20110720 Ver 3_Year 7 Monitoring Report_20190917

ID#* 20110720
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review
Completed Date
09/18/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/17/2019
Version* 3
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
Existing 20110720
(DWR) (nunbersonly ...nodash)
ID#:*
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Ezell
County: Granville
Document Information
C' c-'
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing
Version: (nurnbersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Ezell _MY7_2019_Monitoring_Report.pdf 23MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subr itted.. .
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:

EZELL RIPARIAN BUFFER & NUTRIENT
OFFSET MITIGATION SITE
YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT
DWR # 2011-0720V.3
GRANVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Prepared by:

Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

September 2019

i
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Project Location and Description ..................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2
2.0 Project Area – Pre-Construction Condition Summary ............................................................................ 2
3.0 Bank Site Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 2
3.1 Restoration Plan ............................................................................................................................... 2
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots ............................................................................................................ 3
3.3 Photo Stations ................................................................................................................................... 4
4.0 Monitoring Year 7 Conditions ................................................................................................................ 4
5.0 Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation ........................................................................... 5
6.0 References ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Appendix A: Site Maps Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Monitoring Exhibit Figure 3: Monitoring Exhibit with Vegetation Plots and Photo Stations Figure 4: Monitoring Year 7 Vegetation Plot Success Map Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data Table 2: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table Table 3: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species (MY0 – MY7) Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets Appendix E: Photo Stations Photos Appendix F: 2016 Adaptive Management Plan
Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019

1
1.0 Introduction 1.1 Project Location and Description
The Ezell Bank Site is located in Granville County approximately four and a half miles west of City of
Franklinton, NC. The Site is located approximately 0.35 miles south of the intersection of NC Highway
96 and Suitts Store Road and approximately 0.7 miles north of the intersection NC Highway 96 and Pine
Ridge Road.

The land containing the Site is comprised of 4 parcels (Granville County Tax Map Numbers 183500261043,
183500156027, 183500255145, and 183500166814) that total approximately 88.33 acres. An
approximately 26.99-acre Conservation Easement (CE) protects the Site. Within the CE, existing riparian
areas have been restored to generate both Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset (nitrogen and
phosphorous) Credits. The purpose of this Site is to improve water quality within the Neuse River Basin,
specifically the Falls Lake watershed, by providing off-site mitigation for development (both existing and
proposed) requiring stream buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits.

The Site is located within the Lower Falls Lake watershed in the Neuse River Basin (8-digit USGS HUC
03020201, 14-digit USGS HUC 03020201060020), and more specifically within the Neuse Sub-basin 03-
04-01. Stormwater runoff from the Site drains into unnamed tributaries of Smith Creek (Stream Index
#27-12-2-(1)). According to the Basinwide Information Management System (BIMS), Smith Creek is
classified as Class C and NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters). Class C classification is for “waters protected
for uses such as secondary recreation” while the NSW designation is for “waters needing additional
nutrient management”.

Due to its location and improvements, the project provides numerous ecological and water quality
benefits within the Neuse River Basin. While many of these benefits are limited to the project area,
others, such as pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching
effects.

This Site has been established under the terms and conditions of the EBX Upper Neuse Riparian Buffer
and Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank), signed on February 10, 2012, made and entered
into by Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC (EBX), acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources – Division of Water Resources
(DWR). Annual monitoring activities and monitoring reports were performed by RES.

Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019

2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Ezell Bank Site provides numerous ecological and water quality benefits within the Neuse River
Basin. While many of these benefits are limited to the project area, others, such as pollutant removal and
improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching effects. Expected improvements to water
quality, hydrology, and habitat are outlined below.

The goals of this nutrient offset mitigation project are to:

- Improve the overall quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed tributary of Smith Creek
by reducing nutrient and sediment loads into the streams caused by agricultural influences.
- Improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation easement.
- Provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributary of Smith Creek and associated riparian and
upland buffers.

These goals were met through the following objectives:

- By establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the Bank Site.
- By reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Parcel through hand mechanized
or chemical methods, if necessary.
- By establishing a conservation easement to provide long-term protection for the Bank Site.
- By donation of the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity, to an accredited or
approved land trust or stewardship program.
2.0 Project Area – Pre-Construction Condition Summary
Natural forested areas were limited within many areas of the Site. In addition to cleared or non-forested
areas, Neuse Riparian Buffer restoration was considered for those forested areas that are within 50 feet of
the streams (intermittent or perennial) and ponds, but lacking adequate stem counts. Neuse Riparian Buffer
restoration is defined as the process of converting a sparsely woody vegetated area (less than 100 trees per
acre that are greater than or equal to five inches diameter at breast height for trees (15A NCAC 02B .0233
(2)(m)) to a forested riparian buffer area (15A NCAC 02B .0242). Forested areas within 50 feet of the
streams and ponds that lacked adequate stem counts were planted. All restoration areas planted within the
Site are shown on Figures 3A-3E (Appendix A).
3.0 Bank Site Conditions 3.1 Restoration Plan
Construction of the Site began December 20, 2012 and ended March 2013. Construction activities included
planting activities and the installation of posts around the Conservation Easement. Following construction,
staking of photo stations and vegetation plots occurred.

The maintained fields located outside forested fringe areas within the Site area (i.e. Neuse Riparian Buffer
and Nutrient Offset areas) were sprayed with a dyed glyphosate chemical to kill established fescue grasses
to insure the best survival rate and to eliminate competition to the young trees. In addition, planting was
achieved by utilizing a tractor drawn tree planting implement starting December 20, 2012 through
December 28, 2012. Agriform fertilizer tablets were placed with each bare root tree to provide added
supplemental nutrients to jumpstart the young trees root growth. Where necessary, invasive species were
treated with herbicide to ensure they do not become dominant within the Bank Site, or hinder the
establishment, growth and survival of planted vegetation.
Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019
3
The Site was planted with bare root seedlings consisting of species known to inhabit the Piedmont Alluvial
Forest community type as described Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina. A total
of 16,300 individual species, or 655 stems per acre, were planted within the Bank Site, which is within the
desired range of 436 to 681 stems per acre according to the Ezell Bank Site Proposed Neuse Riparian Buffer
& Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site – Bank Parcel Development Package (EcoEngineering, October 2012).
The list provided in the Ezell Bank Site Proposed Neuse Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
–Bank Parcel Development Package was used as a guide in species selection. Due to stock unavailability
from local nurseries, changes were made on-site. The planted species were a mixture of hardwood tree
species consistent with those found within a Dry Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest community type. Plant
composition consisted of ten (10) tree species. No shrub species were selected as part of plant composition.
The following are substitutions: American beech (Fagus grandifolia, Tree), and tulip poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera, Tree).
Temporary and permanent native herbaceous seed was applied simultaneously to the nutrient offset
restoration areas within the Bank Site area. Temporary seed provided cover until the permanent seed applied
became established. Temporary cover consisted of millet (Echinochloa crusgalli), annual rye grain (Secale
cereal), and crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum). Permanent ground cover consisted of switchgrass
(Panicum virgatum), deertongue (Panicum clandestinman), black-eyed susan (Rudbeckia hirta), and
riverbank wildrye (Elymus riparius).
Following the completion of Monitoring Year 3 activities at the Ezell Site, it was determined that remedial
actions must take place for the site to achieve its success criteria. RES submitted an adaptive management
plan to NCDWR which was approved on January 25th, 2016 (Appendix F). Once approved, the Ezell Site
had extensive remediation work performed during the spring 2016. Due to the history of landowner
encroachment on the Ezell Bank Site, the conservation easement was re-surveyed and marked with
easement signage to prevent any future easement encroachment problems. All monitoring plots were re-
established with corner posts and the tree stems were flagged. A supplemental replant was performed during
March 2016. Approximately 10,500 bare root stems were planted within the conservation easement areas.
Also, along the easement boundary, approximately 1,500 1-gallon containerized trees were planted
to define the boundary. RES conducted site visits approximately once every eight weeks to document the
integrity of the easement boundary. When appropriate, a brief summary was transmitted to DWR and
NCWHF documenting site visit conditions. Since the remediation work and replanting was performed, no
easement encroachment problems occurred in 2016 and 2019 with only minor easement encroachment
problems in 2017 and 2018 along easement boundaries.
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
All monitoring methodologies follow the most current templates and guidelines provided by NC DMS
(EEP, 2010; EEP, 2011). Baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted in accordance with CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS-EEP, v4.2). All ten (10) vegetation plots originally installed
were located in Monitoring Year 7. Table 3 provides a success summary for each vegetation monitoring
plot.
Photographs of each vegetation monitoring plot are located in Appendix C. Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheets are provided in Appendix D. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheet provides the
measurements, location, and vigor of each planted tree within the vegetation monitoring plots.
Monitoring Year 7 field activities were conducted on September 12, 2019. Based on the Year 7 vegetation
monitoring data, eight (8) of the ten (10) vegetation monitoring plots have met the planted stems per acre
Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019

