NCG030259_MONITORING INFO_20170512

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
❑ ylW61RICAL FILE
e�MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
YYYYMMDD

Perfecting motion iblui7i
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
May 12, 2017
Division of Water Quality
ATTENTION. DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
To Whom It May Concern:
Blum, Inc.
7733 Old Plank Rd.
Stanley, NC 28164
800-438-6788
blum.com
R eE!Ntb
MAY 19 2017
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
Attached are a completed original and one (1) copy of Blum's Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Monitoring Report form from the stormwater sampling event conducted at our facility on April 3, 2017,
The facility is currently under a Tier III status at one of the facility outfalls (SW003) for four (4) separate
exceedances of Total Zinc. As per the stipulation of the General Permit, Blum has notified and had a site
inspection conducted by Ms. Holliday Keen with the NCDEQ Mooresville Regional Office on May 11, 2017.
As observed by Ms. Keen, the facility does not store, manufacture or process any raw, intermediate, or waste
by-products outdoors with the exception of two (2) covered scrap metal dumpsters.
Facility BMP's are in place to ensure that any scrap metal that may accidentally be dropped outside these
dumpsters during transit are swept up using magnetic sweepers on an as needed and weekly basis. The facility
has spent approximately $60,000 in capital and operating costs for BMP's and stormwater outfall
rehabilitation in order to improve the quality of stormwater discharged from the site.
Therefore, at this time, we are requesting that the facility be granted relief from the monthly monitoring and
tiered status for all stormwater outfalls due to:
• The exceedances for metals are slightly above current benchmarks and if potential revised benchmarks
(likely applicable with General Permit renewal in October 2017) are applied, then the facility would
not be in Tier III status. A summary table indicating the current and potential benchmarks that
NCDEQ may adopt and the effect on the tiered status for the facility is provided as an attachment to
this letter.
• The potable water used for landscaping and irrigation which are allowable non-stormwater discharges
contain elevated levels of Copper (72 ug/L) and Zinc (510 ug/L), and;
0 1S0 9001
Gerofied Ouality
SyStem

ibluiri
• Per the recommendations of our environmental consultants and based on observations by NCDEQ
personnel (Ms. Marcia Allocco in October 2012 and Ms. Holliday Keen in May 2017), the facility is a
candidate for No Exposure status.
We will be applying to obtain No Exposure for industrial activities exposed to stormwater, shortly. In the
meantime, we respectfully request that NCDEQ grant us relief from monthly stormwater monitoring based on
the factors listed above.
If you have any questions or we may be of further assistance in this matter, please contact me at (704) 827-
1345 (ext. 1133),
Sincerely,
Blu IncW
Dennis Meha fey
EHS & Risk Manager
Attachments
cc: Holliday Keen, NCDEQ Mooresville Regional office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115

