WALKERTOWN_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20110408

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

'STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
Municipalities NOT MS4
PERMIT NO.
NCS0000_�%
DOC TYPE
❑ COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL
MOST RECENT
DATE
❑ �� Q��
YYYYM M D D

TOWN OF WALKERTOWN
Kenneth Davis, Mawr „nr a t.. COUNCIL:
� ew/ Snmv. 'r6wn Mana �cr `'� 17'rlvnc Haver.tilllNf»' Pru %i l��
k y.
L nu Akhhwh... Town Clerk !'C991, Leight
Run(A, Mendenhall
Sarah Welch
April, 08 2011
Mike Randall
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Randall,
Please find enclosed a copy of the Town of Walkertown Comprehensive Stormwater
Management Program which details the existing steps the Town of Walkertown is
currently taking to address the issue of stormwater runoff as well as steps we intend to
implement in the near future, If you have any questions or require any further
information please feel free to contact me at any time.
Sincerely,
Scott Snow
Manager
Town of Walkertown
5177 Main Street
11. O. Box 39 Walkcnown. NC 27051
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]

'000!� nF lkj�
Town of Walkertown
Comprehensive
Stormwater Management
Program

TABLE OF CONTENTS
STORM SEWER SYSTEM INFORMATION
1.1 Population Served 3
1.2 Growth Rate 3
1.3 Jurisdictional and MS4 Service Areas 3
1.4 MS4 Conveyance System 3
1.5 Land Use Composition Estirnates 3
2. EXISTING WATER QUALITY PROGRAMS
2.1 Local Programs 3
2.2 Salcm Lake Watershed 3
3. ORGANIZATION INFORMATION
3.1 Contact List 4
3.2 Signing Official 4
4. REI-IANCI ON O" HE-R GOVERNMENT ENTITY
4.1
Name of Entity 5
4.2
Element to Be Implemented 5
4.3
Contact Information 5
4.4
Legal Agreements 5
5. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
5.1 Public ]education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts 6
5.2 Public Involvement and Participation 8
5.3 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination 8
5.4 Construction Sitc Stormwater Runoll'Control 11
5.5 Post -Construction Stormwater Management in New Development I I
and Redevelopment
5.6 Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations 13
APPENDIX A: Ordinance Declaring All Forsyth County Ordinances Applicable to the Town of
Walkertown
1)

1. Storm Sewer System Information
1.1 Po elation Served: According tothe 2010 US Census, the '['own of Walkertown's (Town's)
pope la ion is 4,608.
1.2 Growth Rate: The 10-year growth rate for the Town based upon the 2010 US Census is 13%.
1.3 Jurisdictional and MS4 Service Areas: `1'he 'I'own's jurisdictional and MS4 service area is
5.86 square miles. The Town's jurisdictional and MS4 service area has a population density
of 813 people per square mile.
1 A MS4 Conveyance S stern: Currently, the "Down contracts with a local company to perform
Public Works duties. We maintain 14.56 miles of i'owcll Bill streets that are not curb &
guttered. We do necessary maintenance to ditch lines in order to keep water flowing. During
leaf season, leaves are cleared front roadside ditches on a regular basis. Catch basins, pipes
and other man-made structures are cleaned as needed by pressure washing and vacuuming.
The "Town participates in the NCDOT Adopt-A-l-lighway program.
1.5 Land Use Composition Estimates: The estimated percentage of land use activities for the
,l'own's Jurisdictional area is as follows:
Residential: 30 %
Conunercial/Industrial: 3.4 %
Agricultural/Open Space: 65 %
Institutional: 1.6%
2. Existing Water Quality Programs
2.1 Local Programs: a� When the Town incorporated in 1984, an ordinance was passed by the
Tovai Council whereby all Forsyth County ordinances would be applicable to the Town as
they are applicable to Forsyth County. A copy of the ordinance is attached as Appendix A.
2.2 Salem Lake Watershed: The Town has adopted and enforces strict watershed protection
regulations within the Salem Lake Watershed. These regulations attempt to maintain or
restore the natural storntwater filtration and purification process by:
1) restricting the maximum number of housing units per acre;
2) limiting the amount of land covered by pavement and structures;
3) maintaining natural vegetative buffers along streams; and
4) requiring storinwater runoff controls that trap sediment and other pollutants before they
enter streams.

3. Organization Information
3.1 Contact List:
Scott Snow —
"Town of Walkertown
Town Manager
[phone]
[phone] FAX
Scott snow a triad.rr.com
Gary Roberts Jr., A1CP, Project Planner
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Planning Department
100 I ast First Street
Winston-Salem. NC 27101
[phone]
[phone]
Jeff Koph, Erosion Control Supervisor
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Inspections Division
100 E. First Street, Suite 328
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
[phone]
[phone] FAX
3.2 Signing Official: Mayor Kenneth Davis is the TowWs signing official because the Office of'
Mayor currently signs all ordinances and resolutions passed by the Town Council as well as
some Town contracts and/or agreements.
4

4. Reliance on Other Government Entity to Satisfy One or More Program Obligations
4.1 Name of Entity: Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Inspections Division
4.2 Elcment to be Implemented. The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Inspections Division will
issue permits, conduct inspections and en#'orce policies and rules as needed. The Forsyth
County Environmental Affairs Department will respond to illicit discharge complaints.
4.3 Contact Information for Responsible Parties:
Jeff Koph, Erosion Control Supervisor
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County hispections Division
104 E. First Street, Suite 328
Winston-Salem. NC 27101
[phone]
[phone] FAX
4.4 Lcgal Aareements: When the '['own incorporated in 1984, an ordinance was passed by the
']'own Council whereby all Forsyth County ordinances would be applicable to the Town as
they are applicable to Forsyth County. A copy of the ordinance is attached as Appendix A.
W

5, Stormwater Management Program Plan
5.1 Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts
5.1.1 BM Summary Table: Refer to page 7 for the Town's Public Education and
Outreach on Stormwater Impacts BMP Table.
5.1.2 Target Audience: The target audiences for the Town's Public Education and
Outreach on Stormwater Impacts are households, schoolchildren, businesses and
industries, and town employees. The Town recognizes an ongoing educational effort
is necessary to build public support for the changes required in the stormwater
program. Schoolchildren are eager to learn and share their knowledge with other
Family members; furtltermore, the'lTown realizes that in order to Have the community
respond favorably to stormwater our employees must set an example.
5.1.3 Target Pollutant Sources: `{'rash, disposal of household chemicals and used oil,
deicing products and lawn care products are pollutant sources that will be addressed
within the community. 'rhe elimination of trash would prevent drain clogging.
Household chemicals, used oil, deicing products, and lawn care products could be
sources of pol lut ion to our stormwater.
5.1.4 Outreach Program: Printed material will be distributed at various Town functions.
The Town's website will also be a means of outreach. Presentations will be given to
schoolchildren, homeowner associations and civic groups.
5.1.5 Evaluation: Annually, the implementation progress of an education plan, the number
of schoolchildren, Town employees; businesses and industries reached as well as
what subject was covered and the number of publications distributed will be reported.
G

6.1.1. BMP's and Measurable Goals for Public Education and Outreach
BMP
Measurable Goals
YR
YR
YR
YR
YR
Responsible Position/Party
1
2
3
4
5
1
Education Plan
Prepare an education plan in the first year of the
X
X
X
X
X
Town Manager
program. The plan will include BMPs, a schedule,
targeted audiences and the measurable goals. A
summary of the plan and the implementation progress
will be documented in an annual report.
2
School Programs
Develop and implement an education program for
X
X
X
X
X
Town Manager
school children. Basic messages regarding clean water
and how they can help will be focused upon. Annually,
we will track the number of children reached and the
subject covered.
3
Brochures, Posters
Educational material will be developed and distributed
X
X
X
X
X
Town Manager
at Town functions. The materials will inform
homeowners and businesses how they can reduce
pollution picked up by stormwater. The number of
publications distributed will be tracked.
4
In-house Communication Tools
Education material will be provided to Town employees
X
X
X
X
X
Town Manager
four times a year using existing distribution methods.
The importance of carrying out their duties without
im actin clean water will be focused upon.
5
Business Education & Outreach
Develop a program to educate businesses and
X
X
X
X
X
Town Manager
industries by use of printed materials and the Town's
website. Annually, we will report on the number of
businesses and industries reached. Workplace issues
that will reduce pollutant loading will be the focus.

5.2 Public Involvement and Participation:
The 'Down will meet the requirements for public involvement and participation by means of
a public hearing to be held at a time to be determined by the Town Council. Public
involvement will be solicited annually on an as yet to be determined basis.
5.3 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
5.3.1 BMP Summary Table: Refer to page 9 for the 'Town's Illicit Discharge Detection
and Elimination BMP Table.
5.3.2 Storm Sewer System Man: The'Town will utilize existing paper maps showing
streams to mark outfall locations. A visual dry weather inspection of'Town streams
will be done initially by walking the streams and noting illicit discharges. These
discharges will be noted on a paper map and marked utilizing a Global Positioning
System (GPS) indicator. Annual reviews of the map and streams will be conducted.
The map will be kept at Town Hall for public inspection.
5.3.3 Re 7ulatq Mechanism: Model ordinances from other municipalities will be
reviewed and efforts will be coordinated with Forsyth County in developing an illicit
discharge ordinance during the first year of the program. Public hearings may be
held during the development process. Once a draft ordinance has been prepared, it
will be presented to the Town Council for their review and approval by the end of
year one.
5.3.4 Enforcement: The illicit discharge ordinance that will be developed will address
enforcement actions.
5.3.5 Detection and Elimination: Dry weather visual inspections will be done to find illicit
connections. II' illicit connections are found, they will be traced upstream in an
attempt to determine the source. 'rhe illicit discharge ordinance to be developed will
include right-of=entry, addressing of spills and elimination of illicit discharge or
connection. The Town will review the program's success in eliminating any
discharges that may be detected. All procedures will be evaluated to determine if any
changes are needed.
5.3.6 Non-StormwaterDischarges: The Town will outlaw all non-stormwater discharges
except those considered incidental.
5.3.7 Incidental Non-Stormwater Discharges: The "Town will allow the following
incidental non-stormwater discharges: water line flushing, landscape irrigation,
diverted stream flows, riding ground waters, uncontaminated ground water
infiltration, uncontaminated pumped ground water, discharges from potable water
sources, foundation drains, air conditioning condensation, irrigation water, springs,
water from crawl space pumps, footing drains, lawn watering, individual residential
car washing, flows from riparian habitats and wetlands, dechlorinated swimming
pool discharges, street wash water, and other non-stormwater discharges that have a
valid NPDES discharge permit.
5.3.8 Outreach: Employees will be informed of the hazards of illicit discharge through
training. The public will be reached via flyers, Town website and other handouts to
be distributed at Town functions.

5.3.9 Evaluation: The 'Town wi II inspect 25% of the stormwater system annual ly and will
record results for the annual report. Report the number of illicit discharges and
connections detected. Report the percentage of connections that have been corrected
and/or eliminated.
MJ

6.2.1. BMP's and Measurable Goals for Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
BMP
Measurable Goals
YR
YR
YR
YR
YR
Responsible Position/Party
1
z
3
4
5
1
Development of Ordinance
Develop an ordinance to include illicit detection, right of
X
Town Manager
entry, prohibition of certain discharges, enforcement
actions and penalties for dumping, spills, and willful
illicit connections in the first year with adoption by the
Town Council by the end of the year. The date of
adoption will be noted and a copy of the ordinance in
the annual report file. Illicit discharges/connections
detected and eliminated will be reported annually.
z
Development of System Map
Develop a system map showing outfalls and the
X
X
X
X
Town Manager
receiving body of water. One -quarter of the community
will be completed each year and system changes
updated within already mapped areas as they occur.
Progress will be reported annually.
3
Septic System Management
Coordinate with Forsyth County Health Department on
X
Town Manager
failing septic systems and locating problem areas in the
system map. A fact sheet on septic system
management will be provided at Town Hall and on the
Town's website. The date of distribution and the
number of copies placed at various locations will be
noted. Complete by end of year four.
El

5.4 Construction Site Stonnwatcr Runoff Control
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Inspections Division will be responsible for the construction
site stormwater runoff control. When the Town incorporated in 1984, an ordinance was
passed by the Town's Board of Councilmen whereby all Forsyth County ordinances would
be applicable to the Town as they are applicable to Forsyth County. A copy of the ordinance
is attached as Appendix A.
5.5 Post Construction Stormwater Mana�,,cment in New Development and Redcycloptimit
5.5.1 Structural BMPs:
The Town has adopted the standards of the State BM Design Manual for retention
of the difference in pre- and post -construction runoff volume from the one-year, 24-
hour storm and removal ol' 85% of total suspended solids.
5.5.2 Stonnwater Manamcment Options:
The existing land usage ordinance will be amended to include a post -construction
stormwater runoff management program for new development and redevelopment
projects that disturb greater than, or equal to, one acre. This includes projects of less
than one acre that are a part of a larger common plan of development or sale that
discharges into the MS4. All such projects shall be required to .apply for locally
issued construction permit coverage under one of the following stormwater
management options:
5.5.2.1 Low Density Projects:
Projects shall be permitted as low density if the project meets the following:
(I) No more than 2 dwelling units per acre or 24 percent built -upon area (BUA)
for all residential and non-residential development;
(11) Stormwater runoff from the development shall be transported from the
development by vegetated conveyances to the maximum extent practicable:
(111) All BUA shall be at a minimum of 30 feet landward of all perennial and
intermittent surface waters. For the purpose of this Rule, a surface water shall
be present if the feature is. approximately shown on either file most recent
version of the soil survey map prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation
Service of the United States Department of Agriculture or the most recent
version of the 1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic maps
prepared by the United States Geologic Survey (USGS). An exception to this
requirement.may be allowed when surface waters are not present in accordance
with the provisions of 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (3)(a); and
(IV) The permit shall require recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants to
ensure that development activities maintain the development consistent with
the approved project plans.

