NCG060036_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20160420

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/V
DOC TYPE
k HISTORICAL FILE
D MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ ,� � I �iJ�'I 2 0
YYYYMMDD

April 14, 2016
Central Files
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NED.,:
A.;� 202016
,section
n;mal office
A P' �\9 2016
WQROSN
MOORESVILLE REGIONXk
pFFCM
Subject: Delegation of Signatory Authority
Cargill Incorporated — Charlotte, NC Facility
(Stormwater General Permit No: NCG0300000/C0C No: NCG060036)
(Wastewater Permit No: 0642)
Mecklenburg County
To Whomever It May Concern:
As the Cargill Dressing, Sauces and Oils Business Unit Leader, I hereby delegate responsibility to
Mr. Michael Mattingly — Facility Superintendent, to sign all required documents under the State of
North Carolina NPDES Stormwater Program, including the authority to sign the semi-annual
Discharge Monitoring Reports for submittal to the State of North Carolina — Division of Water
Quality. Additionally, Mr. Mattingly will have the authority to sign all required documents
regarding wastewater to discharge wastewater under the industrial pretreatment program for
submittal to the City of Charlotte and Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-742-0024 or Lucia Elwood 210-857-9402.
Sin ly,
Matt P "n
Business Unit Leader, Dressing, Sauces & Oils
Cargill, Incorporated
cc: NCDEMLR — Division of Water Quality —Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville
NC 28115
Environmental Compliance Manager System Protection — Environmental Management Division- Charlotto-Meddenburg
Utilities, 4222 Westmont Drive, Charlotte, NC, 28217
Samanth Dawson, FISS Environmental Inc

am
Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
February 3, 2016
Cargill Incorporated
Attention: Mr. Daniel Imoudu, Refinery Superintendent
5000 South Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Subject: Monitoring Report
General Permit NCG0300000, Certificate of Coverage NCC060036
Cargill Incorporated
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Imoudu:
Secretary
TRACY DAVIS
Director
Thank you for submitting the monitoring report for the samples collected on 12/17/2015 for the
subject facility. Please continue monitoring per the permit requirements.
Please note that our Department went through a reorganization few years ago and, as of
August 1, 2013, Division of Water Quality became the Division of Water Resources.
Other changes that occurred during the reorganization was the transfer of all stormwater
related activities (pernutting and compliance) to the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land
Resources (DEMLR).
Mr. Zahid Khan is the Regional Supervisor of the DEMLR programs. The staff of
DEMLR now handles all stormwater permitting and inspection activities.
If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
J - t�
Zahid S. Khan, CPM, CPESC, CPSWQ
Regional Engineer
cc: Bradley Bennett, Stormwater Permitting, Program, Certificate of Coverage NCG060036
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy+, Mineral and Land Resourom
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699 T

C141filim
January 6th, 2016
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
ATTENTION: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
To Whom It May Concern:
REC'CIVE0
JpN 112016
D�NR-D'WtRMoreSy�lpl eVan
egional
ice
Attached are a completed original and one (1) copy of Cargill's Storrnwater Discharge Outfall
(SDO) Monitoring Report form from the stormwater sampling event conducted at our facility on
December 17, 2015_
Sincerely,
Cargill c.
Darnel Imoudu
Refinery Superintendent
Attachments
Cc: Marcia Allocco — NCDENR Mooresville Regional

FISS
ENVIRONMENTAL
VIA EMAIL
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
ERIC SERANTONI
CARGILL INC.,
SAMANTH DAWSON
FISS ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS INC.
DECEMBER 31, 2015
,14 11�
NII o
4fo l hd £ Rp �0/G
a N
°�aStllev SCR
�i0%; 00
01%ce
SUBJECT: 2015 STORMWATER MONITORING RESULTS (JULY 1 — DECEMBER 31)
2015 STORMWATER SAMPLING EVENT - 2
FISS JOB NO. 198-19
I BACKGROUND
Attached are the analytical results for the stormwater samples collected at Cargill on December 17, 2015. The
samples were collected from stormwater outfalls SW001, SW003, SWO04 & SW005. The December 2015
stormwater analytical monitoring serves as the second analytical monitoring event conducted at Cargill for the
year 2015 under the General Permit issued December 1, 2012 and effective till October 31, 2017.
The current sampling event conducted is the fifth overall stormwater sampling event under the General Permit
since a sample from a measurable storm event could not be collected for the period July 1 — December 31,
2014. The facility expects to conduct an additional three (3) sampling events in the Year 2016 to make up for
previously missed sampling events due to precipitation occurring outside business hours or during non -
measurable storm events.
Table 1 shows the schedule and running record of stormwater sample requirements for the current general
permit term. A historical summary of stormwater analytical results is provided in Table 2. Please refer to
previous memo reports for sampling results from all outfalls for the preceding year's stormwater sampling
events.
II RESULTS
Based on the laboratory results from the December 17, 2015 sampling event, Cargill has exceeded the Totals
Suspended Solids (TSS) benchmark for Outfalls SWO03 and SWO04 and Oil & Grease (O&G) for Outfall
7251 Pineville Matthews Rd, FISS Environmental Solutions, Inc. Main: 704-374-5400
Suite 300, Matthews, NC 28105 Fax: [phone]

SWO03 and therefore these tow outfalls are currently in Tier One status. The analytical results and the
respective benchmark concentrations are shown in the table below.
CARGILL STORMWATER SAMPLE RESULTS
December 17, 2015
Total Raenfall;
Outfall No.
TSS (mgA)
O&G{nagll)
1 wCOD,(mgli)
pH (su)
m.
Benchmark
100
i 30
120
6 9
' z
-_
S W001
23
<7.5
<10
7.48
S WO03 110* 60* 15 7.45
7.48
S WO04 110 * <6.7 18 8.64
S WO05 64 <5.5 <10 7.45
* - Benchmark exceedance
III SUBMITTAL
The results of the December 17, 2015 stormwater monitoring must be submitted to NCDWQ on or before
January 30, 2016. All information to be sent to NCDWQ, including a sample cover letter, is included in
Appendix 1. All forms are to be signed by the company signatory authority in the places indicated. Ensure
that the date submitted sections in the forms are completed before mailing. The originals and one (1) copy of
only the following items are required to be sent to the NCDWQ Central and Regional offices:
l) DWQ Central Office
Division of Water Quality
ATTENTION: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
• Completed and signed December 2015 Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Analytical Monitoring
Report;
2) DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
ATTENTION: Marcia Allocco
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
• Completed and signed December 2015 Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Analytical Monitoring
Report;
• Completed and signed 2015 Annual Summary Data Monitoring Report
Page 2 of 4

IV ACTIONS
Based on the December 2015 stormwater monitoring results and the exceedance recorded at Outfalls SWO03
and SW004, Cargill is under a Tier One classification under the regulations of the General Permit.
Based on the requirements stipulated in Cargill's renewed General Permit, FISS recommends the following
actions:
I . Conduct a stormwater management inspection of the facility within two weeks of receiving this
package. This will include identification and evaluation of potential causes for exceedance in
stormwater Outfalls SWO03 & SW004. Utilize the Tier inspection form attached to this package to
document the inspection and control actions to bring the exceedances under benchmark values. Our
recommendation is to conduct routine site inspections and cleanings to remove debris from the
areas draining to Outfalls SWO03 and SW004. A major control action recommended is that the
oil/water separator be cleaned on a monthly basis to reduce any sludge/sediment buildup which
could contribute to benchmark value exceedance for Outfall SW003. Ensure that the stormwater
sample is collected from the outlet of the separator_
2. Implement the specified control actions within two months of the stormwater management
inspection and maintain records of the inspection and dates of implementation. These can be
documented in the same Tier inspection form utilized for the investigations for benchmark
exceedances.
3. Conduct three (3) stormwater sampling events to collect stormwater samples from all outfalls at the
facility with the next sampling window starting February 17 and ending .tune 30, 2016. This will
allow Cargill to complete the missed sampling event from the second semi-annual period of 2014,
when samples could not be collected due to precipitation events occurring on weekends or non -
business hours. Ensure that the samples are collected with a separation of at least sixty (60) days
(unless in Tier 2 status) and that all efforts be made to collect samples during this period.
4. If the analytical results from the next sampling event for outfalls SWO03 & SWO04 shows
exceedance in the same parameters that were exceeded during this current event, then the facility
will be classified as being under Tier Two, which will trigger monthly monitoring for all
parameters at these two outfalls.
5. Ensure that the procedure of rain gauge pH measurement is continued during the sampling event as
a check on the pH of the stormwater at the outfalls and that the Daily Rainfall Record Form is
maintained as needed to determine sampling during measurable storm events. Continue the facility
inspections, outfall maintenance and other requirements as specified in the SWP3 and General
Permit to ensure that all outfalls remain under "normal" status for the remainder of the permit term.
Page 3 of 4

V RECORDS
The results of stormwater monitoring must be included in your facility's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3). All materials to be included in the SWP3 are attached in Appendix 2. Included are:
• December 2015 Stormwater Discharge Outfali Qualitative Monitoring Report;
• December 2015 Stormwater Discharge Outfall Analytical Monitoring Report; (Sign and place in
SWP3 Annex)
• 2015 Annual DMR Form
• Laboratory Analysis Report;
+ Storm Event Data Record
• Tier inspection forms (complete and maintain as needed).
Place a copy of these stormwater records at the end of Annex K of your facility's One Plan.
We appreciate the opportunity of providing stormwater sampling services to Cargill. Please don't hesitate to
contact us at 704-374-5393 with any questions or comments.
Page 4 of 4

Table 1
Stormwater Sample Compliance History
Cargill - Permit No: NCG060000 - (December 1, 2012 to October 31, 2017)
Year I Period I Sample Date I Sample No.
`�`
Year 1 January 1, 2013 - June 30, 2013 April 4, 2013 _ 1
` June 4, 2013 - October 7, 2013 October 7, 2013 2
Year 2 1 Januaryl, 2014 - June 30, 2014 1 May 15, 2014 1 3
Year 3 January 1, 2015 - June 30, 2015 _ March 27, 2015 _ 4
Year May 27, 2015 - December 31, 2015 j December 17, 2015 5
Year 4`
January 1, 2016 - June 30, 2016
6
TBD - December 31, 2016
7
TBD - December 31, 2016
8
Year 5 January 1, 2017 - June 30, 2017 1 19
July 1, 2017 - October 31, 2017 j 1 10
Notes:
1) Permit expires on October 31, 2017
2) Consecutive stormwater sampling events to be separated by 60 days unless in Tier 2 status,
or by permission from NCDENR.
- Additional sampling event required since samples were not able to be collected during the
second semi-annual period of 2014_
TBD - To Be Determined.

Table 2
Historical Summary of Analytical Results
Cargill - Stormwater Outfalls
Permit No: NCGO60000 - (December 1, 2012 to October 31, 2017)
Outfall # SW001:
Sample Date
Parameter
Status*
TSS (mg/1)
O&G (mgll)
COD (mgA)
pH (s.u.)
Rainfall (in)
04/04/13
37
<5.3
67
7.02
1.00
Normal
10/07/13
30
<4.6
54
7.04
0.20
Normal
5116/14'
6.7
<4.8
13
7.10
0.60
Normal
03/27/15
91
<4.9
120
7.30
0.16
Normal
12/17/15
23
<7.5
<10
7.12
7.48
Normal
Benchmark
100
30
120
6.0 - 9.0
-
-
Outfall # SWO03:
Sample Date
Parameter
Status'
.
TSS (mgA)
O&G (mgll)
COD (mgA)
pH (s.u.)
Rainfall (in)
04/04/13
6.0
<5.6
<10
7.04
1.00
Normal
10/07/13
5.6
<4.7
<10
7.07
0.20
Normal
5/15/14
6.0
<4.8
16
7.40
0.60
Normal
03/27/15
16
<4.9
28
7.20
0.16
Normal
12/17/15
110
60
15
7.45
7.48
Tier One
Benchmark
100
30
120
6.0 - 9.0
-
Outfall # SWO04:
Sample Date
Parameter
Status*
TSS (mgA)
O&G (mgA)
COD (mgA)
pH (s.u.)
Rainfall (in)
04/04/13
8.8
<5.0
55
7.04
1.00
Normal
10/07/13
7.9
<5.0
<10
7.08
0.20
Normal
5/15/14'
5.3
<4.9
<10
7.10
0.60
Normal
03/27/15
20
<4.7
22
7.20
0.16
Normal
12/17/15
120
<6.7
18
8.64
7.48
Tier One
Benchmark
1 100
30
120
6.0 - 9.0
---
Outfall # SW005:
Sample Date
Parameter
Status`
TSS (mgA)
O&G (mgA)
COD (mgA)
pH (s.u.)
Rainfall (in)
04/04/13
3.7
<5.0
<10
7.03
.1.00
Normal
10/07/13
3.3
<5.2
<10
7.11
0.20
Normal
6/15/14'
6.6
<5.3
11
7.10
0.60
Normal
03/27/15
24
<5.0
15
7.40
0.16
Normal
12/17/15
64
<5.5
<10
7.45
7.48
Normal
Benchmark
100
30
120
6.0 - 9.0
---
--
Notes:
Italics indicate results aboveloutside benchmark range.

* - See General Permit for description of Status (Tier One, Tier Two, etc.)
1. TSS was analyzed within holding times, but did not have sufficient QA1QC recovery. Samples were
re -analyzed outside their holding times. Higher values among both runs are reported.

SEMI-ANNUAL STORMWATER DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG060000
Date submitted
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCGO60036
FACILITY NAME Cargill Inc
COUNTY Mecklenburg
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Eric Serantoni
LABORATORY Shealy Environmental_ Inc Lab Cert. # 329
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2015
FACILITY ACTIVITIES INCLUDE (check all that apply):
❑ use/process meats ❑ use animal fats/byproducts
DISCHARGING TO SALTWATERS? DYES ®NO
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON THE REVERSE -->
Total event rainfall 2 7.48 In."or n No discharge this period'
C►uttall No.
Sample Collected,
mo/dd/ r
TSS,
mg/L
pH,
Standard units
COD,
m /L
Oil and Grease;
mg/L
Fecal Coliform ;'.:
Colonies per 100 ml
Eriterococcl ,
Colonles per 100 ml
Benchmark
-
100 or 50
Within 6.0 — 9.0
120
30
1000
500
SW001
12/17/15
23
7.12
c10
<7.5
SWO03
12/17/15
110
7.45
15
60
--
---
SWO04
12/17/15
120
8.64
1$
c6.7
- ---
--
SWO05
12/17/15
64
7.45
<10
<5.5
--
Only applies to facilities that use/process meats.
2The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge.
3 For sampling periods with no discharge at any outfalls. You must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
°See Genera! Permit text, Table 3, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than S5 gallons of new motor oil per month? D yes ® no (if g& complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new motor oil/month.
Outfall No.
Sample Collected,
mo/dd/ r
oil and Grease,
mg/L
TSS,
mg/L
pH,
Standard units
New ,Motor Oil Usage,
Annual average gal/ma
Benchmark
-
30
100 or S0
6.0 — 9.0
1 Only applies to facilities that use/process meats.
2The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge.
3 For sampling periods with no discharge at as outfalls, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
°See General Permit text, Table 3, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
SWU-249 Last Revised: October 18, 2012
Page I of 2

*FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
* A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
* 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER I REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
* TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one cony of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of recelptf the lab results for at end of
manitorinq period In the case of "No Discharge" reports] to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
-0 -
mom 0 IN. 07116.. 1.0; MAN
(Signature of Permittee)
+
(Date)
Additional copies of this form may be downloaded at: http://Portal.ncdenr.ore/web/wq/ws/su/npdessw#tab-4
SW U-249
Last Revised: October 18, 2012
Page 2 of 2

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
ANNUAL SUMMARY DATA MONITORING REPORT (DMR)
Calendar Year 2015
Individual NPDES Permit No. NCS❑❑❑❑❑❑ or
Certificate of Coverage (COC) No. NCO 060036
This monitoring report summary of the calendar year Is due to the DWQ Regional Office no later than March 13t of the following year.
Facility Name: Cargill Inc ,
County: Mecklenburg
Phone Number: ( 704 ) 679-7127 Total no. of SDOs monitored 4
Outfall No. SW001
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No
Was this outfall ever In Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No
If this outfall was In Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No
Total
Rainfall,
inches
Parameter, units
TSS (mg1L)
O&G (mg1L)
COD (mg1L)
pH (su)
Benchmark
Date Sample
Collected,
mmlddlyy
N/A
100
91
30
0.9
120
120
8:0 — 9.0
7.30
03127/15
0.16
12/17/15
7.48
23
<7.6
<10
7:12
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010

Additional Outfall Attachment
Outfall No. SWO03
Is this outfall currently In Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No
If this outfall was In Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No
Total
inches
Parameter, (unft)
Date Sam p le
5W U-264-Generic-25May2010

Additional Outfall Attachment
Outfall No. SWO04
Is this outfail currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No
Was this outfail ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No
Total
Inches
Date Sample
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010

Additional Outfall Attachment
Outfall No. SW005
Is this outfall currently In Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No
Was this outfall ever In Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No
If this outfall was In Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No
Total
Rainfall,
inches
Parameter, (units)
COD (mg/L)
Date Sam pie
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010

I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person
or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signs
Date
Mail Annual DMR Summary Reports to:
DWQ Regional Office Contact Information:
ASHEVILLE`RIGIONALOFFIC_E_
F Y�ETTEVJLI.EREGIONALOFFIGE
MOORESV,II;�LIaREGIONALUFFICFi
610 East Center Avenue/Suite 301
2090 US Highway 70
225 Green Street
Swannanoa, NC 29778
Systel Building Suite 714
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
[phone]
[phone]
RALEIGH'AEGIONAL OFFICE
WASHINCTON REGIONAL 6FFICF
WILMINGTON REGIQNALFOFFICE
3800 Barrett Drive
943 Washington Square Mall
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Raleigh, NC 27609
Washington, NC 27889
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
WINSTON-SALEM`RECIONAL OR'FICE
CENTR°A'�L,6F.FICE
1617 Mail Service Center
N
7opreseme; A►g�Winston-Salem,
585 Waughtown Street
NC 27107
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
and ehhahce
W''
336 771-5000
(919 807-6300
uodh► car iravwater..,,
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010

a g C►1-
August 20, 2013
Central Files
Marcia Allocco, NCDENR-Division of Water Quality
Mooresville regional Office,
510 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Angela,
RFCciiVED
DIVISION Op 4r?t, ; " OUAtITY
AUG 1 1 i'�,13
MOORES'—:.t.OFFICE
We have had a change in management, Facility leader. I have attached a letter from corporate stating
that Kristine Kangas is duly authorized to act as the responsible official for Cargill, Inc., representing the
Charlotte facility.
Thanks
�Fran Persinger
EHS Coordinator
Dressings, Sauces and Oils PO Box 240457 Te1704-523-0414
North America Charlotte, NC 28224 Fax [phone]
5000 South Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28217

RECEIVED
DIVISION OF A'07 C— QUALITY
AUG 21 2013
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Ca11 ►�
Dressings, Sauces and Oils
North America
Responsible Official Authorization
Kristine Kangas is duly authorized to act as the responsible official for the Cargill, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina facility.
J. Susan Haas
Operations & Supply Chain Leader, AVP
Cargill, Inc.

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit NCG060036 Effective: 12/01/12 Expiration: 10MI17 Owner : Cargill Inoorporated
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Cargill Incorporated
County: Mecidenburg 5000 South Blvd
Region: Mooresville
Chartotte NC 28217
Contact Person: Lucia Elwood Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-SHe Representative(s):
Related Pernd :
Inspection Date: 07/27/2017 Entry Time: 01:OOPM
Primary Inspector. Water Quality Program Medcenburg County
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certf icatlon:
Phone:
Exit Time: 03:30PM
Phone: [phone]
Zahid S Khan Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Foodrfobaoco/Soaps/Cosmetic s/Public Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit NCGO60036 Owner - Facility: Car9d) Ir- ported
Inspection Dade: 07/2712017 . Mspection Type: Complianoe Evaluation Reason for VFsit: RouuY ne
Inspection Summary:
: Cargill is located at 5000 South Boulevard on approximately 16.9 acres of property in Charlotte. Cargill specializes in the
manufacturing and packaging of various food products including dressings, sauces, and oils.
Previous stormwater inspections were conducted at Cargill by Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services on March 10,
2009 and October 28, 2013. During the previous site inspections, Cargill was observed to be in compliance with the City of
Charlotte Storm Water Pollution Control Ordinance and the General NPDES Storm Water Permit (NCG060000)
requirements_
During the recent site inspection on July 27, 2017, Cargill was observed to be in compliance with the City of Charlotte Storm
Water Pollution Control Ordinance and NPDES General Storm Water Permit (NCG060000) requirements.
Page: 2

perm t NCG060036 Owner - Facility: Cargil lnCOMOrahed
inspection Date: 07I27l2017 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for visit Routine
Stormwater Pollution Preventiori Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a 'Narrative Description of Practices'?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑ N ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stonnnrater Facility Inspection Program?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
0 ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) has been
prepared and implemented for Cargill.
It is recommended that the Cargill site map be updated since
the number of stonnwater outfalls has been recently revised.
A sodium hydroxide spill occurred on the Cargill property on
August 17, 2016.,
There were no non-stormwater discharges observed at the
outfalls during the site inspection.
All ASTs have secondary containment or drain to a spill Pond
that discharges to the facility's pretreatment system.
In addition to the SPPP, Cargill has a Spill Prevention.
Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan due to the volume of materials stored onsite.
The most recent emplaxee stormwater pollution prevention training was conducted for Cargill
employees on March 21.
2017.
The SPPP was updated in March 2017.
The recent semi-annual facil ins ections were conducted
on July 8. 2016 and January 1i. 2017_
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Page: 3

pern t NCG060036 Owner - Faciitty: Cargill Incorporated
inspection Date: 0712712017 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? 01100
Comment: The recent semimannual Qualitative monitoring was conducted
on September 26, 2016 and April 19. 2017.
Ana"cal Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
❑❑■❑
Comment: The recent semi-annual analytical monitorinq was conducted on September 26. 2016 and_Ao6l
19 2017. The recent
analytical results did not exceed the Permit Benchmarks.
Permit and Outfalla YMNg NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: NPDES General Permit NCG060036 expires on October 31
❑❑■❑
❑❑■❑
2017.
All stormwater outfalls were observed during the site inspection. Each of the outfalls appeared to
be in good condition: however, there was sediment accumulation observed at outfall 01. It is
reMmmended that the excess sediment be removed from outfall 01 to lower total suspended
solids (TSS) levels in the stormwater runoff from the property.
Page: 4

Ca g n-
Dressings,
North America
DEC, 06 2012
Sauces and Oils -
December 4, 2012
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Attn: Marcia Allocco, Environmental Chemist
Re: Stormwater Permit Compliance — Quantitative Sampling
Cargill, Inc, Charlotte, NC
NPDES Permit No. NCG060036
AEI Job No. N 198-11
Dear Ms. Allocco:
zloz 9 0 330
Cargill. Inc., located at 5000 South Blvd, Charlotte, NC, this letter is a follow-up to the recent telephone
conversation between Aware Environmental® Inc. (AET) and you regarding the facility's difficulty in
obtaining both the required monthly and semi-annual stormwater monitoring data. As we discussed,
Cargill has not been able to sample due to the timing of rain that has occurred at the site. The qualifying
storm events have either occurred during non -business hours, when a first flush cannot be sampled during
the first 30 minutes, or there has been less than 72 hours of "dry weather between rain events.
In accordance with our telephone conversation, at this point in time, if a sample cannot be obtained by the
end of the 2012 calendar year, the Mooresville Regional office of the NCDENR-DWQ would prefer to
see two sampling events in the first half of 2013, with at least 30 days between the two (2).
Cargill will collect samples at the next rainfall event(s) if possible. We appreciate your guidance on this
matter. If you we have misinterpreted you or you have any further recommendations on this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact us.
Si ,
ii
Ptic d A. Cavaliere
Facility Leader
cc: File
Frank Persinger, Cargill, Inc.
Aware Environmental, Inc
%++1097
Mailing Address: Location/Shipping Address: tel: [phone]
P.O. Box 240457 5000 South Boulevard Fax' 704-525-4510
Charlotte, NC 28224 Charlotte, NC 28217

C�ng►ll.
June 6, 2014
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
ATTENTION: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
To Whom It May Concern:
RECEIVE©
DIVISION of t ATER QUALITY
JUN 9 2014
,Wvp SEC7,f0N
MOORESVILLEOFFICE
'i'V1btuly V` LMU Mt8OURCEf
AND QUALITY SECTIOt j
3 % / P!�
JUN 10 2014
Attached are a completed original and one (1) copy of Cargill's Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Monitoring Report form from the stormwater sampling event conducted at our facility on May 15, 2014.
Since a stormwater sampling event could not be conducted for the period July 1 — October 31, 2012 due to
precipitation events occurring outside normal operating hours, weather permitting, Cargill will conduct an
additional sampling event during the second semi-annual stormwater sampling period in 2014. Please note that
the TSS samples during this sampling event were collected and analyzed within their holding times, but did
not have sufficient QA/QC recovery. Therefore, the samples were re -analyzed albeit outside their holding
time. The highest TSS values among these sample runs are being reported.
Sincerely,
Cargill Inc.
Kristine Kangas
Facility Leader
Attachments
Cc: Marcia Allocco — NCDENR Mooresville Regional
Dressings, Sauces and Oils PO Box 240457 Tel [phone]
North America Charlotte, NC 28224 Fax [phone]
5000 South Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28217

SEMI-ANNUAL STORMWATER DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG060000
Date submittedO—
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG060036 %C� �',�SAM
FACILITY NAME Cargill Inc "Y7 ✓G�/ FACI
COUNTY Mecklenburg'�r, `i
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Frank Persiniter _% ODISC
LABORATORY Shealy Environmental Inc Lab Cert. # 3299
o,
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results-
COLLECTION YEAR 2014
ACTIVITIES INCLUDE Icheck all that apply):
Ameats ❑ use animal fats/byproducts
A
GING TO SALTWATERS7 ❑YES ®NO
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON THE REVERSE 4
Total event rainfall 1 0. 60 in. or i1 No dischome this period
Outfall No.
Sample Collected,
mo/dd/ r
TSS,
mg/L
pH,
Standard units
COD, -_%
mg/L
'v, oil and Grease,
mg/L
Fecal Coliform ,
Colonies per 100 ml
Enterococci ,
Colonies per 100 ml
Benchmark
-
100 or 50
Within 6.0 — 9.0
120
30
1000
500
SW001
05/15/14
6.7
7.10
13
<4.8
---
--
SW003
05/15/24
6.0
7.40
16
<4.8
---
---
SWO04
05/15/14
5.3
1 7.10
<10
0.9
---
---
SWO05
05/15/14
6.6
7.10
11
<5.3
-
Only applies to facilities that use/process meats.
The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge.
a For sampling periods with no discharge at any outfalls. You must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
°See General Permit text, Table 3, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month?[] yes ®no (if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new motor oil/month.
outfall No.
Sample Collected,
mo/dd/yr
oil and Grease,
mg/L
TSS,
mg/L
pH,
Standard units
New Motor Oil Usage,
Annual average gal/mo
Benchmark
-
30
100 or 50
6.0-9.0
-
1 Only applies to facilities that use/process meats.
The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge,
3 For sampling periods with no discharge at any outfalls, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
4See General Permit text, Table 3, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 W U-249 Lust Revised: October 18, 2012
Page l of 2

;`FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER i REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an oriainal and one copy of this DMR, Including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results for at end of
monitoring eriod In the case o "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Sigy ature of Pe
6 /1/ L/
(Date)
Additional copies of this form may be downloaded at: htt ortal.ncdenr.or web w ws su n dessw#tab-4
S W U-249
Last Revised; October 18, 2012
Page 2 of 2

Ai'L�A.
RCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Govemor Director
Mr. Jody House, Plant Manager
Cargill, Inc.
5000 South Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28217
Subject
Dear Mr. House:
January 5, 2010
Stormwater Monitoring Results
Cargill, Inc.
Stormwater Permit COC NCG060036
Mecklenburg County, NC.
Dee Freeman
Enclosed are the monitoring results from the laboratory analyses performed on the discharge from
Stormwater Outfai1003 at the subject facility. The samples analyzed were grab samples collected
during the sampling investigation performed on October 12, 2009, by Heather Sorensen of Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Storm Water Services. This sampling investigation was conducted as part of a cooperative
working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality. In addition, the
sampling investigation was conducted on behalf of the City of Charlotte in compliance with the City's
NPDES Permit, NCS000240,. Part II Section H.
The enclosed monitoring results indicate that the stormwdter discharged on October 12, 2009, contained
an elevated concentration of Chemical Oxygen Demand and Fecal Coliform compared with the
benchmark values contained in Stormwater general permit NCG060000. Please review the requirements
of your stormwater permit and take the required steps/actions to reduce the concentration of Chemical
Oxygen Demand and Fecal Coliform leaving.your site. Through the development and implementation
of stormwater management programs it is the Division of Water Quality's expectation that stormwater
discharges at industrial sites covered by NPDES stormwater permits do not impact receiving waters.
The enclosed results should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions concerning the
sampling results or have any questions regarding your permit, please do not hesitate to contact Ms.
Marcia Allocco of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs, Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
cc: Stormwater Permitting Unit Rusty Rozzelle, Mecklenburg County
Craig Miller, City of Charlotte
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite K1 Mooresville, NC 28115 ��0 On .
Phone: [phone] Fax: (704) 66UO401 Customer service: l-B77-623-6748 1V O1�7Ca�Ol1 lc`i
Internet: w".ncwaterquality.org ]%
An Equal Opportunity+ AffiirmaUve Action Employer - 5E% Recycled. t0% Post Consumer paper N17A AY

ANALYTICAL RESULTS SHEET
Name of Facility: Cargill, Inc.
Grab: Composite: ❑
Sample Date(s): 10-12-2009
NPDES Permit No.: NCG060036
Sample Location: SDO#003
County. Mecklenburg
Temperature
18.46`C
Fecal coliform (CFU/100 mL)
4,000"
Dissolved Oxygen
5.98 mg/L
E. Coli (MPN/100 mL)
520
Conductivity
20 ps/cm
Enterococcus (MPN/100 mL)
520
pH
7.19
Ammonia -nitrogen (NH3-N)
< 0.10 mg/L
Turbidity
60
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
1.3 mg/L
Biological Oxygen Demand, 5-day
(BOD5)
14
Nitrate/Nitrite-nitrogen (NO2 and NO3)
0.33 mg/L
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
130*
Total Phosphorus (P)
0.63 mg/L
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
11
Chromium (Cr)
< 5.0 pg/L
Total Sediment Concentration
18
Copper (Cu)
8.4 pg/L
Oil & Grease
< 5.0
Lead (Pb)
< 5.0 pg/L
Zinc (Zn)
< 10 pg/L
' denotes an exceedance of the permit benchmark values

