NCG030006_MONITORING INFO_20100615

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/v C& c)000lG
DOC TYPE
❑HISTORICAL FILE
DlMONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ 001.0 i7 b 1
YYYYMMDD

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONrMRlNG RETORT
GENERAL PE PJ*W NO. NCGO30000 SA11i IM COUXCM. DURING CAL NDAIL YEAR- (S
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCGQ3) (This nwakerhng i epetrt to due of the Dhblen so' later than 30 days Dun
FACKLM NAME -a&G. T the date tine iadlltJCOUN7T trlREts fraar the tahor�tory,j
PERSON COUECTriG SAMPLES --I& �&XC%&y cA
CELtTF1fED LABORATORY-5 C1�� Loeb 0411
Le 0 PLEASE SIGN ON T W REVERSE .4
Pacl A: SpetHk Matdtwing Regrdreoents
� I F
•.�y�,f,.. .�
.1 ' 7 '
1
I Li._rN!SEE�/
''1^ u••`,
�Y al-i , .1,tr.�.......
i_.�' I i I I •.e. �'- [ I -. .f; -; L1� ., ..,� :.�-- --_c _ .-= a. _ --
Js_',�-:"'
r
I -' _-' ' �•:'
�•it.__ ��_
-•-Fa' ram- I ` �-I
ff=•j_' � ��iy�., - -�� •,��`il "�7 T�IJL ...'=}..r�"- -s-� 'i •]T I•.�"- i�j II, 5�
'•fi :'i'.�6i, j{ 3' i I `� Y..'4 �' �rl' ti"
Nutt: if you report a sampled value is excess of the benchmark value, or outside the bencknrtt range fwpH; you man implartent Tier 1 or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit No.
Did rids facility perfarm Vehicle Maintenance Activities using mom than 55 gallons of new rnotm ail per mon"?—yes
(if yes, complete Put B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance ANvity Monitorine Reaalrements
♦1 I 1 i�`��
•
i '��'
v. 1. .� �
_ rl�iY
- `� 1•I� I:: • •'�-=
L: �,. Jti 'ti' :x,l
�S�i'� at !'! ��i -ram-.�_;,'
'LSx''�.�'�._.�'�'': Z:l:r.L`s �c_�1.`t
xF'•' I I • I I ��! �-'
a�l����T"� `f,�,` �
t -
iii 7 k'^'ii•�
. , TT•:,
. ._.�.�t I �7�4'•1.SaL..r.�
{..r�.l •':.i'—,'='f_' '•!4�_''.�^:'�*1+..'
- F .:act. :'_1ii
i�
Note: Lf you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value,'or'autside die benchmark range for pH, yw anrat kVIemeot Tier 1 or Tier 2 [esponses..
Sea General Pamit text
STORM EVENT CH{ARACTERISI'LCS: Mail Orightal and node copy to:
3l 11Q Division of Water Quality
Date (first event s uwW) Attn: DWQ Central Res
Total Event Predpltation (hides): 1617 Maul Service Carter
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
asmpied this repotting period," and nadhnfall
Date (list each additional event
TeW Evart Predpftatlou (lnchm): r -� �._
JON
V9 t rtAi rjni �r J
FFICE
S W U-245-031308
Page 1 of.2

1 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufachue semiconductors, rt mmfacture electronic crystals. or
manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject
to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.1 l; for semkmaductor manafacam use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12-, for
electronic crystal maziufacture use the definition as found in 40 CPR 469.22; and for cathode lay tube mantffacwre use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Facilities that incorporate a solvent tt mgement plan into the Shrmwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requuetwnt for TTO nmaitoring may be waived_ The
solvent management Plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General Permit. Far those facilities electing to employ the
TTO monitoring waiver, the disciLu r shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons durctly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring n quirement for total toxic organics (TTO).
certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or area which are exposed to rainfall or stormwate,
runoff has occunr-d since Filing the last discharge monitoring teport. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the solvent management
plan included in the Stom water Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
6b-09-10
(Date)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared tinder my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
tare, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including
the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
D'VA4, o(a-- N
{S' ture of rmittee) (Date)
SWU-245-031308
-ge 2 of 2

Starmwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
For guidance on filling out this farm, please visit: httn:/lh2o.enr.sta[e.nc.uslsu/Forms bocuments.htm#miscforms
Permit No.: N1JVIOL i JkIO !LIU I& or Certificate of Coverage No.: t.l <-] L-J -�f1_1
Facility Name:
County: Phone No. QMKM-Nk-oZ 7 - 15ALQ" j ---
Inspector:,,�j�1,:Ae�SwA��h --- _ -- _
Date of Inspection: -A- ;La-)L —A-0-
Time of Inspection: x1sh 1.c� C.% P4 a.-- — — •--
Total Event Precipitation (inches): _ A ro�
Was this a Representative Storm Event? (See information below) ["Yes ❑ No
Please check your permit to verify if Qualitative Monitoring must be performed during a representative
storm event f requirements vary).
A "Representative Storm Event" is a storm event that treasures greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall and that
is preceded by at least 72 hours (3 days) in which no storm event measuring greater than 0.1 inches has
occurred. A single storm event may contain up to 10 consecutive hours of no precipitation.
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
Outfall No. , 1 _ _ Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream:
Describe the industrial T vities that occur wi4n the otltfal] draina�,le area:
� __t - 1 n __ 1 . _ _ i 1 _1 -11 _1 1 - _ 1 - L
2. Color: Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint
(light, medium, dark) as descriptors:
3. Odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak
chlorine odor, etc.): N-pr_
Page 1 of 2
5WU-242-112609

7
4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where 1 is clear
and 5 is very cloudy:
1 2 3 @ 5
5. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the
stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids:
Q 2 3 4 5
6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in
the stormwater discharge, where I is- no solids and 5 is extremely muddy:
1 2 0 4 5
7. Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
8, Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes
9. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the outfall? Yes No
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution:
List and describe
Note: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam, oil sheen, or erosion/deposition may be
indicative of pollutant exposure. These conditions warrant further investigation.
page 2 of 2
5WU-242-112608

SGS North America, Inc.
Cathy Baines
Eastern EnvlronmenW Management
PO Box 4030
Rocky Mt, NC 27803
Report Number: G876-129
Ckent Project: ABB 1st
Dear Cathy Baines,
Enclosed are the results of the analytical services performed under the referenced project for the received
samples and associated QC as applicable. The samples are certified to meet the requirements of the National
Environmentat Laboratory Accreditation Conference Standards. Copies of this report and supporting data will be
retained in our files for a period of five years In the event they are required for future reference. Any samples
submi"d to our laboratory will be retained for a maximum of thirty (30) days from the date of this report unless
other arrangements are requested.
If there are any questions about the report or services performed during this project, please call Barbara Wager at
[phone]. We will be happy to answer any questions or concerns which you may have.
Thank you for using SGS North America. Inc. for your analytical services. We took forward to working with you
again cn any additional analytical needs.
Sincerely,
SGS North America, Inc.
v+.�v— +IL NZ I
Project Manager Dale
Barbara Hager
GS North America Inc. I Enviiorimental Division 5500 Business fh, Wilmington, NC 28405 t [phone] f t9i01350-1557 wwwus.sgs.com
Memher of th� SGS Group
N.C. Certification #481 page i 0f 1

SGS North America, Inc.
Cage Narrative
Kinder Morgan
SGS Project: G876-129
Project Name: ABB I"
SGS North America Inc.
April 7th, 2010
• Five water samples were accepted into the laboratory on March 23d, 2010 at 1010 for
analyses as indicated on the chain of custody. The samples were received in good
condition, with a temperature of 5.7°C.
• All extractions and analyses were completed within holding time limits, with the
following quality control exceptions.
8270 Analyses
• The reported recovery for Naphthalene in the LCS/LCSD associated with batch 16272
was below the QC limit, but within 10% of the lower recovery point. This compound
was not detected in any of the associated samples and has been 'UJ' flagged on the data.
Craig R Tronzo
Data Validation
N.C. Certification #481 Page 2 of 11