5.5.2.2 Fli gh Density Projects:
Projects exceeding the low density threshold (established above in low density
section) shall implement stormwater control measures that:
(1) Control and treat the difference in stormwater runoff volume leaving the
project site between the pre and post development conditions for the I year 24
hour storm. Runoff volume drawdown time shall be a minimum of 24 hours,
but not more than 120 hours,
(11) All structural stormwater treatment systerns used to meet the requirements of
the program shall be designed to have an 85% average annual removal for
"Total Suspended Solids:
(111) General Engineering Design Criteria for all projects shall be in accordance
with 15A NCAC 21-1 .1008(c);
(IV) All BUA shall be at a minimum of 30 feet landward of all perennial and
intermittent surface waters. For the purpose of this Rule, a surface water
shall be present if the feature is approximately shown on either the most
recent version of the soil survey map prepared by the Natural Resources
Conservation Service of the United States Department of Agriculture or the
most recent version of the 1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) cluadrangle
topographic maps prepared by the United States Geologic Survey (USGS).
An exception to this requirement may be allowed when surface waters are
not present in accordance with the provisions of 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (3)(a);
and
(V) The permit shall require recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants
to ensure that development activities maintain the development consistent
with the approved project plans;
5.5.3 Non -Structural BMP's:
The receiving streams in the Town's watershed are classified as Nutrient
Sensitive Waters; therefore the amended ordinance shall also ensure that the best
management practice for reducing nutrient loading is implemented. In addition,
a nutrient application (both inorganic fertilizer and organic nutrients)
management program shall be developed and included in the stormwater
management program.
5.5A Regulatory Mechanism:
In the first year, the Town will assess existing ordinances, policies, programs and
studies that address storm water runoff quality. In addition to assessing these
existing documents and programs, the '['own will provide opportunities to the
public to participate in the development of the program. The existing; land usage
ordinance will then be amended to include a post -construction stormwater runoff
management program for new development and redevelopment. This ordinance
will also include enforcement mechanisms that will provide the legal awhority to
act, procedures to follow, and appropriate actions in the event of non-compliance.
5.5.5 Operation and Maintenance:
The existing land usage ordinance will be arnended to address the long; -term
operation and maintenance of post -construction controls. The amended
ordinance will include guidelines for delegating routine and non -routine
maintenance responsibilities to ensure access for inspections, and providing a
mechanism for enforcement.
12

5.5.6 Decision Process:
The post construction stormwater management program shall ensure that controls
are in place that will prevent or minimize water quality impacts from new
development and redevelopment projects. 'These controls should include all
amended ordinance to address post -construction runoff- control from new
development and redevelopment projects and ensure adequate long-term
operation and maintenance of BM [Is.
5.5.7 Evaluation:
The post construction site management for new and re -development activities
program will be evaluated based on how each individual 13MP is meeting its
measurable goal at the end of each reporting period. Changes will be considered
for any BMPs that are not meeting the measurable goals.
5.6 Pollution Preventions/Good hlousekeeping,-Lfor Municipal Operations
5.6.1 13M13 Summary Table: Refer to page 1 I for the Town's Pollution Preventions/Good
Housekeeping for Municipal Operations BMP Table.
5.6.2 Aficcted Operations: The Town operates and maintains a storage facility and a town
(tall; however, none of these facilities require Industrial NPDES permits.
5.6.3 Training,: The Town will develop training; materials on pollution prevention for
public facilities, using existing materials gathered from other organizations or
creating new tools as needed. All employees will be trained annually oil the need for
controls to protect stormwater from exposure to potential pollutants. All employees
who manage chemicals and drainage systems will also be trained annually on matters
that specifically relate to their Joh.
5.6.4 Maintenance and Inspections: "To reduce floatables and other pollutants front 'Town
drainage systems, oil separators and traps will be cleaned as needed. Wash bay areas
at the storage facility will he inspected and cleaned on an as needed basis but not less
than annually.
5.6.5 Vehicular Operations: Any vehicle that leaks oil is placed in a covered shelter with a
drip pan. The sail storage facility is under shelter and does not drain to the exterior.
5.6.6 Waste Disposal: Waste removed from the Town's drainage system is disposed of in
an approved manner at appropriate facilities. Recovered oil is taken to a local service
station where it is then picked up by a licensed recycler.
5.6.7 Flood Mana eg ment: The "Town has adopted the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) tloodplain management standards in the local Unified Development
Ordinances (UDO). Most development is prohibited in the floodway and in the
Iloodway fringe.
5.6.8 Evaluation: A training session will be held for current employees and a section on
stormwater will be included in the Orientation Process of new employees. All
facilities will be inventoried by the end of year four and any deficiencies will be
corrected by year live.
13

6.3.1. OMP`s and Measurable Goals for Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
BMP
Measurable Goals
YR
YR
YR
YR
YR
Responsible Position/Party
1
2
3
4
5
1
Training Materials
Develop training materials on pollution prevention for
X
X
X
X
X
Town Manager
public facilities, using existing materials gathered from
other organizations or creating new tools as needed.
Educate all employees annually on the need for controls
to protect stormwater from exposure to potential
pollutants. The program will be maintained annually
and the report will include the number of employees
trained as well as subjects covered.
2
Training for Drainage System
Provide training for employees who maintain the
X
X
X
X
X
Town Manager
Employees
drainage system with focus on disposal of floatables,
grit, sediment and other pollutants removed from the
system. Report annually on the number of employees
trained and subjects covered.
3
Training for Employees who
Provide training to employees who manage and apply
x
X
X
X
X
Town Manager
Manage Chemicals
chemicals to address safe application, storage and
disposal of residual chemicals. Repeat training annually
throughout the program. Report on number of
employees trained and subjects covered.
4
Used Oil Recycling Program
Evaluate existing or potentials for a new used oil
X
X
X
X
X
Town Manager
recycling program. Implement new program or make
changes to existing program if needed. Report
annually an the program including the amount recycled
and adjustments made as needed.
5
Inventory of Hazardous Chemicals
Maintain inventory of hazardous chemicals and other
X
Town Manager
potentially hazardous materials. Ensure that limited but
sufficient quantity of items are on hand to minimize risk
of spill or contamination of stormwater. Determine if
inventory of hazardous chemicals used by the Town has
been completed in year three.
14

Appendix A:
Ordinance Declaring All Forsyth County Ordinances Applicable to the Town of
Walkertown
ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL
Sec. 2-1. Ordinances, actions of board of county commissioners applicable and enforceable
within town.
(a) All of the ordinances and actions of the board of county commissioners having the effect of
ordinances shall continue and remain in effect within the incorporated and jurisdictional limits o1'
the town, and shall be fully applicable and enforceable within the town and jurisdictional limits
as in the unincorporated areas of the county.
(b) The zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations and building; codes adopted by the board of
county commissioners and in effect within the county shall be applicable within the incorporated
and jurisdictional limits of the town, and all powers pertaining to these matters shall be exercised
by the board of county commissioners within the incorporated and jurisdictional limits o the
town, and shall, therefore, continue and remain in effect within the incorporated and
jurisdictional limits ofthe town as in the unincorporated areas oflhe county. The zoning; map of
the county for the jurisdictional limits of the town shall remain in effect, as amended from time
to time by the board of county commissioners.
(Ord. No 1, 1,2, 8-23-1984)
Sec. 2-2. County ordinances, powers of board of county commissioners remain in effect
within town, including annexed areas.
(a) All ol'the ordinances of the county, currently existing; or as may from time to time be
adopted, shall continue and remain in effect within the incorporated and jurisdictional limits of
the town, including; the annexed areas, and shall be fully applicable and enforccable within the
town.] urisdictional limits as in the unincorporated areas of7the county.
(b) The zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, and building; code adopted by the board of
county commissioners of the county in elTect within the county shall be applicable within the
incorporated jurisdictional limits of the town, including; the annexed areas, and all powers
pertaining; to these matters shall be exercised by the board of county commissioners of the
county within the incorporated jurisdictional limits of the town, including the annexed areas; and
shall, therefore, continue to remain in effect within the incorporated and jurisdictional limits of
the town as in the unincorporated areas of the county. A zoning map of the county for the
jurisdictional limits of the town shall remain in effect, as amended from time to time by the
board of county commissioners.
(Ord. No. 57, 1, 2, 8-11-1992)
15

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOWN
ABOUT THE
NC PHASE i AND PHASE II MS4
PROGRAM
Mike Randall
`- NCDENR '�=V
Six Minimum Measures
40 CFR Section 122.34 (b)
I . Public Education and Outreach
2. Public Involvement/Participation
3. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
4. Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control
5. Post -Construction Storm Water Management
6. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping
1

BMP and Measurable Goals
40 CFR Sections 122.34 (d) and 123.35 (h)
• Section 122.34(d) ".... requires the MS4 to
identify and submit to the NPDES permitting
authority a list of the BAIPs and measurable
goals '
• Section 123.35 (h)(1) ".....the State must
incorporate any additional ,Measures necessary
to ensure effective implementation of the State
storm eater program for regulated small MS4s"
Public Education and Outreach
40 CFR Section 122.34 (b) (1)
"Yost must implement a public edirc-ation
program to distribute educational materials to
the community or conduct equivalent outreach
activities about the impacts of storrn hater
discharges on water bodies and the steps that
the public can take to reduce pollutants in
storm water runoff. "
0�

Public Education and Outreach
BMP and Measurable Goals
• Defined goals and objectives
• Maintain a description of the target pollutants
• Identify target audiences
• Identify and describe issues
• Identify and describe watersheds in need of
protection
Public Education and Outreach
BMP and Measurable Goals
• Promote and maintain an internet web site.
• Distribute stormwater educational material
• Promote and maintain a stormwater
hotline/helpline
• Measure and record the extent of exposure
3

Y
Public Involvement/Participation
40 CFR Section 122.34 (b) (2)
"You )mist, at a nllnlnnon, comply
11-ith State, Ti-ibal and local public
notice reL uit-ements when1
implementing a public involvement/
pas-ticipation program. "
Public Involvement/Participation
BMP and Measurable Goals
• Conduct at least one public meeting
• Include and promote volunteer
opportunities
• Provide and promote a mechanism for
public involvement
• Promote -and maintain a hotline/helpline
n

1
Illicit Discharge Detection
and Elimination
40 CFR Section 122.34 (b) (3)
1. Develop, implement and enforce a program to detect
and eliminate illicit discharges
1. Develop a storm s"-er system naap
3. Prohibit non -storm water discharges
4. Develop and implement a plan to detect and address
non -storm rater discharges
5. Inform public employees, businesses, and the general
public
Illicit Discharge Detection
and Elimination
BMP and Measurable Goals
• IDDE ordinances or other regulatory mechanisms
• Map identifying major outfalls, receiving
streams, and type of conveyance system
• Conducting dry weather flow field observations
• Written procedures for conducting investigations
5

Y
Illicit Discharge Detection
and Elimination
BMP and Measurable Goals
• Track and document investigations
• Training program
• Inform public employees, businesses, and the
general public
• Promote a reporting mechanism
• Conduct reactive inspections
Illicit Discharge Detection
and Elimination
BMP and Measurable Goals
• Establish written procedures to identify and
report failed septic systems
• Written procedures to notify the system operator
of SS4 and leaks
• Track the issuance of notices of violation
• Written spill/dumping response procedures
6

Construction Site Storm Water
Runoff Control
40 CFR Section 122.34 (b) (4)
"You inust develop, implement, and enforce a
program ....
Post -Construction Storm Water
Management
40 CFR Section 122.34 (b) (5)
"You must develop, in' lenient, and enforce a
program to address storin rater runofffrom new
development and redevelopment projects... "
7

Construction and Post -Construction
• Session Law 2006-246 Section 7
— "satisfies the six minimum control measures required hY 40
Code of Federal Regulations § 122.34(h) " ......
— "muv use anti existing Stute or locul program that relutes to
the minimum measures to meet, either in x,hole or in part,
the requirements of the minimum measures."
• Post -Construction
— Session Law 2006-246 Section 9, Coastal Rules and USNIP
— General Engineering Design Criteria set out in 15A NCAC
02H .1008(c)
• Sediment and Erosion Control-(S&EC)
— Sediment Pollution Control Act of 1973 and Chapter 4 of
Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code
Pollution Prevention/Good
Housekeeping
40 CFR Section 122.34 (b) (6)
"You ou must develop and implement on operation and
maintenance program that includes a training
component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or
reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations....
such as park and open space maintenance, fleet and
building maintenance, new construction and land
disturbances, and storm crater si stem maintenance. "

