20091015 Ver 1_401 Application_20090909

R19@rNWL9 0
SEP 2 2 2009
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Hollybrook
Mooresville, Iredell County
North Carolina
Joint Application Form and Supporting Documentation for
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION
TO CORPS OF ENGINEERS And NCDENR
Prepared For
Mr. James McKnight
David McKay, LLC
255 Rolling Hill Road
Mooresville, NC 281 l 7
Prepared By:
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
[phone]
September 18, 2009
09-1Q?5
W A TF
O lii? -'c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Hollybrook Subdivision
2b. County: Iredell
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Mooresville
2d. Subdivision name: Hollybrook in,
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P, or state
project no:
,P 2 29 200Q

3.
Owner Information ,
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: David R and Betty Y McKay WETLAX XANDS
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 1877 1198
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Mr. James McKnight
3d. Street address: 255 Rolling Hill Road
3e. City, state, zip: Mooresville, NC 28117
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: Mr. James McKinght
4c. Business name
(if applicable): David McKay, LLC
4d. Street address: 255 Rolling Hill Road
4e. City, state, zip: Mooresville
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Leonard S. Rindner
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
5c. Street address: 3714 Spokeshave Lane
5d. City, state, zip: Matthews, NC 28105
5e. Telephone no.: 704-904-2277
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 4676956328
Latitude: 35.5653 Longitude: - 80.7484
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 73.058 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT Coddle Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS II
2c. River basin: Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing pasture and woodland
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 1.0 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 3600 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Low Density Residential Subdivision
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Road/driiveway construction to access lots
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Name (if known): Leonard S. Rindner/Todd Warren Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No El Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ® Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
The road will be constructed first. Individual lots will be sold to home builders. Crossing the creek is required to access
lots.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ® P ? T Road Crossing 1 PSS1 A ? Yes
® No ® Corps
® DWQ .009
W2 ®P ? T Road Crossing 2 PF01 A ® Yes
? No ® Corps
® DWQ .008
W3 ® P ? T Road Crossing 3 PSS1A ? Yes
® No ® Corps
® DWQ .005
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts .022
2h. Comments: Minor wetland impacts are associated with road crossing
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - PER or
404, 1
-
0
(Corps
sw
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ
-
404
non-
, dth (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T Road Crossing 1 UT of Coddle Ck ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 6' 66 LF
S2 ® P ? T Road Crossing 2 same ? PER
® INT ® Corps
® DWQ 3' 30 LF
S3 ? P ? T Road Crossing 3 same ? PER
® INT ® Corps
® DWQ 4' 50 LF
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 146 LF
3i. Comments: Impacts to streams are prosed to be less than 150 linear feet and less than 1 /10th acre of wetlands.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet)
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number - Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporary (T) impact
B1 ?P?T
B2 ?P?T
B3 ?P?T
6i. Comments:
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
? Catawba ? Randleman
6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts have been minimized by use of headwalls and minimizing extent of rip-rap. Wetland and streams have been
incorporated into lot areas; additional impacts are not required to construct individual homesites.
The development is low density subdivision with lots ranging from 1 acre to over 4 acres. The roads are relatively narrow and
have a swale/ditch section - not curb and gutter. There does not appear to be point source discharges proposed. There are no
high density areas on the site.
Proposed impacts to streams and wetlands are less than 150 linear feet of stream and less than 1 /10th acre of wetlands -
therefore mitigation is unlikely.
The WS II watershed appears to allows up to 12% impervious without controls. Based on a calculation by the engineer -
assuming 6000 SF impervious per home and accounted for the roads, the impervious appears to be less than 12%. There
seems to be adequate space on the site to implement BMP's associated with the road work (if required) or incorporated into
the development of the individual lots, if necessary. Even if the impervious exceeds 12%, the extent of the BMP's are
probably going to be minor relative to what is typically seen in a high density residential development. It also seems that there
is room for the enhanced sedimentation erosion control devices as a result of the HQW designation.
Stormwater Management
The project is estimated to be less than 12% impervious in accordance with the WS II Low Density Option.
The project will be implemented in accordance with WS II / HQW requirements administered by NCDENR or Iredell County.
The road development will be treated separately than the lot development. This is not intended to be a development that
requires mass grading of lot areas to develop slab on grade house pads. The lots will not be cleared in conjunction with the
road construction and the developer is unable to predict the timeframe or order in which the lots will be constructed. The
impervious area will be managed to maintain impervious below 12% and/or provide the appropriate BMP's as required.
The developer is requesting that the 401 WQC be approved subject to approval of the final stormwater management plan, if
required.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Project is subject to strict enforcement of erosion control plans; wetlands and streams will be marked minimize inadavertant
stream and wetland impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ? No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
anticipated to be less than 12% in
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? accortance with WSII Low
Density Option %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Proje ct is low density large lot
subdivision; lot sizes range from 1 acre to over 4 acres depending on topographic features.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Mooresville
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ® Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
® HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): The project utilizes
an existing crossing to minimize impacts.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is a low density subdivision that uses existing road network and infrastructure.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Individual lot septic treatment
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
? Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The site was evaluated for the presence of Bog Turtle habitat. Potential habitat includes wetlands such as open
sphagnum bogs, wet meadows and wet pastures. These were determined not to be present on the site. Site was
evaluated during the wetland delineation process for the presence of Schweinitz's Sunflower. The site is heavily disturbed
in conjunction with nursery operations. Invasive grass, vine, and shrub species dominated the lower vegetative strata.
Ecotonal edges along roads and clearings were inspected to determine if Schweinitz's sunflower was present. Project site
is not in a watershed that has been identified as habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter. Based on a field evaluation
Schweinitz's sunflower or it's habitat was determined not to be present.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat/habitatprotection/efh/G IS_inven. htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
ccording to the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of
registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, this site is not registered property or
property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Iredell County GIS; Owner/engineer provided
information
Leonard S. Rindner 9-18-09
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name A i en s Signature Date
(Agent's ig re is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
LEONARD S RINDNER, PLLC
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning Tele: (704) 9042277
August 21, 2009
Mr. James McKnight
David McKay, LLC
255 Rolling Hill Road
Mooresville, NC 28117
RE: Stream Crossings at Hollybrook Subdivision
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. McKnight:
In order to interface with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources I will need your authorization. Please sign the
following statement:
This letter authorizes Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, as our firm's agent in matters
rela to Waters of the U.S. and Waters of North Carolina for the referenced project
sire. T is includes interfacing with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the
ortli arolina Department of Natural Resources.
Nam Date
if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank
you.
&nard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
Profession Wetland Scientist
ataA'
CL Z

