NCG110090_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20140520

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
IV L& I D D g D
DOC TYPE
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ 3D 14 U J6 a D
YYYYM M DD

May 9, 2014
Danny Smith
NCDENR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
A- r'
En elan
North Carolina
Toundcel i as 1740
RE: Town Of Enfield
Storm Water National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
General Permit No. NCG 110000
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG 1.10090
Dear Mr. Danny Smith,
Per Part 1II,B.5.b. 2 of the permit, I hereby appoint Mr. Anthony Gorham, W WTP
Superintendent/ORC as the duly authorized representative for report signature for the Town of
Enfield Storm water Permit for the purpose of signing the Qualitative Monitoring Report Forms.
Please amend your records to indicate this change. Your attention to this matter will be
appreciated.
Sincerely,
Town of Enfield
Mrs. Bar ara Simmons,
Mayor, Town of Enfield
Cc: Anthony Gorham, W WTP ORC, United Water
Gerald Brannon, Area Manager United Water
Town of Enfield 0 P.O. Box 699 0 Enfield, North Carolina 27823 0 {252) 445-3146 0 FAX [phone] Website: www.enfieldnc.org

Compliance Inspection -Report" --
Permit: NCG110090 Effective: 06/01/08 Expiration: 05131113--_Owner: Town of Enfield
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Enfield WWTP
County: Halifax 18270 US Hwy 301
Region: Raleigh
Enfield NC 27823
Contact Person: Warnie Bishop Title: Mayor Phone: [phone] Ext.24
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 11125/2008 Entry Time: 03:00 PM Exit Time: 03745 PM
Primary Inspector: David R Parneli Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Stormwater
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110090 Owner - Facility: Town of Enfield
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Stormwater Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110090 Owner - Facility: Town of Enfield
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Stormwater
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
C■i n n
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
CO) n n
rl
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
C*) ❑ n
n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
�i n n
n
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
6❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■ _ n
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
— ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
— ❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
(� ❑ IF ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
n n
n
_�i
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? i
■+ o
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
❑
J
/■�❑_
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
[ ■ I n
n
Comment: List is not contained in the plan, but listed elsewhere. No documented /
employee training for stormwater. 5-e � e { � e- tic P I -a h s✓
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? iO❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? /� f A . ❑ ❑l ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? Y ❑ ❑ I) ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls I Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? Qn n n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 13 Q 0 iy Kl► ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ n 0 !3
Comment:
Page: 3