I
Pollution Prevention/Good
Housekeeping
BMP and Measurable Goals
1. Municipally Owned or Operated Facilities
2. Streets, Roads, and Public Parking Lots
3. Catch Basins and Conveyance Systems
4, Structural Stormwater Controls
Pollution Prevention/Good
Housekeeping
BMP and Measurable Goals
1. Municipally owned or operated facilities
— Inventory
— Map
Operation and Maintenance Program
— Spill Response Procedures
— Staff Training
0

I
Pollution Prevention/Good
Housekeeping
BMP and Measurable Goals
2. Streets, roads, and public parking lots
— Evaluate BMPs to reduce polluted stonnwater runoff
— include in the evaluation street sweeping and
seasonal leaf pick-up
- Include the BMPs selected in SWMP
— Implement BMPs selected
— Evaluate the effectiveness of these BMPs
— Staff Training
Pollution Prevention/Good
Housekeeping
BMP and Measurable Goals
3. Catch basins and conveyance systems
— Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Program
— Staff -Training
W]

C
r—
Pollution Prevention/Good
Housekeeping
BMP and Measurable Goals
4. Structural Stormwater Controls
— Identify and map
— Operation and Maintenance (08M) Program
— Inspect and maintain
— Staff Training
Pollution. Prevention/Good
Housekeeping
BMP and Measurable Goals
• Pesticide, Herbicide and Fertilizer Application
Management
— Ensure municipal employees and contractors are
properly trained
- Ensure permits, certifications, and other measures for
applicators are followed
• Describe measures that prevent or minimize
contamination of the stonnwater runoff from all
areas used for vehicle and equipment cleaning.
11

Impaired Waters
Federal .Register - December S, 1999
"If a small MS4 operator implements the sir
min nwin control measures in and the
discharges are determined to cause or
contribute to non-attainnrew of an applicable
water quality standard, the operator needs to
erpar7d or better tailor its BMPs i ithin the
scope of the sir minimum control measures... "
Impaired Waters
BMP and Measurable Goals
Identify 303(d) streams
• Describe the likely cause(s) of the impainnent
• Describe and assess existing programs,
controls, partnerships, projects and strategies
• Describe and assess additional programs,
controls, partnerships, projects and strategies
12

0
TMDL
40 C.F.R. Section 122.34 (e)
"You must comply with more stringent
effluent limitations in your permit.._.
based on a TMDL or equivalent analysis
that determines such limitations are
needed to protect water quality. "
TMDL
BMP and Measurable Goals
• Water Quality Recovery Plan (WQRP)
• Develop a Monitoring Plan
• Implementation Plan
• Annual Reporting
13

T AI D L
BMP and Measurable Goals
• Water Quality Recovery Plan (WQP)
— Identifies the watershed(s),
— Includes a description of the watershed(s),
— Includes a map showing streams & outfalls
— Identifies the locations of currently known major outfalls
— Assessment of monitoring data
Describe existing programs, controls, partnerships,
projects and strategies
Federal Regulations
40 C:rR. Sections 122.34 (g) and Section 122.41
• "You must evaluate program compliance, the
appropriateness of yorri- identified Kest
management practices, and progress towards
achieving j,our identified measurable goals. "
• "You must keep records and submit annual
reports "
• Section 122.41 Conditions applicable to all
perinils (i.e., Duty to comply, penalties, etc.)
14

Resources and Guidance
• http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/npdessw/ms
4resources
✓ Model Ordinance
✓ Incorporating Green Infrastructure
✓ EPA Guidance Document for Permit writers
✓ Low Impact Development — A Guidebook for NC
✓ NCDOT BMP Tool Box
✓ Public Notices
• NC State LID FastTrack Certificati,
http://www.bac.ncsu.edu/ionic/lid/workshoI.
NCLlD
'••:'der ur�5�
For further information, please contact:
Ston-nwatcr Permitting Unit
• Phone:
[phone]
• Cell:
[phone]
• E-mail:
[e-mail]
ncdenr.gov
• website:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/index.11tm
Address:
1617 Mail Service Center
Ralcigh NC 27699-1617
.Orris iry
�'.r,.'=
�, A
LJIJI!\J. �
NCDENR 1`�Cf•
15

ZS c o
0
Randall, Mike
From: Randall, Mike
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 3:47 PM
To: '[e-mail],com'
Cc: Georgoulias, Bethany; Diuguid, Bill
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Great,
Bill Diuguid and Bethany Georgoulias will be joining us.
Mike
From: Scott Snow [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 3:44 PM
To: Randall, Mike
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Mike,
10:00 will be fine. We can meet here at Walkertown Town Hall. The address is 5177 Main St. Let me know if you need
directions and I'll send them along.
Thanks,
Scott
From: Randall, Mike[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 11:17 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Did we decide on a time. 10:00 — noon works best for me.
Mike
From: Scott Snow [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 11:37 AM
To: Randall, Mike
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Mr. Randall,
Friday the 25th would be great. I can meet anytime, but if you would prefer around 2:00, that would work for me.
Thanks,
Scott Snow
From: Randall, Mike[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 11:27 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
t

Sorry, I scheduled another meeting that day on the coast. Do you have anything open March 21, 22, 24 or 25"???
From: Scott Snow [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 11:02 AM
To: Randall, Mike
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Mr, Randall,
Sorry for the delay in responding, but I would very much like to meet to discuss the Phase II designation for the Town of
Walkertown. I would be available to meet on the 18th, if that date is still open for you.
Thank you,
Scott Snow
Town of Walkertown
scottsnowCcDtriad.rr.com
336-595-4212
From: "Randall, Mike" <mike,randalI @ncdenr.gov>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:37:22 -0500
To; SVC_DENR phase2 info<phase2.1nfo cr ncdenr.gov>; Scott Snow<ssnow08 c@i yahoo.com>
Cc: Bennett, Brad ley<bradley.bennett a ncdenr.gov>; Diuguid, Bill<bill.diuguidoncdenr.gov>; Munger,
Bridget<bridget.munger cr ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase 11 designation
Dear Mr. Snow,
When determining the effectiveness of Walkertown's water quality protection programs and whether or not water quality
would benefit from Walkertown implementing a Phase II Stormwater Program, the State would like to learn more about on
certain measures that Walkertown is implementing, including:
Public Outreach
Public Involvement
Programs to address illicit discharges
Construction activities that may go beyond the S&EC Program administered the State or a Delegated Program
Post -construction stormwater management for new development and redevelopment
Stormwater housekeeping practices for government facility sites
We also like to learn more about the water quality of the receiving waters and whether the waters support the uses set out
in subsections (c), (d), and (e) of 15A NCAC 26 .0101 (Procedures for Assignment of Water Quality Standards -- General
Procedures) and the specific classification of the waters set out in 15A NCAC 2B .0300, et seq. (Assignment of Stream
Classifications). The impairment could be a result of any number of things. Salem Creek Fecal/Grants Creek is impaired
for turbidity. The best thing is for us to do is to drive around the area and get a better feel for the types of land uses (i.e.,
commercial, agricultural, residential, industrial) that discharge to the stream. We would also like to learn more about
specific efforts Walkertown has implemented to address the impairment within the scope of the six measures identified
above.
By having a discussion with the local government and through the review of the existing programs, opportunities to build
on a current program can be identified and DWQ can determine the overall effectiveness of Statesville water quality
protection programs. Ultimately, staff will present their recommendations for Phase II designation to the Environmental
Management Commission's Water Quality Committee. If the designations are approved, they will go before the full EMC,

r
usually the next day. Currently, staff is looking at the EMC's Water Quality Committee meeting on May 11, 2011 for their
initial presentation.
Attached is a draft guideline being developed to help improve local government stormwater programs. Not everything in
the guideline would be applicable to [the local government], but, it may give them some insight as to what we consider
when we attempt to determine the effectiveness of local government's water quality protection programs.
Also, attached is a brief presentation covering the six minimum measures addressed under a Phase II program pursuant
to Session Law 2006-246 Section 7 and 40 CFR 122.34(b).
We would very much like to meet with Walkertown so that we can learn more about and have a better understanding of
the effectiveness of Walkertown's water quality protection programs, water quality of the receiving waters and whether the
waters support the uses set out in the regulations.
If Walkertown would like to meet, I'm available to meet March 81n 91n or 11t" and March 14`" -181".
Mike Randall
From: SVC_DENR.phase2.info
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 11:07 AM
To: Scott Snow
Cc: Bennett, Bradley; Randall, Mike
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Importance: High
Dear Mr. Snow:
Your request for a Phase II designation waiver on behalf of the Town of Walkertown has been
received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality. The request is being forwarded to Bradley Bennett,
supervisor of the Stormwater Permitting Unit, and Mike Randall, coordinator of the Phase II Program.
Mr. Randall will be in touch with you shortly.
Thank you,
Bridget Munger
Stormwater Outreach & Education Coordinator
N.C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law
and may be disclosed to third parties.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Scott Snow [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 4:51 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
On the belialf of the Town of Walkertown I would like to submit the following comments for
consideration regarding the upcoming NPDLS Phase 11 Stormwater designation review:

E
The Town of Walkertown respectfully requests that the NCDENR Division of Water Quality continue the
current waiver ofNPDES Phase 11 permitting requirements granted to the Town of Walkertown in previous
reviews.
The Town of Walkertown has made considerable efforts to develop its own stormwater management
procedures, and it feels these procedures will continue to be an adequate program for local stormwater
management.
Aspects of the Walkertown stormwater management program includes the policy of adopting strict stormwater
management requirements within our local UDO. The "Town of Walkertown has adopted all stormwater
management requirements for construction site and post construction development that have been previously
adopted by the City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County.
The Town of Walkertown has developed an effective program for stormwater sewer facility maintenance.
This includes regularly scheduled roadside ditch and gutter clearing which is important in controlling
stormwater pollutant runoff into local creeks and streams.
The Town of Walkertown has also previously participated in the Piedmont Triad Water Quality
Partnership program, and educational pamphlets and workbooks are available to the public as an educational
resource.
In closing, the Town of Walkertown would like to respectfully request that the NCDENR Division of Water
Quality consider the efforts at stormwater management it is currently undertaking, and to please consider
renewing the waivers that are now in place. If you require any further information or have any questions, please
feel free to contact me.
Thank you,
Scott Snow
Manager
Town of Walkertown
scottsnow cr triad.rr.com
336-595-4212
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avp,.com
Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3457 - Release Date: 02/21/11

IF _ . 'w
Randall, Mike
From: Scott Snow [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 11:37 AM
To: Randall, Mike
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Mr. Randall,
Friday the 25th would be great. I can meet anytime, but if you would prefer around 2:00, that would work for me.
Thanks,
Scott Snow
From: Randall, Mike[mailto: mike. [e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 11:27 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Sorry, I scheduled another meeting that day on the coast. Do you have anything open March 21, 22, 24 or 25`h7P
From: Scott Snow [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 11:02 AM
To: Randall, Mike
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Mr. Randall,
Sorry for the delay in responding, but 1 would very much like to meet to discuss the Phase II designation for the Town of
Walkertown. I would be available to meet on the 18th, if that date is still open for you.
Thank you,
Scott Snow
Town of Walkertown
[e-mail]
336-595-4212
From: "Randall, Mike" <mike.randall a ncdenr,gov>
I)ate: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 1 1:37:22 -0500
To: SVC,DENR phasc2 info<phase2.inf'o a ncdenr.gov>; Scott Snow<ssnow08 cr yahoo.com>
Cc: Bennett, Bradley<[e-mail]>; Diuguid, Bill<bill.diuguid a nedenr.gov>; Munger,
Bridget <bridge(.munger cr ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RC: Walkertown Storn}water Phase 11 designation
Dear Mr. Snow,
When determining the effectiveness of Walkertown's water quality protection programs and whether or not water quality
would benefit from Walkertown implementing a Phase II Stormwater Program, the State would like to learn more about on
certain measures that Walkertown is implementing, including:

1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[phone]
E-moil correspondence to and from this address maybe subject to the North Carolino Public Records Low
and may be disclosed to third parties.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Scott Snow [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 4:51 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Walkertown stormwater Phase II designation
On the behalf ofthe Town of Walkertown I would like to submit the following comments for
consideration regarding the upcoming NPDIES Phase I I Stormwater designation review:
"The "Down of Walkertown respectfully requests that the NCDLNIZ Division of Water Quality continue the
current waiver o1'NPDES Phase II permitting requirements granted to the Town of Walkertown in previous
reviews
The "Town of Walkertown has made considerable efforts to develop its own stormwater management
procedures, and it feels these procedures will continue to be an adequate program for local stormwater
management.
Aspects of the Walkertown stormwater management program includes the policy of adopting strict stormwater
management requirements within our local UDO. The "town of Walkertown has adopted all stormwater
management requirements for construction site and post construction development that have been previously
adopted by the City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County.
The Town of Walkertown has developed an effective program for stormwater sewer facility maintenance.
This includes regularly scheduled roadside ditch and gutter clearing which is important in controlling
stormwater pollutant runoff into local creeks and streams.
The "Town of Walkertown has also previously participated in the Piedmont Triad Water Quality
Partnership program, and educational pamphlets and workbooks are available to the public as an educational
resource.
In closing, the Town of Walkertown would like to respectfully request that the NCDEINR Division of Water
Quality consider the efforts at stormwater management it is currently undertaking, and to please consider
renewing the waivers that are now in place. If you require any further information or have any questions, please
feel free to contact me.
"Thank you,
Scott Snow
Manager
Town of Walkertown
[e-mail]

