NCG110081_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20121031

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/V
DOC TYPE
2�HISTORICALFILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
I 1) 31
YYYYMMDD

� 'A w=^
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and �atttl�a ot} -ees----
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
October 31, 2012
Jimmy Pridgen, Water Reclamation Manager
City of Wilson Hominy Creek Water Reclamation Facility
P.O. Box 10
3100 Old Stantonsburg Road
Wilson, NC 27894-0010
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
City of Wilson Hominy Creek Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit NCO023906
Stormwater Permit NCG110081
Wilson County
Dear Mr. Pridgen:
On October 22, 2012, Mitch Hayes of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted the subject inspection.
Debbie Collins and your assistance with the inspection were greatly appreciated. Below is a list of findings
and recommendations developed from the inspection.
1. The subject permit was reissued and became effective December 01, 2009 and expires May 31,
2013. Permit renewal is required 180 days prior to pernit expiration date.
2. The 14.0 MGD Wastewater Treatment Facility consists of the of the following units: influent pump
station; two (2) automatic bar screens; manual bar screens; screenings compactor; automatic grit
removal; influent ultrasonic flow meter; two (2) pre -aeration basins; two (2) biological phosphorus
removal tank; three (3) primary clarifiers; seven (7) aeration basins with seven anoxic zones and one
reareation zone; five (5) secondary clarifiers; methanol feed facilities; five (5) deep bed denitrification
filters with automatic or manual backwashing; sodium hypochlorite disinfection tank; reareation
basin with sodium bisulfite dechlorination; effluent ultrasonic flow meter; effluent pump station; one
(1) reuse water basin; a reclaim water facility; one (1) plastic lined reclaimed water pond; four
anaerobic digesters heated by natural gas or methane generated from digesters; a sludge
thickening and dewatering building with two (2) gravity belt thickeners, two (2) belt filter presses,
three (3) return waste activated sludge pump stations; a ten -ton per day alkaline sludge stabilization
facility capable of producing Class A dewatered sludge; three (3) liquid sludge holding tanks; and a
septage receiving station.
3. At the time of inspection the following was observed: one mechanical screen, one grit collector, two
grit classifiers, one primary clarifier, 7 and 2 treatment trains, two biological phosphorus tanks, five -
secondary clarifiers, and five tertiary filters were in operation. The preaeration tank was not in
service. The filter belt presses were not in operation however; they operate ever Tuesday morning
and Friday evening. There was some Class A and Class B biosolids stored under shelter. One
digester methane unit was not in service due to a broken cover. The other 3 digester methane units
were operating normally. Excess methane was being ignited. The color of the influent was a medium
chocolate brown with foam covering over 90% of the service, which is normal for this type of
treatment process. All air diffusers in the aeration basins appeared to be operating normally.
Dissolved oxygen A'basin 2 was 2.32 mgll and 3.53 ma/1 in basin 3. Microseed 3000 is beina added
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1629 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 276W28 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www,nesvalergualuy.org i-ocation: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax (919) 78E,7159 1.977-623-6748
One
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer- 50% Recybed/10% Post Consumer Paper NorthCarolina
Anhirr//yi

Wilson Horniny Creek WRF
Page 2 u
at the end of the aeration basin to reduce phosphorus. Sludge judge reading in secondary clarifier
#2 was '/ foot with a sidewall depth of 10 feet and 2 feet in secondary clarifier #3 with a sidewall
depth of 10 feet. All 5 tertiary filters were in operation. The effluent appeared clear in the reareation 1
dechlorination tank.
4. The upgrade to the influent pump station was ongoing at the time of inspection. New influent pumps
and mechanical bar screens were on site and are anticipated to be installed in December. Concrete
had been poured for the new influent flow channel.
5. Granville Farms operates the Land Application Program under permit WQ0001896. Class B solids
are land applied on private farms or transported to Eastern Composting in Battleboro, NC.
6. Reclaimed water is distributed under permit WQ0018709. Reclaimed water is irrigated on
Wedgewood Golf Course and J. Burt Gillette Athletic complex. Reclaimed water is also used in
process water at the Hackney Industrial Park, and the Wilco Industrial Park. Reclaimed, reuse water
permits and other non -discharge permits are regulated by the Aquifer Protection Section (APS). All
correspondence pertaining to these permits should be directed to the APS.
7. The laboratory was checked in a cursory manner. All instrument calibration logs are being
maintained. The BQD incubator temperature was 20.5 degrees C, the fecal bath temperature was
44.5 degrees C, sample refrigerator was 0.5 degrees C, and fridge #2 was 3 degrees C. An
operator's logbook was available and being maintained. The influent and effluent flow sampler
temperature was 0.5 degrees C. The influent and effluent flow meters are calibrated every 90 days
by Pearson Controls Services from Raleigh, NC.AII pH buffers were within expiration date.
8. Discharge Monitoring Reports for the period August 2010 through August 2012 were reviewed for
compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. There were no violations for the review
period. Commercial lab results, chain of custody records, and bench sheets were compared with
data submitted on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the month of August 2012. No
discrepancies were noted.
Stormwater Permit NCG110081
9. Permit NCG110081 was reissued and became effective on June 01, 2008 and expires on May 31,
2013. Permit renewal is required 180 days prior to permit expiration date. A review of the permit
requirements was conducted after the CEI for NC0023906. A copy of the permit was on hand and
contained all permit requirements. The employee contact list has been updated. There have been
no changes to the facility within the past two years. All elements of the Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) are being maintained. Qualitative monitoring was last conducted
06,14.2012, Employee training was last conducted on 09.18.2012.
I would like to thank you and Debbie Collins for yourtime and assistance with this inspection. If you have
any questions about this letter or the inspection please contact me at mitch. ha es ncdenr. gov or at
919.791.4261.
Sincerely,
MBJOO
Mitch Hayes
Environmental Specialist
cc: SWP files
Central files
EPA

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110081 Effective: 06/01/08 Expiration: 05131/13 Owner: City of Wilson
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Hominy Creek WWTP
County: Wilson 3100 Old Stantonsburg Rd
Region: Raleigh
Wilson NC 27893
Contact Person: Russell P Brice Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
244hour contact name James William Pridgen Phone: [phone]
On -site representative James William Pridgen Phone: [phone]
Related Permits:
W00001896 City of Wilson - City of Wilson Residuals Land Application Program
WQCS00021 City of Wilson - Wilson Collection System
NC0023906 City of Wilson - Wilson WWTP
Inspection Date: 10/22/2012 EntryTime: 10:15 AM(' Exit Time: 02:00 PM zG 1 2—
Primary Inspector: Mitchell S Hayes /�(/l�fjt P.(�-,l�'7 Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant Q Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110081 Owner - Facility: City of Wilson
Inspection Date: 10122/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Permit NCG110081 was reissued and became effective on June 01, 2008 and expires on May 31, 2013. Permit renewal
is required 180 days prior to permit expiration date. A review of the permit requirements was conducted after the CEI for
NC0023906. A copy of the permit was on hand and contained all permit requirements. The employee contact list has
been updated. There have been no changes to the facility within the past two years. All elements of the Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) are being maintained. Qualitative monitoring was last conducted 06.14.2012.
Employee training was last conducted on 09.18.2012.
Page: 2

y..
Permit: NCG110081 Owner -Facility: City of Wilson
Inspection Date: 10/22/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a Genera) Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Pian include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: No spills within the last three years.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: Qualitative monitoring last conducted on 06.14.2012.
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalis observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment:
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ 0 0
Yes No NA NE
Page: 3