V
4-1—
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Jody House, Plant Manager
Cargill, Inc.
5000 South Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28217
Dear Mr. House:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
April 1, 2009
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Cargill, Inc.
Stormwater Permit COC NCGO60036
Mecklenburg County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on March 10, 2009, by Heather Sorensen and Craig Miller of Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, and Marcia Allocco of North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources. This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement
between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality. In addition, the inspection was
conducted on behalf of the City of Charlotte in compliance with the City's NPDES Permit, NCS000240,
Part II Section H. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection.
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Overall, the permittee's Stormwater program was well developed and implemented and this Office
commends the permittee's efforts to ensure compliance with your NPDES permit. As noted in the report,
please keep the Mooresville Regional Office abreast of your ongoing efforts and sampling results as you
work to reduce the contaminants noted during the recent stormwater sampling events at the facility.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions
concerning this report or have any questions regarding your permit, please do not hesitate to contact Ms.
Marcia Allocco of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Enclosure
cc: NPS-ACO Unit
Rusty Rozzelle, Mecklenburg County
Craig Miller, City of Charlotte
Mark Fox, Cargill, Inc.
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 One
Phone: [phone] fax: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623.6748 NoTthC rolina
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org ��tl{raCC�
An Equal Opporainiiy 1 Affirmative AdmEmployer- 50% Recyded/1()% Post Consumer paper

0
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060036 Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Cargill Incorporated
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Cargill Incorporated
County: Mecklenburg 5000 S Blvd
Region: Mooresville
Charlotte NC 28217
Contact Person: Jody House Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 03/10/2009 Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Primary inspector: Water Quality Program Meckenburg County Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspectors):
Marcia Atlocco Phone: [phone] Ext.2204
Reason for inspection: Routine Inspection Type! Compliance Evaluation
Permit_ Inspection Type: Food/TobaccolSoapslCosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant rl Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

r
Permit: NGG060036 Owner -Facility: Cargill incorporated
Inspection Date: 03/1012009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Facility Description:
Cargill, Inc. refines, bleaches, hydrogenates, fractionates, deodorizes, and packages vegetable cooking oil, salad oils,
shortening, and margarine. Most outdoor operations and the facility's tank farm, are reportedly contained by the facility's
spill basin and stormwater control system. This system is designed to convey any spilled materials and stormwater to a
spill pond or to the facility's on -site Wastewater Treatment System. The facility has a wastewater permit from
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities, WQ0017321, which expires on 2128110. The facility operates 24 hours a day, seven days
a week. Allied Waste disposes of spent clay, mechanical ash, and solid waste. Full Circle recycles fly ash. Soap stock,
spent clay, spent catalyst, and distillate are all recycled. Vehicle washing is conducted in areas that drain to the on -site
wastewater pretreatment system. Vehicle maintenance does not occur on site.
Compliance History:
On March 23, 2005, a Compliance Inspection was conducted at the facility by Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Program.
On April 20, 2005, a vegetable oil emulsion discharged from the facility due to a failed plate seal in a stormwater catch
basin. Approximately 10,000 gallons was flushed through the storm drain system. A State Notice of Violation was issued
on May 5, 2005. (NOV-2005-DV-0023).
On March 10, 2006, a stormwater inspection was completed and on March 23, 2006, compliance stormwater sampling
was conducted. A State Notice of Violation was issued on May 22, 2006, due to elevated concentrations above the
associated cut-off concentrations in the general permit. (NOV-2006-PC-0191).
On August 16, 2006, a sodium hydroxide spill occurred due to a leak in the wastewater pond that was holding rainwater.
The product reached a tributary of Little Hope Creek.
Industrial Operations/City of Charlotte Stormwater Ordinance Review
Maintenance Shop/Storage Building —
During the inspection, three open-ended pipes were observed originating from the Maintenance Shop/Storage Building.
Two pipes were confirmed historical pipes with no connections on the inside of the building. No floor drains were
observed inside the building. The facility shall confirm the connection of the third pipe and remove any illicit connections.
Air Compressor Room — This room is attached to the east side of the laboratory building. This room is enclosed and not
exposed to stormwater. The bleed off from the air compressors discharge to an area outside that drains to the -
wastewater treatment system. Heavy oil staining was observed on the outside wall of the air compressor room that is
exposed to storm water and drains to South Boulevard. No standing product was observed outside of the building. The
facility shall contain and ensure proper disposal of all pollutants.
Storm Drain Outfall #005 —
This outfall drains a grassy area in the northeast comer of the property. Erosion was evident along the fence line of the
outfall. The facility should maintain the outfall to prevent further erosion.
Storm Drain Outfall #001 —
This outfall drains the southern part of the property and the lot east of the Packaging Warehouse. Approximately 20% of
the outfall pipe was filled with sediment. The facility should maintain the outfall to prevent blockages.
Page: 2

Permit: NCGO60036 Owner - Facility: Cargill Incorporated
Inspection Date: 03/10/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
n
n n
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
n
n n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
n
n n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
n
n n
# Does the Plan include a fist of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
n
n n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
n
n n
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
n
n n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
n
n n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
Cl
n n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
n
n n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
n
n n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
n
n n
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
n
n n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
n
n n
Comment: Employee training was conducted on 5/20/06, 5/22107, and 5/20108.
The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan was reviewed and updated on 7108 and in
2007.
Stormwater facility inspections were conducted on 11/7/07, 12/27/07, 1/10/08, 2/21/08,
3/4108, 4115/08, 5/19/08, 6/10/08, 712/08, 8/20/08, 9/9/08, 10/21/08, 1114108, 12/10/08,
1/16/09, and 2/27/09.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA Nt
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Qualitative Monitoring was conducted on 1110/08, 12/11/08, 12/10/08, and
1/28/09. Facility staff commented that no monitoring was documented in 2007 due to
severe drought conditions.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ n n n
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ n ■ n
Page: 3

It
I
Permit: NGG060036 Owner -Facility: Cargill Incorporated
Inspection Date: 0311012009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment: Analytical sampling was conducted on 1/10/08, 3/4/08, 12/10/08, and
1/28109. Outfall #003 is in Tier Two sampling due to COD, TSS, and pH. Outfalls #
001, 004, and 005 are in Tier One sampling due to pH. Outfalls # 004 and 005 were
added in July of 2008.
Please keep the Mooresville Regional Office updated on future stormwater sampling
results at the facility as the permittee works to reduce contaminants in the stormwater
discharges on site.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ Q n fl
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■nnn
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? n n ■ n
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: Non-stormwater certification was conducted on 7/2/08.
Page- 4

Ilk
C�^illr
Dressings, Sauces and Oils
North America
April 17, 2009
Division of water Quality
Mooresville fbgional offioe
610 East tenter Avenue, -%ite 301
Mooresville, NC28115
Dear Mrs. Ad Iocco,
APR 2 0 2009
Dy Q-SU'Tf0Ce v%'Lie ` Lii�iL 1,on
I am sending this letter in referenoe of updating the contact information. Mark Fox is the Plant manager
and the contact person for C br jll, Inc at Charlotte, NC Could you please make the changes on your
paperwork? If you have any questions or concernsfeel free to call me, Frank Persinger, at 704-523-0414.
�h ks,
Fr J si�nger
Mailing Address: Location/Shipping Address: Tel: [phone]
P.O. Box 240457 5000 South Boulevard Fax.- 704-525-4510
Charlotte, NC 28224 Charlotte, NC 28217

cir'gor
Dressings,
North America
April 17,2009
Marcia,
Sauces and Oils
APR 2 0 2!2nq
,%j
M-Sudoce Wbtef Pic;I&W-IiOn
I am sending you a copy of the report that was sent to Pdeigh for the month of March 2009.
There was no flow during normal operating hoursfor stormwater sample collection for the month of
March 2009.
Rank Persinger
Mailing Address: LocatiofvShipping Address: Tel.- 704-523-0414
P.O. Box 240457 5000 South Boulevard Fax., 704-525-4510
Charlotte, NC 28224 Charlotte, NC 28217

Ca Ih
Dressings, Sauces and Oils
North America
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Staction
Attention: Cbntral Files
1617 Mail SaNce Cbnter
Rdeigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
To whom it concerns:
Attached isa completed original and one (1) copy of Car jIf's 4orn water Discharge Outfall
(SDO) Monitoring Fbport form. There was no flow during normal operating hoursfor storrrwater sample
collection for the month of March 2DO9.
9naerely,
Mark Fox
Rant Manager
Attachment
Ct-- Frank Persinger
&iSCt)ordinator
Marling Address: Location/Shipping Address: Tel: [phone]
P.O. Box 240457 5000 South Boulevard Fax: [phone]
Charlotte, NC 28224 Charlotte, NC 28217

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
April 14, 2009
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
ATTENTION: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
To Whom It May Concern:
Attached is a completed original and one (1) copy of Cargill's Stormwater Discharge Outfall
(SDO) Monitoring Report form. There was "no flow" during normal operating hours for
stormwater sample collection for the month of March 2009.
Sincerely,
Cargill
Frank Pers' geir
Environme � Coordinator
Attachments
cc: Carol Hambridge, AEI

GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG060036
FACILITY NAME Cargill Inc
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES NA
CERTIFIED LABORATORY NA
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2009
(This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
COUNTY Mecklenburg
PHONE NO. ( 704 ) 523.0414
Lab # NA
Lab #
PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE 4
D
:Sti am le
' .Collected
0 &�r.-
7-111'11-"V��,311P` I "r 0
q 3011(19---or
0 04 OW,
-��,Stan ar&units1,--V
d
nj) emand,�-,-
Oill---'andi rease'
0 F'!"'ltrC `1
��-Xolonfesi penIU0
'Benchmark
171`.1`�)With616A'- 9.0"
P��,4, t-420't
003
March 2009
NS
NS
NS
NS
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the --benchmark -range foxpH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? — yes X no
(if yes, complete Part 13)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity Monitoring Requirements
'00.46M
"
l''I
TOal'Su�6�dS6]1d,
`""""I
orOilUsapge
i'2
ZM0
ng
Standr&,ddits-
aavera a
`30-"
1� 2
6 0� 9.0'
nc
Note- If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Date (first event sampled) NO FLOW DURING NORMAL FACILITY OPERATING HOURS
Total Event Precipitation (inches): NA
Date — (list each additional event sampled this reporting period and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-'1617
SWU-249-102107
Paue 1 of 2

..STORMWATERDISCHARGE OUTFALL;(SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2009
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG060036 (This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME Cargill Inc COUNTY Mecklenburg
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES NA PHONE NO. (-704 ) 523-0414
CERTIFIED LABORATORY NA Lab# NA
Lab # PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
rt
V; ,,-?,T,:-0Q4Q 0
00340
V05
1'6
0-1 Sfts&nd;WPij.."�'
F�'s So I i d s;
H'
nd rd'
Ch'e'm"'Ica Xygep:,
'd
F "'t C fif
-------------
00
003
March 2009
NS
NS
NS
NS
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? — yes X no
(if yes, complete Part 13)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activit Monitoring Requirements
V
'4661"Suspended� -V
"Solids�
0 '. 0 0 4 0'
'Stfibd­fd;umts!tkJr-. ;'
New-� otor1)rip,
M""
uaimr ge
A
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Date (first event sampled) NO FLOWDURING NORMAL FACILITY OPERATING HOURS
Total Event Precipitation (inches): NA
Date — (list each additional event sampled this reporting period and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches): -
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
SWU-249-102107
Pace I of 2

Cargill NCB 060036
Subject: Cargill NCG060036
From: "Sorensen, Heather" [e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:27:13 -0500
To: "Marcia Allocco" <[e-mail]>
Marcia,
Attached is an introduction to Cargill's SPPP.
SDO 003 is in Tier 2, SDO 001, 004, and 005 are all in Tier 1.
SDO 002 was diverted to their onsite WWTP after an oil spill in 2006.
Craig Miller with City of Charlotte will also be attending the inspection. I will be driving him to the
inspection. My truck only seats two. If you would like to car pool from Hal Marshall let me know and I'll
arrange for a larger vehicle, otherwise we can meet at the facility at 9:00 a.m.
Respectfully,
Heather Sorensen
Environmental Specialist
Mecklenburg County Government
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Office: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: Heather. Sorensen(d->MecklenbungCountyNC.gov
0 Please consider the environment before printing this email.
t { Content -Description: Cargill SPPP 03-09.pdf
,Cargill SPPP 03-09.pdf ! Content -Type: applicationloctet-stream
Content -Encoding: base64
1 of 1 3/9/2009 2.05 PM

3PAav
1(p oa(-eCA.)
CY4
Section 1.0
Introduction
Ca 'ni' t�.
.. ... .. ... . .. .....
1.1 BACKGROUND
In November 1990.. the; United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) promulgated
regulations covering stormwater discharges from industrial facilities. Many manufacturing
facilities that discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity were required to apply for
a permit under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). On July 31.
1992, the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) issued 13 General
NPDES Permits for stormwater discharges from various industrial activities.
Cargill Inc. in Charlotte, North Carolina (Cargill) refines, bleaches, hydrogenates, fractionates,
deodorizes, and packages vegetable cooking oil, salad oils, shortening and margarine. The
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code for this type of industry is 2079. A North
Carolina NPDES General Permit, NCGO60000 (General Permit), was developed for stormwater
discharges associated with industrial activity in the SIC.20 category. A copy of the current
General Permit is attached in SWP3 Appendix 1.
Cargill applied for the General Permit by submitting a Notice of Intent (NOT) to the NCDEM
on September 17, 1992. Under the terms of the permit, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWI33) must be developed and implemented within twelve (12) months of the effective date of
the certificate of coverage issued pursuant to the General Permit and updated thereafter on an
annual basis. The effective date of the certificate of coverage for Cargill's permit was May 28.
1993_ A copy of Cargill`s Certificate of Coverage (COC) and initial NOT is included in SWP?
Appendix 1. Cargill's General Permit was renewed and became effective on November 1,
2007. CarIIill's current General Permit will expire October 31, 2012.
1.2 SCOPE OF WORK
The purpose of this plan shall be to identify potential sources of pollution that may reasonably
be expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharge associated with industrial activity at
Cargill. In addition. this plan shall describe the implementation of practices that are to be used
to reduce or eliminate pollutants in the stormwater and to assure compliance with the terms and
conditions of the General Permit.
The SWP3 includes an evaluation of the facility to determine potential pollutant sources, the
identification of appropriate Best Management Practices (BIMPs), and the establishment of spill
prevention and response. good housekeeping and preventive maintenance procedures and
training schedules.
1.3 COORDENATION WITH OTHER PLANS
Cargill Inc. has both a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan and a Facility
Response Plan (FRP) in effect. These plans were developed under 40 CFR 112 for the
prevention of and response to potential oil releases from the facility.
SWP3 I camill [tic.
PAN 1981,198-1 h2008 One Plan docs,SWP3 update 2008.do,: lull 2008

The most significant potential pollutant from the facility is vegetable coil and the SPCC and FRP
plans thoroughly address the prevention of oil spills. Consequently. there is substantial overlap
between the SWP„ SPCC and FRP. The SPCC and FRP documents are bound together into a
single notebook. The SWP, incorporates several sections of the SPCCIFRP by reference .
1.4 POLLUTION PREVENTION TEAM
A primary objective of the SWP3 is to identify a specific individual or individuals within the
plant to be members of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Team. The team is responsible for
developing the plan and assisting the facility or plant manager in implementation, maintenance,
and revision of the plan. The activities and responsibilities of the team shall address all aspects
of the facility's SWP3.
The teams general duties are as follows:
1. Determine and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent
stormwater contamination
2. Conduct regular inspections to verify BIND implementation
3. Collect stormwater data
4. Revise the SVi+P3 as needed
Table 1-1 contains a roster of the Pollution Prevention Team, indicating the: name and
responsibilities of each team member.
SW113 2 Cargill Inc.
P.\N198\I98-t 1l3008 One Plan docs\SWP3 update 2008.doc Julys 2008

Table I -I
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Team
NAME
POSITION
RESPONSIBILITIES
Mark Fox
Plant Manager
• Signatory authority
• Coordinate all phases of SWP3
Frank Persinger
Environmental Coordinator
development and implementation
• Maintain records
• Update SWP3
• Spill Prevention and Response
• Coordinate stormwater monitoring
• Conduct inspections
Clay McClellan
Plant Engineer
9 Provide technical assistance to the
Environmental Coordinator
• Spill Prevention and Response
SW P3 I Cargill Inc.
P:1\ 1981198-102008 One Plan doc.s\SWP3 update 2008.doc July 2008

Section 2.0
Site assessment
2.1 FACILITY DESCRIPTION
The Cargill facility primarily includes process/production areas, office, parking lot.
warehouse areas. a wastewater treatment plant and crude oil tank farm. A strip of
property running east west previously owned by Acme Southern Inc_ (Acme;) has been
acquired by Cargill and currently houses the plant maintenance building. The
wastewater treatment area, crude oil tank farm, and open material storage areas
comprise the portion of Cargill property north of the maintenance building. The
processlproduction area, offices, warehouses, parking lots and truck loading/unloading
areas are located south of the maintenance building.
Facility drainage and site maps are contained in Section 1.9 of the Facility Response
Plan.
2.2 GENERAL LOCATION AND SITE :MAPS AND DRAINAGE
Figure 12 is a general location map, developed using a USGS topographic map of
Charlotte. North Carolina. This map shows the facility's location in relation to
transportation routes and surface waters, the name of the receiving water, to which the
stormwater outfalls discharge, and the latitude and longitude of the points of discharge.
A site drainage neap of Cargill was developed as Figure 1. The drainage areas include
the portions of the facility engaged in industrial activity, having a potentially significant
impact on stormwater discharge front the site. The facility consists of approximately
16.7 acres. Approximately 47% of the site is designed for drainage from spills,
stormwater and process wastewater to he collected in a system of spill ponds and
diversionary pumps providing pretreatment from these areas in the on -site wastewater
treatment prior to discharge to the local CMUD sanitary sewer. The areas where
stormwater is collected and treated are referenced to W WTa-ww,rr on the facility site
drainage map, Figure 1 _ The facility has taken the approach of collecting and treating
stormwater from these areas to significantly reduce the risk of discharging stormwater
pollutants. Drainage including spill containment is described in detail in Section 1.7.3
of the FRP.
Figure 2 is a schematic of the spill containment/diversionary system.
2.3 'RECEIVING STREAMS
The Cargill facility discharges a portion of stormwater to tributaries of impaired
streams.~ Outfall 001 discharges to Kings Branch then flows to Sugar Creek. which is
impaired for biological integrity, turbidity, and fecal coliforms according to the 2006
final 303-d list. Outfalls 003, 004, and 005 discharge to the N-lecklenburg Storm Sewer
along South Boulevard, which discharges to an unnamed tributary of Little Sugar Creek.
Little Sugar Creek is also impaired for biological integrity and fecal coliforms
Stet': 4 Cargiii Inc.
P:`,N198,198-11\2008 Onc Plan docs15WP3 Updare 2003.doc July 2W8

according to the 2006 final 303-d list. Both Sugar Creek and Little Sugar Creek have
TMDLs established for fecal colifornis as of March 2002, Figure 13. contained in
Section 1.9 of the Facility Response Plan shows the location of the Cargill facility with
respect to the impaired streams in the area.
2.4 iNIATERIAL INVE\TORY
The Permit requires that only those significant materials, which may be expected to
contribute to contamination of stormwater discharges, be addressed in the SWP3.
The Permit defines "significant materials" as including. but is not limited to the
following: ~
raw materials, fuels, materials such as solvents (detergents, and plastic pel-lets),
finished materials such as metallic products, raw materials used in food
processing or production, hazardous substances designated under Section 141(14)
of CERCLA, any chemical the facility is required to report pursuant to Section
313 of Title III of SARA., fertilizers. pesticides, and waste products (Such as
ashes, slag and sludge that have the potential to be released with stormwater
discharges).
Material Inventories are contained in Appendix H of the FRP.
The significant materials at Cargill are exposed to stormwater primarily by activities
such as material storage, and material loading/unloading. The following sections
provide narrative descriptions of the various activities by which significant materials are
exposed. to stormwater during everyday operation and could potentially contribute to
stormwater contamination at Cargill.
2.5 OUTDOOR STORAGE ACTIVITIES
Crude, vegetable and scrap oils are raw materials and products, which are stored in
aboveground carbon steel tanks located in Drainage Areas WWTa, WWTb, WWTe, WWTd
and WWTe.
Phosphoric acid and sodium hypochlorite (bleach) are two liquid wastewater treatment
chemicals stored in aboveground storage tanks in Drainage Area WWTe. These materials have
the potential of stormwater contamination if a leak or spill occurs during tank filling or during
transfer (pumping) of the product. The runoff around these tanks is diverted to wastewater
treatment by draining to the Tank Farm Spill Pond.
Spent clay and coal is periodically stored in drainage area WWTf, located east of the Tank
Farm Spill Pond. Direct contact of these materials with stormwater runoff could potentially
result in stormwater contamination. A trash pump with float controls pumps runoff to the tank -
farm spill pond then through to the wastewater treatment system.
2.6 LOADING AND UNLOADING ACTIVITIES
The loadinglunloading dock in Drainage Area I receives all rate materials except for those on
8WP3 j caraill lnc.
P:'-.N198l198.1 I;2009 One Ku does SWP3 update 2008.doc July 2COS

incoming tanker trucks or railcars. Product oils are also handled and shipped from this dock.
All materials in this area are packaged in Foxes, sealed plastic containers, drums, etc.
Various raw and product oils are loaded and unloading throughout the facility. Tanker trucks
routinely transport oils through Drainage Area WWTc and onto scales in Drainage Area L
Section 1.4.1 of the FRP and Section 112.7(h) of the SPCC Plan address loading and unloading
of bulk materials. Also, trash dumpsters in Drainage Area WWTc could potentially contribute
solid or liquid contamination to stormwater. All stormwater in drainage area WWTc drains to
Pend 7.5. Overflow from pond 7.5 is routed either to Tank A 700 or to Pend 7.
Desvatered biological sludge generated from the WWT system is loaded onto trucks in Drainage
Area III and disposed off -site. Direct stormwater contact with the sludge could potentially
cause total suspended solids contamination of the runoff. The sludge loading area is completely
covered to minimize stormwater contact.
2-7 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT REQL IRENIENTS
The Stormwater General Permit requires a schedule to provide secondary containment for bull;
storage of liquid: materials, storage of "reportable" SARA Section 313 Water Priority
Chemicals, and hazardous materials listed in 40 CFR Part 116 to prevent leaks and spills from
contaminating stormwater.
Cargill provides sufficient secondary containment for all non -hazardous bulk liquid storage
(vegetable oil. crude oil, etc.). Cargill drainage areas contain phosphoric acid and sodium
hypochlorite (bleach) which are hazardous materials. These aboveground storage tanks are
located within the drainage area of the Tank Farm Spill Pond (Drainage Area WWTe). The
pond is pumped to the on -site wastewater pre-treatment plant. Therefore, the Tank Farm Spill
Pond serves as secondary containment for the phosphoric acid and sodium hypochlorite storage
tanks. Refer to Sections 1.4.3 - Analysis of a Potential Oil Spill and, 1.7,3 - Containment and
Drainage Planning.
8 EROSION CONTROL
The area east of the Tank Farm Spill Pond in Drainage Area III could potentially contribute
sediment or TSS to the stormwater runoff through Outfall SW003. This area is comprised of
silt with same gravel and fly ash with virtually no vegetation. Presently, a silt fence and gravel
filter surrounds the Outfall SW003 catch basin to filter out suspended Solids picked up by
stormwater runoff. In addition, the OiW separator through which the runoff flows before
exiting through Outfall SWO03 is cleaned on a monthly basis in order to remove deposited silt
and other particulate matter which could be captured during the first flush of the representative
stormwater sampling event leading to results recorded above benchmark concentration levels.
Storrnwater Outfall SWO04 conveys roof runoff from the south side of the plant maintenance
building, Drainage Area IV, (formerly the ACME building) to a storm drain located in the
parking lot of the maintenance building. Outfall SWO05 receives stormwater from Drainage
Area V. which includes roof runoff front the north side of the plant maintenance building.
Flow through the Drainage Area to Outfall SWO05 is filtered by a grass filter strip prior to
discharge to the City storm drainage system,
SWP3 6 Cargill Inc.
P:\N19St198-t 1t2(X)8 One Plan docASWP3 update 2003.doc July 2008

2.9 DUST OR PARTICULATE GENERATING ACTIVITIES
Apart from diatomaceous earth used in the refining process and particulates captured by the
baghouse of the coal-fired boiler there are no other dust or particulate generating activities at
the facility.
2.10 WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES
There is no on -site wastes disposal at the Cargill site.
2.11 VEHICLE (MAINTENANCE
No on -site vehicle maintenance takes place at the Cargill facility. Spills of oil from trucks in
the load ingfunloadirig area are rinsed with hot eater which drains to Spill Pond 7 and is
pumped to the onsite WWT.
2.12 STORMWATER DATA
Table 2-1 is a summary of stormwater data collected at Cargill. This data is used to evaluate
BMP effectiveness.
2.13 SIGNIFICANT LEAKS & SPILLS
According to the General Permit. "significant spills" include, but are not limited to, releases of
rail or hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities under Section 311 of the Clean
Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.10 and 117.21) or Section 102 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response. Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) (Ref: 44 CFR 302.4),
Reportable quantities are set amounts of substances in pounds, gallons, or other units and are
listed under the column heading "Final RT in 40 CFR Parts 117 and 302. Releases of oil are
considered reportable if the quantity spilled causes a visible sheen or discoloration of the
receiving stream.
A list of hazardous substances and reportable quantities is included as Appendix FRP - A --
'.EP.4 Regulations". The hazardous substances and reportable quantities applicable to Cargill
are summarized in Appendix FRP - H - Material Inventoq. Releases are defined to include
any spilling, leaking, pumping. pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping,
leaching, dumping, or disposing into the environment.
A record of significant spills or leaks of pollutants that have occurred is maintained in Section
1.4.4 of the FRP. This list also includes spills or leaks of non -hazardous substances that may
exert a negative impact on stormwater runoff.
2.14 NON-STORIIWATER DISCHARGE CERTIFICATION
Each permitted stormwater outfall was evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges.
A copy of the non-stormwater discharge evaluation and certification is attached in SWP3
Appendix 2.
2.13 POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCE SUtiIMARY
Based on outdoor storage activities, loading and unloading operations, past spills and leaks, and
areas with soil erosion,4a list of potentially significant materials that are handled, treated, stored
S1VT3 7 Cary i I I l uc.
P.;N198';t98-1 l z2U08 one Plan docs',SWP3 update 3008.doc July 2009

stored or disposed in a manner to allow exposure to stormwater was compiled. Potential
pollutant sources (located in the areas that drain to one of the permitted oulfalls) are
summarized in Table 2-2.
The relative significance and risk of each potential pollutant source is based on the following
criteria:
Toxicity of the chemical, quantity of substance, the likelihood of contact with
sturmwater. existing material management practices currently employed to minimize
contact with stormwater run-off. existing control treasures to reduce pollutants entering
stormwater runoff, and the history of significant leaks or spills of pollutants.
SWP3 8 Car -ill Inc.
PAN198kJ98-I 112008 One Plan docslSWP3 update 2008.ctoc July 2008

Table 2-1
Stormwater Data Summary
Prior to 1997
Parameter
Swool
MV002
SWO03
H1 10i94
10/4/95
t1110194
1014/95
11/10/94
10/4i95
O&G (me/1)
8.4
NS
N'S
NS
N5
C 1
9.01
NS
NS
NS
NS
6.5
TSS (nt4/1)
9
NS
NS
NS
NS
852
SOD (mgil)
1 I
NS
NS
NS
NS
9
COD (rng'])
25
NS
NS
NS
NS
188
Under Permit Effective 9-1-97 to 8-31-02
Parameter
Wool
SWO02
S► O03
Cut Oft Lev
6128/00
8115102
6/28/00 ; 8/15r`02
4i25i0t 8/15/02
O&.G (Mg/1)
< 1
< 5
2.4 < 5
6.6
H•(S.u.)
6.84
7.02
6.73 6.41
7.45 6.86
6-9
TSS (mall)
9
8
< 1 38
87 ! 68
100
COD
27
74
36 68
73 1 41
12Q
Under Permit Effective 9-1-02 to 8-31-07
Parameter SW001 SW002*
SWO03
Cut Off Level
0&-G (ntell)
i
30
H (S.u_)
6-9
TSS (me11)
(
100
COD 1
!
120
FSWO02 rernoved front service in 2006
Under Permit Effective 11-1-07 to 10-31-12
Parameter
SW001
SNVO03
SWO04
SWO05
Cut Off Level
1/10/2008
1/10/2008
3/4/2008
314/2008
O&G (rrtgll)
7.2
13.2
<5
7.2
30
Pit (s.u.)
•6.2
7
6.8
7
6-9
TSS (mgi1)
43
420
2
1.3
100
COD
54
614
< 25
< 25
121)
Storm Data Sutntnary
Date
Total Precipitation (in.)
I Total Rainfall (hrs)
1 M 0194
0.26
I' 14.5
10104/95
1.7
9
06/28/00
0. 72
2.75
08/15/02
0.4
0.92
04'25101
0.3
7.5
0I110/08
0.6
1.5
03,'0 €i0R
?.8
9.75
SWP3 9 Cargill Inc.
V3 N 198`.198-1112008 One Plan clocslSWP3 update `200S.doc July 2008

. Ale 2-2
Potential Pollutant Sources
DRAINAGE
AREA
MATERIAL
LOCATION
POTENTIAL
POLLUTANTS
CONTROLS AND MEASURES
1
various oils, chemicals
Truck scales, loading flock
O&C,
Spill response cquipmew €n warellouse
to block s€ormdrains
Oil
Air compressor
O&G
lnspection/Niaintenaltce
11
Ammonia
Northwest side of ►varehouse
NI1,-Nitrogen
Indoors
III
Silt (Topsoil) Gravcl
Area east of'rank Farm Spill Pond
TSS
Oil water separator at 0w hll SW003
Spent clay pad is bermed with
stormwater collectedand pumped to
WWT
Spent Clay
Concrete pad east of "rank farm
Sell[ POtrd
O&G. TSS
IV
Ilaved Area
Sotntt Sidi of new maintenance
building
Low, no storage or
industrial activity
V
DMatcred Sludge
Sludge Dewatering Building
TSS, BOD, COD
Grass Filter Strip
Silt (Topsail, pr:€vel fines)
Area north of Nlaimenance [building
TSS
WWTa-WWTC
Crude. oil
Crude Oil Tank Tartu
(T'miks 001-006)
O&G
Drains to watstowatur treatment
Phosphoric acid
Tank 983
'ratan phosphorous, pli
Sulfuric Acid
Tank 901
PH
Sodium hypochlorite
Tank 913
cl.
Sodium Hydroxide.
"Tank 902,903
P11
Scrap oil
Tank 915
(:)&G
S W I'3 10 Car,il I Inc.
P:IN198\l98-t l\2W8 One Plan docslSW]13 update 2008.doc J€€ly 2009