Randall, Mike
From: SVC_DEN R.phase2.info
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 11:07 AM
To: Scott Snow
Cc: Bennett, Bradley; Randall, Mike
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Importance: High
Dear Mr. Snow:
Your request for a Phase II designation waiver on behalf of the Town of Walkertown has been
received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality. The request is being forwarded to Bradley Bennett,
supervisor of the Stormwater Permitting Unit, and Mike Randall, coordinator of the Phase it Program.
Mr. Randall will be in touch with you shortly.
Thank you,
Bridget Munger
Stormwater Outreach & Education Coordinator
N.C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Corolina Public Records Law
and may be disclosed to third parties.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Scott Snow (mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 4:51 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
On the behalf of the Town of Walkertown I would like to submit the following comments for
consideration regarding the upcoming NPDES Phase I I Stormwater designation review:
The 'mown of Walkertown respectfully requests that the NCDENR Division of Watcr Quality continue the
current waiver of NPDES Phase II permitting requirements granted to the Town of Walkertown in previous
reviews.
The "Down of Walkertown has made considerable efforts to develop its own stormwater management
procedures, and it feels these procedures will continue to he an adequate program for local stormwater
management.
Aspects of the Walkertown stormwater management program includes the policy of adopting strict stormwater
management requirements within our local UDO. The Town of Walkertown has adopted all stormwater

management requirements for construction site and post construction development that have been previously
adopted by the City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County.
The Town of Walkertown has developed an effective program for stormwater sewer facility maintenance.
This includes regularly scheduled roadside ditch and gutter clearing which is important in controlling
stormwater pollutant runoff into local creeks and streams.
The Town of Walkertown has also previously participated in the Piedmont Triad Water Quality
Partnership program, and educational pamphlets and workbooks are available to the public as an educational
resource
In closing, the Town of Walkertown would like to respectfully request that the NCDENR Division of Water
Quality consider the efforts at stormwater management it is currently undertaking, and to please consider
renewing the waivers that are now in place. if you require any further information or have any questions, please
feel free to contact me.
Thank you,
Scott Snow
Manager
Town of Walkertown
[e-mail]
336-595-4212
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.

WA '14�-n
Michael F. Gasley, Governor
9QG
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7
Alan W. Klimek, P_ ir_ Director
Division of Water Quality
Q ^�
CGIcen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
September 5, 2006
The Town of Walkertown
Mayor: Mr. Kenneth Davis
5177 Main Street
P. O. Box 39
Walkertown, North Carolina 27051-0039
Subject: Request for Waiver
Dear Mr. Davis;
Pursuant to Session Law 2006-246, municipalities with a population of less than 10,000, are not
required to obtain a Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for
stormwater management unless the municipality is shown to be contributing to an impairment of State
waters, as determined under the requirements of 33 U.S.C. § 1313(d). The State may waive the
requirements otherwise applicable to the municipality if the MS4 serves a population under 10,000 and
they meet the following criteria:
➢ The State has evaluated the waters, including small streams, tributaries, lakes, and ponds, that
receive a discharge from the MS4 and has determined that storm water controls are not needed
based on wasteload allocations that are part of an EPA approved or established TMDL that
addresses the pollutant(s) of concern or, if a TMDL has not been developed or approved, an
equivalent analysis that determines sources and allocations for the pollutant(s) of concern. The
pollutant(s) of concern include biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), sediment or a parameter
that addresses sediment (such as total suspended solids, turbidity or siltation), pathogens, oil
and grease, and any pollutant that has been identified as a cause of impairment of any water
body that will receive a discharge from the MS4; and
9 The permitting authority has determined that future discharges from the MS4 does not have
the potential to result in exceedances of water quality standards, including impairment of
designated uses, or other significant water quality impacts, including habitat and biological
impacts.
DWQ has reviewed the comments received, the requirements of state laws and administrative
rules, the rights of the municipalities, and our mandate to protect public health and environmental quality.
Based on that review, DWQ is granting the Town of Walkertown (populations less than 10,000) a waiver
from the requirements otherwise applicable to municipalities that own or operate a municipal separate
storm sewer system (MS4) within an urbanized area.
Pursuant to Session Law 2006-246, the Town of Walkertown may subsequently be required to
seek coverage under an NPDES permit if circumstances change.
w�
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Although requirements to seek an NPDES Permit to administer the six minimum measures in 40
CFR 122.34 has been waived for the Town of Walkertown, beginning 1 July 2007, any new development
that cumulatively disturbs one acre or more of land located in the Town of Walkertown, must comply with
the standards set forth in Section 9 of Session Law 2006-246. The Division of Water Quality will
administer and enforce the standards for development unless local government (municipality or county)
requests delegation to administration and enforcement of the standards set forth in Section 9 of Session
Law 2006-246. If you want to review the current Phase lI Session Law 2006-246(Senate Bill S 1566) you
can down load it from:
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/
If you have any questions concerning this. waiver or the post -construction requirements in
Session Law 2006-246, please contact me at 919/733-5083 ext. 545.
Sincerely,
)746oi,- 12wai
Mike Randall
Environmental Engineer
cc: DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Stormwater Permitting Unit
DWQ Central File

[Fwd: Re: NPDES Stonnwater Request for Waivers]
f - ,
Subject: [Fwd: Re: NPDES Stormwater Request for Waivers]
From: Stormwater <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:46:22 -0500
To: Mike Randall <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: NPDES Stormwater Request for Waivers
From: "Gary Looper" <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:43:38 -0500
To: "'Stormwater"' <[e-mail]>
The Town of Walkertown maintains 20+ miles of municipal controlled
streets, implemented authority of their own planning / zoning one year
ago, and drains most of their municipal limits into the Yadkin River.
Also, A portion of the town (downtown and some outlying areas) received
sanitary sewer in the last two years, allowing for more dense
development, both now and in the future. It is difficult to comprehend
how the intent of the Phase II Water Quality objectives would be
enhances if Walkertown is not required to participate with the
stormwater quality management program. The Walkertown jurisdiction, and
their planning/zoning decisions, impact on downstream properties, which
includes the Village of Clemmons. I strongly urge DENR to consider the
requirement for Walkertown's involvement with the Phase II program
requirements.
Gary Looper
Manager, Village of Clemmons-
-----Original Message -----
From: Stormwater [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 1:38 PM
CC: Adam Saslow; Al Moretz; Allen Scott; Anita Watkins; Anne Barnes;
Anne Coan; Chrystal Bartlett; Anthony Lester; Anthony Starr; Arthur
Kennedy; Bethany Georgoulias; B. Jenkins; Beth Chesson; Betsy Pearce;
Bettina Brinkley; Bill Crowell; Bill Eaker; bill holman; Bill
Kreutzberger; Darlene Kucken; Bob Holman; Doug Joldersma; Boyd Devane;
Brad Kerr; Bradley Bennett;.Brendon Pritchard; Jonathan Diggs; buck
trott; Caison; Carey Ricks; Carla DuPuy; Terry Bralley; Carol Hambridge;
Carol Patrick; Cathy Ball; Charles Bruton; Charles Peterson; Warren
Simmons; Nick Weedman; Terri Reid; Chris D. Hilton; Chris outlaw; Chris
Rollins; Chris Rountree; Christie Putman; Greg Jennings; Christine Mele;
Susan Massengale; Aisha Lau; Chuck Hansen; Chuck Turnage; David Cox;
Coleen Sullins; Craig Bromby; Craig Harmon; Cynthia Barcklow; Bill
Duquette; Dan Corder; Dan Dawson; Tony Johnson; Dan Milkkelson; flan
Shabeldeen; Daniel Nonte; Darin Thomas; Darren England; Dave Mayes; Dave
Slade; Dave Weaver; David Chang; David Henderson; David Kraus; David
Lloyd; David McNaught; David Moreau; David Phleger; Ken Pickle; Trip Van
Noppen; Dean Naujoks; Dennis Magovern; Dennis Ramsey; Dent Allison;
Derek Slocum; [e-mail]; Diane Silver; Dianne Reid; Don
Conner; Steve Miller; Donell Braxton; Tom Tysinger; Dora Moore; Doug
Jewell; E. Leo Green Jr.; Ed Harrison; Ed Holland; Edwin Carlson;
Elizabeth Kountis; Elizabeth Treadway; Emily Farmer; Eric Williams;
Everette Knight; Tom Phillips; Frank Rush; Fred Holt; Fred Royal; Terry
Warren; Gary Hicks; Gary Looper; Gene Holleman; George Jackson; Terry
Watts; Steve Kroeger; Glen Whisler; Glenn Pattishall; Gloria Putnam;
Grady McCallie; Greg Feller; Terry Cornett; Guy Cornman; H Dunn; Heath;
Heather Jacobs; Henry Hammond; HRana Rennell; Irving Hooper; Jack Daft;
Jack Garrison Jr.; James Byrne; James Gregory; Jan Harris;
1 of 3 9/7/2006 8:24 AM

[Fwd: Re: Ni'DhS Stormwater Request for Waivers]
Z
[e-mail]; Jason Vance; Jay Chapman; Bill Hunt; Jay
Meyers; Jay Stowe; Jeanette Powell; Jeanette Powell; Teresa Finer;
Jennifer Hoffmann; Tammy Amos; Jerry Hatton; Jim Blose; Jim Farson; jim
frei; Jim Kuszaj; Jim Loyd; Mike Randall; Jim Quinn; Jimmie Overton;
Joanie Cooke; Dennis Testerman; Joe Rudek; Joe Stanley; John Alderman;
John Andrews; John Cox; John Grey; John Jarrell; John Kent; Larry
Baldwin; John Shuler; John Spurrell; John Stephens; John Thuss; Jon
Harris; Jonathan Bivens; Jonathan Smith; Judy McGuire; June Small; Karen
Dunn; Karen Keller; Karen Neill; Katheryn Clifton; Keith Burr; Kelly
Stultz; Ken Schuster; Kim Davis; Kitty Chivers; Stuart Rohrbaugh; Layton
Bedsole; Len Hagaman; Leslie Bell; Linda Bethune; stormwater; Linda
Rimer; Lisa Gideon; Lisa Martin; Lori Crossland; Louise England; Mark
Donham; Mark Senior; Marshall Taylor; Marty Stone; Mary Addor; Mary
Alsentzer; Mary Penny Thompson; Maryjean Naugle; Matt Bolick; Wyatt
Blanchard; Matthew Fusco; Matthew Lauffer; Mell Nevils; Melvin Shepard;
Merrie Salvo; Michael Cramer; Michael Mitchell; Steve Varnedoe; Michael
O'Callaghan; Michele Bunch; Michelle Duvall; Al Hodge; Michelle
Woolfolk; Mick Greeson; Mike Coughlin; Mike Santowasso; Mike Struve; Sue
Weddle; Steve Player; Pat McDow; Patrick Ritchie; Paul Meyer; Paul
Rawls; Paul Wiebke; Paul Wilms; Pete Connet; Pete Varney; Phillip
Gibson; Randy Plummer; Randy Tinsley; Ren Ivins; Rex Gleason; Rich
Gannon; Richard McLaughlin; Richard Parnall; Rick Shriver; Rick zechini;
Robert Epting; Tom reeder; Robert Graham; Robert Louque; Robert Lyons;
Bob Ragland; Robert Wylie; Robin W. Smith; Rodney Tart; Roe Odonnell;
Roger Spack; Ron Eubanks; Todd Miller; Roy Brownlow; Roy M. Williford;
Russell Radford; Rusty Rozzelle; Ruth Swanek; Steve Tedder; Bill
Diuguid; Steve Wall; Scott Leonard; Scott Whalen; Sergei Chernikov;
Steve Miller (Dallas); Sharon Myers; Shea Bolick; Steve Kennedy; Stephen
Shoaf; Steve Hiltner; Steve Jadlocki; City of Gastonia; Forrest Westall;
Steve Everhart; Mark Serosky; Amy Pickle; Don Laton; Ed.Beck; Belinda
Henson; Roger Edwards; Kevin Moore; James Gulick; Laurie Moorhead;
stormwater
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Request for Waivers
Subject: Request for Waiver
Pursuant to Session Law 2004-163, municipalities with a population of
less than 1,000, are not required to obtain a Phase II National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for stormwater
management unless the municipality is shown to be contributing to an
impairment of State waters, as determined under the requirements of 33
U.S.C. § 1313(d). The State may waive the requirements otherwise
applicable to the municipality if the municipal separate storm sewer
system (MS4) serves a population of less than 1,000 within the urbanized
area and they meet the following criteria:
0 Their system is not contributing substantially to the pollutant
loadings of a physically interconnected MS4 that is regulated by the
NPDES storm water program; and
0 If they discharge any pollutant(s) that have been identified as
a cause of impairment of any water body to which they discharge, storm
water controls are not needed based on wasteload allocations that are
part of an EPA approved or established ''total maximum daily load''
(TMDL) that addresses the pollutant(s) of concern.
The Town of Rolesville and the Village of Alamance (populations less
than 1,000) have requested a waiver under this provision.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 122.32, the State may waive the requirements
otherwise applicable to the municipality if the MS4 serves a population
under 10,000 and they meet the following criteria:
0 The State has evaluated the waters, including small streams,
tributaries, lakes, and ponds, that receive a discharge from the MS4 and
2 of 3 41712006 8:24 AM

