TRENT WOODS_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20110810

NORTH CAROLINA

25 SunirellSygo
August IOC 2011
Jimmie W I HC6-, j r.
j h iCkS4i:1W11wYtrS.V0 ni
VIA UPS 0VERN1C'rHT DELIVERY
Mike Randall
North Carolina Department of Environment mid Natural Re;;ources
Division of Water Quality
t617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: Town of"Frent Woods
Phase 11 NPDES Storinwater Permit Application
Craven County
Our File Number: 82244 02 (GL 2010-10)
Dear Mr. Randall -
Enclosed herewith is the Ph 11 NTIDFS Stormwater Permit Application and
Management Program R(2port in The above referenced matter. Also enclosed is the applican'011
fee in the amount of'S860.00.
Please advise if you need anything rurther.
Y() Ve - truly.
J11niflnie- t3; I lick . Jr.
J 1`111/11111,
E'riclosures,
Cc: Mawr C liar] e s Tyson, Jr, (w, encl)

ti
TOWN OF TRENT WOODS
Date voice PO Desory1t
-------__-___-----------__--__-__---_--_-___y__-__----_- --- 0-10-
08/10/2011 MEMO PHASE II STORMWATER PERMIT AP 1360.00
Check 10010, 08/10/2011 Total Invoice!,: 8150.00
010©10
TOWN OF TRENT WOODS - GENERAL FUND FIRST&TRUST,ZENS COMPANYK
912 COUNTRY CLUB DR.-TRENT WOODS, NC 28562 NEW BERN, NC 28560 10010
"This Disbursement Has Been Approved As Required
By The 'Local Governement Budget And Fiscal Control Act.' 66-30/531
VOID IF NOT CASHED IN 90 DAYS
08/1012011 $8E0.00
Eight Hiandt-ed Sixty Dollars and 00 Cen
RAY
TO THE
ORDER NC DEP f ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL
OF
RESOURCES
RALEIGH NC
-

State.,,� North .
: ■ « *r«:»»r» «:v
tL tIXWT,21-pm-*-Urces-
Division of Water « quality
»
Page
3 a64-lpR2

d, CAMA Land Use Plan I LX1 Yes L] No
.... .....
(complebelhi. s: sm.dion a0/ if co -perm' 41.60).
V, REUANCEON ANOTHER ENTMTO SATISFY ONE OR MORE OF YOUR PERMrTOBUGATIONS
(If morethan one,attach. additionai sheets)
V1. DELEG.AT7:ON.OF.AUTHORM(OFrIONAL)
Page 2
SWU-264-103.102

VM SIGNI g». CIA /.A M ƒ
actionapplicatiom If authorit Y for: the NPDES stormwater perm it has been a pprop Hately delegated t ftrouO:
board � documented in this permit app lication, » »... :
may sign �the official statement below,
\gn«7\...j
��: »�,! 4.�■.—,::c y�
Providethe(OHOWinginfOrnabon . . Will: be . day to day
imp lementation and oversight of the stormwater
Page
S# 61, +&a

Gist permits or construction approvals received r applied for under the following programs. Include contact
name if different than the person listed in Item 111. If further spare needed, attach additional sheet.
a.
RCRA HazardmsWaste
d/
Management Program
b,
VIC program under SDWA
N/A,
c.
i PD S Wastewater Discharge
N/
Permit Number
d.
Prevention of Significant
Deterioration ( D) Program
N/
e.
ton Atta6ment Program
N/A
fa
National Standards for
_Emission
Hazardous Pollutants (NESHA,P )
N/
[1tTUClori rival
9.
Ocean dup�npe ik urfei t
W
Marine P l Research and
Sa►tctuar' s ACC
IN
n,
Dredge Cell permits under
section of GWA
r
LE OF CONTENTS
. RECEIVING STREMS'
. EXISTING WA7ER QUALM PROGRAMS
.1. Local Programs
12. State programs
Pagt
u-364•I03ioz

11,
?�IF
! qg #k
41. Organizational

TOWN OF TRENT WOODS
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RECEIVING STREAMS
3, EXISTING WATER QUALITY PROGRAMS
3,1 Local Programs
3.1 State Programs
PERMITTING INFORMATION
4. t . Responsible Marty Contact List
4Z Organization Chart
4.3. Signing Official
4A, Duty Authorized Representative
5.Co-Penitt►n Information (if apP i ablc}
.I Co-perTnittees
2. Legal Agreements
.3, Responsible Parties
6. Reliance on Ot i r Govornment Entity
.1 � Name ofEntity
.1 Measure Irn Icmzntvd
::3: Contact Information
,4, Legal Agreements

TOWN OF TRENT WOODS
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT
1. Storm Water System InfGirmation
LI Ponolation Served. The Town of Trent Woods (-Town') ha8 a
population of 4,155 per the 2010 US Census, The Town does not havc a seasonal
population.
1.2 Growth Rate. The population of the Town per the US Census was 4,192.
The growth rate from 2000 to '41010 was approximatcly -0.9%,
13 Jurisdictional and M 4 Service Areas, The Jurisdictional Serve Area and
M 84 Sery i cc A ren are est i rn a I ed I o be a pprox i m a t ely 2.9 square miles:
1,6 TDML Identification. Trent River,
2. Recefving Streams
Receiving str4�;4111
Stream Name Segment
Water Qwlity Use Support Water Quality 301(d) List
Classification Ratiq Issues
WiNon Creek 27-101-37
C, SW,NSW
C
NSW
No
Hayward Creek 27-101-35
C;SW,NSW
C
NSW
No
Trent River 27-101-(31)
SBSWNSW
SB
NSW
No
Trent River 27-1Cif -09)
SBSW, NSW
SB
NSW
Yes
7

. Existiug Water Quality Pro arias
3.1 Local Programs. The Town has implemented various local pr« grains,
including; comprehensive road and drainage studies, an ordinance prohibiting the Miming
or placement ofdebris within ditches, swabs a nd other areas in whi li storm water'flmy%,
and subdivision and zoning ordinances that regulate the design and construction € f'
development.
3.2 State Prb trams. Known :state programs include LAMA and the Neuse
River Basin Riparian Buffier Rules:
4. Permitting Information
4.1 dies nsihle Party„, Contact List. Measurea is goals are identified
elsewhere herein. 11e�contact person for all such goals is Mika Haber, Director of Public
Works, His contact information is:
t? Ccacsn Flub Drive
Trent wads: NC 28562
25 - 37- l l
252-6 7-7 8 fax)
tow noftroil
twt ��ds{c eanb ircl ;zil_t c7
, r raniza€ionai 'hart, s the To�nn staff is minimspo al, the r nsi ie party
identified in Section 4,1 reports d Tectiy to the Town Commissioners, but after, works
directly with the Mayor on an as needed basis.
43 Si gnirt=_ f ciaf. Charles Tyson, Jr. is the Mayor of the Town; and by
virtu; of'his office and State law, is the appropHata person to sign on behalfofthe Town,
4A Dtly Autliarized t resar►t Live. Not Applicable.
Co -Permitting Information
. Reliance an Other Governmtnt Entity to Sflti fy One or More Permit
Obligations

7. Stormwater Managemimt Program Plat
7.5 Po t- `onig(ruct and
Redeveln rncnt. Townmaintenance staff will Periodically inspect storillwater trealment
measures for proper operation and maintenance. The Town will consider arr ordinance tea

address this issue mom fully should circumstances require, including BMPs, green
infrastructure, and methodology to evaluate the effectiveness c f the same,
7..6 Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeepjng for Municil2al Dg2gjons.
Minicipal operations are timited to one smnll facility approximately one-fourth acre in
size, Town ;naintenanue staff shall keep this area mai idintd in proper order. Outside
story e is ininimal, and will remains ,
91ML-RVERQ# LSStLS5 DOCS1000272IG.iNO.

SumettStim,
I '. , I e.
'flail"ie 11. WCLS—fr-
jhifkc- a 14clahA VVI-sxont
Juty 5� 2011
Mike Randall
North Carolina Division E'avironment and N�aairal Resources
Division of Water Quality
16 17 Mai I Scry i cc Comer
Raleigh, North CarolIna 27699-1617
Re: To wri of" Freat Wo od s Req UeSt for Wa i ver
Ptmsc H NJIDES Pcrmit Rcqui)vrnQnts
Craven County
Our File Nijmber_ 82244_02 (CAI. 20 10- [ 0)
Dear Mr. Randall:
The Trent Woods Board ol"Commissionas is meeting oil Thursday, kily 7. 2011 for its
regular monthly meeting. As this matter is on the agenda, could you please advi.w as to the status
0 f' the TOWTI'S' request t(.) r a waiver'
Youi-,, wry truly,
B, I I icks- Jr.
-1111-1/hIlf
CC- Mayor Charles Tyson. Jr,

SumellSug
J i nignic fl- I flchs.1 r.
jhic"4, ncbot y rmem
J tine 20, 2011
Mike Randall
Nlortb Carolina Division Fnvirom-neTit and Natural Resources
D 1 v isi (in of Water Qual i t v
1
1617 Mail Servicc Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-16 [ 7
Re, Tow-n ofTrent Woods Request f'or Waiver
Phase 1?11DES Permit Requirements
Craven County
Our File Number: 8224402 (GI, 2010- 10)
Dear N-1 r, Ra n d a 11:
On May 5, 2011 I provided to you on behalf of the Town of' Trent Woods
correspondence and certain documentation in support of the '['own's request for a waiver from
the ]Phasc 11 NPDFS Permit Requirements. As the deadline to implement the same is fast
approaching, please advise at yo�ir earliest convenience as to thestatus cat the Town's request,
I In the meantime, should you need additional infOrInatiOT) or have fLtrther qUeSt onS. P ' jeas C
do not hesitate to let me kriow
cry truly,
Jlinmie B. Hicks. Jr.
J B 1-111 in f
CC: Mayor CharlesTyson, Jr.

lots
�j aQ
AV
-1-7 w---
Is
......... .

7 e ;P,,,K-ctluce-- `�i j6eom0aiw-
a A)-/— 4XtLO 4
A.- CA /Z- o f 'e�� f 6C At- � 6R
CD of G✓I �^ I✓�1 �t
eaA- v"F k,/ry
y y
r
/ JJ
Ya u � i�" /!►'+ ts�/ < <- t �� N � u S �°�r �,� W �rt-o R f2. f4-.�. �j
r Q-5
P� r r -ov
li�C /✓ i //b/ A//A u rn citd 7rtel -
Inc a
6A( v),OA1
a t o L� /lf -3Z A -cc m t9
e

! Za�l
O �Jv A�,/40
L
Px-,A-1A1t11V G
�w� %RL %Zr ✓�jt. 6AJ
Gd G bier ✓
° Crp GC9 u t" 2 ►4�n �ni G '�� �C �
r
/Ed A5 /✓aX/ EDIT M'Frr o MPAA c Aw
N 7 �j� r! rr a ]>F-P` r Al a -l' &A4P e �e L arc"
Cy A/6 tvl
des�
�EStGr�eV70,1 �
m 1n6Vdf )' le,4j Aj'-7ye,4 5-
A- t,tA rzr *-&t A IJ � -Ar"-IvAJF
/t7 �j 4/ -S
\ �-i✓�IOUR o 4J 4,,rs cd�` csr�l A-wd f,c0 conJ c(us► �r)-
Wo od,- -
--,k e� SW u Fr+v

From:
Dugu d, Bill
Sent.
Monday, May 16, 2011 3:05 PM
To,
Randall, Mike
Bennett, Bradley; Georgoulias, Bethany
Subject',
Trent Woods Waiver Request
Mike'.
I have reviewed the package of materials that were sent by Trent Woods (T.W.) in response to our visit there April 51
n,,
2011,
mg .
• Town did not comment an the proposed designatiDn during the public comment, period
• From their letter, T_W, will undertake public education and outreach program
• Wilf pursue stermwater retrofitting if; grant funds available
Trent Woods meets the minimum criteria for designation; however, t believe, as you do, that a NPBES Phase 11 permit
would not result in any significant reduction in impairment and stormwater runoff reduction that could not be
accomplished outside of a permit.

Trent Woods wouldbe re-evaluated in two years for possible re -designation based on the measured stages of any Trent
River impairment as weli as local progress on the above -mentioned` programs.
€ have all the information you sent me if anyone wants to review it. ' e should meet on all of these communities we
have visited when appropriate.
Bill Diuguid, AICP
Stuff Planner. Storin-water Permitting
Wetlands and Storntwater Branch �
l ivi jun ofWater Quality I N CDEN
1617 Mafl SenIce Center (Mail)
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 1 911, Floor (Location n & Parcels)
Rvdeigh North Carolina 7 -161
Phone.: I9-807-- j a�. 919-807-6494
WcbstCe; 1z1G ilvortaLnedcur.or wel)walws u
E-mail correspan&nc,- to and trom this addrevs may be 5trbj(�ct to thg,'JnWi Carulina Public Ric-3rds Law imd may be disclo%; ,d In third pa;ti- .

C SunzrellSL�gg
�
May 5. 210 1 t
Dear 'Mr. Randall:
J kil Erlic H. I ficks� Jr.
jil it
Per your request at the meeting with the Trent Woods Town Co4neil, I fiavc enclosed
hcrewith certain documents and other information relatingr to Trent Woods' request i'()r a waiver
frorn the Phase 11 NFIDL"S Permit Requirements. These doctiments, include.,
I Trent Woods vacuum wwcr map, showing the City of New fern's sewer System
currently existing in the Town. o t"Frent Wood-,, -
2 .trial map o f the Town of "Frent Woods, show 111 g a] I storm water o ut, fal I s,
3. Comprehensive Drainage Study cif "Yown of'Frent Woods.
4, Roadway Study for the 'Vown ofTrent Woods-, and
5. U pd ates to Roadway S t u dy for the To�,An of "Preset Woods
In addition to this doCAIMCntation, please be advised of Line following additional
inforniaiion:
t . The Town is riot the owner or operator oCany of the discharges or oud'alls, of
storm water into the Trent River or Crccks connecting thcreto.
2, The number of sewer accounts of" the City of New Bern's system -ithin the Town
of"I'rent Woods varies month to nionth. but has historically been between 1,100
and 1,120 users.
I Trent Woods has tm Ordinance on the burning of yard waste. which Ordinance
expressly prohibits burning within ditches, s�vales and other areas in Which storm
water flows.
4. The New Bern Golfand Country Club does riot have an official nutrient, stralcgy.
We are advised that the Club follows besT rnanagetiwnt pracfiec, and has

North Carolina Division Ftivironment and Natural resources
May 5. 2011
Page 2
provided to us a recent article from North Carolina State University regarding
nitrogen fertilization and water quality. We are further informed that the CIU;
was actually a participant in the study:
5, As you probably saw during your visit toTrent Woods, thcTown itscifis almost
exclusively a bedroom community, Mo,,;t of the lots within the Town are large
and are maintained professionally. Furthermore, although the ']'own doc.s, not
provide for yard waste collections, the Town of Trent Woods has an agreement
Nv i th the C i ty of N c w Bern whereby its residents may del i v er yard waste to a City
v
of New Bern facility ni
without charge. "phis facility is locates in extTeely Close
proximity to the Town of Trent Woods, and is located on a major
jor thoroughfare
leading from Trent Woods into the City ot'New Bern, and as, such is extremely
convenient to the citizens arid residents ofTrent Wood&
Furthermore, in our correspondence of September 13, 20M, we provided very detailed
information as to an overview ofthe To of Trent Woods, size, population. number of
households. breakdown of the uses of property, as well as an estimate of iindevelopcd land. At
that time, we also provided to you a color coded jniap showing all of' the public streets ill the
Town, indicating ownership by Trent Woods and the State of North Carollitia DOT. For your
convernence, enclosed herewith i s a copy of my letter from September 13), 2010,
Regardless of the deterniination as to a waiver requested heretuidev, the Town will
undertake a program of publiQ education and outreach to inform and educate the property owners
ofTrent Wood,% on how to improve storm water discharge quality and quafitity, The Town has a
number of' options to achieve this, including a monthly Town Newspaper, the Town's vv-ebsite,
and othe r d i rec t correspondence with t h property owners, and through loca I Coune i I o J'Go vertune tit,
Finally, [lie Town plans to actively seek grants to address such public education, as well
as ,grants to assist it in best marlagement practice, retrofitting of stomi water outflalls. and to
improve stoat) water d ise h arge quality an d q uant i ty o
I trust this information and docunierltatjon is useful to your review. Should you need
anything further, or if you need further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact nie. On
helial f of the Town of Tre tit Woods, thank 'you l'or your assistance.

Mike Randall
North Carolina Division Environment and Natural Resources
May 5- 2011
Page 3
Yours very tTuly,
Jimmie B, H�cks, Jr. vy,
JBfI.Imf
Enclosuren,
CC M ayor CCanes F. Tyson, Jr. (w. o. e n e 1)

-Randall, Mike
From: Randall, Mike
Sent., Monday, March 28, 2011 11,13 AM
To. 'Chuck Tyson'; jhicksanclawyers.com
Cc: 'Marcia Sproul', Bennett, Bradley; Georgoulias, Bethany, Diuguid, 130
Subject, RE, Town of Trent Woods
Attachments- irnageOOIJpg
Tijesday April 5", at 2 �.00 PM vvOT ks for me.
From: Chuck Tyson [[e-mail]]
Sent.- Monday, Marc 28, 2011 B-56 AM
To: Randall, Mike, [e-mail]
f
Cc- 'Marcia Sproul',i Bennett, BradleyGeorgoulias, Bethany- Diuguid Bill
Subject: Re: Town of Trent Woods
Week of April 4 - any day but April 6"'
Week of April 19 any (Jay but the 21 and 22.
Week of April 25 - April 25 or 26"' works for me.
From: Jimmie B. Hicks (mailto.j hicks@ nclawyers.com
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 9;04 AM
To: Randalk, Mike
Cc: 'Chuck Tyson; 'Marcia Sproul'
Subject: Town of Trent Woods
Good morning. Jugt following up as to your availability to meet with the Trent Woods Town Council. Please advise as to
some dates that would beconvenierit for you. As I menfionad, although the Board usually meets at night, they would be
amenable to a day meeting to accommodate your schedule.
SumrellSugg
V
Jimmie 8. Hicks, Jr.
[e-mail]!

Phone (21;2' -V6�
Cell, 1252; 6-11"u 1208
Fax. 2 b 2'1 33 E. (j?
SUMrell, Sugg, Carmichael, Hicks & Hart, P.X
'16 Polloc�, S"(e.el
PIC Drawer 889
New Bei �i Nar!li 28563
)Lcard I mywKndaw gscg�m
This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended
rectpient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to tie intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited, If you have
received this massage in error, please immediately Rol-ify the sender and delete thts e-mail message from your computer
IRS CIRCULAR 2 30 DI SC L QSIRE: U S . federal tax advice in the foregoing message from Su m retf, Sugg, Carmichael,
Hicks & Hart, PA is not intended or wrftten to be ; and cannot be used by, any person for the purpose of a vo id i n g tax
penalties that may be imposed regarding the transactions or matters addressed. Some of that advice may have been
written to support the promotion or marketing of the transactions or ratter s addresed within the meaning of IRS Circular
230, in which case you should seek advice based on your particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
­­ . . . . . ...... . ..... ............. . .. .................................... — I—- . . — ....... . . ................. . ............
Frorn: Jimmie B. Hicks [mailto;[e-mail]]
Sent; Monday, March 21, 2011 10:26 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: 'Chuck Tyson'; 'Marcia Sproul'
Subjea: Town of Trent Woods
Mr, Randall: Thank you for speaking with me earlier this morning. As I indicated, the Town Council has requested to
meet with you to further discuss the Town's request for a waiver from the Phase If NPIDIES Permit Requirements. At your
earliest convenience, please provide me a list of dates and times you would be able to meet. Although an evenirig
meeting is preferred, we realize you will have to travel from Raleigh, so a day meeting is also possible.
Is
cce Mayor Chuck Tyson
Marcia Sproul, Town Clerk
SumrellSugg
Jimmie 8, Hicks. Jr.
jhicksCd,inclawyers co,r,
P4one, 2 52) 6`313 3131, (80' T, 272 -836��
CeIV 1'2,V) 670-1200
Fax. (2K) 633-35,7
Surnrell. Sugg. Carmichael, Hicks & Hart, P.A.
416 Polkock Streel
RO, Dray;&, 889
New Few, Norn Carol na 265-63
VLcard I �m ncla yers.cdm
This e-mail message may contain legally privileged andlor confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), or the ernpioyee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient( ). you are
N

hereby notified that any dissemination: distribution or copying of this e-mail massage is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, Tease immediately notify the sender and delete this -mail message from your computer.
IRS IR UL R 230 DSCLOSURE. U.S. federal tax advice in the foregoing message from Surnrell, Sugg, Carmtchael,
Hicks & dart, PA is not intended or written to be, and cannot be used by, anyper-son for the purpose of avoiding tax
penalties that may be imposed regarding the transactions or matters addressed. Some of that advice nay have been
written to support the promotion or marketing of the transactions or matters_addresed within the meaning of IRS Circular
30, in which case you shoed seek advice based on your particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

Trent River -chlorphyll a L
impairment
4 1
r
Pamlico to.
(Coastal)
Carteret Co.
(Coastal)

AYI_9;WA
ria
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor . Director
February 2, 2011
Mr. Jimmie B. Hicks, Jr.
Sumrell, Sugg, Carmichael, Hicks & Hart, P.A.
416 Pollock Street
New Bern, North Carolina 28562
Dear Mr. Hicks:
Dee Freeman
Secretary,
Subject: Town of Trent Woods' Request for Waiver
Phase II NPDES Permit Requirements
Craven County
We received your letter of September 14, 2010 on behalf of the Town of Trent Woods, requesting
a waiver of the requirement to apply for a permit under the Phase II National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) program. The request
followed a formal designation of Trent Woods as a Phase II community by the Environmental
Management Commission (EMC) on January 14, 2010.
We have reviewed your request and determined the Division cannot grant a waiver based on the
information presented by your letter. We are requesting additional information to understand the
Town's specific circumstances. Also, the Stormwater Permitting Unit (SPU) is willing to meet with you
to explore the Town's request further if you feel a re-evaluation of a waiver is needed.
Your letter outlined reasons for minimal possibility of future growth beyond corporate
boundaries.
RESPONSE. We appreciate your giving us a better understanding of the Town's built -out landscape. We
also understand that limited ability to retrofit structural best management practices (BMPs) restricts
stormwater management options to some degree. However, under the Phase II NPDES program, the
Town also has a responsibility to manage impacts from existing development and practices through
other measures. Good housekeeping for municipal operations, pollution prevention strategies, and
public education to improve stormwater discharge quality and quantity are examples. Permit
requirements are not limited to managing runoff from new development.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: 91M07-6300 4 FAX: [phone] l Customer Servim 1-877-623-6748 North Carol l nil
internei: www.ncwaterquality.vrg a ^�� y����``//J, ,
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer � �/ `

• The letter discussed an interlocal agreement with New Bern for the operation of a water and
sewer system, as well as a ban on septic tank permits, and the Town's relationship with Craven
County Health Department to address illicit discharges.
RESPONSE: We commend the partnership with the County to address potential illicit discharges.
However, this information does not demonstrate a comprehensive illicit discharge detection and
elimination program, which should also include attention to spills and illegal dumping.
Lb The IA11— refers - the - V.-n'J p4..t Itt1�Ig, I ev levy, and monnUt lllg pr Vicesses III ilia ilagi ilg ltj
construction site runoff, stormwater control, and post -construction stormwater.
RESPONSE: The requirements were not specified for us to evaluate them. Regardless, in the absence of
Town -specific requirements, the State Stormwater Permitting Program in the coastal region would
address post -construction. As mentioned above, the Phase II NPDES MS4 program imposes other
requirements beyond construction and post -construction stormwater control.
• Your letter stated the Town's streets are both Town and DOT streets but explained that "virtually
all of the streets adjacent to the Trent River, and their associated drainage, are DOT streets and
drainage systems."
RESPONSE: We appreciate having a better understanding of the Town's drainage infrastructure, and it
is possible that Trent Woods' stormwater discharges do not fall under NPDES authority. Should the
Town feel it qualifies for an exemption from the Phase II NPDES program because it does not own or
operate an MS4; the Town must certify that claim and provide sunnorting informatinn. O1ir staffwnuld
be happy to meet with the Town to review conditions on the ground if there are questions. The MS4
Non-owner/Non-operation Certification form can be found on the SPU's website:
http�/portal.ncdenr.org-/web/wq/npdessw/ms4resources.
The facts presented in your letter describe stormwater drainage from the Town's jurisdiction
being routed to the river, albeit through DOT conveyances. NPDES federal regulations would still apply
to Trent Woods' MS4 if discharges from that system enter, or have the potential to enter, waters of the
State —whether directly or indirectly. The map provided did not show enough detail to refute the
potential for discharge.
The Division disagrees that subjecting the Town to the Phase II NPDES rules would have no impact
on that drainage. The six minimum measures imposed by the Phase It program include efforts to
educate citizens about stormwater impacts, pollution prevention and good housekeeping practices, and
public involvement opportunities. These strategies are intended to decrease the impact of municipal
stormwater discharges.
The letter contends that the Trent River is not designated by the State as an impaired water and
that the basis for designation was erroneous.
RESPONSE: The Trent River is separated into two segments for water quality assessment purposes.
The first segment is the north shore at Trent Woods; the second extends from just east of Trent Woods
to the Neuse River, also impaired for nutrients. Since the 2006 assessment, one or both segments have
been impaired at least once based on chlorophyll a data (an indicator of excess nutrient impacts).

t
Our initial screening of Phase 11 designation candidates relied on the 2006 assessment and
proposed 2008 assessment, not yet finalized by U.S. EPA. The 2010 assessment was just being
compiled early last year. As of the most recent assessment (2010), the portion of the river immediately
adjacent to the Town is no longer categorized as impaired, but the other segment —less than a half -mile
downstream of the Town's boundary —remains impaired. That proximity would still have identified
Trent Woods as a designation candidate. The current 303(d) List and 2010 Integrated Report is on the
Division's website at: http./Zportal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/mtu/assessment.
The letter points out the Town was not notified further about EMC meeting dates on Phase II
designations.
RESPONSE: 'We agree our communication about the next steps in the designation process could have
been more informative. We will make every effort to improve our correspondence with future
candidates to assist them in the process. We do note that the original letter dated October 21, 2009
advised the Town that comments would be accepted through November 30, 2009. The Town
provided no comments to Division staff during this time. That was an opportunity for the
jurisdiction to provide information to help us make a recommendation. The notification letter also
included a website with more information, including what was presented at the EMC Water Quality
Committee meeting in September 2009.
Scheduled EMC meeting times and agendas are posted for the public on NC DENR's website. The
month our recommendations will go to EMC is somewhat uncertain when notification letters are sent
out. However, we will try to inform future candidates of an estimated timeline for bringing our
recommendations to the EMC, and we will instruct recipients to check the Department website
regularly for agenda items. Thank you for alerting us -to a chance to improve our guidance.
The Town of Trent Woods is given 18 months after designation to apply for an NPDES Phase 11
permit. Please. provide any information that would require us to reconsider our determination. 1
recommend you contact Bradley Bennett or Mike Randall of the SPU to arrange a meeting to discuss
your specific situation. Otherwise, the Town of Trent Woods should prepare and submit all necessary
application materials'no later than July 14, 2011. You can find these materials on the SPU's website. If
you have any questions about this matter, -please contact Bradley Bennett or Mike Randall at telephone
number [phone] or [phone], respectively.
cc: Washington Regional Office
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Sincerely,
Co een H. Sullins

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
January 26, 2011 DRAFT
Mr. Jimmie B. Hicks, Jr.
Sumrell, Sugg, Carmichael, Hicks & Hart, P.A.
416 Pollock Street
New Bern, North Carolina 28562
Subject: Town of Trent Woods' Request for Waiver
Phase II NPDES Permit Requirements
Craven County
Dear Mr. Hicks:
IAln rnrn;cInrl lrnilr Inhhnr nn hnh"IFnFht,n Tns nFTrnnf• AAIn Ar rnnnnr♦inn , ur ivn nFt-hn
■YL 14.. L L.1 Yl.0 �YVUI ll..11l..l VII ULIIGII V1 Lill. I VYYI1 VI 11411L YY VVUJ I L..I..t I1L,IL_1116 G1 YY[1I Y41 V1 I.11%_
requirement to apply for a permit under the Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) program. The request followed a formal
designation of Trent Woods as a Phase II community by the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) on January 14, 2010.
We have reviewed your request and determined the Division cannot grant a waiver based on the
information presented by your letter. We are requesting additional information to understand the
Town's specific circumstances. Also, the Stormwater Permitting Unit (SPU) is willing to meet with you
to explore the Town's request further if you feel a re-evaluation of a waiver is needed.
Your letter outlined reasons for minimal possibility of future growth beyond corporate
boundaries.
RESPONSE: We appreciate your giving us a better understanding of the Town's built -out landscape. We
also understand that limited ability to retrofit structural best management practices (BMPs) restricts
stormwater management options to some degree. However, under the Phase 11 NPDES program, the
Town also has a responsibility to manage impacts from existing development and practices through
other measures. Good housekeeping for municipal operations, pollution prevention strategies, and
puurii, cuucatrurr w improve awe irivyatci u1ac11131 rc yuell iLy ariu LIuarJLrLy ar e exaI I I Pica. r ci lrrlt
requirements are not limited to managing runoff from new development.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Eaua! Opportunity V Affirmalive Action Emolover
NorthCarolina
Naturaffil
- v

0-
The letter discussed an interlocal agreement with New Bern for the operation of a water and
sewer system, as well as a ban on septic tank permits, and the Town's relationship with Craven
County Health Department to address illicit discharges.
RESPONSE: We commend the partnership with the County to address a primary potential for illicit
discharges. However, this information does not demonstrate a comprehensive illicit discharge
detection and elimination program, which should also include attention to spills and illegal dumping.
The letter refers to the Town's permitting, review, and monitoring processes in managing its
construction site runoff, stormwater control, and post -construction stormwater.
RESPONSE.- The requirements were not specified for its to evaluate them. Regardless, in the absence of
Town -specific requirements, the State Stormwater Permitting Program in the coastal region would
address post -construction. As mentioned above, the Phase II NPDES MS4 program imposes other
requirements beyond construction and post -construction stormwater control.
• Your letter stated the Town's streets are both Town and DOT streets but explained that "virtually
all of the streets adjacent to the Trent River, and their associated drainage, are DOT streets and
drainage systems."
RESPONSE: We appreciate having a better understanding of the Town's drainage infrastructure, and it
is possible that Trent Woods' stormwater discharges do not fall under NPDES authority. Should the
Town feel it qualifies for an exemption from the Phase II NPDES program because it does not own or
operate an MS4, the Town must certify that claim and provide supporting information. Our staff would
be happy to meet with the Town to review conditions on the ground if there are questions. The MS4
Non-owner/Non-operation Certification form can be found on the SPU's website:
httl2:Zlportal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/npdessw/ms4resources.
The facts presented in your letter describe stormwater drainage from the Town's jurisdiction
being routed to the river, albeit through DOT conveyances. NPDES federal regulations would still apply
to Trent Wnnds' MS4 if disrharges from that systpm PntPr nr hnvP the nntwntial to Pntwr watPrc of the
State —whether directly or indirectly. The map provided did not show enough detail to refute the
potential for discharge.
The Division disagrees that subjecting the Town to the Phase II NPDES rules would have no impact
on that drainage. The six minimum measures imposed by the Phase I1 program include efforts to
educate citizens about stormwater impacts, pollution prevention and good housekeeping practices, and
public involvement opportunities. These strategies are intended to decrease the impact of municipal
stormwater discharges.
The letter contends that the Trent River is not designated by the state as an impaired water and
that the basis for designation was erroneous.
RESPONSE: The Trent River is separated into two segments for water quality assessment purposes.
The first segment is the north shore at Trent Woods; the second extends from Trent Woods to the
Neuse River, also impaired for nutrients. Since the 2006 assessment, one or both segments have been
impaired based on chlorophyll a data (an indicator of excess nutrient impacts).

.
Our initial screening of Phase Il designation candidates relied on the 2006 assessment and
proposed 2008 assessment, not yet finalized by U.S. EPA. The 2010 assessment was just being
compiled early last year. As of the most recent assessment (2010), the portion of the river immediately
adjacent to the Town is no longer categorized as impaired, but that segment has had noted chlorophyll
a standard exceedances. In addition, the standing impairment downstream does not rule out impacts
from stormwater discharges upstream. The current 303(d) List and 2010 Integrated Report is on the
Division's website at: http:./.Iportal.ncdenr.org/web/wq./12s/mtu /assessment.
• The letter points out the Town was not notified further about EMC meeting dates on Phase 11
designations.
L)rr1POK1QU: AAln nnrnn nllr rnmmilnir ifinn ihnlit tkn nnvh rf-- in hhn rinrin.�- t-;— r�r .rnrr r. u]A 1�- V:
IL I Vl�.]L... YY V U�1 L.L VLl L.VIIIIIlUII1l.ULJVII CIU"UL L1lL 11LAL JLLf/0 III g11L µLJI�IIULJ%JII lJI VLLJJ %,%J U IIC] L
been more informative. We will make every effort to improve our correspondence with future
candidates to assist them in the process. We do note that the original letter dated October 21, 2009
advised the Town that comments would be accepted through November 30, 2009. The Town
provided no comments to Division staff during this time. That was an opportunity for the
jurisdiction to provide information to help us make a recommendation. The notification letter also
included a website with more information, including what was presented at the EMC Water Quality
Committee meeting in September 2009.
Scheduled EMC meeting times and agendas are posted for the public on NC DENR's website. The
month our recommendations will go to EMC is somewhat uncertain when notification letters are sent
out. However, we will try to inform future candidates of an estimated timeline for bringing our
recommendations to the EMC, and we will instruct recipients to check the Department website
regularly for agenda items. Thank you for alerting us to a chance to improve our guidance.
The Town of Trent Woods is given 18 months after designation to apply for an NPDES Phase I
permit. Please provide any information that would require us to reconsider our determination.
Otherwise, the Town of Trent Woods should prepare and submit all necessary application materials no
later than July 14, 2011. You can find these materials on the SPU's website. If you have any questions
nknllf- t• is mnh*nr nln-lcn r•nnhnr•t• Qrnrlln.. nnnrinf-f- - 1- .. —t— C01 Ol 0117_CQrM
u Uvu111.10 I..µ L441, F/14UJL "I UUI\.y LJ It Il LL UI. 1.1.14k11l Vlll. If UI i I UJ I kl1 lJ UUI -VJ/ V.
Sincerely,
Coleen H. Sullins
Director, Division of Water Quality
cc: Washington Regional Office
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
M
�
iA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
January 26, 2011 DRAFT
Mr. Jimmie B. Hicks, Jr.
Sumrell, Sugg, Carmichael, Hicks & Hart, F.A.
416 Pollock Street
New Bern, North Carolina 28562
Dear Mr. Hicks:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Town of Trent Woods' Request for Waiver
Phase 11 NPDES Permit Requirements
C,r;wPn Cnlinty
1 A I.. » ......:......] ...... » 1 „ a.a.,, » L. ,. L..,1 C C tiL... T .. C T» a. 1 A l ...- I .. » ... , a- .....:.. � ., .. F � L..-.
VVC 1Cl,CIVCU �lUU1 ICLLCI VIl UClldll VI LIIC IUW11 of"I YY UUUJ 1CL.iUCJllil�d VVdIVCI U1 Ll1C
requirement to apply for a permit under the Phase 11 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) program. The request followed a formal
designation of Trent Woods as a Phase II community by the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) on January 14, 2010.
We have reviewed your request and determined the Division cannot grant a waiver based on the
information presented by your letter. We are requesting additional information to understand the
Town's specific circumstances. Also, the Stormwater Permitting Unit (SPU) is willing to meet with you
to explore the Town's request further if you feel a re-evaluation of a waiver is needed.
Your letter outlined reasons for minimal possibility of future growth beyond corporate
boundaries.
RESPONSE. We appreciate your giving us a better understanding of the Town's built -out landscape. We
also understand that limited ability to retrofit structural best management practices (BMPS) restricts
stormwater management options to some rdegree. However, under the Phase II NPDES program, the
Town also has a responsibility to manage impacts from existing development and practices through
other measures. Good housekeeping for municipal operations, pollution prevention strategies, and
public education to improve stormwater discharge quality and quantity are examples. Permit
requirements are not limited to managing runoff from new development.
1617 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N, Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: www.ncrvaterquality.org Aatural,(Il
er, Eq, ai Cippp ,��iw 1 atrrmati a Acrio� Fmpioer _ _ r_.._..., ........._,._..._.. _.. r. ,a

r'
The letter discussed an interlocal agreement with New Bern for the operation of a water and
sewer system, as well as a ban on septic tank permits, and the Town's relationship with Craven
County Health Department to address illicit discharges.
RESPONSE: We commend the partnership with the County to address a primary potential for illicit
discharges. However, this information does not demonstrate a comprehensive illicit discharge
detection and elimination program, which should also include attention to spills and illegal dumping.
• The letter refers to the Town's permitting, review, and monitoring processes in managing its
construction site runoff, stormwater control, and post -construction stormwater.
RESPONSE; The requirements were not specified for us to evaluate them. Regardless, in the absence of
Town -specific requirements, the State Stormwater Permitting Program in the coastal region would
address post -construction. As mentioned above, the Phase II NPDES MS4 program imposes other
requirements beyond construction and post -construction stormwater control.
Your letter stated the Town's streets are both Town and DOT streets but explained that "virtually
all of the streets adjacent to the Trent River, and their associated drainage, are DOT streets and
drainage systems."
RESPONSE: We appreciate having a better understanding of the Town's drainage infrastructure, and it
is possible that Trent Woods' stormwater discharges do not fall under NPDES authority. Should the
Town feel it qualifies for an exemption from the Phase 11 NPDES program because it does not own or
operate an MS4, the Town must certify that claim and provide supporting information. Our staff would
be happy to meet with the Town to review conditions on the ground if there are questions. The MS4
Non-owner/Non-operation Certification form can be found on the SPU's website:
http://.12ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/npdessw/ms4resources.
The facts presented in your letter describe stormwater drainage from the Town's jurisdiction
being routed to the river, albeit through DOT conveyances. NPDES federal regulations would still apply
to Trent Woods' MS4 if discharges from that system enter, or have the potential to enter, waters of the
State —whether directly or indirectly. The map provided did not show enough detail to refute the
potential for discharge.
The Division disagrees that subjecting the Town to the Phase 11 NPDES rules would have no impact
on that drainage. The six minimum measures imposed by the Phase 11 program include efforts to
educate citizens about stormwater impacts, pollution prevention and good housekeeping practices, and
public involvement opportunities. These strategies are intended to decrease the impact of municipal
stormwater discharges.
The letter contends that the Trent River is not designated by the state as an impaired water and
that the basis for designation was erroneous.
RESPONSE: The Trent River is separated into two segments for water quality assessment purposes.
The first segment is the north shore at Trent Woods; the second extends from Trent Woods to the
Neuse River. also imnaired for nutrients. Since the 2006 assessment. one or both segments have been
impaired based on chlorophyll a data (an indicator of excess nutrient impacts). V

Our initial screening of Phase II designation candidates relied on the 2006 assessment and
proposed 2008 assessment, not yet finalized by U.S. EPA. The 2010 assessment was just being
compiled early last year. As of the most recent assessment (2010), the portion of the river immediately
adjacent to the Town is no longer categorized as impaired, but that segment has had noted chlorophyll
a standard exceedances. In addition, the standing impairment downstream does not rule out impacts
from stormwater discharges upstream. The current 303(d) List and 2010 Integrated Report is on the
Division's website at: htt rtal.ncdenr.or web w s mtu assessment.
+ The letter points out the Town was not notified further about EMC meeting dates on Phase 11
designations.
RESPONSE: We agree our communication about the next steps in the designation process could have
been more informative. We will make every effort to improve our correspondence with future
candidates to assist them in the process. We do note that the original letter dated October 21, 2009
advised the Town that comments would be accepted through November 30, 2009. The Town
provided no comments to Division staff during this time. That was an opportunity for the
jurisdiction to provide information to help us make a recommendation. The notification letter also
included a website with more information, including what was presented at the EMC Water. Quality
Committee meeting in September 2009.
Scheduled EMC meeting times and agendas are posted for the public on NC DENR's website. The
month our recommendations will go to EMC is somewhat uncertain when notification letters are sent
out. However, we will try to inform future candidates of an estimated timeline for bringing our
recommendations to the EMC, and we will instruct recipients to check the Department website
regularly for agenda items. Thank you for alerting us to a chance to improve our guidance.
The Town of Trent Woods is given 18 months after designation to apply for an NPDES Phase II
permit. Please provide any information that would require us to reconsider our determination.
Otherwise, the Town of Trent Woods should prepare and submit all necessary application materials no
later than July 14, 2011. You can find these materials on the SPU's website. If you have any questions
about this matter, please contact Bradley Bennett at telephone number [phone].
Sincerely,
Coleen H. Sullins
Director, Division of Water Quality
cc: Washington Regional Office
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files

sumr(Alsugg
ATTORNEYS AT L A W
Jimmie S. Hieks,.lr.
,[e-mail]
September 13, 2010
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Attn.: Coleen 11. Sullins
Re: Town of Trent Woods
Request for Waiver — Phase 11 NPDES Permit Requirements
Out File No.: 92244.02 (GL No. 2010-10)
Dear Ms. Sullins:
On behalf of the Town of Trent Woods (Town), please accept this correspondence as the Town's
request for a waiver of the Phase Il National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit requirements, pursuant to Section I L(c) of North Carolina Session Law 2006-246. In
support of this request, the Town submits the following information for your review and
consideration.
Overview of Town of Trent Woods
The Town is located in Craven County, North Carolina, completely bounded by the City of New
Bern and the Trent Diver. It covers approximately 29 square miles of land. As of the 2000
Census, the Town had a population of 4,192, and had 1,692 households. The Town is almost
exclusively residential. Furthermore, given its location and quality of life, the Town is almost
completely developed. Less than eight percent (8%) of the parcels in the Town are undeveloped.
Those parcels not already developed are, in substantial part, subject to numerous state and local
environmental regulations, and conditions including substantial acres of wetlands, which
tremendously limit any further development within the Town. Also, given that it is
"landlocked", it is impossible for the Town to expand its corporate boundaries. Of the 2,098
total parcels of land in the Town, less than 20 are commercial business tracts, two (2) tracts are
private clubs, four (4) tracts are churches, two (2) tracts are municipal buildings, one (1)
extremely large tract is a cemetery, and one (1) tract is an elementary school. The Town's
Zoning Ordinance does not even contain a zoning classification for business or retail. The Town
is truly a "bedroom" community with minimal possibility of future growth.
d141'nil,xi .S1rt•rl 2,-1-I):;:-.�1,;1 i(,fi!rL., �:-inrRli,SI11:. iiiii'.il-II Ih:�k:;,.l'..:!:
,.,•!:..... NC.2'.... 'y-o', � ., ,r:� �Iax, : nda.:y�er.;..,:u

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 13, 2010
Page 2
Sewerage Systems Within the Town
The Town does not operate its own water or sewer enterprise system. These services are
provided by the City of New Bern through an interlocal agreement with the Town. Municipal
sewage is collected and transmitted to the City of New Bern's wastewater treatment plant located
outside of the Town. At this time, a number of developed tracts are still served by private septic
tanks. However, all new development, and all developed tracts whose systems fail in the future,
are required by law to connect to the City of New Bern's municipal sewerage system.
Consequently, no future septic tank permits will be issued within the Town. The Town
proactively works with the Craven County Health Department in an effort to detect and eliminate
illicit discharges.
Stormwater Control
The Town has an active Planning Board and Board of Adjustment. Its land use policies
encourage smart growth, with an emphasis on protecting the environment and the Trent River.
l..,V 1lJl1 UVLSVlI sl4G riilloll, JLlJI 111W[tter control, V1, a11u post -construction stormwater management are
controlled through the Town's permitting, review, and monitoring processes. The Town's
Subdivision Ordinance also requires plans for stormwater control and drainage, detailing all
holding basins, settling ponds, swales, ditches, the use of porous pavement, and similar,
sufficient to insure appropriate control of stormwater and drainage.
Ownership and Control of Streets and Drainage
The streets within the Town are comprised of both Town streets and DOT streets. However,
virtually all of the streets adjacent to the Trent River, and their associated drainage, are DOT
streets and drainage systems. As such, the Town is precluded from maintenance, improvements,
or any other control aspect of the associated drainage: Consequently, the vast majority of tli.-
Town's stormwater flows through DOT drainage systems, outside of the control and regulatory
authority of the Town. Hence, subjecting the Town to the Phase II NPDES rules would have
absolutely no impact or affect on such drainage. A map of the streets within the Town, showing
respective ownership and control, is enclosed herein for your reference.
Request for Waiver —40 C.F.R. 122.32(e)
Based upon the demographics of the Town, and the applicable federal and state regulations, the
Town was designated as a regulated public entity that owns or operates a MS4 subject to the
NPDES requirements under Section 5(1)(d)(4) of Session Law 2006-246. The Town respectfully
disagrees with this conclusion and designation.

