20110720 Ver 2_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20190917

ID#* 20110720
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review
Completed Date
09/18/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/17/201, -
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r— Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
Existing 20110720
(DWR) (nunbers only no dash)
ID#:*
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Cedar Grove
County: Orange
Document Information
r Yes r
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing 2
Version: (nun-bersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Cedar Grove Bank Parcel _MY5_Report.pdf 17.29MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:

CEDAR GROVE MITIGATION SITE
Orange County, NC
Bank Parcel Development Plan Monitoring Year 5 Report
DWR Project # 11-0720v2
Issue Date: September 2019

Submitted By:
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Prepared By:

Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

i
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Project Location and Description ..................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2
2.0 Project Area – Pre-Construction Condition Summary ............................................................................ 2
3.0 Bank Site Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Restoration Plan ............................................................................................................................... 3
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots ............................................................................................................ 3
3.3 Photo Stations ................................................................................................................................... 4
4.0 Monitoring Conditions ............................................................................................................................ 4
5.0 Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation ........................................................................... 5 Appendix A: Site Maps Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2.1: Conservation Easement Area Figure 2.2: Vegetation Plot and Photo Station Monitoring Locations Figure 2.3: Neuse Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Areas Figure 2.4: BPDP Neuse Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Areas Figure 3: As-Built Exhibit Figure 4: Cedar Grove Stream Mitigation Plan Map Appendix B: Photo Stations Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data Table 1: Plant Species Summary Table 2: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table Table 3: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Appendix E: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets

1
1.0 Introduction 1.1 Project Location and Description
Located off of McDade Store Road (NCSR 1354), northwest of its intersection with Rick Road in Orange
County, North Carolina (Figure 1), is the Upper Neuse buffer and nutrient offset mitigation site currently
known as Cedar Grove Mitigation Site (Site). The Site is located approximately 0.8 miles southwest of the
intersection of McDade Store Road and State Route 86 and approximately 0.7 miles northeast of the
intersection McDade Store Road and Efland Cedar Grove Road.

The tract containing the Site is approximately 131.5 acres, which includes area within the right- of-way
along its frontage of McDade Store Road. A 60.14 acre conservation easement protects the Site. Within the
conservation easement, existing riparian areas have been restored and enhanced to generate both Neuse
buffer and nutrient offset (nitrogen and phosphorus) credits in the Falls Lake Watershed. In addition, the
dimension, pattern, and profile of existing perennial and intermittent stream channels located within the
conservation easement have been restored at the Site in accordance with the approved stream mitigation
plan approved by the Interagency Review Team (IRT). The As-Built design of the Cedar Grove Stream
Mitigation Bank site is shown in Figures 2.3 and 3. Please refer to Table 1, below, for additional
information regarding buffer restoration, buffer enhancement, and nutrient offset credits proposed within
this Site.

The Site is located within the Upper Falls Lake watershed in the Neuse River Basin (8-digit USGS HUC
03020201, 12-digit USGS HUC 03020201 0301), more specifically within Neuse Sub-basin 03-04-01.
Stormwater runoff from this site drains into the East Fork Eno River (Stream Index #27-2-3), which is
located in the northeastern section of the Site. According to the N.C. Division of Water Quality Basinwide
Information Management System (BIMS), the East Fork Eno River is classified as WS-II (Water Supply
II), HQW (High Quality Waters), and NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters). The WS-II classification is for
“waters used as sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes which are
generally in predominantly undeveloped watersheds”. HQW is a “supplemental classification intended to
protect waters that are rated excellent based on biological and physical/chemical characteristics” while
the NSW designation is for “Nutrient Sensitive Waters”. The purpose of this Site is to improve water quality
within the Neuse River Basin, specifically the Falls Lake watershed, by providing off-site mitigation for
development (both existing and proposed) requiring stream buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 and nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240. Nutrient offset credits can only be
provided to offset nutrient loads in the Upper and Lower Falls Lake Watersheds of the 03020201 HUC.

This Site is established under the terms and conditions of the EBX Upper Neuse Riparian Buffer and
Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank), signed on February 10, 2012, made and entered into by
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX), a subsidiaryy of Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
(RES), acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality (DWR). Annual monitoring activities and monitoring
reports were performed by RES.

2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals of this buffer and nutrient offset mitigation project are:

- Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed tributaries of
the Neuse River by reducing nutrient and sediment loads into the streams caused by
development and agricultural influences.
- Improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation easement.
- Provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributaries to the East Fork Eno River and
associated riparian and upland buffers

These goals were met through the following objectives:

- Establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the Bank Site.
- Reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Parcel through chemical
methods.
- Establishing a conservation easement to provide long-term protection for the Bank Site.
- Donation of the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity, to an accredited or
approved land trust or stewardship program.
2.0 Project Area – Pre-Construction Condition Summary
The majority of the existing riparian areas within the Site were considered maintained/disturbed and
cultivated lands that have, historically, been a maintained golf course, which included fairways, greenways,
driving range, and maintained fields. The Neuse riparian buffer area width within the maintained/disturbed
and cultivated land areas were less than 50 feet in some instances prior to mitigation work activities. As
part of buffer mitigation, Neuse buffers would be restored out to a minimum of 50 feet. Other riparian areas
which extended 51 feet to a maximum of 200 feet on both sides of the bankfull elevation of each restored
stream bank were planted and described as nutrient offset areas and are shown on Figure 2.4. These areas
were ripped and scarified prior to vegetation planting activities. Existing grasses were mowed and treated
with herbicide to reduce competition with planted species. Where necessary, invasive species were also
treated with herbicide to ensure they do not become dominant, or hinder the establishment, growth and
survival of planted vegetation.

In addition to maintained/disturbed and cultivated land areas within the Site, there were existing forested
riparian areas which had been selectively timbered. Significant portions of the secondary understory within
these existing forested riparian areas had been cleared. Riparian buffer enhancement was considered for
these forested areas that are within 50 feet of the stream, but lacking adequate stem counts. Riparian buffer
enhancement is defined as the process of converting a sparsely woody vegetated area (greater than or equal
to 100 trees per acre but less than 200 trees per acre that are greater than or equal to five inches diameter at
breast height (dbh) for trees and greater than two feet in height for shrubs) to a forested riparian buffer area
(15A NCAC 02B .0233 (2)(m)). Nuisance and exotic vegetation are not included in the stem count.

3
3.0 Bank Site Conditions 3.1 Restoration Plan
Stream restoration and enhancement construction activities at the Bank Site were completed in early May
2015 in accordance with the Cedar Grove Stream Mitigation Plan approved by the IRT. Neuse riparian
buffers and other riparian areas were planted on May 13, 2015. Construction activities included Priority I
stream restoration, stream enhancement, bank stabilization, and installation of stream structures. Removal
of golf course cart paths, draining and filling ponds, and planting Neuse riparian buffers (0-50’) and other
riparian areas (51-200’) within the conservation area were also completed. Monitoring devices were
installed post-construction which included 12 photo stations and 12 vegetation plots. On June 15, 2015,
DWR staff conducted an on-site visit to inspect the As-Built conditions of the buffer mitigation and nutrient
offset areas. Based on DWR’s findings at the site visit, approximately 4.22 acres of planted riparian areas
were removed from the creditable acreage for the bank. Originally, Neuse riparian buffers and other riparian
areas were proposed within Conservation Easement Area 3 along Ponds A and B as well as stream UT6
(Figure 2.4). These areas are considered not subject to generate credit and account for the 4.22 acres
removed from the creditable acreage for the bank (Figure 3).

