M
N oo
M ?D
b ???rr ip
? ?p
? N..r iA
? .N•r
°
O 4L ? M O? i Q Q

y ti
M
^

M

Q
N

00

Q
?

•--?
^

U
N ??ry

i4

!
+ ?Y+?

C

?
y
° m
A
^
M
^
?4
G
y ?
F??iGGGi M N M n O ?' O ? O

o
,?
o0
o O
e?,
k O

n °? N ?"? h Q ? "' N l? O? O? M N ? N •."
G ? ?L
u ^? N "i O
?2 - n o0 C
M l'J
? ?° O N W
r a 00
? r b '
? ry N
M ? N M .,
. Q ?" p M ? N ? M op Q
Q O

V W n -'
N Q
M M
vi '-:
^ M
d'
! L °
?' ^
l? ^
W N
M
N N .Q. N
M G
M ,
O d. h M M r N p 7
G

'n
T
C
1-: O
v O
v
v" 4 w ^ M N v ^ v 4 9 o

7 ° 0. A ? N Q
C u + '??NyI ? ° ? O 00 ? N A A y
w iG

L ? M O? N Q - ? G
?
d
a
? o u ?
s x
a C C
s C
s •-
W' •-
4 C
m C ? E C
t C C •-
L° C
s C
?u C G C
s C
r
o G
? C
Z o
•Ta ?
> y
m
?+ .? a 3 " ¢ A A a 0
v E m ? b 3 2
A y 'o ? m .5 •A
4 « a°i v 'a, ° m 'H ?
$ o
U a
° ° m a =
- ?? m 3
0 m u
E -0
a
o m v =? w cj e d
a
b • ? 3 s w 3 ° m
a ? x ? ? ? ? U m o
U w
3 v
a s o W z k
m
t ° m ` u
w
is "
E E a m
? ? 'o
F v
i d O v°, w a a ?
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.0. North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa
Springs, Colorado.
United States. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1970. Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture.
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina page 30
Appendix A
(Click here)
APPENDIX A
VEGETATION RAW DATA
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables
2. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina Appendix A
N
N
Y
U
N
'oU(p
C. ig
w
O j G
Z. Q 7
O
E??a
E L }
E
U
U) W W W W tb f` (!7 1? O O co W 1? m to O
d
.
O
Q
y

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
to
E
w

U)
_y

O
.O
l6
d
D
N W N O O O 0 0 r O O fO
? N N N V' (n ? N N ? ?- N ?--
y
E
r

.r
Z
J

d

l6
N co O to co tO (0 to co (O O O tO to (O Co co
d 0
0 CD
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
CD 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 CD
0 0
0
N N N
' N N N N N N N N N N N N N
n

W n

? (
o
? m

T-
) e

CT o

0 o

m fl

0 m

W a- 2-0 Q

m CO

a5
co
co
co
<t It -e It It V d' d' V V I
It
It
O OD co co w w w O M W W M O w w W
C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C9 (9 C9 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7
E (n cn (n (n (n (n ? (n (n U to (n (n (n (n (n

G M M M M M M M M M M M
W M
O M
N M
W M
M M
W
O N O M W 00 00 W O 00
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z

d

N

r

w

d
v

CO (n o ti ? rn v oo
C N C
O W ? O ( ( N N N N N N N M '0
m
CO CO O
O C O OD r., co
J 0 0 0 0 0 ( U
C O O O m m m ' D
CO
00 (0
t0 (n
O C() (n
.6
W
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 U.)
00 V
00 V
00 V.
?
?
.6 00 00 00 00
Z

r

d

.?+ (o "t r- 0 00 O O 7 M r O (D (n OD CA
w
l0 r
M N
M M
N M
N O O N
N O
(0 N
O 00
O (M
P- O
LO O
W h
M M

7
J (0
O (0
m (D
O C1
W CO
CA
m (A Of
O 0n
Q
) (0
m On
m (n
O ?
O M
m lO
d) On
O
O
Lo LO to LO CO LO to LO O LO tO O LO LO to m
Cl) M Cl) Cl) CO Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) M Cl) M M
? N M V lf) O r O r N M d' (0 M W O
O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
x
Q x
Q x
Q x
Q X
X
Q x
?(
Q x
x
Q x
?(
Q x
?(
Q x
?(
Q x
x
Q x
?(
Q x
?(
Q x
x
Q x
?(
Q X
Q
M M CO (M M M M M M M ')
7 7 V V V ,It
V
-
V
V
V
d'
7
V
R
V
'R
M M M M M M M M M M M (M M , M M
CVS Summary of Project Data
Smith and Austin Creeks
Year 4 (2006)
Vigor by Species
Species 4 3 2 1 0 Missing
Alnus serrulata 3
Baccharis halimifolia
Betula nigra 16 8 1
Carya cordiformis
Corpus amomum 21 1
Diospyros virginiana 4
Fraxinus americans 1 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 82 65 10
Gleditsia triacanthos
Ligustrum sinense
Liquidambar st raciflua
Nyssa aquatica 1
Pinus taeda 42 8 3
Quercus albs
Quercus falcata 2
Quercus lyrata 6
Quercus michauxii 1 6 6 1
Quercus nigra 9 1
Quercus pagoda 2 9 2 1
Quercus phellos
Rhus g/abra
Salix nigra
Sambucus canadensis 1
Ulmus rubra 1 2 1
Morella cerifera 2
Juniperus virginiana
Carya 1
Liriodendron tulipifera 1 4
Myrica 2
Nyssa 1 10
Platanus occidentalis 10 16 3
Prunus serotina
Acer negundo 2 5 2
Acer rubrum
F Ulmus 3 6 1
TOT: 35 1170 1141 153 3
CVS Summary of Project Data
Smith and Austin Creeks
Year 4 (2006)
Damage by Species

Qc
c°
c c
a J o
?`°° cy? Qr° Jcc
Acernegundo 14 8 4 2
Acer rubrum 8 8
Alnus serrulata 4 4
Baccharis halimifolia 4 4
Betula nigra 33 29 1 1 2
Carya 1 1
Carya cordiformis 2 2
Corpus amomum 4 3 1
Diospyros virginiana 8 4 4
Fraxinus amencana 2 1 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 173 110 6 4 1 5 43 4
Gleditsia triacanthos 1 1
Juniperus virginiana 2 2
Ligustrum sinense 1 1
Liquidambar styraciflua 8 8
Liriodendron tulipifera 8 3 2 1 2
Morella cerifera 2 2
M rica 3 3
Nyssa 12 2 2 3 4 1
Nyssa aquatica 1 1
Pinus taeda 64 60 2 1 1
Platanus occidentalis 38 27 3 2 6
Prunus serotina 2 2
Quercus alba 1 1
Quercus falcata 2 1 1
Quercus lyrata 6 4 2
Quercus michauxii 14 10 2 2
Quercus nigra 12 10 1 1
Quercus pagoda 15 3 3 3 5 1
Quercus phellos 1 1
Rhus glabra 1 1
Salix nigra 4 4
Sambucus canadensis 1 1
Ulmus 13 5 2 3 1 2
W Ulmus rubra 5 2 1 2
TOT: 35 470 327 22 7 1 2 25 69 1 16
L

W Q 0
Wn 0
0
1 0
M 0
O\ 0
00 0
M \

y F
00 .
00
O,
Wn
rn
r- C
G4 0.
0
i.

o O R o
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o

e

e

p\ W ?"' b
y ?
?
t-,

0 M1
r-
l- 01

l- Cl)

01 00

00
00
00

00
00 M

cs M

ON O

V1
01
N
00
00

l?

01
?
ON
ON
00
M
00
00

00
W)
00

00
kn
00

O

O
O
p ° U
°Y'
«° ? ¢

¢

d

¢

¢

d

d

d

d

¢

d

d

¢

d

`
as

¢

d

¢

d

d

d
c
F U h Y
y
w
H z z z z z z z y
z y
z Z z z z z z z y
z z z z
z' d
.O - -
A
F R d f.
G a

o
o
¢
¢
? M M N N N M M ? N N O .
? ?- vl O O
It z
a

0
to
C• %•
C O
O U
r
C

y N ?. ? aoi a ° w c eu

M P1 m o_ Ca o ° jai i
en y a w a c o 0 w
o
? C ? ? .? ? G lC f L f?

ICI
a
U
!A
?
o CI.
F+
* ,? ? a ? ? a ? ?
O •? ? v
d v
U a
O ?
p ? ti

?.d
rA C.

C-. ?.. W
a3 V
w
N

?
N o (U
.-.
? G? N C. •L: N 'i. O W y O N N •I'. f. O C.
o ? U ° c
C's

?.'
L
y
p O
?.
f'
U N y p
?"' rn O
R .O
U O
N O
` W
O
.L
N W
O W
O
O
y
?
Fr y m O .
C 4
i y
m :? ? ? C
•
cC (D O N
? a a ¢?' w '
? a cn A O O d cn C5 U w x ¢? w w w°
i U V i .
vi N M N V i '
h ? V U V i V
c r c r c - c r r c

VI y
ice, ^O

"CI O R
y :T
o
°
?y a
i C C
94

y

V
b

Cyi
C

Lt
eC
a a° F as > 3
F un gi w Q o9 U A w rw L7
O O k
a
a?
c
O
0

W
0
a?MU
U
p c?
?z
o
U
a. o
?w3
i..
p C y
e
e
e
e
e
e

{•Oj 6 .4? Fy
D\
OMi
O
O? en
\p en
M
? a
? O
0 0 0 c) m 0 0
( 0 0
e O o m o C C o o r- 0 0

y ? c)
01 M
01 M
Q\ M
Q\ O\
? M
? M
O? M
01
?
? O?
I? M
M M
Q1
? O\
?
? l?
? l?
? O
? l-
? M
M M
M
O
? ?, y y Q Q d d Q Q d d Q d d d d d ?, o d Q Q d d d
z z z z Z + O z z z z z ?.
t
1
N
,Z 7
i. ?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
?
M
?
?
z
z
?O
?O
?O
?D
M
M

a a

G y M M M M M M M 7 M d' y z may. ?. M V
f a w F

a

.c
0

C' C O U
•
?.d ? '? a0+ s. C?• ? ? b
O v C
G M y ° ° ? ? .
C? M N y C CG '? ay ? ?, ? °? aaa?y?
y