Table 2-2 - Continued
Crude coconut oil
Crude Oil
Railcar Unloading
R/R Unloading Pump Station
O&G
O&G
Trash
Compacter
TSS, O&G, BOD, COD
Oakite Soap (covered)
+ Nickel Storage
Inside Shop
Itigh pH
1nd«ors
Metals
VI
Chemical drum and tote Storage'
area
Inside Shop
pH, COD, Tuxicity
NO'1'E?5:
O&G —
Oil and Grease
Cl
Chlorine
TSS _
' ouil Suspended Solids
BOD -
Biochmnical Oxygen Dem-mid
COD =
C1lenllcal Oxygen Denvuld
R/R =
Railroad
SWP3 1 j Cargill lite.
P:\N198\198-1 11200$ One Plan docs\SWP3 update 2008.doc July 2008

Section 3.0
Stormwater Management Plan
The Storniwater Management Plan is aimed at minimizing the release of significant materials to
stormwater outfalls. The Stormwater Managernent Plan includes best management practices
(BMPs) such as follows:
• Collection, treatment and discharge of stormwater from process areas, where treated
stormwater is discharged to the local city POTW.
• Oil water separation of stormwater
• Preventative maintenance
• Good housekeeping
• A spill plan
• Inspections of load in=.!unloading procedures
• Trainin- and drills.
3.1 FEASIBILITY STUDY
The vast majority of potential stormwater contamination at Cargill is from the
process/production area. In lieu of elimination of exposure of operations to stormwater, the
facility has developed a complex system of collecting and treating stormwater from areas of
potential contamination from exposure_ This rainwater is collected and treated by the WWT
system. Significant capital and operating costs are associated with treating this stormwater.
However, eliminating stormwater exposure by covering all significant materials in Drainage
Areas W1YTa-WWTf was, not justified technically or economically.
3.2 SECONDARY CONTAINi1IEtiT
Secondary contairmient is provided for all bull: storage of liquid materials and hazardous
substances. Secondary containment is provided for some tattles individually, in groups or by the
diversionary spill containment system. The tank list in Appendix H lists all tanks and
secondary containment systems in place. There are no areas where secondary containment
systems are discharged directly to stormwater outfalls.
3.3 BEST ]MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
A description of stormwater management controls appropriate for Cargill was developed. The
appropriateness and priorities of controls in the plan reflect the risk of potential significant
sources of pollutants at the facility which may enter the stormwater discharging from the
facility. Stormwater BMPs were selected based on the appropriate level of control required with
ernphasis on preventative measures.
The selected BMPs are presented in "fable 3-1.
Additional BMPs will be considered if stormwater monitoring data or inspections indicate that
the selected 13MPs are not effective in preventing or reducing stormwater pollution.
sWP3 12 Cargiii Inc.
PAIN1981198-11\2008 One Plan docsiSWP3 update 2008.doe July 2008

Table 3-1
Best Management Practices
Potential Storrnwater Pollutant Source
BMPs
I-
Bulk Chemical Storage (Phosphoric
•
Store indoors or with secondary containment
Acid, Sodium H ochlorite)
2.
Chemical Storage in >j Gallon Drums
Storage on docks that do not drain to �'WTP are to
and Totes
be stored on secondary containment pallets
•
Indoor storage
•
Store in designated areas which drain to the WAgP.
Store drums off ground on pallets vertically
3.
Crude Oil Unloading.
Area drains to spill pond and is treated as wastewater
•
Spill recovery trench at crude oil railcar unloading
4.
Truck Loading/Unloading
•
Area drains to spill ponds and wastewater treatment
•
Covered dock at warehouse
•
Tank truck loading/unloading procedures,
containment ands ill res once
l 5.
Dungy sters
•
Inspections
6.
Sludge Dewatering
•
Area drains to wastewater treatment
•
Store under cover
7.
Compressors
0
Inspections
•
Preventative Maintenance
8.
Spent Clay/coal
•
Minimize run-on and run -oft with berms
1
•
Rainwater pumped to tank farm spill pond and treated
as wastewater
9.
Stormwater Management
•
Maintain separation of stormwater drainage areas that
drain to stormwater and the areas that are treated by
the wastewater treatment system (WWTa through
W WTf)
•
Inspect and maintain oil water separator system at
Outfall SWO03
•
Implement Containment and Drainage Plan — see
Section I . 2 . 3 of the FRP
10. Bulk Oil Storage and Pipelines
•
inspections
•
Preventative Maintenance
•
SPCC and Facility Response Plans in place j
S }1''P 3
13
P:lN1931198-1 M-'008 One Plan docs;SWP3 update 2008_doe
Cargill Inc.
July 2008

3.4 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE, AND GOOD HOUSEKEEPING
Good housekeeping involves maintaining potential pollutant source areas in a clean and orderly
manner. Spills are cleaned up promptly. Durripsters around the facility should be inspected
and maintained in good condition. Preventive maintenance involves the routine inspection and
maintenance of plant equipment, operational systems, and stormwater controls to reduce the
potential of equipment leaks. spills or discharges of pollutants.
Valves. piping and hoses should be maintained and inspected for proper operation and
conncctions. Preventative maintenance schedules are in place for the following equipment.
a. Spill transfer pumps including sump pumps
These pumps are used on a weekly basis and repaired as needed. Spare parts and
pump seals are kept on hand and a portable pump is available for back-up use.
b. Oil/Water Separators
Oil water separators are inspected and cleaned on a monthly schedule.
c. Flow Sensor (in ditch)
The flow sensor is inspected monthly.
d. Tank high levels
Checked on a daily basis as part of process control.
Maintain in fully operational conditions.
3.5 INSPECTIO`'S
A Comprehensive Site Compliance Evaluation shall be conducted on a semiannual basis, once
during the first half of the year (January -June) and once in the second half of the year (July -
December) with at least sixty (GO) days separating the inspection dates. The inspection and anv
subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented, recording date and time of
inspection, individual(s) making the inspection and a narrative description of the facility's
storm, pater control systems. plant equipment and systems. In addition to semi-annual
inspections, Cargill performs monthly inspections of outfalls and stormcvater drainage areas.
A single inspection form used for both monthly and semi-annual inspections is maintained in
Appendix K of the FRP.
SwP3 14 Car -,ill Inc.
P:A198\198-11\2008 one Plan docslSIAT3 update 2008.doc July 2008

Section 4.0
Spill Prevention and Response Plan
The Permit requires a Spill Prevention and Response Plan that incorporates an assessment of
potential pollutant sources based on a materials inventor} of the facility. The Cargill facility
maintains a detailed Facility Response Plan (FRP) and a Spill Prevention Control and
Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan on -site. These plans are for spill prevention planning and spill
response to small, medium and worse case spills of oil.
Section 1.1 of the FRP is the Emergency Response Action Plan (ERAP). The l RAP contains
the immediate actions, notifications and other information needed in the event of an off site
spill.
The SWP, requires that facility personnel responsible for implementing Spill Response Plan be
on -site at all times during facility operations that have the potential to contaminate storrnwater.
The following components of the SWP3 include the spill prevention of oil as well as hazardous
materials used or stored at the site:
Material Inventory,
Drainage Plan,
Inspections
List of Potential Pollutants, and Sources
The FRP includes response to all spills including oil and hazardous substances. Appendix H of
the FRP -"'Material Inventories". includes a Iist of hazardous material used and stored on site,
their location and reportable quantities. appendix A of the FRP - "EPA Regulations"
includes materials with reportable quantities in addition to oil.
S W P3 15 Cargill Inc.
PAN1981198-1 102008 One Plan aocs%SWP.3, t€pdate 2008.doc hly -1008

Section 5.0
Training
5.1 GENERAL
In accordance with the Permit, "annual" employee training is required. Employee training
programs should inform personnel at all levels of responsibility of the components and goals of
the SWP;. "Training should address each component of the SWP3- including how and why tasks
are to be implemented. Topics should include:
1. Spill prevention and response_
2. Good housekeeping;
Material management practices;
4. Standard unloading practices;
Outdoor storage areas;
6. Waste management practices. and
7. Site drainage and improper connections to storm sewer.
When properly trained, persotuiel are more capable of preventing spills, responding safely and
effectively to an accident when one occurs. and recognizing situations that could lead to
stormwater contamination.
Upon implementing the SWP,,, experienced workers will be assigned to train new employees_
Stormwater pollution prevention concepts will be reinforced by posting bulletins on employee
bulletin boards and by reviewing procedures outlined in the SWP3 as a group at least once a.
vear. 'The effectiveness of the training program will be evaluated regularly by speaking with
employees to verify that information has been communicated effectively.
.All employees involved in the industrial activities at the facility will be trained.
The following is an outline of the stormwater pollution prevention -training program:
SWP3 16 Gar -ill Inc.
PAN 1981198-11Q008 One Plan docslSWP3 uPuate 2008.doe 3uiy 2008

5.2 TRAINING OUTLINE
I Regulations and Perinit
Conduct a general discussion of the federally -mandated stormwater regulations,
including the purpose of the regulations and requirements mandated by EPA.
Include a discussion of the facility's stormwater permit and oil prevention
rt~21.1lations.
lI Environmental Awareness
Discuss the receiving stream where stormwater from the site is discharged. Use
the general location map. Review the stormwater drainage map to identify
stormwater drainage routes on site.
III Potential Pollutants
Use the site drainage map, list of significant material and potential pollutant
summary to review the areas identified with potential to pollute stormwater.
IV Best Management Practices
Discuss the specific measures and. controls (I3MPs) for each potential pollutant.
Table 3-1 may be used for this.
`' Spill Prevention and Response
The concept of spill prevention will be discussed in the training program,
Ensure that all plant employees, not just those on the spill response teams, are
aware of what to do if a spill occurs.
Identify potential spill areas and drainage routes. emphasize potential
liquid spills (chemicals, oil). Utilize the site drainage map as a tool.
2. Report spills to appropriate individuals, without penalty (e.g., employees
should be provided "amnesty" when they report such instances).
3. Discuss how to contain a spill to prevent entrance into stormwater.
Review available spill response materials, safety equipment, locations and
application.
4. - Review of past spills and causes.
5. Knoty specific material handling procedures and storage requirements as
stated on a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS).
6. Know specific spill cleanup procedures, noting any special requirements
listed on the INISDS for a chemical.
7. Implement spill response and notification procedures.
SWP3 17 car -ill lnc_
PAN19$1198-11;2008 One Plan docs\SWP3 update 2008.doc Jul} 1008

8- Inform on -site contractors and temporary personnel of the plant
operations and design features in order to help prevent accidental
discharges or spills from occurring.
V1 Good Housekeeping
Facility personnel will be instructed in how to maintain a clean and orderly work
environment. The SWP_, sections on Preventive. Maintenance and Good
Housekeeping Programs outline steps to follow, The following prints in the
C7ood housekeeping portion of the training progrann will be emphasized:
I _ Prompt clean up of spilled materials to prevent polluted runoff.
?. Location of brooms, vacuums, sorbents, foams, neutrali-r_ino agents, and
other good housekeeping and spill response equipment.
3. Discuss updated procedures and report on the progress of practicing good
housekeeping at every Meeting.
4. Instruction on securing drums and containers and frequently checking for
leaks and spills.
5. Regular vacuuming and/or sweeping where necessary.
6. Provide instruction on checking stormwater structural controls (i.e.,
containment dikes) for cracks and leaks.
V1I Materials Management Practices
Employees will be educated on good materials management practices by:
1 _ Encouraging the neat organization of materials for storage.
2. identifying all toxic and hazardous substances stored, handled, and
produced on -site.
3. Discussint handling procedures for these materials. Emphasize that
handling materials around stormwater catch basins should be avoided and
extra care should be taken around catch basins when it is unavoidable.
4. Review proper loading/Unloading procedures for all liquid chemicals.
5WP3 is Carcill Inc.
PAN198\198-t 1%2008 One Plan docs\SWP3 ulxiote 2008.doc July 2008

VIII Discuss Allou-able Discharges to the Storm Sevver.
Other connections are illicit and require permitting -
IX Stormwater Monitoring
Explain the stormwater monitoring requiretnents in the facility's permit. Review
results and potential areas that need to be improved.
X non -Compliance Fines and Penalties
Provide a brief list of maximum tines and penalties included in the stormwater
permit.to emphasize the importance of compliance to the company and
individuals.
XI Oil Pollution Prevention Updates
Highlight and describe any failures, malfunctions, malfunctioning components
and recently developed precautionary measures.
XII Employee Questions and Input
Emphasize the teamwork needed to implement the SWP; and thank employees for
their participation. Solicit questions, comments and valuable employee input
through an open discussion.
5.3 DOCUIVIEN17FATION
Training should be documented. Blank ti)rms for documentation of training are maintained in
Appendix L of the FRP.
SWP 3 19 Cary=i1( Inc.
P:\N 1981.198-110 CX)8 One Plan does`.SWP3 updase 2008,doc Icily 2008

Section 6.0
Monitoring and Reporting
6.1 STORNTWATER SAMPLING
Semi --annual stortnwrater qualitative and analytical sampling is required at Outfalls SW001,
SW003. SW004 and SW005 during the permit period. Records of visual observations and
copies of analytical monitoring results must be retained for a period of five (5) years, in
accordance with Part III Section D.7 of Stormwater General Permit NCG060000_
The specific monitoring parameters are presented in Table 6-1. Detailed storniwater sampling
procedures for Cargill are presented in SWP, Appendix 3
If the sampling results indicate that a parameter at any outfall is above a benchmark value or
outside the benchmark range. then that outfall is considered to be under a Tier One
Classification for that particular parameter. under Tier One CIassification, the facility shall
conduct a stormwater management inspections of the facility within two weeks of receiving
sampling results indicating exceedance; identify and evaluate possible causes of benchmark
exceedance; identify, select and implement source controls, operational controls -etc to bring
parameters of concern within benchmark ranges and record and maintain each instance of
responses to the Tier One Classification in this plan. Record shall include inspection date_
personnel conducting inspection, selected actions and elates of implementation.
If the sampling results are above benchmark levels for a particular parameter during successive
sampling events, the parameter at that outfall is considered to be under Tier Two Classification.
Upon Tier Two Classification. all actions required under Tier One Classification apply. In
addition. monthly monitoring of parameters of concern at affected outfalls should be instituted
until three consecutive sample results are below the benchmark levels or within benchmark
range.
Table 3 in Section B of Part It of the General Permit lists the tiered classification in detail.
A record forth for Tier Onc;Two stormwater response documentation is attached in SWP,
Appendix 3.
SWP3 20 Cnraill Inc.
P.-ViN1981.198-11%2003 One Plan (W&SWN update 2008.duc July?008

Table 6-1
Summary of Stormwater Monitoring Requirements
(Permit No. NCG060000, Effective 11-1-07 To October 31, 2012)
1. Qualitative
1
Outfall
Each, regardless of benchmark
Frequency
Semi-annually (January -June and July -December
between re ortine event.,,)
with at least 60 days
Discharge Characteristic
Color Suspended Solids
Odor Foam
Clarity Oil Sheen
Floating Solids Erosion or deposition at the outfall j
Other obvious indicators of stormwater 1
pollution 1
If. Quantitative
Outfall
Each
Frequency
i
Semi -Annually
(January -June and July -December)
Parameter
Benchmark
Units
i TSS
- - IOU ----
mg/l
j O&G
30
nig/l
H
6.0 to 9.0
COD
120
m211
Total Rainfall
--
inches
Event Duration
--
minutes
6.2 RECORDS AND REPORTING
Samples analyzed must be submitted to the Stale on the Discharge Monitoring Report Forms.
The data must be received by the State within 30 days from the date that Cargill receives the
results from the laboratory_ Documentation of qualitative monitoring do not need to be
submitted to the State, but must be retained on -site for a period of five (5) years.
SWP3 21 cwgill [tic.
P:1N19Rit98-1112008 One Plan docs:SWP3 update 2008-doc July 2008

Section 7.0
Implementation
7.1 SWP, SCHEDULE
A schedule and record of the items implemented at the Cargill Facility are summarized inTable
7-1. This table may be used as a checklist and record of the implementation of the SWP,. The
schedule includes structural BNIPs, inspections, preventive maintenance, monitoring, training
and SWP3 updates.
7.2 RECORDKEEPING
Incidents such as spills or other discharges, along with other information describing the quality
and quantity of storniwater discharges must be included in the records. Inspections and
maintenance activi€ies shall be documented and incorporated into, the plan.
Cargill shall retain records for at least a period of five (5) years from the date the record was
made.
7.3 SWP3 ANIENTDI4ENTS A\D UPDATES
The SWP3 shall be amended whenever there is a change in design, construction. operation. or
maintenance, which has a sianificant effect ©n the potential far the discharge of pollutants to
surface waters_ The SWP, shall be reviewed and updated on an annual basis_
SWP3 ? 7 Cargill Inc.
PAN198t198-11Q008 One Plan docs%SWP3 update'2CMdoc July 2008

Table 7-1
SW.P3 Implementation Schedule/Record
Directions: Use this table as a schedule and record of plan implementation -
Retention: Retain this record for at least five (5) years from last date.
Note: Record does not include routine sampling and inspections.
Vear
Activity
irnpleriientatioit Dute
Com_ menu"
1992-1997
Initial Notice of Intent
September 17, 1992
Certificate of Coverage
May 28, 1993
Initial Stormwater Sam lin,
November 28, 1993
Develo2Fd and Irn Iemented Initial SWP,
Mav 1994
Install berth or dike around material stora8e area
August 1, 1994
(Drainage Area 111)
Take USTs out of service - Tanks 911 and 912 (Drainage
August 1, 1994
Area IV)
Relocate railroad pump station
August 1. 1994
Permit Renewed, effective
Sel2ternber 1. 1997
,
Facility Response Plan
Developed
Approved
July 1997
May 1999
(included containment and
drainage improvements)
2002
Permit renewal, effective
September 1, 2W2
2003
SWP, Updated
August 2003
2002-2007
Monthly Inspections
Semi-annualInspectionsSpring (April -June)
Fall (Sept. -Nov.)
Analytical 'Monitoring of Outfall SWO03
Visual Monitoring Spring (April -June)
Fall (Sept. -Nov.)
Training Annually
Review and Update SWP, Annually
2007
Permit )expired
August 31, -7007
Ail outfalls should receive
analytical monitoring in Spring -
Results to be sent in with
permit renewal application.
SWP3 23 Camill Inc.
P:IN198t198-11l2008 One Plan docsiSWP3 update 2008.doc July 2008

Table 7-1 - Continued
Year-
Aciivit3
Implementation Data
.- CornmenEs
2003
Semi-annual inspectionsimonitorine
January -June 2008
analytical and visual monitoring of all outfalls
� July -December 2008
Analytical and visual monitoring of all outfalls
I
Review and update SWP3
j October 31, 2008
Cnrnplete July 2008
Recertification of outfalls for non-stormivater discharges
October 31. 2008
Complete July 2008
Training
i October 31, 2008
annually
2008
13MP planned improvements
January 1, 2009
I . Plug stormdrain inlet with concrete located under
stairs (near tanks 691-694) to prevent inadvertent
'
release to s€ormdrain
2. Drainage area near Outfall SWO01 to be stabilized
Fall 2008
With grass
3. Drainage area on north side of maintenance building t I
January'_009
be stabilized to address eroded ditch from former roof
drainage. Roof drainage to be rerouted to pavement
4Provide secondary containment pallets for 35-gallon
drums stored in areas that do not drain to WWT
E
2009
Analytical and visual monitoring of all outfalls
( January -June 2009
Analytical and visual monitoring of all outfalls
July-Decenimr 2009
Seini-Annual inspecting/monitoring
Review and update SWP3
October 31, 2009
Annually'
Recertification of outfalls for non-stormw°ater discharges
October 31, 2009
Annually
Training i
(3ctober 31, 2009
Annual)
2010
Analytical and visual monitoring of all outfalls
Jannuary-June 2010
Analytical and visual monitoring of all outfalls
Julv-December 2010
Semi -Annual ins pectingltnonitoring
Review and update SWP; (
October 31, 2010
Annually
Recertification of outfalls for non-stormwater discharges
October 31, 2010
Annually
Training i
October 31, 2010
Annually
2011
Analytical and visual monitoring of all outfalls i
January -June 2011
Analytical and visual monitoring of all outfalls
July -December 2011
Serni-Annual inspecting/monitoring
Review and update SWP3
October 31, 2011
Annually
Recertification of outfalls for non-stormwater discharges
October 31. 2011
Annually
Training
October 31, 2011
Annually
2012
Analytical and visual monitoring of all outfalls I
January -June 2012
Analytical and visual monitoring, of all outfalls
July -October 2012
Semi -Annual inspecting/monitoring
Review and update SWP3
October 31, 2012
Annually
Recertification of outfalls for non-stormwater dtschargcs
October 31, 2012
Annuall}•
Trainin
October 31, 2012
Annuall
_
2012
Permit Expires*
October 31. 2012
'Nare: Continue past year 2012 according to permit u!tleis utbcrwist iitr!ra=ted by hCDWQ. Permit expires Octcbcr 31, 201L
TIte abnre sampling requirrntcnts arc valid if parameters of concern -lo nat exceed benct,=rk limit:. If results show exceedartec, mifalts whrre
exeeedame occurs come under iicred 0assif€c3t4m, See tltc General p_rmit for derailed explanation on Tier one and Tter Tarn classircalwr.
SWP3 24 Cargill Inc.
P:`,N198119841\2008 One Plait docs\SWP3 update 2008.doc July 2008

Section 8.0
SWP3 Certification
The follokvina certification has been signed in accordance with Part II, Standard Conditions,
Section B.13 of North Carolina General Perinit NCG060000.
"I certify, under penalty of law. that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on
my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and
imprisonment for knowin; violations." V
Plant Manager
SWP; 25
P: %N 198%198-11W008 One Plan docslSlVP3 update 2e08.doe
Date
caraill file.
July 2008

f
�
'IL
NL
Nil i'uh:
1
251,,rh'p [al!ms
30G
YYWTf
C.fLAL [ZAP
r i e'A1t1U0 9d 1
l,l CVV»
4EM, Rn 4Ti1;' w I.e11F'
N �tl(tltl
_
,
4.._.-..f•MrA'fi'�
W1rVh YF4l
A.
NO.
i�fl1f'rl
VMT© �. �__ r �; N:: r
N l . L4I1 jj I I Loartl P16f rNoS� Nov. 1 y.al11 Col. ! IW.`5UL1 is I ///' »(lr ..... �....--rr—r .•�j.. �,ry FJ
f/ e w Is qw, rla.s7 f { 1r 30 r-tr +
1 x�
f♦G: -a !-."c-'" 6aa arm � _ . ......
r a 1-
..
1no ae>r* s�wlez�n � L - n THreor9 AT
WASrEWATL'12 � VrLNR11W: 7tl ( � %�` el r,r. .Fri b' �
10 Cu1.0 •ram / 1,� TRf. F1.IFNT _ 1YA5TEw0U4
Sum-r.lav--.: Ah011 !r'DN 1 xY� ,S
9°' F;.4Sr02! O 'IrLs "gfx 'r
(?OC SERIES} .t� 3Ca grm SI k: y,,„�
40 - e5 9i'•" III-STa2_` O 1
HI[x.011: Y fNrillG (yin 1'nr rwr 1 � 1L570i3Q-- P7tH1TH
7?iT4 i»[Nf NEi.",NAV?A+I:i.
140
rux ;
• r ..F'Iti. el IiLi'. ]75.9'
� f
1 h C_ »G Ifla g{vn 1
T�,cMw lraa klr,
!NEL4C ...............e.,.,..,.,. ........:.......• orarw r Ihv' z'
�7,�71i2k.N-
! I�`-'} r+ll�xi+ - 7. F [uL71!ah::r t • L,) ,
C:�'1 �• , ... •���. ...;L. Hfi,flrr.. .. .. n .. •VA:.LI"........ .. ... .. ... .. � L, IIiI1.5'i10!
� 41m JJ C� lIL5 i;F71
. ............ CRt ATr CVERFLOK SNAIYrSI I •r„v ' LLS70u7
I;;ILsaw�.ecT_. ' va, . 1TJT Feeea ,,ram
COAULI CN AI;L(S 1'SE NEL'KLf Null E'.:- IILti)ix]'1.5t7. ,ten $�PAMFF T.. I _ __- ».'•r 1-1 Ur!OT1 OEAWHENi' uNlkxncw E ...y.,.`. :n
WNfih
V* Vni Vr,. (M ANOAL) L — — — — — — — — —. — — — _..............—.y'r r✓'
►y Vk vC (NC - NrNiNAIL" MOSC0 LL��FH0 �)'51 m a •-�+r-��^" /y/
CQC4R
F i
-
CZ4
l`/S, W: (ND - Nf:RNA[,1,1' 43f14)
'.YPAC
fW(xAWih(
-xRLx iF ticO Ixr 4t"r
NU
�36YI
1'•:
CHWI VALVE
YYWTC
a
iO
NWC (1k0r) D By AEI r00
PUMP
CONTROLS
c Y
11HL5
H1GT+EST LEVEL SW,TCH
STCRMWATri? ORAINAOF.
HIS
koGH LEKC.. S"MTCR
"
T
(R£r ER 10 F16URF I)
„
LLS
LOW LEVEL SNITCH
e A; Ho-
— rE`�IW4o»
74tl
CAN 5
51(1RA�
---�-
rlor MATES Fall
907
RAM DUAL
PFCSS NASA
I jF,r
vmxAJ PVe1P
SEAL WAIF
113
SLilftllr 13
797
WASflrlAitiA
g--=T POND 7 TRANSFER VMF SPILL CONJAINME.'Ni /.F lVF.IRSIC lAF2 '
eONU 2.S TRANSFER ROUTE SY51EM SCHEMAkIC
PRIMARY POND 1RAN&CR t?MIE iCARGILL, INC.
TANK FARM SPILL POND TRANSFER RCVTE C iLL�Oir, NORTH l �) _ hNA
.�,:.r,.•..."�°.,FOND 7.5 TRANSFER R0111F. s LE N07 105CALE Ik"I.v"k•,'LI' 8r S.f 0.
port SEls fk�31[3F,R 2CIL'H I}Lyc»Efi �r : C2.H, -�-u_ .__
N(3RNAf.1.Y CLOSED RITE rlLv�u
PHo7rcr wuuare �/ � �� uluxlNc Nr�
M.ANNEO N I �JB-- I ? A�'i�iMtiL "� GUR1-

III � � I �.

��0

Table 1
Historical Summary of Analytical Results
Permit No. NCG060000 (November 1, 2007 to October 31, 2012)
Cargill - Stormwater Outfalls
Outfall # 001:
Sample Date
Parameter
TSS (mg/1)
O&G (mg/1)
COD (mg/1)
pH (s.u.)
Rainfall (in)
01/10/08
43
7.2
54
6.2
0.6
12/10/08
121
29.4
358
4.59'
3.25
Benchmark
100
30
120
6.0 - 9.0
--
Outfall # 003:
Sample Date
Parameter
TSS (mgll)
O&G (mg/1)
COD (mg/1)
pH (s.u.)
Rainfall (in)
01/10/08
420
13.2
614
7.0
0.6
12/10/08
80
27.9
172
5.85'
3.25
01/28/09
476
22.5
335
2.41
0.25
Benchmark
100
30
120
6.0 - 9.0
--
Outfall # 004:
Sample Date
Parameter
TSS (mg/1)
O&G (mg/1)
COD (mgll)
pH (s.u.)
Rainfall (in)
03/04/08
2
<5
<25
6.8
2.8
12/10/08
9
8.1
52
5.67'
3.25
Benchmark
100
30
120
6.0 - 9.0
-
Outfall # 006:
Sample Date
Parameter
TSS (mg/1)
O&G (mg/1)
COD (mg11)
pH (s.u.)
Rainfall (in)
03/04/08
13
7.2
<25
7.0
2.8
12/10/08
9
15.6
45
5.2'
3.25
Benchmark
100
30
120
6.0 - 9.0
---
Notes:
1) Rain gauge pH measured at 5.22, which is outside benchmark range.