4
success criteria for Year 7. When taking in to consideration volunteer stems, nine (9) of the ten (10)
vegetation monitoring plots have met success criteria for Year 7. The Site’s overall average Year 7 planted
stems per acre is 437. The Site’s overall average Year 7 total stems per acre including volunteer species is
761 (Table 2). Table 3 provides a more detailed summary of stem counts and the type of planted species
within each vegetation monitoring plot since baseline. The survival of planted stems per acre during
monitoring Year 7 ranges from 283 to 607 stems per acre. The overall median stem height is 130 cm (1.3
m).
3.3 Photo Stations
Photo documentation is essential to monitoring success of the Bank Parcel. Photos provide a visual
assessment of the vegetation conditions. All 10 photo stations were located in Monitoring Year 7. The
locations of the photo stations are depicted in Figure 4. Photographs for the photo stations are located in
Appendix E.
4.0 Monitoring Year 7 Conditions
Monitoring is completed pending approval by DWR. Overall the site’s vegetation has re-established well
in Year 7. The areas in and around Vegetation Plot 1 and Vegetation Plot 2 have fallen short of the 320
stems per acre success criteria by only one stem each (283 stems per acre). Three-gallon container trees
were planted in and around Plots 1, 2, and 7 on May 1, 2019. Survival of the planted container trees was
relatively low around Plots 1 and 2 compared to Plot 7. Plots 1 and 2 fell one tree short of the success
criteria and Plot 7 exceeded success criteria by one tree. An abundant amount of herbaceous ground cover
as well as volunteer trees species were present throughout the rest of the site during Year 7 monitoring
activities. The majority of the Site is performing as planned, has met or exceeded success criteria, and is
recommended for closeout.

The Ezell Bank Site contains 10 vegetative monitoring plots which were monitored and reported for success
criteria in general accordance with the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS-EEP, v4.2). Ten
(10) by ten (10) meter square plots were permanently established following completion of the planting
phase and at least two opposing corners have been permanently installed and surveyed for future use. The
plant species, density, survival rates, and the cause of mortality, if identifiable, have been recorded within
each plot. Ten (10) vegetation plots were sampled and reported. The primary focus of the vegetative
monitoring was solely on the tree stratum, although shrub and herbaceous species encountered may also
have been recorded but were not counted towards the success criteria.

Within Neuse buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas, success criteria was based on the survival of a
minimum density of 320 trees per acre after five years of monitoring. Within Neuse buffer enhancement
areas, success criteria was based on a minimum of at least two tree species at an average density of 320
trees per acre following five years of monitoring. Following the site replant and approved Adaptive
Management Plan, success criteria was changed to the survival of 320 trees per acre and a median stem
height of greater than 100 cm by the end of Year 7. Year 7 vegetation monitoring activities occurred on
during the month of September. As of Monitoring Year 7, the Ezell Bank Site yields 437 planted stems per
acre and 761 total stems per acre counting volunteer species. The overall site median stem height is 130 cm
(Appendix B).

Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019

5
5.0 Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
The Site provides Neuse Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits for development impacts within the Neuse
River Basin. Additionally, it provides Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits for development impacts within
the Lower Falls Lake Watershed of the Neuse River Basin, HUC 03020201, The 26.98 acres conservation
easement (Figure 2A-2E), was dedicated to Neuse Riparian Buffer restoration and Nutrient Offset
restoration. A Neuse Riparian Buffer restoration area of 7.54 acres was used to generate 7.54 acres of Neuse
Riparian Buffer credits. There are 17.13 acres of riparian restoration area within the Site (i.e. areas outside
of the Neuse Buffer) which provide Nutrient Offset Credits for nitrogen and phosphorous (currently based
on 2,273.02 lbs of nitrogen/ac and 146.4 lbs of phosphorous/ac of riparian restoration). The Site provides
38,936.83 pounds of Nitrogen Nutrient Offset Credit and 2,507.83 pounds of Phosphorous Nutrient Offset
Credit.
Table 1 provides a summary of mitigation credit for the Site. Table 1: Mitigation Credit Summary
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION/ ENHANCEMENT CREDITS
Conservation Neuse Buffer Restoration Area
Area Restoration (Acres/Square Feet) Enhancement
1 1.80 Acres (78,478 sf) 0.00
2 1.72 Acre (75,012 sf) 0.00
3 0.50 (21,685 sf) 0.00
4 0.04 Acres (1,597 sf) 0.00
5 0.40 Acres (17,298 sf) 0.00
5A 2.73 Acres (118,864 sf) 0.00
6 0.35 Acres (15,403 sf) 0.00
TOTAL ACREAGE 7.54 Acres 0.00
RATIO 1:1 3:1
TOTAL CREDITS 7.54 Acres (328,337 sf) 0.00
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION CREDITS
Conservation Area Nutrient Offset
Restoration (acres)
Nitrogen Credit
(2,273.02 lbs/ac)
Phosphorous Credit
(146.4 lbs/ac)
1 3.05 6,932.71 446.52
2 3.03 6,887.25 443.59
3 0.13 295.49 19.03
4 0.85 1,932.07 124.44
5 0.29 659.18 42.46
5A 5.16 11,728.78 755.42
6 1.13 2,568.51 165.43
7 3.49 7,932.84 510.94
TOTAL 17.13 38,936.83 2,507.83
Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019

6
6.0 References

Environmental Banc & Exchange (2015) Ezell Bank Site Neuse Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset
Mitigation Site. EcoEngineering. October 2015.

Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) 2004. Guidelines for Riparian Buffer
Restoration. Available at internet site: http://www.nceep.net/news/reports/buffers.pdf. Accessed
August 2009.