Abandoned golf course fairway areas within the conservation easement were bush-hogged and scarified
prior to vegetation planting activities. The established microtopography on level surfaces has promoted
diffuse flow and surface water storage. In addition, subsurface hardpans were eliminated to promote
vegetation growth and survival and to increase groundwater recharge rates. Where necessary, invasive
species were treated with herbicide to ensure they do not become dominant within the Bank Site, or hinder
the establishment, growth and survival of planted vegetation.

The Cedar Grove Bank Site was planted with bare root seedlings consisting of species previously observed
on the Bank Site and selected species known to inhabit Dry Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest community type as
described in Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley, 1990).
Table 1 (Appendix C) provides a listing of planted species and a summary of total stems planted at the
Bank Site. A total of 28,200 individual stems, or 787 stems per acre, were planted within the Bank Site,
which is slightly above the desired 680 stems per acre. A total of 3,000 live stakes were also planted along
streams banks to provide bank stability and aquatic cover as required per the stream mitigation plan
approved by the IRT.

The planted species were a mixture of hardwood tree species consistent with those found within a Basic
Dry Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest in the Piedmont. Plant composition consisted of 10 tree species. Temporary
and permanent native herbaceous seed mix was applied simultaneously to the nutrient offset restoration
areas within the Bank Site area. Temporary seed provided cover until the permanent seed applied became
established. Temporary cover consisted of millet (Echinochloa crusgalli), annual rye grain (Secale cereale),
and crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum). Permanent ground cover consisted of switchgrass (Panicum
virgatum), deertongue (Panicum clandestinman), black-eyed susan (Rudbeckia hirta), and riverbank
wildrye (Elymus riparius).

3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC permanently installed 12 vegetation plots for vegetation
monitoring purposes. The locations of each vegetation plot are depicted on Figure 2.2 (Appendix A). The
vegetation plots were randomly setup throughout the Bank Site and each are 100 square meters in size (10
meter by 10 meter square plots). Vegetation monitoring was conducted in general accordance to CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS-EEP, v4.2). Table 2 (Appendix C) provides a success summary
for each vegetation monitoring plot. As a result of DWR’s site visit on June 15, 2015 and the removal of

4
4.22 acres from the bank, Vegetation Plot #1 does not require monitoring. However, all 12 vegetation
monitoring plots were monitored throughout the monitoring period. Vegetation Plot #1 monitoring data
was reported; however, it has been discarded from the site’s overall stems/acre average and was not counted
towards the success criteria.

Monitoring Year 5 field activities were conducted in September 2019. Based on the Year 5 vegetation
monitoring data, 11 of the required 11 vegetation monitoring plots met the interim success criteria. The
Site’s overall average Year 5 planted stems per acre is 570 excluding Vegetation Plot #1. The Site’s overall
average Year 5 total stems per acre including volunteer species is 1,059 excluding Vegetation Plot #1
(Table 2, Appendix C). Table 3 (Appendix C) provides a more detailed summary of stem counts and the
type of planted species within each vegetation monitoring plot. The survival of planted stems per acre
during monitoring Year 5 ranges from 324 to 931 stems per acre. The overall average stem height excluding
Vegetation Plot #1 was 8.2 feet.

Photographs of each vegetation monitoring plot are located in Appendix D. Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheets are provided in Appendix E. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheet provides the
measurements, location, and vigor of each planted tree within the vegetation monitoring plots. 3.3 Photo Stations
Photo documentation is a key essential to monitoring the success criteria of the Bank Site. Photographs
provide a visual representation of the onsite vegetation conditions. RES installed 12 permanent photo
stations for future annual monitoring purposes. The locations of each photo station are depicted on Figures
2.2 (Appendix A). Photographs for the photo stations are located in Appendix B. 4.0 Monitoring Conditions
The Site is finished with monitoring pending approval by DWR. The Site is performing as planned and has
met its success criteria. Overall the site’s vegetation has developed into an established stream buffer. An
abundant amount of herbaceous ground cover as well as volunteer trees species were present during Year
5 monitoring activities. No major problems or areas of concern were noted during Year 5 monitoring
activities on the Cedar Grove Bank Site. Vegetation Plot 6 and the area around it was replanted with 200
three-gallon container trees in late April 2019. The vegetation plot met success in Year 5 and the survival
around it is high. Additionally, the low stem density areas in the pond bottoms that were replanted in 2018
were visually inspected in Year 5 and appear successful.

The Cedar Grove Bank Site contains 12 vegetative monitoring plots, 11 of which were monitored and
reported for success criteria in general accordance with the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
(CVS-EEP, v4.2). Twelve 10 by 10-meter square plots were permanently established following completion
of the planting phase and at least two opposing corners have been permanently installed and surveyed for
future use. The plant species, density, survival rates, and the cause of mortality, if identifiable, have been
recorded within each plot. Twelve vegetation plots were sampled and reported; however, vegetation plot
#1 has been discarded from the site’s overall stems/acre average and is not counted towards the success
criteria. Success criteria will be generated from vegetation monitoring plots 2 – 12. The primary focus of
the vegetative monitoring will be solely on the tree stratum, although shrub and herbaceous species
encountered may also be recorded, but will not be counted towards the success criteria.

Within Neuse buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas, success criteria was based on the survival of a
minimum density of 320 trees per acre after five years of monitoring. Within Neuse buffer enhancement
areas, success criteria was based on a minimum of at least two tree species at an average density of 320
trees per acre following five years of monitoring. Year 5 vegetation monitoring activities occurred in