�OF WArERp Incident Report
�o
� r
a �
Report Number. 200602605
Incident Type: Spill (Oil, Chemical, non -sewage)
On -Site Contact:
Category: Incident
First/Mid/Last Name:
Mark Fox
Incident Started: 08/16/2006
Company Name:
County: Mecklenburg
Phone:
[phone]
City: Charlotte
Pager/Mobile Phone:
I
Farm #:
Responsible Party:
Reported By:
Owner: Cargill Incorporated
First/Mid/Last Name:
Mark Fox
Permit: p(ocQ1 (0
Company Name:
Facility: Cargill Incorporated
Address:
5000 South Blvd
First Name: Jody
Middle Name:
City/State/Zip:
Charlotte NC 28217
Last Name: House
Phone:
[phone]
Address 5000 S Blvd
Pager/Mobile Phone:
/
City/State/Zip: Charlotte NC 28217
Phone:
Material Category: Estimated Qty: UOM
Chemical Name
Reportable Qty. lbs. Reportable Qty. kgs.
Chemical 670 pounds
Sodium hydroxide
1,000.00 454.00
DD:MM:SS Decimal
Position Method:
Latitude:
Position Accuracy:
Longitude:
Position Datum:
Location of Incident Cargill Inc. South Blvd site
Address: 5000 South Blvd
Citylstatwzip Charlotte NC 28217
Report Created 08/17/06 03:10 PM Page I

n
Cause/Observation:.
Crack in wall of wastewater sump/pond that was holding
rainwater and high pH ►hater (from NaOH spill within the plant).
This is normally treated on -site but due to heavy ram (3.89
inches) sump was fuller than normal. Discharge was
approximately 15 gpm (-2700 gallons) and flowed down
driveway and entered stomrwater drain on South Blvd. leadinngg to
a tributary to little Hope Creek. The discharged water was -296
NaOH due to dilution with rainwater.
Action Taken:
Immediate action was taken to contain water in the pond and
also to prevent further release to the nearest storm drain using
sand bags. Water was pumped back to pond for treatment in
on -site wastewater system. Discharge lasted for approximately
180 minutes.
Incident Questions:
Directions:
Comments:
Company did no exceed the CERCLA RQ for NaOH so no notification to
EPA was required. The Mecklenburg County Department of Water
Quality (MCDWQ) conducted an on -site investigation and took pH
readings; MCDWQ did not detect any impact from the release.
Did the Material reach the Surface Water? Yes Conveyance: Storm Drain
Surface Water Name? Little Hope Creek
Did the Spill result in a Fish Kill? No Estimated Number of fish?
If the Spill was from a storage tank indicate type.
Containment? Yes
Cleanup Complete? Yes
(Above Ground or Under Ground)
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft : Unknown Groundwater Impacted
Event Type Event Date Due Date
Requested Additional Information
Incident closed 2006-08-16 04:00:00
Report Entered 2006-08-16 03:56:00
Referred to Regional Office - Primary Contact 2006-08-16 03:20:00
Unknown
Comment
Report Created 08/17/06 03:10 PM Page 2

Report Received
2006-08-1611:00.00
Incident Start
2006-08-16 03:45:00
Standard Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone
First Name M.l.
Last Name Contact Date
Other Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone
First Name M.I.
Last Name Contact Date
DWO Information:
Report Taken By:
Report Entered By:
Regional Contact:
Water Qualit Mecklenburg
Marcia Allocco
Marcia Allocco
Phone:
Datelfime: 2006-08-1611:00:00 AM
2006-08-16 03:56:00 PM
2006-08-16 03:20:00 PM
Referred Via: Phone
Phone
Did DWQ request an additional written report?
If yes, What additional Information is needed?
Report Created 08117(06 03:10 PM Page 3

Collection System SSO 24-Hour Notification
Required Information
• a a a i r r r a• a r r a a a a a 1 a/ a a a l a a a 7 a a a r a a r r a t a r a a a a a a r a r a a a/ f■ f r i a a a a a a a a l a a a 1 1
Incident No. -C-SJCo (a COr'j—
Incident Reviewed (Da.te)
Incident Action Ta+cen: Bpi
NOV
a a a i a r a r a a a r a a f a a a s a a a a a a a so r a a a a r e a a a a a a a a a ass 654124 WSJ a a a a r a so a a r a s 1 a a a,
Spill Date
Reported Date�-t�
Reported To (SWP Staff)
Reported By
Time ®J• '11�2 am pm
Time ti • cO0 aml m
Phone �3
Address of Spill � � cS 2-,ivl� CJVW LCK)Z_
County �''te n�c. - City (spill t_ocatian)
Collection System: SSO
WQCSoa
Map Location
Cause of Spill
WWTP Spill: Bypass
NPDES NC00
WWTP
Estimated Gallons _Gal to Surface Waters'
Stream i� C"f 'Fish Kill: Yes, How many?
Comments ashLu`l,Y�sQ +
N\o

oFwArF9
r
?_ y
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT
Mr. Jody House, Plant
Cargill North Americz
5000 South Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28217
Dear Mr. House:
Manager
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 23, 2006
Subject: Notice of Violation
G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6)
NOV Tracking No. NOV-2006-PC-0191
Compliance Sampling Inspection Results
Cargill North America
NPDES Permit No. NCG060000
Certificate of Coverage NCG060036
Mecklenburg County, 'NC
Enclosed is a dopy of the sample analysis results relative to the Compliance Sampling
Inspection conducted at the subject facility on March 23, 2006 by Mrs. Meredith S. Moore of the
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP). Enclosed are the results from the
laboratory analysis performed on the effluent from the Cargill NPDES Outfall S W003. The
samples analyzed were grab samples collected on April 19, 2006 by Mrs. Moore. The sampling
was conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality.
This Report is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) because of violations of the
subject permit and North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1, as described on the analysis
results page. The violations have not previously been cited under either a Notice of Violation
(NOV) or a civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, a civil penalty of
not more than twenty f ve thousand dollars ($25,000.00) may be assessed against any person who
violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit
issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1. Should this Office make an enforcement recommendation
relative to the violations, you will be advised in writing.
i
AVA
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.org 610 East Center Ave,,Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal {opportunitylAfirmative Adion Employer — 50°/6 Recyded/iO% Post Consumer Paper
Is orttaCamlina
,Xa&n lly
Customer Service
1-977-623-6748

r
0
i
It is requested that a written response be submitted by no later than June 22, 2006 that
details actions taken to address the noncompliance_ Please address your response to the attention
of Mr. John Lesley of this Office and Rusty Rozzeile of Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Program.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
_ i
r b Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Attachment
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
t.
msm
File: MAEPICIWQIN0v1CargiI1CS10506
C
I

ANALYTICAL RESULTS SHEET
NAME OF FACILITY: Cargill North America
Sample Date(s): April 19, 2006
Grab: ® Composite: ❑
NPDES Permit No_ NCG060000
Sample Location: Outfall SWO03
County: Mecklenburg
BOD5, mg/l 510
Phenols, ugll
COD: High, mJl 1073*
Sulfate, mg/1
COD: Low, mg/l
Sulfide, mg/I
Coliform: Fecal, #/100 ml
Biomass: Dry Weight
Coliform: Total, #/100 ml
Biomass: Peri Ash Free
Coliform: Tube Fecal, MPN
N143-N, mg/I
Coliform: Tube Total, MPN -
TKN, mg/1
Residue: Total, mg/l
NOz + NO„ mg/I
Volatile, mg/l
PO,, mg/1
Fixed, mg/I
P: Total, mgfl
Residue: Suspended, mg/1 143*
P: Dissolved, mg/l
Volatile, mg/l
Ag-Silver, ug/I
Fixed, mg/1
Al -Aluminum, ug/1
Settleable Solids, ml/l
Be -Beryllium, ug/1
pH, s.u. 5.95*
Ca -Calcium, ug/1
TOC, mg/1
Cd-Cadmium, ug/1
Turbidity, NTU
Co -Cobalt, ug/l
Chloride, mg/l
Cr-Chromium: Total, ug/I
Oil and Grease, mg/l 16
Cu-Copper, ug/1
Cyanide, ug/l
Fe -iron, mg/1
Fluoride, mg/1
Pb-Lead, ug/l
Hardness: Total, mg/l
Hg-Mercury, ug/I
MBAS, ug/1
Ni-Nickel, ugll
Conductivity, umhos/cm 1459
Semivolatiles
Dissolved Oxygen, mg/l 2.85
VOC
Temperature, °C 15.83
* denotes a violation of the permit cut-off concentration.
tGre3 denotes that sample was collected by grab method.

x
40•
Ca�ll�
Dressings,
North Amedca
June 21, 2006
Sauces and Oils
Mr. John Lesley
North Carolina Dept of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
610 East Center Ave, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Mr. Rusty Rozelle
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
700 N. Tryon St., Suite 205
Charlotte, NC 28202
Re: Notice of Violation, dated May 23, 2006
Cargill, Incorporated, Charlotte, NC
Your NOV Tracking No. NOV-2006-PC-0191
Dear Mr. Lesley and Rozelle:
W, utr i. % FW114t T\
Ago KATUjIA _ REIZURMS
moop.miL F- x 7_ OFRM
J �•
HUH 2 2000'
T r.
WATER QUAUTY SECTIN
I am in receipt of the above -captioned Notice of Violation related to Mecklenburg County's
April 19, 2006 stormwater inspection of Cargill's Charlotte, NC facility. As noted in the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resource's (NCDENR's) letter dated April 26,
2006, the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP) found that the facility's
stormwater management plan, recordkeeping and housekeeping were adequate. However, a grab
sample taken on April 19, 2006 indicated that the stormwater from outfail SWO03 contained
elevated levels of COD, suspended residue and pH above the values used to determine
monitoring frequency set forth in Section B of the General Permit.
Cargill takes its environmental obligations seriously and strives to operate the Charlotte facility
in full compliance with all legal requirements. While we have some concerns about the May 23'd
notice and the Agency's treatment of the values as enforceable limits, our focus has been on
improving our operations to reduce any impacts they may have on the environment. After
receiving comments from the inspector during the March 23'd inspection, Cargill undertook a
thorough evaluation of those parts of its facility which discharge through S W003. Cargill then
implemented numerous changes intended to reduce stormwater contact with materials on site:
Removal of coal pile. Cargill stores limited amounts of coal in the storage area
that discharges to SWO03 during winter months as an emergency back-up supply
in the event weather prevents regular coal delivery. At the time of inspection,
Mailing Address: LocafioNShippiq Address: Tel: [phone]
P.O. Box 240457 5000 South Boulevard Fax: [phone]
Charlotte, NC 28224 Charlotte, NC 28217

Mssr. Lesley and Rozelle
June 16, 2006
Page 3
coal was still being stored in the area. The facility has removed all of the coal
from the storage area and put it in its coal storage silo.
2. Removal of spent clay. Also in the storage area is a concrete pad on which the
facility stores spent clay. The concrete pad is open for loading on one side and is
walled on the other sides to help contain material. At the time of the inspection
some clay material had spilled outside of the concrete pad. The facility has
picked up all clay that had spilled off the storage pad. In addition, the facility has
provided additional training to the contractor who removes the spent clay from the
storage area on stormwater management practices and the need to promptly pick
up any spilled materials.
3. Oil -water separator. The facility has an oil -water separator and gravel filter at
SWO03 to capture contaminants that may be in the stormwater. Following the
County's inspection, the facility pumped and washed out the oil -water separator,
removing all accumulated solids and capturing for disposal all standing and wash
water.
4. Storage area maintenance. Following the inspection, the facility removed
obsolete materials, including accumulated pipe, rock and other materials, from the
storage area discharging to SW003. The facility also dug up and disposed of
gravel and underlying soils that were impacted by the coal and spent clay storage.
Approximately 30 cubic yards of gravel and soils were removed and disposed of
off -site and replaced with new soil and gravel cover.
5. Silt fence maintenance. Following the inspection, the facility replaced the silt
fence around the storage area and provided additional training to utility personnel
working in the storage area on stormwater management practices and
maintenance of the silt fence.
Cargill believes that these steps have substantially improved the water quality of stormwater
discharge from SW003. Cargill is also undertaking a review of structural best management
practices at the site and should any additional appropriate practices be identified, the facility will
implement them and update its stormwater pollution prevention plan. In the interim, please call
me or Alicia Thomas, at 704-679-7127, should you have any questions about this response.
Sincerely yours,
Jody House
Plant Manager
JH:sct
1002470

�OF W A r4sA
o
CO
? a--.
O �
CE�Requha6}
taeatrlc0ad ()ellverY froa
Dear Mr. House:
$4.64 05/2312006
MR JODY HOUSE. PLANT MGR.
LLk—
Michael F. Easley, vEJ L_
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Mina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
13493 9191
Subject: Notice of Violation
G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6)
NOV Tracking No. NOV-2006-PC-0191
Compliance Sampling Inspection Results
Cargill North America
NPDES Permit No. NCG060000
Certificate of Coverage NCG060036
Mecklenburg County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the sample analysis results relative to the Compliance Sampling
Inspection conducted at the subject facility on March 23, 2006 by Mrs. Meredith S. Moore of the
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP). Enclosed are the results from the
laboratory analysis performed on the effluent from the Cargill NPDES Outfall SW003. The
samples analyzed were grab samples collected on April 19, 2006 by Mrs. Moore. The sampling
was conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality.
This Report is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) because of violations of the
subject permit and North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1, as described on the analysis
results page. The violations have not previously been cited under either a Notice of Violation
(NOV) or a civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, a civil penalty of
not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) may be assessed against any person who
violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit
issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1. Should this Office make an enforcement recommendation
relative to the violations, you will be advised in writing.
,✓
AW Carolina
A tal
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.ara 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportun4lAtCumative Action Employer — 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper

It is requested that a written response be submitted by no later than June 22, 2006 that
details actions taken to address the noncompliance. Please address your response to the attention
of Mr. John Lesley of this Office and Rusty Rozzelle of Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Program.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
conceming this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
? Rex Gleason, P.E..J
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Attachment
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
msm
File: MAEP1C1WQ\N0V\CargillCS10506

f ANALYTICAL RESULTS SHEET
NAME OF FACILITY: Cargill North America
Sample Date(s): April 19, 2006
Grab: ® Composite: ❑
NPDES Permit No. NCCY060000
Sample Location: Outfall SW003
County: Mecklenburg
BODS, mg/1 510
Phenols, ug/l
COD: High, mg/l 1073*
Sulfate, mg/l
COD. Low, mg/l
Sulfide, mg/l
Coliform: Fecal, #/100 ml
Biomass: Dry Weight
Coliform: Total, #/100 ml
Biomass: Peri Ash Free
Coliform: Tube Fecal, MPN
NH3-N, mg/l
Coliform: Tube Total, MPN
TKN, mg/1
Residue: Total, mg/1
NO2 + NO3, mg/1
Volatile, mg/1
PO" mg/l
Fixed, mg/l
P: Total, mg/l
Residue: Suspended, mg/1 143*
P: Dissolved, mg/I
Volatile, mg/l
Ag-Silver, ug/l
Fixed, mg/1
AI -Aluminum, ug/l
Settleable Solids, mill
Be -Beryllium, ug/l
pH, s.u. 5.95*
Ca -Calcium, ug/l
TOC, mg/1
Cd-Cadmium, ug/l
Turbidity, NTU
Co -Cobalt, ug/l
Chloride, mg/l
Cr-Chromium: Total, ug/l
Oil and Grease, mg/l 16
Cu-Copper, ug/I
Cyanide, ug/1
Fe -Iron, mg/l
Fluoride, mg/1
Pb-Lead, ug/l
Hardness: Total, mgll
Hg-Mercury, ug/l
MBAS, ug/1
Ni-Nickel, ug/l
Conductivity, umhos/cm 1459
Semivolatiles
Dissolved Oxygen, mg/l 2.95
VOC
Temperature, °C 15.83 _
* denotes a violation of the permit cut-off concentration.
(Grab) denotes that sample was collected by grab method.

■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Amide Addressed to:
MWJODY HOUSE, PLANT MGR,
CARGILL NORTH AMERICA
5000 SOUTH BLVD.
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
swp/j 1 5/23/06
❑ AgeM
❑ Addressee
B. Received by (PAnted Name) C.Pata of Delivery
t 7 .1 /
D. Is delvery address different from Item t'i ❑ Yes
If YES, ender delivery address below; ❑ No
service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted DeINW Prtra Fee) ❑ Yes
2.Aft 7L003l 2260 0001 3493 9191
s �>,
'oe C.,.,:, 4A1 1'' t=niti�'m 'w 9rlrld ' F �DomestEc 'Retu n Reoelot 702555 o¢4A-15ac

UNITED STATES.,F9f?-161§
10 '
Sender, Please print your name, address, aVP+4,in this box •
;v
NCDENR
;1z
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION
610 EAST CENTER AVENUE
SUITE 301
sa
no
MOORESVILLE NC 28H5
CAP
C�)
:>
I I I J I I1!llifllI1111ltllF11

�r L
Michael F. Easley, Gove r V
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 26, 2006
Mr. Jody House, Plant Manager
Cargill North America
5000 South Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28217
SUBJECT: Compliance Sampling Inspection
Cargill North America
5000 South Blvd., Charlotte
NPDES Permit No. NCG060000
Certificate of Coverage NCG060036
Mecklenburg County, N.C.
Dear Mr. House:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
On March 23, 2006, Ms. Meredith Moore of Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Program (MCWQP) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was
conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not
hesitate to call Mr. John Lesley or me at this office.
Sincerely,
57 D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Central Files
mms
File: EnvAVq/NPDES/Cargi11060036.0506
1�&Carolina
)VII& QAY
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone]
Internet: %-w A,.ncwterqualk).org 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal opportunity/Affumatnre Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Aga United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460 A. Form Approved
Ta NPDES Compliance Inspection Report -- OMB No. 2040-0003
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources NCDENR Approval Expires
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office """ 7/31/85
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction Code NPDES Permit No. YRIMOIDAY Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N 5 NCG060000 06/03/23 CSI
C 2
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklen§HL County Water Quality Program
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA
...........Reserved............
0.5 3 N N
Section 13: Facility Data
Entry Time:
Permit Effective Date:
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
1:20 pm
September 1, 2002
Cargill North America
Exit Time:
Permit Expiration Date:
5000 South Blvd.
2:40 pm
Mecklenburg County, NC
Date:
August 31, 2007
March 23, 2006
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives ------- Title(s)-- Phone No(s):
Kris Knudson ---Assistant Plant Manager- -- 704-523-0414
Alicia Thomas ---Environmental Safety and Health Coordinator --- 704-523-0414
Mark Fox ---Refinery Superintendent---704-523-0414
Name and Address of Responsible Official:
Title:
Mr. Jody House
Plant Manager
5000 South Blvd.
Phone No.
Contacted?
Charlotte, NC 28217
C
[phone]
Yes
Section C:
Areas Evaluated During Inspection
Permit Flow Measurement ® Operations & Maintenance
❑ Sewer Overflow
® Records/Reports ® Self -Monitoring Program ❑ Sludge Handling/Disposal
® Pollution Prevention
® Facility Site Review ❑ Compliance Schedules ❑ Pretreatment Program
❑ Multimedia
® Effluent/Receiving Waters ❑ Laboratory ® Storm water
❑ Other:
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See Attached Sheet(s) for Summary
Signature(s) of Inspector(s):
Age ncy/Officeffelephone:
Date:
Meredith S. Moore
MCWQP / [phone]
I
April 26, 2006
Jeff' S. Price
MCWQP / [phone]
April 26, 2006
Signature. of Re giver:_
Agency/Office:
Date:
Jo" sley
MRO/SWP/ 704 663-1699
Aril 26, 2006

f
PERMIT:
Cargill North America holds General Permit NCG060000, Certificate of Coverage
NCG060036. The Certificate of Coverage was issued on September 1, 2002 and will remain
effective for the duration of the General Permit, expiring on August 31, 2007. This permit
authorizes the perrnittee to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activities, to the
surface waters of the State or to the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System, providing that the
permittee treats, controls, limits and monitors the discharge as specified in the permit.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
A file review was conducted prior to the Cargill North America inspection. A review of
the facility Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) and related sub plans was conducted
during the inspection. All documents maintained by Cargill North America were well organized,
legible, and readily available for inspection upon request. These files included Cargill North
America's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure
Plan, and Facility Response Plan. It was noted that the SPPP was last updated in August of
2003, included updated employee training records, and also included updated Qualitative
Monitoring Reports dating back to 2000. The SPPP is scheduled for revision in 2006. The
documentation maintained by Cargill North America in part satisfies their NPDES permit
obligations.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility includes process/production areas, an office, parking lots, warehouse areas, a
crude vegetable oil tank farm, and a wastewater pretreatment area. The facility conducts a large
portion of its operations outside of its main enclosures (i.e. exposed to stormwater).
Most outdoor operations and the facility's tank farm (bulk liquid storage area) are
reportedly contained by the facility's spill basin / stormwater control system. This system
consists of catch basins and piping system designated to convey any spilled materials and
stormwater either to a 1,114,900-gallon capacity tank farm area spill pond or directly to the
facility's on -site Wastewater Treatment System. All stormwater that reaches the spill pond is
piped to the WWT System and treated as well. This on -site WWT System operates as a
permitted process pretreatment prior to discharge to Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility's (CMU)
sanitary sewer system.
The remaining stormwater that is not routed to the WWT System drains to two (2) active
outfalls which discharge to the stormwater system. A third outfall, designated in the permit as
SW002, is no longer in use.
SW001: This outfall drains 119,350 square feet of the southern end of the facility (which is
predominantly occupied by a warehouse) and discharges to a stormwater ditch along Old
Pineville Road. This stormwater ditch eventually discharges to Kings Branch, a Class C water in
the Catawba River Basin. There was no discharge at the time of the inspection. The outfall

IV
appeared clean and in good working condition.
SWO02: Due to an accidental discharge that introduced oil into a nearby creek on April 20,
2005, this outfall has been closed off and now drains to the WWT System.
SWO03: This outfall drains 38,050 square feet of the facility and discharges to a stormwater
ditch along South Boulevard. This ditch eventually drains to Little Hope Creek, a Class C water
in the Catawba River Basin. A pile of clay material, coal, and used equipment are stored in the
area that drains to SW003. The clay material is used in the corn oil filtration process. The spill
pond is also located in the area that drains to SW003. There is an emergency bypass operated by
a valve that allows the spill pond to drain to SW003. Technically, the contents of this spill pond
are classified as stormwater and can therefore be discharged as such; however, the facility routes
this flow to the WWT System, as it contains oil and sediments. Cargill staff reported that this
bypass is never used. The contents of this basin would have to meet certain specifications during
qualitative monitoring in order to be discharged. As it is unlikely that the stormwater would ever
meet these specifications, it was recommended that this bypass be removed or otherwise locked
shut in order to avoid accidental bypass. (Note: Kris Knudson contacted Meredith Moore on
April 12, 2006 and informed her that the facility has implemented this recommendation. The
outfall to the spill pond has been capped off with a blind flange, therefore preventing any
accidental discharge.) Outfall SWO03 is equipped with an oil/water separator, as well as a gravel
filter. SWO03 appeared to be in good working order.
The structural spill basin 1 stormwater control system employed at this facility appeared
to be both innovative and effective. Also, the facility's outdoor housekeeping observed during
the inspection appeared to be adequate. In areas that did not drain to the WWT System, stored
materials were out of the path of traffic and containers were closed or covered where possible.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The inspection was conducted during dry weather and no flow was observed in either of
the outfalls. SW001 drains to Kings Branch, a Class C water in the Catawba River Basin.
SWO03 drains to Little Hope Creek, also a Class C water in the Catawba River Basin. Kings
Branch and Little Hope Creek were not evaluated at the time of this inspection.
MCWQP collected grab samples from the discharge point of Outfall SWO03 during a
representative storm event on April 19, 2006. MCWQP measured effluent Temperature, pH,
Conductivity and Dissolved Oxygen using a multi -parameter field instrument in -situ. All
samples were collected at approximately 9:30 am and submitted to the Charlotte -Mecklenburg
Utilities Laboratory at approximately 10:00 am. Analytical results from the sampling will be sent
under separate cover.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
The facility's permit requires that semi-annual qualitative monitoring be conducted.
Adequate records of qualitative monitoring dating back to 2000 were kept on site. The records
indicate that monitoring has been conducted per permit guidelines. Analytical monitoring is only
required the first and last year of the permit coverage, as long as the arithmetic mean of all data is
below the cut-off concentrations specified in the permit during the first sampling event.

w
f
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
Overall, the facility's housekeeping and record keeping were satisfactory.
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION:
The permittee has successfully developed and implemented a plan that is adequate and
innovative. Documentation appeared accurate and up-to-date.

c gill.
Dressings,
North America
nu DEPT.
AND NATO. vc RESOURCES
AL OFFICg
E`er
Sauces and Oils
\�1
June 6, 2005
MRO DENR
Attn: Rex Gleason
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Mr. Gleason
JUN Q $ 2005
WATER f i TSECTION
Attached is the HEPACO clean up report from a stormwater release that occurred on
4/20105. Approximately 10 gallons of vegetable oil left our property through a sealed off
stormwater outfall on the west side of the facility. The concrete vat had developed a
crack which allowed the mixture of oil and water to seep into a drainage ditch. There
was no oil sheen, but it caused the water to appear cloudy.
Mecklenburg County LUESA notified us of the release and after investigation we
determined that we would use HEPACO to clean up the ditch. We immediately stopped
the flow from its source and began the clean up. We flushed the ditch with water from a
fire hydrant and reclaimed 9500 gallons of water with a vacuum truck. The reclaimed
water was transported to our on -site pre-treatment system and treated before discharging
in accordance with our industrial wastewater permit.
The source of the release was identified that day and on 4/21/05 we poured concrete to
seal the crack and permanently seal off the outfall to prevent reoccurrence. We have
evaluated the new outfall modifications and determined that they have and will continue
to be effective in preventing a future release. If you have any questions or concerns,
please call me at [phone] or e-mail Doug,Burns@Car ill.corn.
Sincerely,
Doug Burns
Environmental/Health/Safety Coordinator
Cargill Charlotte
Cc: Mecklenburg County LUESA/DWQ
Plant Superintendent
Attachment: HEPACO Project No. 543058
Mailing Address: LocatioNShipping Address. Tel. [phone]
P.O. Box 240457 5000 South Boulevard Fax: [phone]
Charlotte, NC 28224 Charlotte, NC 28217

Presented to:
Mr. Doug Burns
Cargill
5000 South Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
nu uEPT. Or ENVIRONME14j
AND NAWRP—' . RESOURCES
MOORES V� ' = r w RL OFFICE
JUN 0 8 2005
r
WATER j
0
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTORS
CORPORATE OFFICE • P.O. BOX 26308 • CHARLOTTE, WC 28221 • [phone] • [phone] • FAX [phone]
HOME PAGE httpJlwww.hepaco.com

PROJECT REPORT
Presented to:
Mr. Doug Burns
Cargill
5000 South Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Submitted by:
HEPACO, Inc.
2711 Burch Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28269
HEPACO, Inc. Project No. 543058
April 21, 2005
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTORS
CORPORATE OFFICE • P.O. BOX 26308 • CHARLOTTE, NC 28221 • [phone] • [phone] • FAX [phone]
HOME PAGE httpJ/www.hepaco.cam

a M
Section 1 —Project Summary
Section 2 — Copy of Contract
Section 3 — Certificate of Insurance
Section 4 -- Location Map and Site Layout
Section 5 — Photograph Log
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTORS
CORPORATE OFFICE • P.O. BOX 26308 • CHARLOTTE, NC 28221 • [phone] • [phone] • FAX [phone]
HOME PAGE httpJ/www.hepaoo.com

f � 1
April 21, 2005
Mr- Doug Burns
Cargill
5000 South Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Dear Mr. Bums:
SUBJECT: Cargill
Waste water spill
Charlotte, North Carolina
HEPACO Project No.: 543058
The following information summarizes the clean up a waste water spill in Charlotte,
North Carolina, on April 20, 2005. According to the actions taken by HEPACO, Inc- at
the scene and by submittal of this report, we believe that we have met all applicable state
and federal regulations.
INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
On April 20, 2005, HEPACO, Inc. received a call from Cargill, Inc. stating that they had
a waste water spill at their facility in Charlotte, North Carolina. HEPACO was asked to
respond to mitigate the situation.
SITE ACTIVITIES
David Hendrix, HEPACO Emergency Response Operations Manager, mobilized an
emergency response team to the site. Upon arrival, team members met with Mr. Doug
Burns with Cargill who directed them to the affected area.
Prior to work activities, the team members reviewed safety protocols and discussed
cleanup procedures, job assignments, and photo documentation of work activities.
HEPACO team members found a small creek that had been contaminated by waste water.
The waste water had run the entire creek system for approximately one mile. Prior to the
team's arrival, Cargill personnel had begun using a backhoe to build a containment dam
and clear out a wooded area for better access to the spill. After speaking with Mr. Burns,
HEPACO team members decided that the first priority was to remove the product from
the creek. The vacuum truck was staged at the farthest point from the original spill and
was utilized to begin removing the product from the creek. It was decided to use a fire
hydrant upstream from the spill to flush the creek to push the remaining waste water
down stream to collect. The vacuum truck continued to remove the waste water from the
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTORS
CORPORATE OFFICE • P.D. BOX 26308 • CHARLOTTF— NC 28221 • [phone] • [phone] • FAX [phone]
HOME PAGE httpi/Avww.hepaco.com

r
April 21, 2005
Page -2-
creek, offloading into a tanker. The tanker would transfer the waste water to a dump site
on Cargill property. Operations continued until team members were advised by Cargill
personnel that the waste water had been removed. At that time, team members stopped
vacuuming operations. They then removed the containment dam to allow for the creek to
return to its natural flow. At the completion of the job, all work activities were inspected
and approved by Cargill personnel.
Team members demobilized and returned to the office where equipment was cleaned,
restocked and prepared for service.
HEPACO appreciated the opportunity to have been of service to Cargill during this
response. Should you have any concerns or questions please feel free to contact us at
your earliest convenience.
Respectfully,
HEPACO, Inc.
Qp�ns Manager
Project Manager
HEPACO