M

w
fC
°?
?..I

'"
L

o

w
y
it u
v aj ?? °
'? ^ ° " Q o Cl
d = cai o d ti
i+ ?i p 'II ` N °? b ,+,y
r-L

cd

cC

U

y

• r-L
r-L

ab
O 6?
..C?r
bA ?+ w A
y N C
b 'i.
o N
- 'i.
o N w
o ti
c C
b
3 aj
= N
v i•,
o
a°i °
i; C.
y
° ° .0 r-L
09
L" CL
03

E

o

°

i

a

°

.°

w
o

w
o

w
o

E
y
i U o
E U yL p q ti 3 0 t8
r-L
v c•
i
i
U ??„
?arj s
.
a.
¢? c
3
w
a
rn 0
A
O w
O
d
v?
C7
U'
w
x
¢?'
w
w
w
M N M N N M N U N M V N

r.a
W) eq
V O
ou ? ?
N C cue eo d C
? F
? ?
C? ? a a ? as > 3
H r? rn w d ? U A w rw L7
c o k
vN
N
N
Cam.
O
0
ti
w
obi
r
,i
W
,O
E
ti M
? M U
U ? o
Fu
b ?o
. cw
?w3
s.
R
? p C
o
o
¢
d
p
p
d
r
i
Q?F W 00 z z o o z
wa
do
w rA o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0
b
o
a, rA Ln ;, Lr) z z z z z z o 0 0 0 0 o z z
a; ° v

d ° a d ¢ d ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ d ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ d ¢ c c ¢ d ¢ ¢ d d
H 7
a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z o o z z z z z z
w
z
_ L
R?? ?
¢
¢
d
?
¢
d
¢
¢
¢
¢
V ? ? 7 7 M M M z z z z z z z z N N N N z z

e a

Q E ^4)
M
M
V
V
M
M
N
N
y
.
.
N
N
N
N
<
<
w F. Z z z Z z <
s z 6w 4
a

x
0
E
C
C. C'.
O U

C
L" ^
?+ G u
4al Lr i.i C C "Q

N
p
U W p to
C
U °

v o
o
ryn p ?' co C °
' a°i o °'
'?
w
y C C > a> v o o
td o
°
Q ai ° ° °
v 71
o
U
v
ii 1'--I F?1 PC -0 E
" aX
ctf
6 sr
b W U '°^ V r-L

R
O
w

m

c
N
c
Q
3
n
C
b y
...

15
?
?

i

N

U
C

i

? o

•?

w

y

C

c
o

Q
r
+
bA s.
y
a
o .
0
0
0
°
a C
o
3
°o u
b
°
o

=
:' ?•
°
0
,? a w d b ° ? o ?
O L y c e? C c, a y v ° _
C 0 ? E w
U °O ?' y U i•, °., c'C U N C• o .C N ° o C

Y
a., ^
+•
eC
i. ?y
z
N

O ?

W CL 11?? r.

N

t Tom.
' 0

?..

U

?

s.

?.

O
w u a ? A 0 0 d ? C7 U
? w x ¢ w w w
Q? N M V V'1 N M N N M ?' N U N M N
_
CC ? ?
h
rn

V ?
a?a
y 3 ? C7 d a
G? ?i ? as
y ?' C R R ^
R
H V1 ? F? d•' W U A Gz7 Gzi U`
0 o k
? N
R
0
Q
r
i
W

,!4 ? R
? M C,)
?z
Qz?;
?w3
it
O t'. .w o o
r- Q d o
C?
0 DD o
d•
R L y O
? y F ?
z
rte.
Q
L'
L p r+
O O O o o ?
o c ?
o 0
? 0
o 0
o
Q
d
Q
Q
Q
Q 0
o \°
° 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
o "C
v O
00 O
00 O
00 O
00 O
Z O
00 O
00 O
r- z z z z z z CIO
O? O
N Cl
Zn 00
m 00
m rt
O
a" ^ U
y a ;:, ? ?= Q d d d d d d Q Q d d d d Q ? ° d d d d d d
° E;
F
w z z z z z z z z z z z z z z o z z z z z z
z ti
z z z z z

a a
e4
F 'O
r 00 00 00 00 \O 00 00 l? y y y y y r-? N M M
O z

a

0

? C C .r
.r

O A
J.r C ai N O 'G-.,
72 .2 CL
Tom.
d U 'C1
u y
O
O
'C
aU+
V CC
m L? N
O c?
?'.' U
U
r b ? ' U O U N U U O p U ryi?
I.+ ,
q
c? y J
N «S N b ?O 3 ID eC '? U N

w C N C F s °
IL y N CC b ° 'd ° w ° . Cam. 'O U fir" •° ° ° CL+ U

U
CL
'CL
Cd Q

C

d CL

0 %
67
O
O
C.
Ci
CC
y
U
f'.
('.
U - C
.O CL
lC
?
...
y

u ' 8
?
? y S ° w
? a°i E
' '" "
? °
U d0 ? a w ? a, A O O Q v
? C7 L?
Y w x ¢ w w w
N cV M d' V'1 fV M fV fV M ^? N U fV M fV

ro !N y
V

? O
y
? ?i COQ b0 U Qa
d y y ' C y
g d C

H r/? d w ? ai U A w w L7
ON N O
N
O
i0 ti Q
R
N
Gr"
O
0
ti
ti
0
W
Q

? m U
U p :
E
?s z
Qz?
?w3
7 i O GC
+" o o o \°
° \°
o a
Q
a+ 40:
, „ ?, O
o O
0 C.
0
?
?
O
o
z

°

w y
: o o
" a
" o 0
" 0 0
" 0 0
" 0
'

d
a
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
a 0 0
e
¢
¢
ti
o
c o
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o
o
z
o o
o ? 0
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o
z
z

:° a ;:, ?« d d d d d d d d d d d d Q d .° o d ¢ d d d d
F O y
h z z z z z z z z z z z z z z If) O z z z z z

z
z
'
p '?
. j N N N N N M M M N N N z N N z z M M M M z z
F R a?
G a
C ^?
d i
...
? PC
r-

N

N

N

N

N

M

M

M

N

N

N

z

O

N

z

.?

M

M

M

M

es
w
?
z
z
v
a Ny

0
t

Cb•
C- Cl.

?
C O G

°
4.6 p .'3 c E- o
y N
r
O
U c°

o
42. ao

G
?
.Ti CSI
^ ?
p 'LS ?i?r A U
o O
N ?
? ? •
?
c C?•
n
y
N d c Q ai a
i

M it
C
w
(L)
0 4)
= CL d)
o
w
° p
C
" >
m
A a?i c
.> C y
.i'r C, U O .b ? F cC ?C ? cC
a

k

?
cd
U tn'
m
r.l V a
a tom'. N _N N
•+ N '?
G C•
.? • `??
O 6?
V •? t&
ai N U
? ft$
'i. G
Q r-L
O Rl
'i.
O ?
G
w t
v,
Q ,?'.+
'C GjJ

O fCr
S
4.

r N f•n
O
?-.
..
n 0 ° 0 3 0 c -a o o CI. 0

m e?
,'? G? d
a ti
,. C
,?.' C
•U
,?.'
N
Nti
.a „
y
N
.U
?C
4.
0 R a
O
4. y
4.
a
r
L
r C_
a?
0
0

d
cUC

?
a
?
:;
o
?

?
0
A
o
O
w
O -
p .
N
7

'

?'
?p ? a. w a rn d ? C U
; w x ¢ w w w
kn (V cn vi N m cV cV M -? cV N cn cV
O y N ?,
V
O

3 o G7 ;, y
w
n a o
a is y ?o C
> ee
3
04
H W d 0.1 U A fsl fW U
0 oO x
? N -°
9
a
d°.tid
d)
0
0
v
ti
w
X
O
i
w
0

i N M u
U O
z
¢z
d a?i a
U
• a °
?w3
L
dL ?_ CS ke) In <71 rn z
wa ?F

0
?.?::
0 0 0 o o a
0 o
0 o
0 a
0 o
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 o
0 e
0 d d
b
COD O O O _
? O O
0 O
0 O
0
0? O °
0 O O
D\ O C O 00
W 0
00 O ?
00 z z
O
a ? 1 1 1 0 1 C,
v
o R d d d Q d d d d d Q d d d Q ° o d Q d d d d
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z o z z z z z z

L ?
a
o
o
o
?
?
o
o
o
z
z
Faa?
= R.
^y c. ? ^O
?• d
c
°
o
a
o
0o
rn
rn
o
°
z z z

.Si
O
Tyr•
?p is °' O O C
0 3

f7 ^, O " U No ?" w a
~ ^' C• as
k
O
Q
N
^fl
N
C•
y
^ N
a
M it A C• w O

U 0 006
0
^?
?
c°
W

w
lu Q q O O

i U
o

o

N

O
"
R

p" CL

U
a
y
°
?
?
o
6

v
y b U k a
i o U "

v O % N U r-L O 4 ?E

3 -a
•0 :2
N
+
o
r•
VID a• ""' v o 0 0 0 o b o a o 0 0 ?• d)

ed
N 04
U
R,
.??
qj 61
a 0
G C.
U cd w
P U N
o cC cr.
r-L
o
,
o
c
G? o c?i C a o d y' y r-L r. C,
tc a? 04 0 0 o
a a w 'A Ao Oo w
O d
r-L ? 0
U? ??
w
x ?
d °:
w °:
w o
w
N iG N M V V'1 N M N N M N U N M N
r?
y y M

L

I L
•O

d
W rv
L•
?
?y N
FI R ? y =
^ N
d
i

i
O
a
R
H
y
b
s
C
> PC
ce
3
U a
F v? d w a U A w rw L7
`? o Oa
0 o k
vNa?
V1 ?
O
0
ti
L
W
0
Q
AMU
L+ C 0
Q V C.
0U
a
?w3
ect Name Smith and \--in
s Section ARI-2
ore Rittlc ?
9, 18,06
t
r
1-c-, Jcffcr, F
Y -
b r'"
i'
200 6 200, 2014 2003 -
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Sur c5 .
r' -
Station
-7.4 Elevation
239.9 Station
72 Elevation
2403 Station
2.6 Elevation
239.7 Station
2.0 rle m,,.
-
23,
"f"•" • ,
8.0 240.5 123 2x19 13.2 241.4 3.0
-
23,