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Town of Enfield
Mr. Bobby Davis,
PO Box 699
AMA a.
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Town Administrator
Enfield, NC 27823
Dear Mr. Davis:
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, PE
Director
December 10, 2012
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Enfield Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Wastewater Permit NCO025402 &
NPDES Stormwater Permit NCGI 10090
Halifax County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
1, Dave Parnell of the Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality conducted compliance
evaluation inspections (CEI) on December 6, 2012, consisting ofa. NPDES wastewater inspection and a NPDES
stormwater inspection. The assistance of Tony Gorham, Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC), James
Shoulders, Backup Operator in Responsible Charge (BOAC), and Gerald Brannon, Area Manager, United
Water, was appreciated. Please review the attached Basinwide information Management System (BIMS)
inspection checklists summarizing the inspections.
Below is a list of findings and recommendations developed from the inspections:
NPDES Wastewater Inspection:
1. The current permit was issued June 1, 2010 and expires October 31, 2014. The permit was on site
and reviewed.
2. The 1.0 MGD wastewater treatment plant consists of the following units: mechanical bar screens,
mechanical grit removal system, influent pump station, influent pumps, oxidation ditch with BNR,
dual clarifiers, flow distribution box, chlorine contact tank, dual feed chlorination and
dechlorination, aerobic digester, sludge holding basin, sludge loading station, sludge return pump
station and effluent pump station.
The inspection began in the treatment plant office. All paperwork was well organized and easily
accessible. Discharge Monitoring Reports were reviewed for compliance with permit limits and
monitoring requirements. Chain of custody records were available and found to be in order.
1i)nc
rihCarolina
AVatimally
- I -North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Rogional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Cuslomer service
Internet: www.newaterquality.crg 1628 Mail Service Center Ralcigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone] I-877-623-6748
An Equal Oppertunity/Aff rmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Enfield NPDES Wastewater Treatment Plant CEI
The facility uses a contract laboratory-EnvironmentOne. Sample storage was kept at a temperature
of 5.5 degrees Celsius. The effluent composite flow proportional refrigerator temperature was 3.0
degrees Celsius. The facility is field certified for performing Residual Chlorine, Settleable Solids,
pH, DO and Temperature. A check list was completed and forwarded to the DWQ Lab Certification
Unit. The mechanical bar screen was observed and was in acceptable condition. The debris was
collected in a dumpster twice a day, and the dumpster is deposited in the landfill.
4, The Grit removal system was out of service at the time of June 5, 2012 inspection. The grit removal
system is on line at the time of this inspection. Mr. Gorham has been diligent about notifying the
Regional Office of any components that may be off-line and when they return on line.
The oxidation ditch was being operated properly. Very little foam was noted. The swings in
temperature at this time of year, make keeping the DO in the acceptable range a challenge. Mr.
Gorham is knowledgeable of this process and does a good job keeping the oxidation ditch in
balance.
6. The clarifiers were functioning properly and were free of weir blockages and showed no sign of
short-circuiting. The sludge blanket was reported to be 1.5' feet, which is within acceptable range of
sidewall depth which was 14'.
7. The aerobic digester appears to have adequate capacity with no objectable odor.
The disinfection (chlorine) cylinders were secured adequately, and have been partitioned apart since
the last inspection. This is a good attempt to meet the intent of the rules. All of the cylinders were
under a shelter but did receive direct winter sunlight.
9. Standby power is available and is tested on a monthly basis according to Mr. Gorham. The
generator has adequate capacity to run the plant, partially, but in a manner to achieve desired results.
10. The effluent pump station appears to be in good operational condition. The pumps are operable, and
the audible and visual alarms are back in service, since the last inspection. The effluent composite
sample is flow proportional and collected below all treatment units.
11. The effluent pipe is located adjacent to the Fishing Creek bridge on US 301, just south of town. The
effluent discharging into the stream appeared to be clear. The receiving water is free of foam and
other debris.
NPDES Stormwater Inspection:
1. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan was available and reviewed during the inspection.
Although, emergency training is held annually, it is suggested that it be expanded and better defined
to focus on stormwater and the response to potential spill that may occur at the facility.
2. Qualitative monitoring results were available and reviewed during the inspection and found to be
adequate.
NorthCarolina
Nautrally
- 2 -North Carolina Division of Waiter Quality Raleigh Regional Office Stifface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterqualityorg 1628 Mail Service Ccnter Raleigh, NC 27694-1628 FAX [phone]R 1-977-023-0748
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

I
Enfield NPDES Wastewater Treatment Plant CEl
The four Stormwater Discharge Outfalls (SDO) were observed during the inspection. Mr. Gorham
had questions concerning the lack of concentrated flow at someof the outfall locations. Much of the
rainfall is absorbed by the sandy soil or moves through groundwater to the swamping; areas adjacent
to the outfalls. It was suggested to observed those areas in times of heavy rainfall to see if the flow
of the stormwater concentrates as it leaves the property. The qualitative observation would then be
done at that location. If a representative rainfall event is observed, but no flow is present at one or
more of the outfalls, it is permissible to report "no flow".
The Town of Enfield Wastewater Treatment Plant is considered to be complicint with the NPDES
wastewater permit and NPDES stormwater permit, at the time of this inspection. All deficiencies noted in
the June 5, 2012 inspection have been addressed. If you have questions concerning this report, -please do
not hesitate to contact me at 919-791-4200.
Sincerely,
Dave Parnell
Environmental Senior Specialist
Raleigh Regional Office
Attachment: December 6, 2012, NPDES Wastewater Checklist
cc: Central Files
SWP/RRO files
\orihCarolina
Naturally
- 3 -North Carolina Division of Water (Quality Raleigh Regional OfTice Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Cusuomer Service
Internet: www,ncwaterquality.org 1628NlailService Center Raleigh, NC27699-1628 FAX [phone]B 1-977-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled410% Post Consumer Paper

