20021528 Ver 1_Complete File_20070119

Big Warrior Creek Stream Restoration
2006 Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year Two
Submitted to: NCDENR-Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared by: URS Corporation - North Carolina
1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 400
Morrisville, NC 27560
Project Designed by: CDM
5400 Glenwood Ave Suite 300

Raleigh, NC 27612 ( ! '
Submitted: January 19, 2007
j
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT ....................................................................1
2.0 PR OJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................3
1
2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
.
.
. 3
.
2.2 .......................
...
.........................................................
...................
PROJECT STRUCTURE, MITIGATION TYPE, AND APPROACH .................................... 3
2.3 LOCATION AND SETTING ................................................................................................... 3
2.4 PROJECT HISTORY AND BACKGROUND ......................................................................... 5
2.5 MONITORING PLAN VIEW .................................................................................................. 7
3
0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS 19
. ......................................................
3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................. 19
3.1.1 Vegetative Problem Areas .......................................................................................... 19
3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas Plan View ........................................................................ 19
3.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................... 20
3.2.1 Procedural Items ......................................................................................................... 20
3.2.1.1 Morphometric Criteria ........................................................................................ 20
3.2.1.2 Hydrologic Criteria ............................................................................................. 20
3.2.1.3 Bank Stability Assessment ................................................................................. 21
3.2.2 Stream Problem Areas ................................................................................................ 21
3.2.3 Fixed Photo Station Photos ........................................................................................ 22
3.2.4 Stability Assessment ................................................................................................... 22
3.2.5 Quantitative Measures Tables (Morphology and Hydrology) .................................... 22
4.0 METHODOLOGY SECTION ....................................................................................................... 30
4.1 STREAM METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 30
4.2 VEGETATION METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................... 30
5.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................31
FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Vicinity .........................................................................................4
Figure 2. Monitoring Plan View .............................................................................8-18
Figure 3. Vegetative Problem Areas Plan View ..............................................Appendix A-III
Figure 4. USGS Stream Gage Discharge Data ...............................................................21
Figure 5. Stream Problem Areas Plan View ...................................................Appendix B-I
TABLES
Table I. Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives Table ................................................5
Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History .............................................................6
Table III. Project Contact Table ..................................................................................6
Table IV. Project Background Table ...........................................................................7
Table V. Verification of Bankful Events ....................................................................20
Table VI. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment ......................................22
Table VII. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary .................................................23
Table VIIIa. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary -
Big Warrior Creek ...................................................................................24
i
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
Table VIIIb. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary -
Big Warrior Creek ....................................................................................25
Table VIIIc. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary -
Mountain Creek ............................................................. .........................26
Table VIIId. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary -
Mountain Creek ............................................................. .........................27
Table VIIIe. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary -
Unnamed Tributary ........................................................ ..........................28
Table VIIIf. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary -
Unnamed Tributary ........................................................ ..........................29
Table Al. Vegetation Metadata ....................................................... ..Appendix A-I
Table A2. Vegetation Vigor by Species .............................................. .Appendix A-I
Table A3. Vegetation Damage by Species ........................................... .Appendix A-I
Table A4. Vegetation Damage by Plot ............................................... .Appendix A-I
Table A5. Stem Count by Plot and Species ......................................... ..Appendix A-I
Table A6a. Vegetative Problem Area Table - Big Warrior Creek ................. .Appendix A-I
Table A6b. Vegetative Problem Area Table - Mountain Creek .................... .Appendix A-I
Table B I a. Stream Problem Areas Table - Big Warrior Creek .................... .Appendix B-II
Table B I b. Stream Problem Areas Table - Mountain Creek ....................... .Appendix B-II
Table B2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment................................ Appendix B-V
APPENDICES
Appendix A Vegetation Raw Data
I.
II.
III.
IV.
Appendix B Geor
1.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Vegetative Problem Area Photos
Vegetative Problem Areas Plan View
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
norphic Raw Data
Stream Problem Areas Plan View
Stream Problem Areas Data Tables
Representative Stream Problem Areas Photos
Stream Photo Station Photos
Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Cross Section Photos and Annual Overlays of Plots
Annual Overlays of Longitudinal Plots
Pebble Count Frequency Distribution Plots
ii
00412 Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Big Warrior Creek Stream Restoration Site is located in Wilkes County, North Carolina,
approximately 10 miles southwest of Wilkesboro. Big Warrior Creek drains a watershed area of
approximately 7.4 square miles, beginning on the Wilkes and Alexander County line. Two major
tributaries (Mountain Creek and Unnamed Tributary) flow into the main channel of Big Warrior Creek
within the project reach. Sections of these two tributaries were also restored. The project restoration
segments that are on the downstream property arc completely fenced to exclude cattle from the creek and
riparian areas.
Per the 2005 Mitigation Plan and As-Built report (CDM 2005), the objectives of the Big Warrior Creek
Stream Restoration Project include the following: reduce bank erosion, exclude cattle from the stream
and riparian zone, improve water quality, establish a floodplain at a lower elevation, enhance in-stream
habitat, improve functional and aesthetic value of the riparian corridor, and preserve existing beneficial
channel, floodplain features, and riparian vegetation.
URS did not receive a Restoration Plan for the site. URS assumes from site visits and survey work that
Big Warrior Creek originally had failing banks, unstable plan form and cross sectional geometry, little or
no riparian buffer, cattle access to the creek, and several unstable creek crossings.
The Priority estor ion involved converting the impaired channels into stable channels that meander
for a total o 1,0 tnear feet. Rock cross-vanes, single arm vanes, staked log toe protection, and root
wads were incorporated for aquatic habitat enhancement and bed and bank stability. A riparian buffer on
either side of the stream was planted using native vegetation. The cattle were fenced from the riparian
area along the Unnamed Tributary, Mountain Creek, and most of Big Warrior Creek. The upstream-most
portion of Big Warrior Creek is not fenced, but cattle are not present on the surrounding property. In
addition, two stabilized creek crossings and two culverts were installed to allow vehicular access to
different parts of the farm while limiting impacts.
The 2006 monitoring indicated that the Big Warrior Creek restoration is functioning well. The majority
of the bed features appear stable, with well-developed pools in the meander bends and long riffles in the
straight reaches. However there is significant aggradation in some areas, evidenced by well-vegetated
mid-channel bars. In one location the channel has migrated laterally by a full bankfull width and is
adjusting its planform. There is also a lot of vegetation growing in from the sides of the channel,
indicating that the system may eventually transition from a C channel to a narrower E. Some of the rock
structures are failing or causing bank erosion and should be repaired. Scour is common behind rootwads.
Several animal burrows (likely muskrat or groundhog) were observed in the stream banks, which may
lead to destabilized banks in the future.
The planted woody vegetation is doing fair along all three reaches. The streamside and floodplain zones
are generally in better health than upland areas. Streamside survival appears to be the most successful.
The banks of the Unnamed Tributary are covered with a dense mat of American hogpeanut
(Amphicarpaeae bracteata). This may become a problem in that the vine seems to be choking much of
the planted vegetation and creating a monoculture. Hogpeanut is also evident along the mainstem and
Mountain Creek; however, the presence of kudzu (Pueraria montana) and Chinese privet (Ligustrum
senense) pose a more serious problem to the survival of vegetation along those reaches. Kudzu is a
serious problem along the upstream reach of Big Warrior. Maintenance to control the presence and
spread of kudzu is recommended. There are also several large areas of bare ground where the soil
appears compacted and not conducive to natural colonization. Soil amendments and reseeding are
recommended in these areas.
Fish, snails, and several aquatic insects were observed in all three reaches, and evidence of wildlife use
was present throughout the project area. The rocks in the stream were covered with very thick algal
00412 -- Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
growth, possibly indicating a high nutrient concentration in the water. All of the fencing and gates along
the reaches are intact and functioning properly. No evidence of cattle was observed within the
conservation easement. The unfenced, upstream edge of the project reach (Big Warrior Creek) has a very
minimal buffer on the left floodplain. The landowner along the left bank is mowing the adjacent field to
the edge of the water.
2
00412 Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
According to the 2005 Mitigation Plan prepared by CDM and Biohabitats, the overarching goal of the
project was to establish a stable planform, cross-section, and profile pattern to Big Warrior Creek and it's
tributaries, with the premise that geomorphic and habitat function will follow appropriate channel form.
Specific project objectives included the following:
Reduce bank erosion.
Exclude cattle from the stream and riparian zone.
Improve water quality.
Establish a floodplain at a lower elevation.
Enhance in-stream habitat.
Improve functional and aesthetic value of the riparian corridor.
Preserve existing beneficial channel, floodplain features, and riparian vegetation.
2.2 PROJECT STRUCTURE, MITIGATION TYPE, AND APPROACH
URS did not receive a Restoration Plan for the site. URS assumes from site visits and survey work that
Big Warrior Creek originally had failing banks, unstable plan form and cross sectional geometry, little or
no riparian buffer, cattle access to the creek, and several unstable creek crossings.
The Priority II restoration involved converting the impaired channels into stable channels that meander
for a restored total of 11,035 feet as measured along the thalweg. Rock cross-vanes, single arm vanes,
staked log toe protection, and root wads were incorporated for aquatic habitat enhancement and bed and
bank stability. A riparian buffer was planted using native vegetation. Cattle were fenced from the riparian
area. In addition, two stabilized creek crossings and two culverts were installed to allow vehicular access
to different parts of the farm while limiting impacts.
2.3 LOCATION AND SETTING
The Big Warrior Creek Stream Restoration Site is located in Wilkes County, North Carolina,
approximately 10 miles southwest of Wilkesboro (Figure 1). The project site is on the south side of North
Carolina Highway 18, across from the intersection of northern end of the High Rock Road loop, which is
about 4.5 miles east of the Caldwell County line. Big Warrior Creek drains a watershed area of
approximately 7.4 square miles, beginning at the Wilkes and Alexander County line. Big Warrior Creek
and its tributaries originate in the Brushy Mountains near the boundary between Wilkes County and
Alexander County. Downstream of the project area, Big Warrior Creek ultimately flows into the W. Kerr
Scott Reservoir, an impoundment of the Yadkin River. Two major tributaries (Mountain Creek and
Unnamed Tributary) flow into the main channel of Big Warrior Creek within the project area. Sections of
these two tributaries were also restored. The project restoration segments that are on the downstream
property are completely fenced to exclude cattle from the creek and riparian areas.
To travel to the site from the Raleigh area, take I-40 West to US-421 North towards Wilkesboro. Take
NC-16 South/NC-18 towards Wilkesboro/Lenoir/Taylorsville. Follow NC-18 to the site. It is
approximately halfway between the towns of Boomer and Thankful.
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
rs`r ti \,)f '; 1 i / ? vt ? w +t? ??a1 t?'? c ? /?,?}?? 1f? Inter ? tA+? Cy'
Reservoir
W Kerr Scott
J tlS ?` 1.? c 4/',:`•r `r{ 7? f?a?.. C? ?`u t-? n... 1,
268
?i </ 'vS f Z .• ?tY 1 t. A
4 f tl r C .., ? R r-°v r
l+t r Y
pR]E!NIl
/V q
Y _ ? 1 s l: ? j f '•
r 40
met'?
1 ?.
r 4.
%
:C) e
,, >• Boomer ,
%
1 \ `- Rock Rd . dA l r t ; /?r*
e0l t119h ?Q"
c- 1
.? r ? ?_ ?, f 1ti ? iii ? V _-•.? C?,J _ ? ? .' 1 '' J 1"
Big Warrior Creek Unnamed Tributary vi y `1 „ G l r
Thankful/ c 1 ti'; "? ?° r4y r ho,`v ! f,
u Mountain Creek a ?. * ^?
1 ?s WILKES' x
r ,,77
? ( o r l ?"Q? P?F? ? S ?' i'•? / i f r• f per/ \ i'.l "??
Il r /! I
1 { i t f l/ .
?' t ?1 ,' , Y' ? - -emu.. l i f ? ? .,?'I ? •'
(? ;, r . , , ALEXANDER 1 , ;,,
Prepared By: Prep-d For:
URS Corporation - North Cerolna Nc Emeyetem Protect: Monitoring Year:
1600 Pedmeler Park Drive Enhancement Pmpem Big Warrior Creek Figure1
SO. 400 Stream Restoration Legend
Mwrlavlb. NC 276W - z ?zoos> Project Vicinity
Fewer'. 09-1461-1i415 p r? Wilkes County, NC Protect Reach
1'k'()S St(-111 , Project Number: Date: 0 0.5 1
' ,? „-, 00412 January 2007 Miles
2.4 PROJECT HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
The Big Warrior Stream Restoration project was designed by CDM and construction was completed in
November 2004. The Mitigation and As-built Plan were completed in March 2005. The estimated
restoration length was 11,035 linear feet. This length includes 7,185 feet of Big Warrior Creek, 2,415 feet
of Mountain Creek, and 1,435 feet of an Unnamed Tributary.
EcoLogic conducted the Year 1 monitoring in 2005. At that time, Ecologic was provided with an As-
built site map. Other documentation such as project history, contacts, goals, and the As-built report were
not provided. The measured restoration amount is 10,698 linear feet, as measured by EcoLogic (7,013 on
Big Warrior, 2,373 on Mountain Creek, and 1,312 on Unnamed Tributary). Since EcoLogic did not have
complete project data at the time of the Year 1 monitoring, much of their quantitative data differs from
that presented in the As-built Plan (EcoLogic 2006).
At the time URS was given the contract, URS had only Ecologic's Year One Monitoring Report.
Therefore, our surveys, cross-sections, photo stations, and vegetation plots follow those of Ecologic.
Table 1. Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives Table
Big Warrior Creek
EEP Project Number 00412
+.. °? eu o v a o o a
a s
7 W ? 15
q 15 v c o Y

Comment

Big 450 Ell PIII 450 0+00 to
Warrior 4+50
Creek
Big 6,735 R PII 6,735 4+50 to
Warrior 70+00
Creek
Mountain 2,415 R PII 2,352 0+00 to
Creek 25+00
Unnamed 1,435 R PII 1,409 0+00 to
Tributary 15+00
* Existing Feet, Mitigation Ratios, and Units were not provided in previous reports.
R= Restoration P1= Priority I El= Enhancement I PII= Priority 11
Ell= Enhancement II Pill= Priority III S= Stabilization SS= Stream Bank
Stabilization
00412 -- Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
Table 11. Project Activity and Reporting History
Big Warrior Creek
EEP Project Number 00412

Activity or Report Scheduled
Completion Data
Collection
Complete Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan Unknown Unknown Unknown
Final Design - 90% Unknown Unknown Unknown
Construction Unknown NA November
2004
Permanent seed mix applied Unknown Unknown Unknown
Live stakes and wood plants Unknown Unknown Unknown
Final Walk Through Unknown Unknown Unknown
Mitigation Plan/As-Built Report Unknown Unknown March 2005
Year 1 Monitoring October 2005 Unknown Aril 2006
Year 2 Monitoring
Fall 2006 September
2006 December
2006
Year 3 Monitoring Fall 2007 --
Year 4 Monitoring Fall 2008 --
Year 5 Monitoring Fall 2009 --
Year + Monitoring Not scheduled -- --
Table 111. Project Contact Table
Big Warrior Creek
EEP Project Number 00412
Designer Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM)
5400 Glenwood Ave, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27612
Prima project design POC Kell Boone 919-787-5620
Designer - Subcontractor Biohabitats
15 W. Aylesbury Road
Timonium, MD 21093
Subcontractor POC Ellen McClure 410-337-3659
Construction Contractor Shamrock Environmental
PO Box 14987
Greensboro, NC 27415
Construction contractor POC Bill Wri ht 336-375-1989
Planting Contractor Seal Brothers Contracting
131 W Cleve Street
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
Planting contractor POC Brian Seal 336-710-3560
Seeding Contractor Seal Brothers Contracting
131 W Cleve Street
Seeding contractor POC Mt. Airy, NC 27030
Brian Seal 336-710-3560
Seed Mix Sources
Unavailable
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Unavailable
2004 Monitoring Performers Biohabitats
15 W. Aylesbury Road
Timonium, MD 21093
Ellen McClure 410-337-3659
2005 Monitoring Performers EcoLogic Associates, P.C.
4321-A South Elm-Eugene St.
Greensboro, NC 27406
336-355-1108
Monitoring Performers URS Corporation - North Carolina
1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 400
Morrisville, NC 27560
919-461-1100
Monitoring POC - Kathleen McKcithan 919-461-1597
Table IV. Project Background Table
Big Warrior Creek
EEP Project Number 00412
Project County Wilkes County
Drainage Area Big Warrior Creek
Mountain Creek
Unnamed Tributary 7.4 square miles
1.77 square miles
0.5 square miles
Drainage impervious cover estimate % Estimated at <5%
Stream Order 3` for Big Warrior Creek
2" for Mountain Creek and Unnamed Tributary
Ph sio ra hic Region Piedmont/Foothills
Ecore ion Northern Inner Piedmont 45e
Ros en Classification of As-Built C
Dominant soil types Toccoa sand loam, Dou e fine sand loam
Reference site ID Unknown
USGS HUC for Project 03040101
NCDW Sub-basin for Project YAD01
NCDW classification for Project Class C Index no. 12-29-2-(1)
An portion of an project segment 303d listed? No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a
303d listed segment? No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor NA
% of project easement fenced 75% - no cattle in upper reach
2.5 MONITORING PLAN VIEW
See Figure 2 for Monitoring Plan View.
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07

