NCS000192_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20090313

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
RESCISSIONS
PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
❑COMPLETE FILE -HISTORICAL
DATE OF
RESCISSION
❑ 2oU 9 a313
YYYYMMDD

NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 27, 2009
RECEIVED .
N.C. D&OL of ENR
Mr. Arnie T. Beringer �Q� Za�9
Sun Chemical Corporation
5020 Spring Grove Avenue Winston=SaIDMI
Cincinnati, OH 45232 Regional ottico
Subject: Return of No -Exposure Certification NCGNE0463
And Rescission of NCS000192
Sun 'ChemicaI.Corporation
1100 Fairchild Rd., Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Beringer:
The Division has reviewed your submittal of the No Exposure Certification for Exclusion from NPDES Stormwater
Permitting form, which we received on October 4, 2007. The Division is returning your certification of no exposure since
the facility is no longer operating and has been sold.
We are also herby rescinding your individual permit NCS000192 for this facility. This is based ' n your request received
by the Division on December 1, 2008,
If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Robert Patterson at [phone], or through
email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
✓ cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office -Rose Pruitt
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
NCS000192 Permit File
Frame+
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch One
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 NorthiCarolina
Phone:
9 9-8 N. 300 Salisbury St. Raleigh, North4941 Carolina 27604 �����,� r `�
Phone: 919�07$3001 FAX: 919$07-6A941 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 - "
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Subject: Sun Chemical Sediment Data
From: Collin Day <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:57.53 -0500
To: Rose Pruitt <[e-mail]>
Rose:
I have attached a table that contains sediment data that I split sampled with Sun Chemical. Take a
look at it and let me know what you think regarding the stormwater permit for the site. Sun claims
that the data reflects the results of parking lot runoff as if that is a legitimate excuse. According to
the USEPA Ecological Risk Screening values, they have a problem regardless of whether the source is
from groundwaer or surface water runoff. I have also attached the screening document that we are
using in the IHSB. Table 3 has the sediment values for the PAH's that we have analytical data for.
Consequently, they need to address this. Let me know what your thoughts are because the next PPA
meeting is Thursday and I have to brief the group. Thanks for your help.
Collin Day
Hydrogeologist
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Waste Management, Superfund Section-IHSB
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: (336) 771--5281
FAX: [phone]
Region 4: Superfund
WE I
iYou are here: EPA Home Region 4 Land Cleanup and Wastes Superfund Ecological Risk
00
Assessment Bulletins— Supplement to RAGS
ql PR 66
Ecological Risk Assessment Bulletins —
Supplement to RAGS
Suggested citation:
USEPA. 2001. Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Region 4 Bulletins, Ecological Risk Assessment.
Originally published November 1995. Website version last updated November 30, 2001:
http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/"ots,ecolbul.htm
Updates:
Region 4's Ecological Risk Assessment Bulletins are undergoing revision. Please contact OTS
personnel
November 30, 2001: Citation for Dioxin listed under Table 3.
April 20, 2001: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Contacts Updated
March 9, 2000 change is: Tom Dillon is now the NOAA Coastal Resource Coordinator. See
Bulletin #4.
August 11, 1999 changes were:
I of 28 2/3/2009 I :0l I'M

TABLE 1
STREAM SEDi\IE,NT SAtiIPLE A.NALt'T1CAL RESULTS- DETECTED COMPOUNDS ONL2' (OCTOBER 16, 2008)
SUN CII&MICAL
I100 FAIRCHILD ROAD
NVINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLLNA
`
4
0
Q
O
O
C,
o
O
r
O
n
Analytical Method
0
0
oNo
000
0
0
0
M
0
0
oryo
G]
U
�
V
U
C
d
C
2
U
A
i
I
.
C
�
G
�
Id
C
O
O
O
va'i
N
C
p
v
Compound
Sample
Date
Sample
ID
Collected
Depth (ft)
S-1
10/162008
Surface
0.220'
0.200'
0.130'
0.140'
0.140'
0.170'
0.100'
0.110'
<0,400
0.100'
<0.400
<0.400
NCDENR SEDOI
10/16/2008
0.29
0.27
0.21
<0.66
<0.66
0.15
<0.66
0.13
<0.66
<0.66
0.55
1.7
S-2
10/162008
Surface
0.600
0.500
0.280'
<0370
0.360'
0.330'
0.330'
0.280'
0.300'
0.230'
<0.370
<0.370
NCDENR SED02
10/16/2008
OA50
0.530
0.36
0.37
0.34
0.76
0.65
0.65
0.39
0.16
<1.32
<1.32
S-3
10/162008
Surface
0.420'
0.460 '
0.360'
<0.430
0.220'
0.290'
1 0.290'
0.250'
<13.430'
<0.430
<0.430
<0.430
NCDENRSED03
10/162008
0.58
OA80
0.31
0.18
0.13
0.25
0.22
0.23
0.2
0.25
<0.66
<0.66
S-4
10/162008
Surface
0.780
0.770
0.360
<0370
0.430
0.510
0.460
0.360'
<0.370
0.390
<0.370
<0.370
NCDENR SED04
10/162008
0.350
0.430
0.26
<0.66
<0.66
<0.66
<0.66
0.15
<0.66
0.19
<0.66
<0.66
8270 = EPA,IMethod 8270
J = Estimated value.
All soil results are expressed in mglicg.
Bold values are present above the method detection limit.
�j

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
• deleted Preliminary Risk Evaluation Bulletin
• added soil screening Table 4
• added dioxin screening value in Table 3
• changed 4-bromophenylphenyl phthalate to 4-bromophenylphenyl ether in Table 1
• changed value of arsenic in Table 1 to 190 ug/I
INDEX
1. Ecological Introduction
2. Ecological Screening Values
• Table 1 Freshwater Surface Water Screening Values
• Table 2 Saltwater Screening Values
• Table 3 Sediment Screening Values
• Table 4 Soil Screening Values
3. Endpoint Selection
4. Natural Resource Trustees
DRAFT
Ecological Risk Assessment Bulletins
1. ECOLOGICAL INTRODUCTION
The role of a Superfund Ecological Risk Assessment is to: (1) determine whether unacceptable
risks are posed to ecological receptors from chemical stressors, (2) derive contaminant levels
which would not pose unacceptable risks, and (3) provide the information necessary to make a
risk management decision concerning the practical need and extent of remedial action.l
Ecological Risk Assessment is in a beginning phase of development and therefore exists in a
very dynamic state. Agency guidance is limited and there is uncertainty concerning the roles
and processes of Ecological Risk Assessment in the different programs within the Agency. The
Office of Technical Services (OTS) should be contacted prior to applying other programmatic
guidance, policies, or practices to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA) Ecological Risk Assessments in Region 4.
The intention of this series of ecological bulletins is to provide regional direction for
implementation of the Agency's Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (referred to
as the Process Document).2 This guidance supersedes the previous Risk Assessment Guidance
for Superfund (RAGS), Volume II, which still may be used as a primer on the basic elements of
a CERCLA Ecological Risk Assessment.3 The Risk Assessment Forum's Framework for Ecological
Risk Assessment (referred to as the Framework document) provides the basic approach for
conducting Ecological Risk Assessments used by all programs within the Agency.4 Specific
program guidance presented in these Region 4 Bulletins, as well as the Process document, may
appear in rare cases to be at odds with the Framework document. Region 4 views these
documents as being complementary with their focus directed at different organizational levels.
The CERCLA Ecological Risk Assessment process as outlined in the Process document consists of
eight steps and five scientific/management decision points. These steps are: (1) Preliminary
Problem Formulation and Ecological Effects Evaluation, (2) Preliminary Exposure Estimate and
Risk Calculation, (3) Problem Formulation: Assessment Endpoint Selection and Formulation of
Testable Hypothesis, (4) Conceptual Model Development: Conceptual Model Measurement
Endpoint Selection and Study Design, (5) Site Assessment to Confirm Ecological Sampling and
Analysis Plan, (6) Site Field Investigation, (7) Risk Characterization, and (8) Risk Management.
2 of 28 2/3/2009 1:0 i I'M

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
The decision points follow steps 2 - 5, and 8.
Additional resources may be found in the Bibliography of the Process Document. Included in
this list are the ECO Update bulletin series issued by the Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response.5 These bulletins are focused discussions of elements and topics related to CERCLA
Ecological Risk Assessments. The guidance and direction contained in these bulletins is still
somewhat broad, therefore approval of the proposed approach in CERCLA Ecological Risk
Assessments should be obtained from OTS.
These regional guidance bulletins will be dynamic documents. Bulletins will be updated and new
ones added as questions are posed and regional practices are developed.
This guidance does not constitute rulemaking by the Agency, and may not be relied on to
create a substantive or procedural right enforceable by any other person. Region 4 reserves the
right to take action that is at variance with this guidance. The intent of this guidance is to aid in
the development of high -quality, single draft risk assessments consistent with the criteria of the
OTS in its oversight role.
References
1. Role of the Ecological Risk Assessment in the Baseline Risk Assessment, OSWER
Directive Number 9285.7-17, August 12, 1994, Laws, EP.
2. Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Process for Designing and
Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments, Review Draft, September 1994.
3: Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume II -Environmental Evaluation Manual,
Interim Final, March 1989, EPA/540/1-89/001.
4. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment, February 1992, EPA 530/F-92/001.
5. 'ECO Update, Intermittent Bulletin, Volumes 1 and 2, Publication 9345.0-05I.
Volume 1:
• Number 1 - The Role of BTAGs in Ecological Assessment, September 1991.
• Number 2 - Ecological Assessment of Superfund Sites: An Overview, December 1991.
• Number 3 - The Role of Natural Resource Trustees in The Superfund Process, March
1992.
• Number 4 - Developing a Work Scope for Ecological Assessments, May 1992.
• Number 5 - Briefing the BTAG: Initial Description of Setting, History, and Ecology of a
Site, August 1992.
Volume 2:
• Number 1 - Using Toxicity Tests in Ecological Assessments, September 1994.
• Number 2 - Catalogue of Standard Toxicity Tests for Ecological Risk Assessment,
September 1994.
• Number 3 - Field Studies for Ecological Risk Assessment, September 1994.
• Number 4 - Selecting and Using Reference Information in Superfund Ecological Risk
Assessments, September 1994.
2. ECOLOGICAL SCREENING VALUES
Ecological screening values are based on contaminant levels associated with a low probability of
unacceptable risks to ecological receptors. The Office of Technical Services (OTS) has developed
3 of 28 2/3/2009 1:0 l PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
the attached tables for use at Region 4 hazardous waste sites. Since these numbers are based
on conservative endpoints and sensitive ecological effects data, they represent a preliminary
screening of site contaminant levels to determine if there is a need to conduct further
investigations at the site. Ecological screening values should not be used as remediation levels.
Preliminary screening values for contaminants which lack Region 4 Waste Management Division
Ecological Screening Values should be proposed and submitted to the OTS for approval. If at all
possible these screening values should be based on ecotoxicological information from sources
such as scientific literature, computer databases, etc. As information is submitted to this office
for review or as new information becomes available, these Region 4 screening values may be
modified and additional screening values added.
Exceedences of the ecological screening values may indicate the need for further evaluation of
the potential ecological risks posed by the site. The decision concerning the necessity for
evaluation requires the weighing of such factors as the frequency, magnitude, and pattern of
these exceedences. The basis of the screening values should also be considered when making
the decision for the collection of additional data. An exceedence may result in the retention of
that contaminant for further evaluation even though its frequency of detection may be low. The
sampling may indicate a "hot spot" which would be addressed by future investigations.
Surface Water Screening Values
The surface water screening values (which exist for both Freshwater FTable 1 and
Saltwater Table 21 surface waters) were derived from the Screening Worksheet prepared by the
Region 4 Water Management Division.! These values were obtained from Water'Quality Criteria
documents and represent the chronic ambient water quality criteria values for the protection of
aquatic life. If there was insufficient information available to derive a criterion, the lowest
reported effect level was used with the application of a safety factor _of ten to protect for a more
sensitive species. A safety factor of ten was also used to derive a chronic value if only acute
information was available.
The ambient surface water quality criteria are intended to protect 95% of the species, 950/0 of
the time. If there is reason to believe that a more sensitive species is present at the site, such
that surface water contaminant levels below the chronic ambient water quality values may pose
unacceptable risks, more protective site -specific surface water screening values may be
developed.
Sediment Screening Values
Sediment screening values Table 31 are derived from statistical interpretation of effects
databases obtained from the literature as reported in publications from the State of Florida, the
!National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and a joint publication by Long et al.2,3,4
These values are generally based on observations of direct toxicity. When the Contract
Laboratory Program's (CLP) practical quantification limit (PQL) is above the effect level the
screening value defaults to the PQL. For those contaminants whose screening values are based
on the PQL, data reported below the required quantification limit (e.g., J-flagged data) should
be compared to the Effects Level number. Although the sediment screening values have been
developed from a database containing information from studies conducted predominantly in
marine environments, personal communication with the authors of the studies indicate that
corresponding values being developed from a freshwater database are within a factor of three
of the marine based numbers. The existing values will be used for freshwater sites until a
separate freshwater screening value table is developed.
4 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Soil Screening Values
Terrestrial assessments are one of the least developed aspects of Ecological Risk Assessment
and screening values for this component have not been drafted by EPA. Site -specific soil
screening values may be submitted based on information concerning potential effects for
contaminants whose mode of toxicity is through direct exposure (e.g., soil invertebrates such
as earthworms). For those contaminants which biomagnify, screening values may be
back -calculated from acceptable tissue levels in prey items, through two trophic transfers from
the abiotic medium. Screening values should be based on contaminant levels associated with
ecological effects, instead of area or regional background levels.
Wildlife Screening Values
Wildlife screening values may serve to indicate if tissue residues pose potential risks to
predatory ecological receptors (e.g., Toxicity Reference Values, TRVs). The contaminant
exposure is generally expressed as a daily dietary exposure with the units of mg of
contaminant, per kilogram body weight of the receptor per day (mg/kg/day). Currently there is
limited information concerning tissue contaminant levels which would pose potential risks to
predatory ecological receptors. Site -specific wildlife screening values may be submitted based
on ecotoxicological information from sources such as scientific literature, computer databases,
etc. These values may be refined, if necessary, in the Ecological Risk Assessment. The use of
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Action Levels may be used to suggest risks to ecological
receptors if tissue residues exceed these values, but FDA Action Levels should not be
considered protective of ecological receptors. FDA levels are derived using human health
exposure assumptions from ingesting contaminated food items obtained from commercial
sources (e.g., fish markets). Ecological receptors may show adverse effects at contaminant
concentrations below the FDA level due to greater exposures. important factors include their:
lower body weight, exposure to higher dose levels by more frequent ingestion of contaminated
prey, and innate greater sensitivity to the contaminants.
Ground Water Screening Values
The potential impacts of contaminated ground water on ecological receptors, either directly
(e.g., cave -dwelling ecological receptors) or indirectly through existing or potential discharge to
sediments, seeps, and surface water must be considered.
The maximum ground water contaminant concentrations should be compared to the surface
water screening values as a conservative scenario (e.g., no attenuation, dilution, etc.).
References
1. 304 (a) Screening Values and Related information, Screening List, October 1991, USEPA
Region 4 - Water Management Division.
2. MacDonald Environmental Sciences, Ltd. Approach to the Assessment of Sediment
Quality in Florida Coastal Waters. Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
November 1994.
3. Long, ER, and LG Morgan. 1991. The Potential for Biological Effects of Sediment-Sorbed
Contaminants Tested in the National Status and Trends Program. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOS OMA 52.
4. Long, ER, DD MacDonald, SL Smith, and FD Calder. 1995. "Incidence of Adverse
Biological Effects with Ranges of Chemical Concentrations in Marine and Estuarine
Sediments." Environmental Management 19(1): 81-97.
5 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Table 1Table 21Table 31TOP
Table 1. Region 4 Waste Management Division Freshwater Surface Water Screening
Values for Hazardous Waste Sites[1]
6 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Priority Pollutants
Lead2 1[33.78*
Mercury 2,40* '012*3
. .... .. ... ..... . ...... . . ......... — . ... ..... -- ---- . . . ....... . ................ . .
Nickell
--TL89-OO*
Selenium
2 0 �-O 0 1�5-00
Silvei-2
. . .. ... ...... .
1.23. EO12(1s)
. ........ . ....... . ....... . . . . . ............ .. ... .. ..... .
Thallium _140.00(3s) 4. 0
. ........ j2-s
Zinc2 65.04* 5
Cyanide
2,3,7,8-TCDD- Dioxin o. 1
............. . . . . ..... . .............. . .......................... . ...
n7 77
0 C)OOO 1 [3
Acrolein 2.1 (1s)
.. . ........... .
Acrylonitrile .=1755
(4s)
Benzene 530 (7s)
53
Bromoform
___112930 (2s) 1293
Carbon Tetrachloride
3520 (3S) 352
Chlorobenzene
1950 (5s) 195
2-Chloroethylvinyl Etheru
7 7
35400 (1s) .(3540 ....... ....
.. ......... Chloroform
................... . .........
2�89(3s) 289
1,2-Dic . hloroethane
F
I11800 (3s) �2000 (1s)
1,1-Dichloroethylene
3030 (3s) 4303
L1, 2-Dich loropro pane
TT55O-(3s)---- .525_
1,3-Dichloropropylene (cis and trans)
606 (2s) 24.4 (Is)
--- Ethylbenzene ]l . 4530 (.5s)-- J453
Methyl Bromide . . ......................... .......... ......... . .
11 1 00 (is) 1110
.. —.- ............ - . . ............
7 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 I'M

