20061717 Ver 1_Complete File_20061031

---

ET

2b? --

1110,
Atj

umm;-

-

.' ,?
??
V
Little Grassy Creek Restoration Project
Mitigation Plan Report 2 0 0 6 1 7 1 7
Granville County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
I --
cosystei--fl
DRAFT REPORT
SCO# 050661501
r"N
OCT 3 1 2006
WETLANDS AND P RMW TER BRANCH
July 2006
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
NCDENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program
2728 Capital Blvd, Suite 1H 103
Raleigh, NC 27604
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Little Grassy Creek Restoration Project
Restoration Plan Report
Granville County, North Carolina
Prepared for WEEP
John Hutton
Project Manager
July 2006
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
Buck Engineering
A Unit of Michael Baker
8000 Regency Parkway
Suite 200
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Kevin L. Tweedy, PE
Project Engineer
Report Prepared by:
Executive Summary

The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) proposes to enhance approximately
469 feet of stream along an unnamed tributary to Little Grassy Creek (UT1) and approximately
100 feet of stream along Little Grassy Creek to improve the stream and riparian area function.
NCEEP also proposes to remove and control invasive species for 7 acres along UT1 and improve the
vegetated buffer for approximately 8.3 acres along UT1 and Little Grassy Creek. Little Grassy
Creek is located southwest of Stovall, in Granville County, North Carolina and is part of the
Roanoke River Basin. The Little Grassy watershed has a total drainage area of 8.2 square miles at
the downstream end of the project and is located in the eight-digit hydrologic unit code (HUC)
03010102. The proposed project area is approximately five miles downstream of the headwaters of
Little Grassy Creek. The center point of Little Grassy Creek is located at longitude 78°36'52" West
and latitude 36°25'27" North. The center point of UT1 is located at longitude 78°36'35" West and
latitude 36°25' 16" North.
In the project area, Little Grassy Creek is a moderately stable gravel bed stream with bedrock grade
' control (Rosgen classification E4). Unnamed tributary 1 (UT1) drains a small, agricultural/forested
watershed and is classified as a C5 stream type upstream transitioning to an E5 stream type
downstream. The riparian vegetation along Little Grassy Creek consists of mature bottomland
' hardwood trees. The UT1 riparian corridor has a sparse line of hardwood trees, but is primarily
dominated by invasive species.

I

7

The design goals of the project include:
¦ Stabilizing the banks on 469 feet of UT1 and 100 feet on Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Controlling invasive species for 7 acres along UT1;
¦ Enhancing stream buffer on approximately 8.3 acres along UT1 and Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Preserving approximately 14,697 feet of stream along UT1 and Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Establishing native streambank and floodplain vegetation in the permanent conservation
easement;
¦ Improving water quality in the Little Grassy Creek watershed by restoring the riparian buffer
and reducing bank erosion.
TABLE ESA
Restoration Overview
Little Grassy Creek Restoration Plan
Project Existing Condition Design Condition Approach
Feature
Little Grassy Stream preservation and
Creek 12,624 LF 12,624 LF Riparian buffer
preservation/enhancement
LIT1 2,643 LF 2,643 LF Stream preservation and
Riparian buffer enhancement
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN

5.4 Culvert Stream Crossing ................................................................................................. 5-2
' 5
5 Ri
i
B
ff
E
h
t 5
3
. par
an
er
n
ancemen
u
........................................................................................ -
5.6 Invasive Removal ............................................................................................................. 5-5
' 6 Performance Criteria ................................................................................................................ 6-1
6.1 Stream Monitoring ........................................................................................................... 6-1
6.1.1 Cross-Sections .............................................................................................................. 6-1
6.1.2 Photo Reference Sites .................................................................................................. 6-1
' 6.2 Vegetation Monitoring ..................................................................................................... 6-2
6.3 Maintenance Issues .......................................................................................................... 6-2
' 7 References .................................................................................................................................. 71

C

10
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
V
11

1 Introduction and Background
1.1 Project Site Identification and Location
Little Grassy Creek project site is located two miles southwest of the town of Stovall. It is located
on Gela Road off HWY 15 north of the town of Oxford, North Carolina. The site is located in the
Roanoke River Basin. Little Grassy Creek and UT1 are located in the eight-digit hydrologic unit
code (HUC) 03010102 and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) subbasin 03-02-06.
The project area is approximately five miles downstream of the headwaters of Little Grassy Creek.
The project location is shown on Figure 1.
The primary land use within the project area is agriculture, with limited forested areas along the
' perimeter. Riparian zones transition throughout the project area between bottomland forest and
cleared agricultural fields with minimal preserved buffer.

I

0

1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The specific goals for the Little Grassy Creek restoration project are as follows:
¦ Stabilizing the banks on 469 feet of UT1 and 100 feet on Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Controlling invasive species for 7 acres along UT1;
¦ Enhancing stream buffer on approximately 8.3 acres along UT1 and Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Preserving approximately 14,697 feet of stream along UT1 and Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Establishing native streambank and floodplain vegetation in the permanent conservation
easement;
¦ Improving water quality in the Little Grassy Creek watershed by restoring the riparian buffer
and reducing bank erosion.
To accomplish these goals stream bank stabilization structures will be added to the lower section of
UT1 and an in-stream structure (cross vane) will be added downstream of the culverted crossing on
Little Grassy Creek to stabilize the stream. Also, invasive vegetation will be removed and native
vegetation will be re-established.
Table 1.1
Project Restoration Structure and Objectives
Project Number 050661501 Little Grass Creek
Restoration Station Range
Segment/Reach 11) Restoration
Type Priority
Approach Existing
Length Design Comments
Length
UT1Buffer
10+00- 31+74
Enhancement Preservation N/A 2,174 LF 2,174 LF
UT1 Stream Enhancement Bank
31+74- 36+43
Enhancement Level II pIV 469 LF 469 LF
Stabilization
Little Grassy Creek 10+00- 125+90

Preservation 126+90- 136+24 preservation N/A 12,524 LF 12,524 LF
Little Grassy Creek Enhancement
125+90- 126+90
Enhancement
Level II pIV 100 LF &F Cross Vane
AXMi9
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
4)2!C IgM)N ' l VMrjWiV
1-0

F1

plants may need to be purchased. They should be obtained from a nearby reputable nursery that
' guarantees that the plants are native and appropriate for the locale and climate of the project site.
2.2.1 Live Staking
' Live staking is a method of revegetation that utilizes live, dormant cuttings from appropriate species
to cheaply, and effectively established vegetation. The installation of live stakes on stream banks
' serves to protected the banks from erosion and at the same time provide habitat, shade and improved
aesthetics. Live staking must take place during the dormant season (November - March). Live
stakes can be gathered locally or purchased from a reputable commercial supplier. Stakes should be
' at least 1/2 inch and no more than 2 inches in diameter, between 2 and 3 feet in length, and living,
based on the presence of young buds and green bark. Stakes are cut at an angle on the bottom end
and driven into the ground with a rubber mallet. Split and damaged stakes must be replaced.
' 2.2.2 Riparian Buffer Re-Vegetation
Riparian buffers are naturally occurring ecosystems adjacent to rivers and streams and are associated
t with a number of benefits. Buffers are important in nutrient and pollutant removal in overland flow
and may provide for additional subsurface water quality improvement in the shallow ground water
flow. Buffers also provide habitat and travel corridors for wildlife populations and are an important
' recreational resource, as well. It is also important to note that riparian buffer areas help to moderate
the quantity and timing of runoff from the upland landscape and contribute to the groundwater
recharge process.

Buffers are most valuable and effective when comprised of a combination of trees, shrubs, and
herbaceous plants. Although greater widths generally increase the effectiveness of riparian buffers
in improving water quality and habitat, even buffers less than 85 feet wide have been proven to have
a beneficial impact (Budd et al., 1987). An estimated minimum width of 30 feet is required for
creating beneficial forest structure and riparian habitat. In general, agency requirements provide for
a minimum 50-foot buffer on each side of the stream beginning from the top of the stream channel
banks.
In stream and wetland restoration, where buffer width is often limited, the following design
principals apply:
¦ Design for sheet flow into and across the riparian buffer area.
¦ If possible, the width of the riparian buffer area should be relative to the watershed area and the
slope of the terrain (i.e. the velocity of the flow through the buffer).
¦ Forest structure should include understory and canopy species. Canopy species are particularly
important adjacent to waterways to moderate stream temperatures and to create habitat.
¦ Use native plants that are adapted to the site conditions (e.g., climate, soils, and hydrology). In
suburban and urban settings riparian forested buffers do not need to resemble natural ecosystems
to improve water quality and habitat.
2.3 Risk Recognition
It is important to recognize the risks inherent in the assessment, design, and construction of
environmental restoration projects. Restoration projects involve the interpretation of existing
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
2-2

i
i
i
3 Watershed Assessment Results
3.1 Watershed Delineation
The project site is located in a rural section of Granville County in the Piedmont physiographic
region. The topography is characterized by rolling hills and alluvial valleys with a dendritic stream
pattern. Land use in the surrounding area has remained relatively constant over the last 25 years
with the majority of land being agricultural and forested. Site hydrology is shown in Figure 2
' More detailed information for each project reach is presented in the sections below.
Characterizations were performed by gathering information on topography, soils, land use, and
percent impervious surface. The percent impervious of each watershed was estimated using aerial
' photography and GIS analysis. Figure 3 shows the watershed delineations for both Little Grassy
Creek and UT1 on USGS 7.5 minute topographic mapping.
' 3.1.1 Little Grassy Creek
The area of the Little Grassy Creek watershed is approximately 8.2 square miles. Land use for the
watershed is low in diversity with land cover types including: upland and bottomland forest, shrub
' land, county roads and agricultural land. Based on this information, the impervious land cover was
determined to be approximately 1 percent.
' Elevations within the Little Grassy Creek watershed range from approximately 380 feet to 580 feet
above mean sea level (MSL) with a relative relief of 200 feet.
' 3.1.2 UT1 to Little Grassy Creek
The area of the UT1 to Little Grassy Creek watershed is approximately 0.25 square miles. The land
t use is composed largely of agricultural fields and forested land with one county road crossing.
Overall, the watershed has less than 1 percent impervious land cover.
' Elevations within the UT1 watershed range from approximately 390 feet to 490 feet with a relative
relief of 100 feet. Similar to Little Grassy Creek, soils at the project site are mapped primarily as
Chewacla loam (MRCS, 1976), which is described below.
t 3.2 Surface Water Classification

NCDWQ designates surface water classifications for water bodies such as streams, rivers, and lakes,
which define the best uses to be protected within these waters (e.g., swimming, fishing, and drinking
water supply). These classifications carry with them an associated set of water quality standards to
protect those uses. All surface waters in North Carolina must at least meet the standards for Class C
(fishable/swimmable) waters. The other primary classifications provide additional levels of
protection for primary water contact recreation (Class B) and drinking water supplies (WS). Class C
waters are protected for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic life propagation and
survival, agriculture and other uses suitable for Class C. Classifications and their associated
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
3-1

to these species as a result of the proposed project construction, are discussed in the following
' sections.
Species that the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) lists under federal protection for
' Granville County as of May 31, 2006 are listed in Table 3.1. The table also includes Federal Species
of Concern that are found in Granville County. A brief description of the characteristics and habitat
requirements of threatened and endangered species follow the table, along with a conclusion
t regarding potential project impact on each threatened and endangered species.
TABLE 3.1
' Species Under Federal Protection and Species of Concern in Granville County
Little Grassy Creek Restoration Plan
'
Scientific Name Common Federal State Habitat Present/ Biological
Date Listed
Name Status
Status Conclusion
Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species
t Haliaeetus Bald Eagle T 3/11/1967 T No Effect
leucocephalus
Alasmidonta heterodon Dwarf E 3/14/1990 E No Effect
Wedgemussel
' Ptilimnium nodosum Harperella E 9/28/1988 E No Effect
Echinacea laevigata Smooth E 10/8/1992 E-SC No Effect
Coneflower
' Federal Species of Concern
Carolina
Etheostoma collis Darter -
population.2 Eastern FSC NA SC NA
Piedmont
Population
' Ambloplites cavifrons Roanoke FSC NA SR NA
Bass
Orconectes virginiensis Chowanoke FSC NA SC NA
Crayfish
Lasmigona subviridis Green Floater FSC NA E NA
Lampsilis cariosa Yellow FSC NA E NA
Lampmussel
' Fusconaia masoni Atlantic FSC NA E NA
Pigtoe
Elliptio lanceolata Yellow Lance FSC NA E NA
' Alasmidonta varicosa Brook Floater FSC NA E NA
Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur FSC NA E-SC NA
' Carolina
Lotus helleri Birdfoot- FSC NA SR-T NA
Trefoil
Butner
' Marshallia sp. 1 Barbara's- FSC NA SR-L NA
Buttons

BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
3-3

Potential habitat for the bald eagle does not exist in the study area. The site does not provide
suitable nesting areas less than 2 miles from open water. No nests were observed during the field
feasibility surveys of the project area. In addition, a search of the NHP database on May 31, 2006
found no occurrences of the bald eagle within the vicinity of the proposed project; therefore the
proposed project is not expected to have an impact on this species.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Dwarf Wedgemussel
Family: Unionidae
Federally Listed: March 14, 1990
The dwarf wedgemussel is a small freshwater mussel with a trapezoidal-shaped shell that is usually
less then 1.7 inches in length and is brown to yellowish brown in color. It is historically known to
exist from New Brunswick, Canada to North Carolina. Documented populations in N.C. have
occurred in Johnston, Wake, Orange, Nash, Wilson, Granville, Person, Vance, Franklin and Warren
Counties.
The dwarf wedgemussel inhabits creeks and rivers close to the banks, under overhangs, and around
submerged logs. It is also known to live on firm substrate of sand, gravel, and muddy sand with a
slow to moderate current, and requires clean water that is well oxygenated and nearly silt free. Hosts
for the dwarf wedgemussel larvae (glochidia) that have been identified include the tessellated darter
(Etheostoma olmstedi), Johnny darter (E. nigrum), and mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi).
While the dwarf wedgemussel is found in Granville County, it is not known to occur in the Roanoke
Basin. Therefore the proposed project is not expected to have an impact on this species.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Smooth Coneflower
Plant Family: Asteraceae
Federally Listed: October 8, 1992
Smooth coneflower grows up to 5 feet tall with smooth stems and few elliptical to lanceolate leaves.
Flowers are normally solitary, raylike, and light pink to purplish in color. Smooth coneflower can be
distinguished from its popular relative Echinacaea purpurea (Purple coneflower) by its leaves,
which are never cordate like those of the purple coneflower.
' There are 24 known populations of Smooth coneflower with 6 known in North Carolina.
Historically, the species habitat was prairie-like, often controlled by fire. Now, due to urbanization
and fire suppression, known populations are limited to open woods, cedar barrens, utility right of
' ways, and dry limestone bluffs normally with magnesium or calcium rich soils associated with mafic
rock.
' The study site does not have favorable habitat for Smooth coneflower since it has been heavily
disturbed by grazing, and its soils are not magnesium or calcium rich. A May 31, 2006 search of the
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
3-5
I
with SHPO, Buck Engineering agreed to provide additional information on the sites. If additional
archaeological resources are found during construction, work will halt in the area of discovery until a
determination of National Register Eligibility can be made. However, unless additional resources
are found, there are no cultural resource constraints to the project as designed.

i
1

3.8 Potentially Hazardous Environmental Sites
An EDR Transaction Screen Map Report was obtained and it identifies and maps real or potential
hazardous environmental sites within the distance required by the American Society of Testing and
Materials (ASTM) Transaction Screen Process (E 1528). A copy of the report with an overview
map is included in Appendix B. The overall environmental risk for this site was determined to be
low. The screening reviewed Superfund (National Priorities List, NPL); hazardous waste treatment,
storage, or disposal facilities; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act Information System (CERCLIS); suspect state hazardous waste, solid waste and
landfill facilities; and leaking underground storage tanks. No hazardous environmental sites were
found in the vicinity of the proposed project area. During field data collection, there was no
evidence of potential hazardous sites in the proposed project vicinity and conversations with
landowners did not reveal any further knowledge of hazardous environmental sites in the area.
3.8.1 Potential Constraints and Risks
Buck Engineering assessed the Little Grassy Creek project site in regards to potential fatal flaws and
site constraints. No constraints or fatal flaws have been identified during project design
development.
3.8.2 Property Ownership and Boundary
The project reaches flow through a 192-acre tract owned by Mrs. Joyce Carr and a 409-acre tract
owned by Mr. Sandy Gable. The primary site use is agriculture, with some forested areas along the
perimeter of the properties. NCDOT has purchased the land immediately adjacent to the stream
within the conservation easement boundaries as shown in Figure 2. The Gable's have an easement
with the state guaranteeing a stream crossing and access to their pasture fields.
3.8.3 Hydrologic Trespass
The topography of the site supports the design without creating the potential for hydrologic trespass.
Little Grassy Creek is mapped as Zone A within the project boundary, meaning that no detailed
hydraulic study has been done. Little Grassy UT1 is not located within a FEMA mapped flood zone
except for the portion within the Little Grassy Creek floodplain. No detailed hydraulic study is
required for this project.
3.8.4 Site Access
The site can be accessed via Sam Young Road (SR 1427), which passes along the boundary of fields
containing the project reaches, and a dirt road that allows access to the fields, Little Grassy Creek,
and UT1. Access will be granted for construction and post-restoration monitoring.
3.8.5 Utilities
No known utilities are located on site.
' BUCK ENGINEERING 3-7
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN

During the initial site assessment in 2002, this stream was highly degraded due to headcutting and
bank erosion attributed to unrestricted cattle access and lack of sufficient riparian vegetation. Since
this time, cattle have been removed from the site, allowing the stream to stabilize and riparian
vegetation has been established. The downstream end of UT1 is still experiencing lateral instability.
The lateral instability has resulted in bank erosion and channel degradation.
Invasive species along UT1 have hindered the establishment of a mature buffer. The percent cover
of invasive species for the understory is approximately 20 percent and in the floor of the buffer it is
estimated to be 85 to 90 percent.

1

Table 4.1
Geomorphic Data for Little Grassy Creek and UT1
Parameter Value Units
UTI Little Grassy
Rosgen Stream Type C6/1-E6 E4/2
Bankfull Width (Wbkf) 6.9-11.4 26.9-38.1 Feet
Bankfull Mean Depth (dbkf) 0.6-1.2 2.7-3.4 Feet
Cross-Sectional Area (Abkf) 6.4-8.2 91.7-95.2 Square feet
Width/Depth Ratio (W/D ratio) 5.8-20.3 7.9-13.2
Bankfull Max Depth (dmbkf) 1.1-1.7 4.0-4.3 Feet
Floodprone Area Width (Wfp.,) 55.0-69.4 128 -164 Feet
Bank Height Ratio (BHR) 1.3-1.8 1.0-1.4
Entrenchment Ratio (ER) 4.8-10.1 1.4-4.1
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A
Channel Materials
(Particle Size Index - d5o) Silt/clay Gravel
dl6 0.062 0.062 mm
d35 0.062 2.0 mm
d5o 0.062 8.0 mm
ds4 13.9 64.0 mm
des 38.5 128.0 mm
Slope (S) 0.0008 0.0116 Feet per foot
Channel Sinuosity (K) 1.07 1.26
Evolution Scenario C -E-G-F-C E-G-F-C-E
Notes:
1. Where multiple cross-sections were surveyed in a single reach and data varied, the data
are presented as a range of values.
2. N/A: Meander Width Ratio not measured because channels have been straightened.
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
42

1
i

i
5 Restoration Plan
5.1 Potential for Restoration
There are no known or foreseen constraints at the site, associated with structure and/or infrastructure
encroachments to a successful stream and buffer enhancement within the project site. The project is
located in a rural watershed, with no plans for significant land use changes in the foreseeable future.
The primary goals of this restoration plan include the enhancement of approximately 569 feet of
stream and enhancement of areas of existing riparian buffer vegetation and the reforestation of
cleared floodplain with native species along Little Grassy Creek and UT1 within the conservation
easement to: 1) maintain and increase channel bank stability; 2) reduce sedimentation; 3) filter and
reduce pollutants; and 4) provide increased habitat for aquatic and terrestrial wildlife. Primary
activities within the site are designed to preserve plant community assemblages and to enhance and
restore native floodplain vegetation through site preparation and subsequent plantings.
5.2 Little Grassy Creek Design
Little Grassy Creek meanders through a wide valley with a well established and vegetated floodplain
through the majority of the project length. In several areas, the valley is constricted geologically
which limits the floodprone width.
As part of the conservation easement, NCEEP agreed to build a culverted road crossing on the lower
end of Little Grassy Creek to connect two parcels for the landowner. A cross vane will be installed
downstream of the culvert to facilitate bank stability and centralize flow along approximately 100
feet of channel. The project also consists of upgrading one existing ford stream crossings within the
conservation easement. These crossings will be reinforced with rip rap to maintain their integrity as
crossings for agricultural machinery.
In addition, a combination of native herbaceous and woody vegetation will be established in the
' riparian buffer along Little Grassy Creek and UTL The entire conservation easement will be planted
where existing vegetation is lacking or of poor quality.
1

0

5.3 UT1 Design
The Little Grassy Creek site was assessed for restoration potential during the winter of 2003. At this
time, UT1 was determined to be significantly impaired due to impacts from cattle. Following this
assessment, the property was sold and the current landowner does not have cattle in this area. As a
result, the stream along the upper section of UT1 has stabilized. A defined bed and bank has
reestablished and tag alder and black willow are providing good bank stability. The lower section of
the stream, approximately 469 feet, has some areas of lateral instability. These areas will be
stabilized using minor banks stabilization techniques, primarily the installation of rootwads and live
stakes.
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
5-1

- This culvert design preserves the natural earthen channel
- bottom, providing a seamless channel bed transition between the culverted section of the
channel and its upstream and downstream channel reaches. In this way, fish passage
through the structure is not affected.
- The bottomless quality of the culvert avoids piping scour beneath the culvert structure,
minimizing maintenance issues.
- Sediment transport through the structure may be more efficient than with conventional
box culvert design.
Alternative 2 - Two box culverts, with the following dimensions (see Figure 5):

11

Span: 6 ft
Rise: 5 ft
Length: 30 ft
This design alternative follows
the more conventional culvert
design. These culverts may be
available pre-cast, or may be
cast-in-place.
Depending on method of
construction, this design
alternative may be more
economical than Alternative 1.
However, this design tends to
be less favorable for fish
passage and sediment transport
across the structure.
Two cell box culvert

5ft 5ft E
Flow
ft ft

30 ft
Existing channel bottom V

Proposed
fill
----- -:.1 ft
_
f
Culvert inlet depressed 1
c
below channel invert cW Flow
Figure 5 Schematic showing dimensions and specifications for
Culvert Sizing Alternative 2.
5.5 Riparian Buffer Enhancement
Based on preliminary analysis and field investigations, riparian buffer enhancement is intended for
areas within the property where existing vegetation has been reduced or thinned due to agricultural
activities and land clearing. Enhancement of floodplain forest and stream-side habitat allows for
development and expansion of characteristic vegetative species across the landscape. Ecotonal
changes between community types contribute to habitat diversity and provide secondary benefits,
such as enhanced feeding and nesting opportunities for mammals, birds, amphibians, and other
wildlife. Planting will be performed between November 11 and March 22 to allow plants to stabilize
during dormant period and set root during the spring season.
On-site observations and community descriptions from Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley 1990) were used to develop the primary plant community
associations that will be promoted during community restoration activities. The site represents
approximately twenty acres for riparian buffer enhancement.
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
5-3