-? vw-
13.2 240.9 1 Z9 239.1 17.2 239.5 6.0 40 1 w
G
18.4 238.5 21.1 236.4 22.1 215.5 9.0 40.-
?a.
21.4 236.3 23.3 234 ? 23.4 233.6 12.0 41. - y.
23.5 233.9 25.4 232.8 25.7 232.3 15.0 240
24.9 232.8 26.5 2311 30.6 231.9 IT8 239." a te? '%v -? ;?
26.8 231.1 27.6 231.7 33.0 231.5 21.0 3`.
1 "
28.2 231.0 29.2 231.5 34.4 231.5 _3.1 236- -AI
30.5 231.0 30.4 231.5 38.1 232.0 26.4 23? - '
33.0 230.7 334 230.7 38.8 233.1 27.9 234.r 2:g
r
35.0 230.5 37.0 231.2 41.2 234.8 29.3 233.- •k
37.4 230.6 37.2 23L7 45.5 235.1 30.4 23,.' •?
38.2
39.2
4
40 231.6
232.8
233
5 38.2
39.2
39
5 232.1
233.1
2339 52.9 735.8
73.9 235.8
5 2362
83 32.5
32.9
7
33 232
32.?
232
V-`-
.
42.2 .
234.7 .
40.1
234,3 . .
35.4 .
231.'
-

-
46.6 235.1 40.1 234.3 362 231. --
59.0
77.0 235.7
235.7 41.4
45.0 234.7
235.0 37.9
38.7 231,9
2314
Photo of Cross-Section
ARI-2 - Looking Do-stream (a STA 4+42
81.8 235.9 50.6 235.6 39.8 233.1

85.1
236.2
59.7
235.8
40.8
233.9 -
65.3 _35s 422 234.7
82,0 '_36.2 49.6 234.9
83.' 2363 59.0 235.6
70.0 235.7
76.0 235.8
80.5 236.1
2005 2004 2003 AS-BLILT 2006
Area 63.5 62.4 51.2 49.0 5-.6
Width _.. 195 31.1 314 19.6
Mean Depth 13 2.1 L6 IS 2,9
31ax Depth 4.8 40 3.8 3.9 4.2
N;D 11.7 14.0 18.9 21.4
84.0 '_36.2
84.7 236.2
89.5 2;7.3
97.9 239.6
10-'.0 239.5
Cross Section
Smith and Austin ARI-2 Riffle
242.0
240.0 1
238.0
R
L
236.0
234.0
u
s
232.0
230.0
228.0
0.0
10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survev • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -- 2005 Survev
6.6
It{
t,)113 407 6. Id I
80.0 90.0 100.0
Section
to
tore Riffle
Rffle
•?''?1 e

e
218;06 .
..,
K Lewis. Jett- , 1 f A 1
2006 200, 2004 2003 ?,;-???•• - -r .?
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Ele%at
0.0 238.2 2.0 237.1 0.0 238.2 1.8 _
2.5 237.5 2.8 238.1 2.4 237.7 3.8
_-
2
--
-
5.2 235.4 4.0 2237.9 12.7 231.0 5.7 _. -
6.6 232.6 5.7 236.9 14.4 229.3 7.7
:
2
--
9.4 231.3 7.0 235.8 19.6 228.9 9.1
14.0 229.9 8.8 232.7 22.3 228.6 10,4 2 o
-
16.2 230.1 10.6 231.5 24.6 227.9 13.9 -
" F?.de if
3v
18.2
19
7 229.5
228
6 13.7
13
9 230.4
230
3 28.5
32
5 230.0
231
9 15.2
15
5 2
,
22,)
.,
? -'-
y
. . . . . . . v +1
°? .-
23.9 228.2 15.1 229.7 46.7 231.4 18.2 2211 1-46rr
?
26.6

27.5 228.2

228.5 15.6

16 .9 229.4

229.3 54.4

60.5 232.2

232.2 20.1

21.3
-
221)
22?
-
f wµY '-. ..
"`fi'
" ' °
'.

:'
`
28.4
29
8 230.0
231
3 17.8
9
19 228.9
229
0 21.9
9
23 228
22?
r-••
`?U'?
1
r
.
. . . . .
30.8
32.4 231.9
232.3 21.3
230 228.8
228.7 26.3
28.1 2
2,
lyty -
34.2 232.2 23.6 228-5 28.5
37.2 231.3 24.9 228.3 31.0
44.2

50.3 231.3

231.6 25.7

26.9 228.2

'_28.1 34.2

42.0 2-,

2_1..
,ii?, Do,
y 12 1-3 - L-k
54.5 232.2 28.1 228.1 52.4 232.1
28.2 228.3 59.0 231'
29-0 228.7 62.4 232?
29.8 229.8 635 232.2
32.1 231.2 65-4 232.5
33.3 231.8 70.0 233.6
35.2 231.8 74.4 234.6
38.6 231.5 78.4 234.6
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 54.7 52.7 51.2 49.8 60.6
N-idth 23.5 22.8 23.8 24.4 25
Mean Depth 2.3 _- _._ 2.0 2.4
Max Depth 3.8 3.9 3.2 3.2 4.1
'A /D 10.1 9.9 11.1 12.0 10.3
43.4 231.4 810 234.1)
52.4 231.6 86.0 235.9
54.0 232.1 820 236.5
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR1-3 Riffle
240.0 - -
238.0
-236.0
L
L
.C
234.0
u
u
232.0
u
230.0
228.0
226.0
0.0
10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
- sTA?'1/Zlr6
70.0 80.0 90.0
ject Namc Smith and A usun
ss Section ARI-4 {
tore Pool
.,,
'
e )18/05 ! .
she
»r
I v.-is. Jctl'eo
.
,
.
yx
n
h ?,
r
2006 21104 2004 ?
l t
2003
2006 SurvcS 2004 So, cv 2004 Survcv 2003 Sur e)
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevatioi '.
31.- 2354 33.3 2355 31.7 235.4 6.0 234.,
34.1 235.1 35.0 2348 36.4 234.2 18.0 235.
38.1 233.8 36.8 234.3 42.7 231.2 31.7 235.,
40.2 233.0 39.0 233.3 48.8 228.6 33.1 235-
45.9 230.4 42.2 231.8 53.8 227.0 34.3 234.
48.2 230.1 43.8 2311 60.7 226.8 35.7 234.E
50.3 229.1 45.2 230.4 62.7 227.5 39.4 2_
51.2 228.6 46.4 230.1 68.5 229.4 42.0 231.`
52.8 226.6 47.8 229.5 83.2 230.2 46.8 229 c
54.1 226.4 50.1 228.6 96.1 230.7 49.7 29. .
56.1 226.7 50.9 228.3
59.5 226.9 51.9 2229
62.1 227.1 52.8 227.7
63.3 227.7 53.0 227.6
64.3 228.0 54.2 226.9
65.4 228.6 55.5 227.0
67.2 229.0 58.1 227.0
69.1 229.5 61.0 227.3
72.2 230.0 62.2 227.1
83.7 230.3 63.4 227.6
92.5 230.6 63.9 227.7
97.8 230.7 64.9 228.6
51.3
53.1
54.7
56.4
59.1
60.8
63.0
64.8
68.0
69.3
74.3
85.0
227.4
227.1 `
227.2 .?„•,.. _
227.2 W-9 1,- 11
227'
227.6
227'
22_9.-
Photo of Cross-Section ARI-4- Looking Dt n,tnmm a ? I k 20-90
229.6
'_30.0
230.3
66.1 228.7 94.6 230.7
67.9 229.6 96.1 230.8
626 97.5 230.7
103.0 232.0
108.6 233.4

2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 34.0 38.3 385 38.2 47.6
Width 21.4 22.7 215 23.3 23.9
Mean Depth 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 _
Max Depth 2.7 IN 2.5 2.5 3.6
NN /D 13.4 13.5 13.1 14.2 ..4
Cross Section
Smith and Austin ARI-4 Pool
238.0 r
236.0
234.0
L
F
232.0
d
c 230.0
d
w
228.0
226.0
224.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.1
Distance (feet)
- - 2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
? ?,?1alt?? u
90.0 100.0
- ? ,, ` a ?`
s Section AR2-1
urc Riftlc
918,06
Lewis. Jeff-
20116 20115 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Surve}
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevatio
10.5 234.7 15.6 234.3 10.5 234.4 Z5 234.`
15.1 234.7 21.5 232.3 15.1 234.5 10.3 234.-
19.1 233.0 22.5 230.3 22.4 232.3 10.6 234
21.6 232.4 25.0 2292 26.3 228.2 125 234 -
233 230.0 27.7 226.9 29.2 225.1 15.0 234
25.8 228.4 29.5 225.2 30.4 225.1 17.8 233
28.6 226.2 32.4 225.0 30.9 224.8 21.7 232
.
30.5 225.3 332.6 2249 34.4 224.5 23.1 --
32.0 224.6 34.6 224.6 36.4 224.2 25.2 230.
36.4 224.6 363 224.3 36.7 224.3 26.1 229
40.1 225.4 37.4 224.2 38.0 224.6 272 22-
42.0 225.6 39.0 224.6 41.8 224.4 28.5 22S.
43.7 226.6 40.4 224.7 42.7 224.9 30.2 225
449 227.6 422 224.8 47.2 2282 30.9 225=
47.1 228.9 43.0 225.0 59.5 228.6 31.8 225..
52.2 229.2 43.1 225.0 68.6 228.3 34.3 224--
57.7 229.6 44.4 226.1 79.6 228.2 37.3 224
22•.
82.4 228.7 45A 1_27.1 96.2 227.9 39.2
91.1 228.3 46' 227.7 1093 228.1 46.2 226'
102.4 228.3 48.3 228.4 120.6 228.7 40,6 226.?
1203 228.7 54.5 228.7 44.7 226.4
63.4 228.6 46.0 228.3
74.3 228.2 50.2 228.4
85.0 228.2 61.0 228.8
104.4 228.1 73.6 228.6
115b 228_' 85.0 228.4
120.6 228.4 105A 2283
118.0 228.6
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 561 62.1 453 48.1 63.8
Nidth 20.6 20-8 18.8 193 -__
Me- Depth -. 3.0 2A --- 29
>tav Depth 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.6 4.3
N'iD 7.5 7.0 7.8 - 7.7
- - 1711.5 2286
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR2-1 Riffle
236.0
234.0
232.0
C'
?a
L
R 230.0
c 228.0 -
226.0
224.0 1,
-+ FLVr7?A-p
STraBl? ?
222.0 '
10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -*- 2005 Survey
Photo of Cross-Section AR2-1 - Looking Downstream (a ST,4 27+90
ss Section AR-1-2 Z,
ure Pool
t 918,06
w Lewis. Jetlc :n
•+1
2006 200 5 2004 20113 R•
2006 Sunec 2UU Sunev 2004 SuneS 2003 Sur, v
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station EIS atior.
4.8 232.3 8.4 232.4 4.8 232.7 2.9
82 232.0 103 232.0 7.3 232.5 5.0 231,
9.8 231.2 11.2 231.7 12.7 228' 5.5 2,2 .
I L3 230.1 12.7 230.6 15.7 225.6 7.6 32 + >,'
13.9 226.9 13.2 230.2 15.9 225.0 10.4 X3'_.4 - >
14.5 226.2 15.8 226.8 18.9 224.3 11.6 31.
15.3 224.5 16.4 225.6 20.2 224.6 12.6 2_30.0
.
17.1 224.3 16.5 224.4 20.7 224.6 14.1 2 1.: _ -
20.7 224.0 18.6 2'_4.5 22.6 224.5 16.1 211 ..
24.8 223.9 20.7 224.7 25.1 224.3 17.5 __.-._ ?u
-
-
26.2 224.5 22.3 224.5 25.3 224.9 18.3 '24 -
_ _
' - -
-
27.2 225.8 25.6 '-'-4.5 27.9 227.1 19.7 22.._ -
27.9 226.4 26.6 224.8 33.0 227.7 21.3 224 -
?-
-
28.9 227.2 28.2 2_16.3 44.4 227.9 24.0 114"
31.0 227.9 29.6 2273 55.3 227.9 25.8
35.0 228.8 34.0 227.7 62.9 227.9 26.8 226._ ..
49.0 228.9 43.2 228.0 74.4 227.5 28.0 2_-..
-
57.9 228.0 54.8 227.8 83.8 227.3 29.4 227
-
71.1 227.4 64.4 227.6 98.1 227A 35.8