WIYH O K
LLI

> I LL
LL.

IU0

I LL
ILL.
_j 0

L Z
?W
LLI
LLI W
?
L.
CF
Z W ?(ggLL U
2 Z
=
F
tx ZIA =
Z
IxQZN
'= L
lil?
j
3a N I.- CE
C
U) ago
w+°
W
g'
g \ t\ , ,? \ \t _
?'rTt'11-hl I vk-ri
?\ ,/? I , I 1 1 1 I I l t\ I\ `.` \ \\ 1 % 1 t !f ( 1,1 Ij'I+ ; ! ) ! \ \? ! J 1 ! / // / 1 i
"??, \ )/ I` 1 I ?, j 11 j IS ? I Z \ \ \? \ \ / I , / ?.' 14 \\\ '111 J I I( ? I',\,
//Z?, ?t`\t t`` it ?.' 1?1 i? ?t ?,\\t1j ? 11 1 S?.II !t I IIJ+ / ? 1?\r ,.t?l/! / \\ \r
S , i r r r / 11 \
/W u?{? / / { I f // .f L I Ill \ . / I 1 r / r `' -+- ! , .i \ ??•.
lY 3 P'•' J r / ,/ ). \) I . , l 1 I 1 1 ` -? s--'? ` I I II l / / - \ Y, ?'' C
/ / ,?+ 1 / n 1,/r \ 1 i 1 t ,-r ?_t Y d iJ> I / / / + 1 y , J / ,? a?
y 1:: „' (! ! // f,i Y441 \ t L y_ _ l Illlik r ?l (, f 1 1)! / I r y _ i,,,•?
z { / /\c9e69 !? / , ! +?% i i i li ' ' // 11 m>»M / ! / f \ 1
Z '/J~'`T=_-- ?,f //'r??~/ / i? /ri'/ ! / l 1 `? I? ?/j /Ni/Ni r ? /?1` r r ? \yI \t I
fr I! //1111 1 1 / If /
i' 1 1'1 1 /? - _ "'/rt /? 11 `\\t ! 11 )flI ?/ f d `\ 11 -L- I? R
t tt S t, t ^^^ ?'",1"` r '^'r?? 1 I ,I 1( 1 /11/
/?if I 1
1 (ao )Q-'' i I l
t \ , \ , ^* 111
I A,
fl 1 r iii' P'-`? r-----?= ?? `? \ ri/ )i %' rrM+ ,v.t r \ \ `\? 1\\ rJ- - /~l` I1
/?'i i/ a ?.1 c?^- \ \ t O f /llill (.? ? \ ?+
(L_ _ ?! 1 Ilk ! 1 f ? \
?S ? ? - \ y 1 -, ? 1 \I tl f I tfl? _ _J .i? Il,l?lliI I 111 ?? ? ?\ t \\! - y,.1I --1 \ Il\ 0
AOI, 5? ?-."'? f, ? - \ - I• t1 t'._I-t--tT-._ I 11+1111 I \ ?? \? % J ?I
?i r- \ \t\ \ ` i i 1 1 1 !? / Iri?l r 1 ! / t r? i I i lyl ,?y .l j `'? 11 !`
,ter` `\?-` ;/.tr ',? \ , \ ? \ I S irl i I e /1 ; 1'Il
-'
w
,tZ ', _ 't `t J`pq? ilti?)i! ;? '•7' J ' li 'i r), 411Q11j11 I ``: `1 1
a:_:; a -ate o\` ) Ir+) r 1 y I t I I r i? i I I
ri ) 51(yld °A'p,'1! .r) 1 , ) ' 1 ) 1 1? / / ,Y j ,', ly 1 1 .\ \
r- ?.. J ?s+q \ ~ Z .•y 1
h-W .-? " _? aN g l ^` - r+\ rl-f--r-k3" - r 1 1? \i
_j t , , ?i// i ?? V ? ,-`` P \: t
--- ?w-----° ' _=-• -'r-/ ? \ 1 ?.-?--i-+' ?rl?_ / / r,)? ? jCrJ ) / r x? '? /"-`? ItZ
r -?t14'3?=x:-1\ Zx \1``?_L 1tt
' I __ '?-\ ` rij w. ? `\ \ `? II' h\tltt t 11?'?f \
w. \?C ` \\\` 111 1j1`? --- ---!?
V / ! 1 ! 11 / / i
y_ ei J -"\-t' t r r'C4 ?Y I' 1 / p' I 1 11 1 ?? I;