12/30/2004 THU 10:15 FAX [phone] EEPACO INC 002/040
HEPAC
BLANKET RAPID RESPONSE SERVICES AGREEMENT,
THIS AGREEMENT IS SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION
Thb AGtt PRMfMa is I htta this day of- y �`` \ 2061 � by sae between HE ACC, Inc.
(contractor') and , C V-C' k k , which is a () C,arpora3ion6
( ) PartrtzsWp, () lndivieual ("Ghent) whose priacipal�]office is located sc scoo $
C7(:z
1. BACKORMIND
Comrm for is a provider of emetgency response and mmedi:tiau services. Client deems to c am= With CoutzwWr to provide Pill
=a mcy elearwp umom, raTmft6an saviors, ad f*poW and lrmapartawn or waste and d=uv tnatmaMcbs for Cheat, and
Coatractar dcsa= to pwvWc so& =-&a is accardmroc with the tams of this Agrocmca t.
As part of C h=es opcatiaas, that is a poKntial for ptopaty bdougm to or in. the uxrAdyhespe¢esr-hd* of Chem to spill, bG
relm:ed or otherwise create an. emerpoW-condidWs) CEmsgs ey Con&toa(sn &at mpites rnvhonmaW cw=8zcy mow, clemnp
nerd muodration saviom Tn Order to rlir *wte or corm sash Urnatgw4y Car s} w Fnsawly exist or may adst in the f =; aim
drsirrs w a>gagz Camuaetot to ptondc all cnvua=xnW try vzpacsc, dcaup sad r=N 6at w semcrs am om of Client's
operations and the oecomeoa of aq Mich EmemeM7 Goudid*s) (the ptovislan of such seavica, iadudmg 60 response., clmnnp and
subsequent mmALabom arras a [1cm4tion(s). ben wfennd to as the MwMeney C[wm pWwn
C[ienl d=ift to have dantr=w perrorm sA of its Ewageocy Ck=up Work sssoamd with all of its Emergcu,-y mops, as
pmm* o3si(4 ur tnty eels[ m the fiance, ttud Commsm chases to ptaforman sash % Clmur Week.
IL AGREMENi
NC11A1, THER�QRE, in eousietsation or the sad audnal prom ire teas, and conditions sa forth bdow, the parses
hereto ag= as f0lbww
1. Stater mnt of Sabstm ce In
Chart eek mdcdgis sad warrants Owl all known do ay ibut not limited to Ma=W Safety Daft Sheets.
bWs of lading, wanffi sts, or odw do act cry d=uNhg the subs== hrm1n l is the Fisomaacy CleaMp Wo>k bane
or well be provided to Cmtm= rtpon amval at the loccion Where the EmVey CIMW WOWS =wOwbbr net as"Y ('Site', and
by &a to cw&acw. Griever wnm ommmaate to the c=trxtes'r " my ralevaat dww is fhc bubm tam or
cow indicaf .that sash dwW my be »y and will Comm caw to Contmor any hazards or Asks lwwa,
Zea=4 of s i p M by llie Cunt 0 be hrt3 I t0 fhr: Enugc=Y ©eamtp Wodl under this Agaaoaa.-
Z Crf
Cmtm usars scope of wort shall izdud0. bat shall ran bt lbabod to. providing al l labo , gropmcat, and on' oacemry
to provide all EmaVwy Qemup Wo& to inyedWtq our *&, manage, ad control any P.magavcy Coa&wn(s) as wet[ as
urv�pte,- ana M arm, col, and pmf= all rwWo ordlor semedittion wart trsu[tiog from
saeh Rmcwwqy ems) (the Finag=y Qcump Wost na rtod by, assOcis W Wilk, rzb*" to aadlar aril % out of each
Ema#enq C mdit = being m&aed to as a 'hojeax' L C owtw steal[ Ensile the labor; av*uc ,materials. and swvicra ru[=W
is ca tS to poftm the &Mgatcy Cleanup Work sad all Ulow-erp remadblion work for each s[Fazap Project in aciamx ere with a[i
state turd fcdad gW&U= tmd rules as Well as souad sad prudent judgment CondadOr sleep pdrGrrn tha Fmerseacy C3eanrtlr Weak,
and all iactnded tzruediatiaa WOft, fared Pwje a at the sin teal, ifapplieable, oa the dbpmd facftyom). Cdont eiclmmcdge s that
the ph Und aenrktions At the Sde,imdmh.& wdh" liar bbC., , a autef ace, properties aril quvnides of waste
materials prraeait, ifkaowm which ate rdcvtrs to the Emagtaey Clcmup Wort bw%t boeaa supp W by Qicet to Cb I I `Waste
materals?' as used in tbb Agseawrt shall mew any ma Wdai deposited at the Site and lcachatc or other mApOw= p*odcrad by stwh
rmaoeritls While required by sate and fedeW gmditw and rules awYar sow d and ptukm jadgmaik Coausctw may, in its
Corr, take: such actions as it shall ileem appropiate to prevat thrrelmad persona[ injury or property damage. Any such acdo>g
takes by Cantrtctor Ad be dcrmod indWW in the E=rF ey Coup Work, and Mal shag mapensaft Contractor for sash
acdam an the bads of Caum noes then cm:= smndmd tarn fbr service mid the use of equ4micat and materials or the type
iavrrhred. .
The Wodt shall be pafbzmd in =ordmce with the terms of this Agcnrmt w Will a, the 'l= and 14[atcria4 Rafe
Schedule and tlro Raimbasrmeart Tema and Coaditioas as set lbr4r in E.xhi4it "A" atEadeed herew end iucorpwatsd herein by
rcft=== M& hereby wimawUffin that it has rcccivod rend =&wcd or has had tte oppatmrity to regam topics ofsmi Torte sad
Materials Rate schedule and the Rckbmscmw Terms td Corn idons, and the mnd ratty set rwiih therein for Coatrdews
Eels Work arc reasonable and srcepte d by the Client
Form No.100 Rovlslan 9 — Odor 17, 2004 Panel of 4

12/30/2001 THU 10:16 FAX [phone] EPACO INC
9003/040
3. DuWgn•
n is Ageeernent shall ummenme on On date set fordr above and apply to any Emnency CuuMan(sl as such pocldy
exist or amy CAA in Ots MAIM Urd the CUUM oi: (1) this APMMC of is tmriuurtod by ortt: orthe parties in acsord=ce with Sec ion 7;
or (2) if this AWaamcM was cnterod into u the thuc of and is xespa= to an angoiug C tWi6w% fW Agreerned shall
dam in effete nrt9 Cenuacror Completes all of the EMnMy Clearetp Work is talatl m to &e Piojcet.
4 ComnfencemarsrV
Conractof:ball ceMmence rltc EMerVncy Cleanup Wort assocWtd Wilt each Project a soon as posstUc and practicable
after aceq tanoe or same by Cmgmctw sad mutes to pnmcc d (60= rushy of in writino is provided by Client to Conuaetor.
C Mreelar ror 4x Emc+grncy Corrd3bW (ij. Upon Such accq*= and tender, C:onVackw shill diiVttly pmrue tenth Emergency
CAc=W Wort for the Pmjoct at issac ants completion, mch dmg all response, dldn-vp and trmedi%Wu work aiming ors or the
Emagany Coaditian(sl and rMeai duff ped = its obikark as m =cmda= with the terms of the Ag =Et•
� Pia nt�en•,
Client shall pay Contractor far Iabw, equoneak mac iak rq)wung and eve tasks, sales ad othtr items
rwwiAW in rho pwfortt7,moe of the Bmageaay C3c=W Work rmh7 aompichon or unbl Uro anther ta7mlRaiiao afAls Agneemeat In
u dauoc Wilt &=don 7. Cliau shall pay Cow in aaeordnacs with Cmumaes Time and %ftria s irate Sofm&Ae Farm Nil
101, Revitan 9, dated December 17, 20M as Well as Co== e 6 Rdmbnsiem Teuns and Camdidota for Time turd Materials
(atsached herrlo and muted herein by rvfizmc as PAhibit A) far the aadmsas-we labor, Mo6pniew, M&UdA and
g effons dm.Md is the pafotmaucc of*cBmaqwqy C3eromp Work _
CUEAT1' HEREBY ACKNOVffM= AND WARRANTS THAT fr HAS RECENM AND REVIEWED THE Ma
AND MATMALS RAT$ SCl3B um AmD THE RmmBupsEmBn Taithm AND C:ONDHTONS AND TRAT Tfit TERms
AND RATES 5ET FORTH THEREIN ARE REASONAM E AND ACCMM BY CLU NT.
Cemuaaor may, from time to time, at the regusst of Cliers, provide a bat estimate far C0=*CWr's Cost m p Zb=ng the
smarmy punvwca on a spocific ih� Such c3uma c or quote given by Cbrhtctor is O7dl,Y AN oTmATE and ma rum
contract price ttor a'= to awned" price. Cficttt ackmawkxIgm ti'tat; dcspltd any Burnt by Cm*xAar, C KVu d aA pay the
Invoice submitted by Cam=w In adeaedame: with the Time and Maths Rate Srdsedule mad the Rd:mbutscnttat Tams add
Cortditinris allar�rcd hseb andinoarprnxted herpo by_rdeiprca; as E�dabit A
CHCK basby ubrowlodgm that C=Mwtor may rrt mgMy w5uA ib Bckot RqW Response Sav m Agrearrad or Torre
and Mia tcitals Rix Schedule firm time to dw, bat in no dv= win CCmr== adjust its n= and Mtttt:als hate Sabedulo drdhng the
comic of a Pmject nrtder this Apeemew With Ment AQjusanmft in the Time and Ma2dals Rate Schcdak sball bt made by
Cyr prior to or subsegnmt to Muftaaum°s Ems my Ctea mup Work of a Preyoct Ow is the srtbject of this Agreemem. Such
a asimexrl of dte Trine and Materials Rase Schpdale shad be uma eve upotr Cantraora prvvidmg Chcxrt with wrriUM entice of
C&Ws oW*dim to fully c r tc Occur pto dds Agccmm shall not bo oemdtimW upon. die typo;
atnm ts, or aysURW* of Mica's insrirance anwage. This Indudes, but Is not vinsited m, 4te:mourn owed to HEPACO by Ctlmt
ire accatdartoe wM the ox&= daamuM.r and The WEPACO Torte a rA Materials Rate Sciteduke &Cached beneto and Incorpomaed
herein by mf mmw as EXIOMt A- Any muncy ti slued by C from tiny earricx. , valPrmmoet, ra othc rand
m =y thud party m rdadP tome Wade perfl it ' it by iWACD :bail be pall t6 HEPACO widtm tilted wicadar days of mocipt by
Qimt Vadrt >m � shall the or a� of u�ratas, oohs ear oQur third parties have any Treating
on the lerdes err talon ofpayma4 emdpr this J►g:�rL .
By p9nin8 on this pagd below, Clia4 ooram, s to use of its wodA wad for payerrat of wviem palhvied by Cmumeror
rides this Agrvm = If C2icnt cboom to ttti = ib audit cud for paymcte of ConCaatoes services pmfm, oil =kx this Ag cwnent,
CZiai shaII 531 sat the 1ioDotring informztioa
(edit CArd Type Card Namber: Exp. Date:
act Name as it Appears on Cad:
Wing Addn=
Authorized Rcptaarlalira'a S*nzb re
By sigdmg above, char agtOp that all Wwurtk m aban is valid. Cheat Wta atte;ls that ils sips t ne above
amharizsdon for C.otrtr WW to ut uizc its credit card for payment related to t>:rvkes performed by Conractot• trades tiro Agr=ncr4.
Indernnlfka*m,
Client h=by agsacs to mdcmai y, save harmiets and dtfiad Cbntrae a $ttm and apbst my and all lidnlihas, cheats,
prn dfm suits. and costa and dtpmvcs madam hum (mda ft reasonable attamey's f= hw=vd by Conmiawl wbmh
Contrsemr may beseafter inew, become rrspormble for or pay out as a mull arpuzmiag Work on dtis pmject under this agreement
including, but not lilted to, death, pasgrrai ir6my to airy prior, dcsftw6= or daresage to any prapesty. doomminalion of er adverse
etr=t on thc orwirorrn crrt, or any actual or dkgsd violvion of arty govta m law, ordhmme, -ruk, regulations arising and or or
rcbaod to Ommmaetor's pafum nmoc of I be Wodc of this Agcm mt, rz qx dtat nothing is rid# Agracmeat shall be cmaouod w rclicva
Contractor fat nay liabffity arising out ofCcraraeWs neetmier, wbcamrmd Kai ili Ly arias solely or in past ota of s mh rt 6geue.
Form No. 100 - ttevlaiaa 9—December 17, 2004 Fag62 ofs

12/30/2004 THU 10:16 FAI 7045989224 HEPACO INC �004/040
7. 7BrlrtiriRti0f1 of
7bSS Agrccmetd may be tmoinated ady as follam
a Egba party may terminate tliis Agreemart without cause upon cot less dsan shady (GO) days prior
written active
b. Far EiMm party my tftvwkote this AgvanWt at airy time wdn coot it eidm pasty ftft to kelp, observe, or
perform a matcrW nurses, agrccurest. or paornioa of 1his Agc== sad such brwdi rarer ar, , " od Ear a
cont=mm period of thirty M days after receipt of written aotioe fmm ft non4ethdit poly smfiftg da specific
defatilr provider, however, ttml if the branch P - 0 be rcapmm lr otasd vW thi* (30) dz^ the defs, Pay
&hall leave a reawable Barre with which to onrc dic dcfadL
F Terarination ofAnent With or Without QjM by Bidlcr Ptm: All comanding monies due Conbaciar Evr weak
pafarmW prior to Tht won of this Agtecncn4 phu ovedfimad and proles m relation Tc the same, sW be dae and
payablc as provided in Paragraph S abort and PamMA 9 or tee Rdmb m m w Term& and CmAW= for Tans and
Mmmiale Contrasts. AU mats incta, by Cm*v4 r Wmfscd m rho Tivio and Miirc&b Pitt Schedule price to the
trruurafin of Ibis Agmcmczt, as wdl m the cast of stxmisg the Site. trorit tiqal, od to leavo the Sitc in a m maW
sad ooadtfiam nit dcmDb37it m coso, all camas and mstceialr<ex &anent be remam4 all resindri M charges incased,
sad ail coca as gmd8aity pmvMW for is Pmgrapb S. Pmagapb' 7, and 1?mgapb 9 below. d aA be paid to
C1oaLravior a p vv" in ftagmph S xbwc sad Puaytaplh 9 of tic Rch b=z mt Tway and Conditions far Tmc
fmd WMmiahiContacts,
In the ev= of a termination for as alleged defaoh by the Cm mactor, the Cm=ctor d all be eatitled m The pay;uem
pecified bran tvihen eirry (30) days of the wnfinsfian. steh Faymftn Ong snbje d to adjnszmmi at a later daft
foiiawing a fmal adjaffimuio,n orthe rights and iiaba'!t'zica of Chmt and Caatiaesorby atbitratiorr or a Court of0'tbs9ebm4
in The m= of ration of ell or my put of this
,Ag mm= by the Men wi�rt cause, and in addition to and whbont tirdwins of the panvhiota of Paragraph 7(c) of
this AZmemam, Cm�cmr duR be paid as administrative fee or tear pacmt (10%) of the value of welt perfimnW to
the date ortamimtioa an the Pro
jed a1 in= a wdl xs lcxsauxbk vvabcW.and profit art work rroa exearled or
perromW by Cmtradvr on the Projoct Tht. ovcd=d and profit cm Pmagcsy C>mnp Wmk sot paformod shun
tw=y pf=smi M%) of the amount paid ashy Corer ohs) by C7= to p> ' aW ckan-
np or euviro:mtmtal m wo:lr oe fhc Psvjecl aiier the drde of lnammsom otlhis AE,earrnt that wouM leave
boa wfthin Carmaemr's Scope of Woric ad pafmmcd by (btorbs ibrfa tznnhumios.
All chCa g dispatm aid athor s or quadom wising out of or rchlin to this AF=at shall be dccidod by
MnMagy
xrbitmtiaa in fieca�daoec w�i the [�onenactioe � Arbitrstioa $uhT: oC the American Atbi Arsaaatioii aAlesa tie patties
J o uwese. 7trdg upon The award.rwdened by the mbtm w or mtdn l� may be cnknd is nay Coen having
am cum apmdy #gee Rest me u6ufzatar(a) chill Gave the poweracd azdwrit7 to g-ut rcmmlWe attorneys'
fees ( ilfflriteW Fen based apoa n owd ngmy Etc ngfoaetan) sad ease 1 ' m Psi is [+xaotving any desires or ffiq c r " ll
ad of a * io this Agta�as sad. father, that the pfevaifiag paiq � be e>rTitled fc reoovrr each te�sblc attafa�re' fccs
and cvsm Such costs s hail Made, but are rm 11m nd toj nay emus reooverable ptrm=m to the General StaLur4 of Borth t:moiina,
airy tiling or aditsiniralive Eels of the Ammo Atbihatiott Arraoeaatiam, fhc cost of obs a kcafE loam for the >abitatkm
pmcmdmgs. w*m f= and casts (iachTdiff,E both party and nonparty wimmams&a preparation of arbg aTina arhibA and
ew p=Wba of the arltlta x% HEPAC Wz witness fees and p qmm im Cost will be meted as provided in Paragraph 8 of she
-stfaebad and kmorparafed Torre sad matsrisu Rate Somme sad the Robb tttsrmcrstTom ad Conditions ued will bw1w1c, bat wo
not h-tad W. trayd costs, aahay, UML% ®d for any Soft BEPAC7O posaand.
The Deresed for A**v tim shall bo 9M ion wig with fhc od= pasty to. ithc Au=tcW and with the Amcriefm
ArbitMon Association. A Demand for Arbffradon *ball be m de'widdn a reaoahle Um alter The daim, dMate or o&er raausr
rdating 10 fbe Agmmmeastas a hmm, and in no evmt d all be ms& after The dale when itagadion of legal ar equitable
based oa SW* clam, drspeat or other matter will be bared by the applic" stgkft of lindtations The heminp wail conmrrabce on Qr
before 180 drys after the demand for mbkmtion is file& 11w hcaaafg will caartcnna on canm&t btuimcss days until the procadiW
arc ooficlodcd.
vVilh tsspcd to any sbitratian, rift Parties ague that The atbiIIams(s) shall follow aid give affM to each psty'S cm=
tights and f ilit!s, and that those fights &A be mferprdW ad enforced m a mannll eomsum with flm laws of the Slaw of
Nord* Carolina. Tie tahve or the arbifrafor(s) to give effect to the vanbact or tcadcr a decision fist is irmoesisfort with Kwth
Carali m taw sbail be grounds for air appeal by Connactar. Any such appeal shall be hiasd by an aMopfiatc Sapaior Carat,
Mccklcabarg Coumy. North Carolina.
Form id9.100 R Wmion 9 — Datemtiar tT, 2W4 Page $ or4

12/30/2001 MU 10:17 FAI 7045989224 OEPACO INC
R 005/040
9. Noce:
Any =dce or oem com mni=on to be gmm =der ft Agmemast *A be m "ting and efrwm When ddiv+aed
p 13► or Pia*&Jtv r = v s (r-g FWwaf Faaptrrss), What m=W by cotOcd mail. Td= neaept rapesmk or by
fusiuk as WOW
TWAM I=
P.O. Box 2008. Cbmiotbr, Nmth CmvFms 292214309
AM: Rataald L Herma, Sr.
Telephony (7 598-9982 • Fks Wc; [phone]
Address
QIAl
T, 70yC,79— 7:27
Fatiatilft-—
e�mr1 .
Ia. L m mg Vmnw:
Ile vattdlty, ittttxptelatim and poronmt of" Agmumcut sbU be gwnmW by artd c*nsb od ;n taccO d" " Wi0i tine
i2ws of the State of mdb coQo1b* Thb Avcmmtt shad also be dac W to have baa made mckr the laws of Oho sift of NwO,
Oudg a AU mbivadm err other proo=dhw between Ctnuactor ud r3 mt arisurg oral of or relate to mil Agrc== shall be
condueted in Cladotte. Mecidenbn Couaty, Norm Czarum
11. Semt mw tvi
If may pro ddm of glis AWeemed or its qWEcdicm to any pets® or wactma *=c siatll be iwrnM or =aaramcabk to any
. sire temsiodm of Ober Agri == sad appiivatioan of its p wvid= to dw admr pcm= or ch=astaacts shall not be ttffaeod
sad sbai! be tad to the guest eueat paw by taw. .
12. �ssidrsntortOG
This Agm=ud= malt bo:tssgttsd by cbhca pmW with= the plot wafttta oomcat of the other parry tmd shall be bmdmg
up= sad shall codnm to Ibe bow& ofall approved MmOwees, assigns, and m=emm in ia2x=ofany.kind oftht: paavrs hera m
13. Headiest s'
Mw hadiugs cmudmd fa d& Agnes errs for em mle m and t of s cafe only aad an awl b=dW to dcfinc, limit; or
dewabe the scope cr his of aay p,a¢vi:m of this Arm meat
UL Entim Adry mmuh
TWs Afeemeat, hmbz m the Tone and MmmW Rafa Sahc&& nod Sae %imb wmc=l Tu= and CSnaditimas attached
I= eto .s rxhiW W !ad fimrponmd baaa by n& - Cc. repose to rndm umd lag aW agr=mw bow= ik puft
t== rdsdng to the B=prgy CleaWO& and Mvw4p Remedmbm work, and cgft wits any and aII prior
WhCdff W Of aea1, tram racy Cdg bexirreo dw parda regmfing tiao =mr No ormudificxfim to t>lis Ag=eemafl or
any waiver ofnnypnmsitm hereof dnE be effective =I= in vn intfg sapW bydc pmW so to be bmW tmcrcby:
C LIENT ACKNOWLEDGES HAVING HAD AN OPPORTUNTPY TO HAVE THE TERM OF THM AGit EW TT, AS WELL AS ANY
ATTAR FCRitb'TO, REVMWW BY UGAL OOUNSEL MWR TO MIE EXECUTION HERBOF AND, FURTHER. CLIENT
AC NnWI Fl]= THAT THE TERM RTMMM LRF RFASMAALF
A
r
BY
I?riated Name:�-
D= G Time: �— Q i.rm L7P
CV
BY:
PriatW Names
Dd= za d Tma M ta-m. 0 p.m.
Fwm No.100 RavWm 0 - Docarm err 17, 2mw Page 4 cf 4

HEPA, CO
�rie�� f� se�ous
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
JOB CATEGORY
HOURLY RATES
Stiaight
*,� Ti eWta
Premium Rates
Diiertrme;=Ho[idayTraiie:
L1
Principal/Officer
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
L2
Specialist High Hazards
$162.00
$243.00
$324.00
L3
Specialist Chemical Transfer
$135.00
$202.50
$270.00
L4
Eme[Rency Response Manager
$125.00
$187.50
$250.00
L5
Certified Industrial Hygienist
$115.00
$172.50
$230.00
L6
Project Manager
$110.00
$165.00
$220.00
L7
IT/Communication Manager
$110.00
$165.00
$220.00
L8
Technician High Hazards
$108.00
$162.00
$216.00
L9
Senior HeaWSafeV Specialist
$90.00
$135.00
$180.00
L10
Project Engineer, Senior Engineer, Geologist
$70.00
$105.00
$140.00
L11
Regulatory Manager
$85.00
$127.50
$170.00
L12
Technician Chemical Transfer
$81.00
$121.50
$162.00
L13
Chemist/T&D Coordinator, Soil Scientist
$80.00
$120.00
1 $160.00
L14
Safety & Training Specialist
$70.00
$105.00
$140.00
L15
Supervisor/General
$70.00
$105.00
$140.00
L16
Team Leader
$70.00
$105.00
$140.00
L17
Boat Ca tain
$63.00
$94.50
$126.00
L18
Foreman/General
$56.00
$84.00
$112.00
L19
Mech./Ca ./Welder/Elect.tPlumb.
$55.00
$82.50
$110.00
L20
E ui ment Operator
$54.00
$81.00
$108.00
L21
Su ervisor ACM, Lead, lAQ
$53.00
$79.50
$106.00
L22
Truck Driver
$50.00
$75.00
$100.00
123
Spill Response Technician
$48.50
$72.75
$97.00
L24
Technician
$46.00
$69.00
$92.00
L25
Project Accountant
$38.00
$57.00
$76.00
L26
Foreman ACM
$36.00
$54.00
$72.00
L27
Technician - IAQ & Abatement
$36.00
$54,00
$72.00
L28
Administrative Assistant
$33.00
$49.50
$66.00
L29
lClerical
$33.00
1 $49.50
$66.00
M
PER DIEM
L30
Motel as needed basis
Cost + 20%
L31
Per Diem 1$95.00
lGovemment
per da
L32
Projects - Not to Exceed
FAR
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)
PPE1
Level A(per Person - Includes First SCBA Bottle
$75.00
per hour
PPE2
Level B(per Person - Includes First SCBA Bottle
$40.00
per hour
PPE3
Level C er Person - Includes First Set of Filters
$27.00
per hour
PPE4
Level D(per Person
$7.50
per hour
PPE5
Tum Out Gear
$95.00
per hour
PPE6
Lock Out/Tag Out Kit
$10.00
per hour
PPE7
Full Body Hamess
$12.00
per hour
PPEB
Emergency Bum Kit
$72.00
per hour
PPE9
Blood-Bome Pathogen Kit
$3.00per
hour
PPE10
Portable p2gen
$4.50
per hour
PPE11
Personnel Retrieval System
$47.00 1per
hour
PPE12
Retrieval Device winch
$21.00
er hour
PPE13
Cascade Air System
$19.00 1
per hour per man
Form No. 101 Revision 9A - March 4, 2005 Page 1 of 15

HEPACO
serfaus e,epertence tar SeR� ttrrtes.
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
PPE14
Breathing Air Line
$0.95
per hour per foot
PPE15
Escape Pack f 5 minute
$6.50
per hour
PPE16
High Pressure Compressor Grade D
$41.00
eer hour
PPE17
Portable H.P. Vessel
$79.00
per hour
PPE18
SCBA Bottles - Refill
$40.00
each
PPE19
Portable Eye Wash Station
$8.50
perhour
PPE20
Air Filtration Panel w/Alarms
$33.00
r hour
PPE21
Chest Waders
$10.00
22r hour
PPE22
First Aid Station
$4.00
per hour(plus ex endabfes
PPE23
Life Jacket
$2.50
per hour
PPE24
Cool Vest
$15.00
per hour
PPE25
Flash Suits
$41.00
r hour
PPE26
Rain Suits
$6.00
per hour
PPE27
Nomex Coveralls
$28.00
per hour
PPE28
Orange Safety Vests
$1.00
per hour
PPE29
Wader Boots
$6.00
per hour
PPE30
PVC Steel Toe Boots
$5.00
per hour
PPE31
Steel Toe Rubber Boots
$4.00
per hour
PPE32
Chemical Boots
$9.00
per hour
PPE33
Firefighting Boots
$22.001per
er hour
PPE34
Lanyard
$3.00
hour
VEHICLES = ROLLING STOCK
V1
Mobile Command Center 53'
$185.00
per hour
V2
Command Center Trailer 30'
$96.00
per hour
V3
Emergency Response Trailer 12' to 14'
$54.00
per hour
V4
Emergency Response Trailer 24'
$83.00
per hour
V5
Emergency Response Trailer 32'
$93.00
per hour
V6
jChemical Transfer Trailer
$71.00
perhour
V7
lBoom Trailer 18' Boom not included
$36.00
per hour
V8
Boom Trailer 24" Boom not included
$47.00
per hour
V9
Decontamination Trailer
$38.00
per hour
V10
End Dump Trailer
$65.00
per hour
V11
Road Tractor
$65.00
per hour
V12
Stainless Steel Vac Tanker
$107.00
per hour
V13
Stainless Steel Tanker
$95.00
per hour
V14
Tanker with Vain Pump_$92.00
:Per
hour
V 15
406 Tanker
$85.00
per hour
V16
Frame Truck
$46.00
per hour
V 17
10 Ton Boom Truck
$63.00
per hour
V18
15 Ton Boom Truck
$67.00
Rer hour
V19
Service Truck
$35.04
per hour
V20
Fiat Trailer (up to 10 ton
$10.00
er hour
V21 .
Flat Trailer 10 ton - 25 ton
$35.00
per hour
V22
Flat Trailer 25 ton - 55 ton
$45.00
per hour
V23
VTU Trailer
$16.00
per hour
V24
12' - 16' Utility Trailer
$14.04
er hour
V25
Vacuum Truck 3,000-3,500 Gal.
$125.00
per hour
V26
Liquid Ring Vacuum Truck
$150.00
per hour
V27
Air Mover Vacuum Truck w/ Rota Vane
$175.00
per hour
V28
N droblast Truck
$250.00
per hour
Form No. 101 Revision 9A - March 4, 2005 Page 2 of 15

HEPACO
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
V29
H Rail Vacuum Truck
$245.00
perhour
V30
Vacuum Truck/Trailer Clean Out Charge
$400.00
each
V31
Vec Loader Stainless Steel
$142.54
per hour
V32
Vacuum Trailer 1,200 Gal.
$45.00
per hour
V33
Thermal Oxidizer Unit
$3,200.00
perweek
V34
Pick up Truck 314 Ton and 1 /2 Ton
$14.00
per hour
V35
Pick-up Truck Crew Cab 3/4 Ton
$22.00per
hour
V36
Pick -Up Truck Crew Cab 1 Ton
$16.00
per hour
V37
Pick-up Truck 4 Wheel Drive
$18.00
per hour
V38
1 Ton Flatbed
$22.00
per hour
V39
1 Ton Flatbed Crew Cab
$20.00
per hour
V40
1 Ton Flatbed 4 Wheel Drive
$22.00
per hour
V41
1 Ton Flatbed Crew Cab / 4 Wheel Drive
$27.00
per hour
V42
ISport Utility Vehicle
$22.00
per hour
V43
ATV Vehicles
$32,00
per hour
V44
Crew Van
$16.00
eerhour
V45
Passenger Sedan
$14.00
per hour
V46
Box Truck 16' to 24'
$32.00
per hour
V47
Box Truck 10' to 14'
$22.00
per hour
V48
Cube Van
$18.00
per hour
V49
Dump Truck
$46.00
per hour
V50
45' Box Trailer
$10.00
per hour
V51
High Pressure Tyee C Compressor & Trailer
$77.00
per hour
V52
Ventilation/Decontamination Trailer
$200.00
per hour
V53
Vehicle Use - Pick -Ups. Vans, Cars
$0.50
per mile
V54
Vehicle Use - Large Trucks
$1.87
r mile
V55
Decontamination Charge
Cost + 20%
V56
Miscellaneous Rentals
i Cost + 20%
BOATS AND MARINE, EQUIPMENT'.:
B1
121 Ft. Seacat - Twin Screw
$90.00
per hour
B2
Sea Doo
$70.00
perhour
83
Workboat 21' - 30'
$57.00
perhour
B4
Workboat 17' - 20'
$34.00
per hour
B5
Workboat 12' - 16'
$32.00
per hour
B6
Workboat (up to 12'
$12.00
hour
B7
Boat Motor 15 - 30 HP
'per
$20.00
per hour
B8
Boat Motor J31 - 50 HP
$40.00
per hour
B9
OSRV 56' Steel Hull Workboat
$250.00
per hour
B10
OSRV 65' Crew Workboard
$350.00
per hour
B11
Anchor - 10 - 100 lb.
$5.00
per hour
HEAVY EQUIPMENT
HEQ1
Backhoe 416E
$35.00
per hour
HEQ2
Backhoe 416B - Extend -A -Hoe / 4-in-one Bucket
$44.00per
hour
HEQ3
Backhoe 416B - 4WD Extend -A -Hoe 14-in-one Bucket
$50.00
Ber hour
HE04
Backhoe 416C IT
$55.00
per hour
HEQ5
Bobcat
$32.50
per hour
HE06
Bobcat Sweeper Attachment when rented with Bobcat
$8.00
per hour
HEW
Bobcat Sweeper gush Wear
in addition to Sweeper Rental
$150.00
1per
per inch diameter
HEQ8
Bobcat Fork Attachment when rented with Bobcat
$9.00
hour
Form No. 101 Revision 9A - March 4, 2005 Page 3 of 16