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110090 Effective: 06/01/08 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: Town of Enfield
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Enfreld WWTP
County: Halifax 18270 US Hwy 301
Region: Raleigh
Enfield NC 27823
Contact Person: Barbara S Simmons Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 12/0612012 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 03:15 PM
Primary Inspector: David R Parnell Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110090 Owner - Facility: Town of Enfield
Inspection Date: 12/06/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: Expand on existing Emergency Training to be more specific on
Spill/Stormwater issues.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non Stormwater) discharges?
Comment: All stored vehicles have been removed.
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■ ❑ ❑ Cl
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
■ 1113 ❑
Page: 2

i ��A
�0
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Town of Enfield
Honorable Mayor Barbara Simmons
PO Box 699 - -
Enfield, NC 27823
Dear Mayor Simmons:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
December 8, 2009
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Enfield Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Wastewater Permit NCO025402 and
NPDES Stormwater Permit NCG110090
Halifax County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
I, Dave Parnell of the Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality conducted two compliance
evaluation inspections (CEI) on December 3, 2009, consisting of the NPDES wastewater and stormwater
inspections. The assistance of James Pittman, Operator in Responsible Charge, was appreciated. Please review
the attached Basinwide Information Management System (BIMS) inspection checklists summarizing the
inspections.
Below is a list of findings and recommendations developed from the inspections:
I. NPDES Inspection:
1. The current permit re -issuance is pending. The application timeframe was adhered to by the facility.
2. The 1.0 MGD wastewater treatment plant consists of the following units: mechanical bar screens,
mechanical grit removal system, influent pump station, influent pumps, aeration unit, dual clarifiers,
flow distribution box, chlorine contact tank, dual feed chlorination and dechlorination, aerobic
digester, sludge holding basin, sludge loading station, sludge return pump station and effluent pump
station.
3. The inspection began in the treatment plant office. All paperwork was well organized and easily
accessible. Discharge Monitoring Reports were reviewed for compliance with permit limits and
monitoring requirements. Chain of custody records were available and found to be in order. The
facility uses a contract laboratory and sample storage was kept at a temperature of 4.5 degrees
Celsius. The effluent composite flow proportional refrigerator temperature was 2.5 degrees Celsius.
The influent composite sampler temperature was 2.5 degrees Celsius.
No`hCarolina
�tura!!1l
-I -North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Enfield NPDEW,Wastewater arid;Storrnovaier CEl
4. Overall maintenance was found to be in good condition. The mechanical bar screen was in
acceptable condition. Grit removal was free of organic matter and excessive odor. The replacement
of some of the pipes in the grit removal system is necessary and must be budgeted for in the near
future.
5. The oxidation ditches were being operated properly. Very little foam was noted. The Dissolved
Oxygen level was above the acceptable range of 3.0 at 5.22 mg/l. This may be a result of heavy
rainfall on the day prior to the inspection. The settelometer results were in the acceptable range at
600 ml/l in 30 minutes.
6. Although nutrient removal was not required by the permit, the facility does so in meeting its
obligation to the Tar -Pam Association.
7. The clarifiers were functioning properly and were free of weir blockages and showed no sign of
short-circuiting. The sludge blanket was reported to be 4 feet, which is slightly above the acceptable
range of sidewall depth.
8. The aerobic digester appears to have adequate capacity with acceptable odor.
9. The disinfection (chlorine) cylinders were secured adequately, but were within 10 feet of the de -
chlorination cylinders. All of the cylinders were under a shelter but did receive direct late afternoon
sunlight. It is recommended that the storage area be expanded to further separate the cylinders and
protect them from direct sunlight.
10. Standby power is available and is tested on a monthly basis according to Mr. Pittman. The generator
has adequate capacity to run the plant, partially, but in a manner to achieve desired results, according
to Mr. Pittman.
11. The effluent pump station appears to be in good operational condition. Pumps and float controls are
operable. The effluent composite sample is flow proportional and collected below all treatment
units.
12. The effluent pipe is located adjacent to abridge on US 301, just south of town. The effluent
discharging into Fishing Creek appeared to be clear. The receiving water is free of foam and other
debris.
II.- Stormwater Inspection:
2
A list of significant spills occurring in the last three years, is required to be included as a part of the
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. It is noted that a list of spills was located by Mr. Pittman in
another manual.
The facility is required to provide and document annual employee training by the permit. This
documentation is also required to be within the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SP3°o`hcaro1ina
- 2 -North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628Mai I Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Enfield NPDEW Wastewater and Stormwater CEI
3. Continue semi-annual qualitative monitoring and document these inspections.
4. All outfalls were inspected and showed no sign of illicit discharges.
The Town of Enfield Wastewater Treatment Plant is considered to be in compliance with the NPDES
wastewater permit, as well as the NPDES general stormwater permit, at the time of these inspections. If you
have questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-791-4200.
Sincerely,
b vwt
j /"z /LeU
Dave Parnell
Environmental Specialist
Raleigh Regional Office
Attachment: December 3, 2009 NPDES Wastewater and Stormwater CEI BIMS Inspection
Checklists
cc: Central Files
�SWPIRRO f les
N n9 Carolina
Naturally
- 3 -North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone].623-6748
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycle&10% Post Consumer paper