4j'A U
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
November 10, 2010
Mr. Russell Brice, WRF Manager
City of Wilson
P.O. Box 10
Wilson, North Carolina 27894-0010
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
City of Wilson Hominy Creek Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit NCO023906
Stormwater Permit NCG110081
Wilson County
Dear Mr. Brice:
On October 27, 2010, Mitch Hayes and Mandy Hall of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an
inspection of the subject facility. Your assistance and the assistance of Jimmy Pridgen and Debbie
Collins, with this inspection were appreciated. Below is a list of findings and recommendations
developed from the inspection.
1. The subject permit was reissued and became effective December 01, 2009 and expires May
31, 2013. Permit renewal is required 180 days prior to permit expiration date. There has been
over 12 months of data for cadmium with results less than 2 ugll. You may request in writing
that DWQ reevaluate the cadmium data and determine whether the limit is still applicable.
2. The 14.0 MGD Wastewater Treatment Facility consists of the of the following units: influent
pump station; two (2) automatic bar screens; screenings compactor; automatic grit removal;
influent ultrasonic flow meter; two (2) pre -aeration basins; a biological phosphorus removal
tank; three (3) primary clarifiers; seven (7) aeration basins with seven anoxic zones and one
reaeration zone; five (5) secondary clarifiers; methanol feed facilities; five (5) deep bed
denitrification filters with automatic or manual backwashing; sodium hypochlorite disinfection
tank; reaeration basin with sodium bisulfite dechlorination; effluent ultrasonic flow meter;
effluent pump station; one (1) reuse water basin; a reclaim water facility; one (1) plastic lined
reclaimed water pond; four anaerobic digesters heated by natural gas or methane generated
from digesters; a sludge thickening and dewatering building with two (2) gravity belt
thickeners, two (2) belt filter presses, three (3) return waste activated sludge pump stations; a
ten -ton per day alkaline sludge stabilization facility capable of producing Class A dewatered
sludge; three (3) liquid sludge holding tanks; and a septage receiving station.
3. At the time of inspection, one (1) automatic bar screen, one (1) grit chamber, two (2) pre -
aeration basins, and two (2) aeration basins were not being used due to low inflow. The
number 2 primary clarifier will be taken out of service for a valve replacement. Three (3) out
of four (4) influent pumps were in operation at the influent pump station at the time of
inspection. Sludge thickening by gravity belts was operating normally. The digester methane -
generating unit was functioning normally. Excess methane was being ignited in the burner.
The color of the influent was a medium chocolate brown with foam covering over 90% of the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper No ethCarolina
;Vatura!!y

Hominy Creek'WRIF VEl'" -
Page.2a�i.��.;sa
"y""—es' eF c� a which s normal for this type of treatment process. All air diffusers in the aeration
basins appeared to be operating normally. Sludge judge reading in clarifier number 2 was' 3
feet with a sidewall depth of 9 '/2 feet. The weirs are covered on the secondary clarifiers and
therefore the condition of the weirs could not be checked. Weirs are checked annually and
cleaned if necessary. Effluent appeared clear in the post aeration tank.
4. EPA Region IV has approved the Categorical Exclusion for the replacement of the influent
screens and pumps. The project. includes the replacement - of the four influent pumps,
controls, and variable frequency drivers; replacement of one manual bar rack with two new
mechanical bar screens; replacement of the existing electrical service to the influent pump
station with two service entrances to provide a redundant source of electrical power; and
construction of reinforced concrete flood walls on top of and integral to the headworks facility
and around the influent pump station.
5. Granville Farms operates the Land Application Program under permit WQ0001896. Class B
solids are land applied on private farms or transported to Eastern Composting in Battleboro,
NC. There was no Class A or Class B sludge being produced at the time of inspection. The
last Class A sludge produced was in October 2008. Class B sludge and water treatment plant
sludge were stored separately under the shelter.
6. Reclaimed water is distributed under permit WQ0018709. Reclaimed water is irrigated on
Wedgewood Golf Coarse and at the J. Burt Gillette Athletic complex and used in process
water at the Hackney Industrial Park, and the Wilco Industrial Park. Reclaimed, reuse water
permits and other non -discharge permits are regulated by the Aquifer Protection Section
(APS). All correspondence pertaining to these permits should be directed to the APS.
7. The laboratory was checked in a cursory manner. All instrument calibration logs are being
maintained. The BOD incubator temperature was 19.5 degrees C, BOD water incubator was
20.5 degrees C, the drying oven was 104 degrees C, sample refrigerator was 1.8 degrees C,
and fridge #2 was 4 degrees C. An operator's logbook was available and being maintained.
The influent flow sampler temperature was 3 degrees C. The influent and effluent flow meters
are calibrated every 90 days by Pearson Controls Services from Raleigh, NC.
8. Discharge Monitoring Reports for the period July 2009 to July 2010 were reviewed for
compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. A Notice of Violation was issued
for a frequency monitoring for Total Copper May 2010. Through conversations with you, it
was noted that copper was monitored but not recorded. An amended DMR for May 2010 has
been sent Central Files and this office. Case NOV-2010-MV-0139 has been deleted. There
were no ofher violations for the review period.
9. Commercial lab results, chain of custody records, and bench sheets were compared with
data submitted"on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the month of July 2010. No
discrepancies were noted.
Stormwater Permit NCG110081
10. Permit NCG 110081 was reissued and . became effective on June 01, 2008 and expires on
May 31, 2013. Permit renewal is required 180 days prior to permit expiration date. A review
of the permit requirements was conducted after the CEI for NC0023906. A copy of the permit
was on hand and contained all permit requirements.
11. There have been no changes to the facility since 2006. The last issued map for the facility
shows all process units.
12. There are four stormwater discharge outfalls listed on the stormwater map. Outfall 4 drains to
a catch basin with diffuse flow near the entrance to the property. The stormwater flows to a
creek off site. Water appeared clear in the in the creek. Outfall 3 flows from the drainage area

Hominy Creek WRF CEI
Page 3
on the southeast side of the property and is conveyed to the same creek that discharges from
Outfall 4 via a concrete flume. There was no discharge at the time of inspection. Outfall 2
flows from behind the reuse water pump station to a small pond. Water in the pond appeared
muddy most likely due to wildlife. Outfall 1 flows to a storm drain by the influent pump station
to a settling basin (Raymond's Pond) off site. A locked gate valve controls discharge. Water
at the gate valve appeared clear.
13. Qualitative monitoring was last completed for all stormwater discharge outfalls on
05/17/2010. The last safety meeting was completed on 08/24/2010. All elements of the
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan are being implemented.
I would like to thank you and your staff for you time and assistance with this inspection. It has
been a pleasure to work with you over the years and I wish you the best in your retirement. If you have
any questions about this letter or the inspection, please contact me at 919,791.4261.
Sincerely,
//
*�l 0,
Mitch Hayes
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Central Files
SWP files
EPA

Permit: NCG110081
SOC:
County: Wilson
Region: Raleigh
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 06/01/08 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: City of Wilson
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Hominy Creek WWTP
3100 Old Stantonsburg Rd
Wilson NC 27893
Contact Person: Russell P Brice Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
24 hour contact name Russell P Brice Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Russell P Brice Phone: [phone]
Related Permits:
W00001896 City of Wilson - City of Wilson Residuals Land Application Program
WQCS00021 City of Wilson - Wilson Collection System
NCO023906 City of Wilson - Wilson WWTP
Inspection Date: 1012712010 Entry Time: 10:30 AM f� Exit Time:
/01:40 PM
Primary Inspector: Mitchell S Hayes ""Mi� 166- / Y�1 �I /VG%e�rPhone: 919-791-4200
Secondary Inspector(s): /
Mandy Hall -�L IC �� I 0 Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110081 owner - Facility: City of Wilson
Inspection Hate: 10/27/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
There have been no changes to the facility since 2006. The last issued map for the facility shows all process units. There
are four stormwater discharge outfalls listed on the stormwater map. Outfall 4 drains to a catch basin with diffuse flow
near the entrance to the property. The stormwater flows to a creek off site. Water appeared clear in the in the creek.
Outfall 3 flows from the drainage area on the southeast side of the property and is conveyed to the same creek that
discharges from Outfall 4 via a concrete flume. There was no discharge at the time of inspection. Outfall 2 flows from
behind the reuse water pump station to a small pond. Water in the pond appeared muddy most likely due to wildlife.
Outfall 1 flows to a storm drain by the influent pump station to a settling basin (Raymond's Pond) off site. A locked gate
valve controls discharge. Water at the gate valve appeared clear.
Qualitative monitoring was last completed for all stormwater discharge outfalls on 05/17/2010. The last safety meeting
was completed on 08/24/2010. All elements of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan are being implemented.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110081 Owner - Facility: City of Wilson
Inspection Date: 1012712010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a SMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: Employee training was held August 24, 2010. Facility is maintaining all
permit requirements.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: Monitoring was conducted May 17, 2010.
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non slormwater) discharges?
Comment: Water at outfall 2 appeared muddy most likely due to the wildlife in'the
area.
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 3