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Methyl Chloride 55000 (is)
.... ... . ...... .. . .... .. ...... .
Methylene Chloride_ 19300 (3s) 1930
- 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ---IK32 (3s) 240 (is)
Tetrachloroethylene 528 (5s) 184 (is)
Toluene 1750 (5s) L7 . .........
1,2-Trans-Dichloroethylene fi3500 (is)1350
1, 1, 1 -T r i c h I o ro e t h a n e 2s) 528
1, 1, 2 -T r i c h I o ro et h a n e 3600(3s) 940(1s)
2-Chlorophenol 43.8
2 4-Dichlorophenol
—F�02 (3s) 36.5 (1s)
2,4-Dimethylphenol 212 (3s). 21.2
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
(4,6- Din itro-O-Cresol)
. . . . ....... ..
23 (4s)
2.3
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol
. .. .............. . ...... . . . . . .. . ............. .. ....... 3500
4 Nitrophenol 828 (3s} 82.8
1
3-Methyl-4-Chlorophenol(P-Chloro-M-Cersol)3 (1s) KO. 3
Pentachloropheno,4 (pH 7.8)-7--
. . ........ -
20
13*
Phenol —11
1020(16s) �j 256 (1s)
2,-4,6-Trichlorophenol
3.2
Acenaphthene _I17 i 1117
Benzidine 250 (4s) 2
-- -- — - ------------ --
Bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether 1[�38�0 (1s) -2380
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 1110 (2s)
I< 0. 3 (2s)
4-BromophenylPhenyl Ether F36(2s) L12 22 (is)
Butylbenzyl Phthalate 330(4s) 22 {2s)
-I .2-Dich-.I.o.r. o b e..n..z e 158(4s) (3s)
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
7--1502(3s) 50.2
1,4-Dichlorobenzen 1112(5s)
Diethyl Phthalate 75721�(2s) i��52
Dimethyl Phthalate
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 9-.477
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 3100(2s) 310
1,2-Di p henylhydrazine 27(2s) 2.7
. .. . ... .........
Fluoranthene
398(2s)
8 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Hexachlorobutadiene
1 ,19(5s) 0.93(1s)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene J
7 K.7(4s)- .70-.0-
Hexachloroethane
......... ...
5 s) 9.8
. . . ........... .....
Isophorone
11700(7s) 1170
�_ _ __Naphthalene
. .. ....... .......... . ..... . . . ....
Nitrobenzene
__---1�230(4s)
.......... . . .___ __
2700(2s)
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
S) F58. 5
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
150(4s) '144.9 (1s)
Aldr i n
`7
a-BHC
b-BHC
.....
. . ..........
500[5]
. ..............
5000[5]
g-BHC (Linclane)
0.08
Chlordane
2.4"' 0.0043*3
_J
4,4'-DDT
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDD
105(15) 10.5
0.064(8s) 0.0064
Dieldrin
a-Endosulfan
i�0.22*
R0,056
L
b-Endosulfan
0.22 0.056*
Endrin
—
—10.18
10 —�9 23* . 3
Heptachlor
---Il.0.52*........._.._-==
Heptachlor Epoxide
. . ........ .
0.52* ...... . ... ... ..
E003��--
0, 0038*3
..............
PCB-1242
. �0._014*
PCB-1254
�[0.2(7s)
10. 0 14*
PCB-1221
0.014*
PCB-1232
PCB-1248 -
7A—
__. ..._...._______.
0.2(7s)
.. ..... . . . . . .
0.2(7s)Y-_-__-._—.-__.[0
10-01 4
. . ... . ...................... . . ........
014* —
PCB-1260
S) 0.014
PCB-1 - 01 - 6
.�0.014*
Toxaphene
110,73*
1 0.0002*3
9 of 28 2/3/2009 LOI I'M

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Non -Priority Pollutants
Acute Screening Values
Chronic Screening Values
Compound
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Aluminum (pH 6.5 -9.0) 750
Boron __I F_ [�_50 -6
- --- - - ,-- —i - ..... . . . .... .
Chloride 6 000* 230,000*
ChlorineTRC) 19.
�
--
hlo ropyrif0s EO 4 1:*:
Demeton
0.1
[G7u �tWi:o n 0.01*
Iron 1000
Malat hion 0.1*
Ee hoxychlor
E.
0,03
__ - - - - .-1
. ..................................... . .............. . .. . . .... .. . . ........... .. ........ . . ....... I
. . . .......... . ........... ...... . . . . . . . ......... . . ...... . ... . ............... .......... . ...
. . . . . . . . ....... ..... . .. ..... . ... .. . ........ . ....... . . . . . ........................... . . . ............................. . .................... . ... ........ ...........
Mirex
. . . . . ................ . ........ .......... ... ... ... ... ... . . . . . . .. . .............. ...... . .. . ......
;
C),001* . . . ... .........
Oil and Grease �.0.01*Low LCqn
Parathion �0.013*
Pentachlorobenzene 7] [25:0: SEC)
16.5 - 9. 0
Sulfide (S2 HS-)___
-Tetrachlorobenzen�j� 250 k���,S - -
Tributyltin il-0.026
10 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
I
[1] Based on Region 4 Water Management Division, Water Quality Standards Unit's Screening
List.
Hardness (mg/L as CaCO3): 50.0
pH: 6
*: Criteria
s: Number of Species
[2] Hardness Dependent Based on the following equations:
Compound
Acute Screening Value, Chronic Screening Value,
Cadmium
e(1.128(InH)-3.828)
e(0.7825(InH)-3.49)
Chromium III
ffe(0.819(lnH)+3.688)
e(0.819(lnH)+1-561)
Copper e(0.9422(InH)-1.464)
—_.........__............_._...----...._._......... ........ .......... _.......... _-- _ _.
e(0.8545(InH)
--1.465)
.................---------............................................---
Lead
je(1.273(lnH)-1.46)
e(1.273(lnH)-4.705)
µ
Nickel
e(0.846(InH)+3.3612
e(0.846(lnH)+1.1645)
Silver
e(1.72(InH)-6.52)
Zinc
e(0.8473(InH)+0.8604)
e(0.8473(InH)+0.7614) —11
[3] Based on the marketability of fish. The use of other values which may have greater ecological significance
may be considered.
[4] pH Dependent. Based on the following equation:
Compound — ' Acute Screening Value;Chronic Screening Value
Pentachlorophenol
e(1.005pH-4.83) �I
. . ........ . ..
e{1.005pH-5.29). .. .... ...
[5] Lowest plant value reported
[6) For long term irrigation of sensitive crops (minimum standard)
Table IlTable 2ITable 31TOP
Table 2. Region 4 Waste Management Division Saltwater Surface Water Screening
Values for Hazardous Waste Sites[l]
1 1 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Priority Pollutants
Acute Chronic
Compound Screening Screening
Values (ug/L)_I. Values (ug/L)
. . . . ... ..... ...... .. ... .
L Antimony
Arsenic III36*
L . .. . ..... ... .... .... . . ...................... . . .. .. ... ... . ...... ... . ....
.. ... . ... .
Beryllium
- - -- -------- -
Cadmium
___1---
43*11 9.3-*
Chromium(III) L�71�(2s) 103
Chromium(VI) 11100
Copper
2.9-
Lead
220
. ................. . . . . ...........
*
8.5
I Mercury 12.1* d 0.025*2
.....
. . ............ . . . . . ..
Nickel
75*
I
8.3
Selenium
00*
1f71
Silver 2-3* - 110.23(ls)
-7 Thallium 213(3s) IL, 3
Zinc 5 86
. . . ......... ..
Cyanide
2,3,7,8-TCD D- Dioxin 0.000012
..... ..... ...................... .. .... ...... .
Acrolein 5.5(ls) 0.55
Acrylonitrile
Benzene 1090(6s) 109
Bromoform _ _ _ j 1790(2s) --1164 - 0 . (Is)
Carbon Tetrachloride —[15000(ls) 1500
............. . . ................. ................................................... .................. . ... . . . ..................... .............. . .. ................... . ..... . ..... . . ....... ...... .
I Chlorobenzene I 1050(2s) 11105
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
Chloroform
— ---- - -- 8150I s
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene 22400(3s)
......... . ........ ... .................. . .......... . . . .... ... . . . . .. . ............... .......... . ....... . ..................... . . . ......
1,2-Dichloropropane F_2 (�C( �(ls)
1,3-Dichloropropylene(cis and trans) .1_79(2s)
Ethylbenze'ne 43(5s) �4-3
Methyl Bromide
11200(ls)
120
12 of'28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Methyl Chloride .............. . . 27000(1s)
I GO Methylene Chloride 25600(2s) IF2i6O
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene 10 2 0 1 s) —1145(1s)
Toluene F7C(5 s 37
1, 2-Tra ns-Dichloroethylene
... ... ...... . ............................... . ...... . . . ......
1,1,1-Trichloroethane [3120(2s) 312
......... .. . 1,1,2-Trichloroetha..ne
—.. = .......... .. .......... .
- ---- - -- ---
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
. . ............. . . . .................................
2,4-D imethylphenot
2- M ethyl-4,6-Di n itrophen ol (4,6- Din itro-O-Cresol)
2,4-Dinitrophenol 485(3s) 48.5
2-Nitrophenol
. ............ . . .. ... ..... ---
4-Nitrophenol
... ........ ... . . ........ . . . ............ . ............ .
717(2s) 71.7
3-Methyl-4-Chlorophenol(P-Chloro-M-Cresol)
'Pentachlorophenol3
............ . ................. . . .... . .. . . . .. .. . ........
13
. ..... . ......... . . .......... ............................
7.9*
Phenol 180 (4S) .II58
2,4,6-Trich loro phenol
Acenaphthene 97(2s) 9.7
Benzidine
Bis(2-Chloro'ethyl) Ether
. . . . . .................. . .......... . .... . ............ . .. . .. . .
- ------
.... . . . ..... . ................. . .................. . ...... . ......
Bis(2-Ethythexyl) Phthalate
4-BromophenylPhenylEther
Butylbenzyl Phthalate 294.4(2s) 29.4
1.2-Dichlo ro benzene (3s) 19.7
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 285(2s) 28.5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 199(2s)
. ............. ... ....... ......
Diethyl Phthalate 7S9(2s)
19.9
75.9
Dimethyl Phthalate L5800(
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 3.4[4]
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
. --- - — -- ---- - - -- -
[_ _ I
�(�S)
1.6(1s)
F
13 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 I'M

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
..... . .... . . . .... .... ...... . .......
Hexachlorobutadiene 3.2(4s) ]10.32
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene j 0.7(6s) 0.07
Hexachloroethane
94(2s)
- - --------- .... . .... . .
... ... ... ... .............
Isophorone
1290(1s)
129
Naphthalene ]235(3s)
Nitrobenzene
668(2s) II66.8
23.5
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 330000(1s) 33000
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 45(2s) 4.5
Aldrin
a-BHC 1400[4]
j
b-BHC
g-BHC(Lindane)
. . .. .. ..... .........
Chlordane
�0.09* "
0._004*2
4,4'-DDT
4,4'- D D E1.4(1s)
......... . ............. . .................. . . . . ..................... ..... .. . .... . ............................... . . . ............0.14
4,4'-DDD 0.25(3s)
Dieldrin
0.0019*2
a-Endosulfan
10-034. J0.0087*
b-Endosulfan .
.. . .........
0.034* 0.0087
. . . .............. . . .. .. ..... ........ . . ... .......
Endrin 0_3. 7
Heptachlor j 0.0036*2
Heptachlor Epoxide
0.0036*2
PCB-1242 1.05(3s)
PCB-1254
[1,05(3s)
0.
PCB-1221 1.05(3s)
o ._03
PCB-1232
0..03*
........ . .. . ... ... ... ... . . . ...... . . . .............. .................... . . ..... . ...... . .... PCB- - 1 2 .. 4 .. 8 . .. . . ........... ........... 1.05(3s) FO T3� . . . . .. . ... .......
PCB-1260 05(3s)
0.03* . . . . . ...... ..........
PCB 1016 1.05(3s) _10.103*
Toxaphene
�0.21
0.00 2*2
Id of28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Non -Priority Pollutants
Compound
Acute Screening Values
(ug/L)
Chronic Screening Values
(ug/L)
. . .. . . . ....... . .................................. . .. . .
... . . ............ . .. . .... .... . . . . ........... . ............ .
Ammonia5 - _11
-
Boron
Chloride
Chlorine(TRC) _j
Chloropyrifos
13*
0 011* . . . .............. .. ... .. . . .... . .. ..
7.5
0.0056*
. . . . . .........
Derneton
0. 1
Guthion
J
0,01*
Iron
1—
alathion
M e thoxy chlor 0.03
. . . . .. ........... .... .. .... .. ... .. ... .. .... .. ... . . ...... . ..... . . . ... ...
Mirex 0.001*
N-nitrosopyrrolidene 3300000
Oil and Grease
0.1 * Low LC50
Parathion
.......... .............. . ... . ..............
Pentachlorobenzene Jf
11.78(2s)
. ... . .. ... ...... .......... ...... . ....... . .
160 11129
Phosphorus(elemental
0.1
IpH
6.5 - 8.5
S_uIfide(S2-, HS-)
2
I-I.,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene�l-.160 ...... . ......... . . . . . . .. ...... .. . . . .. ....... ....... . ...... .......... ........... .. . .. .. . . .-- -1---- . _ W ... _ _-.
Tributylti n (Advisory)
0.01
15 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
[,]Based on Region IV Water Management Division, Water Quality Standards Unit's Screening List.
m:Criteria
y : Number ofSpecies
[21 Based on the marketability offish. The use of other values which may have greater ecological significance
may beconsidered.
[3] pH Dependent. Based on the following equation:
Compound Acute Screening Value Chronic Screening Value'
[4] Lowest Plant Value Reported
[5] See table -Ambient VVOCrit.-Ammon ia/Sa|t H20l440/5-88-004
Table IlTable 21Table31TOPI
Table 3. Region 4 Waste Management Division Sediment Screening Values for
Hazardous WasteSites.
metals (ppm)
L& _�ei c a I Effects Value CLP PQLL Screening Valuel
7P77-
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Lea d
Mercury
1�0.02 �[0.13
15.9
Nickel [�5.94 187
Silver 3 . ........ 2 7�2
___]0.,7_33 .. . . ................ ......... . . .....
Zinc
1243
4 T
124
16o[28 1/3/2009/:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Organics (ppb)
Chemical Analyte
Effects Value
CLP PQL1
Screening Value
p,p'- DDD 1.223 3.3 3.3
3.3 3L.
P,p'- DDE 2.073 3.3 3.3
DDE -- 2Z _- -- 3.3 , 3.3
pip`` DDT 1 1g3 3.3 3.3
--
[12 -�3.3 i3.3
Total DDT
Chlordane
1.584
0.52
1.7
1.7
Dieldrin I0 02z
3.3
3.3
Endrin T�_ 0.02Z 3.3 3.3
-_ ~-
--- - ----11
Lindane-(gamma- BHC) 0.323 � 3.3 �E3. 3
Total PCBs 21 63 33(67for Aroclor1221)' 33(67for Aroclor1221).
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 15E823 3.6 �182
Acenaphthene 6.713 330 330
Acenaphthylene 5.873 330 330
..... . .....-- ..._.............---... —_ .... __..._._—._.._..-.- — _._...._ .-.__ ._......_ _
[An�hracene 46.93 -1 330 [�330 -
Fluorene - ---- ----- -� f 21.23 � 330. -- -- I 330
2- Methyl Naphthalene -_- 20_23 --- 0 - - -� — 330 33
Naphthalene
34,63 --
330 ; 330 ---
Phenanthrene 86,73 330 330
_—...- -- ... - ---- ... __..._—... __ - - - ---- ._.. - --- .........
Low Molecular Weight PAHs 13123 330 330
Benzo(a)anthracene 74.83 -- _ 330 -- - ----- i�30 -
Benzo(a)pyrene gg g3 330 330 ........... . .. . ............._ .......
CChrysene- - - --- ---- -I1083 330 i�330
[D:ibenzo(a,h)anthracene 6.223 330 330
Fluoranthene
1133 330 330
F�yrene l 1533330 330 _ - --- -
High Molecular Weight PAHs
- - —..-_
Total PAHs
6553
16843
330 1655
330
_ ___
1684
17 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 I'M