92.2
2221
75.2
227.4
108.5
227.5
54.4
227.7 i'h1? (
ru ., ,ecmn UR1-2 - Looking Downstream a STA 28+35
101.5 227.2 86.4 227.3 71.6 227.6
108.6 2275 101.9 227.4 90.0 227.3
108.1 2_^7.5 103.0 227.3
108.1 2275 107.0 227.4
107.8 227.5
109.0 227.6
114.0 228.8
119.0 _'30.0
1'I.' 2'30.6
131LU 230.9
36.0 231J
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR2-2 Pool
234.0 ,
232.0
Bankfull Elev.
(approx.)
>.
L 230.0 -1 -
z

228.0
s..
o
R
v 226.0
- -

224.0 -- - -

222.0 -----
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -_- 2005 Survey

2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 43.0 43.9 36.9 37.1 685
Width 18.2 173 19.7 _1.3 22.8
Mean Depth 24 25 L9 1.7 3
Mac Depth 3.3 3.4 01 3.6 4 9
NN /D 7.7 6.8 105 12.2
Cross Section AR2-3
Feature Riffle
Date 9/18106
Cres, Lewis, Jeffers
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survev 2005 Sun ev 2004 Sunev 2003 Survet
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
14 132.3 '_.I 232.0 14 2323 0.6 232.3
22.4 2231.6 3.8 230.3 :._ 219.2 2.7 231.9
5.0 2295 6.0 228.8 8.-1 227.0 3.9 230,6
6.9 228.3 8.6 226.7 12.0 224.9 6.5 228.6
85 227.3 103 225.8 12.0 224.5 9.2 226'
9.7 226.8 110 2253 16.3 224.1 111 225.1
11.1 226.3 12.5 224.4 19.1 224.3 12.8 224.8
12.5 224.9 14.2 224.3 20.0 2245 15.2 22_5.0
133 224.6 15.7 2242 21.8 224.6 16.3 224.3
16.9 224.7 18.1 224.4 235 2245 17A 224.0
23.5 225.0 21.3 224.5 26.6 223.9 193 224.1
26.4 224.8 25.1 224.4 28.1 2245 214 224'
28.1 224.5 27.4 224.0 28.9 225.2 23.4 224.2
29.0 2245 27.7 224.0 32.8 227.0 25.5 223.9
29.9 225.9 29.6 224.4 43.0 227.2 27.4 224.0
30.6 226.0 28.9 225.2 50.2 227.6 28.1 224.3
32.3 227.4 29.5 225.6 64.6 227.8 29.7 225.2
33.6 227.7 30.9 226.3 81.6 2282 30.5 2253
41.8 227.4 32.0 227.0 31.7 226.6
50.S 227.6 33.7 2271 332 227.0
72.7 227.9 41.2 2273 40.0 '_27.'-
83.8 228.3 50.5 227.6 48.0 2'_7.3
63.6 227.8 50.2 227.5
_._ 228.4 60.0 227.8
82 2282 717 228.0
x15 228.1
82.4 22x1
x3.1 2281
91.0 229.4
96.5 230.0
103.3 230.5
112.0 231.1
121.0 231.6
140.0 '_31.9
145.0 -32.0
233.0
232.0
231.0
230.0
L
L
229.0
L
228.0
c
227.0
226.0
225.0
224.0
223.0 -
0.0
Photo of Cro...Section kR2-3 - Looking Doi.mtrcam a S14 30-45
20111 2004 2003 ASBCILT
Area - N;4 13.9 56 4 3,.4 18.2
Width 1 24.1 '_10 '_-9 __-.
]lean Depth _.I _._ _.
)lax Depth 3.1 3.2 .._ ?.l
NN /D 11.8 10.8 102 11-3
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR2-3 Riffle
10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
S?A81 ?
80.0 90.0 100.0
Section AR3
'e Poul
9i 1 9; 06
2006
2006 Surrey
Station Elevation
16.9 '_27.0
38? 227.4
64.8 227.1
70.8 226.8
74.7 226.1
78.4 225.2
83.6 224.9
85.8 224.1
86.9 224.0
88.0 223.3
93.8 223.7
95.9 223.3
97.8 223.7
101.4 225.2
105.7 226.9
110.8 227.4
115.3 227.7
231.0
230.0
229.0
228.0
w
227.0
:a
226.0
c
225.0
?a
14 224.0
223.0
222.0
2005
2005 Survey
Station Elevation
30.6 '_27.1
48.0 227.1
59.9 '_26.9
70.5 2_266
73.0 226.0
74.5 225.9
75.6 225.4
75.9 225.3
77.5 224.8
79.2 '24.7
81.0 224.4
83.5 '24.1
84.6 '_23.7
85.9 223.5
87.6 223.5
90.1 223.1
92.3 222.6
94.4 22.5
95.5 222.9
96.9 223.3
97.3 223.6
98.7 225.0
101.5 225.5
101.7 225.5
103.2 226.3
103.2 226.4
107.0 2_26.9
109.0 227.1
110.7 227.1
1139 227.4
2004
2004 Survey
Station Elevation
16.9 2271)
31.6 2222
45,1 227A
60,0 2220
70.6 226.7
75.1 225.7
77.9 224.7
83.5 2'_3.9
87.0 223.6
88.9 223.3
93.3 222.9
95.0 223.1
96.7 223.2
97.5 225.2
101.3 225.4
105.8 226.6
110.3 227.2
113.9 227.4
221.0
20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR3-1 Pool
Section AR3-2
-e Riffle
9/19/06
Lewis. Jeffers
2006 2005
2006 Survey 2005 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevatit
12.3 227,6 12.3 2'_75
25.8 1277 13.2 227.E
36.7 2272 18.7 2274
405 116.9 16,9 227.3
41.9 2265 349 2269
43.8 225.9 39.5 22&6
445 225.6 41.7 2262
46.4 225.1 42.9 225.6
47.1 224.5 44 4 225.0
48.0 223.7 46.0 224.4
48.6 223.3 46.8 223.7
50.1 223.4 48.0 223.1
53.2 223.8 49.3 222.9
545 224.1 50.5 223.1
56.0 2246 51.8 223.2
59.9 2250 53.6 223.3
685 224.6 555 223.7
72.7 225.3 57.5 224.0
77.3 226.8 58.8 224.2
85.0 2273 60.6 224.1
108.8 227.6 64.6 224.1
124.1 227.7 67.6 223.9
69.1 224.3
72.5 224.9
77.1 226.6
80.4 226.8
96.2 227.1
113.8 227.3
231.0
230.0
229.0
c- 228.0

227.0
226.0
12
c
225.0
ti
'? 224.0
223.0
222.0
221.0
2
20 04 2003 '-
2004 Survey 2003 Survey -='-
Station
7 Elevation Sri on Elevation 0
1
3 2276 30 2291.
18.5 227 2 4.0 22(o
41.8 226.3 60 227.1 - '+
44.7 224.9 9.4 227.-,
+'
y,•?
+
47.3 2236 126
2 s..r• :. ?
50.6 222.9 20.0 2
7.-
53.4 223.2 30.0
-
4 „
-

56.3
223.8
360
2271, ;
69.1 223.9 38 ..6 6.
774 2267 4 0 _--
22
92.1 227.1 46 _
104.9 227.4 419 22_.
r
122.7 227.4 50.4
_. 'c,?.•
52.3 '2L`j 550 21
bit
ss1 21-
611
64.2 221 S..T-
65
68.0 223.3
69.4 223.7
73.4 225.4
77.2 226.8
83.0 227.0
95.0 2222
108.0 227.4
117.0 227.2

