NCG110114_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20101210

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/vC���Q�ry
DOC TYPE
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ 301 0 I a I�D
YYYYMMDD

J '
Beverly ;=ayes Perdue
Governor
FILE
NCDLNR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen L�,. Sullins
C,iractcr
December 10, 2010
lls. Jaqueline A. Jarrell, P.E.
Environmental Management Superintendent
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
4000 Westmont Drive
Charlotte, NC 28217
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Mallard Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCG 110114
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear N/fs..Jarrell:
Dee Freeman
Secretari
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on December 10, 2010 by Ms. Donna Hood of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please
do not hesitate to contact Nis. Hood or me at (704) 66 i-1699.
Sincerely,
V�
Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
DH
Mooresville Regional office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] I Customer Service: 1-877-623.6748
Irternet: www.ncwa1erqua1ity.or9
One
North&trolina
An Equal opportunily 4 Affirmative Acton Employer - 50% Rccyc`ed110 a Post Cansumef paper

N
Permit: NCG110114
SOC:
County: Mecklenburg
Region: Mooresville
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 121081C8 Expiration: C5I31113 Owner: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utlitles
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mallard Creek Water ?eclamatior FaciVi j
_4C0 l}5 Hwy 29 N
Contact Person: Jacqueline A Jarrell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title: Superintendent
Certification
Charlotte NC 28262
Phone, 704-357-1344
Prone:
Inspection Date: 9211=010 try Time: 10:00 Q it Time, 12 30 AM
Primary Inspector: Donna Hood / �D Phone: [phone]
'goExt.2193
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal VWVTP > 1MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ® Compliart 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG1 10114 Owner - Facility: Charlotte-Nlecklennurg Utilities
Inspection Date: 12/1012010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plant
Yes
No
NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
e
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
n
n
-n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
n
n
n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
n
n
n
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
m
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Prevertative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
n
n
n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
®❑
n
n
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually'?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
®n
n
n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
®
❑
❑
n
Comment: The SPPP was last updated in December 2010. Employee training last
occurred on 1202010. The SPPP was certified, as well as outfalls evaluated for
non-stormwater discharges, on 12/9/10,
Qualitative MonitoELL19
Yes
No
NA
NF
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
m
n
n
D
Comment: Qualitative monitoring was performed on 4I6109, 10/29/09, 4/21/10, and
9/28/10,
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
®n
n
n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
n
00
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
®
o
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (nor stormwater) discharges?
®
n
00
Comment: All stormwater outfalls were observed during the inspection. No negative
impacts on the receiving stream were observed during the inspection.
Page: 2

I�L
F WATF
o�p qpG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
co `^ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q Y Coleen H. Sullins. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 10, 2008
Ms. Jacqueline A. Jarrell
Superintendent — Environmental Management Division
Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities
4000 Westmont Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Subject_: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Mallard Creek WRY
Stormwater Permit No. NCGt 10114
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
Dear Ms. Jarrell:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the stormwater
inspection conducted at the subject facility on December 5, 2008 by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office.
Please inform the facility's Operator -in -Responsible Charge of our findings by forwarding a
copy of the enclosed report.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mrs. Allocco or Mr. Bell at (704) 66371699.
Enclosure
cc
A02
HCDENR
Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Sincerely,
Robert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
No hCarolina
aturally
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwateLqt1aljty.org610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAtfrrmative Action Fmptoyer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

C
Permit: NCG110114
SOC:
County: Mecklenburg
Region: Mooresville
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 10/19/07 Expiration: 04/30/08 Owner: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mallard Creek Water Reclamation Facility
((WRF
1240 US Hwy 29 N
Contact Person: Darrell Dewitt
Directions to Facility:
System Classiflcations:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative
On -site representative
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 1210512008
Primary Inspector: Wesley N Bell
Secondary Inspector(s):
Charlotte NC 28262
Title: Phone: [phone]
Certification: Phone:
Darrell Dewitt Phone: [phone]
Tara Layne Romine Phone: [phone]
Entry Time: 09:30 AM Exit Time: 01:45 PM
'cf, AW 1 All 0 /0 $� Phone: [phone]
Ext.2192
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110114 Owner -Facility: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
Inspection Date: 12/05/200B Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110114 Owner - Facility: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
Inspection Dale: 12/05/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
Cl
❑
❑
# floes the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
❑
Cl
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: CMU has contracted Black & Veatch to update the facility's Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP). The current SPPP reviewed at the facility was
organized and well maintained. Facility stormwater inspections are performed by
Mecklenburg County's Stormwater Services (annually) and the WWTP staff. CMU has
implemented improvements to the stormwater drainagelcontainment around the sludge
loading and storage areas by the installation of additional curbing (sludge storage area)
and trench drains (upgradient driveways). This Office commends these improvement
efforts initiated by CMU and the facility staff.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The last qualitative monitoring event was performed on 1212108.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
Cl
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
❑
❑
Cl
Page: 3

Permit: NCG110114 Owner - Facility: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
Inspection Date: 12/05/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment: The facility has designated six stormwater outfalls. All stormwater outfalls
were accessible and the discharges from Outfall #3 and Outfall #6 were clear with no
foam. No discharges were observed from the remaining stormwater outfalls. The
stormwater drainage area (Outfall 006) had been properly remediated of the sludge
accumulations noted in the previous inspection Several small accumulations of sludge
were observed in the vegetated area adjacent to the truck scale and a downgradient
stormwater drain in the Outfall 006 drainage system. The facility staff should initiate the
appropriate corrective actions (including site cleanup) to ensure all sludge is contained
and properly disposed. Note: No sludge accumulations were observed in the
downstream stormwater drainage system.
Page: 4

