The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNCG060034_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20090728STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET NCG PERMITS PERMIT NO. /V C& d (pl7D 3� DOC TYPE N( HISTORICAL FILE ❑ MONITORING REPORTS DOC DATE o ano 9 ri -7 aY YYYYMMDD �`�°il av !., — 3 I' NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Ween H. Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary July 28, 2009 Mr. Grant Oxendine Hospira, Inc. 42858 North Wesleyan Blvd Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Subject: Follow up Outfall Sampling for NPDES Stormwater Permits NCG060034,(RM1) & NCG060035 (RM2) NPDES Wastewater Permit NC0001599 (RM 1 & RM2) Hospira, Inc. — Rocky Mount Nash County Dear Mr. Oxendine: On June 9, 2009, Autumn Hoban and I, Dave Parnell, of the Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality, conducted sampling at several conveyances during a follow up visit to the January 13, 2009 compliance evaluation inspections (CEl). Thank you to you and the Hospira staff for your assistance. Observations during the follow up visit, as well as sample data, are summarized below. Inspection checklists are attached for your records: Autumn and I concentrated our sampling in the area of the facility known as RM2, which is the northern most portion ofHospira's Rocky Mount facility. This facility has 8 Stormwater Discharge Outfalls (SDO's), all of which discharge to unnamed tributaries to Beech Branch. Hospim has been granted Representative Outfall Status (ROS) for the SDO's at RM2. DWQ has approved your -facility touse SDO 017 as the representative outfall for RM2. We re - sampled at this outfall, since our sampling data from the January inspection indicated the possibility of process flow or groundwater flow at the stormwater outfall. Upon re - inspection and further sampling at SDO 017, it is evident that flow is present in the stormwater line from a source other than stormwater runoff. The sample result for total recoverable Aluminum (Al) was 1400 ug/L. This may indicate an exceedance of the aquatic life water quality action level for Al, which is 87 ug/L, for class C, NSW waters in the Tar- Pamilico River Basin. The sample result for Copper (Cu) was 11 ug/L. This may indicate an exceedance of the aquatic life water quality action level for Cu, which is 7 ug(L. The Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) result was 492 ug/L and would be approaching the 500 ug(L maximum, when applied to the 2L groundwater standards. The Iron (Fe) results were 6700 ug/L, exceeding the 0.3 mg(L maximum, when applied to the 2L groundwater standards. The Zinc result was 48 ug/L, just below the aquatic life water quality action level of 50 ug/L. laI �"` Carolina lturidk North Carolina division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone (919) 791-4200 Customer Service Internet: www,ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX (919) 788-7159 877-6236748 An Equal OpportuniWAffirmative Action Employer — 50% Recyciedl10% Post Consumer Paper r i 1 A 4 4W, -W O NCDENR L� �� North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 5 Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H, Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary March 11, 2009 CERTIFIED MAIL 7007 2680 0001 8696 4949 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Todd Wegenast Hospira, Inc. 42858 North Wesleyan Blvd Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections of NPDES Stormwater Permits NCG060034 (RM1) & NCG060035 (RM2) NPDES Wastewater Permit NC0001589 (RM1 & RM2) Hospira, Inc. — Rocky Mount Nash County Dear Mr. Wegenast: On January 13, 2009, Autumn Hoban and I, Dave Parnell, of the Raleigh Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality, performed compliance evaluation inspections (CEl) at the referenced site. Grant Oxendine and Mike Lewis were available for the inspection and their assistance was appreciated. Samples were taken at stormwater and wastewater outfalls during the inspection to better understand the composition of the discharge from the facility. Observations during the inspection, as well as sample results, are summarized below. Inspection checklists are attached for your records: RM1—NCG060034 RM1 is the southern most portion of the facility. The facility has 14 stormwater discharge outfalls (SDO), all of which discharge to unnamed tributaries of Beech Branch. Beech Branch is currently classified as a class C, nutrient sensitive water (NSW) in the Tar Pamlico river basin. Hospira has been granted representative outfall status (ROS) for the SDOs at RM1 by a DWQ letter dated September 25, 2006. In that correspondence, DWQ approved Hospira to use SDOs 004B and 005 as representative outfalls for RM1. SDOs 004B, 005, and 014 were inspected during the inspection and no problems were noted. The flow from SDO 005 was sampled, showed no signs of process wastewater and therefore the current monitoring meets current permit requirements. Analytical monitoring of SDOs. 004B and 005 were conducted as required by the permit. All records were on file and met all requirements. Qualitative monitoring of all SDOs has also been completed as required. NorthCarolina Naturally North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone (919) 791-4200 Customer Service Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1626 FAX (919) 7W7159 877-623-6748 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper JW Hospira, Inc. CEI* Page 2 The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SP3) was complete and well maintained. The site maps and general location maps met all requirements. The spill plan was well developed and implemented, with no recent significant spills reported. A spill awareness training signup sheet was faxed to me on February 13, 2009. The facility appeared very well maintained at the time of the inspection. RM2 — NCG060035 R1\42 is the northern most portion of Hospira's Rocky Mount facility. This facility has 8 SDOs, all of which discharge to unnamed tributaries to Beech Branch. Hospira has also been granted ROS for the SDOs at RM2. DWQ has approved Hospira to use SDO 017 as the representative outfall for RM2. A sample was also taken at this outfall. The chemistry readings and temperature indicate the possibility of process flow commingling with the stormwater. The process water may be coming from the condensate line from the degassifier on the roof Please respond to this office within 20 days of receipt of this inspection letter, as to the status of the elimination of process water at the SDO 017 outfall or confirm your ayolication,Lbr the addition of SDO 017 out,Lall as a wastewater discharge outfall in the ugcoming permit renewal. Hospira has conducted analytical monitoring of SDO 017 as currently required by this permit. All records were on file and met requirements. Qualitative monitoring of all SDOs has also been conducted as required. The same SP3 is used for both RM1 and RM2. As stated above, the SP3 was complete and well implemented. RM2 was also very clean and well maintained at the time of the inspection. RMl and RM2 — NC0001589 This NPDES permit regulates the wastewater discharges from outfalls 001 and 002 at RM1 and outfall 003 at RM2. Currently, all three outfalls have the same monitoring requirements and discharge to the unnamed tributary to Beech Branch. No problems were detected at the time of the inspection. However, sample results of the wastewater at outfall 003, indicates higher reading than allowed for Aluminum, Copper, Iron and Zinc. It is the recommendation of the Raleigh Regional Office staff that these parameters be included as monitoring requirements (for this outfall) in the upcoming permit renewal. It should be noted that Hospira has conducted analytical monitoring of outfalls 001, 002 and 003 as currently required by the permit. These records were complete and readily available. The flows at 001 and 003 are measured by inline flow meters that are calibrated annually. Hospira, Inc. CEI Page 3 Please be aware that violations of your discharge permits could result in the assessment of civil penalties in an amount up to $25,000 per day per violation. Please reply within 20 days of the receipt of this inspection letter. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Dave Parnell or Autumn Hoban at 919 791-4200. Sincerely, -�At,� Danny Smith Regional Supervisor Surface Water Protection Section Enclosures: January 13, 2009 Compliance Evaluation Inspection reports Sampling Results Cc: RRO/SWP files Water Quality Central Files Nonpoint Source Compliance Unit Stormwater Permitting Unit .y i Compliance Inspection Report Permit: NCG060034 Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Hospira, Inc. SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Hospira, Inc. -RM1 County: Nash US Hwy 301 N Region: Raleigh Contact Person: Ricardo Isaza Title: Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 01/13/2009 Entry Time: 12:45 PM Primary Inspector: David R Parnell Secondary Inspector(s): Rocky Mount NC 27802 Phone: 252-977-5333 Certification: Phone: Exit Time: 04:45 PM Phone: 919-791-4260 Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/SoapstGosmetics/Pubiic Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Q Not Compliant Question Areas: ■ Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: 1 Permit: NCG060034 Owner - Facility: Hospira, Inc. Inspection Date: 01/1312009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Page: 2 0 Permit: NCGO60034 Owner -Facility: Hospira, Inc. inspection Date: 01/13/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention.Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Training held during last quarter of'08 (December 17, 2008), documentation was faxed to this office Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ ❑ ❑ O # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Comment: Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Page: 3 Permit: NCGO60034 Owner - Facility: Hospira. Inc. Inspection Date: 01/13/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Comment: This southern portion of the manufacturing facility is known as RM 1 (NCG060034) and uses SD4s 004E and 005 as representative outfalls. Page: 4 • •. TRAINING SIGN OFF SHEET Instructor: Phil Davis Training Type: SPILL AWARENES TRAINING Date: DECEMBER 17 2008 ATTENDEES fl A , fF 1 I WI' ,P " mM _/ 8f RPM • �MWAW MOM ■ ��-aq Instructor's Signature Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E_, Director Division of Water Quality 28 August 2007 Mr. Todd Wegenast Hospira, Inc. 4285 North Wesleyan Blvd Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections of NPDES Stormwater Permits NCG060034 (RMI) & NCG060035 (RM2) And NPDES Wastewater Permit NCO001589 (RMI & RM2) Hospira, Inc. -- Rocky Mount Nash County Dear Mr. Wegenast 1. I performed compliance evaluation inspections (CEI) of the subject permits at the subject site on 14 August 2007. Your assistance and cooperation, as well as that of Mr. Grant Oxendine, was very helpful and appreciated. Inspection findings are summarized below and inspection checklists are attached for your records. RM1 — NCG060034 2. RMI is the southern most portion of Hospira's Rocky Mount facility. This facility has 14 stormwater discharge outfalls (SDO), all of which discharge to unnamed tributaries to Beech Branch. Beech Branch is currently classified as a class C, nutrient sensitive water (NSW) in the Tar Pamlico river basin. Hospira has been granted representative outfall status (ROS) for the SDOs at RMI via correspondence from DWQ dated 25 September 2006. In that correspondence, DWQ approved Hospira to use SDOs 004B and 005 as representative outfalls for RM1. SDOs 004A, 004B, 005 and 006 were inspected during the inspection. No problems were noted at any of the SDOs. 3. Hospira has conducted analytical monitoring of SDOs 004B and 005 as required by the permit. All records were on file and met all requirements. Qualitative monitoring of all SDOs has also been completed as required. Several of the SDOs were dry during the qualitative monitoring event(s). One SDO did have trace oil sheen but nothing else of significance was noted. 