5.6 Invasive Removal
Prior land use and clearing has removed the some of the native floodplain vegetative communities
along Little Grassy Creek and UT1 and within the associated floodplain. However, prior to plant
community restoration, remaining invasive vegetation, which exists along the stream banks of UT1,
will be cleared by methods including, but not limited to, bush-hogging, mowing or cutting with a
bush axe, saw, or other device that will not uproot existing vegetation. Care should be taken to
avoid exposure of surficial soils during the clearing of existing vegetation. Continued removal of
invasive species through the monitoring period may require additional control.
Table 5.2 Invasive species to be controlled if found within conservation easement
Scientific Name Common Name Suggested Removal Techniques
Ligustrun sinense Privet Cut, paint and spray
Elaeagnus umbellata Autumn Olive Cut, paint and spray
Lonicera japonica Japanese Honeysuckle' Spray
Rosa multiflora Multiflora Rose2
Cut, paint and spray
Pyrus calleryana Callery Pearl Cut, paint and spray
Festuca spp Tall Fescue' Spray
Paulownia tomentosa Princess Tree . Cut and paint
Pueraria lobata Kudzu Cut, paint and spray
Microstegium vimineum Japanese Stilt grass' Spray
Notes: 1. Groundcover species found within project boundary.
2. Tree/shrubspecies found within project boundary.
5.7 Preservation
Approximately 14,697 LF of Little Grassy Creek and UT1 will be preserved. The segments of stream
preservation will protect the habitat quality and flooding functions of Little Grassy Creek and IT1. Buffers
along the preservation sections will be protected by a permanent conservation easement and additional trees
will be planted along Little Grassy Creek and UT1 where existing vegetation is sparse in order to improve the
riparian buffer.
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
5-5

should indicate the absences of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
bank over time. A series of photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation. Vegetative succession should include initial herbaceous growth, followed by increasing
densities of woody vegetation, and then ultimately a mature overstory with herbaceous understory.
6.2 Vegetation Monitoring
' All woody vegetation will be flagged and evaluated for at least five years to determine survival.
Approximately 15 staked survival plots shall be evaluated. Plots will be 33 feet by 33 feet and all
flagged stems will be counted in those plots. Invasive species survival rates will be monitored in
these plots as well as survival of planted vegetation. Plots should include both live staked and other
planted areas. Success of woody vegetation plantings will be defined as 320 stems per acre after five
years. When woody vegetation does not survive, a determination will be made as to the need for
replacement; in general, if greater than 25 percent die, replacement will be required. The presence of
Non-native species shall be evaluated on a yearly basis and removal may be required by hand cutting
' and/or herbicide treatment.
Herbaceous vegetation, primarily native grasses, planted at the site shall have at least 95 percent
coverage of the seeded/planted area. No bare patches shall exceed 10 square feet. Any herbaceous
' vegetation not meeting these criteria shall be replaced. At a minimum, at all times ground cover at
the project site shall be in compliance with the North Carolina Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Ordinance.
6.3 Maintenance Issues
¦ Maintenance requirements vary from site to site and are generally driven by the following
conditions:
¦ Projects without established woody floodplain vegetation are more susceptible to erosion from floods
than those with a mature hardwood forest.
¦ Projects with sandy non-cohesive soils are more prone to short-term bank erosion than cohesive soils
or soils with high gravel and cobble content.
¦ Urban/suburban sites with rapidly changing hydrology are more prone to short-term bank and
floodplain erosion than forested watersheds.
¦ Alluvial valley channels with wide floodplains are less vulnerable than confined channels.
¦ Wet weather during construction can make accurate channel and floodplain excavations difficult.
¦ Extreme and/or frequent flooding can cause floodplain and channel erosion.
¦ Extreme hot, cold, wet, or dry weather during and after construction can limit vegetation growth,
particularly temporary and permanent seed.
' ¦ The presence and aggressiveness of invasive species can affect the extent to which a native
buffer can be established.
' Maintenance issues and recommended remediation measures will be detailed and documented in the
As-Built and Monitoring Reports. Factors which may have caused any maintenance needs,
including any of the conditions listed above, shall be discussed.
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
6-2
3
^.-,/ GteeK
Gassy
U
v

r
-T-- ?,1•? s• ?Lair4y-?=
? 1.
m + C7 ~?I
Project Location
Rd
Granville County
AUYfdYdWBYV
? Cary. NOM ^A'e0e T6!!
Plpiw:9!9.187.i1lB
[J ar eIncht
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Little Grassy Creek
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
Prepared Jul 6, 2006

7

11

0

r• '`:,, M ,?' { 5~ ? Kg?? 1 Tl?t t 0. .c`i ? ? '?- •,.r lr'?1 I ?'`1 .?ri ` ?Ff , ? ?'v • rr? ? ? j •
Legend
1''I Y y _ r ?(!!? t %r!! If r .%? ` ` Little Grassy Creek \1' •a? vi ?r `
Q Watershed Boundaries DA = 8.1 sq. ml?a,?
C J
!??I ,t.,.i J'`jr tl ;y?T. ! ! en:E tlr .r C \'..
'vr , L t ,'gat I of a ;t (!j 1?: - _ : ' lrl+,f? 11 , •i,
'':'S
14

UT1 0",

DA = 0.24 sq. mi.

r ? •
?
`
_? ., 1.
Ir I ,ir._n
N!. 7, 'key
•'
I

-
(• ? ?\? ? .... yl?.
r ( ? ) , ti
r't •.
,,
..
, ~? -:1 `•`?1
fi
,
, \
,
?
.
'
1
- fi _'?
''
'
i ?
r
' y.
11 I t ?F
.
' Y: f+(i!'?1?
'
' r
?
; `
.
,`
- .J• _r}
-., I tY ., ),?{,t e ,
Ir .
?Cti
i
_s fry
JJ..•:!._., { ?, ?•

?+
?•
.
.
I .. =•f'r A{ov \? ' •. - ` '
5
-
` - ' r
. ?? r ?? ? 3t,:???.'?vs?; ?4 .'',,: , .j) .•l'f } - t'-,1
?
l . ,
?'
?
?
F
?
, t
,ray F' ?i. :,?
! . r a Id
j '; ?•'' ;- ;!`
,
'?1
t
`
i ?" :
"E,
'
._ T "
Y
T
1
`. .
`
?`
?
?
„t. ?, A ••',e" :,' r ` . i5 ?' `
?
'
`?r?^ ' F
..-,
.,1
I ?
'^??.? w:
C •
}.( r Q?`_ `? ! ` car-• '•• ?•tq' ;I, r< ,,?(
.?- .1 -?^r' I?r ?4 ;? ? •i, :'S 7.• ??r? ::??? Ilr,. ?.r;• _ i S(I ?, t {
• a ?/ ,.? Y'=:.r `-n. 1 5'• •},.;Y '•L fit. ?.
w,? •rdr•'I?•l .?} ', •l,r ?I' .,r?' Y?t,?,:??I I.•yr?>,t,`•???_. fa ?.
_q 1 f: •??•, ?% 1 t may: ?1 .,• - ?r I ??. =?'}'.`:j?liri
of. "I
•-Y ?- fir.: L, ;._ _''.? -..,•, .'i- ji?? ?'?.' Z:1( 1 `, ?'? :,•, .-ila
' +r. ? ? 1_ : 1 y. I ,?J1 ?1''._: `.l l r 1j.??'?i`?''I y1••`•'"'.? ' • fJ?i" _ ,^
..?~:`} ;',?TF06L'? : = r•? ?l - ? ? t ?? ?rr '• ? .1 :I?iP''?i,.5f•'• ..
, ??I??,?• -_ - .,;; ?,1. [l' r ? '' f i { •.?_ •, Y ; . ;fit . I ;. r.? ••:; ?, ,
'- _ n -fir.. f r , ,? '' :?'?' "?4-,•'
r 't` 1?.?'} t ?1 Y`!__ 'r~ t `?jr !:-.''til 4 fir. ;, lye, ?. `•y.
i'I % t y ., ,t ?;is tv.r.?`ar?..:? .•?•I! ??lr??. ?. _ ??F..J '_ J 1
? . i i _..ar'%?, \.,``:` ? ? !, i 9,._?°s?. „- I _ 1: ? ,? j• `tF;.. t a' ]- ? -' a`? is
J? ?••,'A Jl'rl t '. ' V',,? f r J ? ? ~ H ? ,.-?^ it \ )?4' 1 f ? '/'e F• ! F 11'"v,
6r. I y 1 v v A ?.t. 'f , * - a: I;•. t% ,,? i.al ` ,?;.
3vV
Ji, 1.-.1 r.? •^1' lea' _'r? `` ?t_ 1f I' ,r ?`•_ Y ' K'`?17t -^-?1 !;
?., ?? ?5 t.. ?.:.ti J ?'.'_':.r.?. `t ., l N t t`. I ?W r,. ?? `\'t `'!. r [ ''.
y `. ` J 1 r ?•F:Il i ? l .}G ?.• 1 `? ?? I.t ?l ? \.e?. _??15?.-+f "' 1 1 L?;,r? ?1
? ,(It ?": `+?`".At,.?+_,•..,1 at.` i ?1._•.. - le•.\.: - ',? /? , l?yi ., __ ? :?.'':=k-et._•-}I?ir .
BW EIng
AJNforMiclrselBekx
99CO Fegxiry Parkway
Saita 200
Gry, NeM Cxolim 2]611
Phone: 913.dE3349
q
5stem
) t

Fat,: 919,153.549C }
/
.i,I1QT1]Cll.
811.

F r•
, • F K
r
r
,
s
Y 1I
ti
1i

v, I ZI,?
f,. r. (I +E1
x.-+
F~ ` ,
%
i•r 'Fi ti ??r? ?r? ? 1 ? •' ??1 'r i
-Ul
a ? • + INv
%
?1 J • '•-, w4

fr 1 1'f ? ?, I , tis J 1

'so

.
1' `•! TIC
r•'+,
It. _
A 1
6u
1 ,•.
>
0
1
Figure 3
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Watershed Boundaries
Feet Little Grassy Creek
Prepared July 6, 2006
Renee Gledhill-Earley 5/31/2006
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617

I

Subject: EEP Stream Mitigation Project in Granville County.
Dear Ms. Gledhill-Earley,
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) requests review and comment on any possible
issues that might emerge with respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with a
potential stream restoration project on the subject site. Figure 1 shows a vicinity map of the
project area. Figure 2 is a USGS site map that shows the buffer area, the area of potential ground
disturbance, and locations of structures on site. Figure 3 shows soils in the project area. A
photolog of site structures is also enclosed.
The Little Grassy Creek site has been identified for the purpose of providing in-kind mitigation
for unavoidable stream channel impacts. Several sections of channel have been identified as
significantly degraded.
Proposed activities at the site include a combination of riparian buffer enhancement and stream
restoration activities. The remnants of two, since-demolished, earthen and rock-constructed
dams, one of which is associated with an old mill house structure, are found along Little Grassy
Creek. However, these structures are not located in the area proposed for stream restoration
activities. The majority of the stream restoration site is in a floodplain that has historically been
disturbed by sedimentation from the adjacent fields to the east of the restoration site (the current
site use is agricultural) and by cattle accessing the streams.
We ask that you review this site based on the attached information to determine the presence of
any historic properties.
' We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact
us with any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated
with this project.

Sincerely,
4K V;e?
Ken Gilland
Buck Engineering, A Unit of Michael Baker Corporation
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
cc:
Robin E. Dolin, Project Manager
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699

Gassy 1
by •?' --Yy r'•'--•
f ?GcasSR#A4301 -
m
U
Project Location -? ??---
- _-Lela ``•` `.
Rd 7
(SRV1 26,
M1 _?
i "l 1f
Bmk Enplnaarlnp
A U.V
u+adai a ng
.? SUM 200
A C¢7.. 919-3,N PT51f
Fax 9/9.103.fN9D
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Little Grassy Creek
Granville County
0 0.5 1
Miles
F
Legend
Planting Buffer
Area of Ground Disturbance (Restoration)

.1

Existing Ford Crossing
U Culvert Crossing
Dam and Mill
?r
7 44 ?-
b?' Dam
I r
\ It
Buck Engineering Figure 2
.. ?ln.f ?I M:cnx; af?XCr
- SudeR?egec<yPartrv` 0 250 500 1,000
Topographic Map
W • Ocry Wn4,-14. l];,1
Feet Little Grassy Creek

j
I
r€
DSL-NAME
.
ChA- Chewacla/Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes. freq flooded
- EnB - Enon loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes t<
- ® GeB - Georgeville silt loam. 2 to 6 percent slopes
?i Gec - Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
,
HrB - Herndon silt loam. 2 to 6 percent slopes
HrC - Herndon silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
TaE - Tatum loam. 10 to 25 percent slopes - - - ----- ------ -

• u,? ,
'
Culvert Crossing - ' -,,.
`
tie'r '' - ..
,
`Av
,X°js5 i!? ,y1, yT
i r.

s
r,
i ? ay

4f
4, _ 1R :' .
F P?`4 ?° r ??K ?'?
,
e J 4s
?'" Dam and Mill
y Existing Ford Crossing i
y ? 4
A??
.
} y ,
e • 1'
?? Dam ,
?,?. ."?,...?? gin, ?- __._ _ .? ;?• , ,
- A 1
.f
ry ?,
t
.t
Legend
Restoration and Buffer Areas
Hydro - Rivers/Streams (100k)
°k?e^..,. Figure 3
" M" 0 250 500 1,000
.'23) '""" Soils Map
sN
'1 N5'9`ai:,„i,:, ?'-.,, Feet
"°?5?,3E-I .: Little Grassy Creek
Fax 91c GF:3 ??a9[r

Little Grassy Creek Structures Photolog
Aff
A& j*-?, ? E*11
ell
Area of old dam Area of old dam 2
(lt ,/? F
J ,4,.1
_ x
Mill H( us,
I
I?
I
®1
i ? .
Mill House 3

!
4rT
J
Mill house 4 Mill house 5
Mill house 6
I

J

Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
July 10, 2006
Ken Gilland
Buck Engineering, A Division of Michael Baker Corporation
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
Oftice of Archivcs and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Little Grassy Creek EEP Stream Mitigation Project, Granville County, ER 06-1507
Dear Mr. Gilland:
Thank you for your letter of May 31, 2006, concerning the above project.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not affect any historic structures.
We have reviewed the proposed work and recommend that it proceed as long as care is exercised to limit
ground disturbance when moving equipment across high ground. Should any archaeological resources be
found during the operation, the work should halt in the area of discovery until we can determine the National
Register eligibility of the remains.
We appreciate your recording of the dam/mill and dam sites. These historic period archaeological sites have
been assigned state site numbers 31GV285** and 31GV286**, respectively. Site forms for both have been
started. They are enclosed with the request that you complete as much of the missing information as possible
(directions to site, historic remains description, e.g.). Please return the updated forms to us for inclusion in
our database. We understand that both sites he outside of the area proposed for stream restoration. Should
that change, please notify us. Both sites would need to be evaluated by an experienced archaeologist to
determine their National Register eligibility.
What more can you tell us about the `ford crossing' noted on Figure 2? Was it made by cattle crossing the
creek? Does it appear to have any physical remains associated with it?
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount Street. Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 (919)7334763!733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount Street. Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/7154801
SURVEY & PLANNING 5 15 N. Blount Street. Raleigh. NC 4617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh NC 276994617 [phone]nl54801
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
eter Sandbeck
Enclosures (site forms for 31 GV285** and 31 GV286**)

11

Appendix B
EDR Transaction Screen Map Report

EDR® Environmental
Data Resources Inc
The EDR Radius Map
with GeoCheck®
Little Grassy Creek
3031 Gela Road
Oxford, NC 27565
Inquiry Number: 1695993.1s
June 15, 2006
The Standard in
Environmental Risk
Management Information
440 Wheelers Farms Road
Milford, Connecticut 06461
Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Internet: www.edrnet.com
FORM-NULL-ERN

n

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary ------------------------------------------------------ ES1
Overview Map---------------------------------------------------------- 2
Detail Map------------------------------------------------------------- 3
Map Findings Summary --------------------------------------------------- 4
Map Findings----------------------------------------------------------- 6
Orphan Summary ------------------------------------------------------- 7
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking-------------------------- GRA
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum-----------------------------------------. A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary ------------------------------------------- A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map------------------------------------------ A-5
Physical Setting Source Map----------------------------------------------- A-14
Physical Setting Source Map Findings---------------------------------------- A-15
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------ A-17
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2006 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the roe of their respective owners.
TC1695993.1s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
3031 GELA ROAD
OXFORD, NC 27565
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranven
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
36.424400 - 36' 25' 27.8"
78.631 500 - 78° 37' 53.4"
9e Mercator: Zone 17
712340.8
4033427.5
407 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map:
Most Recent Revision
East Map:
Most Recent Revision
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
36078-D6 SATTERWHITE, NC
1981
36078-D5 STOVALL, NC
1981
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL------------------------. National Priority List
Proposed NPL-------------- Proposed National Priority List Sites
Delisted NPL--------------- National Priority List Deletions
NPL RECOVERY ------------- Federal Superfund Liens
CERCLIS-------------------- Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
. System
CERC-NFRAP--------------- CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
TC1695993.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CORRACTS----------------- Corrective Action Report
RCRA-TSDF----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
RCRA-LQG------------------ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
RCRA-SQG------------- ----- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
ERNS------------------- ----- Emergency Response Notification System
HMIRS------------------ ----- Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
US ENG CONTROLS-------- Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL ---- ----- Sites with Institutional Controls
DOD-------------------- ----- Department of Defense Sites
FUDS------------------- ----- Formerly Used Defense Sites
US BROWNFIELDS----- ----- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
CONSENT -------------- ----- Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
ROD-------------------- ----- Records Of Decision
UMTRA----------------- ----- Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
ODI--------------------- ----- Open Dump Inventory
TRIS-------------------- ----- Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
TSCA------------------- ----- Toxic Substances Control Act
FTTS------------------------ FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &
. Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
SSTS------------------- ----- Section 7 Tracking Systems
ICIS-------------------------. Integrated Compliance Information System
PADS------------------------ PCB Activity Database System
MILTS------------------- ----- Material Licensing Tracking System
MINES------------------ ----- Mines Master Index File
FINDS------------------ ----- Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
RAATS----------------- ----- RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
SHWS----------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
NC HSDS-------------------- Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
IMD-------------------------- Incident Management Database
SWF/LF---------------------- List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI-------------------------- Old Landfill Inventory
LUST------------------------ Regional UST Database
LUST TRUST ---------------- State Trust Fund Database
UST-------------------------. Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST-------------------------. AST Database
INST CONTROL ------------ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
VCP------------------------- Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
DRYCLEANERS------------- Drycleaning Sites
BROWNFIELDS-------------. Brownfields Projects Inventory
TRIBAL RECORDS
INDIAN RESERV ------------- Indian Reservations
INDIAN LUST ---------------- Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
INDIAN UST ----------------- Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
Manufactured Gas Plants--- EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC1695993.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
F-?
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped:
Site Name
GRANVILLE COUNTY LANDFILL
MISSING LINK CONVENIENCE
FAA RCLR SITE-OXFORD
FOGLEMAN RESIDENCE (ROY MICHAEL)
FOUR CORNERS AMOCO
WEST GROCERY
STOVALL COUNTRY STORE
PROVIDENCE GROCERY
N.C. FOREST SERVICE
NC STATE DPT OF CORRECTION
TOMMY HUFF SERVICE STATION
MAE L. CASH GROCERY
BEREA MINI MART
BEACON FOOD MART
TAMMY'S QUICK STOP
DANNYS
TED ROBERTS GROCERY
W.E. STOVALL GROCERY
ROADWAY EXPRESS. INC.
PLAINVIEW GROCERY
HENRY CURRIN
BEREA SELF SERV
HICKSBORO GROCERY
DEAN'S SERVICE STATION
PROVIDENCE GROCERY
ADCOCK'S MACHINE & WELDING
OVERTON'S CONER GRO
CLACKS GROCERY
CROSSROADS GROCERY
WEST GROCERY
EVANS GROCERY
TOLER'S GROCERY
WALTER HITE GROCERY (CLOSED)
PHILLIPS GROCERY
FRED BLACKWELL'S
M.B. FLOYD GROCERY
TALLEYS CONVENIENT MART
NEIGHBORHOOD GROCERY
STOVALL SHAW SCHOOL
CHANNEL MASTER/JFD-OXFORD
TCI LOGISTICS
ACE TRANSPORT
TRADE MART #100
BRIDGE TERMINAL TRANSPORT
USDA CROPS RESEARCH LAB (SEE C
OXFORD DUMP
Database(s)
SWF/LF
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, LUST TRUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
IMD
IMD
IMD
IMD
IMD
IMD
OLI
TC1695993.1 s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

OVERVIEW MAP -1695993.1 s
Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
? Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
' A Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Landfill Sites
Dept. Defense Sites

0 1/4 1/2 1 miles
F Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
IV Oil & Gas pipelines Disposal Sites
® 1oo-year flood zone
® Soo-year flood zone
® National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
SITE NAME: Little Grassy Creek CLIENT: Buck Engineering
ADDRESS: 3031 Gela Road CONTACT: Staci Ricks
Oxford NC 27565 INQUIRY #: 1695993.1s
LAT/LONG: 36.4244 / 78.6315 DATE: June-15,2006
Copyright -b 2006 EDR, Inc. (s 2006 Tale Atlas Ral. 07/2005. -

DETAIL MAP -1695993.1 s
i
i
IF
?t Target Property g the ?n vaNlke
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property Indian Reservations BIA E _y Hazardous Substance
Sites at elevations lower than
" Disposal Sites
?' Oil & Gas pipelines
the target property
® 100-year flood zone
A Manufactured Gas Plants ® 500-year flood zone
t Sensitive Receptors National Wetland Inventory
National Priority List Sites
Landfill Sites State Wetlands
Dept. Defense Sites
SITE NAME: Little Grassy Creek CLIENT: Buck Engineering
ADDRESS: 3031 Gela Road CONTACT: Staci Ricks
Oxford INC 27565 INQUIRY#: 1695993.1s
LAT/LONG: 36.4244 / 78.6315 DATE: June 15, 2006
Copyright. 2006 EDR. Inc. 02006 Tele Atlas Rel. 0712005.
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Target Distance Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL RECOVERY TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CERC-NFRAP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RCRA TSD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
RCRA Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
State Haz. Waste 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NC HSDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
IMD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State Landfill 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
OLI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST TRUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TRIBAL RECORDS
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
TC1695993.1s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
Search
Target Distance Total
Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 -1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 -1 > 1 Plotted
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
Manufactured Gas Plants 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC1695993.1s Page 5
1
'
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Distance (ft.)
t Elevation Site
NO SITES FOUND

MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
TC1695993.1s Page 6
W
N
a
m
0
p
H
to
7
x
F-
h
N a 0
J
LL
F F- 1- F- F- p LL p rn F F- k- fn - p p F F H H F F H H F F F ?- H F H 1- 1- F- H N rA p F- F- 1- N p
>> 7>> y J>>> J O 7 7 7>>>>>>> 7 7 M 7 p p 7>> J J 7>> J-
w m m m m m o W m In m to In m m m In to m a to w u) in w to m o to m m 1n w to to m m U) LO In u) m to
co (0 to co co to (0 co co co to CD co co (0 w w w w
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
}
7
Ztn
x
O
N
N
v
a
m
U
m
E
z
m
U)
1-
N
0)
m
a
2
M
CA
CD
tq
O ?
U H
J
N
V Q
cOn
O
2 In
O O p F
O

Q m co x N x 2
m z r y
LO
too W into MOOX W) W) 0,x0
0 I-
N C r'NNrn20Uq
>. co
tD?
O?O O Q a?>. xt/)Q QO x0 z

o
`
8 O OD0 000 CCOOco

rn
o
r
0
Q
m
m o
y
m x p? p? O O Q x a to O N of et S mmco
m
a t6 c0 0 O t0 n n n n n A Z a O Z
?
`8
x J
:)-:):)D csoxxx mm?7>>v
CD o i
i
>7?7m>j>j?7?>j?
O
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ? =x
o
O F- 0 0 0 w w m
O x 0$ 0 0 0 01-
x x W W W O M M A x ? x t o x v v x x x x x O O O
r
i
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x a x x 2 x x o
z rn
J
Q U
p U W
O O O- W z s x } m
W H x LL LL 0 p z z w U 0 a.
0 Q I g
x Cl) O z W p > r U O r i 0 r r O Z 2 w x
00aUJ dg LU o o W W?} IX<Lu (D W W cwio9 rZO
U w ' >x0 LL Ua) x Lu U, U U NZ Pxwx
LLX O 1- a Z Z <U) x O $ ?. x o m w > U m O z W r o r O W J w o ug
x O W 0 w Z O w U x o w x x } x x W W -J J a a a U Z m
? r
v)1-m0 U))00) Do waxf00aO = Z x
z W W 000owOxw V OUW Ww0??OwZ>OO Ww?a
?0LLLx_ UUZOU ~ma.Fxx-?-W ?EIULO>w<UppVUOFxzx 0 a.
w wpInz W ~JOO OOUZ W >r O'Jx W Z0 mxaOxO 1X0 UZx W pUx00
?FxU?Q W J Ozmm?pQ mOQ WU(cWOmm?_YON?cx7(7mxamIUWOU00000 0 ui _j >- LL z y V M Z x O r w x U p?p Z x W w Z> O x U m N ?ZZ W J p x p LL J X Q
xa mz LL W s90 W
¢ x O O QJ W C77- J p
(j() wx?av?tgi ¢Qxo?awWOgwwxp U>gxw>oaxxoox°°aww
z z 2mU01-2mHpLL?OaF-H xa ZxmxaaQODU i w I-3aLL LL LL m r-z3: m
m a)
m t.- (D v) co
C(ppp OO (?(pp O I i w aMD MV ONi a?0 O EL I?n IOn T ?yOp ccoo m co O O c cl) to O O O O M O M n c `M7 M m
tD N
C7 c'O M t. m a M mg "'D t0 A c0 M to tD co ro M w W f-- fl a N f? m f? m co co t.- h w to "f m
M M M M M M M M O c0 O R M N
p M M M /p O O) M M V h M M M M M co
< v_ a v_ v M v v to I
7 K O a a 7 V a v v v o v v C v a c7 W O
a. l to m cn M In c7) M
((pp ccpp M M m w t. M M M cp
pp p p pp O O O O O O O O O O p p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 0 o o a p
p 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 ? ?- X 0 0 0 .-- r
W 0 7 D 7 7 t w o 0 ` rA to 0 7 > > O w 0 0 D 7 m 7 7 7 7 > > > > > m > m 7 m 7 > > 7 to y to D 7 7 Cn y
U
V p O p p p QQ p p p p O p O O p p O O p G p p p p p p p p p O p O p O p O p p O p G p
O x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LL
J U. LL U. LL W LL LL LL LL w W LL W w w w x W LL W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL W LL LL LL LL LL W U. w LL LL LL LL LL
DD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

}
I
2
D
U)
zd.
x
a
O
E? I o 0
y
f0
a F' ?
? J J 7
Lo Lo
In to to
a
N N N N
co
0
M
m o
m m
O n a
z Z
N
U x
}
LLI
O
LU co
x
Zd,x
N
d
°v
Q
m
w
0O?o
m W O
U
w co
j a _z:
W Q
U Z a)
m J O J
Z > > >
in main
n ?
LO N
O
O ° ? o
W m m
U
O O >
LL LL O
0 8 m
m
l0
CL
ri
m
rn
Lf)
co
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006
Number of Days to Update: 17
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/31/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/31/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/0512006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/31/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL RECOVERY: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/21/2006
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC1695993.1s Page GR-1

F11

n

1
11
k

1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities,
private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities
List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2006
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status
indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined
no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates
this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time.
This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that,
based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/1312006
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 03/15/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2006
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
RCRAlnfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRAInfo replaces
the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS).
The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of
hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small
quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous
waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per
month. Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg
of acutely hazardous waste per month. Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from
the generator off-site to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store,
or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 03/09/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 33
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.

