20191215 Ver 1_PJD Request 10-09-2018 (signed)_20190913

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 13120 Capital Blvd
City, State:
County:
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Wake
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
1841187608
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Bob Zarzecki
Mailing Address:
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
Telephone Number:
[phone]
Electronic Mail Address:
[e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant)
Interested Buyer or Under
Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Pleasants Family, LLC
Mailing Address:
3023 Devonshire Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607-6619
Telephone Number:
[phone]
Electronic Mail Address:
N/A
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
*See Agent Authorization Form Attached
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/iJSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 66.67 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.997957
Longitude: -78.521612
zA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
W1 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
F] NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
1_J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information isvoluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 09/19/2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Bob zarzecki - 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Raleigh NC 27615
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: N/A
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Wake Forest
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.997957 Long.: -78.521612
Universal Transverse Mercator: N/A
Name of nearest waterbody: Richland Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
S1
35.999106
-78.520767
1300 linear ft.
non -wetland
Section 404
W1
35.998271
-78.520101
0.1 ac.
wetland
Section 404
W2
35.998631
-78.520093
0.03 ac.
wetland
Section 404
W3
35.999384
-78.520986
0.6 ac.
wetland
Section 404
W4
35.999888
-78.521750
0.25 ac.
wetland
Section 404
W5
35.999935
-78.521306
0.005 ac.
wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: V =1000' & USGS Grissom & Wake Forest Quad
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: wake county Soil survey sheet 10 & 11
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
D
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations -
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Bob
Zarzecki
Digitally signed by Bob Zarzecki
DN: cn=Bob Zarzecki, o—S&EC,
PA, ou=Wetlands Department,
email—bza rzecki @sa ndec.co m,
c=us
Date: 2018.10.09 13:23:49 -04'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Rov�onment .. o s> lft
841-Vd5 Of'X006 toad, Shite 104,U ,, N 2-760 v &onei '(9M 446-5; �* i919) W, T
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: 13120 Capital Boulevard S&EC Project #13265
Date: 2018
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: James Lastinaer Field Office: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to f=ederal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions. This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
13120 Capital Boulevard, Wake Forest, Wake County, NC 27587
Evaluation Area: +/- 66.67 acres PIN No.: 1841187608 Lat/Long: 35.998244/-078.519672
Watershed: Richland Creek, 27-21-(1.5), "WS-IV;NSW', Neuse 03020201
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: Pleasants Family LLC
Address: 3023 Devonshire Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607-6619
Phone No.: { ) Fax No.: ( ) Mobile No.: ( )
Email:
h Re96an;S NVOLIn 91 R9 l
Property Owner (please print) Date
?U-M"
Property Owner Signature
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
Me best of our knowledge.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 13265.W3/ 13120 Capital Blvd City/County: Wake Forest/Wake Sampling Date: 9/18/2018
Applicant/Owner: Pleasants Family, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): JH/MM Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.998959 Long: -78.520408
Soil Map Unit Name: Me- Mantachle NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _F__� NOF71 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation = Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? n0 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation= Soil 0, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? no (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 3
Datum: NAD 83
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �0 No= Is the Sampled Area v l
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .I r L No
Remarks:
Impacts of hurricane Florence still present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑✓ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
.❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0
No ❑ Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches):
II
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No ❑ Depth (inches): 4
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30' x 30' )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
% Cover
20
10
30
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
YES FAC
YES FAC
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 85% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
15
6
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
OBL species 30 x 1 =30
Saplinsize: 30' x 30'
g Stratum (Plot )
10 20
1. Acer rubrum
10
YES FAC
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species 55 x 3 =165
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
YES FAC
FACU species 10 x4=40
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 105 (A) 255 (g)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.4
20
= Total Cover
Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
IlHydrophytic
J l 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
E]
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'x 30' )
Q 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 Ligustrum sinense
10
YES FACU
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
❑ 4 Morphological Adaptations'
2
- (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
10 = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
30' x 30' Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium vimineum 5 NO FAC (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Saururus cernuus 30 YES OBL Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Boehmeria cylindrica 10 YES FACW approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
g. It (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
45 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22.5 20% of total cover: 9
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes T71 No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
or confirm
Sampling Point: DP1
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 3/2 60 10YR 4/4 40 RM M Sandy loam
9-12 10YR 4/3 70 10YR 3/2 30 RM M Sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 13265.W3/ 13120 Capital Blvd City/County: Wake Forest/Wake Sampling Date: 9/18/2018
Applicant/Owner: Pleasants Family, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): JH/MM Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Spring Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.999727 Long: -78.521035
Soil Map Unit Name: Me- Mantachle NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _F__� NoF-7-1 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation = Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? n0 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation= Soil 0, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? no (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 0
Datum: NAD 83
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �0 No= Is the Sampled Area v l
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .I r L No
Remarks:
Impacts of hurricane Florence still present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑✓ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
.❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0
No ❑ Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes 0
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No ❑ Depth (inches): 2
No ❑ Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30' x 30' )
1. Quercus phellos
2. Platanus occcidentalis
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Acer rubrum
5.