a{ fr^?=? \ ?\ 5 G W 1 tj ,11 1 /,rt1 <il l \ \\/ Yr-- - , ? 11 I i + 1 t , Ii \ -JI 1 1
g 1 r^?.? ?+y ? 1\ l C / 1 I111S<51.??111 fl I //,/1{1? 'li lA 1 t I 1 1 1 \\ t i?
S I.+ ! .1E 1 .?ti . ?')\ )"'\IIt AI 1 i!)r 1i? 11,It t 1 A 1 1`? '? 1 (:
1 1 11 1 \ ? ? 1 ?!
1/ / ?4 ,1 et' I ill f 1?}'?1 1
tar i
/ S? t)7 1 i /) 1 ?? 1 ^„t\)1J?1 i ' ? f V "1\\\`?? \t?t tit \\?`-i \
"11 b / / / / I •b )/ )III) •?A f I I I
? 1 ! !I 1' / / l
I`/ p/I1'llll 1 ?/ / r/ / i 11 I!
I it ! 1 1 / /- /i.?'/// %??/ / ..Y /r 1 1•s. ) 11 I
1 ! K-/-fa- a-/->--r
1 , i?/iii ? i F ? / j//rrl 1 11 J i\ 1 1) / t\ \ 1 1 1 1 j
1
!) / I {It)1 \\ ? 11r1 Ir,i ,,"rY .1 ?? ?\ 1 t
' )?' - 11-+ ?j//j jrir `- ? i ' %V'Al A,
!, / /J i i % = '? Il I1 11 \1t \ , 1 1 I 1 1 r 1 I li-A1?\ ,
// i'i'.i' /' //'J ?\ 1 l iI1I
} \ t ) 1 + I 1 ' 11 II r \ ? `?l ?
// / -? i'/ //.-_ __-_•- \ ? \ li,il y ?' ) S Ly 111 I 11 4 I 1 \
/ / / , / ii/ fr -_ ? \ \ IltlSl /// / /i I 1 ) I I /I? l 1 I I\\
, / / r, /, ? 1_: ? i ?', ",_ - \ \\x111 `? , ?,?/ r ?, r „1 ..-) \\v 1 tll
PC l \ t ?t 1 ?v
t\S.`??Itt t I`\\\\ J I
? \ \ 1 \d ` - I Imo..
i' i i t \.> ? Ilill?? 1 I 1 \ )` t\ 1 \ 4-t'itf-- 1 1
?r?'`? y? ? ?6\t) ) c 1 1\ \ \ , v ? 1
I. \?I I 1
.? ! ? i??i,?i .. _ ?^?. t ? .. ` \\ \ \ 11 f/ l?j 1 f il'F'lll \\ A \
? ^ \ 1 \ 1
/i .-?i?ii iii' ?--..J+'? ?.?\ 1 '-_\'` \\\1\i l`\` ' _ 1/ 5 < IlSlt ? / \ , t ?r 1 I
!i1 f?c _" __? ` ~"?? e s?l? h?a \) ?, \ , ter ?\?? \ tl\I\I 11 ` \ r?TJ 11-+1
i'h? ' I Ir)r I ?I
' ? 11
?\i ; t,\li 1 I ill 11 1 1 j , t j,
O ??y ! G G 1 t 1 I U/ 1-11 V 1 r r-1 _iJl ,, All
y C C aZ
Ft, ; r
t WN
>U, g fYQ C ?F" ,t I /, r i1' I 11 j 1 11 \ \I\ t O
r, O mJ Z i) 1 1
,,?1 I 1 1 \1\ 15
3 z Z O V{ V LL " +'+II li 11 , I 1 1 , , , \ 1 nl ?- \ t
y_? ` ?( ~' W O 1111 1 1 1 1 ,ti ?'?I?? I r i tL+ ?F l.. 1 \
a y? S ?. GQ7 fV Z e S W I 1!1111 LX 'V 1?,!]`7 1 (1 ? `\ ti
_j Ir
J F LL ' ((.?" rl w Z (J I I {? i t l tt 1t I,t \ /?? \\ I 1
¢ C C 0'' C[ z?11 11) i' 1 1 t
ate. \\1t I111 1 I I I S rl 1 11 1 \ "1 ?t. 1
cqa Zo - z II IJ 1 I1I
C4 w tt I \ \'l\\ ,)? t
? to W C1 L__a-il41 I ? y \ \ \ 1 r 1' ,
1 ell a d,?, \`tl\ i 1 I I 4?1` `Z\ r.?._'1-JT
1
A, I
e t
gEo
CO N
a