Schafale MP and AS Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019

APPENDIX A Site Maps

N EZELL BANK SITE
USGS SITE MAP
0 300 600 1,200
Feet
1 inch — 600 feet
Figure 1

/
$ qo
rq1.
�e9
I
\\\ s C
VICINITY MAP
NOT m SCNE
•,Q
'.\
®
t SHEET 3 O z
\
BEET 2 ` •
\ ® `
0
82 z
o
#q --,s.
•"--....,, •""�.,,_
"-'
SHEET 5
`.�
GRAPHIC SCALE
GENERAL NOTES
1. THIS IS A SURVEY OF AN EXISTING PARCEL(S) OF LAND. THIS IS
A CONSERVATION EASEMENT PLAT.
2. BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON NC GRID NAD 83..
3. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES
4. ZONING: L S THESE PARZONI ARE ALSO LOCATED IN THE
ZONING DISTRICT.
LOWER FALLS STORMW GEOMETRY.
5. AREA BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY.
6. FLOOD NOTE: THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN A SPECIAL
FLOOD HAZARD ZONE. IT IS LOCATED IN ZONE 'X" AS DEFINED
BY F.E.M.A F.I.R.M COMMUNITY PANEL #37201824001 DATED
APRIL 16, 2007.
7. REFERENCES: DB 246 PG 704. DB 251 PG 614, DB 940 PG 478,
DB 943 PG 549, PB 41 PG 36
OF THE GRANVILLE COUNTY REGISTRY.
PIN: 1835-26-1043. 1835-16-1684. 1835-15-6027
8. THIS SURVEY PERFORMED AND MAP PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT
OF A EASETITLEMENTS WHICHREPOR .THIS SURVEY SUBJECT TO ANY FACTS AND
EASEMENTS WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A FULL AND
ACCURATE TITLE SEARCH.
9. NO GRID MONUMENTS FOUND WITHIN 2000' OF SITE.
10. SEE SHEET 5 OF 5 FOR SITE DATA TOTALS
-THE FALLS WATERSHED STORMWATER ORDINANCE FOR NEW
DEVELOPMENT PLACES LAND DISTURBANCE THRESHOLDS ON THE
PROPERTIES.--
UNE TABLE
LINE
BEARING LENGTH
LINE
BEARING LENGTH
'
-
FIGURE 2A
- i
UNE BEARING LENGTH E52 N 45-42'34' W 38.76' E103 S62'47' " E 63.84'
E7 S 1852'21' E 133.58' E53 N 42'06'30' IN 0.33' E104 S 5474'52' E 37.59'
E2 N 41'27'16" E 242.8gL E54 N 51'21'01" W 55.05' E105 S 50.2444" E 47.66
E3 N 7953'20" E 292.55' E55 S 73'12'46' W 41.24' E106 S 73.34'41" E 40.50
E4 N 2ZI1'36" E 14.37' E56 S 64'43'35' W 44.98' E707 5 61'48'10' E 18,67-
E5 N 2727'55' E 37.07' E57 S 71'05'02" W 39.21' E108 N 5651'17' E 37.67'
E6 N 3859'41= E 36.94V E58 S 79'03'12' W 41.35' E109 N 20'4 41.27'
E7 50'27'56' E 3293' E59 S 87'00'32" W 45.86' EIIO N 32'40'00' W
: =
388.78'
E8 E60 N 86'20'42" W 45.42' E111 '
E9 N 30'59'06" E 20.76' E61 N 78'58'59' W 15.94' E112 S 8851'55' E
48.43'
E10 N 13'15'34" E 21.75' E62 5 17'09'25' W 94.12' E113 N 86'56' 3" E 38.92'
E11 N 0711'05" E 68.19' E63 S 0737'39' E 113.37 E114 S 61'38'12' E 29.29'
E72 N 2351'20" E 31.64' E64 N 76'21'56' E 59.51' E115 S 83'39'29' E 19.46'
EN N 503523' W 229,30' E65 N 7627'56' E 97,97' E116 74'57'29" E
3222'
E14 5 88'44'23' W 35.95' E66 S 81'28'48" E 162.05' E117 50471'44" W 8.10'
E15 S 6056'04' W 38.07 E67 N 0930'26' W 24,58' E118 5 33'52'31' E 35.80'
E16 S 15'47'01' W 92.55 E68 N 355559' E 49.77' E119 S 19'49'02' E
36.26'
E17 S 3323'45' W 99.17 E69 N 17'16'13' W 38.52' E120 N 86'09'00" E
7282'
E18 N 8024'50' W 125.06' E70 N 5937'50' W 30.25' E121 N 74'41'33" E 56.46'
EI9 ' . 7" W E71 El 22 . 7" .
E20 S 6837'03' W 36.37' E72 N 0023'53" E 20.72' E123 S 59'28'13' E
50.68'
E21 S 67'57'03' W 204.38' E73 N 00'3127" E 4.81' E124 S 7925'36" E 30.81'
E22 S 0371'41" E 15.2' E74 N 15 W 17.76' E125 N 27'02'15" E 52.26'
E23 S 13'40'36" E 103.02' E75 5 6 7'3 ' W 46.72' El 26 N 28'49'06" E 46.88'
E25 S 29'5253' W 152.21' E77 S 4127'16" W 33.30' E127 N 50'33" 26.79'
E26 S 3355'18' W 4487 E78 S 1835'55" W 8.52' E128 N 35'1135' E
56,55'
E27 S 3634'13' W 29.75' E79 S 10'06'50' E 78.1V E129 N 30'20'30" E 75.96'
EZB S 45'15'58' W 58.51' E80 28'19'41" W 52.20' El 30 N 811'24" E
82.91'
E29 5 51'21'19" W 49.11' E81 S 77'01'11' W 76.33' E131 N 0825'17" E
23.88'
E30 S 28'47'50' W 109.10' E82 56'43'10" W 52.48' El 32 N 12'08'41" W 130.38'
E31 E83 E133 N 8728'48' W
70.76
E32 N 8720'04 E 39.07' E84 5 18'16' 1' E 49.85' E134 S 76'21'56" W 3.93'
E33 79'0 '12" E 37.71' E85 N 7557'32' E 21.00' E135 5 07'00'58" E
111.32'
E34 N 70'41'46" E 3240' E86 N 5548'40" E 20.15' E136 S 09147'01' E 3.14'
E35 N 6432'35' E 4205' E87 N 7030'50" 3. ' ET N 562627" E 9.55'
E36 N 68'41'35" E 3886' EBB N 79'00'39' E ,11' E135 N 67'16'12' E 24.46'
E37 N 9'07'56' E 36.91' EBB N 8610'12" E 38.67' E139 N 60'3724' E
29.65'
E38 S 6716'45" E 3296' E90 N 7926'02' E 37.97' E140 N 38'3 '24" 25.56'
E39 S 4354'44" E 57.22' E91 N 76'47'39' E 39.89' E141 N 51'55'17' E 33.97'
E40 S 4542'36" E 48.90' E92 N 6322'03' E 30.35' E142 N 6128'40' 37.58'
E93 N 5655'59' E 23.43' E143 N 84'31'33" E 32.21'
E41 S 5 27'51" E;0.00'
E42 S 59'37'50" E E94 N 3932'11' 27.72' E144 N 77'36'48" E 23.43'
E43 S 7123'11' E E95 N 16'01'42" E 9.10' EI45 N 3155'32" E 12.11'
E44 S 84'4728" E E96 N 042028" E 31.31' E148 6'17'57" W 22.52'
E45 N 29'46'02" E E97 N 15'22'53' W 23.62 E147 N 56'22'38" W 2336'
'
E46 E98 E148EM1_1
E47 N 39'40'00' W E99 S 8 0'52' W 83.09' E74914.91E48
N 682222' W E100 5 40'53'40' W 1 9,05' E150
124.73
E49 S 85'34'30' W E101 S 19'32'56' W 125.75' E151 216.84
E50 N 00'00'00' E E102 S 71'37'13" E 204.56 E152 17.82'
N 5229'40' W 41.32'
BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING
LENGTH
S 56"42'33" E 18.56' E203 S 7125'00" W 20.80 E254 N 26'45' W
21.93'
El5 0625'06' W 4,81' E204 S 6530'25' W 15.33 E255 N 0528'58' 27.14'
S 6378'30' W 27.90' E205 S 27'03'45' W 54.45 E256 N 44'32'03' E 20.31'
S 3521'53' W 34.46' E206 S 2326'45' W 31.27 E257 02-08-45- E 23.57
tE159
2Y57'59" E207 E258 '
5 54'3824' W 3456' E208 S 83'28'08" E 49.88' E259 N 1"'4913 E
19.52'
5 12'38'26" W 31.16' E209 N 8452'58" E 35.41' E260 N 37*5 56 E 20.12'
S 24'40'58' W 30.46' E210 N 76'4355" E 127.17' E261 N 56'0 '08" 15.98'S
45'50'53' W 38.03' E211 Al12529" W 190.86' E262 N 5 ' 1'28" E 16.60'
E162 S 0819'32" W 30.34' E212 N 8558'51' W 2229' E263 S 50'59'14' E 20.44'
E163 S 53'0221' W 21.51' E213 I S 8029'13' W 40.96' E264 5 52`08'13" W
20.67'
E164S 64'17' 7" W 24. 3' E214 N '21' W 31.10' E265 S 7211'17' W 15.30'
E165 N 7950'19' W 80.20' E215 I S 4717'21" W 16.69' E266 S 4621'47" W
'
E166 N 14'4828' W 256.29' E216 I S 6745'13' W 14.23' E267 S 0 27'55 W 19.37'
E167S 66-20`28' W 88.48' E217 N 75'33'09' W 14.04' E268 S 04'46'41" W 5.73'
E168 E218 E269 '
E169 5 41'13' 7 W 26.34' E219 N 6617'58' W 20.99' E270 S 6628'54 E 18.67'
E170 5 61'04'45' W 28.47' E220 N 09'00'19" E 4.89' E271 S 59'06'24' E
16.76'
E171 S W2248" W 33.7r E221 N 24'5545" W 29.75' E272 S 4354'10" E 5.79'
E172 N 89'44'52' W 42.33' E222 N 57'38'09' W 38.23' E273 5 130'06' E 8.6'
E173 N 8812'36' W 44.84' E223 N 6733'05' W 49.43 E274 S 37'041 36.13'
E275 S 4755' E 24.68'
E174 5 8712'12' W 33.06' E224 N 45'3724" W 24.43' '00'
E175 S 80'48'35' W 1. 7' E225 N 51'2731" W 34.57' E276 S 5717'48' E
2292'
E176 S 69'0733' W 9.89' E226 N 375801" W 29.76' E277 S 25'45'58 E
15.00'
E177 5 2753'27" E 23.65' E227 N 605412' W 32.03' E278 5 3 2'49' E 17.52'
7.52
E178 S 21'15'38' E 34.28' E228 N 4745'13' W 30.86' E279 S 1914'05" W
E179 S 3530'36' E 24.08' E229 S 28'0734' E 303.27' E280 •36'02" W 14.29'
E181 S 68'37'27" E 26.01' E230 5 03'44'58' W 42.28' E281 1658'04" E 10.33'
E181 S 7705'49" E 26.78' E231 5 00'02'14' W 36.46' E282 N 4'44" E 104.67'
.67
E182 I S 7703'47" E 39.18' E232 S 05'49'29" E 24.88' E283 N 35'34'35" E 68,06'
E183 E233 E284 7' ' W 145,49'
E184 S 06'55'48" W 26.70' E234 S 20'03'17' E 2275' E285 N 2'57' W 26.50'
E185 S 7728'03" W 8.37' E235 5 35'47'52' E 28.81' E286 N 15'57'07 E
1 39.92'
E186 S 484855' W 26.51' E236 N 6821'20" E 60.19' 1 E287 N 033'52' W 54.65'
E187 S 03'37'36" E 35.18' E238 N 64'41'36' W 15.38' E288 N 36'34'59' W 228.93'
E786 S 3316'01' E 20.02' E239 N 4527'42' W 16.73' E289 5 84'40'22' W
48.63'
E189 5 5935' 26.11' E240 N 0'03'17' W 2275' E290 S 16'1854" W
86.72'
E190 55855'59" E 19.93' E241 N 09'06'41" W 32.32' E291 S 1 7'05'54' E 91.39'
Ei91 S 15 ' ' W 13.63' E242 N 05'36'35' W 21.83' E292 S 14747'47" W
166.31'
E192 N 753438' W 1268' E243 N 0028'50" E 31.16' E293 S 0730'57' E 103.97'
E193 S 8626'10' W 21.34' E244 N 03'52'04" E 46.04' E294 S 14'3,V58"13.03'
E1947 ' W E245 E295 7'
E195 S 2820'20' W 9.43' E246 N 00'57'18' E 80.20' E296 N 51'08'54" E
B`62'
E196 57743'55" W 17.28 E247 N 0058'54" E 4241 E297 N 745-7'33' E 64.05'
E197 S 73'46'44' W 25.20' E248 N 0415'48' W 1 27.89' 1 E298 IS 2T52753" W
1 20.86'
E198 S 7059'58' W 25.48' E249 N 06'39'28' W 1 15.27' 1 E299 N 81'28'48" W 1 13.46'
E199 S 42'5226' W 29.22' E250 N 2224'54' E 20.65 E300 N 76' 1'56" E 9272'
E200 S 2039'11' W 3265 E251 N 01'53'23' W 33.99' E301 5 0210'48" W 7.86'
E201 S 3259'41' W 19.48' E252 N 0653'41' W 3296' E302 S 6517'36' E 54.13'
E202 7 5'00" W 224' I E253 N 14'34'58' W 31.39' E303 S 74'40'39' E
153.68'
E304 N 4359'49" E 42.57'
E305 S 46'0011" E 95.26'
Iti
Z z
Z >-I ]�
y�i`
o
�1 \ALV
N
E V 0, 1sT O
O �
W
z
Q
SHEET
I OF 5
ozF
o
A 0
U
oascr no. EBX-12020
"" FBX12020 F3
sicneo er: RTF
JBT
.u.e.
1"=500'
­ 09-25-2013
LJI MCADAMS

