NCG110036_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20120223

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/V
DOC TYPE
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ ;;tn1a Od a
YYYYMMDD

f �r:• is � �j�►
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natura
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Director
February 23, 2012
Mr. Mike Allen
Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
P. O. Box 220
Tarboro, NC 27886
Resources
Subject: Request for Representative Outfall Status
Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
Stormwater Permit NCG110036
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Allen:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On January 17, 2012, Dave Parnell of the Raleigh Regional Office (RRO), Surface Water Protection
Section, conducted a site visit in order to address the possibility of this Facility (NCG 100036) being
granted Representative Outfall Status (ROS).
As described in your application, dated December 22, 2011, there are currently twelve
stormwater discharge outfalls (SDO), with four discharging to a drainage ditch and eight
discharging directly to the Tar River.
During the site visit, it was noted that you have a clear understanding of the requirements of the
NCG 110000 permit and are currently monitoring all of the outfalls as required. An evaluation of each
SDO was conducted and sampling techniques at each SDO were agreed upon. After reviewing sample
results and outfall locations, it is understandable that the similarities among the outfalls would allow for
ROS designation.
Therefore; it is determined that the following outfalls can be representative of other outfalls at this time:
The drainage areas of Outfall # 1, 10, 11. and 12 are contiguous. All of the outfalls have similar activities
and contain similar materials in their drainage areas. SDO # 10 is granted ROS for SDO # 1, 10 11 and
t2.
The drainage areas of Outfall # 2, 3, 4, and 5 are contiguous. All of the outfalls have similar activities
and contain similar materials in their drainage areas. SDO #3 is granted ROS for SDO # 2, 3, 4 and 5.
The drainage areas of Outfall # 6, 7, 8, and 9 are contiguous. All of the outfalls have similar activities
and contain similar materials in their drainage areas. SDO # 7 is granted ROS for SDO # 6, 7, 8, and 9.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquaI1y.orq Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Tarbo o,Wastewater TAtmeiiY)Plant Representative Outfall Status Evaluation
Analytical sampling is required at the frequency and for the parameters set forth in the permit for OutfalIs
# 10, #3, and 47.
In the event that topography and activities change at the facility, the above approval of the representative
outfall may be revisited/re-opened by the Division of Water Quality. Sampling is required if new outfalls
are added or if outfall locations are changed. In addition, after analytical data is obtained from these
locations, DWQ may revisit the request for representative outfall status.
Please note that the representative outfall designation is only for analytical monitoring; requirements of
the General Stormwater Permit. The qualitative monitoring requirements are still effective for all
stormwater outfalls.
If you have questions concerning this letter, please contact me or Dave Parnell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Danny Smith
Surface Water ?rotection Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
cc. SWP/RRO Files
Stormwater Permitting; Unit Files

NCDENR
l.NNgpMiM'.fAJ NffLRAL F7E= -�
Division of Water Quality / Surface Water Protection
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
REPRESENTATIVE OUTFALL STATUS (ROS)
REQUEST FORM
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Yea
Moldh
Da
If a facility is required to sample multiple discharge locations with very similar stormwater discharges, the
permittee may petition the Director for Representative Outfall Status (ROS). DWQ may grant Representative
Outfall Status if storm water discharges from a single outfall are representative of discharges from multiple
outfalls. Approved ROS will reduce the number of outfalls where gnalWcal sampling requirements apply.
If Representative Outfall Status is granted, AU out
falls are still subject to the aualitadv monitoring
requirements of the facility's permit —unless otherwise allowed by the permit (such as NCGO20000) and DWQ
approval. The approval letter from DWQ must be kept on site with the facility's Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan. The facility must notify DWQ in writing if any changes affect representative status.
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area (see page 3).
(Please print or type)
1) Enter the permit number to which this ROS request applies:
Individual Permit (or) Certificate of Coverage
N I C I S N I C I G I I I , 16 d
2) Facility Information:
Owner/Facility Name
Facility Contact
Street Address
City
County
Telephone No.
3)
List the representative outfall(s) information (attach additional sheets if necessary):
Outfall(s) 1� �"T� i is representative of Outfall(s)
Outfalls' drainage areas have the same or similar activities? des ❑ No
�i
Outfalls' drainage areas contain the same or similar materials?
Yes�es
❑ No
Outfalls have similar monitoring results?
'yes
❑ No
❑ No data44
3
1�
Outfall(s) Oc is representative of Outfall(s)
Outfalls' drainage areas have the same or similar activities?
ids
❑ No
Outfalls drainage areas contain the same or similar materials?E
-Y-es
❑ No
1
Outfalls have similar monitoring results?
kles
❑ No
❑ No data* i CD
Outfall(s) 1 Ci is representative of Outfall(s)
Outfalls' drainage areas have the same or similar activities? Os ❑ No
Outfalls' drainage areas contain the same or similar materials?fes ❑ No
Outfalls have similar monitoring results? k'Yes ❑ No ❑ No data*
*Non-compliance with analytical monitoring prior to this request may prevent ROS approval. Specific
circumstances will be considered by the Regional Office responsible for review.
a
a
I
a

fAfIl PG UWqq"Q Pik PS QJO"! DgXS LWhOW!RG Q WQWA,
tq":WNAPM; 0WOWSOA 1�& M ;;� LACKi,•'I, i ALI
W 11 U 0 v4,411i2
A
�jo L.9i 0,
jqj quamIG on 52, !M qb oak O"Wo QL QWWIL XNAIPSES
Awn
V
fill "t
(Y!qSn;, qL410% NOW IJSAG jIG ?WHG CA UMVIL OnNVEel
1 Onu;.� F any vqq G"
---7-
A---- — -
IL
k KV 'Won
Z
IU A.-,Sr.04 it C M A
L J
Q

Representative Outfall Status Request
4) Detailed explanation about why the outfalls above should be granted Representative Status:
(Or, attach a letter or narrative to discuss this information.) For example, describe how activities and/or
materials are similar.
The (12) outfalls listed should be r n
Outfall Status_ --because (a) years of mnrii t ar-i nQ t-hP
results are simijaL.We had rnn Pnvi,r-nnmPntal 1 1 a
during this 2pan-
5) Certification:
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 B(i) provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record,
report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this
Article; or who knowingly makes a false statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case
under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device
or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the [Environmental Management]
Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to exceed
ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
I hereby request Representative Outfall Status for my NPDES Permit. I understand that ALL outfalls are still
subject to the qualitative monitoring requirements of the permit, unless otherwise allowed by the permit
and regional office approval. I must notify DWQ in writing if any changes to the facility or its operations
take place after ROS is granted that may affect this status. If ROS no longer applies, I understand I must
resume monitoring of all outfalls as specified in my NPDES permit.
1 certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my
knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate. r i L _ 1
Printed Name of Person Signing: fl U di VV I i I l
Title: mebx�
a - aa,-
(Signature of Applicant) (Date Signed)
Please note: This application for Representative Outfall Status is subject to approval by the
NCDCNR Regional Office. The Regional Office may inspect your facilityfor compliance with the
conditions of the permit prior to that approval.
Final Checklist for-ROS Reaues3
This application should include the following Items:
❑ This completed form.
❑ Letter or narrative elaborating on the reasons why specified outfalls should be granted representative
status, unless all information can be included in Question 4.
❑ Two (2) copies of a site map of the facility with the location of all outfalls clearly marked, including the
drainage areas, industrial activities, and raw materials/finished products within each drainage area.
❑ Summary of results from monitoring conducted at the outfalls listed in Question 3.
❑ Any other supporting documentation.

eWala ftl 0 9 vi.li,-. jr Is
wovi, qd�!nz;f-3� ,.Aqmcig�) -.0"; 1 rloijcaylvi' t , ifit w qkli
.. ..........
0
IIVXJ`Itr .'I' h,q.i
.Cl
nv. 4 iv;
i.u, ;N
1,0C i_5 I i 'G
;i,! oil ,j,,v,p ?:e'r j
irnl...ri y.!r ('ki -I
it
Vi4n"V, F. 3
ri

A'r*wA ... �
�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen M. Sullins
Governor Director
October 22, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL 7007 2680 0001 8685 7685
RETURNED RECEIPT REQUESTED
Samuel W. Noble Jr., Town Manager
Town of Tarboro
P.O. Box 220
Tarboro, North Carolina 27886-0220
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit NCO020605
Stormwater Permit NCG110036
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Noble:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On October 16, 2009, 1, Mitch Hayes of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an inspection of
the subject facility. The assistance of Hubert Whitehead, Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) WW-4
certified, with this inspection were appreciated. Below is a list of findings and recommendations
developed from the inspection.
The subject permit was reissued and became effective December 01, 2004 and expired
September 30, 2009. Please continue to operate under the last issued permit until a new
permit is issued.
2. The 5.0 MGD facility consists of the following units: auto and manual bar screens; aerated
grit chamber and auger for grit removal; influent flow meter (used for reporting); 3 primary
clarifiers; 2 trickling filters, 3 basins with 1 anoxic zone, 1 aerobic zone with diffused air, and
1 aerobic zone with mechanical air; 4 secondary clarifiers; dual chlorine contact tanks;
dechlorination; effluent flow meter; cascade aeration; 2 aerobic digesters for primary sludge;
1 aerobic digester for secondary sludge; a 1.65 MG sludge holding basin; 18 sludge drying
beds (not used); 1 on -site generator for back-up power generation.
3. At the time of inspection, the influent entering the plant was black in color and appeared to be
septic. This may be due to wastewater being held too long in pump station wet wells. There
was no build up of solids in the center well of the primary clarifiers. There were a few ports in
the trickling filters not having even water flow but the media supported a good zoogleal film.
No ponding was noted. The weirs in all four secondary clarifiers are covered to prevent algae
growth. Weirs are checked annually and cleaned if necessary. Sludge judge reading in the
ten foot sidewall depth clarifier was 2 feet. Sludge judge reading in the fourteen foot sidewall
depth clarifier was two feet. All four rotors were operational in the two activated sludge
aeration basins. One air diffuser manifold was out. of service in the third activated sludge
aeration basin. Two out of four surface aerators in the aerated sludge holding lagoon were
not in service. This has been a continuing problem according to past inspection reports.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
One
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/1 0% Post Consumer Paper North
Carolina
Natuially