HEPACO
serioies experience for ssrtwis limes:
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
HE09
Bobcat Trailer when rented with Bobcat
$10.00
per hour
HEQ10
5000-Lb Forklift - All Terrain 4 x 4
$60.00
per hour
HEQ11
Forklift- Telescopic Boom Material Handler
$50.00
per hour
HEQ12
112 Yard Skid Steer
$50.00
per hour
HE013
JD 544 Rubber Tire Loader orequivalent
$68.00
per hour
HEQ14
1JD 644 Rubber Tire Loader orequivalent
$92.00
per hour
HEQ15
JJD 744 Rubber Tire Loader orequivalent
$156.00
per hour
HE016
CAT 943 Track Loader orequivalent
$59.00
ger hour
HEQ17
CAT 953 Track Loader orequivalent
$89.00
per hour
HE018
CAT 963 Track Loader orequivalent
$105-00
per hour
HEQ19
Mini Excavator
$42.00
per hour
HEQ20
PC 150 Excavator orequivalent
$78.00
per hour
HEQ21
PC 220 Excavator orequivalent
$117.00
per hour
HEQ22
PC 300 Excavator orequivalent
$130.00
per hour
HEQ23
D4 Bulldozer orequivalent
$69.00
pw hour
HE024
D5 Bulldozer orequivalent
$78.00
per hour
HE025
D6 Bulldozer orequivalent
$111.00
per hour
HEQ26
Hydraulic Drum / Claw Grappler
$48.00
per hour
HEQ27
Double Barrel Fork Lift Grappler
$10.00
per hour
HEQ28
Hydraulic Shears 490 Ton
$165.00
per hour
HEQ29
Hydraulic Shears 200 Ton
$81.00
per hour
HEQ30
Hydraulic Ho -Ram 215/330
$35.00
per hour
HEQ31
Hydraulic Ho -Ram 580
$19.00
per hour
HE032
Hydraulic Ho Ram Bobcat
$13.00
per hour
HEQ33
Hydraulic Power Pack
$94.00
per hour
HE034
Man Lift- Scissor to 26'
$27.00
Rer hour
HE035
Man Lift -- Snorkel to 40'
$44.00
per hour
HEQ36
Drill Rig - Mobile B47
$260.00
per hour
HEQ37
Drill Rig - Mobile B53, 4WD
$330.00
per hour
HEQ38
Geo robe Direct Push Sampler
$240.00
per hour
1per
HEQ39
Pressure Grouting Machine
$260.00
hour
HEQ40
Fuel, Maintenance, & Mobilization
Cost + 20%
RECOVERYITREATMENT/ STORAGE EQUIPMENT
R1
72" Barrel Skimmer
$182.00
22r hour
R2
36" Barrel Skimmer
$100.00
per hour
R3
Manta Ray Skimmer
$68.00
per hour
R4
Duck Bill Skimmer
$37.00
per hour
R5
Hi h Speed Weir Skimmer 450 HP
$150.00
per hour
R6
Oil Mop w/100' x 4" Mop
$59.00
perhour
R7
Oil Recovery System Scavenger
$19.00
per hour
R8
Up to 17" Containment Boom(per foot
$0.28
er hour
R9
18" Containment Boom(per foot
$0.35
per hour
R10
Shower Filtration Pump
WOO
per hour
R11
Centrifugal Pump
$40.00
per hour + REBUILD
R12
Pneumatic Pump
$44.00
eer hour + REBUILD
R13
B-K Hand Pump
$9.00
Rer hour + REBUILD
R14
GrandFos 2" Redi-flo Pump
$18.00
per hour + REBUILD
R15
1" Electric Pump
$8.00
per hour + REBUILD
R16
1" Polypropylene Pump
$16.00
per hour + REBUILD
R17
Submersible 2' Pump$37.00
per hour + REBUILD
Form No. 101 Revision 9A - March 4, 2005 Page 4 of 16

HEPACO
Serious e�erierrce far serious times:
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
R18
2" Viton Pump
$44.00
per hour + REBUILD
R19
2" Stainless Steel Diaphragm Pump
$31.00
Per hour + REBUILD
R20
F Diaphragm Pump
$31.40
per hour + REBUILD
R21
2" Trash Pump
$24.00
per hour + REBUILD
R22
3" Diaphragm Pump
$35.00
per hour + REBUILD
R23
3" Stainless Steel Pump
$38.00
per hour + REBUILD
R24
3" Trash Pump
$28.00
per hour + REBUILD
R25
4" Diaphragm Pump
$38.00
per hour + REBUILD
R26
PVC Siphon Pump
$10.00
per hour+ REBUILD
R27
Corken Pump
$107.00
per hour + REBUILD
R28
Rotary Vain Pump 3"
$82.00
per hour+ REBUILD
R29
%" - 1" Acid Hose
$2.78
per foot per hour
R30
Air Tool Hose
$0.20
per foot per hour
R31
industrial Water Hose
$0.12
per foot per hour
R32
IFire Hose
$1.38
per foot per hour
R33
2" Discharge Hose
$0.41
per foot per hour
R34
3" Discharge Hose
$0.70
per foot per hour
R35
2" Chemical Suction Hose
$3.30
per foot per hour
R36
3" Chemical Suction Hose
$5.22
per foot per hour
R37
2" Reg. Suction Hose
$0.83
per foot per hour
R38
3" Reg. Suction Hose
$1.26
per foot per hour
R39
4"16" Reg. Suction Hose
$1.95'per
foot per hour
R40
4"16" Chemical Suction Hose
$6.50
per foot per hour
R41
Flex Vacuum Hose (Up to 6" diameter
$0.57
er foot per hour
R42
6" Aluminum Vacuum Pie
$1.70
per foot per hour
R43
6" Aluminum Fittings 90's, 45's, etc.
$5.75
per hour
R44
6" Aluminum e's
$13.25
per hour
R45
Hydraulic Hose
$1.00
per foot per hour
R46
Steam Hose
$4.50
per foot per hour
R47
Anhydrous Ammonia Hose
$6.76
per foot per hour
R48
Liquefied Petroleum Gas Hose
$5.00
per foot per hour
R49
Monel/Chlorine Hose
$11.00
per foot per hour
R50
Polyethylene. Cross Link Hose
$2.88
per foot per hour
R51
Teflon, Rubber Jacketed Hose
$7.50
per foot per hour
R52
Teflon, Stainless Steel Wrapped Hose 1"
$7.50
per foot Der hour
R53
Teflon, Stainless Steel Wrapped Hose 2"
$10.50
per foot pEr hour
R54
Stainless Steel Transfer Hose 2"
$4.12
per foot per hour
R55
Stainless Steel Transfer Hose 1"
$3.50
per foot Rer hour
R56
Truck Mounted Com ressor
$22.00
per hour
R57
125 CFM Air Compressor without fuel
$18.00
per hour
R58
1 B5 CFM Air Compressor without Fuel
$21.00
per hour
R59
825 CFM Compressor
$54.00
per hour
R60
Corken Compressor
$137.00
per hour + REBUILD
R61
Boiler (up to 40 HP
$100.00
per hour
R62
Boiler 40 - 75 HP
$180.00
per hour
R63
Digital Tachometer
$3.00
per hour
R64
Standard Fittings Charge for Transfer
$69.00
per hour
R65
Inert Purging System (nitrogen not included
$27.00
per hour
R66
Betts Emergency Unloading Fixture
$182.00
per hour
R67
Holdin Pool 1 OK w/o Liner
$30.00
per hour
Forth No. 101 Revision 9A - March 4, 2005 Page 5 of 15

HEPACO
ser;p� ��� for ssr;� trrr>es:
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
R68
Holding Pool 50K wlo Liner
$56.00
per hour
R69
Flash Mixer
$8.00
per hour
R70
Fuel Cell 50 Gal.
$10.00
per hour
R71
Pal (Steel Tank 250 to SOD Gal.
$7.0D
efr hour
R72
Poly Tank 501 to 1,000 Gal.
$13.00
per hour
R73
Pot Tank 1,001 to 2,000 Gal.
$19.00
per hour
R74
Poly Tank 2,000 to 2,500 Gal.
$28.00
per hour
R75
Poly Tank 2,501 to 5,000 Gal.
$50-00
per hour
R76
21,000 Gallon Frac Tank
$13.00
per hour
R77
21,000 Gallon Frac Tank Stainless
$31.00
per hour
R78
Roll Off Box
$5.00
per hour
R79
Sludge Box
$6.00
per hour
R80
Hazwaste Box
$9.00
Rer hour
R81
Vacuum Box
$10.00
per hour
R82
Drum Vacuum - single head
$32.00
per hour
R83
Drum Vacuum - dual head
$38,00
ger hour
R84
Mixing Bucket Attachment
$65.00
per hour
R85
Mobile Groundwater Treatment Unit
$190.00
per hour
R86
Mobile Liquid Ring Groundwater Treatment Unit
$275.00
per hour
R67
Oil Water Separator 10 GPM
$95.00
per hour
R88
2" Portable Bag Filter f 100 GPM
$180.00
per hour
R89
Carbon Filter 800 - 1,200 lb.
$130.00
per hour
R90
Carbon Filter 400 lb.
$95.00
per hour
R91
Carbon Fitter 200 lb.
$75.00
r hour
R92
Haz Hammock
$55.00
per hour
R93
Hose & Equipment Cleaning, Repair
Cost + 20%
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT:
ME1
ITent
$28.00
per hour
ME2
Portable Light Stand
$37.00
per hour
ME3
intrinsically Safe Light
$18.00
per hour
ME4
Light Plant
$38.00
per hour
ME5
Water Heater
$9.00
per hour
ME6
Space Heater
$12.00
per hour
ME7
Pipe Threader / Triart Pipe Stand/Roller Stand
$47.00
per hour
ME8
Portable Lights
$5.00
per hour
ME9
Water Cooler
$2.00
per hour
ME10
Safety Fenoe
$1.00
per foot per hour
ME11
Air Tank
$2.00
per hour
ME12
Drain Pan
$2.00
per hour
ME13
Pump Sprayer
$5.00
per hour
ME14
Drill
$5.00
perhour -
ME15
Sawzall
$5.00
er hour
ME16 1Pig
Tail
$4.00
perhour
ME17
Sand Blaster
$19.00
per hour
ME18
350 AMP Welder
$45-00
per hour
ME19
Cutting Torch
$3.00
per hour
ME20
GFCI Plus
$4.00
per hour
ME21
GFI Circuit Panel Boards
$16.00
per hour
ME22
Battery Charger
$8.00
per hour
ME23 lGenerator
- Up to 5 KW
$27.00
per hour
Form No. 101 Revision 9A - March 4, 2005 Page 6 of 15

HEPA- COexperience � s�ious .
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
ME24
Generator - 6-30 KW
$45.00
per hour
ME25
Generator - 30-50 KW
$60.00
per hour
ME26
Generator - 51-100 KW
$75.00
per hour
ME27
Extension Cords Each
$3.00
per hour
ME28
Groundinu Cable & Rod Each
$10.00
per hour
ME29
Airless Sprayer - Standard
$10.00
per hour
ME30
Airless Sprayer - 30 to 1
$22.00
per hour
ME31
Airless Sprayer - 45 to 1
$29.00
per hour
ME32
Steam Cleaner
$41.00
per hour
ME33
Pressure Cleaner - 2500 psi
$48.00
per hour
ME34
Hot Water Pressure Washer 3000/4000 psi
$53.00
Rer hour
ME35
High Pressure Washer- 10,000 psi 28 al/min
$110.00
per hour
ME36
High Pressure Washer- 10,000 psi 70 galf min
$148.00
per hour
ME37
Scaffolding & Rigging Per Section
$7.00
per hour
ME38
Air Blower
$4.00
per hour
ME39
Roof Saw
$34.00
per hour
ME40
Chain Saw
$15.00
per hour
ME41
Skill Saw
$6.00
per hour
ME42
Cut Off Saw
$34.00
per hour
ME43
Weedeater
$6.00
per hour
ME44
Wind Resistant DOT Si n Stand
$12.00
per hour
ME45
Lane Closure Sin
$4.00
per hour
ME46
DOT Barrel with Base
$2.00
per hour
ME47
36" DOT Traffic Cone
$1.50
per hour
ME48
Stop 1 Slow Hand Held Sin
$1.00
per hour
ME49
Traffic Flags
$1.00
per hour
ME50
Triangle Reflector
$1.00
per hour
ME51
Ventilator
$20.00
per hour
ME52
Triangle Flare Kit
$2.00
per hour
ME53
Drum Wrench
$2.00
r hour
ME54
Infrared VAT Machine
$20,00
per hour
ME55
Concrete Saw &alk Behind
$22.00
per hour
ME56
Shop Vac
$3.00
per hour
ME57
Mercu Vac
$35.00
per hour
ME58
HEPA Vac
$22.00
per hour
ME59
Back Vac
$11.00
per hour
ME60
AFD/Ne ative Air Machine w/o Filters
$19.00 1per
hour
ME61
Non -Sparking Tool Set (Reconditioning Additional, if
required)
$38.00
per hour
ME62
Tanker Tapping Kit
$41.00
perhour
ME63
Dome Clams Each
$8.00
per hour
ME64
Midland Kit
$195.00
perhour
ME65
"A", "B", or "C' Kit
$135.00per
hour
ME66
Tank Cleaning Nozzles 2"
$18.00
per hour
ME67
sank Cutter
$5.00
per hour
ME68 IDemolition
Hammer
$32.00
per hour
ME69
Floor Scrubber
$12.00
per hour
ME70
Inert Gas Powered Tools Each
$41.00
per hour
ME71
Air Tools Each
1
$6.04
per hour
ME72
Debris Cart
$4.00
per hour
Form No. 101 Revision 9A - March 4, 2005 Page 7 of 15

HEPA,CO
Serlasis weri�c a hsr seataus 1�r,es
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
ME73
Wheelbarrow
$2.00
r hour
ME74
Pallet Jack
$12.00
per hour
ME75
Step Ladders
$2,00
per hour
ME76
Extension I -adders
$6.00
per hour
ME77
Quick Frame 11
$850.00
per hour
ME78
lQuick Frame III
$1,275.00
er hour
ME79
jPro Maq VI
$3,300.00
perhour
ME80
IFuelCans
$2.00
per hour
ME81
I Blast Protection Shield
$32.00
per hour
ME82
jCylinder Containment Device
$200.00
per hour
ME83
Cylinder Tapping Device
$400.00
per hour
ME84
Drum Dolly
$6.00
per hour
ME85
Drum Lifter
$7.00
per hour
ME86
Drum Opener Remote
$63.00
per hour
ME87
Drum Sling
$9.00
per hour
ME88
Drum Hoist
$8.00
per hour
ME89
Portable Shower
$9.00
per hour
ME90
Portable Latrine
$12.00
per hour
ME91
Rotary Brush & Air Wash System
$27.00
r hour
ME92
Carpet Extractor 4 Gallon
$22.00
per hour
ME93
Air Mover Fan
$9.00
per hour
ME94
Wall D!jing Device
$34.00
per hour
ME95
Dehumidifier
$26.00
per hour
ME96
Air Scrubber Filters not included
$47.00
per hour
ME97
Fire Extinguisher
$5.00
per hour
ME98
Miscellaneous
Cost + 20%
MATER_ [ALSIDISPOSABLEs: ' '
Mi
Sandblasting Sand 50 - Lb.
$32.00
each
M2
Filtration Sand No. 20
$25.00
each
M3
Carbon GAX 40 - 50 Lb. Bag
$240.00
each
M4
Oil Pillows
$9.00
each
M5
Absorbent Cla 50 Lb.
$15.00
each
M6
Citric Acid 50 lb.
$153.00
each
M7
Hydrochloric Acid
$4.25
gallon
M8
Lime -Bag
$20,00
each
M9
Lime, Posi / Kiln Drum
$240.00
each
M10
Oil D(Bag)
$10.00
each
M11 lVermiculite(Bag)
$22.00
each
M12
Soda Ash- 50 Lb.(Bag)
$45.00
each
M13
Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, 15%
$9.50
gallon
M14
Suffamic Acid 50 lb.
$57.00
bag
M 15
Oil Gator - 30 Lb.(Bag)
$50.00
each
M16
5 ha -Oil Sorb(Bag)
$32.00
each
M17
Acid Gator- 25 Lb.(Bag)
$47.00
each
M18
Gator Wash/Shure solve /Citra Solve
$45.00
allon
M19
Stabilizers & Inhibitors
$35.00
gallon
M20
12 x 16 Tarp
$35.00
each
M21
Caution Tape
$32.00
each
1V122
Decon Chamber
$260.00
each
M23 ITowels
$8.00
each
Form No. 101 Revision 9A - March 4, 2005 Page 8 of 15

HEPACO
ser4ou5 ex�eri�ce for serioes limes:
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
M24
Spray Adhesive
$17.00
each
M25
Enca sulant Gallon
$18.00
each
M26
Mastic Remover Gallon
$18.00
each
M27
Gloveba
$27.00
each
M28
Trash Bag
$2.00
each
M29
Detergent
$9.00
each
M30
Cotton Ras(perpound)
$3.00
each
M31
Acid Socks
$40.00
each
M32
Petroleum Sacks
$20.00
each
M33
3" x4" Mini -Boom
$75.00
each
M34
jAbsorbentPads- Chemical
$15.00
each
M35
ITrash Can
$28.00
each
M36
15 Gallon Bucket
$10.00
each
M37
610 Polyethylene
$75.00
each
M38
420 Polyethylene
$60.00
each
M39
620 Polyethylene__
$90.00
each
M40
10,000 Gallon PVC Pool Liners
$370.00
each
M41
25,000 Gallon PVC Pool Liners
$792.00
each
M42
50,000 Gallon PVC Pool Liners
$1,074.00
each
M43
Poly Bags - 6 Mil
$3.00
each
M44
Duct Tape
$7.00
each
M45
DOT & Hazardous Waste Labels
$5.00
each
M46
55 Gallon Drum Liners - 10 Mil
$6.00
each
M47
Roll Off Liners
$75.00
each
M48
17H 55 Gallon - Reconditioned Drums
$65.00
each
M49
17E 55 Gallon - Reconditioned Drums
$65.00
each
M50
Fiber Drums - 5 Gallons
$54.00
each
M51
Fiber Drums - 30 to 40 Gallons
$65.00
each
M52
15 Gallon Poly/Steel Drums
$55.00
each
M53
20 Gallon Poly/Steel Drums
$45.00
each
M54
30 Gallon Poly/Steel Drums
$71.00
each
M55
55 Gallon Poly Drums
$80.00
each
M56
85 Gallon Recovery Drums - Steel
$226.00
each
M57
85 Gallon Recove Drums - Plastic
$285.00
each
M58
Drum Sucker, PVC, 2"
$81.00
each
M59
Absorbent Boom - Disposable - 4"
$90.00
each
M60
Absorbent Boom - Disposable - 5" Double
$214.00
each
M61
Absorbent Boom - Disposable - 8"
$176.00
each
M62
Absorbent Pads Bundle - Universal
$125.00
each
M63
50 Micron Filters
$10.00
each
M64
25 Micron Filters
$11.00
each
M65
5 Micron Filters
$25.00
each
M66
Cloth Gloves
$4.50
each
M67
Neoprene Gloves
$14.00
each
M68
Leather Work Gloves Pair
$21.00
each
M69
Cotton Glove Liner Pair
$3.50
each
M70
Natural Rubber Gloves Pair
$41.00
each
M71
Nitrile Gloves Pair
$19.50
each
M72
Sifver Shield Gloves Pair
$37.00
each
M73 ILatex
Gloves Pair
$1.00
each
Form No. 101 Revision 9A - March 4, 2005 Page 9 of 15

HEPACO
Se,fous experience far serious limes
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
M74
Butyl Gloves
$40.00 each
M75
PVC or PVA Gloves
$40.00 each
M76
Nomex Gloves
$112.00 each
M77
Acid Suits
$165.00 each
M78
Polypropylene Suit
$7.00 each
M79
Coated T Lek Suit
$14.00 each
M80
Tyvelk Suit
$11.50 each
M81
Level A Suits
$1,100.00 each
M82
Level B Suits
$435.00 each
M83
Saranex / with hoods
$28.00 each
M84
Saranex / without hoods
$22.00 each
M85
Latex Over -Boots
$7.50 each
M86
Boot Covers
$6.25 each
M87
Fire Extinguisher - Recharge
$40.00 each
M88
COZ Bottle Recharge
$30.00 each
M89
Hazard Tape Roll
$35.00 each
M90
Plug & Patch Kit
$95.00 each
M91
Wood Plug Kit
$75.00 each
M92
SP3 Cartridges
$15.00 each
M93
OVP 100 Cartrid es
$18.00 each
M94
Combination Cartridges
$22.00 each
M95
Acid Gas Cartridges
$19.00 each
M96
CUMV Cartridges
$20.00 each
M97
Mercury Cartridges
$32.00 each
M98
Mersorb, P-100
$47.00 each
M99
HEPA Vacuum Bags
$275.00 each
Mi00
Primary AFD Filters
$5.00 each
M101
Secondary AFD Filters
$10.00 each
M102
HEPA AFD Filters
$150.00 each
M103
Splash Shields
$6.00 each
M 104
Caution Si na a
$2.00 each
M 105
Batteries
$2.00 each
M106
Decontamination Pools
$25.00 each
M107
Decontamination Tool Drop Pools
$5.00 each
M108
Decontamination Brushes
$6.00 each
M 109
Silicone Sealant / Tube
$4.75 each
M110 ILiquid
Nails / Tube
$4.50 each
M111
Butyl Sealant / Tube
$5.50 each
M112
Mold & Mildew Spray Protectant 5 Gallons
$150.00 each
M113
Disinfectant Cleaner 5 Gallons
$70.00 leach
M114
Evaporator Coil Cleaner
$68.00 per gallon
M115
Duct Liner Adhesive / Insulation Sealer 5 Gallons
$270.00 each
M116
Fungicidal Protective Coating 5 Gallons
$380.00 each
M117
Biorernediation Accelerator
$16.00 perpound
M118
Rupture Discs - General
$60.00 each
M119
Rupture Disc -2.5' ICD
$144.00 each
M120
Ru ture Disc - 3' ICD
$167.00 each
M121
Safety Glasses (Replacement)
$20.00 each
M 122
Goggles/Face Shield
$28.00 each
Mi23
Chemical Classifier Strip
$27.00 leach
Form Wo. 101 Revision 9A - Mamh 4.2005 Page 10 of 15

HEPWCO
serious experience for seriaas times:
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
M124
Manway Gasket
$375.00
each
M125
pH Paper
$24.00per
package
M126
Sample Container
$3.00
eer hour
M127
Monitoring Cassettes
$16.00
each
M128
Coliwasa Tubes
$23.00
each
M129
1 Quart Sample Container Kit
$2.00
per hour
M130
Detector Tubes
$75.00
each
M131
Personnel Monitoring Badges(per contaminant
$100.00
each
M 132
Swipe Sample Collection Kit
$420.00
each
M133
Smart Ticket
$190.00
each
M134
Half -Face Negative Pressure Respirator w/o cartdd es
$30.00
each
M135
Full -Face Negative Pressure Respirator w/o cartridges)
$210.00
each
M136
Powered Air Purifying Respirator
$300.00
each
M137
Mercury Spill Kit
$185.00
each
M138
Miscellaneous lCost
+ 20%
MONIT0111NGlSAMPLING"EQUIPMENT AND: MATERIALS
MISE1
PID Meter
$24.00
per hour
M/SE2
Portacount
$45.00
per hour
MISE3
Audio Dosimeter
$17.00
per hour
M/SE4
Rotometer
$12.00
per hour
M/SE5
Monometer
$16.00
per hour
MISE6
Soil Sample Kit
$20.00
per hour
M/SE7
Level A Suit Test Kit
$29.00
per hour
M/SE8
Sample Cooler
$4.00
per hour
MISE9
Area Monitors each
$10.00
per hour
M/SE10
Chemical Guidance Manuals
$4.00
per hour
M/SE11
Hand Auger Stainless Steel
$5.00
per hour
MISE12
Sludge Sampler
$5.00
eer hour
M/SE13
Scales
$3.00
per hour
M/SE14
pH, SC Probes, Meter
$5.00
per hour
M/SE15
Water Level Indicator
$2.00
per hour
M/SE16
Pressure Transducer - week minimum
$600.00
per week
M/SE17
Data Logger - minimum 4 day rental
$140.00
perday
M/SE18
Toxic Gas Detectors Individual Gas
$9.00
per hour
M/SE19
Free Product Probe
$4.00
perhour
M/SE20
Automatic Sampler
$44.00
per hour
M/SE21
Suryeying Equipment
$19.00
per hour
M/SE22
Sampler Pans Stainless Steel
$2.00
per hour
MISE23
Tank Sampling Device
$9.00
per hour
M/SE24
Personnel Air Sampling Pumps Low & Medium Flow
$8.00
per hour
M/SE25
Hi h Volume Air Sampling Pump
$20.00
per hour
MISE26
Sample Pump Calibrator
$11.00
er hour
M/SE27
Oxygen Detector
$9.00
per hour
MISE26
Explosion Meter
$9.00
per hour
MISE29
Dra er Pump
$6.00
per hour
M/SE30
Mono-Tox Detector
1
$16.00
Per hour
M/SE31
4 Gas Meter
$36 00
per hour
MISE32
Hazardous Characterization Kit
$245.00
per test
M/SE33
Photographic Equipment Plus Film & Development)
$27.00
perday
MISE34
GPS Unit
$9.00
per hour
Form No.101 Revision 9A - March 4, 2005 Page 11 of 16

H E PWC 0
Serious experience for serious times:
EXHIBIT A - TIME AND MATERIALS RATE SCHEDULE
MISE35
Weather Station
$6.00
per hour
M/SE36
Binoculars
$6.00
per hour
M/SE37
PID w/3 Gas Meter
$51.00
per hour
M/SE38
Radiation "Pancake" Meter
$27.00
per hour
MISE39
Chlorine Monitor
$16.00
per hour
M/SE40
IMercury Monitor
$75.00
per hour
MISE41
Heat Stress Monitor - WBGT
$33.00
per hour
M/SE42
HAZMAT Dra er CMS Monitor
$50.00
per hour
M/SE43
JIAQ Anderson 6 stage impactor
$32.00
per hour
M/SE44
IAQ, CO, 02, Temperature, RH Monitor
$32.00
per hour
M/SE45
FID Meter
$31.00
Rer hour
MISE46
Organic Vapor Analyzer
$27.00
per hour
M/SE47
Ground Field Resistance Meter
$38.00
per hour
MISE48
Infrared Non Contact Thermometer
$11.00
eerhour
MISE49
ITesiNet E ui ment 1
$275.00 1per
hour
C6lVIMUl4lCATIONS.EQUIPMENT
.'_
C1
Portable Computer
$8.00
per hour
C2
Field Printer
$4.00
per hour
C3
Intrinsically Safe Communication Radios
$11M
per hour
C4
Portable Communication Radios
$4.00
per hour
C5
Response Cellular Phones Each
$8.00
per hour
C6
IMobile Broadband Access Unit
$312.50
per hour
C7
Wireless Enabled Computer
$25.00
per hour
C8
ISatellite Communications Unit
$687.50
per hour
C9
Remote Surveillance PTZ Camera
$81.25
per hour
C10
Digital Videa Recorder
$150.00
per hour
C11
Video Camera
$23.00'per
hour
C12
Intemet Protocol Telephone
$18.75
per hour
DISPOSAL
D1
Drum Storage Each
$25.00
per day
D2
Non-Haz Solids Disposal
$185.00
perdrurn
D3
Non-Haz Solids Disposal
$60.00
perton
D4
Non Haz Liquids Disposal
$0.80
per gallon
D5
Non-Haz Sludge Disposal
$225.00
perton
D6
Waste Transportation
ICost + 20%
D7
Miscellaneous Non-Haz Disposal
Cost + 20%
D8
Hazardous Waste Disposal
Cost + 20%
SUBCONTRACTORS''
S1 ISubcontractors I Cost + 20%
INSURANCE AND. BONDING-.,,-.
11
Performance Bonds if required)
4% of All Costs
12
Liability Insurance/Pollution Liability (Hazardous Materials
and/or Emergency Response)
6% of All Costs
13
Liability Insurance Asbestos, Lead, or Insulation
4% of All Costs
Reimbursement Terms and Conditions
Reimbursement terms and conditions shall be as set forth in the Reimbursement Terms and Conditions for
Time and Materials Contracts attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Form No. 101 Revision 9A - March 4, 2006 Page 12 of 15

NEP A-� C
Serious experience far serious times:
REIMBURSEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
FOR TIME AND MATERIALS CONTRACTS
All listed unit rates for labor categories and equipment items in HEPACO's Time and Materials Rate Schedule shall apply whenever such labor
and/or equipment are required by the nature of the work, or by the Client, to be either in direct use or available for use. All charges are on a
"portal-to-portal" basis from our office and/or equipment, vehicle, and personnel dispatch points. Specific terms and conditions for
reimbursement of direct job costs are discussed below.
1. Mobilization/Demobilization
Rolling stock equipment (i.e., vehicles and trailers) and direct labor are charged to the project on a "portal-to-portal" basis. Also, all
direct expenses associated with mobilization or demobilization, such as those incurred for crane rental or supply shipment, are billed
directly to the Client, plus HEPACO's standard mark-up as shown on the Time and Materials Rate Schedule.
2. Per Diem
HEPACO pays each of its field workers a per diem when he or she is involved in job -related work and travels more than 50 miles from
his or her work base_ Full per diem covers breakfast, lunch, dinner, laundry, and incidental expenses.
3. Lodging Costs
HEPACO always seeks the most reasonably priced, practical lodging accommodations for its field crews. HEPACO crews are usually
lodged two per room, except when accommodations for gender are required or in special circumstances approved by the Client.
Supervisors, Project Managers, and other Senior Managers are lodged one per room. The Client is billed directly for all lodging costs
plus HEPACO's standard mark-up as shown on the Time and Materials Rate Schedule.
4. Premium Rates
Time -and -one-half on Saturdays, before 7:00 A.M. or after 4:00 P.M., and/or after employee has exceeded 40 hours or if transferred
from another location. Holiday rates apply on Sundays and all legal holidays. Minimum of 4 hours per employee plus the daily rate (8 .
hour minimum) per vehicle and/or related equipment call out charge.
5. Materials and Expenses
HEPACO charges for inventoried itemized materials at the rates listed on the Time and Materials Rate Schedule. Materials not generally
obtained from inventory and not itemized on the Time and Materials Rate Schedule but purchased for the work are billed at their direct
cost plus the mark-up shown on the Time and Materials Rate Schedule. Likewise, all direct expenses not itemized on the rate schedule
but incurred as part of the work, such as subcontracted services, are billed at cost plus the listed mark-up. Insurance and Bonding is
billed as shown on the Time and Materials Rate Schedule under Insurance and Bonding.
fi. Stand -By
HEPACO guarantees a minimum of 40 hours pay per week to its non-exempt employees when they are assigned to, and present on, a
project. Therefore, labor stand-by due to adverse weather conditions or to delays incurred through no fault of HEPACO or its
subcontractors will result in labor charges at Straight Time Rates for all stand-by hours up to 8 hours per day and 40 hours per week per
worker. In addition, stand-by hours shall accrue toward overtime charges in the same manner as straight time work (see Item 4). During
such periods, HEPACO may at its own discretion, demobilize workers if no adverse effect on job performance is caused. In such cases,
the Client shall not be further charged for stand-by costs of such workers. The Client may request that workers by demobilized, but in
such cases shall be responsible for demobilization costs and remobilization costs if required to properly conduct the project.
7. Project Management Charges
HEPACO assigns a Project/Response Manager to every project HEPACO's Project/Response Managers are experienced professionals
who are responsible for directing HEPACO field supervisors, obligating company resources to a project, and providing technical
guidance to projects. Clients are billed for reasonable time and expense spent or incurred by the ProjectfResponse Managers due to
periodic site visits, Client -requested meetings, and other activities deemed necessary to assure a property run project. Additional
Project/Response Managers or supervisory personnel may be assigned as deemed necessary by HEPACO.
8. HEPACO Personnel
HEPACO personnel will be billed to the contract for the time required to mobilize, service, repair, coordinate, administer, demobilize,
and restock all vehicles and equipment used in the performance of the contract (whether performed on or off site). These rates apply to
HEPACO personnel and all personnel supervised on the project by HEPACO or its affiliates, whether HEPACO employees, HEPACO
subsidiaries, or leased or temporary labor. Travel time for personnel shall be billed at the corresponding rate in the Time and Materials
Rate Schedule.
In the event any personnel scheduled above are engaged to provide testimony in any court, arbitration, or administrative proceeding, the
rate for such person while testifying either at a deposition or hearing shall be two (2) times the hourly rate specified in the Time and
Materials Rate Schedule.
Form No. 101 Revision 9A — March 4, 2005 Page 13 of 15