Semi-annual 5tormwater_Discharae _Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No.
NCG030000 Date submitted May 12, 2017
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030259
FACILITY NAME Blum Inc
COUNTY Lincoln
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES: Dennis Mehaffe
LABORATORY: Shealy Environmental Inc. Lab Cert. f# 329
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2017
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ® Monthly' April (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow [:]waterSupply ❑SA
®Other C
None RECEIVEt)
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results SAY 1 ,9 1A17CENT
nu,d ! L FILER
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 --)�
❑ No discharge this period?2
if
N
Non -Polar O&G/
Date Sample
p1
24-hour rainfall
PH,
Total Toxic
Outfall No.
Collected
amount,
Total Suspended Solids
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Total Petroleum
Organics'
(mo/dd/yr)
inches
Hydrocarbons
Benchmarks ===>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/O
6.0 -- 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
SWO02
04/03/17
0.67
77
6.48
0.012
0.0016
0.076
<5.0
---
SW003
04/03/17
0.67
150
6.41
0.014
0.0027
0.130
<5.2
---
SW004
04/03/17
0.67
6.5
6.81
0.005
<0.001
0.100
<4.7
---
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organicsc
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. i further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
DENNIS NIEHAFFEY
Name (Print name)
EHS & M GER
Title Nti
(5 gnat re (D te)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 1, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
n No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (5GT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS, SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES ®NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ®NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Holliday Keen
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No _Discharge" reports, withi'n_30 days of receipt of the lab results (or at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am awarqA�at there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(S
S,z
( te)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Historical Summary of Analytical Results
Permit No: NCG030000 - (November 1, 2012 to October 31, 2017)
Stormwater Outfall SW001/SWO04
CURRENTBENCHMARKS
Sample Date
Parameter
Outfall Status'
TSS (mg/1)O&G
Non -Polar
(mg/1)(mgll)
Total Lead
Total Copper
(mg/1)
Total Zinc
(mgA)
Total Rainfall
(in.)
PH (s.u.}
09/18/12
18
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
8.40
Normal
02/26/13
<5.0
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
6.30
Normal
11/17/14
9.6
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
5.90
Tier One
12117/15
30
<4.3
<0.010
<0.010
0.038
0.30
7.50
Normal
09/01/16
7A
<4.4
<0.010
0.016
0.052
0.85
7.20
Tier One
121D6116
<1.0
<4.5
<0.010
0.016
0.038
0.35
6.89
Tier TWO
02/15/17
6.6
<5.3
<0.001
0.0035
0.120
0.24
6.70
Tier TWO
04/03/17
6.5
<4.7
<0.001
0.005
0.100
0.00
6.81
Tier Two
Benchmark
100
15
0.030
1 0.007
0.067 j
-
6.0 - 9.0
CURRENTBENCHMARKS
POTENTIAL REVISED BENCHMARKS
Sample Date
Parameter
Outfall Status'
TSS (mgM
Non -Polar
O&G (mg11)
Total Lead
(m9/1)
Total Copper
(mgfi)
Total Zinc
(mgll)
Total Rainfall
(in.)
PH (s.u-)
09/18/12
18
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
8.40
Normal
02/26/13
<5.0
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
6.30
Nominal
11/17/14
9.6
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
5.90
Tier One
12/17/15
30
<4.3
<0.010
<0.010
0.038
0.30
7.50
Normal
09/01/16
7.4
<4.4
<0.010
0.016
0.052
0.85
7.20
Tier One
12/06/16
<1.0
<4.5
<0.010
Q016
0.038
0.35
6.89
Tier TWO
02/15/17
6.6
<5.3
<0.001
0.0035
0.120
0.24
6.70
Tier Two
04/03/17
6.5
<4.7
<0.001
0.005
0.100
0.00
6.81
Tier Two
Benchmark
f OD
15
0.030
0.010
0.126
---
6.0 - 9.0
-
Stormwater Outfall SWO02
Sample Date
Parameter
Outfall Status'
T55 (mgA}
Non -Polar
O&G m
Total Lead
(mail)
Total Copper
m tl
Total Zinc
m R
Total RainfallA
in.
PH {s.u.)
09/18/12
5.8
6.3
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
6.00
Normal
02/26/13
10
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
5.80
Tier One
11/17/14
22
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
6.10
Normal
12/17/15
31
<4.5
<0.010
<0.010
0.038
0.30
7.50
Normal
D9101116
38
<4.5
<0.010
0.010
0.052
0.85
7.17
Tier One
12/D6116
4.8
<4.3
<0.010
0.0031
0.027
0.35
6.63
Normal
D4103/17
77
<5.0
0.0016
0.0120
0.076
0.67
6.48
Tier One
Benchmark
100
15
0.030
0.007
0.067
-
6.0 - 9.0
-
CURRENT BENCHMARKS
POTENTIAL REVISED BENCHMARKS
Sample Date
Parameter
Outfall Status`
TSS (mgll)
Non -Polar
O&G m R
Total Lead
m /1
Total Copper
m A
Total Zinc
m
Total Rainfall
in.
PH (s.u.)
09/18/12
5.8
6.3
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
6.00
Normal
02/26/13
10
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
5.80
Tier One
11/17/14
22
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
6.10
Normal
12/17/15
31
0.5
<0.010
<0.010
0.038
0.30
7.50
Normal
09/01/16
38
<4.5
<0.010
0.010
0.052
0.85
7.17
Normal
12/06/16
4.8
<4.3
<0.010
0.0031
0.027
0.35
6.63
Normal
04/03/17
77
<5.0
0.0016
0.0120
0.076
0.67
6.48
Tier One
Benchmark
100
15
0.030
0.010
0.126
---
6.0 - 9.D
---
Stormwater Outfall SWO03
Sample Date
Parameter
Outfall Status'
TSS (mgll}
Non -Polar
O&G m
Total Lead
m
Total Copper
m
Total Zinc
m(in.)PH
Total Rainfall
(s.u.}
09/18/12
6.6
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
5.30
Tier One
02/26/13
10
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
5.40
Tier TWO
11/17/14
8
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
5.90
Tier Two
12/17/15
97
<4.5
<0.010
<0.010
0.110
1 0.30
7.50
Tier Two
09/01/16
69
<4.3
<0.010
<0.010
0.110
0.85
7.09
Tier Two
12/06/16
1.8
<4.3
<0.010
0.0014
0.056
0.35
6AI
Tier TWO
02/15/17
23
<5.1
<0.001
0.0058
0.200
0.24
6.52
Tier TWO
04/03/17
150
<5.2
0.0027
0.0140
0.130
0.00
6.41
Tier Three
Benchmark
100
15
6.030
Q.OD7
0.467
-
6.0 - 9.0
POTENTIAL REVISED BENCHMARKS
Sample Date
Parameter
Outfall Status`
TSS (mg l)
Non -Polar
O&G m
Total Lead
m
Total Copper
m
Total Zinc
m(in.)PH
Total Rainfall
(s.u.}
09/18/12
6.6
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
5.30
Tier One
02/26/13
10
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
5.40
Tier TWO
11/17/14
8
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
5.90
Tier TWO
12/17/15
97
1 <4.5
<0.010
<0.010
0.110
0.30
1 7.50
Tier TWO
09/01/16
69
<4.3
<0.010
<0.010
0.110
0.85
7.09
Tier Two
12/06/16
1.8
<4.3
<0.010
O.OD14
0.056
0.35
6.41
Normal
02/15/17
23
<5.1
<0.001
0.0058
0-200
0.24
6.52
Tier One
04/03/17
150
<5.2
0.0027
0.0140
0.130
0.00
6.41
Tier Two
Benchmark
100
15
0.030
0.010
0.126
--
6.0 - 9.0
-