fr` ?1'K
200.1 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 91S 97.1 125.1 126.5 74.4
Width 326 355 37.2 38.4 38.7
Mean Depth _.4 2.7 3.4 3.3 1,9
Max Depth 3.8 3.8 53 5.3 3.6
W/D 154 13.0 11.1 11.7 20.1
122.4 227.4
124.0 227.5
1280 228.1
132.0 228.9
136,0 229 6
1450 '_3(1-1
161.0 23f1.n
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR3-2 Riffle
-I d 4 Cl? EA S) ld l
-4 /./CZvgovG
Ml
Photo of Cross-Section AR3-2 - Looking Downstream o STA 35+15
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smah and Aus
AR3-3
Puo1
9/19/06
Lewis. Jeff- tin
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survcv 2005 Survcv 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
443 226.5 51.2 226.1 44.3 226.5 4.0 230.2
51.5 226.3 60.0 226.3 67.7 2265 15.0 229.4
71.1 226.7 75.3 2265 77.5 226.6 25.0 228.8
99.1 226.8 92.3 226.5 93.8 226.6 35.7 228.5
102.5 226.7 102.7 226.5 102.2 226.5 39.3 227.8
105.4 226.3 109.3 224.7 108.5 224.8 43.7 226.4
107.2 225.8 111.6 224.4 115.1 223.7 44.2 226.4
112.7 224.8 114.2 224.1 115.5 223.2 51.6 225.9
116.2 224.8 115.6 223.3 118.6 2229 62.0 226.2
118.2 223.5 117.6 223.1 120.9 222.7 72.9 226.5
119.1 222.6 119.3 222.8 124.8 223.1 88.0 226.5
120.9 222.7 120.4 222.7 127.9 223.3 102.3 226.5
124.1 223.0 122.5 222.7 131.7 223_' 109.0 224.7
125.1 223.3 124.8 223.3 135.3 223.5 114.0 223.2
127.0 224.2 126.5 223.6 141.3 226.8 115.8 222.5
131.9 224.1 127.4 223.5 148.2 226.7 118.7 220.9
136.5 224.3 129.3 223.4 148.8 226.7 121.0 219.6
138.0 224.6 132.0 223.4 123.8 219.5
140.2 225.8 134.8 223.6 126.0 219.4
142.4 226.9 136.3 224.1 127.2 219.4
1445 227.0 137.4 224.5 130.0 219.8
150.4 227.0 141.5 226.7 132.3 220.6
143.9 '_26.7 133.6 221.5
148.8 226.7 135.8 223.6
149.1 226.7 141.7 226.9
148.9 226.8
149.4 226.9
153.0 227.8
156.9 '-28.7
164.0 228.9
180.0 228.8
'_01.0 228.8
232.0
230.0
228.0
L
L
226.0
u
u
E 224.0
S
u
W
222.0
Photo of Cross-Section AR3-3 - Looking; Doe nstream a STA 38+IS
2005 2004 2003 AS-BL ILT 2006
Are. 90.5 93.0 151.2 153.8 85.6
width 38.8 39.1 39.4 38.5 39.6
Mean Depth 23 2.4 3.8 4.0 12
Max Depth 3.8 IN 7.1 7.1 42
%%/D 16.6 16,4 10.3 9.6 NA
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR3-3 Pool
-- - Bankfull Elev.
(approx.)
220.0
218.0
50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
ss Section AR3-4
ture Riffle
9/18/06
Lewis. Je tfe?
2006 '_005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
185 225.2 19.0 225.3 18.5 2253 6S 228.t,
34.4 2255 22.1 225.3 221 225.3 10.0 228-'
41-8 225.5 33.1 2255 30.8 2'_5.6 II.6 228.0
44.4 224.8 42.3 2253 41.2 2255 44 225n
46.0 2242 46.3 '_1_39 48.7 223.0 16.9 225.:
47.6 224.0 48.6 2239 51.8 222.7 185 225.]
487 223.5 505 223.0 54.5 223.1 2L0 225'
51.1 223A 54.5 223.1 56.2 222.9 29.0 225.4
542 223.4 57.1 223.0 61.3 222.2 39.0 225.:
56.7 223.5 60.2 222.4 64.8 222.9 42.1 225.0
57.7 223.3 617 2223 66.5 223.2 45.4 224.1
58.6 222.1 63.2 2225 69.9 224.0 48.6 222.1
59.1 221.7 65.2 222.8 763 226.4 54.7 222.1
60.7 221.6 66.6 1-34 80-2 226.2 57.6 221.9
61.9 221.6 68.7 223.7 90.4 226.4 58.4 2215
62.7 221.7 70.1 224.2 99.0 226.4 58.9 11_1.5
635 222.5 71.1 224.8 999 2265 60.3 221.7
66.6 223.5 71.2 224.8 61.0 221.9
69.5 223.7 75.0 225.9 61.7 2222
70.9 224 2 76.9 226.2 625 222A
73.3 225.2 80.1 226.2 65.5 222.5
76.3 225.9 88.6 226.5 67.3 222.8
79.4 226.2 91.9 226.1 704 224.1
95,5 226.0 99.9 226.4 750 226.0
100.9 226.2 77.0 226.2
86.0 1164
91.0 226.3
95.0 226.2
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 61.0 63.7 77.4 78.8 64.2
Width 32.7 35.1 34.1 11.6 9
Mean Depth 1.9 I.8
VIacDepth ,._ - ._ 40
AN ID 17.6 19.3 15.0 C.' 16.?
99.0 226.4
99.9 226.5
100.6 226.5
03,6 2275
106.3 228.2
112.0 228.2
128 0 228'
133.0 228.5
147.2 328_;
150.0 22x v

Cross Section
22 .0
228.0
227.0
L
R
226.0
L
L
R
Z 225.0
C
C
224.0
u
W
223.0
222.0 - - - - - -
221.0
10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0
90.0 100.0 110.0
Distance (feet)
2004 Survey 2003 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
Photo of Cross-Section AR3-4- Looking Downstream (a STA 41+00
Cross Section A113-5
Feature Riffle
Date 9;18/06
Crew Lcwi
2006
**2006 Survey**
Station Elevat
37.1 226.:
70.1 226.
89.2 225
984 225.1
101.2 24.!
102.0 14.:
104.0 114
111.5 223!
114.3 _'24.
120.9 224.
:
123)
3 2 223.
'.
124.4 -123.
1252 23..
125.6 222.
126.5 2221
127.6 222.1
128.6 22.1
29.7 32
1305 223.
131.9 223.E
134.4 224.,
140.6 225
147A 225 ,
184.3 225.'
228.4 226.
274.4 226..
32L5 '_16.347.4
358.6
2005
2005 Survey
Station Elevation
21.2 226.5
52.1 226.1
81.7 2'6.6
104.9 226.2
108.5 225.6
111.6 2240
5.0 .2, 5
117.8 22-2.3
119.7 222.5
24.3 2222
27- 221 9
128 8 221 8
129.8 '_21.8
130.6 222.0
133.1 222.1
1351 222.8
:36.4 223.2
139.0 223.8
144.3 225.5
154.2 226.0
226.0
181.0
229.5 '_25.3
284.9 ..25.6
338.9 225.4
2004 2003 : `.. ??va _?pJi?b!
2004 Sun ey 2003 Sunray } y P +l'
Station Elevation Station Elevati,, '. --a
16.6 226.8 20 22(,
33.0 226.3 7.0 226.-
60.3 2265 15.6 22GJ,
92.2 226"7 31.0 226.4 - - _ '
107.8 226'_ 94.0 26.: ?.• +;y;ir
113.5 2233 58.0 26,
14.7 222.9 75.0 226 (,
114.8 222.9 91.0 226 c,
115.0 222.7 103.0 226.E--`i
115.3 222.9 107.9 225.`
119.8 222 3 109.3 221(
> '-
127.0 222.2 113.0 22t ` v?t,SL.R h d+
130.1 221.8 115.3 22 132.8 222.2 116.5 221."
134.9 222.6 117.7 21.3 'rS?° t 'ter'
r.
135.0 '_22.8 119.7 _
136: 23.2 1213
r?143.4 225.9 122.4 '_21 '
166.5 226.2 124.5 '_21.0
1969 .226.2 1275 '_21-1
201.5 225.8 130.3 221A
229.0 225.6 132.7 2215
257.8 225.6 134.7 221.9
282.8 225.8 136.2 222.0
299.7 225.9 137.1 222.3
310.9 225.8 140.0 223.7
334.7 225.7 143.0 225.0
358.6 224.8 144.2 225.2
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 934 88.9 1160 99.9 [+1_'
Width 36,4 35.6 39.1 343 329
Mean Depth 2.6 2.5 3.0 2.9 _
Mav Depth 3.9 3.9 4.7 4' 3.9
WiD 14 14 2 131 I I-% 168
147.0 2_'5.7
57.0 225.9
177.0 226.0
2000 . 225.6
208.0 ?25.4
219.0 225.5
247.0 225.4
274.0 225.5
293.0 225.'
300.0 225.7
306.0 '_25.7
320.0 '_25.4
3370 225.4
356.0 225.6
359.6 '_25.6
363.5 225.(
368.0 226-
376 0 226-7 1
Cross Section
228.0
Smith and Austin AR3-5 Riffle
226.0 - - --
225.0
q
22.1.0
w
c
223,0
w
222.0
221.0
220.0

Bankfull Elev. (approx.)
80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0 160.0 170.0 180.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey **2006 Survey** -'*- 2005 Survey
Photo of Cross-Section :\R3-5- I,ooki ng Do, nstrea mn STA 46+40
rosy Section AR3-6
eature Pool
ate 9W05
rew Lewis. leffea
2006 2005 2004 2003 k r ._
2006 Survey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 S urvey - - ,? .
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Eleva[ioi
79.9 224.9 95.3 224.8 79.9 225.1 2.0 246.r - - -
]00 3 224.6 126.9 224.7 94.7 224.8 20.0 26
55:
124.4 224.5 146.7 224.5 126.9 224.7 37.0 2" ?
147.6 2241 165.6 224.0 157.7 224.1 61.0 225 A
a? s
.? •?p??"??.
157.7 223.9 169.4 223.4 167.2 223.1 79.9
163.6
169.4 223.6
222.8 170.7
173.4 223.0
222.8 171.0
174.8 222.4
222.1 101.0
125.0 224.-
_24
176
1 222
3 175
1 222
5 1798 222
0 140
0 224
-
.
180.9 .
222.6 .
178.6 .
222.2 182.2 .
221.8 .
153.0 .
114
s' C t,
?,"r • t;
fi
181.9
182
8 222.5
220
9 180.5
181
8 222.5
4
222 187.0
189
3 221.6
221
1 165.0
171
0 223
222
- _

` ..
r
.
184.4 .
220.9 .
184.2 .
222.0 .
192.6 .
222.1 .
176.0 .
22. R
d1
y
185.6 220.6 187.4 221.9 197.8 224.5 178.9 I ). L7
"' "'R' Y
187.4 220.2 189.4 221.7 206.6 225.3 181.4 I J-- 3-a1'
188.9 20.6 191.2 221.6 227.4 226.2 182.9 1 S. -Y
?
:
>
s