�s��rrrrr
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 06, 2009
Mr. Russell Brice, WRF Manager
City of Wilson
P.O. Box 10
Wilson, North Carolina 27894-0010
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
City of Wilson Hominy Creek Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit NCO023906
Stormwater Permit NCG110081
Wilson County
Dear Mr. Brice:
On March 25,2009, Mitch Hayes of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an inspection of the
subject facility. JoEllen Gay, Jimmy Pridgen, and your assistance with this inspection were appreciated.
Below is a list of findings and recommendations developed from the inspection.
1. The subject permit was reissued and became effective December 01, 2009 and expires May
31, 2013. Changes to the permit include:
a) Weekly monitoring for cadmium with a weekly average limit of 2 ug/l and a daily average
limit of 15 ug/I. After 12 months of data, a request can be made to determine if the limit is
still applicable.
b) Quarterly monitoring for chloroform and dichlorobromomethane had been added to the
permit.
c) Total Nitrogen discharge allocation has been increased to 157,886 pounds per year
(annual mass loading) with 78,943 pounds per year discharging into the estuary.
2. The 14.0 MGD Wastewater Treatment Facility consists of the of the following units: influent
pump station; two (2) automatic bar screens; screenings compactor; automatic grit removal;
influent ultrasonic flow meter; two (2) pre -aeration basins; a biological phosphorus removal
tank; three (3) primary clarifiers; seven (7) aeration basins with seven anoxic zones and one
reaeration zone; five (5) secondary clarifiers; methanol feed facilities; five (5) deep bed
denitrification filters with automatic or manual backwashing; sodium hypochlorite disinfection
tank; reaeration basin with sodium bisulfite dechlorination; effluent ultrasonic flow meter;
effluent pump station; one (1) reuse water basin; a reclaim water facility; one (1) plastic lined
reclaimed water pond; four anaerobic digesters heated by natural gas or methane generated
from digesters; a sludge thickening and dewatering building with two (2) gravity belt
thickeners, two (2) belt filter presses, three (3) return waste activated sludge pump stations; a
ten -ton per day alkaline sludge stabilization facility capable of producing Class A dewatered
sludge; three (3) liquid sludge holding tanks; and a septage receiving station.
3. At the time of inspection, one (1) automatic bar screen, one (1) grit chamber, two (2) pre -
aeration basins, one (1) aeration basin, one (1) secondary clarifier, and two (2) RAS pump
stations were not being used due to low inflow. Three (3) out of four (4) influent pumps were
North Carolina Division of water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: wvwv.ncwaterquality.org 1628 mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmabve Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper None Carolina

.HominyTCreek WRF CE!
`Page 2
-- "-----'in operation at the influent pump station at the time of inspection. An electrical fire to pump #
4 circuit breaker on March 21, 2009 forced staff to take the influent pump station out of
service. Three out of four influent pumps are now operational. Auxiliary pumps have been set
up to provide back-up pumping in case electrical problems reoccur. Sludge thickening by
gravity belts were operating normally. The digester methane -generating unit was functioning
normally. Excess methane was being ignited in the burner. There was a small leak in the
digester heat exchanger. A digester will be taken off line to check the gasket and replace if
necessary. The color of the influent was a medium chocolate brown with some foam. All air
diffusers in the aeration basins appeared to be operating normally. Sludge judge reading in
clarifier number 1 was 2 1/2 feet with a sidewall depth of 14 feet. The weirs are covered and
therefore the condition of the weirs could not be checked. Weirs are checked annually and
cleaned if necessary. Effluent appeared clear in the post aeration tank.
4. Granville Farms operates the Land Application Program under permit WO0001896. Class B
solids are land applied on private farms or transported to Eastern Composting in Battleboro,
NC. Class A solids are used by the City of Wilson in various landscaping projects. There
were no Class A or Class B sludge being produced at the time of inspection. The last Class A
sludge produced was in October 2008. Class A and Class B sludge were stored separately
under the shelter.
5. Reclaimed water is distributed under permit WQ0018709. Reclaimed water is irrigated on
Wedgewood Golf Coarse and at the J. Burt Gillette Athletic complex. Reclaimed water is also
used in cooling water at the Bridgestone/Firestone Plant, Hackney Industrial Park, and the
Wilco Industrial Park. Reclaimed, reuse water permits and other non -discharge permits are
regulated by the Aquifer Protection Section (APS). All correspondence pertaining to these
permits should be directed to the APS.
6. The laboratory was checked in a cursory manner. All instrument calibration logs are being
maintained. The BOD incubator temperature was 19.5 degrees C, BOD water incubator was
20 degrees C, the drying oven was 105 degrees C, sample refrigerator was 3 degrees C, and
fridge #2 was 4 degrees C. An operator's logbook was available and being maintained. The
influent flow sampler temperature was 0 degrees C without freezing. The effluent flow
sampler temperature was 0.5 degrees C without freezing. The influent and effluent flow
meters are calibrated every 90 days by Pearson Controls Services from Raleigh, NC.
7. Discharge Monitoring Reports for the period June 2008 to January 2009 were reviewed for
compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. Monthly permit limit for ammonia
nitrogen was exceeded for October 2008 due to the plant experiencing an upset. The reason
for the upset is not known. There were no other violations for the review period.
8. Commercial lab results, chain of custody records, and bench sheets were compared with
data submitted on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the month of January 2009. No
discrepancies were noted.
Stormwater Permit NCG110081
9. Permit NCG110081 was reissued and became effective on June 01, 2008 and expires on
May 31, 2013. The reissued permit contains the following changes: The site plan must
include a general location map (or alternatively the site map) that identify whether each
receiving water is impaired (on the state's 303(d) list of impaired waters) or is located in a
watershed for which a TMDL has been established, and what the parameter(s) of concern
are. A list of North Carolina's 303(d) list can be found at the web site
http_://h2o.enr.slate.nc.us/tmdl/General 303d.htm_#Down loads North Carolina TMDL
documents can be found at the website
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdI/TMDL list.htm#Final TMDLs The definition for a rain event
has been modified. A schedule for qualitative monitoring is now implemented. Schedule for
the facility site inspection has been changed to once during January to June and once during

Hominy Creek WRF CEI
Page 3
July to December with at least sixty days separating inspection dates unless performed more
frequently. There are no other significant changes made to the permit. A review of the permit
requirements was conducted after the CEI for NC0023906. A copy of the permit was on hand
and contained all permit requirements with the exception of the new requirements noted
above.
10. There have been no changes to the facility since 2006. The last issued map for the facility
shows all process units.
11. There are four stormwater discharge outfalls listed on the stormwater map. Outfall 4 drains to
a catch basin with diffuse flow near the entrance to the property. The stormwater flows to a
creek off site. Water appeared clear in the catch basin. Outfall 3 flows from the drainage area
on the southeast side of the property and is conveyed to a creek off site via a concrete flume.
Water in the creek appeared clear with no indication of sediment. Outfall 2 flows from the
reuse water pump station to a small pond. Water in the pond appeared muddy most likely
due to previous rainfall. Outfall 1 flows to a storm drain by the old headworks pump station to
a settling basin (Raymond's Pond) off site. A locked gate valve controls discharge. Water at
the gate valve appeared clear.
12. Qualitative monitoring was last completed for all stormwater discharge outfalls on
09/12/2008. Please ensure to follow the qualitative monitoring schedule as stated in the
permit. Workman's Comp. Safety meeting was completed on 10/28/2008.
I would like to thank you and your staff for you time and assistance with this inspection. You and
your staff should be commended for maintaining the water reclamation facility at top performance. If
you have any questions about this letter or the inspection, please contact me at 919.791.4261.
Sincerely,
a
Mitch Hayes
Environmental Specialist
Cc: CentrF.,!t les, SWP files

J
Permit: NCG110081
SOC:
County: Wilson
Region: Raleigh
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 06/01/08 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: City of Wilson
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Hominy Creek WWTP
3100 Old Stantonsburg Rd
Contact Person: Russell P Brice Title:
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
Wilson NC 27893
Phone: [phone]
Certification: Phone:
On -Site Representative(s):
24 hour contact name Russell P Brice
24 hour contact name Barry Glenn Parks
On -site representative Russell P Brice
Related Permits:
WQCS00021 City of Wilson - Wilson Collection System
NCO023906 City of Wilson - Wilson WWTP
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Date: 03/25/2009 Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 03:00 PM� >
Primary Inspector: Mitchell S Hayes �L�IZV
� Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): �(L r
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