Tarboro WWTP CEl
Page 2
u
Please state whatasteps the Town will take to eliminate surface aerator motors from burning
mA.0otat-tiudge was settling in the aerobic digester allowing the supernatant to collect to be
drawn off at a later time. There was no sludge on the drying beds. Mr. Whitehead stated that
the drying have not been used in the last five years. Effluent appeared clear in the chlorine
contact tank and step aeration. Foam was dissipating in the Tar River within twenty feet.
4. Class B solids are land applied in accordance to Land Application Permit WQ0002047.
According to Aquifer Protection compliance evaluation inspection dated 06/04/2009, 552.78
dry tons of sludge was land applied to 181.85 acres for the year 2008.
5. The laboratory was checked in a cursory manner. All instrument calibration logs are being
maintained. The BOD incubator temperature was 19.7 degrees C, fecal coliform water
incubator was 44.5 degrees C, the drying oven was 99 degrees C, and the sample
refrigerator was 3 degrees C. An operator's logbook was available and being maintained.
The influent flow sampler temperature was 0 degrees C without freezing. The effluent flow
and influent sampler temperature were 4 degrees C. The influent and effluent flow meters are
calibrated every 90 days by Chadwick lnstruments.
6. Discharge Monitoring Reports for the period July 2008 to July 2009 were reviewed for
compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. Notice of Violation was issued for
December 2008 and January 2009 for effluent pH values not reaching minimum value of 6.0
standard units. Frequency violations for nickel were noted for 10/18/2008, 01/17/2009,
01/24/2009, and 01/31/2009. Frequency violation for ammonia nitrogen was noted for
07/18/2009. The Division of Water Quality may consider taking enforcement action for
continued future frequency violations. There were no other violations for the review period.
7. Commercial lab results, chain of custody records, and bench sheets were compared with
data submitted on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the month of July 2009. No
discrepancies were noted.
8. The Tarboro WWTP laboratory is state certified for the following parameters: BOD, TSS,
NH3-N, Fecal coliform, DO, and pH. Environment 1 analyses TP, TN, and metals. Pace
Analytical performs toxicity.
Stormwater Permit NCG110036
9. Permit NCG110081 was reissued and became effective on June 01, 2008 and expires on
May 31, 2013. The reissued permit contains the following changes: The site plan must
include a general location map (or alternatively the site map) that identify whether each
receiving water is impaired (on the state's 303(d) list of impaired waters) or is located in a
watershed for which a TMDL has been established, and what the parameter(s) of concern
are. A list of North Carolina's 303(d) list can be found at the web site
htto.//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdI/General 303d.htm#Downloads North Carolina TMDL
documents can be found at the website
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/TMDL list._htm#Final TMDLs The definition for a rain event
has been modified. A schedule for qualitative monitoring is now implemented. Schedule for
the facility site inspection has been changed to once during January to June and once during
July to December with at least sixty days separating inspection dates unless performed more
frequently. There are no other significant changes made to the permit. A review of the permit
requirements was conducted after the CEI for NC0020605. A copy of the permit was on hand
and contained all permit requirements with the exception of the new requirements noted
above.
10. The current site plan does not list whether the Tar River is impaired or is located in a
watershed for which a TMDL has been established and what the parameters of concern are.
Please update the site plan to include this requirement.

Tarboro WWTP CEI
Page 3
11. There are twelve stormwater discharge outfails (SDO's) listed on the stormwater map. Four
SDO's discharge to a drainage ditch behind the facility. The other eight SDO's discharge to
the Tar River. All outfalls are checked weekly. There was no discharge at the SDO's. Water
in the drainage ditch appeared clear with no sediment deposition.
12. Qualitative monitoring is completed as permitted. Training and safety meeting was completed
05/18/2009 and 10/16/2009.
Please respond within 20 days receipt of this letter about the concern of frequent surface rotor
burnout in the aerated sludge holding lagoon and continued frequency violations as noted in item 6.
Please have the facility site plan updated to meet the Stormwater permit requirement as noted in item
9.
I would like to thank Hubert Whitehead for his time and assistance with this inspection. If you
have any questions about this letter or the inspection, please contact me at 919.791.4261.
Sincerely,
llalal -47
Mitch Hayes
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Central Files,(SWP.files)
EPA

Permit: NCG110036
SOC:
County: Edgecombe
Region: Raleigh
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 06/01/08 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: Town of Tarboro
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Tarboro WWTP
US Hwy 64 Bypass
Contact Person: Donald A Morris
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
24 hour contact name
On -site representative
Related Permits:
Title: Mayor
Samuel W Noble
Hubert Leon Whitehead
Certification:
W00002047 Town of Tarboro - Town of Tarboro Residuals Land Application
Program
NCO020605 Town of Tarboro - Tarboro WWTP
WQCS00045 Town of Tarboro - Tarboro Collection System
WOCS00316 Town of Princeville - Princeville Collection System
Tarboro NC 27886
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Date: 10/16/2009 Entry Time: 10:45 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM �•,
Primary Inspector: Mitchell S Hayes �� 9-7 � i hone. 919-791-4 00
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110036 Owner - Facility: Town of Tarboro
Inspection Date. 10/16/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Permit NCG110081 was reissued and became effective on June 01, 2008 and expires on May 31, 2013. The reissued
permit contains the following changes: The site plan must include a general location map (or alternatively the site map)
that identify whether each receiving water is impaired (on the state's 303(d) list of impaired waters) or is located in a
watershed for which a TMDL has been established, and what the parameter(s) of concern are. The current site plan does
not list whether the Tar River is impaired or is located in a watershed for which a TMDL has been established and what
the parameters of concern are.
There are twelve stormwater discharge outfalls (SDO's) listed on the stormwater map. Four SDO's discharge to a
drainage ditch behind the facility. The other eight SDO's discharge to the Tar River. All outfalls are checked weekly. There
was no discharge at the SDO's. Water in the drainage ditch appeared clear with no indication of sediment deposition.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110036 Owner - Facility: Town of Tarboro
Inspection Date: 1011612009 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation Reason for Vlsit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: The current site plan does not list whether the Tar River is impaired or is
located in a watershed for which a TMDL has been established and what the
parameters of concern are.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
■ ❑ ❑ Cl
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/OWNERSHIP FORM
SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT IOEi':m;z;,' tl�
No person may initiate any land -disturbing activity on one or more acres as covered by the Act before this
form and an acceptable erosion and sedimentation control plan have been completed and approved by the
Land Quality Section, N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (Please type or print and, if
the question is not applicable or the e-mail and/or fax information unavailable, place NIA in the blank.)
Part A.
1. Project Name Water System Extension for Edaecombe County WSD #4 — Phase I
2. Location of land -disturbing activity: County: Edgecombe City or Township: NIA
High
3. Approximate date land -disturbing activity will commence: December 2009
4. Purpose of development (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.): Utility
5. Total acreage disturbed or uncovered (including off -site borrow and waste areas): 6.19 or 7 Acres
6. Amount of fee enclosed: L155.00 The application fee of $65.00 per acre (rounded up to the next acre)
is assessed without a ceiling amount (Example: a 9-acre application fee is $585).
7. Has an erosion and sediment control plan been filed? Yes No Enclosed (X)
8. Person to contact should erosion and sediment control issues arise during land -disturbing activity:
Name Michael Matthews E-mail Address michael.matthews®co.edgecombe.nc.us
Telephone [phone] Cell # NIA Fax # [phone]
9. Landowner(s) of Record (attach accompanied page to list additional owners):
(See Appendix C)
Name Telephone Fax Number
Current Mailing Address Current Street Address
City State Zip City State Zip
10. Deed Book No. (See Appendix C) Page No. (See Appendix C) Provide a copy of the most current
deed.
Part B.
Individual(s) or Legal Entity(s) who are financially responsible for the land -disturbing activity (Provide a
comprehensive list of all responsible parties on an attached sheet):
Michael Matthews
Name
P.O. Box 10
Current Mailing Address
Tarboro NC 27886
City State Zip
Telephone: [phone] _
[e-mail]
E-mail Address
201 St. Andrews St.
Current Street Address
Tarboro NC 27886
City State Zip
Fax Number: (252)41_-0456

2. (a) If the Financially Responsible Party is not a resident of North Carolina, give name and street address
of the designated North Carolina Agent:
Not Applicable
Name
Current Mailing Address
City
Not Applicable
E-mail Address
Current Street Address
State Zip City
Telephone Fax Number
State Zip
(b) If the Financially Responsible Party is a Partnership or other person engaging in business under an
assumed name, attach a copy of the Certificate of Assumed Name. If the Financially Responsible
Party is a Corporation, give name and street address of the Registered Agent:
Not Applicable
Name of Registered Agent
Current Mailing Address
Not Applicable _
E-mail Address
Current Street Address
City State Zip City State Zip
Telephone Fax Numbe
The above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and was provided by me
under oath (This form must be signed by the Financially Responsible Person if an individual or his attorney -in -
fact, or if not an individual, by an officer, director, partner, or registered agent with the authority to execute
instruments for the Financially Responsible Person). I agree to provide corrected information should there be
any change in the information provided herein.
Michael Matthews
Type or print na e
Signature
Director of Water & Sewer
Title or Authority
4-as -09
Date
i, LC,' f1d , a Notary Public of the County of
.,•
State of North Carolina, hereby certify that A,1 _Lip 1 - =ii S appeared personally
before me this day and being duly sworn acknowledged that the above form was executed by him.
- Witness my hand and notarial seal, this day of , 20 09
Y�
rota
Seal
My commission expires