5
September 2019. As of Monitoring Year 5, the Cedar Grove Bank Site yields 570 planted stems per acre
and 1,059 total stems per acre counting volunteer species. The Site is performing as designed and has met
Year 5 success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. The site has met all Year 5 monitoring requirements
and is recommended for closeout.
5.0 Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
The Cedar Grove Site provides Neuse buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits for development impacts
within the Neuse River Basin USGS HUC 03020201, specifically the Falls Lake watershed (Figure 1). Of
the 60.14 acres conservation easement (Figure 3), approximately 39.43 acres will be dedicated to Neuse
buffer restoration / enhancement and nutrient offset restoration. A Neuse buffer restoration area of 14.46
acres (629,616 sf) was used to generate 14.46 acres (629,616 sf) of Neuse buffer credits. A Neuse buffer
enhancement area of 0.75 acres (32,611 sf) was used to generate 0.25 acres (10,870 sf) (enhancement area
divide by 3) of Neuse buffer credits. Therefore, a total of 14.71 acres (640,486 sf) of Neuse buffer credit
was generated. The remaining 24.22 acres of riparian restoration area within the Site (i.e. areas outside of
the Neuse buffer) provided nutrient offset credits for nitrogen and phosphorus. The Site provides 55,052.54
pounds of Nitrogen Nutrient Offset credit and 3,545.81 pounds of Phosphorous Nutrient Offset credit.
Table 1 provides a summary of mitigation credit for the Site. Table 1: Mitigation Credit Summary
NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION/ENHANCEMENT
Conservation Area Neuse River Buffer (Acres)
Restoration Enhancement
1 1.37 (59,503 sf) 0.00
2 3.02 (131,551 sf) 0.75 (32,611 sf)
3 10.07 (438,562 sf) 0.00
TOTAL ACERAGE 14.46 (629,616 sf) 0.75 (32,611 sf)
RATIO 1:1 3:1
TOTAL CREDITS 14.46 (629,616 sf) 0.25 (10,870 sf)
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION
Conservation Area Nutrient Offset
Restoration (Acres)
Nitrogen Credit
(2,273.02 lbs/ac)
Phosphorus Credit
(146.4 lbs/ac)
1 2.69 6,114.42 393.82
2 7.14 16,229.36 1,045.30
3 14.39 32,708.76 2,106.70
TOTAL 24.22 55,052.54 3,545.81

6
6.0 References

Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) 2004. Guidelines for Riparian Buffer
Restoration. Available at internet site: http://www.nceep.net/news/reports/buffers.pdf. Accessed
August 2009.

Schafale MP and AS Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.

APPENDIX A Site Maps

03020201
03010104
NC 8
6
Ef
land
-Cedar
Grove
RdCompton RdAllison RdCaviness Jordan RdLees Chapel Rd
Hawkins RdHurdle Mills RdOakley Rd McDade Store RdCarr Stor
e

R
d Rick RdOli
n

R
dStewart Farm RdMcCullough Rd
Cedar Va
l
ley
RdToms Creek LoopCarr Store Rd
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
0 2,0001,000
Feet
FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP
CEDAR GROVE MITIGATION SITE
ORANGE COUNTY, NC
Legend
Roads
Cedar Grove Streams
Cedar Grove Mitigation Site
HUC Boundary
©Date: 6/9/2015
Drawn by: BSH
Document Path: E:\RES Files\Cedar Grove\CADD\GIS\MXD\BPDP As Built Figures\Figure 1. Site Location Map.mxdCedar Grove Mitigation Site
Rick RdMcDade Store RdCompton RdParticipating NC Counties, NCCGIA, NC OneMap, US EPA, NC OneMap, NC
Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board
0 500250
Feet
FIGURE 2.1 - CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA MAP
CEDAR GROVE MITIGATION SITE
ORANGE COUNTY, NC
Legend
Roads
Cedar Grove Streams
Cedar Grove Mitigation Site
County Boundaries
Parcels
©Date: 6/19/2015
Drawn by: BSH
Document Path: E:\RES Files\Cedar Grove\CADD\GIS\MXD\BPDP As Built Figures\Figure 2.1 Conservation Easement Area Map.mxdEast Fork
Eno River
UT1
UT3
UT4
UT2
UT2
UT5
PS-5
PS-4
PS-3
PS-2
PS-1
PS-6
PS-7
PS-8
PS-9
PS-10PS-11
PS-12 VP 1 VP 2
VP 6
VP 3
VP 4
VP 5
VP 7
VP 8VP 9
VP 10
VP 11 VP 12
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
©
0 400200
Feet
Figure 2.2
Cedar Grove MY5 2019
Vegetation Plot andPhoto Station Location Map
LEGEND
Date: 9/16/2019 Drawn by: RTM
Document Path: S:\@RES Projects\North Carolina\Neu-Con UMBI\Cedar Grove\monitoring\Monitoring Data\MY5 - 2019\GIS\MXD\DWR Maps\Figure 2.2 - Cedar Grove- VP and Photo Station Map.mxdConservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
>320 stems/acre
2019 Replant Area
^_Photo Station
Stream Restoration
Source: 2017 NC OneMap Aerial Imagery
Latitude: 36.195740 Longitude: -79.160346
Vegetation Condition Assessment
AbsentPresentMarginal
Absent
Present
Target Community
Invasive SpeciesNo Fill
Rick RdMcDade Store RdNC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board©0300150FeetFIGURE 2.3NEUSE BUFFER & NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREAS CEDAR GROVE MITIGATION SITEORANGE COUNTY, NCLEGENDCedar Grove Mitigation SiteRoadsTop of BankBuffer Restoration AreaBuffer Enhancement AreaNutrient Offset AreaDate: 6/19/2015Drawn by: BSHDocument Path: E:\RES Files\Cedar Grove\CADD\GIS\MXD\BPDP As Built Figures\Figure 2.3 Neuse Buffer Nutrient Restoartion Areas Map.mxdEnhancement1020.75 (32,611 sf)30TOTAL ACERAGE0.75 (32,611 sf)RATIO3:1TOTAL CREDITS0.25 (10,870 sf)Conservation AreaNutrient Offset Restoration (Acres)Nitrogen Credit (2,273.02 lbs/ac)Phosphorus Credit (146.4 lbs/ac)12.696,114.42393.8227.1416,229.36 1,045.30314.3932,708.76 2,106.70TOTAL24.2255,052.54 3,545.8110.07 (438,562 sf)14.46 (629,616 sf)1:114.46 (629,616 sf)NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATIONNEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION/ENHANCEMENTConservation AreaNeuse River Buffer (Acres)Restoration1.37 (59,503 sf)3.02 (131,551 sf)Conservation Area #1Conservation Area #2Conservation Area #3Conservation Area #3
xxxxxxxxxxxx'JHVSF