j UefAOI$
1 '414 pa - +C
/ . Rd ?
a,
4.
w

E
00, 1
TEETER ROAD - HOLLYBROOK
PHOTO PAGE 10F 2
PHOTO 2: WETLAND A/B (TYPICAL)
PHOTO 1: WETLAND A/B (TYPICAL)
PHOTO 3: WETLAND A/B (TYPICAL)
PHOTO 4: WETLAND C/D (FACING UPSTREAM/UPSLOPE)
(FACING UPSTREAM FROM HEADWALL)
PHOTO 7: WETLAND H (TYPICAL) PHOTO 8: WETLAND E (TYPICAL)
TEETER ROAD - HOLLYBROOK
PHOTO PAGE 2 OF 2
PHOTO 6: WETLAND H & RPW E
PHOTO 5: WETLAND C/D
(FACING DOWNSTREAM FROM HEADWALL)
LU0'Z99'90L (j) • 00LOZ99'Y0L W
L L M ON 'c4IMaMVY • 90 L RCS w4JO 1114JO^0 gZ L
aint3niisei)u1 lg uoI{eljadsueil
S113S m dSM'
H ?-
F- __ rt In W O
I- Z O z
W O
¢ V ? U V l T? ioli? II 1 If v n ti 1' _LDQ
1 FW- ti Pa ¢ ?L r ' )I / /? Iylx` 1?i • 3 r1 2
L I
3 ¢ > ri, i ?I CL u
p

i
u«s •w?s
6209-60 60/9 L/L
adOH b2i331
77
I
¢OvW v I\ /x\ II / ///?
W a W l.ll r ill ` ,4 n i l ? °? v? ? V ?
, 1 ?c, 7 v ,• ?i3 /f al ? , -. ? ,
,
g1 / ? I
/. 'l ??• it I i ,??
?HI-LIION
1 I I i !! I I 'w q
I

woo-sllasdsm-mmm z 09=.L
MW7991,0L (3) • 0OL0799170L (1) } epos
L L RZ ON `al!!ASaJ00yy . 50 L apnS anua ll!4iaAO OZ L
6209-60
60/SL/L
ainjonilseijul 3luosisliodsuejl *ON qoP em

