HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG120087_MONITORING INFO_20120731A� K
, A
NCDENR Z
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
July 31, 2012
Mr. Don Misenheimer
Project Scientist
Richardson Smith Gardner and Associates, Inc
14 N. Boylan Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Subject: Request for Representative Outfall Status
Johnston County Landfill
Stormwater Permit NCG 120087
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Misenheimer:
On July 17, 2012, Dave Parnell of the Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) observed the landfill site,
with you and Mr. Rick Proctor of the Johnston County staff. The purpose of this site visit was to
evaluate the facility's request for Representative Outfall Status (ROS).
In a correspondence dated June 14, 2012, you proposed combining twelve existing outfalls into
four ROS designations. The reasons cited were that the 4 ROS would be contiguous and similar
in activity to the existing outfalls. One of the outfalls (SDO-A) is strictly for vehicle
maintenance activity area and is not represent other land uses.
The site visit and subsequent sample data review revealed only one sample -event has been
collected by Johnston County. Accordingly, we are not approving your request for
Representative Outfall Status at this time. Please proceed with the required monitoring for
Year 5, Period 2 monitoring schedule, as required by your permit. Once you have secured this
data (one additioan sample event), please submit these results to the attention of Dave Parnell at
the Raleigh Regional Office for review. After this analytical data is obtained from all locations,
DWQ will revisit your request.
The RRO commends you on your proposal and manner by which similar outfalls are proposed
for combining. For example, in your proposal you selected outfalls that capture stormwater from
active cells that had bench mark exceedences as the designated ROS sample location. This
office looks forward to seeing the additional data and revisiting your request in short order.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1628 Phone (919) 791-4200 Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwateMualitV.or[1 Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax (919) 788-7159 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper
Johnston County Landfill Representative Outfall Status Evaluation
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have questions concerning this letter, please
contact me, or Dave Parnell, at (919) 791-4200.
!' Sind ely,
i
�1J.7
Dannv Smi
Surface Water Protection Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: Rick Proctor, Johnston County Landfill
DLR/RRO files
DWM Files
SWP/RRO Files
Central Files
Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Resort
for North Carolina Division of Water Resources General Permit No. NCG030000
Datesubmitted Q1/09/2019
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG03 0 2 S 9 SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2019
FACILITY NAME Consolidated Diesel Company SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
COUNTY Nash or ■❑ Monthly' May (month)
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Rodney Freeman
LABORATORY Environmental Conservation Labs Lab Cert. # NC591
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
DISCHARGING TO CLASS
RECEIVED
JUN 11 2019
❑ORW ❑ HQW ❑ Trout ❑ PNA
❑Zero -flow ❑ Water Supply [:]SA
QOtherNSW
CENTRAL FILEeLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 0
DVVR SECTION
No discharge this period?2
Non -Polar O&G/
-pate Sample
24-hour rainfall
pH,
Total Toxic
Outfafl No.
Collected'
amount,
Total Suspended Solids
Standard units
Copper
'Lead
Zinc
Total Petroleum
Organics
(mo/dd/yr)
Inches3
Hydrocarbons
Benchmarks = => _ - 100 mg/L or 50 mglC 6.0 — 9.0 1 0.007 mg/L 0.03 mg/L 10.067 mg/L 15 mg/L i mg/L
A NO DISCHARGE
D NO DISCHARGE
ontmy sampling kinstead or semi-annuai) must begin with the second consecutive benchmarK exceedance Tor the same parameter at the same outran.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring reportwith a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
S Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for elprtrnnir-rrvctal manufarture usP the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31). ,
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
j Page 1 of 3
Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
!��j ZL�A rl-
Name (Print name)
Title (Pr' itle)
v, P, 4,
(Si natur
(Date)
Nate: Results must be reported in numerical format. D2rtot relrt_Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must hg reported in the format. "<X&Mg/r, where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note. If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must Implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part IB: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?z
Outfali No.