_ 09Std /l dr/Y') AD
II?.)J?.1?I tr'

WKI IJQd 7?od .oN XwVgd lul+od WSW 9l

L N
F
mo-dA7 sun '131,1 7 yl
? L C v? 1 a

S Iva 1HOd38 ON18011NOW 9002

NOI1Vd01S3d NUHIS 1
S331 SM iYu - L
J7
r Y f
p
]Y 25
ll,a .a
`
GNv LN3'MgW"I 30
d
F

SNOISIA3i!
k P..*,d JIB
A338:) )30188VM
10P ]N MINV 3a TM Rr1 HMN
1100
i
, i
r?
.rte..°.-o°o,. ^... rn^.a RFpfJARRF RR::Raa ;.` i
N
- C R P>3 R" ? ? ?
Sfl
s I
I
? 444444444444444444444444444444 -
099td x11-11 ul oN w1NAS1fwN M31A NVId ON18011NOW
wa rmd jopwlAd 0091 R Q
wwww3 wAN - w1mjww3 sNn nuH
1210d3H 0N18011NOW 9002 e $
533'IOS38 3VtlnlyN
31.0 .? NOIIVHO1S38 WV38iS MV 1N3NNOMAN3 10 E
SNOISIA38 M3383 dOI88VM 010 N3Nltlra3a VNIIOHV3 HIH
M pioAai 113f01w -1013
8
3 -?
o >-
R
S
2 133HS 33S NO H31VM
yy f
\ ?? l LL 1
f Y
? §a J
$ 8 9 8 6 6 e g
? IlrD???I

o9sa -IN-3 V,AN YINNI/Al1
"V Wd oo-lAd 0091 M31A NVId ON18O11NOW ItIJj4?IA1,l ??p5 7 y? 9
VVINroJ VI.oN - w/IaVOAJ SN/1
I dOd3d ONIHO11NOW 9002
NOI1V801538 WV32115

IVWMVN
s33t MS3N
Q

A
?
,.. „,..?. N3380 8018UVM 019 ONr
1NJVMMA43 30
1N3111NVd30 VMIOUV3 H1M7N _ a
S
3 ?
R
3

?Yrr
?c
r
?,y{r
i

1133HS 335 3NIl H31YI!
f gelgp gp?yp 87 ? ®q ? ? ? a ',' ? p ?,
N! C 9? 9 ? 9 a. a ? IS ? "?
? ®tl ? I I ?CF
i I ? ?? C7 ?J
g ?
? t r y k p
I
Ord' I ? l l
I
-
- r
_
: :_ -- -- osslawoo"oyl^VII 4Mwr M31A NVId ON180ilNOW
_ •va 410d AI-IAd 0091
R
4
- -- WjfflV7 VlAU - W1jD-dAj sun nw,
-- 180O1NOW 9002
s3Ylna
LL

ll.o

•a NOIIV NOIS38321 WV3211S

A3380 80188VM O19 ONr 3"NO AN3 !D

1N3111tlrd30 3U rNiIOHV ,otlr] H1tlON

a
EEE
8
S $
N
o S-
Y 133N5 33 3NIl N IVM
',
,
n 't
d
wy y y
e
B
I 7. a M ? A
V
'? i?d 9I23d ? ? 9a?n a ? g ?
? ? U L•?1
?.r 9 h
Z 1334 335 3NI1 N]1YI1 B g 7 y 1?
n r?'I X11
_ ' ovsta alApJ wAx roxlNV??wr M31A NVId ON1801.1NOW ut.l ?1W 6f?? !4 {?
- _-- - .O 0791 N
R N
?j
- MI.A
alNm3 Vlpll - wIM.aC?oJ $!/(1 'ILIA
180d3a ONWO11NON 9OR n
Y
a

S l
rv
N N
S V
"
LN3N WAN3
ar N3mO a A
SNOISIA38 M mj.*Id N
VM 0 0113
338:) 8018 NOIiii1
N33210 16 UV "
1N3Nlurd3o rNiw? x1 aN v
8

S 133N5 335 3NII Holy"
46,
A4??
Y4 ?
3
?o \
JAS , 1 "???Odd ? A
1? \
?I
C 133NS 33S 3NI1 NllYn
9 $
R

n k
1
®iI ? e l C~ ? / l
?a
M Y
r Y ? e r
i ?
6 6 a B 9 s a
I
nrB?l11?
Y
_ ---- 095La.1N 'IYIXNronlmUAn M31A NVId ON18011NOW iUi?{u r,?.' g
-
_ -- _ "jo Pod NNwl rrd 0091 « R C

-------- imvo qmv - ?II?Ad o,3 9e0 nm
idOd3d ON18011NOW 90OZ /
66
?
~
-
SRI tl Ttlo1YN
S3ZW )OS i p
1)ra •pri NOI1Vii01532i WV32i1S A
3 ONV IN
p1Y 0) A . E
u
7
SN0ISIA38 A3380 80188VM 919 /N3I11nYd30 YNllom NLnoN a 0
:lk
o- s-
R
S
i j Frt ? Sl
8 ?
5
8 b
r 9 ) E
8 6 9 6 a?
I
I1r0'I r??

o9s[aW/roN,7WNNwulw'IINn
w10 /Nd I-WiNd 0791 M31A NVId 9NI8011NOW

- - _ _- -11-JWNN - mm-aN7 son nw
i8Od3d ONRi011NOW 11001
S3" WV3211S L?

s33"SM IVWiVN I
¢
4 ss
p
F
t?
9
?iy

3lro NOUV801
ON. IN3NNOUTAN3 30
a B a
A
SNOISIA321 b w weld )4338:) 80188VM OIB? IN3nlura3o ne7ONr3 NINON n
8
ry pp3
1? i? tl? e?? S p i g ?
9 ? ?? ? ? ? 9 is ? 5 S Y @
Uil?°®}I?BIgC. CJIJ
a
1 t'
A
9 6 d 6 9? g
I
11 !
1101
a
A N?f
e NOW
3S ssoe
M8
41
III
-

W?
i
a
e
S ?
R
3
poi
•1111095LZ W/P"'I NIXN'AIIIM"OAA M31A NVId ONIHOilNOW ui.i ?nuzr,
JO f"d f
ANAd 0091 h
AIIP/ai Vi^ - wiffl wlroa7.oJ SN0 n
'1N Y
AOd3H ONI8011NOW 90OZ
NOlIV80IS38 WV381S s33MOS30IANnINN k'
Zinn
N3380 HOIHHVM 0I9 1N3MIj3a vNlmtlii N?1MON
8
Y?$
9 133HS 335 NI3 H IVA1
A
a
AlI ;

?I

A
o ?-
Y-
f t i C?
? zp
:e
? ! r r d e
B@ g 8 6 9 e
I
l11' 6? l ? l l
- - - --
09S[d
WANro11101'?
M31A NVId ONItlO11N0YV
tnS????izY.?
Q
_ __ _
--- _ _
--- __
--- VJvd
We7 1wd lopwlAd 0091 n n
WINw7 WAN - wipmdn,3 SN/1 .n?N
?
idOd3d ONIa011NOw 9002 S
JO Z f

S NOI1VHOIS38 VW381s s33uws3u lrunlrN
p1r 1N3NNOMnN3 >
D a
SNOtSIA3H N3380 80188vm Die IN
3NItlrd3O VN,lOtlr3 NINON tl
S
g ?
R
S
6 133HS 33S 3NIl NDlrn

..?wM ?Zry?4
v(

7
a???? A 9 9i??p ? S Y @
OFl
6 6 x 6 9 e
I
?r?rrll
- - • - J!
- a9sla au/pA,3 wpx vulwl.An M31A NVId ONiii011NOW
I
l?GV1
Y
UI

[t
•VV IAd -V-lAd 0091 .
,
,
I
?
?
_--_- a/lpA,3 VIAN - wIpAOAJ SN/I nuu L,.? ?y ? g ?„
idOd3d ON18011NOW 9002 45 ? ? ? S

M??a
•w NOlIV801S38 MV38iS

N3383 80188vm 019 ONV 1IN3m iv 3MANr3N
sn N3 N
1N3MIUVd3a "110era HiMaN 30
8
9 ?
M
0
s
R)
t

?? I I
pil®'I? i C
U ?pl
e
8 6 tl B 8 a X
T- S 133HS 33S All H31VM _
r ? 1
IJ , \ \ \l IJ /
1el ?i.
y
C? t t
9 133HS 33S 3NO Ha1rY1
I
nr?/ ??J
_ -- - _ - ov$[Z a/pA,7 ulA,v wuuuAn M31A NVId ONI8011NOW ?IIIJ?ti?(I.I,I ti

-.
_
_ wa iAa AO-IAa oow
w/NAJ VIAM - 4O/I?AAAJ $N/1
'11H1
L? r
?
'

G ry

lJZ
Y

y0
p
_ _ 18Od38 ON1801INOM 90OZ ? $ ?
? [
t$ P
NOIIVHOIS38 YVV3dlS T37tlH053tl 1rM 1rN LL A
v.u H3380 80188VM Ole M, 1.3nraWN3 30
IH1111tl.OO rHI'gtlr7 H1tl a K E
:Ik
133HS SNII 3N13 H71.11
lilt
0
els 1
s?
+ i
13 HS Ml I H !r
a? N
a?Vt
K
\
6 131HS 33S 3NIl H71.N
A
0 7-
R
S
9 ? ? ? y5y q ? b ? + i ? ? sr s
t 9? 5 a i ?" 9?? "r
®I I ? C; L? l
! C
Q g
? ! r r d ? e
g g d B 8? d
i
?rD'I r?l
3.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
Vegetation monitoring plot stem counts and photos arc located in Appendices A-I and A-IV.
3.1.1 Vegetative Problem Areas
The number of vegetative problem areas has decreased between 2005 and 2006, from 19 to 16,
respectively. Of the 16 problem areas observed in 2006, six are areas of high concern. URS recommends
that these areas receive repair or treatment. The other ten areas should be monitored further to see if they
improve or worsen. The areas of high concern arc related to invasive species and bare, eroding soil.
Vegetative Problem Areas are listed in Tables A6a and A6b in Appendix A-1.
The presence and abundance of kudzu along Big Warrior Creek appears to have increased dramatically
since 2005. The 2005 monitoring report described one vegetative problem area related to kudzu, while
four kudzu-related problem areas were observed during 2006 monitoring. Because of the highly
aggressive growth habit of kudzu, it is expected to continue expanding across the site and endangering the
planted vegetation if it is not treated. American hogpeanut is also growing very aggressively along the
Unnamed Tributary and portions of the other reaches. While this vine is a native species, it is a vigorous
climber and may threaten the survivability of planted stems. The presence of American hogpeanut was
not documented in 2005. Small Chinese privet were observed along the mainstem of Big Warrior Creek
during the 2006 monitoring period. While these individuals do not pose an immediate threat, their
presence should be noted and monitored.
Other problem areas include bare banks and floodplains along the mainstem (BWVPAI through
BWVPA8) and Mountain Creek (MCVPAI through MCVPA8). No problem areas were documented
along the Unnamed Tributary. These problems are likely resulting from poor site soils or soils that were
compacted during construction. URS recommends soil amendments and reseeding in these areas.
Vegetative Problem Area Photos are located in Appendix A-II.
3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas Plan View
See Figure 3 in Appendix A-III for the Vegetative Problem Areas Plan View.
19
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
3.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT
3.2.1 Procedural items
3.2.1.1 Morphometric Criteria
Dimension and profile were sampled per the 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines (USACE 2003) as
follows:
Dimension: Eight permanent cross sections were surveyed. Two are located on Mountain Creek (one
riffle and one pool), two on the Unnamed Tributary (one riffle and one pool), and four on Big Warrior
Creek (two riffles and two pools). The survey includes points measured at all breaks in slope, including
top of bank, bankfull, and thalweg.
Profile: A total of 6,841 linear feet of longitudinal profile was surveyed, broken into three segments as
follows: 2,352 linear feet on Mountain Creek, 1,409 linear feet on the Unnamed Tributary, and 3,079
linear feet on Big Warrior Creek. Survey points include the top of bank, the beginning of each stream
feature such as riffle, run, glide, or pool, and the maximum pool depth.
3.2.1.2 Hydrologic Criteria
No crest gages are installed at this site to document bankfull events. Therefore, potential occurrence was
extrapolated based on USGS stream gage discharge data for the Reddics River at North Wilkesboro, NC
(USGS 2006), The USGS gage plot is shown below. The gage is located about 10 miles from the project
site in the same watershed and has a drainage area of 89 square miles. An estimate of the number of
bankfull events in 2006 was made by comparing the stream discharges from the USGS data in cubic feet
per second (cfs) against the bankfull discharge estimated from the drainage area on the Rural Piedmont
Regional Curve. According to the regional curve, a bankfull event occurs on a stream with an 89-square
mile drainage area when the discharge is about 2,250 cfs. This discharge was exceeded in late June of
2006, indicating that the Reddies River has had one bankfull event this year (as of October 19, 2006). Big
Warrior Creek is in close proximity to the Reddics River, and it is likely that the project site also
experienced a bankfull event in late June 2006.
Table V. Verification of Bankfull Events
Big Warrior Creek
EEP Project Number 00412
Date of Data Collection Date of Occurrence Method
10/19/2006 Late June 2006 Proximal USGS Gage Resource
20
00412 Big Warrior Creek MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
Figure 4. USGS Stream Gage Discharge Data
USGS 02111500 REDDIES RIVER AT NORTH WILKESBORO, NC
3906
0
y 2060
Vi
L
Q 1906
4
d
d
0
ai I
as
r 100^
J
36
° Nov 01 Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01
2005 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006
---- Provisional Data !,itihject to Revi.;s.i.on --°--
- Daily naxinun discharge --- Daily nean discharge
- Daily nininun discharge
3.2.1.3 Bank Stability Assessments
A detailed BEHI and NBS assessment was not required for the Big Warrior Creek Stream Restoration site
during this monitoring year. According to the 2006 Monitoring Guidelines (EEP 2006), an assessment is
required during year 5, post construction only.
3.2.2 Stream Problem Areas
There were a total of 26 problem areas identified for the project, 19 on the mainstem and 7 on Mountain
Creek. Fifteen problem areas were classified as areas of high concern, and URS recommends repair or
maintenance on these areas. The remaining eleven should be watched closely to see if they improve or
worsen.
The stream problem areas consisted primarily of bank erosion, structure failure, and bed aggradation.
One especially problematic area is the structure failure at the beginning of Mountain Creek, MCPA1.
Water is piping behind and around the structure, and it is constructed at a large elevation drop. If this
structure fails, it is likely to induce a headcut that will work up the unrestored section of Mountain Creek.
Many of the rootwads were causing scour on the downstream side. A common problem was also
observed with many of the J-hook vanes, as shown in photos BWPAI, BWPA3, and BWPA10. These
structures were often constructed with three rocks placed high above the invert of the bed, which caused
an obstruction of flow, and the water to be diverted into the banks. This problem was further exacerbated
by the fact that the rocks trap debris and create a larger obstruction. The Problem Areas Plan View is
21
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
located in Appendix B-I, Problem Area data tables are located in Appendix B-II, and Problem Area
Photos are located in Appendix B-III.
3.2.3 Fixed Photo Station Photos
Stream Photo Station photos are located in Appendix B-IV.
3.2.4 Stability Assessment
Table VI. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment (% Functioning)
Big Warrior Creek
EEP Project Number 00412
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
A. Riffle 100 N/A 100
B. Pool 100 N/A 100
C. Thalwc 100 N/A 96
D. Meanders 100 N/A 98
E. Bed General 100 N/A 93
F. Bank Condition 100 N/A
G. Vanes / J Hooks 100 N/A
H. Wads and Boulders 100 N/A 70
\'Zy
3.2.5 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables (Morphology and Hydrology)
Neither EcoLogic nor URS received the Restoration Plan for the Big Warrior Stream Restoration Site,
and the 2005 Mitigation Plan contained little pre-restoration data. Therefore, populating the Baseline
Morphology and Hydraulic Summary Table was not possible. The table has been condensed to show the
Regional Curve Interval data for each reach. URS was unable to generate data for the rest of the table.
22
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07