'
' M31A NVld L V38V ONVIAM

S
1
1 3 S /
d SMm `dNI10WO H18ON 31lIAS3800W
m ado ?Illllll
\
\ W
\ A W

\

\ W
Y
a
?
\ ?
O
F

Q

N w

.C

` a
d
rn
C)
0
oo
CD
0
U)
C)
0
N
0
a

CD °

C?j

Lo
co
?
\ Q r 0 U

Z
O
O
O
G
kn
\ NW CA
Q?Q a ? ?

\ Oe?cn
wUZ
W

p a a
??
O?
f
i 2 Q
Q
Z

g r
H
U
a N
1-
U
a co
H
U
a
Z
Q
?
H
U
a cm
H
U
a
H
U
a
?'
Q?
w IL a- a- (L 0- a.

o
\ 0
o
?
o' w o
Z ' I- z

Q
W J• Q
Y F- • D
W
WW W
? ? 11
Ca H
U
F" P
o
F,
w? Q
II Z ,
0
H?
8
QU w
F-
P o zw
0o w3
W
co

1
'
H N E+ C)
rW kf)
W
II
a
1

R ?
!
NO

i
woo•sllasdsm-mmm i?
WL07991,0L (3) • 00W'Z99'170L (1)
`a
AsalOO vwm opo$
L l L9Z ON
W • 9M al!nS anuO ll!4jaAo 9Z L
ll!
6209-60 60/9 L/L
sinjani;soijul is uoll4oliodsusjl qr w "M

-
NOLL03S OV06 L V3 2IV QNV
13M

STI dSM / VNI-108VO Hi2IO N TRAS3800h
(Ivod dII III1
M
0
e
to
M U
d' O

p W U
L]ZZo
r mW
m
IL Z M U W
O
io a W
IY
a to Z to
oo+oe
macro
ODW

N
o" N

00+OC Z
Z
W
m1-0Y
OOaOC
m+OZ N

9 g o0fOl

o"oat
g
W amt
amt

O
U W 0?t

Q
Z
X
K o

O
Z U OO+OZt
OOWtt
00+001
O
ma0p w
z a
R ?? O
U
W
m+oL
? ?{
N (? w
0D+00 ^
F O
9 ?
Oct
W to
?
Ls
00+00 Fs-a r II
a
m+oC
?
00+0Z
.
mrot

woo•spasdsm•mmm b 09=.L
LOL07991,0L (3) • 0OL0'Z99170L (1)
a
n
nsWoO
anu
`a Pals opos
p
S
N . SOL
M OZ ON
lll
a IfiLPOA0 8ZL
6009-60
60/9 L/L
ainjonilseijul '8 uoetstiodsusil *ON qOP am
`
M31A N
dld Z d3Nd ONVl13M
S113S /
dSM VNI108VO HldON 371ASIWOW
aVO(li NIllll

ci
?
h

/ >
i

i

a o > A
.i
/
? , ? li
,.Pr C°sed Cot q ' A V]

?
l -
\ > cG
P,, 4
q,
•
A ?
z

r. ?
; V) oCf)
o Wo

Q
W
W "? ?Q ? G4 ? Y W • W F--

.a u Q
00 U

I
N
A \

l
41
\
0
? i U o w°
A ?, II

0
o
woo•spasdsm•mmm

LOLO'Z99'b01 (3) • OOLO'Z99'170L (l) S
L
'09=j

!nsaJoo
a
n
'al
0
J8A iaIS oPoS
l
p
S
yy . SOL
M 9Z ON
w0 II!4
o SZL
6009-60
60/9 L/L
ain;onilsoj;ul '8 uolle4iodsueil nN qop e0

M31A NVId C V32]V 0Ndl13M
STI
d SM
m
r4 `dNII08 /O HidON 3l?IAS380OV4
m GVMJ ?Ilill1

I?