1357
VICINITY MAP
(NGT TO SCS )
NOTES.,
7. NO NO 4 AWYO AAgA MENTS WERE LOCATED W)7HW
2070. Or TMS PROPERTY.
2. ALL 067ANCE'S ARE HORIZONTAL GROUNB
MElSUREAOEN75 AN FEET & DELYMALS WEMA Or,
UNLESS OTHERWif$E NOTFD-
3. NO UlXfTIES ARE SHOWN ON TMS SV' RYEY.
LEGEND
A/W y RIGHT OF WAY
CfL LEN rERLINE
An EXISRNG IRON STAkE
EP = EX67ING IRAN PAPE
EAfN . DZ7WS MG NAR
EPK = EX67NC PK k4L
ERAS r EXSTWG RAILROAD SPIRE
EATI = EASUNG AXLE
NP$ NO POW), SET
0 • NO POWT SET
(TLj .71E UNE
(ECJ = CONTRaL CORNER
NIP- ,. NOW OR FARMER' -Y
---- = ADVOWNG PROPERTY LINE
PE LINE TABLE
FLOOD STATEMENT
fAX A' TO NPS 14"
rMS PROPERTY IS 4LOCA70 W ZONE •X 8AE'
LEVE
BEARING
LhGtANL•E
L-98
41'
0-97
N }6-2957" E
40.45'
L-98
N 85"36'x0" E
32.07'
073 MN -ES PROW ERRSS ALONG
OF MCMOE STORE RO {NCSR
RYTERSECTIDN OF ACC. NWY. 86
SOURCE OF ITTLE A -
OB 5323, PG 798
AB r r0. PG 142 I
1
� 7 I
111111
►11
I �
1 1
I r e1
I, I
I
rrr ffr /
le
/rrr'
rrrr rsry/'y{rJ
r �1
r�` r
UT 5
ST
I
N
G
PARCE LINES rf' rr s
69 ,
p
rrr rr�Q.
r/.
EAz 323, L LLC
l rr OB 5323, PC 198 11 fi f
rr r
AREA
A
nREA r A , f
W�.p�I/r I A'Sa
1 �
I �m.�ww V 1f F'f
ry f
A
DB 7 5, P
DG 242
PB 55, PC 727 •A{ f`/% -
W /f
61
EA° S 8750'48" W
i CHgNNING P. McOADE I
I DB 5209, PC 394 '
P6 109. PO B
U76
POND POND
1
� VI
�^ L7 Ev MELSE 6 LLC
OB 53236 FV" 998
PARCEL LWE___ _____-LtlT
(800K 710, PAC£ lw;J LOT Z
EBX MUSE d LLC
DB 5313 PG 198
POND
SJI&LHNY
EAST FDRK
ENO AVER
COMSERIM DON FA5E7 /3
AIARGERET S ANDE'RS'AM HEARS
w_r_3T2
DB 827, PG 1584
FLOOD STATEMENT
rMS PROPERTY IS 4LOCA70 W ZONE •X 8AE'
UT I
AND 6 PAATL7LiY LOCATED WITHIN A SPEGNL FLOOD
HAZARD AREA AS DETERMINED BY NRP RATE A61Y'
U6rED FEaWbVrr 2 20072001 : COLtllUM7Y PANft
370.342-9858--J d 370342-9859-J,
CONSERVATIONNiAVBfAS
EASEMENT /3
I
I
N/F
AMRGERET S ANDERSON HEL@.5
9D -E--312
OB 227, PG 7.554
U76
POND POND
1
� VI
�^ L7 Ev MELSE 6 LLC
OB 53236 FV" 998
PARCEL LWE___ _____-LtlT
(800K 710, PAC£ lw;J LOT Z
EBX MUSE d LLC
DB 5313 PG 198
POND
SJI&LHNY
EAST FDRK
ENO AVER
COMSERIM DON FA5E7 /3
AIARGERET S ANDE'RS'AM HEARS
w_r_3T2
DB 827, PG 1584
JOSEPH W. Cawrm JR.
AMVE E CAWPtGN
DB 870, PC 328
PB 25, PG 24
rr • /•� rf �/• / __ tar ` - %r - //• - - �-,� ,- ,.ti. � �, ,� . w-„
!/ // /r �• �_ rOrr2 l //ff L -r5 67,16,07- .
7-w 18' L-J'871-25W"W 759.95'
L- 16 s 713759- w 5933, L-� 55'M24'' 52'
co7� L -n N>ssro2-w 912.4o L-40 S 7
ir_1O'1&7
L-16 N 0213 • E 94.71• L-41 N .
L-19 N 3'!6' r s L-42 ^ W la5gr,
- //j// --� - /f � � ► L-20 L-43 N 4'}5'2 • W 89.38'
L-21 -48' L-44 N '21" W 79-54'
-22 N • E 784-911' L-45 N 16.08'20" £ 12,67,87'
L- ryy /,/ff 5.5
1 L-23 N 7 .21 E r 1978or'
/t; f/•�/f/�/f/ 2? / - / r� IIVVIIllr11
$$1Lf rrr L JAMES F M61iSOk, PROFES5107i<L LAND SURWYW NO. 471.2
Y rr
ARFA Y I % %// �! ./ff y JOSEPH W. COAR-MV., JR. $ • p "Y .
�e 4 Y cERrE�Y TMT THIS SuAVEs' 1s OF ANOTHER cArEGoxr ro Orr,•
Ur 2 4 jJ///./. /// / 1 A}W F E CouprAv : � SEAL e. - AN £xcmrroru TO nr£ DE7rnvmAN of susaursKlrL
ff/ f % as 870, 2.% 24 Pc r y_;T12 0;
PB 2s, Pc 24
/ COA5EY7YA TION EASEMENT /2 . //ff% f ur J %F//qs i0At�j�`� ��L-47F2
la LE STATE OF NORM CARLXM �vwcE COUNTY ACCRR£AAGE DAACBY COMPuAGE�TA
ABX NEUSE I, LLC I
DS 5323 PC 198 { JAMES R. WATSON CERRFY TH47 THIS _ CON ERVA N EASEMENT (C.C.)-LMS N07 SURVEYED
Ew NEU5E 1 LLC `71 f q Pf.41 WlS DRAWN UTJnER ABY SUPERHSION FROM AN AMMO
DB 5323 PG 198 ¢ 1+ r.i SURVEY ANO£ UMBER A7 5OP£RvaYOnp (DEED DwCA1P110N CE /2 a 14,21 ACRESf
C.F. jU = 40.91 ACRES±
RECORDED AN ANP k DEED BOOKS NtlTEOJ; rrNr THF TOTAL AREA W CX. - 60-14 ACRES'3
�1 J BOUNMRIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY WRD ATE'O AS DRAWN
FROM 1NFOR94TKAN REFERENCED REREM,,• THAT THE RAW �� NUTRIENT OFFSET PMVRAt9W AREA
CONSEAVArION EASEMENT /r J%ff/ / %/ CA16ER1+ArION OF PREC75FON As G1LCUlRrEp 1S 1: fO.000f: TMT Tlils Pur WrTHIN GE ,/7 2.69 AARESf
EASEMENT 1.3 WIS PREPARE6 IN ACGOROANCE WRN G.s 47-30 As N7IAAV CS /2 = 7.14 ACRESt
__�_-�--r58T50'ZS•w»
ULfN F PAPE
DB 1664, PC 60
JOHN F- POPE
OB 166A PG 150
AS -BUILT EXHIBIT
FOR
CEDAR GROVE MI TI GA TION SITE
BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DOR-PROJECT #11-0720V2