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110090 Effective: 06/01/08 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: Town of Enfield
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Enfield WWTP
County: Halifax 18270 US Hwy 301
Region: Raleigh
Enfield NC 27823 .
Contact Person: Warnie Bishop Title: Mayor Phone: [phone] Ext,24
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 1210312009 Entry Time: 01:15 PM Exit Time: 03:30 PM
Primary Inspector: David R Parnell Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s).
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110090 Owner - Facility: Town of Enfield
Inspection Date: 12/03/2009 Inspection Type. Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: SP3 did not contain a list of significant spills nor employee training as a
part of plan, but was located elsewhere and Mr. Pittman was able to locate.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
❑
110
1919T,itiW iiiti
Page: 2

Town of Enfield
Honorable Mayor Warnie Bishop
PO Box 699
Enfield, NC 27823
Subject:
Dear Mayor Bishop:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 2, 2008
Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Enfield WWTP
NPDES Permit NCO025402 and
Stormwater Permit NCG110090
Halifax County
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Dave Parnell of the Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality conducted two
inspections on November 25, 2008, consisting of the NPDES and Stormwater inspections. The
assistance of James Pittman, Operator in Responsible Charge, was appreciated. Please review
the attached Basinwide Information Management System (BIMS) inspection checklists
summarizing the inspections.
Below is a list of findings and recommendations developed from the inspections:
I. NPDES Inspection:
1. The current permit was reissued March 1, 2005 and expires October 31, 2009
2. The 1.0 MGD wastewater treatment plant consists of the following units: manual and
mechanical bar screens, mechanical grit removal system, influent pump station,
influent pumps, aeration unit, dual clarifiers, flow distribution box, chlorine contact
tank, dual feed chlorination and dechlorination, aerobic digester, sludge holding
basin, sludge loading station, sludge return pump station and effluent pump station.
3. The inspection began in the treatment plant office. All paperwork was well organized
and easily accessible. Discharge Monitoring Reports were reviewed for compliance
with permit limits and monitoring requirements. Chain of custody records were
available and in order. The facility uses a contract laboratory and sample storage was
kept at a temperature of 4.5 degrees Celsius. The effluent composite flow
proportional refrigerator temperature was 2.5 degrees Celsius. The influent
composite sampler temperature was 2.0 degrees Celsius.
NCDENR
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center phone [phone] Customer Service
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748