C7
Permit: NCG110081 Owner - Facility: City of Wilson
Inspection Date: 03/25/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
There have been no changes to the facility since 2006. The last issued map for the facility shows all process units.
There are four stormwater discharge outfalls listed on the stormwater map. Outfall 4 drains to a catch basin with diffuse
flow near the entrance to the property. The stormwater flows to a creek off site. Water appeared clear in the catch basin,
Outfall 3 flows from the drainage area on the southeast side of the property and is conveyed to a creek off site via a
concrete flume. Water in the creek appeared clear with no indication of sediment. Outfall 2 flows from the reuse water
pump station to a small pond. Water in the pond appeared muddy most likely due to previous rainfall. Outfall 1 flows to a
storm drain by the old headworks pump station to a settling basin (Raymond's Pond) off site. A locked gate valve controls
discharge. Water at the gate valve appeared clear.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110081 Owner - Facility: City of Wilson
Inspection Date: 03/25/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: There have been no changes made to the site since 2006. There has been
one significant spill since the last inspection. Influent pump station lost power resulting
in 374,000 gallons of sewage bypass. The SPRP was implemented and resulted in no
sewage being released to waters. All sewage was contained in the stormwater retention
pond and pumped back into the treatment plant.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Comment: The last monitoring was completed 09/12/2008.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
❑
■ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls f
Yes No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■ ❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■ ❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑ ❑
■
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCG110081 Owner - Facility: City of Wilson
Inspection Date: 03/25/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: There was no discharge at any of the outfalls.
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

W a r�9P
�O G
p Y
M MAtLEQ
i•
June 13, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL 7006 0810 0002 6049 5237
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Russell Brice, WRF Manager
City of Wilson
P.O. Box 10
Wilson, North Carolina 27894-0010
Dear Mr. Brice:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
City of Wilson Hominy Creek Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit NCO023906
Stormwater Permit NCG110081
Wilson County
On May 20, 2008, Mitch Hayes and Cheng Zhang of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an
inspection of the subject facility. The assistance from Sandra Mooneyham, Joellen Gay, Tonya Grogan
and you with this inspection was appreciated. Below is a list of findings and recommendations developed
from the inspection.
1. A permit renewal for the Hominy Creek Water Reclamation Facility was received in this office in
December 2007. The permit is still under review in the Central Office. Please continue to operate
under the last issued permit until a new permit is issued.
2. The 14.0 MGD Wastewater Treatment Facility consists of the of the following units: influent
pump station; two automatic bar screens; screenings compactor; automatic grit removal; influent
ultrasonic flow meter; two pre -aeration basins; a biological phosphorus removal tank; three
primary clarifiers; seven aeration basins with seven anoxic zones and one reaeration zone; five
secondary clarifiers; methanol feed facilities; five deep bed denitrification filters with automatic or
manual backwashing; sodium hypochlorite disinfection tank; reaeration basin with sodium
bisulfite dechlorination; effluent ultrasonic flow meter; effluent pump station; one reuse water
basin; a reclaim water facility; one plastic lined reclaimed water pond; four anaerobic digesters
heated by natural gas or methane generated from digesters; a sludge thickening and dewatering
building with two gravity belt thickeners, two belt filter presses, waste activated sludge pump
station; a ten -ton per day alkaline sludge stabilization facility capable of producing Class A
dewatered sludge; three liquid sludge holding tanks; and a septage receiving station.
3. At the time of inspection, one (1) automatic bar screen, one (1) grit chamber, both pre -aeration
basins, two (2) primary clarifiers, one (1) aeration basin and two (2) anoxic zones, and were not
being used due to low inflow and underloading. The plant has been experiencing underloading for
the last four months. Spikes in BOD and ammonia have been noticed on Mondays and after
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
tntemet: www,ncwaterAuality,org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Acton Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper JohnCarolina
tura!!r!

Wilson Hominy Creek WRF CEI
Page 2
holidays. Presently, infusion of sugar water int6;�tfie T BNR Basins appears to be reducing the BOD
spikes. Methanol is being fed into the two (2) anoxic zones to further reduce ammonia. Installation
of a mechanical mixer at the end of the aeration -zone is planned later in the year to increase Total
Nitrogen uptake. Please note that the addition of the mechanical mixer may require an
Authorization to Construct (ATC) from the Construction Grants and Loans Section and a
modification to the permit. Please contact Mr. Daniel M. Blaisdell at 919.715,6211 for further
information. Effluent flowing off the primary clarifier was even with no obstruction. Diffusion of
air in the aeration basin appeared to be evenly distributed. Secondary clarifier weirs are covered to
prevent algae growth and could not be checked. Weirs are checked annually to ensure there is no
build-up of solids. All five (5) denitrification deep bed filters were in operation. Backwashing of
the five deep bed denitrification effluent filters is done on a 42-hour cycle for 45 minutes. Effluent
flowing into the reaeration zone below the dechlorination feed appeared clear with no odor, solids,
or foam. Rainwater was present in the basin that was formally used for sludge storage. Sludge
drying beds are used for drying out pump station wet well clean out pumpings and basin clean
outs. Some of the unused drying beds will be dismantled and removed. The digester methane
generation unit was operating as designed.
4. The sludge thickening and stabilization facility was producing Class B sludge at the time of
inspection. The facility is capable of producing Class A and Class B sludge. The facility has been
unable to produce Class A sludge for the last two weeks due to an error in the programmable logic
controller (PLC). Repair is expected to be completed later in May or early June 2008. There were
Class B solids stored under shelter. Dewatered and stabilized biosolids are land applied to
permitted privately owned farmland or transported to a privately owned composting facility.
Granville Farms operates the Land Application Program under permit WQ0001896. Any
supernatant from the sludge dewatering is conveyed back to the wastewater treatment head works.
5. Reclaimed water is distributed under permit WQ0018709. Reuse water is irrigated on Wedgewood
Golf Coarse and will be used in at the Firestone plant for cooling water. Reclaimed, reuse water
permits and other non -discharge permits are regulated by the Aquifer Protection Section (A -PS).
All correspondence pertaining to these permits should be directed to the APS.
6. The laboratory was checked in a cursory manner. All instrument calibration logs are being
maintained. An operator's logbook was available and being maintained. The influent and effluent
flow meters were last calibrated 05/01/2008 and are calibrated every 90 days by Pearson Controls
Services from Raleigh, NC. The BOD incubator temperature was 20.0 degrees C, the drying oven
was 107 degrees C, sample refrigerator was 4.5 degrees C, fridge #2 was 4 degrees C, and the fecal
fridge was 1.0 degree C.
7. The wastewater treatment plant staff, Tritest, Mircrobac (STR Division), and EnChem analyzes all
permit parameters.
8. Discharge Monitoring Reports for the period June 2007 to May 2008 were reviewed for
compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. Weekly and monthly permit limit for
ammonia nitrogen were exceeded in 09/2007. The violations occurred as a result of repairs being
made to the aeration blowers and were dismissed. Monthly permit limit for ammonia nitrogen was
exceeded November 2007. This occurred as a result of an unpermitted biodiesel facility
discharging wastes with high concentrations of BOD, COD, NH3-N, TKN, and FOG. The
discharge caused a plant upset. Monthly and weekly permit limit for ammonia nitrogen were
exceeded for December 2007. The plant experienced underloading during the weekends and
holidays and believed to have caused the permit limits for ammonia to be exceeded. Further
examination by plant staff found that another unpermitted biodiesel facility was discharging into