Michael F. Easley, Gov? l
William G. Ross Jr., S?cr ry
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Reso ces
January 16, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7006 2760 0001.8497 6414
Ms. Jacqueline A. Jarrell
Superintendent -- Environmental Management Division
Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities
4000 Westmont Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Subject:
Dear Ms. Jarrell:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Notice of Violation
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Mallard Creek WRF
Stormwater Permit No. NCG110114
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
Tracking #: NOV-2008-PC-0040
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the stormwater
inspection conducted at the subject facility on January 7, 2008 by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office.
Please inform the facility's Operator -in -Responsible Charge of our findings by forwarding a
copy of the enclosed report.
--------This report is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) due to the discharge of sludge —
into a stormwater drainage system and the facility's failure to implement a good housekeeping
program as part of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan which are violations of the subject
Stormwater Permit and North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1, as detailed in the
Summary/Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and Permits and Outfalls Sections of the
attached report. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation, per day, may be assessed against any person who
violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit
issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215,1.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by February 6, 2008,
addressing the above -noted violations in the attached report. In responding to the violations,
please address your comments to the attention of Mrs. Marcia Allocco.
TNOoc Caro ina
NCDENR Naturally
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www,ncwatcrguality.org 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

I
. 10
Ms. Jacqueline A. Jarrell
January 16, 2008
Page Two
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mrs. Allocco, Mr. Bell, or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Robert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
-1Only, . Insurance Coverage Pro viderl)
For delivery Information visit our website at www,tjsps.cornj�
postage $
Cn
Certified Fee
ra , postmark
O Return Receipt Pee
C3 (Endorsement Required) Here
G Restricted Delivery Fee
© (Endorsement Required) _ .3
`0
C%- u MS JACQUELINE JARRELL
fU sum it1Ni 1 NI)PNT - ENV. MGMT, DIV.
-p en CHAR/MECK UTILITIES
4000 WI STMONT DRIVE --------
Orr C14ARLOTTE NC 28217
swplwb 1116/08
PS Form 38DO. AU(JLL�t 2006

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110114 Effective: 10/19/07 Expiration: 04130l08 Owner: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: {Mallardd Creek Water Reclamation Facility
County: Mecklenburg 1240(3 US Hwy 29 N
Region: Mooresville
Contact Person: Jacqueline A Jarrell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative
Related Permits:
Title: Superintendent
Harrell Victor Dewitt
Certification:
Charlotte NC 28262
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Phone: [phone],43
Inspection Date: 01/07/2008 Entry Timix 2 AM Exit Time: 02:33 PM
Primary Inspector: Wesley N Bell !/J- j,��(,� , Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): l Ext.231
Marcia Allocco i�'� �© Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: INC G110114 Owner -Facility: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
Inspection Date: 0110712008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SECTION cont'd:
Accumulations of dewatered sludge were observed throughout the driveways adjacent to sludge dewatering building
(unloading area). The facility staff failed to implement a good housekeeping program around this area. No record of the
sludge being discharged into the stormwater drainage system had been documented in the SPPP. In addition, two
secondary containment structures (sugar water storage tanks) were observed leaking onto the ground.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110114 Owner - Facility: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
Inspection Date: 01/07/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
■
❑
❑
Comment: The SPPP was organized and last updated in March 07. A statement
signed by the responsible official should be included in the SPPP certifying that all
stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for nonstormwater discharges. See
"Summary" Section for additional comments.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yea
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ----- -- — - ---
— --- ■
❑
❑
❑ -
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
❑
■
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfalI status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? .
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The SPPP identified 15 outfalls; however, the inspection revealed that only
6 - 8 stormwater outfalls should be designated. The SPPP should be updated to reflect
the appropriate number of stormwater outfalls. Dewatered sludge had entered into a
stormwater drainage system adjacent to the covered sludge storage area. The sludge
was observed at the stormwater outlet and throughout the adjoining drainage ditch (for
approxmiately 30 feet).
Page: 3

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also Complete
Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that.,we can, relpm the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece,
or on the front If space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
# MS .IACQUI�LINC ]ARR1�E11.
SUPI RINTI NDENT - I NV. MGMT. DIV.
CHAR/MLCK UTILITIES
44000 %A1TQ 'MONT DilWr
A Signature
X0 Agent
❑ Addresses
B. F#ocolved by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
utanu rllr�(Q�► l7 oB
D, IlAellvery address different from Item 1 f EtYas
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. ServlceType
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
Certlf[ed Mall ❑ Fxpress Mall
swp/wb 1 / 16/08 Istered ❑ Return Recelpt for Manhandles
❑ Insured Mall ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. 7.006 2760 0001 8497 6414
Ps Form 3811, February 2004 fJoniestic Return Receipt f0288B 02•M.t1140