Enfield CEI 12.2.08
Page 2 of 3
4. Overall maintenance was above average. The manual and mechanical bar screens
were in acceptable condition. Grit removal was free of organic matter and excessive
odor.
5. The oxidation ditches were being operated properly. Very little foam was noted. The
Dissolved Oxygen level was slightly above the acceptable range of 3.0 at 3.06 mg/l.
The settelometer results were in the acceptable range at 750 ml/l in 30 minutes.
6. Although nutrient removal was not required by the permit, the facility does so in
meeting its obligation to the Tar -Pam Association.
7. The clarifiers were functioning properly and were free of weir blockages and showed
no sign of short-circuiting. The sludge blanket was reported to be 2.5-3 feet, which is
in the acceptable range of sidewall depth.
8. The aerobic digester appears to have adequate capacity with acceptable odor.
9. The disinfection (chlorine) cylinders were secured adequately, but were within 10 feet
of the dechlorination cylinders. All of the cylinders were under a shelter but did
receive direct late afternoon sunlight. The storage area should be expanded to further
separate the cylinders and protect them from direct sunlight.
10. Standby power is available and was tested and operational during a recent power
failure according to Mr. Pittman. The generator has adequate capacity to run the
plant, partially, but in a manner to achieve desired results, according to Mr. Pittman.
11. The effluent pump station appears to be in good operational condition. Pumps and
float controls are operable. The effluent composite sample is flow proportional and
collected below all treatment units.
12. The effluent pipe is located adjacent to the right of way of a bridge being constructed
on US 301. The pipe appears to be unaffected by the construction. The effluent
discharging into Fishing Creek appeared clear. The receiving water is free of foam
and other debris.
lI. Stormwater Inspection:
1. A list of significant spills occurring in the last three years should be included as a part
of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
2. The facility is required to provide and document employee training by the permit.
3. Continue semi-annual qualitative monitoring and document these inspections.
4. All outfalls were inspected and showed no sign of illicit discharges.

Enfield CEI 12.2.08
Page 3 of 3
The wastewater treatment plant is considered to be in compliance with the NPDES permit, as
well as the general stormwater pemit at the time of these inspections. If you have questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-791-4200.
Sincerely,
am'-'t ?4".tf XZ)
Dave Parnell
Environmental Specialist
Raleigh Regional Office
Attachment
cc: Central Files
SWP/RRO files

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110090 Effective: 06/01/08 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: Town of Enfield
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Enfield WWTP
County: Halifax 18270 US Hwy 301
Region: Raleigh
Enfield NC 27823
Contact Person: Warnie Bishop Title: Mayor Phone: [phone] Ext.24
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Entry Time: 03:00 PM Exit Time: 03:45 PM
Primary Inspector: David R Parnell Phone: [phone]
Secondary inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Stormwater
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110090 Owner - Facillty: Town of Enfield
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Stormwater Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

r
Permit: NCG110090 Owner - Facility: Town of Enfield
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Stormwater Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑
❑
Cl
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: List is not contained in the plan, but listed elsewhere. No documented
employee training for stormwater.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative out -fall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Page: 3

Michael F. Easley, Governor
O�q� WArFROG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Coleen H, Sullins, Director
-i Division of Water Quality
o -c
January 23, 2008
Town of Enfield
Honorable Mayor Edward Jones
PO Box 699
Enfield, NC 27823
Subject: Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Enfield WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCG110090
Halifax County
Dear Mayor Jones:
While I was at the WWTP for an NPDES inspection,1, Myrl Nisely of the Raleigh Regional
Office of the Division of Water Quality, also performed a stormwater compliance inspection on
1/22/2008. The plant had developed a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan manual (SP3) in
2007 since the last inspection. All required elements were in the plan. The only monitoring
activities required are semi-annual qualitative evaluations of the outfalls, since there is no
Vehicle Maintenance that would trigger analytical sampling.
Attached is the inspection checklist. A qualitative inspection should be done soon to provide a
second round within the 12 months since the SP3 was created. Then two rounds will be needed
later in 2008 to establish a calendar schedule.
If you have questions concerning this report, please contact me at 919-791-4255.
Sincerely,
�y 0(. 'PI
Myrl A. Nisely
Environmental Chemist
Raleigh Regional Office
Attachment
cc: Central Files
SWP/RRO files
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center phone [phone] Customer Service
IAI-& .n.. 14- D-I-; k kit` g7&e)d1 Ir-no MI n17ao 71 cn 4 077 c-)a C7Ao
M
i CbENrR-