9. Terms of Payment
Ail monies due and payable upon receipt of invoice. Payment not received by the 14th day will accrue interest of 18% per annum or the
maximum finance charge allowed by law, whichever is less. Any attorney's fees, collection fees, arbitration fees, or other costs incurred
in collecting any delinquent account shall be paid by the Client. Any time spent by HEPACO or its subsidiaries or affiliates in the
collection of delinquent accounts shall be invoiced in accordance with the Time and Materials Rate Schedule and shall be paid by the
Client.
Client shall, within seven (7) days of receipt of an invoice, communicate in writing to HEPACO any invoice errors, discrepancies, or
disputes. The written notice must specifically state the portion in dispute and describe the dispute in such detail that HEPACO has full
notice of the dispute_ Client hereby agrees that failure to provide such written notice within seven (7) days of the invoice date constitutes
waiver of any such dispute. If such communication is not made within this seven day period, the invoice will be deemed to be approved
and shall be paid If an error, discrepancy or dispute is identified, then the parties will endeavor to resolve it within an additional four (4)
days. if no resolution is made within this time, the disputed amount will be excepted from the total invoice amount. The balance of the
invoice shall be deemed approved and Client shall promptly pay such portion.
Under no circumstances shall the opinion or analysis of adjusters, auditors, consultants or other third parties have any bearing on the
terms of payment. This includes, but is not limited to, the amounts owed to HEPACO by Client in accordance with the contract
documents and the HEPACO Time and Materials Rate Schedule, as well as the time frames for notices and payment.
All claims, disputes, and other matters in question arising out of, or relating to, this Contract or any subcontract made or purchase order
issued pursuant to this Contract, or the breach thereof, shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry
Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association that are in effect as of the time demand for arbitration is made.
Notice of demand for arbitration shall be filed in writing with the American Arbitration Association and upon all proposed parties to
such proceeding, and shall be filed within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute, or other matter in question has arisen, but in no
event shall be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter will be
barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Any arbitration proceeding will be conducted in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina The arbitration hearings will begin within 190 days of the date the demand for arbitration is served and continue on successive
business days until completed. The prevailing party shall be entitled to recover not only attorney fees, but also the costs of the arbitration
proceedings, including the fees paid to the American Arbitration Association and the arbitrators, witness fees, and the cost of preparing
demonstrative exhibits.
Where Client's Authorized Representative (or someone authorized by him or her for such purpose) has signed any daily reports
submitted by HEPACO showing charges for any days, such charges shall be deemed accepted by Client for all purposes hereunder, and
Client thereby waives the right to later object that such charges are invalid. (Provided, the absence of such daily reports and/or Client
approval of such reports shall in no way relieve Client of its duty to pay for Work performed.)
Upon HEPACO's written request, at any time, Client shall furnish reasonable evidence satisfactory to HEPACO that sufficient funds are
available and committed for the cost of the Work. Where such evidence is not furnished, HEPACO is not required to commence or
continue any Work, or may, if such evidence is not presented within a reasonable time, not to exceed two (2) days, terminate this
Agreement. Upon such termination, HEPACO shall be entitled to payment for all work performed to the date of termination, all stored
materials, all restocking charges, the cost of demobilization, and reasonable overhead and profit on the work performed.
10. Small Tools
Small tools such as hammers, rakes, rock bars, shovels, squeegees, common wrenches and other small tools that are provided by
HEPACO, but are not itemized in the Schedules, will be billed at five percent (50/6) of the total labor billing. Specialty tools or hardware
purchased for job specific tasks which are not itemized on the HEPACO Time and Materials Rate Schedule shall be billed at cost plus
twenty percent (20%).
11. Permits and Access
Client shall secure and pay for all necessary approvals, easements, orders, assessments, permits, and charges required for the Work to be
performed and for HEPACO to have legal access to the Project Site. Any right-of-way provided by Client to/from the most convenient
public way shall be sufficient to bear the weight of HEPACO's equipment and vehicles reasonably required to perform the Work. Client,
and not HEPACO, shall be responsible for any changes required to be made to any private pavement or accompanying subsurface of any
route used in the Work, and for repairs to roadways and right-of-way caused by normal wear and tear during the performance of the
Work Contractor shall be entitled to reimbursement for any costs incurred as a result of encumbrances, conditions different from the
conditions described by the client or differing substantially from what would normally be encountered in performing work under this
agreement. These costs, if any, will be invoiced at cost plus twenty percent (20%).
12. Protective Equipment
Protective equipment such as hard hats, safety goggles, safety shields, steel toe boots, and the use of respirators are included in Level A,
B, C, and D charges. Replacement items, disposable or specialty suits, gloves, etc, will be billed separately under Materials.
Form No. 101 Revision SA — March 4, 2005 Page 14 of 15

13. High Hazards
High hazard/reactive/explosive/cylinder rates apply to projects involving: explosives or explosion risk; fire fighting or risk of fire; Level
A, Level B Personal Protective Equipment; gas or chemical transfer, uncontrolled events, unknown materials, actual or suspected
Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) events; and/or handling of highly hazardous materials. Applicability of High Hazard rates will be
at the sole determination of HEPACO based on project conditions.
14. Jones Act
If the contract requires labor to be performed over, adjoining, and/or in water such that the U.S. Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers'
insurance or !ones Act insurance apply, then an additional fee of thirty percent (3(r) of total charges will be added to compensate for
U.S. Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' insurance or Jones Act insurance and related risks attendant to the work when contract
requires labor to be performed ever, adjoining and/or in water.
16. Rentals
The charges for operators to operate the equipment are not included in these rates and will be charged under the appropriate labor
category. The rental rates do not include pick up, delivery, fuel, oil and grease, tarps, damages beyond reasonable wear and tear, and/or
demurrage. HEPACO will invoice charges for all itemized equipment utilized or available for use on the project per the Time and
Materials Rate Schedule, regardless of whether the equipment is owned by HEPACO or rented equipment items that are not itemized in
the Time and Materials Rate Schedule, or for which there is no applicable rate in the Time and Materials Rate Schedule, will be invoiced
at cost plus twenty per cent (2(%). The daily rental rate is based upon an eight (8) hour day. There is an eight (8) hour minimum charge
for any equipment mobilized for the project, utilized at the project site, or available for use at the project site.
16. Delegation and Assignment
HEPACO may, at any time, delegate orally or in writing, the performance of the Work, or any portion thereof. Any such delegation
(such as subcontracting, laboratory work, or services) shall not operate to relieve HEPACO of its responsibilities hereunder, for which
HEPACO shall remain obligated to Client
17, Safety
HEPACO shall take necessary precautions and provide adequate safeguard for the safety of its employees and shall comply with
applicable provisions of Federal, State, and local safety laws. HEPACO shall have no responsibility for the elimination or abatement of
safety hazards created, or otherwise resulting from, work at the Project Site carried on by other persons or firms directly employed by
Client as separate contractors or by Client's employees and agents. Client agrees to cause any such separate contractors, employees,
and/or agents to fully comply with all applicable provisions of Federal, State, and local safety laws and/or regulations, and to comply
with all reasonable requests and directions of HEPACO for the elimination or abatement of any such safety hazard at the Project Site.
18. Confidentiality
All reports, documentation, invoices, or other work product generated by HEPACO, its subsidiaries, vendors, suppliers, subcontractors,
or affiliates will be kept in strict confidence by the Client. Dissemination of any such information to any third party shall not be
permitted without the written consent of HEPACO. Reasonable requests for such permission will not be withheld. Release of such
information to third parties will not operate to relieve the Client of any obligations under the contract or terms, including obligations for
full payment of all HEPACO invoices.
Without prior consent from Client, HEPACO shall keep confidential all information, including all maps, data, reports, and other written
or oral information relating to the Work., received from the Client, as well as the substance of any report, test, recommendation,
information or advice that HEPACO provides to the Client in connection with the Work provided under this Agreement In the event
HEPACO is required by law, regulation, subpoena or court or administrative order to disclose any information deemed to be
confidential, HEPACO may disclose such information so long as it provides written notification to the Client upon a good faith
determination that it is so required or upon receipt of the subpoena or court order.
Form No. 101 Revision SA —March 4, 2005 Page 15 of 15

HEPAIN
Client#: 32104
A� ry CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 04/2510i�5IVY n
PRODUCER
Frank Crystal & Co of TX, Inc.
2000 West Loop S., Suite 1800
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER- THIS CERTIFICATE DOES AMEND. EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BOYTTHE POLICIES BELOW.
P.O. Box 27723
Houston, TX 77227-7723
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
NAIC #
INSURED
INSURERA: American Int'I Specialty
Hepaco Inc.
2711 Burch Drive
Charlotte, NC 28269
INSURER B: Commerce & Industry Ins.
MsuItER c:
INSURER O:
INSURER E:
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERRA OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
IN SR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
O LILY EFFEW
OCYL
PRATE EEXPIRATION
Lmm
A
X
GENERAL LIABILITY
PROP1570296
06/08104
07/01/05
EACH OCCURRENCE
$1 10GO1000
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
DAMAGE TO RENTED
S50 000
CLAIMS MADE 1E OCCUR
MED EXP (Any one person)
0,000
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
S1,000,000
X Asbestos/Lead
GENERAL AGGREGATE
$1,000,000
X _Microbial
GENT AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
PRODUCTS - COMPIOP AGG
$1 000 000
POLICYEl EEC LOC
B
X
AurmoBlLE Lwa ny
X ANY Auto
CA1570298
06108/04
07/01/05
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea l
$1,000,000
BODILY INJURY
(Per Person)
S
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY
acddera)
3
X HIRED AUTOS
X NON4WHED AUTOS
PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per acciderd)
s
GARAGE LIABILITY
AUTO ONLY • EA ACCIDENT
$
OTHER THAN EA ACC
S
ANY AUTO
S
AUTO ONLY: AGG
A
X
ExcEsslu sRELLALwanm
PROU1570297
06/08/04
07/01/05
EACHOCCURRENCE
$10 000 000
X OCCUR CLAIMS MADE
AGGREGATE
$10 000 000
s
s
DEDUCTIBLE
S
X RETENTION s 10000
B
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
WC3283338
07/01/04
07101 /05
WC STATU- OTH-
X
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
ANY PROPRIETORMARTNERIEXECUTNE
El. EACH ACCIDENT
$1,000,000
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
51,000,000
OFeFIICEWMEMBER EXCLUDED?
If SPECIAL P OIO VI IsONS below
Et. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT 1
s1,000 000
A
OTHER Pollution/
PROP1570296
06/08/04
07/01/05
Per Loss $1,000,000
Professional
Total Ail $1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES I EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Project IN, 543058-000
RE: Cargill, 5000 South Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28217
rE
Cargill
5000 South Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28217
LD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL Ag_ DAYS WRITTEN
,E TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL
* NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR
REPRESENTATIVE
. A —
ACORD 25 (200110B) 1 of 2 #M130692 ,JxV 0 ACORD CORPORATION 1988

HEPACO Project 4543058-Location Map
49 a2i a
�' ding or Q-a
CP F �, M$„h a
0
t:ba��� cn .
a`oA Star
AD
o � `Q� S�ringbraok Rd
w00dfew
„ Rd
�a site of Spill
Rd 5000 South Blvd Br
S�roltz. Charlotte, NC 28217 ockba�k Rd
i
Rountree Rd `71 61 GIs kot elf b' or
! 21 Charlotte �-a �►�,?
Gam aga Rd 0 ayhill Ra
Whe
521 vo� G� Q`
r .72
Gv G e
11 —
1 co Se"eca P1
r�'l'W %per, or
o
Rd $
s m Ebb Pl ae O
' Rd m $
0
i�l W
0 ml 0.2 0.4 0.6
Copyright O 1906.2001 Microsoft Corp. andlor Its suppliers. All rights reserved, htlp;lArrww.mlcrosott.00mlmappolnt
O Copyright 2000 by Geographic Data 'technology. Inc, All rights reserved. O 20DO Navigation Technologies. All rights reserved. This date Includes Information taken with permission from Canadian authoritles O Her Ma)osty the Queen In Right of Csnede.
0 Copyright 2000 by Compusearah Micromarketing Oats and Systems Ltd.

- - - _ '3-0 B QvaLL-
Saco labu7K BII D
j O t�TH l u Q• C•}(, las i �.l -c , a 8 I
SocD SoV r1 8,
Al 3S° P5 �a2tcrE
w $pr- Sa. ��� l� 35° )p. i� I y
L
U�CP
AL,L
4k
�v
T
/ RTC A-0J
fI I f! flfi
PA,Tt 26A 6 reA X
C-1 P5
54.7 '7 I
41,
�9 fT
1
7o i z t E --�5
z

Photograph Documentation
Photograph 1 Location of product in creek
Photograph 2 Product in creek
Photograph 3 Containment dam set up to contain product
Photograph 4 Vacuum truck set up and removing product
Photograph 5 pH test of product
Photograph 6 Vacuum truck loading into road tanker
Photograph 7 Offloading product into holding pond

����£1 `�`�{'r'!} �9 ''{ ii1�.ay`i'.��f�li'tr'I"�11 !t. z� j1',' #�•li.l,' T'
1+74'��IJ',, �.���'ll.�.����1^�WrrJ+-ls�,Yi+��S�'S•xaT±..,a .,_`�� i�.1,+11,i} "�+.E'.+�
,I
�.�.,s � .' `ryf 1 }��t Y y�� ri�k I�y�rf �• j' �r"S i1 ?�, �! '
'rrl`Ii -j1 5�'7'`'�ih, C r,.�';I �'',!-.�''+�}I•� � �1''4! `�: r' :hdLi
+h 'J'• � i. I ,�N'+�I�+I ry5 f•', li'lt �C: y'++ Pi1i , /{ ����
•':1 !' 7 t ��•a >ft+ ti 1:1�/�'� 1���,r�•e�
.Ir `I51 OUT
T"�1.+!I�'1\\
•.+ jj' +4'i)t.
n.l I f+• '1; •s . ;„+ ,. i f � v' ��,,�} I !'f �! ', Iti, j , ,'I +�
y
I
.
,;i} �, of 1'-•- ! - ,j NEU UV "'! ys -
1+ �I+'L{r L1 ,br�~ •+Fly3' 1 I. \ ;. F j� ti��`�� ! ,.
►t'I a° }"� fk,� 1L15.5 .Ic {', L �, 'n ''� +�� � , rp �l�r} �i{, I 1,
\ I .[�!' ���' i.l�� !'('``.l.",- 115 1. .•r�k �II� ,'

A-4

N itural Resources
m l
..
Ln
(Domestic Mail Only; No InsuranCe COveragO P""
Michael F. Easley, Govi m William G: Ross, Jr., Secretary
rr_r F F G A L LD S Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
u,
Ln
r"postws �V
RFTIJRN Rh o ems, Ate„ r rie ,.,
i52 3153
W. Jody How; S
Cargill North E rruu TV
N i
50M South Bf m MR JODY HOUSE, PLANT MANAGER
Charlotte, NC : o CARGILL NORTH AMERICA _________-_
N 1$i 5000 SOUTH BLVD.
CWP CHARLOTTE NC 28217
swv/rmb 5/5/05 ON
Tmdcing #: NOV 2005-DV-0023
Violation of G.S. 143-215.1(a)
Discharge of Vegetable Oil
Cargill North America
5000 South Blvd, Charlotte
Mecklenburg County, NC
lt7 ur
Chapter 143, Article 21 of the North Caroiroa General Statutes (G.S.) authorizes and directs
the Environmental. Management Commission of this Departmert to protect and preserve the water
resources of the State. The Division of Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted
pollution control rules and regulations.
On April 20, 2005, Mr. Jeff Price of the mec1demburg County Water Quality Program
(MCWQP) conducted an invon of your property located at 5000 South Blvd. This
investigatCon was conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg
County and the Division of Water Quality. As a result of this kvestigation, the following condition
was found on the property in violation of G.S.143-2151(a):
Discharge of emmilsified vegetable oil to a storm water ditch that drams to King's
Branch, a Class C water in the Cdawba River Basin.
Be advised that G.S. 143-215.6A provides for a civil penalty assess of not more than
twenty-fiw thousand dollars ($25,000.00), or twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per day when
the violation is of a continuing nature, against any person who is required but fads to apply for or to
secure a permit required by G.S. 143-215.L Penalties may also be assessed for any damage to the
surface waters of the State tbat may result from the unperaritted discharge. You wO lie adviud of
Mooresville Regional Offices
610 East Center Avenue, suite 301, Mooresville, North Cambna 28115 AhCarohna
Phone: [phone] ! Fax: 704-663 aQ I Internet: h2o enr.state.nc.us ;UMMAY
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Emptoyer— 50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Jody House
Page 2
May 5, 2005
To comply with the law, it wdl be nay to immediately discontinue all Megal disc�e
activity. It is also recommended that you implement corrective actions to eliminate the potential for
recurreut fflegal discharges.
It is requested that you respond, in writing, to this Notice, the actions you have taken
to correct the violation. Please address your response to me bx an later thAn Mims Z3,NOW. Also,
please send a copy ofthis response to Mr. Rusty Rozzelte of MCWQP at 700 North Tryon Street,
Suite 205, Charlotte, NC, 28202. In responding, please indwate the Incident and NOV Tracking
Numbers.
Should you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Richard Bridgeman or me at
704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
cc: Rusty Rozrelle, MCWQP
DRGfisp
Fxr4=cxgfflrrovoazaMA=

�'tii. •,,,>r�+-+.�. �..1.: 1. �'�- '•, l � ,I C , ,I t . ". '� tt . 'R r.�, � r t "� � x y � �"'�����
+ tk, 7r `` j til i L ItI
�.' :+ba ' '�' - � 3 � •-'I y [ F" �NJt15, yr � • '[rF,xx
-� J , Cr'
t f J
♦ w ft It t
lk,tt�
ril
�. - � a r" _ r� ... •x � ;+#';. , k �. .0 `, lj 111 P'''lW'k tilt �' .L � s 4-
^ h � �� � ' - �.. 1 � -. _ .. Y - +� y L V `•1, fit, ,'�' t ,tit„ t
� _f->� � - "n. ti• -V � '���`^ � _ o,, - - .k ,�'., "sY� ' �i .l�r +iF+4� k.$.
• f
_. ,�, ��. �`. ,'7 +1� 3iJ�� j� j9" '. eY _ � �� •"'�' r YF vR�. �'s` "1�3! +lh'� ➢".M�1��:'" "k• 1�`. g Y .1
1e•. '�rars�fTfS�.£1� V .� Ct e •• S i' 's�'- 'rA"W�� _ F AV
� .. .`.i y3y �"$��''t F/•1�� � ._ � � ry,i i�F W' f�'�'ne _ n"�[+ -_� r i _
vi
"f'v �, •,LIYiyV T.1 F -�i .J . - t +_ , '�,j' J .i ,� w...'
• .,:� a � M - -'3.. S �! �''���-�_� '� .� '� �•- `4�� ��� � _ S`- r tier -' � 1' � �, �
v �� - � •� i, r:-�r ��° ram} �' `� '"'y' �. �^!�� 9 J-11 �r Y C t... . _ � � ?� 6� _ � �� i w',
4i. ` �. ,''�• sY' . -- �G_ �. 7 ". `�� 1^ Cg � i .. � � . � 6w •� �r y� '4 �`-�, , Vim. .Jr .(J. F = - -.. � ✓' ��� _ G' -
C..r�r
`.w'f'+vi..#'�
ps
!. - •� , .-.• �' . _ _r. aG, ., :t �,.{ ''� a' • [�J der. p '� ,I ep.�� : Y', ypG '1 �� f �T� +, �' sr
4: L
p tilt. y tiy� ti i
.• J.:• _ CM � - �,� ^_' G'l. '`G/j' � � �k- � �_ f �..✓�TTTvrr Y �~WCD
� � " ''+T"�'- � � ^!. �' - ,,-�T ., x ':�. ,Sr t� }% k'..,iw:.,n •f ;� .,.y, r�1� 3.!C p+� in F �'�' � �� ,�y•�'
P� . 's �c A-'." �,f''1,'ti T.'""• y.. 1t'#1. ;'„ •4 !.. k I t:•
CP E
t. eT'� ~� a r7• �� v. i r :� - - ` �l

rl
�R
1
. ,Ef� �.. rt ♦ �.r -t � .tr F ?v
��*� ��s"��i - •o! �� �,�, �r?y'TCr.r�ij"�r y'.�, y� ��k � s y- ""s:. � ,..
f`c
!14 t w
IV,
! 'r u . � �� ^•3 ` 1' ��fr,E J�- :. �� '�J � �,,yL']���.� 5h� � r +�� 4` x.�' �f '�� �Yt���r
�� r !_ - ,h, / :. t _ r_?! C .f�1.iL r` - Ad? _`� r.r r�i ',�.' ` •alb '.
.i r .� ✓• - � f !3 t �&i"•( ��'C � �-�',*, ��•,
-... 'v L t` ��' h Y FJ N ..k✓ , _ r , 4:� •.1 .�.$.•!17'-,a,.r
� , e 4 i �� J� ; � .� #•'- mil- �/+«" ,'SEA
F 11 ��� � � ;��f,_fL�+4: ��+-raP.. � +�' '.i •'*�� .,b � � �,,i!j �.f � �� �.71lc:...t ,�� y i�..
Q ,.U! �:,-1 i��.l�. f`.iC.+ !".-t� •,a F.,.• y`. !:``'J-' IS ,' P' G •,r`sil `'' 'Q '`_

�� � � fi� �� �` w *�� �'{.^' .. �' �. it "prll" y,t ' �u r s v<:'? ��'", � �� - �, • i ", . ,IIP�`� ]I1I I � 1.•�}
� t� � to � �f V t' i r � �..• ' �f+ /! s�`�+8►i�u'". Y - - ' �' .' itglol l ► � f i .~p� � +,.
{'. i tl�{Il.l l.fl� r I .41 •4
"� 'y° �- - '�� '� � r : .}j, y i . , h ti4r F. �R ar yt'S�" t '; mot' Il! 1{.� •�' _ �..�
'k ` �'. •;'• IRI'IIrNI1Nl i;f�fi r
Zw
�� 'Sw' • ` , ��'�1 � A � *•.•' i � � fr ♦ Y � r ! � � 'h ` e
IPA
... t. �- .1,± eb
t ,.':Sf 'L`'i`I �, I y i 9i1! 1 iq { W r• ,{r
T "Y� , c•qn" ' a r ,i, 1�� �JI' 11 � I F
J
M �''..,� ad +�' r _�..c� - '- F f��� j , I Ittil ���•I11� I1 ! ��. f•`f:
Al
• � � .� A r , • � ..�+', -�.: P 4 f,,y,• -^fit, •!� - !!F ! ], , ,k+.4 G � ; � - � �{� F J �"l .. � 'kJ}�, ,.�i,1' ; �" ,C, _ �r`t" :� � r , ; � I�I�Il kk�k il�, �A :� � y, !• I
s't�r-. — , ^F. I eI ``, ' � 1 , FFF { 1ti /�• 4
v�. . � \ ,�- ��-� � � . ; ` R • _ r - '. Gr Rz � r � +� '�I,"y' "`" r; � �. 1 I , 1 f� • }; � :� � { � 9 `f r , it �
ir
' r "c' , y .,�d .. .. ' r••- .'di ..F ;y s ti� J'�=M:, �f" 1'� �'t a , _. , �' I r,, I 1+ 7 �� { IF � � � '� �rj`. �+� � F !'. {+�.. } Y+
Y � n •'» ,�r l- f 5 , � - :'4 *• i t;`1 - - � 1 •. • r ;�''� I •�,j�.�` - , _ + -�. r F' U r l I 1 � � � }QL i �I '
� +.,+:,�•! \�' � �'� 9!C .. = 3� 3is. � I r,��' . ?; � r _ � I J E t „ i I t „ . � I E { f � �: 1 1+, � {'� ,y . i
$ - "�' .ti �. IM. ,Y '" •t�� I+ { }! ti r'�I� i�{ t f
�. r r ;�. # �' �� �. .✓] � .w�iw.Yy`1.� �` rl{=I�iE��1{ 1 'li �� r] _ i �f �e
� • _ 3 . �� � I�Iw ' Tlr`} � ,.�{ �,�� .`-� �,.�,� � .. s r r'�� 11�� I{� ' `I � � i �Ij �'1„ ,
.. ,r dP � r.,. �. •`f It �' .'I rf� r ►,� . -. f ;iy,' ^'� cr'�l. tri`II ��1 �i ��,� { 4. .� � �
�� "�4 R,y'il• ro,. �- � ��_ ��., ', 4 1 + ;�f''l"�'� ,� `` = f`� ` �i - ,y`' (�, �-_,•�� .. I, r �. J' �;I'� Il �, �' � •
� � ° - �'' _ `,� i .,�' "'" p'" "� � Cr., e•• �• � � `t, �, . � "e ti-'C L •` � � v� - �„� is
�s a. � .�! t '+ :+�f +�, P' — �• u a ' � , . �' � , =•�'� t i1 ,� t. �.. \ ri r` �' e. — v e I �, i �,.
:r 91�:" �.s'``�{. r " "'.,:� �tl 'ro'ti ��. �*+�"'i. ,1 �-..��, "+.� } �.�� • y. �,+. f4�.' �.,� ��t,.i-.- i � `' I• I� � i

EPIC - WQ PAGE NO: i
=%
04/22/2005 SERVICE REQUESTMORK ORDER
LOG NUMBER:
SECTION:
ENVIRONMENTALIST:
NATURE OF REQUEST:
FILE DESCRIPTOR 1:
FILE DESCRIPTOR 2:
2005-00417 DATE: 04/20/2005 Q 10.58
WQS TAKEN BY: David J. Rimer
Jeff S. Price
Citizen's Request
IC-F(1)-CI
REQUESTING PARTY
CONTACT: BLAINE COLE-CITY STORM WATER
COMPANYIWORKPLACE:
ADDRESS:
BUSINESS PHONE NO: [phone]
NOTIFICATION PROMPT: Government
COMPANY:
CARGILL
ADDRESS:
5000 SOUTH BV
CHARLOTTE NC 28217- -
CONTACT:
Jody House
PHONE NO:
[phone]
SERVICE REQUESTED..:
outfall is discharging milky white at 5320 Old Pineville Rd.
Tax ID #16908406
HOME PHONE NO:( ) -
FACILITY INFO
►:L�31il�L�T�.?
16907104
ACTION TAKEN.......:
4/20/2005
JPrice responded to CRS at Old Pinville Rd. Milky white discharge was observed. Smelled foul like rancid fat and oil. I
followed discharge across Old Pineville to a culvert under the RR tracks, and up a storm water ditch to the back of Cargill
(formerly C&T Refinery).
I spoke to Mr. Jody House, Plant Manager. He was unaware of the problem. According to Mr. House's investigation, a faulty
storm water catch basin at the back of the property was the culprit. In years past, storm water was caught and released via a
manual valve from the basin. Now storm water and process water from the back of the facility routed through the basin and
pumped to the on -site pre-treatment facility, prior to release to the CMU Sanitary Sewer.
The old valve had been removed and a steel plate had been fitted into the opening. The seal around the plate had failed and
no one had noticed.
Mr. House contacted Hepaco, who responded in approx. 1 hr. Hepaco went downstream to a suitable location North of
Tyvola and built an earthen berm. Then hydrants flused approx. 10,000 gallons fo water through the storm water conveyance
system, where Hepaco pumped it into trucks. The waste material was trucked back to Cargill and pumped into a holding tank.
Cargill is holding the material until CMU approves release to their pre-treatment facility.
4/22/2005
JPrice followed up on cleanup efforts. The site appeared to be thoroughly cleaned. The faulty basin valve had been filled in
with new concrete and some soil had been excavated. Clean up appeared adequate.
State NOV drafted.
COMMENTS ........... :

EPIC-WQ PAGE NO: 2
0412212601 SERVICE REQUESTMORK ORDER
SAMPLES
DISPOSITION, ETC.
NOTIFIED REQ PARTY:
Y
TIME ON SITE:
3:00
VERBAL OR WRITTEN:
V
TRAVEL TIME:
1:00
DATE NOTIFIED:
04/22/2005
ADMIN TIME:
3:00
NOTICE OF VIOLATION:
Y
MILEAGE:
0
LEGAL ACTION:
N
SITE VISITS:
0
WELL SAMPLE:
N
RECALL DATE:
1 1
OUTFALL SAMPLE:
N
STATUS:
OPEN
LAKEISTREAM SAMPLE:
N
DATE CLOSED:
1 1
EMERGENCY RESPONSE: N
REVIEWED BY: 1 1

■ compiete items 1. 2, and 3. Also complete A.
Rem 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. x
• Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you,
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailplece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
MR JODY HOUSE, PLANT MANAGER
CARGILL NORTH AMLRICA
50OWSOUTH BLVD.
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
swn/rmb 5/5/05
, /' !_,o2 _,j ❑ Agent
by (Printed Name)-- I C.
U�IME
is delivery address dltferent from Item 17 ❑ Yes
if Yi=S, enter dellvery address below: ❑ No
Service type
Certified Mall ❑ Express Mall
❑ Registered M Return Recelpt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mall ❑ C.o.o.
4. Restricted Delivery? (FXm Fee) ❑ Yes
a. € 7:QQ3€ 226Q 00Q13'S52 �315;
i i 7 3 r
PS Form
i T, February 2004 Domestic Return Recelpt
102595-02•M•1544

UNITED STATES POSTAL $ER a TL
`� He Postage&-Feos.Pald
PM
• Sender: Please V1nt your-rlai'ne, address;nd.Z11?f4,in`fhls box .y
,A,1'I: WAT R R FcCoF,I \1 r F 1)
\S i' G17.N`CLR AVENUE
1 )01 MAY 1 1 2�
RLSV1LLE NC 2811
atn-nrrtr�-nr'wan pBnuQaCIJT
AND NATURAL KSOURCES
MOORESVILLE i:...+++kL OFFICE
11111111111111iiIIIII II111111111