Q
U
� a o
Cho
Ow zy�d N
W � ZZP�.�i'WOO
x rol
G- r
O W
W
z
z
0
5m
a Q
SHEET
2OF5
0
co
o z
18
U
m... "o. EBX-12020
newer EBX12020 F3
sic"eo �r. RTF
14 JBT
rc. 09-25-2013
'J MCADAMS

5 8534.31' W � 1
859.99' ,2h/
01/
W �y j
W
sl
// ;a 1
N/Fe / /C' ONSERVATION / // � //
W
DG EZELL �>
PIN: 1835-26-1043 �// / / , / / / / / AREA #7
6 DB 246. PG 704 162,053 sq. ft.
E36 Cie
AREA
/ OA F', E31 E32 E33 E%5 f v
fo✓ 1
y� % { 1
•:.s_ S 8723'00" E`
j/! ,/•m
129 69' (nE) ;Tr',�.--E� � %1 f�✓��� //.' 1 I
1 1 1
E44 � A
Lo
f 1 1
,� / / J CONSERVATION 1 f �
/ AREA #6 1
7L423 sq.
/,/A 1
A / /
I
501-1111,
0EMENT 55 PSNC I
6 ✓%/ / / EAS- S 35 50 EASEMENT 355
1340 P / - Ef3J i 81'28'48 OB 1340 PGS 352= — — — — — — —
3 --- v
134.40'(TIE)
O
jCONSERVATION
AREA #5
30,863 sq. ft,
0.71 a
CONSERVATION
AREA #5A
355 L 74,890a
E143 Etaa � 1 J/ LEGEND
® EXISTING IRON PIPE
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
A CALCULATED POINT
\ / GRAPHIC SCALE
60 120
\' MATCHLINE SHEET 3 e /�/�j
SHEE 4 C i inch = 80 ft.
FIGURE 2C
x z cg, E\,
N
w a El o
SrOr,, \H � M,
V wtU40 am
w
wap
of
Z
5O
a Q
SHEET
3OF5
18
0
O
U
EBX-12020
EBX12020 F3
s�cnEo e�. RTF
D"WN BY:JBT
- 1"=60'
P6i 09-25-2013
iJ MCADAMS

A
CIO
U
z
W
x�ZI rn a
H �o
oW
wadW
di
z
0
Q
SHEET
4OF5
0
°z
1s
o
A o
tqW`� 6
w
AlBX-1
B,e"EBX12020 F3
sicnss Br. RTF
JBT
n�.e.
Mc1"=60'
E: 09-26-2
01
M3