4. The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SP3) was complete and well maintained. The site maps and general location maps met all requirements. The spill plan was well developed and implemented and two small (non -reportable) spills were recorded. Hospira uses its in-house proprietary maintenance program known as MP2 to administer the facility's good housekeeping and ria Nrmafr1 North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone (919) 791-4200 Customer Service Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX (919) 791-4718 1-877-623-6748 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper Hospira, Inc. — Rocky Mount, Compliance Evaluation Inspections NCG060034, NCG060035 & NC0001589 r Page 2 of 3 28 August 2007' preventative maintenance program. The facility appeared very well maintained at the time of the inspection. RM2 — NCG060035 5. RM2 is the northern most portion of Hospira's Rocky Mount facility. This facility has 8 SDOs, all of which also discharge to unnamed tributaries to Beech Branch. Hospira has also been granted ROS for the SDOs at RM2. DWQ approved Hospira to use SDO 017 as the representative outfall for RM2. However, Hospira has been monitoring SDO 016 as the representative outfall instead, because of the difficulty Hospira has had in collecting a sample at SDO 017; SDO 017 is a wide and shallow stormwater swale that has not experienced sufficient flow to provide a representative sample. Please address this issue immediately by submitting another request that SDO 016 be assigned as the representative outfall for RM2. Please submit the request, along with all appropriate explanations, justifications and supporting material to the Stormwater Permitting Unit at the following address: Stormwater Permitting Unit Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 6. Hospira has conducted analytical monitoring of SDO 016 as required by the permit. All records were on file and met all requirements. Qualitative monitoring of all SDOs has also been completed as required. Several of these SDOs were also dry during the qualitative monitoring event(s). No problems were detected at SDOs 016 and 017. 7. The same SP3 is used for both RMl and RM2. As stated in paragraph 4 above, the SP3 was complete and well implemented. RM2 was also very clean and well maintained at the time of the inspection. RM1 & RM2 — NCO001589 8. This NPDES permit regulates wastewater discharges from outfalls 001 and 002 at RM1 and outfall 003 at RM2. All three outfalls have the same monitoring requirements and also discharge to unnamed tributaries of Beech Branch. The descriptions of these discharges in the permit remain accurate and no changes have occurred. No problems were detected during the inspection at any of these outfalls. The right-of-ways to the outfalls are properly maintained. 9. Hospira has conducted analytical monitoring of outfalls 001, 002 and 003 as required by the permit. All records were complete and readily available. The flows at outfalls 001 and 003 are measured by inline flow meters that are calibrated at least annually. Flow at outfall 002 is measured using a staff gauge. Chlorine is only monitored when used in the systems that discharge to these outfalls. ram' ,� Hospira, Inc. — Rocky Mount, Compliance Evaluation Inspections NCG060034, NCG060035 & NC0001589 Page 3 of 3 28 August 2007 10. Please be aware that violations of your discharge permits could result in the assessment of civil penalties in an amount not to exceed $25,000 per day per violation. Hospira must take immediate action to resolve the ROS issue as mentioned in paragraph 5 above. Failure to do so in a timely fashion will result in a Notice of Violation (NOV). Please reply within 10 days of your receipt of this letter to notify us of your intent regarding the ROS issue at RM2. If you need assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-791-4200. Sincerely, Ronald C. Boone Environmental Specialist Raleigh Regional Office Attachments: 1. Inspection Checklist — NCG060034, RM1 2. Inspection Checklist — NCG060035, RM2 3. Inspection Checklist— NC0001589, RM 1 & RM2 cc: RRO/SWP w/ All Atchs Stormwater Permitting Unit w/ Atchs 1 and 2 NPDES East Unit w/ Atch 3 Central Files w/ All Atchs Compliance Inspection Report Permit: NCGO60034 Effective: 09/01/02 Expiration: 08/31/07 Owner: Hospira, Inc. SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Hospira, Inc. -RM1 County: Nash US Hwy 301 N Region: Raleigh Rocky Mount NC 27802 Contact Person: Ricardo Isaza Title: Phone: 252-977-5333 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Secondary ORC(s): On.Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Certification: Phone: Inspection Date: 08/14/2007 jETime: 09AS.45 AM Exit Time: 12:45 PM Primary Inspector: Ron Boone Phone: 919-791-4200 Secondary Inspector(s): ��Z�/� 7 Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: IN Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Question Areas: E Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: 1 N r permit: NCG060034 Owner - Facility: Hospira, Inc. Inspection Date: 0&1412007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Page: 2 Permit: NCGO60034 Owner - Facility: Hospira, Incl. Inspection Date: 08/14/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Comment: Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfa11 status, is it properly documented by the Division? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Page: 3 Z �0 W q rFR� �O G 4 � April 24, 2006 Ms. Melanie Proctor Hospira, Inc. (Formerly Abbott Laboratories) 4285 North Wesleyan Blvd Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Michael F. Easley, Governor William'G. Ross, Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections of Stormwater Permits NCG060034 & NCG060035 and NPDES Wastewater Permit NC0001589 Hospira, Inc. - Rocky Mount Nash County Dear Ms. Proctor: Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality On April 18, 2006, I, Mr. Ronald Boone, of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Raleigh Regional Office (RRO), conducted compliance evaluation inspections (CEI) of the subject facility's stormwater and was permits. The assistance and cooperation of Mr. Grant Oxendine was very helpful and appreciated. During the inspections the following items were noted. Please use the permit references cited throughout the report for further details as needed. I. Site Descri lion A. Hospira is a pharmaceutical products manufacturing company. This particular Hospira site actually has two separate manufacturing facilities known to Hospira as RM 1 (furthest south) and RM2 (furthest north). B. There are three separate discharge permits issued for the facilities at this site as shown below: 1. NCG060034 - Stormwater permit for RM1. RM1 has 14 stormwater outfalls covered by this permit: Outfalls 1 and 2, 4-14 and 22. 2. NCG060035 - Stormwater permit for RM2. RM2 has 8 stormwater outfalls covered by this permit: Outfalls 3 and 15-21. 3. NC0001589 - NPDES permit covering both RMI and RM2. There are 3 outfalls covered by this permit: Outfall 1, 2 and 3. C. All 25 outfalls discharge to an unnamed tributary of Beech Branch in the Tar Pamlico River Basin, a Class C, nutrient sensitive water. t Carolina ura!!y North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone (919) 791-4200 Customer Service Intemet h2o.ennstate.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX (919) 7914718 1-877-623-6748 An Equal Opportun4lAfPirmawe Acton Employer — 50% Regdedl90% Post Consumer Paper . j4ospira, Inc. - Rocky Mount, Compliance Evaluation Inspections, April 24, 2006, NCG060034, NCG060035 & NC0001589 Page 2 of 4 II. Permit/Certificate of Coverage (COC) NCG060034 (RMD A. The current permit became effective September 1, 2002, and expires on August 31, 2007. B. The stormwater system and the two stormwater discharge outfalls (SDO) that you currently monitor were observed. There was no visible evidence of spills, overflows or similar incidents in the system. No significant erosion was found. No problems or discrepancies were noted. C. Structural and procedural best management practices (BMP) were reviewed and/or observed. No problems or discrepancies were noted. D. The permit, certificate of coverage (COC) and proper up-to-date analytical and qualitative monitoring documentation were available on site during the inspection for the two SDOs that you currently monitor. No problems or discrepancies were noted. E. The general location map in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SP3) does not show all 14 SDOs and does not list accurate latitudes/longitudes for each SDO as required in Part H, Section A, Paragraph la. Please update the map to show this information. Alternatively, latitudes/longitudes for each SDO can be placed elsewhere in the SP3 to prevent map clutter as necessary. F. Checklists, schedules and records for good housekeeping (GH), preventative maintenance (PM) and employee training programs were available, in order and found to meet requirements. PM and GH records are generated and maintained through the company's proprietary plant maintenance software program, known as MP2. This program seems sufficiently encompassing and effective, however the SP3's PM and GH section does not sufficiently reference this program. Please reference MP2 in the SP3 and provide a thorough but brief description of how Hospira uses MP2 to meet the PM and GH requirements of the stormwater program. G. Hospira maintains a list of significant spills in the SP3 as required in Part II, Section A, Paragraph 1 d. According to the list the last recorded spill took place in 2000. However, it is suggested that an entry