Roadway Study update
Town of Trent Woods
Trent Woods, NC
Prepared By:
Avolis Engineering, PA
PO Box 15564
New Bern, NC 28563
(252) 633 006-8
tGJL� VJJ-VVVO
Prepared For:
Town of Trent Woods
Mayor Charles F. Tyson, Jr.
Michael Shane Turney, Commisioner
Bobby Bell, Commissioner
Robert S. Shields,Commissioner
October 14, 2009
D�Ib�o
CAA
Q f�
z y,
`��I111EIIf11�1��'

Table of Contents
1. Introduction........................................................3
11. Roadway Evaluation Procedures...............................3
Ill. Roadway Evaluation Findings.................................4
V. Initial Roadway Improvement Project .........................6
V. Future Roadway Improvement Projects .......................6
Appendices:
Appendix A - Overall Town Road System
Appendix B —Town Roads
Appendix C - 2009 Paving Recommendations

1. Introduction
Avolis Engineering, PA was contacted by the Town of `]'rent Woods to provide an update
of the study of the Town's roadway system which was completed in 2007. The purpose
of the updated study is to assess the condition of the existing Town of Trent Woods
maintained roads. This information would provide the basis for prioritizing needed
roadway maintenance and improvements and resurfacing.
The purpose of the roadway study update is also to recommend the packaging of a
roadway improvement project. Recommendations are also made for future
improvements based upon the annual funding received from the Powell, Bill.
The study update does not address the roadways maintained by the North Carolina
Departmcrrt of']'ransportation (NCDO'T). The Town of "Trent Woods is prohibited by
law from using Powell 13111 funds for the maintenance and repair of roads maintained by
the NCDOT. Privately owned roadways in the Town were not evaluated. All of the
roadways in the "]'own are constructed of an asphalt pavement section.
The Town of Trent Woods had their last paving project completed in the fall of'2007
fol lowing completion of the Town wide sewer installation project.
1I. Roadway Evaluation Procedures
The Town of Trent Woods roadways were walked in order to observe their condition.
The evaluation was conducted by comparing the condition of the roadways relative to
one another. The level of use of the roadways was observed, recognizing that cul de sac
and other isolated residential streets usually experience less traffic than collector or
thoroughfare roads.
The conditions of the roadways were assessed by observing the surface drainage, general
soil conditions in the area, number and the degree of various surface cracking conditions
and the level of asphalt patching that has previously occurred. The observations for each
of the roadways was recorded in the field and summarized on the drawings in appendix B
mach ol'the roadways was assigned a general condition of good, fair or poor based upon
the relative condition of the road and considering the amount of use that the road
experiences.

Ill. Roadway Evaluation Findings
Generally, the condition of the Town of Trent Woods maintained roads were observed to
be satisfactory. There were no roadway surfaces that were observed to be severely
deteriorated or unable to be used for an additional period of time if needed. Maintenance
or resurfacing of the poorest roadway surfaces is recommended in order to help maintain
the structural integrity of the roadway surface and to improve the overall roadway ride
and appearance.
The '[own of Trent Woods roads and their general determined conditions are as follows:
Roadway
Alexander Lane
Baron's Way
Berkley Drive
Cambridge Court
Camelia Road
Carolina Aventie(West)
Carolina Avenue(East)
Carteret Drive
Chatham Pass
Chinquapin Lane
Colleton way
Cooper's Court
Coquina Circle
Country Club Circle
**Country Club Drive
Country Club Drive
(Southern Portion)
Country Club Drive
(Creek's End)
Creekwood Drive
Darby Road
**Devonshire Drive
Discovery Bay
Dogwood Lane
Dorsett Way
Downing Circle
Fairway Drive
Gloucester Drive
Greenview Road
Greenwood Road
Condition Repairs
Cost
Good
Patching
$1,900
Good
Patching
Ineligible
Good
None
$0
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$0
Fair
Overlay
$30,000
Good
None
$0
Fair
None
$0
Fair
None
$0
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$0
Good
None
$0
Good
Resurfaced 2005
$4,500-Patch
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$0
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$0
Fair
None
$0
Fair
Resurface Portion
$102,000
& thermoplastic striping
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$0
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$0
Good
None
$0
Good
Resurface intersection
$5,000
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$0
Thermoplastic striping
$1,500
Fair
Resurface
$21,600
Good
Recently repaved
$0
Good
Resurface intersection/patch
Ineligible
Poor
Resurface
$12,600
Good
Partially Resurfaced
$4,000
Good
None
$0
Good''
None
$0
Good
None
$0
0

Roadway
Condition
Repairs
Cost
I-lampton Way
Poor
Partial resurface
$25,200
Hatcher Road
Good
Resurfaced 2007
V)
Hawthorne Road
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$0
Hermitage Road
Fair
Patch
$4 000
-lillandale Road
Poor
Resurface
$37,200
Hillcrest Road
Good
None
$0
Holly Ridge Road
fair
None
$0
I-lunt Club I.,anc
Good
None
$0
Hydes Corner
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$0
Ives Avenue
Pair
None
$0
Llewellyn Drive
lair
Patching
$1 000
**Meadowbrook Dr
Poor
Resurface
$99,600
Melody Lane
Poor
Resurface
$17.916
Monck's Court
Good
None
$0
Morgan I..ane
Good
None
$0
Moye Road
Good
Resurfaced 2007
S0
Norman Road
Pair
Patching
$2 ,600
Park Drive
Pair
None
$0
Pearson Circle
Good
None
$0
Pinecrest Road
Good
Repair shoulder
$200
Pine Tree Lane
Fair
Patching
$5Q0
Roger's Court
Pair
None
$0
Rossic Road
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$0
Runaway Bay
Pair
Partial resurface
$12,000
Sandhurst Road
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$0
Somerset Court
Pair
Partial resurface
$12,500
Springwood Drive
Pair
None
$0
Stratford Road
Poor
Partial resurface
$12.500
Stratton Drive
Good
None
$0
Surrey Lane
Good
Patching
$500
Tack House Road
Good
None
$0
Tenella lZoad
Good
None
$0
"Trent fines Drive
Good
None
$0
Trent River Drive
Fair
Resurface
$43,320
Wentworth Court
Good
None
$0
West Fairway Drive
Good
None
$0
Westward Court
Poor
Resurface
$9.600
Wexford Place
Good
Resurfaced 2007
$o
White Oak Drive
Fair
Partial resurface.
lk 1 ; inn
Wilson Point Road
Good
None
$p ,�
Yacht Club Drive
Good
None
$0
** = HiLlher priority repairs
5

Total High Priority Roads $203,100
Total Low Priority Roads $272,136
IV. Initial Roadway Improvement Project
It is recommended that a pavement improvement project for the Town of Trent Woods be
initiated to address the recommended repairs. The project proposes the resurfacing; of
approximately 2.6 miles of roads in addition to patching and striping; at various other
roads where needed.
The estimated construction cost for repairing; the higher priority roadways is $203,100.
The estimated construction cost of repairing; the lower priority roadways is $272,136.
The estimated engineering and construction administration costs associated with the
project are $6,500.
There has been discussion regarding teaming; with the `town of River Fiend in order to
group together a larger overall paving project. This action would make the project more
attractive and efficient for most contractors, particularly out of town bidders. Petroleum
price ALictuations also have an impact on roadway repaving costs.
V. Future Roadway Improvement Projects
The proposed project will still leave an adequate fund balance to adequately address
future roadway maintenance given the good overall condition of the Town roads and the
maintenance efforts completed in the recent past
Given the overall good condition of th,- Town lRoa 1, L'_ '
b..�•.. w+ v +w ++,wu �wuu� at tll[a Ltllle, it is reCOn1111enOed that
a future project be determined later when the next road work phase is ready to take place.
n better evaluation of the needs at that time can be made as the roads continue to age.

Appendix A

�X
Y
1
L
.4 Fd!L
o
o
v
p !
ROADWAY STUDY
TOWN OF TP.ENTWOODSVRA�tN
NEW KERN. NORTH C.AROLINA
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
} a,e -d Eo�.o —td Enq.—r
�� 9
O BOX 15564. NEW BEAN, NC 29561
BY
AT ., 9i2 07
jI COVER SHEET
v
[phone]. Fox (252)63�-6507

Appendix B

d
2007 PAVING PROJECT
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
o
I�uj�1
TOWN OF TRENTWOODS
aw wd Enyh-tnl Enginwimy
P.O. BON f5sea NEW BEIRI, N OAROIINA
y
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
� PRONE: (2S2) 03J-006!! FAX 252) ... 65V30�
(
�'
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT

Appendix C

$
o
d
7
2009 PAVING RECOMMENDTATIONS
TOWN OF TRENTWOODS
TRENTWOODS. NORTH CAROLINA
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
CIA and Enviranmmtol Engl—inq
P. 60X 155B4 NEW EEFK N
_ Za ewwr. CNIii CA8CUNA 2ml
_- _--
PROJECT NO 0 120
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT

Mq`p 6
Roadway Study
Town of Trent Woods
Trent Woods, NC
Prepared By:
Avolis Engineering, PA
PO Box 15564
New Bern, NC 28563
[phone]
Prepared For:
Town of Trent Woods
Commissioner Ron Oliver
Commissioner Harry Lassiter
Commissioner Shane Turney
August 7, 2007

Table of Contents
1. Introduction........................................................3
II. Roadway Evaluation Procedures...............................3
III. Roadway Evaluation Findings.................................4
IV. Initial Roadway Improvement Project .........................6
V. Future Roadway Improvement Projects .......................6
Appendices:
Appendix A - Overall Road System
Appendix B - Pavement Evaluation Findings
Appendix C - Roadway Inspection Reports (Town Roads)
Appendix D - Roadway Inspection Reports (NCDOT Roads)
2

I. Introduction
Avolis Engineering, PA was contacted by the Town of Trent Woods to provide a study of
the Town's roadway system. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the existing roads
and to assess their condition. This information would provide the basis for prioritizing
needed roadway maintenance and improvements and to establish a timeline and schedule
for their completion.
The purpose of the roadway study was also to recommend the packaging of an initial
roadway improvement project to fit within the initial budgetary requirements.
Recommendations were also to be made for future improvements. based upon the annual
funding received from the Powell Bill.
The study addressed both the roadways maintained by the Town of Trent Woods and
those roadways maintained by the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT). The Town road deficiencies are reported in more detail given the position
that the Town of Trent Woods is prohibited by law to use Powell Bill funds for the
maintenance and repair of roads maintained by the NCDOT. The observations of the
NCDOT roads are provided to convey a general knowledge of the condition of these
roads since they comprise approximately fifty percent of the Town's roadway length.
Privately owned roadways in the Town were not evaluated: All of the roadways in the.
Town are constructed of an asphalt pavement section.
The Town of Trent Woods has not had any Town funded paving projects since 2000.
Roadway repairs were placed on hold pending the installation of the Town wide sewer
system. The Town sewer project required the installation of sewer mains primarily
adjacent to one side or the other of the majority of the roads in the Town. Excavations
were -required to be performed adjacent to the edge of pavements. The excavation along
with the operation of heavy equipment resulted in damage to many of the Town and
NCDOT roads. The sewer project ultimately provided the repair of many of these
damaged areas with asphalt patching. In some instances, entire roadways were repaved
due to excessive damage or the requirement to place the sewer main down the center of
the street. Heavy equipment operations often resulted in gouging of the asphalt surfaces
and cracking along the edge of the pavement. All of these damaged areas were not
repaired by the sewer project.
II. Roadway Evaluation Procedures
The Town of Trent Woods and the NCDOT roadways were walked in order to observe
their condition. The exception to this evaluation procedure was Country Club Road,
Trent Woods Drive, River Road and Chelsea Road, where each of these major NCDOT
roadways were driven.
3

The evaluation was conducted by comparing the condition of the roadways relative to
one another. The level of use of the roadways was observed, recognizing that cul de sac
and other isolated residential streets usually experience less traffic than collector or
thoroughfare roads.
The conditions of the roadways were assessed by observing the surface drainage, general
soil conditions in the area, number and the degree of various surface cracking conditions
and the level of asphalt patching that has previously occurred. The observations for each
of the roadways are recorded in the individual inspection reports in Appendices C and D.
Each of the roadways was assigned a general priority of low, medium or high based upon
the condition of the goad and considering the amount of use that the road experiences.
Ill. Roadway Evaluation Findings
Generally, the condition of the Town of Trent Woods maintained roads were observed to
be satisfactory. There were no roadway surfaces that were observed to be severely
deteriorated or unable to be used for an additional period of time if needed. Maintenance
or resurfacing of the poorest roadway surfaces is recommended in order to help maintain
the structural integrity of the roadway surface and to improve the overall roadway ride
and appearance.
As a general rule, the NCDOT maintained roads were observed to be in a more
deteriorated condition than the Town roads. These conditions appeared to be due in part
to past maintenance attention, damage caused by the sewer system construction and the
general age of the roads.
The Town of Trent Woods roads and their general determined conditions are as follows:
Roadway Condition Repairs
Atexanaer Lane
kjooa
none — Kecenuy raven
Baron's Way
Good
Patching
Berkley Drive
Good
None
Blackledge Circle
Good
None
Cambridge Court
Fair
Resurface
Cameha Road
Good
Patching
Carolina Avenue
Good
None
Carteret Drive
Good
None
Chatham Pass
Poor
Resurface
Chinquapin Lane
Good
None
Colleton Way
Good
None — Recently Paved
Cooper's Court
Poor
Resurface
Coquina Circle
Fair
Partial Resurface
Cost
$0
$3,000
$o
$a
$%,UVU
$3,000
$320
$0
$16,000
$0
$0
$15,000
$20,000
4

Roadway
Condition
Repairs
Cost
Country Club Circle
Good
None
$300
Country Club Drive
Good.
Patching/Restripe
$66,000
Country Club Drive
Fair
Resurface(Creek's End)
$21,000
Darby Road
Good
Replace poor patches
$400
Devonshire Drive
Poor
Overlay/Restripe
$24,000
Discovery Bay
Good
Patching
$2,000
Dogwood Lane
Good
Recently repaved
$0
Dorsett Way
Good
Resurface intersection/patch
$3,000
Downing Circle
Fair
Resurface
$8,000
Fairway Drive
Good
None
$12,000
Gioucester Drive
Good
Minor patching
$500
Greenview Road
Good
None
$0
Greenwood Road
Good
None
$0
Hampton Way
Fair
Patching
$1,000
Hatcher Road
Poor
Resurface
$15,000
Hawthorne Road
Fair
Resurface
$34.000
Hillerest Road
Good
None
$0
Holly Ridge Road
Fair
Partial resurface/patching
$7,500
Horse Shoe Bend
Good
None — recently repaved
$0
Hunt Club Lane
Good
None — recently repaved
$0
Hydes Corner
Fair
Overlay
$10,000
Ives Avenue
Good
None
$0
Kingsworth lane
Good
Minor patching
$200
Llewellyn Drive
Good
Patching
$1,000
Meadowbrook Drive
Good
Patch ing/Restri pe
$2,000
Monck's Court
Good
One patch/recently surfaced
$300
Morgan Lane
Good
Patching
$300
Moye Road
Poor
Resurface
$23,000
Norman Road
Good
Repair patches
$1,200
Pinecrest Road
Good
Seal Cracks
$150
Pine Tray t am
C',nnrt
rrnr.kc
T"AA
Roger's Court
Good
None
$0
Rossie Road
Poor
Resurface
$11,000
Runaway Bay
Good
None
$0
13 ll.l Jl.L VVUll
1 Llll
1- GI LI LLI leJl111 µcL
.V 1 L rinri
-, VV
Springwood Drive
Fair
Partial overlay
$6,000
Stratford Road
Good
Patching
$1,600
Stratton Drive
Good
None
$0
n--.-.._-- 1_
Jurrey Lane
n a
U00d
n Lc�..
ratell1111�
C� i nn
DL, 1 VU
Tack House Road
Good
None
$0
Tenella Road
Good
None
$0
Trent Pines Drive
Good
None
$0
Trent River Drive
r. ,
vooa
None
�v
5

Roadway Condition
Wentworth Court
Good
West Fairway Drive
Good
Wexford Place
Good
White Oak Drive
Good
Wilson Point Road
Good
Yacht Club Drive
Good
Total
Repairs Cost
None
$0
Single patch
$2,600
Resurface
$14,000
Patching
$300
None
$0
None
$0
$347,570
A total of the NCDOT projected repairs was not made since the repair priorities are
established by the NCDOT during the course of their roadway evaluation procedures.
IV Irl1 1.11 nn/l �i�n�r 1rr. r..-�irom or.* D1 9-13 �t
I•. 113ALl"A I\l/[1" VV ".y 111111a V V 11111%,it L I 1 V,\rl-1
Since the Town of Trent Woods has not had any Town funded roadway improvement
projects since 2000, Powell Bill funds and interest have accrued where there is currently
$575,000 available to fund an initial project. As previously noted, the Powell Bill funds
are only permitted to be used to maintain Town owned roads. The available fund balance
allows the repair of all of the Town roads where significant deficiencies were observed
by this study. The project proposes the resurfacing of approximately 13,614 feet (2.6
miles) of roads in addition to patching and striping at various other roads where needed.
The estimated construction cost of the initial project is $347,570. The estimated
engineering costs associated with preparing construction documents for bidding is
$9,000, The estimated construction administration costs are $7,000. The remaining fund
balance of $21 1,430 would be available to fund change orders and/or to compensate for
increased asphalt and/or labor costs prior to bidding of the project. The majority of the
balance would be available to fund future projects as roadway conditions naturally
deteriorate over time.
V. Future Roadway Improvement Projects
It is anticipated that approximately $200,000 would be available from the existing
accumulated roadway fund to perform future roadway repaving and repairs.
Approximately $42,000 is provided annually from Powell Bill funding and would be
placed into the roadway improvement fund. A second roadway project is recommended
in two years at which time approximately $294,000 would be available.
6'

Given the overall good condition of the Town Roads at this time, it is recommended that
a future project be determined later when the next road work phase is ready to take place.
A better evaluation of the needs at that time can be made as the roads continue to age.
Based on the condition of the Town Roads, the remaining roadway fund balance as well
as additional Powell Bill funding would be adequate to meet any perceived future
maintenance requirements.
7

APPENDIX A

o
o
OVERALL ROAD SYSTEM
TOWN OF TRENTWOODS
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
ctio Endrmmmmi EngAR="g
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
and
NORTH cANvuNA
P.O. BOX lsxs NEW BEAN. 2E86t
�`�
� \
PHONE (252) m, -oma FAX (252) as- -aw
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT

APPENDIX B

PAVEMENT EVALUATION FINDINGS
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
o
f]
TOWN OF TRENTWOODS
CM and EnW�anmental Englneering
"o e0% llb"4 ww ff ' NmR CAROLNA 2&%,
+
7�
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
P ME (252) eu--wee FAX' (252) e-33-6507
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
n
(

����l�Tui� i

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Alexander lane PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL 0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1666 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 3702
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY NIA
COMMENTS OVERLAYED IN 2005. SECOND HALF NEW IN 1999. NO WORK

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Baron's Way PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1150 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2556
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVFRAI I RO D CONDITION GOOD n FAIR n o000
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTWA T ED QUANTITY OF TYPE S FULL DEPTH PATCHING { HING ISY) 20
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $3,000
COMMENTS TS REPLACE ONE PATCH. PATCH FOUR LOW AREAS WHICH ARE THE START OF POT
HOLES.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Berkley Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 833 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1851
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING © ❑
❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ W
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
r-71
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD IV FAIR
LI POOR
LJ
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 8 FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS NO WORK AT THIS TIME.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Blackledge Circle PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL 0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 223 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 496
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ W ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD d❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION' ter---nnm n CAIP ❑ m��m
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 8 FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS SHORT CUL-DE-SAC IN GOOD CONDITION, NO WORK RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Cambridge Court PRIORITY HIGH
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 289
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
THOROUGHFARE ❑
TRAFFIC LOADING COLLECTOR
LOCAL 7
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
642
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION
SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT
MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑
❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑
❑
0
❑
EXISTING PATCHING
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD
0 FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD
❑ FAIR
EVI POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
$7,000
COMMENTS POORLY DRAINED AREA.
CANDIDATED FOR FULL
OVERLAY.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Camelia Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
[]
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1400 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 3111
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ wi ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITn OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 67
ES T WA T ED QUAN T I T T OF I TPE B FULL DEPTH PA T CHiNG (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY $3,000
COMMENTS ALLIGATOR CRACKING IS LIGHT, PATCHING IS ON SEWER MAIN INSTALLATION
SIDE.
REPAIR INTERSECTION RADIUS AT COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. WORK IS
ALL DEFERRABLE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Carolina Avenue PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 915 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2033
PAVEMENT MARKINGS❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ W-1
❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING L411 ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING w ❑
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD C/ FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOy fz0q FAIR
F-11
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED QUAN I I I T OF TYPE PE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
U
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS ROAD IS IN GOOD OVERALL CONDITION, ION, ALL WORK IS DEFERRABLE. NO WORT( AT THIS
TIME.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Carolina Avenue (NEAR HIGHLAND) PRIORITY
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑I
LOCAL Cl
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1538 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
10
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1709
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOC KITRANSVERSE CRACKING❑ ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD Lrl FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD O FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 8
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $320
COMMENTS PORTION BY CHURCH IS A DRIVEWAY, TWO SMALL AREAS TO PATCH 8 SY.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Carteret Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1030 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2289
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD FAIP n POOR
❑I
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUAN T I T Y OF T Y PE S FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY 0
COMMENTS SEVERAL PATCHED AREAS BUT ROAD IN OVERALL GOOD CONDITION. NO WORK AT
THIS TIME,