Wilson Hominy Creek WRF CEI
Page 3
the collection system and most likely have caused the spikes in ammonia. There were no other
violations for the review period.
9. Commercial lab results, chain of custody records, and bench sheets were compared with data
submitted on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the month of February 2008. No
discrepancies were noted.
Stormwater Permit NCGI 10081
10. Permit NCG110081 was reissued and became effective on June 01, 2008 and expires on May 31,
2013. A review of the permit requirements was conducted after the CEI for NC0023906. A copy of
the permit was on hand.
11. The stormwater map for the facility was updatedl2/18/2006 and contains all permit requirements.
12. There are four stormwater discharge outfalls listed on the stormwater map. Outfall 4 drains to a
catch basin in front of the old head works pump station off site. This outfall has been reworked to
include more rip/rap with a small settling basin with diffuse flow. There was no discharge. Outfall
3 flows from the drainage area on the southeast side of the property to a creek off site. Water in the
creek appeared clear with no indication of sediment. Outfall 2 flows from the reuse water pump
station to a small pond. Water in the pond appeared tanic most likely due to the high organic
matter content in the soil. Outfall 1 flows to a storm drain by the old headworks pump station to a
settling basin (Raymond's Pond) off site. A locked gate valve controls discharge. Water at the gate
valve appeared clear. There were no stormwater discharges at the time of inspection.
13. Qualitative monitoring reports for Outfalls l; 2, 3, and 4 were available for 04/18/2008 and
09/10/2007. Documentation of employee training on clean-up procedures occurred on 04/2007.
'I would like to thank you and your staff for your time and assistance with this inspection. If you have
any questions concerning this report or the inspection, please contact me at 919.791.4261.
Sincerely,
AAf�' UV I
vl
Mitch Hayes
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Central Files
EPA

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110081 Effective: 05/21/04 Expiration: Owner: City of Wilson
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Hominy Creek WWTP
County: Wilson 3100 Old Stantonsburg Rd
Region: Raleigh
Wilson NC 27893
Contact Person: Russell P Brice Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Certification: Phone:
24 hour contact name Russell P Brice Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Russell P Brice Phone: [phone]
Related Permits:
N00023906 City of Wilson - Wilson WWTP
Inspection Date: 05120/2008 Entry Time: 09:15 AM Exit Time: 04:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Mitchell S.Hayes �,0 dG/I %/z Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): - /
Cheng Zhang Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110081 Owner - Facility: City of Wilson
Inspection Date: 05/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
There are four stormwater discharge outfalls listed on the stormwater map. Outfall 4 drains to a catch basin in front of the
old head works pump station off site. This outfall has been reworked to include more rip/rap with a small settling basin
with diffuse flow. There was no discharge. Outfall 3 flows from the drainage area on the southeast side of the property to
a creek off site. Water in the creek appeared clear with no indication of sediment. Outfall 2 flows from the reuse water
pump station to a small pond. Water in the pond appeared tanic most likely due to the high organic matter content in the
soil. Outfall 1 flows to a storm drain by the old headworks pump station to a settling basin (Raymond's Pond) off site. A
locked gate valve controls discharge. Water at the gate valve appeared clear. There were no stormwater discharges at
the time of inspection.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110081 Owner - Facility: City of Wilson
Inspection Date: 05/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
Cl
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: There has been no spill withing the past three years.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑
Cl
Comment, Qualitative monitoring was on 09/10/2008 and on 04/18/2008.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment,. Facility does not have representative outfall status
Page: 3

�0� W A rFRp
�O 7
September 4, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL 7006 0810 0002 6048 4925
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Russell Brice, W WMF Manager
City of Wilson
P.O. Box 10
Wilson, North Carolina 27894-0010
Dear Mr. Broome:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. I�EI?
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
City of Wilson Hominy Creek Wastewater Management Facility
NPDES Permit NCO023906
Stormwater Permit NCG110081
Wilson County - - -
On August 22, 2007, Mitch Hayes of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an inspection of the
subject facility. Your assistance with this inspection was appreciated. Below is a list of findings and
recommendations developed from the inspection.
1. The current permit was reissued and became effective February 1, 2004 and will expire May 31,
2008. Permit renewal is required by December 03, 2007.
2. The 14.0 MGD Wastewater_ Treatment Facility consists of the of the following units: influent
pump station; two automatic bar screens; screenings compactor; automatic grit removal; influent
ultrasonic flow meter; two pre -aeration basins; a biological phosphorus removal tank; four primary
clarifiers; seven aeration basins with seven anoxic zones and one reaeration zone; five secondary
clarifiers; methanol feed facilities; five deep bed denitrification filters with automatic or manual
backwashing; sodium hypochlorite disinfection tank; reaeration basin with sodium bisulfite
dechlorination; effluent ultrasonic flow meter; effluent pump station; one reuse water basin; a
reclaim water facility; one plastic lined reclaimed water pond; four anaerobic digesters heated by
natural gas or methane generated from digesters; a sludge thickening and dewatering building with
two gravity belt thickeners, two belt filter presses, waste activated sludge pump station; a ten -ton
per day alkaline sludge stabilization facility; three sludge holding tanks; and a septage receiving
station.
3. At the time of inspection, the pre -aeration basins, the number one 85-foot primary clarifier, one
aeration basin, one grit chamber, and two anoxic zones were not being used due to low inflow.
Flow was being restricted to the number 2 and 3 primarys due to low inflow. Rainwater was
present in the basin that was formally used for sludge storage. Sludge drying beds are no longer
used and are being dismantled. The digester methane generation unit was operating as designed.
Secondary clarifiers are covered to prevent algae growth. The condition of the weirs could not be
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phnne [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.ort; 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX (919) 788,7159 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled]10% Post Consumer Paper tltulral&
Carolina

Wilson Hominy Creek WWMF CEI
Page 2
checked. Backwashing of the five deep bed denitrification effluent filters is done on a 42-hour
cycle for 20 minutes or 45 minutes. The 20 minutes backwashing cycle maintains a film for
denitrification bacteria to grow. When too many solids build up on the filters, the filters are
backwashed 45 minutes. Effluent flowing into the reaeration zone below the dechlorination feed
appeared clear with no odor, solids, or foam.
4. The sludge thickening and stabilization facility was not operating at the time of inspection. The
facility iscapableof producing Class A and Class B sludge. There were some solids stored under
shelte ,The�CldSs,.;A•.:or Class B dried sludge is land applied by Granville Farms under permit
WQO00I•896. Any supernatant from the sludge dewatering is conveyed back to the wastewater
treafinent�liead-works.
5. Reclaimed water is distributed under permit WQ0018709. Reuse water is irrigated on Wedgewood
Golf Coarse. Reclaimed, reuse water permits and other non -discharge permits are regulated by the
Aquifer Protection Section (APS). All correspondence pertaining to these permits should be
directed to the APS.
6. The laboratory was checked in a cursory manner. All instrument calibration logs are being
maintained. An operator's logbook was available and being maintained. The influent and effluent
flow meters are calibrated every 90 days. Fecal coliform bath temperature was 44.4 degrees C, the
BOD incubator temperature was 19.5 degrees C, the drying oven was 106 degrees C, and the
refrigerator was 1.5 degrees C.
7. The wastewater treatment plant staff, Tritest, Mircrobac (STR Division), and EnChem analyze all
permit parameters.
8. Discharge Monitoring Reports for the period August 2006 to May 2007 were reviewed for
compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. There were no violations recorded
during the review period.
9. Commercial lab results, chain of custody records, and bench sheets were compared with data
submitted on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the month of May 2007. No
discrepancies were noted.
Stormwater Permit NCG110081
10. Permit NCG110081 was issued and became effective on May 20, 2004 and will expire on April
30, 2008. A review of the permit requirements was conducted after the CEI for NC0023906. A
copy of the permit was on hand.
.11. The stormwater map for the facility was updated12/18/2006 and contains all permit requirements.
12. There are four stormwater discharge outfalls listed on the stormwater map. Outfall 4 drains to a
catch basin in front of the old head works pump station off site. This outfall has been reworked to
include more rip/rap with a small settling basin with diffuse flow. Outfall 3 flows from the
drainage area on the southeast side of the property to a creek off site. Outfall 2 flows from the
reuse water pump station to a small pond. Outfall 1 flows to a storm drain by the old headworks
pump station to a settling basin (Raymond's Pond) off site. There were no stormwater discharges
at the time of inspection. Water at all outfalls appeared clear with no sediment.