189.4
220.5
192.2
221.3
185.0
17.r ?
?
:.
, v
y
,
r a '' ?'' { „r, f .
r -• -
190.9 220.7 194.3 223.0 186.7 1 N_-
'
?
j'•
192.2 220.7 1965 223.3 188.1 218." li?:l?t..
?t7
I
194.5 223.0 199.1 224.8 189.4 212(,
197.8 224.5 204.7 2251 191.3 219.4 Photo of Cross Section A113-6 - Looking Downstream a STA 48-20
208.8 225.0 220.7 225.8 192.8 220.7
221.5 225.4 227.4 2261 194.1 2211
226.6 225.6 196.3 223.3
198.4 224.7
201.0 225.0
205.3 225.3
213.3 225.6
223.0 225.9
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 61,7 70.0 108.9 79.4
Width 39.1 56.9 58.4 5S.3 59.5
Mean Depth .6 1.2 1.9 23 1.3
Vlas Depth 3.4 6 - "q 4.1
VA 1) 4h__ . 1.3 " ) SA
227.4 226.2
229.0 2261
Cross Section
Smith and Austin AR3-6 Pool
228.0
227.0 Bankfull Elev.
226.0
225.0
5 224.0
;.o
L
223.0
V
? 222.0
O
221.0
220.0 --- -- - - -
219.0
218.0 - --- - -
-- -
217.0
120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0 160.0 170.0 180.0 190.0 200.0 210.0 220.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey -*- 2006 Survey 2004 Survey - 2005 Survey
Iject Same Smith and ,%-In
ass Section SRI-2
tmre Riffle
to 9/18106
M Lewis. Jetfen
2006 2005 2004 2003
**2006 Survey** 200±Sunes 2004 S.- 2003 Suncc
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevmi,-
33.99 233.37 22.47 234.92 22.475 234.9 1.0 235.-
43.35 232.98 28.49 234.59 28.455 234.55 12.0 235.t
48.32 233.49 34.91 233.28 33.665 233.37 21.0 234
50.21 233.08 44.78 232.91 43.765 232.97 22.5 234.,,-
53.01 231.33 48 231.46 45.555 232.43 25.0 234.E
53.50 230.80 50.29 230.19 46.60 232.2 28.6 234-
55.48 230.53 51.01 230.24 48.935 230.27 30.9 23-, -
230.81 52.33 230.27 49'95 230.03 33.1 233.7
64.13 231.60 56.54 229.91 50.925 230.17 39.7 _ ±.
65.03 232.11 58.2 229.98 53.305 230.21 44.0 2_.
68.80 233.30 59.7 229.96 55.035 230.'_1 46.6 2 .
7557 234.10 61.57 229.93 57.525 230.18 49.3 23h -
87.36 233.65 64.4 231.1 59.3 230.3 50.2 220.E
66.0 231.7 61.7 230.3 51.5 22_9-
68.8 233.1 66.4 230.8 52.8 22, -
70.9 2318 66.8 231.9 56.1
79.5 233.5 66.9 231.9 57.7 22
93.8 233.5 68.8 233.3 58.8 229.5
106.5 232.9 78.6 233.4 59.1 229.7
115.01 232.91 99.92 233.14 61.7 229.9
115.33 232.60 64.0 231.2
67.6 233.09
72.1 233.38
92 233.09
112 232.52
115.3 232.58
116.2 232.66
122 233.57
130 -34.?,
136 _35.30
140 ?1.42_
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Arc. 54.6 55.9 60.8 59 fi 32.8
Nidth 26.1 25.1 23.6 23.5 19.5
Mean Depth 2.1 _._ 2.6 25 1.7
119as Depth 3.2 3.1 3.7 3.7 2.8
N'10 12.5 11.3 92 9.3 11.6
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SRI-2 Riffle
237.0 -
236.0
235.0 - - - -
_ Bankfull Elev.
(approx.)
L
S
234.0
r
L '
....
233.0
w I -
a 232.0 - - - --
231.0 ! - .. - - - - - - -
-?
230.0 - - - --
229.0
20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0
Distance (feet)
- 2003 Survey • 2004 Survey **2006 Survey** 2005 Survey
Photo of Cross Section SRI-2 - Looking Do-stream ;n STA 9*35
Project Name Smith and A.,, ,
Cross Section SRI-3
Feature Riffle
Date 9118,06
Crew Lewis. Jeffca
2006 2005 2004 2003
`2006 Sunev`• 200 5 Survey 2004 Sunev 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
5S.0 2325 _ ._ 2_321 27.0 232.2 2.8 236.6
70.5 233.0 48Y 2321 40.0 232.3 7.0 2363
80.3 232.4 5;.- 2325 51.1 232.7 13.0 23 5. 1
83.5 231.7 67.6 2325 67.8 232.8 18.0 233.7
845 231.5 72.9 2328 75.0 2326 24.0 2325
89.0 230.7 74." 232.7 811 231.3 27.4 232.3
90.1 228.9 77.9 232.2 84.2 2305 33.0 232.2
922 228.7 80 S 2313 85.1 229.8 50.0 232.4
946 229.7 84.6 230.3 90.7 229.7 69.0 232.6
97.8 23 LO 87.4 229.9 93.0 2295 76.7 232.5
103.8 232.0 88.1 229.9 96.5 229.8 80.0 231.6
115.8 237.1 89.(, 229.4 97.2 230.8 84.0 230.2
1235 2322 90-- 229.2 103.8 231.9 84.4 229.9
911 229.5 126.0 2322 86.8 229.6
94.9 229.5 147.4 232.6 88.0 229.2
95-S 229.6 17'_.9 2_32.7 90.6 229.2
96.5 229.9 93.6 229.3
97.7 230.9 95.2 229.5
106.n 232,0 96.2 229.7
118.! 2320 96.8 229.9
134.1 232.1 98.7 230.4
153.1 - 2324 1033 23L7
I(i5 2_32_.n 110.0 231.9
116.0 231.9
136.0 232.2
1640 2326
172.5 232.7
174.5 232.7
1740 233.6
185.0 234.4
191.0 235.0
194.0 235.4
204.8
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 41.3 36.6 47.5 44.9 29.6
Width 25.8 25.9 25.6 31.3 22
Mean Depth L6 1.4 1.9 1 4 13
Nlas Depth 2.7 2.4 _.. 2.8 3.3
W',D 161 183 I3.8 2_1-8 16,4
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR1-3 Riffle
237.0 --.--..
236.0
235.0
234.0
L
a 233.0
232.0
0
231.0
230.0
229.0
228.0 - -
40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey **2006 Survey** -•- 2005 Survey
120.0 130.0 140.0
Photo of Cross-Section SRI-3 - Looking Downstream a STA 11+30
Project Name Sinith and Austin
Cross Section SRI-4
Feature Pool
Date 9.1806
Crew Lewis. later.
2006 21111 5 2004 2003
-2006 Survey- 200, Survey 2004 Survev 2003 Survev
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
71.1 2317 30.1 232.5 30.1 2325 1 L2 236.8
75.5 232.5 373 2326 48.0 232.6 13.7 236.6
76.6 232.3 50.8 232.8 63.4 232.6 17.7 235.4
78.9 232.5 63.8 232.6 81.6 232.4 22.3 233.7
99.2 231.9 718 232.5 98.9 232.0 26.2 232.6
107.4 231.8 78.1 232.5 104.6 231.1 30.2 232.5
109.1 231.6 86.1 232.0 1079 231.1 39.7 232.3
110.9 231.3 98.2 231.4 111.2 230.3 49.4 232.5
112.9 230.8 102.2 231.4 116.0 229.8 59.4 232.7
113.6 230.1 105.0 231.2 119.0 229.8 70.5 232.6
116.7 229.4 167.8 231.3 121.0 228.8 81.0 232.2
118.0 229.0 109.1 231.0 122.5 229.7 95.0 232.1
120.4 228.6 1122.1 229.9 123.4 230.9 100.5 231.9
121.6 229.4 114.3 229.9 123.5 23 L 1 105.3 231.2
122.3 230.3 114.7 229.6 124.5 23 L 1 108.1 230.2
123.8 2312 116.6 229.4 125.6 231.7 110.3 230.4
129.9 233.0 1182 229.1 126.7 2325 110.8 229.9
132.7 233.4 119.5 229.0 128.5 233.4 113.2 229.5
119.7 228.8 129.6 233.4 115.2 229.0
121.7 228.7 129.9 233.3 117.0 228.4
122.4 229.7 132.8 233.6 118.8 228.4
1225 230.0 137.2 233.8 121.0 229.0
123.3 230.5 1232 229.8
123.7 230.9 125.0 230.8
128.2 2329 128.4 232.7
136.4 233.9 1303 233.4

2005 2004 2003 AS-BL ILT 2006
Area 53.4 43.8 69.3 57.9 54.5
Width 49.7 45.1 47.4 46.5 52.S
Mean Depth I.I LO I., 1.2 I
Nos Depth 3.S 3.7 4.. 3.8 3.9
W/D 46.3 46.4 32.4 373 NA
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR-1-4 Pool
238.0
237.0
I
236.0
235.0
T
234.0
ii
233.0 ! -
W
232.0
c
0
> 231.0
w
230.0
229.0
228.0
227.0
40.0
Bankfull Elev.
(approx.)

50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey **2006 Survey** - 2005 Survey
Photo of CrossSection SRI-4 - Looking Downstream to STA 12+00
ss Section SRI-5
ure Pool
9,18; 06
n Lawis. Jett?<o

2006
2005
2004 - IM
2003
**2006 Survey** 2U05 Sun-es 2004 Survey 2003 Sun es
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation,
7.9 232.0 11.2 232.2 8.2 231.8 0.6 232.1
13.3 231.9 13.6 232.0 175 231.9
._
5.2 2-2
163 2314 14.8 231.9 20.0 230.8 7.6 232.2
178 231.0 17.7 231.7 23.5 230.2 14.8 1
22.6 230.1 23-8 230.0 25.3 2-94 16.8 23i.?
24.4 229.7 253 2295 26.1 228.6 19.0 230J
25.8 228.3 26.5 228.2 28.4 228.6 22.0 229.'_
28.4 2270 275 228.1 31.9 228.6 23.0 228.8
32.6 227.8 28.7 228.3 35.7 229.1 24.5 228.8
35.0 2285 315 228.7 41.7 229.8 26.2 7..
35.8 229.2 31.9 228.7 47.5 231.2 27.9 2_7.
37.9 230.2 32.7 228.9 60.7 232.1 29.8
41.1 230.7 34.8 229.2 877 231.5 33.7 2'a
43.3 2303 36.2 229.9 117.1 231.9 34.7 227.3
44.8 230.4 38.2 230.1 139.'-- 231,4 364 2_ho
49.8 231,2 413 230.5 384 "7
56.9 231.7 44.9 230.6 41.3 2277
685 2313 49.8 2313 43.8
53.1 231.6 45.9 228 9
56.2 231.8 476 229 3 Photo of Cross-Section SRI-5 - Looking Do-tream u ST.-1 I6r90
74.5 231.8 51.7 2301
I
93.1 231.8 55.8 231.0
1205 231.9 59.0 23]4
139.'_ 2314 63.0 2315
75.0 231.4
8ti.0 231.0
96.6 231.0
101.5 '_31.3
1131)
22.0
35.0
139.8
033
11 ,60
172 U
Smith
233.0 -- - --
232.0
„231.0