Permit: NCG110090 Owner - Facility: Town of Enfield
Inspection Date: 01/22/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Does Sk►81a{t include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a 1"Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑ ❑
Cl
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑ ❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑ ❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑ ❑
❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Comment: SP3 manual was developed in early 2007. A round of qualitative
monitoring is needed soon to meet the annual requirement, with a second round carried
out later in 2008.
Analytical Monitoring
Tes
No
NA
NC
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: Exempt because no Vehicle Maintenance is done at this location.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
110
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
❑
❑
❑
Page: 3

Mr. Bobby Davis
Town Administrator, Town of Enfield
P.O. Box 699
Enfield, NC 27823
Dear Mr. Davis:
Michael F, Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 10, 2005
L [�
Subject: General Permit No. NCG 110000,' �_\ c '
Stormwater from -Enfield WWTP`1 =-� p �1v
COC No. NCG110090 ` _1 Z
Halifax County'
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on April 18, 2005 we
are forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage (COC) to discharge under the subject
state — NPDES general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina
and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit
are unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an
individual permit application. Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be
final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice. to
the Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or
revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or
permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other
federal or local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit please contact Aisha Lau at telephone
number [phone] ext. 578.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED By
BRADL'EY 13ENNETT
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachments
cc: Raleigh Regional' Office
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files No Carolina
Altum!!1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Rerycled110% Post Consumer Paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCGI10000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG110090
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Town of Enfield
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Enfield WWTP
18270 Hwy 301 North
Enfield
Halifax County
to receiving waters designated as Beech Swamp, a class C SW NSW stream in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin in
accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, I1, III, TV,
V and VI of General Permit No. NCG 110000 as attached.
This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective November 10, 2005.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day November 10, 2005.
;"'GINA S!C1 NED CI-
BRADLE•Y 13ENNETT
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

%
...� •4 t .�•- '" � t \\`...✓✓� / � ,%�.--'�I L f __ x +� E r: / ♦^= � ; li;'�� I i''.-f� / htVe
:t 4'.
IV
111V
V
0
to
4�
N
7
91 -A,
7
'77.
K.
7�
-Y
v7,
,
'Prt, -91 7
7-
-21
A-
:7
i�l 1 93.7
0 m
- fA u
f r6i
;:0
4r**.
.e.L4. 8 0
tl
J.:: -,z"
Y
N
q ,
v",
%
4p,
ffibbr'din
A.
A 4
too
4 t, 5
W" -
A
109
cv"
•Joe---
LI
it i
Z
V z
7,
Gopynghl (C) 1998, Maplech, Inc.

UnitedWater 4t'
Enfield WWTP
18270 highway 301 North
Enfield, NC 27823
telephone [phone]
fav3imile 252445-3404
Fax
r �
TO: FROM:
FAX NO: _ �j/�� %�,3- g% NO. PAGES: �
(including cover)
DATE: cc:
SUBJECT:- 07J?
an
❑ Urgeiat WorReview © Please Reply ❑Please Recycle
COMMENTS:
_m%r/lez
Td WdTO:TT SaOZ 2LZ 'daS be72-St70-ZGE: 'ON Xdd d1MM ON`G1StdN3/SWH: WOdA