January 31, 2008 "l1LZ-KX"_1" i` 1
Mrs. Marcia Allocco
Mooresville Regional Office 41
NCDENR — Division of Water Quality
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
RECEIVED
,j FEB 6 ppp8
1
NC DENR MRO
M-Surface Water Protection
Subject: Notice of Violation, Compliance Evaluation Inspection, Mallard Creek Water
Reclamation Facility
Stormwater Permit No. NCG110114
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
Tracking #: NOV-2008-PC-0040
Dear Mrs. Allocco:
This letter is in response to the above Notice of Violation (NOV) letter dated January 1 G,'
2008 and received by me in our office on Monday, January 28, 2008, As stated in the
NOV letter, "This report,is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) due to the
discharge of sludge into a stormwater drainage system and the facility's failure to
implement a good housekeeping program as part of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan which are violations of the subject Stormwater Permit and North Carolina General
Stature (G.S.) 143-215.1....... We are contesting this NOV based on the facts below:
During an internal staff ston-nwater inspection on 12/27/07, staff discovered that there
was a trench drain near the biosolids storage pad and the loading area that was connected
to a storm water catch basin that leads to a pipe outlet on the other side of the fence. Per
the existing Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, this is labeled as Outfall No. 12. This
outfall discharges to a man-made ditch that flows to a sediment trap installed during
construction of the expansion of the Mallard Creek WRF. During our internal inspection
we discovered a small amount of material at the outfall and approx 30 feet down the
ditch. We could not really determine if this material was biosolids or some other inert
material. There was no evidence of any solids found near the sediment trap either
immediately upstream or downstream. Mallard staff took immediate steps to correct this
situation and prevent any further possible runoff from the solids storage from entering the
storm drain system.
The initial corrective action included plugging the trench drain and pumping down the
sediment trap just as a precaution. The Mallard staff installed a sump pump at the trench
drain to pump stormwater from the low area at the plugged drain to a plant drain for
treatment. The pump was necessary in order to prevent stormwater from rising above, the
curb and entering a near -by catch basin. The purpose of the pump was for stormwater
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG UTILITIES
Environmental Management Division
4000 Westmont Drive
Charlotte, NC 28217
PH: 704/357-1344

collection and not to pump solids. This took place on December 27, 2007.
A qualitative monitoring report was completed for all current outfalls including Outfall
No. 12 on 12/28/07 (please see attached report, page 24). The monitoring report included
a listing and description of indicators of stormwater pollution as required.
At the same time, we are in the process of completing a project to improve the wash
down area of the biosolids facility thus cleaning the area more effectively and capturing
the residual solids for treatment through the plant. With the plug in place to prevent
water from going through the drainage system, it is very difficult to maintain the sludge
loading area until the piping system can be redone to drain to the head of the plant.
However, we felt that first priority was to ensure that no more solids would enter the
storm water system. This was all brought to Mr. Wes Bell's attention during his
inspection of the Mallard WRF on January 7, 2008. During the inspection, Mr. Bell and
the plant supervisor Mr. Darrell DeWitt viewed the material on the other side of the
drainage pipe but did not verify what it was but that it should be removed. The material
was removed on January 8, 2008. The amount of material collected was less than 500
gallons. This information was reported to Mr. Wes Bell on January 8, 2008, in a phone
call to the Mooresville Regional office by Mr, Darrell DeWitt. .
An engineering firm, Black & Veatch, who did the original design of the storm piping
and drainage system as part of the Mallard WRF expansion was also contacted upon
discovery of the drainage problem. We requested that they complete engineering work to
redesign the piping system. As you are aware, as the City of Charlotte, we are required to
develop contract documents with the consultant to complete this work. This was in
progress beginning on January 15, 2008, and the scope was finalized on January 22,
2007. Black & Veatch is actively working on the re -design of the piping system. The
cost of engineering work is estimated at $20,000.
Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities worked in good faith to make corrections upon
discovering this drainage problem at the Mallard Creek WRF. Although there were some
temporary housekeeping problems that arose, we felt that it most important to prevent
any possibility of runoff from the biosolids storage area from entering the stormwater
system. We believe there should be consideration for allowing reasonable time to make
corrections without being penalized.
Regarding the two secondary containment structures (sugar water storage tanks) leaking.
These tanks are not leaking. In fact, there was seeping rainwater not sugar water. We
also have place portable pumps at each containment structure so we can keep the water
pumped out.
Further, on January 3, 2008, the City of Charlotte Stormwater Services completed a
stormwater inspection of the Mallard Creek WRF as part of their NPDES permit
requirements. There was no finding of any significant issues.
I hope this letter and our actions address the concerns outlined in the January 16, 2008
letter. Please let me know if there is any other information I can provide. I can be
contacted at [phone] ext. 238 or [e-mail].

Sincerely,
jacquine A. Jarrell, . Superintendent
nvironmental Management Division
C: B. Gullet
R. Rozzelle, Mecklenburg County Water Quality

Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NIC/ 1 I`l—l_ITI—•1 or Certif icate of Coverage No.: NIC1Gl 1 / l / 9-1 1_1 l_L�+
Facility Name: _ U455"Q.D C,A,6G�r�t -�
County: ^ Phone No. • d
Inspector: 1w
Date -of Inspection: sM4L�. _ 1-21S-1 P_ 1 I z-i jC"7
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Pe 'ttee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
"Outfall No. �IStructure (pipe, ditch, etc.) • �) f
Receiving Stream: , MAcLLI+� (&.'Eri.1L_,_„ _ ---
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
� l ��b'i�.�-Q�K' ��.�`I.b�t? F�'�t Ll `R c.i.6 f+.•1�L
�, l� AcC.xl� F't..c7�..1 �. •
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and'tint (light, medium,
dark)'as descriptors: N
10hierW%3 it 14%.j
3. Odor `
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.) L__X>1 6 -
4. Clarity
Choose -the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is.clear and 10 is very
cloudy:
1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10
No r—L V-V-)
Page 1
Swu-242-101599

5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 W0 F'��
6.- Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 'l0 is extremely muddy:
2 3 4 5 6 7 8. 9 10 No FLxr,-o
7. Foam I�CD 1�[O'1C-ral�'�J�C
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes Na4 s�
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
9. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe O N C
Note: 'Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen may be indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
5WU-242-1015"

Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NlC/ ! l`I�1_I_I 1 or Certificate of Coverage No.: NIGGI I 1 i / 4 i I !-,&
Facility Name: MA!4,& } (AwAaLe uu4
County: Phone No. 77921• 591- d(o S b
Inspector: IW
Date of Inspection: o
By this signature, 1 certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) P 1 Pe —
Receiving Stream:
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
Tick'Q- 3 _Aa-I",.:� " AE 1Z-rr+ r -
*-Q0 A _T%Vrc t-•1,e�v.a qAx-� STACKQAts'C'
2. Color e D15C.H�tR►C'�.•
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark) as descriptors: wi IA
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.) rJa
4. Clarity
Choose -the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where I. is clear and 10 is very
cloudy:
2 3 4 5
SWU•242-101599
N.
9 - 10
P �•Ip�-p w1Ac� VITA
Paoe i(iG-"L^14T tid

t_1
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no V d 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
2 3 4 5 6 7 '8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge?
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge?
Yes C)
Yes No
) -
9. ' Other Obvious Indicators of Storrnwater Pollution
List and describe
Note: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen maybe indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
0
SWU-242-101599
Page 2

e
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NIG�1 I_h! 1�1�1 or Certificate of Coverage No.: NICIGI I
Facility Name: . jll�L� r LL**
County: IRE-)LtErAkAL(6 LCU ►AY4 Phone No. "Z!mj• 5 - 0 $_D
Inspector: ufaAwtJ 1UAgA
Date of Inspection:
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature ooeitt{iittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No. �;. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) .
Receiving Stream: hkhLAINIQ Q ChAk34= _
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area: tom, __-
_F1�Jh-,.. ems~--ircc_ �D. 3 p��u►�AS No 2� �,
%A=- No A-c,-nvT-- Fte�u� A�r Trk-t5
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark) 'as descriptors: v
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.) We46—
4. Clarity
Choose -the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is.clear and 10 is very
cloudy.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 �JJA-
Ftolj
E1lb
Page 1
SWU-242-101599

M
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amoutit of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
2 3 4 5 6 7 '9 9 10
6. C. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no�solids and 10 is extremely muddy: ,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S. 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes eo
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes o
9.- Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution '
Dist and describe
Note: 'Low clarity, high solids, -and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen maybe indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
SWU-242-101599

9
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NICI_ I_h1�h1_l_I or Certificate of Coverage No.: NICQ I / I / 0 1I! +
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Perm 6kbr Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) 1
Receiving Stream: —Kh _ [A.'E*Ai--
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark) as descriptors: I-4D F-La1
3. . Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.) G%
4. Clarity
Choose -the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is,clear and 10 is very
cloudy-
1 2 3 4 5 b 7 8 9 10 f�IA,
Page 1
S WU-242-101599

5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
2 3 4 5 6 7 '8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 i o'solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes
S. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes
9. Other Obvious Indicators of Storinwater Pollution
List and describe
Note: -Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen maybe indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
SWU-242- t 0! 599

W.
Stormwater Discharge Out_fall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NICI_I l�l 1_1 _I_I or Certificate of Coverage No.: NIGQI l / l / C7 11! ILLY
Facility Name: MA kA NAQ (AASQ, _t,a *V--
County: Phone No. ]!4- Sn- 0(o SC?
Inspector: IkJk.tA-A
Date of Inspection: 13:h 1-2jz-1j 1_E2�=I fz-j-L!6 LQ'7
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) - ?L P
Receiving Stream:
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area: iW bQ
A9vv,A,vi*gL) A,-44St a V-'t r lArt, V;hD QAe t
D t Sch3vkBkse: r4Lzrm Z i" t P a 5. u a ArtrTT V� Ftmu_i
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark) as descriptors: t�1 O rJ� Lp &rMV' s FtPtA.-) --'-
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.) i�id t.j Li-- WLm! •.1!c ..myfr r:
4, Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very
cloudy:
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Page i
SWU-242-101599

to
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
2 3 4 5 6 7 •'8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the. number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes 10
9.- Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe
Note: 'Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen may, be indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
sWU-242-101599

IV
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: N/C/ / / 1-1I_! / or Certificate of Coverage No.: PiLcQ f / [ / Q- I I + /+
Facility Name: _U-*-F'
County: A fi" Phone No. 7FIf•
Inspector: IN
Date of Inspection:
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(signature of Per4jeVor Designee)
1. outfall Description
Qutfall No. (D Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) . p 1 R�
Receiving Stream: T
Describe the industrial. ctivities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
+'NQ ACX-N�': Ft - ti5cht E Ta sC-O T A0 T'Aptz t�
2. Color r L L, 61- 5TMZ-+-'i- ,
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.} and tint (light, medium,
dark) -as descriptors: b cx> ..C&:- a t• A3 Pu.A10
3. odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.)
4. Clarity
Choose -the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very
cloudy:
A7" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Page 1
SWU-242-101599

12
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where;
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
2 3 4 5 6 7 '8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
2 3 4 5 6 7 8. 9 10
7. Foam � �
Is there any foam'in the stormwater discharge? Yes /No )
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
9. • Other Obvious Indirntoi s of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe
Note: - Low clarity, high solids, -and/or the presence of foain or oil sheen may be indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2