;a a
ca
F ? ? ? o0 o Q
V Q Q
d ?
y
Fy N N N

a o oo h

u U U

.
O 0
? C4 a+ M
a
,

?i 0 0 0
?
1 M 00 M
?" tea. o U A
fs7
cd p a

5

0 d

a
o 3
?
q
a
u

v a

3 l

3

'?
,
0
°' 3 ? U b b 9 08

w
$
w
w
w b
°'
>
c
v ,
co
G
W
o
oa w m m m 3 a
w 3 x a U a? r a c o
a o
a, ?l
V) 1/)
b oo
b a
r< > U .
CA 3 .
aa x
M
N
0
w
N
X
N
w.
U
0
3
on
W
N_
SAN
PAN
0
u
C

H
CAW
h
yo,,,
O
p
00
?
,?
N
M
O
M
M
?
N
U ZAW N m A N o
I-p V? N -- .-. 00 Q O d'
00 M
00
TAW r14
N C>
v ?o
M r' Z N o 00

u
6.
U SAW
L
0
'C
p PAW
3
u a+
CAW

CC ? ? O M ? ? N N O ? ? ? O
8 U ZAW N A M
E

N p r! 00
° M Q 00 N
a?°o TAW N M `^ z N o .

c E SAW

a
3 v
o PAW

x a y CAW
W
v
W o
'
L

V 00 V1

V) V
ul V1 M

f'4
O O
M
?c
N
ZAW N A A N N 00

M M V? V1 01 00 00

L iAW
M
0

SAW

a, o PAW
a
.

y a
y CAW
L

V
°

O 00 00
ZAW M n N O n O N
N
M °\ M N 00 00 Q M kn V1
TAW M ° 0O - M N N z M O -'

i .29
u Y ..U.
q

y
C.c d
o?
.2
° °
0 x
0 b? ? p
. O U
-` ° ? °' b o
0 CO w
ao w3 w
mv?? w a?
wCa w
m v
3r? c m
wrx cd Fl
mrx 3a. >
x ° v? v"' -?v
N
b?A
o a
8 ,o
3 3
T
U
C E
O ?
?b
EN
o
td
31
N
y °
3 ?
a
b o
? U
? o
o a
on ?
C
C
y ?
40.
ti 00
M 'b
C
O
u O
N
y
h
°
It
N
t
a
04
w
I
2
U
O

o?
0
o
N

U
y
0
y
3
e?o ?
a 0
1
I N QI
1
??
ty _
9
X
1

O yam„ G? ?
U.0
c
O O a 0 N
M
=3•

a
w
a w .?

I

?

i

I

C?

O

?
N
M

I

I

i

I

I

I
O
O

?
O
'LpQ',?,
?
O

O
N

I

I

I

?

00

O

?
'?

M

pp
N kn

0
M

M

M

O

U
L
O ? ? N a' ? h '""' O
? O O

? ^?
? I O0
N I I °o N ? I I I ' I I
? O
00
(.n O h
?

N
i
I
I
I
0 8
M
I
ON
I ?p}
0 N O

? M

IG i I i I M
O
? h
M I I i i I I
3
v
; v a° o o o ° ro o o y
A a v
0 ,1 ? y a a a s a >
f * 3: w
m 4u o a d
a - - v) V) U
kn
N
O
R
PL
C
w
I
X
F.
U
O
b0
I

SAW

U
c
VAN
0 c
o u v

a CAN
0

`" O? M V'1 Q M '?
e I A W v rn ?' Z o
.r
O
O -

U SAW
V 1..
^' O
.? VAN
?" cd O

V O
o CQ H a, CAN

U OO
00 W) rn

° ? oo N

N o ° v,
v
ZA W - n °,
< - N n
0
.C
°
JAW N ^ v - "' ?' z N N
V

y

C ^

??'

y cd

?

y

a
C
N

,?

?

?

.G L d 3 o'o V'
°o? ? O N O x O
r a ? ? .
; a w ° o a
F ? w
m o
-2 w
mo
mcn w
?
mA m 3x wx mC2 1 v

0
E
.n
O
U
0
? o
U
0 a
b ?
? O
w
o .b
* 3
N
8.
a
w
N
y?
N
4
U
0
'E
3
N_

g
N ?
in
it

U A
a

o
?

??,
? $
N ego

V] N
bA ?

O
o U .a TJ
?

a w
Gd W

i
l- M
N
00
00 O
00 N
v1
M 00
0 00
0
{
M
00
00

N
O
O U

O O O O
Ja
Q N 'd { { I { O 00 { { { I {

a { i { i 0 00
i
{
I
i
{
z
O

E"q
rd
V1
l? 00 W)
O

N O O N [? in
O 'n
00 00
00 ?
M M
,-. O
O O
O
CYI
ti O N O O

p
?
I
N
vi
M
of a,
O
N

r.
N
ii
FF o
d ¢y Qy ? ? ? VJ ? ? V _ ? ?
d
e
o
?
3 OOU9
° L
??
U
P a?0 a ? v?_ .a
- v
- °ela °' y ? o aw
cu E 0 0- 10

N
C
O
v
PL
C
fi
N
I
a0i
H
U
0
OU
GQ
SAN
d

E
C VAN
C O
?
? v O
y a° CAN

00
r
c?
C'4
d
a ZAW ? 00

bA
C N
Cy rl
N-.
O?
l/l

?"
M
Q
`O
Ln
00
o TAW 06
N
`'
°
^
`^
z
°°
°
o
0
0
L
L
SAW
c
'C z
L a 6 ?
H3• VAW
?
o [

W y ?/ CAW
W w
O O
jOr" U O N Q? l? N N O
o 00
v
a ZAW n o --
V
??Or
TAW o -- 00 z o M
? ro

G d ri
OS
ti
?
N E
C .?p
N
Y
=
a+
L d 3 ? s ? x
? o o x a
El

y
o
° u. ° c r,
'
° o
v
0; G1 w
as w 3 ?v?
M
n w a)
Cq L1 wr? ??/
3 / cz
w M? ?
CL' ? ?
3 a x m
>b on
u W W W W 4
a
b
v
N
L
N
0
v
a
a
0
U
0
N
Y
N
O
U
,D
00
b?
b?
N O
3
00
N
PC
d

o
N ?

b

CE

O 00
00
O
? Q
? 1!
02
CO
O r4 Q

On r
r

•? M
O

O O a
E
v ea u
?
.a N
M
1p
?
a,
?
w
x
b w
o

?

?

?

M
N

Q
l?

M

D
Cl

O

O
V'

'7
.-.

Q ?

M
O

U
p
O ? O O ?

•q
Q
M 00
O
oo?
/
O
{ { { { Vl p 00

O

A

?? kn in
00
N 00
N
M
O
M
{
i
{
{
{
{
O
0
N
14
O

O

M
k!1
N
CD

?
\0
CD
N

?
O

O
O

O
O\

O

{

O

O

O

O
y
f? M O
?
?G O
O
?
? O c) N
M In
'
{
{
{
{
I
{
M
N ? O V
1

?

? v
a?
o N d b „ a
a?
.a a o d
? 0 a N
o CA
a o w

a u o n
a: um0 4 u 4 01
N
O
a
a
G
w
N
N
w
U
0
3
4.0 METHODOLOGY SECTION
All monitoring methodologies follow the most current templates and guidelines provided by EEP.
Photographs were taken at high resolution using an Olympus Stylus 4.0 megapixel digital camera. GPS
location information was collected using a Trimble Geo XT handheld mapping grade GPS unit. GPS
locations were collected on both banks of each cross section and on all four corners of each vegetation
plot. Stream and vegetation problem areas were noted in the field on As-Built Plan Sheets. Permanent
photo station photographs were taken from locations marked in the Year One Monitoring Report,
prepared by EcoLogic Associates.
4.1 STREAM METHODOLOGY
The methods used to generate the data in this report are standard fluvial geomorphology techniques as
described in Applied River Morphology (Rosgen 1996) and related publications from US Forest Service
and the interagency Stream Mitigation Guidelines (USACE 2003). URS' field morphology survey was
conducted using a Zeiss Level Ni 2 and the data were analyzed and displayed using the Reference Reach
Spreadsheet, Version 4.2L (Mecklenburg 2006). Modified Wolman weighted pebble counts were
conducted in the vicinity of each cross section. Photographs were taken at each cross section. A photo
was taken from the left bank towards the right bank, and from the right bank towards the left bank.
4.2 VEGETATION METHODOLOGY
Vegetation monitoring methods followed the 2006, Version 4.0 CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation (Lee et al 2006). Vegetation plot photographs and GPS locations were collected at the
southwest corner of each vegetation plot. Vegetation monitoring plots were re-marked in the field by
replacing all old flagging with new flagging. Each vegetation plot was marked by Ecologic in 2005 with
a four-foot PVC pipe at the upstream, outside corner. The remaining three corners were marked with
steel conduit. URS placed orange flagging at the southwest corner of each vegetation plot and blue
flagging at the remaining corners. The orientation of the plot was marked on the CVS-EEP data sheet if
the PVC was not in the southwest corner (the origin of the plot). Planted stems were flagged in white.
Volunteer/natural regeneration stems were inventoried and flagged with red. Stem height was measured
with a folding one-meter rule. Diameter at breast height and decimeter height were measured with
calipers. The X,Y coordinates relative to the southwest corner (origin) of each stem in the plot were
recorded.
Seven vegetation plots were established by CDM in 2004. These seven plots were evaluated for the As-
built survey. These plots consisted of 1/10-acre circular plots with the center points marked with rebar.
For the Year 1 survey in 2005, EcoLogic did not have As-built project data. EcoLogic established 30 10-
meter by 10-meter vegetation plots, per ESP's current protocol at that time.
According to the current CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (Version 4.0), the Big Warrior
Creek Stream Restoration Project requires the monitoring of 16 vegetation plots. The new CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation was used to inventory 16 (1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 19, 25, 26, 28,
29, and 30) of the 30 vegetation plots established by EcoLogic.
Rebar was used to mark all four corners of the vegetation plots and the southwest corner is marked with a
4-foot PVC pipe flagged with orange ribbon. The remaining three corners were marked with blue
flagging. GPS coordinates were taken for the southwest corner of each plot and a reference photograph
was taken from the southwest corner towards the northeast corner for each plot.
The CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (Levels I-II) was used to inventory the plots for the
Year 2 stem counts. All planted stems were marked again with white flagging. Natural regeneration
stems were marked with red flagging. The results of the stem counts are located in Appendix A-I.
Photographs of the monitoring plots are located in Appendix A-IV.
30
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
5.0 REFERENCES
CDM. 2005. Big Warrior Stream Restoration Mitigation Plan. Prepared by Camp, Dresser, and McKee
and Biohabitats, Inc. Prepared for NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program. March 2005.
Daniels, R.B., Buol, S.W., Kleiss, H.J., and C.A Ditzler. 1999. Soil Systems in North Carolina. North
Carolina State University, Soil Science Department. Technical Bulletin 314. January, 1999.
EcoLogic Associates, P.C. 2006. Big Warrior Creek 2005 Monitoring Report, Monitoring Year One.
Prepared for NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program. April 2006.
Mecklenburg, Dan. 2006. The Reference Reach Spreadsheet for Channel Survey Data Management.
Version 4.2L. Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
EEP. 2006. Content, Format, and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports. Version
1.2 (11/16/06). NCDENR, NCEEP. 17pp.
Lee, Michael T., Peek, Robert K., Roberts, Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation. Version 4.0. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from
littp://www.riccel).tlct/business/monitoring/ve /dg atasliccts.litrn.
Radford, A.E., Ahles, H.E., and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC.
Rosgcn, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
Tuttle, JohnW. 1997. Soil Survey of Wilkcs County, North Carolina. US Department of Agriculture
(USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).
USACE, Wilmington District, US Environmental Protection Agency, NC Wildlife Resources
Commission, and NC Division of Water Quality. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. April
2003. 26 pp.
USGS. 2006. Reddies River at North Wilkesboro, NC streamflow gage. USGS Rcal-Time Water Data.
Gage 02111500. http://waterdata.trs is..Lyov.
31
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
Appendix A
(Click. here)
APPENDIX A
VEGETATION RAW DATA
00412 Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
APPENDIX A-I. VEGETATION SURVEY DATA TABLES
Table Al. Vegetation Metadata
Report Prepared B Susan Shelin oski
Date Prepared 1/10/2007 15:22

database name CVS EEP Data Entr v202.mdb

atabase location C:\Documents and
Settings\susan_shelingoski\My
Documents\2005 On-call
Kickoff Meeting

DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------

Metadata This worksheet, which is a summary of the project and the project
data.
Plots List of lots surveyed.
Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes.
Vigor bS Frequency distribution of vigor c lasses listed b species.

amage List of most frequent damage
classes with number of
occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted b each.
Damage b S Damage values tallied b type for each species.
Damage b Plot Damage values tallied b type for each lot.

tem Count b Plot and S Count of living stems of each
species for each plot; dead
and missing stems are
excluded.

PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Pro ect Code 412
project Name Big Warrior Creek
Description Stream Restoration
length ft
stream-to-edge width ft
areas r
Required Plots calculated
Sampled Plots 16
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
APPENDIX A-I. VEGETATION SURVEY DATA TABLES
Table A2. Vegetation Vigor by Species
Species 4 3 2 1 0 Missing
Alnus serrulata 1 11
Betula ni ra 1 6 2
Cephalanthus
occidentalis
1
Cornus amomum 1 12 4
Fraxinus enns Ivanica 5 1
Ju lans ni ra 2 11 5 2
N ssa s Ivatica 1 1
Ox dendrum arboreum
Pinus vir iniana
Salix ni ra 1 5 1
Cercis canadensis 1 2
Ca rya
Lindera benzoin 1
Liriodendron tuli ifera 1 12 4
Platanus occidentalis 1 12 6
Ph socar us o ulifolius 8 3
Prunus
Acer rubrum
Ulmus americana
TOT: 19 9 80 31 3 2
Table A3. Vegetation Damage by Species

Species All
Damage
Categories
(no
damage)

Deer

Insects
Acer rubrum 1 1
Alnus serrulata 14 14
Betula ni ra 12 12
Ca rya 1 1
Cephalanthus
occidentalis
1
1
Cercis canadensis 4 4
Cornus amomum 18 17 1
Fraxinus enns Ivanica 9 9
Ju lans ni ra 22 21 1
Lindera benzoin 1 1
Liriodendron tuli ifera 22 22
N ssa s Ivatica 2 2
Ox dendrum arboreum 2 2
Ph socar us o ulifolius 12 12
Pinus vir iniana 1 1
Platanus occidentalis 26 25 1
Prunus 4 4
Salix ni ra 10 10
Ulmus americana 1 1
TOT: 19 163 160 1 2
00412 Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
APPENDIX A-I. VEGETATION SURVEY DATA TABLES
Table A4. Vegetation Damage by Plot

lot All
Damage
Categories
(no
damage)

Deer

Insects
412-01-0001 16 14 1 1
412-01-0002 11 11
412-01-0004 3 3
412-01-0006 6 6
412-01-0007 19 19
412-01-0008 4 4
412-01-0009 12 12
412-01-0011 19 19
412-01-0013 10 10
412-01-0015 6 6
412-01-0019 6 6
412-01-0025 10 10
412-01-0026 13 12 1

412-01-0028
9
9 -
412-01-0029 5 5
412-01-0030 14 14
TOT: 16 163 160 1 2
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
Q
y
O_
Q
W

O
O N ? n M M I?