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Dioxin (n9/kg)-.......---� _ _ .... ................._l.___ 2.5
1. Contract Laboratory Program Practical Quantification Limit
2. Long, Edward R., and Lee G. Morgan. 1991. The Potential for Biological Effects of
Sediment-Sorbed Contaminants Tested in the National Status and Trends Program.
NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 52
3. MacDonald, D.D. 1994. Approach to the Assessment of Sediment Quality in Florida
Coastal Waters, Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
4. Long, Edward R., Donald D. MacDonald, Sherri L. Smith, and Fred D. Calder. 1995.
Incidence of Adverse Biological Effects within Ranges of Chemical Concentrations in
Marine and Estuarine Sediments. Environmental Management 19(1):81-97.
5. USEPA. 1993. Interim Report on Data and Methods for Assessment of 2,3,7,8 -
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Risks to Aquatic Life and Associated Wildlife.
EPA/600/R-93/055.
(Adobe PDF Reader Required)Table 4. Region 4 Waste Management Division Soil
Screening Values for Hazardous Waste Sites (PDF, 87K)
1. Ecological Introduction
2. Ecological Screening Values
• Table 1 Freshwater Surface Water Screening Values
• Table 2 Saltwater Screening Values
• Table 3 Sediment Screening Values
• Table 4 Soil Screening Values
3. Endpoint Selection
4. Natural Resource Trustees
3. ENDPOINT SELECTION
An Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) should be conducted at a hazardous waste site if the
result of the Preliminary Risk Evaluation (PRE, see Ecological Risk Assessment 1) indicates that
there is a likelihood of impacts to ecological receptors from exposure to site related
contaminants. The first and most important step in the ERA is the selection of appropriate
assessment and measurement endpoints. Assessment and measurement endpoint selection is
discussed in detail in Chapters 3 and 4 of the Process Document, along with other components
of the ERA planning process such as defining testable hypotheses, formulating the site
conceptual model and designing the field study.1
The following definitions of assessment and measurement endpoints are contained in Risk
Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume II, Environmental Evaluation Manual, Interim
Final2. An assessment endpoint is the explicit expression of an environmental value that is to
be protected. A measurement endpoint is a measurable ecological characteristic that is related
to the environmental value chosen as the assessment endpoint.
An easy way to envision the difference between assessment and measurement endpoints is to
consider the decline in numbers of some species of piscivorous birds such as the bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus), brown pelican (Pelicanus occidentalis) and osprey (Pandion
haliaetus) which was well documented 20 years ago. This phenomenon was caused at least in
part by decreased reproduction due to egg shell thinning induced by dietary exposure to DDT in
forage fish.
18 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
If one were conducting an ERA at a hazardous waste site where DDT has migrated into a
surface water body, an assessment endpoint could be the maintenance of reproductive success
in a population of piscivorous birds which utilizes the contaminated aquatic system as a
foraging area. The measurement endpoint in this case would be concentrations of DDT in forage
fish tissue consumed by piscivorous birds. Measured (not modeled, as in the PRE)
concentrations of DDT residues in forage fish tissue from the contaminated area could be
converted to a daily dose using life history and ingestion rate parameters for the piscivorous
bird being considered, This exposure level could then be compared with a literature derived
Toxicity Reference Value (TRV) for DDT related to eggshell thinning in the ecological receptor
species. Resultant hazard quotients (HQ, see Ecological Risk Assessment 1) would indicate the
magnitude of potential risks to receptors from consumption of contaminated fi! sh.
One problem with using fish tissue residues as a measurement endpoint is that fish are mobile
and many species are migratory. Tissue residue levels could be due to site contamination,
area -wide (background) contamination, or another source. It is important, therefore, to obtain
tissue samples from non -migratory fish which have a small home range relative to the
contaminated area.
The results of the PRE should aid'in the selection of assessment and measurement endpoints,
however, for the ERA, additional literature review is usually required to better define stressor
characteristics (e.g., fate and transport), receptor specific effects, toxicity and the most
appropriate endpoints to be evaluated.
Following assessment and measurement endpoint selection and development of a testable
hypothesis and site conceptual model, a study plan is designed to ensure that adequate data
are collected to support the ecological component of the Baseline Risk Assessment and
Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS). There are a limited number of
fundamental approaches for conducting site specific investigations on ecological impacts of
hazardous substances. Tissue residue studies, population or community evaluations and toxicity
testing are the three methodologies most commonly used. The appropriate methodology will
depend on the assessment and measurement endpoints selected in the previous steps.
However, none of the methods can be successful without a full understanding of the
ecotoxicological properties of the contaminants, their migration pathways, and complete
exposure routes at the site.
Tissue residue studies are most useful for predicting ecological risk from contaminants which
bioaccumulate or biomagnify in the food web, resulting in impacts to upper trophic level
receptors via the ingestion pathway. In the DDT example above, whole body residue analysis of
forage fish likely to be consumed by piscivorous birds would be the most appropriate
methodology to assess the measurement endpoint.
Toxicity testing is most commonly employed to determine potential risk via direct contact with
contaminated surface water, soil or sediment. Toxicity testing must be carefully designed to
ensure that the proper test species are used for the environmental medium being evaluated.
For example, a benthic macroinvertebrate such as Hyalella should be used as a test subject in
freshwater sediment toxicity tests rather than a free-swimming organisms such as
Ceriodaphnia.
Community or population evaluations involve floral or faunal field surveys and the computation
of species diversity and richness indices. Results of these studies should not be used as
measurement endpoints for a hazardous waste site ERA because the various diversity and
richness indices were not developed to measure ecological impacts of hazardous materials in
the environment. Natural variability in population and community structure, lack of sensitivity
19 of 28 2/3/2009 l :01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
of some species to some contaminants and impacts to population/community structure from
non -chemical stressors make the interpretation of these studies difficult in the context of
assessing ecological impacts of hazardous waste sites.
Conducting an ERA as presented in the Process Document involves a focus of time and work in
the planning phase and the selection of assessment and measurement endpoints. This is
necessary in order to design an ERA which will allow an adequate understanding of potential
risks at the site and provide enough information to establish site clean up goals for protection
of ecological resources.
References
1. Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Process for Designing and
Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments. Review Draft. September 1994.
2. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume II. Environmental Evaluation Manual.
Interim Final. March 1989, EPA/540/1-89/001.
1. Ecological -Introduction
2. Ecological Screening Values
• Table_ 1 Freshwater Surface Water Screening Values
• Table 2 Saltwater Screening Values
• Table 3 Sediment Screening Values
• Table 4 Soil Screening Values
3. Endpoint Selection
4. Natural Resource Trustees
4. NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES
The participation of the natural resource trustees (state, federal, including federal departments
managing resources potentially impacted by NPL sites such as the departments of Defense,
Energy, Interior, or Agriculture, or other entities, e.g. Native American tribes) in the CERCLA
process is not only encouraged but required. Early notification of natural resource trustees by
the site managers (e.g. RPMs, OSCs) should produce more efficient investigations of NPL sites
and result in more timely decisions. In addition, early notification will provide the initial
information to assist the natural resource trustees in completing their mandates and
responsibilities in determining impacts to their trust resources.
FEDERAL NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES
Department of the Interior
The Office of Environmental Compliance and Planning (OEPC) is the natural resource trustee
contact for the Department of Interior (DOI). The Regional Environmental Officer in DOTS
Region 4 is located in Atlanta and is the individual who should be contacted. The Department of
Interior agencies include the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the United States
Geological Survey, the National Park Service, the Minerals Management Service, the Bureau of
Reclamation, Bureau of Land Management, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The DOI agency
which is most often involved with ecological impacts of hazardous waste sites is the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The regional USFWS for the Region 4 states is also
located in Atlanta. A listing of the regional and field office contaminant specialist contacts is
included.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrations
20 of 28 2/3/2009 l :01 l'M

Sure Chemical Sediment Data
The Secretary of the Department.of Commerce has delegated the natural resource trustee
responsibilities to the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA). NOAA is represented in the EPA Region 4 office by the Coastal Resource Coordinator.
Other Federal Agencies
Federal agencies which own or manage land or resources potentially impacted by the release of
contaminants will also have a natural resource trustee role. Examples include the Department
of Defense, which is a trustee for all military installations; the Department of Energy, which is a
trustee for their facilities; the Department of Agriculture, which is a trustee for sites which
would impact land they manage, such as national forests or their laboratories; and the
Department of Interior, National Park Service, which is a trustee for land that they manage
(e.g. national parks and monuments).
STATE NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES
The State Governor designates certain state officials as trustees for those natural resources
belonging to, or controlled by the State. The state natural resource trustee responsibilities may
be divided among the state regulatory agency, the state wildlife and fisheries agency, and the
office of the Governor. A list of the trustees for the states in Region 4 is attached.
OTHER TRUSTEES
Other entities which may serve a trustee function include American Indian tribes whose
property may be impacted by an NPL site.
NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENTS
If there has been injury or lost use of natural resources due to an NPL site, the natural resource
trustees may sue for damages to restore resources. Ideally the remedy selected for an operable
unit at a site will reduce the risks posed to ecological receptors to acceptable levels, including
those trust resources under the jurisdiction of the natural resource trustees. However, EPA and
the natural resource trustees may disagree on the protectiveness of the selected remedy. This
disagreement may be due to a difference of opinion concerning contaminant levels which are
protective of ecological receptors, or pertaining to the balancing of the beneficial aspects of the
remedy in reducing contaminant levels to acceptable risk levels versus its detrimental aspects
such as habitat destruction. This balance may result in remedial goals which exceed the
contaminant concentrations posing risks to the receptor in terms of contaminant exposure
exclusively. injury due to these residual levels of contamination.
The natural resource damage assessment process is the responsibility of the natural resource
trustees and does not involve EPA. The data and information collected in the Ecological Risk
Assessment process which may be useful to the natural resource trustees are available.
However, elements which are strictly supportive of the natural resource damage assessment
process will not be approved as part of the Ecological Risk Assessment or Remedial
Investigation Work Plan. Any work elements strictly supporting the Natural Resource Damage
Assessment should be segregated into a separate document, or at least in an appendix, and
their purpose should be clearly stated.
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
The Endangered Species Act is a potential ARAR (applicable or relevant and appropriate
requirements) for all NPL sites. The party conducting the Remedial Investigation should contact
21 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 1'M

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
all appropriate state and Federal natural resource trustees, and their representatives (such as
USFWS), to determine the potential presence of threatened and endangered species or their
critical habitat.If the trustee agency or their representative determines a threatened or
endangered species, or their critical habitat is present or potentially present, a survey of the
appropriate area should be conducted. The appropriate area may extend past the "boundaries"
of the site (e.g., to account for the utilization of the site from an off -site nesting location). The
qualifications of the party conducting the survey should be presented to the trustee agency or
their representative for approval. The results of the survey should be presented to the trustee
agency, or their representative, for their concurrence. This interaction is among the various
components of an informal Section 7 consultation.. If it is determined that a threatened or
endangered species is utilizing the site, or may utilize it in the future, a finding concerning the
likelihood of effects due to site -related contaminants or activities should be presented to the
trustee agency, or their representative.
The informal Section 7 consultation allows a time period for the trustee, or their representative,
to determine if a formal Section 7 consultation will be required. A "may effect" finding in the
informal Section 7 consultation will trigger a formal Section 7 consultation. Information
contained in the Ecological Risk Assessment may be used in reaching the resolution of this issue
if the threatened or endangered species possesses life history characteristics, susceptibility, or
exposure to the site -related contaminants making them representative of an appropriate
endpoint for the Ecological Risk Assessment.
Federal Natural Resource Trustees
Department of Commence
Coastal Resource Coordinator
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
c/o USEPA Region 4, 4WD-OTS
61 Forsyth St. SW
Atlanta, GA 30303
Current Contact - Torn M. Dillon, Coastal Resource Coordinator
Telephone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Department of Interior
Office of Environmental Compliance and Planning
Regional Environmental Officer
United States Department of Interior
Office of Environmental Compliance and Planning
75 Spring Street, SW, Suite 306
Atlanta, GA 30303
Current Contact - Jim Lee, Regional Environmental Officer
Greg Hogue, Assistant Regional Environmental Officer
Telephone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region
Ecological Services Field Offices Contact Information (Environmental Contaminants)
Alabama
1208-B Main Street (P.O. Drawer 1190)
Daphne, AL 36526
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor: Mr. Larry Goldman (x. 30) e-mail: [e-mail]
22 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
EC Biologist: Vacant (x. 31) e-mail: @fws.gov
Arkansas
1500 Museum Road, Suite 105
Conway, AR 72032
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor: Mr. Allan Mueller (4475) e-mail: [e-mail]
EC Biologist: Dr. Jim Warren (4482) e-mail: [e-mail]
Florida --Panama City
1601 Balboa Avenue
Panama City, FL 32405
Telephone: 850.769.C552 Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor: Ms. Gail Carmody (x. 225) e-mail: [e-mail]
EC Biologist: Mr. Mike Brim (x. 232) e-mail: [e-mail]
Florida - -Jacksonville
6620 Southpoint Drive, South
Suite 310
Jacksonville, FL 32216-0912
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor: Mr. Dave Hankla (x. 108) e-mail: dave [e-mail]
Note: The Jacksonville field office does not currently have an EC Biologist. Contact the Field
Supervisor
Florida --Vero Beach
1339 20th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor: Mr. Jay Slack (x. 234) e-mail: [e-mail]
EC Biologist: Dr. Bob Frakes (x. 242) e-mail: [e-mail]
Assistant EC Biologist: Jim Boggs (x. 223) e-mail: [e-mail]
Georgia -Athens
240 South Milledge Avenue
Athens, GA 30605
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor: Ms, Sandy Tucker (x. 30) e-mail: [e-mail]
Georgia -Brunswick
4270 Norwich Street
Brunswick, GA 31520-2523
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Cell: 912.266.3706
Assistant Field Supervisor/EC Biologist: Dr. Greg Masson (x. 30)
e-mail: [e-mail]
Assistant EC Biologist: Ms. Karen Salomon (x. 31) e-mail: karen—[e-mail]
Laboratory Manager: Jeff Gardner (x. 21) e-mail: [e-mail]
Kentucky/Tennessee
446 Neal Street
Cookeville, TN 38501
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor: Dr. Lee Barclay (x. 212 ) e-mail: [e-mail]
23 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
EC Biologist: Mr. Steve Alexander (x. 210) e-mail: [e-mail]
Cellular phone: 931.260,1906
Asst. EC Biologist: Laila Lienesch e-mail: [e-mail]
Louisiana
646 Cajundome Blvd.
Suite 400
Lafayette, LA 70506
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor: Mr. David Fruge (3115) e-mail: [e-mail]
Primary Spill Responder: Mr. Buddy Goatcher (3125) e-mail: buddy_goatcher@ fws.gov
Cell Phone: [phone]
EC Biologist: Mr. Paul Conzelmann (3126) e-mail: [e-mail]
Mississippi
6578 Dogwood View Parkway, Suite A
Jackson, Mississippi 39213
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor: Ray Aycock (x. 23) e-mail: [e-mail]
EC Biologist: Mr. Lloyd Inmon e-mail: [e-mail]
North Carolina
Street Address: 551-F Pylon Drive, Raleigh, NC 27606
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 33726, Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor:- Dr. Garland Pardue (x. 11) e-mail: [e-mail]
EC Biologist: Mr. Tom Augspurger (x. 21) e-mail: [e-mail]
Presidential Management Intern
Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands
Carr 301, KM 5.1, Bo Corozo
P.O. Box 491
Boqueron, PR 00622
Telephone: [phone] x. 26 Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor: Mr. James Oland e-mail: [e-mail]
EC Biologist: Mr. Felix Lopez e-mail: [e-mail]
Cell Phone: [phone]
South Carolina
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
176 Croghan Spur Road
Suite 200
Charleston, SC 29407
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Field Supervisor: Mr. Roger Banks (x. 15) e-mail: [e-mail]
EC Biologist: Ms. Diane Duncan (x. 29) e-mail: diane—[e-mail]
Alternate Work No.: 843.559.7909
Asst. EC Biologist: Mr, Russell Jeffers (x. 20) e-mail: russell^[e-mail]
Regional Environmental Contaminants Program Coordinator
W. Allen Robison, Ph.D.
1875 Century Blvd, Suite 200 (Ecological Services)
Atlanta, Georgia 30345
24 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 1'M