1'3
Stormwater Discharge OutfalUSDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NIC/ 1 I_1 1 I_I_I or Certificate of Coverage No.: NIGGI i I [ 1 4 I! l�l
Facility Name:
County: A !Ca!�� != ` Phone No. 1E21•_ 5-7-_d(cP1Q _
Inspector: P-j } IJA-_A _ _ -
Date of Inspection: Z.
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Pir► 9tee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream: N11k1.�a4'g-O_ (AA.i.{L_-----
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage ar
_MAICJ &Q- 2, 0645 1 kz> . (*Q %A-b I J NA LAJ _P
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark) as descriptors: INJ PONQnAY Q E,
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.)
4. Clarity t� p c,,d
Choose -the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where I is_clear and 10 is very
cloudy:
2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10
Page 1
S WU•242-101599

1K
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
1 /;*N 3 .4 5 6 7 'S 9 10 '
-
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no •solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
1 2 4 5 6 7 8. 9 10
7 *i bT RE Artr.� N•�t.c.�a4-✓�
7. Foam � � .
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes 10
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes o
9.- Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe
J r '
Note: ' Low clarity, high solids; and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen maybe indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
SWU-242-1015"

I L5,
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: N!G I I_!�l `I 1 I or Certificate of Coverage No.: NIGGI 1
Facility Name: MALLAVZ (AASOL, LL*W _.....
County: -i� Er.1L^tf►. _ Phone No. • C
In lu
Date of Inspection: __-[jhAr1A iZ.LZDj!Qj Nr 1-1-2_elca
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) - Pt
Receiving Stream:
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
TVZA +J AAA 1 Fs *12z
�p Ad.n v CJ 1; LTV►-�. . Ell bs t 4 0 t5�4,Ca e
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark)'as descriptors: bi
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.)
4. Clarity
Choose -the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very
cloudy.
JA 1 2 3 4 5 G 7 8 9 10
Page 1
S WU-242-101599

I
l�0
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amour Vof floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
I is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
2 3 4 5. 6 7' - 8 9 10
1
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no 'solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
h
O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8, 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes �1Fo1
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
9.. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution
'List'and describe
Note: 'Low clarity, high solids,- and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen maybe indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
SWU-242-101599

17
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NICI I I —I / _ I / or Certificate of Coverage No.: NICIGI I I 1 / 4 I I + 1+
• - ■ •
� � 1l a Y 1 � .J � Imo,. I. r1• w...w� u.��Ai Ja Wit. � A 1
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signatur4f V rmittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfaii No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) 1T CGL. {,1)
Receiving Stream: Kbg LAeN:P:Q f A.ft*Aj,
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfalI drainage area
VVtrtsDS . f3 I o wi i o S TtL.SAADLk c,r.� r Fhrri%► ,, 4Tt tc-R-
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark) as descriptors: Q?LUCv I II kfi _
I Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.) wc—
'
4. Clarity
Choose, the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is.clear and 10 is very
cloudy:
I DI 2
SWU-242-101599
4 5 5' 7 8 9 10
Paae i

9
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amourit of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
%] 2 3 4 5 6 7 '8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
:hoose. the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids
in the stormwater discharge
there 1 is no'solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
2 3 4 5 6 7 8.
9 10
Foam
s there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes T0^�
1. OR Sheen
s there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes o
�.' Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe' )
I
I
I
Note: 'Low clarity, high solids, -and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen
may be indicativco f pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
SWU-242-101599

W
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NIC/—/ I-1_I 1 `I 1 or Certificate of Coverage No.: NICQ l
AIV
1 • � � ' � I 1 --a. - .1_�l �.f� AN ..1. MIT", , w .max
• 1 ' • e....i�'
By this signature, l certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Per ni &/or D
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No. ---t b Str
Receiving Stream: , Kh u
Describe the industrial activi
hto Arcxty-c—.,
2. Color
Describe the color of the disc
dark)'as descriptors:
re (pipe, ditch, etc.)
that occur within the outfall drainage area:
,e using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
3. Odor I
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (he_ smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.) 11r f
4. Clarity
Choose -the number which
cloudy:
0 j)S, 0 2 3
SWU-242-101599
escribes the clarity of the discharge where l is clear and 10 is very
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Page 1

5. Floating Solids
Choose the.number which best describes the amount of floating solids i
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
N- 2 3 h 5 6 7 '8
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solic
where 1 is no 'solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
�. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8.
7. Foam.
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes r
S. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes
9.- Other Obvious indicators of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe ` l {
Note: 'Low clarity, high solids,- and/or the presence of foam of oil
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigat
Page 2
5WU-242-101599
i the stormwater discharge where
9 10
in the stormwater discharge
9 10
r
aQ�
may be indicative of pollutant

Z1
y raw
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NICE_
Facility Name:l.t#�c2Q
County: fig t &AL-_
Inspector:
Date of Inspection: Mkh
By this signature, I certify that
d .
f 1
(Signature of P+Ike or Desi
L Outfall Description
Outfall No. Strua
Receiving Stream: KAtl,.l�,
Describe the industrial activitic
+b a�
S
2, Color
Describe the color of the disch;
dark)'as descriptors: _ 1M
VLv %r%
_I I or Certificate of Coverage No.. N/ClG11
c� tl: — ---- -
Phone No. "7�#- 5 I- _0"O
report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
re (pipe, ditch, etc.) • . VOt P6 I I TZ44—
that occur within the outfall drainage area:
ens
CAth
go using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
UD --., Q.armrh a a ii.�
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors th the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.)
4. Clarity ---;p 4g
Choose -the number which
cloudy:
1 • 2 .3
5 WU-242-101599
escribcs the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very
4 5
6 7 8
Page 1