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Chatham Pass PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL 0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 493 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1096
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ R ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ 0
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ R ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 8 FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $16,000
COMMENTS CRACKING AT INTERSECTION- PATCHING NEEDED, CRACKING THROUGHOUT LENGTH.
CANDIDATE FOR OVERLAY.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Chinquapin Lane PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 317 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 704
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS GOOD CONDITION. NO WORK.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Colleton Way PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
U
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
LJ
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2998 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
18
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 5996
PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑� ❑ ❑
L�
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD L� FAIR ❑ POUR
Lm.J
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS RESURFACED IN 2005 BY SEWER PROJECT. GOOD CONDITION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Cookers Court PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 442 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
18
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 884
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING Rl ❑
❑
BLOC KfTRAN SVERS E CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
0
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) D
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 8 FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $15,000
COMMENTS DAMAGED BY SEWER PROJECT. ROAD IS IN POOR CONDITION. GOOD CANDIDATE FOR
OVERLAY. ALLIGATOR CRACKING ALONG LENGTH, OIL STAINING & EQUIPMENT GOUGES,

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Coquina Circle PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1087 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2416
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ w
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ R1
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR R❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 14
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $20,000
COMMENTS CRACKING AT ENTRANCE & ALONG EAST SIDE FROM SEWER INSTALLATION. COOPER'S
CT. INTERSECTION HAS LARGE UTILITY PATCHES. CANDIDATE FOR OVERLAY. BETWEEN
COOPERS CT & COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE IS IN WORSE CONDITION.
EXTENSIVE PATCHING
SOUTH END.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Country Club Circle
PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD
TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
O
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 344
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
764
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0
PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ©
❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKfTRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑
0 ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING El
RI ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD
© FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD
© FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 9 FULL DEPTH PATCullVIn_�.a r tirwk, 2
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $300
VOI�� IYIL=..1YIS GOOD bVIYVITIV I'f. IYV YYVRf1 ATI fIIJ IIIVIE,

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Country Club Drive PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR 0
LOCAL ❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 6570 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 30
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 21900
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ Rj ❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ [� ❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR ❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 10O
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY $66,000
COMMENTS REPAIR INTERSECTION. ROAD NEEDS MISCELANEOUS CUT & PATCH & STRIPING.
OVERLAY CANIDIATE ON EASTERN END WHERE ROAD NARROWS, PATCH AT #408 &
#404. POOR PATCH AT #502 SEWER CONNECTION. PATCH ALLIGATOR CRACKING AT
POND (SPALLING). CONSIDER SEALING.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Country Club Drive (Creeks End Portion) PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE r� U
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL Cl
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1227 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2727
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
1 fPE OF DISTRESS NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ Q ❑
❑
BLOC KITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING❑ ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY $21,OD0
COMMENTS CRACKING AT ENTRANCE & THROUGHOUT LENGTH. PAVEMENT IS
NOT BREAKING
APART YET. OVERLAY CANDIDATE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Creekwood Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
L�
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 780 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1733
PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING L7 ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING 2 ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD Cl/l FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ICI FAIR ❑ POOR
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY 0
COMMENTS ROAD HAS BEEN OVERLAYED IN THE PAST. SOME CRACKING AT INTERSECTION WITH
CIRCLE DR. GOOD CONDITION -ALL WORK DEFERRABLE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Darby Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE Cl
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL I
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1244 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
18
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2488
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING G ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 20
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $400
COMMENTS REPLACE POOR SEWER PATCH AT STRATFORD DRIVE INTERSECTION.
ROAD IS IN
GOOD CONDITION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Devonshire Drive PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE
C�
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 893 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
28
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2778
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 6� PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ 'Ell
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING 5z ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑d ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR El/l POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR n POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUAN T I l r Oi P fFE C FULL DEPTH PATCHi NG (SY) 20
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $24,000
H
COMMENTS REST RIPE ROAD 6 BIKE LANES. OVERLAY C:ANDIDA T E-HEAVY TRAFFIC. FULL DEPTH
PATCHING 20 SY.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Discovery Bay PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL u
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 481 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1069
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING 0 ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD] CONDITION GnnD n FAIR ❑ PnnR
F]
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 50
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $2,000
COMMENTS PATCH AT RADIUS DISCOVERY BAY/RUNAWAY BAY (20 SY). PATCH AT END OF ISLAND
NEAR LEEWARD DR. (30 SY). LIGHT TRAFFICE RD. AT END OF SID.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Dogwood Lane PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 757 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
18
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1514
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD yj FAIR LJ POOR
LI
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS OVERLAYED BY SEWER PROJECT.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Dorset Way PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 654 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1453
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 5
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE R FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY $3,000
COMMENTS OVERLAY INTERSECTION WITH BARONS WAY DUE TO POT HOLES & EXISTING PATCH &
CRACKING. PATCH AT #911. ALL WORK IS DEFERRABLE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Downing Circle PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
CI
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 316 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
18
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 632
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ R
❑
BLOCK(TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR
LI
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING'SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY $8,000
COMMENTS OVERLAY CANDIDATE -COULD BE DEFERRED A YEAR OR TWO.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Fairway Drive PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH {FEET} 1879 AVERAGE WIDTH IFEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 4176
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE PE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑✓ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSlOVERLAY $12,000
COMMENTS LIGHT CRACK COUNTRY CLUB DR. INTERSECTION. LIGHTLY TRAVELED. EQUIPMENT
MARKNGS AT NEW PIPE CROSSING. RESURFACE FROM NORMAN ROAD TO
GREENWOOD ROAD.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Gloucester Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
I�
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 710 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1578
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ d❑ ❑
❑
BLOCK(TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 8 FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 3
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $500
COMMENTS PATCH ROUGH SPOT AT END OF CUL-DE-SAC-OTHERWISE OK REPAIR CONCRETE
CURB AT ISLAND -DEFERRABLE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Greenvlt Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL O
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 939 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2087
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ 6a ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ 0
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS VERY LIGHTLY TRAVELED. PATCHING ALONG ONE SIDE FROM SEWER MAIN
INSTALLATION. LIGHT DAMAGE ONLY -ALL WORK IS DEFERRABLE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Greenwood Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 566 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1258
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
e YnE ^vF Diu T REUS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
HLOCKIrRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ Q ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD 91 FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 4
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE $ FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS NO WORK RECOMMENDED,

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Hampton Way PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1170 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2600
PAVEMENT MARKINGS DPAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ 0
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ Rj
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR I] POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 25
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $1,000
COMMENTS PATCH LOW AREA AT SOMERSET CT, INTERSECTION. CRACKING THROUGHOUT BUT
ROAD HOLDING UP OTHERWISE ALL WORK DEFERRABLE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Hatcher Road PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE LJ
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL ❑�
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 678 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1507
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOC KITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ 7 ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
0
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION r_nnn F-1 71
vvvv u 'AIR hI POOR
n
Lrj
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $15,D00
COMMENTS ALLIGATOR CRACKING AT INTERSECTION WITH RIVER ROAD. POOR CONDITION WITH
TRANSVERSE/BLOCK CRACKING & BASE FAILURE. NEEDS OVERLAY.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Hawthorne Road PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
LOCAL ❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2356 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 5236
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑� PAVEMENT SECTION DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ 96 ❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $34,000
COMMENTS CRACKS TO BE SEALED SCATTERED ALONG ROAD. LARGE CENTERLINE CRACK
APPROXIMATELY HALF ROAD LENGTH WITH SPALLING ASPHALT & OPEN JOINT, ROAD
IS AN OVERLAY CANDIDATE. REPAIR RADIUSES AT INTERSECTION WITH TRENT
WOODS DRIVE,

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Hermitage Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1054 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2342
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING 0 ❑
❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD O FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD 0 FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS ROAD HAS BEEN RECENTLY OVERILAYED.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Hillandale Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1110 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2467
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ O ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR d❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR 0 POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 8 FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY
COMMENTS REPAIR RADIUSES AT WILSON CREEK DRIVE INTERSECTION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Hillcrest Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 795 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1767
PAVEMENT MARKINGS FI-11 PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ll-/� ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ w ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD 0 FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS MINOR ALLIGATOR CRACKING ALONG EDGE OF PAVEMENT AT FEW LOCATIONS. ROAD
IS IN OVERALL GOOD CONDITION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Holly Ridge Road PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL 0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1 D62 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2360
PAVEMENT MARKINGS FI-11 PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ 0
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING El ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 50
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $7,500
COMMENTS LARGE AREA OF PATCHING NEEDED AT #4113. POSSIBLE OVERLAY
200' THROUGH PIPE
CROSSING LOW AREA, PATCHING NEEDED AT COUNTRY CLUB INTERSECTION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Norse Shoe Bend PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL EVI
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1425 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 3167
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOC KITRAN SVER SE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
n
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 0 CALL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) �
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS GOOD CONDITION RECENT L Y REPAVED. NO VVORK NEEDED, RECEN I LT RESL1R FACED.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Hunt Club Lane PRIORITY LOW
77
THOROUGHFARE L_!
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL 0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 303 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 673
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING 0 ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ PQn.R.
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS RECENTLY RESURFACED. GOOD CONDITION. NO WORK.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Hydes Comer PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 662 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
18
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1324
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ �z ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ w ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR 0 POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $10,000
COMMENTS WEST END CUL-DE-SAC IN POOR CONDITION. EQUIPMENT GOUGES IN PAVEMENT.
POOR PATCH IN EAST CUL-DE-SAC. CANDIDATE FOR OVERLAY.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Ives Avenue PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE CI
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 395 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
10
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 439
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DRIVEWAY
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
R
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING © ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑�
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS DRIVEWAY STYLE ROAD. NO WORK.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Kingsworth Lane PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
O
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 215 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 478
PAVEMENT MARKINGS liPAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCK(TRANSVERSE CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING 0 ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD 0 FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 5
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $200
COMMENTS PATCH # 1014

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Llewellyn Drive PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑�
LOCAL ❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1037 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2304
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING © ❑ ❑ ❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑d ❑ ❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD R] FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 5
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 5
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $1,000
COMMENTS REPAIR EDGE OF PAVEMENT AT INTERSECTION WITH RIVER RD. (PATCH) CRACKING AT
CENTER LINE. ROAD IS IN GOOD CONDITION EXCEPT CRACKING ALONG CENTER LINE
JOINTS. SPALLED AREA AT INTERSECTION WITH TRILLIUMS HIDEAWAY.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Meadowbrook Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
LOCAL ❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2833 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 6296
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING 91 ❑ ❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ R ❑ ❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
0 V E R A LL ROAD COND, 1 T 10 N' GOOD u1 FAIR L_J POOR L i
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 12
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $2,000
COMMENTS CENTER LINE CRACKING NEAR RIVER RD. END (1W) & AT MISCALANEOUS LOCATIONS -
TAR SEAL -THE MAJOR COMMENT, LIGHT PATCH NEEDED 3 LOCATIONS. ROAD
APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN OVERLAID IN THE PAST. OVERALL ROAD IS IN GOOD
CONDITION. CONSIDER RESTRIPING.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Melody Lane PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 550 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1222
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOC KITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR 6/1 POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS CRACKING AT HILLANDALE INTERSECTION, LIGHT ALLIGATOR CRACKING TROUGHOUT.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Moncks Court PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL ❑✓
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 745 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1556
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ P/]
❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING © ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION' Cvw- u V"i
❑ rvvR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
10
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY $300
COMMENTS REPLACE POOR PATCH AT #4507 SEWER MANHOLE. APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN
RESURFACED IN THE PAST.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Morgan Lane PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 848 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1884
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ R ❑
❑
BLOCKffRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING Rl ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 20
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $3,000
COMMENTS NEED PATCHING FROM TREE ROOTS, HAS BEEN OVERLAYED IN THE PAST BUT NOT
RECENTLY. VERY LIGHTLY TRAVELED. HIGH SANDY AREA. WORK
IS DEFERRABLE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Moye Road PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1555 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 3456
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TY PE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ ❑d
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY $23,000
COMMENTS A LOT OF PATCHING APPARENTLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH SEWER MAIN INSTALLATION.
EQUIPMENT DAMAGE FROM SEWER PROJECT. ROADWAY APPEARANCE
IS POOR,
REPAIR INTERSECTION SHOULDERS AT RIVER RD.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Park Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL 0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 645 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA {SQUARE YARDS) 8571
PAVEMENT MARKINGS L� PAVEMENT SECTION DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
17 PE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ Rl ❑ ❑
BLOC KITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ ❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD S/1 FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR LJ POOR ❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS LIGHT ALIGATOR CRACKING ALONG MOST OF LENGTH. LARGE PATCH AT #1206 & NEAR
FOREST DRIVE INTERSECTION. SEGMENT BETWEEN HIGHLAND & FOREST DRIVE IS
GOOD. NORTHEAST HIGHLAND POSSIBLE TOWN ROAD-1-2 SY PATCH. OVERALL GOOD
CONDITION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Pearson Circle PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL CI
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1272 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2827
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ I] ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ -7/ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ W ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS HAS BEEN OVERLAYED IN THE PAST. ROAD IN GOOD CONDITION.
LIGHTLY TRAVELED.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Norman Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 603 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1340
PAVEMENT MARKINGS Q PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ 66 ❑
❑
BLOC KITRANSVERSE CRACKING d❑ ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑d ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 6
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $1,200
COMMENTS REPAIR SHOULDER AT COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INTERSECTION. EQUIPMENT MARKS.
OVERALL GOOD CONDITION. REDO UTILITY PATCH.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Pinecrest Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
L�
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2011 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET]
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 4469
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ , PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOC KITRAN SVER SE CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ rle� ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD EI FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD n FAIR ❑ PCOR
4❑i
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED IMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE C FULL DEPTH PA T l41'IIIVG (S Y ) U
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $150
COMMENTS .SEAL THREE CRACKS NEAR TREN T WOODS DR. IN T ERt it:u 1 IVN. SEAL TWO CRACKS AT
PINE TREE LN. INTERSECTION. OVERALL VERY GOOD CONDITION.
APPEARS TO HAVE
BEEN OVERLAID IN THE PAST.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Pinetree Lane PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2576 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 5724
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
BLOC KITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑❑ ❑ ❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ ❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD 0 FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 10
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE S FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $300
COMMENTS TRANSVERSE CRACKING NEAR SPRINGWOOD INTERSECTION, ONE POOR UTILITY
PATCH ACROSS ROAD, SEVERAL PATCHED AREAS BUT DO NOT LOOK BAD. OVERALL
GOOD CONDITION. MINOR SEALING & PATCHING.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Roger's Court PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWNIPRIVATE TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH IFEET) 360 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
18
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 720
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DIS T RESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
BLOCKlTRANSVERSE CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ U
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS OVERALL GOOD CONDITION

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Rossie Road PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL d❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 483 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1073
PAVEMENT MARKINGS❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
7
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
0
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SYj 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $11,000
COMMENTS ALLIGATOR CRACKING AT ENTRANCE, BASE FAILURE NEAR END.
POOR ROAD
CONTITION. SPALLING AREAS. NEED INTERSECTION RADIUS REPAIR.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Runaway Bay PRIORITY
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 800
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
ir99
TRAFFIC LOADING
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
THOROUGHFARE ❑
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT
MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑
❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD
FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION r__n 0D
FAIR
❑
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 0 FULL DEPTH
PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
0
COMMENTS NO WORK NEEDED.
20

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Sandhurst Road PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 765 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1700
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ Rl
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR R POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑d POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS CENTER LINE CRACKING & TRANSVERSE AT INTERSECTION WITH WEST WILSON
CREEK DRIVE. SHORT ROAD IN ROUGH SHAPE. POOR LOOKING ROAD. RECOMMEND
RESURFACE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Somerset Court PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 680 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 18
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1360
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
i 1(PE OF DISTRESS NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑✓ ❑ ❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR ❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 5
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $12,500
COMMENTS NORTHEAST CUL-DE-SAC IN POOR CONDITION. SOUTHWEST CUL-DE-SAC IN POOR
CONDITION. INTERSECTION WITH HAMPTON WAY NEEDS RADIUS WORK. HAS BEEN
OVERLAYED IN THE PAST -STILL HAS CRACKING. OVERLAY CANDIDATE AT CUL-DE-SAC
ENDS.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Springwood Drive PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL ❑�/
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2755 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL. PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 6122
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION
LIGHT DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR 96 POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR (Ji POOR
F-1
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (S T) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $6,000
COMMENTS CONSIDER OVERLAYING FROM INTERSECTION OF PINE TRLL IQ RIVER
ROAD.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Strartford Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1108 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2462
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING Rl ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ R] ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD n FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 40
ESTW TED QUANTITY OF TYPE 8 FULI DEPTH PT TC"ING
� v�r � � � rn � �.nu��a (jY) U
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $1,600
cok.A :"= :TS FIX POOR PATCHES.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Stratton Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 530 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
18
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1060
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ k ❑
❑
BLOCKfTRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ 6/1 ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 8 FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS DAMAGED CONCRETE CURB AT CUL-DE-SAC-NUMEROUS CRACKS.
LOW PRIORITY. NO
SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY DAMAGE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Surrey Lane PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
L�
LOCAL❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 940 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
18
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1880
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION , GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 52
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $2,100
COMMENTS RECENTLY REPAVED THE FIRST TWO THIRDS UP TO ROGERS COURT. LAST 500' IS
NARROW DRIVE. RECOMMEND PATCH THREE AREAS, VERY LITTLE TRAFFIC.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Tack House Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 956 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2124
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ Sa ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS GOOD CONDITION. RECENTLY RESURFACED. NO WORK.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Tenella Road PWORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 988 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
18
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1976
PAVEMENT MARKINGS Q PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ Cl ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS HAS BEEN OVERLAYED IN THE PAST. HIGH SANDY LAND. GOOD CONDITION -NO WORK.
EQUIPMENTMARKS.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Trent Pines Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 745 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
19
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1575
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD FA1 �
/11f\ l_ 1 POOR
n
L__I
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY 0
COMMENTS RECENTLY RESURFACED. GOOD CONDITION, NO WORK.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Trent River Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1764 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
1$
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 3528
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD CAI FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD S6 FAIR I -I POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE Q FULL 1 DEPTH PATCHING- (env)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
vi�nvrw vni rruJlrCU11VEV UJ LOCATIONS. ALL
COMMENTS LIGHT ALLIGATOR IGATOR & TRANSVERSE 'CRArvrNn AT • ISCE
WORK IS LOW PRIORITY. VERY LGHTLY TRAVELED STREET.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Wentworth Court PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
fO
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 325 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 722
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF VISTRE55
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
$LOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ Q ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD [] FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE S FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY 0
COMMENTS GOOD CONDITION -NO WORK.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME West Fairway Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL 0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 15W AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 3467
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TTPE OF DISTRESS
RESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING 0 ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ FIA ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 65
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SYj 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $2.600
COMMENTS HAS BEEN OVERLAYED IN THE PAST. CUL-DE-SAC NEEDS LARGE CUT
& PATCH.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Westward Court PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 187 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 416
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING 0 ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING 0 ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD [J FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD 91 FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS MINOR CRACKING AT CUL-DE-SAC BULB ALONG CENTER LINE. VERY LIGHT TRAFFIC.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Wexford Place PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 755 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1678
PAVEMENT MARKINGS [] PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
wnr �r m— nrnn
I I r� yr VM n�aa NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKf TRANSVERSE CRACK]NG ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ./❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY $14,000
COMMENTS RUTTING AT NORTHERN CUL-DE-SAC. PAVEMENT IS STABLE. EVENTUAL OVERLAY
CANDIDATE. WORK IS DEFERRABLE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME White Oak Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
CI
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1488 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 3307
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ R ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑d ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD r0Nf)IT[nN GOnn POOR
1F7
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 5
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEF T H PAT C;Hi NG (SY) (}
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $300
COMMENTS POT HOLES NEAR EAST END REPAIR. SEAL OTHER FEW MISCEALANEOUS
CRACK.
HIGH, DRY& SANDY LAND.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Wilson Point Road PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN/PRIVATE TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1340 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
12
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1787
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DRIVEWAY
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING 91 ❑
❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING © ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
0
�vC�Y f
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE S FRILL DEPTH PATCHIN-0 I
�
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY 0
COMMENTS RECENTLY O`.'ERL"YED BY SEWER PROJECT.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Yacht Club Dr'rve PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS TOWN ROAD TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL ❑✓
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 502 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
PAVEMENT MARKINGS R5 PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING 91 ❑
❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS NO WORK. GOOD CONDITION.

