20040026 Ver 2_More Info Received_20070302

`f

xE
KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
March 1, 2007
Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands WQ Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Re: Cedar Ridge Subdivision
DWQ Project # 04-0026 Wake County
Rolesville, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly:
We are submitting the additional information requested from written correspondence
on February 26, 2007. The proposed Neuse River basin riparian buffer (NRBRB) impacts
are subject to 15A NCAC 02B .0233. Impacts associated with this project include 22,800
square feet of Zone 1 and 15,200 square feet of Zone 2 NRBRB areas. Please find
attached a revised application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence
from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may precede utilizing Nationwide
Permit 39. We have addressed your included written comments in the following
paragraphs.
1. Buffer mitigation is required for the 150 linear foot crossing at western
Virginia Water Drive. Buffer mitigation is required for all road crossings
that impact 150 linear feet of riparian buffer or more. Please submit a
mitigation plan detailing the amount of buffer impact at this crossing and
how the impact will be mitigated.
Please refer to the attached western Virginia Water Drive Plan and Profile Details.
The Con Span road crossing will span 134 and 140 linear feet of valley and stream
lengths, respectively. Buffer mitigation should not be required for this crossing.
2. The geotechnical report provided in your application shows that
bottomless culvert structures (Con-Span) are appropriate only at Boring
No. B-2, the northernmost crossing. Please submit a revised application
detailing the crossing structures, i.e. bridges, or culverts for the remaining
proposed crossings.

• Neuse R. Buffer Rules Re-Submittal
Cedar Ridge Subdivision
March 1, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Please refer to the revised profile views of the Virginia Water Drive Stream
Crossings. The profile views assist in showing the boring locations in relation to the
elevations of the creek bed, footers, and bedrock.
Boring B-3 is located at the western Virginia Water Drive crossing. Since the
elevations to bedrock and the footers were ± 327 and ± 323.50-feet respectively, the 3.5-
feetdifferential is conducive to a bottomless culvert.
The eastern Virginia Water Drive crossing has been converted to a single 60-inch
RCP with headwall. To facilitate aquatic passage, 30-inches of the RCP will be buried.
Please refer to the revised profile view of the Virginia Water Drive Eastern Crossing.
If you should have questions or require additional clarification please feel free to
contact me at 844-7437 (office), 749-8259 (cell) or email: iay~a kellerenvironmental.com.
Sincerely,
Keller Environmental, LLC
Jay Keller
Principal
Cc: Harold Yelle, PE
Attachments:
• Virginia Water Drive Plan and Profile Details
• February 26, 2007 DWQ Request for More Information letter
• Revised PCN Application

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Robert Polanco
Mailing Address: 8804 Albright Road;
Raleigh, NC 27612
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jay Keller
Company Affiliation: Keller Environmental
Mailing Address: 7921 Haymarket Lane; Raleigh, NC 27615
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: jay(a~kellerenvironmental.com
Page 1 of 10

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Cedar Ridge Subdivision Phase II
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1768-07-3234
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Rolesville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Cedar Ridge
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Site is located on
Rolesville Road approximately'/4 mile south of downtown Rolesville and US401.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5474 °N 78.2746 °W
6. Property size (acres): 70.07 Acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Harris Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is comprised of an existing subdivision (phase 1)
adjacent to Rolesville Road and a pond on the east side of Phase I. Harris Creek
was determined to be a perennial stream below the pond on Phase I. No subject
streams were evident above the pond. Remaining Phase II is mostly wooded with
Page 2 of ] 0