such as, "No spills have occurred since "INSERT DATE"", be recorded on the list when you do go for an extended length of time without a spill. The annual SP3 review would be an ideal time to make such an entry. Making an entry in the log as suggested would avert superfluous questions during the annual inspection. H. Vehicle maintenance activities do not occur on site. I. It was noted during the inspection that you are sampling/monitoring only 2 of the 14 SDOs that serve this site. When questioned about this, Mr. Oxendine stated that Hospira had been granted representative outfall status (ROS). However, a records search at Hospira, D WQ's Central Files office and the Raleigh Regional Office, turned up no record of DWQ granting ROS status to Hospira for this permit. As such, if you wish to continue monitoring only 2 of the outfalls, you must immediately initiate the process of requesting ROS from DWQ. To do so, please send a letter requesting ROS to the address below. Once your request is received, we will then request the information necessary from you to determine if you qualify for ROS. In the meanwhile, it is strongly suggested that you begin monitoring all SDOs as required by the permit. Division of Water Quality Stormwater Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 . Ifospira, Inc. -Rocky Mount, Compliance Evaluation inspections, April 24, 2006, NCG060034, NCG060035 & NC0001589 Page 3 of 4 II1. Permit/Certificate of Coverage (COC) NCG060035LRM2) A. The current permit became effective September 1, 2002, and expires on August 31, 2007. B. The stormwater system and the one SDO that you currently monitor were observed. There was no visible evidence of spills, overflows or similar incidents in the system. No significant erosion was found. No problems or discrepancies were noted. C. Structural and procedural best management practices (BMP) were reviewed and/or observed. No problems or discrepancies were noted. D. The permit, COC and proper up-to-date analytical and qualitative monitoring documentation were available on site during the inspection for the one SDO that you currently monitor. No problems or discrepancies were noted. E. The general location map in the SP3 does not show all 8 SDOs and does not list accurate latitudes/longitudes for each SDO as required in Part U, Section A, Paragraph 1 a. Please update the map to show this information. Alternatively, latitudes/longitudes can be placed elsewhere in the SP3 to prevent map clutter as necessary. F. Checklists, schedules and records for good housekeeping (GH), preventative maintenance (PM) and employee training programs were available, in order and found to meet requirements. PM and GH records are generated and maintained through the company's proprietary plant maintenance software program, known as MP2. This program seems sufficiently encompassing and effective, however the SPTs PM and GH section does not sufficiently reference this program. Please reference MP2 in the SP3 and provide a thorough but brief description of how Hospira uses MP2 to meet the PM and GH requirements of the stormwater program. G. Hospira maintains a list of significant spills in the SP3 as required in Part 11, Section A, Paragraph Id. According to the list the last recorded spill took place in 2000. However, it is suggested that an entry such as, "No spills have occurred since "INSERT DATE"", be recorded on the list when you do go for an extended length of time without a spill. The annual SP3 review would seem to be an ideal time to make such an entry. Making an entry in the log as suggested would avert superfluous questions during the annual inspection. H. Vehicle maintenance activities do not occur on site. I. It was noted during the inspection that you're satnpling/monitoring only 1 of the 8 outfalls that serve this site. When questioned about this, Mr. Oxendine stated that Hospira had been granted representative outfall status (ROS). However, a records search at Hospira, DWQ's Central Files office and the Raleigh Regional Office, turned up no record of DWQ granting ROS status to Hospira for this permit. As such, if you wish to continue monitoring only 2 of the outfalls, you must immediately initiate the process of requesting ROS from DWQ. To do so, please send a letter requesting_ ROS to the address below. Once your request is received, we will then request the information necessary from you to determine if you qualify for ROS. In the meanwhile, it is strongly suggested that you begin monitoring all SDOs as required by the permit. Division of Water Quality Stormwater Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 . Hospira, Inc. - Rocky Mount, Compliance Evaluation inspections, April 24, 2006, NCG060034, NCG060035 & NC0001589 Page 4 of J. Our database still shows the owner of this permit to be Abbott Laboratories. Please submit a Name/Ownership Change Form for this permit to initiate the action necessary to change the owner name in our database to Hospira, Inc. You can find the form at on the web at httoa/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms _Documents.htm#stormwaterGP, under Miscellaneous Forms. Please follow all instructions on the form. IV. Permit NCO001589 RM1 & RM2 A. The current permit became effective May 1, 2005, and expires on October 31, 2009. B. All three outfalls were observed. There was no visible evidence of spills, overflows or similar incidents. No significant erosion was found. The effluents appeared clear and odorless, with no visible evidence of excessive solids or sheens. No problems or discrepancies were noted. C. Discharge monitoring reports (DMR) were available for inspection and no discrepancies were noted. All reviewed data was accurate and no transcription errors between on site records and DMRs were noted. Please be aware that violations of your discharge permits could result in the assessment of civil penalties in an amount not to exceed $25,000 per day per violation. However, in view of the fact that very few discrepancies were found during this inspection, I have recommended that no Notice of Violation (NOV) be issued against Hospira, Inc. Nevertheless, please reply within 30 days of your receipt of this letter with your plan and schedule to achieve compliance with all permit requirements. If you need assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit, please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-791-4200. Sincerely, Ronald C. Boone Environmental Technician cc: Central Files Raleigh Region Files Stormwater Permitting Unit Non -Point Source Compliance Enforcement Unit WA SRO �O G 7 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality April 24, 2006 Ms. Melanie Proctor Hospira, Inc. (Formerly Abbott Laboratories) 4285 North Wesleyan Blvd Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections of Stormwater Permits NCG060034 & NCG060035 and NPDES Wastewater Permit NC0001589 Hospira, Inc. - Rocky Mount Nash County - Dear Ms. Proctor: On April 18, 2006, 1, Mr. Ronald Boone, of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Raleigh Regional Office (RRO), conducted compliance evaluation inspections (CEI) of the subject facility's stormwater and wastewater permits. The assistance and cooperation of Mr. Grant Oxendine was very helpful and appreciated. During the inspections the following items were noted. Please use the permit references cited throughout the report for further details as needed. I. Site Description A. Hospira is a pharmaceutical products manufacturing company. This particular Hospira site actually has two separate manufacturing facilities known to Hospira as RM1 (furthest south) and RM2 (furthest north). B. There are three separate discharge permits issued for the facilities at this site as shown below: 1. NCG060034 - Stormwater permit for RM1. RM1 has 14 stormwater outfalls covered by this permit: Outfalls 1 and 2, 4-14 and 22. 2. NCG060035 - Stormwater permit for RM2. RM2 has 8 stormwater outfalls covered by this permit: Outfalls 3 and 15-21. 3. NC0001589 - NPDES permit covering both RM 1 and RM2. There are 3 outfalls covered by this permit: Outfall 1, 2 and 3. C. All 25 outfalls discharge to an unnamed tributary of Beech Branch in the Tar Pamlico River Basin, a Class C, nutrient sensitive water. )��tCar. tna ✓W& MMY North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone (919) 791-4200 Customer Service Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX (919) 791-4718 1-877-623-6748 An Equal OpportunitylAtfrnnabve Action Employer— 50% Recydedl90% Post Consumer Paper t Hospira, Inc. -Rocky Mount, Compliance Evaluation Inspections, April 24, 2006, NCG060034, NCG060035 & NC0001589 Page 2 of 4s II. Permit/Certificate of Coveraste (COC) NCG060034 (RMl) A. The current permit became effective September 1, 2002, and expires on August 31, 2007. B. The stormwater system and the two stormwater discharge outfalls (SDO) that you currently monitor were observed. There was no visible evidence of spills, overflows or similar incidents in the system. No significant erosion was found. No problems or discrepancies were noted. C. Structural and procedural best management practices (BMP) were reviewed and/or observed. No problems or discrepancies were noted. D. The permit, certificate of coverage (COC) and proper up-to-date analytical and qualitative monitoring documentation were available on site during the inspection for the two SDOs that you currently monitor. No problems or discrepancies were noted. E. The general location map in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SP3) does not show all 14 SDOs and does not list accurate latitudes/longitudes for each SDO as required in Part 11, Section A, Paragraph 1 a. Please update the map to show this information. Alternatively, latitudes/longitudes for each SDO can be placed elsewhere in the SP3 to prevent map clutter as necessary. F. Checklists, schedules and records for good housekeeping (GH), preventative maintenance (PM) and employee training programs were available, in order and found to meet requirements. PM and GH records are generated and maintained through the company's proprietary plant maintenance software program, known as MP2. This program seems sufficiently encompassing and effective, however the SPYs PM and GH section does not sufficiently reference this program. Please reference MP2 in the SP3 and provide a thorough but brief description of how Hospira uses MP2 to meet the PM and GH requirements of the stormwater program. G. Hospira maintains a list of significant spills in the SP3 as required in Part II, Section A, Paragraph 1 d. According to the list the last recorded spill took place in 2000. However, it is suggested that an entry such as, "No spills have occurred since "INSERT DATE"", be recorded on the list when you do go for an extended length of time without a spill. The annual SP3 review would be an ideal time to make such an entry. Making an entry in the log as suggested would