Date of Government Version: 12131/2005 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/12/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/21/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2006
Number of Days to Update: 40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/24/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC1695993.1s Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2006
Number of Days to Update: 46 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 03/21/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/0312006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 03/21/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12131/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 177
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/21/2006
Number of Days to Update: 33
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/03/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC1695993.1s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields
t properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA's Targeted Brownfields
Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalities--especially those without EPA
Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots-minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with
' brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments
at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts
under EPA's Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement
Recipients-States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become Brownfields Cleanup Revolving
Loan Fund (BCRLF) cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the
U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF
' cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified
brownfields-related cleanup activities.

Date of Government Version: 04/26/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 33
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09111/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
7

Date of Government Version: 12/14/2004 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2005 Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2006
Number of Days to Update: 69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/24/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 04113/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 32
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
' Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.

Date of Government Version: 11/04/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11 /28/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/20/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies

ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08109/2004
Date Made Actve in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC1695993.1s Page GR-4
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2005
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03121/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12131/2002
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 46
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2006
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the .
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 03/29/2006 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/2612006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05130/2006 Last EDR Contact: 03/20/2006
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/3012006
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/20/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 12131/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 02/13/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2006
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephoner 202-564-5088
Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC1695993.1s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
' PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.

Date of Government Version: 12/27/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2006
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually

MILTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04103/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MINES: Mines Master Index File
' Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 02/09/2006 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2006
' Number of Days to Update: 62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
' Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
' Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).

Date of Government Version: 04/27/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/0212006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 04/03/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

1

RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/0311995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2006
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
' BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.

TC1695993.1s Page GR-6
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 48
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/1712006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2006
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 04111/2006 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/12/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2006
Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated h
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/1997
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/1997
Number of Days to Update: 53
azardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/28/2006
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2006
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/24/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04127/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2006
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/24/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information.
sites).
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006
Number of Days to Update: 15
(Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/24/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC1695993.1s Page GR-7
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 03/03/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2006 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2006
Number of Days to Update: 31 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006
Number of Days to Update: 15
claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05109/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 01/03/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2006
Number of Days to Update: 36
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006
Number of Days to Update: 41
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/0712006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/1212006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Date of Government Version: 04/11/2006 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/12/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2006
Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Date of Government Version: 04/11/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/12/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2006
Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
TC1695993.1s Page GR-8
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING,
Date of Government Version: 04/04/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/1412006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2006
Number of Days to Update: 40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07117/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2005 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/08/2006 Last EDR Contact: 05105/2006
Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/31/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TRIBAL RECORDS
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 177
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2006
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/21/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/2712006
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2006
Number of Days to Update: 29
PROPRIETARY RECORDS
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/21/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Manufactured Gas Plants: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC1695993.1s Page GR-9
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2006
Number of Days to Update: 49
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2006
Number of Days to Update: 8
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/20/2006
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09111/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/17/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/28/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/06/2006
Number of Days to Update: 33
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually

WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12131/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2006
Number of Days to Update: 46
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/17/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC1695993.1s Page GR-10
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs
from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily
gas pipelines.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: PennWell Corporation
Telephone: [phone]
This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided
on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
TC1695993.1s Page GR-11
7
1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2006 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

Il
0

TC1695993.1s Page GR-12
GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK
3031 GELA ROAD
OXFORD, NC 27565
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
36.42440 - 36° 25' 27.8"
78.6315 - 78° 37'53.4"
Zone 17
712340.8
4033427.5
407 ft. above sea level
Target Property Map: 36078-D6 SATTERWHITE, NC
Most Recent Revision: 1981
East Map: 36078-D5 STOVALL, NC
Most Recent Revision: 1981
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC1695993.1s PageA-1

GEOCHECK0 - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General West
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
iR
O
d
W
A ? m b ? V
? N
A ± j N y ? 41
A ma c _
North
F_
C
O
N
d
W

V A
I
TIP
it a A a g b V W
Y W
g e
South
w
e .
West East
TIP
0 1/2 1 Miles
Target Property Elevation: 407 ft.
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC1695993.1s PageA-2
GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Target Property County
GRANVILLE, NC
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property:
Additional Panels in search area:
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Propert
y
SATTERWHITE
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Flood
Electronic Data
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
3707700075C
3707700025C
3707700050C
37077CO1000
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC1695993.1s Page A-3

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
' GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
I GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
t at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Paleozoic Category: Volcanic Rocks
System: Cambrian
Series: Cambrian volcanic rocks
Code: Cv (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
' Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).

TC 1695993.1 s Page A-4

SSURGO SOIL MAP -1695993.1 s
1
3
5 3
1 4
4
1
3
4

it Target Property 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Milce
N SSURGO Soil
N water
SITE NAME: Little Grassy Creek CLIENT: Buck Engineering
ADDRESS: 3031 Gela Road CONTACT: Staci Ricks
Oxford NC 27565 INQUIRY#: 1695993.1s
LAT/LONG: 36.4244 / 78.6315 DATE: June 15, 2006
Copyright ? 2006 EOR. Inc. c? 2006 Tele Atlas Rel. 07/2006.
i
GEOCHECK@ - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
Soil Map ID: 1
Soil Component Name: GEORGEVILLE
Soil Surface Texture: silt loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil has not been ranked with a hydric criteria.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 5 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 7.30
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), silt.
Soils.
1 flinches 10 inches gravelly - silt Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 5.50
loam Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50% silt.
2 5 inches 35 inches clay Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit 50% or
200), Clayey more), Elastic
Soils. silt.
TC1695993.1s PageA-6
GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
2 10 inches 42 inches gravelly - Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.60 Max: 5.50
sandy clay loam Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.20 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
3 35 inches 65 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3 42 inches 68 inches gravelly - Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 5.50
sandy loam Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 2.00 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 2
Soil Component Name: CHEWACLA
Soil Surface Texture: loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly. Soils commonly have a layer with low hydraulic
conductivity, wet state high in profile, etc. Depth to water table is
1 to 3 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 0 inches
TC 1695993.1 s Page A-7
GEOCHECK® -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches gravelly - silt Granular FINE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 6.00
loam materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
pct. or less Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty, or 50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
1 0 inches 6 inches loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
2 7 inches 27 inches gravelly - silt Granular. FINE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 6.00
loam materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
pct. or less Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty, or 50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
2 6 inches 19 inches sandy clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3 27 inches 72 inches very gravelly - Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 20.00 Max: 7.80
loamy coarse materials (35 SOILIS, Gravels, Min: 6.00 Min: 5.10
sand pct. or less Clean Gravels,
passing No. Well-graded
200), Stone gravel.
Fragments,
Gravel and
Sand.
3 19 inches 65 inches variable Not reported Not reported Max: 0.00 Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00 Min: 0.00
Soil Map ID: 3
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
Hydrologic Group:
Soil Drainage Class:
GEORGEVILLE
silt loam
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
TC 1695993.1 s Page A-8
GEOCHECKO - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Soil has not been ranked with a hydric criteria.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 8 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 7.30
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), silt.
Soils.
1 0 inches 10 inches gravelly - silt Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 5.50
loam Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
2 8 inches 62 inches clay Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit 50% or
200), Clayey more), Elastic
Soils. silt.
2 10 inches 42 inches gravelly - Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.60 Max: 5.50
sandy clay loam Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.20 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
3 62 inches 72 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3 42 inches 68 inches gravelly - Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 5.50
sandy loam Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 2.00 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC1695993.1s PageA-9
i
GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 4
Soil Component Name: HERNDON
Soil Surface Texture: silt loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil has not been ranked with a hydric criteria.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeabili Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 5 inches gravelly - silt Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
loam Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
1 0 inches 8 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and , Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
2 5 inches 9 inches gravelly - loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2 8 inches 40 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 3.60
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
TC1695993.1s Page A-10
GI EOCHECK® PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
3 9 inches 40 inches very gravelly - Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
loam materials (35 SOILS, Gravels, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
pct. or less Gravels with
passing No. fines, Clayey
200), Silty, or Gravel
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3 40 inches 65 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 3.60
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit 50% or
200), Silty more), Elastic
Soils. silt.
4 40 inches 85 inches stratified Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 20.00 Max: 8.40
materials (35 SOILIS, Gravels, Min: 20.00 Min: 6.60
pct. or less Clean Gravels,
passing No. Well-graded
200), Stone gravel.
Fragments,
Gravel and
Sand.
Soil Map ID: 5
Soil Component Name: LIGNUM
Soil Surface Texture: silt loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained. Soils have a layer of low hydraulic
conductivity, wet state high in the profile. Depth to water table is 3
to 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil has not been ranked with a hydric criteria.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 40 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > Winches
TC1695993.1s Page A-11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
GEOCHECIO - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 14 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
1 0 inches 9 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 7.30
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), silt.
Soils.
2 14 inches 39 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.00 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit 50% or
200), Clayey more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
2 9 inches 30 inches very channery - Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.20 Max: 7.30
silt loam Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.06 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), silt.
Soils.
3 39 inches 46 inches sandy clay loam Granular FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.60 Max: 5.50
materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.10 Min: 4.50
pct. or less Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty, or 50%), Lean Clay
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3 30 inches 42 inches channery - Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 0.20 Max: 7.30
silty clay loam Materials (more SOILS, Gravels, Min: 0.06 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Gravels with
passing No. fines, Silty
200), Silty Gravel
Soils.
4 46 inches 62 inches weathered Not reported Not reported Max: 0.00 Max: 0.00
bedrock Min: 0.00 Min: 0.00
Soil Map ID: 6
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
Hydrologic Group:
Soil Drainage Class:
HERNDON
silt loam
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
TC1695993.1s Page A-12
GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Soil has not been ranked with a hydric criteria.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (In/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 5 inches gravelly - silt Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
loam Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
1 0 inches 10 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
2 5 inches 9 inches gravelly - loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2 10 inches 55 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 3.60
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3 9 inches 40 inches very gravelly - Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
loam materials (35 SOILS, Gravels, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
pct. or less Gravels with
passing No. fines, Clayey
200), Silty, or Gravel
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3 55 inches 65 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 3.60
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit 50% or
200), Silty more), Elastic
Soils. silt.
4 40 inches 85 inches stratified Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 20.00 Max: 8.40
materials (35 SOILIS, Gravels, Min: 20.00 Min: 6.60
pct. or less Clean Gravels,
passing No. Well-graded
200), Stone gravel.
Fragments,
Gravel and
Sand.
TC1695993.1s Page A-13
GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database 1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
1 USGS2234110 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
TC1695993.1s PageA-14
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP -1695993.1s
N County Boundary o 1/4 1/2 Wes
//
N
0 Major Roads
Contour Lines
Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
Groundwater Flow Direction
Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location
Wildlife Areas
Natural Areas
® Water Wells cv ; Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species
© Public Water Supply Wells
® Cluster of Multiple Icons
SITE NAME: Little Grassy Creek CLIENT: Buck Engineering
ADDRESS: 3031 Gela Road CONTACT: Staci Ricks
Oxford INC 27565 INQUIRY #: 1695993.1s
LAT/LONG: 36.4244 / 78.6315 DATE: June 15, 2006
GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS

n

Elevation _ Database EDR ID Number
Map ID
Direction
Distance
1
SSW FED USGS USGS2234110
112 -1 Mile
Higher
Agency cd: USGS Site no: 362457078381601
Site name: GV-034
Latitude: 362457
Longitude: 0783816 Dec [at: 36.41597635
Dec Ion: -78.63750236 Coor meth: M
Coor accr: S Latlong datum: NAD27
Dec latlong datum: NAD83 District: 37
State: 37 County: 077
Country: US Land net: Not Reported
Location map: Not Reported Map scale: Not Reported
Altitude: Not Reported Altitude method: Not Reported
Altitude accuracy: Not Reported Altitude datum: Not Reported
Hydrologic: Not Reported
Topographic: Hillside (slope)
Site type: Ground-water other than Spring Date construction: Not Reported
Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST
Local standard time flag: Y
Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type
Aquifer Type: Not Reported
Aquifer: FELSIC METAVOLCANIC ROCK
Well depth: 35.0 Hole depth: Not Reported
Source of depth data: reporting agency (generally USGS jroject number: 453709900
Real time data flag: 0 Daily flow data begin date: 0000-00-00
Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data count: 0
Peak flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data end date: 0000-00-00
Peak flow data count: 0 Water quality data begin date : 0000-00-00
Water quality data end date:0000-00-00 Water quality data count: 0
Ground water data begin date: 1968-00-00 Ground water data end date: 1968-00-00
Ground water data count: 1
Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1
Feet below Feet to
Date Surface Sealevel
1 1968 20

t

TC1695993.1s Page A-15

GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
County Result Type Total Sites Avg pCi/L
GRANVILLE Statistical 8 0.55
GRANVILLE Non-Statistical 25 1.20
Federal EPA Radon Zone for GRANVILLE County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Range pCi/L
-0.10-2.10
0.00-10.70
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 27565
Number of sites tested: 5
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L
Living Area - 1 st Floor 0.620 pCi/L 100%
Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported
Basement Not Reported Not Reported
% 4-20 pCi/L
0%
Not Reported
Not Reported
% >20 pCi/L
0%
Not Reported
Not Reported
TC1695993.1s Page A-16
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

u
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.

TC1695993.1s Page A-17
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or hight quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
NC Game Lands: Wildlife Resources Commission Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC1695993.1s PageA-18
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2006 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC1695993.1s Page A-19
I
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK PHOTO LOG

Bedrock outcrop in Little Grassy Creek
4 ?
_ '4 y y, i, }ya
auk ? ' ? •,r: •, s?
f r
4?
Az 7
Lam:; } ?• FI{? ? - ? ? 2 rat, . d` .e5. '.1Y?`.?
Boulder outcropping and forested floodplain
Existing fence along easement Floodplain forest
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK PHOTO LOG
ff-w:111
Historic Mill House
Meander bend on Little Grassy Creek
Stable meander bend on Little Grassy Creek Stable riffle in Little Grassy Creek

LITTLE GRASSY CREEK PHOTO LOG

4 -}
•? w? s
UT1 eroding meander bend
x
UTl prior to cattle exclusion
c,
MI
PROJECT: 0501661501
o S S mmmmAwn» ?-?

Sri
n

.
ccc °D

:
0
-n

r
2!
° NO mmm:

m
1n to,

n in n W G) CO)
-0 m

m

?,;,;.?-••

p ,i .....-. ?-..?_ -?_.?_
z
?
?
2
z5

0 00 V)
Dn-j
?

m
O

r
Lb co ca o
??
?r
o
or^zozoZr
x ooo
zzzd ZM zm?

000'" N
03 Fy- z
b zzzS cN na?D0
z v D
J
p 8
"'!!1111
Z 000
-0 Z r,
n
m v(j)
N

m vi
O
A M-
4 A

w

a

i
y Z

o
Rl
i
?,? b
( ZS2
V C
sy D
z
-1
m
;: EA w

z
40 aA M
O

z
?
? N
.
0

o
v z
CA CA
vv
y
§M
?o C]
zz4 ? 0

ZZ
n n x °?

a N
V o V
$O
>

i? CEO

?S
m mm
q 1

O
O
b
W
Va
c
a

r

z
10
gO

m , L? AO sN
':
O
P?%,
?® ?

i Q

U1
c
c
?
?,C?
so C-) o

?yir1 /?
5? J rr

Zc -
y

. to
wz 'y
X vii Asa ?
?

1.E )m
G) o
1.0

r
rn
rn
?•
a
b R r
z y tl
?
Y ' '[ t
Ri\?fF2241W M\Desi gn\Plens\R2241WM _SYS_ 01A.DGN
o
z
° o 0 0 0 0 0 o x$ `? $ o°$$
??-- r rz r
y x511 9 x A D 1-1 ° rtj m Rj n < X
-V C < (< z m mo m O m Z
ai o A -ri m° O'm
x i m m X m°
z ?Z
m D o w
0
r
Z
o
w ??
m
y x®
a?
Z ®?C IL
m m m m O O $
_ 1 6
Z cm C7 m O O t7 < ;ma m
z T
-mi a E X. °zi $ 3 m z
An o > co Co O r m n m ar m
m 3 g°°
E
w 0 2 t7 Z o
Z m D
a D 70o Z O m z
M ;a
Z m i n m O N N
> z y LA
IL 0 3
0 G) G)
z
1I
40
r A FL m
U1 W Ol
0 D n o d H
M 3
R'
M m o
z
m
v
> i
m 3 0 IL CL IL OL IL 0- 1 a
r
o z m a f7 N
L ^o. a ?
c o Arn32 3 aoD+
G) Er 43 ?s -8
4 ;U o °mo- 600
i Z m IzF A x=z
?. O oo0 z ?m
CIA ? 0 g
O m?Zm wjf?
Z 0Oox O ? X >
Z
0) Or- n ?M
to 01 aF°o
gm ?;
L D ?n
O °
c? ci a c? 3 g? m gi2 8 Z
o . Z ccr-z Z
s ad
o On mom ?"r J
0 A T CO C72 ° m an 0 a z
? z z
ito
GO yMlmo ?'
-n o M z ?..??? me
-+ CrJ
co 2 0
146
G'?2 m00 ?G
> ;a Z cm
m O °i Osy
2 0. mT)
m czi
u O
czi y
Z
? ? 8 pro ?
tt s
g7dq
00000 ?L 0000
!? :y
z -? ? o m

m

m

m c

m a ? ?,

? I.
v

b
?

?'
m
o

?
g
oo

?

m

7
co

mm
W
-

a
?
?
?
<
x ?
?''
•
?
?
9E
}
n
?
?

o
?

g
o W
?
? N '?
g +
? -?
? -?
o N
o N N
a ?
g ?
? +
a N
o N
o -+
o r
o -+
?
?
o

a i ? m ? a ? a m
r

? o

g
o m
. m ?

A A A A n n

m ?

a
c
?
G1 ? G ? ? m ? ? ? m S
g1

z

s 3
v
3

°i ?' o o 'o a m a a ea ea o ?? ?
m? m
Q?
O O ? ? j 0 0 0 0 N N ? t? ap
cn -4 is is is -4 a -4 -4 ? vNi ? m

T
D T
D T
D T
D T
D T
D T
D T
D T
D T
D T
T. T

D m
c c 2 c 2 + + * 8 ?
0
11

T a
•n N N p ° N p A m on N to •v •v •v -v 7D A A N
° a 9 0 s ° 3 o m do Q? ?' ?' ?' a ?' a a a° a a a g o° QI
?c
a. g$ 0 m ° a s aQ A o c a C° C
c
n
.?YT ??? ? ? III
I W ? ?-+? ? 1 a I I I
?=I x®?9oillll
8; f.ll??.I K??,;i,'?o "O0 g?
Li Li
III; ! III
I-il i
°?mmm -0 m o ga
a a 12 43. CL
a. a. m s "a? y A m a. A m ?. m A n 3. 3. ° o c a.
• 'C 0 70 (? ° ?` N N C m y of ?° A O z0 7 ZO ZO m m + ° G? O
o• g o o a- • s o 0 0° o m° m m 3 O ' m 0
O c g C) a O $ o? o o 3 x 3 3 a. P. S" ? v m
a 3 a s s o c ?7 >> C. SL a? c? o °
a "? o 's s s
a a - ??A o =a a ° mC. C.c :c
S G 4 m °
CC,
I I + +i
I) Q C I® ,° ;^ I I m IT D• } 3F C1O
: m
i i I I I I #
LJ 0 r r ?? II I I
O • • • •
3 '? °°a. g s o 0 0 0 n O
8. 8. a i s s s o m
? O S
0 0 ?
m a
SgmM car
p-0 I. n o m o
7 Qi
? c A ? A ? a
a °' °• c m o
a o. 0 0
N to C
C C rn
I i I l
a a j a j ® ?'' ©© O
0a9 o&a
a. s ° -?
° QQ
r S y •g? o o A o a b g 0
o o C C' 'n
444))) 0 0 0 0? ? ? o
0 m
o ? ? 0 0
O
• O_
c °
i.n
1
t
I
I
I
I
I
_ 'C `C 7 ' O ° m L N a 2 o ' N
o? y m m? p? y c n ?? ?' A o3
a. C)
c C: ' o
O O O k 2 O y o O
C
O N
,
in
m g I I I ? I
p B ?; ®o O• It s O
7o I I I
a
N
C
m
I
I
€ I
I
I
m T _
o? A a po o mo?
CL c
° m 0 ,
a• m m
A c $
S n
CL c
3 y
G O
O
o
o`o m
a.
Rt.
II
?• O
n
O
Z
m
Z
O ?
Z >
?
?m
r 4
® '0
Z
M
m
c
Y

® Io ?

a 3 a
g o S. o ? ? o
g ?
0
?3+T
3+ S °
c ' A oa
p A o
O r m o
'? n O O
n
y
A co
T C
O M
N
? I
I I
I I
a
I
vl j
II
H
?I I O
?i
c p? g g? y r
?om?N
o a. ?o
o c ?
m
C o ?
? C m
o ?
l
I
? I
I
b ® 0
it .
R

RR/ D24Q6
s/\ 2 WM\Oeesgn\Plena\R2241WM_DTL_02.OGN
i
m

:F
YN? ? ? TOP OF BANK/BANKFULL

TOE OF BANK

+ ?-

m TOE OF BANK
r D
b n
O F
Z
O
<

C P P! 7Yp? pyN?
????1T???yC

s $
m??iniymo? ??
?- 2 ?71loix
N
?
p
m
Z?vyc JO
zLm @ ?i>
1m11 CM
* op
mg
4
m
g g
in 0
n

° 0
O
to
CO)
D
z

?D C

30 Cb
n
m
?i, -n
m
1

O
3 '. S m :s -
o wa w N±
o
m
g=
'
. r:-•.. 1
/\ a
?\
=yet
Q
?"
LL$ . rT
CO)
l
it
.Aye .....: .. V!
fe