O N ' ? ? N
as°o
-

ON'=1WV fV h
o.v°$

C N '
O 0 N W
av°o

O N ' N M N ? W
ix

N ? OI
O
aao$

N '
O N M
aepOo

O N , M N N Ol
aao$

O N ? ? N n r 10
VI
n.v°$

O N , N (O OI
O
Gy o °
O N ' O
S? o $
v N ' O
as°o

C N ' O N ?- N W
aaoo
pp
O N ' O - - - M
nv°$

N
O N ' 0 M N m
aao0
o

ON O N V ?(1 ? M 1fl
o.a°o
E
> y N r
V N
N M
N
N
R N
I?l W ? ? N I? M 1? r In N V I? N M
s
N
IS E N 1? .-- M r t0 O
N ? f? N ? 01 n M
N
02
N

C ?
7 N

g
(D
E
o C
v
N ?
w
s E c e c y
7

U) I
c
m 'gi pp v`
N °
l0 f0 y
L
[?
j N J
f C
' C 4
009N11 N
$ C
'9 C
.?s
a Z
m f
J
O U p
o
U J J Z d a N 1
M

6
a
d
V
E
u
0
Ea
3
m
m
9
APPENDIX A-I. VEGETATION SURVEY DATA TABLES
Table A6a. Vegetative Problem Areas - Big Warrior Creek
Big Warrior Creek
EEP Project Number 00412
Feature # Feature/Issue Station #/Range Probable Cause Photo #
BWVPAI Bare bank 2+00 to 8+00 Bank erosion BWVPAI
BWVPA2 Invasive/exotic plant 12+00 to 20+10 Invasive/exotic plant BWVPA2
BWVPA3 Bare bank 29+70 Bank erosion BWVPA3
BWVPA4 Invasive/exotic plant 33+00 to 35+00 Invasive/exotic plant BWVPA4
BWVPA5 Bare bank 43+15 Bank erosion BWVPA5
BWVPA6 Invasive/exotic plant 43+15 Invasive/exotic plant BWVPA6

BWVPAI Bare floodplain, gully
erosion
49+00 to 50+00
Poor soil
BWVPAI
BWVPA8 Invasive/exotic plant 63+50 Invasive/exotic plant BWVPA8
Table A6b. Vegetative Problem Areas - Mountain Creek
Big Warrior Creek
EEP Project Number 00412
Feature # Feature/Issue Station #/Range Probable Cause Photo #
MCVPAI Bare bank 5+00 Bank erosion MCVPAI
MCVPA2 Bare bank 6+20 Bank erosion MCVPA2
MCVPA3 Bare bank 13+60 Bank erosion MCVPA3
MCVPA4 Bare bank 15+00 Bank erosion MCVPA4
MCVPA5 Bare flood lain 17+00 to 17+60 Overflow MCVPA5
MCVPA6 Bare bank 17+00 Bank erosion MCVPA6
MCVPA7 Bare bank 17+60 Bank erosion MCVPA7
MCVPA8 Bare bank 19+00 Bank erosion MCVPA8
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
APPENDIX A-II. VEGETATIVE PROBLEM AREA PHOTOS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
BIG WARRIOR CREEK
r/ n$
A-
BWVPAI
BWVPA3
BWVPA5
BWVPA2
BWVPA4
7
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
A-II. VEGETATIVE PROBLEM AREA PIIOTOS
9/26/06 to 9/29/06
BWVPA8
0 APPENDIX A-II. VEGETATIVE PROBLEM AREA

MCVPA5
MCVPA7

12 - Bis Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS

:r
IS

VEGETATIVE PROBLEM AREAS PLAN VIEW
c
?e U
z, n ? af4i
?? S e 1?:' U°? v o m cv $ ??u3i
ga . ?'''^^++ E U rn N 2' ° y c
BEY ° N m LL>or-
0
q0
3
n
m
p m
Mold raaJ? JoIJJeM Big
S P
m
j
1?2 1
?
m
-g
T
m ?

m T

3 ?

m t

m
u

i1
e
U
?
C g
g
5
,i'
?
tl
J
E
_
S
k
tl
?
P

y
9
3 o
22
S
?
9 y
< ? F ?
m Qy
d
3
.6 03 9 ?3 ? t J
C

4
<
?
7
?
?
?
?
?
7
?
Q{<
5
6
9
a
3N

f'i
U
'E
G
C
?
G M1
G

Fs
i 8
g

e
S
e
0
nI A
i
m ?
O f7
a
N
•' m
ZQ
m
an
U
V
MOI 1aaJ? Jo +iEl
7i
7
1
i
W
4H ?
L
0
co
O
O
O
N
O
8
O
O
O
M
r
g?
a
U
fN
APPENDIX A-IV. VEGET
VP7
'ATION MONITORING PLOT PHOTOS
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
VP8 (9/29/06)
APPENDIX A-IV. VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT PHOTOS

Ilia Wnrrinr Crrelr -- MV') Final Rrnnrt I IRS ! - c i
APPENDIX A-IV. VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT PHOTOS
VP26 (8/30/06)
VP29 (8/30/06)
VP28 (8/30/06)
VP30 (8/30/06)
00412 — Big Warrior Creek — MY2 Final Report URS 1/07

APPENDIX B
GEOMORPHIC RAW DATA
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
APPENDIX 13- 1. STREAM PROBLEM AREAS PLAN VIEW
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
E E
e r-'-- a Z E E N 3
C
N In x c? Y f6 E 2D
0 :3
a
i d
Z- W- IL CL
4
a
m ''s
4 m o
CL $Y
m
r ? _m
4
a
?\ Qq
:i
( di
?o
4
(L e
m o
CL
o - ro
.n
Q
a
ID o
F3WPA13
Q Q
a a
r ?
m m
0
rn g
a ?
m g

1 ? r n 1 ? i 1
?
4 ; ? 1 r
0
N
M
Q
3
3

d
04)
o u.
0
co
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
d'
O
O
O
cM
Q O
U N
i
Qo
?j 11
b
d aU my yc?p
U i.) 4 O
o !h??r
? r
U ?
'a O
CL
? U Q
3 i
a $
u t„
a
Q
a
g
I
?vi a
rn nLa ?
ag
e
m
N ? ? W
6
CD ?
u
c
c
m
N
sr
m?
U
rn Hit.
2 N
APPENDIX B-Il. STREAM PROBLEM AREAS DATA TABLES
Table Bla. Stream Problem Areas - Big Warrior Creek
Big Warrior Creek
EEP Project Number 00412
Feature # Feature Issue Station Suspected Cause Photo #
BWPA1 Structure failure 5+00 Rocks obstructing flow, causing flow
diversion into banks BWPA1
BWPA2 Structure failure 11+00 Scour BWPA2
BWPA3 Structure failure 16+00 Rocks obstructing flow, causing flow
diversion into banks BWPA3
BWPA4 Structure failure 17+60 Scour BWPA4
BWPA5 Bank erosion, failure of log
toe rotection 20+80 Scour BWPA5
BWPA6 Bank erosion 34+50 Scour BWPA6
BWPA7 Bank erosion 34+75 Scour BWPA7
BWPA8 Bank erosion 34+90 Scour BWPA8
BWPA9 Aggradation, mid-channel bar
formation 43+00 Inadequate sediment transport BWPA9
BWPA10 Structure failure 42+60 Rocks obstructing flow, causing flow
diversion into banks BWPA10
BWPAI l Aggradation, lateral bar
formation 44+70 Lateral migration of channel BWPAI I
BWPA12 Bank erosion 49+75 Lateral migration of channel BWPA12
BWPA13 Structure degradation 49+60 Stability BWPA13
BWPA14 Aggradation, mid-channel bar
formation 52+00 Inadequate sediment transport BWPA14
BWPA15 Structure degradation 54+80 Scour BWPA15
BWPA16 Structure degradation 56+00 Floodplain flow is undermining log
structure BWPA16
BWPA17 Structure degradation 62+60 Scour BWPA17
BWPA18 Structure degradation 64+90 Scour BWPA18
BWPA19 Structure degradation 67+00 Stability BWPA19
Table Blb. Stream Problem Areas - Mountain Creek
Big Warrior Creek
EEP Project Number 00412
Feature # Feature Issue Station Suspected Cause Photo #
MCPA 1 Structure failure 0+00 Too much elevation drop MCPA 1
MCPA2 Structure degradation 0+25 Potentially constructed with large
as MCPA2
MCPA3 Structure failure 1+80 Lo not keyed into bank adequately MCPA3
MCPA4 Bank erosion 2+10 Scour MCPA4
MCPA5 Bank erosion 13+75 Scour MCPA5
MCPA6 Bank erosion and a radation 17+00 Excessive scour MCPA6
MCPA? Bank failure 17+60 Excessive scour MCPA?
00412 -- Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
APPENDIX B-III. REPRESENTATIVE STREAM PROBLEM AREA PHOTOS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
BIG WARRIOR
B W PA 1 facing upstream
BWPA3 facing left bank, upstream
BWPA5 facing left bank
1
ENDIX B-III. REPRESENTATIVE STREAM PROBLEM AREA PHOTOS
os Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
Ile
Y
1? a
4a i S
1r

1/07
I
APPENDIX B-III. REPRESENTATIVE STREAM PROBLEM AREA PHOTOS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
4

+; ?pX, .e'' ?,F 1

F G.
f
'
f 4' s
Fa - 7 rf?-Xr?
?I
?R 6'i.? FL ?F k 1,,,r#
•??
t ! 'Y
,
i
d
.

B WPA 14 facing upstream

,r

00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS
BWPA13 looking down at left bank

APPENDIX B-III. REPRESENTATIVE STREAM PROBLEM AREA PHOTOS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
01
1 yp??e$A' r °,'.
0 a
i
BWPA19 facing downstream

- Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
MCPA4 facing right bank
MCPA3 facing upstream
APPENDIX B-III. REPRESENTATIVE STREAM PROBLEM AREA PW
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
r wr °
MCPA7 facing right bank

t ? 1 4
f

00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
APPENDIX B-IV. STREAM PHOTO STATION PHOTOS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
Final Report
URS
6 - Big warrior creeK
1/07

F
APPENDIX B-IV. STREAM PHOTO STATION PHOTOS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
I?
PS7 - Big

PS9 -

i w r `? .
4 Z'.i
? ,?jt . •!` y y y 1:F"1 cif
..
S
.
. f • y r `
d

pis ? i
'`? 1? , ?'pt f1. •, t ?y. 5? i d
?j •, + ? 1? f ,l Id f 1 4t/i ? 1 r ?y;
?L?.??, 5 f?? t ( j

PSI I - Unnamed Tributary
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2
j
r i i I

! j
i
t i t
PS8 - Big Warrior
r.
0
PS10-
lop

4 gay j
? I

2 - Unnamed
1/07
? III ' Iii i
APPENDIX B-IV. STREAM PHOTO STATION PHOTOS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
APPENDIX B-IV. STREAM PHOTO STATION PHOTOS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
t I i

t,.
irk v ??"? ':, ?' A'" ?.?;Y 3?1j rya ???y?y ?K ? ! i~•
"JG6 - 1VIVUHLU111 VIGGK
4 ??dr
Mountain Crcck
5
iI (If' 11 /07

PS23 - Mountain Creek
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report
APPENDIX B-IV. STREAM PHOTO STATION PHOTOS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
PS29
PS30 - Big Warrior Creek
APPENDIX B-IV. STREAM PHOTO STATION PHOTOS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
A AA

- Big Warrior Creek
r
i?
1
1 i

9
ff ? I i
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS
1
t
i
PS31 - Big Warrior Creek
Ig3o3
ao ugaw
•wopad
S O
°
C,
rn
a
oO
°
a.in;uad

uol;lpuoa

algg;Sul
S
O
O
S
S
O
O
O

rn

rn
M
rn
¢
z
S
r.,
O

oo
O
?

rn
N
?
N
?
N
?
N
?
o
r-
0
n
waopad % ,
a;g;s a M
alquasunul ¢
z d
z ¢
z ¢
z ¢
z d
z ¢
z ¢
z ¢
z ¢
z ¢
z ¢
z ¢
z ¢
z o o °
o ¢
z d
z ¢
z ¢
z d
z ¢
z
aa3/aagwnu r
kn W)
Iu1o,L v

paqq
H
w.
C.
d.
d
U
O
x
1?0
1?-1
r?r^
VI
HN

w
a

a )I!nq-sd
.iad.Iagwnu
Ig1oi,
"t ?o
1^ 1o
'^ ?o
'^ ?
In ?
In ?c
'^ <Q
yH o
Vl ?c
'^ ¢
z ¢
z ¢
Z rn
OD o,
00 o,
w o
w

papuaaulso
0 21utwaolaad o
I, 0
In o
In v
In v
V) N
In o ?o
In o
kn ¢
z ¢
z ¢
z ?r v 0
In 0
tn
aagwnu
;? ? ?alquls #)
65 v
w z -
N

APPENDIX B-VI. CROSS SECTION PHOTOS ANI
Several cross section pins were not able to be located during 2006 monitoring. In instances where pins were not located,
URS re-established one or both pins in the field. Data from these cross sections are not comparable to data reported in
2005 monitoring reports. The re-establishment of pins effectively relocates the cross sections.
URS has plotted these data on the same graph for reference only. The data and/or graph should not be used to interpret
channel change. Such cross sections include:
• Big Warrior mainstem, cross section 1 I
• Big Warrior mainstem, cross section 3
• Big Warrior mainstem, cross section 4 G j
E
• Mountain Creek, cross section I

k

i
? E E ? I
} ? ? f t t
I, #
i I

1 ? t !P

? I
F t FI j

}

I tl
1
t

k
i

VVYIG-Dig Yvamui"rur. - rvi i s rural i%upun vno t I I/VI
I
SECTION PHOTOS AND ANNUAL OVERLAYS OF PLOTS
Photos

XS1 facing right bank

A31 lacing rignt odnx
APPENDIX B-VI. CROSS SECTION PHOTOS AND ANNUAL
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
XS4 facing left bank
Big Warrior - Mainstem XS 1, Year 1&2 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
1112
1110
c 1108
..p
1106
°-' 1104
w 1102
1100
I

0 20 40 60 80
Station
-?- Year 1 - 11 /16/05 -• Year 2 - 9/27/06 -Both bank pins re-
Big Warrior - Mainstem XS 2, Year 1&2 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
1101
1100
0 1099
1 1098
W 1097
1096
1095
100 120
stablishedl

0
10 20 30 40
Station
-? Year 1 - 11/16/05 - m Year 2 - 9/27/06
50

Big Warrior - Mainstem XS 3, Year 1 & 2 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
1092
c
c 1090
A
Ii
1088
W
1086
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station
-0 Year 1 - 11/16/05 -w- Year 2 - 8/29/06 - Right bank pin re-established
Big Warrior - Mainstem XS 4, Year 1 & 2 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
1092
C 1090
c 1088
1086
Z 1084
W 1082
1080
Year 1 - 11/16/05 -*-Year 2 - 8/29/06 - Right bank pin
{
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS
?Il
re-established
APPENDIX 13-VI. CROSS SECTION PIIOTOS AND ANNUAL OVERLAYS OF PLOTS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to 9/29/06
Z"77771f 711F,
;