[f-wd: Re: NE'DES Stormwater Request 1'or Waivers]
has determined that storm water controls are not needed based on
wasteload allocations that are part of an EPA approved or established
TMDL that addresses the pollutant(s) of concern or, if a TMDL has not'
been developed or approved, an equivalent analysis that determines
sources and allocations for the pollutant(s) of concern. The
pollutant(s) of concern include biochemical oxygen demand (BOD),
sediment or a parameter that addresses sediment (such as total suspended
solids, turbidity or siltation), pathogens, oil and grease, and any
pollutant that has been identified as a cause of impairment of any water
body that will receive a discharge from the MS4; and
0 The permitting authority has determined that future discharges
from the MS4 does not have the potential to result in exceedances of
water quality standards, including impairment of designated uses, or
other significant water quality impacts, including habitat and
biological impacts.
The Towns of Walkertown, Bermuda Run, Glen Alpine, Red Oak and
Youngsville, the City of King, and the Village of Tobaccoville
(populations less than 10,000) have requested a waiver. These
municipalities do not appear to be draining to water bodies that do not
meet water quality standards or which have impaired uses at this time.
If a waiver is approved, pursuant to either Senate Bill 1210 or 40 CFR
122.32, the municipality may subsequently be required to seek coverage
under an NPDES permit if circumstances change.
DWQ is seeking comments to determine if any of the municipalities
mentioned herein should not be granted a waiver pursuant to Senate Bill
1210 or 40 CFR 122.32. DWQ will carefully study all of the comments
received, the requirements of state laws and administrative rules, the
rights of the municipalities, and our mandate to protect public health
and environmental quality. Based on that review, DWQ will either grant
a waiver or deny the request for a waiver.
Comments should be submitted by Friday, March 3, 2006 to:
Mike Randall
Division of water Quality, Wetlands and ,Stormwater Branch
1617 Mail Service Drive
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[e-mail]
919-733-5083 x545 Fax: [phone]
Content -Type: message/rO22
Re: NPDES Stormwater Request for Waivers
Content -Encoding: 7bit
3 of 3 9/7/2006 8:24 AM

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (_�I
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Mike Randall, Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
Di sign of ater Quality
FROM: Shari L. Bryant, Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE. 2 March 2006
SUBJECT: Request for Waiver to Phase I1 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Permit for Stormwater Management for Villages of Alamance and
Tobaccoville; Towns of Walkertown, Bermuda Run, and Glen Alpine; and City of King.
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject
request and we are familiar with the habitat values of the area. Our comments are provided in accordance
with provisions of the Clean Water Act of ] 977 (as amended), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48
Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U_S.C. 661-667d), and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
Municipalities with a population of less than 1,000 are not required to obtain a Phase 11 NPDES
permit for stormwater management unless the municipality is shown to be contributing to an impairment
of State waters. The Village of Alamance has a population of less than 1000 and has requested a waiver
under this provision. The State may waive the requirements otherwise applicable to the municipality if
the MS4 serves a population under 10,000 and they meet specific criteria. The Towns of Walkertown,
Bermuda Run, Glen Alpine; the City of King; and the Village of Tobaccoville have populations of less
than 10,000 and have requested a waiver.
The NCWRC is very concerned about direct and indirect impacts of widespread urban growth,
loss of headwater ecosystems, urban stormwater runoff and unmitigated stormwater issues, including
aggravated flooding, on the aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources in North Carolina. The documented
decline in freshwater species is a direct response to declining quality of our streams and rivers. For
example, 21 % of freshwater fishes and 53% of freshwater mussel species in North Carolina are
designated endangered, threatened, or of special concern at the state level (LeGrand et al. 2001).
Federally endangered and threatened species are particularly affected by secondary and cumulative
impacts associated with urban development due to their sensitivity to slight habitat alterations.
The NCWRC will not oppose the issuance of a waiver for the Villages of Alamance and
Tobaccoville; Towns of Walkertown, Bermuda Run, and Glen Alpine, and the City of King since no
federally listed species are known to occur in these watersheds at this time. 1-lowever, we feel these
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
2-d %ueAJa 'J*S e8D:0T 90 20 Jew

Page 2
2 March 2006
Request for Waiver
waivers should be re-evaluated periodically. Should significant increases in population, degradation of
water quality or aquatic habitat be found then the local municipality should be required to obtain a Phase
II NPDES stormwater management permit. Although these municipalities may not be required to obtain a
Phase II NPDES stormwater management permit, we encourage each municipality to work proactively to
prevent ,",ater duality and aquatic habitat degradation that results from urban growth and development.
We offer the following measures to help reduce impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources.
More detailed information on each of these measures can be found in NCWRC's Guidance Memorandum
to Address and Mitigate Secondary and Cumulative Impacts to Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
Resources and Water Quality (August 2002) which is located on the web at:
htt J/�%-%vNN-.newildlife,or g07 Witdlifc5 eciesCon! 7c3 im acts. df
1. We recommend the maintenance or establishment of a minimum i 00-foot native forested buffer along
each side of perennial streams and 50-foot native forested buffer along each side of intermittent
streams and wetlands. Buffer width averaging may be appropriate due to existing contours and
elevations if averaging provides the same overall acreage.
2. Delineation of streams should be conducted for the municipal service area according to U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACOE) or N.C. Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) methodology. This
information can be found at h_tty://h2o_enr.state.nc_us/nc,,vetiands/stnnfrm.btml_ Stream delineation
should occur prior to site clearing activities including tree removal.
3. Sewer lines, water lines, and other utility infrastructure should be kept out of riparian buffer areas
(Knutson and Naef 1997; and references therein). Where practicable, utilities should follow the
contours along the edge of floodplains. All utility crossings should be kept to a minimum. The
directional bore (installation of utilities beneath the riverbed, avoiding impacts to the stream and
buffer) stream crossing method should be used for utility crossings wherever practicable, and the
open cut stream crossing method should only be used when water level is low and stream flow is
minimal. A minimum 50-100 foot setback on all streams, lakes, and wetlands should be maintained.
Pesticides should not be used for maintenance of rights -of -way within 100 feet of perennial streams
and 50 feet of intermittent streams, or within floodplains and wetlands associated with these streams.
4. Commercial or residential development within the 100-year FEMA floodplain and jurisdictional
water floodplains should be prohibited and entire floodplains should be protected as undisturbed
forested areas. A no net Ioss of floodplain capacity ordinance is recommended.
5. To adequately protect streams, it is suggested that impervious surface is limited to less than 101/16.
Suggested examples to accomplish the <10°/a impervious goal are using conventional designs at a
level of <10% imperviousness or using conservation clusters with higher densities, with dedicated
open space and other stormwater control measures to mimic the hydrograph consistent with an
impervious coverage of less than 10%.
6. Use bridges for all permanent roadway crossings of streams and associated wetlands to eliminate the
need to fill and culvert, where practicable. If culverts must be used, the culvert should be designed to
allow passage of aquatic organisms. if multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box
should be designed to remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
7. We recommend that municipalities incorporate the following elements into their erosion and sediment
control plans: minimize clearing and grading, protect waterways, phase construction for larger
construction sites (>25 acres), stabilize soils as rapidly as possible (<2 weeks), protect steep slopes,
establish appropriate perimeter controls, employ advanced settling devices, implement a certified
contractors program, and regularly inspect erosion control measures.
E'd SZ9G-Gifb-9EE '4ue1;ag —I's eGO:0T 90 20 Jew
t
r

Page 3
2 March 2006
Request for Waiver
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this request for waiver. If we can be of
further assistance, please contact our office at [phone].
Literature Cited:
Knutson, K. L., and V. L, Naef. 1997. Management recommendations for Washington's priority habitats:
riparian. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia.
LeGrand, J. E., Jr., S. P. Hall, and J. T. Finnegan. 2001. Natural Heritage Program list of the rare animal
species of North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh.
ec: Ron Linville, WRC
�'d 929L-6irir-9EE. querjg '-j'S e60:01 90 20 JeW

FAX COVER
Date 03/02/06
Number of pages including cover sheet
To: Mike Randall
Phone
Fax Phone
CC:
REMARKS:
919-733-5083 x545
919-733-9612
NG Wildlife Resources Commission
Habitat Conservation Program
P. O. Box 129
Sedalia, NC 27342-0129
From: Shari Bryant
Phone
Fax Phone
336449-7625
336-449-7625
❑ urgent ❑ For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please comment
Stormwater Waivers - Village of Alamance and Tobaccoville, Towns of Wai lkertown, Bermuda
Run, and Glen Alpine, City of King.
t 'd 9a9L-6H►-9EE '4ueFJa • I -s e80 :01 90 20 Jett

waiver comment
Subject: waiver comment
From: "judy cherry" <jchcrry a clemmons.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:52:52 -0500
To: <mike.randall®ncmail.net>
Ca
Mike,
It is my belief that Walkertown should be required to obtain a Phase II permit. The runolf from Walkertuwn ends up in the Yadkin River, the source of our drinking water. I
see no dit%rence in this community and any of the other small communities in Forsyth County, Therefore, I hope DWQ will consider denying the request for waiver.
Thanks,
Julia (Judy) Cherry
Stormwater Administrator
Village of Clemmons
336-766-9170
[e-mail]
of 1 3/28/2006 M51 AM

o�oF W A
i -A
Date: January 10, 2006
To: Winston-Salem Journal
Number: 336-727-7424
From: Sarah Young, Division of Water Quality
Subject: Public Notice
Pages: 1
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Pursuant to 40 CFR 122.32, municipalities with a population of less than 10,000, are not required to
obtain a Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for storrnwater
management unless the municipality is shown to be contributing to an impairment of State waters, as
determined under the requirements of 33 U.S.C. § 1313(d). The State may waive the requirements
otherwise applicable to the municipality if the MS4 serves a population under 10,000 and they meet the
following criteria:
The State has evaluated the waters, including small streams, tributaries, lakes, and ponds, that
receive a discharge from the MS4 and has determined that storm water controls are not needed
based on wasteload allocations that are part of an EPA approved or established TMDL that
addresses the pollutant(s) of concern or, if a TMDL has not been developed or approved, all
equivalent analysis that determines sources and allocations for the pollutant(s) of concern; and
The permitting authority has determined that future discharges from the MS4 does not have the
potential to result in exceedances of water quality standards, including impairment of designated
uses, or other significant water quality impacts, including habitat and biological impacts.
Please publish only the information (Public Notice) below, ONE TIME in the legal section of your
paper by Tuesday, February 7, 2006. Please fax a copy of the proof to me at 919-733-9612 for final
approval prior to publication. Within 10 days after publish date, please send the invoice and two
copies of the original affidavit to:
Sarah Young
NCDENRIDWQ Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
The Town of Walkertown, the Town of Bermuda Run, and the Village of Tobaccoville have requested
waivers from the requirements otherwise applicable to municipalities that own or operate a municipal
separate storm sewer system (MS4) within an urbanized area located in Forsyth County, within the
Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin. The City of King has requested a waiver from the requirements otherwise
applicable to municipalities that own or operate a municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) within an
urbanized area located in Stokes County, within the Yadkin Fee -Dee River Basin. Comments must be
received no later than March 3, 2006. Submit comments to:
Mike Randall
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Telephone Number: (919)-733-5083, extension 545
[e-mail]
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

jk2006 11:56am From-
.:
T-475 P.001/002 F-144
Winston-Salem Journal
Facsimile TransmiRal
To: Sarah Young
Fax: Ci1cl-733-%12
From: Kellie Sapp
Date: 02f 0-5
Re: Legal Ad
Pages: 2 lndudin cover
Phone: [phone]
Fax:' 336-727-7424-
email:
[e-mail]
Notes: Here is a proof oP your legal ad. Please REVIEW very
carefully. then sign, date It fax back to me the attached
Signature oP Approval. The deadline to makfn ANY CHANGES to
the ad is 12:00 noon on Fri., San.13th. This c;d WILL run unless you
advise us otherwise. Please call w/any questions.
ALSO...
For an additional $7, we can place your ad our our web site:
SournalNow.com. Sust let me know iP you do want this ad to be
included on the web, and I'll add the 177 Pee.
Recipient may request that we not send any future unsolicite.3 advertisements by
facsimile. Failure to comply within the shortest reasonable time is unlawful.