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Telephone: [phone] Fax: 404,679,7081 e-mail: [e-mail]
Regional Spill Response/NRDAR Coordinator
Dr. Diane Beeman
1875 Century Blvd, Suite 200 (Ecological Services)
Atlanta, Georgia 30345
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] e-mail: [e-mail]
Cell Phone: [phone] Pager: 888.518,8424
Additional Contacts
US Department of Interior Contacts --Southeast Region
Mr. Jim Lee (Regional Environmental Officer)
Mr. Greg Hogue
US Department of Interior
Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance
Richard B. Russell Federal Building, Room 306
Atlanta, GA 30303
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Division of Environmental Quality
4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 322
Arlington, VA 22203
Everett Wilson, Chief
Mary Henry, Deputy Chief
National Spill Response Coordinator --Vacant
703.358.2148 (t)
703.358.1800 (f)
FWS Liaisons to EPA:
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
c/o USEPA
Environmental Response Team
2890 Woodbridge Ave., Bldg. 18
Edison, NJ 08837
Ken Seeley (732.906.6987)
Mark Huston (732.321.6609)
USEPA/Region 4
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, GA 30303
Mr. Lynn Wellman (404.562.8647)
National Response Center: 800.424.8802
State Trustee Designations to Section 107 of CERCLA January 30, 1995
Alabama Trustees:
25 of 28 2/3/2009 1:0 l PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Mr. James D. Martin, Commissioner
Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
64 N. Union St.
Montgomery, AL 36130
Telephone: [phone]
Mr. Leigh Pegues, Director
Department of Environmental Management
1751 Congressman W.L. Dickinson Dr.
Montgomery, AL 36130
Telephone: [phone]
Dr. Ernest Mancini, State Geologist
Oil and Gas Board
P.O. Drawer 0
Tuscalossa, AL 35486
Telephone: [phone]
Florida Trustee:
Ms. Virginia Wetherell, Secretary
Department of Environmental Protection
Marjorie Stoneman Douglas Building
3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS 10
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400
Telephone: [phone]
Georgia Trustee:
Harold F. Reheis, Director
Environmental Protection Division
Department of Natural Resources
Floyd Tower East, Suite 1154
205 Butler Street
Atlanta, GA 30334
Telephone: [phone]
Kentucky Trustee:
William C. Eddins, Commissioner
Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet
Department for Environmental Protection
Frankfort Office Park
18 Reilly Road
Frankfort, KY 40601
Telephone: [phone]
Mississippi Trustee:
26 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Mr. Jimmy Palmer, Executive Director
Department of Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 20305
Jackson, MS 39209
Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina Trustee:
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
512 N. Salisbury
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Telephone: [phone]
(Note: Richard Whisnant, General Counsel, is contact)
South Carolina Trustees:
Mr. Ron Kinney, Director
Waste Assessment and Emergency Response
Department of Health and Environmental Control
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Telephone: [phone]
Mr. J. Keith Lindler, Director
Division of Site Assessment and Remediation
Bureau of Solid and Hazardous Waste
Department of Health and Environmental Control
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Telephone: [phone]
Ms. Beth Partlow
Office of the Governor
1205 Pendleton St., Suite 333
Columbia, SC 29201
Telephone: [phone]
Mr. Ed Duncan
Marine Resources Center
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
Post Office Box 12559
Charleston, SC 29422-2559
Telephone: [phone]
Tennessee Trustee:
Mr, Don Dills, Commissioner
27 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

Sun Chemical Sediment Data
Department of Environment and Conservation
701 Broadway
Nashville, TN 37243-0435
Telephone: [phone]
USEPA/Region 4
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, GA 30303
Ms. Sharon Thoms (404.562.8666)
National Response Center: 800.424.8802
TOP
Collin Day <[e-mail]> 1
WSRO j
NC DENR
USEPA Ecological Risk Bulletin 11-2001.htm
Content -Type: text/html
Content -Encoding: base64
Content -Type: application/pdf
Sun Chemical Stream comparison table 0I_09.pdf
Content -Encoding: base64
28 of 28 2/3/2009 1:01 PM

MEMO
Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office"
November 21, 2008
Memorandum to: Bradley Bennet, Stormwater Permitting Unit
Through: Steve W. Tedder
WSRO Water Qu Supervisor
From: Rose Pruitt
Environmental Specialist
Subject: Sun Chemicals
NCS000192
Forsyth County
Stormwater Permit Recission Request
Sun Chemical: NCGNE0463
No Exposure Certification
Forsyth County
A request was made by Sun Chemicals to issue a No Exposure Certification for the
Fairchild Rd facility covered under existing SW permit NCS000192 on 10/04/2007.
Since that time the facility has been closed and the property sold to a plumbing supply co.
I contacted Arnie Beringer with Sun Chemicals after my initial inspection on 10/10/2008
and suggested he ask that the SW permit NCS000192 be rescinded, his request is
attached.
The WSIZO recommends that NCS000192 be rescinded and NCGNE0463 be returned to
applicant.

SunChemical
Sent via email to: [e-mail]
November 21, 2008
Rose Pruitt
North Carolina DENR
585 Waughtown Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Rose,[e-mail]
RE; Stormwater Permit for 1100 Fairchild Road
Dear Ms. Pruitt:
SunCare°
Environmental Health & Safety
5020 Spring Grove Avenue
aT1 ' Cincinnati OH 45232
' Phone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
Per our recent conversation, this letter shall serve as Formal confirmation that Sun Chemical has sold the
property located at 1100 Fairchild Road in Winston-Salem, NC. Please rescind any stormwater permit in
Sun Chemical's name with respect to the aforementioned property and/or disregard any NOI for
stormwater coverage.
Should you have additional questions regarding thig matter, please contact me at [phone] ext.
655.
Sincerely,
Arnie T. Beringer, CHMM
Compliance Assurance Manager
Corporate EHS
✓VGS �� lye
/VG�j VF 0 (�3

s
0 Division of Water Quality
j] Division of'Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number ; Facility Status: Proposed Permit: NCGNE0463 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: EQutine _ T County: Forsyth Region: Wnston-Salem
' Date of Visit: 1OL101200f Entry Time:11:20 AM Exit Time: 11:25 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Sun Chemical Corporation
Owner: Sun Chemical Corporation
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 120 Regent Dr Win5jon 521em NC 27103
Physical Address: 1100 Fairchild Rd Winston Salem NC 27105
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°07'50" Longitude: 80°13'50"
Question Areas:
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Arnie Beringer Phone:
Primary Inspector: Rose Pruitt Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Original NOI for NE made 10/04/2007. Site has since been sold and is now plumbing supply co. Contacted Mr Beringer and
suggested SW permit NCS000192 be rescinded, request recieved 11/2112008. NE NOI should be returned.
Page: 1

Map of 1100 Fairchild Rd Winston Salem NC by MapQuest http://www.mapquest.com/maps?cit}Winston+SalemRstate=NC&ad...
M AP IQU E'l V earryl VMen of printing c rec0y For
the t resul r your doing cl ions
h
EI or rr�p may not print correctly, For tresl results, [ry Wicking the
Printer -Friendly button.
1100 Fairchild Rd �-
Winston Salem, NC 27105-4528
Snonsorad Links Spnnsornd Links
Cheap Auto Insurance Travelers Auto Insurance Serving the Triad-18 vfs Kurtz 8 Blum PLLC
Excellent deals on all Travelers Can Sava You Up Experienced Divorce Trial Lawyers.
products in stock now. to $472. Attorney We Can Help!
wrwvan,eree.cam Get an Instant Insurance Spough Law wn.rKurUendalumcom
Quote Now! Firm,Winston-Salem
wrwe Travelers co- r Triawmrce com
$_ �_.�_.
g dAk` r�r Dt 10�
_ 4
^� No 33id St
5t 1! I(
t Fd m
'Bon Air %'
L)
Brookwood'
4 ..1 t011 1
EI
MAPQJF�7i7rh Ce._F,77thG Ne 27[A S[_- ?a..� a 202.ad l+hpOu�at kc Wp-Osbi 02001H
All rights reserved. Lke subject to LicenselCopynght Map Legend
Directions and naps are ireormotlortal only. We make no warrantee on the accuracy of ter cceMM road corld7On5 or
route usability or otpeditousness_ You assume at risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers shall not be liable to you for any
Ion or delay resulting from your use of MapQuesL Your use of MapQuest means you agree to our Terms of Use
VV�
/� /a -o g �� -o
IEK
or"
gn
NE
1 of 1 10/8/2008 10:02 AM-
1'A

��5. N 'S.3. 'k3 j1Y.�.•x„ -� ��:-• ++aL s..C.{ "i.,�"`-�- w..+r ��1 Lj fi'J•-'i�r"ify __�� ,
1e,v �..�r�'��f � .Y,F�13 � K''� •- �_ i L ��` fe��.��i. y� t -2� .��T'�X �' 4- -jam t
MR
D?
'TSB+• a�w it l,. ��_ .�"?y�'' `��` -R'R a� �rS N'- �3�'.
.� 100 � •'�� s�4r a` _ ��y�S air d���� � -�-'Y -.�h a' `k�
,.�. s x-� •• ' T.� - � � e � "��- '�, "" a ? ?' _ �-
•S rTr '"'- 4: ,� �r'� �'3 ,"..✓ -bra �.'t q _ �"" 1a Y
�' •� t � `K7 a� ter: ; a �� r 4 .� } F2-� � �
R" s
- �'S 3g•�'i �1 'i .� 7 � � G h 2 •f

SunChemical
Sent via email to: rose.pruitt&cmail.net
November 21, 2008
Rose Pruitt
North Carolina DENR
585 Waughtown Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[e-mail]
RE: Stormwater Permit for 1100 Fairchild Road
Dear Ms. Pruitt:
SunCare
Environmental Health & Safety
5020 Spring Grove Avenue
Cincinnati, OH 45232
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Per our recent conversation, this letter shall serve as formal confirmation that Sun Chemical has sold the
property located at 1100 Fairchild Road in Winston-Salem, NC. Please rescind any stormwater permit in
Sun Chemical's name with respect to the aforementioned property and/or disregard any N01 for
stormwater coverage.
Should you have additional questions regarding this matter, please contact me at [phone] ext.
655.
Sincerely,
Arnie T. Beringer, CHMM
Compliance Assurance Manager
Corporate EHS
CGS ooa 112
NGC� Nt✓ o'! 9 3

w�-a ✓ss'
A� Division of Water Quality / Surface Water Protection
NCDENRNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
t D,,,,.„e„,a NO EXPOSURE CERTIFICATION for Exclusion
E„vu,[)y,ne„T IJ.O N..S. M.� NC.564RCL1
NCGNE0000
NO EXPOSURE CERTIFICATION
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year
Mamh
Ua
Certificate of C�
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for exclusion from a Stormwater
based on NO EXPOSURE:
Submission of this No Exposure Certification constitutes notice that your facility does not rE
authorization for its stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity in the State of
T
z C �
n"n
�e perlirit
Carolina because it qualifies for a no exposure exclusion. A condition of no exposure at an industrial
facility means all industrial materials and activities are protected by a storm resistant shelter (with dome
exceptions) to prevent exposure to rain, snow, snowmelt, and/or runoff.
Industrial materials or activities include, but are not limited to: material handling equipment or activities,
industrial machinery, raw materials, intermediate products, by-products, final products, or waste
products. Material handling activities include the storage, loading and unloading, transportation, or
conveyance of any raw material, intermediate product, final product or waste product. A storm resistant
shelter is not required for the following industrial materials and activities: drums, barrels, tanks, and
similar containers that are tightly sealed, provided those containers are not deteriorated and do not leak.
"Sealed" means banded or otherwise secured and with locked or non -operational taps or valves;
adequately maintained vehicles used in material handling; and final products, other than products that
would be mobilized in stormwater discharges (e.g., rock salt).
A No Exposure Certification must be provided for, each facility qualifying for the no exposure exclusion.
In addition, the exclusion from NPDES permitting is available on a facility -wide basis only ---not for
individual outfalls. If any industrial activities or materials are, or will be, exposed to precipitation, the
facility is not eligible for the no exposure exclusion. By signing and submitting this No Exposure
Certification form, you certify that a condition of no exposure exists at this facility or site and are
obligated to comply with the terms and conditions of 40 CFR 122.26(g).
You are required to reapply for the No Exposure Exclusion once every five (5) years.
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area. (See page 5)
Please print or e -
1) Mailing address of owner/operator (address to which all certification correspondence will be mailed:
Name SV �J CuC-Pil s`AL CO2PC)q_A.-rlo+•l
Street Address 50ZO 5P21 NG G�&WE. _ AVC-NUG
City Cl KI + ►►-I-j A`n _ State- 0[4 ZIP Code 45Z 3 2
Telephone No. S i 3 10-9 l - 5q 50 Fax: _S 1: (0 1 - -4 1 q-1 _
2) Location of facility producing discharge:
Facility Name !3yr l L02POCxn cti
Facility Contact Petyie -T,
Street Address
City W iNS77)N -SState MC- ZIP Code 211 OS
County I
Telephone No. _ I� sorb l, — J Sd Fax: S i 3 (a?) I -A `}q 7
Page 1 of 5
SWU-NE-060607 Last revised 06/08/07