SGS North America, Inc.
List of Reporting Abbreviations
And Data Qualifiers
B = Compound also detected in batch blank
BQL = Below Quantification Limit (RL or MDL)
DF = Dilution Factor
Dup = Duplicate
D = Detected, but RPD is > 40% between results in dual column method,
E = Estimated concentration, exceeds calibration range.
J = Estimated concentration, below calibration range and above MDL
LCS(D) = Laboratory Control Spike (Duplicate)
MDL = Method Detection Limit
MS(D) = Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit
RL/CL = Reporting Limit / Control Limit
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
UJ = Target analytes with recoveries that are 10% < %R < LCL; # of MEs are allowable
and compounds are not detected in the sample.
mg/Kg = miIligram per kilogram, ppm, parts per million
�tg/kg = micrograms per kilogram, ppb, parts per billion
mg/L = milligram per liter, ppm, parts per million
pg/L = micrograms per liter, ppb, parts per billion
% Rec = Percent Recovery
% Soilds = Percent Solids
Special Notes:
l) Metals and mercury samples are digested with a hot block; see the standard
operating procedure document for details.
2) Uncertainty for all reported data is less than or equal to 30 percent.
M 134.02 t a08.a
N.C. Certification #481 Page 3 of 11

SGS North America, Inc.
Results for Volatlles
by GCMS 8260
Client Sample ID: 4A Analyzed By: DVO
Client Project 10: ABB 1st Date Collected: 3/22/2010 10:00
Lab Sample 1D: G876-129-5A Date Received: 3/23/2010
Lab Project ID: G876-129 Matrix: Water
Sample Amount: 5 mL
Result
Quantitation
Dilution
Date
Compound
UGIL
Limit UGIL
tractor
Analyzed
Acetone
76.6
25.0
1
4/2/2010
Benzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Bromobenzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Bromochloromethane
SOL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Bromodichloromethane
8QL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Bromoform
SQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Bromomethane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
2-Butanone
BQL
25.0
1
4/2/2010
n-Butylbenzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
sec-Butylbenzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
tert-Butylbenzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Carbon disulfide
SQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Carbon tetrachloride
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Chlorobenzene
SOL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Chloroethane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Chloroform
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Chloromethane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
2-Chlorotoluene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
4-Chlorotoluene
BQL
1,00
1
412/2010
Dibromochloromethane
BQL
1.00
1
412/2010
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
BQL
5.00
1
4/2/2010
Dibremomethane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
BQL
1.00
1
41212010
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/212010
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/212010
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
SOL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
BQL
5.00
1
4/2/2010
1,1-Dlchloroethane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
1,1-Dichloroethene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
1,2-Dichloroethane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
SOL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
trans-1.2-dichloroethene
8QL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
1,2-Dichloropropane
BQL
1,00
1
4/2/2010
1,3-Dichloroprops ne
BQL
1,00
1
412/2010
2,2-Dichloropropane
BQL
1.00
1
4/212010
1,1-Dichloropropene
BQL
1.00
1
4/212010
Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
BQL
1,00
1
41212010
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
BQL
1,00
1
4/212010
Dichloroditluoromethan 9
BQL
5.00
1
4/212010
Diisopropyl ether (DIPS)
BQL
1.00
1
412/2010
Ethylbenzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/212010
Hexachlorobutadiene
BQL
1.00
1
4/212010
2-Hexanone
BQL
5.00
1
4/2/2010
lodomethane
BQL
1.00
1
412/2010
Isopropylbenzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Page 1 of 2
GCMSMS08
8260
N.C. Certification #481
Page 4 of 11

SGS North America, Inc.
Results for Volatiles
by GCMS 8260
Client Sample ID: 4A Analyzed By: DVO
Client Project ID: ABB 1st Date Collected: 3/22/2010 10:00
Lab Sample ID: G876-129-5A Date Received: 3/23/2010
Lab Project ID: G876-129 Matrix: Water
Sample Amount: 5 mL
Result
Quantitation
Dilution
Date
Compound
UG/L
Limit UG/L
Factor
Analyzed
4-1sopropyltoluene
SQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Methylene chloride
SQL
5.00
1
4/2/2010
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
BQL
5.00
1
4/2/2010
Methyl -tent -butyl ether (MTBB)
BQL
1.00'
1
4/2/2010
Naphthalene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
n-Propyl benzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Styrene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Tetrachloroethene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Toluene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
1.00
1
402010
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Trichloroethane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Trichlorofluoromethane
SOL
1.00
1
412/2010
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Vinyl chloride
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
m-,p-Xyiene
BOL
2.00
1
4/2/2010
o-Xyiene
BQL
1.00
1
4/2/2010
Spike
Spike
Percent
Added
Result
Recovered
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
30
30
100
Toluene -dB
30
25.5
85
4-Bromofluorobenzene
30
28.2
94
Comments:
Flags:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits.
Analyst: OVE) Reviewed By:
GCMSMSD8
Page 2 of 2 8260
N.C. Certification #481 Page 6 of 11