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Qu li y G eral Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted D &)5 ZD
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO, NCG030259
FACILITY NAME Blum Inc
COUNTY Lincoln
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES: Dennis Mehaffey
LABORATORY: Shealy Environmental Inc. Lab Cert. # 329
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
None
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2017
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ® Monthly' February (month)
16QdjAV@ TD CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
APR ��)� ❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
®Other C
F11 cc
DWR SECTINASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
❑ No discharge this period?'
Outfall No
Date Sample
Collected x
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Copper
lead
(.
Zinc
NonPolar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic.
Organics',
Benchmarks
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L'
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
SWO03
02/15/17
0.24
23
6.52
0.0058
<0.001
0.200
<5.1
---
SW004
02/15/17
0.24
6.6
6.70
0.0035
<0.001
0.120
<5.3
---
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
'The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
° See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469,31).
Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
DENNIS MEHAFFEY
Name (Print name)
EHS & RISK MANAGER
Tit (Print }
Signature)4Y
Da �
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX me/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier Z or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period ?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Non -polar 0&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (5GT-HEM)
'total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks =_=>
-
is mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 —.9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART lI SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results tkr at end of monitoring period
in the case o "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
am aware at here,.2)re significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature
(o e)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Perfecting motion ibluj7i
Blum, Inc.
7733 Old Plank Rd.
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL Stanley, NC 28164
800-438-6788
blum.com
April 05, 2017
Division of Water Quality
ATTENTION: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
To Whom It May Concern:
Attached are a completed original and one (1) copy of Blum's Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Monitoring Report form from the stormwater sampling event conducted at our facility on February 15, 2017.
The facility is currently under a Tier II status at two of the facility outfalls (SW003 & SW004) for exceedances
of Total Copper and Zinc and has instituted monthly monitoring at these outfalls because of the metals
exceedances. The facility has historically sampled for stormwater from Outfall SWOOiwhich drains Drainage
Area I of the facility. However, during investigations of the facility outfall status, another outfall was
discovered that drains Drainage Area 1. This outfall (Outfall SWO04) is considered more accessible with
regards to obtaining stormwater samples due to engineering controls installed at Outfall SW001 to control the
stormwater flow from the facility towards Old Plank Road. Therefore, since Outfalls SWOOI & SWO04 drain
the same area within the facility, Outfall SWO04 is considered the representative outfall for Drainage Area I
and all future samples will be collected from this Outfall.
In addition, these sample results are being reported slightly over the thirty (30) day reporting period due to
splitting the stormwater samples between two (2) certified third party laboratories to verify the stormwater
sample results. While one of the certified laboratories was able to analyze and report the results within the
stipulated time period, the other laboratory has had ongoing equipment issues with its Mass Spectrometer and
therefore results from the 2" d laboratory is not available yet and if required will be reported when available.
If you have any questions or we may be of further assistance in this matter, please contact me at (704) 827-
1345 (ext. 1133).
.0 ISO 9001
1 Certified Quality
xx System