avert superfluous questions during the annual inspection. H. Vehicle maintenance activities do not occur on site. I. It was noted during the inspection that you are sampling/monitoring only 2 of the 14 SDOs that serve this site. When questioned about this, Mr. Oxendine stated that Hospira had been granted representative outfall status (ROS). However, a records search at Hospira, DWQ's Central Files office and the Raleigh Regional Office, turned up no record of DWQ granting ROS status to Hospira for this permit. As such, if you wish to continue monitoring only 2 of the outfalls, you must immediately initiate the process of requesting ROS from DWQ. To do so, please send a letter requesting ROS to the address below. Once your request is received, we will then request the information necessary from you to determine if you qualify for ROS. In the meanwhile, it is strongly suggested that you begin monitoring all SDOs as required by the permit. Division of Water Quality Stormwater Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 *11 ' 1 Hospira, Inc. - Rocky Mount, Compliance Evaluation Inspections, April 24, 2006, NCG060034, NCG060035 & NC0001589 Page 3 of 4 111. Permit/Certificate of Coverage (COC) NCG060035 (RM2) A. The current permit became effective September 1, 2002, and expires on August 31, 2007, B. The stormwater system and the one. SDO that you currently monitor were observed. There was no visible evidence of spills, overflows or similar incidents in the system. No significant erosion was found. No problems or discrepancies were noted. C. Structural and procedural best management practices (BMP) were reviewed and/or observed. No problems or discrepancies were noted. D. The permit, COC and proper up-to-date analytical and qualitative monitoring documentation were available on site during the inspection for the one SDO that you currently monitor. No problems or discrepancies were noted. E. The general location map in the SP3 does not show all 8 SDOs and does not list accurate latitudes/longitudes for each SDO as required in Part II, Section A, Paragraph 1 a. Please update the map to show this information. Alternatively, latitudes/longitudes can be placed elsewhere in the SP3 to prevent map clutter as necessary. F. Checklists,. schedules and records for good housekeeping (GH), preventative maintenance (PM) and employee training programs were available, in order and found to meet requirements. PM and GH records are generated and maintained through the company's proprietary plant maintenance software program, known as MP2. This program seems sufficiently encompassing and effective, however the SPTs PM and GH section does not sufficiently reference this program. Please reference MP2 in the SP3 and provide a thorough but brief description of how Hospira uses MP2 to meet the PM and GH requirements of the stormwater program. G. Hospira maintains a list of significant spills in the SP3 as required in Part II, Section A, Paragraph Id. According to the list the last recorded spill took place in 2000. However, it is suggested that an entry such as, "No spills have occurred since "INSERT DATE"", be recorded on the list when you do go for an extended length of time without a spill. The annual SP3 review would seem to be an ideal time to make such an entry. Making an entry in the log as suggested would avert superfluous questions during the annual inspection. H. Vehicle maintenance activities do not occur on site. I. It was noted during the inspection that you're sampling/monitoring only 1 of the 8 outfalls that serve this site. When questioned about this, Mr. Oxendine stated that Hospira had been granted representative outfall status (ROS). However, a records search at Hospira, DWQ's Central Files office and the Raleigh Regional Office, turned up no record of DWQ granting ROS status to Hospira for this permit. As such, if you wish to continue monitoring only 2 of the outfalls, you must immediately initiate the process of requesting ROS from DWQ. To do so, please send a letter requesting ROS to the address below. Once your request is received, we will then request the information necessary from you to determine if you qualify for ROS. In the meanwhile, it is strongly suggested that you begin monitoring all SDOs as required by the permit. Division of Water Quality Stormwater Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 HospiM Inc. - Rocky Mount, Compliance Evaluation Inspections, April 24, 2006, NCG060034, NCG060035 & NC0001589 Page 4 oi4l J. Our database still shows the owner of this permit to be Abbott Laboratories. Please submit a Name/Ownership Change Form for this permit to initiate the action necessary to change the owner name in our database to Hospira, Inc. You can find the form at on the web at http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm#starmwaterGP, under Miscellaneous Forms. Please follow all instructions on the form. IV. Permit NC0001589 RMI & RM2 A. The current permit became effective May 1, 2005, and expires on October 31, 2009. B. All three outfalls were observed. There was no visible evidence of spills, overflows or similar incidents. No significant erosion was found. The effluents appeared clear and odorless, with no visible evidence of excessive solids or sheens. No problems or discrepancies were noted. C. Discharge monitoring reports (DMR) were available for inspection and no discrepancies were noted. All reviewed data was accurate and no transcription errors between on site records and DMRs were noted. Please be aware that violations of your discharge permits could result in the assessment of civil penalties in an amount not to exceed $25,000 per day per violation. However, in view of the fact that very few discrepancies were found during this inspection, I have recommended that no Notice of Violation (NOV) be issued against Hospira, Inc. Nevertheless, please reply within 30 days of your receipt of this letter with your plan and schedule to achieve compliance with all permit requirements. If you need assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit, please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-791-4200. Sincerely, Ronald C. Boone Environmental Technician cc: Central Files Raleigh Region Files Stormwater Permitting Unit Non -Point Source Compliance Enforcement Unit A �0 QG Ms. Melanie Proctor Hospira, Inc. P.O. Box 2226 Rocky Mount, NC 27802-2226 Dear Ms. Proctor, 0 Michael F. Easley, Govemor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources September 26, 2005 Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection NPDES Permit No. NCG060034 NPDES Permit No. NCG060035 Nash County Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality SEP 2 6 2005 On September 20, 2005 Mr. Chad Coburn of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a stormwater inspection of the Hospira, Inc. facility (NPDES Permit No. NCG060034 & NCG060035) with the assistance Mr. Grant Oxendine, Environmental Health and Safety Manager and Mr. Kenny Kicklighter, who represented the facility during the inspection. Their assistance was greatly appreciated. Findings during the inspection are as follows: 1) The outfalls covered under both permits were observed. Little flow was observed at either outfall, due to limited rainfall in the previous days. The flow at both outfalls was clear_ Both outfalls receive flow from paved areas. There was no evidence of spills, overflows or similar incidents within the area at either outfall. 2) The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP), Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) and a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP), were reviewed and found to be in compliance with the general permit. records of annual stormwater permit training rosters were reviewed and found to be in order. 3) Records of annual stormwater permit training rosters were reviewed and found to be in order. 4) Records of stormwater monitoring were reviewed and found to be in compliance with the general permit. Attached is the checklist generated as a result of this inspection. If you have any questions concerning the inspection, please call me at (919) 791-4200. Sincerely, Chad Coburn Environmental Technician Cc: Central Files t�Wai Carolina glly North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone (919) 791-4200 Customer service lntemet h2o.enr.state.naus 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX (919) 571-4718 1-877-623-6748 0 United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington, D.C. 20460 OMB No. 2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Repo Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yrlmolday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 u 2 u 31 NCGO60034 1 11 121 05/09/20 1 17 18 E 19 U 20 U Remarks 211 1 1 1, Jill 1 1 1 i Jill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 166 ._1.1, ,1 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 CIA Reservers 671 1 69 70 U 71 i__1 72 U 73 W 74 751 1 1 1 1 i -Li 80 Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry TimelDate Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) Hospira, Tnc. 12:00 PM 05/09/20 02/09/01 Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Us Hwy 301 N Rocky Mount NC 27802 01:40 PM 05/09/20 07/08/31 Name(s) of Onsite Rep resentative(syTitles(syPhone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data Name, Address of Responsible Otficial/TidelPhone and Fax Number Russell A Gall,Pa Box 2226 Rocky Mount NC Contacted 27802//252-977-5333/2529775427 No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Storm Water Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Chad Coburn RRO WQ/// Fax Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone a umbers Date qtq s7a 1 1 Z* 05 EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. NPDES yr/molday Inspedon Type 3� NCGO60014 11 121 05/09/20 J 17 18 U Section d: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality December 5, 2004 Russell A.Gall Hospira, Inc. PO Box 2226 Rocky Mount, NC 27802-2226 Subject: NPDES General Permit NCG060000 Certificate of Coverage NCG060034 Hospira, Inc. Formerly Abbott Laboratories Nash County Dear Mr. Gall: Division personnel have reviewed and approved your request to transfer coverage under the General Permit, received on May 3, 2004. Please find enclosed the revised Certificate of Coverage. The terms and conditions contained in the General Permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This revised Certificate of Coverage is issued under the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. If you have any questions, please contact the Stormwater Permitting Unit at (919) 733-5083, extension 502. Sincerely, Alan W. Klimek P. E. cc: DWQ Central Files Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section Stormwater Permitting Unit on e Carolina Naturally North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone (919) 733-7015 Customer Service