one pond, Harris Creek, and its tributaries. Adjacent land uses include residential,
forested and aaricultural areas.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Three
road crossings are proposed to access upland areas at the rear of the property and
provide connectivity to the northern parcel. The Irina Drive and Virginia Water
Drive East crossings will utilize Con-Span Bridges. A 60-inch RCP with headwall is
proposed for the Virginia Water Drive West crossing. All lots to have county water
and sewer. Equipment to be used includes cranes, trackhoes, bulldozers, and other
land grading equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The proposed impacts to the stream buffer
area will be necessary to complete the subdivision, thus sustaining the development
of the proposed residential area. Extending Virginia Water Drive across Harris
Creek and its tributary will also provide connectivity to the adjacent parcels and
existing neighborhoods.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. December 6, 2006: Keller Environmental (KE), on behalf of Mr.
Robert Polanco, submitted a PCN application to the US Army Corps of Engineers and
NC Division of Water Quality.
January 16, 2007 Conducted an on-site stream determination with DWQ staff Lia Myott
and Dr. Cynthia Van Der Wiele.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
Page 3 of 10

should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The eastern Virginia Water Drive
stream crossing will involve 120-feet of a single 60-inch diameter RCP. To facilitate
aquatic passage, 30-inches of the RCP will be buried. Please refer to the revised
profile view of the Virainia Water Drive Eastern Crossina.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no) (linear feet)
None
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2 Acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multiply length X width. then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
Virginia

Water Drive
Harris Creek Culverts &
Perennial
6
120
02
0
East headwalls .

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 120 0.02
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dred~in~, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
Page 4 of 10

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.02
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.02
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 120
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed Virginia Water
Drive Extension crossinas were strateaically placed to connect with the subdivision to
the west and the large upland area between it and Phase I. The Irina Drive Extension
will provide access to the upland areas to the area north of Harris Creek. The crossings
were also placed perpendicular in fairly linear stream corridors and Con-Span
bottomless arched culverts (CSBAC) will be utilized on two of the geologically suitable
streams to avoid stream impacts.
The Irina Drive CSBAC is 80 linear feet and the 12-foot span will clearly span the entire
4-feet wide stream bed and bank. Also, it was evident during our January 16, 2006 site
visit that the crossing area appeared to be a historic stream crossing for agriculture and
silvaculture activities. Our perennial stream determination was conducted within and
Page 5 of 10

immediately upstream of the proposed crossinq area. Please refer to Sheet 6 on the
attached CD for details.
The eastern Virginia Water Drive 60-inch RCP is 120 linear feet and the RCP will be
buried 30-inches to facilitate aquatic passage. During our perennial stream
determination, we entered the subject riparian corridor from the existing Virginia Water
Drive end of pavement and walked upstream via the existing sewer line on the west
side to the existing pond and sewer crossing area. It was evident during our analysis
that the stream in the proposed crossinq area is slightly incised. Please refer to Sheet 7
on the previously submitted CD for details.
The western Virginia Water Drive CSBAC will span 134 and 140 linear feet of valley and
stream lengths, respectively. The CSBAC will also include one slight turn to avoid
impacting any stream bank. This crossinq area is also being utilized for utilities (i.e.
sewer, etc.) to avoid additional impacts. Similar to the aforementioned CSBAC's and
evident on the Overall Site Plan, this stream crossinq is being placed in a fairly linear
stream section. It will provide connectivity to the existing Virginia Water Drive and the
Village of Rolesville (Phase II) Subdivision on the west side. Please refer to Sheet 9 on
the previously submitted CD for details.
The wide spans will be placed by using a crane and bridge footings will be placed
outside of the stream banks. Since all of the proposed crossinq areas have direct road
access, temporary impacts to the streams will also be avoided.
This proposed Phase (II) of Cedar Ridge will also use an existing sewer line that
parallels Harris Creek and the two ponds. During initial construction of Phase II, a
sanitary sewer line will be installed near and parallel to the southern property line. As
mentioned in the previous paragraph, this new sewer line will utilize the Virginia Water
Drive CSBAC area to pain access to the existing sewer line on the west side of Harris
Creek.
Also evident on the Site Plan, there will be minimal grading conducted on the residential
lots throughout this phase. This should maximize nutrient removal through the grassed
and landscaped areas.
15.78 Acres will be permanently preserved along Harris Creek and its tributaries. This
includes the large pond at the rear of lots 72-88. Moreover, areas adjacent to the
stream crossings will be in the dedicated open space area. This will prevent homes
from encroaching into the riparian buffer areas. Examples include areas west of Lots
103 & 118.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 6 of 10