.Z Z
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids 3i
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
1 2 3 4 5 7 -8
6. Suspended Solids.
the stormwater discharge where
9 10 n f a,
rfin , 4.- papa
Choose the number which hest describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy: Y,p
1 2 3 4 5 7 8. 9 10
7. Foam @ •Pr'"��
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes Co ROo•-e4f� b.X-'1
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
9.. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwfiter Pollution `
'List and describe o }
a k
Note: • Low clarity, high solids, -and/or the presence of foam or oil sh
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigatior
Page 2
SWU-242-101599
Yte Y1,e P-Yr�SF.y-�� C4� KXA-0
may be indicative of pollutant

z3
�_ d
nwater Discharge Out€all (SDO)
ualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NIG/T 1 1_I� 1 I 1 or Certificate of Coverage No.: Hiv I / 1 / 4 l
Facility Name: _[1I�{�l.t wWF'
County: JAGcA C7%4&L L(,,1Phone No. • P
Inspector: lu l tA-A _
Date of Inspection: f c]
r
By this si re, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature bf Permitteeb or —Designee)
1, Outfall Description
Outfall No. 1 Z Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) p "P'F-- D. t"'144—
Receiving Stream:
Describe the industrial activiti that occur within the outfail drainage area:
N�.J�'i-ngr*_ I . Pow
2. Color
Describe the'coloi of t}ie discharg6lsffig basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (fight, -medium,
dark)'as descriptors:
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors thal the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.) D
4. Clarity
Choose -the number which
cloudy:
1 2 3
SWU-242-101599
describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very
4 4 D5 6
Page I
7 8 9 10

zH
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of: floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
l is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stortwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
1 2', 3 5 6 7 S. 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes
S. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes
9. • Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe -- ---- - -----
Note: -L4Dw clarity, high solids, -and/or the presence of foam or oil
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigati
Page 2
SWU-242-101599
may be indicative of pollutant

Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring- Report
Permit No.: NICI_hl 1 % I 1 I or Certificate of Coverage No.: XLQG1 l / 1 / QI
By this suture, 1 certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
of P rok&e or Designee)
1. Outfall Description ' 'Ki. �L�
Outfall No. 3 Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream: _ MAC U�r�A (JDAtAi-� --- -
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
J) I TL- L ��
-* 1D F-LA�
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark) as descriptors:
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.) r)flV"=
4. Clarity !7 s -' E � n o rcS' &---4
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very
cloudy; I
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Page 1
SWU-242-101599

IRM
5. Floating Solids
• � o ��a h:o lV�.•�'�► � � i..u� yam,-��"
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
1 2 3 4 5 6. 7 '8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is noasolids and 10 is extremely muddy: ,
• it - r •.
1 : 2 3 .4 5 • 6 ..7 8. 9, 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Ye o
r
t i j J i'
s y., ,as
9. Other Obvious Indicators of Stortnwater Pollution
List and describe
Note: 'Low clarity, high solids; and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen maybe indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
SWU-242-101599

Z'1
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report'
Permit No.: NICI 1 1_l�l�l�l 1 or Certificate of Coverage No.: NLCQY J I / 4_I I! .
Facility Name: MA—U A AD LA40 r_u� - _
County: Phone No. �r„54'1. O(g&O
Inspector: NldkAw
Date of Inspection: a
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Perm(tt "r Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream: P_ LAA-_ —C� (L�%rd&=
Describe the industrial activitiesthat occul within the outfall drainage area:
k-, " FjP L -
2. Color
Describe the color of the
dark)'as descriptors: _ _,,,,
3. Odor
Describe
etc.) __-!
}
using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, feak chlorine odor,
4. Clarity I
Choose -the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very
cloudy:
�j DI2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 l
Paae 1
S WU-242-101599 }

z%
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
N}A© 2 3 4 5 6 7 '8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in thee stormwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
3 4 5 G 7 8 9, 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the storrnwater discharge? YesV
, 4 ,
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
9.- Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater pollution
List and describe y M 3
Note: 'Low clarity, high solids, -and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen maybe indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
SWU-242-1015"

-2ci
SrATF r
P
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NIG�I_ J / 1 1 1 I or Certificate of Coverage No.: HLCQ I / f
Facility Name: AALLAAAQ LOROL., k
County: Phone No. 7221- 293- 01agO
Inspector: W
Date of Inspection:' F52- i -zJ 2.
By this sigilature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
n AP. --,A. , . _ A -_-,"I
(Signature of PedVAIe or Designee)
]. Outfall Description i �� �-� - P �' @
Outfall No. _ Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) • PIP C—
Receiving Stream: —KA IJ j-Q
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
pcswtL fir'
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark) as descriptors: n p c-ot W"— "
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc'.) — -- --
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where I is.clear and 10 is very
cloudy:
U 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Page 1
SWU-242-101599

3O
5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the arnourit of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
l is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
11 2 3 4 5 6 7, '8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy: r
f
2 3 4 5 p 6 7 9 9 to
7. Foam `'�
Is there any foam in the sttormwater discharge? Yes o
i
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Ye No
9.. Other Obvious indicators of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe
Note: 'Low clarity, high solids, -and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen may be indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
SWU-242-101599
Page 2
i'l

3)
WORKSHEET 4
Non -Storm Water D€scharges
Date of
Evaluation
Outfall
Number
Flow Observed
(gPm)
Potential Sources
of Flow
Evaluated by
11/24/93
ALL
0
RLG
2/22194
4
Unknown
RLG
02/05/02
ALL
0
JNL
�z12,1�r
12-