CEDAR GROVE TOWNSHIP JUNE 15. 2015
ORANGE COUNTY. N.C. SCALE: I " = 200'
200' 100' 0 200' 400'
GRAPHIC SCALE
` AMENOM WINESS MY ORA54DW SKAA6ATURC. R£CISTR WN W77Mw CIE /3 . 14-39 ACRES±
I[ NUMBER AND SEAL THIS 15W MY OF aw A.D.. TOW AREA 24.22 ACRES*
2015. ®e MEUSE 6UFFER RESMRA71W AWA
' N9YAIA1 C.E /1 . 1.37 ACRES'f (5SS503 Sq. FT.tJ
W111IIN C -E: /2 3.02 ACRES* {131,551 SO-
WITNAV C.E. /3 - MO? O7 AARES1 (4.1&562Ll SR f7.f}
L-4712 TOTAL AREA 14.46 ACEESi
" NEUSE SUFFER adMANC£MENT AREA
LAVE TABLE WUHhV ACRES
WFFHhv CE �2 a 0.75 ACRES± (32,611 SR hT.tJ
COA5ERIAiWN EASEMENT WITH81 at. /.3 •+ 0-00 ACRES
LAVE' - 9EARpVC TNS7ANCE11 LJNF Bfa71NG LYSrANLF TOTAL AREA a 0.75 ACRES# (32,1511 50. FT:.#)
,;. MATRIX EAST, PLLC
$., PROFE5SIOWIL LAND SURVEYORS
906 N. OUEEN ST.. SUITE A KINSTON. NC 285tH
TEL [phone] FA%: 252--522-4747
FIRM LIC- ] P-0221 EMAIL: surveyor®motriwe st-net
DRAWN BY: JRW PROJECT NO.: 20140036
SURVEYED BY., .IAS/DGf DATE: 6-15-15
SCALE: T" = 200' ORAIYING NAME. BUFFERS
I
UT I
I
I �
$
I
I
I
5�
x
JOSEPH W. Cawrm JR.
AMVE E CAWPtGN
DB 870, PC 328
PB 25, PG 24
rr • /•� rf �/• / __ tar ` - %r - //• - - �-,� ,- ,.ti. � �, ,� . w-„
!/ // /r �• �_ rOrr2 l //ff L -r5 67,16,07- .
7-w 18' L-J'871-25W"W 759.95'
L- 16 s 713759- w 5933, L-� 55'M24'' 52'
co7� L -n N>ssro2-w 912.4o L-40 S 7
ir_1O'1&7
L-16 N 0213 • E 94.71• L-41 N .
L-19 N 3'!6' r s L-42 ^ W la5gr,
- //j// --� - /f � � ► L-20 L-43 N 4'}5'2 • W 89.38'
L-21 -48' L-44 N '21" W 79-54'
-22 N • E 784-911' L-45 N 16.08'20" £ 12,67,87'
L- ryy /,/ff 5.5
1 L-23 N 7 .21 E r 1978or'
/t; f/•�/f/�/f/ 2? / - / r� IIVVIIllr11
$$1Lf rrr L JAMES F M61iSOk, PROFES5107i<L LAND SURWYW NO. 471.2
Y rr
ARFA Y I % %// �! ./ff y JOSEPH W. COAR-MV., JR. $ • p "Y .
�e 4 Y cERrE�Y TMT THIS SuAVEs' 1s OF ANOTHER cArEGoxr ro Orr,•
Ur 2 4 jJ///./. /// / 1 A}W F E CouprAv : � SEAL e. - AN £xcmrroru TO nr£ DE7rnvmAN of susaursKlrL
ff/ f % as 870, 2.% 24 Pc r y_;T12 0;
PB 2s, Pc 24
/ COA5EY7YA TION EASEMENT /2 . //ff% f ur J %F//qs i0At�j�`� ��L-47F2
la LE STATE OF NORM CARLXM �vwcE COUNTY ACCRR£AAGE DAACBY COMPuAGE�TA
ABX NEUSE I, LLC I
DS 5323 PC 198 { JAMES R. WATSON CERRFY TH47 THIS _ CON ERVA N EASEMENT (C.C.)-LMS N07 SURVEYED
Ew NEU5E 1 LLC `71 f q Pf.41 WlS DRAWN UTJnER ABY SUPERHSION FROM AN AMMO
DB 5323 PG 198 ¢ 1+ r.i SURVEY ANO£ UMBER A7 5OP£RvaYOnp (DEED DwCA1P110N CE /2 a 14,21 ACRESf
C.F. jU = 40.91 ACRES±
RECORDED AN ANP k DEED BOOKS NtlTEOJ; rrNr THF TOTAL AREA W CX. - 60-14 ACRES'3
�1 J BOUNMRIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY WRD ATE'O AS DRAWN
FROM 1NFOR94TKAN REFERENCED REREM,,• THAT THE RAW �� NUTRIENT OFFSET PMVRAt9W AREA
CONSEAVArION EASEMENT /r J%ff/ / %/ CA16ER1+ArION OF PREC75FON As G1LCUlRrEp 1S 1: fO.000f: TMT Tlils Pur WrTHIN GE ,/7 2.69 AARESf
EASEMENT 1.3 WIS PREPARE6 IN ACGOROANCE WRN G.s 47-30 As N7IAAV CS /2 = 7.14 ACRESt
__�_-�--r58T50'ZS•w»
ULfN F PAPE
DB 1664, PC 60
JOHN F- POPE
OB 166A PG 150
AS -BUILT EXHIBIT
FOR
CEDAR GROVE MI TI GA TION SITE
BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DOR-PROJECT #11-0720V2
CEDAR GROVE TOWNSHIP JUNE 15. 2015
ORANGE COUNTY. N.C. SCALE: I " = 200'
200' 100' 0 200' 400'
GRAPHIC SCALE
` AMENOM WINESS MY ORA54DW SKAA6ATURC. R£CISTR WN W77Mw CIE /3 . 14-39 ACRES±
I[ NUMBER AND SEAL THIS 15W MY OF aw A.D.. TOW AREA 24.22 ACRES*
2015. ®e MEUSE 6UFFER RESMRA71W AWA
' N9YAIA1 C.E /1 . 1.37 ACRES'f (5SS503 Sq. FT.tJ
W111IIN C -E: /2 3.02 ACRES* {131,551 SO-
WITNAV C.E. /3 - MO? O7 AARES1 (4.1&562Ll SR f7.f}
L-4712 TOTAL AREA 14.46 ACEESi
" NEUSE SUFFER adMANC£MENT AREA
LAVE TABLE WUHhV ACRES
WFFHhv CE �2 a 0.75 ACRES± (32,611 SR hT.tJ
COA5ERIAiWN EASEMENT WITH81 at. /.3 •+ 0-00 ACRES
LAVE' - 9EARpVC TNS7ANCE11 LJNF Bfa71NG LYSrANLF TOTAL AREA a 0.75 ACRES# (32,1511 50. FT:.#)
,;. MATRIX EAST, PLLC
$., PROFE5SIOWIL LAND SURVEYORS
906 N. OUEEN ST.. SUITE A KINSTON. NC 285tH
TEL [phone] FA%: 252--522-4747
FIRM LIC- ] P-0221 EMAIL: surveyor®motriwe st-net
DRAWN BY: JRW PROJECT NO.: 20140036
SURVEYED BY., .IAS/DGf DATE: 6-15-15
SCALE: T" = 200' ORAIYING NAME. BUFFERS