°

z
AI
ppg!aa
if nit x
z„C

? y ?
T
roi(R2241WM\Deetgn\Plene\R2241NM_DTL_02e.DGN
Y° ? v
K? y R
j Qs
>R S O 0
00
- - o
c
4?
" fh m
m
CO I .. 2
III Ssg w _ § III o
§
v o
oc
D IV Z? III s III s
G' z
# m 3 F - F ca
.... ':.:.I' CO)
CO)
.....I z CA
.' A A A N '
;16 ;11
H
Ilk
HOUR 0
_ S m
" fib ;rm
Fo m s !
m 2
?mcg O
z -I
j Fm'o r Cl)
m6r pImp 5g " 8
9
> IN
i
11 >
p m
I i
n
• • I•I
A
p II
y y N?+S?8 m • • • • •I•I • ? .. .. ? ?'?
CO)
:..:..
o o s sm . . I.I CO)
z :. I • • •I I• m .' O
5 CO
-Zi • • I•I .: ca O
0 Z S • • •I I• z Am Z
CO)
m n • • I•I ?
P. P. ?PN P N • • •I 10 Fg
m
P P.O.
PN 1
2nul
!0 lqm
•
• • •I I
MINNA
D
G) i i 39
lop
?' • • • i • Z
LJ
I - $
INS
? 8-e
if 113
Ri\R2?241WM\Design\Plens\R2241WM_PSH_03_temp.dgn
•o D
3. o0
m c
?? ?? ?? r r m CD V Of °(A w N M
Of ?71 A W N O ?
°??s» =r o cv 03 ??3 a'? m ?3 0 c a =rn m 3
m m a CD m m a m m (A •O a 0 m a C m .L.R + m g a A m m y m m y 7 m m 0 C) 40 c oA mp 0 m 90 w OaoD ?D'3 ° xn° a 36=20 one-0 ?m 00 nC)g?o 02 ? =
° m o a mm oao co o m o o 0 0 0 0
4?• c0 0mmmmcm c aa CA- s o? = mmD>>>?°.' .• . ?c?o .a°
m m m ao m •' m rc?w m w om 0 m >o o m m w m> 0? 220 0' m m 5-- o m" co
oo?'•+o oa?wococmm ?e??? o mommmcoo?moooct
° m a -1 m a f c= m O 0, a m °°-° w 7 0 a° m a 0• ' m m 0 (A .?
3 mm03 mm m?.m aan? ow c o m F%L ?mom m 0? 0 m 41mm namm(OA 0 m? 2 3
- m`? 8 0 0 a Mm m 0 a .. 90 = m == m =.0
> > N O m m A m ;' m r a- O ? m a =a
ono > > m 060 ?0 L046 5 •' a v 0mmm ACL(Q m m m m Am (On s a go m c? ?m
o- 5" ° 3 c =•' O m P n ?o m o c>> m am m o y m m
?m a c 5 60) a (a =r m c5a 'a c ? D ° m c wv o ac.o m CD ? m a_ c ?
m 0?0 <oa ....a0 ":e t wo= m m= 0
••?m 3 a m 3 a0 -f c m m b 0 m? •? o DO m c o
;IL m mvv y a R' 0v O
EF -0< <o3mm loam moaa =m oa 60 300 cma 83 z
0 7? .m•? m m m C 3 a 7 CL O c S m=5 7 = m ... cr ? CL 0 OR R m •° y a -CO)
1
..m m m ?Q =re aco am M.m S m m ?'sm m m m am ?o aQ Q a m mm
m m o np ma--m?m o w X?? m ?° m e ? X. m 0o CQ Q Ca o »•' -8 C
0
0'a o m' s' • a ?•'< 5 5- N -1 EL w -I 'A 40 m ? O_I
m 0 -°• ma an d ?' a m 3 ff C ,•
S O a m 0 m m O m ?, OaD m 8 3 7 .. CO
mao ? m m co a'°° x3 w mco aM2 »a CL awm m m m o m 2 O - St Q,'A in a 0 3 a 8 o o m o 20 a s a?° m 01 - 40 ? 0 m M C) 3 m ? m 0.m a? Z
2?mm< (°' m-0 m5,ao wm rnmw3 o.a a•am3 m' a wM c co
O 3O C < a 0= .. C O ? W m N
? A m C 7 O. O 10
m °° m
30 m c3 •? ,.3 mm m°o 0 0 a
m O m 51" m 0- 8 -0 O 10 a'A m =° m C A W am a m C (A 0 m a? O." m 0 co w C
G.= m m °? Z O a•-0 o amp n(°p ?? m F o'A 3 4w5'? w m m o a ro m 3 -0 M
Z Z
,, 5m m m °?m a°y 3(° aro o sw m m w m a m 13 m C7
ma o' m m c mac ?? m< m m m a m m e ? 3 •' m w' 3 0 m
m m ?m
m m 43 'a m °.3 m?m° m° m o c c QO M m'm ° ?tp0 a 3 co a ?c
m- 0 20 °=(na , w o mr 0Om?3 ?m
m m 42 a ;v :O-0 mm Q CA m O?- m O a O 8,00 rA o d °, m Q 040
as o =r 0
o ma m g? ?-i m -+ Q? a ,.gym 0 a'w m a,m
m m ?2 ?
w >> 3 3 a,4 m 3 5 a o ° m m c o m 2 a o
(A '0 a o m m m 8
'a (A
?. o < ?Sa 3e} ..3' mmw m CL a
0 •om o m o c.0 a l< A L =v 06 0 a. m
m a (0°° (=Dr r ? m ca mm? m so c ;LL .0 Q. mmm mn?mwm O'er- a°ao 00 O mC aim O O
Cc -
0) CD 0 °=?> >? 0a?m oc ??oo ?°-° ? m 10
° m 5?°mw
o rm
?a 40 3 c c mm 8((A 83;m 8t ?'RL 0 . m ? m
m o m w a 1 ? 0° o --c 0 to >> 'sue= 5? 0
c m 0 m g v ,.
c m an 3 o a °
=r '0
0 o _ -
C
X 3 0
."0
O
A
D
z
=1
mCO)
J
g? 0 r ? N ? Ch
1y
c -4 tA M ?D V 0 3 r 7C 7C 7C 7C 7? 7C 7C ? - x x O -t m v A 3m

g O -n W r CO p m g m -u •o M -0 ? (^ m v ? -I -
3 to T -i C
<
? M
9 S
0 m
m m«
2 o
- =
m •,
m ? o
c
Q m
ff m
3 m
S m
> .j
m o
> x
m m c
g m
3
m v
4,D c
3 o
3 o
a
<
o •'
m tn a m m m .
m ? ? ? m m to o
D o
$ x ? o Q 3 ? v v v v ? O M m m m ° y 'm c

m ro m m v v v v m ?l m m m v m n y Q.
m C,
? n A A n a ? a ? oD 0 •r1
C) st -1
a co ? m a a w ro
> > > a m p o' IS
> > O m a m ao a CO co
c cc e - aD D •' o
m a m w > >
a m
A
(T w ? w
(°Ji ?
O ?

,4 0 0 (NA (N7i 0 0 0 0

"

"
? °
.+ ,0..
O O O
? m :.
'
D
A m
M r'
? -N-I
m ?
m w N N m
D -i
0 -i
0 ?
0 -1
0 -I
0 -I
0 -I
0 n r-
oD D
A D
A r M
D r r r c

?

?

^
?
{
?

=

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

?

w

m

i

w T w

?
?
m
m C
r?(R2. WM\Design\Plens\R2241WM_PSH_04.dgn
O
®® _#
c M Dzrn
-n m" M
m Oz °mz
m -l-1
m 2c),
m -Dz
mm C-oz
z M - m ni oa
0 0
'mu G) ?.,
z n-4m \\
CO) °z
-1 mzCo \\
o Ca
m
D pm°
CO 0 \`\
m °
m z\\
n
C)
00 co Z
08 J6 0
0 _9
mo 9"(03
T55 0-1 4 z O
z
o
i 0O
m to
c z\\
0 i
i
ii ,
ca m
i
w %7
O
r ?
z v' O
a 07 y -,J
o?
=%s
Ron ^?+
Ch (D -1
m Z O
z O z
r?r M
_
\ \ Z 0
_o z
r t?
m
!I z S2 D
-4 G)
\ C; z
NX
i
MAT SHEET 5 SrA TipN 80464.30
o g?
O z
A if nit
0
No
N? No.
o ? ?
r
10r:\2/?/i 04?6
WM\Design\Plans\R2241WM_PSH_05.dgn
bL4TCHUNE SHEET 4
STATION ?g,{,?p ...
ON,
°°z?o
Ego r- Ca
?ca r-?d
rmz-mjz
?5>?+ xmmSZ<;
rZ?rp D rtiz0?3
co in 5::? 20 >
mcdo poL) -CA -j
?Tz8 ODZM?z
(boot T.00>8
om m nK) rZmmm}
O ^' °C*zZm
r, W ??mw
?n
n C) z m
A
lO?
O?RFC
?0
c mCmm
m m -n D
;?,M.
z
A Dim
.0 m Oz
m -1z 1
oZ- /
00 ? -mm _
m
Z
C) z
; mM 52
D
oz
mZ 200
z m? mom
? -°izo
Z m- 0 ,m
fR 0 0 z
X
g°z ca
r
D
mco P
Z) z
W
zm? '
v, (, a
m z ?j
a >>
,
08
°
m
GELq RD--- ------- -------
----- i
---
s?
g b ?? 'O
S pq
CA o a s
o ?z
m ti O Pll-
o g ?
y
10/
r:\2 /ii?6
WM\Design\Plens\R2241WM_PSH_06.dgn
i

X
X

k
I
1k
1
X
k
X
y
f T ?\\
k
X
AB
Z Z
0
0
20
mZ
mm

803
s?
IrA

s

o ? O II
b r - I
N O
?I -
lz

t 4
$
CA) !a z'e

0+ mill
1

:0501661501

o

F o
n

0 I
N H ti

CA
O
x
n
o g
i
N A
? o
n6z
ErD 6A I-an
v
?Z O
m
l?
y
0
O b
?rn
Big : 1O ?? O ? ??y?e ??g?x?'
111
b HIP
8M
z 4111 n co D
O
v_
v
n
LITTLE GRASSY
00 N
RA,
?
z?Ox
C
??rg
w
C3
O p

1
T
t

o r
?'! ? ?i ? CIl1
x y ? ?
y ?? o
b a ?
b b
0
x
olit
J
V1
0%
?D
O
F."
t t S ?
10/2/ pqpp6
r:\ 2 41WM\Oee:gn\Plens\R2241WM_EC-PSH-EC-2.dgn
f ,
19
o?
N
Q
q
gig;
S$? ? m
?e
A

g
0
E
z
t fI N+
rg
?s
J_gs.
o
q FBI
o?
Z
i
it Ili[
qm"
10
4
'O
n
D
r
C
.D
D
M
O
C
z
v
O
M
m
O
z
s03
V
h h
?>
rAA

gm?
Ell
F. :?- P. P. P. . m

10/2/ 006
r:\ 2 41WM\Oestgn\Plene\R2241WM_EC_PSH-EC-4.dgn 2/26/03
O O > r,O
co -0 x m
Cmnr-
o??o
?z-0v
G) > CD
n
o o
oco
-q 4
z
ao
cnm \
cn
m0 ;0 -q
r-ME
r- CD G)
o0
G)0
0
\, ;?o
\ ip
\ Cf)
M
N/,/;/
Cl)
/1
a Cf)
1 z
x
m ;o
r N
O
` ` Z
DIS FRB OF
R gNCE
HAuL ROAD sq. "
OG
z r
c MATCH??NE SHEET EC-5 9
srgnON 80+64.30

,.(R2241WM\Desxgn\Plens\R2241WM_EC_PSH-EC-5.dgn 2/26/03
MA T'4noN SHEET

t o
Nr_

cn
O
0
m

4

O,S?A-
w .
'?s
?F

Z07 s
4D/
1
CT
'OA.
,y
w

i
1

? !I

N Z
A? I tS
N O j S
z
m 1,
N
y
GEI A An---= ----

O

-0 Z
!.FO^B NO
1 . 0
0000
O i?
"000 X '? + 1 1 1
r X X` f? 1
4000
0-40
` CO) m 1 ` 1
+ 1
4000
.0000 a.
?O ?.
Cf)
???? w
n Cf) ?1 1
1 f.
10
-?- ? I r- 1 1 1
I .:? 11
1 Z .?.
11 fi
71
0 1t
388 m -n F ? 1
3eg
-t
;^
ml .Z
"'M o 10
1- CZ
•
1
J
_. .per r
- r
O _ -
CA o _
- - -- <06 _ r s ro
"
i
r
7
i
t?
•\ t
\ +
\lt
ON ? \tl?
IG)
qN
I/ r l X 4
12
lom
, k
CM -0
-
T., / cr
G E l i . / I ! ? ?'? / Ott- \ ,/....,-. _. •?

oz,
00
ry I: ar 'p
Aij

r 0O
t
Ii @'? ? .I v

'
'I Z
f
? D

r11
?? r f
?o
,
LIMITS OF DISTVRBANCE
ice/ F

as
I

t
:;f

ti •?
\ CO)
l ;o _ m 0
m>
0 . I
(to 0
-
Cl)
Al c

Clo
p 0 i I W` s?
? i = i .0 W
PROURAM
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Cyndi Karoly
Salam Murtada
20061717
Permit Application- Grassy Creek Stream Restoration
October 24, 2006
Attached for your review are 2 restoration plans (1 sent to Winston-Salem Office) for the Grassy
Creek Stream Restoration, Granville County. Please feel free to call me with any questions
regarding this plan (715-1972).
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Attachment: Restoration Plan (2 originals)
%/7
xr?
e g3
OCT 3 2006
E j,"
U
RAND /uNC) 9TO-pM Et .1 C ft HNANCH
AXX
I a
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem 'enhancer it Program, 1652 Mail Service Cuter, Raleign, C 27699-1652 1919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
Office Use Only: Form Version October 2001
20061717
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information 999,E ((ryr§ ?, f
y
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program, Attention: Salam Murtada 0 C 3 1 2006
Mailing Address: 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 ^,t-,q ; tiYr TER QUALITY
Telephone Number: 919-715-1972 Fax Number: 919-715-2219 w7LAN 8 AND STORAAWATER BRMIGH
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Little Grassy Creek
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): -
4. Location
County: Stovall Nearest Town: Granville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The project is located on Gela
Road off HWY 15 north on the town of Oxford.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 78.3652136.2516
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
agricultural, timbered logging, forested area and some residential properties.
7. Property size (acres): 8.3 ac
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Little Grassy Creek
9. River Basin: Roanoke River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the purpose of the proposed work:
The work involves the stabilizing the banks on 469 feet of UTI and 100 feet on Little
Grassy Creek, controlling invasive species for 7 acres, enhancing stream buffer of
approximately 8.3 acres along UTI and little Grassy Creek, preserving approximately
Page 6of12
14,697 feet of stream along UTI and Little Grassy Creek, establishing native streambank
and floodplain vegetation in the permanent conservation easement. improving water
quality through restoring riparian buffer and reducing bank erosion.
List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Track Hoes,
10. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: agricultural, low density residential.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior 'segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
There are no jurisdictional wetland areas within the project site.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application: None
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on ma) (acres) (es/no) (linear feet)

none
Page 7 of 12

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.o.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) .
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0.0 ac
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0 ac
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams: 2,446 linear feet
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please seci )
UT I Enhancement 469 LF UT to Grassy Creek 6.9-11.4 Perennial
Little Grassy Enhancement 100 LF Little Grassy Creek 26.9-38.1 Perennial
Creek
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.coin,
www.mgpquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 569 linear feet. Note that
the project involves approximately 14,697LF of preservation.
Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation (N/A)
Page 8of12
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The existing stream will be restored and enhanced within the assigned construction easement.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control measures will be complied with and reviewed closely by
the DENR Division of Land Resources. The Land Quality Section will also issue the
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Permit.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
Page 9 of 12
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmaide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Please refer to the plan sheets in the Attachment Section of the Restoration Plans
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enl-.state.nc.us/wM/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Page 10 of 12
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 0 3 0
2 0 1.5 0
Total 0
* "Lone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Lone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the
property. Not applicable to this project
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Page 11 of 12
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The contractor will be held responsible for protecting all sewer lines and water lines that exist.
The designer is required to show all utility lines including sewer lines on the design sheet.
The contractor is required to verify the exact location of the sewer lines. In addition, the
contractor is required to call the "Call Before You Dig: toll free number at least 48 hours
before construction activities.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
to/2y,
Ap`pli'cant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

Little Grassy Creek Restoration Project
Mitigation Plan Report
Granville County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
rAd I
stem
ecosy
i'ROGF nr.<'
DRAFT REPORT
?V e
SCO# 050661501 ocT 200
VVETI AtdpS RND git^k4VJ ?.i qis vrl;tt
July 2006
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
NCDENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program
2728 Capital Blvd, Suite 1H 103
Raleigh, NC 27604
Little Grassy Creek Restoration Project
Restoration Plan Report
Granville County, North Carolina
Prepared for NCEEP
-S„-°
rAJ
Ecowstem
pROGRAM
Buck Engineering
A Unit of Michael Baker
8000 Regency Parkway
Suite 200
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
John Hutton
Project Manager
July 2006
Kevin L. Tweedy, PE
Project Engineer
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
Report Prepared by:
Executive Summary
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) proposes to enhance approximately
469 feet of stream along an unnamed tributary to Little Grassy Creek (UT1) and approximately
100 feet of stream along Little Grassy Creek to improve the stream and riparian area function.
NCEEP also proposes to remove and control invasive species for 7 acres along UTl and improve the
vegetated buffer for approximately 8.3 acres along UT1 and Little Grassy Creek. Little Grassy
Creek is located southwest of Stovall, in Granville County, North Carolina and is part of the
Roanoke River Basin. The Little Grassy watershed has a total drainage area of 8.2 square miles at
the downstream end of the project and is located in the eight-digit hydrologic unit code (HUC)
03010102. The proposed project area is approximately five miles downstream of the headwaters of
Little Grassy Creek. The center point of Little Grassy Creek is located at longitude 78°36'52" West
and latitude 36°25'27" North. The center point of UT1 is located at longitude 78°36'35" West and
latitude 36°25' 16" North.
In the project area, Little Grassy Creek is a moderately stable gravel bed stream with bedrock grade
' control (Rosgen classification E4). Unnamed tributary 1 (UT1) drains a small, agricultural/forested
watershed and is classified as a C5 stream type upstream transitioning to an E5 stream type
downstream. The riparian vegetation along Little Grassy Creek consists of mature bottomland
' hardwood trees. The UT1 riparian corridor has a sparse line of hardwood trees, but is primarily
dominated by invasive species.
The design goals of the project include:
¦ Stabilizing the banks on 469 feet of UT1 and 100 feet on Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Controlling invasive species for 7 acres along UTl;
¦ Enhancing stream buffer on approximately 8.3 acres along UT1 and Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Preserving approximately 14,697 feet of stream along UT1 and Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Establishing native streambank and floodplain vegetation in the permanent conservation
easement;
¦ Improving water quality in the Little Grassy Creek watershed by restoring the riparian buffer
and reducing bank erosion.
TABLE ES.1
Restoration Overview
Little Grassy Creek Restoration Plan

Project Existing Condition Design Condition Approach
Feature
Little Grassy Stream preservation and
Creek 12,624 LF 12,624 LF Riparian buffer
preservation/enhancement
UT1 2,643 LF 2,643 LF Stream preservation and
Riparian buffer enhancement
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN

Introduction and Background ......................................................................................................1-0
1.1 Project Site Identification and Location ........................................................................1-0
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ..........................................................................................1-0
2 Background Science and Methods ..............................................................................................24
2.1 Vegetation .........................................................................................................................2-1
2.1.1 Live Staking ..................................................................................................................2-2
2.1.2 Riparian Buffer Re-Vegetation ...................................................................................2-2
2.2 Risk Recognition .............................................................................................................. 2-2
3 Watershed Assessment Results .................................................................................................. 3-1
3.1 Watershed Delineation ....................................................................................................3-1
3.1.1 Little Grassy Creek ..........................................:...........................................................3-1
3.1.2 UT1 to Little Grassy Creek .........................................................................................3-1
3.2 Surface Water Classification ..........................................................................................3-1
3.3 Geology ..............................................................................................................................3-2
3.4 Soils ....................................................................................................................................3-2
3.5 Land Use ........................................................................................................................... 3-2
3.6 Endangered/Threatened Species .................................................................................... 3-2
3.7 Cultural Resources ...........................................................................................................3-6
3.8 Potentially Hazardous Environmental Sites ..................................................................3-7
3.8.1 Potential Constraints and Risks .................................................................................3-7
3.8.2 Property Ownership and Boundary ...........................................................................3-7
3.8.3 Hydrologic Trespass .................................................................................................... 3-7
3.8.4 Site Access .....................................................................................................................3-7
3.8.5 Utilities .......................................................................................................................... 3-7
4 Stream Existing Conditions ......................................................................................................... 4-1
4.1 Reach Identification .........................................................................................................4-1
4.2 Channel Classification and Stability .............................................................................. 4-1
4.3 Vegetation ......................................................................................................................... 4-3
5 Restoration Plan ........................................................................................................................5-1
5.1 Potential for Restoration .................................................................................................5-1
5.2 Little Grassy Creek Design ............................................................................................. 5-1
5.3 UTl Design ....................................................................................................................... 5-1
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
Iv
5.4 Culvert Stream Crossing .................................................................................................5-2
5.5 Riparian Buffer Enhancement ........................................................................................5-3
5.6 Invasive Removal ............................................................................................................. 5-5
' 6 Performance Criteria ................................................................................................................6-1
6.1 Stream Monitoring ........................................................................................................... 6-1
' 6.1.1 Cross-Sections ..............................................................................................................6-1
6.1.2 Photo Reference Sites ..................................................................................................6-1
' 6.2 Vegetation Monitoring .....................................................................................................6-2
6.3 Maintenance Issues .......................................................................................................... 6-2
' 7 References ..................................................................................................................................7-1

C
H

u
' BUCK ENGINEERING V
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN

List of Tables
Table 1.1 Project Restoration Structure and Objectives
Table 3.1 Species Under Federal Protection and Species of Concern in Granville County
Table 4.1 Geomorphic Data for Little Grassy Creek and UT1
Table 5.1 Planting Species for Little Grassy Buffer Restoration
Table 5.2 Invasive species to be controlled if found within conservation easement
List of Figures
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Site Hydrology / Conservation Easement
Figure 3 Watershed Boundaries
Figure 4 Schematic showing dimensions and specifications for Culvert Sizing Alternative 1
Figure 5 Schematic showing dimensions and specifications for Culvert Sizing Alternative 2
List of Appendices
Appendix A Cultural Resources Correspondence
Appendix B EDR Transaction Screen Map Report
Appendix C Site Photographs
BUCK ENGINEERING VI
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
I Introduction and Background
1.1 Project Site Identification and Location
Little Grassy Creek project site is located two miles southwest of the town of Stovall. It is located
on Gela Road off HWY 15 north of the town of Oxford, North Carolina. The site is located in the
Roanoke River Basin. Little Grassy Creek and UT1 are located in the eight-digit hydrologic unit
code (HUC) 03010102 and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) subbasin 03-02-06.
The project area is approximately five miles downstream of the headwaters of Little Grassy Creek.
The project location is shown on Figure 1.
The primary land use within the project area is agriculture, with limited forested areas along the
' perimeter. Riparian zones transition throughout the project area between bottomland forest and
cleared agricultural fields with minimal preserved buffer.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives

C
i

The specific goals for the Little Grassy Creek restoration project are as follows:
¦ Stabilizing the banks on 469 feet of UT1 and 100 feet on Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Controlling invasive species for 7 acres along UT1;
¦ Enhancing stream buffer on approximately 8.3 acres along UT1 and Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Preserving approximately 14,697 feet of stream along UT1 and Little Grassy Creek;
¦ Establishing native streambank and floodplain vegetation in the permanent conservation
easement;
¦ Improving water quality in the Little Grassy Creek watershed by restoring the riparian buffer
and reducing bank erosion.
To accomplish these goals stream bank stabilization structures will be added to the lower section of
UT1 and an in-stream structure (cross vane) will be added downstream of the culverted crossing on
Little Grassy Creek to stabilize the stream. Also, invasive vegetation will be removed and native
vegetation will be re-established.
Table 1.1
Project Restoration Structure and Objectives
Project Number 050661501 Little Grass Creek
Restoration Station Range Restoration Priority Existing Design Comments
Segment/Reach ID Type Approach Length Length
UT1Buffer 10+00 -31+74 Preservation N/A 2,174 LF 2,174 LF
Enhancement
UT1 Stream 31+74 -36+43 Enhancement PIV 469 LF 469 LF Bank
Enhancement Level II Stabilization
Little Grassy Creek 10+00 -125+90

Preservation 126+90- 136+24 Preservation N/A 12,524 LF 12,524 LF
Little Grassy Creek 125+90 -126+90 Enhancement PIV 100 LF 100 LF Cross Vane
Enhancement Level II
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
1-0
11
2 Background Science and Methods
2.1 Lateral Stream Stability
The degree of lateral containment (confinement) and potential lateral erosion are assessed in the field
by measuring the meander width ratio (MWR) and the Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) (Rosgen,
2001a). The MWR is the meander belt width divided by the bankfull channel width. This
measurement provides insight into lateral channel adjustment processes, depending on stream type
and degree of confinement; for example, an MWR of 3.0 often corresponds with a sinuosity of 1.2,
which is the minimum value for a stream to be classified as meandering. If the MWR is less than
3.0, lateral adjustment is probable. BEHI ratings along with near bank shear stress estimates can be
compared to data from monitored sites and used to estimate the annual lateral stream bank erosion
rate.
2.2 Vegetation
The planting of additional and/or more desirable vegetation is an important aspect of the restoration
plan. Vegetation helps stabilize stream banks, creates habitat and serves as a food source for
wildlife, lowers water temperature by stream shading, improves water quality by filtering overland
flows, and improves the aesthetics of the site.
The reforestation component of a restoration project typically includes live dormant staking of the
stream banks, riparian buffer plantings, invasive species removal, and seeding for erosion control.
The stream banks and the riparian area are typically planted with both woody and herbaceous
vegetation to establish a diverse streamside buffer. Vegetating the stream banks is a very desirable
means of erosion control because of the dynamic, adaptive, and self-repairing qualities of vegetation.
Vegetative root systems stabilize channel banks by holding soil together, increasing porosity and
infiltration, and reducing soil saturation through transpiration. During high flows, plants lie flat and
stems and leaves shield and protect the soil surface from erosion. In most settings, vegetation is
more aesthetically appropriate than engineered stabilization structures.
Stream banks are delineated into four zones when considering a planting scheme:
1. Channel bottom - extending up to the low flow stage. Emergent, aquatic plants dominate
bank range, extending from the low flow stage to the bankfull stage
2. Lower bank - frequently flooded, extending from the low flow stage to the bankfull stage. A
mix of herbaceous and woody plants including sedges, grasses, shrubs and trees
3. Upper bank - occasionally flooded, but most often above water. Dominated by shrubs and
small trees.
4. Riparian area - infrequently flooded, terrestrial and naturally forested with canopy-.forming
trees.
The most appropriate source of plant material for any project is the site itself. Desirable plants that
need to be removed in the course of construction should be salvaged and transplanted as part of the
restoration plan. The next best alternative is to obtain permission to collect and transplant native
plants from areas nearby. This ensures that the plants are native and adapted to the locale. Finally,
BUCK ENGINEERING 2-1
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN

plants may need to be purchased. They should be obtained from a nearby reputable nursery that
guarantees that the plants are native and appropriate for the locale and climate of the project site.
2.2.1 Live Staking
' Live staking is a method of revegetation that utilizes live, dormant cuttings from appropriate species
to cheaply, and effectively established vegetation. The installation of live stakes on stream banks
' serves to protected the banks from erosion and at the same time provide habitat, shade and improved
aesthetics. Live staking must take place during the dormant season (November - March). Live
stakes can be gathered locally or purchased from a reputable commercial supplier. Stakes should be
' at least 'h inch and no more than 2 inches in diameter, between 2 and 3 feet in length, and living,
based on the presence of young buds and green bark. Stakes are cut at an angle on the bottom end
and driven into the ground with a rubber mallet. Split and damaged stakes must be replaced.
2.2.2 Riparian Buffer Re-Vegetation
Riparian buffers are naturally occurring ecosystems adjacent to rivers and streams and are associated
' with a number of benefits. Buffers are important in nutrient and pollutant removal in overland flow
and may provide for additional subsurface water quality improvement in the shallow ground water
flow. Buffers also provide habitat and travel corridors for wildlife populations and are an important
' recreational resource, as well. It is also important to note that riparian buffer areas help to moderate
the quantity and timing of runoff from the upland landscape and contribute to the groundwater
recharge process.