Ca �ll.
Dressings, Sauces and Oils
North America
May 8, 2009
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
ATTENTION: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
To Whom It May Concern:
R F C,,F, IV P D
MAY 15 2009
Attached are an original and one (1) copy of Cargill's Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Monitoring Report form for Outfall 003 for the month of April 2009.
Sincerely,
Cargill
Mark Fox
Plant Manager
Attachments
cc: Marcia Allocco, NCDENR Mooresville Regional Office
Carol Hambridge, AEI
Mailing Address: Location/Shipping Address: Tel. [phone]
P.O. Box 240457 5000 South Boulevard Fax: [phone]
Charlotte, NC 28224 Charlotte, NC 28217

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2009
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG060036 (This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME Careill Inc COUNTY Meeklenbur2
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES NA PHONE NO. 704 523-0414
CERTIFIED LABORATORY NA Lab # N
Lab #
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE 4
Ji"
100530N
'��-,00400,�
-005564�
j
'P
Vv�l'
ended,.z
RTdtal. Sum,
i�1"111li�,f�'�",,,..;O.H,,�'1��
Jiffch-jw", 110--,
e ca,,, xyg
d
ra-0tuandiurea
leciUu -olirorrmlpg,-�
g
j,pistandard'Unit:
stY TW
01
-r P�l
l
-"Within*4WN 9;Tvio
F45Iw
319100MIR
f.101m'I
R
003
April 2009
NS
NS
NS
NS
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? _ yes X no
(if yes, complete Part 13)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity onitering Requirements
J�ii 1,
UM
p Conec
"1 /ddlyir.'i
VIA-)
M j
BTU al Suspent
H':
S iidft"� iu�' nF"
t r
AE;a imot "O.C.U".
"'Ni
A'
-"qi "Ii7i; -n
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Date (first event sampled) NO FLOVVDURING NORMAL FACILITY OPERATING HOURS
Total Event Precipitation (inches): NA
Date (list each additional event sampled this reporting period and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
SWU-249-102107
Page 1 of 2

"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision is accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including
the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of P i ee) (Date)
SWU-249-102107
Page 2 of 2

.0,!r/25/2069 08:48 19197330059
uaicaius OZ: [4 P11 vvV. IArc. vscg. m2 t Attn:
PERCS PAGE 01/03
Paga 1 of 3 OZESI14 $_s
P. 44 S O..v-
NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER 1-800-4R4-8802 O ki—
•**GOVERNMENT USE ONLY***GOVERNMENT USE ONLY***
Information releasers to a third party shall comply with any
applicable federal and/or state Freedom of Information and Privacy Laws
Incident Report a 906600ai.., �eS
INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
rANOW
*Report taken by: F4 TIMOTHY SMITH at 14:17 on 25-MAY-09
Incident Type: FIXED
Incident Cause: EQUIPMENT FAILURE
Affected Area: STORM DRAIN
Incident was discovered on 25-MAY-09 at 10:30 local incident time.
Affected Medium: WATER STORM DRAIN
REPORTING PARTY
Name: MARK FOX
Organization; CARGILL
Address: 5000 S BLVD
CHARLOTTE, NC 20217
CARGILL reported for the responsible party.
PRIMARY Phone: [phone]
Type of Organization: PRIVATE ENTERPRISE
SUSPECTEO RESPONSIBLE PARTY
Name: MARK FOX
Organization: CARGILL
Address: 5000 S BLVD
CHARLOTTE, NC 28217
PRIMARY Phone: t70416797093
INCIDENT LOCATION
5000 S BLVD County: MECKLENBURG
City: CHARLOTTE State: NC Zip: 28217
RELEASED MATERIAL(S)
CHRIS Codd: NEC Official Material Name: NO CHRIS CODE
A180 Known As: SOAP STOCK
Oty Released: 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT Oty in Water: 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT
CALLER IS REPORTING A RELEASE OF HIGH SUSPENDED SOLIOS WITH A PH OF
B.S. CALLER STATES THAT THIS RELEASE WAS INTO THE STORM WATER.
SENSITIVE INFORMATION
INCIDENT DETAILS
Package: NIA
Building I0,
Type of Fixed Object: FOOD PROCESSING PLANT
Power Generating Facility: UNKNOWN
Generating Capacity:
Type of Fuel:
NPOES:
NPDES Compliance: UNKNOWN
---HATER INFORMATION ---
Body of Water: STORM DRAIN
Tributary of: KINGS BRANCH

W 26/2009 08:48 19197330059 PERCS PAGE 02/03
u5-,z!+1py O1: 24 PM www. nre. useg. mi ! Attn: Page 2 of a s26811q 8=
Nearest River Mile Marker:
Water Supply Contaminated: UNKNOWN
IMPACT
Fire Involved: NO Fire Extinguished: UNKNOWN
INJURIES: NO Hospitalized:
FATALITIES: NO Empl/Grew:
EVACUATION5:NO Who Evacuated;
Damages: ND
Closure Type Description of Closure
N
Air:
N
Road:
N
Waterway:
N
Track:
Empl/Crew: Passenger:
Passenger: Occupant;
Radius/Area:
Hours Direction of
Closed Closure
Environmental Impact: UNKNOWN
Media Interest: NONE Community Impact due to Material:
REMEDIAL ACTIONS
MATERIAL CONTAINED, CLEAN UP CREW ON -SITE
Release Secured: YES
Release Rate:
Estimated Release Duration:
WEATHER
Weather: PARTLY CLOUDY, 8211F
ADDITIONAL AGENCIES NOTIFIED
Federal: NONE
State/Local: NONE
State/Local On Scene: NONE
State Agency Number: NONE
Major
Artery:N.
NOTIFICATIONS BY NRC
USCG HSOC AT DHS (USCG HSOC DESK(
25-MAY-09 14:24 (202)2828114
DHS X&A STATE AND LOCAL PRGM OFFICE (RALEIGH, NC FUSION CENTER)
25-MAY-051 14:24 (202)5575179
DHS SOUTH CAROLINA FUSION CENTER (LE SENSITIVE ADVISORS do LIASON PRDGRA
25-MAY-09 14:24 (202)6690151
DOT CRISIS MANAGEMENT CENTER (MAIN OFFICE)
25-MAY-09 14;24 (202)3861663
U. S. EPA IV (MAIN OFFICE)
(404)6504955
U.S. EPA IV (NC/SC INCIDENTS)
25-MAY--09 14: 24 (404) 6504955
NC DEPT OF EMERGENCY MGMT (MAIN OFFICE)
25-MAY-09 14.24 (B00)8580368
NC OCCUPATIONAL ENVMTL EPIDEMIOLOGY (COMMAND CENTER)
25-MAY-09 14;24 (919)7075950
NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE COORO CTR (MAIN OFFICE)
25-MAY-09 14:24 (20212029201
NOAA RPTS FOR NC (MAIN OFFICE)
25-MAY-09 14:24 (205)5264911
SC EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DIVISION (MAIN OFFICE)

• `05l2612009 08:4B 19197330059 PERCS PAGE 03103
09125/0g 02. 210 PR vrv, nrc. aceq. mii Attn: Page 8 of 3 *2$0114 pa
25-MAY-09 14:24 (803)7378500
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DENR (MAIN OFFICE)
25-MAY-09 14;24 (919)7335083
SC DEPT OF ENV CNTL ATTN; ERS (MAIN OFFICE)
25--MAY-09 14. 24 (803) 2536488
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
CALLER STATES HE ATTEMPTED TO NOTIFY THE COUNTY,
^ #*�* END INCIDENT REPORT 4906600 ***
Report any problems by calling 1--000-424-8002
PLEASE VISIT OUR WEB SITE AT http: 1/www. nrc. uscg. mil
Prc-��y..,
p "L�
'6-0
l ,
dV
- ,rx s + L;_

Allocco, Marcia
From: Sorensen, Heather [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 4:48 PM
To: Allocco, Marcia
Subject: FW: Root Causes
Marcia,
FYI. Cargill spill from May 25, 2009.
Respectfully,
Heather Sorensen
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 4:43 PM
To: Sorensen, Heather
Subject: Root Causes
Heather — our extended team performed a root cause analysis on the incident Wednesday afternoon. Here
area couple bullet points summarizing our findings and corrective actions:
Root Causes:
• Excessive moisture and low pH in a byproduct stream created fermentation causing the material to
expand and foam in the railcar. The pressure from fermentation blew the gasket on the railcar and the
material overflowed into an area flooded from an overnight rainstorm
• Area inside the plant flooded due to a sump pump that had malfunctioned. This puddling created a
means for the byproduct residual to leave the property.
Immediate Corrective Actions:
• Immediate corrective action was implementing the SPCC plan. Area was contained, Hepaco was
dispatched to vacuum and flush the material from the ditch and drains. Storm water drains, ditch and creek
were inspected.
• Ditch was vacuumed and straw was distributed throughout the ditch to absorb additional moisture
and solids
Hepaco returned and completed a flush of the entire track area, ditch, and drain
Permanent Corrective Actions:
• initial startup of the refining process is complete. Permanent parameters around byproduct quality
have been established and are being monitored to reduce the risk of fermentation
Sump pump was fixed.

Supervisor rounds implemented during rain events
Initiating an engineering study on additional containment along the West RR tracks, gravity
controlled

VrNff
,A �®
NMENTAL A ■ R 1m
October 6, 2009
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Attn: Marcia Allocco, Environmental Chemist
Re: Stormwater Permit Compliance — Quantitative Sampling
Cargill, Inc, Charlotte, NC
NPDES Permit No. NCG060036
AEI Job No. N198-11
Dear Ms. Allocco:
OCT " 8 2009
On behalf of Cargill. Inc., located at 5000 South Blvd, Charlotte, NC, this letter is a follow-up to the
recent telephone conversation between Aware Environmental® Inc. (AEI) and you regarding the
facility's difficulty in obtaining both the required monthly and semi-annual stormwater monitoring data.
As we discussed, Cargill has not been able to sample due to the timing of rain that has occurred at the site.
The qualifying storm events have either occurred during non -business hours, when a first flush cannot be
sampled during the first 30 minutes, or there has been less than 72 hours of "dry weather between rain
events.
In accordance with our telephone conversation, at this point in time, since samples have not been
collected for a significant length of time, the Mooresville Regional office of the NCDENR-DWQ would
prefer to see some type of stormwater sample data, even if the samples are not collected within the first 30
minutes of run-off or if samples are collected after less than 72 hours of dry weather.
We have passed this information on to Cargill so that they can collect samples at the next rainfall event(s)
if possible. We appreciate your guidance on this matter. if you we have misinterpreted you or you have
any further recommendations on this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely.
AWARE EnvironmentaiO Inc.
CAAJ�
Carol Z. Hambridge, P.E.
Water Resource Manager
cc: File
Mark Fox, Cargill, Inc.
Frank Persinger, Cargill, Inc.
juFfIloill
P.O. BOX 2669 8514 McALPINE PARK DR.
MATTHEWS, NC 28106-2669 SUITE t00
MAIN: 704-845-1697 • FAX: [phone] CHARLOTTE, NC 28211

August 14, 2009
AUG 1 7 2009
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Attention: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
To whom it may concern:
Attached is a completed original and one (1) copy of Cargill's Stormwater Discharge Outfall
(SDO) Monitoring form. There was no flow during normal operating hours for the stormwater
sample collection for the month of July 2009.
Sincerely,
Mark Fox
Plant Manager
Attachment
cc: Frank Persinger
Dressings, Sauces and Oils PO Box 240457
North America Charlotte, NC 28224 Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
5000 South Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28217

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: ;LO2
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG069036 (This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME Cargill Inc COUNTY Mecklenburg
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES NA PHONE NO. (-70-4) 523-0414
CERTIFIED LABORATORY NA Lab # NA
—Lab # PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE 4
Part A.- Specific Monitoring Requirements
u A
a >"No. M=
te'g,
S n�ilhtr
F;.; Nih � i
; ,5!N a �{,A ji'] I
A—,00340�:-',
ti'eiOic I:OX�/ en
Cii1 a�ttl; reuse
-Eec�l Cnlii'ornn , M:
5661sifi
its
fftfi
003
March 2009
NS
NS
NS
NS
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? — yes _?Lno
(if yes, complete Part 13)
Part B- Vehicle Maintenance Activity onitoring Requirements
7
lal
pH,NM
Standard units
otot0r Usage; ..
Annual
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses,
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Date (first,event sampled) NO FLOW DLJRING-NLDRMAL FACILITY OPERATING HOURS,
Total Event Precipitation (inches): ISA,
Date _ (list each additional event sampled this reporting period and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches)*.
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn-, DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617
SWU-249-102107

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL'(SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2009
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCGO60036 (This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory,)
FACILITY NAME Cargill Inc _ ,!. COUNTY Mecklenburg
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES NA PHONE NO. ( 704 ) 523-0414
CERTIFIED LABORATORY NA Lab # PlA
Lab 0 PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE 4
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
yft
•Ta" � � ��.
I j.4✓ :,lf .i M4 i.�q
l �,
,; 4'" I •i:AfS"r ^,�
+�L_ I��, i�E
�, tJ'F '(1 .1 -
.'.ti r +
al' i _fir
.,-,u •: :nxxx ,n: �
& VC H10 ended"
yjyga
�� 1,a °)t 1f w%:,N•
�lDlt�;,�y +',5, �
.'�,�r1;,
� 1 4u.IJ
^.. +^.r!I �s'„i'd �• t,R�"
3?}.•Y 4z 'C' k:'o..', ' r�
�� �r � �. ,r � �
�v51,y��1 i. 1/,fj ';'A, ijt,.�i5'.,
�yj?�Ut�ndA�Y��llJ 1'S� �R
.l 4' 'i fiii%�}�+erdi�'�1.�- �:"'
��.'��, lyy� � Y( F-'ilrisli..�'
n 'c'yi": I 13i'"r
.. ,v,; � �
��CH`elnl�iil Ciai '"eei
� ¢�Ffi■�.■.l }�jy��y jy,�y y��,.�. � �
x�,�•'+SAlel��AnU�� 'SS
�i!v�.i 7 l.�•,:',�` �G. ���;
$a�:},^,)��,^�.111 .S'A.r;;;r;i.t
00556 � k �
.t• r-
'K ;Oilaand,t re`sC
y�
,144S4 ,(}�y '��, µ�`.J�YZ{�„ �, x `�f
:fi'=1�"`�' '.11l�.J k �1r'lt:
w s'?I.`�Si�.�y,•gik�
•B JI�,k:LJ`..x. ..�'-i-,r
# - S"1 T-_ e�Vrar
3IFi16F
I R a••,!r-". �
x 1wec�al Colifbrin' Ir
-i^: �;1h yr,rya y..,:�I� .:: f�f��i "?I�jj.1 .
f,Y, �V�V�fW 1p�r�i�VV �1>,\'.fie.'
'! 4+.
I;,.o :.,.,,- ;� ry
- ,.v�-
� 'es1'ti�;• i� dS3r
w T u� •?,�t��itm .�
'��'" n.:x �'kl.s,^
u.
i' .. -; �.' .. i<
, ;:,� . . ,, Ir ,., ..., �><' kuil.. ?
�'�t.�;7'.1', � � -..e-
•}r'+ hF ..;�... ,.� .:.I
Ed,.': . t1.' .�_:I�t.
, �'T�:+ '!� , ' t'.°
➢., .:�" i. ...n:..s
"'�. -s:''-
c„ -.-�� .'r,;,� �. -1 ;i
003
March 2009
NS
NS
NS
NS
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses,
See General Permit text.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? — yes X no
(if yes,,complete Part 13)
Part 13: Vehicle Maintenance Activity Monitoring Requirements
itftt�rl:r[�N41iXA2
'..1"a9� r.�. ssa i+.rt.<��F' �•hp:yy�,a 'r
.*+`+
:4, �`y�,�'MyY(^v. �1'°�
!,?"f\'a'1:�l�K,O� ��rn..iToynYt:�^"cFViT/� x "�113;;''�
�
N'•'-"
1 �''}�y}rm -•Yy+y r.. �.K} 51� -S.. '}•
:'f �+."+ "ff..F22:,,;;1r'l"'l.�liatA n.l�I:T =Pt.a$e' }.�riFd�;.1'�''�^+f;�`y[
"N.. d 7 ,
0�30L_f1
F� �'t': �r g�_-..A..,:
,.'S,Totar�1�=O.t 1.[.Jfame?ni; de„rM5..�o ,7,�sjr°'
ld
1r
V
,!.rt.rFias7,:t'.F.n�.�5i�c't
1k�!i!,_.., �•4y1tW°r�r" ? ='r S-.:r�n•l'. HtSlt 7',-r',:,..t,�vN.t'.,� .1t !. "'£]�' �� '
utifts
:��c.ij�-�fa', N' z�c.:W'?M': +O:tiyt�Eint^'. •:.�, If ��,.,..� 1eI�1'�
Anrttial.avt• e, riUmo.;;.
', I] �yy^l sr•, hh y vvJ)y{..
7��4ht�il f�i\Asf.u�5
�{
\f`�'�i���,,1��vi�kS..���v'y�l%�����i.N'VV.}^�":M
y ♦,,, y*{�yy{ �M C.
(A"�r�,•��S'��.
,y�1
''Yl �'L'� �1.I VOaI �� h yt.2
1y�1
-�n� 'y.��. V.� 9i0_ r s
.4
Note: If'you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier 1 or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Date (first event sampled) NO FLOWDVRING NORMAL FACILITY OPERATING HOURS
Total Event Precipitation (inches): N_
Date (list each additional event sampled this reporting period and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-I617
SWU-249- 102107

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL '(SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2009
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE N45 NCG060036 (This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME Cargill Inc COUNTY Mecklenburg
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES NA PHONE NO. (7. 04_) 523-04I4
CERTIFIED LABORATORY NA Lab # NA
Lab # PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE -�
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
dyye Uutfall
fig_, No x #
yr r (t 5
ui,�
€,. i;. ,
;, • �, ,�,;::�i;
€ Yy
i� •It Date
. Sampleza ;
3
�;, Collected;�4�',,.€
�� l{�y
4lr+.:i��pp•£
a{�%vim��dlJl-
t :00530.;;`�'
;: 9'
k:r7' - t:@'
zTatalSas ndeii-;t:'
{tMe, F?e .
;�h7:v(..:a
. ,5oltdsl'ilr�7
�,a�� :�y,;,'t> >�',°i � 3����
004004 1 w
a.um
4 '.,K 7 "4i�x �...1.� _ry
.1" .� ..,
, pH',' r .
h r... Y- f- C.. i,
�,. a
Standaa
rd units �
n��i �Oii340.,�u,s
". :
•. �E•r,4
"Chem"ical` x'
y0 Ygen
P: Dein nd
;� � a ,. ,, .
,t .�: t�
i a00556
..,,,� 7
�+, Oil And+Grease
'R'...1A,
,} ,,
r �� �• r,
i� �,aN �mpp'/L
b, [ Y:.'xt
L:
, � r [
,s.°s, ..31[iI6.�.
..[,
' I ecai Cohform�`
3 .:,Colonies er,3l[lb�ml ;.
�', •p
<s...
iBenchinarlc��
,)r: ��- r+31.,i�'<i.l:l(}0".vl%._y.:r.{`W...ithin
b;b. 9.[) ..._
=120, i . E<. „
u, ;.Ys 30
003
March 2009
NS
NS
NS
NS
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? _ yes X no
(if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activitv Monitoring Requirements
,5!., ..
;i:
utfall'�
�t 0.. jgg;
">b . f.�> -R`
}allo
.;.,;
!!1 'n4 .f'... •..4l6�'ti
.sl s t "s�,,,
. 4$ iDate� raw
p,i{r{£L ds : >�ayp
E :` f� ,_xr r' :�T�
IS leCollected,F�
P •�..3 ..„
i=. w.y x L € Q0556,, <.. , i'
fi�l�;�ar ;r - �' -r-.m� y;4:;w t�
�s,,G t 0i1<and,Grease; .4,�; c
. ,.:.. r• «
a r
E i3.
k a,�, Ii [ s:;«0053D;
;y r, ,.a.r. 1.i � �h
aTotal'�Sus elided SoEicls,
p,
iY, „- ,
,,�;; , r f�{
Nm
f�•.. 1'i,.
''Lr.s'
00400 i`IVI
N ss
3�is-s3: ,u' rrr,•�-: " `r.,
;, , L,' �c H�r,r
1p ^�)�
„r;,; t�,,,. ..�t.. F �,.r,
:: Standard°iinits,�i
'ii
i� :•� -
;irk ,
,� .:aht
:New;Motor Oil ,Elsa e''€
g
.��.:r •� rii:, • : s,,+
=Annual avera e'.aUmc0;.'
.,d. a, ,::;: x
�i,,,1 .f+:,�..7;
BenG)}ttiark._'.d,€
y.,i., Y. 0 s• ,-.G Iyy..:Vp- i
„a ,,� Lj )YI IN l%t,"Ar.
kS.i; :Y7. . ,tp..?'n <.,.n@ Rr.
--[r. ... ,'t
�yd.t [4 t1.1�. i
Fi` :.,x �.?
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier 1 or Tier 2 responses,
See General Permit text. OCT 2 8 2009
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS: Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Date (first event sampled WED DURING-NORMACFACILI'I'-Y-_OPERATING-HOURSI Attn: DWQ Central Files - -%
Total Event Precipitation (inches): NA 1617 Mail Service Cerifer, .
. Y
Raleigh, North Carolina 'Z*9' 1617'
Date (list each additional event sampled this reporting period and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
SWU-249-102107

Ca/*Iq%ll-
August 14, 2009
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Attention: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
To whom it may concern:
Attached is a completed original and one (1) copy of Cargill's Stormwater Discharge Outfall
(SDO) Monitoring form. There was no flow during normal operating hours for the stormwater
sample collection for the month of July 2009.
Sincerely,
Mark Fox
Plant Manager
Attachment
cc: Frank Persinger
Dressings, Sauces and Oils PO Box 240457
North America Charlotte, NC 28224 Tel [phone]
5000 South Boulevard Fax [phone]
Charlotte, NC 28217

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2009
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG060036 (This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME Cargill Inc COUNTY Mecklenburg
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES NA PHONE NO. (7. 04 1523-0414
CERTIFIED LABORATORY NA Lab # NA
Lab # PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE 4
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
x,}saa�;.; 'v- a jV,i,�.-iY7
OntlAll A
i �.. t ,x^x:ti:F'
i Ua�e
k'�f- t ,1 ?:tk;
�, �-0'S0530,_s
r,�✓.•=iwxArM1 ra,
s E �:j:� � � ^i
c
s•A, , ti.-
+Cib,F�.:.,
0aF3fi4a~b, 0•:'
...L".r:..�G
6
��u�.:�s'-
_w-:,Y:.,7, a
`
r"rt,�i�,.
1''
fi.i-.�!
",m•�.
oTA
!,xii.l
,�l4.F �k,
Ff;.f=t iail;
.31n sl.K�;
"i•.', ,Y
T,r �.h,ry:t.
. rr:,n�;F Kx ',,i�F:^:
rn,S.al0i
_,- ''$'ja,.,.Jnn30
n
�P ',.ti?+,r^AL:
r
- ..i Sd..
r �t�'•+rls
.00055
6ksl:.bi'uf:iotwr>,?.i
.,
,'ii=..�'3.�^l�✓r- e3J
;Wtii(' .
1i+.1. hi
4 �Y k ,*;°-an.g[�.,2� �
3 L
F".
.e•£ ^'�, R}'
�w
r.t
d���';��:��
� y i�,,✓ �
'�.[
r;_,'
-rr'1:0:
�
'�c(sJ
' A.n
_
'.M1
',
S,.'
k F.., ' k •ray .:
�, U a�ii
�,�,*.<„��F } 5'if: 'tF� t, t�
�tL' ,�.:iS�,r 4 ; ;� ' ! .�i �
.;. ,4iti. i.� ^ .�
•,a „ f:,..+,.r } 1. ',SF
�;a�gltt "1r
{'� h v,.Y7 : f5,;•
�Ir. { f� �'k > �.� ,ia`
t 9`'
��,vbt..a
,�%: + !x'.ir A i "a v
-
}A"y f.:l. i .nt+ ti,; •1G`� a
RArc.,�.A �F
�,1,;',F.F; .+:rr�.r
#-. .
r;'r sshi'.�:? A
fsf--;.fin N r,v.
'�•„ ",.rn, l�'s``� 'i4 4� r �,',,:
J:,. v.;•�}_..�i'S�. �.rv�e�:
S - tiA'•'4>v'-1 Y ..,`c ::
;i`„ ',ly�>� '.i C`.e�, Y �.:
,�•. - -�. •ia <.- �.-
L i r
��:��'WitNtds6:0`�'"9.��r��.�.
_
i f i"£•f'�"f _ -� �. 7
�ii l`h J
- r t�1�N h(A i :y["'{.- V i,
003
March 2009
NS
NS
NS
NS
Note; If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier 1 or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month?_ yes X no
(if yes, compiete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity Monitoring Requirements
,'Ai':''. y;� r�C1;,V.,S
+t O�itfAtf`.�t.3^�
b?;k :�,,.� �.. �y"h �rF,,AA}; r¢�t'x!„�, ��
`�;:� "I:V�LL.+'"p� '.� 3f
dV k'.�:?,..i4 �+�t i,`E, JI-'L J ,YI
'�'�,:[;. S. Fa:7, �(y.7P�?i,, �"..i_'>t 1GF
-1 j'� u a as ri � fi ;.F T J,
""1'�i { M1•„�:'i j�//�� �.yy /� i,
',�,'� R,��'"��:0115J0�}� �r--.,' r,1
i r�
- I+'.., f /�/�'Y.,N'
•,. l}04 VOr:.;t-]i .vA'.-
L r ,ti. :=i .•,.. 7 k', A t;
� b .i�
"� fts�ra
� [r 3 .• x
`i' Co�ctd� a�Fv;
4if ani��Greg'se ;
Sus eni3ed,5o[iii�,
p
p H `
New: Moto"r; Oil.Usa e
:
,,;Total
r
"al/ma
Stan tar(Funits
Annual, avers e:
' `"-Ct i'M S, v- 2.-
�enchmttrk�
5 , f, T k T� W i
- lM 1 rl'�"- AS rtrYl -.}
` L - t
pA
ra: ��.
!< - -
0
Y l• b !" '
'
t i , � � �,- � .,, 4�. ., ,s.
,e ,. t,:, . < r . .3 ,:, � . �;;,, . ,
. ,y
�'' �,. c•6
. , �: ;
'o
C
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for p ;youu� imp t Tier I or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text. o 9 Q
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS: 0 f4pil. Original and one copy to:
DiA�ion of Water Quality
Date (first.event sampled) NOFLOWDURINGIVORMAL FACILITY OPERATING HOURS AttnrrDWQ Central Files
Total Event Precipitation (inches): NA,! 1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-'1617
Date _______ (list each additional event sampled this reporting period and rafnfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
SWU-249-1021 n7

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL"(SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR:-LO09
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG060036 (This monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME Cargill IncCOUNTY Mecklenburg
PERSONCOLLECTING SAMPLES NA PHONE NO. (-,104 ) 523-0414
CERTIFIED LABORATORY NA Lab # NA
Lab # PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE 4
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
•4
k " �,
led"
�0
I-'-""sz
4 1 AM, 'Wi- 'Tilly
Rtapiryd,, M
003
March 2009
NS
NS
NS
NS
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for p14, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses,
See General Permit text.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? _ yes X no
(if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity onitorinp, Requirements
1"N11SAys.
M
4M
i
-en '',
61,Si es6i
P
60*6
j
luAN
I
'-units IM
A
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier I or Tier 2 responses,
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Date (flrst event sampled) NO ELO DURING NORMAL FACILITY OPERATING HOURS
Total Event Precipitation (inches). NA
Date _ (list each additional event sampled this reporting period and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches): -
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
SWI T-)dQ- In') I M

F W A TF Michael F. Easley, Governor
O�0 9?0 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
65
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
December 27. 2001
WALTER COOPER
C&T REFINERY LLC
PO BOX 240457
CHARLOTTE. NC 28224
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal
C&T REFINERY LLC
COC Number NCG060036
Mecklenburg County
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently covered for stormwater discharge under General Permit NCG060000. This permit expires
on August 31, 2002. The Division staff is currently in the process of rewriting this permit and is scheduled to have
the permit reissued by late summer of 2002. Once the permit is reissued, your facility would he eligible for
continued coverage under the reissued permit.
In order to assure your continued coverage under the general permit, you must apply to the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) for renewal of your permit coverage. To make this renewal process easier, we are informing you in
advance that your permit will be expiring. Enclosed you will find a General Permit Coverage Renewal
Application Form. The application must he completed and returned by March 4, 2002 in order to assure continued
coverage under the general permit.
Failure to request renewal within this time period may result in a civil assessment of at least $250.00. Larger
penalties may be assessed depending on the delinquency of the request. Discharge of stormwater from your facility
without coverage under a valid stormwater NPDES permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and
could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day.
Please note that recent federal legislation has extended the "no exposure exclusion" to all operators of industrial
facilities in any of the I I categories of "storm water discharges associated with industrial activity." (except
construction activities). If you feel your facility can certify a condition of "no exposure", i.e. the facilty industrial
materials and operations are not exposed to stormwater, you can apply for the no exposure exclusion. For additional
information contact the Central Office Stormwater Staff member listed below or check the Stormwater & General
Permits Unit Web Site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/stormwatcrhtml
If the subject stormwater discharge to waters of the state has been terminated, please complete the enclosed
Rescission Request Form. Mailing instructions are listed on the bottom of the form. You will be notified when the
rescission process has been completed -
If you have any questions regarding the permit renewal procedures please contact Mike Parker of the Mooresville
Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Aisha Lau of the Central Office Stormwater Unit at [phone]. ext. 578
Sincerely.
Bradley Sennett, Supervisor
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
cc: Central Files
Mooresville Regional Office
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
e�A
NCDENR
Customer Service
1-800-623-7748

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr_, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P-E., Director
Division of Water Quality
August 23, 2002
ROBERT FOOTE
C&T REFINERY LLC
PO BOX 240457
CHARLOTTE, NC 28224
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal
C&T Refinery LLC
COC Number NCGO60036
Mecklenburg County
Dear Permittee:
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NCGO60000, the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. This permit is reissued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated December 6, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
* A new Certificate of Coverage
* A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCGO60000
* A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from responsibility
for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or
decree.
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Aisha Lau of the Central Office Stormwater
and General Permits Unit at [phone], ext. 578
cc: Central Files
Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files
Mooresville Regional Office
Sincerely,
Bradley Bennett, Supervisor `
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
2 9 2002
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
AA
NCDENR
Customer Service
1- 800-6ZJ-7748