Intemet h2o.enr.statenc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX (919) 733-2496 1-877.623-6748 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000 CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG060034 STORMWATER DISCHARGES NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, HOSPIRA, INC. is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at HOSPIRA, INC. PO BOX 2226 ROCKY MOUNT NASH COUNTY to receiving waters designated as Beech Branch, a class C NSW stream, in the Tar - Pamlico River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG060000 as attached. This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 5, 2004. This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit. Signed this day December 5, 2004. Alan W. Klimek, Director Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission F.WATE �Q /Qp Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources ❑ Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality September 25, 2006 Ms. Melanie Proctor 5 Hospira, Inch SEP 2 GU P.O. Box 2226 Rocky Mount, NC 27802 Subject: Representative Outfall Request Hospira, Inc. - R1 and R2 NCG060034 & NCG060035 Nash County . Dear Ms Proctor: This letter is in response to your request for representative outfall status for the two stormwater permits referenced above. We apologize for the delay in response to your original request from. May 24, 2006. We have reviewed the information presented on the outfalls and drainage areas for each facility and we agree with the proposed representative outfalls in your letter. Please note the considerations outlined for each permit below. R1 Site: The Division approves your use of outfalls 004B and 005 as representative outfalls for this facility. We would note that the drainage area for outfall 014 does appear to have some different potential sources of pollution when compared to other drainage areas, most notably, the existence of wastewater transfer activities and the maintenance shop activities. We recognize that the drainage area of this outfall is small compared to other outfalls at the facility but would suggest that your visual observations in this drainage area pay special attention to any potential impacts. R2 Site: Your letter requested use of outfall 003 as representative of site R2. Outfail 003 is discharge from a cooling water pond that accepts both wastewater and stormwater flows from this site. While outfall 003 does drain a significant. portion of your industrial activity, we are concerned that the combined nature of this discharge may not be representative of stormwater from the site. In addition, this outfall is limited through your wastewater discharge permit. The Division has determined that outfall 017 should be used as your representative outfall for this site. This outfall contains industrial activity in the form of material storage and other related activity. N�"` Carolina J�atura!!y North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone (919) 733-5083 Customer Service Internet: www.ncwaferqualitv.ore Location: 512 N. SalisburySt Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax (919) 733-9612 1-877-623-6748 An Equal Opportvn4lAfniative Action Employer— 50% Reciclal0% Post Consumer Paper • Approval of representative outfall status for your facilities only impacts the requirements for analytical monitoring. As outlined in Part II Section C of your permit, you must continue to perform qualitative monitoring at all outfalls draining areas containing industrial activities, In addition, if changes occur at you facilities that could impact these approvals, you must notify_ the Division of the changes and adjust your monitoring practices to stay in compliance with your permits. If you have any further questions, please contact Bradley Bennett by phone at (919) 733-5083 or by email at bradley.benneft@ncmail.net. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY BRADLEY BENNETT Alan W. Klimek cc: Central Files Stormwater Permitting Unit Files Raleigh Regional Office 0 0. Page 1 of 2 Ron Boone From: Ron Boone (ron.boone@ncmail.net] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 1:13 PM To: Proctor, Melanie Subject: RE: NPDES Sample Points for Outfall # 3 (R2 Cooling Pond) Melanie, Here's what we came up with during the site visit on 09/22106. R1 001 Permitted under NC0001589 Sample separately 002 Permitted under NC0001589 Sample separately 004A Represented by 004B sampling. 004B Sample 005 Sample 006 Categorically exempt 007 Categorically exempt 008 Represented by 005 sampling 009 Categorically exempt 010 Categorically exempt 011 Categorically exempt 012 Categorically exempt 013 Categorically exempt 014 Represented by 004B sampling 022 Delete - sheetflow runoff, no point source R2 003 Permitted under NCO001589 Sample separately 015 Represented by sampling SW at 003 016 Represented by sampling SW at 003 017 Represented by sampling SW at 003 018 Delete - sheetflow runoff from agricultural fields not in use, no point source 019 Delete - sheetfiow runoff from agricultural fields not in use, no point source 020 Delete - sheetflow runoff from agricultural fields not in use, no point source 021 Delete - sheetflow runoff from agricultural fields not in use, no point source Problems are as follows: 1. Non -point Source Unit already sent a letter to you dated 09/25/2006. You should get it soon. In it they agreed that for R1, sampling 004B and 005 would be representative of the others, as you requested in your letter. However, they do highlight the continuing requirement to perform qualitative monitoring at all outfalls regardless of representative outfall status. Please keep this in mind and let us know if you have any questions. 2. For R2, they are concerned that 003 would not be representative of the SW leaving your site because it is a combined SW/WW flow. I agree with them on this and this is part of what my concern was from the visit on the 22nd. Therefore, they directed you to sample 017 as representative of the other SW outfalls. I called and spoke with them and told them the layout of the outfall makes it very difficult to sample. I will work with them on this further. Don't completely disregard the letter but consider it on hold for the time being. Actually, all general permits, including the two you have, require that sampling of the WW/SW stream under scrutiny be sampled prior to combining with any other waste stream. That, in essence, would disqualify 003 as representative of either the NCO001589 discharge and the NCG060000 discharge, because sampling on the 9/29/2006 Page 2 of 2 discharge side of the cooling pond is a combined waste stream. You kind of have this same issue at R1 too. This is something we're going to have to discuss with the NPDES people and the non -point source people. Don't think we'll complete this issue before you depart. I will be back in the office on 9 Oct. Take care and have a great week next week. Thanks, Ron Boone -----Original Message ----- From: Proctor, Melanie (mailto:melanie.proctor@hospira.com] Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:32 AM To: Ron.boone@ncmail.net Subject: NPDES Sample Points for Outfall # 3 (R2 Cooling Pond) Ron, Thanks so much for all your help and input today. Here are the sample points for Outfall # 3 that you asked about: Parameter Sample Location listed in NPDES Permit Flow Influent Temperature Effluent (makes sense since this is a cooling pond) Total Residual Chlorine Effluent pH Influent Note: The pH used to be measured at the effluent before, but we requested this to be changed in our permit to be monitored at the influent because algae in the pond raised the pH significantly in the summer months. Hope that helps. Please let me know if you need any more information. I would very much appreciate it if you could send me at least a little summary of what we decided about our representative outfall request before October 16th (e-mail would be fine). We have our Corporate EHS Audit the week of October 16th and it would be good to have this issue addressed before the audit. Thanks again for your help! Melanie Proctor Hospira Rocky Mount EHS (252) 977-5480 9/29/2006 o�oF � A r�, 7 Yv July 27, 2006 5116 Ms. Melanie Proctor Hospira, Inc. P.O. Box 2226 _Rocky Mount, NC 27802-2226 Subject: 2006 Performance Evaluation Study Dear Ms. Proctor: Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality 1 1 8 2000 .. f . L ._ - __ a The North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification program has received the NSf QC! 035B Study results that were submitted to our office July 27, 2006. The studies received did not contain acceptable values, or analytical values were not provided for the following parameters: NS! QC! 035S, Reported 7124106 1. pH Acceptable Results Reported 2. Total Residual Chlorine Unacceptable Results Reported (Deadline for acceptable results: 9/24/2006) If your laboratory has already conducted a blind study for these analyses in 2006, please supply this office with a copy of the results. If a blind study has not been completed in 2006, your laboratory must secure and analyze performance evaluation samples and have your approved selected vendor provide us with the results. Likewise, our program requires that you arrange to procure blind follow-up samples for all unacceptable results. All follow-ups to unacceptable results must be completed and submitted by the vendor, within 60 days of the reporting date to NCLC. To maintain certification for each parameter, a certified laboratory must analyze an acceptable performance evaluation sample per parameter per year. The 2006 calendar year Proficiency Testing (PT) schedule for NC Laboratory Certification (NCLC) will end on December 31, 2005. All initial PE samples results must be submitted to this program (NCLC) on or before December 31, 2006. All PE results submitted for certification requirements must be sent directly to us by the accredited vendor. Failure to report these required PE studies by December 31, 2006 will be considered) as a first unacceptable result for certification purposes. • Corrective actions for unacceptable results .for DMR-QA 26 must be submitted by December 8, 2006. (This is an EPA requirement for DMR-QA). • All follow-ups to unacceptable results must be completed and submitted by the vendor, within 60 days of the reporting date to NCLC. Fax. 919 - 733 - 6241 E-mail: pncmail.net Telephone: 919 - 733 - 3908 Address: 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 ' Contact us at 919-733-3908, extension 249, if you have questions concerning our program requirements.