iblaiii
Sincerely,
Blu Inc
Dennis Mehaf ey
EHS & Risk Manager
Attachments
cc: Marcia Allocco, NCDEQ Mooresville Regional office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG030259
FACILITY NAME Blum Inc
COUNTY Lincoln
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES: NA
LABORATORY: NA Lab Cert. # NA
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
None
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2017
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ® Monthly' .. _ (monthl
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
RECEIVED ®Other C
FEB 14 2012 PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION ® No discharge this period?'
outfall No.. ,
Date Sample
i
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
-
pH,'
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organlcs s
Benchmarks===>
_
-
200 mg/Lor 50 mg/L4
6.0-9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/1
15 mg/L
i mg/L
Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
a For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes, For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilitibs that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(70), 1 certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. i further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
DENNIS MEHAFFEY
Name (Print name)
EHS & RISK MANAGER
Title tint tit
2 B 12-0%7
(Si nature (Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar 0&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks =__>
-
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 = 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier Z or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
a A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
a 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
a TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an on final and one copy of this AMR including all "No Discharge" re orts within 30 days of receipt of the lab results or at end o monitorin eriod
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality T
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the nest of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am awa;0hat there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
nature
{ atej
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
January 30.2017
Division of Water Quality
ATTENTION: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center FIL't
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
To Whom It May Concern:
Perfecting motion �blui7i
� 4f c'
Blum, Inc.
7733 Old Plank Rd.
Stanley, NC 28164
800-438-6788
blum.com
�30,;?-59
RIEC tI ED
F9 0 3 Z,417
f:1LES
Attached are a completed original and one (1) copy of Blum's Stormwater Disc
hai
Monitoring Report form from the stormwater sampling event conducted at our face ity on December 6, 2016.
The facility is currently under a Tier 11 status at two of the facility outfalls (SW001 & SW003) for exceedances
of Total Copper and Zinc and has instituted monthly monitoring at these outfalls because of the metals
exceedances. The other remaining stormwater outfall is under Normal status.
A historical summary of the stormwater analyses conducted at the facility is attached to this letter. Due to a
rapid turnover in our EHS staff some stormwater analytical parameters were not analyzed during
representative storm sampling events. In order to avoid such occurrences. the facility has recently hired an
Environmental Consultant (Fiss Environmental Solutions) to provide guidance with the facility stormwater
sampling program and to develop an updated comprehensive Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3)
which has been initiated and developed as of December 2016.
We are currently investigating the potential discovery of a 4" stormwater outfal1. Technical drawings have
been requested from the engineering firm responsible for the work performed in that area of our facility. It
will be integrated into our SWP3 if confirmed and added to the stormwater sampling protocol.
Historically, the facility has not conducted any manufacturing operations outdoors. In addition, the facility has
eliminated all outdoor storage of materials/products. The only outdoor storage consists of two (2) covered
scrap metal dumpsters. Facility best management practices ensure that any necessary exposure during
precipitation events is not significant. The areas around these dumpsters are inspected and swept on a regular
basis. Magnetic sweeping is also conducted regularly on the main driveway around the facility. We are
investigating the feasibility of installing a permanent cover over the 2 scrap metal dumpsters.
Blum is dedicated to pollution control in all areas of production and will continue to emphasize pollution
prevention in all aspects of its manufacturing and storage operations. If you have any questions or we may be
of further assistance in this matter, please contact me at [phone] (ext. 113).
0 I ISD g001
Certified Ruality
system

Sincerely,
Btu Inc
Dennis Meha ey
EHS & Risk Manager
Attachments
cc: Marcia Allocco, NCDEQ Mooresville Regional office
610 East Center Avenue. Suite 301
Mooresville. NC 28115
Perfecting motion �blui7i
Blum, Inc.
7733 Old Plank Rd.
Stanley, NC 28164
800-438-6788
blum.com
01.4 xx � ISO 9001
Certified Quality
System