DS
270,
PG
385
--------------------
N/F
SUE
WARD
PIN:
1835-05-50
DB
770,
PG
605
N
LIFE
TENANT
MAR IN
LEE
TURNER
PIN:
1835-04-5'
DB
1118.
PG
328
N/F
MARK
A
SMELTZ
PIN:
18351
04-5894
DS
255.
PG
474
N/F
MARK
A &
LYNN
H
SMELTZ
1835-04-PIN:5697
DB
594.
PG
429 ,
CONSERVATIDN
AREA #4
80,689 sq. ft.
.85 n
N/F
DOUG EZELL
PIN: 1835-15-6027
DB 940. PG 478
LEGEND
CONSERVATION EASEMENT (CE) AREA = 26.98 acres
• AREA i1 - 4.99 acres
• AREA # = 4.84 acres
• AREA I{3 - 0.63 acme
• AREA ,f4 = 1.85 acres
• AREA 1/5 - 0.71 ac
• AREA #5A - 8.61 ac
• AREA 111 - 1.63 acre
• AREA #7 - 3.72 acres
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREA = 11.67 acres (508,524 If)�'i11�,
• WITHIN CE AREA #1 - 1.67 acres (72.802 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #2 = 1.47 ­: (64,071 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #3 - 0.00 .cm (0 If)
• WffHIN CE AREA �4 - 0.61 atm (26,]]3 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA �5 - 0.07 a s (3.256 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #SA - 3.58 acres (156,092 If)
• ,r HIN CE AREA #6 = 0.77 acres (33.708 If)
• WITHIN CE AREA #7 - 3.49 ccrea (151,822 sf)
NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION AREA - 7.54 acres (328,337 sf)---=
(0' TO 50'. ZONES 1 & 2)
• WITHIN CE AREA #1 - 1.80 acres (78,478 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA 2 = 1.72 atm (75.012 sf)
• WffHIN CE AREA #3 - 0.50 acroa (21,685 ef)
• WITHIN CE AREA 4 = 0.04 acres (1,597 sf)
• WTTHIN CE AREA #5 - 0.40 acres (17.298 af)
• WITHIN CE AREA $5A = 2.73 a s (118,864 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA �6 = 0.35 acres (15,403 If)
NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION AREA - 5.88 acroa (256,021 sf)rZM-0
(50' TO 100'. ZONE 3)
• WITHIN CE AREA $1 - 1.41 acres (61.436 If)
• WITHIN CE AREA #2 = 1.56 acres (67.880 f)
• WITHIN CE AREA #3 = 0.13 care: (5,628 af)
• WITHIN CE AREA /4 = 0.24 acres (10.401 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #5 - 0.22 .tree (9.367 sf)
• WNHINCE AREA {#5A = 1.89 acres (82.197 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #6 - 0.44 acres (19.022 If)
NOTAL SITE AREA - 88.33 acre.
CONSERVPTi
AREA #SA
374,890 q. f
8.61 acre,
®�ql
� �T4�'nyGNe
S
a
O EXISTING IRON PIPE GRAPHIC SCALE
■ EXISIING CONCRETE MONUMENT
CALCULATED POINT ""
1 inch = 60 ft
FIGURE 2E
Vl
/y
A
U
Z LAz.1
W 500
OWC.00
\F y N
E"I U
FT
z Pa
Z
O
ul
a Q
SHEET
5OF5
c5
°z
0
18
0
A O
Z
O
U
EBX-12020
nage. EBX12020 F3
sicNeo xa. RTF
m. JBT
1"=60'
Tc. 09-25-2013
IJ MCADAMS
C
f
SHfEj
/
/
t"0
CONSERVATION
/
AREA #3
/
27,312 sq. Ft.
0.63 ncres
E89 I
N/F-
JOHN
-----------------
50' PSNC
•O�,t
9f'
THOMASEASEMENT
;COGGINS
DB 1340 PGS 352-355
?�
DS
270,
PG
385
--------------------
N/F
SUE
WARD
PIN:
1835-05-50
DB
770,
PG
605
N
LIFE
TENANT
MAR IN
LEE
TURNER
PIN:
1835-04-5'
DB
1118.
PG
328
N/F
MARK
A
SMELTZ
PIN:
18351
04-5894
DS
255.
PG
474
N/F
MARK
A &
LYNN
H
SMELTZ
1835-04-PIN:5697
DB
594.
PG
429 ,
CONSERVATIDN
AREA #4
80,689 sq. ft.
.85 n
N/F
DOUG EZELL
PIN: 1835-15-6027
DB 940. PG 478
LEGEND
CONSERVATION EASEMENT (CE) AREA = 26.98 acres
• AREA i1 - 4.99 acres
• AREA # = 4.84 acres
• AREA I{3 - 0.63 acme
• AREA ,f4 = 1.85 acres
• AREA 1/5 - 0.71 ac
• AREA #5A - 8.61 ac
• AREA 111 - 1.63 acre
• AREA #7 - 3.72 acres
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREA = 11.67 acres (508,524 If)�'i11�,
• WITHIN CE AREA #1 - 1.67 acres (72.802 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #2 = 1.47 ­: (64,071 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #3 - 0.00 .cm (0 If)
• WffHIN CE AREA �4 - 0.61 atm (26,]]3 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA �5 - 0.07 a s (3.256 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #SA - 3.58 acres (156,092 If)
• ,r HIN CE AREA #6 = 0.77 acres (33.708 If)
• WITHIN CE AREA #7 - 3.49 ccrea (151,822 sf)
NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION AREA - 7.54 acres (328,337 sf)---=
(0' TO 50'. ZONES 1 & 2)
• WITHIN CE AREA #1 - 1.80 acres (78,478 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA 2 = 1.72 atm (75.012 sf)
• WffHIN CE AREA #3 - 0.50 acroa (21,685 ef)
• WITHIN CE AREA 4 = 0.04 acres (1,597 sf)
• WTTHIN CE AREA #5 - 0.40 acres (17.298 af)
• WITHIN CE AREA $5A = 2.73 a s (118,864 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA �6 = 0.35 acres (15,403 If)
NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION AREA - 5.88 acroa (256,021 sf)rZM-0
(50' TO 100'. ZONE 3)
• WITHIN CE AREA $1 - 1.41 acres (61.436 If)
• WITHIN CE AREA #2 = 1.56 acres (67.880 f)
• WITHIN CE AREA #3 = 0.13 care: (5,628 af)
• WITHIN CE AREA /4 = 0.24 acres (10.401 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #5 - 0.22 .tree (9.367 sf)
• WNHINCE AREA {#5A = 1.89 acres (82.197 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #6 - 0.44 acres (19.022 If)
NOTAL SITE AREA - 88.33 acre.
CONSERVPTi
AREA #SA
374,890 q. f
8.61 acre,
®�ql
� �T4�'nyGNe
S
a
O EXISTING IRON PIPE GRAPHIC SCALE
■ EXISIING CONCRETE MONUMENT
CALCULATED POINT ""
1 inch = 60 ft
FIGURE 2E
Vl
/y
A
U
Z LAz.1
W 500
OWC.00
\F y N
E"I U
FT
z Pa
Z
O
ul
a Q
SHEET
5OF5
c5
°z
0
18
0
A O
Z
O
U
EBX-12020
nage. EBX12020 F3
sicNeo xa. RTF
m. JBT
1"=60'
Tc. 09-25-2013
IJ MCADAMS

3
SHEET 2 ) SHEET �1 /� -_
SHEET 41
04 Y",
SHEET 5
GRAPHIC SCALE
GENERAL NOTES
1. THIS IS A SURVEY OF AN EXISTING PARCEL(S) OF LAND. THIS IS
A CONSERVATION EASEMENT PLAT.
2. BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON NC GRID NAD 83..
3. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES.
4. ZONING: AR 40,
THESE PARCELS ARE ALSO LOCATED IN THE
LOWER FALLS STORMWATER ZONING DISTRICT.
5. AREA BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY.
6. FLOOD NOTE THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN A SPECIAL
FLOOD HAZARD ZONE. IT IS LOCATED IN ZONE 'X' AS DEFINED
BY F.E.M.A F.I.R.M COMMUNITY PANEL /3720182400) DATED
APRIL 16, 2007.
7. REFERENCES: DB 246 PG 704. DB 251 PG 614. D8 940 PG 478.
DB 943 PG 549. P8 41 PG 36
OF THE GRANVILLE COUNTY REGISTRY.
PIN: 1835-26-1043. 1835-16-1684, 1835-15-6027
B. THIS SURVEY PERFORMED AND MAP PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT
OF A TITLE REPORT THIS SURVEY SUBJECT TO ANY FACTS AND
EASEMENTS WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A FULL AND
ACCURATE TITLE SEARCH.
9. NO GRID MONUMENTS FOUND WITHIN 2000' OF SITE.
10. SEE SHEET 5 OF 5 FOR SITE DATA TOTALS
-THE FALLS WATERSHED STORMWATER ORDINANCE FOR NEW
DEVELOPMENT PLACES LAND DISTURBANCE THRESHOLDS ON THE
PROPERTIES. --
FIGURE 3A
A
U
�-I ?l z I
x
W
�a
a�Ns
�oo
cW O %E 0 0
C— UO M
k:4 G7
zw'W
w IX
z
0
Q
SHEET
1 OF 5
o z
18 w
Aso � o
Q
U
o,ecr No. EBX-12020
NA E: EBX12020 F3
s11xen er. RTF
m er. JBT
1"=500'
Te' 09-25-2013
IJ MCADAMS

Q
U
z
z
W n o
aaoo
V w u xO .
G WWWdWd La
T
zw�
vi
z
0
Q
SHEET
2OF5
� o
°z
A� �o
W � W
ai O
U
o.�rcr No. EBX-12020
ENAME: EBX72020 F3
sm.xo e�. RTF
p1 JBT
nes. 1"=60'
rr'. 09-25-2013
0 MCADAMs

S 8534'31" W
859.99'
_ E49,.
"
PHOTO
STATI❑
VEGPLOT
t DOUG E26 1043 ryry0/ AREA
DV P#'ION
PIN: 1835-26-1 /
B 246. PG 704 // 162 053 cq� /
ft.
E14
//Y
%,% 3��// i/,/ Fi3 (/// / � //`/J E36 fag ..• /�// � 1 _ 1
/j CONSERVAT ON � v 2
/i/
2'a°:ela9asq. ft.
PHOTO /,�//ys�b /
cres 4.%'�-F E33 E55 •////// / / / �s
�/E3l•� E32 /�� / / 1 1
STATI❑
4
/ �`�_ 5 87'1 J'00" E ?�6`1` Eg1 '•FSS �� /.
�` „ry 129.69' (17E) E5 E60 E59
TPHOTO 0, LID
A # 6 1 cp
1
AREA #6 STATI❑N
711.643 acr ft..
6 1
HOTO
STATION
6� IY✓/%/ / E65 E50'pSEMENT 55 50 RS
NC 1
/ S 35 EASEMENT 6l
Gb ®WV OB 1340 PO - E13d DB 1340 PCS 352=355
81. iJ
/�_—��./'• / CONSERVATION /�/�,1� 3 1
AREAsgS v 5 /! / / / �1C ➢ O
Y 30,863 ft. Fv
�s' AREA SA 1
355 N✓ X L 7B.'61
E143 890 Sq. ft. /
�1q4 . \ l ncrej/� LEGEND
1
x QEXISTING IRON PIPE
t 5 ■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
6•
• CALCULATED POINT
VEG
EG
PLOT
j/E 9 PL❑T 5 /�/ j� PLOT 10 I� N
GRAPHIC SCALE
/ 60 D 30 60 120
"\'`"" MpTCHUNE W 1 inch —FIGURE 3C
A
z z
W
z�
�1 a
� � N
O w�Ol'1
oW
z
O
� a
SHEET
3OF5
0
z
Q
U
mecr ND. EBX-12020
nnxe: EBX12020 F3
sicNeo er. RTF
—N m. JBT
1"=60
re: 09-25-2013
1J MCADAMS