999'JHVSF
4USFBN
.JUJHBUJPO
1MBO
.BQ

APPENDIX B Photo Stations

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Appendix B.
Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 1

Photo Station 1 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 1 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 1 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 1 West (5/9/2019)

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 2

Photo Station 2 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 2 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 2 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 2 West (5/9/2019)

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 3

Photo Station 3 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 3 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 3 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 3 West (5/9/2019)

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 4

Photo Station 4 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 4 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 4 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 4 West (5/9/2019)

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 5

Photo Station 5 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 5 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 5 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 5 West (5/9/2019)

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 6

Photo Station 6 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 6 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 6 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 6 West (5/9/2019)

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 7

Photo Station 7 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 7 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 7 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 7 West (5/9/2019)

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 8

Photo Station 8 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 8 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 8 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 8 West (5/9/2019)

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 9

Photo Station 9 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 9 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 9 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 9 West (5/9/2019)

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 10

Photo Station 10 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 10 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 10 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 10 West (5/9/2019)

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 11

Photo Station 11 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 11 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 11 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 11 West (5/9/2019)

 Appendix B. Photo Stations

Cedar Grove Photo Stations

Photo Station 12

Photo Station 12 North (5/9/2019)

Photo Station 12 South (5/9/2019)
Photo Station 12 East (5/9/2019) Photo Station 12 West (5/9/2019)

APPENDIX C Vegetation Assessment Data

  Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 1. Planted Species Summary
Planted Date: May 13, 2015
Scientific Name Common Name
Species
Type
Total Stems
Planted
Betula nigra River Birch Bare Root 4,000
Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud Bare Root 200
Liriodendron tulipifera Tuliptree Bare Root 4,000
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Bare Root 8,200
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Bare Root 3,700
Quercus nigra Water Oak Bare Root 3,000
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Bare Root 2,000
Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak Bare Root 600
Quercus pagoda Cherry Bark Oak Bare Root 2,000
Cephalanthus occidentalis Common Buttonbush Bare Root 500
Total 28,200
Salix nigra Black Willow Live Stake
1,000 
Populus deltoides Cottonwood Live Stake
1,000 
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Live Stake
1,000 
    Total 3,000

Table 2. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary

Plot #Planted 
Stems/Acre
Volunteer 
Stems/Acre
Total 
Stems/Acre
Success 
Criteria 
Met?
Average 
Planted Stem 
Height (ft)
1 607 850 1457 Yes 7.5
2 526 688 1214 Yes 4.7
3 445 607 1052 Yes 8.2
4 647 1255 1902 Yes 13.5
5 324 202 526 Yes 6.0
6 607 364 971 Yes 5.8
7 728 1255 1983 Yes 9.2
8 526 283 809 Yes 7.4
9 405 0 405 Yes 10.6
10 6470647Yes6.2
11 931 688 1619 Yes 9.6
12 486 40 526 Yes 7.7
Project Avg 573 519 1093 Yes 8.2
Project Avg 
w/o VP1 570 489 1059 Yes 8.2
  Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data  Table 3: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLSP‐all TAcer negundo boxelder TreeAcer rubrum red maple TreeBetula nigra river birch Tree 111222 333222111 222222111Carya illinoinensis pecan TreeCarya ovata shagbark hickory TreeCercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 5 5 5 2 2 2111DONTKNOW: unsure recordFraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree111 17111Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree 1Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 7 7 15 26 5 4 14 5 17 1Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 3 3 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree222 111Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 12 85Platanus occidentalisAmerican sycamoreTree 7772234449912 333555333333555 222Prunus serotina black cherry TreeQuercus oak TreeQuercus alba white oak Tree 2 2 2Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree222Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree1 222 333 777Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1111 222Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 111 111 222 222Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 444222333111333333555333666444555Quercus rubra northern red oakTree 333111111666 444111111222777111Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac shrubUlmus alata winged elm Tree12Ulmus americana American elm TreeUnknown Shrub or Tree15 15 36 13 13 30 11 11 26 16 16 47 8 8 13 15 15 24 18 18 49 13 13 20 10 10 10 16 16 16 23 23 40121213335669667558334779668668444555667667607 607 1457 526 526 1214 445 445 1052 647 647 1902 324 324 526 607 607 971 728 728 1983 526 526 809 405 405 405 647 647 647 931 931 1619 486 486 52605202015‐01‐0003 05202015‐01‐0004 05202015‐01‐0005 05202015‐01‐0006Scientific Name Common Name Species Type05202015‐01‐0001 05202015‐01‐000210.0205202015‐01‐0007 05202015‐01‐0008 05202015‐01‐0009 05202015‐01‐0010 05202015‐01‐0011 05202015‐01‐0012Current Plot Data (MY5 2019)Stem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRE10.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.02Cedar Grove10.0210.02
  Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data   PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer negundo boxelder Tree2Acer rubrum red maple Tree 29Betula nigra river birch Tree 141414131313141414141414181818212121Carya illinoinensis pecan Tree 1Carya ovata shagbark hickory Tree 2Cercis canadensis eastern redbudTree 888888888888999999DONTKNOW: unsure record999Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 19 1 1 11 1 1 12 4 7Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree 1Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 101 78 114 36 45Liriodendron tulipiferatuliptree Tree 779668668666101010191919Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 333333444Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 25 18 17Platanus occidentalisAmerican sycamoreTree 434347424243444446393939454545484848Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 4Quercus oak Tree 222666757575Quercus alba white oak Tree 222222111Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 2 2 2Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oakTree 12121312121213131313131315 15 15 1 1 1Quercus nigra water oak Tree 555666666777888222Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 6 6 6111111111111 6 6 6 6 6 6Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 39 39 39 34 34 37 29 29 29 24 24 26 31 31 33 34 3434Quercus rubra northern red oakTree 27272727272732323228282831313118 18 18Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac shrub2Ulmus alata winged elm Tree 3 6Ulmus americana American elm Tree 2 2 4 2Unknown Shrub or Tree111170 170 324 165 165 288 171 171 350 147 147 189 179 179 239 237 237 23713 13 17 12 12 17 13 13 17 10 10 12 10 10 15 11 11 11573 573 1093 556 556 971 577 577 1180 496 496 637 604 604 806 799 799 799size (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRECedar GroveScientific Name Common Name Species TypeStem countAnnual MeansMY5 (2019) MY4 (2018) MY3 (2017) MY2 (2016) MY1 (2015) MY0 (2015)0.30120.30120.30120.30120.30120.3012

APPENDIX D Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Appendix D. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Cedar Grove Monitoring Year 5 Vegetation Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 1

Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 3 Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 5

Vegetation Plot 6

Appendix D. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Cedar Grove Monitoring Year 5 Vegetation Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 7