XS I facing left
XS I facing right bank
- Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
f
i
Big Warrior - Mountain Creek XS 1, Year 1 & 2 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
1104
e 1102
1100
m 1098
w 1096
1094
0
1105
c
1100
?o
d 1095
w
1090
0
10 20 30 40
Station
Year 1 - 11/15/05 --Year 2- 8/30/06 -Left bank
Big Warrior - Mountain Creek XS 2 - Year 1 & 2
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Ir
10 20 30 40
Station
Year 1 - 11/15/05 -0- Year 2 - 81
{
3 i
I
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS
?l
I
i
i
i
i
i
I
3 I .
j
I
i
5U
50
60
I
fl
f?
li
Y
•t iii
1/07
SECTION PHOTOS AND ANNUAL OVERLAYS OF PLOTS
Photos Taken 9/26/06 to
"t r3j 71 01,
XS l lacing left bank
XS I facing right bank
Big Warrior - Unnamed Trib XS 1 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
c 1108
w 1107
d 1106
w 1105
0 5 10 15 20 25
Station
Year 1 -11/15/05 --w-- Year 2 - 8/29/06
Big Warrior - Unnamed Trib XS 2, Year 1 & 2 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
1102
c 1101
1100
m 1099
w 1098
1097
Station i
-*-Year 1 - 11/15/05 -*-Year 2 - 8/29/06
fVDIX B-VII. ANNUAL OVERLAYS OF I
PLOTS

n
Q

{
1
E,
{
f

rn
K
I

L
0
0p ID N O m 0sp? pNp oop
O O O O O O O
Iu) uoIIene13 .-
i
'E
3
m
ypN
O
I

M CL)
L

075 C:

N U O
o
ad o
O'
? N
m W o
L
?-
cu
E Q
0
O
0
O

? L
Q
¦
? O N
N

L i
O c0 0
O
O
L Co
N
M _N
W

co
m Q
O O
O
O 000
N
O
O
O N
O
LO L -
co

0 p
}
0
O
It mw LO
O

O
O
O
r-
M

co
O
O
N I
O
O
O
LO O 0 O LO O 0 O LO
T r- T- O O O O O
T- r- r r r r' ? r T-
U0148AG13

n
0

N
U
`o
3
rn
m
N
O
O

APPENDIX B-VII. ANNUAL OVERLAYS OF LONGITUDINAL PLOTS
MOUNTAIN CREEK
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
?D
O
N
07
Y
O
V
C
C
O
O
-E
3
LM
m
fC
N
C
J
2N
2
U)
m
0
J
i
m
0
H
x
m
c
2
O
N
Qf
0
c
0
N
K
r?
c
f0
N
d
m
1y}?
1

tx
+ x
0
o ?
N
O
O
N
N
O
N

$
O
d
c
_y
N O
r ?
c
c
.r-
C)
0
00
$
t0
$
'd
O
N
0
N N O O CD 0)i
_ 0 0
(ll) uoiaene13
U)
N
c
LL
}
Yy
N
U
o
E
m
3
m
N
g
0
L
w
0 c
ots
N
r c
17
L.. O
A? s
W ?
VVw O
AiA ?
AW ?
W N
V CO
O
O
N
wON
D
0c
O
cv
>
(1)
L W
0=
L. m
Q

a i
¦
r'
' i i
V / O
I
m i
O 1
^
O O m
T- O
r? ? ?
U014BA013
TO
V
0
0
0
LO
N
O
O
N
O
LO
r
O
O
O
T
0
LO
O
m
W
0
C
_C
V+
O
\
co
N.
N
L
O
r
r
\
r
r
i
r
L
W
/I1T
1
APPENDIX B-VII. ANNUAL OVERLAYS OF LONGITUDINAL PLOTS
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
?O
O
0
M
H
d
t0
C
C
A
3
o?
m
f0
N
c
J
N
7
m
0
J
4-
m
0
H
X
c
2
O
N
d
N
U
C
O_
N
X
<1
C
O
(/1
N
3
V
d
0
r
ri
O
r se
0
0
N
O
a
O
O
r
O
O
N
O
O
O
S
O
O
m
r
0

o
O
°
D c

c
0
r t ?
U ?
O

co
O

O
O
7
O
O
M
O
N
O
O
C
g
d
N
c
ll
N
?y
N
U
E
m
3
m
N_
O
0 0 LO
o °o m rn co
0 0 0
(») uopenel3
L C
N
>
OC/)
N
0
r _
AR3 =
W L
O
m
i
O
L
O
cn
C
1 0
O
Lw
co
O

r
i
i
r

I
+s;
O
r
r
O
r
r
C) LO
O O
r O
r r
U014BAal3
O
O
O
r
CD
T
O
O

r
O
O O
O
O
co

00

O nJ
O
_ L
O (0
r
r_
O .O
O
0
cn
O
O
O
O
N
O
00
O
r
N
O
r
r
r
r
I
r
L

I`
O

N
Y
N
U
`o
-E
co
m
m
N_
d
O
O
APPENDIX B-VIII. PEBBLE COUNT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION PLOTS
BIG WARRIOR
00412 Big Warrior Crcck -- MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
Crave secuon I
2) W,Ight,d Pebble Count
Fast-patent of Reach
_ RIM. d0 % Run %
RMh, cool, 0.un, GWe
Pod 40 % OlltleO%
W.li led pebb • ceunl by bad fast.,..
Material Slze Ren s mm walhled
.n . D - o e.o
vary Sn. vend OR - 0,125 0,0
flne and 0.125 - 0.25 8.0
medlum and 0.25 - 0.5 2.0
sn...nd 05 - 1 90
is, L-1 1 - 2
e 0.0
very flne gravel 2 - 1 50
flne gravel 4 e 50
flne preval 6 -8 2.0
medum gravel 8 - 11 50
in
l.egr.y.1 n -te
20
o
c ,rave 16 - 22 170
ea re 22 - 32 Ito
el 32 45
very re.-° 12.0
rev
el 15 64
c 90
xnall cobble 64 90 3,0
medlum cobble 90 126 00
large cobble 126 - 180 0.0
e large cobble 180 - 256 on
small boulder 255 362 00
small boulder 362 512 0.0
memum boiler, 512 - 1024 0.0
large boulder, 1024 -2046 0.0
very tars muldx 2046 -1096 0.0
total penlcle weighted count: 100
bedrock -.- 0.0
clay hard n------------- 0,0
d.bltus/wooe-------------- 00
s11N1 lal .---_....-._...__ p
total wrlghl.d count. 100.0
Note'
R fine
Material size Rana m Count
.IIUc1e 0
- 0.002
1
va
ry One and 0. 002 - 0.125 0
flne tend 0. 125 - 0.25 2
medum.add 025 -0.5 0
e tend 0.5 - 1 1
, rata and 1 2 0
very fine gravd 2 - 4 2
One grevnl 4 6 1
One,revel O - 8 1
medlum grevel O 11 2
.ad I
m
,rev?l I I . 10 1
'
e
co ,revel 15 - 22 14
coana grevel 22 -32 15
very roar,
gravel 32 - 45 10
.
ox revel 45 - 64 7
smell co Me 64 .90 2
medium cobble 90 - 126 0
Ierpa Gabble
e le a cobble
18D I"
small boulder
mall boulder 296 362
362 - 512 a
0
medium boulder
512 112 1124
1
large er m 46
budd
e ter a Oculdx
total particle count: 60
bedrock --- ----------------
clay hsrdpen
e.adw7wooa -- --------------

Note' totecount: 60
ool
Marshall Sit. Race. term Ccruml

very Sne and 0.062 - 0.125 0
fine and 0.125 - 0.25 4
medium and 025 *05 2
coarse
tl 0.5 - 1 a
een
tl 1 2
coar 0
very
flne,revto 2 -4 2
flne el 4 - e
, 4
an: g
5 . a I
medium gravel 8 - 11 J
medium grevel I1 16 1
one gravd 15 - 22 2
se prev11 22 - 32 2
very
as ,l Jx - 45
2
e cuxae gravel 45.64 2
...It cobble 84 - 90 1
medlum cobble 90 - 128 0
Ixge cobble 128 - 180 0
Very ter a cobble IBO - 258 0
..all boulder 256 - 362 0
smell boulder 362 - 512 0
medlum boulder 512-1024 0
large boulder 1024 - 2046 0
ve lar a bouldx 2048 - 4098 0
total particle count. 40
bedroll -----------
clay hsrdpen --------------------
d0U."mut --°-..-..-----
andlclal ----_.........._
(.let count: 40
Nola
Weighted pebble count by bed features Big Werrlor - Melnetem
60% dm. 40% pool
walghtad percent . Rod. --•--Pod -•-Run -?Olide ------a nf penidr.
100% elludii eentl ravel cobble boulder

i 18%
60% 1 14
70% 3
12%
60%
? ? - 10%d
SOY. fl% ?
40%
6%
20%
i
I
I 4%
10% 2% 5

0.01 0.1 1 to too 1 000 10000
particle size (mm)
sit. (mm) Size Dlstrlbulton Type
D16 0.58 4 8
cm.c sllVCley e%
D36 B dim. Mnn 17.4 and 17%
D50 19 Ike-... 0.44 gravel 74%
065 25 -bbl. 3%
DM 40 budder 0%
D95 50
Riffle Big W

100 errlor - Maintain

eIlVcla

eentl -4
-
cubbl.
I u eY.---p II nlrl
boulder
%

90%
I 16

14
50%
2
5 00% 10
60% 8 P.
40% 6
JO%
20% 1 4
to% . .2
0% 0

0. 01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
pediclr it. berm)
SIX. (mm) Sit. Dloklbullon Type
018 88 10.1
e .011dey 2%
D35 2' dlsp.
slon 2.3 sand 5%
D50 24 skewness -0.10 gravel 90%
D65 JO c.bbl. J%
ON 44 boulds, 0%
095 at
Pool Big Werrlor - Melnetem
100% ell der eentl f
r evel nutekve
obble x -
b.uld.r -a lpanmleeJ
9
90%
? g
80% ... _._ ... ... _ ..._.. ... 7
lox
eox
5
50% .._ ... _. 4
1
4ox
Sox
1
I
10%. '
i
o
o%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 loom
penlcle it. (mm)
Size (m m) Size Dletrlbulbn Type
019 0.10 mean 2.0 e1lVCley 13%
D. 0.65 dispersed 11.2 and 35%
D50 2 fl sk.wn.e. -0 10 grsv.l 50%
1165 11 c.bbm 3%
D84 25 boulder o%
D95 54
9128109
00412 - Big War., Crank - MY2 Fmill Rapod URS Vol
C.o.e Section 2
Feature Percent of Reach
HdSe 00
.u.. 1-1..un. cM. Pon, % Gild. O%
Weighted pebble ...ml by best feet...
Meisel Size Rene med) wet hied
a cla 0 o. o 0
vary tie .end 0082 0125 00
fine .end 0125 025 60
medium and 0.25 . 0 5 140
oces. ad 05 1 60
entl 1 -2
e 20
very sea vel 2 4 2 0
fine gravel 4.6 20
fine gravel 6 B 2.0
medium grovel 6 . 11 50
memo. gavel 11 . 16 90
tears

gr.yN 16 zz
8
0
na grrvN 22 32 I6 0
very cou
e gravel 32 45 70
'
very oar gravel 45 - 64 6.0
mall cobble 64 - 90 60
medium cobble 90.128 50
huge cobble 128 160 4 a
e her a cobble 180 - 256 00
mall bodtla. 256 362 0.0
.,.It boulder 382 512 00
medlum boulder 512 - 1024 00
large boulder 1024 2048 00
e lar eboddu 2048 .4096 00
total panicle weighted count 100
bedrock -------------- _..... GO
day hardpan 00
cildrdiuM.. 0.0
e'dic"l ._.....------ ....._ 0.0
total weighted count. 100.0
Nola'
R611e
Mali Size Rene 10 Count
ailVCle 0 .0002 0
vary
Ana end
0.062 - 0.125
0
Be. end 0.125 0 25 1
medium end 0.25 05 2
..no 05.1 0
end
e 1 . z 0
very Sna gravel 2 -4 1
one vr.v.l 4 -6 1
he. g.... I a .8 2
deadline arrival 5 - 11 4
m.dlum gravel 11 . 16 a
.. gravel 16 . 22 6
a gr.vN 22 .32 15
very c.uea gravel 32 45 5
ouae revel 45 64 3
mall cobble 64 - 90 5
meemm cobble 90 - 126 5
large cobble 121 IN
e Mr a cobble 1 80 256 0
met beci 255 - 62 0
...It boulder 362. 512 0
m.dlum boulder
4
Iwgeboulder 24 - a o
br a boulder
total panicle count 60
bedrock
clay hardpa
debiuilf-i !
,infiked ..-

Nola Iola count'
Pool
Melanel 91za Reno 10 Count
el 0 0062
very R end 0.062. 0.125 0
In. Bend 0.126 - 0 25 0
vellum and 025.05 12
end 0.5 . 1 e
.end 1 2
o 2
vary fine preval 2 -4 1
One preval 4 -6 1
One gravel a -8 0
medium gravel a - 11 1
medium gravel 11 - 1a 3
.. gr.vN 18 - 22 2
a mavel 22 32 1
very wris
gravel
32
45 2
e
rave 45
64
very . 3
mall cobble 64 0 0
medium cobble 90 126 v
1111, cobble 129 - 190 1
e ,go
,. ne190 _ 259
0
mail boulder 258.362 0
.
m mill hodd.. 362 - 512 0
medium boulder 512 .1024 0
I.rge boulder 1024 2048 0
e le.. Would.. 2046 -4096 0
total Pan". court 40
bedmce

-----....__..
clay heopen
dimbilue wood
endklal ._.-.._-_---.--.-
10181 count: 40
Note'
Weighted pebble counl by bad features
BD% riffle 40% end
w.ighl.d pe nl • R'Me

ellVcla send
100 Big Warrior Meinatam

P-.-.i-
R
gravel

lltl
cobble

oi p
boulder

diclae ]
18%
%
90%
BO%
... _.
..
... ..... _ .
i 8%
b
/ I .
74%
70%
Iti 60%
-tax
6xy
40
%

B%
30% ..-
20% 4% j
10% 2%
0%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 Ion 1 000 1 0000
panicle d- (mm)
uw
St.. mm) slz. DlNnbulwn T,,!
D1a 0.41 50
mean ellVcley 01
D35 8 5 dlepu eldn 22 5 and 20%
D50 11 .k-m... -0 36 gavel 57%
005 21 cobble 15%
D64 90 boulder 0%
D95 120
Riffle Big Warrior - Mainalem

el/clay

..nd

.-I
_
cobbl
^ nula8ve %
boulder
- M 21 paaiclea
16
100%
90%
BO% (f 14
72
c? 70% '.,
6 80% 0
I

50% . .. . .. B A
E 40% 6
JO%

20%
10% 2
o
0%
001 01 1 10 100 1000 Men
P.mcl. si te (mm)
Size (mm) Size Dleei bulbn Type
016 BB 28.3 'llVC1eY 0%
035 z0 disp.nlre 2.9 and 5%
D50 28 .k.wn... 0.04 gnv.l 11%
Day 34 cobble 2J%
OBI 82 boulder 0%
095 130
Pool Big Warner - M

100% .,it cl.y einatam
F-- --- mulallva %
and ayel cobW
-
-M of prinl
boulder
des I
14
BO% ...
12
80% I
70%
80% ! 10 a
9.

40%

•• -

r

• _......