- cc: Files Raleigh Regional Office Filename: singerell, f • V. Ray Bolin , r. Laboratory tion tCarolina irally Laboratory 5eetioo 1623 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 4405 Reedy Creek Road; Raleigh, NC 27607 Phone (919) 733-3908 / FAX (919) 733-24961 Internet: www.dwglab.org An Equal OpportunilylAffim:ative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper O�oF VVAT Eqpt 0 Russell A.Gall Hospira, Inc. PO Box 2226 Rocky Mount, NC 27802-2226 Dear Mr. Gall: • Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Fmironn=t and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality December 5, 2004 Subject NPDES General Permit NCG060000 Certificate of Coverage NCG060034 '! Hospira, Inc. Formerly Abbott Laboratories Nash County Division personnel have reviewed and approved your request to transfer coverage under the General Permit, received on May 3, 2004. Please find enclosed the revised Certificate of Coverage. The terms and conditions contained in the General Permit remain unchanged and in full effect This revised Certificate of Coverage is issued under the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. If you have any questions, please contact the Stormwater Permitting Unit at (919) 733-5093, extension 502. Sincerely, . ?,A !X'1'w" Alan W. Klimek P. E. cc: DWQ Central Files Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section Stormwater Permitting Unit OCT 1 8 2006 . 21 DENR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE �~ N�°octrtCarolina North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone (919) 733-7015 Customer Service Intemet h2o.enf.state.ne.us 512 N- Salisbury St Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX (919) 733 2496 1-877-623-6748 An Equal OpportunitylAlfitmative Action Employer — 50% RecycWMO% post Consumer Paper 0 • STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DMSION OF WATER QUALITY GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000 CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG060034 STORMWATER DISCHARGES NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance -with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, HOSPll2.A, INC. is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at HOSPMA, INO. ; PO BOX 2226 ROCKY MOUNT NASH COUNTY to receiving waters designated as Beech Branch, a class C NSW stream, in the Tar - Pamlico River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCGO60000 as attached. This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 5, 2004. This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit Signed this day December 5, 2004. Alan W_ Klimek, Director Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission QC'OFWAT�)Q .^,, � �Mr O liii� 'C • Michael F Easley Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources WATER QUALITY SECTION NAME/OWNERSHIP CHANG I. CURRENT PERMIT INFORMATION: Permit Number: NICI G l 0 / 6 / 0 / 0 / 3 / 4 / or Certificate of Coverage Number: NIC/GI_I 1 1�1�1_I 1. Permit holder's name: Abbott Laboratories 2. Permit's signing official's name and title: Alan W. Klimek. 11.I . Director- Division of Water Quality (Person legally responsible for permit) Divisional Vice Presiderij, Rocky Mount Site Operations (Title) 3. Mailing address: P. O. Box 2226 City: Rocky Mount State: NC Zip Code: 27802-2226 Phone. (252) 977-5333 if. NEW OWNER/NAME INFORMATION: 1. This request for change is a result of: X Change in ownership of company X Name change for company X Change in ownership of property/facility X Name change for property/facility Other (please explain): 2. Owner Information Company or Owner Name: Hospira. Inca _ (name to be put on permit / certificate of coverage) Owner's/operator's or signing official's name: Russ Gall Title: VP. Rocky Mount Operations Company Contact: Grant Oxendine Title: EHS Manager Owner Mailing address: P. O. Box 2226 City: Rocky Mount State: NC Zip Code: 27802-2226 Phone: (252) 977-5932 E-mail address:— era ntoxendineZbospira.com 3. Facility Information Facility Name: Hos ira Inc. Facility Contact: Grant Oxendine Title: EHS Manager Facility Mailitig address: P. O. Box 2226 City: Rocky Mount State: NC Zip Code: 27802-2226 Phone: 252 977-5932 E-mail address: grantoxendine a(),hoslpira.com SWU-239-102501 r THIS APPLICATION PACKAGE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED BY THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY UNLESS ALL OF THE APPLICABLE ITEMS LISTED BELOW ARE INCLUDED WITH THE SUBMITTAL. REQUIRED ITEMS: 1. This completed application 2. Legal documentation of the transfer of ownership (such as a contract, deed, articles of incorporation) Certification must be completed and signed by both the current permit holder and the new applicant in the case of change of ownership. For name change only, complete and sign the application certification. Current Permittee's Certification: 1, Russell Gall , attest that this application for name/ownership change has been reviewed and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge_ I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned as incomplete. Signature. Date: Applicant's Certification: I, Russell Gall , attest that ibis application for'A name/ownership change has been reviewed and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned as incomplete. + IJTJ%//i►�/� Date: THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION & MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDDRESS: NC DENR / DWQ / Point Source Branch Attn: Valery Stephens 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 • SO.2004 12:26P 1 its. �dUh r, 1 ABB0TT FROM: Michael J. Klein, Counsel Domestic Legal OpeMWO DEFT, 372 BLDG. APED EXT. 6-3325 DrMOFFICE CORUSPMENCE DATE: April 30, 2004 (Via Em_.. _ .. TO: Domais D. Lowry (Dept, 073W, Bldg. ANA, x8-6112 (fax)) Heruy H. Sprague (Dept. 32RA, Bldg, AP6D, x 6-5883 (fax)) RE: Rocky N 0=4 NC Deed I have attached copy of the above refetenood deed per my conversation with Hal Sprague. .TK. 30, 7004 11;'16VM _ Nu. Z3U5 �, 3 NORTH C,AROU NA NON WARRANTY DEED Abbott Uborstories corm whrmdo*dPoo") Hosphl6l= Wm9wfwmd=%vm Abw RnneTft Pjk n To: Un 0%C& Mqt . &ow, b" a MW LLP 140 SwA l uWe sM dtio, nip 6m, . i149N5T.1 asla l�7C mt�l2 7 .. ... ... ....� r s:....,.s .--::1�: ... sslie�:.idci'i_C'�=`.- ".'•s::�a"ri..Wiei _,.. .W.......... Wit..- .��_�A .. �.. �..� , ,.ti.... �. ...-.. _�. .... :,�JR'�..L.. ,... _ . .c%iri�1_. ,,:x.:. � _ • ,�•�,, �v• cvv� it.tvim Tex Lae N a >rNW 1dmmw No, YeP M By Canna as flee dsy of • 2�0 by MaQ air rasosd'�ge to List O'er l,Eap�. 8rvwa, Roa dt hfa� LLA, 1p4 Saam 1.a41k � CkicaBo, tL 60603 Tki[ iol�meraws�s Draptded �!'- Ltsa O'iCtefa Btigf&= ba ford* ledac NORTH OAKUM NON -WARRANTY DEED Twx Dint) raade lids- .. „� dye of - _, IbW, byead bstwm GRANTOR Abbon Lfbmwmias, as ililaais eerpmadm t o Ablmtt PI& Baal Abbots Psrk, MLcals 60DA4040 CMAWM Haspira, lag, a Askawen caporitwh 276 N. rw D i+n Blob Feel, B, OW EW le 91 ' Feint blxlt for eery perp� edd+mb,area, liap�wpruM. chetaotot Olrsmriq, e q • aorpotrAiaa ar pattaesshlp. Th: dogttation Comm ad Omm as and harsat:half Made saki parch, tbdr hoW, mc=mq and btddns. bad:bap tnetade alas&r, plaaal, mssattl'mo, *m4bia ar oeasr is rmmmd by bontan a/TP3dE8$8'm that the orattar, fbtr avaflubk ammmon lem peid bylb Qnoee, to mwc l of VAA is km*y+ aebow6slaad, has and iy dens: prb M 4M ter, bar9alt4 sell and COO twine Um Gaarse is R+b WMpK all tbec =min tat orpereol of had ibmW is i MW ofRadw ytMamtt, Bomb WEbdm Tow chip, Nash Comq, North Caulk* and roan pmfmIA* tles, a ed as lhtlowc In ZWK A ettaahad hemp. NU. 1W r. 4 tban.r Ionia larc mtstt�a IVU:[ .-InU'c '!VN! 0 n S .d ki f TL �p t b g .l113. JV• IVVT II.IVIIII Exhibit A NO.2UO5 F. 6 BWDMMG at a point marked by a Pound Rebar in the southern right-of-way line of U. S. Highway 301 northbound lane which point marks the northwest corner of the property conveyed to the City of Rocky mo=t by Deed of Record in Book 1069, Page 320, Nash County Registry; thence along the southern right-of-vay line of the aforementioned Highway 301 naztribouud lane, N. 25 deg.-15 min. E. 1722.56 feet to a new iron pipe; chance continuing along the south right-of-way line of the aforeaentioned U. S. gighway 30I by chord measurement V. 35 deg. 58 min. E. 306.14 feet to another new iron pipe; thence continuing along said southern right -of -gray line of V. S. Highway 301 N 46 deg. 48 min. E. 962.59 feet to an existing iron pipe; there 6: 26 deg. 35 min. E. 313.51 feet to an existing iron pipe marking a corner for Sattleboro Housing Partnership (see Deed of Record in •Book 1242, Page 117, lash County Registry); thence along the line of the Sattleboro Housing Partnership S. 46 deg. 33 min. W. 292.51 feet to as exiting irci thence S. 46 deg. 57 min. E. 500 feet to another existing iron P�ye; thence X. 46 deg. 33 min. S. 369.72 feet to a new iron pipe designated as point A on the may hereinafter referred to; thence from said Point A S. 67 deg. 20 min. E. 144 feat to a new iron pipe on western bank of Beech branch or Long Branchl thence along tits western bank of said branch the following courses and distances; S. 24 deg. 22 min. S. 109.89 feet, S. 7 deg. 7 min. R. 134.35 feet, S. 4 deg: 12 mia. 8. 136.73 feet, S. 16 deg. 28 min. R. 120.15 feet, S. 2 deg. 38 min. W, 140.10 feet, S. 11 deg. 15_min. B. 127.43 feet, S. 0 deg, 33 min. E. 82.21 feet, S. 21 deg. 21 mi.n. W. 283.90 feet, B. 1 deg. 10 min. E. 85.65 feet, S. 12 deg. 9 min. W. 150.06.feat, s. 26 deg. 13 min. W. 200.08 feet, S. 17 deg. 37 min.. W. 233.91 feet, S. DD deg. 37 min. R. 148.50 feet, S. 00 deg. 38 min. W. 94.07 feet, 5. 26 deg. 24 fain. 1. 93.09 feat, a. 03 deg. 47 min. W. 96.15 feet to Point B on the reap herei4after referred to, said point being marked by an existing iron pipe marking a corner for property being conveyed to Abbott Laboratories by Deed of Record in Book 840, Page 236, Nash County Registry, also see may of record in Map Book 7, Page 22, Nash Co=ty Ugiotry; tbenee along the Abbott Laboratories line S. 87 ¢eg. 40 min. W. 1348.43 toot to an existing iron pipe; thence continuing with the Abbott 'Laboratories line S. 88 deg. 03 min. V. 577.93 feet to a new iron pipe marking the Southeast corner of the. City of Rocky Mount property referred to above; thence along the City of stocky XQkMt line N. 25 deg. 30 min. E. 184.43 feet to a point another -corner in the City of Rocky Mount lime; thence continuing With,the said city of Rocky Mount line N. ea deg. 30 Min. W. 199.72 ; feat, .to - tbs. begimriing oontaiming 202.067 acres including 1, 464 - acres.; ] ocated within the , City ot..