Vegetation Plot 8
Vegetation Plot 9 Vegetation Plot 10
Vegetation Plot 11

Vegetation Plot 12

APPENDIX E Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets

THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0001
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0001
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1953374.114
Latitude or UTM-N:890580.3392
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):168
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis1 1.0 0.4 420.0 2.5 a R
Platanus occidentalis2 1.1 2.8 400.0 2.8 b R
Platanus occidentalis4 1.2 7.9 400.0 3.1 c R
Platanus occidentalis7 3.2 7.2 370.0 2.0 f R
Platanus occidentalis8 3.2 4.8 280.0 1.2 e R
Platanus occidentalis9 3.3 2.9 360.0 2.6 d R
Cercis canadensis11 5.6 0.5 20.0 g R
Cercis canadensis13 5.7 5.8 60.0 h R
Cercis canadensis14 5.6 8.4 91.0 i R
Cercis canadensis15 7.6 7.9 58.0 k R
Cercis canadensis17 7.6 3.1 50.0 j R
Platanus occidentalis19 9.9 0.2 225.0 1.2 m R
Liriodendron tulipifera20 9.8 2.4 290.0 1.9 n R
Liriodendron tulipifera22 9.8 7.0 190.0 1.0 o R
Liriodendron tulipifera23 9.7 9.2 210.0 1.2 l R
# stems: 15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0001
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0001
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:168 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:15
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 2
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0002
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1954312.697
Latitude or UTM-N:890558.7357
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):257
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus pagoda38 0.5 5.1 Missinga R
Quercus phellos39 0.6 7.8 35.0 b R
Cercis canadensis42 2.9 5.1 111.0 d R DBH?
Cercis canadensis43 2.8 2.9 53.0 c R
Quercus pagoda44 3.2 0.7 67.0 e R
Quercus phellos49 7.5 8.8 173.0 0.8 f R
Quercus nigra50 7.7 6.5 121.0 i R DBH?
Quercus phellos51 7.7 3.9 95.0 h R
Platanus occidentalis52 7.7 1.9 270.0 1.8 g R
Quercus rubra53 9.8 0.6 132.0 j R DBH?
Quercus phellos54 9.8 3.0 105.0 k R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis55 9.8 5.7 310.0 2.3 l R
Quercus rubra56 9.8 8.1 170.0 0.5 m R
Quercus rubra57 9.8 9.7 210.0 1.0 n R
# stems:14 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 3
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0002
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0002
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:257 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:14
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 4
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0003
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1954840.257
Latitude or UTM-N:890553.8035
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):246
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Betula nigra62 9.6 0.4 420.0 3.4 l R
Quercus alba64 5.4 3.3 50.0 g R
Platanus occidentalis66 0.4 5.7 270.0 1.3 c R
Platanus occidentalis68 5.1 6.2 240.0 1.0 f R
Platanus occidentalis69 7.6 6.1 390.0 2.3 j R
Platanus occidentalis70 9.9 5.7 450.0 2.5 m R
Quercus rubra71 9.0 8.9 120.0 k R DBH?
Quercus phellos72 6.3 9.5 270.0 1.7 h R
Quercus phellos73 3.8 9.5 125.0 e R DBH?
Quercus nigra74 0.8 8.6 360.0 2.0 d R
Quercus alba971 0.2 2.0 51.0 a R
Quercus pagoda972 0.2 3.5 Missingb R
Quercus rubra1186 7.0 4.5 Missingi P
# stems:13 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*Notes by ID:62-no marker pole
971-no marker pole
972-no marker pole
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 5
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0003
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0003
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:246 °
a
k

b
l

cm

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:13
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 6
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0004
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1954555.225
Latitude or UTM-N:890062.7158
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):210
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis76 4.2 0.2 550.0 3.6 g R
Betula nigra77 5.9 0.3 400.0 3.1 j R
Betula nigra78 7.8 0.8 230.0 0.7 m R
Platanus occidentalis79 9.5 1.2 450.0 3.7 p R
Platanus occidentalis81 5.6 3.2 600.0 4.8 i R
Quercus phellos82 3.8 2.6 91.0 f R
Platanus occidentalis83 2.1 2.0 700.0 4.2 c R
Platanus occidentalis84 0.1 1.3 500.0 3.3 a R
Platanus occidentalis85 0.5 4.4 700.0 5.6 b R
Quercus phellos86 3.1 5.0 280.0 1.9 e R
Quercus phellos87 5.4 5.7 185.0 0.3 h R
Quercus rubra88 8.2 6.1 153.0 0.3 o R
Platanus occidentalis90 8.1 9.1 450.0 3.0 n R
Platanus occidentalis91 7.7 8.5 400.0 1.8 l R
Platanus occidentalis92 2.8 7.8 800.0 4.2 d R
Quercus pagoda974 7.0 3.0 Missingk R
Liriodendron tulipifera975 9.5 9.0 71.0 q R
# stems:17 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 7
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0004
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0004
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:210 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g
q

h

i

j

# stems:17
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 8
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0005
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1954029.015
Latitude or UTM-N:889560.9106
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):106
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus rubra95 0.1 3.4 63.0 a R
Quercus rubra97 1.0 9.6 310.0 2.2 b R
Quercus rubra101 2.9 1.0 280.0 1.8 c R
Quercus pagoda102 5.7 1.0 Missinge R
Quercus rubra103 5.7 3.3 98.0 f R
Quercus pagoda106 7.7 9.6 300.0 2.2 g R
Quercus rubra107 9.4 9.0 30.0 h R
Quercus rubra109 9.7 3.6 215.0 1.0 i R
Quercus phellos111 5.2 9.8 160.0 0.3 d R
# stems:9 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 9
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0005
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:106 °
a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

# stems:9
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 10
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0006
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1954563.782
Latitude or UTM-N:890785.7802
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):218
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus phellos113 2.6 0.0 120.0 g R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis115 7.4 0.7 40.0 j R
Quercus michauxii117 7.9 3.7 27.0 l R
Quercus michauxii120 0.2 3.4 89.0 a R
Betula nigra121 0.7 7.1 425.0 4.5 b R
Betula nigra122 3.2 7.2 400.0 3.5 h R
Platanus occidentalis979 2.5 1.0 220.0 1.0 e R
Quercus lyrata1407 1.0 2.5 200.0 0.7 c P
Quercus phellos1408 2.5 5.0 183.0 0.5 f P
Quercus lyrata1409 2.0 9.5 190.0 0.7 d P
Betula nigra1410 9.0 8.5 173.0 0.3 o P
Platanus occidentalis1411 9.0 6.5 193.0 0.9 n P
Liriodendron tulipifera1412 9.0 2.5 12.0 m P
Fraxinus pennsylvanica1413 7.5 2.0 138.0 0.6 k P
Quercus phellos1414 6.0 0.5 230.0 0.8 i P
# stems:15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 11
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0006
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0006
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:218 °
a
k

b
l

cm

d
n

e
o

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:15
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 12
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0007
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1953725.702
Latitude or UTM-N:889142.07
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):154
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus rubra129 0.1 0.0 35.0 a R
Quercus rubra130 0.2 2.6 110.0 c R DBH?
Quercus pagoda131 0.2 4.8 180.0 0.6 d R
Quercus rubra132 0.3 7.4 60.0 e R
Quercus rubra133 0.1 10.0 62.0 b R
Quercus pagoda135 2.3 5.3 164.0 0.8 f R
Betula nigra138 4.1 1.5 450.0 3.1 g R
Platanus occidentalis139 4.2 3.7 450.0 3.6 h R
Platanus occidentalis140 4.4 5.6 425.0 2.3 i R
Platanus occidentalis141 4.6 7.6 450.0 2.7 j R
Liriodendron tulipifera143 6.5 8.1 310.0 1.5 m R
Liriodendron tulipifera144 6.4 5.6 210.0 1.1 l R
Betula nigra146 6.3 0.9 600.0 4.8 k R
Quercus phellos147 8.2 1.7 215.0 0.8 n R
Platanus occidentalis148 8.3 3.9 350.0 2.0 o R
Platanus occidentalis149 8.4 5.5 500.0 3.5 p R
Quercus phellos150 8.5 7.6 250.0 0.8 q R
Quercus phellos151 8.6 9.7 250.0 0.8 r R
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*Notes by ID:139-broken
148-broken
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 13
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0007
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0007
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:154 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f p