6.
Absolute
% Cover
5
30
10
10
55
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
no FAC
yes FACW
no FAC
no FAC
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
20% of total cover:
27.5
30' x 30'
Herb Stratum (Plot size. )
11
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
2. Saururus Cernus
OBL species 10 x 1 =10
30' x 30'
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
FACW species 55 x 2 = 110
1. Platanus occidentalis
20
yes
FACW
55 165
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 120 (A) 285 (g)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.3
20
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Il
1 11 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
Q✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
v
6.
= Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
30' x 30'
Herb Stratum (Plot size. )
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium
30 YES FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Saururus Cernus
10 YES OBL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Boehmeria cylindrica
5 NO FACW
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. It (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
45 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22.5 20% of total cover: 9
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes T71 No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
or confirm
Sampling Point: DP2
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 3/2 70 7.5YR 4/3 30 RM M Sandy loam
8-12 10YR 3/2 90 10YR 3/4 10 RM M Sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 13265.W3/ 13120 Capital Blvd City/County: Wake Forest/ Wake
Applicant/Owner: Pleasants Family, LLC State: NC
Investigator(s): JH/MM Section, Township, Range:
Sampling Date: 9/18/2018
— Sampling Point: DP3
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.00086 Long: -78.521438
Soil Map Unit Name: CeC2- Cecil NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _0 No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation = Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? n0 Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
_ Slope (%):
Datum: NAD 83
Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation L__J Soil 0, or Hydrology ,0 naturally problematic? no (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No ✓� Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes.= No
Impacts of hurricane Florence still present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
.❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches):
❑ ❑
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes= No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30' x 30' )
1. Quercus alba
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Fagus grandifolia
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
% Cover
5
10
10
25
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
yes FACU
yes FAC
yes FACU
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 28% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
12.5
1
5
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
Saplinsize: 30' x 30'
g Stratum (Plot )
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
0 0
1. Fagus grandifolia
30
yes
FACU
FACW species x 2 =
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
yes
FAC
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
FACU species 60 x 4 = 240
3. Quercus alba
10
yes
FACU
0 0
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: 80 (A) 300 (g)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.75
50
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
25
10
II 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
LJ -
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'x 30' )
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 Ligustrum sinense
5
yes
FACU
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
v
6.
5 = Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
g.
It (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes = No�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
or confirm
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc
0-8 7.5YR 4/4 100
8-12 5YR 4/6 100
Sampling Point: DP3
Texture Remarks
Sandy loam
Sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 13265.W3/ 13120 Capital Blvd City/County: Wake Forest/ Wake
Applicant/Owner: Pleasants Family, LLC State: NC
Investigator(s): JH/MM Section, Township, Range:
Sampling Date: 9/18/2018
— Sampling Point: DP4
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.000489 Long: -78.522115
Soil Map Unit Name: CeC2- Cecil NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _0 No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation = Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? n0 Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
_ Slope (%):
Datum: NAD 83
Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation L__J Soil 0, or Hydrology ,0 naturally problematic? no (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �0 No Is the Sampled Area v l
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .I r L No
Impacts of hurricane Florence still present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑✓ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
.❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0
No ❑ Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes 0
No ❑ Depth (inches): 8
II
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No ❑ Depth (inches): 4
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30' x30' )
Fa us randlfolla
1. g g
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Plantanus occidentalis
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
% Cover
10
20
15
45
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
YES FACU
YES FAC
YES FACW
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
20% of total cover: 4
22.5
30' X30'
9
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
1. Saururus Cereus
OBL species 30 x 1 =30
30' x30'
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
2. Microstegium
30 YES FAC
FACW species 25 x 2 = 50
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
YES
FAC
60 180
2. Plantanus occidentalis
10
YES
FACW
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species 30 x 4 = 120
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: 145 (A) 380 (g)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.62
20
= Total Cover
Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
IlHydrophytic
J l 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
E]
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' x30' )
Q 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 Ligustrum sinense
20
YES
FACU
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
v
6.