APPENDIX D

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Abner Nash (NCSR 1206) PRIORITY NCDOT
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1775 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
19
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 3747
PAVEMENT MARKINGS Q PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF CUSTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑❑
BLOCKrrRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) Q
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS REPAIR INTERSECTION RADIUS. EXTENSIVE ALLIGATOR CRACKING
ENTIRE LENGTH.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Bridle Path (NCSR 1366) PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET)
425
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
944
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0
PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION
SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT
MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING
❑
❑
❑
BLOC KITRAN SVERS E CRACKING
❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING
❑
[]
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY
GOOD ❑
FAIR
D POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION
GOOD ❑
FAIR
❑ POOR
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $11,000
COMMENTS RECOMMEND OVERLAY.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Canterbury Road (NCSR 1299 81 1328) PRIORITY
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT
TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
ov
LOCAL
❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET)
6456
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
22
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
15781
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING
❑
❑
❑
BLOC KITRANSVE RSE CRACKING
❑
❑
0
❑
EXISTING PATCHING
❑
❑
lrJ
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR w POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR rl.7 POOR n
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
PT110,11
\ Y A TI ED QUA LL1Y[Tv OF —i i PE
CJ I IIYIn I CV 41UM1'� I I I T Vr 17 rC o rULL DEPTH PH I l.nllVta (.7Y)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY
401�I[TIEI\T.li NUI"viEnvv.i AREAS OF BROKEN PAVEMENT ONSOUTHERN END J I h1RT1iVG AT i3ANGER 1
ELEMENTARY. NORTHERN END IN GOOD CONDITION 81 RECENTLY RESURFACED.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Chelsea Road PRIORITY
THOROUGHFARE
S/❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT
TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
17,
LOCAL
El
APPROXIMATE LENGTH IFEET)
3696
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
22
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
8213
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0
PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION
SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPF OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING
❑
0 ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING
❑
❑� ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING
❑
0 ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY
GOOD ❑
FAIR © POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION
GOOD ❑
FAIR 0 POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Circle Drive (NCSR 1311, 1312, &1313) PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2395 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 5322
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑❑
❑
BLOC KITRANSVERS E CRACKING ❑ 11/7 ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING R/1 ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD 0 FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $28,000
COMMENTS HIGH SANDY AREA. ENTIRE PORTION OF NCSR 1311 & 1312 HAS EXTENSIVE ALLIGATOR
CRACKING. EVENTUAL REPAIR IS TO OVERLAY NCSR 1311 & 1312 PORTION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Corral Circle (NCSR 1358) PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL ❑v
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 364 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 809
PAVEMENT MARKINGS Q PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
�I f PE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ 0
❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING © ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COMMENTS GOOD CONDITION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Edgehill Road (NCSR 1316) PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
❑v
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2490 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 5533
PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
GLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ O
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR Pi
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS PATCHING ON WESTERN LANE FROM SEWER MAIN INSTALLATION. SOUTHERN END OF
ROAD IN WORSE CONDITION THAN NORTHERN END, ROAD IS IN OVERALL POOR
CONDITION. RECOMMEND OVERLAY. INTERSECTION WITH WEST WILSON CREEK DR.
IN POOR CONDITION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Edgevrood Drive (NCSR 1310) PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1308 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2907
PAVEMENT MARKINGS Q PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ R ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ �/❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS HAS BEEN OVERLAYED IN THE PAST. ENTIRE LENGTH OF ROAD HAS ALLIGATOR
CRACKING BUT PAVEMENT IS STABLE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Forest Drive (NCSR 1290 & 1301) PRIORITY
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL d❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET)
1600
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
3556
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0
PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION
SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING
❑
❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING
❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING
❑
0
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY
GOOD ©
FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION
GOOD ©
FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE R FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS GOOD CONDITION OVERALL.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Fox Chase Road (NCSR 1300)
PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT
TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
o
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1620
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
3600
PAVEMENT MARKINGS wl
PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION
SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑
0 ❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ©
FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑
FAIR © POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 13 FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS LIGHTLY TRAVELED. SHOULD HOLD UP SATISFACTORILY.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Foxhom Road (NCSR 1351) PRIORITY
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2042 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 4538
THOROUGHFARE
❑
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
d❑
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT
MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑
w
❑
❑
BLOC KITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ©
FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION! C-r ,nm
vv� u
FAIR
a POOR
Li
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING
(SY)
30
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS OVERALL GOOD CONDITION.
20

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Haywood Creek Drive (NCSR 1213) PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE
n
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2197 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 4882
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
T Y rE Ow DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑❑
BLOC K(TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 13 FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS ROAD CRACKS HAVE BEEN EXTENSIVELY TAR SEALED BY THE NCDOT.
EDGE DAMAGE
IN CURVE. ROAD IS IN POOR OVERALL CONDITION WITH DAMAGE ALONG ITS ENTIRE
LENGTH,

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Hedge Row Road (NCSR 1367) PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 677 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1504
PAVEMENT MARKINGS❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ CJ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ w ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED? COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS BUILD UP CUL-DE-SAC & REPAVE WHERE IT WILL DRAIN TO THE DITCHES -CUL-DE-SAC
IS CRACKED.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Highland Avenue (NCSR 1216) PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE 0
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR mv
LOCAL ❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1800 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 4000
PAVEMENT MARKINGS❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ 0
❑
SLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ �/❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑/ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION rnnn ❑ FAIR fal Deno
fu
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 6 FULL DEP 1 F1 PA 1 C:HING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY 0
COMMENTS OVERALL GOOD C:.ONDI T ION. BU$Y ROAD. OVERLAYED IN THE PAST.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Hound Trail (NCSR 1352)
PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT
TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
d❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 410
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
911
PAVEMENT MARKINGS Q
PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION
SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑
0 ❑
❑
6LOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ©
❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑
w ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD
FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ©
FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE 8 FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 6
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $1,000
COMMENTS GOOD CONDITION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Hounds Circle (NCSR 1339) PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL 0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 186 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 413
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE
SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
w
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING L1 ❑
0
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR
RI POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR
© POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
4
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING rsY)
n
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS TWO HOl1SF$ ON STREET.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Huntmaster Road (NCSR 1355) PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
LOCAL ❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2368 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 5262
PAVEMENT MARKINGS Q PAVEMENT SECTION DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ R U
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ ❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR 0 POOR ❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY 0
COMMENTS NUMEROUS PATCHES ALONG SEWER LINE SIDE OF ROAD. EXTENSIVE ALLIGATIOR
CRACKING FROM SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION ON SOUTHERN END. GREATER THAN
50% OF LENGTH PATCHED ON EDGE FROM SEWER MAIN CONSTRUCTION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Leeward Drive PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 789 AVERAGE MOTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1753
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING © ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD 0 FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 400
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $8,000
COMMENTS EDGE OF PAVEMENT PATCHED AT 4-5 LOCATIONS. NUMEROUS LOCATIONS OF EDGE
OF PAVEMENT CRACKING, ESTIMATE 300 - 400SY.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Longwood Drive (NCSR 1349) PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCOOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL C�
APPROXIMATE EE LENGTH (FEET) 533 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
21
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1244
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ R]
❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ Fl/-]
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
Q
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD 0 FAIR
❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR
0 POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
30
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY $1,200
COMMENTS LIGHTLY TRAVELED.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Park Drive (NCSR 1299, 1302, & 1302) PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCOOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL CI
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 3212 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET) 20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 8571
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
BLOCK17RANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ ❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD dl FAIR ❑ POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR 0 POOR ❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE n FULL DEQTH PATCHING (SY) C
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY 0
COlvllf1El\ 1 S LIGHT ALIGn I O1\ l^ V 11\IV ALONG lAOS 1 OF LENGTP H. LARGE PATCH AT #F 1206 & NEAR
FOREST DRIVE INTERSECTION. SEGMENT BETWEEN HIGHLAND & FOREST DRIVE IS
GOOD, NORTHEAST HIGHLAND POSSIBLE TOWN ROAD-1-2 SY PATCH. OVERALL GOOD
CONDITION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Red Fox Road (NCSR 1338) PRIORITY
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
0
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 3557 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 7904
PAVEMENT MARKINGS Q PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ w
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
0
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑� ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 10
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY $300
COMMENTS EXTENSIVE ALLIGATOR CRACKING I TRAVEL LANES. APPARENTLY DUE IN PART TO
SEWER MAIN CONSTRUCTION ALONG ONE SIDE.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME River Road (NCSR 1214) PRIORITY
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR mv
LOCAL ❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 3696 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
24
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 9856
PAVEMENT MARKINGS❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR
0 POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR
POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING ISY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE R FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY
COMMENTS OVERALL GOOD CONDTION,

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Sidesaddle Lane (NCSR 1356) PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 707 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 1571
PAVEMENT MARKINGS❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑ ❑
w
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY
COMMENTS ALLIGATOR CRACKING ALONG ONE SIDE. CUL-DE-SAC IS CRACKED UP.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Steeple Chase Drive (NCSR 1216) PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE I'vi
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑�
LOCAL ❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 3660
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
26
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
10573
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0
PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑
m
❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR 0 POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR I❑ POOR [ l
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS PATCHED ONE SIDE FROM SEWER MAIN CONSTRUCTION. ROAD IS IN OVERALL GOOD
CONDITION. HEAVILY TRAVELED ROAD.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Trent shores Drive (NCSR 1206) PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 3113 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 6918
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 0 PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
T — PE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑❑ ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ ❑ k
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ Rl ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR Rl POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS EXTENSIVE ALLIGATOR CRACKING: SEVERAL AREAS REQUIRE LARGE PATCHES.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Trent Woods Drive (NCSR 1213) PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
LOCAL ❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET)
7920
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
30
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
26400
PAVEMENT MARKINGS Q
PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING
❑❑
❑
❑
BLOC KIT RANSVERSE CRACKING
❑
❑
d❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING
❑❑
❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY
GOOD
❑ FAIR
R POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION
GOOD
❑ FAIR
Pi POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SYI
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Virginia Avenue {NCSR 1372) PRIORITY LOW
THOROUGHFARE
❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 1195 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 2656
PAVEMENT MARKINGS ❑ PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ R ❑
❑
BLOCKITRANSVERSE CRACKING © ❑ ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ Q ❑
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD © FAIR ❑ POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY) 0
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY 0
COMMENTS ALLIGATOR CRACKING ISOLATED IN ONE AREA TOWARDS NORTHERN END.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Wedgewood Dnve (NCSR 1299) PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR L7
LOCAL ❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 5004 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 11120
PAVEMENT MARKINGS Q PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑ ❑
❑
BLOC KITRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ 0 ❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑ [�
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERiAY
COMMENTS NEW PAVEMENT AT ENTRANCE OFF OF COUNTRY CLUB DR. TO VACCUM STATION.

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME West Wilson Creek Dr. (NCSR 1315) PRIORITY HIGH
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR
LOCAL ❑
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 4056
AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
22
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS)
9915
PAVEMENT MARKINGS❑
PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION
SUMMARY
SEVERITY
1 ESS
T YPE Of' DISTRESS
NONE
LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING ❑
❑
w
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑
❑
0
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR © POOR ❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR ❑ POOR
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRSIOVERLAY
COMMENTS PATCHING ONE SIDE FROM SEWER MAIN INSTALLATION. START OF ROAD AT
HAWTHORNE IS IN POOR CONDITION. SOME RUTTING. CRACKING & PATCHING
THROUGHOUT. SURFACE IS IN OVERALL POOR CONDITION. WEST END IN WORSE
CONDITION THAN EAST END.RECOMMEND OVERLAY

2007 ROADWAY INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF
TRENTWOODS, NORTH CAROLINA
ROAD NAME Windsor Drive (NCSR 1327) PRIORITY MEDIUM
THOROUGHFARE ❑
ROAD STATUS NCDOT TRAFFIC LOADING
COLLECTOR ❑
LOCAL
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (FEET) 2576 AVERAGE WIDTH (FEET)
20
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (SQUARE YARDS) 5724
PAVEMENT MARKINGS Q PAVEMENT SECTION
DITCH
VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY
SEVERITY
TYPE OF DISTRESS
NONE LIGHT
MODERATE SEVERE
ALLIGATOR CRACKING Rl
❑
❑
BLOCK/TRANSVERSE CRACKING ❑ Rl
❑
❑
EXISTING PATCHING ❑ ❑
R
❑
OVERALL RIDE QUALITY GOOD ❑ FAIR
W POOR
❑
OVERALL ROAD CONDITION GOOD ❑ FAIR
w POOR
❑
ESTIMATED QUANITITY OF TYPE A SURFACE PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF TYPE B FULL DEPTH PATCHING (SY)
ESTIMATED COST OF REPAIRS/OVERLAY
COMMENTS ALLIGATOR CRACKING THROUGHOUT.

F 5 I
COMPREHENSIVE DRAINAGE STUDY
Ito it ONVE9] a I:l Iz t I WIL1111 W
Prepared for:
Town of Trent Woods
Mayor Don Day
Commissioner Ron Oliver
Commissioner Harry Lassiter
Commissioner Shane Turney
Prepared By:
Avolis. Engineering, PA
PO Box 15564
New Bern, NC 28561
[phone]
fa��nM May 5, 2005
L� U 1l
MAY Qszdrt

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction...................................................3
/..v 1 li�owi lcai liavn81uullu.......................................3
3.0 Drainage History.............................................5
4.0 Survey of Town Drainage Routes ..........................6
5.0 Reported Drainage Problem Areas ..........................9
6.0 Town Ditch Grading Improvements ......................50
7.0 Recommended Priority for Drainage Improvements ...54
8.0 Improvement Complications..............................55
9.0 NCDOT Participation........................................55
10.0 Conclusions..................................................56
Figures:
1.0 Overall Town Map
2.0 Town Drainage Watersheds
3.0 Reported Drainage Complaints
4.0 Locations of Standing Roadside Water
5.0 NCDOT/Town of Trent Woods Roads
2

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Residents in the Town of Trent Woods have experienced varying degrees of stormwater
drainage problems over the last several years. In some cases, these conditions have been
exacerbated or brought to light by significant rainfall events. In other cases, the
conditions have been created or compounded by development of the upstream or
downstream areas of the individual drainage watersheds. Other contributing factors
include the inability to access major drainage outlets to perform maintenance cleaning or
regrading, poor placement or maintenance of driveway culverts, leaf litter accumulation
in drainage swales and culverts, localized over excavation of drainage swales and
development in naturally low areas of the Town. The drainage conditions range from
short term standing water in roadside ditches to shallow flooding of garage and crawl
space areas. In some areas, standing water is a continuous condition over a several week
period.
The purpose of this Comprehensive Drainage Study of the Town of Trent Woods is to
provide a clear understanding of the stormwater drainage conditions in the Town as a
whole. This understanding will be the result of determining all of the drainage patterns in
the Town and their impact and requirements on other lots, piping systems and major
stormwater outfalls. The major stormwater outfalls have been identified and their impact
on upstream drainage areas is outlined. Recommendations for improvements are made
along with the estimated costs to implement these changes. Additionally, guidance is
provided on evaluating and prioritizing the drainage improvements in order to meet
funding limitations of the Town.
The drainage conditions in the Town were primarily assessed by walking the streets and
the accessible drainage routes to observe the existing conditions. The Town also
conducted a drainage survey in the summer of 2004 inviting all Town residents to submit
their written drainage cunccrtis for further evaluation and study ny the Town. The
information presented in the questionnaires was all reviewed and individually evaluated
as a part of this study. Also reviewed and evaluated were the historical drainage
complaint information provided by Town of Trent Woods' personnel. Where required to
evaluate potential solutions to drainage concerns, surveys were conducted to determine
elevation differences.
2.0 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The Town of Trent Woods is almost entirely a residential community. Development
started increasing in the Town in the early 1960's following the Town's incorporation in
1959. Residential development has continued to occur steadily, with the Town now
being almost entirely built -out. Some of the remaining Town areas are not developable
due to wetland conditions. Other lots are now being developed as a result of being able
3

to obtain sewer service as a result of the Town wide public sewer system, where these
lots did not previously meet septic system requirements due to available space, soil
rnnrlitinnc or )nnrl%vater eleyatinnc nr nther concerns Witl1 the Pv "tinn of an'l
I.M.— v vnvv�uva� vi a vv'vvu U
area north of Bangert Elementary School and another wooded area on the eastern side of
Hawthorne Road, no other Town development is foreseen that may have any potential to
impact overall drainage issues significantly.
PAST RAINFALL AND SIIGNIFICANT STORMS
Stormwater drainage has been an issue in several parts of the Town for numerous years.
Poor stormwater drainage has become a more frequent issue in the Town in the last eight
years, where our region has experienced several hurricanes or tropical storms, often
during short time frames. Some time periods have been free of tropical storrn events but
have been periods of relatively heavy rainfall events nonetheless. Rainfall data from the
National Climatic Data Center in Asheville, North Carolina was obtained for the New
Bern Airport for the past forty-eight years. This data indicates that the average annual
rainfall amount for this period has been 53.3 inches per year. The data indicates that the
annual precipitation for the past six years has averaged 52.5 inches per year. The year
2003 had an annual total rainfall amount of 72.7 inches. Short periods of higher than
normal rainfall events and continued development of the Town have contributed to the
increased drainage concerns.
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
The Town is nearing the end of the construction of the Town -wide wastewater collection
system that will convey wastewater to the City of New Bern's wastewater treatment
facility. The vast majority of Trent Woods has been previously served by individual
residential septic systems. In many areas of drainage concerns, one of the primary
complications has been the inability of the septic systems to function properly during
periods of excessive rainfall. The Town -wide sewer system will eliminate this
inconvenience and health concern. The public wastewater collection system will remove
a source of continual discharge to the groundwater. The average three -bedroom home
generates 360 gallons per day for a total of 131,400 gallons of wastewater per year.
Spread over a one-third acre lot, this water amount equates to a depth of 1.2 feet.
Considering that the soil occupies at least fifty percent of this area, the depth of additional
groundwater could be as high as 2.4 feet. This additional water source is not normally a
concern in areas of the Town characterized by sandy soil conditions and a relatively deep
depth to groundwater. In areas characterized by naturally higher water tables and poorer
soil conditions, the replacement of septic systems with connection to the public sewer
could improve the wetness conditions. These groundwater impacts are subject to a
variety of other influences and do not indicate that connection to the public wastewater
collection system will result in a 2.5 foot decrease in the groundwater elevation at a site.
4

In addition to natural groundwater elevation, the existing soil conditions usually play a
significant role in the effective stormwater drainage of an area. Large portions of Trent
Wnnrdc nartiridgrly alnno the Trent Ri`rer and the Ulleoi \Alilcn„ f'-1, — , 1,. — +1,-
V—.,............J t, OL 110V11 1�14'\.A UPU, 11QV4. L111.
Tarboro soil type in addition to relatively high topographic elevations and deep depths to
groundwater. Tarboro is a sandy soil with a high natural infiltration rate. As a result,
areas that receive high volumes of stormwater runoff, often experience only brief
ponding as a result of the soil's ability to infiltrate the runoff. These conditions occur
both in low points in roadside drainage swales in addition to yard areas. Without these
soil conditions, many other areas of Trent Woods would likely experience poor drainage
conditions or would require better stormwater outlets to major water bodies in the area.
3.0 DRAINAGE HISTORY
Trent Woods, like most municipalities, was developed over the years as separate small
subdivisions. There was not an overall master plan that would have provided planned
major drainage outfall routes that would have taken stormwater runoff to the very good
discharge areas in the Town such as the Trent River or West Wilson Creek. As
development occurs and isolates particular areas, it becomes increasingly difficult to
provide satisfactory drainage.
DRAINAGE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
i?rainage oi+tfall patl:5 often Crvaa aiviLg rear Ur Side iUt iiii� �, making It d11111 Lllt to [tel eSs
the drainage pipes or ditches for maintenance. Consequently, these drainage
conveyances silt in, fill with leaves or become overgrown with vegetation over the years
and no longer function satisfactorily. The Town of Trent Woods continues to have a
policy Uf not going ontu private propel Ly tU 111anita111 drainQgc StI-UCLL1res SU& as ditches
or piping. As a result, these drainage conveyances, which almost always serve other
upstream development, become a source of drainage concern impact. Any maintenance
of the drainage system is left for the individual lot owner who normally has access to
only a short length of overall drainage route. Cleaning out of only short segments of
ditches usually only compounds situations of standing water. The Town of Trent Woods
was not usually provided a dedicated casement along residential lot lines for the purpose
of providing maintenance functions on drainage structures. In order to restore and
adequately maintain some of the major drainage routes in the Town, it is recommended
that access to these areas be obtained by the Town for long term maintenance. In many
situations, there is no feasible drainage alternative other than maintaining the drainage
system that is in place.
Maintenance of the major drainage routes by individual property owners is a task that
would obviously require the cooperation of all adjacent landowners. The maintenance
activities would usually benefit upstream property owners in the same watershed who
would be normally expected to participate in the costs. Some maintenance functions are

simple and of no significant cost; however, many maintenance operations would require
the use of a backhoe, dump truck and increased manpower, thereby often making these
nnerntions nrnhihitive to the ,'nvlP nrnnf,.rty numPr.
PAST TOWN DRAINAGE PROJECTS
Larger maintenance operations, as with large construction projects, are often beyond the
capacity of the Town's maintenance department. The Town's maintenance department
may perform minor culvert inlet and outlet clearing, but roadside and other drainage ditch
cleaning and reestablishment usually require additional manpower and equipment. These
types of operations are recommended to be packaged into an overall larger project and be
competitively bid. The Town in the past has operated in this manner to complete
miscellaneous drainage repairs and improvements, including the discharge piping from
the Town pond to Country Club Road.
NCDOT DRAINAGE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
Approximately fifty percent of the roadways by length in the Town are owned by the
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). These streets are often referred
to as State roads. The NCDOT is tasked with the maintenance of the roadside drainage
swales (ditches) in addition to the pavement and roadway shoulder areas. The roadside
drainage swales are the primary stormwater collection measure in the Town, often
collecting runoff from a wider area prior to discharging it into a side lot line swale or
other stormwater outlet. The NCDOT has had the policy in the past of not committing
maintenance or construction resources to the maintenance of the drainage system along
State roads in the Town. In order to do so, the drainage conditions being experienced
have to be impacting the roadway where it becomes in the NCDOT's best interest to
make the repair. This policy precludes the NCDOT from performing the regrading of
grass swales and the realignment of driveway culverts to eliminate standing water along
streets, a common source of drainage complaints in the Town. The NCDOT's policy also
limits them from cleaning out or improving many roadway outlet swales and culverts that
still function but in a reduced capacity that may cause standing water or shallow short
term flooding. As a result of the NCDOT's stance, it may become necessary for the
Town to step in and make improvements to the roadway drainage systems along some of
the State roads in the Town.
4.0 SURVEY OF TOWN DRAINAGE ROUTES
MAJOR DRAINAGE WATERSHEDS
The Town's drainage system consists of a network of roadside swales, culverts, outlet
swales, piping, catch basins and natural drainage water courses. The drainage systems
on

were observed in the field to determine their apparent overall effectiveness and to make
recommendations for improvements. Virtually all of the major drainage routes require
some sediment removal from culvert ends and downstream receiving outlet ditches. The
drainage routes were followed from their source to their eventual discharge points out of
the Town. The Town was delineated into the individual drainage watersheds for the
purpose of evaluating the individual stormwater conveyance measures and the discharge
outlets. Figure 2.0 shows the drainage watersheds in the Town and the major drainage
routes within these areas. From Figure 2.0, it is shown that some of the drainage
watersheds are relatively large and require flow over long distances prior to reaching
their eventual outlets. These flow paths at one segment or another usually result in flow
along private property where no drainage easement exists. From other watershed areas, it
is noted that there are no drainage outlets. In these watersheds, infiltration becomes the
means of discharging the stormwater runoff. Major stormwater outfall points in the
Town include the following:
• Culvert crossing under Highland Avenue near the intersection with Trent Road —
This drainage outlets flows into a stormwater drainage ditch located on private
property in the City of New Bern. Shallow flooding occurs in the area of the
swale where it is located in the City of New Bern. This outlet contributes to
upstream flooding and standing water in the area of a cross culvert under Forest
Drive near its intersection with Trent Road. Drainage ditch maintenance in this
area to restore satisfactory flow is estimated at $18,000.
0 Outlet Swale on Foxhorn Road at the northern end of Hounds Trail — This outlet
swale serves a large area of the Fox Hollow subdivision. Flow to this outlet takes
a circuitous route prior to its discharge. The discharge is to a straight, excavated
ditch that crosses Country Club Road into the Olde Towne subdivision. The ditch
is located on the boundary between Trent Woods and the City of New Bern. The
ditch is grown up with vegetation and was observed to have some clogging at two
locations, but appears to have adequate piping under Country Club Road.
Maintenance costs to improve this system are estimated at $10,000.
o Culvert crossing under Country Club Road west of its intersection with Trent
Shores Drive — This culvert discharges inin a swamp whir_.h riinc alnng the
western side of the Trent Shores subdivision. This watershed includes major
discharge routes including the ditch crossing Darby Road, the swamp areas
draining Windsor Avenue, Canterbury Road, the two ponds on Hampton Way and
one-half of the Red Fox Road _red 'rhprP arP nn rernmmen"ieii ;Mnrnvementc
e Culvert crossing under Country Club Road east of the Country Club Drive
intersection — Discharge through this culvert continues to the Trent River via a
AiT1.:)waaC�Sll,A ' I ALC U.11,F A 44.
LzVlavill". 11I16lieu 1nciliucs oric-halvl 1Jcllelclanu Lite New Bern, Golf and Country Club, a large portion of the Wedgewood Drive, Fox Chase
Road, Canterbury Road, Fairway Drive, Baron's Way, Country Club Drive, the
Town Pond and points as far away as Park Drive and Longwood Drive. There are
no recommended improvements.
7