SGS North America, Inc.
Results for Semivolatiles
by GCMS 8270
Client Sample ID: 4
Client Project ID: ABB 1st
Lab Sample ID: G876-129-48
Lab Project 10: G876-129
Initial Volume: 995 mL
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 3/22/2010 10:00
Date Received: 3123/2010
Date Extracted: 3124/2010
Matrix: water
Result
RL
Dilution
Date
Compound
ug/L
ug/L
Factor
Analyzed
Acenaphthene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Acenaphthylene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Anthracene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Benzo[a]anthracene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Benzo[a]pyrene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Benzo[I<]fluoranthene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Benzoic Acid
BQL
25.1
1
3/25/2010
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
B utylbe nzylphtha late
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
2-Chloronaphthalene
BQL
5.03
1
3/2512010
2-Chlorophenol
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
4-Chloroaniline
BQL
25.1
1
3/25/2010
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Chrysene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Dibenzofuran
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Di-n-Butylphthalate
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
BQL
10.1
1
3/25/2010
2,4-Dichlorophenol
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Diethylphthalate
BQL
5.03
1
3/2512010
Di methyl phtha late
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
2,4-Dimethylphenol
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Di-n-octylphthalate
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
BQL
25.1
1
3/25/2010
2,4-Dinitrophenol
BQL
25.1
1
3/25/2010
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Diphenylamine *
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Fluoranthene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Fluorene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Hexachlorobenzene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Hexachlorobutadiene
BQL
5.03
1
3125/2010
H exach lorocyclo pentad lene
BQL
10.1
1
3/25/2010
Hexachloroethane
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
lndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Isophorone
BQL
5.03
1
312512010
2-Methylnaphthalene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Page 1 of 2
8270
N.C. Certification #481 Page 6 of 11

SGS North America, Inc.
Results for Semivolatiles
by GCMS 8270
Client Sample ID: 4
Client Project ID: ASS 1st
Lab Sample 10: G876-129-48
Lab Project ID: G876-129
Initial Volume: 995 mL
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 3/22/2010 10:00
Date Received: 3/23/2010
Date Extracted: 3/2412010
Matrix: Water
Result
RL
Dilution
Date
Compound
ugJL
ug/L
Factor
Analyzed
2-Methylphenot
BQL
5.03
1
3125/2010
3- & 4-Methylphenol
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Naphthalene
SOL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
2-Nitroanitine
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
3-Nitroanitine
SQL
25.1
1
3/25/2010
4-Nitroanitine
SOL
25.1
1
3/25/2010
Nitrobenzene
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
2-Nitrophenol
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
4-Nitrophenol
SOL
25.1
1
3/25/2010
N-Nitrosodi-n-propyiamine
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Pentachlorophenol
BQL
25.1
1
3/25/2010
Phenanthrene
SQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Phenol
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Pyrene
SQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
SOL
5.03
1
3/26/2010
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
BQL
5.03
1
3/2512010
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
BQL
5.03
1
3/25/2010
Spike
Spike
Percent
Added
Result
Recovered
2-Fluorobiphenyl
10
8.1
81
2-Fluorophenol
10
8.1
81
Nitrobenzene-d5
10
8.7
87
Phenol-d6
10
8.1
81
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
10
9.2
92
4-Terphenyl-d14
10
6.3
63
Comments:
* N-Nitrosodiphenylamine is reported as the breakdown product Diphenylamine,
Flags:
BQL = Below Quentitation Limits.
Reviewed By:
Page 2 of 2
UJ
8270
N.C. Certification #481 Page 7 of 11

SGS North America, Inc.
Results for Metals
Client Sample ID:
1
Client Project ID:
ABB 1st
Lab Sample ID:
G876-129-1
Lab Project ID:
G876-129
ICP fnitWWol:
50 mL
Final Val: 50 mL
Hg lnitWl/Vol:
Final Vol:
Prep Batch:
16257
Metals
Result
RL
Lead
0.0323
0.0100
Comments
SOL = Below Quantitation Limits
DF = Dilution Factor
J = Between MDL and RL
B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL
Analyzed By:
PSW
Date Collected:
3/22/2010 10:00
Date Received:
3/23/2010
Matrix:
WATER
DF Units Method
1 MG1L 6010C
N_C- Certification #481
Date
Analyzed
3/25/2010
Reviewed By:
METALS.XLS
Page 8 of 11