`OI-2006 11:56am From-
..
T-4T5 P.002/002 F-144
Put3uC NOTICE
The Town of Walkertown, the Town of Bermuda Run, and the Village of
Tobaccovilie have requested waivers from the requirements otherwise
applicable to municipalities that own or operate a municipal separate
storm sewer system (MS4) within an urbanized area located in Forsyth
County, within the Yadkin pee -Dee River Basin. The City of King has re-
quested a waiver from the requirements otherwise applicable to munick
palities that own or operate a municipal separate storm sewer system
(MS4) within an urbanzed area bcated in Stokes County, within the Yad-
kin Pee -pee River Basin. Comments must be received no later than
March 3, 2006. Submit comments to:
Mike Randall, NC DiAsien of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Telephone Number. [phone], extension 545
Mika, [e-mail]
WSJ: January 15, 2006
WINSTON-SALEM JOURNAL PROOF
Customer: NCDENR/DWQ/STORMWTR PERMITTING UNIT Co
Address: 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER ATTN: SARAN '
RALIEGH NC 276991617
Ad Number:
Insert Dates:
Price:
Section,
Printed By:
Signature of
653259
01/15/2006
101.12
CL Class: 99; LEGALS Size: 2 x 16.00
KSAPP Date:01/12/2006
Date: r ��

NORTH CAROLINA
FORSYTH COUNTY
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly a�
commissioned, qualified, and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally 9 I z
appeared D.H. Stanfield, who being duly sworn, deposes and says: that he is 5 a!
Controller of the Winston-Salem Journal, engaged in the publishing of a newspaper
known as Winston-Salem Journal, published, issued and entered as second class mail C=
��
in the City of Winston-Salem, in said County and State: that he is authorized to � _
make this affidavit and sworn statement: that the notice or other legal advertisement,
a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in Winston-Salem Journal on
the following dates:
January 15, 2006
and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper document, or legal
advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a
newspaper meeting all the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the
General Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the
meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
This 16th day of January, 2006 4W k4'e:i�
(signature of pe ji making affidavit)
Sworn to and subscribed before me, this l6th day of January, 2006
Notary�iivllc
My Commission expires: September 28, 2010
OFFICIAL SEAL
y f ? Notary Public, North Carolina
COUNTY OF FORSYTH
•.�� KIMALEOHON�O
My Gorrtrriission Expires ff�X
,
PUBUC NQTICE
The Town of Walkertown, the Town of Bermuda Run, and the Viltage of {
TubacwAla have requested waivers from the requirements otherwise;
applicable to Muruppauues that own or operate o municipal separate
storm sewer system fMS4) wiWn an uroanaed area located in Forsyth
Coumy, wtftin the Yadkin ee�Dee RKV Basin. The City of King has ra
fgtraafad a wai.Qf from the requiremeM orhanvlse appt�bla to m,,ji6
pudaies that own of operate a municipal separate storm sewer system(
(M54) witNn air urbanized Brea looaled to Stokes county Withinii,e Yad•
3
j kin PeaDee River Basin. COMM" must be reUMO r,o-lhW MM
I March S. 2406. Su&M oommefets ro,
` e Mrke Rendae. NC Division of Water Qwft.
-'r 1617 Mak Service Center,�eE�ph. NC 276WI617 _
Tefaphor* Number. (g[S) 733-50&1, extetstan 545
} Mike.fande#@rxtnaif. net
MISJ.Jenupry 15, 200r1,_

- - -... .� .-ter ,.._�... ._stir-�.
- - .' i
. �)i-Fli� � ,
' � "� ��

A r-9p�
65 7
Michael F. Easley, (iOvemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Tom Southern
Mayor
Town of Walkertown
P.O. Box 398
Walkertown, North Carolina 27051-0039
Mr. Tom Southern:
February 27, 2003
Subject: NPDES Phase Il Stormwater
Non -ownership / non -operator certification
P2CERT-0004
Forsyth County
The Division of Water Quality's Stormwater and General Permits Unit hereby acknowledges receipt of your form
SWU-266: Stormwater non -ownership / non -operation certification on January 2, 2003.
Please be advised that this certification is accepted based wholly upon your evaluation. Division staff has not visited
your facilities to obtain independent verification. Discharging stormwater from a small municipal separate storm
sewer system covered by this program to the waters of the state without a valid NPDES permit will subject the
responsible party to a civil penalty up to $25,000 a day.
The Division encourages you to continue to keep abreast of the permanent rulemaking process associated with the
NPDES Stormwater Discharge Program. The final North Carolina permanent rules as currently proposed would
rely on factors other than ownership and operation to determine which public bodies need to seek permit coverage.
It is possible that your jurisdictional area will be subject to stormwater permit coverage once the permanent rules are
finalized. The Environmental Management Commission approved taking draft permanent rule language to public
notice and public hearing at their February 13, 2003 meeting. The public hearings will be held during the month of
April and you are encouraged to continue participating in the process.
Note that this certification does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be required by
the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management
Act, or any other Federal or Local government.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Darren England at telephone number (919) 733-
5083, extension 545.
Sincerely,
/��..�t.��� � _.__1
Bradley Sennett
Stormwater & General Permits Unit
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
M
NWENR
Customer Service
1 800 623.7748

TOWN OF WALKERTOWN
Kenneth "Doc" Davis, Mayor
Toby Linville, Town Manager
Lynn McKinnie, Town Clerk
October 11, 2004
Mike Randall
Division of Water Quality
Stormwater & General Permits Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Randall,
COUNCIL:
avn.a Dorothy "Dot"Duggins
r.•�......,..........4... .._ _'I3'a7faL�°L`dFi'iiAore
Horace Warn'v
Sarah `{4releh , j
RRrpM
OCT 14 2004
'WATER'QUA0TY
SDURCE'BR'ANCH
On January 2, 2003 the former Interim Town Manager Bill Roberts submitted a Stormwater
Non-Ownership/Non-Operator Form. After discussing this action with you the Town of
Walkertown understands that we do not qualify for this exemption because we maintain our own
streets and there is storm sewerage along these streets. Please disregard the previous request
from Mr. Roberts.
The Town of Walkertown would like to request a waiver in accordance with 40 CFR Part
122.32(e):
(e) The NPDES permitting authority may waive permit coverage if your MS4 serves a
population under 10,000 and you meet the following criteria: (The Town of Walkertown's
population was 4,009 from the 2000 US Census.)
(1) The permitting authority has evaluated all waters of the U.S., including small streams,
tributaries, lakes, and ponds, that receive a discharge from your MS4;
(2) For all such waters, the permitting authority has determined that storm water controls are not
needed based on waste load allocations that are part of an EPA approved or established TMDL
that addresses the pollutant(s) of concern or, if a TMDL has not been developed or approved, an
equivalent analysis that determines sources and allocations for the pollutant(s) of concern;
(According to your office from a quick inspection, the Town of Walkertown is not
contributing to an impaired stream.)
(3) For the purpose of this paragraph (e), the pollutant(s) of concern include biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD), sediment or a parameter that addresses sediment (such as total suspended solids,
turbidity or siltation), pathogens, oil and grease, and any pollutant that has been identified as a
cause of impairment of any water body that will receive a discharge from your MS4; and
(4) The permitting authority has determined that future discharges from your MS4 do not have
the potential to result in exceedances of water quality standards, including impairment of
5177 Main street
P. U. Box 39 Walkertown, NC 27051
Telephone (336) 595-A212
Fax [phone]
http:NtownofwalkeMown, corn

designated uses, or other significant water quality impacts, including habitat and biological
impacts.
We understand that by filing this request for waiver we are not in violation of missing the May
2003 deadline for submitting an application. The Town of Walkertown will await notification
concerning our qualification for this waiver.
Sincerely,
AA --
Toby Linville, Town Manager
TOWN OF WALKERTOWN

I
,4
` TOWN OF WALKERTOWN
h
Tom Soui crn,Mayor aOf COUNCIL.
William N. Roberts, Town Manager �e�' � `�� Dorothy "Dot" Dugg;m
Lynn McKinnie, Town Clerk �: ,,�z Wallace larrimore
Jahn Tmgen
;7 Horace Warner
10 .4n. ,e
Attachment to: Stormwater Non -Ownership / Non -Operation Certification Form
January 2, 2003
The Town of Walkertown hereby applies for Certification as a Non -owner and a Non -
operator of a small municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4), because Walkertown does not
own or operate a MS4.
The Town of Walkertown has a permanent population of 4,065 (July 1, 2002 Official
Estimate), There is no seasonal population. Although Walkertown is not far from Winston-
Salem, the residents are mainly older and have lived in the community for many years.
Walkertown is located in Northeastern Forsyth County, in an area that is still quite rural and
undeveloped. Our growth rate is quite low. The Town of Walkertown has not annexed any
territory in the past six years and none is planned. Walkertown has no industry and only a few
stores.
Walkertown provides garbage service and street lights as amenities for residents. No
recycling. Our tax rate is low and our staff only has four paid employees: Town Manager, Town
Clerk, Receptionist/Typist and a Maintenance Man. Our Town Hall was donated to us.
Our water comes from the City -County Utilities Commission -- we are not a member of the
Commission nor are any members of its Board from Walkertown. Walkertown has no sewer
service at this point, but when it arrives it will also be handled by the City -County Utilities
Commission.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency defines MS4 in the Stormwater
Regulations as a "conveyance or system of conveyances" including roads and municipal streets
with drainage systems designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater. The Town of
Walkertown has no conveyances or systems of conveyances of any kind. None are planned.
Walkertown does receive a small amount of Powell Bill funds for road construction,
which are transferred to the NC Department of Transportation whenever any roads in
Walkertown are to be paved or repaired. No streets have been paved in the past four years.
Walkertown still has several unpaved streets; almost all streets that DOT paved for Walkertown
5177 Main street
P. O. Box 39 Walkertown, NC 27051
Telephone (336) 595A212
Fax [phone]

Page 2. Town of Walkertown Stormwater Certification Form. Attachment.
are paved with tar and stone, not asphalt. The Town itself does not build, pave, repair or
maintain any roads in our jurisdiction. While our maintenance man does pick up dead animals
off all the roads, that is the limit of our road maintenance. Our roads in the Town of Walkertown
have no catch basins, man-made channels, storm drains, pipes, ditches, drains, curbs and gutters,
or sheet flow (?) — designed or used for collecting or carrying stormwater — nor do we
maintain any of these.
The Town of Walkertown tax rate of 14 cents (plus 6 cents for our fire districts) produces
approximately $375,000 each year for town operations, almost entirely from residential property.
Taxes have not been raised in six years and no increases are contemplated. This means that
funds are limited for any new or expanded projects.
The Town of Walkertown will of course cooperate with any area -wide stormwater
programs that can be fitted into our Budget.

-- - • • r •-
State of North Carolina QF C u5E ONLY
Dea'it[:wnt of Environment & Natural Resources Date Rer'd
Divisie►i of Water Quality BIMS
Cert. Nu;b �z e�nx _ors
STORMWATER NON -OWNERSHIP / NON -OPERATION CERTIFICATION FORM
This form is for use by Regulated Public Entities (RPE), pursuant to Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code
2H .0126, to certify that they do not own or operate a small MS4.
I. APPLICANT STATUS INFORMATION
Name of Regulated Public Entity
TOWN OF WALKERTOWN
Status (federal, state, public, or
other)
PUBLIC
Type of Public Entity (city, town,
counprison, school etc.)
TOWN
County(s)
LOCATED IN FORSYTH COUNTY
RPE 3urisdictional Area in square
miles
5 MILES
II. OPTIONAL PERMITTING OPPORTUNITIES
Are you exercising your option to apply for a NPDES.Stormwater Discharge
Permit? If yes, submit this form along with a complete application package (Form ❑ Yes © No
SWU-264 and a Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program Report),
Are exercising your option to apply for Permit by Rule status? If yes, submit this ❑ Yes [E No
form along with a completed form SWU-267
III. SIGNING OFFICIAL'S STATEMENT
I certify, under penalty of law, that the Regulated Public Body listed in Section I of this document does not
currently own or operate a small municipal separate storm sewer system, as defined in 40 CFR 122. I further
certify that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, the Information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations
5]
Signature
Print Name
William H. Roberts
Title
Town Manager
Street Address
5177 Main Street _
PO Box
P. 0. Box 39
City
Walkertown i! 4 i'----------- ` - —�
State
North Carolina
Zip
27051 - 2003
Telephone
336/595-4212 -
Fax
336/595-6183
E-Mail
[e-mail]
swu-266-103102 ATTACHMENTS: 1

► TOWN OF WALKERTOWN
Tom Southern, Mayor sOF WA
William 11. Roberts, Town Manager 0
Lynn McKinnie, Town Clerk t %
�� C1RV
December 4, 2002
Mr. Bradley Bennett, Supervisor
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
N.C. Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and
Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Bennett:
COUNCIL:
Dorothy "Dot" Duggins
Wallace Larrimore
John Tingen
Horace Warner
The Town of Walkertown would appreciate it if you would send us the hard copy of
all documents in the application package for the Stormwater Permit due March 10,
2003. Please include the information for certifying that a town or city does not own
or operate a small M1S4.
Thank you.
}
Sincerely, 5
TOWN OF WALKERTOWN
William H. Roberts
Town Manager
me
5177 Main Strad
P. 0. Box 39 Walkertuwn, NC 27051
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
t. 0 E C- 9 2002