s
230.0
u
!
c 229.0
w 228.0
227.0
226.0
0.0
10.0
2005 2004 21103 AS-BL ILT 2006
Area 55.8 78.9 123' 109,2 70.2
Width 413 43.'_ 44.1 _ 41.8 41.9
Mean Depth 1.3 I.8 IN 2.6 17
M.: Depth 3.6 3.1 5.1 4-8 4.7
NN /D 30.7 23.6 159 16.0 NA
231.7
2315
231.2
231.1
31.4
_31.0
-,_.0
Cross Section
and Austin SRI-5 Pool
20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0
Distance (feet)
- 2003 Survey • 2004 Survey **2006 Survev** -y- 2005 Survey
80.0 90.0
100.0
_ross Section SR2-1
7eature Riffle
late 9/18/06
Lewis. Jeffer
2006
2006 Survey
Station Elevation
100.0 2249
109.5 229.7
132.9 2295
140.1 2292
144.9 229.3
147.8 228.8
149.5 227.1
150.5 226.7
151.1 225.5
153.8 225.1
156.7 225.0
158.6 225.4
159.2 225.7
159.8 226.4
161.9 227.6
168.8 228.7
1795 228.7
186.1 228.9
2005
2005 Su,ey
Station Elevation
112.4 229,7
129.8 229.7
1463 229.3
148.7 228.0
149.4 2'_7.5
150.0 227.1
150.8 226.9
151.2 226.7
153.5 225.5
154.3 2255
156.2 225.6
158.4 226.1
158.5 226.3
162.9 227.3
167.1 228.8
168.9 228.8
172.6 229.0
188.0 229.0
2004
2004 Survey
Station Elevation
100.0 229.9
115.5 229.7
125.5 229.7
138.4 229.4
146.5 229.1
148.9 227.7
150.8 226.1
152.1 225.8
153.6 225.3
155.0 225.6
155.7 225.9
156.6 225.8
157.6 226.1
158.8 226.2
159.2 226.4
160.8 226.7
164.1 228.0
166.5 228.5
169.7 228.6
185.5 228,9
2003
2003 Survey
Station Elevation
0.0 232.3
11.0 232.0
20.0 231.2
22.8 231.1
39.0 231.4
50.0 231.2
60.4 231.2
69.0 231.2
79.0 230.8
89.0 230.4
97.0 230.1
99.8 229.9
120.0 229.7
136.0 229.4
145.2 229.1
147.4 229.0
148.4 2280
1495 227.6
150.0 226.5
152.2 2262
154.1 226.1
1550 225.9
155.4 225.8
156.6 225.8
157.6 226.0
158.2 226.3
160.3 226.3
162.3 226.5
233.0
232.0
231.0
E
230.0
L
a
229.0
228.0
0
227.0
226.0
225.0
2240
1613 227.5
165.8 227.8
1672 228.5
170.0 228.6
175.1 228.5
180.7 228.9
185.7 228.9
188.3 22&6
1925 228.1
193.9 228.1
195.3 2227
198.3 227.9
204.8 228.3
212.8 22T Q
215.5 227.5
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR2-1 Riffle
Bankfull Elev.
(approx.)
-- - - - - --
I
100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0 160.0 170.0 180.0 190.0 200.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey - 2005 Survey
Eoj"t Name Snoh and .Austin
oss Section SR'_
ature Pool
te 9e 18,05
2006 2005 2UU4 2003
2006 Survey 2005 SU-,Y 2004 So- 21103 Sur. es
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevatiun Station Elan ?.
-91 231.2 4.0 '29.9 4,0 7 0.0
6 23
w3. 0.9 13' 129.6 4.5 329.7 3.7
14 230.0 I67 '_28A 4.7 229.3 4.0 22
13.7 229.5 169 ?28.1 13.7 229.7 10,0
17.1 228.4 IS .7 227.5 18.1 2280 14.0
19.6 227.4 20.0 227.0 18.5 227.3 17.2
2I.I 226.8 20.6 226.4 22.2 225 9 20.2
22.I 225.0 '_I.1 225.4 23.0 224.8 20.3 _2-
23.3 224.3 22.6 2234 239 '_24.0 22.3
25.4 2243 2241 265 2243 22.7
27.1 224.9 23.8 224.1 29.2 224.7 24.0 2_ _
29.3 2251 _+._ ?24.0 31.0 226.2 24.9 _2 . -
303 225.1 26.9 2241 31.3 226.6 27.5
30.6 226.4 27.9 224.5 35.7 227.8 30.3 2_.
311 227.2 ^_93 '14.9 43.8 ^_28.7 36.9
31.9 227.5 33.4 226.8 51 4 228.6 41.0 _-
33.5 227.9 346 227.2 43.4 228 i,
38.8 22R 6 37.9 228-1 48.8 228
48.1 228.9 43.10 228.5 51.5 228.1
53.9 2286 501 22R.7 i3.0 228.5
-4 228.7 55.3 '_28.1
60.6
680 228.3
71,7 228.2
77.1 227.6
82.8 228.4
x9.fi 228.5
90,9 228.1
2005 2004 2003 .AS-BUILT 2006
.Area 64.5 60.8 59.2 48.5 14.6
Width ^_6-1 26 '_ '64
M
ean Depth
_.=
24
_.+

,
Alas Deplh 46 46 3.8 3.S 4
3
N/D 12 109 116 139 AA
912 '26.4
994 226.2
101.8 ?26.1
10:.1 1
11H4 2'_T4
1074 2289
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR2-2 Pool
232.0
231.0
230.0
L
229.0
228.0
V
!V-227.0
G
O
'226.0
u
W
225.0
224.0
223.0
0
Bankfull Elev. (approx.) -
Photo of Cross Section SR? 2 - Looking Downstream w S'I A 24+87
.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -.- 2005 Survey
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Austin
SR2-3
Pool
9 1S;Ob
Le-, let; -
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 Survey 200±Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Sun e}
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
5.40 226.40 7.8 226.5 74 226.6 2.0 226.7
41.38 22639 8.6 226.6 8.1 2267 7.0 226.6
7154 226.17 19.5 226.5 222 226J 7.6 2265
80.84 225.63 32.7 226.6 42.4 226.7 21.0 226.5
85.87 22536 51.3 226.5 59.9 226.4 33.0 2265
92.48 224.98 605 2265 75.0 226.1 53.0 226.3
94.69 223.82 71.6 226.4 78.8 225.8 69.0 226.3
97.44 223.10 74.5 2263 87.2 225.3 74.0 226.1
100.51 223.05 76.4 226-1 90-2 224.7 81.9 2255
101.99 223.09 81.9 2259 92.9 224-4 88-0 224.9
102.46 223-37 84.3 225.7 951 223.6 92-7 224.2
103.29 22346 84.8 2255 100.5 223-1 94.7 2213
105.94 225.86 864 225.2 101.8 2231 975 223.1
111.09 228.16 88.0 224.8 104.1 223.7 100.1 222.3
11544 229.44 923 224.6 105.8 225.1 101.8 223.1
123.07 229.40 94A 223.8 108.3 226.6 104.2 223.1
97.6 223.6 114.7 229.4 105.0 223.3
99D 223.1 123.7 229A 1063 225.1
100.8 222.9 107.9 226.1
102.4 223.8 108.2 226.4
104.1 224.6 110-9 227.6
104.7 224.9 114.5 229.3
105.2 225.1 119.9 229.7
105.5 225.1 122.1 229.5
1065 225.8 123.5 -9.4
108.10 226.68
114.'--- 229.58
I 1 ; ?6 22904
1''-" 1, 29.45
2005 2004 2003 AS--BUILT 2006
Area 49A 524 s96 64:O 46.S
Width 35A 36.3 377 39.1 35.7
Mean Depth 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 I.'_
Atav Depth 3.6 34 4.2 4.1 3.2
N'/D 25.0 25.1 23.8 239 NA
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR2-3 Pool
231.0
230.0 -- -
229.0 --
- -- - Bankfull Elev. (approx.)
228.0 ---
L 227.0
r
A
y 226.0 - -
225.0 - -
7
u
224.0 - - -
223.0 - -
---- -- - -------
222.0 - - - - - -
I
221.0 - --- - --
20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -- 2005 Survey
Photo of Cross-Section SR2-3- Looking Downstream Ia STA 31+25
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and Au>in
SR2-4
Riffle
9.18/06
Lewis, Jeff-
2006 200, 2004 2003
2006 Su rvey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survev
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
4.9 226.9 17.3 226.1 4.9 226.9 2.0 226.8
221 226.2 26.2 226.1 18.6 2261 4.9 226.9
35.5 226.2 261 226.1 30.8 226.0 8.0 226.7
38.3 224.3 355 225.9 35.8 215.9 15.3 1_26_2
40.6 223.9 35.7 225.3 36.5 225.5 22.3 226.1
417 223.2 35.9 225.0 38.1 223.8 29.3 226.0
43.4 223.0 37.9 2245 40.8 223.2 35.0 225.8
44.2 2229 38.8 223.6 43.7 2217 37.1 225.1
45.5 222.7 395 2235 44.6 222.9 39.2 223.3
46.9 222.7 43.0 223.1 473 223.1 39.7 223.1
471 223.1 43.5 223.1 50.2 224.1 41.4 222.8
48.9 223.4 47.4 223.1 52.1 225.2 43.0 222.7
50.1 2245 50.4 224.1 54.2 226.1 44.3 222.7
518 226.1 50.5 224.2 60.4 225.8 46.1 222.7
614 225.8 51.6 224.5 67.0 226.2 47.4 2217
715 225.9 53.1 225.9 69.8 226.4 47.8 223.1
816 226.0 53.1 226.2 71.0 226.0 48.7 223.3
90-8 2259 58.4 225.8 811 225.9 519 224.7
58.7 225.8 91.1 225.8 53.9 225.9
620 225.7 57.0 225.9
64.8 225.9 60.8 225.6
695 226.4 68.3 226.0
725 125.8 71.3 225.7
78.4 2255
86.0 226.0
902 225.7
91.1 225.8
100.1 225.8
108.0 226.0
113.6 226.3
117.0 226.5
118.6 '_281
121.3
124.6 228.1
227.5
227.0
226.5
226.0
L
ti
225.5
L
225.0
N
224.5
c
224.0
v
223.5
223.0
222.5
222.0
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 345 18.4 +_. 38.9 37-3
Width 17.6 184 18.9 18.7 I8
Mean Depth _._ '_.1 __, 2.1 2.1
Max Depth 28 3.2 3.3 3.1 3.4
W'/D 7.8 8.8 8.4 9.0 8.7
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR24 Riffle
(approx.)