0� W ATRQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7 �
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
September 21f,2005
To: Enfie1d-W4V P—operatox
Fax: [phone] /
From: Aisha Lau
Phone: [phone] ext. 578
Fax: [phone]
pages, including this cover sheet.
Comments:
Following you should find dopy of the USGS topo area around where the Enfield WWTP is
located. After you've located where your site is would you please place an " V over it and fax it back
to me.
If you have any questions feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
dt4,-z /-�/-4
Aisha H. Lau
Onc
NorthCarolina
,Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone (9l9) 733-7015 CustomerServiee
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

,+ .� A= �.r•-way f
JA
r --,JI f le. r at _ ♦ t of I h--
+ r•k 'f} C,�e�x --} - + _r1 i1;" ;�_ 1t';t 16n FL
u kk
k+f f� r - � � r '' ^w'n,�r'Da �-}roC.y ,sS,u..�1 �,Sr. 4 � sw uef•ytr'+ I�F i..�,r�>F�-�. h�
'4; �J, k �' �5 f.�i dY. �r i" fylY•
' --r L + S r � rP st' of;, \• � t 5: r r.r- I s f �" -a �c Yl t .r' r n. 5, n�iNr'� i 1� Fyjr �=
1 n 7 ttw-+ f i1 I ✓ R i k ni r ri 1L i
r�{x*�'rL ,t,,�';�� t
rx��t� rF `•� .+• - � 7}L 1►Ya I s}d �rk�ry ;eld. �YrCi� } sn�. 'Ca 1 r�l F ��' ",�.{�Hrw �ti-�,,r
;v�f- _ L T�y;'F"�7 � - r � � r �Y�}i��YSY''r?4�ii..H .rAi tii •1, r �S� y y v¢ r�''VC+. it`3s:,r.µ{'s',�'}�
-1'r Ar it rG=�('•1".i.? �r � x - r + ( Lt t .7�,;.,, k C iY1 r R' 4 i !� U�n • yyZ,x3+ �1 '�
r ,� 's•1., ` r Ks f � - 1,��� t" h °1yt�p+ya Pri' 'a �r� `Y �I+ ,i,� "'rf Wyc4
rr . I - a E ++ _ 1 v I i.. ._ ° � �Y ,iti ?4 L� ' �j.rit +',}. ! 7':�+° �F �?Y� r el 9-gPa;. y�'yy'h vA ��%f 1 'Y �+��. •"t'f.�
4rL� y'z V l� i f •,.
�w+ tt`k•'�'i"��,y ,(' ! ..,r�+•.,,��;�- n:I� YEi.?i' f
51 �r •' rr+k r r} r �-Yf` l - r s4 r 1.
q,q F+ ; . "'ec�r ✓,�
��' •1r�f�S�r; s ., r e,.� sl'�'Y.r'ir�•���5"�i+„�1.'[S-r7�'"r"A�'�
r f
tea 4 CLi F `
�;a
t�iK,�
r � '� 4 i '.e 1 ��:� i�i'���?r'-1 t����` `�V �i '"1'-• ��`��,��1':AY"
` Bricks
2
r :fife -'��;' •
it .'
A
RIR
' J � ar CT r •'i N N�
101,47
� ,�ryS
� �M1F�hr,lJ1r��l�rr9'1
'On
• - � 4'1:' �' �� 9r�.%3 �v,r4 �.t4- Ya1:yr•' u���}
+� r a ^"-r'a > _ rr s • r f,p+'SW� .r t
� � �!' � >,k�s* �+I rt���l�r�4✓1'"SP•��+N M �tl �,e �'a �.
Br
icks
;w
Facility Information Facilitys� L �bl& 36°�i
og 0z,N Sub-rr 03-OX,04
Lonizibide: Tf4r1T W Locafion
Strem C[ C NSW
P►2CCi htre X - F14i g Creek
afield MOM,
FP
PerdttedFlow: 1.0 MGD North,... _ _ iiAlifax CA I
Ed WUE0 : Z T SOOZ 42 'daS baby-Sbb-ZSZ : 'ON Xbd diMM DN "Q-1d l dNdiSWH : WMA