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Noah Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
11/6/2002
THE TOWN OF WALKERTOWN
TOM SOUTHERN, MAYOR
P.O. BOX 398
WALKERTOWN, NC 27051-0039
Subject: NPDES Phase II Stormwater Program
Tom Southern:
In 1990 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Phase 1 stormwater program was promulgated under the
Clean Water Act. Phase I relies on National Pollutant discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit coverage to
address stormwater runoff from: (1) "medium" and "large" municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) generally
serving populations of 100,000 or greater, (2) construction activity disturbing 5 acres of land or greater, and (3) ten
categories of industrial activity. The NPDES Stormwater Phase I1 Final Rule was promulgated in December 1999 and is
the next step in EPA's effort to preserve, protect, and improve the Nation's water resources from polluted storm water
runoff. The Phase 11 program expands the Phase I program by requiring additional operators of MS4s in urbanized areas
and operators of small construction sites, through the use of NPDES permits, to implement programs and practices to
control stormwater runoff. Phase II is intended to further reduce adverse impacts to water quality and aquatic habitat by
instituting the use of controls on the unregulated sources of stormwater discharges that have the greatest likelihood of
causing continued environmental degradation.
The NPDES Stormwater Phase II Final Rule requires nationwide coverage of all operators of small MS4s that are
located within the boundaries of a Bureau of the Census defined "urbanized area" based on the latest decennial Census.
We are writing to you to remind you that the Town of Walkertown has been identified as being located within a census
designated urbanized area in both the 1990 and 2000 decennial census. As a regulated community, you are required to
develop a stormwater management program and apply for stormwater permit coverage, if you own and operate a small
MS4 or file a certification that the Town of Walkertown does not own or operate a small MS4. The deadline for
submitting your application package or non -ownership certification is March 10, 2003. Application and certification
documents, as well as additional information on the NPDES stormwater program, are available for download at our web
site . Our web address is http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/stormwater.htm1. You may also contact us for hard copies of the
documents. If you have any questions about this letter, please feel free to contact me (919-733-5083, ext.525) or Darren
England (919-733-5083, ext. 545)
Sincerely,
Bradley Bennett, Supervisor
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
cc: Central Files
Stormwater and General Permits Unit Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office
PM
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1-800-623-7748

Waters with TMDLs
303d Impaired Waters DRAFT 2010 Walkertown
NPDES-Exempt Phase II Municipalities + ETJ
(2009 Corporate Boundaries)
Phase 11 NPDES Entities
NPDES Permit - Phase i MS41Miiitary
NPDES Permitted Ph II MS4/Co
i HaO NPDES Permitted Phase I MS4
NPDES Permitted Phase IM city ETJ
NPDES Permitted Phase 11 MS4
Phase II Ti ed Counties Post-Canstruckian
Winston-Salem W.
G;e6�1
661
0
fee
Y-1
3/24/2011
Kernefsvifle
P
4 Kemersville
� ~ C
C] c^_1
N
I
m
u:
*Post -Construction requirements still apply inside
exempted municipality boundaries and will be
be implemented by DWQ or delegated authority
{e.g., County).
Summerfiekd
Oak Ridge
Greenstroro
lit
9 p o
High Point)
s!.
4 Wles
Fff�h t st

w
supervisor of the Stormwater Permitting Unit, and Mike Randall, coordinator of the Phase II Program.
Mr. Randall will be in touch with you shortly.
Thank you,
Bridget Munger
Stormwater Outreach & Education Coordinator
N.C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[phone]
E-moil correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Low
and may be disclosed to third parties.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Scott Snow [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 4:51 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject; Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
On the behalf of the Town of Walkertown I would like to submit the following comments for
consideration regarding the upcoming NPDES Phase I1 Stormwater designation review:
The Town of Walkertown respectfully requests that the NCDENR Division of Water Quality continue the
current waiver of NPDES Phase I1 permitting requirements granted to the Town of Walkertown in previous
IC-17A VAWA .
The Town of Walkertown has made considerable efforts to develop its own stormwater management
procedures, and it feels these procedures will continue to be an adequate program for local stormwater
management.
Aspects of the Walkertown Stormwater management program includes the policy of adopting strict stormwater
management requirements within our local UDO. The Town of Walkertown has adopted all stormwater
management requirements for construction site and post construction development that have been previously
adopted by the City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County.
The Town of Walkertown has developed an effective program for stormwater sewer facility maintenance.
This includes regularly scheduled roadside ditch and gutter clearing which is important in controlling
Stormwater pollutant runoff into local creeks and streams.
The Town of Walkertown has also previously participated in the Piedmont Triad Water Quality
Partnership program, and educational pamphlets and workbooks are available to the public as an educational
resource.
In closing, the Town of Walkertown would like to respectfully request that the NCDENR Division of Water
Quality consider the efforts at Stormwater management it is currently undertaking, and to please consider
renewing the waivers that are now in place. If you require any further information or have any questions, please

To: SVC_DENR phase2 into<phase2.info(a nedenr.gov>; Scott Snow<ssnow08(u)yahoo.com>
Cc: Bennett, Brad ley<bradley. [e-mail]>; Diuguid, Biil<bill.diuguid�u;ncdenr.guv>: Munger,
Bridget<bridget.niunger(ri)ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Dear Mr. Snow,
When determining the effectiveness of Walkertown's water quality protection programs and whether or not water quality
would benefit from Walkertown implementing a Phase It Stormwater Program, the State would like to learn more about on
certain measures that Walkertown is implementing, including:
1. Public Outreach
2. Public Involvement
3. Programs to address illicit discharges
4. Construction activities that may go beyond the S&EC Program administered the State or a Delegated Program
5. Post -construction stormwater management for new development and redevelopment
6. Stormwater housekeeping practices for government facility sites
We also like to learn more about the water quality of the receiving waters and whether the waters support the uses set out
in subsections (c), (d), and (e) of 15A NCAC 2B 0101 (Procedures for Assignment of Water Quality Standards -- General
Procedures) and the specific classification of the waters set out in 15A NCAC 2B .0300, et seq. (Assignment of Stream
Classifications). The impairment could be a result of any number of things. Salem Creek Fecal/Grants Creek is impaired
for turbidity. The best thing is for us to do is to drive around the area and get a better feel for the types of land uses (i.e.,
commercial, agricultural, residential, industrial) that discharge to the stream. We would also like to learn more about
specific efforts Walkertown has implemented to address the impairment within the scope of the six measures identified
above.
By having a discussion with the local government and through the review of the existing programs, opportunities to build
on a current program can be identified and DWQ can determine the overall effectiveness of Statesville water quality
protection programs. Ultimately, staff will present their recommendations for Phase II designation to the Environmental
Management Commission's Water Quality Committee. If the designations are approved, they will go before the full EMC,
usually the next day. Currently, staff is looking at the EMC's Water Quality Committee meeting on May 11, 2011 for their
initial presentation.
Attached is a draft guideline being developed to help improve local government stormwater programs. Not everything in
the guideline would be applicable to [the local government], but, it may give them some insight as to what we consider
when we attempt to determine the effectiveness of local government's water quality protection programs.
Also, attached is a brief presentation covering the six minimum measures addressed under a Phase It program pursuant
to Session Law 2006-246 Section 7 and 40 CFR 122.34(b).
We would very much like to meet with Walkertown so that we can learn more about and have a better understanding of
the effectiveness of Walkertown's water quality protection programs, water quality of the receiving waters and whether the
waters support the uses set out in the regulations.
If Walkertown would like to meet, I'm available to meet March 8'h, 9th, or 11'h, and March 14th -181h
Mike Randall
From: SVC_DENR.phase2.info
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 11:07 AM
To: Scott Snow
Cc: Bennett, Bradley; Randall, Mike
Subject: RE: Walkertown Stormwater Phase II designation
Importance: High
Dear Mr. Snow:
Your request for a Phase II designation waiver on behalf of the Town of Walkertown has been
received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality. The request is being forwarded to Bradley Bennett,

feel free to contact me.
Thank you,
Scott Snow
Manager
Town of Walkertown
scottsnow(c�triad. rr.com
336-595-4212
It's herel Your new messages
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3457 - Release Date: 02/21/11

Communities for Consideration for Phase II Designation
Legend
Minor Roads
303d Impaired Waters 2010
- Major Highways and Roads
Primary Streams
- Phase 2 Designation Candidate
NPDES-Exempt Phase 1.1 Municipalities + ETJs
Proposed Phase II MSIs (from 2009 Boundaries)
Water Supply Watersheds
Phase 11 NPDES Entities
Phase 11 MS1s (from 2009 Boundaries)
Municipalities (2009 Boundaries)
Phase 11 Tipped Counties (Post -Construction)
POW Walkertown
I uUalkertown
_4
Kemersville Kemersville
ro'tential sphere of infl verage-around
ldesignation candidates drawn per S . ` n Law 2006-246
"based on the 2000 Census Data. Hooer, the candidate is
located in a tipped county and no add anal measures emu- Id o
Abe required in this area.
9
c�
R
-/�
N
1/1 /2 111
0.5 1 2
Miles

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Staff
Number of staffed stormwater management position( s ���`y ry c_aa Ca �Co
g Po () c o n �r-e�c � [ t � nn,�; n.} � Rc,� s� �
Does the local government have an organizational ch that shows where the responsible parties
fit into the structure of the stormwater program?
IJPr Does the local government maintain a list of stormwater staff, their job descriptions, training
requirements and records, SOP, etc.
Stormwater Utility Fee q(�c 0
Has the local government established a Stormwater Utility Fee?
Stormwater Hotline and Website
Has the local government established a stormwater hotlin el CCt.l-rl -Couni� 4 SW�
Has the local government developed and maintained a si does n o-do(re SS
�Q Does the web site include information on water quality, water cts and activities, and
ways to contact stormwater management program staff?
Local Programs I-V
y P6 Does the local government rely on aner e p o ne or more of their Stormwater Programs?
Partnerships "� �Ci^ Consi 1
? Has the local government entere!oth
rships with other organizations to pursue a _g C��Yx C! ►�.bstormwater management objec 'F pie, CWEP, County soil and water, chamber of ;a loa-2 f 1brs
commerce, river -watch organ' eTVVC� P._ c kijo — N1tPP—A 4-Has the local government w EP, the Clean Water Trust Fund, NCSU (BAE) or other
public or private entities onstormwater projects?
Does the local government have a stormwater stakeholder group of private citizens and
organization representative to work on stormwater issues?
Legal Authorities
Cl Stormwater Ordinance — U IDO
❑ IDDE Ordinance ►1c,
Impaired Waters (if applicable)
Has the local government identified the likely cause(s) of the impairment and/or the pollutant or
pollutants of concern for streams listed on the 303(d) list of impaired streams?
Has the local government identified and assessed existing programs, controls, partnerships,
projects and strategies to address discharges to impaired water bodies in the 303(d) list?
Has the local government identified projects and plans that the community is pursuing as far as
retrofits, new development and re -development, mitigation, and stream restoration projects?
Has the local government developed BMP strategies aimed at addressing discharges to impaired
water bodies in the 303(d) list?
'I-,ei i4 4�. Vvt S w t ! — Co . "4k
March 24, 2011 page 1 of 8

PUBLIC EDUCATION
Federal Regulations 40 CFR Section 122.34 (b)
Public education and outreach on storm water impacts. As a Phase I1 regulated entity, the local
government must implement a public education program to distribute educational materials to the
community or conduct equivalent outreach activities about the impacts of storm water discharges on
water bodies and the steps that the public can take to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff.
State Requirements Session Law 2006-246 Section 7
Permit Standards. — To obtain a Phase 11 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit for stormwater management, an applicant shall, to the extent authorized by law, develop,
implement, and enforce a stormwater management plan approved by the Commission that satisfies the six
minimum control measures required by 40 Code of Federal Regulations § 122.34(b) (I July 2003
Edition). Regulated entities may propose using any existing State or logram that relates to the
minimum measures to meet, either in whole or in part, the require*nt a minimum measures.
Evaluation of Program Effectiveness
�)0 Does the local government administer a Public Educat' P
Z Has the local government defined goals and object' a al Public Education and
Outreach?
Has the local government identified target po an
�1cZ For each target pollutants, has the local go me ified the appropriate target groups and
developed stormwater education ter Ed
tate target groups as likely to have a
significant stormwater impact on a ants?
Does the local government's outreach pAgrain IMc (check all that apply):
❑ Newspaper articles and/or insert
o Kiosks and signage
❑ Targeted direct mail
La' Displays at the point -of purchase [ComPAA- J Pdl �t J
Li Utility bill inserts — No oi� !,Wm-
❑ Public meetings
�,Z' Community events
❑ Contest
❑ Storm drain marking
%j' Stream and Litter cleanups i eoi _Scou f'5
AT' —Group presentation and/or speeches
❑ News coverage
❑ Workshops and class room outreach
❑ Distributing promotional giveaways and specialty items
❑ Brochures, displays, signs, welcome packets, and pamphlets
u Local cable access
❑ Newsletters
❑ Other? (Briefly describe other public involvement activities)
March 24, 2011 Page 2 of 8

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Federal Regulations 40 CFR Section 12234 (b)
Public involvement/participation. As a Phase If regulated entity, the local government must, at a
minimum, comply with State, Tribal and local public notice requirements when implementing a public
involvement/ participation program.
State Requirements Session Law 2006-246 Section 7
Permit Standards. — To obtain a Phase II National Pollutant Discharge E 'm' ion System (NPDFS)
permit for stormwater management, an applicant shall, to the exte :al
d by law, develop,
implement, and enforce a stormwater management plan approve y is ' that satisfies the six
minimum control measures required by 40 Code of Federal Reg '1 } (1 July 2003
Edition). Regulated entities may propose using any existing Stat program that relates to the
minimum measures to meet, either in whole or in part, the re mthe minimum measures.
Evaluation of Program Effectiveness
LS Does the local government provide a mec
stakeholders' group(s) and/or pag&hiq
Does the local government promo is
SWMP?
is involvement (e.g., a citizens' or �sG
&A441W uvb/ l,eCa tkt.•r
in the development and implementation of the
Does the local government's public in#lvementMTogram include (check all that apply):
❑ A Stormwater Steering Committ44101w,lar advisory group)?
od' Stream clean-up events?
Adopt -a -stream, Adopt -a -drain, Adopt -a -highway or Adopt -a -trail programs?
❑ Reforestation programs or wetland planting programs?
❑ Volunteer monitoring programs?
❑ Storm -drain stenciling? -
Neighborhood coordinators to become active in the program (i.e., building a rain garden)?
❑ Working with citizen volunteers willing to educate others about the program?
❑ Sponsoring and participating in Big Sweep?
❑ Forming partnerships with local businesses?
❑ Poster contest?
❑ Other? (Briefly describe other public involvement activities)
March 24, 2011 Page 3 of 8