U
z
W
O� ndi a�N
H U W�o�
zP�
wdW
wza;W
z
z
0
Q
SHEET
4OF5
0
OCD
z
0
U
m
NPOT NO. EBX-12020
NA: EBX12020 F3
sw"eu ": RTF
"" ur. JBT
n -E. 1 "=60'
" 09-26-2013
iJ MCADAMS

•� °0�S � // Zlm //
y4
P H ❑ T ❑/ CONSERVATION
AREA #3 y
N/F /
SUE
WARD
PIN:
1835-pB-5074
770,
600 5 /
N
STATI❑f\}/-
LIFE
• AREA #2 = 4.84 acres
8 /
TENANT
------'
MARVIN
• AREA 1f5 - 0.71 a
JOHN
50' PSNC
THOMAS
• AREA #7 = 3.72 acres
EASEMENT
SCOGGINS
S///i
1
DS 1340 PGS 352-355
PIN:
535-05-6218
• WITHIN CE AREA #2 = 1.47 acres (64,071 sf)
E99 _,...a
DB
-------
-_--_-270. -- //
----
/
328
• WTTHIN CE AREA #5 - 0.07 acres (3,256 sf)
PG
385//////��
'
3
• WITHIN CE AREA 46 = 0.77 acres (33,708 sf)
N/F /
SUE
WARD
PIN:
1835-pB-5074
770,
600 5 /
N
• AREA 1/1- 4.99 acres
LIFE
• AREA #2 = 4.84 acres
TENANT
• AREA #4 = 1.85 a
MARVIN
• AREA 1f5 - 0.71 a
N
TURNER
' „Ela2
PIN:
• AREA #7 = 3.72 acres
1835-04-5984
S///i
1
I
DB
• WITHIN CE AREA #2 = 1.47 acres (64,071 sf)
118PG
I
328
• WTTHIN CE AREA #5 - 0.07 acres (3,256 sf)
_
'
3
• WITHIN CE AREA 46 = 0.77 acres (33,708 sf)
�IF
oINMARK
NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION AREA - 7.54 acres (328,337 sf)
(0' TO 50', ZONES 1 & 2)
A
SMELTZ
• WITHIN CE AREA /1 - 1.80 acres (78,478 sf)
PIN:
• WITHIN CE AREA #3 = 0.50 a.m. (21,685 f)
1835-04-5894
I
DB
• WITHIN CE AREA #5A = 2.73 acres(118,864 sf)
255.
• WITHIN CE AREA $6 = 0.35 acres (15,403 sf)
c
PG
(50' TO 100', ZONE 3)-`-
474If
• WITHIN CE AREA #1 = 1.41 acres (61,436 sf)
• WfTHIN CE AREA ##2 = 1.56 acres (67.880 f)
�q'I'S}Og0
5
N/F
MARK
A &
LYNN
H
SMELTZ
PIN:
1835-04-5697
DB
594,
PG
429
PHOTO
STA
CONSERVATION 9
AREA #4
60,689 q, ft,
1.8
1.85
VEG
PLOT 7
V E G
PLOT
I
I �
CONSERVATION EASEMENT (CE) AREA = 26.98 acres
• AREA 1/1- 4.99 acres
• AREA #2 = 4.84 acres
• AREA If = 0.63 ac
• AREA #4 = 1.85 a
• AREA 1f5 - 0.71 a
• AREA 1)5A - 8.61 acres
• AREA #6 - 1.63 acres
• AREA #7 = 3.72 acres
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREA = 11.67 acres (508.524 sf)
S///i
1
• WITHIN CE AREA #1 = 1.67 acres (72.802 sf)
�-'
• WITHIN CE AREA #2 = 1.47 acres (64,071 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA A3 0.00 acres (0 sf)
• WTTHIN CE AREA #4 = 0.61 acres (26,773 sf)
• WTTHIN CE AREA #5 - 0.07 acres (3,256 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #5A = 3.58 acres (156,092 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA 46 = 0.77 acres (33,708 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #7 - 3.49 acres (151,822 ef)
NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION AREA - 7.54 acres (328,337 sf)
(0' TO 50', ZONES 1 & 2)
• WITHIN CE AREA /1 - 1.80 acres (78,478 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #2 = 1.72 acres (75,012 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #3 = 0.50 a.m. (21,685 f)
• WITHIN CE AREA #4 = 0.04 acres(1,597 0)
• WITHIN CE AREA #5 = 0.40 acres (17,298 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #5A = 2.73 acres(118,864 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA $6 = 0.35 acres (15,403 sf)
NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION AREA - 5.88 acres (256.021 sf)
(50' TO 100', ZONE 3)-`-
• WITHIN CE AREA #1 = 1.41 acres (61,436 sf)
• WfTHIN CE AREA ##2 = 1.56 acres (67.880 f)
• WITHIN CE AREA /3 = 0.13 acres (5,628 af)
• WrZN CE AREA #4 = 0.24 acres (10,401 sf)
• WITHIN CE ARTA #5 = 0.22 scree (9,367 af)
• WITHIN CE AREA $5A = 1.89 acres (82.197 sf)
• WITHIN CE AREA #6 = 0.44 acres (19.022 ef)
TOTAL SITE AREA - 88.33 acres
\ E202
\ I 2ap[2W
/
CONSERVATI
AREA 55A
4,890 e
VEG
PL❑T 9--
MqT,,,, HVNF
�G4'Fw"^«SYyFFT
\ S�
N/F
DOUG EZELL
PIN: 1835-15-6027 \
O8 940, PG 478
\ "1a
LEGEND \
O EXISTING IRON PIPE GRAPHIC SCALE
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
CALCULATED POINT "
1 inch = 60 ft
FIGURE 3E
Q
U
TG o
W
0 N
wTe_i 7a�'1 �n o
u C) p Coo
FLy rr ll \H � .n
R WWWW
O
W aFL �
z
a Q
SHEET
5OF5
O
18
O
A /l o
WN O
U
mer mo. EBX-12020
xnmt. EBX12020 F3
RTF
sr. JBT
n�.e.
1"=60'
re. 09-25-2013
J MCADAMS

^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
VP5
VP2
VP9
VP7
VP3
VP8
VP4
VP1
VP6 VP10
PS5
PS6
PS9
PS8
PS3
PS7
PS4
PS2
PS1
PS10
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
0 250125
Feet
Figure 4.Ezell Bank SiteNeuse Riparian Bufferand Nutrient Offest Site
MY 7 Vegetation Plot Success Map
Legend
Conservation Easement
^_Photo Stations
Vegetation Plot Success>320 stems/acre283 stems/acre
©Date: 9/16/2019
Drawn by: RTM
Document Path: S:\@RES Projects\North Carolina\Upper Neuse Buffer-Nutrient Bank\0123 - Ezell\Monitoring\Monitoring Data\MY7_2019\GIS\Figure 4 MY7 Vegetation Plot Success Map.mxdChecked by: JRM
1 inch = 250 feet
Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019

APPENDIX B Vegetation Assessment Data

  Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 2. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary

Plot #Planted 
Stems/Acre
Volunteer 
Stems/Acre
Total 
Stems/Acre
Success 
Criteria 
Met?
Median 
Planted Stem 
Height (cm)
1 283 162 445 No 130
2 283 0 283 No 169
3 405 809 1214 Yes 141
4 486 728 1214 Yes 55
5 445 445 890 Yes 78
6 526 445 971 Yes 194
7 364 0 364 Yes 106
8 607 81 688 Yes 170
9 405 40 445 Yes 205
10 567 526 1093 Yes 128
Project Avg 437 324 761 Yes 130
  Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data  Table 3: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLSP‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer rubrum red maple Tree22Betula nigra river birch Tree 222 111111111 555666666171717222Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2111111Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub222222 3Diospyros virginianacommon persimmonTree 111 1111111118882237772121 22 23 23 25 24 24 45 24 24 24 14 14 14DONTKNOW: unsure record1 1 1101010Fagus grandifolia American beech Tree111Fraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash Tree 555111 112333 222111111141415131313131313131313151515Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree 1 5 6 416 10 2Liquidambar styracifluasweetgumTree 3 2 6 7 2 1333406432Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 6 6 6 2 2 2 5 5 5 1 1 1 15 15 15 17 17 1718 18 18 26 26 26 3 3 3Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 8 10 422 15 16Platanus occidentalisAmerican sycamoreTree 2222222222221112221112 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5212121202020212121313131 6 6 6Quercus oak Tree111111111Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 111111 222 444111222333Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree333222111 666333Quercus nigra water oak Tree 333 111 111 555448222111111Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree444333111Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 222222222333111111 111111131313131313 12 12 12 14 14 14 4 4 4Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree111111 111Robinia pseudoacacia black locust Tree4Ulmus alata winged elm Tree 771040Unknown Shrub or Tree37 7 11 7 7 7 10 10 30 12 12 30 11 11 22 13 13 24 9 9 9 15 15 17 10 10 11 14 14 27 108 108 188 102 102 188 106 106 256 145 145 179 59 59 592 2 4 5 5 5 6 6 9 4 4 7 7 7 9 6 6 8 6 6 6 5 5 6 8 8 8 4 4 5 12 12 16 11 11 17 12 12 18 12 12 14 11 11 11283 283 445 283 283 283 405 405 1214 486 486 1214 445 445 890 526 526 971 364 364 364 607 607 688 405 405 445 567 567 1093 437 437 761 413 413 761 429 429 1036 587 587 724 2171 2171 2171Scientific Name Common Name Species Type00001‐01‐0001 00001‐01‐000200001‐01‐0010Annual MeansMY7 (2019) MY6 (2018) MY5 (2017) MY4 (2016) MY3 (2016)Current Plot Data (MY7 2019)00001‐01‐0003 00001‐01‐0004 00001‐01‐0005 00001‐01‐000610.0200001‐01‐0007 00001‐01‐0008 00001‐01‐0009Stem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRE10.0210.0210.020.0210.0210.0210.02100.251.10.03Ezell100.25100.25100.2510.0210.021
Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019

