310288_Inspection_20190827

%Division of Water Resources
Lifitymber ® - ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
��[-_,-.��►►q�' Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 1 1� �IIt'W11� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
FacilityContact: "6N4 Mille-` Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feede
Farrow to Finist
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Integrator:
Phone: 01) on 1 (00S
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
I INon-Layer
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood COw
❑ Yes [ !o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [:]No L f Z ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
[:]Yes
[:]No A
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[:]No A
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
/
[g.2Go NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[-]Yes
L'�: o NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
r�
Waste Collection & Treatment ,--,
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes[o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No Q-4B ❑ NE
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2
�!
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes [�❑NA ❑NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
1-11
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes F2Z ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes - to ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
E lac
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
E/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination? '
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
<
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
d
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
No NA E
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
L"J
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[ENE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
Io ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[:]No ❑ NA
a<
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes 21<0
/
❑ Yes DINO
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes [3 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [.*Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Ic i (7I1gi$) , Re cali br -C 2oig
Ke-ev 0cC3� Cam„' -Co C� dYo C�c L1 ,S4 A �rIns
Ce-tmA I c �� 0f ���, 10 7 A► -0 2 S�Z :D C.-rnA; I , eOM)
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �/ V�1C�� Phone: Ili ��L1 D
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I
Page 3 of 3 2/ /1015