`O�QF WA TFRQG
O Y
16 January 2008
Samuel W. Noble, Jr.
Town Manager
Town of Tarboro
P.O. Box 220
Tarboro, NC 27886-0220
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections of
NPDES Wastewater Permit NCO020605 &
NPDES Stormwater Permit NCGI 10036
Town of Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Noble:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
M96192
0
1. I, Ron Boone, of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Raleigh Regional Office (RRO), Surface
Water Protection (SWP) section, conducted wastewater and stormwater compliance evaluation inspections
(CET) of the subject facility on 10 January 2008. The cooperation and assistance of the Operator in
Responsible Charge (ORC), Hubert Whitehead, was greatly appreciated. The results of the CEI are
summarized below and in the attached inspection reports.
2. This is a Grade IV facility and it is located off of US Hwy 64 Bypass, behind the Walmart Super Center in
Tarboro, Edgecombe County, NC. The NCO020605 permit allows the discharge of treated wastewater
into the Tar River from the Tarboro wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and the NCGlIO036
permit/Certificatc of Coverage (COC) allows the discharge of stormwater to the Tar River from
stormwater point source discharges associated with activities classified as treatment works treating
primarily domestic sewage. This section of the Tar River is currently classified as a Class C, nutrient
sensitive water.
3. The plant is as described in the permit. The plant is well operated and maintained and for the most part in
good condition. The grounds were well kept and all equipment was in good condition. Some minor
maintenance work should be done on the catwalk over the grit -separating chamber, as corrosion on the
walk was quite heavy.
4. The flow meters are calibrated annually and they were last calibrated in 10/2007, The composite samplers
are set up to draw flow proportional samples over a 24-hour period and the sample coolers were both
between 1 and 4.4 degrees Celsius. It is noted that the effluent sampler has been moved to a different
location than during the last inspection. During the last inspection the sampler was set up to take samples
before dechlorination and final aeration. This was found to be inadequate because samples must be taken
after all treatment processes. However, because of the layout of the plant near the outfall, it would have
been very difficult to set it up to sample after post aeration. It was therefore agreed to allow the town to
move the sampler so it sampled post dechlorination, but before final aeration.
N°0e Cara i a
atura
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Town of Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NCO020605 & NCG 110036
16 January 2008, Page 2 of 3
5. The primary clarifiers, trickling filters, and secondary clarifiers all appeared to be in good repair and
operating properly. There were some floating rags that did get trapped at the weirs of the primaries. It
may be better to remove the rags more often and you may want to check the operation of the bar screen to
ensure it is screening sufficiently and being cleaned often enough.
C. The anoxic/reaeration basin still has two issues that were noted during the previous inspection. Firstly,
there is a Iarge clump of cattails growing in the middle of the reaeration zone. These weeds and the sludge
they're growing in should be removed and efforts made to prevent weed growth in the future. Secondly,
the fabric curtains that separate the anoxic and reaeration zone are not sufficiently weighted down as
they're partially afloat and not effectively serving their intended purpose. The curtains should be weighted
down to fully separatethe anoxic/reaeration zones in order to help maximize plant efficiency.
7. The chlorination, dechlorination and final aeration systems were all operating normally. No discrepancies
were noted. The effluent looked clear and free of solids, sheen, etc. The effluent appeared to have no
adverse effect on the Tar River.
8. The anaerobic and aerobic digesters, as well as the aerated sludge storage basin, appeared to have no
problems were operating normally. It was noted that the town replaces motors on the storage basin
aerators frequently. It appears that one of the primary reasons for this is the splash of sludge up onto the
motors when the aerators are running. A motor guard of some kind may help reduce the frequency with
which these motors must be replaced.
9. There was no operator's visitation or operations and maintenance logbook at the time of the inspection. It
is noted that Mr. Whitehead just started as the ORC on 1 January 2008, however Mr. Whitehead must still
implement these logbooks as soon as possible.
10. Laboratory records were reviewed and found to be complete. A review of discharge monitoring reports
for the months of April and August 2007 yielded one error: The Fecal Coliform value reported on the
DMR on I4 August 2007 was 14. The actual value on the lab bench sheet was 12. Mr. Whitehead was
asked to correct this mistake and send an amended DMR form to the Division. The lab is state certified
and performs the majority of the permit -required parameters.
11. The stormwater pollution prevention plan required by the NCG110030 permit was reviewed and found to
meet minimum requirements. Qualitative monitoring is being done as required and operators actually
check all the outfalls weekly. It was suggested to Mr. Whitehead that he read the stormwater permit as he
was not familiar with it and was not aware that he was delegated as responsible party. The certification
page had his signature block on it but he had not yet signed it. Furthermore, there were no inspection
records of the secondary containment(s) on the site and no certification that the stormwater discharge
outfalls had been evaluated for the presence on non-stormwater discharges. Finally, there were no annual
reviews of the plan noted. It was also suggested that he review and sign the plan annually and annotate
whether any spills had occurred in the previous twelve months when he performs the annual review.
Please review the permit in detail with Mr. Whitehead to ensure both he and the town fully understand the
requirements of the permit.

Town of Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NCO020605 & NCG 110036
16 January 2008, Page 3 of 3
12. Please reply to this letter in writing within 30 days of receiving it. Your reply should include detailed
corrective actions and implementation schedules for those discrepancies identified in paragraphs 3, 5, 6,
and 8 through I above. Should you or your staff have any questions regarding the inspection or this
letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-791-4200.
Sincerely,
Ron`aId�>3oone
Environmental Specialist
Surface Water Protection Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Attachments:
1. Inspection Checklist NCO020605
2. Inspection Checklist NCG110036
CC: Central Files w/ atchs
NPDES West Permitting Unit w/ atchs
RRO/SWP Files w/ atchs
Attn: Hubert Whitehead, Operator in Responsible Charge
Town of Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
P.O. Box 220
Rocky Mount, NC 27886-0220
w/Atchs

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110036 Effective: 04/25/03 Expiration: 04/30/08 Owner: Town of Tarboro
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Tarboro WWTP
County: Edgecombe US Hwy 64 Bypass
Region: Raleigh
Tarboro NC 27886
Contact Person: Donald A Morris Title: Mayor Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
24 hour contact name
On -site representative
Related Permits:
Hubert Leon Whitehead
Hubert Leon Whitehead
Certification:
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Date: 01/10/2008 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 04:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Ron Boone Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): ell, Y/ ` -`' S
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit; NCG110036 Owner - Facility: Town of Tarboro
Inspection Date: 01/1012008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
See attached letter.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110036 Owner - Facility: Town of Tarboro
Inspection Date: 01/10/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spili Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑
Cl
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Plan meets minimum requirements. Mr. Whitehead was made the
responsible party but he was unaware of this and hasn't yet signed the plan or reviewed
the permit. There were no annual reviews of the plan annotated. There were no
inspections of the secondary containments annotated.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: No analytical monitoring required.
Permit and Qutfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCG110036 Owner - Facility: Town of Tarboro
Inspection Date: 01110/200B Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment: Facility must certify in the SP3 that they have evaluated all outfalls for the
presence of non-stormwater discharges.
Page: 4

9 January 2007
Mr. Samuel W. Noble, Jr., Town Manager
Town of Tarboro
P.O. Box 220
Tarboro, NC 27886-0220
Dear Mr. Noble:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Erivironment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7006-0810-0002-6048-1405
Subject: Notice of Violation (NOV), NOV-2007-PC-0011,
Resulting from Compliance Evaluation Inspections
at the Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant for
NPDES Wastewater Permit NCO020605 and
NPDES Stormwater PermwNCG'i-10036,_ '
Edgecombe County
I. On 22 December 2006, Ron Boone, of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Raleigh
Regional Office (RRO), conducted an annual compliance evaluation inspection (CEI) at the
Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) for both of the subject permits. The assistance
and cooperation of Mr. Julius Sessoms, plant Operator in Responsible, Charge (ORC), was
helpful and appreciated. Inspection reports are attached for your records. Inspection findings are
listed below.
2. This plant discharges to the Tar River, this segment of which is classified as a class C, nutrient
sensitive water (NSW) in the Tar Pamlico river basin. The plant is as described in the permit.
3. All plant components were inspected. In general the plant was clean and well maintained. There
were some issues of concern however, as noted below:
a. About 15 of the trickling filter's nozzles were clogged. Mr. Sessoms stated that the nozzles
are cleaned once per week and he is well aware of the importance of keeping the nozzles
cleared and operational. This should not become a problem as long as this maintenance
regime is sustained.
b: The fabric curtains that separate the anoxic zone from the reaeration zone in the first aeration
basin need to be weighted down because they were partially afloat at the time of the CEI.
You may consider installing permanent concrete walls in this tank to replace the fabric
curtains and avoid the maintenance headaches that they can create.
c. The influent and effluent samplers were inspected. Both were within the required
temperature range however there were a few issues with the effluent sampler as listed below:
1�" Cara ina
,1vaturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raieigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Intemet: h2o.enr.state,nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycfed/10% Post Consumer Paper

Tarboro wastewater Treatment Plant, Compliance Evaluation Inspections
NCO020605 & NCG1 10036
01 /0912007, Page 2, of 3
,
1. The sample tube on the effluent sampler appeared quite dirty. You should decrease the
interval at which the sample tube is maintained to ensure you continue to receive good
representative samples.
2. It was noted that the effluent sampler actually takes samples at the discharge end of the
southern most chlorine contact chamber, before dechlorination and the cascade aerator.
However, your permit, as well as 15A NCAC 02B.0503(12), requires effluent samples to
be taken "...following all treatment processes from a water pollution control facility...".
This is a serious concern for DWQ as dechlorination chemicals have a significant oxygen
demand and thus raise the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in the dechlorinated water.
The effluent sampler must be relocated in order to take samples after dechlorination.
4. The discharge from the plant was observed. No excessive foam, solids or other pollutant
indicators were noted. The right-of-way to the outfall is well maintained.
5. All plant records were reviewed including the operator's visitation log, operations and
maintenance log, laboratory calibration records, and chains of custody, etc. All were up to date
and compliant.
6. January and June 2006 DMRs were reviewed and compared to laboratory bench sheets and
reports. No inconsistencies were noted.
7. The stormwater program was also reviewed. There was a stormwater pollution prevention plan
(SP3) on site but the following discrepancies were noted:
a. Both the site map and the general location map need to be refined to better meet the
requirements of the permit.
b. Narrative descriptions of storage practices, loading/unloading activities, etc., were minimal.
c. There was no list of significant spills over the past three years.
d. There was no certification that stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of
non-stormwater discharges.
e. There was no feasibility study.
f. There were no secondary containment inspection records and the one secondary containment
on site (diesel tank for generator) had a drain valve that was not properly secured with a
locking mechanism.
g. The best management practices (BMP) summary was minimal.
h. The spill prevention and response plan (SPRP) was minimal.
i. The preventative maintenance and good housekeeping program was minimal.
j. There was essentially no employee training program and no records of employee training.
k. There were no amendments to, or annual reviews of the SP3.
1. There was no facility inspection program and no records of facility inspections.
m. The SP3 had not been fully developed and implemented.
We would like to note that Mr. Hubert Whitehead (backup ORC) has been conducting qualitative
monitoring as required by the permit. All records of qualitative monitoring that were reviewed
during the CEI were up to date and satisfactory. Most of the 12 stormwater discharge outfalls

Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant, Compliance Evaluation Inspections
NCO020605 & NCG110036
01 i09/2007, Page 3 of 3
(SDO) were identified and inspected. All that were inspected were clean with no indication of
non-stormwater discharges and/or pollutants. Please bear in mind the importance of the
stormwater permit. The plant easily becomes a serious pollution threat in the unfortunate event
of spills and/or mishaps. The SP3, as required by the permit, is intended to curb that threat to a
tolerable level.
8. Please bear in mind that the findings outlined above constitute violations of North Carolina
General Statute (NCGS) 143-215.1 et seq. and could result in the assessment of civil penalties in
an amount of up to S25,000 per day per violation. Please provide a response to all findings
outlined above. Your response should include narratives for each item as well as a tentative
schedule for you to achieve full compliance.
9. If you or your staff has any questions regarding the inspection or this letter, please feel free to
call Mr. Boone for assistance at 919-791-4200.
Sincerely,
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Section
Raleigh Regional Supervisor
cc: Central Files
RRO/SWP Files
Julius Sessoms
Town of Tarboro
P.O. Box 220
Tarboro, NC 27886-0220
Attachments:
1. Final Inspection Checklist

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110036 Effective: 04/25/03 Expiration: 04/30/08 Owner: Town of Tarboro
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Tarboro WWTP
County: Edgecombe US Hwy 64 Bypass
Region: Raleigh
Tarboro NC 27886
Contact Person: Donald A Morris Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 12/22/2006 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Ron Boone ,' 63 `d5/5 Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
M Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110036 Owner - Facility: Town of Tarboro
Inspection Date: 12122/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Forgot to input this inspection into BIMS at the time of the inspection. Permittee was inspected for both the NPDES WW
and SW permits at the same time and received a NOV for the inspection, more so for the SW than for the WW though.
But the NOV was mistakenly generated via the WW permit, not the SW permit.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110036 Owner - Facility: Town of Tarboro
Inspection date: 1212212006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
Cl
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
Cl
Cl
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
Q
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
■
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
■
❑
❑
Comment: Refer to inspection letter.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
. ■
Q
Q
❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
1111011
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: No onsite vehicle maintenance.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Page: 3

w A
7
July 19, 2005
Mr. Samuel Noble, Jr., Town Manager
Town of Tarboro
PO Box 220
Rocky Mount, NC 27886
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Tarboro WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0020605, Stormwater Permit No. NCG1100361
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Noble,
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.>., Director
Division of Water Quality
This writer, of the DWQ, conducted a Compliance Evaluation Inspection of the Tarboro WWTP, for the subject
Permits, on July 15, 2005. Mr, David Cashweli, Director of Public Works, and Mr. Lynwood Sessoms, ORC, represented
the Plant during the Inspection. Findings are as follows:
1) This 5 MGD wastewater treatment plant consists of a manual bar screen, mechanical grit chamber, three primary
clarifiers, two trickling filters (one in use, one standby), three aeration zones (in series), four secondary clarifiers, chlorine
contact chamber, dechlorinabon by sodium bisulfite, two anaerobic digesters for primary sludge, three aerobic digesters
for secondary sludge and a sludge holding lagoon. A contractor removes liquid sludge periodically. Drying beds are no
longer used for sludge dewatering. A diesel generator is used to provide backup power during emergencies and during
daily peak load shaving.
2) An ORC log was available and up to date.
3) A comparison of bench note data with the Discharge Monitoring Report for the month of March 2005 was made. No
discrepancies were noted. A review of the DMR data for the 12-month period from June 2004 through May 2005 was
performed subsequent to this Inspection. The DMR's indicated compliance with final effluent limitations. The BIMS
system noted missing data as follows: effluent ammonia (reported daily) for 619104, 10/20/04 and 417105 and effluent
nickel (reported weekly) for 12104 and the first three weeks of 1105. Mr. Sessoms reported on July 19, 2005 that the first
two ammonia tests were run but inadvertently not reported (both results were <0.1 mg/L). It could not be determined if the
third ammonia test was run. With regard to the nickel, Mr. Sessions reported that it took until February 2005 to get the lab
on a weekly nickel analysis schedule as required by the new permit that went into effect on December 1, 2004.
(Previously, nickel analysis was performed once a month.)
4) The permit for the Plant indicates that a total residual chlorine limit will become effective June 1, 2006. The Plant
currently meets the future chlorine limit most of the time using a flow -paced chlorination system. The Plant
representatives stated that a demand -type system is being investigated that should allow the Plant to meet the chlorine
limit consistently.
5) The effluent meter was calibrated the date of this Inspection. The effluent sampler reportedly collects flow proportional
samples. The temperature of the sampler storage compartment was 4 degrees C.
6) The Plant's effluent was viewed where it enters the Tar River. No solids or excessive foam was noted.
or`
NhCarolina
,Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Intemet: h2o.enr,state.ne.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
An Equal OpportunitylAfTirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Phone (919) 57 t -4700 Customer Service
FAX [phone]

Mr. Noble /
Page 2 `
7) The Plant's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and Qualitative Monitoring reports were reviewed. The first round of
qualitative monitoring for 2005 had been performed and the results were available. Annual employee training is indicated
as being performed each April. Please note that training event attendance should be documented. All 12 of the
Plant's stormwater outfalls were viewed during this Inspection. The outfalls were free of debris and there was no
evidence of spills, overflows or similar incidents. The aboveground emergency generator tank is equipped with secondary
containment. This writer noted diesel stained soil adjacent to the tank. Mr. Cashwell reported that the Contractor
responsible for filling the tank apparently caused this condition. (Mr. Cashwell reported by phone on July18, 2005 that the
soil had been removed and placed on plastic and will be taken to a facility equipped to handle contaminated soil.)
8) Attached is the checklist generated as a result of the Inspection. If you have any questions concerning the inspection,
please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Mrd C a�V
Michael Dare
Environmental Technician
Cc: Edgecombe County Health Dept.
Central Files

ni
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
Yas
❑
No
❑
NA
9
NI
❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
❑
❑
❑
is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
& Maintenance
Yas
No
NA
NI
�ratinns
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
No
❑
❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge,
No
❑
❑
and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
M ❑
❑ ❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
0 ❑
❑ ❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
0 ❑
❑ ❑
Is the unit in good conditlon?
0 ❑
❑ ❑
Comment.
Type of grit removal
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
0
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
M Cl
❑
❑
Is disposal of grit in compliance?
n ❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Primary Clarifier
Yes Nn
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of back and odorous wastewater?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
M ❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
M ❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately % of the sidewall depth)
E ❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Yes_ No
NA
NE
5ecandat:y Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
N ❑ ❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
0 ❑
Cl
❑
Are weirs level?
■ ❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
M 0
0
0

Secondary Clarifier
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive Floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solidslpin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately ;: of the sidewall depth)
Comment:
Trickling Filter
Is the filter free of ponding?
Is the filter free of leaks at the center column of filter's distribution arms?
Is the distribution of flow even from the distribution arms?
Is the filter free of uneven or discolored growth?
Is the filter free of sloughing of excessive growth?
Are the filter' s distribution arms orifices free of clogging?
Is the filter free of excessive filter flies, worms or snails?
Comment: One in use, one standby.
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mgll)
Comment: Three units in series; 1 - diffused aeration, 2 - mechanical aeration.
Disinfection -Gas
Are cylinders secured adequately?
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
Comment:
De-chfnCin@finn
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Comment: Sodium bisulfite system.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
®❑❑❑
E ❑ ❑ Cl
Yes No NA NF
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
00130
Yps No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ O ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Cl ❑ ❑ ■

chlorinatinn
Number of tubes in use?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine appropriate? (Approximately ratio 1:1)
❑ ❑ ❑
❑
Comment:
Yes NA
NE
Standby,P,QwPr
Is automatically activated standby power available?
—No-
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the generator tested under load?
❑ ❑ ❑
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
❑ ❑ ❑
❑o the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
❑ ❑ ❑
0
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
Cl ❑ ❑
Comment: Generators run daily for load shedding.
Type of lagoons?
Aerated
Number of lagoons in operation at time of visit?
1
Are lagoons operated in?
Is a re -circulation line present?
❑ ❑ 0
❑
Is lagoon free of excessive floating materials?
M ❑ ❑
❑
Are baffles between ponds or effluent baffles adjustable?
❑ ❑ M
❑
Are dike slopes clear of woody vegetation?
M ❑ Cl
❑
Are weeds controlled around the edge of the lagoon?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
Are dikes free of seepage?
❑ ❑
❑
Are dikes free of erosion?
❑ ❑
❑
Are dikes free of burrowing animals?
❑ ❑
❑
Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (s) been measured periodically in multiple locations?
❑ ❑ 0
❑
If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help control the growth?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
Is the lagoon surface free of weeds?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is the lagoon free of short circuiting?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Comment: Sludge holding lagoon.
Yes No NA
NF
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
❑ ❑ ❑
0
!s the tubing clean?
❑ ❑ ❑
0
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4A degrees Celsius)?
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
M ❑ ❑
❑
Comment:
Aerobic Qlgeste[ YP.5 No NA NIF
Is the capacity adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the mixing adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? M ❑ ❑ ❑
is the odor acceptable? 0 ❑ Cl ❑
Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:

erobic Diaester
Type of operation:
Is the capacity adequate?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
Is gas stored on site?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Is the digester(s) free of tilting covers?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
Is the gas burner operational?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
Is the digester heated?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Is the temperature maintained constantly?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
Comment: The units are operated at ambient temperature.
Yas No NA
NE
QuIna Beds
Is there adequate drying bed space?
■ ❑ ❑
Cl
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
❑ ❑
❑
Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
Is the sludge land applied?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
❑ ❑ 0
❑
Comment: Most drying bed space is no longer used. Some space used to dewater collection system debris