Wilson Hominy Creek WWMF CEI
Page 3
13. Qualitative monitoring reports for Outfalls 1, 2, 3, and 4 were available for 04/17/2007 and
09/29/2006. Documentation of employee training on clean-up procedures occurred on 11/21/2006
and 01 /08/2007.
I would like to thank you and your staff for your time and assistance with this inspection. The staff'
and yourself are doing an excellent Job in maintaining and operating the wastewater facility and should be
commended for your efforts. If you have any questions concerning this report or the inspection, please
contact me at 919.791.4261.
Sincerely,
/t��/W pig
Z
Mitch Hayes
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Central Files
EPA

Permit: NCG110081
SOC:
County: Wilson
Region: Raleigh
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 05/21/04 Expiration: Owner: City of Wilson
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Hominy Creek WWTP
3100 Old Stantonsburg Rd
Contact Person: Charlles W Pittman
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
Title: City Manager
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative Russell P Brice
24 hour contact name Russell P Brice
Related Permits:
NCO023906 City of Wilson - Wilson WWTP
Certification:
Wilson NC 27893
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Date: 08/22/2007 Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exi Time: 02:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Mitchell S Hayes �� f%— C�%� Phone: [phone]
VVV
Secondary Inspector(s): v
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110081 Owner - Facility: City of Wilson
Inspection Date: 08/22/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
There are four stormwater discharge outfalls listed on the stormwater map. Outfall 4 drains to a catch basin in front of the
old head works pump station off site. This outfall has been reworked to include more rip/rap with a small settling basin
with diffuse flow. Outfall 3 flows from the drainage area on the southeast side of the property to a creek off site. Outfall 2
flows from the reuse water pump station to a small pond. Outfall 1 flows to a storm drain by the old headworks pump
station to a settling basin (Raymond's Pond) off site. There were no stormwater discharges at the time of inspection.
Water at all outfalls appeared clear with no sediment.
Employee training on emergency response and clean-up procedures was conducted on 11/26/2006 and 01/08/2007.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110081 Owner - Facility: City of Wilson
Inspection Date: 08/22/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: Stormwater map was updated 12/18/2006
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: Monitoring was conducted during 04/17/2007 and 09/29/2006.
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non Stormwater) discharges?
Comment: Facility has 4 Stormwater discharge outfalls.
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

I
Od-03-2006 01:46PM FROM -CITY OF W - WASTEWATER 252-399-2209 jWT-461 P.001 F-620 I
m a�oasuiag xa,
P.Q. Box 10
Wlkz6 NC 2-493
CITY �F N F Ps2) 994209
Emil:rhriceranvikonnc.org
- W 4�.TER MG1VTI`, .
To: Mitch HayeS, Raleigt► Regional Fax: [phone]
Office
From: RUSSO Brice Date: 10/3/06
WWI? Manager
Re: Stormwatcr Qualitadvc Monitoring Pages: 9
Rcport
CC:
0. Urga t x For Review 0 Please comment D Please Re0y A Please Recycle
Notex Per your uquest. l «ill forward the training roster when completed.

4CT-Q3-2006 01:49PM FROM -CITY OF W - WASTEWATER
252-39D-22Q9 • T-461 P.002/009 F-629
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: 1I_I I Certificate of Coverage No.: NJG�111/dlDl�l�l
Facility Name: _4
County: N jorPhone No. — Z
Inspector: �
Date of Inspection: .2 O
By this !j pature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No. ` Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream: _ /""DlV1 (, Jr -
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
2. Color
Describe the color of the
dark) as descriptors:
using basic colors Sreo, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor.
etc.) ONE
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where I is clear and I0 is very
cloudy:
1 2 (1) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 'I ; I
k Page 1
S WU-242-10 1599
i
1 I

06T-03-2006 01:50PM FROM -CITY OF 9
N - WASTEWATER 252-SOO-2206 0 T-401 P.003/009 F-620 i, r
a
c
5, Floadng Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids;
0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where L is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
1 3 ....,4..:....5 5 ;7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge7 Yes iYo
9. Other Obvious Indicators of Stortnwater Pollution
List and describe A/o/U�5
Note. Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen maybe indicadvc of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
swU•?a2-10159'j

OCT-03-2006 01:51PM FROM -CITY OF V - WASTEWATER
252-399-2209 • T-481 P-004/009 F-620 0
�\D
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Momitoring Report
Pemiit No.: NICI l_I 1 I ! 1 or Certificate of Coverage No.: NIGGI!1 110I01 �1 �l
Facility Name: (!/ IAI
County: ,Phone No. — Ti
Inspector: t c 6
Date of Inspection; 6
By this signature„I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream:
Describe the industrial activities that o ur within the ourfall drainage area
z erM b;(vr _ . ti _ .
2. Color
Describe the color of the
dark) as descriptors:
using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
/' it -b�
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weal: chlorine odor,
etc,) /yO& le—:, _
4, clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where I is clear and ID is very
cloudy:
1 Z (D 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Page I

1�
OCT-03-2006 01.51PM FROM -CITY OF 0R - WASTEWATER 252-399-2209 • T-481 P-005/009 F-629
1
r
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the storrnwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
1 073 4 5 5 i 8 9 ?0
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
81 Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes tvo
9. Other Obvious indicators of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe 412ill_4!5-* - - ___--
Note. Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen maybe indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
S W U-242-101599
Page 2

OCT-03-2006 01:52PM FROM -CITY OF W - WASTEWATER
252-399-2209 0 T-481 P-008/000 F-820
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: �11C1_I_I�1J�1_I I or Certificate of Cover N .: N/C1G1111 /D 101�1�1
Facility Name: D
County: Phone No.
tnspector; E G C C
Date of Inspection: 9 06
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No. �. 5tru cure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream:
Describe the i Tt
dustrial activities that occuf within the outfall drainage area:
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red. brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark) as descriptors: NO ,_<,rwhk6l�
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of of I, weak chlorine odor,
etc.) N °
4, Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where I is clear and 10 is very
cIoudy: No 'p1'5C1y k&6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 & 9 10
Page I
SwU•142-101599

OCT-03-2006 01:53PM FROM -CITY OF ON - WASTEWATER 252-399-2209 • T-481 P-00T/009 F-629
,I
S, Floating Solids Ne),
i
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the srorrnwater discharge where I'
3 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
I Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids.in the stormwater discharge �!E
where I is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
i ,. ...._...4..^...5 5 F. 8 9 0
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
3
8. Oil Sheen
i�
15 there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No j
9. Other Obvious Endicators of 'Storm water pollution
List and describe
Note- Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foarn or oil sheen may be indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may Warrant further investigation.
Page 2
SWU-74:-101599

OtT-03-2006 01:54PM FROM -CITY OF 6N - WASTEWATER
252-389-2208 . T-481 P.008/006 F-626
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Pemzir No.: �ICI�I 1 I I_I_l-J or Certificate of Courage No.: O/Uljl
Facility Name;
County; / 6 Phone No. Z
Inspector:
Date of Inspection: 9 O
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No.,.Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream: 0 �t
Describe the industrial activities thdt occur within the outfall drainage area:
i Z. Color
Describe the color of the discharge u
dark) as descriptors:
A colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
3. Odor.
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e.. smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine Ddor,
ctc,) _. e d rV ._
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very
cloudy:
1 2 (D3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Page I

kT-03-2006 01:55PM FROM -CITY OF 1 N - WASTEWATER 252-309-2200 • T-481 P.009/009 F-629 I
5. Floating Solids j
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
I is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids: ,
3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10
i
6. Suspended Solids `
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
1 �_...3.......4. ......5 5) 7 8 9 io
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwarer discharge? Yesa i
8. Oil Sheen
L there an oil sheen in the stornawater discharge? Yes 1�I
9. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe Q Gr
Note: Low clarity. high solids, and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen may be indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
SIVU-?47•101599

P. 01
TRANSACTION REPORT
OCT-03-2006 TUE 01'52 PM
FOR: DENR RRO 19195714718
DATE START RECEIVER TX TIME PAGES TYPE NOTE M# DP K
OCT-03 01:35 PM 97150166 58" 1 SEND OK 451 �

• •
CITY OF WILSON
JoA CCt o&na
INCORPORATED 1849
27894-0010
Wastewater Management
Facility
October 24, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
NCDWQ/RRO
Surface Water Protection
1626 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Subject: Response to Notice of Violation
NOV-2005-PC-0227
Stormwater Permit NCGI 10081
City of Wilson — Hominy Creek WWMF
Dear Mr. Schuster:
Wilson, NC
AlAmerimClty
+
c
-i972 ♦ 2003
This serves to notify your office that the Hominy Creek WWMF has developed a
Stormwater Management Plan as required in Permit No. NCG 110081 and in accordance
with the requirements set forth in General Permit No. NCGI 10000.
If you have any questions concerning this letter please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Russell Brice
Plant Manager
Cc: Charles Pittman
Barry Parks
P.O. BOX 10 ♦ WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27894-0010 ♦ TELEPHONE [phone] ♦ FAX: [phone]
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER

Nlichael F. Easley. Governor
•r ` OF `il A TF
i
September 26, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURNED RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Russell Brice, WWMF Manager
City of Wilson
P. 0. Box 10
Wilson, NC 27894-0010
Dear Mr. Brice:
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
-----------r------------
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Wilson Hominy Creek WWMF
NPDES Permit NCO023906
r.l+.Fk et ,!ter
Notice of Violation NOV-2005-PC-0227
Stormwater Permit �NCG110081
Wilson County
Mitch Hayes of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a Compliance Evaluation
Inspection on June 6, 2005. The cooperation and assistance of you and Aichester Hinnant with
this inspection was appreciated.. Please find the attached Basin Wide Information Management
System (BIMS) inspection checklist summarizing the inspection. Some items of concern are
listed below:
DMR's for the period June 2004 through June 2005 were reviewed for permit limits and
monitoring compliance. DWQ's computer system BIMS noted the following: there has been no
weekly monitoring for NO3 + NO2 for the months June, July, August, and September 2004.
Total Nitrogen and TKN are being monitored and therefore the value for NO3 + NO2 can be
extrapolated. Please send in amended DMR's for the period June through September 2004 to
included the NO3 + NO2 parameter. BIMS is also picking up frequency violations for all weekly
parameters when there are holidays. Please place the letter "H" for holiday in each parameter on
the DMR that is not monitored because of holidays. Monthly Permit limit violations for NH4-N
and weekly NH4 limit violation were noted for May 2005. These violations have already been
addressed.
Stormwater Permit NCG 110081 was issued and became effective on May 20, 2004 and will
expire on April 30, 2008. A review of the permit requirements was conducted after the CEI for
NC0023906. The stormwater permit was available for the inspection however; a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has not been developed. Permit requirements state that a
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Internet: h2o,enrstate.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Nor hCarolina
Jvah rally
Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]

Wilson Hominy Creek WWTP CEI ; i-
Page 2 T
SWPPP be developed within 12 months after permit issuance. Minimum requirements for the
SWPPP can be found in the permit in Part iI Section A, items 1 through 9. Qualitative
monitoring is required for each stormwater outfall twice a year, once in the spring (April through
June), and once in the fall (September through November). Analytical monitoring is required for
facilities that have any vehicle maintenance activity occurring on site which uses more than 55
gallons of new motor oil per month when averaged over the calendar year. Requirements for the
monitoring are specified in Table 2, Section C of the stormwater permit.
This report is being sent as Notice of Violation for Stormwater Permit NCG110081 for
failure to develop and implement a SWPPP within twelve (12) months of the effective permit
issuance date. Please notify this office by October 31, 2005 when a SWPPP is developed. If you
have any questions concerning this report or the inspection, please contact Mitch Hayes at
91'9.791.4261�-' -
Sincerely,
. 4, WL'l
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Surface Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Cc: Central Files

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., Pi
Transaction Code NPDES yrimo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 1,,j 2 [5 31 NCGi10081 1 11 12 05/06/o8 17 18 U 19 S 20 LJ uu -
�
Remarks
211 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I _1 I I JL1_ 1__ I I I I I I I Ill 1 1_ I I I 1 1 161
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evatuation Rating 131 CIA
671 1 69 70 U 71 U 72 U 73 W 74 751 1 1 1 1 Lj 80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For tndustrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time)Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
11:00 AM 05/06/08
04/05/21
Hominy Creek W7TP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
3100 Old Stantonsburg Rd
wilson NC 27893
03:00 PM 05/06/08
Names) of Onsite Representative (s)rTitles(s)rPftone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Charlles w Pittman,Po Box 10 wilson NC Contacted
27893/Manager/252-399-2462/2523992453 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit ■ Records/Reports 0 Facility Site Review 0 Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Find in/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
{See attachment summary}
f G
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspectors) AgencylOffice/Phone and Fax Nu bens Date
Mitchell S Hayes RRO WQ//919-571-4700 Ext.265/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/OfficelPhone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.

NPDES yrimolday inspection Type
3I NCG1100B1 I11 12 05/06/08 17 18l.:_I
(cant.) 1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Permit NCG110081 was issued and became effective on May 20, 2004 and will expire or. April 30, 2008. A review of
the permit requirements was conducted after the CEI for NC0023906. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
{5+7PPP) has not been developed. There have been no records kept since permit issunce. Stormwater drains at
the screenings area and at the sludge press area are routed back to the head of the plant. A Secondary
containment wall is provided for the methanol, sodium hypechlorite and sodium metabi.sulphite tanks.

Permit: NCG110081
Inspection Date: 06/08/2005
Owner -Facility: Hominy Creek WWTP
Inspection Type: Compgance Evaluation
Permit
(If the present permit expires in 6 Months or less) Has the permittee submitted a new application?
Yes- No
1311
NA NF
■ ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■ ❑
❑ Cl
Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Comment: No special condtions.
Yes
NA NIF
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Wo
❑ a ❑ ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab, reg. required 5 years)?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
❑
Name of indivAuat performing the sampling
❑
Results of analysis and calibration
❑
Dates of analysis
❑
Name of person performing analyses
❑
Transported COCs
❑
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
(It the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted Flow) Do they operate 2417 with a certified operator on each shift?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annuat Report on file for review?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
Comment: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan has not been developed within 12 months of permit issunce. No
qualitative monitoring has been done.

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Boss Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7 Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
0 Division of Water Quality
Mr. Russell P. Brice
City of Wilson
3100 Old Stantonsburg Rd.
Wilson, NC 27893
Dear Mr. [trice:
1V ay'2l, 2004I ] ' 17IS
AMY
r
G�«cf
Subject: General Permit No. NCGI 10000
Hominy Creek WWM.F
COC NCG 1 10081
Wilson County
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on April 19, 2004 we are
forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state — NPDES general
permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Caroline and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated May
9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division
Of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the
certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management
Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Jonathan Diggs at telephone number
[phone] ext. 537.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater and General Permits Unit Files
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699.1817 [phone]
tJCI rNM
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMITNO. NCG110000
CERTII+ICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG110081
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
City of Wilson
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Hominy Creek WWMF
3100 Old Stantonsburo Rd.
Wilson
Wilson County
to receiving waters designated as Hominy S%vamp, a class C Sw NSW water in the Meuse River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, 11, 111,
1V, V, and V1 ol' General Permit No. NCG 110000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall became effective May 21, 2004.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day May 21, 2004.
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

UltjfK.
Zv
'kh j f
H
v Ov;
C
Rest Ha,�eil 'I.
L
tz
X,
A,
w l,
01
p
Nv
#
L?
x*
V., wlr
6k Jr
-aw VIL
17
oRk
r
Cem;
P3
'T
2
Y,•(Dree
T7
.,n unlry C,
TE,
"0
f f �"`•�z;,:_::%�r ��'� ��..-----� 4I�'.:---rA-_. i�� � +�..:+...-,�-� :,��f 1r� i ; I _ ,;�, y F' \ i - -
J1
,'� ,I I � /` 4jtr .w�"'>� � e . i" � ,. +•e�f �.�.�� .ck`: /,,+! — i' ,, ° l �I .�� - if �I —•-•--- -
4.1
15
. 61=7N
4,
d
$v
4,
Coovriclht (0) 1997. Mantech, Inc.

qF" ,_ a .. .
Markers
Name: Hominy Creek WWMF
Short Name: HmnyCr
Coordinates: 0350 41' 11.8" N, 0770 53' 49.5" W
Comment: Hominy Creek WWMF, subbasin 03-04-07, Neuse River Basin, Wilson County, Hominy
Swamp, Class C Sw NSW, USGS quad E27NW

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross .Jr , Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
May 21, 2004
Mr. Russell P. Brice
City of Wilson
3100 Old Stantonsburg Rd.
Wilson, NC 27893
Subject: General Permit No. NCG 110000
Hominy Creek WWMF
COC NCG 110081
Wilson County
Dear Mr. Brice:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
Division of Water Quality
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on April 19, 2004 we are
forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state — NPDES general
permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated May
9, 1994 (or LIS subsequently amended).
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division
of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissttance of the
certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management
Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Jonathan Diggs at telephone number
[phone] ext. 537.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek. P.E.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater and General Permits Unit Files
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
5Ub[ R-
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