O�O W A T ,E�9�G
6
>
0 � �
Ms. Jacqueline A. Jarrell
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
4000 Westmont Drive
Charlotte, NC 28217
Subject:
Dear Ms. Jarrell:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
October 30, 2007
General Stormwater Permit
Mallard Creek Water Reclamation Facility
COC No. NCGL10114
Mecklenburg County
Our records indicate that you have been issued the subject Certificate of Coverage (COC)
under General Permit (GP) No. NCG110000 from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to
discharge stormwater associated with industrial activities performed at your facility. The purpose of
this letter is to advise you of the importance of the GP and the liabilities in the event of failure to
comply with the terms and conditions of the GP. If you have not already done so, it is suggested that
you thoroughly read the GP. Of particular importance are Part 11 and Part III, Sections A & B.
Part I1 is titled "MONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR PERMITTED
DISCHARGERS". Part II, Section A discusses the need to develop a Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SPPP), which includes, but is not limited to the following components: a site plan, a
stormwater management plan, a spill prevention and response plan, preventative maintenance and
good housekeeping program, and employee training. Specific guidance as to the information to be
included in each plan is also listed in this Section. Section B sets forth the qualitative monitoring that
should be performed at all outfalls that discharge stormwater runoff. Section C establishes analytical
monitoring requirements for facilities that have vehicle maintenance areas and use more than 55
gallons of new motor oil per month.
Part III of the GP consists of general conditions and definitions consistent with all GPs, which
are applicable to your SW discharge. These conditions also include special reporting requirements in
the event of noncompliance, bypassing of treatment works (if applicable), and other conditions that
pertain to your stormwater discharge. In Part III, Section B (2), please note that GPs are not
transferable. If you, as the permittee, cease to need this COC (for example: your facility has closed),
then you should request that the COC be rescinded. It should also be noted that the GP requires that
any monitoring data be retained by the permittee for a period of three (3) years and made available to
a Division representative upon request. If you haven't already done so, please note that any analytical
and/or qualitative monitoring as required by this GP should begin upon commencement of your SW
discharge as a result of a representative storm event.
"A Nonc Caro ina
NCDENR Jvaiurallry
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer service
Internet: www.ncwateraualilv.oru 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal OppwunitylAf6rmafive Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Ms. Jacqueline A. Jarrell
October 30, 2007
Page Two
Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of any NPDES Permit may subject the
permittee to enforcement action pursuant to Section 143-215.6 of the North Carolina General Statutes
in the form of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation. Criminal penalties may also be
recommended for violations determined to be intentional or willful. If you find that you are unable to
comply with the terms and conditions of the GP, you should contact this Office immediately.
Lastly, when representatives from this Office contact you in order to conduct an inspection of
your facility, you should be prepared to demonstrate compliance with all terms and conditions
included in the GP. If an inspection is scheduled at your facility, the inspection will focus on
evaluating the following items (if applicable): Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, stormwater
outfalI locations, a review of any qualitative and/or analytical monitoring data required by the GP,
and any other activities that may be required by the GP that are unique to your discharge. This
information should be readily available if requested by a Division representative.
Copies of the GPs and associated documents can be accessed from the following web page:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm#sswm . If you have any questions, please contact
the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
/mlp

4:
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
Attn: Jacqueline A. Jarrell
4000 Westmont Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Dear Ms. Jarrell:
le
Cin
m o reNorth Carolina a rnen f n Nat
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
OCT. @i4o aterQuality
October 19, 2007
NC DENR SRO
DWG -Surface Water Protection
Subject: General Permit No. NCG110000
Mallard Creek Water Reclamation Facility
COC No. NCG110114
Mecklenburg County
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on August 14, 2007, we are
forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage (COC) to discharge under the subject state —
NPDES general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US
Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to -you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual
permit application. Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the
Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and
reissuance of the certificate of coverage. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain
other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the
Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other federal or local governmental
permit that maybe required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Bill Diuguid at telephone
number [phone] ext. 382.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED J3Y
BRADLEY SENNETT
Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Mecklenburg County
Attachments
N' CU J'na
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwateMoality,,= Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 5W. Recyclecill0% Post Consumer Paper

. da

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG110000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG110114
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Mallard Creek Water Reclamation Facility
12400 US Highway 29 North
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as UT to Mallard Creek; to Yadkin River Basin, Class C, in accordance with the
effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, II, III, IV, V and VI of
General Permit No. NCG 110000, as attached.
This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective October 19, 2007,
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day October 19, 2007.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
BRADLEY BENNETi
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

W.54
r9abOW
�1%
1�01
T".
Ko
14.1 1 J
Q
�R's
A
Mallard Creek WRF
S,
J.Fj t kW C1
i9l(
F
3
Zug
771
Latitude: 35r20'27"
Longitude: 80142'07" NCGI 10114 Facility
Mallard Creek WRF
County: Mecklenburg Mallard
Stream Class: C
Receiving Stream: Mallard Creek
Stream Index: 13-17-5 NOT TCAUD
Sub -basin: 03-07-11 (Yadkin River Basin)

+r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H, Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
October 19, 2007
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
Attn: Jacqueline A. Jarrell
4000 Westmont Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Subject: General Permit No. NCGI 10000
Mallard Creek Water Reclamation Facility
COC No. NCG110114
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Jarrell:
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on August 14, 2007, we are
forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage (COC) to discharge under the subject state -•
NPDES general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US
Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended). .
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual
permit application. Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the
Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and
reissuance of the certificate of coverage. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain
other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the
Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other federal or local governmental
permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Bill Diuguid at telephone
number [phone] ext. 382.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
BRADLEY BENNETf
Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Mecklenburg County
Attachments
N�on�eh Caro na
)_ atur170
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www nowaterayality.ora Location; 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Aclion Employer— 50% Recycledll(r% Post Consumer Paper