:
:
.
.:

u /

Q WWI

? o wo
z ' F- Z
J' Q J
Y W?W

U
W z`G
1 ?
Z
,
a 3 o
I
i s
1 I

1 ? ?o
w
z
cn W
W
? ii d
F oN
o Q F O
F Q ¢
O ° n W
II

p v
V
O I
r I

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 08-17-09
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Applicant:
MCKAY DAVID R & BETTY Y
c/o Jimmy McKnight
505 TEETER RD
MOORESVILLE, NC, 28115-8219
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Tetter Road - Hollybrook
State:NC County/parish/borough:lredell City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 035.5653983° N, Long. 080.7484601° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Coddle Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Rocky River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03040105
M Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
g Field Determination. Date(s): 06-15-09
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Pick List "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
? Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
? Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Pick List "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
? TNWs, including territorial seas
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
M Relatively permanent waters'` (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
0 Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
? Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section 111 below.
' For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 3531inear feet: 5width (ft) and/or 0.044 acres.
Wetlands: 0.488 acres.
Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987, Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section 1111.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.I.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TN W
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanov have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 1420square miles
Drainage area: 80 acres
Average annual rainfall: 43 inches
Average annual snowfall: 3 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 30 (or more) river miles from TN W.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TN W5: Unnamed RPW to Coddle Creek to Rocky River.
Tributary stream order, if known:
' Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 5 feet
Average depth: 4 feet
Average side slopes: Vertical (la or'less).
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ? Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ® Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: The main N-S stream is stabile, the W-E
tributary has been impacted by agriculture/straightening.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 0.5 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: 5easojW.fllow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: ZO (or gt?atei!)
Describe flow regime: All the streams on site flow year round..
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Wserete andveoadaed. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknoi vn. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
® changes in the character of soil
® shelving ?
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ?
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away
® sediment deposition ?
? water staining ?
? other (list):
? Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
? High Tide Line indicated by: ?
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/characteristics
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? survey to available datum;
? physical markings;
? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Water color is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: None known specifically, however, historically, agricultural pollutants are probably
present near the streams.
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the Ott W M does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows undergmund, or where
the OFI W M has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OH WM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
® Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain Endings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Fish observed in the main N-S stream. Amphibians noted in all the
streams.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:0.488acres
Wetland type. Explain:Wetland seeps.
Wetland quality. Explain:High.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Perennial flow. Explain: See attached stream worksheets.
Surface flow is: Discrete and conned
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
® Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 30 (or more) river miles from TN W.
Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: Water has a slight tannin-colored hue.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: None known.
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
® Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:Fish observed in the main N-S stream. Amphibians noted in all the
streams. Crayfish noted in all the wetlands.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 3
Approximately ( 0.488 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres)
A/B (yes) 0.400
C/D (yes) 0.019
H (yes) 0.069
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IRD:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
? TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: See attached stream worksheets.
? Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
0 Tributary waters: 353 linear feet5width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Eg Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: The wetlands all physically connect to and discharge into RPW's.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
? Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
? Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
? Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATES WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
? which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
? which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
? Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
"See Footnote # 3.
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
? Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
? Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/con sultant:Partial wetland delineation survey.
C9 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
? U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):Iredell County GIS aerial photography.
or ? Other (Name & Date):
? Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
? Applicable/supporting case law:
? Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
? Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form
Date: 06-15-09
Project: Teeter Road - Hollybrook
Latitude: 035.5653983° N
Evaluator: Todd Warren/Nick Nelson
Total Points: 30.50
Stream is at least intermittent
if t 19 or perennial if t 30
County: Iredell
Feature label: Main perennial stream (N-S)
Longitude: 080.7484601 °
W
Quad: ENOCHVILLE
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15.50 Absent = 0 Weak= 1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3`
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 3
2. Sinuosity
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 1
7. Braided channel 0
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0
9a Natural levees 1
10. Headcuts 1
Absent = `0 Weak = 0.5 Moderate =1 ' Strong I.
11. Grade controls 1
12. Natural valley or drainageway 1.5
13
Second or
reater orde
h
l
i
ti
USGS No =0 Yes=3
.
g
r c
anne
on ex
s
ng
or
NRCS map or other documented evidence. 0
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8.00 Absent = 0 Weak = 1 Moderate= 2 Strong = 3
14. Groundwater fl-ow/discharge 2
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in
channel -- dry or growing season 2
Absent =1.5 Weak = 1 Moderate = 0.5 Strong = 0
16. Leaflitter 1
Absent = 0 Weak = 0.5 ''Moderate =1 Stron ' =1.
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 1
No 0 Yes =1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
1.5
F
C. Biology Subtotal = 7.00 Absent = 3 Weak = 2 Moderate =1 Strong = 0
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 2
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 2
Absent= 0 Weak = 0.5 Moderate =1 Strong = 1.
22. Crayfish 1.5
24. Fish 0
25. Amphibians 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance 0
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us. 0
=Absent ="0 Weak =1 Moderate = 2 - Stron = 3
23. Bivalves 0
27. Filamentous algae; periph ton 0
FAC = 0.5 FACW = 0.75 OBL =1 5 SAV = 2.0 Other = 0
29b. Wetland plants in streambed
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form
Date: 06-15-09
Project: Teeter Road - Hollybrook
Latitude: 035.5653983° N
Evaluator: Todd Warren/Nick Nelson
Total Points: 24.00
Stream is at least intermittent
if a 19 or perennial if ? 30
County: Iredell
Feature label: Stream "E"
Lonqitude: 080.7484601 °
W
Quad: ENOCHVILLE
A. Geomorphology subtotal = 10.00 Absent = 0 Weak = 1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
1a. Continuous bed and bank 2
2. Sinuosity
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic flood lain 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 1
7. Braided channel 0
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0
9a Natural levees 0
10. Headcuts 1
Absent = 0 Weak=13.5 Moderate 1 Strong =1.5
11. Grade controls 1
12. Natural valley or drainageway 1
13
d
d
h
l
i
ti
S
t
USGS No = 0 Yes = 3
.
econ
or grea
er or
er c
anne
on ex
ng
or
s
NRCS map or other documented evidence. 0
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 7.00 Absent = 0 Weak =1 Moderate = 2 Strong = 3
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 2
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in
channel -- dry or growing season 1
Absent= 1.5 Weak=1 Moderate ='0.6,j ,,Strong=-,O
16. Leaflitter 1
Absent = 0 Weak = 0.5 Moderate = 1 Stron"'=1
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines 1
No =0 Yes-1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 7.00 Absent= 3 Weak = 2 Moderate = 1 Strong = 0
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 2
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 2
Absent ='0 Weak = 0.5 Moderate = 1 Strong =1.
22. Crayfish 1.5
24. Fish 0
25. Amphibians 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us. 0
Absent =,O Weak =1 Moderate = 2 Strong 3
23. Bivalves 0
27. Filamentous algae; periph ton 0
FAC = 05 "FACW = 0.75 OBL =1.5 SA1/ = 2.0 Other = 0
29b. Wetland plants in streambed
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
MCKAY DAVID R & BETTY Y c/o Jimmy McKnight 505 TEETER RD
MOORESVILLE, NC, 28115-8219