SGS North America, Inc.
Analytical Results
Client Sample ID:
2
Date Collected:
2010-03-22 10:00:00
Client Project ID:
ABB 1st
Date Received:
2010-03-23 10:10:00
Lab Sample ID:
G876-129-2
Matrix:
Water
Lab Project ID:
G876-129
Analyte
Result RL
Units Method Date
Analyst
Analyzed
Oil and Grease
5.6 5.0
mg1L EPA1664A 03/30/10
TT
Comments
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits
DF = Dilution Factor
RL = Report Limit
Reviewed By: k
wbout
N.C. Certification #481 Page 9 of 11

SGS North America, Inc.
Analytical Results
Client Sample ID: 3 Date Collected: 2010-03-22 10:00:00
Client Project ID: ABB 1st Date Received: 2010-03-23 10:10:00
Lab Sample ID: G876-129-3 Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: G876-129
Analyte Result RL Units Method Date Analyst
Analyzed
Total Suspended Solids 583 2.0 mg/L SM2540D 03/26/10 TT
Comments
BQL = Below Quentitaticn Limits
DF = Dilution Factor
RL = Report Limit
Reviewed By: r:wr
about
N.C. Certification #481 Page 10 of 11

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
SGS Environmental Services Inc.
Locations Nationwide
• Alaska • Hawai!
• Ohio • Maryland
• New Jersey • North Caroilna
• West Virginia
us e9e WM 091747
` ! 1 ►
CLIENT — {<S�IRt-�Lr1���tac�cvpc�c u` 41iLAt�tl trj-
SGS Reference:
GY /
PAGE OF,
CONTACT, PHONE NO:( rQ) ykN4-
No
0
N
T
I
N
R
S.
5AYPEmPLE
C=
COW
GPA2
Pmeni�
tkee
Pii06lECT: St]EiPVhiSll lr,� S
Analysis
ReWred
3
O
!�\
REMARKS
REPORTS TO: E-MAIL:
`
FAX NO.;( )
INVOICE T QUOTE ik
P.O. NUMBER
2
LAB NO,
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
DATE
TIME
MATRIX
LA A
tl
\11
-
5
4
Iected/Relinquished By:(1)
i��
Date
name` 1
Received By:
Date
�!Z
Time
�Q
Shipping Carrier:
Shipp4V Ticket No:
Samples Received Cold9 (Cl e) YES NO
Temperature
Relinquished By: (2)
Date
Time
ecety y:
Date
Time
Special Deliverable Requirements:
Chain of Custody Seal: (Circle)
INTACT BROKEN=ABSEN
Relinquished By: (3)
Date
Time
Received By:
Date
Time
Special Instructions:
Relinquished By: (R)
Date
Time
Received By:
Date
Time
Requested Turnaround Time:
❑ RUSH ❑ STD
Date Needed
0 270 W.. Patter OtNe Anchorage, AK 49319 Tet [phone] Fax: C?M 561-5901 Q 127D Greenb* Street Chuieeson. W V 2$311 Te {3D4y 340-0T25 Fax: M4) 3u1-9761
D 5500Buslness DrW@ Wilmiroon. NC 2ti4i1S Tel: (91V)3541DM Fax: (D10) 350.1557
Whale - Reteln" by Lab
Yelbw - Retuned with Report
Pink - Retained by Sampler