II jW
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY,
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG110000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG110114
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-21 S.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Mallard Creek Water Reclamation Facility
12400 US Highway 29 North
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as' UT to Mallard Creek; to Yadkin River Basin, Class C, in accordance with the
effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, IV, V and VI of
General Permit No. NCG 110000, as attached.
This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective October 19, 2007.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day October 19, 2007.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
BRADLEY BENNETT
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

P
,�' t7i°i'_ Xf, vtw �4:�, .: � f, j . � � ,fir ,tea __ �i,r ^,�, aS,,• � r �1'+`�� �.. �4•�i�� ,p..
y.. � a ,. R 1��, _•.5 +J%'�,1 , 1 f' ,,r r -��V. 1 ' '{� � 3 .�,r�. �'%.' � :lr � :13
4
�¢'" .. 'ry7,t�, �i•` 3 1 �yf _i �,; f o. * a�_"" /� a_• � x� ':..7 P� S�,°i
•X1 � n 1 j, � z:.!T" � rY ..y�r � � a �i, �,- '.�_ � �1 �, � �^Y3 -'� O ,� " 1 • �` s � �.
1,`�► ,.r. "�� E s Mallard Creek WRF
7 �
y,iA,Ls a 1 v
y ti l..� + !'f -�a� .3 •1 , �� ��'�r� �- .F A. _i �l zb �'""i� n4 i:: �. a �. �•r
+t>'41r; `�` �y, � � i �` r i ,� ��- ' yx. C c� �•�'r. � F-,e4 ,{ n r -
a y a•'� l �. F s .S, y 1'' ..�' r � { .1�""d �rr'•,+•.i \ ��5.; y a3f;
a,' `E _ �� . X x'� ` � 13n`R t � '�1Y� n._}? a ,�z�l: � .y,•�. ti 3 „�„ .� $_ .z � ��r r � J•i � ��,; k w $,i .
.t'".�:• —Y r . i� h �L� }s 54+ s� t� il� �. �•'' S�y�t � � i / FF -,f a+'_�`t � �.� �..
��• y .e! .�.�'_'i:� m�F �T.>! ._.. h 3 ;.1!' �� :-� Irk. _ �b �a-. � e,�F3i �' '�'Si�P.t '.� 3l �, �'! y . - f� ,• �.0
:J�irLY .. s.if r $ rF � .. ri • � 1,�,:; �'! �i. � �Y � .3 3 r 1 a � - . f'�. . �'. - « .A.-Y
Latitude:35c20'27" NCG110114 � Facility '
Longitude: 80142'07" ;=
County: Mecklenburg Mallard Creek WRF Location
Strum Class: C krw
Receiving Stream: Mallard Creek
Stream Index: 13-17-5
Sub -basin: 03-07-11 (Yadkin River Basin) NOT SlSLD

DWQ Fee Schedule
Page 1 of 2
search:[
N. C. Division o Water Quality about the division contact us dwg
70 preserve, plotBCi
+ Narifi Camlirias,svaler
-. �.
horne > sections > swps > stonnwater > Fee schedule
Navigation; Links Stormwater Unit:: Fee Schedule
Stormwater Home As of January 1, 1999, a new fee schedule for NPDES permitting was enacted. This
NPDES Phase I summarized below.
Stormwater Program
NPDES Phase II
Stormwater Program
NPDES Wastewater
General Permit Program
State Stormwater
Management Program
Neuse River NSW
Management Strategy -
Stormwater Mgmt.
Manuals, Factsheets,
Forms, & Documents
Stormwater Resources
on the Web
Fee Schedule
Links of Interest
Staff
Activity (Category A)
-7:11
Annual Fee
Major Individual Permits IE—$2,865
Minor Individual Permits
F $715 .
Single Family Residences IL
$50
Stormwater and Wastewater General Permits
$80
Recyle Systems
$300
Animal Permits Small $50
Animal Operations (Medium) $150
Anima! Operations (Large) $300
Non -Discharge Major Permits
$1090
Non -Discharge Minor Permits
�$375
�cw
Activ€ty (Category B)
NoTt� o� iI _ -
� `,
Special Order by Consent -Major
p� {"`(fi ISpecial Order by Consent - Minor
Annual Fee
$500
$250
Major
Major
Activity (Categor C)Proje
Sewer Extensions
State Stormwater
$�
Water Quality Certifications - Major
$�
Water Quality Certlfications - Minor
$:
Petroleum Contaminated Soils
$�
Permit Renewal -No
Authorizatlon to Construct IF No
httt)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Fee cr lediile.html
'7P)n/'$nn-7

Re: NCG 110114 Mallard Creek Water Reclamation Facility -- Charlotte
Subject: Re: NCGI 10114 Mallard Creek Water Reclamation Facility -- Charlotte
From: Michael Parker <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07.21:01 -0400
To: Bill Diuguid <[e-mail]>
Bill,
Feel free to issue the COC.
Mike
Bill Diuguid wrote:
Michael Parker, Mooresville Regional Office:
Please review the attached application . In addition to the table below, I've
also attached a scanned Copy of the NOI and map for your review.
COC #
Facility
Location
City
NCG110114 Mallard Creek Water Reclamation Facility
12400 US-29-N
Charlotte
Questions? Give me a call. if you could respond by 11/16/2007, I'd appreciate
it, so I can issue their COC.
Thanks,
William H. Diuguid, AICP
Community Planner, Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
Division of water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone], ex 382
Fax: [phone]
Michael Parker - Michael.Parker@ncmail,net
Environmental Engineer II
Borth Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
610 East Center Avenue
Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
1 of 1 10/17/2007 9:06 AM