Pr0)eCt/Slte: Teeter Road - Hollybrook
15-09
Date: 06-
Applicant/Owner: County: Iredeli
Investigator: Todd Warren and Nick Nelson State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ? Yes No Community ID : Wetland A/B
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No ?
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No ?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Tree/sap FACW g
2_Acerrubrum Tree/sap FAC Tp
3. Sambucus nigra Shrub FACW- 11.
q Impatiens capensis Herb FACW 12.
5 Carex crinita Herb FACW+ 13.
g Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 14
7. 15.
& 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). 100°
Remarks:
1
11
HYDROLOGY
( Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
/V Drift Lines
i
V Sediment Deposits
Field Observatlons: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0-10 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): MO, Monacan Loam Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fine-loamy, mixed, active, thermic Fluvaquentic Eutrudepts Confirm Mapped Type? (Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munseli_Moist) (Munsell_Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-7 A 10YR 3/1 10YR 6/8 10% Fine Sandy Loam
7-15 B 10YR 6/4 7.5YR 3/2 20% Clay Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surfa ce Layer Sandy Soils
_ Suifidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? VYes
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?/ Yes
Hydric Soils Present? V( Yes
Remarks:
No (Circle) (Circle)
No
No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? //Yes No
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
MCKAY DAVID R & BETTY Y c/o Jimmy McKnight 505 TEETER RD
Project/Site: Teeter Road - Hollybrook -15-09
MOORESVILLE, NC, 2SJ15-8219
Date: 06
Applicant/Owner..- nt °= County: Iredeii
Investigator: Todd Warren and Nick Nelson State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ? Yes No Community ID : Wetland C/D
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No ?
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No ?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 Typha latifoiia Herb OBL g
2. Peltandra virginica Herb OBL 10.
3. Sambucus nigra Shrub FACW- 11.
4 Impatiens capensis Herb FACW 12
5 luncus effusus Herb FACW+ 13.
6. _ 14.
7. 15.
8. 1&
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). 1000
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
y( Inundated
Other _ /V Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
V Drift Lines