20 = Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
30' X30'
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Saururus Cereus
30 YES OBL
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Microstegium
30 YES FAC
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
g. It (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes T71 No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
or confirm
Sampling Point: DP4
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 5/4 50 10YR 2/2 50 RM M Sandy loam
8-12 10YR 2/2 100 Sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

: �' W�l NO
IN
LP
�o�
goo
W A,,
me for Geogr ph c 14formataon & An I s
Lante
Project Number:
13265.W3
Map Title:
0
N
1,000 2,000
Figure 1- USGS
Project Manager:
I I
I I I I I I I
BZ
13120 Capital Blvd,
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Feet
Scale:
1 " = 1000'
•
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Source: USGS Grissom &
Date:
09/17/2018
Wake Forest Quads 2016
8412 F,11, ofNama Rond. Saila 104, Relaigh. NC 27615 • Ph-, (919) 8465900 • Fah: (919) 846-946
-d--

t
ce
ecIc
r C`
LdI3 r t -
IT Wake ion
• . SII - -
hur - OV
eB
U
.ec y 'y5k
1132 CeC
1
i ApI32
»7
�.2 JJ Ap
o.
ri
C
pp ,kyr
13? ae _
or}
Q i
. off .2
f:" , � � �' S� Nei 5 �• �.
EB2. .,.
L,
ti .>,
CM
+ »
v y,
1
'+a
�" N_C C me r p f m & n I s•
Project Number: Map Title: N
13265.W3 0 700 1,400
Project Manager: Figure 2- Soil Survey/ I I I I I I I I I
BZ 13120 Capital Blvd, Feet
Scale: Wake Forest, NC 27587
1 " = 700' 1
Source: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: Wake County Soil i I 8412 Falls of Neuss Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax [phone]
09/17/2018 Survey Sheets 10 & 11 -&-..

a�
�o
�DP3
S02 Start S03 Start �
57 TT 72 //J� J�
Stream determinations confirmed by DWR on 10/3/18
h� DP49
S01 Start
73 TT CH //
33 30 TT C H
75 TTCH 29 TT CH
_o
J
J
Q
DP2
Q
56 TT CH 25 TT C H
Q
0
101 TT CH
DP1
W1
24 TT C H
w '1.e
E DUNPATRICK PL ;
Preliminary Approximation of Waters of the US
Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only
S&EC reserves the right to modify this map based on more fieldwork,
detailed delineations and any other additional information. Jurisdictional
boundary approximations were mapped using topographic maps, air photos
and ground truthing. If the site is going to be disturbed, a detailed
delineation should be performed by S&EC, approved and permitted by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as required. If the user of this work desires
an accurate map of the regulated features identified by S&EC, they should
authorize S&EC to perforin a detailed delineation and then retain a NC
Registered Professional Land Surveyor to locate S&EC's flagging.
IProject Number: 13265.W31 Map Title:
Project Manager:
BZ
Scale:
1" = 350'
I Date:
09/18/2018
Wetland Sketch Map
13120 Capital Blvd,
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Source: NC One Map
Wake County Aerials
¢1
ICS
Legend
Evaluation Area
Potentially Jurisdictional Perennial Stream
Non -Jurisdictional Ephemeral Stream
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland
50' Neuse Buffer
0 350 700 N
Feet
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P
&512I;*] I& of Xc cRc&8uAc IW. RAIcigh.NC 2761!•Ph— (919)$46�5W- Fax:[phone]
SI