JL It 10
V90919
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan — Tier One & Two Response
Monitor Date: Monday, March 22, 2010
Tier One Report:
Conduct a stormwater management inspection of the facility within two weeks of receiving
sampling results.
Set-up was reviewed with testing agent, Cathy Baines, who concluded that the current soil
disruption from the ground breaking for the construction activities caused the continued
spike in our TSS in our samples. This facility has consistently maintained a pH of 5.24
(average over 11 sample reports) since 1994. The 5.05 pH reading was below the threshold
standards, but was not much of a dip from the historical readings done at the site due to soil
type. Gaps in the contractor's Sediment and Erosion Control Program were again found.
(Implemented May 2010 — Cathy Baines with Eastern Environmental Management per Jen
Dively, EHS Manager for ABB Pinetops)
2. Identify and evaluate possible causes of the benchmark exceedence.
SDO Monitoring Report & Qualitative Monitoring Results:
Date 03/22/10 (Monday) — Total Event Precipitation 0.12 inches
TSS, mg/L
pH
Lead, mg/L
Oil and Grease
TTO
583 (over100)
5.05 (under 6.0)
0.0323
5.6
76.6 (Acetone)
TSS — soil movement from recent construction activity to prep site for new additions to rear
and front of the facility. TTO — acetone; suspected there was a diesel fuel spill from the
contractors that went unreported. (See photos)

JL 1110
p9LIPIP
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan — Tier One & Two Response
3. Identify potential, and select the specific: source controls, operational controls, or physical
improvements to reduce concentrations of the parameters of concern, or to bring concentrations
to within the benchmark range.
Sediment and Erosion Control Plan was found to be missing key components necessary to
meet permit requirements: silt fences were not installed or were installed but not properly, a
site spill significant enough to allow for a testing spike of acetone was not reported as is
required by the permit and the contractor's ABB contract. Additionally, the subcontractor
responsible for the site's soil and erosion control and design of the site's new stormwater
retention pond and process submitted a packet to the NCDENR that was rejected. The soil
and erosion control issues and lack of spill reporting on the part of the General Contractor
are believed to be the cause for the high TSS readings and the TTO hit for acetone.
(Implemented May 2010 — NASHCO Inc. / Mack Gay Associates per Jen Dively, EHS
Manager for ABB Pinetops)
4. Implement the selected actions within two months of the inspection.
Issues with the erosion and sediment control plan were found by the lack of proper
protection applications (silt fences, erosion control, etc.). Review the erosion and sediment
control plan for construction project and ensure it is being properly implemented (silt fences,
etc.). This is the second time issues with the contractor's Sediment and Erosion Control Plan
and Implementation have been noted. The contractor was instructed to provide all permit -
required documentation on their permit, to correct all deficiencies, and to perform monthly
joint audits with their soil control agency and ABB Safety and Project Management
personnel. Any further deficiencies will result in the removal of the soil control contractor
from the project. The next audit is scheduled for July.
Mack Gay Associates was brought in to meet with Jen Dively (EHS Manager) and Tom
Hansen (Project Manager) to review the deficiencies in their stormwater retention pond
application. They were instructed to meet with Jennifer Jones (NCDENR Environmental
Engineer) to correct all issues associated with the packet and to meet all application
requirements including those specifically outlined in the BMP (Chapter 10). Mack Gay
Associates met with Jennifer Jones in May and revised and re -submitted their package.
The General Contractor (NASHCO Inc.) was written up for failing to ensure proper
reporting on spills in the construction area. A complete review of the Construction Soil and
Erosion Control Plan is underway.
(Implemented May 2010 — NASHCO Inc. / Mack Gay Associates per Jen Dively, EHS
Manager for ABB Pinetops)

JL It It
P90919
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan — Tier One & Two Response
In response to the high TSS readings in the last two testing sessions, monthly testing has been
instigated per Tier Two requirements. On June 9, 2010, an assessment of the suspended
solid state in the new stormwater collection pond was done by Mike Haley of Rain for Rent
and Cathy Baines of Eastern Environmental Management. A proposal is being put together
to treat our stormwater with StormKlear LBP-2101 and Chitosan LiquiFloc 2 % (see photos)
during the construction phase to reduce the suspended solid rate.
ttpalwww.stormklear.comlcontentlstklstormklear-I)roducts . i)hp , ...._..,
5. Record each instance of a Tier One response in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
Include the date and value of the benchmark exceedence, the inspection date, the personnel
conducting the inspection, the selected actions, and the date the selected actions were
implemented.
Plan is currently being completely revised for new layout applications and stormwater
changes due to construction of two additions to the existing properly, a new roof drainage
collection system, and a stormwater retention pond system.
This report is the interim Tier One & Two response while the program is being revised.
Note: Myrl Nisely, Environmental Chemist, for the NC Division of Water Quality performed
a site stormwater audit on Tuesday, May 11, 2010.