STATE; OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMIHNT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCGI10000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG110081
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
City of Wilson
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Hominy Creek NMMI-
3100 Old Stantonsburg Rd.
Wilson
Wilson County
to receiving waters designated as Hominy Swamp, a class C Sw NSW water in the Neuse River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements. and other conditions set forth in Parts I, 11, 111,
IV, V, and VI of Gencral Permit No. NCG 110000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective May 21, 2004.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day May 21, 2004,
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

-
-'t 1 3 ,.` f••M•'• i ,G,s� uw y4 �"'ata, 1 -•'� a �r 4•. - S 4'':� "r • /1 ,y-' -
`
I'Dpad •tcM, • x ti^S' �,., { 3 +z. -� ) -s sr ° . a c r { i'') ;
:JT D I . • k * ? $ _rr. 4 zsc L, ! "v.y�t' K yam-' a �...�_ j __ �. ... -
-.: , ! ••.•. � ` '4 r� �li.r Jc �� t �r �'v.�y Y- S.^t yt It ail �• e Y - �•' _ __.-._.
-.. s; \ .'.:•. _`-,. - (- max„ rrl�¢ Y Tr ��. ® u - ---... I _ .3 ,
a
i hy„ v
r •
' i _ ^' /.�'I �,t.�.. a;` � �•5.'�px��,.' , �i ` k.. � ! - f� a �1... - Wit,'-" _.% ,. n j � ]�:J.
•
\'.\ e. k,- r `�' c"'��.'x� '-�'.:"� '".�*',}: #•` ! .aa�. ..lt<,y.,„ � � : l _ t : ♦ SJ- �T x i�4h "L I,t�,., -x � r., •. i� :.. :; S!`. i
\ -. i' : � f.. -yi ° ��.•' .t `.•ear 1 r ` }, � �. - � /- •.+: •s /'- U.- T • �; • ��. _ s �
/:. •I C-ASS
�i. \_�` 1 y�� .? > >;;Z�� rl� °'��`1`'�'x:_`' `�"M.�.�.. � �; f•[7 'm1?�+`�'�qR�-� '''.,z,��,.,'T� - � f" . � � ,� .i, �, - _�r
.1 ••Y � � 1 �l -'� .u�.•, iI f'x, •. t' .�,..: �ti.�}ti _"rijy.:"` .� l ��..1........ .✓� f' C ` j •'�I, _
ke
� , - -' �_„ii• " . q '� 'ram
y �a
-'• _ LL
7 •�, c5 J r "�a'° ^� w \� _ 1� _.;+`art ty �,y, ": lk. �a , 4µ -:pp' i;` "' .I` %,� �• i
i"t�iifi� ","j,��a-`• M !. .s�^'.•'�"^Ai'r.�- r !J _ t ,f�P.�. �4 i/!....
,k 1?S'Mt ,� -C` .x ,�. `.' i •!y �,� J i , i - 5 --e.' _.:..'"rz 1 '$ •' 1 ,e
c
;
'•A- ._. - a_ ,• ., _� ter.::. ..*.'rti. S 1.' 1_ti.-••-/ti 1. i.. x I,..
�(: •"�'-` n':' - '/` - i, k l .^ 'iaa�::•,, ✓ f."' T ti ;`, _ ,�sv._- - ,:i 3![�sn y:.A- i - �`iE a- l..a..�•` .r r w - ' � .: -- -
7. ^e:Y4 JJ ,„-- ice\�•��.i t,�.f 'v' �. 1 •�lh k J
;k sit Y' /' Y- ;' .J``sk., i aP fx `�e� IaYi sue•_ - - u— "�
• ;' .1; , I r � � y '-, b� � ! �'�' ti � �� .;.r="'�` -w.{.ry �� s •f ��4E � � rT ,� I'
!r- 11M . ..� i s ,1 Si 1 1^..t O +-_• 'd iL-141$Ir ,V'"i 1 t'ir�i 9 yq�a� a _ •i
'� :\`, ( _•'�=� .c�.�,-•- _-, � `C•�\- Y �.r��,G •�'�y't�'1.� ���i I� '� � *s+� '�.� \,-"l �. �1 r •i.n.
.,a kt • 1,' 1 c�. � 1 ::'�` f , �, ���•'��� '�- i, `�f� f � ,� vh / "'4, .c - �}✓ � i' .
z¢ 1 �� ~.�.� ',� iws' ✓i` .c' �.����s-t'� rry ',+q •�_• �` ti,•
ua1,
i.y •I • rt -- ? j •0' �.r� 7,� •E < �. � �_�
,::� •�,A . __:. _, �~' � �_'� \.•-r--�� � ice.
o�
........ . �. r
. iE ,,.i•�.-.; F �� ;ems• J� 'ir - :'^•�=•�-- ���,"� "s-y _ _=�i`z`•���:•.a:�•�Z= � S.. p�� e I .,� .M.. y _ _. - I_ 1 � F; �. t'f
44
Yam•' ,,� !-. ._ .. - � •t �.-
--1—'--'�L-.� 1 �,{-°. i� --- � � �.- � ' 1'I s,f:. S,R.�.,,-�•f �,_l ,i,, ' �� - - s. i'- �_:,� '-•fir= �' x'�_ . �" ^� Z.;i, 3_ _ T`
�ER,rjcE"i
1-±'-i:��•, -, T r' . y r- - !. L�� l -
`j � r s �� 'Elk. � � �_-wti� ry�'�r'' � cam' _ �) � i � �-• � ���lC� �, �`y�rr• 'F, z 'ti•.
"\p J f '' \ ~ c _ : - rr✓. it Sep
i s7'a�r1:. hk i.-!_.+.i�- 1=�.�r:.`-I •� i �'• '•'��%fi...`� jj✓`1WO
13,
psi
••�'r� *:• y�S.,J}�•'s�, ktf •:tl� �_.�-}, a -"i'r t, *- �"+_ r'��
{
- _ r
9 �;:ti..;--...». ,, � � J ��ll'7 7 i„-__ •,��._ '--?!--....-__ _ a T )- ,*ti�•a Y �t Xw�;�, .. �, l�+ lr�t �.� � � _� __fib �, .,•� �
•�� � !__ �. fi , -�•e, s.. � 1. ,r ^,c �/.. I � � !, � � � � .
�-f• a r"'� � 1 ii.•. k^—tii ..� � r I ter_,.,__ {,__ A"�:Y� fi €' r } i I_ ,;
� K ;�- � � �( , ! S � f �`�s�—k_t• � j F '1 � � t'"' ,�+ Y � 1� 1- "'I4 � ',
•a•,:,F���t . � �•g,,;�,� +x � '-�.E~�'r � 'a� _ b� �:J. _ .' � � f jd.F �-r�'"'_'-�._�-_�.�ar-,5.•.,r.J, a`- : e . � ; 's..,tilL^�4- al�h{. � �Y[ ik _ _•u � � -..�
a! j� ' i`°'"-a;,ff ;�,e �_�` _' 1.�T ��., a /47i� r•M 1'.� 1 �j� Y ._�..R-"••-i>
�•*rv� ';ea' �;'1 � r +'^. .. *c,�.�v3:� y�� -,C'� �� � ''! j'• .J ` p� : �,�1-�w��p \ ti' F } r ! \�' _ .=�S'`-•, q� i i_ ,� 1 , /'!-.
$- � � t •�.4 Y .r�- •pr•7 F, �F'='\ �• �� �,�?'�•5��� ���� 1�� y � ./J' U'.. � j 4=3? , •. _ - i � �_��' � � ' � :-� 4. -. ,�;`:J1 •S�x_� /�• �,
�y'�+.•2>1,�,;•-�� {: 'Na-�y'. �� ��. :$ L?��a n���-;�S�.�s-:- 1 �ny^•u.*.'�./..i `ti':s..--��wS�.i' � :F�:.�i t4 t s'il _�"., � ' /• {:

Markers
Name: Hominy Creek WWMF
Short Name: HmnyCr
Coordinates: 035° 41' 11.8" N, 0770 53' 49.5" W
Comment: Hominy Creek WWMF, subbasin 03-04-07, Neuse River Basin, Wilson County, Hominy
Swamp, Class C Sw NSW, USGS quad E27NW