April 25, 2003
Mr. David L. Cashwell, Director of Public Works
Town of Tarboro
PO Box 220
Tarboro, NC 27886
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
X Z-11
IX
r' v�
Subject: General Permit No. NCG110000
Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
COC NCG110036
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Cashwell:
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on March b, 2003, we are forwarding herewith
the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general permit. This permit is issued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between
North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit application. Unless such demand is
made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except al -ter notice to the Division of Water
Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the certificate of
coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division
of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other
Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact M.ack Wiggins at telephone number 9191733-
5083 ext. 5,12.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater and General Permits Unit Files
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AA
Jf_DEP;R
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG110000
CERTIFICATE O1+ COVERAGE No. NCG110036
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
City of Tarboro
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
service road south of'farboro, west of Princeville
Tarboro
Edgecombe County
to receiving waters designated as Tar River, a class C NSW water in the Tar -Pamlico River-Basm
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, If, III,
IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCGI00000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective April 25, 2003
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day April 25, 2003''^��-,.rC`
Alan W. Klimek, I'.1;., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

T
- [ �- .t �� '•i - ! � '.ha �- �o Amy yy,. �y,4 e�y�' -�;\- f- �` .,`(� �k !: _- � liI �f r fr �.0 _... _,.,,_
' ly�lE a n �f ///�M;-�.. i' . r�F--`r-¢f' '`+ yyy _.. fC 't � '•.;��^\t �'` s � 5 ` i�'8 i i:~ �.,
n
u VorlhT kwra ti'•) j .�'° �St r �� z��` s`��l Yet \ Il. 1 v Y, :/ f �w
• a' � , S c1, J .1.. a'. o , S ,�•i'` � _ ,L. r r !
'I ay }t��u'� �^3� � 1 �-- �.a� ,� v � ���t -i� �`� 1 � { � •%.� I i , �%J'
A
S\)- - .' • t`�, f �• J c lr lfr C.
r � 1 Jr 1 � I\`�\�� ��•. � z r � ��'?4o-�'� y . � l.P�,3, ` °���`_S� � t. y�'�,L\ `: r';.�� 1`.r r r� ' ki �� � l
�'"i .ram v ' �,� `�, tV� /i�V�j ` • %, ll
���k
?fj.- II �-.: EP.LYTrIry2a y"! r rti- 4� rr �,*,-�ra.'�♦ G' Q�AffrlQryit� � :t1 i5.r��'',V`. `COy'[ '. �__' I
de �I i �' -•g t" ti�/ L1�i S .» j` �f�-..� �,�•� ..• t A�� tt Fes, r•t •„l �J �t I _.12^
i ti �i a `• V S pS ilG�� S
2 2 ?` i EJdI th E�750 x 4x d f. 1�r 1•�.>, !
v
-. \ p(i'd
'(
�
/
2ct
r f. � Jr r � ������ l%�� rn SUry�➢ is +' ._ e" !9P T. .( x p��b .t ^`. :�1.. C .�-r by _
<VK '1 f i { � —1 •-- �� 4 �] � �� " w—, 4� ,�!J` �- � F r 36. / „� .r� J � 'J,i;• 1 f `, , t-•' � ?1...
a y y 4 r' Z ,T � a f y 3' " , V • r E CG_ f Id' yt ;4V1G� "� /'' i •�/ '
AN,
a'-. atr�$'s _'( ��.'.��••=j" 1 -f$!/r/
� r
F,ric±1'Ilr`r .t r� ..>%.� '�\"'•�1. `� k �- s"�r c p�V7�� t_ph`- � .; •—
��iv1aE �a � � .• ~� 10 ` � ,.,.,.- ✓ � 4�-,.•-�, ' fir• � .( 1,�'" r �„'
�r".y{ {I. - �. b. , !S rS r ['ram } Si ��r-.. 5 r p , r' Jr J ,✓'-r l � ,,-Y,.`
r> f �x�� t r ✓ i
N" �`'. � �^ `. �,� � �O ,� YI � ,` jr � � `� �. „r��_ra. ri ✓'°
�i~ �.a '9tiE` `� t ': J`-'>' t" '/ �.:\~, `S �i�j, E,^_r�,r..? �S�'�li � t�rYfr� •-.�3 :� b s" f'. i. /j1 ,•! te:.{`� �„� _ - :'✓ I b� �tr' , ` rr �/5; •2'..9'4Y i' --`"� _' 1;,•. W "!r• „'.,. - s � '\'f,°.,,.1;'K •'F`-"Y`.t " $` 11� ,1j;�-s:w;1_;v'"- /� A�'{�� _
.3(r--r-� :a \• `w Gc,lt .: �S
e�f,��/ ' + T °� y �� l • r^ 5 BSI ^'r "`.J�c r's-�o '
�,_ ';t<°��. ti� ;� d � t'�l�r w 4,+~ i�i �• � '-�`. !����-.��A-. r,��Vl;"_,q .. ,;. �f � 1
r ,�[ '• `�]wcx: sir J ' �� �:. il'� �� r jr y [ �Y s /„� 1� 'r, -�a'i e l' �t t 1 �, I . � { .f ,kt,�T, � � � �` , i :1e` t . �,�. ' a � -fir. r". -
'µ• r ��y' cr ; C �� vxx85ut ;ti4 i `��-jjj� 44 ;�� t eV� }l,f �;
• � ��'I A � � /a - i [ y`k ��,�i � .� ! ka, ;� ;,L h. I.!' � Etril CQf'r)'
� �� / I: r$-`•' I ..��' � '� tri��'.1 �t �_`�'?'�/ f "' 1 �� �; Tx •'.'a.:.�1 �,•'� �r�� �t^v` fl:'/'.0 5i M '�
1H F': ,, f I I � �F ��r` a 4, y � � p .��`''��.Y at S r ' 3 ! / 5! �, �. 'S/-^�•-a�...:��, -, N '' r,� ffjJ x (t "� �.-
tifeiping ,.I 127 0 { ;'•' ° df.'i b t :,unscaar
�Ri 1f,..' r! F•.. k�,i P�I!l•ier., _:CBt7V
rtifFl1�tir fJ,r"!4 ,�a �fN _�l�i.�.T�,t,;lr "/ �7 ,�;.Y-,.-/*^-,S'"�.r✓-�i. t �{ # r#ter .r%.';'
C %) Al
If G_ 1:+ • P •�f16t7ii� f j . i
ti.�- t „y! �, � t _-' : ,I`. r r . �-, S _ _ _ � s� y i. -.. �.r S t S / .' IJ r •�,11,� t M5:-i '�t 4 'ST �.'� ' �t 1. { 1./
`� G y-- •TL!
•'%' .�, a, �7 `,.� a•ai's 3-!% .a tir h tl % �t rn[ `..1 '1`�.- Str_Y} '
LLit
O%! �:1 r I' r c• ,rj .���it jq��'tiYr j� �V r yl� rrr ,f { 141.
! t �..-S°f� �n f, - ? ,_.� m _,�- -'--,' _t'- ��` !, t V r t}t. `, �, 7 i. �\.. �a*�'7�yra • � '1 f �„r. 5 �j'• �; ry I� ,:
�tc
- •,♦ - F' i r E1r d '', '^V -t 7 T.:/ f� r 5 f}'
rr.�t. .ems\-J(., a�' qf;,..� •� �, �w t r�1�e� ��, Fes" r -'+ra �f.;
vim. 1/AP/OT /tray % �z r� lC I Sewnr�0 rg q. ll 1ar��''� C� ts '�1
f !0/O// • l 'e(Lil h- ,' i or
"All
l' \ '
�;•:. / " J St -.ti J Z T-.� �'r I e r
1 _ �tt� � � r� �,;1�' � _ � � � ! � ' '1�t, t t; i fsor• _-,y1+•t"„�- ��1 7
�.�� -�� `�4 _� ^�.- `�~ r E� i' •45it� SI `�'�- ' { f i �^~ �� •*ti��' � i��-� r,
i^fs ...1�?I / Bti1[� .d r-a r,� r. I a�- j!- l ,� 1[ . - \`_l Er ':Li; f,F• i+>r� "y
r :� 8;=f, � ,r•'a��r;_ � { �� � :�} �T'�. it{�ii� �` 1: _ 'rep �r•;}ir, �^�� t� �r � f{ty.� t•`...;f
` r+i .t F ('� r y } rt,y. •� f ••�• �,.,: � � "O of r{ - ! i it i 1 , �'�.—.f I #-
c
^I L ` � • �� — -•1 r a. ]I� � l � .�� lrlr .� � f ! t 1r �l .! • � r ,f
aG+ 1 +rr f
1
of �"" ,I� x{- I jC� •1 .} �a j % :r,ti�'�,.,r1;'`i•ti {�� r f ! 1'411 f ,�� 'I�l.�..3~i •/� '1� ••�«.rlY " � .
:1s i I '.�� 1 ,., ` �/��' �� ^1,�+.� � �---f6-..ter [3 4 � t .�• �� t J { , , �," .j( f `:�-
} l , � ` i . � Y- _,. � �-' r��� y5rf• •, l✓ \� r !,?ri l !t� . ; �` E.t {tee, � -' � �=-' r �^'+�S � . =-�\'. �.•• �{l ��'S
'� / -.w-�V ^,tr l* /'f�. t tl �'rr' J jl J. r• t,/ `� ♦ v ^'j. .�. R J
• - � • S � 11 I t J� �]1,1`
`1
_ •.� t .r: � r — .1, � rr.'r �7! es � � � �`, � y • i z .' i i � � , �•• '�,• y 9,r 6�•
_�. �� r ... 1. rf �d f.. [Sjl N,.�t , � `-�Oi; �' i'Y•j! 1. P ��✓.
a * � f .,- ..� _ i '. ,rs yr. r'. •! : 3 , r a � { . rr i r /.I t O. � �\
Ile
ko
_•r;�',.��Ecigecomb4, �r� � �+`�=f _ ,r/--�t �t � r j ; �� ��_ '4 � 1 � i � r
"Memo aliparkT i Ji
�n�+`- ,rr ''r I '! �• fi � ..irk },�1.� r •r rr r 4 F ;, '}ti
f = f s.
�l Irl lfr G S ! h �i11• / k f -x;' s
fir � 't � � i 1-� il� •�: � .S, '1 `�,, is µ gE i _'
10, W
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc,