APPENDIX C Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Ezell Bank Site
Monitoring Year 7 Report
Granville County, North Carolina
EBX-13000
September 12, 2019

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos:

Vegetation Plot 1

Vegetation Plot 2

Vegetation Plot 3

Vegetation Plot 4

Vegetation Plot 5

Vegetation Plot 6

Vegetation Plot 7

Vegetation Plot 8

Vegetation Plot 9

Vegetation Plot 10

Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019

APPENDIX D Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 8
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 00001-01-0001
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Datum:
X-Axis bearing (deg):1
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Fraxinus pennsylvanica119 1.4 1.2 85.0 b R
Platanus occidentalis120 6.9 0.5 160.0 0.4 e R
Liriodendron tulipifera122 9.9 4.0 Missingh R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica123 7.1 2.5 10.0 f R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica124 4.5 3.3 80.0 d R
Platanus occidentalis128 9.1 6.7 800.0 7.8 g R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica130 2.4 10.0 220.0 1.2 c R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica131 0.1 9.6 130.0 a R DBH?
# stems:8 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Map of stems on plot 00001-01-0001
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:1 °
a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

# stems:8
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 2
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 8
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 00001-01-0002
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:Longitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Datum:
X-Axis bearing (deg):8
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis3 2.8 3.4 240.0 1.7 b R
Diospyros virginiana5 5.7 2.9 195.0 0.7 d R
Quercus phellos136 7.5 3.5 188.0 0.7 e R
Quercus phellos138 5.5 5.9 119.0 c R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis141 9.5 8.9 169.0 0.6 g R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica144 2.6 8.2 73.0 a R
Quercus lyrata704 8.5 3.0 5.0 f P
# stems: 7 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 3
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Map of stems on plot 00001-01-0002
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:8 °
a

b

c

d

e

f

g

# stems:7
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 4
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 8
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 00001-01-0003
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:Longitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Datum:
X-Axis bearing (deg):242
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Liriodendron tulipifera6 2.7 1.2 50.0 c R
Quercus nigra7 9.0 3.5 270.0 1.6 i R
Platanus occidentalis8 3.6 6.8 168.0 0.7 d R
Platanus occidentalis9 9.1 6.8 152.0 0.4 j R
Quercus nigra14 0.2 7.7 262.0 1.6 a R
Quercus lyrata15 3.8 5.9 85.0 e R
Cercis canadensis148 7.5 1.6 60.0 g R
Quercus phellos149 8.6 2.5 131.0 h R DBH?
Quercus phellos150 6.0 3.3 150.0 0.3 f R
Quercus nigra706 2.0 7.0 105.0 b R DBH?
# stems:10 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 5
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Map of stems on plot 00001-01-0003
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:242 °
a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:10
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 6
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 8
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 00001-01-0004
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:Longitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Datum:
X-Axis bearing (deg):222
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Liriodendron tulipifera156 1.5 0.1 71.0 a R
Liriodendron tulipifera157 6.9 0.6 60.0 h R
Quercus phellos158 9.4 0.6 60.0 l R
Platanus occidentalis159 8.8 3.3 40.0 i R
Liriodendron tulipifera160 6.5 3.4 32.0 e R
Platanus occidentalis161 4.1 2.5 61.0 c R
Liriodendron tulipifera165 4.3 5.3 30.0 d R
Quercus phellos166 6.5 6.0 Missingf R
Betula nigra167 8.8 5.9 39.0 j R
Betula nigra168 9.3 7.9 70.0 k R
Liriodendron tulipifera169 6.7 9.0 50.0 g R
Liriodendron tulipifera171 1.7 8.2 30.0 b R
Quercus phellos710 9.5 5.0 205.0 0.4 m U
# stems:13 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 7
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):00001-01-0004
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 00001-01-0004
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:222 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:13
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 8
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 8
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 00001-01-0005
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:Longitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Datum:
X-Axis bearing (deg):304
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Liriodendron tulipifera173 1.5 5.8 58.0 c R
Liriodendron tulipifera176 8.1 3.7 60.0 k R
Platanus occidentalis177 4.4 7.6 100.0 e R
Quercus phellos178 3.9 5.4 36.0 d R
Cornus amomum181 5.2 4.9 78.0 f R
Cornus amomum182 6.6 8.4 88.0 i R
Quercus rubra183 7.2 9.7 40.0 j R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica406 6.0 6.0 70.0 h R
Quercus phellos579 0.5 0.5 95.0 a R
Diospyros virginiana580 0.5 5.8 80.0 b R
Quercus phellos714 5.5 9.0 102.0 g U DBH?
# stems:11 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 9
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):00001-01-0005
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 00001-01-0005
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:304 °
a
k

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:11
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 10
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 8
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 00001-01-0006
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:Longitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Datum:
X-Axis bearing (deg):178
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Fraxinus pennsylvanica28 10.0 1.8 165.0 0.8 a R
Diospyros virginiana30 6.7 5.4 220.0 2.0 i R
Quercus nigra185 3.7 4.4 194.0 0.5 c R
Liriodendron tulipifera186 2.8 5.7 71.0 b R
Platanus occidentalis187 6.0 10.0 340.0 2.6 h R
Platanus occidentalis188 5.4 7.5 390.0 2.4 g R
Liriodendron tulipifera189 5.5 4.8 95.0 f R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica190 4.6 1.9 210.0 0.8 e R
Liriodendron tulipifera191 7.6 1.4 145.0 0.6 j R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica192 8.3 3.9 235.0 1.2 k R
Liriodendron tulipifera193 8.2 6.6 145.0 0.2 l R
Liriodendron tulipifera194 8.4 8.7 120.0 m R DBH?
Quercus phellos583 4.0 7.5 230.0 0.8 d R
# stems:13 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 11
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):00001-01-0006
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 00001-01-0006
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:178 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:13
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 12
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 8
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 00001-01-0007
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:Longitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Datum:
X-Axis bearing (deg):236
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Betula nigra201 2.6 7.8 71.0 b R
Diospyros virginiana205 3.3 2.5 92.0 c R
Quercus phellos410 1.0 1.2 215.0 1.3 a R
Quercus lyrata720 4.5 7.5 141.0 0.4 d P
Quercus michauxii721 5.0 2.5 140.0 0.6 e P
Quercus lyrata722 8.5 2.5 8.0 g P
Platanus occidentalis723 9.0 1.0 104.0 i P DBH?
Quercus michauxii724 8.5 4.5 106.0 h P DBH?
Quercus michauxii725 7.0 4.5 183.0 0.6 f P
# stems:9 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 13
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Map of stems on plot 00001-01-0007
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:236 °
a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