Culvert crossing under Country Club Road at the end of Greenside Court —This
culvert discharges into a small piping system prior to its eventual discharge into a
canal off of the Trent River. The culvert serves approximately thirty percent of
the New Bern Golf and Country Club in addition to West Fairway Drive,
Greenview Road and a portion of Chelsea Road. Replacement of this culvert with
a larger diameter culvert is recommended in addition to increasing the
downstream piping size to the nearby canal. This project is being completed
under the Town sewer contract.
Culvert under River Road adjacent to Greenleaf Cemetery — Provides drainage for
a portion of Haywood Creek subdivision and River Road prior to its discharge
into a piping system through the Greenleaf Cemetery into the upper reaches of
West Wilson Creek. Improvements to this system are recommended to prevent
flooding during heavy rainfall events. Estimated costs are $40,000.
Culvert under Meadowbrook Drive at the intersection with Pine Crest Road —
Culvert discharges into a swale and the branch area in the upper reaches of West
Wilson Creek. Culvert and piping collection system serves the otherwise isolated
low areas of the western halves of Springwood Drive and Pine Tree Lane.
Recommend remove accumulated sediment from piping and first thirty feet of
outlet swale — estimated cost $5,000.
0 Culvert under Haywood Creek Drive near its northern end — provides drainage of
Haywood Creek Drive area. This is a good outlet for the roadway system. No
recommended repairs to the outlet.
• Culvert under Leeward Drive — A good outlet into a swale and overland flow
leading to Haywood Creek. Provides most of the drainage for the Haywood
Creek subdivision and a portion of River Road. No recommended repairs to the
outlet.
o Piping system Trent Woods Drive/West Wilson Creek Drive intersection —
Prov.des drainage of Vo-- � of i;�est IVY 11Jvil Creel: Drive, Call A 1-first !toad an
Trent Woods Drive. No recommended work to the piping system.
The above outlets represent the major stormwater outfall points in the Town. Other
VU 1Ia11 IVLau VI1J are 0.1JV lU LLIIOU V11 I'1gU1G G.V.
COMMON DRAINAGE OBSERVATIONS
During the course of the field investigation, the most common observation was the poor
grading and driveway culvert elevation alignment in roadside drainage swales. This
condition generally does not lead to significant flooding but does represent a source for
standing water in the front yard areas of houses. in areas where soil and groundwater

conditions may not be favorable, standing water can last several days or more. This
condition was observed to be made worse at times where the ditch areas were further
excavated in an attempt to rid the area of water but only making it more isolated and
unable to be drained. Other complications included excavating around culverts placed
too low thereby further trapping the water and the long term accumulation of leaf litter.
Correction of these areas of poor ditch grading are recommended to be evaluated from
the nearest upstream point free from standing water to the downstream point free of
standing water and in some conditions to the eventual drainage outlet. The roadside ditch
would be evenly graded between the two points and the driveway culverts adjusted in
elevation accordingly. This work effort becomes more costly as it often requires
demolition and replacement of concrete driveways in addition to the culvert. This
condition was observed to occur most commonly in areas where the land is relatively flat
require careful construction and maintenance of the roadside swales. Many of the areas
of standing water occur on State roads and do not present a structural threat to the roads
or a safety threat to the traveling public. Thereby, the NCDOT will not normally commit
their resources to resolve these areas.
A second common observation was the clogging of culvert or piping inlet and outlet
areas. This condition was observed to occur at many primary culvert roadway crossings
in addition to numerous individual driveways. Clogged inlet and outlet areas at culverts
impede the flow of water, at some critical areas significantly. A high percentage of
driveway culverts are silted in but often do not create any significant drainage impact.
These culverts are recommended to be cleaned out on a single larger scale project but are
not considered to be a high priority.
5.0 REPORTED DRAINAGE PROBLEM AREAS
In the summer of 2004, the Town held a special drainage meeting giving residents an
opportunity to provide their written drainage concerns. A total of thirty-five responses
were received, several of which addressed the same or related problems in a particular
area. The responses covered the following areas:
FAIRWAY DRIVEINORMAN ROAD AREA (TOWN ROADS)
Received a total of uve responses for this area which has been the location of along time
known drainage concern in the Town where flooding of crawl space areas, yards, ditches
and streets occur during significant rainfall events. Standing water remains in the ditches
on private property in this area on a continual basis. Two primary drainage ditches
converge from the New Bern Golf and Country Uub area and the swamp area west of
The Towns subdivision into one drainage ditch behind the lots on the south side of
Fairway Drive. Runoff then enters a run of drainage piping prior to reentering an open
drainage ditch along the rear lot lines on the south side of Norman Road. Runoff flows
E

into a cross culvert under Country Club Drive prior to discharging into the piping system
flowing south along Country Club Drive.
As seen on the Drainage Watershed Map (Figure 6), the ditches and piping in this area
serve a relatively large area including approximately one-half of the Bellefern
subdivision. The source of the drainage problems in this area can be attributed to the
long time lack of maintenance of the drainage ditches and piping which cross through
private property and the roadway cross culverts. The ditch and culvert capacities have
been reduced greatly by siltation and the subsequent loss of elevation fail along these
drainage routes. Upstream development subsequent to the construction of these drainage
features has also produced a greater strain on the drainage system.
Outlet Swale looking downstream from Fairway Drive culvert.
[Ul

Submerged and partially clogged culvert end at Fairway Drive crossing.
Existing clogged outlet swale further downstream from Fairway Drive.

Flooding at Fairway Drive.
Flooding at Fairway Drive.
12

Flooding on Holly Ridge Road upstream of Fairway Drive.
One solution to improving this drainage condition would be to clean out and regrade all
of the contributing and downstream drainage ditches in this area, all of which are on
private property. The roadway culverts are recommended to be enlarged and possibly
adjusted in elevation. The section of piped stormwater west of the Fairway Drive
crossing would require removal and replacement with larger piping. The piping is on
private property. The large, straight drainage ditch along the rear lot lines on the
southern side of Norman Road is an adequate drainage structure but needs to be cleaned
out and regarded to allow runoff to enter the cross culvert under Country Club Drive. A
ten foot drainage casement exists at the rear of the lots on the southern side of the ditch
(Map Book 12, Page 56), but no easement is in place for the lots on the northern side of
the ditch (Map Book 6, Page 54). The culvert crossing under Country Club Drive at the
eastern end of the ditch is recommended to be lowered to increase the elevation fall in the
system. The culvert is also recommended to be increased in size to improve the outlet
flow.
The estimated cost to make these drainage system improvements is $115,000. The
majority of the work would be eligible for Powell Bill funding. The primary issue
associated with this solution would be obtaining access easements from five adjacent
property owners. The work in the drainage ditch would help to alleviate an eyesore and
would also help the stagnant water associated with the existing conditions.
A second solution to the poor drainage conditions in the area would be to construct a
piping system running eastward along Fairway Drive and Norman Road from the culvert
crossing west of Fairway Drive and connecting into the existing piping system along
Country Club Drive. The piping system would intercept the runoff flowing through the
13

lots on the northern side of Fairway Drive and the runoff coming from the New Bern
Golf and Country Club and other further upstream areas. The piping system would be
constructed deep enough to permit the incoming drainage ditches to dewater or have a
free outfall. This solution would not solve the wetness conditions in the drainage ditch
behind the lots on the southern side of Norman Road but would reduce the amount of
water flowing into this feature.
The limiting factor associated with this potential solution is the availability of only 2.1
feet of elevation fall between the area where the piping system would originate and the
connection point in the Country Club Drive piping system. The required length of piping
is i Oo0 feet. The resulting pipe slope of 0.2"io is hatter Than what is normally provided
for a piping system. This condition would result in less capacity for the system.
The estimated cost to construct this piping system is $90,000 and could occur within the
right-of-way areas of public streets and would be eligible for Powell Bill funding .
SOMERSET COURTILONGWOOD DRIVE AREA (TOWN ROADINCSR 1349)
A total of six responses to the drainage survey were received for the drainage problems
being experienced at the end of both Longwood Drive and Somerset Court. flooding of
yards up to the building perimeter occurs in addition to short term flooding of the streets.
Water was observed to be standing in the side and rear lot areas even during dry periods.
Standing water was reported to occur in the side yard areas continuously.
This area is drained by a long straight ditch segment that eventually discharges to the
Town pond. The ditch runs alongside an electrical power line easement area. The United
States Geographic Survey (USGS) topographic map shows that the area at the end of
Longwood Drive and continuing along the ditch and power line easement is swampland.
At the time of the field investigation, significant rainfall had not occurred for several days
and the water in the drainage ditch to the pond was observed to be standing still, with no
significant flow. The ditch was traversed along its entire length to determine any clogged
areas which were documented to have occurred in the past associated with Beaver's
building dams in the area. The ditch was observed to be in overall good condition from
its beginning point to its outfall point at the Town pond. A constriction in the drainage
route occurs at a small dirt driveway crossing at the end of Baron's Way. A culvert may
exist in this driveway, but it would be located below the standing water level in the ditch.
A surface water elevation difference of four inches was observed to occur at this
driveway at the time of the field investigation.
A small dam was also observed near the ditch outfall area to the Town pond. No
noticeable elevation difference across the dam was observed at the time of the field
investigation, but this structure could produce upstream water surface level increase
during rainfall events. These two drainage constrictions do not produce a large change in
the standing upstream water levels, but only a small change is required to eliminate the
perpetual standing water at the end of Longwood Drive.
14

Even a slight decrease in the Town pond surface elevation would also benefit the yard
areas at the end of Longwood Drive and Somerset Court. The Town pond was
continuing to draw down at the time of the field investigation. Cleaning out of the outlet
swale and cross culverts would help to improve this process. In order to further improve
flow in the primary drainage ditch to the Town pond, which also serves other areas, it is
recommended that the vegetation be cut and removed from the area to prevent further
degradation of flow.
Flooding at the end of Longwood Drive/Somerset Court.
15

. g
40
�; wa
Al
'Ell
L...;{'tit
rl7T2P "P-:14
'14

Downstream end of culvert choke point in ditch flowing to Town pond.
The estimated cost for these drainage improvements is $40,000, including regrading of
the roadway swales along Somerset Court (northern end). The majority of the
improvements would not qualify for Powell Bill funding.
The primary constraint associated with the maintenance of the outfall ditch would be
access. Although a drainage easement exists along much of the ditch (Plat Cabinet G,
Slide 96-D), access to the ditch becomes a concern due to the absence of lateral entry
points. Access to key points in the ditch would allow substantial improvements in the
flow capacity of the ditch. Hand clearing of vegetation and sediment nay be a
worthwhile option where required.
HAMPTON WAX/CA.MRRIDGE COURT AREAS {TOWN ROA
Three responses to the drainage survey were received from residents in the Hampton
Way and Cambridge Court areas. Responses were also received from a resident of the
adjacent Dorset Way and Canterbury Road for similar standing water conditions in the
yard and ditch areas. Although this area is located in the same neighborhood area as
Somerset Court and hongwood Drive, the drainage watershed where the stormwater
runoff flows is different. Runoff from this area drains into the two ponds located at the
r f U ,., « t \17— —A D,�. 4 17 - -, A— ... -Aq fha � ,�nF{ �rnccpo
A11LL1 J�►+[i�i� vF 1 iu�1l�JlOLA VT uy Ullu %i ULLLlI vu■ y .�v uu. a .v... L.— lim-0, L.—. u W.. ......w
17

under Canterbury Road in two culverts which discharge to a natural swamp area. The
swamp was traversed for a short distance and no significant obstructions to the natural
elevation fall of the swamp were observed.
The surface water levels in the two ponds are controlled by the natural swamp across
Canterbury Road which flows toward the south in the direction of Windsor Drive.
Therefore, the pond surface levels cannot be lowered by natural drainage. The area is
prone to flooding based on flood maps.
The drainage concerns expressed by residents in the area include continuously wet
roadside ditches, flooding of the roadway between the two ponds and flooding of the
yards adjacent to the ponds. The lots around the two ponds are at a relatively low
elevation compared to the two ponds and are easily impacted by rising water levels in the
ponds. Some regrading of roadside ditches in the upstream areas of the road away from
the pond is possible to help dry out the ditches. Roadside ditches closer to the pond
would likely require piping to get rid of the standing water, but maintenance and function
of the pipe becomes an issue due to the flat pipe slopes that would result.
One of two ponds located at the intersection of Hampton Way & Canterbury Rd.
18

Submerged upstream end of culvert outlet from two pond system.
Downstream free culvert outlet from two pond system.
19

Swamp area discharge for the two pond system.
Roadside ditch improvements including driveway culvert realignment are estimated at
$40,000 but would not solve all of the drainage concerns in this low lying area. The
work would qualify for Powell Bill funding.
Access to the work areas is not a concern due to the location of the work within the
roadway right-of-ways.
PARK DRIVE (NCSR 1290)
Drainage survey responses were received from two residents on Park Drive. Stormwater
runoff was reported to back up into the side lot line and rear lot line outlet swales that
carry runoff from Park Drive. Standing water was reported to continually occur during
periods of rainy weather. This runoff continues to the Town pond via excavated drainage
swales through low lying areas.
FA

Side lot discharge swale leads to rear lot line ditch and on to the "Town pond.
Correction of this drainage condition would require cleaning out the drainage ditch area
on private property behind the lot on Park Avenue and some clearing efforts in the
drainage ditch behind the lots on the eastern side of Forest Drive. The estimated cost for
this work is $20,000.
The work would require entry onto private property and would not qualify for Powell Bill
funding. Hand clearing of vegetation is a viable improvement option.
A second possible solution offered by one of the residents was piping the Park Drive
runoff to the north across Highland Avenue. This option appears to be cost prohibitive
considering the distance involved and the existing ground elevations in the area.
A third option presented by a resident involved purchasing the vacant wooded land to the
south of Park Drive and creating a holding pond. Approximately one-half of this area is
already wetlands. The additional upland area could be excavated to provide additional
temporary storage of stormwater until it drains to the Town pond. This solution could
also provide some benefit to the residents on Longwood Drive. This potential solution
would require additional more involved study to determine its potential effectiveness.
WiNnC."D nUTVF/CTI7ATlRn'On D"An AIDIWACrTC%WX 0"AnQl
� •1 S\ 1\VALAJJ
Three responses were received to the drainage survey from residents living in the vicinity
of the culvert crossing under Darby Road. Complaints included yard flooding and
21

prolonged standing water in the ditch area located between the houses on Stratford Road
and Windsor Drive.
The ditch and culvert are both badly silted in and require cleaning to function properly.
The cross culvert at Darby Road has lost approximately seventy-five percent of its cross
section due to siltation. The culvert and ditch have a good eventual discharge point at the
major culvert crossing under the southern end of Windsor Drive and the natural swamp
area upstream of that culvert crossing.
The ditch and culvert carry runoff from Stratford Road, Darby Road, Windsor Drive and
a portion or Canterbury Road. The drainage area upstream of the Darby Road culvert
crossing is not unusually large.
Looking upstream from Darby Road culvert crossing at sediment filled ditch.
22

,/� 5�6 Y � ii ;1t'! 'L ti 1Y tT':ln '-• rk...�c�S �� t - _ � �.
�'� h "� � 1 �'4 � Lr.�a�Jl� cs �� � • � F,`• +�' S � as w
f i' � , �� �� ;r( a J i iJ'1 ;� -- cr i c,�t f�•1f'�1}l �_ r. r
>.'a `.+t Wt:s�j;,-:,�i;;:i�P.��ii,LT,wi`,tF�w Wei, .}��, � a.S�sc 5.1� ;:�►`� .� Cg".. ` A-�'.�
M1t�
'xj
'••
I ii{�y� S �i T�
J 7 f - _ `�, Alm •}
i��
;h-
i �
R,
S _� l.. YS,`r�
R � .
�
,�'
�ectti s 1 RiSm
6`

Good culvert conditions at Darby Road ditch where it crosses Windsor Drive.
Minor stream clogging upstream of Windsor Drive culvert.
24

The estimated costs for the ditch and culvert maintenance operations are $37,000. The
work may qualify for Powell Bill funds due to the impact of the roadway culvert
function.
A drainage easement fifteen feet wide exists at the rear of the lots along Windsor Drive
(Map Book 8, Page 101). A drainage easement does not exist along the rear of the four
lots along Stratford Road which back up to the ditch. Access for sediment removal
would require working along the ditch on wooden mats in order to support equipment.
Piping the runoff to a public roadway right-of-ways is not a viable alternative due to the
lack of available elevation fall for a piping system.
FOXHORN ROAD/HOUNDS TRAIL CSR 13511NCSR 1352
One resident responded to drainage concerns on Hound's Trail and the major stormwater
outfall on Foxhorn Road at the end of Hound's Trail. from the watershed map (Figure
6), it is shown that this stormwater outfall point provides drainage relief for a relatively
large area of the Fox Hollow subdivision.
The discharge is to a side lot line Swale located between two residences. Runoff
continues to flow into a rear lot line swale that flows towards the cast in the direction of a
culvert under Country Club Road near the Olde Towne subdivision. The ditch is located
along the boundary line between the City of New Bern and the Town of Trent Woods.
The adjacent City of New Bern property is the location of a developed residential
subdivision.
The culvert under Country Club Road was observed to be clear and adequate. The ditch
leading to the culvert was observed to be grown up with vegetation and would be
improved by cleaning operations.
The short ditch along Hound's trail is relatively deep and holds water at virtually all
times. Due to its depth and the large area that it drains, the ditch standing water condition
would best be solved by piping this drainage segment.
Piping the Foxhorn Road/Hounds Trail runoff to another outlet location is not feasible
given the relatively low elevation of the area and the lack of any other nearby stormwater
outlet points.
25

A N1 f'1
41
Al
� {rx 7'M1"1Ly�.. .' r LLS �� �I' "11. �•7 f ��r ���p
t � j •its- s. � h �� `!`� � { t 5 / 1i.i -1-w t I .: �ff S ' �l '? µ • f
y..SSt, dR
Far
'3•ii`._ = ��}y y•�, t�h.. >•, -jt}jt i I
'CM r{t'►��i:er Y1�'^lyx,4l �l �f-.3 �I �'R TI"� `�,� f Y'`#L !"f •fA.'/'y��%
y C�'C � i# a ra3;�,� 4i `� •' r } '',�- e . ',1, .�* =; F �w
.Ixl 1, -4' r'S lt;•F aY
i� �f' j''"�Tp' � � '•`f�y�
� �.:� 5 tax �i." f, • - � �� a��jin .ii* r;+ �:,Sr• .�,"" �ii'G