g
q

h
r

i

j

# stems:18
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 14
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0008
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1953408.748
Latitude or UTM-N:888878.6851
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):56
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus phellos152 0.1 0.1 310.0 1.3 a R
Quercus phellos154 4.7 0.3 290.0 1.4 h R
Quercus phellos155 6.9 0.2 70.0 l R
Platanus occidentalis156 9.1 0.0 600.0 4.0 n R
Liriodendron tulipifera160 1.7 3.1 Missingd R
Betula nigra161 1.4 6.3 300.0 1.8 c R
Platanus occidentalis985 1.3 8.0 210.0 0.7 b B
Nyssa sylvatica986 4.8 9.2 172.0 0.5 i B
Quercus phellos987 6.2 9.2 120.0 k B DBH?
Nyssa sylvatica990 3.0 3.2 170.0 0.4 e B
Fraxinus pennsylvanica991 3.5 2.0 195.0 1.1 f B
Platanus occidentalis1196 4.0 6.0 205.0 0.6 g P
Quercus rubra1415 7.0 7.0 171.0 0.4 m U
Quercus phellos1416 5.0 2.0 100.0 j U
# stems:14 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 15
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0008
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0008
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:56°
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:14
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 16
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0009
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1951982.528
Latitude or UTM-N:888860.4046
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):50
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus rubra176 5.3 3.2 170.0 0.5 h R
Platanus occidentalis177 2.9 3.6 500.0 5.0 f R
Quercus phellos179 1.1 5.6 425.0 4.0 a R
Quercus michauxii184 9.9 9.1 320.0 3.4 j R
Quercus michauxii186 5.6 8.7 290.0 3.0 i R
Quercus michauxii187 3.4 9.0 250.0 2.0 g R
Platanus occidentalis188 1.4 9.8 600.0 5.5 c R
Platanus occidentalis993 1.5 7.0 240.0 1.6 b B
Quercus phellos994 2.5 9.8 200.0 1.0 e B
Quercus phellos1417 2.0 8.5 250.0 1.4 d U
# stems:10 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 17
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0009
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0009
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:50°
a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:10
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 18
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0010
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1952614.215
Latitude or UTM-N:889185.9688
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):174
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus phellos189 0.1 0.0 198.0 1.2 a R
Quercus phellos191 0.4 4.2 79.0 d R
Quercus phellos192 0.3 6.3 70.0 b R
Quercus phellos193 0.2 8.4 60.0 c R
Quercus nigra194 2.2 9.5 90.0 f R
Quercus rubra195 2.3 6.6 135.0 e R DBH?
Quercus rubra196 2.4 3.6 205.0 1.5 g R
Platanus occidentalis198 4.5 2.0 400.0 2.8 h R
Platanus occidentalis199 4.5 4.5 340.0 2.5 i R
Platanus occidentalis200 4.5 7.4 152.0 0.6 j R
Betula nigra202 6.9 7.4 400.0 3.3 l R
Betula nigra204 6.9 1.4 330.0 2.5 k R
Quercus phellos205 9.2 1.3 142.0 0.2 m R
Quercus phellos206 9.3 3.1 132.0 n R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis208 9.4 7.5 205.0 0.8 o R
Platanus occidentalis209 9.6 9.6 71.0 p R
# stems:16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 19
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0010
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0010
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:174 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f p

g

h

i

j

# stems:16
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 20
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0011
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1952446.46
Latitude or UTM-N:889598.4073
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):164
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus michauxii210 0.1 0.0 280.0 1.5 a R
Quercus michauxii211 2.2 0.1 150.0 0.3 f R
Quercus pagoda212 4.3 0.1 260.0 1.7 k R
Cercis canadensis213 6.5 0.1 82.0 o R
Quercus michauxii214 8.8 0.2 260.0 1.7 t R
Quercus rubra215 9.6 2.2 260.0 1.2 w R
Quercus rubra216 7.3 2.2 300.0 2.6 q R
Quercus rubra217 4.9 2.3 250.0 1.2 l R
Quercus pagoda218 2.6 2.4 85.0 g R
Quercus rubra219 0.4 2.3 215.0 1.7 b R
Quercus michauxii220 0.8 4.7 205.0 1.2 c R
Quercus michauxii221 2.9 4.7 102.0 h R DBH?
Quercus michauxii223 7.0 4.7 300.0 2.5 p R
Quercus michauxii224 9.0 4.7 340.0 2.8 u R
Quercus rubra225 8.1 6.7 370.0 2.0 r R
Quercus rubra226 5.5 6.7 400.0 3.0 n R
Quercus rubra227 3.2 6.6 225.0 1.0 j R
Betula nigra228 1.0 6.6 500.0 4.7 d R
Betula nigra229 2.1 9.1 700.0 7.0 e R
Quercus phellos230 5.1 9.1 415.0 3.0 m R
Quercus phellos231 8.0 9.1 300.0 2.0 s R
Quercus phellos1203 9.0 6.0 450.0 4.5 v R
Quercus phellos1418 3.1 9.0 270.0 1.8 i U
# stems:23 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 21
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0011
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0011
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:164 °
ak
u
bl
v
c
m
w
dn

e
o

f
p

g q

h
r

is

j
t

# stems:23
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 22
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 6
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 05202015-01-0012
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2019 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:1952957.56
Latitude or UTM-N:889560.9684
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD83/W
GS84
X-Axis bearing (deg):108
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Betula nigra232 0.1 0.2 600.0 6.5 a R
Platanus occidentalis236 8.2 2.9 300.0 4.2 k R
Platanus occidentalis238 3.7 2.7 320.0 1.8 e R
Quercus phellos244 9.4 7.0 147.0 0.1 m R
Quercus phellos245 7.5 9.1 220.0 0.8 j R
Quercus phellos246 5.7 8.1 170.0 0.3 i R
Quercus rubra247 4.6 9.0 60.0 g R
Quercus nigra998 9.0 0.5 Missingl B
Quercus nigra999 4.0 5.0 180.0 0.7 f B
Quercus phellos1000 5.7 7.5 190.0 0.8 h B
Quercus nigra1001 2.0 8.5 165.0 0.5 c B
Nyssa sylvatica1002 3.0 6.0 285.0 1.2 d B
Quercus phellos1208 1.0 7.5 185.0 0.5 b R
# stems:13 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*Notes by ID:246-broken
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 23
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):05202015-01-0012
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2019 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — H EIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0012
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:108 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:13
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 24
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.