I 6
30%
I 4
tax .. .. _, .. _.... ..
10%
?.
2
%
0 o
o U 1 0 1 1 l U 100 1 000 10000
mul". We Imm)

- size ( mm) SU. D10i lbn Type
D16 027 27 ainrn.y 0%
UJ5 042 tll.par.lon 210 and 83%
050 0.71 .awneee 041 gravel 35%
Day 4 cobble 3%
DB4 28 houida. U%
0B5 57
Bn81p6
00412 Big Weldor Creek My] Final Repod URS 1107
Cross S.- 3
2) Weighted pebble Count
Feature Percent of R-In
_ Ma 40 % Run %
aflb, bill earn, rbe Pool 040 % Olld. %
Weighted pebble ecr nt by bad Mules
Metenel Size Rena Orm) will Med
b
vary IT. send D.OB2 - 0.125 4.0
one send 0.125 -0.26 100
medium and 0.25 -05 13.0
se and 0.5 - 1 10
caersa.end 1 -2
e 4.0
very
fine prevel 2 .4
50
ana pnv.l 4 -e 20
fine gravel 6 - B 4.0
metllum prevel 8 - 11 10.0
m.dlum pnv.t 11 - 16 4k
coena gr.var 11 22 +o
rile prevel 22 - 32 7.0
very c eras gavel 32 - 45 40
very suet 45 - 64 3.0
small cobde 84 .90 5.0
medium cobble 90 - 129 5.0
large cobble 128 - 180 3.0
a large cobble 180 - 255 0.0
,,.It boulder 255-302 0.9
mall boulder 3e2 - 512 0.0
medium boulder 512 - 1024 060
Ing boulder 1024 2048 00
ve I.,,. bouldar 2045 - 4o9e O.o
total panicle Walghled count: 100
bedrock---_----.__--.-- 00
cony hardpan ------------- 00
MIR.bwcod --------------- ----- 0.0
IN WBIg led rWDl: 0.0
Note',
R
Materiel Size Ran a mm Count
sll cis 0 - 0.062 2
very fine sand 0.002 - 0.125 9
fine and 0.125 -026 1
medlum and 0.25 - 0.5 0
and 0.5 - 1 0
c.arae and 1 - 2
e 1
very flna Oraval 2 - 4 1
,ravel 4 -6
11 0
:
an prevel 5 8 1
d Om gravel 8 - 11
. 3
:
mall
prevel 11 - 15 2
e
r gravel 10.22 3
rail- prevel 22 - 32 5
very coena prevel 32 - 45 3
e rav
l 45.94
,mry co 3
e
urs
ful B
medium cobble ,0 - 110 a
largecobbin -
e Iar a cobble -
mel a Idar 255 .352 0
emsll boulder - 12
medium boulder 512 - 1024 0
large boulder 1024 - 45 0
a Ones bould.
lots[ particle count. 40
blithe" ----- -----------
clay herdpen
debnuelwooe .-...----------
---..
total count. 40
Note
Pool
Material Size Rana 10 Count
blUala 0 - 0.082 1
very fine and 0.062 - 0.125 4
fine and 0.125 - 0,25 a
medlum and 0.25 - 0.5 13
..,as and D.5 - 1 7
ve coarse and t - 2 3
very Me gravel 2 - 4 4
nnepm.l 4 -6 2
,no
prevel 6 - 8
3
mall I Wey.l 6 - 11 7
medlum prevel 71 - 16 2
u prevel 10 - 22 1
ee prrv.1 22 - 32 2
l 32 45
very Iarsa p 1
reve
very use I 45.84 0
smell cobde 64 - 90 0
medium cable 90 - 126 0
large cobble 126 - 760 1
very large cobble 160 - 256 0
small boulder 256 - 362 0
smell bounder 362 - 512 0
medium boulder 512 - 1024 0
large be. .r 1024 - 2048 0
Very tare battles, 2040 .4096 0
late) panicle counl60
bedrock
ley hardpan
dellubwootl

------------------
linfifichil
(.let count: 60
Note'.
Weighted pebble count by bed features
40% cline 60% pool
Iphletl percent - R Ifi
100% sIIUCI. eantl Big Warrior - Malnslem

--Pod Run
revel

Glide
cobbl boulder 14%
90Y. _
{/ i 12%
80% ff j
z
10%
70%
60%
50% B% a

... _

8%'? 3
40%
20% t
10%
0% 0%

0.01 01 1 10 00 1000 10000
Particle size (mm)
_ size (mm) Size Dlslnbullon Type _ n
DIB 033 3.P
-en sllllcisy 3%
036 Ofl2 nlepor,lon 19.fl is
out 30%
D50 6.9
De5 IS ekewneee Ole prevel 43%
cobble In%
Del e4
D05 120 boulder 0%
RIMa Big Warrior- Melnatem

100% sllUcle Bend

oval
- _cu
cobbl
mulafive v. --a n1 penlu,I-I
boulder 9

70%
8
6
BOX t 6

40% 4
8
20% )
I 2
10%

0% a
0.01 0.1 1 to 100 1000 10000
panicle size Imm)
Size Imm) Site Dlablbullon Type
OIB 8.3 30.2 bNCMy 5%
035 22 diapason 3.7 and 5%
050 36 skewness .001 gravel 53%
065 89 cobble 38%
OBI 110 boulder 0%
095 130
Pool Big Werrlor - Melnalem Irumule5ve%---a (Panicle.
100%
90%
80%
70%
L 00%
tp 60%
q0%
30%
20%
10%
e%
14
12
10
8
4
2
0
001 0.l 1 10 Ion loon 10000
parlirle One (mm)
size (m m) Size DIa0lbullon Type
DIB 0.10 mean 13 blUcley 2%
D35 030 dl.perslon 9.2 and fl0%
050 0.67 ekewnesa 0.23 grevn1 37%
D65 20 cobble 2%
D84 g e boulder 0%
095 21
p1281De
ON 12 - Blp Werner Creak - MY2 Final Report URS 1107
Crone Socllon 4
2) Weighted Pebble Count
Feature Percent of Reach
Hello 10 % Run %
I.m., woo.... cue
Pod 00 % GkdoO%
Bighted pebble count by bad features
MalaMl Sit. Rana mim) wet bled
0
r0odity 002 0
very Ana and 0.062 -0 125 0.0
Ana sand 0125 -0.25 50
madlum and 0.25 - 0.5 13.0
end 05-1 too
send 1 - 2
s
e 5.0
very fine a
2 .4
e0
nne gravel 4 6 2.0
nne gravel B -0 0
2
madlum gravel B - 11 0
'
madlum gravel 11 -16 90
u,o,al 16 - 22 7 0
coanui gravel 22 - 32 So
vary coves gnat 32 - 45 4.0
cosols gravel 45 64
,cry 4.0
..It c.bd. B, - 90 50
nun lum cobble W 128 90
large cobble 128 180 1 0
e ler a cobble 180 - 256 00
mall boddar 268 392 0.0
...It powder 362 512 0.0
medium boulder 512 1024 00
large boulder 10242W8 00
ve ler aboulder 2D48 4096 00
total panicle wolghled count. 100
bedrock '--"----..--....... 00
clay hardpan- - 00
deloho/waotl 00
anllklal ._...._ _.......... 0.0
(doll weighted count. 100.0
Note
Pool
Ma1eNl Slae Rene m Count
rialldily - 0062 3
very fine .ale 0 062 0.125 0
Me and 0 125 - 0.25 5
madlum and 0.25 - 05 13
send 05 1 10
end 1 - 2
e 3
very nne gravel 2 4 7
flna,raval 4 0 1
nne gavel 8 8 4
matllum gavel B - 11 7
matllum gavel 11 -18 5
se gravel 18 22 2
se gravel 22 32 0
vary ...... go el 32 - 45 1
Very o 45 64 1
...It cobble 64 g0 0
matllum cobble 90 128 1
large cobble 128 - 180 0
e bar a cabbie 180 - 256 0
mall boulder 256 362 0
mall locution 362 512 0
matllum boulder 512 - 1024 0
We. bouaan 1024 2048 0
e ler a boulder 2048 4096 0
total panicle counl. 80
bedrock _...._.....__.._
day hardpan
d.01lu.AVO.d
annklel
total count. 60
Note 1 -1
RIM.
M.Irmel 91x. Rene m Count
.I ds 0 OOB2 0
P
very No. and 0062 0125 .
nne Band 0 125 0 26 0
madlum ...it 025 0.5 0
co- .and 05 1 0
a.
va 1 Z Z
very nne gravel 2 4 1
nne gravel 4 . 0 1
nne gravy 5 8 1
madlum grsvel 5 11 2
matllum gravel 11 18 4
c.anui gravel 16 - 22 4
Ba gravel 22 32 5
very coar
vel 32 .45 3
very se V.1
g a 45 - 64 2
II cobble 64 . W 5
m.alum cobble 90 - 126 a
large cobble '2' "' I
e on a coblem
small rIdes 256 - 362 5
,,,It bowder 352 512
- 0
madlum bouldal 512
1024
large bouMlm - 2 B 0
'roy ler . boulder
lotel panicle mount. 40
bedrock
day n.,open
d,morstwood
arlifili'l
total count 4
Nola
Weighted pebble count by bed features
40% r,Ill. 60% pool
f _ --- Weighted percent _ -Rile.
NIOCIA Bend Big Warrior - Malnstem

_ -?-Pod +-Run Gilde
revelcobb

-MOl panicle.
boulder 14%
100%
0% 1 12%
8
BOX
? .
70Y. 10%
60% 'i 8% 3
` 50%
40% )
6X X2
r
S $
30% 4%
20%
2x 5
10%
0%
0%
0.01 0,1 1 10 100 1000 10000
panicle sit. (mm)
V e
91ie Imm) Sire Olslrlbullon Type
DIB 036 -
47
in " ellllclty 3%
035 17 dlspersbn 13.8 send 33%
050 7 6 skdwnee. 0 14 gavel 49%
D65 16 cobble /5%
0. 5B OouMer U%
095 110
Riffle Big Warrior . Mamalem

"hide .arM

vet
^_. cumulaevs X
cobble b.ukler
- M ul penlcle?
9
100%
BO% B
80% 7
q 70% j B 3?g
60% it ? 5 4
60%
4
40%

i
f a
3
lox 2
10%
0
0%
0 01 01 1 10 too 1000 10000
paNCle sire (mm)
Sky (mm) Sire Dlaltlbullor Type
018 10 319 .IlVCley 0%
D35 20 oupenlon 32 sand 5%
D50 32 ekavmoee -0.01 gon, 1 60%
D65 64 cobble 35%
DM too bookie, 0%
OB5 120
Pool Big Warrior - Malnslem
% slit ca Band
aver nulebve% -
co ble bouMer sot penlGSe
14
100
90%
.. 12
80%
10%
% r
10 ,
50
%
8 3nx _ r $

20%
tU% 4
0
U%
Dot 01 1 10
P.,10. .Ire (mm) IN 1000 10000
se. (mm) Sir. 041,11m.11- Type
_ 010 027 1e
owan aIlvcl.y 5%
035 05
D50 083
DO 33
Del 12
D95 ANIA 11.9-rem 8.2
Or-... 022 and
gravel
cobble
blind., 52%
42%
2%
0%
8128100
00412 Dig W-in, Creek-My2 Final Damn URS INi
APPENDIX B-VIII. PEBBLE COUNT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION PLOTS
MOUNTAIN CREEK
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
craze 9e01an 1
2) W,Ighted Pebble Count
P•alun Parent of Reach
RIIAe 70 % Run %
ark, Pool it., oar. Pod 70 % GsdeO%
alghbi p•bbla eeunl by bad fWa,..a
M.larlal Size Ran a mw.l hlod
iii D62 0
vary fine .and 00620125 10
fine and 0 125 .0 25 9.0
madlum and 0 25 - 0.5 90
ae land 0 5 - 1 5.0
and 1 2 00
vary fine gravel 2 4 50
fine gravel 4 -e 30
fine gravel 6 6 40
madlum gravel 6 11 50
madlum gravel 11 16 5.0
caara. gravel 16 - 22 11 0
.e grovel 22 - 12 4.0
very con. its "I 32 .45 2 0
very v 1 45 64
coarse 130
m?11 cobble 64 90 60
madlum cobble W 126 6 0
Inge .icicle 126 - 160 2 0
ki . obble 160 - 2s8 0
melt boulder 256 J82 0.0
m.n boudn 302 .512 00
metllum boulder 512 1024 00
large boulder 1024 - 20,18 .0
very lar a bouldex 2046 - 4060 00
In panicle weighted count 10
bedrock 00
clev hotdpen ----.... 00
dolr4uN .. 00
artilklal --......__._ ..... 0.0
""I we lghled count 100.0
Note
Weighted pebble count by bed features
70% nlae 30% pool
-weighted p senl_ Was
sill/clay Band Big Warrior - Mountain

P-1 _ R
revel Creek

-Gilds
cobble

of panicles
boulder 14%
100%
90%
12%
BOX ?
70% / 0%
5 60%
? -BX 9
a
N

i 3
6%
!
40% g
a
30X 4%
20%

10% 2% g
a%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1 000 10000
pr ido alto (mm)
e^
Size(m.) SIxn Dlelrlbullan Type
D16 02 35 eIX/cley 9%
D35 2 9 dl.per.Nn 30 3 and 24%
050 11 ekewnea -0 31 gavel 52%
D85 21 cobble 15%
D64 e2 bouMei 0%
095 110
:C:;:'] Riffle Big Want-- Mountain Creek
fine e.nd 0 125 0 25 4
medwm Bend 0 25 05 2
.alb 05 - 1 2
.end
e 1 - 2 0
very fine gavel 2 4 3
fine gravel 4 6 1
fine gavel 6 .8 7
media. gavel 6 - 11 6
madlum gravel 11 10 5
[Dane gravel 16-22 s
coarse gravel 22 32 3
very coarse gr.val 32 - 45 2
mall boulder
metllum bouldei
large bouldei
try large boultlei
lab
bedrock
clay hardpan
d.lrltu./wood
fine sand
medwm and
and
ourain, very.... .and
vary 6n. gravel
fin. gravel
gave
In.
madam gravel
medium gravel
a. =r Zl
ae gravel
,nny g-.1
,nay, co
enes gravel
...It cobble
medium cabbie
Inge cobbl.
very 4roe cobble
...It boulder
mall boulder
m.dlu. boulder
betlrock
day hempen
debdualwlrod
?--_.c,. able LVaX -^-M U?parbc?ea
100%
90%
60%
d 70%
s 60%
L
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
a%
14
12
10 a
6 R$5
R
41
2
0
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
2 016 0 parade airs Imm)
1 panicle count. 70
Size Imm)
S. DlsbNulNn
type
-------------- ...... Me 054
035 11 moan 61
aninnaon 1s5 silgclay
and 1%
11%
----"-----
---------- D50 is
Dab 41 ek.wnea D 33 gravel
cobble e3%
Is%
late) count, ) DIN 12
DO 110 bookie, 0%

Sire Ran a mm Count
i
l B
W
i
M
t
C
k
P f
6 2 4 n
ree
arr
or -
oun
a
oo
ig -f muleeva
l % -x of Pemdee
0 115 0 25 6 _
10u%
uax
60%
70%
an%
F sax
p 40%
8 ]D%
20%
111%
o%

001 D1
Slx. (mm)
Die 011
D35 020
050 041
as, Des
DU 11
D95 76
e
7
e
5
4 $a£
3 g
2 R
0
1 la 100 t00o 10000
Pankl. sire Imm)
Size Dbbibullen Type
14 nlllcley 13%
dbpn.Nn 22 6 and 53%
akewnea 0.35 gravel 11%
cobble /%
boulder 0%
gn6lo6
00412 - Big Warrior Creak - Mv2 Final Report UR9 1107
Croce Bncean 2
21 Weighted P.bblo Count
Futon Percent of Reach
_ Rlmo 50 % Hun %
lurk, Peel, Pun, ewe
Pod N. OIIda?X
Bighted pebble count by bad future,
Metered Rl.e Rana m Wel hl,d
.IVUe e2 80
very An. Bend 0.082 - 0.125 4.0
fine and 0.126 . 0.25 1,0
medium untl 025 -05 30
e......nd 0.5 - 1 60
eentl 1 - 2
o 5,0
vary Ana growl 2 .4 7.0
Ane Brava 4 - 5 1.0
Ane prswl B - 8 5.0
memo" Breval 8 - 11 11.0
growl II -18
m
eri 5.0
a
e
c Brava 15 - 22 5.0
ere preva 22 - 32 9.0
wry mane growl 32 - 45 8.0
wane revel 45 - 04 7.0
smell cobble 64 - 90 5.0
medium cobble 90 - 128 4.0
lag, cobble 128 - 160 no
e tar a cobble 780 - 258 0.0
smell boulder 258 -JB2 0.0
imall boulder
302 -512
0
medium boulder 812 - 1024 0.0
large boulder 1024 - 2048 0.0
ter a boulder 2048 - 4095 0.0
Iota, panicle weighted count: 150
bedrock ----------------- 00
clay ramp 0.0
detrltu.7%mod ---------------- 0.0
en81d-.-....--.----- 0
tole weighted taunt: 100.0
Note
RRfM
Melenal Rite Rena 10 Count
al da 0 - 0.062 1
very nit and 0.062 -0125 0
line and 0.125 -0.25 0
medlum and 0.25 .06 0
eentl 0.5 - 1 4
-y couver, and 1 .2 1
vmy line gravel 2 - 4 4
Ane Brevet 4 -e 3
Ane gravel 6 -8 2
medium gravel 8 - 11 3
..drum gavel 11 - 16 3
ern. preva 18 - 22 3
maroe greva 22 -32 7
vary noeree gavel 32 .45 A
coare. t 45 - 04
sue a
amTco
de 84 .90 5
medlum cobble 90 - 129 4
xga cobbb
e ter a cobble
180 256
0
der B
ou
.mall
boulder 302 - Iz 0
medlum boulder
large boulder i 1 -
very large boulder
total perk le count: 50
bedrock
city herMen
d itrlluawood ------------ --
----
Iola counl:
Note'
Pool
Manna, 8110 Ran a mm Count

very Ane and 0.002 - 0.125 4
An. and 0.125 - 0,25 1
medium and 025 05 3
c..... ..no 0,5 - 1 1
o Band 1 - 2 4
vary on. gravel 2 - 4 3
Ane gavel 4 - 6 1
Ane Breval 6 B 3
medium Brave, 8 11 R
medium Orevel 11 .76 2
ee greva 18 22 2
coeree greva 22 - 32 2
vary mar gl 32 - 46 2
..... ve
45.64
1
mall cobble 04 - 90 0
medium cobble 00 - 128 0
large cobble 128 180 0
vary large cobble 100 - 258 0
.mall bouder 250 - 362 0
...It boulder 382 - 512 0
in-in boulder 512 - 1024 0
large boulder 1024 - 2048 0
e large boulder 2048 - 4096 0
total panicle munl: 50
betlnck ---------------
Gay ,it -------------
d.blluawootl ------------------
edA1Ge1
total count: 50
Nole:
Weighted pebble count by bed feRturee Big Warrior - Mountain Creek
50%rime 50%pool

ghted percent - RIIA
-+P d Run -- 01 .
Dlltla ..-.___
-MOl ..
pedlrlae l
100% IIYcl. send r va el m b,e boulder 12%