Clogging at outlet ditch behind lots on Foxhorn Road.
The estimated costs for the improvements in this area are $35,000. The estimate includes
piping of the Hound's Trail deep ditch area. The work may not qualify for Powell Bill
funding since the roadways are NCDOT maintained.
A thirty foot wide drainage easement exists at the rear of all lots on the eastern side of
Foxhorn Road that back up to the ditch (Plat Cabinet A, Slide 82-B). A five foot
drainage easement exists along all side lot lines. Access to the work area may be
obstructed at points due to fencing and travel across yard areas. Hand clearing and
removal of accumulated leaf litter may be a viable potion to reduce standing water levels.
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE TOWN ROAD
One resident reported a drainage concern associated with standing water along the ditch
of his residence on the eastern side of Country Club Drive. This ditch used to be a
primary drainage route prior to the construction of the piping system along the southern
end of Country Club Drive.
This drainage condition could be improved by connecting the ditch to the piping system
along Country Club Drive. The estimated cost to complete this modification and to clean
out the ditch as well is $7,500. The work would require permission from the landowner
27

making the complaint and his next door neighbor. The work would not qualify for
Powell Bill funding.
GRENVILLE COURT (TOWN ROAD)
One resident on Grenville Court reported standing water along the adjacent roadway on
Country Club Drive where the water flowed down the side lot line prior to reaching the
Town pond. The runoff originates in other upstream areas of the Bellefern subdivision.
Ponded water remains along the side lot line and rear yard areas for several days
following heavy rains.
The runoff can be made to continue to flow directly to the Town pond by regrading a
high point approximately one -hundred feet long in the Country Club Drive roadside
swale. The estimated cost to complete this modification is $3,000, There are not any
complications associated with making this improvement. The work would qualify for
Powell Bill funding.
BARON'S WAY (TOWN ROAD)
One resident on Baron's Way expressed concern with the water level in the 'town pond.
The pond water level can be dropped approximately four inches by cleaning out the outlet
swale along Country Club Drive. However, it is difficult to drop the pond further without
pumping, which is not recommended. It is noted that the pond is constructed in a area
previously shown as swamp land on the USGS topographic map.
The estimated cost of this repair is $4,000. The work could qualify for Powell Bill
funding.
CIRCLE DRIVE (NCRS1312)
One resident on Circle Drive reported standing water on the inside of the roadway curve.
It is noted that this area is located at a relatively high elevation in very sandy soil. The
area does not have a drainage outlet and was reported to be an area of standing water
dating back for over twenty years.
The resident reported that the area infiltrated stormwater better prior to the sewer main
construction when a gravel area which aided the stormwater infiltration was disturbed.
Due to the very sandy soil in the area and the relatively deep depth to groundwater, it is
recommended that a gravel infiltration area be constructed to provide a more rapid and
wider infiltration area. This solution is more economical and practical than constructing
a swale where no roadside swale system exists in the neighborhood or piping the water to
the nearest outlet more than eight -hundred feet away.
28

Standing water after light rain.
The estimated cost for this improvement measure is $7,000. The work would not qualify
for Powell Bill funding since the roadway is NCDOT maintained.
SPRINGWOOD DRIVE (TOWN ROAD)
One resident reported shallow flooding and standing water at the upper reaches of a
piping system on Springwood Drive. The area of concern is lower than the surrounding
relatively sandv area_ several areas in this neiphhorhned in the West Witson Creek area
do not have roadside swaies and rely on stormwater infiltration for drainage. This
particular area has a piping system which flows to the upper reaches of West Wilson
Creek across Meadowbrook Drive to the north.
The catch basin opening receiving runoff is restricted by protruding pipe into the catch
basin. It is recommended that the catch basin opening be cleared and that the
downstream piping be cleared out.
29

4:4 MORK,
MAN
to two &A,
Pipes restricting drainage inlet. Upstream end of pipe has been covered.
Outlet ditch from Springwood Drive inlet to pipe inlet at Meadowbrook Drive
Mul

The estimated repair costs are $3,500. The work is located on the roadway right-of-way
and can be accessed for repair. Limited side lot line drainage casements are provided in
Map Book 9, Page 25. The work does not qualify for Powell Bill funds since the
roadway is NCDOT maintained.
PINE TREE DRIVE TOWN ROAD
Two residents reported flooding at the pond area south of Pine Tree Drive and west of
Hawthorne Road. The area was reported to flood to depths of two feet and taking weeks
to dry out during rainy periods. The flooding impacts adjacent garages and outbuildings.
The water in the pond is often pumped to the roadside ditch on the eastern side of
Hawthorne Road to infiltrate. There is currently no development on the eastern side of
Hawthorne road and this measure has not been a source of complaints. The small pond is
located in a depression which receives runoff from a one block area fully developed with
residential structures. The surrounding area to the west has a relatively steep slope,
discharging runoff quickly at times prior to it having the opportunity to infiltrate in the
sandy soils.
The ditch in the adjacent Hawthorne road Swale is too flat and shallow to drain the runoff
from the pond without excavation to excessive depths which would require the use of
land outside of the road right-of-way. It is recommended that a piping system be
constructed along the Hawthorne Road right-of-way to access the naturally low drainage
area in the upper reaches of West Wilson Creek.
Flooding of residence adjacent to pond.
31

Flooding of pond area.
Hawthorne Road represents a possible outlet piping location for area.
32

The estimated cost of this measure is $185,000. The work would qualify for Powell Bill
funding.
All of the piping would be located in the Hawtorne Road (Town Road) right-of-way.
Map Book 9, Page 119 shows the Hawtorne Road right-of-way extending to Morris
Branch on the northern end of the street. The roadway was never put in this location but
a residential driveway and outbuilding have been constructed. It appears that the unused
right-of-way may have been sold to the adjacent landowner. A drainage easement would
be required in order to route the piping to Morris Branch if the old roadway right-of-way
is not available.
A stormwater permit would be required to discharge the piped runoff directly to Morris
Branch.
TRENT SHORES DRIVE (TOWN ROAD)
One resident reported shallow flooding and continually standing water on the eastern end
of Trent Woods Drive. The source of the problem is a roadway cross culvert in the area
that is clogged. The culvert ends and interior are recommended to be cleaned to restore
drainage to the adjacent naturally low swampy area. Approximately two -hundred linear
feet of roadside swale leading to the culvert area recommended to be regarded.
C''1naoPrllenhmeraer1 oidvert nntlnt
,oa--1 -- .- --a-- --- • --- --- --•
33

Clogged inlet area of culvert.
The estimated cost of this maintenance is $4,000. The work would qualify for Powell
Bill funding. No access restrictions are foreseen.
WILSON CREEK DRIVEITRENT WOODS DRIVE (NCSR 1315/1213)
One resident reported standing water on the southern end of West Wilson Creek
associated with poor roadside ditch grading. The water depth was reported to reach ten
inches in the ditch, lasting for several days. The ditches in this area are poorly graded.
The ditches discharge to a piping system along Trent Woods Drive. The piping system
has a good outlet to West Wilson Creek Drive. It is recommended that the ditches in the
area be regarded to eliminate the standing water_
The estimated cost for this repair is $7,500. The work would not qualify for Powell Bill
funding since the roadway is NCDOT maintained.
34

HAYWOOD CREEK DRIVE (NCSR 1213)
Two residents reported drainage concerns associated with poor ditch grading along this
roadway. Approximately five -hundred linear feet of the ditch system has been piped in
the past. The problems in the area have been brought to the attention to the NCDOT by
residents of the road with no final satisfaction. It is noted that the swale and ditch system
outlet to a roadway cross culvert which discharges to Haywood Creek. The outlet area is
one of the best in the Town. The standing water conditions in this area can be eliminated
by regrading the existing roadside swales and cleaning the inlet area and interior of the
piping system along the roadway.
Looking downstream at roadside swales requiring alignment.
35

Roadside swale requiring realignment and culvert requiring lowering.
The estimated cost to complete these repairs and maintenance is $10,000. The work does
not qualify for Powell Bill funding since the road is NCDOT maintained
HATCHER ROAD NCSR 1345
One resident reported standing water associated with poor ditch grading at the end of
Hatcher Road where there is no a drainage outlet. It was reported that this condition
results in water flooding to the resident's garage. In order to eliminate this source of
standing water, it is recommended that the ditch grading at the end of the cul-de-sac be
reversed to flow out to River Road. 'Phis modification would not require excessive
deepening of the existing ditches along Hatcher Road.
36

Roadside swale requiring grading.
The estimated cost to complete this modification is $7,500. The work would not qualify
for Powell Bill funding.
RUNAWAY BAY (TOWN ROAD)
One resident reported flooding of yard areas up to the garage on the northern end of the
Haywood Creek Landing subdivision. Runoff from the subdivision enters a culvert
which discharges into the ditch system along the western side of the adjacent River Road
(NCSR 1214). The runoff then Flows a short distance before entering another culvert
crossing under River Road and into a piping system which crosses the Greenleaf Park
Cemetery prior to discharging to the upper reaches of West Wilson Creek. The drainage
system is not adequate to handle the peak runoff rates from the subdivision, the roadway
and the portion of the cemetery drained. The cemetery piping has adequate slope but
may need to be increased in size. The culvert under the adjacent River Road (NCDOT
Road) and the culvert discharging through the subdivision landscaping berm may be
contributing to the poor drainage conditions. It is recommended that the area be studied
further to determine the proper solution for correction of the various culverts and pipes in
the system.
37

River Road swale where flooding occurs between two culverts.
Qens wale an culverts where runoff flows from R- naway Ray to River Road
V tJyAA Jvv ua�. uAAu culverts where a...•va.i flows from s��+��µ ��u� rrr+J •v +�+�v. ��v,uv.
38

Flooding at Runaway Bay.
The estimated cost to perform these modifications is S40,000 and is based on having to
upgrade the cemetery piping system. The work would not qualify for Powell Bill funding
since the area is located on and downstream of a NCDOT maintained road.
Accomplishment of the necessary improvements may require access permission from the
owner of the adjacent cemetery.
MEADOWBROOK DRIVE (TOWN ROAD)
One resident reported wet yard conditions at the eastern end of Meadowbrook Drive
where it meets West Wilson Creek Drive. The condition results from a piping system
entrance area at the rear of the lot which is located on the southern side of the road. The
piping system receives runoff form a side lot line swale and upstream areas on
Springwood Drive. The piping system crosses through private property and has catch
basin inlets in the Meadowbrook Drive right-of-way. It is recommended that the piping
system be cleaned of sediment including its outlet area on the northern side of
Meadowbrook Drive.
M

Piping system at outlet area requiring sediment removal.
The estimated cost of this maintenance is $5,000. A portion of the work is located on the
roadway right-of-way and would qualify for Powell Bill funding.
EDGEHILL ROAD (NCSR 1316)
One resident reported standing water along a low point on Edgehill Road near the
intersection with Hillandale Road. The area was observed to be an isolated low point in
the relatively long roadside swale system of Edgehill Road. It was observed that there
are not any adjacent storrnwater outfall areas, including the surrounding roadway ditches,
where the runoff could be directed. If a piping system is constructed to resolve the low
area flooding at the adjacent Pine Tree Lane/Hawthorne Road area to the west, then the
Edgehill road roadside swale could possibly be piped to this system. It was observed that
upgradient properties to the west behind the lots on Edgehill Road contribute runoff to
the ditch system and rear yard areas in this area of Edgehill Road.
40

Flooding at rear area of lots.
The estimated cost of this improvement is $15,000, assuming that the piping system
previously discussed for Hawthorne Road is installed and is available as an outlet. The
work would not qualify for Powell Bill funding. The work would require an easement
from the adjacent landowner.
FOREST DRIVE (NCSR 1301)
During the course of the field investigation, it was reported that water overflows the
roadway at a cross culvert under Forest Drive near its intersection with Trent Road. This
culvert receives runoff from a relatively large area including portions of Trent Road. The
culvert flow continues along two side lot line ditches where it crosses under a second
culvert under Highland Avenue and on into a ditch located in the City of New Bern.
Standing water was observed along Forest Drive at the time of the field investigation. It
is recommended that the Forest Drive and Highland Avenue culverts be cleaned out to
provide improved flow. Additionally, the street and side lot line swales are
recommended to be cleaned out and regraded.
41

High water conditions at side lot line swale between Forest Dr. & Highland Ave.
Outlet swale from Highland Avenue downstream of Forest Drive.
42

RZT" 4 'Allum-Niz

The estimated maintenance costs are $25,000. The work would not qualify for Powell
Bill funds but is recommended to be referred for NCDOT action due to the impact to the
street. A drainage easement is not in place for drainage along the side lot lines in the area
(Map Book 7, Page 23).
COQUINA DRIVE CULVERTS (TOWN ROADS)
The flow through Coquina Circle is directed through a series of culverts which are silted
in to their crown. As a result, the roadways in this area flood during heavy rains. It is
recommended that culvert ends be cleaned out and the connecting ditches be cleaned out
to provide unobstructed flow to the cross culvert on Carteret Drive.
Sediment clogged outlet end of culvert, Typical of four at this circle.
The estimated cost of this maintenance is $6,000. The work would qualify for Powell
Bill funding and exists entirely on the roadway right-of-way.
GLOUCESTER DRIVE PIPING SYSTEM (TOWN ROAD
A side lot piping system provides drainage for four streets in the Bellefern subdivision.
., , a.. rt t�+ t Outlet SAS ()f4,�
1 he piping system is located on private property. T be Inlet and Outlet c„u� �I L„C nipples
44

are clogged and are recommended to be cleaned out to provide unobstructed flow. The
piping system appears to have drained to the outfall ditch between Carteret Drive and
Monck's Court in the past but no outlet piping leading to this ditch could be located. The
outlet for this drainage system was not identified and could be the reason for some of the
lot flooding at the end of Gloucester Drive.
The estimated cost of this maintenance is $22,000. The work would qualify for Powell
Bill funding. Portions of the work are located off of the roadway right-of-way. Drainage
easements exist for the piping system (Plat Cabinet B, Slide 4).
Sediment clogged outlet of piping system, typical of five this area.

Yard flooding in low area at the end of Gloucester Drive.
DITCH BETWEEN MONCK'S COURTICARTERET DRIVE
'Phis ditch provides a drainage outlet for a relatively large area of the Bellefern
subdivision and Country Club Drive and outlets to the New Bern Golf and Country Club.
The ditch was observed to have standing water and is recommended to be cleaned out to
reestablish satisfactory flow.
M

Country Club pond open culvert end where ditch water could drain.
The estimated cost of this repair is $7,500. The work may qualify for Powell Bill funding
since the ditch drains Country Club Drive. A thirty foot wide drainage easement exists
along the ditch (Plat Cabinet C, Slide 164).
HUNT CLUB/STEEPLECHASE DRIVE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
A relatively large drainage area flows through a culvert at Hunt Club Drive and into a
ditch and piping system through private property prior to flowing to Steeplechase Drive.
Plonrlino orr.nrc at the. Himi C itih Drive Culvert rive to downstream restrictions. It is
recommended that the drainage systems be cleaned out to reestablish satisfactory flow.
The estimated cost of this maintenance is $18,000. The work may be eligible for Powell
R;11 A—A;ny a;nrP 14nnt Oink is a Tnum Rnnrl The %xrnrl- urnidrl rwnnira arrrcc fn
Ll!! 11111U111�: JIlAVu i�uiaa Uluv 1ia1 f.+ IJ u a va• atvuaa. alav •vaa� •vuu av�uaav uvvv..l v
the piping system which is located along private property lines.
4R

Flooding where runoff is flowing toward Steeplechase Drive toward the right.
1ri1rTTLTT1k4 A C'rV" 14" A TA Dr li Diit A DT
HUNl1AkylLl OADBUlu"JEDCREA!1VxN RA D\
A bulb shaped area exists off of Huntmaster Road that is subject to flooding. The road is
located at the uphill end of the Huntmaster Road roadside swale drainage system, but the
bulbed pavement area is too low to discharge into the drainage system. The
recommended drainage solution is to reconstruct the bulb shaped roadway area and the
leading edge of the four connecting driveways at a higher elevation. This change will
force runoff into the Huntmaster Road swaie collection system.
The estimated cost of this solution is $40,000. The work would be eligible for Powell
Bill funds in order to correct the flooding roadway conditions. Access to the work area is
not anticipated to be a concern since the improvements will benefit all residents in the
area equally.
49

Flooding at bulb shaped area of Huntmaster Road.
6.0 TOWN DITCH GRADING IMPROVEMENTS
As mentioned earlier, the most common source of drainage complaints in the Town of
Trent Woods is the presence of short and long term standing water in the front yard
roadway swales. Commonly this problem can be resolved or improved by the regrading
of segments of the Swale. In many instances, driveway culverts also require elevation
adjustment due to the new ditch grades or because of original culvert installation at the
improper elevation. Ditch wetness conditions cannot always be eliminated sometimes
due to final stormwater outlet elevations or because of construction through naturaliy wet
areas. Many driveway culvert crossings at the ditches also require sediment removal at
the inlet and outlet areas to improve flow through the culvert. This condition occurs at an
estimated fifty percent of the driveway culvert but is not always critical to having
adequate flow in the roadside swale.
To accomplish ditch grading improvements in the Town, it is recommended that this
work be accomplished by one or more larger overall projects to make the work more
economical from a contracting and administration perspective. If funding constraints
prevent all of the work from being accomplished at once, then the areas requiring work
can be prioritized. Ditch regrading requires destruction of the existing grass in the
ditches. The cost estimates are based on replacing this grass with centipede sod in order
to cut down on erosion, prevent driveway culvert siltation and to reduce resident
complaints regarding reestablishing vegetation. The cost estimates are separated as
NCDOT and Town Roads.
50

NCDOT ROADS
ROAD NAME
SWALE
LENGTH
NO. DRIVEWAY
CULVERTS
ESTIMATED
COST
Abner Nash 1206)
300
3
6,075
Bridle Path (1366)
300
1
2,875
Canterbury Road (1328)
800
3
8,200
Circle Drive (131 I & 1312)
0
0
0
Corral Circle 1368
200
0
850
Creekwood Drive (1343)
0
0
0
Edgehill Road (1316)
300
0
1,275
Edgewood Drive (1310)
0
0
0
Forest Drive 1301
125
0
531
— —1 — 1 /I ' nn%
r ox Chase Road � 1 J w
Innn
► wu
n
�
" Acn
�,�+�u
Hatcher Road (1345)
400
3
6,500
Haywood Creek Drive (1213)
200
3
5,650
Hedge Row Road 1367)
200
0
850
Hermitage Road (1336)
0
0
0
Highland Avenue (1216)
400
0
1700
Hillandale Road (1334)
0
0
0
Hounds Circle (1352)
0
0
0
Hound Trail 1352)
200
2
4,050
Huntmaster Road (1355)
200
0
850
Melody Lane (1333)
0
0
0
Park Drive (1303)
200
0
850
Pearson Circle 1335
0
0
0
Red Fox Road (1338)
200
0
850
Rossie Road (1350)
0
0
0
Sandhurst Road (1332)
0
0
0
Sidesaddle Lane 1356
0
0
0
Steeple Chase Drive (1216)
1600
8
19,600
Trent shores Drive (1206
400
1
3,300
Virginia Avenue (1372)
600
0
2,550
Wed ewood Drive (1299)
1000
2
7,450
West Wilson Creek Dr. (1315)
300
2
4,475
Windsor Drive (1327)
400
3
6,500
TOTAL
9325 .
33
$92,431
5I

TOWN ROADS
ROAD NAME
SWALE
LENGTH
NO. DRIVEWAY
CULVERTS
ESTIMATED
COST
Alexander Lane
200
0
850
Baron's Way
0
0
0
Berkley Drive
130
0
553
Black Iedge, Circle
0
0
0
Buckingham Road
0
0
0
Cambridge Court
400
0
1,700
Carnelia Road
0
0
0
Canterbury Road
800
2
6,600
Carolina Avenue
300
1
2,875
Carteret Drive
200
0
850
Chatham Pass
100
0
425
Chelsea Road
500
0
2,125
Chinquapin Lane
0
0
0
Coo er,s Court
0
0
0
Coquina Court
200
0
850
Coquina Circle
200
0
850
Colleton Way
0
0
0
Country Club Circle
0
0
0
Country Club Drive
800
0
3,400
Darby Lane
600
6
12,150
Discovery Bay
0
0
0
Dogwood Lane
0
0
0
Dorset Way
700
5
10,975
Downing Circle
0
0
0 1
Fairway Drive
400
4
8,100
Foxhorn Road
200
0
850
Gloucester Drive
15
0
64
Greenside Court
0
0
0
Greenview Road
0
0
0
Greenwood Drive
0
0
0
Grenville Court
100
0
425
Hampton Way
1000
4
10,650
Hawthorne Road
0
0
0
Hillcrest Road
0
0
0
■ 11 n__j
doily m1uye nuau
n
V
n
u
n
v
Horse Shoe Bend
400
0
1,700
Hunt Club Lane
200
0
850
Hydes Corner
0
0
0
Ives Avenue
0
0 _ _
L0
5?