NCGNE0000 No Exposure Certification
3) Physical location information:
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection). D2>Ce_!' / STIZ.EEr 70 FA12CH ILO
t2oAi� , WEST ^' 1500 fe - Si"TF iS Soc1Tl t OF SN ITIA fLEPI dO(~DS AIzr 6
_ _
(A copy of a map with the facility clearly located on it should be included with the certification application.)
4) Is the facility located on Native American Lands? ❑ Yes XNo
5) Is this a Federal facility? ❑ Ye5No
6) Latitude It 011
V a SO Longitude U$0 I. / i1 50 (deg, min, sec)
7) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following:
0 New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin
iX Existing Date operation began C .
8) Was this facility or site ever'covered under an NPDES Stormwater Permit? >( Yes ❑ No
If yes, what is the NPDES Permit Number? NC S00019 2-
9) Standard Industrial Classification:
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial
activity at this facility
SIC Code: 2 Y) �L 3
10) Provide a brief description of the types of industrial activities and products produced at this facility:
11) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)?
WNo
Cl Yes
C
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility:
Exposure Checklists (12. - 14.)
12) Are any of the following materials or activities exposed to precipitation, now or in the foreseeable
future? (Please check either "Yes" or "No.") If you answer "Yes" to any of these items, you are not
eligible for the no exposure exclusion..
a. Using, storing, or cleaning industrial machinery or equipment, and areas where ❑ Yes XNo
residuals from using, storing or cleaning industrial machinery or equipment remain
and are exposed to stormwater
b. Materials or residuals on the ground or in stormwater inlets from spills/leaks
c. Materials or products from past industrial activity
d. Material handling equipment (except adequately maintained vehicles)
e. Materials or products during loading/unloading or transporting activities
f. Materials or products stored outdoors (except final products intended for outside
use [e.g., new cars] where exposure to stormwater does not result in the discharge
of pollutants)
❑ Yes J(No
❑ Yes I No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
Page 2 of 5
SWU-NE-060607 Last revised 06/06/07

NCGNE0000 No Exposure Certification
g. Materials contained in open, deteriorated or leaking storage drums, barrels, tanks, ❑ Yes VNo
and similar containers
h. Materials or products handled/stored on roads or railways owned or maintained by ❑ Yes ONo
the discharger
i. Waste material (except waste in covered, non -leaking containers [e.g., dumpsters]) ❑ Yes X' No
j. Application or disposal of process wastewater (unless otherwise permitted) ❑ Yes O No
k. Particulate matter or visible deposits of residuals from roof stacks and/or vents not ❑ Yes X No
otherwise regulated (i.e., under an air quality control permit) and evident in the
stormwater outflow
I. Empty containers that previously contained materials that are not properly stored ❑ Yes W No
(i.e., not closed and stored upside down to prevent precipitation accumulation)
m. For any exterior ASTs, as well as drums, barrels, tanks, and similar containers ❑ Yes XNo
stored outside, has the facility had any releases in the past three (3) years?
13) Above Ground Storage Tanks (ASTs): If you answer "No" to any of the following items, you are not
eligible for the no exposure exclusion.
a. Are exterior ASTs or piping free of rust, damaged or weathered coating, pits, or XYes ❑ No
deterioration, or evidence of leaks?
b. Is secondary containment provided for all exterior ASTs? If so, is it free of any Yes ❑ No
cracks, holes, or evidence of leaks, and are drain valves maintained locked shut?
14) Secondary Containment: If you answer "No" to any of the following items, you are not eligible for the
no exposure exclusion.
a. Is secondary containment provided for single above ground storage containers Yes ❑ No
(including drums, barrels, etc.) with a capacity of more than 660-gallons?
b. Is secondary containment provided for above ground storage containers_ stored
in close proximity to each other with a combined capacity of more than 1,320-
gallons? _
c. Are release valves on all secondary containment structures locked?
)(Yes ❑ No
XYes O No
Page 3 of 5
SWU-NE-060607 Last revised 06OWN

NCGNE0000 No Exposure Certification
15) Hazardous Waste:
a. Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility? Cl Yes XNo
b. Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste ❑ Yes ) No
generated per month) of hazardous waste?
c. Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste ❑ Yes JKNo
generated per month) of hazardous waste?
If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Type(s) of waste:
How is material stored:
Where is material stored:
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport 1 disposal vendor:
Vendor address:
16) Certification:
I certify under penalty of law that I have read and understand the eligibility requirements for claiming a condition of "no
exposure" and obtaining an exclusion from NPDES stormwater permitting.
I certify under penalty of law that there are no discharges of stormwater contaminated by exposure to industrial activities
or materials from the industrial facility or site identified in this document (except as allowed under 40 CFR 122.26(g)(2)).
understand that I am obligated to submit a no exposure certification form once every. five (5) years to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality and, if requested, to the operator of the local municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) into
which the facility discharges (where applicable). I understand that I must allow the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, or MS4 operator where the discharge is into the local MS4, to perform inspections to confirm the condition of no
exposure and to make such inspection reports publicly available upon request.
In the event that the site no longer qualifies for a No Exposure Exclusion, I understand that I must obtain coverage under
an NPDES permit prior to any point source discharge of stormwater from the facility. Additionally, I certify under penalty
of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based
on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate and complete. I am aware
that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for
knowing violations. - -.-
certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge and
belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing: _ IAQN I E T- BC�i SuG
Title:
(Signature of Applicant) (Date Signed)
Please note: This application for the No Exposure Exclusion is subject to approval by the
NCDENR Regional Office prior to issuance. The Regional office may inspect your facility for
compliance with no exposure conditions prior to that approval. The Regional Office may also
inspect your facility at any time in the future for compliance with the No Exposure Exclusion.
Page 4 of 5
5WU-NE-060607 Last revised 06/06/07

NCGNE0000 No Exposure Certification
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 B(i) provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other
document riled or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
[Environmental Management] Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine
not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
There is currently no fee for a No Exposure Exclusion.
Final Checklist
This application should include the following items:
�f This completed application and all supporting documentation.
A map with the location of the facility clearly marked.
Mail the entire package to:
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of a No Exposure Exclusion.
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for yourarea.
DWQ Regional Office Contact Information:
Asheville Office ......
[phone]
Fayetteville Office ...
[phone]
Mooresville Office ...
[phone]
Raleigh Office ........
[phone]
Washington Office ...(252)
946-6481
Wilmington Office ...
[phone]
Winston-Salem ......
[phone]
Central Office .........(919)
733-5083
Page 5 of 5
SWU-NE-060607 Last revised 06/06107

, f 1 r—�;9Iy;' I r.. ,r; �.i� �-, \r•-�'.�.-_-r, �• � , I �,( I�� - i
"�v` j i rnC •Water «?,`3,:�,`-�H `-T •\�1A'1-�_ \`-�"[ 7uZ.-! f—s
a ! f�•••�y + 1 1
f{:1�►MfiPl�ea
+ \Bht l/ �% � ? `• u.'! • � ��• J y r� - l 'r�.. �. tF-�• �.I \ 11 � Ir • � .I i t T• �.::�-i
� �� -8G6' �� ���.=�: r = ;fry ''. f ' y\; I �:,; II•'• - ���;� ",�is�---r, 1\.
i11.1 `Cr
.r• 1. � i1 _ ,�• _"' �i •I'll', `.iIL;..r r.�l
j• �� !Yl to
• ,p= t.�'�� t � ,1 ��'• , ' -�.'.� oa�� !%` �� �r `13 ''(r:� ,,t~ ��:ft/'+-+. '\i�: '��t
.� .mow 3�--.,
l (%] 1 ..
•�� �•• �/ir � �l , IR�•Tl�� � •.� r *o-1 ~ I1 � ?`^ �?. � �r e. �141,
1ro�51
�� �A � - L t� �? -t � � � \�,�Ia•, rzT1 �t>� �•1 'mil ;.
c
7 -1 ; � � ' • l �, ` sv,�r; .! �Jj„I, •�'•:.rl�� ,i - "�' If}. La �: i;.y.
�� C, � �'ti-� � �• �U � � ;^�91�.�� �.�f Clf . t\ \• tii ,SY�Vlijr � •t .�..a t
SCALE 1:24,000
I y2 0 I MILE
10 I 4090 5QRL==§AQQ ADO FEET
I 5 0 IKILOMETER
SOURCE: U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7.5 MIN QUADRANGLE: WALKERTOWN, NC [REV 1986)
FIGURE I
VICINITY MAP
E A R T H `■ T E C H SUN CHEMICAL
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
92294
usgsbord.dgn 8/21/2006 3:12:18 PM

7
MEMO
Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office'
November 21, 2008
Memorandum to: Bradley Bennet, Stormwater Permitting Unit
Through: Steve W. Tedder
WSRO Watcr Qu Supervisor
From: Rose Pruitt
Environmental Specialist
Subject: Sun Chemicals .
NCS0001.92
Forsyth County
Stormwater Permit Recission Request
Sun Chemical: 1lNCGNE0463
No Exposure Certification
Forsyth County
A request was made by Sun Chemicals to issue a No Exposure Certification for the
Fairchild Rd facility covered under existing SW permit NCS000192 on 10/04/200T
Since that time the facility has been closed and the property sold to a plumbing supply co.
I contacted Arnie Beringer with Sun Chemicals after my initial inspection on 10/10/2008
and suggested he ask that the SW permit NCS000192 be rescinded, his request is
attached.
The ,WSRO recommends that NCS000192 be rescinded and NCGNE0463 be returned to
applicant.

SunChemical
Sent via email to: [e-mail]
November 21, 2008
Rose Pruitt
North Carolina DENR
585 Waughtown Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Rose [e-mail]
RE: Stormwater Permit for 1100 Fairchild Road
Dear Ms. Pruitt:
SunCareo
Environmental Health & Safety
5020 Spring Grove Avenue
Cincinnati, OH 45232
Phone: [phone]
y.
Fax: [phone]
Per our recent conversation, this letter shall serve as formal confirmation that Sun Chemical has sold the
property located at 1100 Fairchild Road in Winston-Salem, NC. Please rescind any stormwater permit in
Sun Chemical's name with respect to the aforementioned property and/or disregard any NO1 for
stormwater coverage.
Should you have additional questions regarding this matter, please contact me at [phone] ext.
655.
Sincerely,
Arnie T. Beringer, CHMM
Compliance Assurance Manager
Corporate EHS
,NGS o00 ly2
/VGC� /VF, oLe 3

ip
u
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCS000192 Effective: 10/01/94 Expiration: 08/31/99 Owner: Sun Chemical Corporation
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Sun Chemical Corporation
County: Forsyth 1100 Fairchild Rd
Region: Wnston-Salem
Winston Salem NC 27105
Contact Person: Accounts Payable Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 10/10/2008
Primary Inspector: Rose Pruitt
Secondary Inspector(s):
Entry Time: 11:20 AM
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Other
(See attachment summary)
Certification: Phone:
Exit Time: 11;25 AM
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: NCS000192 Owner -Facility: Sun Chemical Corporation
Inspection Date: 1011012008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Request dated 10/04/2007 recieved by WSRO 10/2008 to convert permit to No Exposure, NCGNE0463. Site inspection
10/10/2008 revealed site has new owner and use. Recommend NCS000192 be rescinded per request dated 11/21/2008
from Arnie Beringer with Sun Chemical (513-681-5950)and NO NCGNE0463 be returned.
Other
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
Page: 2

Stormwater - 1 100 Fairchild Road
Subject: Stormwater- 1100 Fairchild Road
From: "Beringer, Arnie" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:52:40 -0700
To: <rose.pruitt@ncmail. net>
Dear Ms. Pruitt,
Per our conversation, attached is a letter regarding the stormwater situation at 1100 Fairchild Road.
Sincerely, .
«Stormwater Rescission-1 1-21 -08. pdf>>
Arnie T. Beringer
Compliance Assurance Manager
Corporate EHS
Sun Chemical
5020 Spring Grove Avenue
Cincinnati, 01-1 45232
513-681-5950 x 655
513-68 l -4797-fax
513-200-5329 - cell
This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information and is
intended only for the use of the addressee named above. No confidentiality or privilege is
waived or lost by any error in transmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message you are hereby notified that you must not use, disseminate, copy it in any form or
take any action in reliance on it.
--......_..... ----- -.._._._.--._..,.....,..,.. —---..-._.....__ ._.
Content -Description: Stormwater Rescission-1 1-21-08.pdf
Stormwater Rescission-l1-21-08.pd1' Content -Type: applicationloctet-stream
Content -Encoding: base64
of 1 1 1/21/2008 8:55 AM

SunChemical
Sent via email to: [e-mail]
November 21, 2008
Rose Pruitt
North Carolina DENR
585 Waughtown Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[e-mail]
RE: Stormwater Permit for 1100 Fairchild Road
Dear Ms. Pruitt;
SLinCare
Environmental Health & Safety
5020 Spring Grove Avenue
Cincinnati, OH 45232
s{} z Phone: [phone]
Fax; (5 t 3) 681-4797
Per our recent conversation, this letter shall serve as formal confirmation that Sun Chemical has sold the
property located at 1100 Fairchild Road in Winston-Salem, NC. Please rescind any stormwater permit in
Sun Chemical's name with respect to the aforementioned property and/or disregard any NOI for
stormwater coverage.
Should you have additional questions regarding this matter, please contact me at [phone] ext.
655.
Sincerely, d,77
Arnie T. Beringer, CHMM
Compliance Assurance Manager
Corporate EHS
IV66 Nti oL� (�3

4
6va-
EarthTech
A t1i International Ltd. Company
September 6, 2006
701 Corporate Center Drive P 919.854.6200
Suite 475 F 919.854.6259
Raleigh, NC 27607 earthtech.com
Ms. Shuying Wang
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Reference: Sun Chemical Facility Stream Sediment Sampling
1 100 Fairchild Road
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Wang:
RECEIVED
N.0 r--' -4R
SEP 13 20M
W;ns:ca Salem
Regional Office
In correspondence dated July 25, 2005, Mr, Don Geddes of the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection
Section, requested stream sediment sampling at the above -referenced facility. On behalf of Sun
Chemical Corporation (Sun Chemical), Earth Tech, Inc. (Earth Tech) has conducted the
requested sampling and prepared this letter transmitting the analytical results. The purpose of this
letter is to document the sampling methods, analytical procedures, and analytical results.
According to the July 25, 2005 letter, at least three sediment samples were to be collected from
Bowen Branch, which borders the facility on the south. Each sediment sample was to be
analyzed for volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, and RCRA metals.
On August 2, 2006, Earth Tech visited the Sun Chemical Facility at 1100 Fairchild Road in
Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Figure 1) to collect the stream sediment samples. Two storm
sewer outfalls are located at the stream on the Sun Chemical property. The downstream outfall
was identified in the held, but the heavy kudzu overgrowth on the upstream portion of the
property prevented the identification of the upstream sewer. As a result, Earth Tech collected a
sediment sample from the approximate location of the upstream outfall based on previously
prepared drawings of the site. Sample SED-3 was collected from a location immediately
downstream of the downstream outfall (Figure 2), sample SED-2 was collected from the
approximate upstream outfall location, and samples SED-1 and SED-4 were collected from
locations upstream of the Sun Chemical property where Bowen Branch splits into two tributaries.
The sample identification numbers were assigned to correlate with the previous NCDENR
sampling and were not collected in numerical order. Rather, the farthest downstream location
was sampled first and then each subsequent upstream sample was collected to minimize potential
cross -contamination.
Sediment samples were collected with clean, stainless steel samplers and placed directly into
laboratory -supplied containers. Following collection, the sample jars were placed into a
container that was then chilled and sealed, and transported by common carrier to SGSIParadigm
Laboratories in Wilmington, North Carolina. The laboratory analyses included EPA Method