- Rocky 'Mount utility aasemeat area alamg: Highway 301 and 0:156 acmes is the MOD easement'srea for zwt usable acres of 100.467 scree. S 'd—HIt 'ON Rlc�:6 �YIF .f 'a.YVI IL•LUIM NO.78Uh P. 7 EXHIBIT A . BEGINNING at a concrete monument at the intersection of the sovthem property lien of Mrs. C. H. Hines (formwV Dr. H. B. Marriott) gnd the northern property line of parties of the fttst part with the eastem %hl of way lire of U. S. Highway 301 as shown on map hereinafter refemed to; then whir the H'mes line S. 66' 64' E. 800 feet to an iron and concrete monument; thence continuing along the Hines lino S. 87214' E,1649 feet to an Hon and conomte monument on Long Branch, caner of Mrs. C. H. Hines and k M. Adoox thence with Adcos's line S,12' W W.107 feet to an Iran and concrete monument in the westem right of way line of the Atlantic Coast une Railroad Company; thence with the wastem right of way line of said Ratiroad G. 28' 31' W. 2426.31 feet to an iron stake on the northern bank of Beech Branch (also called Beech Run Carialr thence continuing along the western right of way line of the Atlantic Coast line Railroad In a southerly direction to Its intersection with the center One of Beech Branch; thence with the center One of said Branch in a westerly direction its various courses and distances to its intersection with the eaatam right of way line of U. S. Highway 301, straight lines connecting iron stakes located on the northern bank: of said Branch between the weatem right of way line of said RarlroW and the eastam right of way line of sold Highway being the folk*ng courses and distances: N. 786 58' W. 3D4.61) feet, N. 85' C9 W. 233.55 feet, N. 29' 3W W. 72.75 feet. N. or W W.107 feet N. 8W IV W. 267.66 feet, N. 89` 22' W. 286.80 feet, S. W 39' W.156.30 feet, S. 88- fib' W. 425.80 feet and N. 68` 30' W. 310.83 feet thence with the eastern right of way line of U. S. Highway 301 in a northerly direction to an Iron stake on the norMem bank of Beech Branch; then(* continuing with the eastern right of way line of U. S, Highway 301 N. I r 3S E. 470.3 feet to an Iron stake, point of curve; thence continuing with the ea9tern right of way lire of U. S. Highway 301 along a curve to a concrete monument, point of tangency, said curve having a radius of 2234.83 feet by chord measurement from point of curve of tangarwy of N. 24' 01' E. GD0,82 feet; thence continuing with the eastem right of way line cf U. S. Highway W1 N. 30' 2T E;.1180.63 feet to a concrete monument, point of beglnning, containing 113.90 acres as shown on map entitled, " Map of Property of Mate May p. Gorharn et al to be conveyed to Abbott Laboratories' by M; L. Gay, Jr., C. E., dated February 28. W, recorded in Nash County registry simultaneously with the recordation of this dead, and being a part of the properly carneyed to Thomas Braswell and M. C. Braswell by deed dated January 17.1694, and recorded in Book 97, Page 14, Nash County Registry and known as part of the Belmont Farm. THERE IS EXCEPTED from the foregoing that 2.83 acm parcel conveyed to Virginia Electflo and Dower CoMany in Book 1352, Page 771, Noah County Rep;Wy. W 7 : { n ('. 'I u41J .. .., .. Y I L- L 7 1 �N NORTH CAROLINA NON WARRANTY DEER Abbott L iborftari= Pmlorfor Hospira, I. catm"fw Aft PAWft P4= To: LIMa"R Meer, b*v% Rm& Mmiw w lso s"M uMo room "s MU. M5 N. a tom4m mom 1101= also W.7. C'�flfiT '� Jilt! .. �.. ram• t li Ii. t nu. I � Y. 4 TmLot Na hroel IduldfwNe. verged 8y c ma do t o dw by Mtii A* mwrdhty = Lin 07.e0ik Mqu, Erovok Km A Mm UJ,190 Soft L09k kut. Q avt IL 6M This s eat wean p+apevd by: Lha O'r&bk aa#.rd�tiam fbr rb Ias�oc NORTH CAROLINA NON -WARRANTY DEED TH13 DEBD rase= A% (2 dq of $Otl/, by ad bemo y l3 LVMR GftarlM AUh.d Ii6arUNW, 01l Wis 00POZ1190 Moo tU,14c,. / Dolowm coaporedaty 100 Asbem Peck Road 37$ N. Mei Vft A*07 Park Mimesis 60064400 Lako P=gk IL dms Etw to spp►speW bbok tz ark pW. Sidra& ud. if aj i mps c', dowAm of tft Lq. earpor od o er putnlrsiep. Tho Cvc t ad GroMo as tud barpa A%D c:babe laiapaa do. dank hch� am and 82im ma &a haoluds liop lu, PhM at UMMM.lhMWM erom era MWOld bysee►tsaet, wffMssm to dw Grou, hr i woods e m makd a paaid bYdw ommoc. the Ma* ofvc& & h=w uimawhadgld, ha amd by thu1 promm Cop M Wtzay 08 ad mfiM wo"Gaaft % des sft pier, in tlatrcuub let or potal or lsrad timeW is da MV of Ral * Moattt, ftda 7 ibweft Edgwombe Corr % Nor* Cowlim sad mace paaatlasW* daaaebod as fb)lovit d f7. �l 0 0 M r a MIS oU a h t C n 0 f oil € UbL k A (heir Edgeaombe county Abbott Laboratories Property) Being all of that certain piece, parcel or tract of land lying and being in the lumber Seven Township, Edgec=be County, - north Carolina and mere particularly described by mates and mounds as f o21 ows ! �-•` 29GIMIN1G at a set iron an the eastern margin of the rLgbt-or- way of the Seaboard Coast Twine Railroad, said iron being located South 16' Si' 194 pest, 1910.85 feet from a concrete mcmumeat - D.S.C.U.S. Station °Battleborc-1993", said concrete monument havinq Borth Carolina coordinates Y-838643.229 feet and Xc2369598.74B feat; thence running from said Point of Beginning along lands of the 7ova of 8attleboto (Book 324, Pape 133) South B66 27' 350 Sant 514,13 feet to a set' iron; thence Nm th 03. 42' 25" East 127.00 feet to a set iron; thence South 860 17' 3S" Sant 38.00 feet to a. found =crete monument; thence South 869 07' ss'" Best 180.27 feet. to a 4 concrete manmentl thence !;forth 05' 05' 55" East 481.56 Feet to 8 found concrete monument on a southern 7.ine of the property of Marvin E. Robbins, et ux (Book 1015r sago 414)1 thonee along the lands of Robbins South 250 19' 04" Bast 79.30 feet to a Found concrete monument; thence Worth 450 09' 074 Best 49.67 feet io a found concrete monument on a western line of 8attleboro Methodist Church (Back 639, page 79); thence .along the lands of Battleboro Methodist Church South 471, 18' 220 East 30.20 feet to a found Concrete noewent; thenci South 469 30' 2B11 East 151.99 feat to a set irons thence north 789 111 3S' East 3S5.08 feet to a Found concrete monument at a Southwestern corner of lands of E11a Cherry Moors,- at aI (Soak 701, Page 36)r thence along the lands of Moore, et al, and passing throvgh'a found concrete monment on line at 102.1 feet f South aV 32' 091 Bast 102.77 feet to a point on the western margin of n, a the right-of-way of Warrolina State Route Number 1400E thence along the wastarn margin of the right -of- way of North Carolina state Roote-Number 1400 South ale 45' 00° Best 995.12 feet to a point; thence along a CUM to the left having a radion of-9210.14 feet, a delta of 03. 43' 00," and a chord bearing of South ago 53' 30° west (chord length of 344.96 feeb)r an are distance of 345.0E feet to & point, thence South He 02' 00" West 405.34 Peet to a points thence along a curve to the right having a radio ■ of 3093.22 feet. a delta of 06" 431 094a and a chord bearing of South 110 ail 30' West (chord length of 362.64 feet)j an arc distance of 362.65 feet to a points thence Booth 14• 45' 00° hest 603.23 feat to A. Point on. the western_wrgln.,of-the - lyJ^7:� �f�f7 •r Pq Nu. IM P. 17 right-cf-way of North Carolina State Route Number 1400; thence ago a nev division line north 660 30' 00' Vkst 1743.99 feet to a tot icon on the eastern margin of the right-of-way of Seaboard Coast Line Railroad= thence along the eastern margin of the right-of-wayof the beaboard Coast Line Railroad North 23' 38' 350 East v 2596,84 feet to the Point Q! Beginning. Said tract or parcel contains 75.70 acres, more or lessy and is shown as parcel a on a plat and survey-- •Houndary Survey for Cogentri:' as surveyed by Ralpph p. Hines, North Carolina R.L.B. Ito. L-3047 of Maxey-giaba a Associates, P.C., January 30, 1989 and recorded in the Office of tgister of Deeds of Edgecombe County in plat Cabinet s _, at Page $I- ► f A ., yid P-�So � n &=� illcm — r j)Dq13 b!S Dry ' � � L`i• c �a�� — ..�,.. - - .� N K vw 62r Hospira 7M Hospira, Inc. 3 (,�1 P.O. Box 2226 r �Z �� Rocky Mount, forth Carolina 27802-2226 i x May 24, 2006 Cr Division of Water Quality— Stormwater Permitting t3nit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 RE: Request for Representative Outfall Status for NCG060034 and NCG060035 A recent inspection by Ronald Boone with the NCDWQ indicated that our facility's request for Representative Outfall Status was not on file with DWQ. The facility submitted a Petition for Exemption from Testing claiming requesting; "Representative Outfall Status" on June 28. 1993 for the R1 and R2 sites. This letter was sent to Mr. William Mills to the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources. Since the original request and the reply for this request are not on file with DWQ. we are now resubmitting our request for Representative Outfall Status. Attached is a site map for R1 (pen -nit #NCG060034) and R2 (permit 4NCG060035), which shows the locations of the facilities outfalls and their corresponding drainage areas. For the R1 site. 1Jospira, Inc. requests to only sample outfalls OMB and 005 as representative outfalls. For the 15 RI outfalls, two (001 and 002) are primary process water discharges already permitted under a North Carolina NPDES permit (permit # NC0001589). Seven outfalls (006, 007, 009- 010. 011, 012, and 013) are categorically exempt from testing because they are not associated with industrial activity. Four outfalls (004A, 008. 014, and 022) were determined to be substantially identical to the two proposed for sampling. Descriptions of the 15 R1 outfalls are provided below: 0�001 - This outfall is associated with the RI site and consists of one reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) that discharges effluent from Cooling Pond 41. It is currently permitted kn•.jer North Carolina NPDES Permit No. NC0001589. This outfall discharges incident rainfall which accumulates within the pond and surrounding berms, but primarily discharges effluent comprised of non -contact cooling water and autoclave condensate (approximately 98%) and deionizer column backwash (approximately 2%). In addition, some insignificant amounts of the discharges to this outfall consist of filter backwash, uncontaminated neutralized water, distilled water tank drainage. reverse osmosis discharge, and new container heating/cooling/rinsing water. t!�002 - This outfall is associated with the R1 site and consists of one 24" RCP that discharges effluent from Cooling Pond 42. It is currently permitted under North Carolina NPDES Permit No. NC0001589. This outfall discharges incident rainfall which accumulates within the pond and surrounding berms, but primarily discharges effluent comprised of non -contact cooling water, distilled water, and new container heating/cooling/rinsing water. 044A QO4These outfalls are associated with the R1 site and consist of two 36" RCPs ed outlets and rip rap outfall protection. These two pipes serve the same drainage area, which includes the shipping docks and south building roofs. Both outfalls are located on the southern boundary of the facility and drain the shipping docks, southeast building roofs, the south trailer parking area, the water treatment area, a diesel fuel storage area, and the cooling tower area. *Activities mconducted-in_this=area include-finished_product ssHipping,-temporar-y-trailer parEiig, ,treatment -of munisi al -supplied potable^wateriifoT:use--in-the=facility_`s-steriliza o� n process; and--diesel_fuel:storage and_transfer7 �Significant-niaterials,ppteritidIly ,exposed-.in:this-area=include_the_fallowing:_(1)-packaged.finished.pharmaceutical and, chemicals=(sodium_hydroxide_and-sulfuric_acid=solutions in-contairied storage -tanks with_seeondarv-containment..drummed_nronvlenelvcol-stored-in the watei_treatment biflouride=sstor`ed"in_a.storage_building),_and:(3:�'d es el�fuel_stored_in-a 300-gallon_tank w. ith-secondary containment. A 100,000 gallon No. 2 fuel oil tank located in this drainage area has been cleaned and taken out of service. This area is 13.3 acres and is approximately 70% impervious. 