ILLICIT DISCHARGE DETECTION AND ELIMINATION PROGRAM (mDE) '
Federal Regulations 40 CFR Section 122.34 (b)
Illicit discharge detection and elimination. As a Phase II regulated, the local government must develop,
implement and enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges (as defined at Sec.
122.26(b)(2)) into your small MS4. As a Phase II regulated, the local government must:
(A) Develop, if not already completed, a storm sewer system map, showing the location of all outfalls
and the names and location of all waters of the United States that receive discharges from those
outfalls;
(B) To the extent allowable under State, Tribal or local law, effectively prohibit, through ordinance, or
other regulatory mechanism, non -storm water discharges into your storm sewer system and
implement appropriate enforcement procedures and actions;
(C) Develop and implement a plan to detect and address non -storm water discharges, including illegal
dumping, to your system; and
(D) Inform public employees, businesses, and the general public of hazards associated with illegal
discharges and improper disposal of waste.
State Requirements Session Law 2006-246 Section 7
Permit Standards. — To obtain a Phase [I National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit for stormwater management, an applicant shall, to the extent authorized by law, develop,
implement, and enforce a stormwater management plan approved by the Commission that satisfies the six
minimum control measures required by 40 Code of Federal Regulations § 122.34(b) (1 July 2003
Edition). Regulated entities may propose using any existing State or local program that relates to the
minimum measures to meet, either in whole or in part, the requirements of the minimum measures.
Evaluation of Program Effectiveness
Does the local government have an ordinance to prohibit illicit discharges?
4& Does the local government have written procedures for implementing and enforcing the IDDE
yo ord-er:«+ Program including appropriate enforcement procedures and actions?
_4a Has the local government developed a storm sewer system map?
Has the local government established and publicized a reporting mechanism for the public? �-
►l�e noes the local government conduct inspections in response to complaints and follow-up - QR-4
inspections as needed to ensure that corrective measures have been implemented? Ga -
Ib Does the local government conduct dry weather inspections? [, ,cj4 W-ff
_tZ Does the local government inform businesses and the general public of hazards associated with
�U illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste? CO - Ckiq RAH - }0'jri
Does the local government have an employee and contractor training program? /0o S6.9
March 24, 2011 Page 3 of 8

POST -CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER CONTROLS
Federal Regulations 40 CFR Section 122.34 (b)
Post -construction storm water management in new development and redevelopment. As a Phase [I
regulated entity, the local government must develop, implement, and enforce a program to address storm
water runoff from new development and redevelopment projects that disturb greater than or equal to one
acre, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale,
that discharge into your small MS4. Your program must ensure that controls are in place that would
prevent or minimize water quality impacts. As a Phase II regulated entity, the local government must:
(A) Develop and implement strategies which include a combination of structural and/or non-structural
best management practices (BMPs) appropriate for your community;
(B) Use an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to address post -construction runoff from new
development and redevelopment projects to the extent allowable under State, Tribal or local law;
and
(C) Ensure adequate long-term operation and maintenance of BMPs.
State Requirements
State Post Construction Requirements (check all that apply) W S
❑ Session Law 2006-246 YZ 3/5 S C�J -Cc 5
❑ Session Law 2008-211 D l a � s
❑ Water Supply Watershed I (WS-1) — 15A NCAC 2B.0212.
❑ Water Supply Watershed 11(WS-11) — I SA NCAC 2B.0214.
❑ Water Supply Watershed III (WS-III)— 15A NCAC 213,0215.
❑ Water Supply Watershed [V (WS-[V) — 15A NCAC 213.0216.
❑ Freshwater High Quality Waters (HQW) — 15A NCAC 2H.1006.
❑ Freshwater Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) — 15A NCAC 2H.100T
❑ The Neuse River Basin Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) Management Strategy — 15A NCAC 2B.0235.
❑ The Tar -Pamlico River Basin Nutrient Sensitive (NSW) Management Strategy — 15A NCAC 213.0258.
❑ The Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed Nutrient Management Strategy — 15A NCAC 213.0251.
❑ Jordan Lake 15A NCAC 02B .0265
❑ Goose Creek Watershed 15A NCAC 2B .0600 -.0609
❑ USMP
Evaluation of Program Effectiveness Zo_A K � % � Co
JO v Has the local government developed by ordinance (or similar regulatory mechanism) a program
to address stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment?
k Does the local government review designs and proposals for new development and
redevelopment to determine whether adequate stormwater control measures will be installed,
implemented, and maintained?
Does the local government use an approved local BMP Manual or the State BMP Manual?
Does the local government conduct inspections during construction to verify BMPs are built as
designed?
oil Does the local government maintain an inventory of projects with post -construction structural
stormwater control measures?
NO- Does the Iocal government conduct and document inspections of the private and/or public
structural stormwater control measures and if so, at what frequency?
Does the local government require the owner of each structural BMP to conduct and document
inspections of each structural BMP and if so, at what frequency?
March 24, 2011 Page 4 of 8

POST -CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER CONTROLS
NA` Does the local government require an operation and maintenance plan that ensures the adequate
long-term operation of the structural BMPs required by the program?
Does the local government have the authority to perform necessary maintenance or corrective
actions neglected by the property owner/operator, and bill or recoup costs from the property
owner/operator when the owner/operator has not performed the necessary maintenance?
0.µt�Does the local government rely on staff, another public entity and/or a consultant to conduct
plan reviews, inspections and maintenance for the local government?
Does the local government provide training for staff and developers?
March 24, 2011 Page 5 of 8

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PROGRAM
Federal Regulations 40 CFR Sections 122.34 (b)(4)
Construction site storm water runoff control. As a Phase Il regulated entity, the local government must
develop, implement, and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in any storm water runoff to your small
M84 from construction activities that result in a land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre.
Reduction of storm water discharges from construction activity disturbing less than one acre must be
included in your program if that construction activity is part of a larger common plan of development or
sale that would disturb one acre or more.
State Requirements Session Law 2006-246 Section 7
Permit Standards. — To obtain a Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit for stormwater management, an applicant shall, to the extent authorized by law, develop,
implement, and enforce a stormwater management plan approved by the Commission that satisfies the six
minimum control measures required by 40 Code of Federal Regulations § 122.34(b) (1 July 2003
Edition). Regulated entities may propose using any existing State or local program that relates to the
minimum measures to meet, either in whole or in part, the requirements of the minimum measures.
Evaluation of Program Effectiveness
The NCDENR Division of Land Resources Erosion and Sediment Control Program whether implemented
by the state or a state delegated program effectively meets the requirements of the Construction Site
Runoff Controls by permitting and controlling development activities disturbing one or more acres of
Iand surface and those activities less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development.
The NCGO10000 permit establishes requirements for construction site operators to control waste such as
discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, chemicals, litter, and sanitary waste at the
construction site that may cause adverse impacts to water quality.
Does the local government rely on delegated local program or the NCDENR Division of Land
Resources to satisfy the Erosion and Sediment Control Program?
NO In addition to the State and/or a delegated state program, has the local government developed a
local Erosion and Sediment Control Program for construction site stormwater runoff control?
March 24, 2011 Page 6 of 8

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
Many traditional stormwater management practices fail to address the hydrologic modifications that
increase the quantity of stormwater discharges and cause excessive erosion and stream channel
degradation. Frequently the volume, duration, and velocity of stormwater discharges cause degradation.
Has the local government developed a comprehensive development plan?
Has the local government developed policies, regulations and incentives to protect natural
resource areas and critical habitat?
Does the local government require buffer zones and other protective measures around
wetlands, riparian areas, Iakes, rivers, estuaries and floodplains?
Does the local government require dedicated open space?
Does the local government require measures taken to preserve, protect and maintain trees
on public and private property, rights -of -way and plant trees to enhance the urban tree
canopy?
Does the local government provide incentives in place to direct development to
previously developed areas?
Does the local government require measures taken to direct growth to areas with existing
infrastructure, such as sewer, water, and roads?
Does the local government allow mixed use and transit -oriented developments?
Does the local government allow for street design standards and engineering practices
that encourage streets to be no wider than is necessary to effectively move traffic?
Does the local government allow for shared driveways, reduced driveway widths, two -
track driveways, and rear garages and alleys and encourage alternative forms and
decreased dimensions of residential driveways and parking areas?
Does the local government permitted, allowed or encouraged pervious or permeable
pavement?
Has the local government taken measures to provide for alternative parking requirements that
allow flexible arrangements to meet parking standards?
Has the local government taken measures to allow alternative measures to reduce
required parking in exchange for specific actions that reduce parking demands on site?
Has the local government taken measures to require landscaping to reduce runoff?
Does the Iocal government take measures to ensure stormwater management plan reviews
take place early in the development review process?
Does the local government describe measures taken to encourage and allow LID practices
for managing stormwater runoff?
Does the local government encourage and incentivize water harvesting, rain gardens, rain barrels,
cisterns, green roofs, residential and public bioretention areas?
March 24, 2011 Page 7 of' 8

POLLUTION PREVENTION AND GOOD HOUSEKEEPING
Federal Regulations 40 C11'R Section 122.34 (b)
Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations. As a Phase 11 regulated entity, the
local government develop and implement an operation and maintenance program that includes a training
component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal
operations. Using training materials that are available from EPA, your State, Tribe, or other organizations,
your program must include employee training to prevent and reduce storm water pollution from activities
such as park and open space maintenance, fleet and building maintenance, new construction and land
disturbances, and storm water system maintenance.
State Requirements Session Law 2006-246 Section 7
Permit Standards. — To obtain a Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit for stormwater management, an applicant shall, to the extent authorized by law, develop,
implement, and enforce a stormwater management plan approved by the Commission that satisfies the six
minimum control measures required by 40 Code of Federal Regulations § 122.34(b) (I July 2003
Edition). Regulated entities may propose using any existing State or local program that relates to the
minimum measures to meet, either in whole or in part, the requirements of the minimum measures.
Evaluation of Program Effectiveness
Local government owned and/or operated facilities
Has the local government identified local government owned and/or operated facilities and/or
activities? G�c, 1 Lh
i` A Does the local government have an inventory and/or map of facilities and operations owned and
operated by the local government?
Local government owned and/or operated facilities may include (check all that apply):
❑ Animal Shelters
❑ Composting facilities
❑ Easements, public right of ways, and other open spaces
❑ Emergency Services (Emergency Response, Police and Fire Departments)
❑ Equipment storage and maintenance facilities
❑ Fleet Maintenance
❑ Forestry Horticulture and Farms
❑ Fuel farms
❑ Golf Courses XIA
❑ Hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities
❑ Hospitals
❑ Incinerators
❑ Industrial Parks Tpw�
❑ Landfills
❑ Landscape maintenance on municipal property
❑ Local government Buildings
❑ Materials storage yards
❑ Parking Lots
❑ Parks and Recreation Areas
❑ Pesticide storage facilities
❑ Public buildings and parking lots
March 24, 2011 Page 7 of 8

POLLUTION PREVENTION AND GOOD HOUSEKEEPING
o Public golf courses
❑ Public Owned Open Spaces
❑ Public swimming pools
❑ Public works facilities
❑ Recycling and household hazardous waste facilities
❑ Oil collection centers
❑ Salt storage facilities
❑ Solid waste handling and transfer facilities
❑ Street repair and maintenance sites
❑ Structural stormwater controls
❑ Vacant Properties
❑ Vehicle Washing Facilities
❑ Wastewater treatment facilities
❑ Waste Transfer Stations
NA Has the local government developed an O&M program for municipally -owned or operated
facilities?
__11A Does the local government inspect local government owned and/or operated facilities?
_,44Has the local government determined potential sources of polluted runoff and the stormwater
controls required for each local government owned and/or operated facilities?
Municipally owned or operated structural stormwater controls e.., wet ponds, rain gardens)
IVA Has the local government identified and mapped municipally -owned or operated structural
stormwater controls?
Has the local government developed and implement, assess annually and update as necessary
an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) program for municipal owned and operated stormwater
controls?
Streets, roads, stormwater system, and public parking lots
yES Does the local government have a description of stormwater sewer system maintenance activities
(i.e., parking lot maintenance, street sweeping, culverts, cleaning curbs and catch basins, storm
lines and ditches) schedules, and inspection proc dures for controls t reduce floatables and other
pollutants to the local government's MS4? � Ov �-
Pesticide Herbicide and Fertilizer Aimlication Management,
Does the local government en r�iir un pa of mp7 es and contractors are properly trained and
all permits, certifications, and o er measures for applicators are followed?
Does the local government have a description of pesticide, herbicides, and fertilizers (PHFs)
programs? (i.e., standard operating procedures, use restrictions, frequency, training programs)
/V/" Does the local government maintain an inventory of PHFs used by the local government and/or
any contract service?
Training f
COA
Alk Has the local gov ment de�vel p� and implemented an employee training program for
employees involve implementing pollution prevention and good housekeeping practices?
March 24, 2011 Page 8 of 8