00%
?
r . .lox
BO%
70% 9%
b 60%

r
$
d
3
40% 4
%
20%

10% 2%

% 9
0% 0
%

0.01 0.1 1 1, too l oon 10000
Particle ale (mml
Rice (mm) Rlce Dl.ulbullon Type n
019 0.18 29
mean .1111day 8%
035 2.7 tlleperelan 25.0 eend 24%
050 8.5 ek.-lour 0 w gravel 59%
DB5 17 nobble B%
D&1 45 boulder 0%
095 BI
RiMe Big Warrior - Mountain Creek
"--mmule9va%-aolp nlcle?
100% aludi Band oval cobble boulder 6
90%
RO% I i
B
e 70%
6 sax R
60% _ 4 4
/0%
9
30%
20% 2
`
0%
0% 0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle el:e (runt
I
aim Imm) Rix, Dlaribullan "Pe
01. 2.8 139 eIIOGay 2%
D35 10 dlepenim 5.6 and 10%
050 23 ekmimmui -0.19 greva 70%
095 3e cobble 18%
D84 BB boulder 0%
095 100
Pool Big Werrlor - Mountain muha.v. % ---A of panicle.
100%
90%
80%
/0%
h eo%
E 50%
40%
}}}jjj 30%
20%
111%
0%
B
B
7
e
E Sl
J
2
0
001 al 7 10 100 1000 room
portal. it. (mm)
at,.( ..) Size Distribution Type
Die 0014 1.0
mean .Ildclay 14%
D35 0.24 dbperaon 15 3 and 38%
050 1.1 ek..n... 0 gavel IB%
De5 7.e cobble 0%
D84 13 boulder 0%
095 35
01201(18
00412 - Big Warrior Crack - MY2 Final Report URR 1101
APPENDIX B-VIII. PEBBLE COUNT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION PLOTS
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
00412 Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
Cross Secboo 1
21 Weighted Pebble Court
Feature Pucacl of Ranch
_ Rfifla 80_j% Run?]%
tun,' P.." .u.' -
Pad 20 % Gllim %
Weighted pebble count by bad features
Material Size Reno m Weighted
el cis - 062 0
very One mend 0.062 - 0.125 5.0
One and 0.125 - 0.25 16.0
medium mend 0.25 - 0.5 15.0
ad ad 0.5 - 1 9.0
-Y cants. esnd 1 - 2 1.0
very flue gravel 2 - 4 640
fle:'ravel 4 - 6 2.0
flee prevel 6 -e 00
medium'revel 6 - 11 1 o
coed( m gravel 11 - 16 2.0
coat a prevel 16 - 22 3.0
tae greed 22 - 32 Bo
very coerce Breve( 12 - 45 6.0
mar ravel 45 - e4 7.0
mall cobble 64 SO 50
medium cobble 90 126 1.0
large cobble 128 - 160 00
e Iar : aoeele I20 256 0.0
smell houMar M - 362 0.0
small bouldn 3 2 - 812 00
medium boulder 512 1024 0.0
large boulder 1024 - 2046 00
a to d. bouidu 2048 .4096
v 0.0
Inlet panicle Weighted count: 100
bedrock ---------------- ._.. 0.0
day h rdpn -....._...-------- 0.0
eelruu.rwpae 0.u
artificial
Wal weighted count: IMO
Note'
RRfle
Materiel Si t. Rena m Count
mllOdit 0 -0062 3
very fine:end 0
ad .062 - 0.126 2
0
Ana :: .125 -025 12
medium and 0.25 -0.5 10
esnd 05 - 1 e
Ve end 1 -2 1
very floe gravel 2 - 4 6
fin: prevel 4 - e 2
floe prevel B -8 4
mecum gravel e - n 1
memum'r.vel n _ 1e 2
c.ose prevel 11 22 0
.: Brae.I 22 - 32 e
very coarse pfewl 32 45 e
coa Vel
rn 45 64 1
ell cobble
: 64 90 1
medium cobble 90 - 128 1
large cobble 128
[.Me cobble
8
small It toar 392 - 12 0
medium boulder
large boulder 7 0
e ter a bmldn
total panicle count: SO
bedrock _ _._......_.._.
cloy hardpan -- ----- -----------
deldfini wood ------_.......
Iota counl.
Nola'
Pool
Material Slze Rena
l, Count
==W; . o. 2
= 3
very Me send _
0.062 - 0.125 3
fin...ad 0.126 - 0.25 6
medium send 0.25 .05 5
.or.. 0.5 - 1 0
ea send
o 1 - 2 0
vary fine prevel 2 .4 0
fine prevel 4 .6 0
An. prevel e - 6 0
m:dloin 'ravel e . 11 6
m:dm
grovel 11 . to 0
a
greval 16 22 0
metes time:( 22 32 0
very coarse gravel
a 32 -45 0
cianut
I 45 - 64 0
,..It cobble 64 - 80 0
medium cobble 90 - 126 0
large cobble 121 100 1
a ter a cobble 710 - 261 0
smell boultler 251 - 362 0
small boulder 302 - 512 0
medium boulder 512 - 1024 0
Lrg:boulder 1024 -2041 0
[ e bouidin 2041 .4096
vim, 0
late( particle count: 20
bedrock
clay hardpan ---------------
demtutit-d ----------
anllciel
..._._
....... ......
(owl count. 20
Nola.
Weighted pebble count by bed features Big Warrior - Unnamed Tributary
80% mile 20% pact
-.-weighted percent - Rile, Pont --•--Run Glide --pal
100% allude sand revel co hlo boulder

pnrliclee?
20%
90% 18%
BOX - ? 188/.
70% 14%
b 60% 72x
SOX . ... _.. ..._... ......_ I - - 7
40%
r
B% 0
$
30% 0%
20% 4% 111¢iii
1o% 2 % 9-
0% OY
.
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
panicle :I4e (mm)
Slze(mre) Site Olelrlbullon Type un
Ole 0.15 moan 24 elluclay B%
035 1.33 dispanuon 27.9 and 41X
M. 0.79 skewness 0.32 prevel 3B%
0 B5 7,4 cobble 7%
Da4 40 boulder 0%
ON 12
Riffle Big Warrior - Unnamed Tributary

to0x sllbaia nand

oval
r---.cumuiauve % o -of panicle.]
aopbl. boulder 14
90%
80% 2
? 70%
to
fl

10% S
BI
20% t i 1
4
t0%
0% 2
0
0,01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
panicle size (mm)
Site (mm) Size Dleblbutlen TY'2
DIfi 0.2 3.1 slfl/day 4%
035 0 .56 dl:per.lan 160 .end 39%
D50
005
D84
095 4
22
4.
76 skewness -0.07 grev:l 49%
cabbie 0%
boulder l%
Pool Big Warrior - Unnamed Tributary
[ -a-a mule0va % -d all nanlcle_ J
100%
90%
80%
10%
cox
g 60%
41%
8 30%
20%
10%
0%
7
a
s 5
2
1
0
001 at 1 10 100 1000 10000
partial, site (mml
Sim (mm) Slze Distribution Type
Die O.OBS '.T
Mean .Ilucley 15%
035 0.14 mi.mireion 2.6 and BS%
D50 0.2 sk.wn... -0.05 prevel 0%
D65 0.29 cobble 0%
D14 0.49 boulder n%
085 0.79
81301on
00412 - Big Werner Creak - MY2 Fuel Report URS Vol
Croce Sacllon 2
1) Weighted Pebble Count
Feel.. Pamnl of Reach _
RIMo 70 % Run %
caw, Xaal avn, etle
Pod 70 % GXdaO%
Bighted pebble count by bad features
Malarial site Range 111) hied

.hL
0 .0062 13 0
very firM send 0 082 - 0.125 9.0
fine ... 0.125 0 25 6.0
medium sand 0.25 - 0 5 160
and 05 1 9.0
very and 1 2 60
very this gravel 2 .4 30
fine gravel 4 -6 50
fine gravel 6 - B 30
medium prevel 8 11 50
medium prevel 11 I6 4.0
wane prevel 16 22 20
so gravel 22 32 40
very wise gravel 32 45 30
very oar vet 45 - 64 00
...It cobble as - g0 40
medium cobble 90 128 0 0
large cobble 126 160 00
Y, tar . cobble 180 256 00
.mall boulder 256 362 00
mall boulder 762 - 512 00
medium boulder 512 1024 00
large boulder 1024 2048 o u
a larabouldn 2a6 4090
v 00
total panicle lighted count,
to m.k 00
clay hardpan -------- - 00
datum wood-_......._.... 00
artificial 0.0
Iota Weighted count. 1000
Nola
RMIs
veteran Site Rena m Count
1 cla 0 U112 6
very fine and 0 0152 - 0.125 4
nne send 0 125 0 25 4
medium and 025-05 5
end .5 1
1
Viand
ve 1 2 e
very fine gravel 2 4 J
fine gravel 4 6 0
Me gravel " 7
madlum prevel B 11 5
madlum prevel 11 - 16 4
Co.". prevel 18 22 2
se gravel 22 -32 4
very .a
pn
al 32 45 1
nti
?
very war el 15 , 64 e
mall cobble 84 - BO 4
medium cobble 00 - 126 0
large cobble
e ler a cobble 110 256
- 0
small bounce, 255 362 0
mall boulder 362 512 0
madlum bauldor
Irge boulder 1 024 2NS 0
e large boulder
total panicle count. 70
bedrock
clay
M
detiluntm
total count. 7
Note
Pea
Manuel an. Rana (rmn Count
allvca 0 0062 10
very fine and 0.062 0125 5
nne and D.125 0 25 2
metllum and 0.25 05 11
sand 0.5 1 2
and 1 2 0
_
very nne l nvel 2 - 4 0
nne gravel " 0
fine gravel 6 8 0
medium prevel 8 11 0
madlum gravel 11 a 0
wen. gravel 16 22 0
.. gravel 22 32 0
vary ..". gov.1 72 45 0
45 - a
cost.. 0
woble 94 - 90 0
medium wbble go - 128 0
large cobble 128 180 0
e ler a cobble 180 - 255 0
smell boulder 256 362 0
mall boulder 362 512 a
medium boulder 512 - 1024 0
large boulder 1224 - 2218
e lard. bwld.r 2048 4098
total panicle count: 30
b.drack
clay heldpen
d.bllu.lwwd

---------- - -----
andklal
Met -on[ 30
Note
Weighted pebble count by bed features Big Warrior - Unnamed Tributary
70% Hire 30% pool
welphletl PB I Rlee - Pool -N - Dlld -?-p of Policies
Wlvda send aver bble boulder 18%
100%
90% 18%
BOX 14%
+ 70%
'
12%
?
60% i

- 50% 8% o
4ox e%
JOY.
20%
4%
10% 2%
Ox
0%
0. 01 0.1 1 to 100 1000 10000
particle elte (mm)
V
alto (mm) Sit, Dlslrlbutlon Type ^
Dt6 0018 1.5 srlllde
075 0.34 dlspmslon 234 and 46%
D50 D. is ekewnaea 0 17 prevel 37%
065 51 nibble 4%
Da 29 boulder 0%
D95 e
Riffle Big Will - U

100% °ilVCle nname d Tributary

aarld ravel
f- cumulativeX
ribbl. builder
=-aof penlGa_?
9
90%
J B
_,.. .. .. _... .. .-
_.

fi0% 5 Y
50% - ... _ S
F§
40% 4
e
a
30%

/ J
3
20% 2
10%
i
9
o%
001 0 1 1 10 100 1000 10000
P.nicl, site (mm)
811. (mmj Sao Dlelnbullon _ Type
D18 026 35 etwl.y 4%
D35 12 dlsperelon 144 and 37%
050 5 1 skewness 0 ll gravel 53%
D55 12 cobbb 6%
Da 47 boulder O%
D95 87
Pool Big Warrior - Unnamed Tributary
sill cis sand I
gravel - mw n X -- X
cobble boulder I1 amcles
12
100%
Sox
10
box I
70% a
4
r= sox - - -i ? 6

q
Sox
? ,
20% 2
10%
0
0%
0 01 01 1 10 coo IDUD IW00
Pend. site (mm)
site lmm) St.. V100ilkn Typo
D16 0081 O2 elnlcley 33%
D35 0007 d4pe.kn 2.7 and 67%
D50 0.13 skinvu- 0 to "I'll 0%
Des 029 cobbb ox
Da 0.42 boulder 0%
D95 0 So
8130108
W412 Big WenIm Cmk MY2 Flnel Report URS 1107
-? •, ,095[a ugp/oJ V1Ax 'omMVan dVW A3N ??'lU 1T? Ilal?i.? gg
<Np i/M >nl?1Po 0091 ?I R '? yyQ? ¢
- _ - oulp?oJ VI,uN - W1/O.W.o7 SNP 'lLi, L Y Z
1dOd38 ON18011NOW 900Z
N011 V2f015321 WV361S 53ONY 3tN IN3n sm i dAN3 a q
3,.a s33 v J
AN3 N a E
N338D 8()IHdVM 919 ,N3AINVAO VNIMdV3 "IN
SNOISIA321 ,y niaoia
---- -L-I- /
I I I ..
I
L---------
Q0
0 /
i I
I
I I I I
I I I I
I ,? I
? I
M
S9
;?,u J I N I
----r-------
11A AIM q
?8 I I '? I
? 444YYYYY444Y4444", 444444444Y444 t - - -
------------?
3
$ g
R
S
0952 -11-0 WAN Vll/VIJAR M31A NVId ON18011NOW I' ?? Id. ufltU.? g '
- - - - N
' {7
o 41od ?Y$-I-f 009/ 1t7? rv R
WlPiO7VlAN - moxdAJ SHn i)l?i? W 6 ga
- - - - -- - 180d38 ON18011NOW 9002 5 3 °
NOI1VdOiS38 WV38iS s3owws3N IrtlnivN
)?.a ON) 1N3MNOwNN3 ! 3 k
SNOISIA321 A3383 2i0R121VM 018 1N3N1tlYd3O YNi IOUV3 ft W. )
o
@
??11
1133H5 335 3NII Hal VYl
?? I I
r
VM
? ppy yy ? ? ? y? ?
3 S N g B q 3l
a
? I ! x W @
pp tltl Y
B tl 0 8
_ - _- - - - - •I 10952 wxj
oV/AN b//vpmv
aN,p 4jDd AAwlAd 009/
M31A NVId ON180iINOW

?XX1l

N

Q

ry

Q
aulN?oO VIIDM - Wllo?ulAJ SNl1 '31rD
j d
ly n

sun 1NOd38 ONI8011N011 9002
N011V2i01S32i WV3LIIS sJJanos3a ?ranl•N
oN. 1N3NNO 3 bq
'
E A

SNOISIA3tl
M ouauld H338D aolaavM 018
avrow N3WltlYd30 YNIIOU IOtl.J H 1tlO
nxnJ a ?
I
0
°n
xDlc?
/ w AxcN iArtxwc _-
x01 SILL r(D.
T
y
.1 ! W x 5 s 5 Y 5 6
r r A
y Q
/` ., Q fl? I i CFA J®e
it
a
r W k ?
? r r r d ? e
B B a? 8 a
nr6"I +11
? •11N ,•?•?A• J u.M •• n M31A NVId ONI2JO11NOW
095/2 W/pi0 VIA 'Gll/AS/iA tic. II rv F w" Q
INV 41-d ?lAd 0091
L n
a V/AN - w/IOAOAJ sun ni?u 8g ga
- -- 1bOd38 ON18011NOW 90OZ ^? 5 s t°' ^
ONv 1N3YMi INItl0W AN3 N3 a
N011 V2fO1S321 WV3211S s3
!0 4 d ] Y
?...,.,... H33N3 8018"M 91B 1N3A1Nrd30 VNIIOUr) HLWN
133N5 333HS 33S

i
r
i

t
?l
1
$ o
i
0
S
X11
p
1r ? ? _ ? y ? ? ? n a ? p _
r i
? ?®II ei C:?®®
,a
a
p
? ? r r w d
I
_
oi.?
;9[2 a/NJn WA~•l/Iw'/J
? x' Jar '

M31A NVId ONRIOIINOW
.11 3 I: 11.?
?'i It
IW VIVIXI?'