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2004 Survey 2006 Survey -2005 Survey
Photo of Cross-Section SR24 - Looking Do-stream 'a STA 32+45
Project Name
Cross Section
Feature
Date
Crew Smith and .Ausun
SR-1-5
Rif c
91806
Lewis. Jeff-
2006 2005 2004 2003
2006 S urvey 2005 Survey 2004 Survey 2003 Survey
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
40 224.4 0.7 2245 0.8 224.5
24.4 2245 7.0 224.7 4.6 224.5
362 224.2 8.1 2245 14.3 224.6
41.4 1_24.3 91 224.5 24.8 224.4
43.3 221.4 102 224.6 32.0 224.2
45.1 221.0 10.3 224.6 36.1 224.0
48.4 2215 10.7 224.6 38.3 223.3
50.5 2216 11.0 224.6 39.8 2215
52.0 221.6 12.5 224.5 41.2 220.9
53.1 223.1 12.5 224.6 42.3 221.0
53.8 223.1 26.0 224A 43.7 220.8
55.5 223.8 30.0 224.4 46.1 220.8
61.3 223.9 31.6 224.1 47.4 220.8
70.7 224.3 34.0 224.1 48.0 221.0
78.8 224.4 37.7 223.3 49.8 2211
39.2 222.3 51.0 221.4
41.1 2222 515 222.1
42.3 221.4 52.7 222.8
44.0 221.4 533 223.2
45.2 221.4 55.2 223.8
46.4 221.2 59.9 223.7
48.0 220.9 675 224.1
49.1 221.1 75.2 224.6
51.4 222.0 90.9 2255
51.7 222.6 102.5 226.1
52.7 223.2 111.6 227.3
2242 121.0 228.1
- 125.9 228.3
66.9 ]24.5 131.11 228.2
229.0 r
228.0
227.0
R 226.0
L
225.0
224.0 ! - -,
a
3 223.0
222.0
221.0
220.0
2005 2004 2003 AS-BUILT 2006
Area 31.4 25F
Width 16.4 16.9 15.4 13.9
Mean Depth 1.9 '_-1 '_-0 1.9
NI., Depth 25 3 0 3_0 2-B
N'/D 8.6 81) 9.1 74
Cross Section
Smith and Austin SR2-5 Riffle
Bankfull Elev.
(approx.)
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Distance (feet)
2003 Survey • 2006 Survey 2005 Survey
Photo of Cross-Section SR2-5 - Looking Do-stream a STA 39+20
Appendix C
(Click here)
APPENDIX D
BEHI and NBS DATA FORMS
Smith and Austin Creeks Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2006)
EEP Project Number 343 January 2007
Wake County, North Carolina Appendix D
Total Bank Erosion Calculation
s
?o
Cf)
rJ
s?
t?
sm
RCO( -
Q
AUS-hvl
V,ea( h2.
Mfiv)
FeC,3
Stream: 5M 1'1 at;9 V-1 Total Bank Length D i 9 U o
E
Type: /L
Stream

Observers: Ax p yy1
Date: 911? ) 0V s
NRC.S 1 NC
Graph Used: E S
L W C-
BEHI
_(adjqqtln) Near Bank Stuns
(adjective) Erosion Rate
(ftlyr) Length of
Bank (ft) Bank Height
(ft) Erosion Sub-
Total (fie
1 S N) C PLIES ?,
2 ?XT MOD ; H C)o 10 IoOo D•D
3 Loin 1--0 vj 0.01 100 3.5 33
4 IVl O D Lo Uj -0.01 b -7 ` 5 4 55 b,b
5 MOD MOD 0.()LI 952? 4. 139
6 Moth LOV?6 0 , 51 ? 1,gI5 ( DO 1;-
7 MoD. NN0 o.04 150 I ?tD
$ H16H A 0 D 0&-7 3 5
e 'NIGH M 0 D 0,21
?.Iq
5?5
10 AuST! 'l (WEr
11 H 1? I? ,?? 0.?j rJv } I (0 0
12 M0 D MO'D o, 0y ZG 50
" 13 NOD MOD D.Oq 560 go,0
14 MoD ?vtbj? b-01 3 la3.o
15 MOD I LOW O-DICb- IgOO 4,? It3.`I

I. Sum erosion sub-totals for each BEHI/NBS combination Total Erosion

Rely
C?a ? ? l.
)

It. Dhride total erosion (feet) by 27 feeteyarde 7=1 Erosion
(ydelyr)
(J? .

Ill. Multiply Total Erosion (yard) by 1.3 (a„r.vI&,aO%vMieraww0.Maddtpe) Total Erosion
(tonslyear)
I ?2? • ? I
U
0 ?
'O
M ?
t44
f
r
A
i

0
U
w
p4
CCC C?
4
e .!N
? p f
i
a _? g
v ?
m
m w `
>q
L ? d?
b
+ir a
3 +
? v

z CP
W
0
4
C
o c

m
40

0

O s?
N

.S Q

1?c

m
J
? 3,?rm z Q 'm ? y
? ?m ? _ ? oca c ? ,? W ? X
... p y' S y 4 ?f!
W iC Q ., c d V =. C O `° m
d
0
o C
M
A
m
20
E
C
?I
W!
U{

? S
UA

5 C

a ?
ti
E ?
m
3
is
W
r
O

g. .g o

m -C
e a'+ E

L 4
b
'?
MM a ,? p

Y1 r
?
a sA
Ot0
»?

m
C`a

2
t ao 71?

_ G3 L]
0

'ad
a
a
V
S

.Q
C
a m
W

R

?nd
_
a
?
py
¢ - ?
N
O . ?
a
N

? 1w1?

CM CD
..+ L C
F-I
L- i
lb
0
0
0
fl
CP
ti
0
b
?e
o?
?M a.g
A?
_?

I
r-I 3
t t
t+

S

s

Z
W X

5
t
N r 0+
c) 0oN
?- M - C

g
2
a
lic
v S
r
s g ? ?
r
? r=g
Z
3
i
o ! ?f
Z
Co
m
X
C
k
d
U
rM O M
t ? 1-
1.10 I?
?CnN
TO ?
?LS)?ac?
1ST lP ®`? O
8
a
L

A
A
P
w
A
4
.,a 01
a
.? 1
W2
x

E ?
N
a
rm
m
?a
7
0
U
?U
II

c o
a
E
? B a
.
@o ?
C 2
Y
?p co •
m
s ? o
o
A
I "?
e

?
e ?
4 1 ?g

V - a a t
l ?Ti Y
(i x? v
G

C
J
C?
v
D

r
a
0
S
a
3
3
c
t4 m
0 6 ?
L3
r ?
m v
"Sal
'y Ti
o 3 ?
b ?
a J ? ?
Q
ss

O
-
?
1

O iRS1

y
s

X

C

b N O

N
N
N

.2 3

3 s ?-
.s
d
B
M
E
8
s
a
a
.? a
s?
a 8
pow
cow
? s

? r
01 Z?
mebm
0
T
3

a m
g
w
s

A
a
n ?

R ? S O

+ I Clot
cn

® cs

jt m t
.. V

U
9
1
M
Q
t
N
d
U
m
H
a
.Q
q
y
t
e
m
e ? t f
Q _
{O O r Y,
A O 06 ?10
m o ?o', o o?Q o o,o
x ni a; a o o T tea,
? ? o v o ego ??o •e,o
ao C ab m o?, ed r} o
1
C4 P-;l 6 f- t-
tt e
= t01d O C!. O rF0 O? O
?? t0 ?O N tD m ? tf! N m
O,
o 'm m aq ao
.? ? .ti ? Lei ? ai ? ? •n eQi ?ti
t
cV O? O T.q. r;O- d
r ? d?Q N ? ? O ? e
? Cn 'n 4 Cf ? a? pp C? ? or
r ? Nf o M Yf l+f fp ? M 1f! l?)
.?1 r C Q Of O r O O Q
!V O N ~ [V N N r` Ct
r
C -10) CD Of .? OS
?" O?QC? Q g O Q C3 $ O
m x? rc ? x? x? x
° ' tr C0 0'
MRM:A AWIQU a3

m
? m
c a

v ra
Y
pw
g Cac C
? - G

m A a
Z C6
A t:
o
S
l el
gi.
y o

fa ? ? N

o
m
a m v
e ?
N
O ?
N
S
at o. S -z

w IL

m
? =rm arc (? O? V
!u
I?D
m = O m 8.
t
0
s
a

I
"
I - -- t ?

0 1 cJt to
t ? I MI

S ?

y
?
X

i
i
p
? Q
eo
v
a.
?v
3
as
Q
n
6
d
Z
x
0
c
a?
m
Q
0
?Q
T ?
1
O U'1
lS?
t 1-
tr T
? S
? Q
C
1 U M
O 1
O ? ?C
4 Lr
MO
T
0
i
S
v
C9
Q
c0
L
LA
qN?
S
s
C
N
X
c
m
Q
m
w
4
N OU)?o
? 1 I 1
\S\ M?pS
0
U
E
k ao
^ o
r c o?
h
r o
n o
.+ v y
` o
w
W ? !
?

= ao
h1 C
CI O
O O O
6f 4'i O
Im 0.
- 0
Of 0i
r a
OI

? w,
N} 0
O p
p O. R
O w O
0 ??
0' O
p '?t, 0
t

r`
O O
INI
! tls
h ?
G O O i
f+ r? O,
h pf
Cf. 0!
?? 47
.. Os
A
d = ?,;i p ? ip N m m{ O h1 0

rn 4n
eft ,
r O
e ' O T
V O
t O
f O
f.
O

.7 w O
eV ? O Q?
N ~ O
eV r
CY ? 0
eV O?
t- O
tY
w
? G w O O O? W ? Ol ? Q1
o
r !p
I ?:
c o
? a g
r q
w p v,.
r ?
w o
?
, III ;l
s ;

SMWWA AN I OIPW3
a
3
f
v
a
lot sa
?E
x
m
r
W
N
L' O
E
C
o ?
O
O
U! v
i? tI1 N

0
S 3
? ?
>
J

a I`
< 43
Z
m
0
0
a.
s
3

A
s
?

m
A 0 e
?
C
9
01

0 N
0
N

m
Q

Ow 3 p
N 0?

3 ?
?
t
c?

- ? 1 Cn 1
t?l

4 v E
4 ? 6 ? J
m ? 9 m V a?
a a o