Leeward Drive
200
1
2,450
Llewell Drive
300
0
1,275
Longwood Drive
0
0
0
Mathew's Lane
0
0
0
Meadowbrook Drive
20
0
85
Monck Court
0
0
0
Morgan Lane
0
0
0
Moye Road
50
0
213
Norman Road
0
0
0
Park Drive
400
2
4,900
Pinecrest Drive
0
0
0
Pinetree Lane
0
0
0
River Road
100
0
425
Roger's Court
0
0
0
Runaway Bay
100
0
425
Somerset Court
400
2
1,700
Springwood Drive
0
0
0
Stratford Road
400
3
6,500
Stratton Drive
0
0
0
Surrey Lane
0
0
0
Tack House Road
0
0
0
Tenella Road
0
0
0
The Towns
0
0
0
Trent Pines Drive
0
0
0
Trent River Drive
80
1
1,940
Tumberry Court
0
0
0
Village Green Court
1 0
0
0
Village Green Drive
0
0
0
Wentworth Court
0
0
0
West Fairway Drive
0
0
0
Westward Court
150
0
638
Wexford Place
50
0
213
White Oak Drive
0
0
0
Wilson Point Road
0
0
0
Yacht Club Drive
0
0
0
TOTAL
8895
31
$87,606
53

7.0 RECOMMENDED PRIORITY FOR DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS
In order to provide guidance on the use of limited funds, the following recommendations
for improvement priorities are provided. Costs which appear to be eligible for Powell
Bill funding appear in bold.
HIGH PRIORITY AREAS
Includes areas where threats exist for the flooding of'streets or structures. Estimated
costs include design and construction.
-1. Fairway Drive Norman Road Area — Improve ditch/piping system. Estimated cost
$115,000.
2. Runaway Bay/River Road — improvements to piping system. Estimated cost
$40,000
3. Pine Tree Lane/Hawthorne Road pond — Provide outlet piping. Estimated cost
$185,000.
4. Longwood Drive — Provide outlet ditch improvements to Town pond. Estimated
cost $40,000.
. - 5. Darby Road — Clean out culvert and ditch. Estimated cost $37,000.
6. Foxhom Road — Clean out stormwater outfall ditch. Estimated cost $35,000.
7. Hampton Way Pond - Provide means to drain ponds to swamp more quickly.
Estimated cost $40,000
8. Forest Drive/Highland Avenue — Clean out culverts and ditches. Estimated cost
$25,000,
- 9. Huntmaster Road — Raise bulbed shaped roadway. Estimated cost $40,000,
MEDIUM PRIORITY AREAS
Includes areas where prolonged standing water creates nuisance conditions.
l . Hunt Club/Steeplechase Drive — Clear drainage system. Estimated cost $18,000.
1) Tj ay.�.00d Creek, Tl � Provide ditchl dit- r. .-A i - Tr t;m 1
Z- iia,'wVvu Vleen Lll Ve l to VJue u11411 reglaulll� WIG pipe Clear Mig. 1a LLILl—C"
cost $10,000.
3. Park Drive — Clean out ditch outfall. Estimated cost $20,000.
E- 4. Coquina Circle — Cleanout culverts and ditches. Estimated cost $6,000.
r kiloucest--- ry-'--- Clean Estimated
S22 00"U
�. vwuce5ter >J[i�� -- �,ica�i out piping Syste�i�. t.�ui�ia«u must .n��,�vv.
6. Edgehill Road — Reroute standing water. Estimated cost $15,000.
7. Grenville Court — Regrade swale to pond. Estimated cost $3,000.
..
- • 8. Trent Shores Drive — Clean out culvert and regrade swale. Estimated cost $4,000.
9. Circle Drive —Provide roadside intiiitration area. Estimated cosi $7,0v0.
54

10. Country Club Drive — Regrade ditches and clean out culvert. Estimated cost
$7,500.
11. Dorset Way — Regrade roadside swales. Estimated cost $7,500.
12. Meadowbrook Drive — Clean out piping system. Estimated cost $5,000.
13. West Wilson Creek — Regrade ditch and improve outlet. Estimated cost $7,500.
-14. Hatcher Road — Regrade ditch. Estimated cost $7,500.
15. Monck's Court/Carteret Drive — Clear outlet Swale. Estimated cost $7,500.
LOW PRIORITY AREAS
Includes areas where standing water occurs but normally clears up within one to two days
with no threat to roads or structures.
1. Wedgewood Drive — Reestablish ditch grades. Estimated cost $5,000.
2. Miscellaneous ditch regrading and culvert clearing NCDOT roads. Estimated cost
$92,431.
3. Miscellaneous ditch regrading and culvert clearing Town roads. Estimated cost
$87,606.
8.0 IMPROVEMENT COMPLICATIONS
The primary complications associated with implementing several of the
recommendations for drainage improvements in the Town are associated with access to
the work area. A large portion of the Town was developed in the late 1950'5 and the
1960's when the placement of drainage easements along lot lines or major drainage
routes was not routinely done. As a result, access, access to these drainage structures for
maintenance is not available. Access may not be permitted by adjacent landowners due
to concerns associated with restoring the area after construction or for other reasons.
Easements along drainage routes still do not solve all access concerns for maintenance
since equipment may still be required to travel along the drainage route to perform the
maintenance operations.
Obtaining permission to access drainage structures and routes from private individuals
can be a time consuming and sometimes costly requirement. Access restrictions are
noted for each of the improvement areas are recommended to be addressed early in the
design phase.
O 11 N1"Y'% 1r p A ID9r i CP A' IC11V
J.V 119VJlV i i 4—x A% &Y%il A11N—/l14
Several of the drainage improvements identified in this study occur on North Carolina
. r.r�rms .
Department of`Transportation �INCDOTj roadways. The i-41-1301 s position in the past
SS

has been that they would only respond to drainage concerns that affect the safety of the
traveling public or that have the potential to impact the structure of their roadway. These
conditions are met for the following roads in the "Down of Trent Woods:
1. Forest Drive (NCSR 1301)
Roadway culvert and side lot line ditch are badly silted and result in overtopping of the
roadway during significant rainfall events. Water stands in the adjacent roadside swale
on a continual basis due to the clogged drainage conditions.
2. Circle Drive (NCSR 1312)
Prolonged standing water remains on this low area of the roadway including the roadway
pavement. There is no nearby drainage outlet for this location. It is recommended that a
shallow infiltration swale or similar device be constructed in this sandy soil area.
10.0 CONCLUSIONS
The Town of Trent Woods has had to more frequently experience and deal with a variety
of drainage issues during the recent past. The long term maintenance of the existing
drainage systems appears to be the source of the majority of the drainage concerns.
Fortunately, these improvements are definable and easily accomplished, with the
exception of having to access private property to perform the maintenance. The access to
private property to perform drainage system maintenance will be a necessity in a lot of
circumstances in order to resolve drainage concerns.
The new construction and larger scale maintenance projects are clearly and cost
efficiently definable into stand alone single projects. The smaller scale projects are
recommended to be combined into a larger group of work items in order to make the
design and construction more efficient. Several of the smaller work items may be
accomplished more informally with purchase orders from the Town Public Works
Department.
Sr�

SCALE: t" = 600'
AVOLIS ENGINEERING,
C'iA and Fnvirnr,m Fnfnl 7nnin P_�r.
r� PO BOX 1550-4 NEW B'ERN, NORTH CARO(
PHONE: ,252)6-53-0068, FAX (252)63

SCALE. I " = 600'
s AVOLIS ENGINEERING,
PO BOX 15564 NEW 6ERN, NORTH CAROLI
RMU !E: [phone]. FAX (25Z)63:

1
5' oI
. �=UJLA"LLUU
AVOLIS ENGINEERING,
Civii and Environrnen tol Engineerin
PO BOX 15564 NEW BERN, NORTH CAROL!
PHONE: l252}633-0068. FAX (252)673

GOLF
Nitrogen Fertilization on
Golf Courses: A Water -
Quality Problem?
by Tom Rutty, Ph.D., and Dan Bowman, Ph.D., Research Professors with the Center for Turfgrass
Environmental Research and Education, North Carolina State University
three-year field study was conducted to determine whether golf courses were a major cause of nitrogen
pollution of ground and surface water in eastern North Carolina. At experimental sites on ten golf
courses, intensive testing Indicated that tittle inorganic nitrogen leached from the turfgrass system and
the potential for water pollution was very low.
Fig-e 1. F,xperrmenW design jar
enWromnental studies at 10 golf courses in
eastern NC. Nitrogen fate was followed by
analysis of samples from clippings, soil
cores, soil solution, shallow wells, and
MaNnns.
This research is supported jointly by the
North Carolina Twjkram Foundation
and the NCSU Center for Turfgrass.
Although this research was conducted
on golf courses, the results are also
applicable to other warm -season turf
grass areas in North Carohna.
As is the case in many areas of the United States, there is concern
in North Carolina about the quality of water supplies, especially in
the eastern part of the state where periodic algal blooms and fish
kills occur. The main culprit in these environmental systems is
nitrate nitrogen. Many articles have been published in the popular
press stating that golf coarse fertilization is a main cause of the
water -quality problem, but there has been little scientific basis for
this conclusion.
We initiated a study several years ago to determine whether
golf course fertilization might actually be an environmental
problem. When the project began, it quickly became obvious that
past research would not supply the answer. Many recent water -
quality research projects had focused on fertilizer run-off. It
seemed unlikely, however, that run-off was a major problem in
North Carolina river basins, because best management practices
(BMPs) are commonly used. The BMPs for turfgrass fertilization
were established by N.C. State research/extension faculty many years ago and
are widely followed by turfgrass managers throughout the state. These
practices specify that fertilizers should not be applied before anticipated rain
events, and the practices prescribe light watering at the time of application to
ensure rapid biological use. Most golf coarse superintendents are well
informed, and they closely adhere to BMPs to minimize adverse
environmental impacts and to control their own costs!
If fertilizer run-off were not a problem, then the main concern would be
nitrogen leaching downward in the soil. Indeed, information coming from
environmental studies with natural and agronomic systems indicated that
nitrate losses occurred primarily through leaching and not surface run-off.
Research funded by the USCA had addressed nitrate leaching in turfgrass
systems, but almost all experiments were done on newly constructed plots.
Because soil characteristics and the ecology of established turfgrass fairways
would be very differem from those in constructed plots, there was no way to
extrapolate results from the USGA project to a landscape scale.

Our research approach
To try to clear up the issue of whether North Carolina golf courses
were a major cause of water pollution, we initiated an extensive field -
research project to follow the fate of nitrogen in bermudagrass
fairways. The goal was to develop a nitrogen budget that would
account for uptake by bermudagrass, retention and downward
movement of nitrogen (I) in the soil profile, as well as any loss of
into adjacent streams and lakes.
The scope of the project dictated its complexity. Detailing N
movement requires crossing several scientific disciplines, including
turfgrass agronomy and physiology, soil physics and hydrology, and
soil microbiology. As a consequence, a group of research faculty was
assembled with expertise in each of the disciplines. The large project
was made possible by environmental research grants from the North
Carolina Legislature. Funding also was provided by the Turfgrass
Council of North Carolina, which offered support even with the
prospect of negative results for the turf grass industry.
Experimental sites were established on ten golf courses in eastern
North Carolina. The locations were chosen based on several criteria.
One was that they represented a variety of soil types, because soii
texture strongly influences leaching. Secondly, we wanted to examine
golf courses of different ages, thinking that older courses could have
very different levels of organic matter and compaction compared to
younger ones. Thirdly, it was important that the research be located on
golf courses wiiiing to cooperate and put up wiul our ul luusiOn.
As shown in Figure 1, multiple plots were established on each site
for periodic collection of clippings during the bermudagrass growing
season. Transects were run from adjacent natural areas, across roughs
and fairways to a stream. Four transects were used at each site to
allow appropriate statistical analysis of data. Along the transects, soil
cores were taken to a depth of 4 feet, four times a year (bracketing
fertilization periods), to resolve patterns of nitrate accumulation in the
soil profile. Suction lysimeters were installed at 6", 12" and 18"
depths, which allowed direct sampling of soil solution for nitrate
analysis. The lysimeter samples were collected on a weekly basis.
"Nests" of shallow wells, X to 20' deep, were installed for sampling of
subsurface water flows. Water samples were collected weekly from
streams at points where they entered and exited the golf course.
As implied above, this was the first comprehensive study of
nitrogen fate in bermudagrass fairways in a natural setting. The
experiment ran for three years, and the golf course superintendents
were asked to maintain their normal management practices
throughout. The general fertilization protocol in this geographical area
is to supply 2.5 lbs. to 3.5 lbs. of nitrogen per 1,000 sq. ft./year,
mostly during the bermudagrass growing season from May through
September.
Frpected results
Our initial expectation was that we would find high nitrate levels
in soil solution and subsurface water beneath the turfgrass system
and, consequently, a high potential for water pollution. This came
from simple reasoning:
g n light
ON GOLF
Continued
• The golf courses ranged from 10 to 100 years old, and
even in the youngest, soil organic -nitrogen levels should have
been in equilibrium or approaching equilibrium. That meant
soil organic -nitrogen levels were stabilized and would not
increase from year to year.
• Since clippings were not removed from any of the sites,
fertilizer inputs should approximate losses. Taking into
account fertilization rates and yearly rainfall (- 45 in/yr), it
was estimated that groundwater should contain about 50 100
ppm nitrate.
From the earliest analyses, it became evident that our initial
expectations were wrong.
Nitrogen in the lurfgrass/soil system
One of the initial surprises in the study was the realization that more
nitrogen was being incorporated into clippings during the growing
season than was being supplied in fertilizer. Nitrogen uptake
efficiency was calculated from the clipping harvests and analyses, and
values generally ranged from just over 1000/0to as high as 300%. The
calculation indicates that nitrogen was being rapidly cycled in the
system. In other words, fertilizer N was taken up into the grass; cut
clippings were rapidly being degraded by soil microbes, releasing N
back into the soil; and the soil N was being reabsorbed by the
turfgrass.
The soil cores revealed that nitrate levels in the soil profile beneath
the turf always were very low, ranging from I to 3 mg/kg of soil. The
levels were similar to those found in natural areas adjacent to the
course that were not fertilized, and the levels were much lower than
those reported in studies with fertilized agricultural crops. The nitrate
levels were uniformly low with depth from the soil surface, so there
was no indication of accumulation anywhere within the soil profile.
Also, nitrate was not elevated in the days and weeks following
fertilizations, probably reflecting the high uptake efficiency by the
turfgrass. Samples from the lysimeters, which were taken with
greater frequency, also indicated that soil -solution nitrate was low.
The placement of wells allowed sampling of subsurface water as it
flowed beneath fertilized fairways from higher natural areas to low-
lying streams. The subsurface flows would contain nitrate that
leached downward through the soil to the water table.
There were two major findings. First, some elevation in nitrate
could be seen as subsurface water moved from unfertilized, natural
areas to the fairways, but levels were relatively low, ranging from
- 2 to 8 ppm. This is much lower than the predicted range of 50 to 100
ppm. Second, and most importantly, nitrate declined to almost
undetectable levels (less than 1 ppm) as the flow approached streams.
The water samples contained high levels of dissolved organic carbon
(- 8 to 20 ppm). The high carbon levels, coupled with anaerobic
conditions, presumably led to denitrification, i.e. transformation of
nitrate to nitrogen gas that was released into the atmosphere.
In agricultural fields, leaching of fertilizer nitrate generally leads to
nitrate accumulation in the soil that "bleeds" into adjacent streams or
lakes over extended time periods. We have found no

��een light
ON GOLF
continued
evidence that fertilization of fairways
causes an increase in nitrate in adjacent
streams. Stream nitrate levels generally
were low (less than 0.5 ppm) and actually
tended to decrease during water passage
through the golf course. All of the
superintendents maintained vegetation
along streams, which evidently absorbed a
portion of the available nitrate,
Significance to the industry
The results from the field studies are
consistent among all locations, always
indicating a very low potential for nitrate
contamination of ground and surface waters.
In the past two years, the research has been
expanded to include five additional sites in
other parts of North Carolina where soils
and topographies are different than those in
the East. Up to this time, we have not found
any evidence indicating
significant pollution problems.
Our findings may come as a surprise to
many people working in the water -quality
area, just as they were to us. Turfgrass
systems have particular characteristics,
however, that are atypical of the
agricultural world, where almost all
previous landscape -scale research has
been done. One is the fertility approach.
Turfgrasses are usually fertilized three or
four times during the growing season with
relatively small amounts of nitrogen (- 42
Ibs.lac.), so the system is not overloaded
and predisposed to leaching. Also, most of
the root system is fully developed when the
fertilizer is added By contrast, a corn crop
would receive the same total amount of
fertilizer, but in one or two applications
early in the growing season. It has been
estimated that corn takes up only about
50% of the nitrogen applied.
A second notable difference with
turfgrasses is the density of the root system.
Nitrogen uptake efficiency is a function of
root absorption surface. The fine roots of
turfgrasses typically form a dense matrix
several inches into the soil, and individual
roots can extend downward as much as two
to three feet. Nitrogen entering the root
zone is rapidly taken up from the soil
solution.
A third difference is the very high
microbial activity in the soil just beneath
turfgrasses. The thatch layer at the soil
surface provides an ideal environment for
microbial communities, and microbial
biomass greatly exceeds that found in
natural or agricultural soils. High microbial
activity and efficient uptake by the root are
key components of efficient nitrogen
cycling, which causes fertilizer N to be
retained within the system.
Another key characteristic of turfgrasses
that is different from traditional agriculture
is the large amount of carbon being
deposited into the soil. With irrigation and
frequent fertilizations, bermuda grass is
grown in a relatively stress -free
environment. Large amounts of organic
material are generated, and none is
removed by harvesting. The carbon in the
organic material provides an energy source
for microbial activity that, in tum, drives
degradation and de -nitrification processes.
The evidence that we have assembled
thus far suggests that managed turfgrasses
may serve a similar function as the riparian
buffers being constructed to protect streams
and lakes from nitrate contamination. The
purpose of the riparian buffers is,
primarily, to intercept nitrate in subsurface
water flows. Buffers function by providing
a carbon source that is used by microbes
for denitrification in the anaerobic
conditions present close to stream banks,
an effect analogous to that observed in our
research. With this in mind, it is
conceivable that turf grass systems may
occupy an important role in strategies to
protect water supplies in the future.
Collaborators: D.K. Cassel, J.W. Gilliam,
C.N. Peacock, A.G. Wollum,

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 13, 2010
Page 3
The official recommendation found that the Town should be designated, as the "town drains to
impaired water (Trent River, impacted by nutrients)." However, the Trent River is not
designated by the State as an "impaired water." So the primary basis for the Town's designation
was erroneous.
Further, the fact, that the Trent River flows into the Neizse River is ,rrelevant. First, the federal
regulations discuss the quality of the water body into which the discharge directly flows (the
Trent River). Second, the recommendation itself does not even mention that the Town is having
any impact on the Neuse River. Third, the Town's stormwater discharge has, at most, a
negligible impact on the Neuse River. Fourth, if the Neuse River is the water body on which the
analysis should be made, then each and every unit of local government in the entire Neuse River
Basin should be designated as a regulated MS4, since all waters within the entire Neuse River
Basin eventually flow into the Neuse River.
Most importantly, given that the Town is almost completely developed, combined with the
location and control of DOT streets along the Trent River, and combined further with the Town's
current regulations and policies, future discharges from the Town's MS4 do not have the
potential to result in exceedances of water quality standards.
Finally, it is important to note that although the Town received correspondence dated October 21,
2009 that the Town was being considered for designation, it received no further information from
DENR whatsoever, nor was it advised of the meeting dates of the EMC, until after the
designation was made.
In conclusion, the Town respectfully renuests a waiver as authorized hu CeSgi�„ r axxr `)0t)A_1n4
fu r• .... N6.
The Town believes that given the minimal number of tracts left to be developed, the existence of
currently existing Town, ordinances that govern and regulate future development, the numerous
federal and state environmental regulations that will substantially limit future development, the
lack of control over DOT streets and drainage which flow into the Trent River, the fact that the
Trent River has not been designated by the state as an "impaired water", and the many other
issues raised herein, the Town clearly should not be designated as a regulated MS4.
m 11, Sugg, Carmichael �icks & Hart, P.A.
Ji--.fnie icks, Jr.
Enclosure

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 13, 2010
Page 4
cc: Senator .lean Preston
Representative Alice G. Underhill
Representative William L. Wainwright
Marcia Sproul, Town Clerk

Trent Woods
Why Screened
Housing Units (2000 Census): 1,744
Estimated Population (2007): 4,364
Potential stormwater discharges to impaired waters. Trent Woods — drains to the Trent River,
also an impaired water body due to agricultural (swine facilities) influences. The nutrient load
from stormwater continues to grow and add to the impaired estuary of the Neuse River. Type of
Illlpa lllflell t(J) VVIL111 l Vlle-I11Ile of segll1e111. olI 2vV6 JVJ(U) Llst - Vh1VI a alld biological integrity
DWQ Recommendation
DWQ recommended that Trent Woods be designated. The town drains to impaired waters
(Trent River, impacted by nutrients). Trent Woods is in a county where the Coastal Stormwater
Rules apply to development, but the town is not a named Neuse NSW community. The Neuse
Basinwide Plan (2009) recommends stormwater BMPs to reduce nutrient and fecal loadings to
this lower segment of the river. Designation would align Trent Woods' stormwater management
responsibilities more closely with neighboring towns New Bern and Havelock (Neuse NSW
program). DWQ did not receive any response from Trent Woods during the public comment
period.
EMC Action
Pursuant to Session Law 2006-246, Section 5, the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) at its regularly scheduled meeting on January 14, 2010, considered the designation of
the Town of Trent Woods as a regulated public entity that owns or operates a municipal
separate storm sewer system (MS4) subject to the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES). Following proper deliberation in accordance with the procedures delineated
in Session Law 2006-246, Section 5, the EMC determined that the Town of Trent Woods shall
ho Anoirvnnh=A oc n -Ihlira enfifu that n irionulatedne nr nnerntae n MCA ciihiar} to tha NPnF:.R
1./6.. b14r VIaJ. 114ya.4V M V� I✓M wlly laJ vNvYav� �vva
requirements.
Under the provisions of Session Law 2006-246, Section 5, Designation of Regulated Entities,
the Town of Trent Woods was identified as a candidate for potential designation because the
town is located near impaired waters. In October 2009, the Town of Trent Woods was notified
that it had been identified for consideration under the state designation procedures. Public
notice of potential designation was given, and comments on potential designation were
accepted through November 30, 2009.
After review of the public comment, the EMC determined that the Town of Trent Woods met the
required criteria for formal designation under Section 5(1)(d)(4) of the Session Law because the
town's MS4 discharges stormwater that results in a significant contribution of nutrients to the
Trent River and Neuse River.

Candidate Local Governments Identified for Potential Designation
Pursuant to Session Law 2006-246 Section 5
The Phase 2 Stormwater Rules (SL 2006-246) require that the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) consider designation of public entities owning and operating a municipal separate
storm sewer system on a basinwide review schedule. The EMC is currently considering designations
for the following river basins: Broad, Chowan, Neuse and Pasquotank. At their September meeting
the EMC's Water Quality Committee reviewed possible candidates and established a list of entities
f^r nnA n11klir, rnmmcnt GIAameu rnnfn fhmf tho in nniifia¢ sro nnhr hoinn rnncerf ared
IVI Vial 117I%A%1IGIIVI I GI 16i VMJ 11V VWl III I —I IL. I IF-- IF-- Off— I
for designation at this time and the final decision on designation will not be made until public
comment and other relevant information has been compiled and considered.
Broad I River Basin
ChowanlPasquotank River Basin
Neuse River Basin
Forest City
Elizabeth City
Benson Roxboro
Rutherfordton
Kill Devil Hills
Butner Smithfield
Shelby
Nags Head
Clayton Stem
5pindale
Creedmoor Trent Woods
Farmville Wendell
Havelock Wilson
Kinston Zebulon
New Bern
The entities noted above will be notified in writing that they are under consideration and the list will be
publicly noticed and comments accepted on these potential designations. After gathering comments,
the Division will come back to the Environmental Management Commission for their review and final
consideration on designations. The list above is based on reviewing population and 'housing unit
information along with drainage to impaired waters in areas throughout the four River Basins in
accordance with Section 5 of the Session Law.

Legend
�SG4llh� � Wvxi a�:tl36fl
VdGUam`4W ,Uro

Ell
MI
JN\'
y�IN FN.4
It
7R tti 1,°c ` i FI Irk 4' °' ' r _ ➢ "!
Im -
Aw