A"m"�-KWA
Division of Water Quality 1 Water Quality Section
NCDENRNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
tow" c. o - Dcvwn a
�'MwONrio+r wo Nutn.� 1
NCG110000
NOTICE OF INTENT
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Recetved
Year
!V[onth Da
t
Certittcate of Cwer e
r~
Check 1
Amount
iLO
/Permit
ZED
Ass ned to
va
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit
NCG110000:
STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as:
Treatment Works treating domestic sewage or any other sewage sludge or wastewater treatment
device or system, used in the storage, treatment, recycling, and reclamation of municipal or
domestic sewage, with a design flow of 1.0 million gallons per day or more, or required to have an
approved pretreatment program under Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 403,
including lands dedicated to the disposal of sewage sludge that is located within the confines of
the facility.
1) Mailing address of owner/operator:
Name
(Please print or type)
Town of Tarboro
Street Address P.O. Box 220
City _ T - State NC ZIP Code 27886
Telephone No. 252 641-4229 _ _ _ _ Fax: [phone]
Address to which all permit corfespondence will be mailed
2) Location of facility producing discharge:
Facility Name Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
Facility Contact _Lynwood _Sessoms
Street Address _P.O. Box27-0
City Tarboro State NC ZIP Code 27886
County Edgecombe
Telephone No. 252 641-4251 Fax: [phone]
3) Physical Location Information:
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection). Take the Agrvice ENd at 1he
_ intersection of US 64 and 258 East - plant is at end of road. _
(A copy of a county map or USGS quad sheet with facNRy clearly "led on the map is required to be submitted with this application)
4) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following:
❑ New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin
19 Existing
5) Standard Industrial Classification:
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial
activity at this facility
SIC Code: 4 9 5 2
Page 1 of 3
SWU-226-101701

NCGI 10000 N.O.I.
6) Provide a brief narrative description of the types of industrial activities and products manufactured at
this facility: The plant treats waste water_
7) Discharge points ! Receiving waters:
How many discharge points (ditches, pipes, channels, etc.) convey stormwater from the property? 5
What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater
discharges end up in? Tar River
If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm
sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer). N / A
8) Does this facility have any other NPOES permits? T
❑ No
IR Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility: NC 0020605
9) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)?
❑ No
IR Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility: W0 0002047 Land Application
10) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control? Permit
❑ No
IR Yes If yes, please briefly describe: Grass swales for filtering and infiltration.
11) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
G� No
❑ Yes
If yes, when was it implemented?
12) Are vehicle maintenance activities occurring at this facility?
IX No ❑ Yes
13) Hazardous Waste:
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
EXNo ❑ Yes
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
[*No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
EkNo ❑ Yes
d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c„ please provide the following information:
Page 2 of 3
5W U-226-101701

NCG110000 N.Q.I.
Type(s) of waste:
How is material stored:
Where is material stored:
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport ! disposal vendor:
Vendor address:
14) Certification:
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 b (1) provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report,
plan or other document filed or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental
Management Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with or knowingly renders inaccurate any
recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a
fine not to exceed $10.000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides
a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar olfense.)
I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit. I understand that coverage under this permit
will constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an
individual permit.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge
and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing: David L. Cashwell
T //Director of Public Works
(Signature of Applicant) (Date Signed)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $80.00 made payable to:
NCDENR
Final Checklist
This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included:
a Check for $80 made payable to NCDENR
4( This completed application and all supporting documents
C)( Copy of county map or USGS quad sheet with location of facility dearly marked on map
Mail the entire package to:
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Note
Page 3 of 3
SW U-226-101701

W a rFRQG Michael F. Easley
` Governor
co William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
•J �_ Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
April 25, 2003
Mr. David L. Cashwell, Director of Public Works
Town of Tarboro
PO Box 220
Tarboro, NC 27886
Subject: General Permit No. NCG110000
Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
COC NCG110036
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Cashwell:
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on March 6, 2003, we are forwarding herewith
the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general permit. This permit is issued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between
North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated December 6, 1981
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit application. Unless such demand is
made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division of Water
Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the certificate of
coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division
of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other
Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mack Wiggins at telephone number 9191733-
5083 ext. 542.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater and General Permits Unit Files
_. Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
NICOENN
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG110000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCGI10036
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
City of "Tarboro
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Tarboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
service road smith of `!'arboro, west of !'rinceville
Tarboro
Edgecombe County
to receiving waters designated as Tar River, a class C NSW water in the'l'ar-Pamlico River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, II, II1,
IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG100000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective April 25, 2003
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
�11IFiR. ��+.� _,
3Signed this day April 25, 2(X)3rwr�
L
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

OV
q11WV�F"1,r
IJ r North I Wra
jr
36,ti IJ r Ep:et.17S .���- 4� • � •'. � v ;,•
7
-
�' /. $unsglt ���1y 7�� `"'' �,a �r '" kYA�•�"z6 i i T ,I� � y��� : SF�t 1 SI.,.� ,E "r':i� 1 / ✓ ��If,/ • P9f� 7�� '" ljj 1 y. r ilk-_'P"'.. a a . �� � r' Y �'� � k.., i� � % � �.� ✓ g4
,t ` A-
�-124.1
•`�.4�' t r r�FEI h`, h�.a `E .�t y -5 � i -, 5 ,""e, 5 ".• gr.I4 „Y sD ta. , ° � r � �G;st �..�
135, *,YJ•-�',.✓` T �� "�,.- .,, i '�"' �.` � iU� V. },.fi4 ^�?s -t�".. ,°��'�': pSL r9 ° E3R1d/ � 1 s� ii�",^y!%�`s � / ,.✓
f'/,ti4lx`l.- („ f[,
Iva
',� •'�� / ,a, - �� . �. W_J �w-.r"\�r�„i% it ��, «."- � /; '`�kr jam. !' �.. ��,:
��,� � ��%' '\s�� ✓` a�s� ��''` �.%� 4 l�r �--••.��._�`�'-• �1 � rlre�,�>:0'cYnrr, �" ,�� ;� `" o `./ '�y✓��
�! L•p, z.ff�f } HrR / - . �asY ;�., 1 1 rth
� UQfl
Cou�sa
z C Bb r .{. 4 y -- r -lr 1, t {• •` j ii.trY
�......+
✓ h a..° ! `�. �\���� 1• �' �a '.S �F �, a rf � d r 't�'� J IC.." •^ � 10 �'" '•})� �� � ���
��� r� �t��-� .��. ! r•f,,,'€„� s ccrlln +o ,� (-'� � �, r r� V a� �paflcy r�-�. -
.�� .x���q� S l� s c''F•� �x `�� Yx '''t• • ;, f/C'. `. Y /• � 4. _ '4.' x ', .,,,.r '�� �+ �..,..,.,ti,f- F �,
°t�Corn
�(Stu qt
"C"=� •�� e '��'r .L '��(rl�i�: :p!�i �{NFL=cs��� J� !'.� i. »JI��.. � " �. 1'; r f1f =! v�� tiyi
�. `c~" ,lt j S}; .�-��••^-' , :_�, i`Z ` "' , " ({`{ P ricers
���%.' r ��g�` �/ �- s ��°t��' ��' `��, l '��.• � � � '�rl- ;; p �'a. '��`1 S7'� d', :�
•��"� 'i�� Qa��� L�9 °��,�'t/ r ! r��� � /mil . ;� � � M�� b� c �l #rw `ter. �ti f F .i= -i �'..1._
J A.���-�c. r c. %- "° -�.. �� � ��� .-_� � �� \ �^jy/� '`��� ,�i�,� � • � ��o A� � l �.9 r x", a 1 r . '" t ,
`ES3A AN69,� O�i i �� �� � �.� o � �•"' t; �.. � ��, a , tx8 �.. - N
'¢p a�f4�°� 1, 1,� s���/aa/o/>is aresSit I�f�
VOID':, r3 ) I
vu -,N�rj v
f 1
'0
J/
r
���Pi%F� �F � ��� �� � ,' �'t,./•"`6 It If i `�� '� �� � y4"ts
27.5
�j
'` F,..
r�
` 7'; _;: lz '• ��'
33
�.�TLf
'�'-3:�.,./� �' tip•" t� 1 ' �� �Oa +
ira:lerr 0 y
f'" zR ) j, � \ ``'� ,�._ t . },5 � ` �„f r sue.• •., s 6
V �_., f' ✓d �. � '/l--^—�ti� (�4i:L� f l f ft ^Q.�i.: •• �� � • .'t
'\�i•� � { `' a� �i �� 1 '; r.= ti',1 •= i� r , _ � '\ �•, tit ~
`� _ `-` ! r,✓ ,• i ;r,"•r_till - —
ar�ptdgeccr/m
U 1110flat �a[ . ! J j1 f 1 . �F I 1'll �1 '. l {�!! •IJ"h(� r ! I I If/
WIT
o� '; ram• Y., ! 1' J•E Sio •1..'7!J u! 1
h �--f.°rl.`'� — F J.� �I ff;: � �✓i ,:�,,,,''a_r� b��i '/. •. ! .. �� •J^1 I^r
" �i✓""" // '�
10*W
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.