Date Sample
Collected'
mo dd r
24-hour rainfall
amount,s
Inches
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 5WU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS, SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO X❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES []NOrRI
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Attn: DWR Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that tl are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
{Sign
hol q
(Date
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3
Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 27, 2018
Full Circle Solutions, Inc.
Attn: Robert Waldrop
136 Full Circle Drive
Battleboro, NC 27809-
ROY COOPER
Govenior
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secrelary
WILLiAM E.(TOBY) VINSON, JR.
Interim Director
Subject: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
Full Circle Solutions, Inc.
Battleboro Facility, Certificate of Coverage-NCG070177
NPDES Stormwater General Perm it-NCG070000
Edgecombe County
Mr. Waldrop:
On June 22, 2018 a site inspection was conducted for the Full Circle Solutions, Inc. facility located at 136
Full Circle Drive Facility, Edgecombe County, North Carolina. A copy of the Compliance Inspection Report
is enclosed for your review. The site visit and file review revealed that the subject facility is covered by
NPDES Stormwater General Permit-NCG070000, Certificate of Cove rage-NCG070177. Permit coverage
authorizes the discharge of stormwater from the facility to receiving waters designated as Compass
Creek, a Class C;NSW waterbody in the Neuse River Basin.
As a result of the inspection, the facility was found to be in compliance with the conditions of the
NCG070000 permit. Please refer to the enclosed Compliance Inspection Report for additional comments
and observations made -during the inspection.
Please be advised that violations of the NPDES Stormwater General Permit are subject to a civil
penalty assessment of up to $25,000 per day for each violation. If you or your staff has any questions,
comments, or needs assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit, please contact me at (919)
791-4200 or by e-mail at Thad. valentineCo)ncdepr_,00v.
Sincerely,
Thad Valentine
Environmental Senior Specialist
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Raleigh Regional Office l 1628 Mail Service Center ! Raleigh, NC 27609
919 791 4200
Enclosure
cc: RRO — Land Quality Section, Storrnwater Files-NCG070177
Central Office/Stormwater Permitting Unit
Central Files
Nothing Compares�,
State of Narth Carolina I Environmental Quality I €nergy, &Uneral and Land Resources
512 N. SaUsbury Street I 1612 MA Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 -
919 7079200
j
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG070177 Effective: 06/01/18 Expiration: 05131/23 owner: Full Circle Solutions Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Full Circle Solutions, Inc.
County: Edgecombe 136 Full Cir
Region: Raleigh
Battlebora NC 27$09
Contact Person: Robert I Waldrop Title: Phone: 706-253-1051
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 0612212018 Entry Time: 11:00AM Exit Time: 01:15PM
Primary Inspector: Thaddeus W Valentine Phone:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Prcducts Stormviater [Discharge COC
Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
In Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1
4
Permit: NCG070177 Owner • Facility:'uil C;rle Sclutons Inc
Inspection hate: 06/2212013 Inspection Type : ComFlian�--e EvaiJeucn Reason for Visit: Rouka
Inspection Summary:
1 meet Tome Sears and walked the facility inside and onside. The facilty sold pelletized cola ash to farmers who used the
materials for the lime content that Bras a biproduct €ram the power companies ahborn fiy ash capture process, The site is in
compliance and they have requested a rescission from their general industrial storrnvvater permit. As of this inspection that
request has been granted
Page: 2
Permit: NCG070177 Owner - Facility: Full Circle Salutinr,5 Inc
Inspection Date: 06/22/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluaticr, Reason for Visit: Reutine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes Na NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Alan include a General Location (USGS) map?
IN ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a 'Narrative Description of Practices"?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑
# noes the Plan include a BMP summary?
19 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?.
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
IM ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
Is ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan revievied and updated annually?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
®❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
19 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: In compliance .
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Nionitoring semi-annually?
IM ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: In compliance
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ®❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Nlaintenance areas? ❑ ❑ IM ❑
Comment: In compliance
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? IN ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? IN ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? IM ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: In compliance
Page: 3