EarthTech
A *yco ,nteinational LSE. {aaVartt
Ms. Shuying Wang
September 6, 2006
Page 2
8260 for volatiles, EPA Method 8270 for semivolatiles, and EPA methods for RCRA metals
(arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver).
The laboratory results are summarized in Table 1 and attached to this report. The results indicate
that detectable concentrations of several semivolatile organic compounds and metals were
present in each sediment sample. Volatile organic compounds were not detected in any of the
samples.
Each sample contained fluoranthene and pyrene as well as arsenic, barium, chromium, and lead.
In addition to these compounds, one or more of the sediment samples contained
benzo[a]anthracene, chrysene, benzo[b]Fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,
and phenanthrene. Three of the four sediment samples contained low concentrations of mercury.
The analytical results indicate that the detected compounds are semivolatile organic compounds
classified as polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and several metals. Earth Tech contacted
the NCDENR Winston-Salem Regional Office to obtain guidance related to stream sediment
cleanup or action levels. Earth Tech was advised that no specific standards have been
established and that analytical results are reviewed on a case -by -case basis.
The PAH compounds detected in the Bowen Branch sediment samples are common constituents
of heavy hydrocarbons such as oils, greases, and asphalt, and the metals are naturally occurring
in the area. Urban runoff studies indicate that overland flow from roads and asphalt parking
areas, rooftop runoff, and atmospheric deposition of vehicle and other emissions contribute
PAI-Is and metals to surface water and sediments. The concentrations of PAI-Is detected are
within the ranges attributable to urban runoff. For example, in the late 1990s, the United States
Geological Survey conducted sediment sampling of lakes and ponds largely located in mixed
residential and commercial areas throughout the United States.' The study results identified
ranges of PAH concentrations in the surficial sediments for benzo(a)pyrene, fluoranthene, and
pyrene that were attributed to urban activities. The concentrations of these compounds detected
in the Bowen Branch samples generally fall within the lower end of the ranges detected in the
studies. Thus, based on the nature of the detected compounds, the site's location in an urban
area, and detected concentrations similar to those found in studies of urban PAH impact, it
appears that the compounds detected are attributable to area -wide conditions. In addition,
chemicals used in the manufacture of printing inks (the manufacturing operations formerly
conducted by Sun Chemical at the site) do not include these PAI-Is. The Bowen Branch PAH
data suggest a slight increase of PAI-Is in the SED-3 sample, indicating a potential contribution
of roadway/parking lot runoff from the nearby outfall.
The concentrations of metals detected in the four Bowen Branch sediment samples are generally
uniform (i.e., no significant concentration increase due to the outfalls located adjacent to the Sun
property is evident).
l Van Metre, Peter C., Barbara J. Mahler, and Edward T. Furlong, United States Geological Survey, "Urban Sprawl
Lcaves Its PAH Signature," Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 34, No. 19, 2000, pp. 4064-4070.

EarthTech
A VICQ International Ltd. Company
Ms. Shuying Wang
September 6, 2006
Page 3
Sun Chemical and Earth Tech are submitting this letter report and analytical results for the
stream sediment sampling in accordance with the NCDENR request. If you have any questions,
please contact Arnie Beringer with Sun Chemical at [phone] or Michael Branson with
Earth Tech at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael W. Branson, P.G.
Senior Hydrogeologist
c: Mary Jo Anzia, Earth Tech
Arnie Beringer, Sun Chemical
Rose Pruitt, NCDENR
�•o�-H CARpz
41
Sf AL
• ,4G7 -
i =
'� FOLOG\ ��� .

TABLE I
SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS- DETECTED CO\IPOUNDS ONLY
SUN CHEIMICAL
1100 FAIRCHILD ROAD
WINSTON-SALE-1, FORSI'TH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
m
=
x
0
r
0
n
0
r
0
r
0
r
0
r
0
r
o
n
c
o
0
0
r
Analytical Method
r•,
cc
r-,
x
r,,
x
r,,
a
ri
x
rq
x
fd
3c
r14
x
o
G
0
0
0
c
r<
u
�
u
c
4)
CCz
w
J
c
�
C
C
C
U
Compound
'
U
=
�_
�_
{j
2
Sample
Date
Sample
ID
Collected
De th (R)
SED-I
812/2006
Surface
0.586
0.551
<0.349
<0.349
<0349
<0,349
<0349
<0.349
2.36
14.7
6.84
14.4
<0.0196
SED-2
8/2/2006
Surface
0.7
0.624
0.64
0.48
<0.400
<0.400
<0.400
<0.400
5.21
28.9
16.6
54.1
0.0555
SED-3
8/2/2006
Surface
1.38
1.25
0.801
0.752
0.715
0.589
0.409
0.638
7.46
24.2
15.2
46.7
0.0616
SED-4
8/2/2006
Surface
0.812
0.664
0.612
0.468
0.416
<0.400
<0.400
0.452
7.51
19.8
13.4
42
0.114
8260 = EPA Method 8260
8270 = EPA Method 8270
601013 = Metals analysis
7141 = Mercury analysis
All soil results are expressed in mg/kg.
Bold values are present above the method detection limit.

�q ''+si�l.�•�t.p7�R,1:�''• "it(:'� '\ �,11/ ���1���.:.'�'�*�i-1 •`..'!�i,'f.��`L'� �v� �� �f1�.�'I���'`'-���
-�r !:I_i-, f' /IJ r'� I • ��Ti i�fit�s
i .t�i••^ •�'J9J I j1`�y\�11ii-�,,. If-" :;f
`�� ,'.✓,n,' :• �a.-.�,l + f•� y G�'�.r �'`��i?;l,�.--ter ,
� �.. �_ •tom. � „` ' �T::.. � �E�. .?SA'�/��•:�( `)i�,•=r:�,�r`� j0�,.� �fy ;•a��.r ;.'
IT
i f +r�i{'%r3+.--a• or, . 0,'~ .£•i. Rom...
• '" l. •:7`�r t•' :' G --" r`-O>;b , ; �.. Tem+ita; t
� .�} �� --- � J •, I, •�.�•��.+��, �:
'b�K, .777 �'R;' > i :' �.a� ��� \J 1i.�'� 11h• 1'.•.�.,.�r
J � l�i:ti •��� r:7::I17�; :� i� �� ..•a.�.�'��....w�1 ;/j �, ' iti r ..� �T6 it+� '�. /
L f �+�jlb � :• �J
in
r l 1 ++
ql! ����f:.l p ' if �! �• ` \AtR.�T ��' `~' t=�"'�ti �,ivr����
', __ -�' "'� 1�fJ.� •t7 � �yl `�'�. � � alb---L � �\� � �ti�'�r'�.li ��RGmr
Qodland { � _ ,� Q
sIo • �VI .'� ''may p I�r�'►� �1' f_.�� 'L,I' j;i f,, l f**YY ;:�) ... Y' P�+y \i !� ti: ►�.. ,'•. s ,,1 ���. •fit' / f�i. /r4 `1
.,\+��'j���t�rl�'t
' t ,II .14.Ei.l )' ! ! I,•� :L✓'� \ .•'.r ( ' .1 YYl 11 r(
�.��+s1��ly� � ! �i
f./J! ��� �.�. 7}�y�`• lr.� � ( _ �(ra..�,4�' �� ,.}�
.t�';iI,•:`•`'1r,Eh!
SCALE 1:24,000
I 1/y 0 1 MILE
IO logo-4 i 00 FEET
I 5 0 I KILOMETER
SOURCE. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7.5 MIN QUADRANGLE: WALKERTOWN, NC (REV 1986)
FIGURE I
E A R T H` T E c H VICINITY MAP
SUN CHEMICAL
WINSTON-SALEM. NORTH CAROLINA
92294
XVJ 1rEIRLG G1 Q 30

FAIRCHILD ROAD
SED
LIE©cND
SED-1
STREAM SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION
0 30 60
APPROXIMATE LOCATION - UNABLE TO FIELD VERIFY GRAPHIC SCALE (FEET)
FIGURE 2
AUGUST 2006 SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS
E A R T H` T E C H SUN CHEMICAL
WINSTON-SALEM. NORTH CAROLINA
922941
IU GJQ $0