0This outfall is associated with the RI site and consists of one 36" RCP culvert tted under the northern railroad tracks. This outfall drains the northeastern building roofs, the receiving docks, the north employee and trailer parking areas, a diesel fuel storage area, and the surrounding grass areas. �A-ctivities�_qonducted-within. Lulls; area-includcraw-materials-receiving,_temporary_trailer_parking,_ligwR1 _propane cstorage,_spare_parts:storage;_anddiesel7fuei.storage=and--transfer� 6ignificaut.materials potentially_exposed within-this_area-includepackagedtaw materials_such_as_finished) 5metai_parts,_lastics_and_pharmaceutic`al_materialss—__Iubricating_oils_from_treck tiailers°,i' spare:parts,_and-*diesel-fuel-stored-in-a-300_g`allon-tank iih-secondary containment) This area is 13.0 acres and is approximately 34% impervious. 006 - This outfall is associated with the RI site and consists of one 15" ductile iron pipe (DIP) with headwall located at the northern edge of the facility. This outfall discharges northern building roof runoff. No industrial activities or significant materials are exposed to storm water in this area. This area is 2.25 acres and is 100% impervious. 007 - This outfall is associated with the R1 site and consists of one 12" RCP and one 18" black acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic pipe that discharge into an b irregular earthen channel located at the northern edge of the RI site. This outfall discharges northern building roof runoff. No industrial activities or significant materials are exposed to storm water in this area. This area is 1.93 acres and is approximately 73% impervious. 008 - This outfall is associated with the R1 site and consists of a gravel outflow 6�5 located at the northwestern site boundary. This outfall discharges storm water runoff 4 from the northwest building roofs and gravel areas. 'Industrial_acti-vities-conducted--i7 o� -44this=area=include dieseLfuel_storage-and-transfer. 'Fuel_oil-storage-i"s-protectedrby3 o� �e.condary_containment iChe_only=significa`nt_material,potentialiy n�t exposedihis e ' Mage-area-diesel-fuel-stored-for_emergency_power_generation7 This area is 3.57 acresand is approximately 72% impervious. �,✓ '` - .f1' cvc � �P s �2+ �6a«aP �s Q �� yP�P ..P�,l�. ®ate c�.l.Q�, �.•��Q• 009 - This outfall is associated with the R1 site and consists of a grass swale located at the western side of the facility. This-outfall=drains--the:western-grass--area. Flo) cindustrial-activities=or--si gnificant-_materials;are -exposed-to-stoim-water--in`-this-area' This area is 433 acres and is totally pervious. 010 - This outfall is associated with the R1 site and consists of one 36" RCP with flared outlet located at the western edge of the facility. This--outfall-serves-the northwestern -employee -parking lot -No--industrial-activities-or_significant_maferialg, care exposed_to-storm iwater-in-this area] - This area is 2.76 acres and is 100% impervious. 011 - This outfall is associated with'the RI site and consists of one 4" corrugated plastic pipe located at the southwest edge of the facility adjacent to the entrance. This=outfall=is=an=overtlow_pipe for-the:.city--water system -valve_ box-located-on=the-R13 p1� eproperty-andTisMnot:�associated=with-the=Rl=site. This outfall could potentially discharge precipitation seeping into the concrete vault box. No--industrial_activities-or3 significant:materials_are_exposed=to=storm-water=in_this _ area: 012 - tlocated-on the Rl-property-but it is not associated with the R1 facility. The outfall consists of a 4" metal pipe located at the southwestern edge of the facility. efhis� outfallcould7patentially_dis`chargeTprecipitation-seeping-into-the-vault7-box cNo:) ,�industrial_activities_or_signi ficant-materials.are.ekposedao=storm-water=in.this_are_a. 013 - This outfall is associated with the R1 site and consists of one 24" RCP and rip rap at the outfall. This outfall is located near the road in the southwest grass area of the facility and drains southwestern building roof runoff and the western employee DK parking lot. This-outfall:serves-employee--parking-areas,,building-roof runoff, -ands road_suriaces. CNo=iridustrial=activities-or_signif cant_materials-are exposed -to -storm water- -this area This area is 5.66 acres and is approximately 75% impervious. c � 014 - This outfall is associated with the Rl site and consists of one 18" RCP culvert ., that discharges into a grassed swale. This outfall--is-located:in_the-southern-part-of_the %faci lily -and -serve s'-the-pressurized=liquids=storage-area,.a: diesel_ fuel=storage-tank=with secondary_connt`ai nnient,-an-enclosed--waste-water_equalization_ basin;_ and_the_southern employee-and-aailer parking_'- `are Industrial-activities-conducted-within_thig=area include -storage -of -pressurized -liquids (liquid, nitrogen—_liquid-oxygen,=and ccarbon7 dEoxide);.diesel=fuel-storage-and=transfer, wastewateitransfer_systems,_and=temp ary3 truck -trail er_parMg. tSignificant-materials potentially_exposed within:this_ar" ea—are- 'diesel :fuel_aif wastewater_from_Ihe-equalization_basiia. This area is 2.36 acres and is approximately 26% impervious. 022 — This drainage area.is located in the southern part of the facility and associated with the R1 site. Storm water run off from this area sheet flows off the property at the southern facility boundary (approximately perpendicular to the property line). tThis_drainage=area-contains-chemical_ storage-bui ldings=with-diked-arid--sealed=floors rand-a-diesel::fuehstorage=area_protected—by::secondary containments +Industrial] activities-conducted_wiiiiin_tliis.area.include7storage and=transport of chemic la s This area is about 2 acres and is approximately 30 %impervious. For the R�,g t , Hospira, Inc. requests to only sample outfall 003. For the eight R2 outfalls, one outfall (003) is a process water discharge already permitted under a North Carolina NPDES permit (permit 9 NC0001589) which also drains stormwater from the majority of the industrial area. An additional outfall (017) drains a portion of the industrial facility at R2 while the remaining six outfalls (015, 016, 018, 019, 020, and 021) are categorically exempt from testing because they are not associated with industrial activity. Descriptions of the eight R2 outfalls are provided below: r,V,04 I-v I • . ')-') 003 - This outfall is associated with the R2 site and consists of a 36-inch RCP with rip rap protection that discharges effluent from Cooling Pond 93. It is currently permitted under North Carolina NPDES Permit No. NC0001589. This outfall discharges non -contact cooling water, distilled water, still blowdown, deionization system effluent, media filter backwash, steam condensate, and storm water from the central and southern portions of the k2 site. The storm water includes runoff from the main'R2 building, shipping/receiving docks, operations area, and parking areas. This outfall also discharges incident rainfall, which accumulates within the cooling pond and surrounding dam. Activities conducted in this area include finished product shipping and raw material receiving, potable water treatment. for use in the facility's operations, oxidizer and flammable storage, compressed gas storage, and diesel fuel storage and transfer. Significant materials potentially exposed in this area include the following: (1) raw materials and packaged finished pharmaceutical products, (2) water treatment chemicals (chlorine), (3) hydrogen peroxide and alcohol, and (4) compressed gases. This drainage area is 18 acres and approximately 36% impervious. k 0t5 - This outfall is associated with the R2 site and consists of an earthen, non - vegetated drainage ditch that is located in the southeast portion of the facility. This outfall serves the eastern grassy area of the facility. No industrial activities are conducted within this drainage area. This drainage area is 5.1 acres and entirely pervious. 016 - This outfall is associated with the R2 site and consists of an earthen, non - vegetated drainage ditch that is located in the eastern boundary of the facility. This outfall serves a small portion of the eastern grassy area. No industrial activities are conducted within this drainage area. This drainage area is 1.2 acres and entirely pervious. 017 - This outfall is associated with the R2 site and consists of an earthen, non - vegetated drainage ditch that is located in the northeast portion of the facility. Significant materials stored in this area include sulfuric acid, emergency generator diesel fuel, and sodium hydroxide, all of which are stored in secondary containment. In addition, cryogenics such as liquid nitrogen and carbon dioxide are stored in this area. This outfall serves the northern portion of the central facility area. This drainage area is 9.8 acres and approximately 20% impervious. 618 - This outfall is associated with the R2 site and consists of an earthen irrigation/drainage ditch located in the northwest portion of the facility. This outfall serves a portion of the agricultural fields leased by Hospira, Inc. to a local farmer. No industrial activities are conducted in this drainage area. This drainage area is 2.1 acres and entirely pervious. 019 - This outfall is associated with the R2 site and consists of an earthen irrigation/drainage ditch located in the northwest portion of the facility. This outfall serves a portion of the agricultural fields leased by Hospira, Inc. to a local farmer. No industrial activities are conducted in this drainage area. This drainage area is 2.4 acres and entirely pervious. 020 - This outfall is associated with the R2 site and consists of an earthen irrigation/drainage ditch located in the northwest portion of the facility. This outfall serves a portion of the agricultural fields leased by Hospira, Inc. to a local farmer. No industrial activities are conducted in this drainage area. This drainage area is 2.3 acres and entirely pervious. 021 - This outfall is associated with the R2 site and consists of an earthen irrigation/drainage ditch located in the northwest portion of the facility. This outfall serves a portion of the agricultural fields leased by Hospira, Inc. to a local farmer. No industrial activities are conducted in this drainage area. This drainage area is 3.1 acres and entirely pervious. Please let us know as soon as possible if our Representative Outfall Status request has been granted. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call Grant Oxendine at (252) 977-5932 or myself at (252) 977-5480. Sincerely, Melanie S. Proctor Environmental Specialist