?

?

a

- -
- I aNXI yJOd NFwIJY`/ 0091
.1/..J VIAN -WoAd-o SNN n w
180d3d 9N18011NOW 9002
w 8
- - -
WV s33mas3a 3ranl•N
4
NOI1VdO1S38
381S oxr 1N3naomnN3 3 d e
SNOISIA38 ,b N3380 d01d8VM 018 IN3rIl Nra30 •Nnoav3 H1a0N
1
0
S 133HS 33S 3NI3 H31•W
lli V 11 \ \ I l? v
/ _. ,®
i
f 133H5
H
g?
A
a
? r? r ti ? e
@ d d 8 8 ? X
r`irB' ? 1I
40
II s,
I y?
e
1
3 ?
I
?p ?gpR y $/q 5 0
? FP? r tl? '! {y? 5 5 f Y
I I?®11 ? 8
_ _. _ -. _ • 03SLZ au/PioJ VIAM roll/nc A

ANA ]/-d APw/Al 0091

rw1p?OJ V/AN - uU//DAOAJ Sall

M31A NVId ON18011NOW

mIn
I'i j''
U1.. V11 117
L4
rv
z

u

6

.

fy

¢

-._ 18Od38 ON18011NOW 90OZ
NOIIVHOIS38 WV381S
S33W Sk lVdnl VN
_ _._ ]CVO O V 1N3NN00AN3 A

$NOISIA3
21 .h aAU]?d N3380 8018"M 018 1N3N1Nra3a V`V"a
canon ]
I
0
j
!? ill
uI.
1 1 ?I /'
'll i
I\

i
I
%
't
40
\ j
0 133HS 33S 3N13 HJ1Vr1
Y Y
p? T S pWp Y tl
6 E ? ? Y ? tl
I
fir6'I rl?
F
9 ?opyyo
?E
y9y
i 9 g q? o t
Q? a. ? ?y ? e g a a ? 4 u _
C e ? A S a i d ? i? Y Y
e ?,

_ ox?z v,-N rollluv4n
oN,O rind -WI-d 0091

wlp,olW.um - wllox"3 SMO M31A NVId ONIa011NOW

vuu I.'i iT,ipNu.lu

1111.1 YrlQl?r?'

?

ry

W

6

¢

y
- - 1a0d3a ONI8011NOw 900z 5 ' °
- 533d?oS3tl ,.tl?j.H ;
Nollvaols3a wv3als

SNOISIA38
ro aiou,d r3383 aolaavM 019
?nrow H3nltlrd3a rnnotlq HLtlOH
ann?

4 P
y
Y y y
? II
r ? ? ? h
5a r
g
f ? I
C. ? _? ®? 3
a
t?
? 6 a
QQ
L] Y ?
?? $ H o f33HS 33s
W , 1 I /
I
l
7 Y /
I

?QJ A

:y

t
I
rY
i u
I
I•
I
;
l
V' /
-- - _ -_-- • 109S7a//N/?JVIAN blll?l/Ap M31? NV Id ONNOINOW I'i!iil.?
w w i? ?' d 4
aNK/ 41od /?A'Wl4 009/ w L ? ti
d4P/aJVIAN - ?/IOwCAJ SN0 mug ?r?I}'S??y
180d38 ON18011NOW 9002 ^? 5
NOIIVHOIS38 WV381S 53]tlfgS3tl 1VN01YN
- ]I?0 ONV LN311NOWAN3 3O d r L L7
sun g
N33210 H01H21VM 019 1N3YI1NYd30 1Ni3O8Y3 NINON

F?
w
a

UW /
o
ID

p<
S
S ?
i
S
1 ? ? ? Y V
a
? W r
6@ d 6@ e tl
nrr 1
0992 uo1p,q3 ulAx •anlna/?An
"10 4Ad ,.I.WIM/ 009/ M31A NVId WdOIINOW ?I I•u ?• i611;?,+
l A
d
au/pAJ VIAN w/MAOA7 SH/1

- - - _

- IdOd3N Wdo1NOW 900 z
W
3 3 NO1.N

4

'

,.. l,.p V3als
NCIIVHOIS38
N3383 8018HVM ore ONY NV 1
N31NOMnN3 >D
1N3n,x.d3O .N110HV3 MOON a
8
$ o
m
i
Si
OD

A ? o(d ? "o ?' Y @
2 s p
r ?
I
nrr ?l?
_ _ '095(Z l+?/N/oJ VIAM roll/?//All M31A NVId `JNIdOlINOW Al' l'y},' "'? N
- -_ _ ? - - - i -- • ayp r/Od ?/Ad 0091 ?ill?+AV1xxf ? ?N ?
a/NAJVIAN - wUOAOAJ San vun L d
- - - - - - - idOd3d ON18011NOW 90OZ 5 z? ? P
y
14011 V2J01S321 WV32115 533dWSM 3YNn11N UNr 1N3MOMAN3 30 y d k E e
SNOISIA321 ,y -.V" N3383 8018"M 018 1N3/11N•n3O TNi3ON•3 ll U
I
0
°n
S 133HS 33S 3141l H3101
\ lY
t.A
1
I
\.M
1 9
of : ? I I 1
I l 'y ? e P a Y ? ? 1
?`??\?® / p I fl i gCr?s
B 133HS 33S 3NIl N31tlN ?
? rp
?, ? '! T d s d
I
rtr?' / ? 1 I

--
09910 -XjAj wAN v fljvi,An

YNb i'i.d AMa/Ad 0091

C
M31A NVId ONINODNOW

, '. I,111(111I,I
LtLq
y1? t?

N

g

R

M

?

?

b

- - -
-- AJ 5y[)
WINAJ VIAN - uo//oa l1HI
iHOd3N ONIHO11NO1N 900?
NOI1 V?
S3Li WV3a1S
O

s3JUrIOS3a lraN N
S33 qii O
,
llv0 j
1 3 J
IN tlIAN a S G

SNOISIA39
_
N3380 80188VM 919
1N3W1tlrd30 YH l0ar] N
1tlON F
S
133HS SIH1 ]Nil HJIVVI II
• g

,

V ?
?N I

? y
/• 1111 ?\, g.
I

, "? .Ii ..11111

1 133H5 IHl NI HIM

3 tl fl Gar
? ^
11 Nr a
p
I
(? ?
NJ \ e a
r
6 133HS 33S 3NIl HJIVN Y 4
? ? IY I p v p

?
W nrD'I t 1!
a E E
a) c O Z N
Z5 L: r- 2 3:
c m co a _N o v 8:ry3r Cl)ji m
E J
>
Z5 i
n
Sao^ c d' U Ol O E Z' w k 2 N C
co h m z f? LL y Ey ~ .. C N Z C ?O $9 LL N .L] m
Pcm9'm d, a ??i' O_?dY r U m L X X?° to 20-
?3 C .O • I s¦¦ I I tl
?S&E?wc ,,,L 0 ca
???$a 4 zw
om
m
o L-
0
o (n
40 °o
?P LO
?? o
'fir q
s It
0
a
a ? o
O
o
m o 0 o O
QQ O
to d Cl)
pO ¦ ??bb0 ¦ U
O ¦ d d a E
N 0. > > > fn oq ¢ O
> Q a MO O
%
o Q ?
a N (o V q ? G??
MOI j Heei? loweM 619 r, f r Go? C)
> Q "?¦ v O
o a N v ° `-
(L 1? N
U)
> G o
a ¦ ? o in
N A (°
m > QP N

? s 3 3
s s tl ?
X $ ?

e G E a z
d ? ? 9
C 5 m
5 Y ? '= i p
i Q
R

U .g Y T t?
4
5

4 a E ti

5
5 E ti s
i < L 6 < <
4
3
m 3
m 3 3
m 3 3 3 3

d U
? C
S C
F. L,
S 4
S u
S u
S U
r
y
y
U
s g

m .?

m

m

m

O
u

m

m

m
«

`
¢ X

k
U
E
o &
a
m
M
M
p0
a¦ a M
N m
p>
4
N
¦
0
N
o
m ?
0
> ¦ m
¦
a N
MO?j '8
Y
0
0
q
O
C
a
a
m
0
N c?
C ? Y
N °
p ,w
p S T
m c
0
o a
v u n n
d ? jp
3a x?
° n o
c?2c
pc b g 0
U - d N
my 3 ?'(d
u
? ? N U N
aatl°0-
E E ?d
m
y d
rOSmD
w
z N
e (D.2 z Vn
L: U 2 3:
?` E ?? ^.• in d co N N 'D f A E Q N
6a doe ?U o? N C) E V
m m m E E E N m
m m E a rr'_ .. M y LL
C N Z o C J ' Y O
a 5 d
3aS4° vp °? w__- W 0)NY y o
E: d
mO O Y
NSg n.m O ? ? C
? 'n
a ?1°up :? a, a Z. it =' it C 0 I I I?
N
o N
o LL .

3 o C
cD
??o g
? o

0
tic 0
0
o
Lf)
C?? o
Jc `?
C)
0
0
g ?
0
T o o
o ? ? U ? U M
g m ? m E
v
o
n ` m o Q d O
po

o Y
?
N
g N

Mol.j ?IBBI
? ?or»e BWPA13 ?i
Q Sb Mo

°' ry41
O

M Bib %
o?,
Jo
o
C
og \'oh'
% o
LO
i .
fy 4

i
4)
G
r
k
i rp
1p

; sp .P
?

;afi e

3
p

t? ;E
y1j
1.

pl
?

i?

'
`

ii

!
Ssa

3 ,.

a

:

? j?

g
N
a
3
m
g
0
N

a a °g a o
n d
m mo ? a
o y
o
;
a
o
V
Q
m ? n
_ v

i
i
Mo?? Hee??'B
a "=
H
°i o du
a
t
?p O BUT
?3pp
n
O
? C
0
°'z$8
L ? 6
N.4n
N Co
Y
3g?g
a m E0
u o m
v ?
- n c
L N 4O
m N N.?
a,tl ND
N W N
E m U rv
a o c
E-
y?? a
O Q E w y d
z w
Big Warrior - Mainstem XS 1, Year 182 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
1112
1110
c
0 1108
1106
°-' 1104
w 1102
1100 '
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Station
Year 1 - 11/16/05 -Year 2 - 9/27/06 - Both bank pins re-established
Big Warrior - Mainstem XS 2, Year 182 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
1101
1100
1099
1098
d
W 1097
1096
1095
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station
-? Year 1 - 11 /16/05 -a-- Year 2 - 9/27/06
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
Big Warrior - Mainstem XS 3, Year 1 & 2 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
1092
c
.2 1090
M
m 1088
w
1086 ' - '
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station
Year 1 - 11/16/05 -w-Year 2 - 8/29/06 - Right bank pin re-established
Big Warrior - Mainstem XS 4, Year 1 & 2 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
1092
c 1090
.0 1088
1086
m 1084
w 1082
1080 ' '
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station
Year 1 - 11/16/05 Year 2 - 8/29/06 - Right bank pin re-established
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
Big Warrior - Unnamed Trib XS 1 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
r- 1108
•= 1107
M
1106
d w 1105 L
0
5 10 15 20 25
Station
4 Year 1 -11/15/05 -*-Year 2 - 8/29/06
Big Warrior - Unnamed Trib XS 2, Year 1 & 2 Overlay
As-Built Elevation Used for 2006 data for Height of Instrument
1102
c 1101
1100
m 1099
w 1098
1097
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Station
0 Year 1 - 11/15/05 -Year 2 - 8/29/06
00412 - Big Warrior Creek - MY2 Final Report URS 1/07
co
N
E
d
N
C
O
m
3
>a
m

c
lD
lD
a>
c
J
N
N
7
U
2
U)
m
0
F
J
t
m
0
f-
x
N
<1
C
2
O
N
d
U
0
ff-E
O
c
0
U
N
fil
X
a
7
Y
c
a
I
N
N
l0
3
0
N
y}1?
1
0
0
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V'
O
O
N
C.
OOi 00) g m O0) OOD 0 m 00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(u) UOIJene13
O
0
N
M
O
O
0
M
O
O
W
N
00
0
N
O
N
i
O
N
N
O
O
O
`. N
O
O
OD
O
Q N
ccc
0
C:, In
O O
c
m
r
O U
C)
r
O
cr
Z)
C
O
CL
U)
af
c
ll
N
}
d
N
U
o
E
m
3
rn
m
?_N}
O
O
? c
M
L
0 0 4-
N Q o
o ?.,
? N
m W O
L
Q M
O CD
00
00
Cr) N
L
m
D
L p
0 (o Co
O
O
L N N
M W
co
m cb
Q
LO CD MCD m 0m 0m
00MMM00f`
00000

0
O
00
d
O
O
O
ti
O
O
O y
O N

O N
O
L co
(D'

O O
T
O
0 w LO
V cl) O '

O ?-
O
C)
C')

cu
O N
O

N I'
O

O

O
v
0
m
.s
N
}
Y
U
0
t
m
m
aN
O
O
w
O
iD
N
07
Ag
4)
V
U
C
C
O
V
O
IC
3
m
7
C
(0
f0
N
C
J
N
N
7
V
7
ft1
O
J
t
m
0
F
x
N
U
m
7
c
2
O
O
d
N
c
O
c
0
U
G7
N
X
Q
C
(0
?I+
I
N
d
I}3
I
0
0
a
N
O
O
N
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
U
C
O
O .N
r
c
L
U
O
Cl
O

O
co
O
O
to
O

0
0
N

0
C) n o Ln o u? o
o o m
0 rn
0
(4)uogenal3
0
U)
C
0
a
d
Wo
LL
N
}
Y
N
N
U
0
m
3
m
m
N
O
O
L
a)
0 c
N -n
cn
r c
L 0
L
>" _
" o
co
d) m
L ?
V C°
0
0
N
cn
O ?
N
1 >
a)
L W
0=
L co
Q
m

LO O Lid O LO O LO
r- O O O O 00
r- r- O O O
T- r r
UOIIBA813
O
O
LO
N
O
O
N
O
O
Ir-
O
O
O
Ir-
O
L(7
O

._
a
O
N
O
N
(0
T
O
r
r
L

C)
O
v R
R
M
R
w
L
Cd
G
A
C
C
O
3
as
'm
Y
C
lC
f0
N
C
J
N
N
7
U
2
U)
m
0
H
J
m
H
X
N
C
2
¦
O
CL
N
N
N
O
c
0
X
a
Y
C
f0
1d
I
N
N
f0
I}3
I
d
.D
1
O
O
V
O
O
r
O
0
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O C
f0
N
0
N
O C
O C (n
r 0 d
U
0
0
0
a
O
O
V
O
O
Cl)
O
O
N
O
O
v
O
a
N
10
C
LL
N
Y
Q1
N
U
0
E
m
3
m
0
0
o LO o lA o In
0 o O) m ao
0 0 0
.- ? (il) uoiJene13 ? ? .-
L
CD E
>
OL
N C:
O
Tom s
O
W L
O
L -0
? CO
O
? O
? N
E 4O
N
D
O
L. ;
N
i W
m
? Q
O LO O In O LO
r O O O) O 00
r r r O O O
r r r r r r
UOIIBA013
O
CO
r
O
O
r
O
N
r
O
O
O
C
O 0
O ++
00 1.1-6
cn
O
CO
O
Itt
O
N
O
O
O
co
O
N
L
O
r
r
r
r
i
r
L
a)
T
I-
C)
U)
04
Y
d
N
U
0
m
N_
d'
O
O