# stems:9
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 14
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 8
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 00001-01-0008
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:Longitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Datum:
X-Axis bearing (deg):144
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Diospyros virginiana40 4.5 6.2 200.0 1.2 i R
Betula nigra41 4.1 3.5 83.0 g R
Diospyros virginiana42 2.9 6.6 170.0 0.3 d R
Diospyros virginiana43 4.7 1.3 182.0 1.2 j R
Quercus michauxii44 1.9 7.1 128.0 c R DBH?
Diospyros virginiana45 1.8 4.2 245.0 1.2 b R
Diospyros virginiana46 8.0 4.2 145.0 0.3 n R
Diospyros virginiana47 7.0 0.2 205.0 1.3 k R
Diospyros virginiana48 7.8 8.1 215.0 1.4 m R
Diospyros virginiana49 7.9 6.7 192.0 0.6 l R
Platanus occidentalis211 1.8 0.7 189.0 1.0 a R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica213 3.0 8.5 133.0 e R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis214 3.2 5.8 117.0 f R DBH?
Fraxinus pennsylvanica215 4.3 0.3 132.0 h R DBH?
Quercus michauxii411 4.6 1.2 90.0 j R
# stems:15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 15
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):00001-01-0008
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 00001-01-0008
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:144 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e

f

g

h

i

j

There are multiple stems represented by
some letters, shown in bold on the map.
# stems:15
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 16
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 8
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 00001-01-0009
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:Longitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Datum:
X-Axis bearing (deg):40
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis51 2.4 3.5 800.0 10.5 d R
Diospyros virginiana52 0.3 0.4 500.0 7.2 a R
Liriodendron tulipifera217 8.8 1.9 122.0 h R DBH?
Quercus michauxii218 9.3 4.4 162.0 0.5 i R
Quercus nigra219 9.4 5.6 180.0 0.5 j R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica222 7.1 8.5 235.0 1.2 f R
Quercus phellos223 7.2 5.8 131.0 g R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis224 6.9 1.4 230.0 0.9 e R
Betula nigra229 0.2 3.4 65.0 b R
Diospyros virginiana587 1.5 1.5 230.0 1.1 c R
# stems:10 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 17
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Map of stems on plot 00001-01-0009
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:40 °
a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:10
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 18
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 8
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 00001-01-0010
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:Longitude or UTM-E:
Latitude or UTM-N:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Datum:
X-Axis bearing (deg):140
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus phellos231 0.8 0.5 60.0 a R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica236 2.5 4.1 110.0 b R DBH?
Betula nigra238 6.7 1.4 Missingi R
Diospyros virginiana239 5.2 3.0 130.0 c R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis240 5.3 4.9 140.0 0.4 d R
Diospyros virginiana241 6.4 8.7 115.0 h R DBH?
Diospyros virginiana242 6.4 7.9 107.0 g R DBH?
Quercus phellos243 6.5 7.6 Missingf R
Diospyros virginiana244 6.4 7.4 160.0 0.3 e R
Platanus occidentalis245 7.0 5.8 160.0 0.8 j R
Platanus occidentalis247 8.2 1.6 170.0 0.4 m R
Platanus occidentalis248 9.2 5.3 190.0 1.0 n R
Platanus occidentalis249 8.1 7.6 126.0 k R DBH?
Diospyros virginiana250 8.0 8.2 110.0 l R DBH?
Diospyros virginiana251 9.7 8.8 131.0 p R DBH?
Diospyros virginiana252 9.5 9.0 110.0 o R DBH?
# stems:16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 19
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):00001-01-0010
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 00001-01-0010
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:140 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g

h

i

j

# stems:16
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 20
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019

APPENDIX E Photo Station Photos

Ezell Bank Site
Monitoring Year 7 Report
Granville County, North Carolina
EBX-13000
September 12, 2019

Photo Station Photos:

Photo Station 1: View facing 168SE

Photo Station 2: View facing 284NW

Photo Station 3: View facing 114SE

Photo Station 4: View facing 146SE

Photo Station 5: View facing 158SE

Photo Station 6: View facing 322NW

Photo Station 7: View facing 128SE

Photo Station 8: View facing 76E

Photo Station 9: View facing 194S

Photo Station 10: View facing 360N

Ezell Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 7 Monitoring Report• Granville County, North Carolina • September 2019

APPENDIX F 2016 Adaptive Management Plan

January 15, 2016

To: Katie Merritt
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality

From: Daniel Ingram
NC Regulatory Manager
Resource Environmental Solutions

Ezell Nutrient & Buffer Site Adaptive Management Plan
Understanding
Environmental Banc & Exchange is the bank sponsor and is an entity of Resource Environmental
Solutions (RES). As determined during Year 3 monitoring and stated in the letter received from
Karen Higgins (DWR) dated December 29th, 2015, The Ezell Bank Site is not in compliance with
the conservation easement and BPDP, and is not meeting project goals. This is primarily due to
lack of proper easement marking, pervasive easement encroachment, and mowing within the
easement. Some natural tree mortality may also be a contributing factor. RES is committed to
ensuring the successful implementation of the Ezell Bank Site and its long-term stewardship.
This adaptive management plan details how RES intends to enforce the conservation easement
measures and re-establish the vegetation to satisfy the goals stated in the BPDP.
Easement Marking
The previous easement markers have almost entirely been removed or damaged. RES will re-
establish all easement corners using the original survey and metal locator. A heavy metal
fencepost and easement boundary sign will be installed at each corner. Additionally, fence
posts and signs will be installed along the easement boundary at a maximum spacing of 150
feet. If easement encroachment continues to be an issue, then a continuous visual barrier (i.e.
horse tape) will be installed at the landowner’s expense. RES will monitor the integrity of the
easement boundary on a regular schedule described below.
Supplemental Planting
RES will provide supplemental planting in winter 2016 as indicated on the exhibit attached to the 12/29/15
DWR letter. In addition, RES will independently determine if any additional easement areas require
supplemental planting. All easement areas will be planted to a minimum 680 trees per acre. The
supplemental planting will be one year old bare root stock. Primary species will be early successional
species such as sycamore, river birch, green ash, and willow oak. All supplemental trees will be flagged for
identification.

10055 Red Run Blvd.
Suite 130
Owings Mills, MD
21117

412 N. 4th St.
Suite 300
Baton Rouge, LA
70802

100 Calhoun St.
Suite 320
Charleston, SC
29401

5020 Montrose Blvd.
Suite 650
Houston, TX
77006

1200 Camellia Blvd.
Suite 220
Lafayette, LA
70508

137½ East Main St.
Suite 210
Oak Hill, WV
25901

33 Terminal Way
Suite 431
Pittsburgh, PA
15219

302 Jefferson St.
Suite 110
Raleigh, NC
27605

1521 W. Main
2nd Floor
Richmond, VA
23220

2

In high –visibility areas and areas with past encroachment issues RES will plant a row of three-gallon
container trees along the easement boundary to provide a clear visual easement boundary for the
landowners. The row of container trees will have a maximum spacing of 20 feet.
Supplemental Monitoring
Due to the history of landowner encroachment on the Ezell Bank Site, RES will conduct site visits a
minimum of once every eight weeks to document the integrity of the easement boundary. A brief
memorandum will be transmitted to DWR (Katie Merritt) and NCWHF (Matthew Harrell) documenting each
site visit and describing any encroachment issues. All monitoring plots will be re-established with corner
posts and tree stakes. Tree survival monitoring will be conducted in spring following leaf-out. Annual CVS
vegetation monitoring will be conducted in the fall to determine planted stem density, re-sprouts,
volunteer species, and height.
The severity of the easement encroachment necessitates monitoring beyond the original five years
specified in the BPDP. RES proposes to provide two years of additional monitoring (through 2019 growing
season). If at that time all vegetation plots exceed 320 TPA and median tree height exceeds one meter, no
additional monitoring will be performed. If those criteria are not met in Year 7, RES will perform an
additional year of monitoring to document the density of at least 320 TPA across the site.
Landowner Communication
RES has met with the current landowners (Bruce and Laura Howerton) and clearly communicated the
severity of the easement encroachment issue. The owners have been instructed to cease all activities in
the easement unless clearly allowable in the easement language (passive recreation). Further, RES
transmitted a letter from our legal counsel informing the Howertons that they will be held liable for future
easement encroachments and interference with mitigation activities. The Howertons acknowledged their
role in the encroachment and have verbally agreed to cease all “maintenance” activities and not disturb any
markers, stakes, or vegetation. As part of the landowner communication, RES has set-up a site visit
schedule (every 8 weeks) to inform the Howertons when we intend to be on-site.
RES has communicated with the NCWHF stewardship staff to ensure they are aware of all landowner
communication and in a position to successfully implement stewardship. RES will coordinate a meeting
with NCWHF staff and the Howertons to set expectations for long-term stewardship. All communication
between RES, NCWHF, and the landowners will submitted to DWR in the annual monitoring reports.
Modified Credit Release Schedule
Activity Release
Total
Released
Credits
All activity through 2014 Monitoring (Year 2) 75% 75%
2016 Monitoring 8% 85%
2017 5% 90%
2018 5% 95%
2019 5% 98%
2020 (if needed) and/or Close-out 2% 100%