n

Buffers are most valuable and effective when comprised of a combination of trees, shrubs, and
herbaceous plants. Although greater widths generally increase the effectiveness of riparian buffers
in improving water quality and habitat, even buffers less than 85 feet wide have been proven to have
a beneficial impact (Budd et al., 1987). An estimated minimum width of 30 feet is required for
creating beneficial forest structure and riparian habitat. In general, agency requirements provide for
a minimum 50-foot buffer on each side of the stream beginning from the top of the stream channel
banks.
In stream and wetland restoration, where buffer width is often limited, the following design
principals apply:
¦ Design for sheet flow into and across the riparian buffer area.
¦ If possible, the width of the riparian buffer area should be relative to the watershed area and the
slope of the terrain (i.e. the velocity of the flow through the buffer).
¦ Forest structure should include understory and canopy species. Canopy species are particularly
important adjacent to waterways to moderate stream temperatures and to create habitat.
¦ Use native plants that are adapted to the site conditions (e.g., climate, soils, and hydrology). In
suburban and urban settings riparian forested buffers do not need to resemble natural ecosystems
to improve water quality and habitat.
2.3 Risk Recognition
It is important to recognize the risks inherent in the assessment, design, and construction of
environmental restoration projects. Restoration projects involve the interpretation of existing
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
2-2

conditions, development of design criteria, application criteria to the restoration design, and, most
importantly, the execution of the construction phase. There are many factors that determine the
success of restoration projects and many of these factors are beyond the influence of the project
engineer. To list each factor is beyond the scope of this report; and would not improve the project
design, as it is impossible to consider and to design for every contingency. However, it is important
to acknowledge that such variables as daily temperatures, the amount and frequency of rainfall
during and following construction, subsurface conditions, and changes in watershed characteristics,
can ultimately determine the success of a project.
Many restoration sites will require some post-construction maintenance, primarily because newly
planted vegetation plays a large role in channel and floodplain stability. Stream restoration projects
are most vulnerable to adjustment and erosion immediately after construction, before vegetation has
had a chance to establish fully. Risk of instability diminishes with each growing season. Streams
and floodplains usually become self-maintaining after the second year of growth. However,
unusually heavy floods often cause erosion, deposition and/or loss of vegetation in even the most
stable channels and forested floodplains.
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
2-3
3 Watershed Assessment Results
3.1 Watershed Delineation
The project site is located in a rural section of Granville County in the Piedmont physiographic
region. The topography is characterized by rolling hills and alluvial valleys with a dendritic stream
pattern. Land use in the surrounding area has remained relatively constant over the last 25 years
with the majority of land being agricultural and forested. Site hydrology is shown in Figure 2
' More detailed information for each project reach is presented in the sections below.
Characterizations were performed by gathering information on topography, soils, land use, and
percent impervious surface. The percent impervious of each watershed was estimated using aerial
' photography and GIS analysis. Figure 3 shows the watershed delineations for both Little Grassy
Creek and UT1 on USGS 7.5 minute topographic mapping.
' 3.1.1 Little Grassy Creek
The area of the Little Grassy Creek watershed is approximately 8.2 square miles. Land use for the
watershed is low in diversity with land cover types including: upland and bottomland forest, shrub
' land, county roads and agricultural land. Based on this information, the impervious land cover was
determined to be approximately 1 percent.
' Elevations within the Little Grassy Creek watershed range from approximately 380 feet to 580 feet
above mean sea level (MSL) with a relative relief of 200 feet.
' 3.1.2 UT1 to Little Grassy Creek
The area of the UT1 to Little Grassy Creek watershed is approximately 0.25 square miles. The land
' use is composed largely of agricultural fields and forested land with one county road crossing.
Overall, the watershed has less than 1 percent impervious land cover.
Elevations within the UT1 watershed range from approximately 390 feet to 490 feet with a relative
relief of 100 feet. Similar to Little Grassy Creek, soils at the project site are mapped primarily as
Chewacla loam (NRCS, 1976), which is described below.
' 3.2 Surface Water Classification

NCDWQ designates surface water classifications for water bodies such as streams, rivers, and lakes,
which define the best uses to be protected within these waters (e.g., swimming, fishing, and drinking
water supply). These classifications carry with them an associated set of water quality standards to
protect those uses. All surface waters in North Carolina must at least meet the standards for Class C
(fishable/swimmable) waters. The other primary classifications provide additional levels of
protection for primary water contact recreation (Class B) and drinking water supplies (WS). Class C
waters are protected for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic life propagation and
survival, agriculture and other uses suitable for Class C. Classifications and their associated
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
3-1

protection rules may also be designed to protect the free flowing nature of a stream or other special
characteristics.
Little Grassy Creek is classified by the NCDWQ as a Class C water (DWQ Index No. 23-2-4). UT1
is not specifically mentioned in the Roanoke Basin Water Quality standards regulation. However,
based on NCDWQ's Tributary Rule, unless specified, a tributary has the same designated uses as the
stream into which it flows. Therefore, UT1 is also considered to be Class C water.
3.3 Geology
Little Grassy Creek is located in an alluvial valley. The valley is composed of fine alluvium (sand
and silt), which has been deposited on the floodplain to a depth of two to three feet. Larger gravels
and cobble are found below the alluvium and in the streambed. The streambed is underlain by
bedrock, with knickpoints present in some reaches.
The geologic setting of the site is the Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont physiographic province.
The Carolina Slate Belt is comprised mainly of. metavolanic rock with interbedded felsic to mafic
tuffs and flowrock.
3.4 Soils
Based on the North Carolina Soil Survey for Granville County (NRCS, 1976), soils at the project site
are mapped primarily as Chewacla loam (Ch). The Chewacla series consists of nearly level,
somewhat poorly drained soils of stream floodplains. These soils formed in recent alluvium and are
frequently flooded for brief periods of time. The surface layer typically extends to a depth of 9
inches and is dark brown. The subsoil is a dark brown or light olive brown color with grayish brown
to yellowish brown mottles. The Chewacla soil series is listed as hydric by the National Resource
Conservation Service (1996). Small, sporadic pockets within the Little Grassy Creek floodplain
would be classified as jurisdictional wetlands; however the majority of the floodplain is reasonably
well drained.
3.5 Land Use
The primary land use within the project area is agriculture, with limited forested areas along the
perimeter. Riparian zones transition throughout the project area between bottomland forest and
cleared agricultural fields with minimal preserved buffer. The overall Little Grassy Creek and UT1
watersheds are mostly rural with land uses that include agriculture, timber logging, forested area and
some residential property.
3.6 Endangered/Threatened Species
Some populations of plants and animals are declining either as a result of natural forces or due to
their difficulty in competing with humans for resources. Plants and animals with a federal
classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed
Threatened (PT) are protected under the provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973. Federally classified species listed for Granville County, and any likely impacts
BUCK ENGINEERING 3-2
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
to these species as a result of the proposed project construction, are discussed in the following
sections.
Species that the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) lists under federal protection for
Granville County as of May 31, 2006 are listed in Table 3.1. The table also includes Federal Species
of Concern that are found in Granville County. A brief description of the characteristics and habitat
requirements of threatened and endangered species follow the table, along with a conclusion
regarding potential project impact on each threatened and endangered species.
TABLE 3.1
Species Under Federal Protection and Species of Concern in Granville County
Little Grassy Creek Restoration Plan

Scientific Name Common Federal
Date Listed State Habitat Present / Biological
Name Status Status Conclusion
Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species
Haliaeetus

leucocephalus Bald Eagle T 3/11/1967 T No Effect
Alasmidonta heterodon Dwarf E 3/14/1990 E No Effect
Wedgemussel
Ptilimnium nodosum Harperella E 9/28/1988 E No Effect
Echinacea laevigata Smooth E 10/8/1992 E-SC No Effect
Coneflower
Federal Species of Concern
Carolina ,
Etheostoma collis Darter -
population.2 Eastern FSC NA SC NA
Piedmont
Population
Ambloplites cavifrons Roanoke FSC NA SR NA
Bass
Orconectes virginiensis Chowanoke FSC NA SC NA
Crayfish
Lasmigona subviridis Green Floater FSC NA E NA
Lampsilis cariosa Yellow FSC NA E NA
Lampmussel
Fusconaia masoni Atlantic
Pigtoe FSC NA E NA
Elliptio lanceolata Yellow Lance FSC NA E NA
Alasmidonta varicosa Brook Floater FSC NA E NA
Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur FSC NA E-SC NA
Carolina
Lotus helleri Birdfoot- FSC NA SR-T NA
Trefoil
Butner
Marshallia sp. 1 Barbara's- FSC NA SR-L NA
Buttons
BUCK ENGINEERING 3-3
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
Torrey's
Pyclranthemum torrei Mountain- FSC NA SR-T NA
Mint
Smooth-
Scleria sp. 1 Seeded Hairy FSC NA SR-L NA
Nutrush
Notes:
E An Endangered species is one whose continued existence as a viable component of the state's flora or fauna
is determined to be in jeopardy.
T Threatened
PE Proposed Endangered
PT Proposed Threatened
PD These species have been proposed for delisting from the current status.
FSC Federal Species of Concern
SC A Special Concern species is one that requires monitoring but may be taken or collected and sold under
regulations adopted under the provisions of Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes (animals) and
the Plant Protection and Conservation Act (plants).
SR A Significantly Rare species is not listed WE," "T," or "SC," but which exists in the state in small numbers
and has been determined to need monitoring.
L The range of the species is limited to North Carolina and adjacent states (endemic or near endemic). These
are species which may have 20-50 populations in North Carolina, but fewer than 50 populations rangewide.
The preponderance of their distribution is in North Carolina and their fate depends largely on conservation
here. Also included are some species with 20-100 populations in North Carolina, if they also have only 50-
100 populations rangewide and declining
NA Information not available
Bald Eagle Threatened-Proposed for Delisting
Family: Accipitridae
Federally Listed: March 11, 1967
Bald eagles are large raptors, 32 to 43 inches long, with a white head, white tail, yellow bill, yellow
eyes, and yellow feet. The lower section of the leg has no feathers. Wingspread is about seven feet.
The characteristic plumage of adults is dark brown to black with young birds completely dark
brown. Juveniles have a dark bill, pale markings on the belly, tail, and under the wings and do not
develop the distinctive white head and tail until five to six years old.
Bald eagles in the Southeast frequently build their nests in the transition zone between forest and
marsh or open water. Nests are cone-shaped, six to eight feet from top to bottom, and six feet or
more in diameter. They are typically constructed of sticks lined with a combination of leaves,
grasses, and Spanish moss. Nests are built in dominant live pines or cypress trees that provide a
good view and clear flight path, usually less than 0.5 miles from open water. Winter roosts are
usually in dominant trees, similar to nesting trees, but may be somewhat farther from water. In
North Carolina, nest building takes place in December and January, with egg laying (clutch of one to
three eggs) in February and hatching in March. Bald eagles are opportunistic feeders consuming a
variety of living prey and carrion. Up to 80 percent of their diet is fish, which is self caught,
scavenged, or robbed from osprey. They may also take various small mammals and birds, especially
those weakened by injury or disease.
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
3-4
Potential habitat for the bald eagle does not exist in the study area. The site does riot provide
suitable nesting areas less than 2 miles from open water. No nests were observed during the field
feasibility surveys of the project area. In addition, a search of the NHP database on May 31, 2006
found no occurrences of the bald eagle within the vicinity of the proposed project; therefore the
proposed project is not expected to have an impact on this species.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION:
Dwarf Wedgemussel
Family: Unionidae
Federally Listed: March 14, 1990
NO EFFECT
The dwarf wedgemussel is a small freshwater mussel with a trapezoidal-shaped shell that is usually
less then 1.7 inches in length and is brown to yellowish brown in color. It is historically known to
exist from New Brunswick, Canada to North Carolina. Documented populations in N.C. have
occurred in Johnston, Wake, Orange, Nash, Wilson, Granville, Person, Vance, Franklin and Warren
Counties.
The dwarf wedgemussel inhabits creeks and rivers close to the banks, under overhangs, and around
submerged logs. It is also known to live on firm substrate of sand, gravel, and muddy sand with a
slow to moderate current, and requires clean water that is well oxygenated and nearly silt free. Hosts
for the dwarf wedgemussel larvae (glochidia) that have been identified include the tessellated darter
(Etheostoma olmstedi), Johnny darter (E. nigrum), and mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi).
While the dwarf wedgemussel is found in Granville County, it is not known to occur in the Roanoke
Basin. Therefore the proposed project is not expected to have an impact on this species.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Smooth Coneflower
Plant Family: Asteraceae
Federally Listed: October 8, 1992

Smooth coneflower grows up to 5 feet tall with smooth stems and few elliptical to lanceolate leaves.
Flowers are normally solitary, raylike, and light pink to purplish in color. Smooth coneflower can be
distinguished from its popular relative Echinacaea purpurea (Purple coneflower) by its leaves,
which are never cordate like those of the purple coneflower.
There are 24 known populations of Smooth coneflower with 6 known in North Carolina.
Historically, the species habitat was prairie-like, often controlled by fire. Now, due to urbanization
and fire suppression, known populations are limited to open woods, cedar barrens, utility right of
ways, and dry limestone bluffs normally with magnesium or calcium rich soils associated with mafic
rock.
The study site does not have favorable habitat for Smooth coneflower since it has been heavily
disturbed by grazing, and its soils are not magnesium or calcium rich. A May 31, 2006 search of the
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
3-5

NHP database indicated no known populations within the immediate project area according to the
NHP website. It is concluded that the project will not impact this endangered species.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Harperella
Family: Apiaceae
Federally Listed: September 28, 1988
This annual herb grows to a height of 6 to 36 inches. The leaves are reduced to hollow, quill-like
structures. The small, white flowers occur in heads, or umbels, not unlike those of Queen Anne's
lace (Daucus carota). Flowers have five regular parts and are bisexual or unisexual, each umbel
containing both perfect and male florets. Seeds are elliptical and laterally compressed. In pond
habitats, flowering begins in May, while riverine populations flower much later, beginning in late
June or July and continuing until frost. Pollination biology of the species has not been studied, but
seed set is apparently profuse in this annual since populations in localized areas can achieve a high
density and number of individuals each year.
This plant is a relatively prolific annual, and large numbers may occur within each population,
especially along rivers. Harperella typically occurs in two habitat types: (1) rocky or gravel shoals
and margins of clear, swift-flowing stream sections; and (2) edges of intermittent pineland ponds in
the coastal plain.
One of two known populations of Harperella occurs within Granville County. However, based on
field surveys, the project area lacks suitable habitat for the species. Therefore, there are no effects
anticipated to this endangered species.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION:
Federal Species of Concern and State Status
NO EFFECT
Federal Species of Concern (FSC) are not legally protected under the Endangered Species Act and
are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or listed
as Threatened or Endangered. Table 3.1 includes FSC species listed for Granville County and their
state classifications. Organisms that are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special
Concern (SC) on the NHP list of Rare Plant and Animal Species are afforded state protection under
the State Endangered Species Act and the North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of
1979. However, the level of protection given to state-listed species does not apply to NCDOT
activities.
3.7 Cultural Resources
During the site evaluation, two earthen and rock-constructed dams, one of which is associated with
an old mill house structure, were found to constrain the creek. The dam/mill structure was assigned
state site number 31GV285 by the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO). Both that site, as well as the other dam (assigned state site number
31GV286 by SHPO), lie outside of the area proposed for stream restoration. Based on consultation
BUCK ENGINEERING 3-6
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
with SHPO, Buck Engineering agreed to provide additional information on the sites. If additional
archaeological resources are found during construction, work will halt in the area of discovery until a
determination of National Register Eligibility can be made. However, unless additional resources
are found, there are no cultural resource constraints to the project as designed.

1

II

3.8 Potentially Hazardous Environmental Sites
An EDR Transaction Screen Map Report was obtained and it identifies and maps real or potential
hazardous environmental sites within the distance required by the American Society of Testing and
Materials (ASTM) Transaction Screen Process (E 1528). A copy of the report with an overview
map is included in Appendix B. The overall environmental risk for this site was determined to be
low. The screening reviewed Superfund (National Priorities List, NPL); hazardous waste treatment,
storage, or disposal facilities; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act Information System (CERCLIS); suspect state hazardous waste, solid waste and
landfill facilities; and leaking underground storage tanks. No hazardous environmental sites were
found in the vicinity of the proposed project area. During field data collection, there was no
evidence of potential hazardous sites in the proposed project vicinity and conversations with
landowners did not reveal any further knowledge of hazardous environmental sites in the area.
3.8.1 Potential Constraints and Risks
Buck Engineering assessed the Little Grassy Creek project site in regards to potential fatal flaws and
site constraints. No constraints or fatal flaws have been identified during project design
development.
3.8.2 Property Ownership and Boundary
The project reaches flow through a 192-acre tract owned by Mrs. Joyce Carr and a 409-acre tract
owned by Mr. Sandy Gable. The primary site use is agriculture, with some forested areas along the
perimeter of the properties. NCDOT has purchased the land immediately adjacent to the stream
within the conservation easement boundaries as shown in Figure 2. The Gable's have an easement
with the state guaranteeing a stream crossing and access to their pasture fields.
3.8.3 Hydrologic Trespass
The topography of the site supports the design without creating the potential for hydrologic trespass.
Little Grassy Creek is mapped as Zone A within the project boundary, meaning that no detailed
hydraulic study has been done. Little Grassy UT1 is not located within a FEMA mapped flood zone
except for the portion within the Little Grassy Creek floodplain. No detailed hydraulic study is
required for this project.
3.8.4 Site Access
' The site can be accessed via Sam Young Road (SR 1427), which passes along the boundary of fields
containing the project reaches, and a dirt road that allows access to the fields, Little Grassy Creek,
and UTL Access will be granted for construction and post-restoration monitoring.
3.8.5 Utilities
No known utilities are located on site.

BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
3-7

4 Stream Existing Conditions
4.1 Reach Identification
For analysis and design purposes, the on-site streams were divided into two reaches. The main
stream through the site is Little Grassy Creek. It flows onto the project site at Gela Road, and
continues to flow from the south to the north out of the project boundary. UT1 flows from the east
and ends at the confluence with Little Grassy Creek. The reach locations are shown in Figure 2.
Little Grassy Creek's 8.2 square mile watershed was determined to be approximately 1 percent
impervious. The drainage area for UT1 is 0.25 square miles and was determined to be less than 1
percent impervious.
4.2 Channel Classification and Stability
Little Grassy Creek
Little Grassy Creek is classified as a moderately stable Rosgen E4 stream type. Pebble counts using
the modified Wolman procedure (Wolman, 1954; Rosgen, 1996) indicate the median particle size in
the riffles is 32.0 mm and the median particle size in the pools is 2 mm. The cumulative D50 particle
size is 8.0 mm. These particle sizes are representative of a gravel bed stream.
Bank height ratios (top of low bank height divided by bankfull height) range from 1.0 to 1.4. A bank
height ratio of 1.0 is ideal because it indicates that the stream has access to the energy dissipating
effects of its floodplain during channel forming flow events. Rosgen (2001) converted bank height
ratios to stability ratings. He rated streams with bank height ratios between 1.3 and 1.5 as "unstable."
Bank height ratios greater than 1.6 are considered to be "highly unstable."
The measured meander width ratio of Little Grassy Creek ranges from 4.2-12.0. This is a very stable
range for an E4 stream type, indicating a low degree of lateral confinement. These values show that
the creek is free to adjust pattern within its valley.
Overall, the project reach has a stable pattern with a sinuosity of 1.26. E stream types generally have
a sinuosity of 1.5 +/- 0.2. In general, the downstream half has a greater diversity of bedform in
terms of riffle and pool sequences. Bedrock knickpoints provide grade control throughout the reach,
but the knickpoints are more prominent in the downstream third of the reach. A bedrock knickpoint
just above the bridge on Gela Road sets the invert grade of the project site on the upstream reach.
There is some diversity of riffles and pools with relatively long runs in the upstream half. The
average slope for this reach is 0.0021 ft/ft.
UTl
UT1 drains a small, agricultural/forested watershed (0.25 mi2), and is classified as a C stream type
upstream transitioning to an E stream type downstream. Although, the upstream section is classified
as a C system, it functions more like a Bc system, dissipating its energy with a series of steps and
pools rather than through meander geometry. Sinuosity is higher in the middle section with energy
dissipation occurring through a regular meandering pattern.
BUCK ENGINEERING 41
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
During the initial site assessment in 2002, this stream was highly degraded due to headcutting and
' bank erosion attributed to unrestricted cattle access and lack of sufficient riparian vegetation. Since
this time, cattle have been removed from the site, allowing the stream to stabilize and riparian
vegetation has been established. The downstream end of UT1 is still experiencing lateral instability.
The lateral instability has resulted in bank erosion and channel degradation.
Invasive species along UT1 have hindered the establishment of a mature buffer. The percent cover
' of invasive species for the understory is approximately 20 percent and in the floor of the buffer it is
estimated to be 85 to 90 percent.

C
Table 4.1
Geomorphic Data for Little Grassy Creek and UT1
Parameter Value Units
UTI Little Grassy
Rosgen Stream Type C6/1-E6 E4/2
Bankfull Width (Wbkf) 6.9-11.4 26.9-38.1 Feet
Bankfull Mean Depth (dbk f) 0.6-1.2 2.7-3.4 Feet
Cross-Sectional Area (Abkf) 6.4-8.2 91.7-95.2 Square feet
Width/Depth Ratio (W/D ratio) 5.8-20.3 7.9-13.2
Bankfull Max Depth (dmbkf) 1.1-1.7 4.0-4.3 Feet
Floodprone Area Width (W fpa) 55.0-69.4 128 - 164 Feet
Bank Height Ratio (BHR) 1.3-1.8 1.0-1.4
Entrenchment Ratio (ER) 4.8-10.1 1.4-4.1
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A
Channel Materials
(Particle Size Index - d50) Silt/clay Gravel
die 0.062 0.062 mm
d35 0.062 2.0 mm
d5o 0.062 8.0 mm
ds4 13.9 64.0 mm
d, 38.5 128.0 mm
Slope (S) 0.0008 0.0116 Feet per foot
Channel Sinuosity (K) 1.07 1.26
Evolution Scenario C -E-G-F-C E-G-F-C-E
Notes:
1. Where multiple cross-sections were surveyed in a single reach and data varied, the data
are presented as a range of values.
2. N/A: Meander Width Ratio not measured because channels have been straightened.
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
42

4.3 Vegetation
Little Grassy Creek
Vegetation along the main channel of Little Grassy Creek is relatively diverse with a well-developed
buffer of trees in most areas throughout the project reach. Some clearing in the vicinity of the
stream has recently occurred. Trees and shrubs include Red maple (Acer rubrum), Tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), River birch (Betula nigra), Shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), Northern red
oak (Quercus rubra.), White oak (Quercus alba), Musclewood (Carpinus carolinia), Sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), Beech (Fagus grandifolia), Spicebush
(Lindera benzoin), Tag alder (Alnus serrulata), Silky dogwood (Cornus amomum), Flowering
dogwood (Cornus florida), Sassafras (Sassafras albidum), Blueberry (Vaccinium sp.) Blackberry
(Rubus spp.), and Multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora). The herbaceous and vine layer along the stream
bank consists of sedges (Carex spp.), Panic grasses (Panicum spp.), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica), Greenbrier (Smilax spp.), Ground-nut (Apios americana), Poison ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia).
UTl
Floodplain vegetation on both banks is dominated by a mixture of relatively sparse canopy of
Slippery Elm (Ulmus rubra), Sycamore, Sweetgum, Red Maple (Acer rubrum), and Black Willow
(Salix nigra) and an understory of Tag alder, Hazelnut (Corylus americana), blackberry multiflora
rose, and Spicebush (Lindera benzoin). The herbaceous and vine layer consists primarily of Fescue
(Festuca spp.), sedges, Rushes (Juncus spp.), Deertongue (Panicum clandestinum) Wingstem
(Verbesina spp.), Sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), Virginia creeper, Japanese Honeysuckle, and
Poison ivy.
BUCK ENGINEERING 43
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
5 Restoration Plan

5.1 Potential for Restoration
There are no known or foreseen constraints at the site, associated with structure and/or infrastructure
encroachments to a successful stream and buffer enhancement within the project site. The project is
located in a rural watershed, with no plans for significant land use changes in the foreseeable future.
The primary goals of this restoration plan include the enhancement of approximately 569 feet of
stream and enhancement of areas of existing riparian buffer vegetation and the reforestation of
cleared floodplain with native species along Little Grassy Creek and UT1 within the conservation
easement to: 1) maintain and increase channel bank stability; 2) reduce sedimentation; 3) filter and
reduce pollutants; and 4) provide increased habitat for aquatic and terrestrial wildlife. Primary
activities within the site are designed to preserve plant community assemblages and to enhance and
restore native floodplain vegetation through site preparation and subsequent plantings.
5.2 Little Grassy Creek Design
Little Grassy Creek meanders through a wide valley with a well established and vegetated floodplain
through the majority of the project length. In several areas, the valley is constricted geologically
which limits the floodprone width.
As part of the conservation easement, NCEEP agreed to build a culverted road crossing on the lower
end of Little Grassy Creek to connect two parcels for the landowner. A cross vane will be installed
downstream of the culvert to facilitate bank stability and centralize flow along approximately 100
feet of channel. The project also consists of upgrading one existing ford stream crossings within the
conservation easement. These crossings will be reinforced with rip rap to maintain their integrity as
crossings for agricultural machinery.
In addition, a combination of native herbaceous and woody vegetation will be established in the
' riparian buffer along Little Grassy Creek and UT1. The entire conservation easement will be planted
where existing vegetation is lacking or of poor quality.