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Mr. Mike Branson
Earth Tech
701 Corporate Dr. Suite 475
Raleigh NC 27607
Report Number: G204-533
Client Project: Sun Chemical
Dear Mr. Branson:
Enclosed are the results of the analytical services performed under the referenced
project. The samples are certified to meet the requirements of the National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference Standards. Copies of this report
and supporting data will be retained in our files for a period of five years in the event
they are required for future reference. Any samples submitted to our laboratory will
will be retained for a maximum of thirty (30) days from the date of this report unless
other arrangements are requested.
If there are any questions about the report or the services performed during this project,
please call SGSl11aradigm at [phone]. We will be happy to answer any questions
or concerns which you may have.
Thank you for using SGS/Paradigm Analytical Labs for your analytical services. We look
forward to working with you again on any additional analytical needs which you may have.
Sincerely,
SGS/Paradigm Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Laliorato erector ate
J. Patrick Weaver
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 1 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GCMS 8260-5035
Client Sample ID: SED-1 Analyzed By: MJC
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical Date Collected: 08-02-2006 11:15
Lab Sample iD G204-533-1 A Date Received: 8/3/2006
Lab Project ID: G204-533 Matrix: Soil
Report Basis: Dry Weight %Solids: 89.3
Report Name
Result
Quantitation
Dilution
Date
Compound
UG/KG
Limit UG/KG
Factor
Analyzed
Acetone
BQL
56.0
1
8/9/2006
Benzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Bromobenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Bromochloromethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Bromodichloromethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Bromoform
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Bromomethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
2-Butanone
BQL
28.0
1
8/9/2006
n-Butylbenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
sec -Butyl benzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
tert-Butylbenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Carbon disulfide
BQL
5,60
1
8/9/2006
Carbon tetrachloride
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Chlorobenzene
BQL
5.60
1
819/2006
Chloroethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Chloroform
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Chioromethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
2-Chlorotoluene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
4-Chlorotoluene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Dibromochloromethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Dibromomethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/912006
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,1-Dichloroethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,1-Dichloroethene
BQL
5.60
1
8/912006
1,2-Dichloroethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
trans-1,2-dichloroethene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dichloropropane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,3-Dichloropropane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
2,2-Dichloropropane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,1-Dichloropropene
SQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Dichlorodifluoromethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Diisopropyl ether (DIPE)
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Ethylbenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Hexachlorobutadiene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Page 1 of 2 GCMS_LIMS_S0L0_V1.5
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 2 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GCMS 8260-5035
Client Sample ID: SED-1
Analyzed By: MJC
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical
Date Collected: 08-02-2006
11:15
Lab Sample ID G204-533-1A
Date Received: 8/3/2006
Lab Project ID: G204-533
Matrix: Soil
Report Basis: Dry Weight
%Solids: 89.3
Report Name
Result
Quantitation
Dilution
Date
Compound
UG/KG
Limit UG/KG
Factor
Analyzed
2-Hexanone
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
lodomethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
isopropylbenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
4-Isopropyltoluene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Methylene chloride
BOL
22.4
1
8/9/2006
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
BOL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Naphthalene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
n-Propyl benzene
BQL
5,60
1
8/9/2006
Styrene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Tetrachloroethene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Toluene
BQL
5.60
1
8/912006
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Trichloroethene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Trichlorofluoromethane
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
BQL
5.60
1
819/2006
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
BQL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Vinyl chloride
BQL
5,60
1
8/9/2006
m-,p-Xylene
BQL
11.2
1
8/912006
o-Xylene
BOL
5.60
1
8/9/2006
Spike
Spike
Percent
Added
Result
Recovered
4-Bromofluorobenzene
50
51.1
102
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
50
51.2
102
Toluene-d8
50
50.3
101
Comments:
Flags:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits.
Reviewed By: V—e
Page 2 of 2 ccMs_4iMs_s0t0_v1 s
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 3 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GCMS 8260-5035
Client Sample ID: SED-2 Analyzed By: MJC
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical Date Collected: 08-02-2006 11:00
Lab Sample ID G204-533-2A Date Received: 8/3/2006
Lab Project ID: G204-533 Matrix: Soil
Report Basis: Dry Weight %Solids: 74.0
Report Name
Result
Quantitation
Dilution
Date
Compound
UG/KG
Limit UG1KG
Factor
Analyzed
Acetone
BQL
67.5
1
8/9/2006
Benzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Bromobenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Bromochloromethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Bromodichloromethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Bromoform
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Bromomethane
BQL
6.75
1
8I912006
2-Butanone
BQL
33.8
1
8/9/2006
n-Butylbenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
sec -Butyl benzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
tert-Butylbenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Carbon disulfide
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Carbon tetrachloride
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Chlorobenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Chloroethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Chloroform
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Chloromethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
2-Chlorotoluene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
4-Chlorotoluene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Dibrornochloromethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
BQL
6.75
1
819/2006
Dibromomethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,1-Dichloroethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,1-Dichloroethene
BQL
6,75
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dichloroethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
trans-1,2-dichloroethene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dichloropropane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,3-Dichloropropene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
2,2-Dichloropropane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,1-Dichloropropene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Dichlorodifluoromethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9=06
Diisopropyl ether (DIPE)
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Etylbenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Hexachlorobutadiene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Page 1 of 2 GCM5-LIMS-S9L0_V1.5
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 4 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GCMS 8260-5035
Client Sample ID: SED-2 Analyzed By: MJC
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical Date Collected: 08-02-2006 11:00
Lab Sample ID G204-533-2A Date Received: 8/3/2006
Lab Project ID: G204-533 Matrix: Soil
Report Basis: Dry Weight %Solids: 74.0
Report Name
Result
Quantitation
Dilution
Date
Compound
UGIKG
Limit UGIKG
Factor
Analyzed
2-Hexanone
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
lodomethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Isopropylbenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
4-Isopropyltoluene
BQL
6.75
1
8I912006
Methylene chloride
BQL
27.0
1
81912006
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Naphthalene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
n-Propyl benzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Styrene
BQL
6.75
1
819/2006
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Tetrachioroethene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Toluene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Trichloroethene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
BQL
6.75
1
819I2006
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
BQL
6.75
1
81912006
Trichiorofluoromethane
BQL
6.75
1
8I9I2006
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
SQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
Vinyl chloride
BQL
6.75
1
8/9/2006
m-,p-Xylene
SQL
13.5
1
8I9I2006
o-Xylene
BQL
6.75
1
81912006
Spike
Spike
Percent
Added
Result
Recovered
4-Bromofluorobenzene
50
46.5
93
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
50
50.3
101
Toluene-d8
50
51.3
103
Comments:
Flags:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits.
Reviewed By:
Page 2 of 2 GCMS-LIMS_S0L0-V1 5
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 5 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GCMS 8260-5035
Client Sample ID: SED-3 Analyzed By: MJC
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical Date Collected: 08-02-2006 10A0
Lab Sample ID G204-533-3A Date Received: 8/312006
Lab Project ID: G204-533 Matrix: Soil
Report Basis: Dry Weight %Solids: 75.6
Report Name
Result
Quantitation
Dilution
Date
Compound
UG1KG
Limit UG1KG
Factor
Analyzed
Acetone
BQL
66.2
1
8/10/2006
Benzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Bromobenzene
BQL
6,62
1
8110/2006
Bromochloromethane
BQL
6,62
1
6/10/2006
Bromodichloromethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Bromoform
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Bromomethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
2-Bulanone
BQL
33.1
1
8/10/2006
n-Butylbenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
sec-Butylbenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
tert-Butylbenzene
BQL
6,62
1
8/10/2006
Carbon disulfide
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Carbon tetrachloride
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Chlorobenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Chloroethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Chloroform
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Chloromethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
2-Chlorotoluene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
4-Chlorotoluene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Dibromochloromethane
BQL
6,62
1
8/10/2006
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Dibromomethane
8QL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
12-Dibromoethane (EDB)
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
trans- l ,4-Dichloro-2-butene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,1-Dichloroethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,1-Dichloroethene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,2-Dichloroethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
BQL
6,62
1
8/10/2006
trans-1,2-dichloroethene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,2-Dichloropropane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,3-Dichloropropane
BQL
6.62
1
8110/2006
2,2-Dichloropropane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,1-Dichloropropene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
BQL
6.62
1
8110/2006
trans- l ,3-Dichloropropene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
D ich lorod ifluorom ethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Diisopropyi ether (DIPS)
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Ethylbenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Hexachlorobutadiene
BQL
6,62
1
8/10/2006
Page 1 of 2 GCMS_LIMS_S0L0_V1.5
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 6 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GCMS 8260-5035
Client Sample ID: SED-3 Analyzed By: MJC
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical Date Collected: 08-02-2006 10:40
Lab Sample ID G204-533-3A Date Received: 8/3/2006
Lab Project ID: G204-533 Matrix: Soil
Report Basis: Dry Weight %Solids: 75.6
Report Name
Result
Quantitation
Dilution
Date
Compound
UG/KG
Limit UG/KG
Factor
Analyzed
2-Hexanone
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
lodomethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Isopropylbenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
4-Isopropyltoluene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Methylene chloride
BQL
26.5
1
8/10/2006
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
M ethyl -tert-bu tyl ether (MTBE)
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Naphthalene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
n-Propyl benzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Styrene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Tetrachloroethene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Toluene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Trichloroethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,1.1-Trichloroethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
BQL-
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Trichlorofluoromethane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Vinyl chloride
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
m-,p-Xylene
BQL
13.2
1
8/10/2006
o-Xylene
BQL
6.62
1
8/10/2006
Spike
Spike
Percent
Added
Result
Recovered
4-Bromofluorobenzene
50
44
88
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
50
48
96
Toluene-d8
50
50.2
100
Comments:
Flags:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits.
Reviewed By:
Page 2 of 2 GCMS_LIMS, SOLO_V1,5
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 7 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GCMS 8260-5035
Client Sample ID: SED-4 Analyzed By: MJC
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical Date Collected: 08-02-2006 11:20
Lab Sample ID G204-533-4A Date Received: 8/3/2006
Lab Project ID: G204-533 Matrix: Soil
Report Basis: Dry Weight %Solids: 74.5
Report Name
Result
Quantitation
Dilution
Date
Compound
UG/KG
Limit UG/KG
Factor
Analyzed
Acetone
BQL
67.1
1
8/9/2006
Benzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Bromobenzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Bromochloromethane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Bromodichloromethane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Bromoform
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Bromomethane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
2-Butanone
BQL
33.6
1
8/9/2006
n-Butylbenzene
BQL
6.71
1
819/2006
sec-Butylbenzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
tert-Butylbenzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Carbon disulfide
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Carbon tetrachloride
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Chlorobenzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/912006
Chloroethane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Chloroform
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Chloromethane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
2-Chlorotoluene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
4-Chlorotoluene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Dibromochloromethane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
BQL
6.71
1
8/912006
Dibromomethane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
6.71
1
819/2006
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
6.71
1
1319/2006
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1. 1 -Dichloroethane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1, 1 -Dichloroethene
BQL
6.71
1
819/2006
1,2-Dichloroethane
BQL
6.71
1
819/2006
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
trans-1,2-dichloroethene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,2-Dichloropropane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,3-Dichloropropane
BQL
6.71
1
8/912006
2,2-Dichloropropane
BQL
6.71
1
8/912006
1,1-Dichloropropene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Dichlorodifluoromethane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Diisopropyl ether (DIPE)
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Ethylbenzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Hexachlorobutadiene
BQL
6,71
1
8/9/2006
Page I of 2 GCMS-LIMS-SOLO_V1.5
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 8 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GCMS 8260-5035
Client Sample ID: SED-4
Analyzed By: MJC
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical
Date Collected: 08-02-2006 11:20
Lab Sample ID G204-533-4A
Date Received: 8/3/2006
Lab Project ID: G204-533
Matrix: Soil
Report Basis: Dry Weight
%Solids: 74.5
Report Name
Result
Duantitation
Dilution
Date
Compound
UG/KG
Limit UG/KG
Factor Analyzed
2-Hexanone
SQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
lodomethane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Isopropylbenzene
BQL
6,71
1
8/9/2006
4-Isopropyltoluene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Methylene chloride
BQL
26.8
1
8/9/2006
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
SQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Naphthalene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
n-Propyl benzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Styrene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
SQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Tetrachloroethene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Toluene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Trichloroethene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
BQL
6,71
1
8/9/2006
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
BQL
6,71
1
8/9/2006
Trichlorofluoromethane
BQL
6,71
1
8/9/2006
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Vinyl chloride
BQL
6.71
1
81912006
m-,p-Xylene
BQL
13.4
1
8/9/2006
o-Xylene
BQL
6.71
1
8/9/2006
Spike
Spike
Percent
Added
Result
Recovered
4-Bromofluorobenzene
50
50
100
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
50
48
96
Toluene-d8
50
49.9
100
Comments:
t=tags:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits.
Reviewed By: "_
Page 2 of 2 GCMS-L1N.S_SOLO_V1.5
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 9 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Semivolatlles
by GCMS 82TO
Client Sample ID: SED-1
Analyzed By: EAW
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical
Date Collected:
8/2/2006 11:15
Lab Sample ID: G204-533-1 C
Date Received:
8/3/2006
Lab Project ID: G204-533
Date Extracted:
8/7/2006
Report Basis: Dry weight
Matrix:
Sail
% Solids:
89.29
Result
RL
Dilution
Date
Compound
ug/Kg
ug1Kg
Factor
Analyzed
Acenaphthene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Acenaphthylene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Anthracene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Benzo[alanthracene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Benzo[alpyrene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Benzo(blfluoranthene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Benzoic Acid
BQL
698
1
8/20/2006
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Butylbenzylphthalate
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
2-Chloronaphthalene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
2-Chlorophenol
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
4-Chloroaniline
BQL
1750
1
8/20/2006
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Chrysene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Dibenzofuran
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Di-n-Butylphthalate
BQL
349
1
8/2012006
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
1,4-Dich loro benzene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
BQL
698
1
8/20/2006
2,4-Dichlorophenoi
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Diethylphlhalate
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Dimethylphthalate
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
2,4-Dimethylphenol
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Di-n-octylphthalate
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
4,6-Dinitro-2-melhyiphenol
BQL
1750
1
8/20/2006
2,4-Dinitrophenol
SQL
1750
1
8/20/2006
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Diphenylamine `
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Fluoranthene
586
349
1
8/20/2006
Fluorene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Hexachlorobenzene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Hexachlorobutadiene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
BQL
698
1
8/20/2006
Hexachloroethane
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Page 1 of 2
8270 LJM5 V1.99
N.C.
CERTIFICATION #481
10 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Semivolatiles
by GCMS 8270
Client Sample ID: SED-1
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical
Lab Sample ID: G204-533-1 C
Lab Project ID: G204-533
Report Basis: Dry weight
Anaiyzed By: EAW
Date Collected: 8/2/2006 11:15
Date Received: 8/3/2006
Date Extracted: 8/7/2006
Matrix: Soil
% Solids: 89.29
Result
RL
Dilution
Date
Compound
ug1Kg
ug/Kg
Factor
Analyzed
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Isophorone
BQL
349
1
8/2012006
2-Methylnaphthalone
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
2-Methylphenol
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
3- 8 4-Methylphenol
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Naphthalene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
2-Nitroaniline
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
3-Nitroaniline
BQL
1750
1
8/20/2006
4-Nitroaniline
BQL
1750
1
8/20/2006
Nitrobenzene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
2-Nitrophenol
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
4-Nitrophenol
BQL
1750
1
8/20/2006
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Pentachiorophenol
BQL
1750
1
8/20/2006
Phenanthrene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Phenol
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Pyrene
551
349
1
8/20/2006
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
BQL
349
1
8/20/2006
Spike
Spike
Percent
Added
Result
Recovered
2-Fluorobiphenyl
10
9.6
96
2-Fluorophenol
10
10.3
103
Nitrobenzene-d5
10
9.6
96
Phenol-d6
10
9.6
96
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
10
8.1
81
4-Terphenyl-d14
10
10.4
104
Comments:
' N-Nitrosodiphenylamine is reported as the breakdown product Diphenylamine.
Flags:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits.
Page 2 of 2
Reviewed By: z,.r'
e270—LIMB—Vs.99
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481
11 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
M
Client Sample ID: SED-2
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical
Lab Sample ID: G204-533-2C
Lab Project ID: G204-533
Report Basis: Dry weight
Results for Semivolatiles
by GCMS 8270
Analyzed By: EAW
Date Collected: 8/2/2006 11:00
Date Received: 8/3/2006
Date Extracted: 8/7/2006
Matrix: Soil
% Solids: 74.03
Result
RL
Dilution
Date
Compound
ug/Kg
ug/Kg
Factor
Analyzed
Acenaphthene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Acenaphthylene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Anthracene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Benzo[a]anthracene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Benzo[a]pyrene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
640
400
1
8/20/2006
Benzo[g,h,i]peryiene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Benzoic Acid
BQL
800
1
8/20/2006
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Bis(2-chioroisopropyl)ether
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Butylbenzylphthalate
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
2-Chloronaphthalene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
2-Chlorophenol
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
4-Chloroaniline
SOL
2000
1
8/20/2006
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Chrysene
480
400
1
8/20/2006
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Dibenzofuran
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Di-n-Butylphthalate
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
BQL
800
1
8/20/2006
2,4-Dichlorophenol
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Diethylphthaiate
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Dimethylphthalate
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
2,4-Dimethyiphenol
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Di-n-octylphthalate
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
4,6- Di nitro-2-methyl phenol
BQL
2000
1
8/20/2006
2,4-Dinitrophenol
BQL
2000
1
8/20/2006
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Diphenylamine
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Fluoranthene
700
400
1
8/20/2006
Fluorene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Hexachlorobenzene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Hexachlorobutadiene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
BQL
800
1
8/2012006
Hexachloroethane
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Page 1 of 2
8270 LIMS V1.99
N.G.
CERTIFICATION #481
12 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
M�
Client Sample 1D: SED-2
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical
Lab Sample ID: G204-533-2C
Lab Project ID: G204-533
Report Basis: Dry weight
Results for Semivolatiies
by GCMS 8270
Analyzed By: EAW
Date Collected: 8/2/2006 11:00
Date Received: 8/3/2006
Date Extracted: 8/7/2006
Matrix: Soil
% Solids: 74.03
Result
RL
Dilution
Date
Compound
ug/Kg
ug/Kg
Factor
Analyzed
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Isophorone
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
2-Methylnaphthalene
BOIL
400
1
8/20/2006
2-Methylphenol
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
3- & 4-Methylphenol
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Naphthalene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
2-Nitroaniline
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
3-Nitroaniline
SQL
2000
1
8/20/2006
4-Nitroaniline
BQL
2000
1
8/20/2006
Nitrobenzene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
2-Nitrophenol
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
4-Nitrophenol
BOIL
2000
1
8/2012006
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Pentachlorophenol
BQL
2000
1
8/20/2006
Phenanthrene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Phenol
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Pyrene
624
400
1
8/20/2006
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
SOL
400
1
8/20/2006
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
BQL
400
1
8/20/2006
Spike
Spike
Percent
Added
Result
Recovered
2-Fluorobiphenyl
10
9.3
93
2-Fluorophenol
10
10.5
105
Nitrobenzene-d5
10
9.5
95
Phenol-d6
10
10
100
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
10
10
100
4-Terphenyl-d14
10
9.7
97
Comments:
` N-Nitrosodiphenylamine is reported as the breakdown product Diphenylamine.
Flags:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits.
Page 2of2
Reviewed By: "
8270 LIMS_VI.99
N.G. CERTIFICATION #461
13 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Semivolatiles
by GCMS 8270
Client Sample ID: SED-3
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical
Lab Sample ID: G204-533-3C
Lab Project ID: G204-533
Report Basis: Dry weight
Analyzed By: EAW
Date Collected: 8/2/2006 10:40
Date Received: 8/3/2006
Date Extracted: 8/7/2006
Matrix: Soil
% Solids: 75.56
Result
RL
Dilution
Date
Compound
ug/Kg
ug/Kg
Factor
Analyzed
Acenaphthene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Acenaphthylene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Anthracene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Benzo(a]anthracene
715
409
1
8/21/2006
Benzo[a]pyrene
589
409
1
8/21/2006
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
801
409
1
8/21/2006
Benzo(g,h,i]perylene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Benzoic Acid
BQL
818
1
8/21/2006
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Bis(2-ethylhexyi)phthalate
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Butyibenzylphthalate
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
2-Chloronaphthalene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
2-Chlorophenol
BQL
409
1
8121 /2006
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
4-Chloroaniline
BQL
2040
1
8/21/2006
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Chrysene
752
409
1
8/21/2006
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
SQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Dibenzofuran
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Di-n-Butylphthalate
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
BQL
818
1
8/21/2006
2,4-Dichlorophenol
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Diethylphthalate
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Dimethylphthalate
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
2,4-Dimethylphenol
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Di-n-octylphthalate
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
BQL
2040
1
8/21/2006
2,4-Dinitrophenol
BQL
2040
1
8/21/2006
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Diphenylamine
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Fluoranthene
1380
409
1
8/21/2006
Fluorene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Hexachlorobenzene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Hexachlorobutadiene
BQL
409
1
8/2112006
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
BQL
818
1
8/2112006
Hexachloroethane
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Page 1 of 2
0270LIMS_V1.99
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481
14 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Semivolatiles
by GCMS 8270
Client Sample ID: SED-3
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical
Lab Sample ID: G204-533-3C
Lab Project ID: G204-533
Report Basis: Dry weight
Analyzed By: EAW
Date Collected: 8/2/2006 10:40
Date Received: 8/3/2006
Date Extracted: 8/7/2006
Matrix: Soil
% Solids: 75.56
Result
RL
Dilution
Date
Compound
uglKg
ug/Kg
Factor
Analyzed
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
409
409
1
8/2112006
Isophorone
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
2-Methylnaphthalene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
2-Methylphenol
BQL
409
1
8121/2006
3- & 4-Methylphenol
BQL
409
1
8121/2006
Naphthalene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
2-Nitroaniline
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
3-Nitroaniline
BQL
2040
1
8/21/2006
4-Nitroaniline
BQL
2040
1
8/21/2006
Nitrobenzene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
2-Nitrophenol
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
4-Nitrophenol
BQL
2040
1
8/21/2006
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Pentachlorophenol
BQL
2040
1
8/21/2006
Phenanthrene
638
409
1
8121/2006
Phenol
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Pyrene
1250
409
1
8/21/2006
1,2,4-Trichiorobenzene
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
BQL
409
1
8/21/2006
Spike
Spike
Percent
Added
Result
Recovered
2-Fluorobiphenyl
10
8.5
85
2-Fluorophenol
10
10.4
104
Nitrobenzene-d5
10
8.9
89
Phenol-d6
10
9.4
94
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
10
8.3
83
4-Terphenyl-d14
10
9
90
Comments:
. N-Nitrosodiphenyiamine is reported as the breakdown product Diphenylamine.
Flags:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits.
Page 2of2
Reviewed By: ,emu __
8270-LIMS_VI,99
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481
15 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Semivoiatiles
by GCNIS $270
Client Sample ID: SED-4
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical
Lab Sample ID: G204-5334C
Lab Project ID: G204-533
Report Basis: Dry weight
Analyzed By: EAW
Date Collected: 8/2/2006 11:20
Date Received: 8/3/2006
Date Extracted: 8/7/2006
Matrix: Soil
% Solids: 74.49
Result
RL
Dilution
Date
Compound
ug/Kg
ug/Kg
Factor
Analyzed
Acenaphthene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Acenaphthylene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Anthracene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Benz o[a] an th racene
416
400
1
8/21/2006
Benzo[a]pyrene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
612
400
1
8/21/2006
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
BQL
400
1
8121/2006
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Benzoic Acid
BQL
800
1
8/21/2006
Bis (2-ch I oroethoxy)m ethane
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Butylbenzylphthalate
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
2-Chloronaphthalene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
2-Chlorophenol
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
4-Chloroaniline
BQL
2000
1
8/21/2006
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Chrysene
468
400
1
8/21/2006
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Dibenzofuran
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Di-n-Butylphthalate
BQL
400
1
8/2112006
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
BQL
800
1
8/21/2006
2,4-Dichlorophenol
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Diethylphthalate
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Dimethylphthalate
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
2,4-Dimethylphenol
BOL
400
1
8/21/2006
Di-n-octylphthalate
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
BQL
2000
1
8/21/2006
2,4-Dinitrophenol
BQL
2000
1
8/21/2006
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
BQL
400
1
8121/2006
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Diphenylamine •
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Fluoranthene
812
400
1
8/21/2006
Fluorene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Hexachiorobenzene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Hexachlorobuladiene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
BQL
800
1
8/21/2006
Hexachloroethane
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Page 4 of 2
9270LIMB VI.99
N.C.
CERTIFICATION #481
16 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Semivolatiles
by GCMS 8270
Client Sample 0: SED-4
Client Project ID: Sun Chemical
Lab Sample ID: G204-533-4C
Lab Project ID: G204-533
Report Basis: Dry weight
Analyzed By: EAW
Date Collected: 8/2/2006 11:20
Date Received: 8/3/2006
Date Extracted: 8/7/2006
Matrix: Soil
% Solids: 74.49
Result
RL
Dilution
Date
Compound
ug/Kg
ug/Kg
Factor
Analyzed
Inden o(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Isophorone
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
2-Methyinaphthalene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
2-Methylphenol
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
3- & 4-Methylphenol
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Naphthalene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
2-Nitroaniline
SQL
400
1
8/21/2006
3-Nitroaniline
SQL
2000
1
8/21/2006
4-Nitroaniline
BQL
2000
1
8/21/2006
Nitrobenzene
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
2-Nitrophenol
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
4-Nitrophenol
BQL
2000
1
8/21/2006
N-Nilrosodi-n-propyiamine
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Pentachlorophenol
BQL
2000
1
8/21/2006
Phenanthrene
452
400
1
8/21/2006
Phenol
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Pyrene
664
400
1
8/21/2006
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
BQt_
400
1
8/21/2006
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
BQL
400
1
8/21/2006
Spike
Spike
Percent
Added
Result
Recovered
2-Fluorobiphenyl
10
8.7
87
2-Fiuorophenol
10
10A
104
Nitrobenzene-d5
10
9.3
93
Phenol-d6
10
9.5
94
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
10
10.3
103
4-Terphenyl-d 14
10
9.3
93
Comments:
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine is reported as the breakdown product Diphenylamine.
Flags:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits.
Page 2of2
Reviewed By: \-e
8270_L1MS_V1.99
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481
17 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Client Sample ID:
SED-1
Client Project ID:
Sun Chemical
Lab Sample ID:
G204-533-1
Lab Project ID:
G204-533
Batch ID:
5917 5921
Report Basis:
Dry
Metals
Result
RL
Arsenic
2.36
0.933
Barium
14.7
9.33
Cadmium
BQL
0.933
Chromium
6.84
0.933
Lead
14.4
0.933
Mercury
BOL
0.0196
Selenium
BQL
1.87
Silver
BQL
0,933
Comments
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits
DF = Dilution Factor
J = Between MDL and RL
B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL
Results for Metals
Analyzed By:
RML
Date Collected:
8/2/2006 11:15
Date Received:
8/3/2006
Matrix:
SOIL
Solids
89.29
DF
Units
Method
Date
Analyzed
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
601OB
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010B
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010B
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
7471
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010B
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481
Reviewed By: 4-0
MET_UMS_4.1
18 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Client Sample ID:
SED-2
Client Project ID:
Sun Chemical
Lab Sample ID:
G204-533-2
Lab Project ID:
G204-533
Batch ID:
5917 5921
Report Basis:
Dry
Metals
Result
RL
Arsenic
5.21
1.25
Barium
28.9
12.5
Cadmium
BQL
1.25
Chromium
16.6
1.25
Lead
54.1
1.25
Mercury
0.0555
0.0246
Selenium
BQL
2.50
Silver
BOL
1.25
Comments
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits
DF = Dilution Factor
J = Between MDL and RL
B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL
Results for Metals
Analyzed By:
RML
Date Collected:
8/2/2006 11:00
Date Received:
8/3/2006
Matrix:
SOIL
Solids
74.03
DF
Units
Method
Date
Analyzed
1
MG/KG
6010B
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
601013
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010B
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
7471
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010B
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010B
8/10/2006
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481
Reviewed By: V-�-V
MEr_LlMS_4.1
19 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Client Sample ID:
SED-3
Client Project ID:
Sun Chemical
Lab Sample ID:
G204-533-3
Lab Project ID:
G204-533
Batch ID:
5917 5921
Report Basis:
Dry
Metals
Result
RL
Arsenic
7.46
1.25
Barium
24.2
12.5
Cadmium
BQL
1.25
Chromium
15.2
1.25
Lead
46.7
1,25
Mercury
0.0616
0.0260
Selenium
BQL
2.50
Silver
BOIL
1.25
Comments
BQL = Below Quantilation Limits
DF = Dilution Factor
J = Between MDL and RL
B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL
Results for Metals
Analyzed By:
RML
Date Collected:
8/2/2006 10:40
Date Received:
8/3/2006
Matrix:
SOIL
Solids
75.56
DF
Units
Method
Date
Analyzed
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010B
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010B
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010B
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
7471
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481
Reviewod By: y i
MET_-UMS 4.1
20 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Results for Metals
Client Sample ID:
SED-4
Client Project ID:
Sun Chemical
Lab Sample ID:
G204-533-4
Lab Project10:
G204-533
Batch ID:
5917 5921
Report Basis:
Dry
Metals
Result
RL
Arsenic
7.51
1.18
Barium
19.8
11.8
Cadmium
BOIL
1.18
Chromium
13.4
1.18
Lead
42.0
1.18
Mercury
0.114
0.0240
Selenium
BQL
2.36
Silver
BOIL
1.18
Comments
BOIL = Below Quantitation Limits
DF = Dilution Factor
J = Between MDL and RL
B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL
Analyzed By:
RML
Date Collected:
8/2/2006 11:20
Date Received:
8/3/2006
Matrix:
SOIL
Solids
74.49
DF
Units
Method
Date
Analyzed
1
MG/KG
6010B
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
1
MGIKG
6010B
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
7471
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
1
MG/KG
6010E
8/10/2006
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481
Reviewed By: "_
MEr_UWS_4.1
21 of 23

SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
List of Reporting Abbreviations
and Data Qualifiers
B = Compound also detected in batch blank
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit (RL or MDL)
DF = Dilution Factor
Dup = Duplicate
D = Detected, but RPD is > 40% between results in dual column method.
E = Estimated concentration, exceeds calibration range.
J = Estimated concentration, below calibration range and above MDL
LCS(D) = Laboratory Control Spike (Duplicate)
MDL = Method Detection Limit
MS(D) = Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit
RL = Reporting Limit
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram, ppm, parts per million
ug/kg = micrograms per kilogram, ppb, parts per billion
mg/L = milligram per liter, ppm, parts per million
ug/L = micrograms per liter, ppb, parts per billion
% Rec = Percent Recovery
% soilds = Percent Solids
Special Notes:
1) Metals and mercury samples are digested with a hot block, see the standard
operating procedure document for details.
2) Uncertainty for all reported data is less than or equal to 30 percent.
M134.030606.3
N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 22 of 23

N
W
O
N
W
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
SGS Environmental Services Inc.
Locations Nationwide
• Alaska • Hawaii
• Louisiana • Maryland
• New Jersey • North Carolina
• West Virginia 0540
Www,us.sps.=n
CLIENT:
SGS Reference: ?O
G J
PAGE OF
CONTACT: r �a,J�v� PHONE NO:i;q f I) g�Y � �`� ff
No
O
N
T
A
N
E
R
$
SAMPLE
TYPE
C=
COMP
GRAB
P=d
Lww
PROJECT: SITElPWS(Dpl:
S✓r✓ � ��,k r� �AfR�,�Fi�� l�
Reghaee
3 14
O
(�
r,
�`1'
REMARKS
REPORTSTO: M,-fjgA,,,w,, V d 1 dal
�e � y7S 44, r/ NI FAXNO.:( r'? 8 Y BLS
INVOICE TO 4 �/� QUOTE p (7
P.O. NUMBER
2
LAB NO.
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
DATE
TIME
MATRIX
5&D
'a�n-Z
oo
JD
-
S-3
�6foqo
S.P
1-11
S
4
Collected! elinqulshed By:(1)
Date
�
Time
Received By:
Shipping Carrier:
Shipping Ticket No:
Samples Received Cold? (Circl E NO
Temperature EC: , .
elinquished By: (2)
Date
Time
Received By: 111
A�,��.�y
Special Deliverable Requirements:
Chain of Custody Seal: (Circle)
INTACT BROKEN ABSENT
Relinquished By: (3)
Date
Time
Received B -
Requested Tu around Time and Special Instructions:
7'� Y
Relinquished By: (4)
Date
Time
Received By:
0200 W. Poltar Ortrs Andmi ige, AK 99818 TeI: (907i 582-23e3 Fax (907) 5e1SWI ❑ 1258 GreW&W Street ChaA«ion, WV 25311 Tel: (304) 34"725 Fax: (301) 3s&0781 Whirs - Retained by lab
O 5500 Business Orhro NAlminpton NC 28{aS Tal: (914) 35Q 1903 Fac: [phone] Yellow - Rehrned with ReportPink - Rsta{n;.d by --TPkw
Cn
G7
m
z
C
0
z
9
m
z
D
r
C!s
m
C
n
m
z
n

o�o w A
o
Sun Chemical Corporation
1100 Fairchild Road
Winston Salem, NC 27105
Subject: General Stormwater Permit Inspections
Sun Chemical Corporation
Permit No. NCS000192
Forsyth County
Dear Sir or Madaam:
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, Y.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIVED v
,BAN 112006
ftnston-salerr.
Regional Gt;-oce
Your facility holds a General Permit from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to
discharge stormwater associated with industrial activities performed at your facility. Please be
advised that the Winston-Salem Regional Office will be performing NPDES Stormwater
Inspections sometime in the near future.
If this office has not previously inspected your facility, you should be prepared to demonstrate
compliance with all terms and conditions included in the Permit. Specifically, we will be
evaluating the following. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, Stormwater Outfall Locations,
Qualitative and Analytical Monitoring Data and any other activities required by your permit.
Copies of the general permits and accompanying documents can be accessed from the following
webpage: hy12://h2o.enrstate.nc.us/su/Forms_Documents.htm#StormwaterGP.
If you have any questions, please contact Rose Pruitt in the Winston-Salem Regional Office at
- [phone].
Sincerely,
Rose Pruitt
cc: NPS Compliance & Assistance Oversight Unit
SWP-Central Files
WSRO Files
NonthCarolina
)atura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal OpportunitylAtfirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the maitpiece,
or. on the front If space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Carl Raycroft
Sun Chemical Corporation
135 West Lake Street
Melrose Park, IL 60164
i ❑ Agent
t�V ' ❑ Addressee
d C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from Rem 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Sery Type
El'tertifled Mall ❑ ress Mall
❑ Registered etum Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ yes
7004 2510 0002 2083 542�
Form 3811 ; February 2004 Domestic Return' Receipt
>J
1112595-02-M-154C

i
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE--
s�. 'O '�----...Postage,&,Fees .Paid _
USPS .
Perinit No.-G-10.
•S
NCDENR-WATER QUALITY--—._----
Wins#on-Salem Regional Office
A TTN:
585 WAUGHTOWN STREET
WINSTON-5ALEM, NO
27107OCT 17 2005
Wirrtston•Salern
Regional bfrire
it�i�!!l111lli�ilklll!1!F!itllll!!�!1!!fllltlilillllltllll!

U.S. Postal Service,.
�Q%IED MAIL,.RECEIPT
(afl Only; No Insurar:ce Coverage Provided} .
rn
OFFCIAL USE
Lj
ru Postago
$
t D j 5
No
rLi Certllied Fee
O
O Retum Receipt Fee
M
Postmark
Here
(Endorsement Required)
p ResMcted Delivery Fee
a (Endorsement Required)
Ln
ru Total Poste
/G
Carl Raycroft
=
Cl
e°` ° Sun Chemical Corporation
0
135 West Lake Street
or PO Box Nc
§ii�,"z Melrose Park, IL 60164
.
�'�. t3T7i51 : 11 1RTHIIIIY •
.

Certified Mail Provides: t--ar=rizooz-er'ooss­ojsd
r A mailing receipt
■ A unique Identifier for your m£ilpiece
■ A record of delivery kept by the-rF,ostal Service for two years
Important Reminders:
■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Mail®.
s Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
s NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
■ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt mar be requested to provide proof of
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt sennoe, please complete and attach a Return
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for
a duplicate return receipt, a USPSO postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is
required.
• For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or
addressee's authorized a ent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
%ndorsement "Restricted -Delivery-
■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti-
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present It when making an Inquiry.
Internet access to delivery information is not available on mail
addressed to APOs and FPOs.

micnaet r. casiey, ernor
William G. Ross J.,Se,retary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division.of Water Qualify
October 5, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL 7004 2510 0002 2083 5421
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Carl Raycroft
Sun Chemical Corporation
135 West Lake St
Melrose Park, Il 60164
SUBJECT: Re: Notice of Violation
October 5, 2005 Follow Up Inspection
Sun Chemical Corporation: Fairchild Rd Facility
Permit No: NCS000192
Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Raycro It:
On October 5, 2005 a follow up to the Compliance Evaluation Inspection of July 15 was conducted
by Rose Pruitt of the Winston-Salem Regional Office. Mr. Tony Blakely of Sun Chemical was
present and Mr. Donald Hankins of Resolve Environmental Services was also present. At that
time it was observed that barrels and storage tanks noted at the previous inspection had been
removed from the exterior of the facility. Some material storage was still being done inside the
building. According to the representatives the facility is no longer manned and no shipping and
receiving is being done at this site.
There was a four inch metal pipe that ran down an embankment to the creek but was not attached
to anything. This pipe was previously used to drain a stormwater inlet according to a company
representative. The representative said that this pipe would be removed immediately.
It was recommended to the representatives that they apply for a No Exposure Certification for this
facility. The no exposure certification application was supplied by the inspector at that time.
585 Waughtown Street Winston Salem, NC 27103 [phone] Customer Service 1 800 623-7748

Sun Chejrpai ,
Page 2
October 5, 2005
Thank you for your cooperation and prompt attention to this matter. Should you have any further
questions please contact Rose Pruitt at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Attachment
Cc: Donald Hankins, Resolve Environmental Services, 410 East Franklin St, Monroe, NC
28112
Tony Blakely, Sun Chemical Corp, 120 Regent Dr, Winston Salem NC 27103
Keith Huff, City of Winston Salem Stormwater Division
Bradley Bennett, Stormwater Permitting
Danny Smith, NPS Assistance and Compliance Oversight
Collin Day, Aquifer Protection
Doug Holyfield, Hazardous Waste
Bob Ragland, Forsyth County Environmental Affairs
Shawn Cline, Winston Salem Forsyth Co Emergency Management Department
Jim Bryan, Forsyth County Public Health
Central Files
WSRO