_V Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0-10 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: o (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): MO, Monacan Loam Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fine-loamy, mixed, active, thermic Fluvaquentic Eutrudepts Confirm Mapped Type? (Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell_Moist) (Munsell_Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 A 10YR 3/2 10YR 6/6 10% Fine Sandy Loam
3-15 B 10YR 6/3 7.5YR 3/2 10% Clay Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol v/ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
_ Suifidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? v(Yes No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? /Yes No
Remarks:
by HQUSACE 3/92
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
MCKAY DAVID R & BETTY Y c/o Jimmy McKnight 505 TEETER RD
MOORESVILLE, NC, 28115-8219

PfojeCt/Site: Teeter Road - Holtybrook
15-09
Date: 06-
Applicant/Owner: ° = ^L l- County: Iredeli
Investigator: Todd Warren and Nick Nelson State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ? Yes No Community ID : Wetland H
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No ?
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No ?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Tree/sap FACW g
2, Acer rubrum Tree/sap FAC Ip
3. Salix nigra Shrub OBL 1 t
q Impatiens capensis Herb FACW 12,
r? Carex crinita Herb FACW+ 13.
6. _ 14.
T 15.
8 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks:
1
11
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream. Lake, or Tide Gauge
?-Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Other V Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines

Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
?L Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 5 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 3 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): MO, Monacan Loam Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fine-ioamy, mixed, active, thermic Fluvaquentic Eutrudepts Confirm Mapped Type? VYes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell_Moist) (Munsell_Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-7 A 10YR 3/1 10YR 6/8 10% Fine Sandy Loam
7-15 B 10YR 6/4 7.5YR 3/2 20% Clay Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol V Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surfa ce Layer Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? /Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Remarks:
No (Circle) (Circle)
No
No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? /Yes No
3'92
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
MCKAY DAVID R & BETTY Y c/o Jimmy McKnight 505 TEETER RD MOORESVILLE, NC, 28115-8219
Project/Site: Teeter Road - Hollybrook Date: 08.15-09

ApplicantlOwner. = °= County: Iredell
Investigator: Todd Warren and Nick Nelson State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ? Yes No Community ID: Upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No ?
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No ?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 Fraxinus americana Tree FACU g
2, Acer rubrum Tree FAC 10
3. Liriodendron tuiipifera Tree FAC 11.
q Juniperus virginiana Shrub FACU- 12.
5. '13.
6. _ 14.
Z 15.
$ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
v( Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
T Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil; (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): MO, Monacan Loam Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fine-loamy, mixed, active, thermic Fluvaquentic Eutrudepts Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell_Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-5 A 10YR 6/3 Loamy sand
5-15 B 10YR 6/8 Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surfa ce Layer Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ?Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Remarks:
No (Circle) I (Circle)
No ?
No ? Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No ?
Approved by HOUSACE 3192
Nom. ?N,? M NN ? .. ??
vaOLARU IX¢0s I?io.oon
x? Rg9,VHl la
PREUMINARY
\ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
? ?I I
' I I
,; I I
q I I
F
I
• II I
I
II

«cENo
m-

m •° ••• • • ABMND DBI.DIRATION Y
DAVID R. k BF M Y. MM
DSBD B
00K1677 PA6
TOTAL ACRRS x
7

0.5321 TOTAL -- EoN_
WNO YOGY, LLC
353' OF STREAM ROIll16 NNl RQN
WMMLLF. NC Will
Plus 'IIN.M.M, fu: NLM
JJMmILTN)NH. Nn1FN5 ai 1ME Il.i .NU

vATERS a ME srn)E IX NatT LA

GRAPHIC SCALE
SEE
,

IN ACpES
N ? AREA N
AL SIREAN __ O.OH

° .?..?rw A.•I

r°°nN. w?. ..i
Iwrni)

4
Y
a
4

I

I I
I• I
i I
H?? I
%
I
I
I
I
I
i
m I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I /
I /
1 -All
-
I I ,. o