5.3 UT1 Design
The Little Grassy Creek site was assessed for restoration potential during the winter of 2003. At this
time, UT1 was determined to be significantly impaired due to impacts from cattle. Following this
assessment, the property was sold and the current landowner does not have cattle in this area. As a
result, the stream along the upper section of UT1 has stabilized. A defined bed and bank has
reestablished and tag alder and black willow are providing good bank stability. The lower section of
the stream, approximately 469 feet, has some areas of lateral instability. These areas will be
stabilized using minor banks stabilization techniques, primarily the installation of rootwads and live
stakes.
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
5-1

The buffer of UT1 is dominated by invasive species. In order to establish a native buffer these
invasive species must be removed. Section 5.6 outlines which species to remove and suggests
techniques on removing them from the buffer. Once the invasive species have been removed native
species will be planted within the conservation easement. The stream bank stabilization along with
the planting and establishment of a native buffer along UT1 will enhance stream stability and
function.
5.4 Culvert Stream Crossing
A stream crossing is required for a private access road which crosses Little Grassy Creek at the
project site. To size the culvert required for this crossing, a design discharge was determined and
from this, a detailed hydraulic analysis was performed to select the optimal culvert dimensions.
Design Discharge
The culvert crossing under study is for a private access road, used mainly by the landowner as a
transportation path for agricultural machinery and vehicles. This type of crossing should be
passable during normal high flows, but does not need to be passable at extremely high flows. For
this reason, the design discharge selected for the culvert sizing was the channels' bankfull discharge.
A previous stream restoration study performed by the Buck Engineering team in March 2003 for the
same reach of Little Grassy Creek identified the bankfull discharge for this stream reach to be 290
cfs. This discharge was used as input for the hydraulic analysis.
Hydraulic Analysis
A hydraulic model was prepared within the HEC-RAS modeling environment to simulate and size
the required culvert. Topographic data of the channel at the culvert location was used to construct
the hydraulic model.
The culvert was sized such that water surface elevation does not rise more than half a foot above the
culvert crown elevation during bankfull flows. Two culvert dimension alternatives were determined
for the stream crossing:
Alternative I - A single bottomless Con Span Arch, with the following dimensions (see Figure
4):
Span: 14 ft
Rise: 4 ft
Length: 30 ft
This design alternative has several
advantages:
- The culvert is pre-cast,
making installation simpler
and quicker than a cast-in-
place structure. Minimizing
construction time minimizes
impacts to the stream.
Con-Span
Arch E
co _Flow
cn
Oft
14ft
--------------
Con-Span 30 ft
Proposed channel bottom bottomless
Existing channel bottom culvert

.-.. -.
Proposed ` E
^-...
fill
M ~ CU
Keep earthen bottom with 05 Flow
same invert elevation.
BUCK ENGINEERING Figure 4 Schematic showing dimensions and specifications for
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN Culvert Sizing Alternative 1.

1

1

This culvert design preserves the natural earthen channel
- bottom, providing a seamless channel bed transition between the culverted section of the
channel and its upstream and downstream channel reaches. In this way, fish passage
through the structure is not affected.
- The bottomless quality of the culvert avoids piping scour beneath the culvert structure,
minimizing maintenance issues.
- Sediment transport through the structure may be more efficient than with conventional
box culvert design.
Alternative 2 - Two box culverts, with the following dimensions (see Figure 5):
Span: 6 ft
Rise: 5 ft
Length: 30 ft
This design alternative follows
the more conventional culvert
design. These culverts may be
available pre-cast, or may be
cast-in-place.
Depending on method of
construction, this design
alternative may be more
economical than Alternative 1.
However, this design tends to
be less favorable for fish
passage and sediment transport
across the structure.
Two cell box culvert
r
Flow

5ft 5ft tip
ft Eft
r
>
f
30
t
Existing channel bottom V

Proposed •,..,. ?"
_
till
_ _ _::
1 ft
f
Culvert inlet depressed 1
below channel invert
N Flow

Figure 5 Schematic showing dimensions and specifications for
Culvert Sizing Alternative 2.
5.5 Riparian Buffer Enhancement
Based on preliminary analysis and field investigations, riparian buffer enhancement is intended for
areas within the property where existing vegetation has been reduced or thinned due to agricultural
activities and land clearing. Enhancement of floodplain forest and stream-side habitat allows for
development and expansion of characteristic vegetative species across the landscape. Ecotonal
changes between community types contribute to habitat diversity and provide secondary benefits,
such as enhanced feeding and nesting opportunities for mammals, birds, amphibians, and other
wildlife. Planting will be performed between November 11 and March 22 to allow plants to stabilize
during dormant period and set root during the spring season.
On-site observations and community descriptions from Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley 1990) were used to develop the primary plant community
associations that will be promoted during community restoration activities. The site represents
approximately twenty acres for riparian buffer enhancement.
BUCK ENGINEERING 5-3
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN

A bottomland hardwood forest is the targeted community for areas available for riparian buffer
enhancement activities. The vegetation selected for enhancement includes species with high value
for habitat, sediment stabilization, rapid growth rates, and the ability to withstand hydraulic forces
associated with bankfull flow and overbank flood events that occur within Little Grassy Creek.
Certain opportunistic species that may dominate the early successional forests within bottomland
hardwood forests have been excluded from riparian buffer restoration efforts with the anticipation
that natural regeneration will occur from existing local species. Opportunistic species consist
primarily of red maple, box elder (Acer negundo), and sweetgum. These species should also be
considered important components of bottomland forests where species diversity has not been
jeopardized.
Table 5.1 Planting Species for Little Grassy Buffer Restoration
Percent
Scientific Name Common Name Tree Canopy Species
Betula nigra River Birch 15%
Quercus phellos Willow oak 10%
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 10%
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Popular 20%
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 20%
Acer rubrum Red Maple 10%
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 15%
Total 100%
Understory Species
Lindera benzoin Spicebush 20%
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 20%
Corylus Americana American Hazelnut 20%
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 10%
Cercis canadensis Red Bud 15%
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood 15%
Total 100%
Live Stakes
Sambucus nigra Elderberry 20%
Salix sericea Silky Willow 35%
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 35%
Salix nigra Black Willow 10%
Total 100%
Notes: Planting density for enhancement is 436 trees per acre (10' on centers).
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
5-4
5.6 Invasive Removal
1
H

k
Prior land use and clearing has removed the some of the native floodplain vegetative communities
along Little Grassy Creek and UT1 and within the associated floodplain. However, prior to plant
community restoration, remaining invasive vegetation, which exists along the stream banks of UT1,
will be cleared by methods including, but not limited to, bush-hogging, mowing or cutting with a
bush axe, saw, or other device that will not uproot existing vegetation. Care should be taken to
avoid exposure of surficial soils during the clearing of existing vegetation. Continued removal of
invasive species through the monitoring period may require additional control.
Table 5.2 Invasive species to be controlled if found within conservation easement
Scientific Name Common Name Suggested
Ligustrun sinense Privet Cut, paint and spray
Elaeagnus umbellata Autumn Olive Cut, paint and spray
Lonicera japonica Japanese Honeysuckle- Spray
Rosa multiflora Multiflora Rose2
Cut, paint and spray
Pyrus calleryana Callery Pearl Cut, paint and spray
Festuca spp Tall Fescue' Spray
Paulownia tomentosa Princess Tree Cut and paint
Pueraria lobata Kudzu Cut, paint and spray
Microstegium vimineum Japanese Stilt grass' Spray
Notes: 1. Groundcover species found within project boundary.
2. Tree/shrubspecies found within project boundary.
5.7 Preservation
Approximately 14,697 LF of Little Grassy Creek and UT1 will be preserved. The segments of stream
preservation will protect the habitat quality and flooding functions of Little Grassy Creek and IT1. Buffers
along the preservation sections will be protected by a permanent conservation easement and additional trees
will be planted along Little Grassy Creek and UT1 where existing vegetation is sparse in order to improve the
riparian buffer.
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
5-5

6 Performance Criteria
Environmental components monitored in this project will be those that allow an evaluation of
-channel stability and survivability of riparian vegetation. Post-restoration monitoring will be
conducted for five years following the completion of construction to document project success.
A mitigation and as-built report will be produced for the site within 90 days following completion of
construction on the site. The report will include a detailed survey on four established permanent
cross-sections, photographs of cross-section locations, sampling plot locations, and a list of the
species planted and the associated densities. Following the as-built report, monitoring reports will
be produced annually for five years. These reports will be prepared and submitted to NCEEP by
November 30 during each monitoring year. Annual monitoring reports will document the
parameters described below.
6.1 Stream Monitoring
Geomorphic monitoring of restored stream reaches will be conducted for five years to evaluate the
effectiveness of the restoration practices. Monitored stream parameters include stream dimension
(cross-sections) and photographic documentation. The methods used and any related success criteria
are described below for each parameter.
6.1.1 Cross-Sections
Four permanent cross-sections (either surveyed or located using a GPS) will be established with an
effort made to include both riffles and pools. Each cross-section will be marked on both banks with
permanent pins to establish the exact transect used. A common benchmark will be used for cross-
sections and consistently used to facilitate the comparison of year-to-year data. The annual cross-
section survey will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull,
inner berm, edge of water, and thalweg and at two foot intervals between. Calculations will be made
of width/depth ratio, entrenchment ratio, and low bank height ratio. Riffle cross-sections will be
classified using the Rosgen stream classification system.
There should be little or no change in as-built cross-sections from year to year. If changes do take
place they should be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a more unstable
condition (e.g., down-cutting, erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability
(e.g., settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, decrease in width/depth ratio and/or
cross-sectional area).
6.1.2 Photo Reference Sites
Photographs used to evaluate restored sites will be made with a digital camera. There will be one
photo reference site per cross-section showing both banks and the stream channel. The cross vane
and culvert will also be photographed.
Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal photos
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
6-1
should indicate the absences of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
bank over time. A series of photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation. Vegetative succession should include initial herbaceous growth, followed by increasing
' densities of woody vegetation, and then ultimately a mature overstory with herbaceous understory.
6.2 Vegetation Monitoring
' All woody vegetation will be flagged and evaluated for at least five years to determine survival.
Approximately 15 staked survival plots shall be evaluated. Plots will be 33 feet by 33 feet and all
' flagged stems will be counted in those plots. Invasive species survival rates will be monitored in
these plots as well as survival of planted vegetation. Plots should include both live staked and other
planted areas. Success of woody vegetation plantings will be defined as 320 stems per acre after five
years. When woody vegetation does not survive, a determination will be made as to the need for
replacement; in general, if greater than 25 percent die, replacement will be required. The presence of
Non-native species shall be evaluated on a yearly basis and removal may be required by hand cutting
and/or herbicide treatment.
Herbaceous vegetation, primarily native grasses, planted at the site shall have at least 95 percent
coverage of the seeded/planted area. No bare patches shall exceed 10 square feet. Any herbaceous
' vegetation not meeting these criteria shall be replaced. At a minimum, at all times ground cover at
the project site shall be in compliance with the North Carolina Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Ordinance.
6.3 Maintenance Issues
' ¦ Maintenance requirements vary from site to site and are generally driven by the following
conditions:
¦ Projects without established woody floodplain vegetation are more susceptible to erosion from floods
than those with a mature hardwood forest.
' ¦ Projects with sandy non-cohesive soils are more prone to short-term bank erosion than cohesive soils
or soils with high gravel and cobble content.
' ¦ Urban/suburban sites with rapidly changing hydrology are more prone to short-term bank and
floodplain erosion than forested watersheds.
¦ Alluvial valley channels with wide floodplains are less vulnerable than confined channels.
¦ Wet weather during construction can make accurate channel and floodplain excavations difficult.
¦ Extreme and/or frequent flooding can cause floodplain and channel erosion.
¦ Extreme hot, cold, wet, or dry weather during and after construction can limit vegetation growth,
particularly temporary and permanent seed.
¦ The presence and aggressiveness of invasive species can affect the extent to which a native
buffer can be established.
Maintenance issues and recommended remediation measures will be detailed and documented in the
As-Built and Monitoring Reports. Factors which may have caused any maintenance needs,
including any of the conditions listed above, shall be discussed.

6-2
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN

7 References
Andrews, E. D., 1983. Entrainment of gravel from naturally sorted river bed material, Geological
Society of America Bulletin, 94, 1225-1231.
Bunte, K. and S. Abt. 2001. Sampling surface and subsurface particle-size distributions in wadable
gravel- and cobble-bed streams for analyses in sediment transport, hydraulics, and streambed
monitoring. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-74. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 428 p.
Copeland, R.R, D.N. McComas, C.R. Thorne, P.J. Soar, M.M. Jones, and J.B. Fripp. 2001. United
States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE). Hydraulic Design of Stream Restoration
Projects. Washington, DC.
Dunne, T. and L. B. Leopold, 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. New York: W. H. Freeman
and Company.
Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG). 1998. Stream Corridor
Restoration: Principles, Processes and Practices. National Technical Information Service,
Springfield, VA.
Gomez, B. 1991. Bedload transport. Earth-Science Reviews 31, 89-132.
Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.O. Slate, A.G. Jessup, J.R. Everhart,
and R.E. Smith, 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina
Streams. Wildland Hydrology. AWRA Symposium Proceedings. Edited by: D.S. Olsen and
J.P. Potyondy. American Water Resources Association. June 30-July 2, 1999. Bozeman, MT.
Inglis, C.C. 1947. Meanders and their Bearing on River Training. Institution; of Civil Engineers,
Maritime and Waterways Engineering Division, Paper No. 7, 54 pp.
Jessup, A.G. 2002. Personal communication with W.A. Harman.
Knighton, David. 1984. Fluvial Forms and Processes. Rutledge, Chapman, and Hall, Inc. New
York, NY.
Knighton, David. 1998. Fluvial Forms and Processes. Rutledge, Chapman, and Hall, Inc. New
York, NY.
Lane, E. W. 1955. Design of stable channels. Transactions of the American Society of Civil
Engineers. Paper No. 2776. pp. 1234-1279.
Leopold, L. B., M. G. Wolman and J. P. Miller. 1992. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. Dover
Publications, Inc. New York, NY.
BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
7-1

u
Leopold, L.B., 1994. A View of the River. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
McCandless, T. L. 2003. Maryland Stream Survey: Bankfull Discharge and Channel
Characteristics of Streams in the Allegheny Plateau and the Valley and Ridge Hydrologic
' Regions. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Annapolis, MD.
NRCS - soil survey for Granville County
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
' Rosgen, D.L., 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs, Colo.
Rosgen, D.L., 1997. A geomorphological approach to restoration of incised rivers. In: Wang,
' S.S.Y, E.J. Langendoen, and F.D. Shields, Jr. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Conference on
Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. pp. 12-22.
' Rosgen, D.L., 1998. The Reference Reach - a Blueprint for Natural Channel Design. Draft Presented
at ASCE Conference on River Restoration in Denver Colorado - March, 1998. ASCE.
Reston, VA.
Rosgen, D.L. 2001. A stream channel stability assessment methodology. Proceedings of the
Federal Interagency Sediment Conference, Reno, NV, March, 2001.
i
i
W
pt
on,
-Weir and J-Hook Vane Structures... Their Descr
Rosgen, D. L. 2001b. The Cross-Vane,
Design and Application for Stream Stabilization and River Restoration. Published By: ASCE
conference, Reno, NV, August, 2001.
Schiechtl, H.M. and R. Stern. 1994. Watercourse Bioengineering Techniques. Blackwell Sciences.
Cambridge, MA.
Schumm, S.A., 1960. The Shape of Alluvial Channels in Relation to Sediment Type. U.S.
' Geological Survey Professional Paper 352-B. U.S. Geological Survey, Washigton, DC.
Simon, A. 1989. A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface
' Processes and Landforms 14(1):11-26.
Soar and Thorne. 2001. Channel Restoration Design for Meandering Rivers. U.S. Army Corps of

' Engineers, Engineering Research and Development Center. Coastal and Hydraulics
September
2001.
Laboratory
ERDC\CHL CR-01-1
,
,
.
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 2000. Soil Survey of
' Anson County, North Carolina
Wohl, E.E. 2000. Mountain Rivers. Am. Geophys. Union Press, 320 pp.

' BUCK ENGINEERING
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK RESTORATION PLAN
7-2

i
--.,_f G?eeK
G?ass`J
m
U
\0
v
U?
U
'. C9
Project Location

Rd
A
Granville County

r j I? 1
&kE gy-dn
aurdA«n.wew
¦ ?? wn+ar
n ? Z 6 t
r F-210t
PAOno:9:9.1w54B8 tF? n tt yyn?m?i}
.?919.999190 i, [l 7et (l
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Little Grassy Creek
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
Prepared July 6, 2006
1
1
1
1
1
1
• ?? '?., h. i ,•? .` ` <_, , I ..I ::? ?,.- if :u , ,I }
=X
Legend
r R 7 i' ti ~?? Little Grassy Creek ?? •,? , ?` .>
I Q Watershed Boundaries i=' t s r DA = 8.1 Sq. mi,?,? `-,ray
<'?•' ti;,.?L i , a ? ? ?w..? .. •. J. ab c ay - , f ?. M r'? r ,y?.' ti
r ? L, ? I 't/ ' ? ? tYr ' ? - ? R ? +rr P1 ? a I ', S ,
4 - " r a 1, ` ?t l cl.. }'r•,p r. Y -w? .'?j? t, r rl rr.
:iL -t t f 1z5^ ?. - sue. - r , r ii'fa??,?\ r' ? ?,? Y tt Y 1 ?? } +`•r?5- `rr„+ f r?:
:V• ' ? 1 t 1'`?e ? • t n 5 c? ?; - r \?-?l f ; ,? JJ .1?`S,? ?t ., 1.5-•4 '; ; '? Lich' - L~-
- -1 r i'+e. 4 -? C ; y `? 77 •t ; : - I ¦ ?.;-t t . . ,
UTi t;r It I s _ ' r`:1 f ?: ` ?ti' a? r ,d rl l-`
r r
o., EDA = 0.24 sq. mi.
)i+ vy',? ?h r -_ ? it + - ??JC?• g,-•• r 'Jr ? a`'s"- r ? a??t ?? ?JI?i`t `?.R
1 "lr •fY/ J rt-:. I!. r a?-s ?Y?'+ !? ?.a:+?.`?.'?-'- ? 1•• r l >. S ?? ti
1, Al
1- r r t r ¦ ?.J I :ter 1'1 t? .y= ??
,1 ) Cs t r r,J J rli i u ti 1 r ';
E ? ? 1 , I y f'I;' ?.- L•. ,' a .t f .- s, rl ???J Jr.• L ? ?`j ?• I **! ` ??Y•:.
7 -,f I I eJ ? fj 1 r 1 ?•a4sQq - a- I`? r l-+
T'1~'r 1 ? y r rC./yr^^?• 1'1`.'.T; ?,
-G??•f.K 'L•I•.1 _ '..t •. 3E,.'?y„ ? r /. ?- ?l? .,? - 1 ?1. ',
s t t' ,y ? ???'' 1 t;?? r r;• ft?1 ? ra._ rc 1 ti+1 L •cy ?;. _I`.YS
r ?'' t I r r,' I? L rr r 1 '} ?4'? r- ••?r j7 ,"•ti .' I _? t i,..,c.
? )77
k?'.21 ? ? ter. ???1„ ,r? ? .1y ?- !•?y,?yr ?{. •?r-w., :.r.. .Y s.. f1?r? ' S 1 i•, qr.
y , r ..'' ? f? 5, ? 1 t b t? t 4r ? r,?,ti ., r 7 5 l dF ?
A : t yet ? , f y t1 % ?f r t'?? J ?` w s /`?. ?}' .
f"?i\?.
r t 5y.rx ?: Cr , r ,l_ ti?? J F 4 rr / ' `
t Ir 1 X_iy' , ?4 " ??C1?1}? f , r tYa „ . vj% 1• r 'L '.' r r rtf -4r\ r: ? ,+` .??iJ?1 r r ?•,? , I
j 'R?'.,:I-•.
i `Y? `• I yJ•fis"I r r1? s4 S at ! `? , I1.1 f.^' f s (i - r `
?..
%
Al
J -• ?I ,Y b?.:f • 1,/?.,. f:. IY r?,1 ? J r '"l• ,M1 ?, S ; '9+.?.1??
f i {r J.\ S J ,I iY N. ?LMFIt' fy'ri'??, " .. ?? -•r.,!., ?'w".'ywe'??.
r 1 1.{ -?, l cr.'
r ? r _- .I - 'r. Flr I• J-^ i•r\'I?r. r--, ??'rr-ter Z -.?
.,.}2•'t5y4 + ...{...?- yratij, l.r _??,u .? ; tly'?' !jt?,+ •i:.
! ?e Vr x ro f Jy"5,t
r•'' 1 I , .l 6f S? -?!y? ?j" RF} l ,'?+ `Iti !+ Y •I '.
?••-d f? , '.I •1l_ ??'r.l, r•?'?Y Is`_.?. tSl_x?? (l+rrf -- ?'.`r ?,<fe ;J. •?r",??,•:.
w fv I .4_ ? - ? I .r y1 l J v ?? t ff`,1nl.t 1r.-? { ? '-r•?iiS 7 14..?,P. ?r + t' 1 ``ly+ r%, -- !"~
I F ""? 1? - .f' -?4 .. ?i fY' 1 'ft `- /?/ H ?l `. r J )If1M,.• ` +- i
i?: I = fr, » ,, •. '?'?•: ',y ?? <a t 1 E?.. ,? l?+r ?y -,}?,,` •J? r n r??. •?• a ,{ r-,? -?,^ •_
t: 1
' rr It :4` I •`. .? ±!:-• t ?f lr ? '" ?'' , f rj +?'.`?a? ,'1. ,j 's1:y-?,-,?1 > >l.r?'1 ,`'•' ?, -i 1a'?
:, 'Il 1?M!Y--?I:.. '.Ptir,•rr`:.r r.1a. :,? ti•1,,_.w I L
_. _;r..-.•r_,;,..
1 L ??` "-'':_. .^7 QV'Yt'-i$3?^?t.{.?q?T9 \ I.Yr.: _ !?,+?.•'?? w?-. 43.1':
t '•J ? ? ?.lyc .`? , +?:: ,•..? ,, ; 4 M ,T/ / ?l :` t. a•.s'?1-„rid, -t' ?Y
+n ire ^l a,w . 1 tilt'.-: • ? t l ri'JI 11 ??'7 Jy - t t. ?+• I ?
-.
?? {t7bL ?r = f 4° !'' :' ff,r ' RY m 7 f } I 1 f/».rr,f t r {r F f(• .l b , -
i _ ,1' ? •? t 'r ?I1 ?r... + /5 1 ,-?ft -?`I ? +,.t?'??tl }f `..rs?t j? ,? ? ?? `•' ? --
?t '_ r 1 fly` `•-- j,,t IJ?r r -. , I ?,7 • ?' > ,, „ _. irr f.'.}? ?. ` I
e F I ,ar t?Jl /L ?J , , ti l ` r i 11 r J ? ? S +
r i r ?? - ,,.r ?'- r ?.. - , I ? f I I I tic#.y J.]( ,?? ?' ?i •? J +r - ? ? t_I ? t. ;. r rt ?{;
r..? 1 ? d ?: ? !, f?"`- ? I f• I ) Y:-¦?.}, + '? '•_ w i ? I J ! rt - t'-. "'ll
r f I -I '1`'. y' ti y ??lV' ??r9Y - fi _•:`• , ?S cal • ,.r>! .,+*l'11 , II?-• .? I \?ry `-_ :::1"`_-..`- J: - r..r ...J
L? ?, M--•aU, I ??.: 'tis k :: Il 5 1',__ - • ? ?4 ? '.? '^rllt• J II •r ?'~", y `? L. ? „ ? ti ? al +?`4.?{t
r
k l.h r1 ?. ^f
r+? r? lr? k n +. ?1 .lL r ti? 1 c•B$ 3? :",.
1 f - ? I ' tr cr ?: / ._`? t .'? is M;1 I I L , js +,,,,-c? a ?r, y -Y^•s:{•
IIr If i\ 'S [.?•'.^ r J ? r ` al, I ?, 1 1 ? 1 , 1 ? ti •^? , t (1? xv4. ,? _? DSs I ,r
I ? - ? ~ - ?:(? ?.f? r 'j ? >?'? ? ?i.=? r ! r?, ? ?._ - ?5r..-•1-1 ?? ? X?y`?' y I + j• .? 1 ? ., f't t (? . i.
I :rll r? n?v„_ • l f is \ Y ,•?? _ .I'? F -?¦ s' "• )?.,i1 •.y?4 4 1$'. a• a '?•.
?IIE¦,I¦..,1j ?. Figure 3
A:NeReWw N6Mar
•_ C"" C=27 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Watershed Boundaries
PM1mr.: 913 rE15<99
""""4`"'?"'?'$" FCa Ustem Feet Little Grassy Creek
Far'. 9'.9A87.5199 {?
II 2?1 . IIlellt Prepared July 6, 2006
Appendix A
Cultural Resources Correspondence

u

1

Oaker
Renee Gledhill-Earley 5/31/2006
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 276994617
Subject: EEP Stream Mitigation Project in Granville County.
Dear Ms. Gledhill-Earley,
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) requests review and comment on any possible
issues that might emerge with respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with a
potential stream restoration project on the subject site. Figure 1 shows a vicinity map of the
project area. Figure 2 is a USGS site map that shows the buffer area, the area of potential ground
disturbance, and locations of structures on site. Figure 3 shows soils in the project area. A
photolog of site structures is also enclosed.
The Little Grassy Creek site has been identified for the purpose of providing in-kind mitigation
for unavoidable stream channel impacts. Several sections of channel have been identified as
significantly degraded.
Proposed activities at the site include a combination of riparian buffer enhancement and stream
restoration activities. The remnants of two, since-demolished, earthen and rock-constructed
dams, one of which is associated with an old mill house structure, are found along Little Grassy
Creek. However, these structures are not located in the area proposed for stream restoration
activities. The majority of the stream restoration site is in a floodplain that has historically been
disturbed by sedimentation from the adjacent fields to the east of the restoration site (the current
site use is agricultural) and by cattle accessing the streams.
' We ask that you review this site based on the attached information to determine the presence of
any historic properties.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact
us with any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated
with this project.