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state. nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The proposed project should not be required to provide mitigation for the proposed
impacts. This is due the efforts of the developer's team to avoid jurisdictional areas
to the maximum extent possible. As shown in the attached Engineering Plans the
properties adiacent to the stream will not encroach into the vegetated buffers to
protect open waters along Harris Creek and its tributaries. Moreover areas adjacent
to the stream crossings will be in the dedicated open space area. This will prevent
homes from encroaching into the riparian buffer areas. Examples include areas
west of Lots 103 & 118. 15.78 Acres will be permanently preserved along Harris
Creek and its tributaries. This includes the large pond at the rear of lots 72-88.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): n/a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Page 7 of 10

IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(s uare feet) Miti ation
1 22,800 3 (2 for Catawba) 68,400
2 15,200 1.5 22,800
XI.
Total I 38,000 I I 91,200
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Riparian buffer mitigation is not required.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss Stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level.
Page8of10

Quantity Area Area Proposed
s uare feet) (acres Im ervious
Roadways 230,622 5.29
Lots * 117 3,500 9.40
Sidewalk 39'995 92
0
7,999 x 5 .
Total 680
117 15.61 22'23%
Im envious Area , 15.61 / 70.07
Open Space 16.00
Total Tract Area 70.07
* Lot SF based on 2200 SF Footprint, 1300 SF in Deck, Drive, & Sidewalk
Please refer to "Site Plan Information" for details and the Table on Overall Site Gradin
and Drainage Plan. While under construction, temporary, custom sedimentation basins
will be installed outside of the wetlands and streams to protect them against
sedimentation along with other appropriate sedimentation and erosion control measures
in compliance with the DWQ and Wake County Sedimentation and Erosion Control
requirements. Fourteen Level Spreaders will be utilized to provide diffuse flow. Utilizing
fourteen level spreaders that average 55-feet and are no longer than 95-feet will
maximize stormwater distribution. As seen on the Site Grading and Drainage Plan site
grading will be minimal. This will maximize the penetration of surface water into the
rg ound.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
To City of Raleigh Walnut Creek Waste Water Treatment Plant.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Page 9 of 10

The proposed Cedar Ridge Subdivision proposes using bottomless culverts on the Irina
Drive and downstream Virginia Water Drive West stream crossings to avoid impacts to
Waters of the US. It is unlikely that the proposed project should result in cumulative
stream impacts and degrade downstream stream quality.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~~T
March 1, 2007
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

41o V G W V
EASTE N CROSS NG
SCA E (H) 1" = 50' V) 1" _ '
LOW P INT ELEV ~ 387.02
_ N

PVI
STA = 13+34.21 O
Q~
`O
PVI ELEV = 384.47 n a
O "'
A.D. = 8.84 °"~~
K = 30.00 '~?~

' m ~zz
265.12
VC
M
'~ `~
400
~
O
~~M
~ /
+~pMF f
0 M
_ M?=
O ~ ~
N O ~
fV
m ~» O N M
+d~ ~; ~ I I /~
~
o rn~ v
Mo > >
m /
I I i
~
~
~, ~> m I I ~
~
M - .rll .~
°
N~ • ~
M N ~
•
M / I IJ
FYI
EXISTIN

~ Sao o ~
~
+~pH Nnrn I I

o r'r7 O
> MO N'{'cD
ak'~ao I
I
TIE INTO I
o ~ ~
v~,~ ? m ~Z =^"' p~Q I I WATERLINE
°w " m_ _~~ 390 ,
~ti I I VERIFIED I
' II
z II
u
35. LF I
0.5
15in. RCP

35
0E 44. LF

.
0.5 /
9:

15in. R
P 15in. RC
4 .1LF FES 1
STA 1 +15.85 60.55R
0 17> INV 83.00
380
~ 15i RCP
J
m /
\
N
Q
,~'~
'~
H
Z ~''
LP
~
}
_ /

W \

~- 5
60" R k'
~
.
: FILL MATH CLASS "B" RIP RAP
370

~ GEOTECHNICAL E GINEER

30" BURIED ,~
PTH
~
BACKFILL MATH #
7 STONE
~" ~ s' MIRIFY GEOGRID INING TO
"
•
. PREVENT SEDIME T INFILTRATION
~, r
14 00 13 00 12 00 11 00

370
380
350
340
330
320

VI GINIA ~ ER DRIV
E5TERN ROSSING
GALE (H) 1" = 60' (V) 1" = 6'
LOW POINT STA 39+08.87
PVI STA = 9+05.11
PVI ELEV = 346.66
A.D. 3.98
K=2 .00
'
279.62 VC
~
~W

O~

1~pp
If1
N

~

NDN

J o
M
N
~
n
wa ~ o ~n n ~:i
~Z U ~ ~~ m nM >
N~

mW
W
° » ' r),ry n
+
r~
~
a N
o
mn Z2
- ~
=
n?o
~
+ 'M

M
~ f»

Q.ZZ
M Z
N

~
~ H
y ~ Z n

.-•
K _
O
O
~ \ \
~ ~'F \
\ /?
\
+ M
~

O
J
~ ~~A ~ Q j ai
~ ~
~~ \
I U 41 Z
- (O
~ o S
~ ~ +
~~
`~ -
~?

v
'~
~ ~
. S.OLF
~°oM n. RCP
~MM
r>„ ~?
~f>
NR'?
~
I
m ~

t~
O ;a
TIE INT EXISTING 12" Q
WATER INE TO BE FIEL v {r eyn PAC
VERIFIE 8Y CONTRAC R ~ ~
5~y
.
p
134• F 15.4LF

0] Sin. RCP

134-LF,
6' (SPAN) x 8~
(RISE) CONSPA
RIDGE 1 / ROCKS ATUM
SYSTEM / 5' HEADWAL and WINGWALL
x
SHEET 6 FOR TOP OFF NDATION ELEV TIO
BED OCK ELEV. 326.0
REEK ELEV. f325 00
FOOTE ELEV f323. 0
J
U
40+00 39+00 38+00

VIRGINIA WATER DRIVE
WESTERN CROSSING
20 10 0 20
SCALE: 1" = 20 FEET

~~()~ W AT~RQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
.y William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
t-- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
~ ~
D 'C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 26, 2007
DWQ Project # 04-0026, Ver. 2
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Robert Polanco
8804 Albright Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject Property: Cedar Ridge Subdivision
Harris Creek [030402, 27-26, C, NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Polanco:
On February 19, 2007, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated January 30,
2007, to impact 22,800 square feet of Zone 1 protected Neuse River basin riparian buffer and 15,200
square feet of Zone 2 protected Neuse River basin riparian buffer to construct the proposed residential
subdivision. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate
information as discussed below. The DWQ will require five copies of additional information in order to
process your application to impact protected buffers on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive
the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as
required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your
project.
Additional Information Requested:
Buffer mitigation is required for the 150 linear foot crossing at western Virginia Water Drive.
Buffer mitigation is required for all road crossings that impact 1501inear feet of riparian buffer
or more. Please submit a mitigation plan detailing the amount of buffer impact at this crossing
and how the impact will be mitigated.
2. The geotechnical report provided in your application shows that bottomless culvert structures
(Con-Span) are appropriate only at Boring No. B-2, the northernmost crossing. Please submit a
revised application detailing the crossing structures, i.e. bridges, or culverts for the remaining
proposed crossings.
Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this
letter and that you remain interested in continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be
providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact me in writing and Mike
Horan of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we will
assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] /Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
N~°e hCarolina
~atc~ra!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Robert Polanco
Page 2 of 2
February 26, 2007
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-733-
1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 OversighbExpress Review Permitting Unit
CBK/~m
cc: Mike Horan, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Jay Keller, Keller Environmental, 7921 Haymarket Lane, Raleigh, NC 27615
Filename: 040026 Ver2Ceda rRidgeSD(W a ke)On_Hold2