Ic-
Markers
Name: Discharge Site-NCG110036
Short Name: Dschrg
Coordinates: 0350 53' 01 Z' N, 077' 32' 23.4" W
Comment: Tarboro Wastewater Treatmnt Plant, Subbasin 030303,Tar-Pamlico River Basin,
Edgecombe County, Tar River, Class C NSW, Quad D28NE

--..., -,, ... ,....- ».__.,-.:.ram ---..,--. .-- ...-•-- -c---- ----- ..::..r.^.' --+,... - - -- - ..-- .- «.r---. _.. _._ :..ar'-- - ..-ar.+w .. _. -,..f...----er•-+max-_s..cM r .L-:-•.w.. -Y', - .••a-,r:--.'at, - n-+rr >: -r ►,r.!n-' •.-"t• -
'" ---^-"`w-r +..teen- f -- -•-y • ..,,._. _ . .-..
_ r ,r :�"'".`-. _. .'9R}-...5:.av"'+"a wwt rr' xl-zPT,'F•. G,1'7i'ii ,'%- 4 `�tl`-._ f -'w '9C ` L '., .r._ _ %,':r^ _ -wn-vf •+-•• �f*lr 1..
M-ZF . a
r
/
) _
-
f
4.
c Am • a
NOTE: TAR RIVER DATA :
WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED
REPLACE SILT FENCE Y. -':# PERMANNT < `
BERM 'AS .SHOWN ON SH NO. L A.
HWL ELEV 4
- ..
w NW ELE - 17 , 2 MSL
w fit,. o 0 0 0 o O o T A CD LOWFL r o - o `= x
z Al 78 - on - /Z z71.
E- 3+00 Z R PRAT.
rb
4�1
oSEE DETAIL, _-__ ---- --.-.- __ __--�°`~-------------- ---_
GRIT CHAMBER SHT . NO, 32 �� =�--�_-__---- ---- _ .! ,-_ -- _- - _`_` --� -
Al
_ -��rr ��FJ Yi r ' '�=f_ -= _ ~-�_ � � fr CONCH, AD'h JCL ---- _ _ -~ --= _ � 2�' 33 -IZ {
_ r _ _ - _ _
a
' -"' �~ -^ r� - ^'~ ^ . .+rr ` -�.� \ \ - _� _ � �1ti �i- - � .. -.
1 ___ _^_-. ^•''; •^,.r __ � �ti_ \ \ �I may( A 7 _ ` - ��
1• � __- ---_ rlr.r +_::r_ ��- r _1� � ^_•4.� 1-; +ram+ + _ '• ■ I'I�' r�_ GF+ �
��� �y '" __� _ _-_ - ^ - .�'' - `� ♦ lI� r �8 a�� NEW 12" RGF'R'`'` _�_--_- _- ---= �Z '-'
-- ter- +NE1-t YARD__\♦�\\ rev-
,� --- -_ - -\ _ E APP OX INLET r �35'..0"(`1�\ j ��_ -�,,,� x v -1_ _ __-- - - - =_ ��_--
Zz
/ �J e EXI5T FEN E , f '' \ I �~ -
L
r� -- 43 , .' f f ' // \� \! EXIST NG .' y�� _ �t s11,•f-1 df F / i�.�\- -'•-.- A
)50. 1.-Q " AA V�GAhIT' 143L-
Al Zg . �� I I \•� / ELL / / CLARI ER ' / �,�.- P/i�7ir- - 3 10 e7��
+oo-- _ _ -_
r I ✓t wl• I EX STING \ 2.25� M.L.EL. 3.0 1 ,� \ �`` �_�\ \ -
CLARIFIER MARY\\ // IV `7`l-q� r+ I i _-4�--- - - _1� _ ,
ss 12•=0' DO E pj,, - oul EXISTING �, L. M.L. 4s.o \ ZSE"3Z 4 1 1 I j L. UT E EXISTING
\ �'" �-� =� =� -- _ �E Zgl3
LAB I ,/ 1 r E 1 c /�(-_ _I 1r1
GATE 63 6 r �� BUILDING I� _ \\♦ _ ' YAR .mot Fit v.,. i ti , CONTACT
\
C IN IN j ' / ! EXIST. INLET �� EXli SEC. QLARI�I / 1 1 \\, I i / \ �--- _��_- -- ----- �� `♦ \ / /
i+ �- - IRC. PU - 5tL1C'ir REC R Bo '4_ -
1=E CE� S ITTER BOX PI -� - i p �oa0ib ! NtW,B" s D ,
�_- // �\ EXIST. j �t4RyiAia��1
EXISTING AC SS ROAD 0 1 b
SLUDGE PIT 1 ' 4 \ 42 �♦ ( I r<I'1 1' 1
(PA ED) ��1 --- \ -�\ ' DISTRI AROF 1
EXIST. §dais // '�._ ' 43 r 1 1 Al 77- Q3+
PROVIDE 5 ALE~ 4�-\ �� T E DEMOLIS ' EXI5T NG \11, r I f III a `� - \,♦ E7-4-33- (o
1 } �\ - 1 EX STING / / SECOND RY f I I I OND LARIF
OR D13,,46N GE . \ \ / / I
�+ CLARIFIER
EXISTING M.L.EL. 3.0 SECONDARY
Y EXISTING CTIVATE-0 1AE ATIDN `7 I j j Ir r
_ w.L 4s.o r TRICKLING I I CLARI IERFILTER p FU ,` SLUDGE A RATION l 'mod r r I jr j
EXrSr/ r + ` \♦\ / �♦� \ \ I /!> ���: EXISTING -- ���♦ / 1 I I I L. L. ` BASIN 1 1 I I Ij"rj '
\ \. / /// /��` CONTROL ���\\\ \\ I TOP OF 5T EL. 32.25 r I I 1 [ ASIN
-L/x rCH /i > HOUSE ♦ \ \ \ f / > I I i p I j
♦~ I , �(/ /� / \ 1\ 111 - ' �' 1 11 `\ .-r I I , M.L.EL 47.0 1 I 1 j I j Ir I r .1
1
FUiI)I ♦ FUTURE I !r r(! I EXIS ING EXISTING 111, 11 r -- 1 \\ I
tj � -01-93 \ l r I I r I I PRIM RY SECONDARY 1 1 \ / / \ , r I I /�%�, I I of 1I Ir
zE Z-,3Z-7.� , �., ♦♦ f \ I I Ijil11 fJIGE TEA i3IGE5TER III11 \ \ / �---. 1 I j r li
1 1 r r►r� \ v+ I j�
WAREHOUSE
ISTING i. r f
AREHOUSE
k �� / ' , 1 / , 1 ,\\\\\�\.�-- ��i-�-��---�/j%I/ DCaA�.S;\� ���"-�' imay/ r \
d 1 r \ - F ,� � Z �\� �` --- ---,� ���/i � s�c� � � �' � 43-
_
..�..- _ -ter --- ---� -•--_ I �_..�= -- - - �--------_--__-_---•__-
�4-32--70--- - r - i -^� --- -----_-------_-------
0+00 'At_ COMPRESSOR BUIL ING / _.___ -_ -�_ - - -- - -- - - -- - - ---
E a�- �73 �s , - - -- __ __---^ ^_1-- rr
BY OTH�_RS -�-- j
• - \ o IFS,. ) r
` -RAISED WALK R TION BASIN "-DISTRIBUTION t rjr r I
EE DETAIL, 'q V- �`� D. PLITTER BOX BOX ijf 1
EXISTINI-- TOP aF GNP CITO FU� f HT. NO .
CHAIN 1,3N,C PADS I Y - d� _- __ } > '•.` 1 r 1
FENCE EL, 46.
I LE T. //�� 4 F. 4s.0 r I 11 I f•
` I i PA 1 1 1
ISTING RETURN I 14 5
SLUDGE 9 LIFT L-5STA
EXISTIN SLUDG DRYING BEDS ZcwB �C N(i R CTD.. ' FL. 0_ 47.0 �' r �'
1 I1 -- \ \ 11 I 1
Sl EXISTING SLUDGE EXISTIN SLUDGE j
S i �TA L S IT`\ _ {III 1 1 DRYING BEDS DRYINGBEDS I r I f r
E OIRMEN BY I j r 1 TOP OF
SAND YAAIE5 47.0 T 47,5 TOP OF SAND VARIE £L; 47.0 TO 47,5 11 r •j
I I I 1 IIII
1 S®3
', I I � I 11 11 I j r• '
I I 1 II i
I i �� 1 II III I 1 j r
o+ ----�- �
f
EXISTING
AEROBIC 7 0
I
- - --. _
i
rr 2 DIGEST R II
I
t,
I �
wr o�,�rtr + { cn
iiI� f ,
W 2+00 r _ IWAWA
1 D � III I
•Q I I I f I
� 11 111 1
I II 4
• �I III 1
itIII ,
III 1
r
r r _ ASr-
1 \
W 3+00
W 5+00 L
0
O
IX7
z
I �
ApmA wi-rN DNA►►J 1 !r
-ri•1a-r �Ms�Es cui p
�rLTO U
I -
I
I 8.75
I
I�V. 413.5 t
1
SLUDGE HOLDING BASIN
"ri�E oaiL-� t'oT'Lr.tg'IA'!
PoLucT'AjlJT -n4A-r CC>t'-LD
5�s ocxrFAu_c_, s s
P>A qTi ALk q T ,rco
5�vu� c�E
o O o o (D CD o o O o
O O O O O C, o O O O
�7 m CL1 O 0 i (r7 d lf7
z z z z in in cn in cn
SEDIMENT
BASIN SCHEDULE
(SB)
BASIN
LENGTH WIDTH
SEDIMENT
TOTAL
EMBANKMENT
SPILLWAY
NO.
STORAGE
DEPTH
WIDTH
DEPTH
SB--S
22' ' S1'
2'
5'
6'
5'
SB-2
36' 18'
2'
5'
6'
I
5'
SB-3
L r 10,
2'
..
5$
I 6'
5•
NOTE:
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE
3'-0" DEEP X
3'-0" WIDE
SEDIMENT
POOLS
WHERE INDICATED BY
"SP".
LEGEND
EXISTING
-ONTOUR
-- x --
EXISTING
FENCE
Q
EXISTING
STRUCTURE
DEMOLISH
_ -
EXISTIN«
STIORM DRAIN
p
EXISTI�,"
YARD INLET
EDGE OF
s,'JODS
FINISHED CONTOUR
---x x NEW CHAIN LINK FENCE
NEW STRUCTURE
NEW CONCRETE WALK
190.0 FINISHED SPOT ELEVATION
=- --�- SURFACE DRAINAGE
NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT
1 1 , , -� SILT FENCE
NEW STORM DRAIN
■ NEW YARD INLET
1•
f .
*.5
1
f
y
\
\
f
\
j
-
F
0 0
", O
a o
fl
+
+
CD r-
OD
cn cn
cn
NOTES:
1.
THERE ARE NO POTABLE WELLS WITHIN 500 FEET
OF THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SITE. _
2.
THE 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION IS 42.25 MSL AS
DETERMINED BY THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
3.
TBM ELEV. = 46.0 FIN FLOOR LAB, BLDG.
4.
DATUM FOR ELEVATIONS SHOWN: MSL
'a
5.
GRID SYSTEM REFERENCE: ASSUMED
REVISIONS
TOWN OF TARBORO
DES. BY.
DWN , 13Y:,
TARBORO NORTH CAROLINA
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION
CHK'D.
f ' . -
GRADING PLAN '.
JOB "No. 2204-E
SCALE: 1".=40'
DATE: NOV 1987
L . E . WOOTEN AND COMPANY `
SHEET NO- . 2.
ENGINEERING PLANNING ARCHITECTURE
RALEIGH• N_ C. GREENVILLE. N. C.
OF F 1. SHEETS