Sincerely,

y
&
"
,
Ken Gilland
Buck Engineering, A Unit of Michael Baker Corporation
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
' Cary, NC 27511
cc:
' Robin E. Dolin, Project Manager
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Challengel/L .
Gteey-
Gassy ??
t ''{ N, J -
L r ?
l J
GrasSR#14301
?, ovall`
4QJ -f 7-111
I", N
f
Project Location
! ?t , I
.J J
_ 1l r
r`
1 II
Buck E EnI hpinurinp
Bwk eel ng
9000 Ra9mcy Pe,kw
- , suds 200
Cary. N Ce j.2J511
Plwne: 918.609.5199
A
P-919.100.5690
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Little Grassy Creek
Granville County
0 0.5 1
Miles

DSL-NAME
ChA- Chewacla/Wehadkee soils. C to 2 percent slopes_ freq flooded
_nB - Enon loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
:aeB - Georgeville silt loam. 2 to 6 percent slopes
3eC - Georgeville silt loam. 6 to 10 percent slopes
HrB - Herndon silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
'-':C - Hendon silt loam. 6 '.C oe,cent slopes
-._ -atom Tam. 10 to cues
r
r
it
Allik
f . .
r
R s ` a.
s Dam and Mill
Existing Ford Crossing f
* ?4
X11 n X ?.
#x t° _.f
f
? l Dam
< r
Legend
Restoration and Buffer Areas
- - Hydro - Rivers!Streams (100k)
Buck a gi-ring Figure 3
JMry"'m 1?k`. 0 250 500 1,000
- s'u'gSoils Map
• C ,-y N hC Nr 77511 Feet
161 s° Little Grassy Creek

Little Grassy Creek Structures Photolog
}? v tijy
III ,Ly7j *,/ f f yyTyy
?? L!f ~ ? 011
s p??r ; I ?r l ? R rt #''? f
yam,,. ? 4 R °1.!;.1
Area of old dam Area of old dam 2

Mill House 2

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources

11

t

State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Adninistrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Office of Archivc s and History
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Division of Historical Resources
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
July 10, 2006
Ken Gilland
Buck Engineering, A Division of Michael Baker Corporation
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
Re: Little Grassy Creek EEP Stream Mitigation Project, Granville County, ER 06-1507
Dear Mr. Gilland:
Thank you for your letter of May 31, 2006, concerning the above project.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not affect any historic structures.
We have reviewed the proposed work and recommend that it proceed as long as care is exercised to limit
ground disturbance when moving equipment across high ground. Should any archaeological resources be
found during the operation, the work should halt in the area of discovery until we can determine the National
Register eligibility of the remains.
We appreciate your recording of the dam/mill and dam sites. These historic period archaeological sites have
been assigned state site numbers 31GV285** and 31GV286**, respectively. Site forms for both have been
started. They are enclosed with the request that you complete as much of the missing information as possible
(directions to site, historic remains description, e.g.). Please return the updated forms to us for inclusion in
our database. We understand that both sites he outside of the area proposed for stream restoration. Should
that change, please notify us. Both sites would need to be evaluated by an experienced archaeologist to
determine their National Register eligibility.
What more can you tell us about the `ford crossing' noted on Figure 2? Was it made by cattle crossing the
creek? Does it appear to have any physical remains associated with it?
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 (919)7334763/733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 [phone]/715-4801
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blount Street. Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/7154801

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
a4u W W
eter Sandbeck
Enclosures (site forms for 31 GV285** and 31 GV286**)

Appendix B
EDR Transaction Screen Map Report

EDR® Environmental
Data Resources Inc
The EDR Radius Map
with GeoCheck®
Little Grassy Creek
3031 Gela Road
Oxford, NC 27565
Inquiry Number: 1695993.1s
June 15, 2006
The Standard in
Environmental Risk
Management Information
440 Wheelers Farms Road
Milford, Connecticut 06461
Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Internet: www.edrnet.com
FORM-NULL-ERN

I
1

J

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary ----------------------------------------------------------------- ES1
Overview Map---------------------------------------------------------- 2 .
Detail Map------------------------------------------------------------- 3
Map Findings Summary --------------------------------------------------- 4
Map Findings----------------------------------------------------------. 6
Orphan Summary ------------------------------------------------------- 7
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking-------------------------- GRA
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum-----------------------------------------. A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary ------------------------------------------- A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map ------------------------------------------ A-5
Physical Setting Source Map----------------------------------------------- A-14
Physical Setting Source Map Findings---------------------------------------. A-15
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------ A-17
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2006 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC1695993.1s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
3031 GELA ROAD
OXFORD, NC 27565
COORDINATES
i
Latitude (North): 36.424400 - 36° 25'27.8"
Longitude (West): 78.631500 - 78° 37'53.4"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X (Meters): 712340.8
UTM Y (Meters): 4033427.5

Elevation:
'I
407 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map:
Most Recent Revision:
East Map:
Most Recent Revision:
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
36078-D6 SATTERWHITE, NC
1981
36078-D5 STOVALL, NC
1981
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
it
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL------------------------- National Priority List
Proposed NPL-------------- Proposed National Priority List Sites
Delisted NPL--------------- National Priority List Deletions
NPL RECOVERY ------------- Federal Superfund Liens
CERCLIS-------------------- Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
. System
CERC-NFRAP--------------- CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action. Planned
TC1695993.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CORRACTS----------------- Corrective Action Report
RCRA-TSDF----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
RCRA-LQG------------------ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
RCRA-SQG------------------ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
ERNS------------------------ Emergency Response Notification System
HMIRS----------------------- Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
US ENG CONTROLS -------- Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL--------- Sites with Institutional Controls
DOD------------------------- Department of Defense Sites
FUDS________________________ Formerly Used Defense Sites
US BROWNFIELDS---------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
CONSENT ------------------- Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
ROD------------------------- Records Of Decision
UMTRA ---------------------- Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
ODI-------------------------- Open Dump Inventory
TRIS------------------------- Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
TSCA------------------------ Toxic Substances Control Act
FTTS------------------------ FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &
. Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
SSTS------------------------ Section 7 Tracking Systems
ICIS-------------------------. Integrated Compliance Information System
PADS________________________ PCB Activity Database System
MILTS------------------------ Material Licensing Tracking System
MINES----------------------- Mines Master Index File
FINDS_______________________ Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
RAATS---------------------- RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
SHWS----------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
NC HSDS-------------------- Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
IMD-------------------------- Incident Management Database
SWF/LF______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI-------------------------- Old Landfill Inventory
LUST ------------------------ Regional UST Database
LUST TRUST ---------------- State Trust Fund Database
UST-------------------------. Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST-------------------------. AST Database
INST CONTROL ------------- No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
VCP------------------------- Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
DRYCLEANERS_____________ Drycleaning Sites
BROWNFIELDS-------------. Brownfields Projects Inventory
TRIBAL RECORDS
INDIAN RESERV------------- Indian Reservations
INDIAN LUST ---------------- Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
INDIAN UST_________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
Manufactured Gas Plants--- EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC1695993.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped:
Site Name
GRANVILLE COUNTY LANDFILL
MISSING LINK CONVENIENCE
FAA RCLR SITE-OXFORD
FOGLEMAN RESIDENCE (ROY MICHAEL)
FOUR CORNERS AMOCO
WEST GROCERY
STOVALL COUNTRY STORE
PROVIDENCE GROCERY
N.C. FOREST SERVICE
NC STATE DPT OF CORRECTION
TOMMY HUFF SERVICE STATION
MAE L. CASH GROCERY
BEREA MINI MART
BEACON FOOD MART
TAMMY'S QUICK STOP
DANNYS
TED ROBERTS GROCERY
W.E. STOVALL GROCERY
ROADWAY EXPRESS. INC.
PLAINVIEW GROCERY
HENRY CURRIN
BEREA SELF SERV
HICKSBORO GROCERY
DEAN'S SERVICE STATION
PROVIDENCE GROCERY
ADCOCK'S MACHINE & WELDING
OVERTON'S CONER GRO
CLACKS GROCERY
CROSSROADS GROCERY
WEST GROCERY
EEANS GROCERY
TOLER'S GROCERY
WALTER HITE GROCERY (CLOSED)
PHILLIPS GROCERY
FRED BLACKWELL'S
M.B. FLOYD GROCERY
TALLEYS CONVENIENT MART
NEIGHBORHOOD GROCERY
STOVALL SHAW SCHOOL
CHANNEL MASTER/JFD-OXFORD
TCI LOGISTICS
ACE TRANSPORT
TRADE MART #100
BRIDGE TERMINAL TRANSPORT
USDA CROPS RESEARCH LAB (SEE C
OXFORD DUMP
Database(s)
SWF/LF
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, LUST TRUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
IMD
IMD
IMD
IMD
IMD
IMD
OLI
TC1695993.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
i
t
OVERVIEW MAP -1695993.1 s

A Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
? Sites at elevations lower than

A the target property
Manufactured Gas Plants
0 National Priority List Sites
El Landfill Sites
MI. Dept. Defense Sites

! SITE NAME: Little Grassy Creek CLIENT: Buck Engineering
ADDRESS: 3031 Gela Road CONTACT: Staci Ricks
Oxford NC 27565 INQUIRY #: 1695993.1s
LAT/LONG: 36.4244 / 78.6315 DATE: June 15, 2006
' Copyright ? 2006 EDR. Inc. of 2006 Tole Atlas Rel. 07!2005.
0 114 112 1 Niles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
/' Oil & Gas pipelines Disposal Sites
® loo-year flood zone
® 5oo-year flood zone
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
DETAIL MAP -1695993.1 s
j
r
•
tt Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
• Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
A Manufactured Gas Plants
s Sensitive Receptors
ji, National Priority List Sites
Landfill Sites
III
i Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/16 1/6 114 Miles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
. Oil & Gas pipelines Disposal Sites
® 100-year flood zone
® 500-year flood zone
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
SITE NAME: Little Grassy Creek CLIENT: Buck Engineering
ADDRESS: 3031 Gela Road CONTACT: Staci Ricks
Oxford NC 27565 INQUIRY #: 1695993.1s
LAT/LONG: 36.4244 / 78.6315 DATE: June 15, 2006
Copyrlght ? 2006 EDR, Inc. «2006 Tole Atlas Rel. 07/2005.
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Target
Database Property
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL
Proposed NPL
Delisted NPL
NPLRECOVERY
CERCLIS
CERC-NFRAP
CORRACTS
RCRA TSD
RCRA Lg. Quan. Gen.
RCRA Sm. Quan. Gen.
ERNS
HMIRS
US ENG CONTROLS
US INST CONTROL
DOD
FUDS
US BROWNFIELDS
CONSENT
ROD
UMTRA
ODI
TRIS
TSCA
FTTS
SSTS
ICIS
PADS
MILTS
MINES
FINDS
RAATS
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
State Haz. Waste
NC HSDS
IMD
State Landfill
OLI
LUST
LUST TRUST
UST
AST
INST CONTROL
VCP
DRYCLEANERS
BROWNFIELDS
TRIBAL RECORDS
INDIAN RESERV
Search
Distance Total
(Miles) < 1/8 118-1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
TC1695993.1s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Target Distance
Database Property (Miles) < 118 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
Manufactured Gas Plants 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
Total
Plotted
0
0
0
TC 1695993.1 s Page 5
' Map ID
Direction
Distance
Distance (ft.)
Elevation Site
NO SITES FOUND

t

MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
TC1695993.1s Page 6
h9
a
m
p
p
F
to
F
F
LL
F F F F F p LL a o) F F F - p p F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F O7 N p F F F y p
co co W 0) W 0 0) 0) (1) (1) 0 (j) 0) C0 W 0) CO 0 CO U) CO
:) 7 D D 0 dJ J » > O » » » » > 7 » » » » > J J 7 7 J
to to In In In to In 1n U) In to In W) In to to In In In LL] In to In If) In In In to to In In In to In In In to to to In LO U) to
t0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O t0 t0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
CL ?2 I-?nn111-to.to.Nr-I,rlnI,n r-ntf) nnLO LO U) I,NnnnNnPP-I,nLc) I-nP-n1-nn?nt`.
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
n
}
D
v)
O
N
m
v
to
U
d
E
2
'D
U)
p
O
J
o v Q ID
S ? ?
0 7 x
F .-
W
p p
x U 0: x U
m 0
F
Q
F LL O ao O
In to O LL In to p to
N
O W O O
X •- •- O M W Z
n n ao ao m W > F
N ? rn N N M 2 O Q OQ
F-
O U
x
0p0 O ¢¢
>- tn¢¢
X QOto W
to
°D It
O
U,
O
In IT m ??•- O ??mOm
Z t
o O
O OOO
o
m c?m mmm?00-? Qm
n D 04 M In r
e O 0 0 a x a I
m
x
= }}
}
y a LI to co x t0 n n n n n n t- h 0 O¢ ( Up C Zp
Oi Oi
O O
M i J
P
? j? t
x x r' O O? ? j
o O
O F O O O X W O (9 °o ? co co
0 0 0 =
j?? j? j j j j
a?
F O 0 0 0 F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °' ?? = x
U o
0
0: 0: 0 ' 0' 0 ' N t o M M S F S w x *,t w w m x 0: x x x 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: a = S x 2 2 Z rn
a
Q U

O O 0 w U W
Z
w
f) < LL LL O F m
0 EL
XQ) Oz w
W0() ag W
LL O 0}?O ?OZ W x
W Wz
)
Waa W W C
?
F
UU>U ? F >0:0 LL
ZQ
X
Fa
?LL O: .
>'
Q
DUOCoW WFUW x O }0>-M W 2F W W
> 0 w 0 Z W
Q-1 0z0 (W/1
o
0X
?
Z
O
m
O W O, OQ: W O 2 O a
}w
o O: w
-
F O U W O w x S Z O} W w W J co) ¢ O W O} W
NOj(nZ wFZOd U)p yF?Q WC70'?OD:U?V7?QUUOCFO= ZZO:oOSUa.
0 D: W
U D: O
O
W
2
'
W W Q J J s2 J LL 0: p
O:FxU? W J OZmU) }
O
Z CO Z () O
i p W
w U
W> )-
S
s co O?o_
1. 0¢wUmOU W Y O o:?C
9 tn?mg OLU
O F J 0: ¢ Z O D U Z 0 0 In
Z
W J J W U' p p LL
j U
¢ Z Z O: N U O U W U O to
W W
zz
?
- p
W
Q
0 111 a
°<
F-
U
°
°
U
?
In00F
°F
2n 0LL o ¢
F
at
i
LL
LL In z
3:W
CL<O00 L
D
M M? M n Ip M M N COp) M O M LL W M tW V COO t0 w m M M m t? N M O7 m w eaj h mw o N O i_ M N O
COD M ch O m in tOO n M t0 CID M W W M O a n a tCpO M O O O N to O O O O M O h IO M M N
p M f'O M M Mt0O O M M Vnc0 M M M a
a M M M M M VM M O w O
m o V M c'7 M M co
a 0 7 O Q V O 7 t tp t tpp V V V V 'tf V V V V V V V 'V n n v M O O
O O O O p O O_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O .- 0 0 0 .-- ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ? ? 0 0 0 ?
W > > > > > y N fA fA > > > fq N M to 7 ? 7 7 7 7 7 » » 7 ? 7 7 ? 7 » tq lA lA 7 » V1 to
Z,
a
U p p p p p p p p p O p p 0 0 0 0 p p p p p p O p p O p p p p p p O p p O p O p G p p
O
S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 O O 8 8 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 8 6 8 8 8 0
N
m
CL
CL
N
M
0)
to
In
0)
w
U
F
1
1
1
i
1
`? D D
N
LC
D J J 7
C. I to 'i LO
N N N N

N
d
Q
m
co
}
I
D
a
0
0
?_. M
O
U co
LL
C) 0
o r Z
3 .
U = }
o
LLI to
H ?
w
J
}
0
y W o
U
U
U Q
W
U Z ai
m J Q J
m o'o0o
M U) a m
C n C
n?'I
cic
w tqN=
U
o o
LL LL 0
U U m
co
m
m
m
a
ri
rn
O)
rn
?o

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2006 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2006 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006 Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2006
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/31/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006
Number of Days to Update: 17
EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/31/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 04/19/2006 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2006 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006 Last EDR Contact: 05/0512006
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/31/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL RECOVERY: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
Date of Government Version: 10/1511991 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2006
Number of Days to Update: 56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/21/2006
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC1695993.1s Page GR-1

11

I
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED) DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities,
private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities
List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2006
Number of Days to Update: 23
CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status
indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined
no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates
this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time.
This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that,
based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 02/0112006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2006
Number of Days to Update: 23
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 03/15/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2006
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03121/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRAInfo replaces
the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS).
The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of
hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small
quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous
waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per
month. Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg
of acutely hazardous waste per month. Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from
the generator off-site to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store,
or dispose of the waste.

Date of Government Version: 03/09/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/2712006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 33
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.

t

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/12/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/21/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2006
Number of Days to Update: 40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/2412006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC1695993.1s Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 46
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07117/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 03121/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 03/21/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 1213112004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 177
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/21/2006
Number of Days to Update: 33
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/03/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC1695993.1s Page GR-3
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED] DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields
properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA's Targeted Brownfields
Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalities--especially those without EPA
Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots-minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with
brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments
at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts
under EPA's Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement
Recipients-States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become Brownfields Cleanup Revolving
Loan Fund (BCRLF) cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the
U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF
cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified
brownfields-related cleanup activities.
' Date of Government Version: 04/26/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 33

F'11
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 12/1412004 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2005 Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2006
Number of Days to Update: 69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07124/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 04/13/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 32
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
' shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2005 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11128/2005 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/30/2006 Last EDR Contact: 03/20/2006
Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/1912006
'
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI:
Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
L11
C
TC1695993.1s Page GR-4
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/3112003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07113/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2005
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2002
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 46
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2006
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the I
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 03/29/2006 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006 Last EDR Contact: 03/20/2006
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04126/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05130/2006
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source:. EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/20/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 02/13/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2006
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC1695993.1s Page GR-5
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 12/27/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2006
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MILTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04112/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/03/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 02/09/2006 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2006
Number of Days to Update: 62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
' FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
' Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2006 Source: EPA
' Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2006 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/03/2006
Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
' the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2006
Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2006
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
n
TC1695993.1s Page GR-6
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/3112003
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 48
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/17/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2006
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 04/11/2006 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/12/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2006
Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/1995 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/1997 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/1997 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2006
Number of Days to Update: 53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/28/2006
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incide nts
Date of Government Version: 04/0112006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04127/2006
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/24/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 0512412006 Last EDR Contact: 04126/2006
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/24/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2006
Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/24/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC1695993.1s Page GR-7
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING,
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 03/03/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2006 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2006
Number of Days to Update: 31 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006
Number of Days to Update: 15
claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
' Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 01/03/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2006 Telephone: [phone]
' Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2006 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2006
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09104/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
' AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04112/2006
Number of Days to Update: 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
' INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Date of Government Version: 04/11/2006 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/12/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05124/2006
Number of Days to Update: 42 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2006
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
' Date of Government Version: 04/11/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/12/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2006
Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2006
' Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
' knowledge of and entered into this database.

E
TC1695993.1s Page GR-8
GOVERNMEMTiRECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 04/04/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2006
Number of Days to Update: 40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2005 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/08/2006 Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2006
Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/31/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TRIBAL RECORDS
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2005
Number of Days to Update: 177
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/07/2006
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2006
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/21/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Date of Government Version: 01101/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2006
Number of Days to Update: 29
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/21/2006
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Manufactured Gas Plants: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC1695993.1s Page GR-9

7

r
F
F

L

C
GOVERNMENT. RECORDS SEARCHED. /BATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2006
Number of Days to Update: 49
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2006
Number of Days to Update: 8
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/17/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/20/2006
Number of Days to Update: 50
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/06/2006
Number of Days to Update: 33
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2006
Number of Days to Update: 15
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2006
Number of Days to Update: 46
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/28/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/1912006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/17/2006
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2006
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC1695993.1s Page GR-10
i
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs
from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily
gas pipelines.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: PennWell Corporation
Telephone: [phone]
This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided
on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While.the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
TC1695993.1s Page GR-11
F

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2006 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

J

d

0

11

C
TC1695993.1s Page GR-12
i
GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK
3031 GELA ROAD
OXFORD, NC 27565
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 36.42440 - 36° 25'27.8"
Longitude (West): 78.6315 - 78° 37'53.4"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X (Meters): 712340.8
UTM Y (Meters): 4033427.5
Elevation: 407 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Most Recent Revision:
East Map:
Most Recent Revision:
36078-D6 SATTERWHITE, NC
1981
36078-D5 STOVALL, NC
1981
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.