1
,*
_r
_ y
r
NOTE: TAR RIVER DATA
WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED
HWL ELEV . 42. 14 !ESL '
LL
- REPLACE SILT FENCE WI-•Fi PERMANENT
BERM AS SHOWN ON SIA NO. LA. NWL ELEV. 17.27 + ,.
LC!l FLOW=36 CFS
o 0 T ;L 3F s
O 0 CD o 0 A
0 0 0 +0 �,.� 0 0 © + I V E r� + a o �� r �.,,
.:� �+ m t1J DJ7 �. �I �]� -- O (ZJ _ . Lr7 LD
z z z z l� 7B -C.� -IZ. z _ cn cn ua to cn _ ,ti ct� ctJ
. 3+0 d Z-4 &Q_ Q-T _ - _ _ _-- -_-
A �2 5
l Z R PRAP _ f
o✓ SEE DETAIL, _ -_-.-_ ___ .____- _ ___-------" _ ____-"'---`��L
GRIT CHAMBER _ _ _----------_�--_ �� � = -_ �� _ - - -- ----
I _ _ _�`
r%$ DZ� I.3 SHT . NC , 32 _ _-- __�_ .._._ _ __ - -- _- -_�_ __ __ -_ - _
== - -,- ,� may= --� --
CONIC a off<< .. - _ `_= � -����- � 2q-33'iZ
r/Io�tlr :rf g
-----_ — _ LI /•J,..n�
'- Z_33-0'7 - y����A�-��'}E _
_146.5
-- -- -*-++c!''`� �-� -W - NEW 12 RCF \ 1 _--__ . _._ __ --
,�;r- _ NEW YARD ��,♦`\\ 1 ` ` - __-- -_ ____ �'r-----_`-
-_ I, . l! 1 ! / fr _— -_-___-�'_A_ 43 EXI} .� ,. N E } I Ii �'-ff�}\\} ` I l ��� _. \-`♦.,\ter��%� 1 ...\ 1 /� _ - c __-_TOX TNLAPP 35ISTFEEXISTING
4 //r�a/SECONDARY
CLARIFIER
FIL
50.
2+00 EXISTING 22,
—1\
T67
_-�- --- - -9--_-__
__-_—
.
I P IMARY
% 1 1---45---- - - r
ss 12'=0• �a E p- ., W� I �} .L. CLARIFIER �\ . N?7-97 z�3 , CLA
217E u EXISTING R/ W.L. . 46.a Zq-3247 1 f ! L 1 UT E }
BJILDING i - \�\ - NE .�f r��r ovs:� 1 *fj i I 1 }
YAR
C IN L.IN 1 J1 � Ara / `-�IST.IRC. PU INLET �� 9�UC'"E REC R0 AROl1'I �r � 11 1 \\
S ITTER BOX ,
h
` —-- —�—_ Ill I /
45
.r.,s �� � 1 ^-
x % I1\ PI I I] \ rocolb I NtW�S .
� r
SS ROAD iS; , \ D EXIST. \ [12
EXISTING AC SLUDGE PIT 1
��
(PA EAHT
D) � - � � 43 1 DISTRIBOX11 , Al 77- 43-'
EXIST. ERS , -- \
a� \ T E ❑EMOLIS fib/ �� �♦ j! -.
i P30VIDE $ ALE } \� STING / / STONTDXIS RY ! I i OND LA'RIr ;JR1 +f�N GE. �\ \�} I
\- 1 CLARIFIER
-� W. WL. 46.0 EXISTING W.L.EL. 3.0` SECON ARY
` �♦ .-- V 1 - 1 r TRICKLING I CLARI IER EXISTING CTIVATEI) At Al
FILTER f
♦ /\� ` /%i ice- ` EXISTING --� \�`♦ / I I 1 _ FU SLUDGE A RATIDN
ST, O \ \ f / /// i �� CONTROL ��. \` \ %� I I' I L. L. h BASIN l I ASIN r r r I! J
ITCH \ ♦ \ \ f / \ \ \\ I TOP of ST EL. 52.2s ! I i R 1
--) - HOUSE ) \
♦`� 1 1 I1 /� / \\I\ 11} �_��s l} I ♦ -f r i I w.L.L 47.0�r
A/ "7 -D1-•43 FUTURE,FUTURE I ! !! 1! I I EXIS ING EXISTING 1 }} } 11 - 1 1 / I r I ---------
s
` `♦♦ \ 1 11}li y I DICE TER DIGESTER ! IJI1!
\ ♦ \ } } I } 1 11 // 1111 ! EXISTING \ \♦ , / } 1 1 - I i r f ! .�
\ / \\\ / } \1\\\\\\♦ / ♦ // // // WAREHOUSE
✓k li _ ` 1 \\\\♦♦♦��__ �-�ii/j/%/ bCaA�_S;\` ��- -�� ! -
1
A!?`i-Qq` $1 ----ate- --_ '♦ �� __ -�- ---
7i7 _ ., 1
� _ COMPRESSOR BUILDING / �\ -_-- _-- _- -- �-___ __________ �-
___________ !f
0+00 - E d(I- 1-3 �s �*T BY OTH`;=RS I ----- ------ ---__- - ---....._--------- ----�\ r► Il "
cv,_-.`. -D R TIDN BASIN OI5 RIBOTIDN t 1! r
RAISED WALK '
,�• , G/NE Aron 1 EE DETAIL, Acc PLTTTER BOX BOX 11
EXISTING` FUEL
CHAIN L�+ PADSOF p D � I HT. NO. ,� __ ;: ,.`, f ! !
r
EL. 46. r rr 1
FENCE : !-
I LEF
y.. /�'a 4 C Y F�f� 4r.oAAA. sp
r! j rr
` I I IPA /, 1 1 a 5
EXISTING RETURN
` • I I l SLUDGE i LIFT I 5 L•S
I
., 1 STATION -
lieEXISTIN SLUDG DRYING BEDS 1�� NfiR CT
: I 47.0 r Uiur
`\ I S rFR TA L r.iT� j1 — \ EXISTING SLUDGE
•• I I . --- j Il I r } DRYING l'EDS
E [JIRMEN BY �`—"'— �_ Ill 1 } TOP OF SAND VARIES 47.D T 47.5
W 1+00
I I II i1 I
I
i
i
EXISTING
SLUDGE
DRYIN
BEDS
TOP OF SAND VAAIE
EL. 47.0 TO 47.5
I
-
1 ---� —•^- / i 1 1 I II 1�I r � o +
t t 1♦ I I I I /
N
48
_�'_ i t � � I I i 1 1 T Al W f A e r fi % % if �` _�.. __ -.-.. _--_-.. .. _" -_ . . - -.- .- •._ .. ._-.--d$- ..r. .-a,r.,..� �. .1 �. � - . - - - Yf
----_- � EXISTG r
ACHUL71u
DIGESTER
j -
f
II I11 I
II f II I
II Ill
itill l
III 1
1J I 1
46.2�f = o
JL1Ay,E L Z
I Cc y
AP,eA Wit'N
`nkA-r � Z
=r4rc) I \
Pt.fa•,rT. � I� �
II�
I 8.75
77II
1
I�V. 4 .5 �.
l
J
-SLUDGE HOLDING BASIN
"rti;E 004" PPaTEl. ri,&L_
Poc w,LcrA� -n+'AT- Cott-L.D
t�ar��r►ac.c-y "��~�o
5�w� r;E -
�,.-.....,I --
0
t
0
- t ...... ..�
0
.. t
0
0
(D
0
0
cv
r�
v
Ln
I� U7 cn cn
LEGEND
"ONTOUR
FENCE
;STRUCTURE
STORM DRAIN
YARD INLET
i )ODS
FINISHED CONTOUR
—x x NEW CHAIN LINK FENCE
NEW STRUCTURE
NEW CONCRETE WALK
190.0 FINISHED SPOT ELEVATION
--- �- --�- S',_RFACE DRAINAGE
NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT
SILT FENCE
NEW STORM DRAIN
■ NEW YARD INLET
\
♦
f
0 0
,i
:.'co
0 0
; - ca
+ +
+
r.D F__
OD
U) cn
cn
NOTES:
1.
THERE ARE NO POTABLE WELLS WITHIN 500 FEET
OF THE; WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SITE.
2.
THE 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION IS 42.25 MSL AS
z
DETERMINED BY THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
3.
TBM ELEV. = 46.0 FIN FLOOR LAB. BLDG.
4.
DATUM FOR ELEVATIONS SHOWN: MSL
5.
GRID SYSTEM REFERENCE: ASSUMED
3;
Y
REVISIONS
TOWN OF TARBORO
DES.B i.
TARBORO NORTH
CAROLINA
DWN . BY:: �f
''
..
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION
CHK'D. B`Y•�461
JOB �"°. 22°�-E
GRADING PLAN ��
SCALE: i . 40
.
DATE: NOV 1987
L. E. WOOTEN AND COMPANY'°
SHEET Na. 2
ENGINEERING PLANNING ARCHITECTURE.of
RALEIGH. N. C. GREENVILLE. N. C.
41 SHEETS
}