TC1695993.1s Page A-1
i

GEOCHECK® -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General West
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
E
0
N
W
A
w
North

0
41
W
it
a
I South
TIP
t & m a
1D w
- ? ? N N a
? A w
------------------------
West I East
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles
Target Property Elevation: 407 ft.
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC1695993.1s Page A-2
GEOCHECK® -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Target Property County
GRANVILLE, NC
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property:
Additional Panels in search area:
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
SATTERWHITE
FEMA Flood
Electronic Data
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
37077000750
3707700025C
3707700050C
37077CO1000
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC1695993.1s Page A-3
GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
' GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
' using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
' at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Paleozoic Category: Volcanic Rocks
System: Cambrian
Series: Cambrian volcanic rocks
Code: Cv (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
' Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
I
I
TC1695993.1s Page A-4
l
SSURGO SOIL MAP -1695993.1s
1
3
5 3
1 4
4
1
3
4
* Target Property
N SSURGO Soil
N Water
U I/l6 1/8 1/4 Milts
SITE NAME: Little Grassy Creek CLIENT: Buck Engineering
ADDRESS: 3031 Gela Road CONTACT: Staci Ricks
Oxford NC 27565 INQUIRY#: 1695993.1s
LAT/LONG: 36.4244 / 78.6315 DATE: June 15, 2006
Copyright O 2006 EDR, Inc. cb 2006 Tole Atlas Rel. 07/2005.
i
GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
Soil Map ID: 1
Soil Component Name: GEORGEVILLE
Soil Surface Texture: silt loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil has not been ranked with a hydric criteria.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 5 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 7.30
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), silt.
Soils.
1 0 inches 10 inches gravelly - silt Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 5.50
loam Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
2 5 inches 35 inches clay Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit 50% or
200), Clayey more), Elastic
Soils. silt.
TC1695993.1s Page A-6
GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
2 10 inches 42 inches gravelly - Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.60 Max: 5.50
sandy clay loam Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.20 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
3 35 inches 65 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3 42 inches 68 inches gravelly - Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 5.50
sandy loam Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 2.00 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 2
Soil Component Name: CHEWACLA
Soil Surface Texture: loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly. Soils commonly have a layer with low hydraulic
conductivity, wet state high in profile, etc. Depth to water table is
1 to 3 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential- Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 0 inches
TC1695993.1s PageA-7

GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches gravelly - silt Granular FINE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 6.00
loam materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
pct. or less Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty, or 50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
1 0 inches 6 inches loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
2 7 inches 27 inches gravelly - silt Granular FINE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 6.00
loam materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
pct. or less Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty, or 50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
2 6 inches 19 inches sandy clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200). Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3 27 inches 72 inches very gravelly - Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 20.00 Max: 7.80
loamy coarse materials (35 SOILIS, Gravels, Min: 6.00 Min: 5.10
sand pct. or less Clean Gravels,
passing No. Well-graded
200), Stone gravel.
Fragments,
Gravel and
Sand.
3 19 inches 65 inches variable Not reported Not reported Max: 0.00 Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00 Min: 0.00
Soil Map ID: 3
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
Hydrologic Group:
Soil Drainage Class:
GEORGEVILLE
silt loam
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
TC1695993.1s Page A-8
GEOCHECKF - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Soil has not been ranked with a hydric criteria.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 8 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 7.30
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), silt.
Soils.
1 0 inches 10 inches gravelly - silt Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 5.50
loam Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
2 8 inches 62 inches clay Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit 50% or
200), Clayey more), Elastic
Soils. silt.
2 10 inches 42 inches gravelly - Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.60 Max: 5.50
sandy clay loam Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.20 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay.
Soils. FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
3 62 inches 72 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3 42 inches 68 inches gravelly - Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 5.50
sandy loam Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 2.00 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC 1695993.1 s Page A-9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 4
Soil Component Name: HERNDON
Soil Surface Texture: silt loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil has not been ranked with a hydric criteria.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 5 inches gravelly - silt Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
loam Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
1 0 inches 8 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
2 5 inches 9 inches gravelly - loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2 8 inches 40 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 3.60
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
TC1695993.1s PageA-10
GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
3 9 inches 40 inches very gravelly - Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
loam materials (35 SOILS, Gravels, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
pct. or less Gravels with
passing No. fines, Clayey
200), Silty, or Gravel
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3 40 inches 65 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 3.60
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit 50% or
200), Silty more), Elastic
Soils. silt.
4 40 inches 85 inches stratified Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 20.00 Max: 8.40
materials (35 SOILIS, Gravels, Min: 20.00 Min: 6.60
pct. or less Clean Gravels,
passing No. Well-graded
200), Stone gravel.
Fragments,
Gravel and
Sand.
Soil Map ID: 5
Soil Component Name: LIGNUM
Soil Surface Texture: silt loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained. Soils have a layer of low hydraulic
conductivity, wet state high in the profile. Depth to water table is 3
to 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil has not been ranked with a hydric criteria.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 40 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > Winches
TC1695993.1s PageA-11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
GEOCHECKO - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeabili Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 14 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
1 0 inches 9 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 7.30
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), silt.
Soils.
2 14 inches 39 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.00 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit 50% or
200), Clayey more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
2 9 inches 30 inches very channery - Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.20 Max: 7.30
silt loam Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.06 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), silt.
Soils.
3 39 inches 46 inches sandy clay loam Granular FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.60 Max: 5.50
materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.10 Min: 4.50
pct. or less Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty, or 50%), Lean Clay
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3 30 inches 42 inches channery - Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 0.20 Max: 7.30
silty clay loam Materials (more SOILS, Gravels, Min: 0.06 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Gravels with
passing No. fines, Silty
200), Silty Gravel
Soils.
4 46 inches 62 inches
i weathered
i Not reported Not reported Max: 0.00 Max: 0.00
I bedrock Min: 0.00 Min: 0.00
Soil Map ID: 6
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
Hydrologic Group:
Soil Drainage Class:
HERNDON
silt loam
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
TC1695993.1s Page A-12
GEOCHECK® -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Soil has not been ranked with a hydric criteria.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 5 inches gravelly - silt Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
loam Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
1 0 inches 10 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Silty 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
2 5 inches 9 inches gravelly - loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2 10 inches 55 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 3.60
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit less than
200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3 9 inches 40 inches very gravelly - Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 7.30
loam materials (35 SOILS, Gravels, Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10
pct. or less Gravels with
passing No. fines, Clayey
200), Silty, or Gravel
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3 55 inches 65 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 3.60
than 35 pct. Clays (liquid
passing No. limit 50% or
200), Silty more), Elastic
Soils. silt.
4 40 inches 85 inches stratified Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 20.00 Max: 8.40
materials (35 SOILIS, Gravels, Min: 20.00 Min: 6.60
pct. or less Clean Gravels,
passing No. Well-graded
200), Stone gravel.
Fragments,
Gravel and
Sand.
TC1695993.1s PageA-13

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database 1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
1 US-GS2234110 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
TC1695993.1s Page A-14
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP -1695993.1s
400
440 ( D2
S
D
Q
Q
a
O
i3
D Q
00
4
H?
e
O
County Boundary
N Major Roads
N Contour Lines
0 Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
®
i
? Water Wells
I i?
l © Public Water Supply Wells
Cluster of Multiple Icons
0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles
Groundwater Flow Direction Wildlife Areas
c l Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas
c v ` Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species
SITE NAME: Little Grassy Creek CLIENT: Buck Engineering
ADDRESS: 3031 Gela Road CONTACT: Staci Ricks
Oxford NC 27565 INQUIRY #: 1695993.1s
LAT/LONG: 36.4244 / 78.6315 DATE: June 15, 2006
Copyrlpht ? 2006 EDR, Inc. @ 2006 Tele Atlas Rel. 0712005.
GEOCHECKS- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
1
SSW FED USGS USGS2234110
1/2 -1 Mile
Higher
Agency cd: USGS Site no: 362457078381601
Site name: GV-034
Latitude: 362457
Longitude: 0783816 Dec lat: 36.41597635
Dec Ion: -78.63750236 Coor meth: M
Coor accr: S Latlong datum: NAD27
Dec latlong datum: NAD83 District: 37
State: 37 County: 077
Country: US Land net: Not Reported
Location map: Not Reported Map scale: Not Reported
Altitude: Not Reported Altitude method: Not Reported
Altitude accuracy: Not Reported Altitude datum: Not Reported
Hydrologic: Not Reported
Topographic: Hillside (slope)
Site type: Ground-water other than Spring Date construction: Not Reported
Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST
Local standard time flag: Y
Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type
Aquifer Type: Not Reported
Aquifer: FELSIC METAVOLCANIC ROCK
Well depth: 35.0 Hole depth: Not Reported
Source of depth data: reporting agency (generally USGTroject number: 453709900
Real time data flag: 0 Daily flow data begin date: 0000-00-00
Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data count: 0
Peak flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data end date: 0000-00-00
Peak flow data count: 0 Water quality data begin date: 0000-00-00
Water quality data end date:0000-00-00 Water quality data count: 0
Ground water data begin date: 1968-00-00 Ground water data end date: 1968-00-00
Ground water data count: 1
Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1
Feet below Feet to
Date Surface Sealevel
1968 20

TC1695993.1s Page A-15

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: INC Radon
Radon Test Results
i ill
icl County Result Type Total Sites Avg pCi/L Range pCi/L
GRANVILLE Statistical 8 0.55 -0.10-2.10
GRANVILLE Non-Statistical 25 1.20 0.00-10.70
Federal EPA Radon Zone for GRANVILLE County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.

?. i Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.

Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 27565
Number of sites tested: 5
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1 st Floor 0.620 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
TC1695993.1s Page A-16
i

7

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE. RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS -11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
' Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
' natural resource planning and management.

TC1695993.1s Page A-17
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water .
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or hight quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
NC Game Lands: Wildlife Resources Commission Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 -1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC1695993.1s Page A-18
i
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2006 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC1695993.1s Page A-19
I' LITTLE GRASSY CREEK PHOTO LOG
Mb,
r 6N`
`r
Aw,
' Bedrock outcrop in Little Grassy Creek
?v
t
S _M
i
Existing fence along easement
li
Aa

s+
Boulder outcropping and forested floodplain
Floodplain forest
LITTLE GRASSY CREEK PHOTO LOG
UTl eroding meander bend

- • ? . Kx .t is
UTl prior to cattle exclusion
,1

PROJECT: 05016615 01
o
Ooo;xxxg mm
&? G
O
I ;o 'CO ICU
in in 0 co 0 co
59

y Oz
z Omzm z c n
N
Z
se 0
1
000 M*T25 ?? ?np =
O
;

Loco
opmo Zo oZq
O
OO

? Z
ZZZ Z0P fm/lZNiA
- ca
>2 Z

b

m 0
000 CO
00o mp navo
zzz? CN00 DOZ?

V 1
xO
000m Z Z Dr

CO)
n
Z = ?ovm m vCt)
Im
Z
!y o O

Ti F ;o CO COOO)i
S
c
. '
c'?-e z tai? Z d
yt
Y

a
+ CO)
.
Y Z ? A 1?
?C
z O N
w
0-4
0

0

00Z
a x
0 Vj
v v
m
Z M 0 y
48 C3
Z?~Z A s9? 29

Z
Z
n
A

p. V ?
V V
SW
a
>p

?1

O
$
O
9

b
?9
M s
y
C5
a
i
z

l
?? ?0??
was ? ? O

7D A O'
A l
a c
a
O

? .
x y .y
< J
? cow o ?" rr ?

Q o ??

g\Rif?f M\Design\Plans\R2241WM_$Y$_01A.OGN
32
CID
r r0
S
SL
O O O O O O RrO? $ N CS p O O
+ ssp m m ROj o <
c N "' $ g g 9 ° o z$
w < Z O ai o m
3
0 x x o "n In m A z m z ?s7®
m IS o z P
z N
w
Z <
o m
c
I ( ® y?
0 x -J -L
m m ll o o
rri
m m m $ yyb
O m m O m N < m
It
Z
m z m p m Z Z m T
or a
n o 3 ? a ci
-mi a r c m < O i m z to
-rr ° `n ? 9 ° m A °x z G m o C)
o ?? Z Z o
5
y n n 8 -=1 Z
C43 o O
3 O c a z
p m as m m p y CO) x
Z ? Z G) G)
Q '
Ao "'
c
a m s X-2 i
IL
n > a
'7
R
M CD ?
M m c
m
v
C4) a
any
m m l
r 3 ?^
O z m a
c O `" ? mm Q.
?B 43 -8 ® ?R" c?
c y ?-
m Z m Om- zca mz?
Zr m Ap
w m ca
??8 x-81
0 m w$9?
2 p°= -n DUI
a zK o X ED
t U)
co H ccf°0 C
ov > MO° C?
3 z =9pz ono z
m 3
G) 0
3 8 i °z OO °d ?C?? nr
z m9 Z? Z
c_'m y
z ?y N
p R108 N
O z to 1-- 3mg me
QL CD
b w2 moo o?
m my om
CRAM m -4 0 z 0 ?LA
z
0
n O
2
? ? 8 pro ?
to
log
MIR
I> y
9 ?
Q ? SP n
o
m fP

? ?

? ? ?

CM

OI ? o

? ?

? ?

m ? ?

Oi

1'

4fi
m

?
?

$
m

?

d

L?.
z
G>
m ? 'JF ?• n ?
a ? ? ? <
x ?
?

4
?

r r N ? r ?? .a N Al IJ ? r ...? IJ fJ r r r

$

p?
?

y

T

Q ?pp
T

a? p??p

e? p??p

?p ?
a?

at

p ??p
T

?
Or m m m T o
a?
3a •? ? ? ? o m ? D ?
Q

W ?
m
q
Q O

3
m ?

a
c
-?

? ? ?
t8 ? g Q. m 3 ? a

4

3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?T N O l
a m
a
o o ,, ? ,_. o o o o ro a ? ?n
tlV1 O V i in tll N N N tl ? l ( V 71 fN71 fN71 en m

D D D D D D D D D D D D oil
C n n C ? ? C ? + + ? ? ? ?

I I

??aN? ?Im N p'T C on g 3 Sli ?'? a s ?a'°A° O N?
O
c :r
00 o h m v o o' s g Q e c 3 m C o°
c? p > >
ID 0
1, c 3
• °
'r
C
a p c ° Q 8$
c'ag O
? i r? I ri
m I
1 o
V1 i 1 I I U ?-+? I i g .o ~ O O 9 F t x ®go
iO I I I I I
?j
S O = N N m m m m A 7 O N N
Gaoa?'?'
a '8 H
0 8. ; s a 3 a- O 'S "S 01
m ?C 70 ° O ?` N N C m -i 10A O Zp 7 z0 z0 m m G a O O ?O
R. 0 v m
& '00
9. 2.
c c: a° a T o 0 4 s a 1 a a o- 3? c:*
a= =g,,A m a CO. C. 'rt
- 3 3
. . . . : ? . : . : . . . . : • :
III ? I 1 1 1 I I I ? ??
b= ???? I II ??
LJ r r ?? ???II
o? v v o 0 o m a ?' ?
1=0 C-L
g a 0 0 0 o o m o
s s s o o m
s -a
u m A p 0 0 7
s s m o
O •3 o 0 o m c o m
°-
o s c °o- m o
a' rt
° m IC
c
N y C
C C m
in in
I I I I I 1
a a a a j ® ?+ D© m¢ T
! I ? I I
o
?a.a.°??•gm?
m A p o a
_ o m
O O O .r ? O
O m
° o c o s
v ? 0 0
? ? a m
m
m o
N m •
m
I
I
I
I
1
I
I

? CC
c
O
N N
7
°
'Z 2
m m
?
,
O

' g H

o O O ao

a
s O y

T O '

??

'
C1
$

>-

p
m
a p o 65 >
02.
3' ? m
?
a. m
?
.
m

"'
O
? 8
a =
; ! ?
;
0
o p • I
?
I
?
q
.c
m
O
I
G
C
o v ?
m u m
C '
a:
I
I
? I a ® O
$ i
I
I
NNmv„ - XA-: T T
0 o s a S g z '.
aOmm°
(A o- c
°
s s o °m m o
CCO A °o
G o S C = g
$' a c n
v o ?
O
O C.
m
• a
n too
h
O
O
Z
rn
Z
O
Z 1--4?
O?4
r ®®
?z
®®
I??I A
rn ? 0-4
rn
I
' o

1 1 1

I

a 3 a g
o• v
0
?+ _ s
•*I g °
g -1 A a
A °
O 3 c• m c :
? O o
n '
A ° H
>1'
P O in
m
..rte
? I
I I
I 1
a z ? z®®© Q
a
I
V 1 j
11
i--? 1 1
L! O
o c ° °.
a o °
a ? ? o
c c o
° o m
C
I
I
I
'

S I b ® 0
? I
I
R:\R/22416WM\Design\Plens\R2241WM_DTL_02.DGN
i

Y N f TOP OF BANK I BANKFt LL

TOE OF BANK

lit
i
rn •f 1T
\

pp
Z O
p N
- -
TOE OF BANK

Fe z
TOPOFBANKISOMM
m
n
O
;F
z
m $
G 1
r-
In
gy
;I-oFl m';
2>tf??gp?"Rpnix
zQM
m Ire z
?m ?4

c ?m
p pm n
O
CA
D

F z
m

Q
>
T
z
mmmm
p
\/ ? Z
w
a
. rT

?... ..
5 v m ./? ?
5 /, O
Z
p
+FFiX?(K2?
Qy b ?? \ m
Ills HIM

02
!e m
o CO)

A
?

if nif
s : 1
?y
5v

10 6
r:(R2241WM\Deaign\Plans\R2241WM_DTL_02a.DGN
.10
gT
o
K
pp,
?? `' III s III z -?
CA cd)
m mz F cn
n == F O
Q z
n cn z
CO)
..::..:::..:..:..!' O
I. .
0221 618;
q!-3
11111HP11
> q g51111 1 BAS Kg >_2$ $? A
t $ I'm V
C2 ? y?
o
g o ?
m log! yy
Pat
FaIg 41
J"i _0
>IX
roe €
?x
m
3 • • I•I
• • •I I •
joo e+ $m • • • n : ? ?A
4D 01 10
l5nc
°p I i p rj O
o_ Z s • • •I I• z
.. .. -n G1 . . I•I 5 O
on -o .1 I . T Z
' m m • • ?•?
_ Q 7AC A Af?N 1e N :` • • •I I • F? ?I
? A AA A N 1 tp ?i{ ?l
Jill
G) G)
ggill
I I cZi
o- lox N
03
? e ?e
Ri\RY241WM\Design\Plens\R2241WM_PSH_03_temp•dgn
•o >
o, 00
Of OI A W N C m OD V W C" A W N M
o???m w ?g i-°. > w m m 5 A-13 ?m m ?3 00 ( D m Q-I -I ?? ? mm
$ m m a m m < WV a m 3 m m °+D m m g m m== m m= 0 ° 0 0
m
m m o
V m m m $ c o Q ap = a m= 2. m
0 0 ID CA CA =r -
O o = m vac m(0 040 m a2ao o w = m o o g-0 0 0g 0 ?=
?.°?4°$.°+a a?na'?m0Qmiv 0 m o a?mm.°?=xa0 or°
Xm0a00 mm?m?Nmm m =mDoomm 00 -<c6?mg?mmm?002 m?
.. -,? " c 0 a$ Cf-1 a0- 0 mo 0 o ° o= m m o o Sow oo? ==o? $ °
00 0, w? -1w 00 ate? W m ?? - 0 ?$ -4 $ to w *000000
? to
.° x$ w w a.$ we 0 ow
3 0 mm m ?a0 0 O m = m??mm m mom? w pmmam mmy ° fA 0 2 m
w .+?- m< w m c m
y c O m 0m m m m a? v 01 ..oa0 z m m 0 m = m m = cr = 0
_ ca 5. < m m= ?..o A m- a-- Q w m
%800 ZVOW00wo D•o=>o 0 PV cr ;;wo= mm? ma m 0
gm mv? wv a Imo a aw o? 0o c < ac ++ ;LL m mvv s 0. =v O
m m: m m m° c m m cm 0 am o•m Sm °_' m ,=? ? m ° m w=v v R m 'a y
a=? m0 CL c06!; 05 ? c3: OCL 50 0 Q Q a 3$' ?m ?
r.m m ae? 940 o, 7.m = m m w53 m m m =m
m v m'Q o?= x ammm = m=7omm ?w" m= m
m ?v m 00 ao w? 3740 o CA X.? c W x. -0 °o C? Z ?° ° ?y Qo
7 Jn
O 'O O m Q ? (? _ ?S m = "a. N = 1 co cA ? 0 AL' m ?S
m O a m = m Wm a C Co d 0 m' M IA m `"g m w m= " m m 0 Gi O 7? y m L? y
m m= = -x3 mm -0 0 -(0 a co o. m .. 03 3 0 m 0 m 2 Z
0 0*
=0-3W ao ° a=a Cmm3 v,m co to 0(D n0
$ 3 40 -•w c Q o 0
mm$•cr ?m m W-0 --w wm ::mm3 am t?=m3o °?' m ?? c= m
?f 3 a m am m? ?= c 3 c° m o ::3 m m o w m o c v> 7 Q A
= m m a w$ v w m 3• = O C °' m m= m °' to 0 m CO -0 06 m m - m o a-0 o amp c (AA 0 CL o° 5 m °m 3 ?3= co m m o a m? 3 z z
m + m m'a 7 .. m! 0 0= m a OA O w m m N = m 3 40 •O m n
mom m m v aL.mro m m =r m to M m 0= m a w 3 a?t• 0 0 fA 0 m o M
m.<o 0 goo m=3 mm =<m" zm a?o'm`<<A mCo r ?- 3=
m -0 v `" m o m ,m=.0 c0 m? mg ?0 m- CL =r m om- 3 a s 0 Q.
30 mS o mcwof ommm m o°mo mr o=0197 mm o mm m?
:L R 06 0 CL
10 9S -% 040 0
e? m ,m m -a (a = o• m c n °-0-+ ni °-= m m o o
?' m 3 3 CO) °m a3•m am f 6 o 060
0 c w o -I- a m? m
r-- 0 ?
° -< 3 0-3 m
' m = O
o *0 o m o °??'? c o 3g ?140.°? n 3 ?vm 06 !A = ay
oa $ m m v m aim Ce m 'o om = o.o me 'o m c 0
m 0?? m O a? 53 w m O ::m = t°n mDa=i = ??
o sm ?w - : A= m xm o s o o o =r r m
- 0 d 3 p C m 00 O y 3 3 7 40 l07 $ °?6 .°c. ' m j
c o m m co n 06 ? 0 -ft o= ?m a m$ m o
m m 0 3
m -
0 3 to
m
ML CA AT 0 - CA
C
co m? -- m m o m
co ?c 0000 o a f ma ? W.o -1 3 m
D
O
A
C
D
z
=i
mCO)
J
M ;mm???n0000000Q arD??.rncDiuri?v> >
1f
g pip ?
C -I UI ? fJ '0 0 3 r 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7K ? - x 2 0 -t m C (? m
3

3 G) m r N n ?+ g w 'a -o M 'a a 0 m -o ? -I
? y
• M -1 ?
<
? OD
o m
c?i m
m L
m S
2 0
? ?
$ Ol
r+ O
c C1
S W
S 01
S y
? V O
= X
$ m
? c
m m
3
m O
m C
3 m
3 0
a
o m m o 3 ? o v v v ? ? 0 o m D m
x = m Q O m m ca a
m

? o ? m ? :o v a v m ? ? ro tn o S o, tn a

a
m m m
= o
$ 3 ? c' e a s e to
?
m

$
?
e
c ° ° ao > O m g' C, v

m o m
c ?
°A c
> =
>

? a

m
=
D
O W ? ? O C" O
0 O
0 N U 0 0
0
0
0
0 r
N N
O O 0 0 N r r .a » 7
O O O O 07 m ?
1
O ca
m s z z z z z z z (a

y
?
=
M
M

= M
i
g?
R $ni 8K
H lC4a m ?A
O
i i
s
{
-f/
z
fA
f t s
s
IHII-
I

x
0
y
0
?z
0

o ?

r

n
O
H y
0
?
y

95 to
m
I?
Z?
8
VN?
N ?
mo
=o
i
X

lk?
-4
50
v'
2
rI
O
?j
A
Am
??rg
w
?s
y
y ? o
y syF
000.
z °
m
S?
s?

y
?>
r
?
iH

's 'sssssssss'ss111ti o
n CD D
CJ®®
%.10 vv YC 1
1

Z
? T

r
O
col
?c n
y ?? o
b a It
b
c
0
lk
J
z
0
a'
a'
r?;
.-I
V,
O
Fr

LITTLE GRASSY
s !
r03(R2241WM\Design\Plens\R2241WM_EC_PSH-EC-2.dgn
i {.
10
10/ / 006
r:\ 2 41WM\Design\Plens\R2241WM_EC-PSH-EC-3.dgn /
A
g
0
o
w°"a rp
ARE4 N
q
n
-o
g C
'O
D
O
C
Z
g v
? o
-o
? m
? g
pAO v ew a m u? Z -
°yJ mlm>18 ??IM ±y Y N?
?m $ m I g? 89 ?
gy m' _;m£
MJFJF?;j 129F 9
F <m ?i? ? ? a }i?6
m gig;s
s? sill M m -
12p12 i fgo E m ?i LmQi
a r.
0 21gi.
?_ m [.? r
rc.
g$l
z
? 8?

10/A/ 0?6
r:\ 2 4 WM\Deetgn\Plene\R2241WM_EC_PSH_EC-4.dgn 2/2S/03
Z°?r,-4
cn-0M=m
rp c
0 -4
CA (A 0
0 j. z?>
?
O Cl)
0Otn0
oco
4P
O?*
zw
(j) m
?n
0O M
r CO O \?
O ?\`:.
G)
VX
r'0
c
r\? N
\x o.
CO) M VX,
o
F
X
Cl)
Cl) Oil c)
i
? !s
z
1 0
ox
\ /? D W
` m;o
z
r Cl)
o
0
0
/ - VA w
LIMITS OF
?.... - ??? DISTURBANCE
A
L ROAD
x06"
CO) O s? ?
S
z
Pi
Fling
11
i y
MATCHUW HEET ECG g
° STATION 80+64.30

r:0/\2 /,4 0?6
WM\Design\Plens\R2241WM_EC_PSH_EC-5.dgn
MArCHUNJE SHEET EC-4
STATION 80+64.30

t o
a
t C:?
UN
_ ?O

m

SrG??
O?
F

1
?
ot,
l
Zo _
4,/1
O? y
r

r .?

r

?

i !I
N
O C4 `
= •
?
o

ti
O

I W
$
S ~

m ;P.

rA ?a
GE( A Qn --_ ----
i
i

Cif °o s . 1
-0 w
?,m \ ± z
-, o Y o
v
ANN)
t
-A m
1000
?- ti o . f ???,.b 11
-.00
-c
.mot
0
C'n
1 G
I I? ,? 1 1 m ??,
s. P o 1 ,
W?
Qn,
CIO
o
.n PF: 1
?i -0 rl, /
w
32,7 01 c z
cyl
.
-,Z- 614
r L 4'
J
8
.......... ,
/
11 11511
- i.
x _
C) i
-- - -- - --
. „?. spa y
tow.

\fi2?94'Ya/M\Dasign\P lane\R2241 WM _EC-PSH_EC- 7.dgn
Fak /h ?. ?ti,
? n tS e /
rl y?
\ r +?
s? +?
\\ ' +?
?i
/ ` ?'•"?.... ..._ ? ..... - ? .art
• ski r.?? ,
\\le '
Vol
C cJJ" ?„
'4, r
m?Z \ /
niq
_,
Fri
r r it ? .? ?,/ ? ;?--- ?,;, , ?. ? \? • ? ? ?.
rJ r / ?.? rte, '` 1?? ?L
-01
;? goo J ?,?\ \ ?C'.
a m
41" ?.
114
4 9 1 1?
41 •
0 0
'oa
'ca ?t 1, + G7
hb ° ?D
/ 0 0
w°
c
vz
mo,
Cl)
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
-s
c•
to
,? 1 I
C'x;t
l y
cn
I ?-
CD >
m m I
m m
i .
10,
O
spa
01
h ?? i !? 1z