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted _January, 30 2017_
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030259
FACILITY NAME Blum Inc
COUNTY Lincoln
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES: Michael Kilpatrick
LABORATORY: Shealy Environmental Inc. Lab Cert. # 329
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
None
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2016
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ® July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' (month)
,r�lS loF�J �LASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
(� []Zero -flow ❑Water Supply []SA
FEB 0 3 2017 ®other C
CENTRALALYA REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
DVVR SECTION
❑ No discharge this period?2
'
Date Sample
,24-hour,rainfall
pH,
Nan=Polar Q&G/
3 , • : .
Total To
outfall No
1
Coliected.
amount,
Total Su s ended Solids
p
Standard units
apper
Lead
tint
Total Petroleum
" ' s
Organicsit . .
;(mo/dd/yrj
Inches3Hydratar
b
Benc►�morka =�
;, .=
100 nWL or 50 mg/L'
6.0 — 9:0
0.007 mg/L
0:03`mg/L'
0:067 mg/C
15 mg/l.
l mg/l
SW001
12/06/16
0.35
<1.0 mg/L
6.89 su
0.D16 mg/L
<0.010 mg/L
0.038 mg/L
0.5 mg/L
<3 mg/L
SWD02
12/D6/16
0.35
4.9 mg/L
6.63 su
0.0031 mg/L
<0.010 mg/L
0.027 mg/L
0.3 mg/L
<1 mg/L
SWO03
12/06/16
0.35
1.9 mg/L
6.41 su
0.0014 mg/L
<0.010 mg/L
0.056 mg/L
< 4.3 mg/L
0.00012
mg/L
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
'The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
a See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
Stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
DENNIS MEHAFFEV
Name (Print name)
EHS & RISK MANAGER
Title r nt ti
/ 3a 17
Z�
(Sig ture 1 (D e)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected"
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,_
Inches'
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks ===>
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L'
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an on inal and one copy of this DMR including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results or at end -of monitoring eriod
in the case of "No Discharge" deports to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
am aware that there are signjKc-ant pe*ties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of Permittee)
Permit Date:11/1/2012-10/31/2017
i e) /7
(D tee
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Historical Summary of Analytical Results
Blum Inc.,
Permit No: NCG030000 - (November 1, 2012 to October 31, 2017)
Outfall # SWO03:
Sample Date
Parameter
Outfall
Status*
TSS
(mgll)
Non -Polar
O&G (mgll)
Total Lead
(mg/1)TTO
Total Copper
(mgll)
Total Zinc
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
Total Rainfall
(in.)
pH (s.u.)
09/18/12
6.6
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.30
Tier One
02/26/13
10
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
NA
5,40
Tier Two
11/17/14
8
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.90
Tier Two
12/17/15
97
<4.5
<0.010
<0.010
0.11
0.000059
0.30
7.50
Tier One
09/01/16
69
<4.3
<0.010
<0.010
0.11
0,000129
0.85
7.09
Tier Two
12/06/16
1.8
<4.3
<0.010
0,0014
0.056
0.00012
0.35
6.41
Tier Two
Benchmark
100
15
0.030
0.007
0.067
1
---
6.0 - 9.0
---
Notes:
NA - Not Analyzed
Blunt Inc Page; 2 of 2 Historical Sumnuiry of SW Analyses

Historical Summary of Analytical Results
Blum Inc.,
Permit No: NCG030000 - (November 1, 2012 to October 31, 2017)
Outfall # SWO01:
Sample Date
Parameter
Outfall
Status*
TSS
(mg/1)
Non -Polar
O&G (mg/1)
Total Lead
(mgll)
Total Copper
(mgll)
Total Zinc
(mg/1)
TTO (mg/1)
Total Rainfall
(in.)
pH (s.u. )
09/18/12
18
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.40
Normal
02/26/13
<5.0
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
NA
6.30
Normal
11/17/14
9.6
<5.0
<0.0050 1
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.90
Tier One
12/17/15
30
<4.3
<0.010
<0.010
0.038
0.0021
0.30
7.50
Normal
09/01/16
7.4
<4.4
<0.010
0.016
0.052
0.00013
0.85
7.20
Tier One
12/06/16
<1.0
<4.5
<0.010
0.016
0.038
<1
0.35
6.89
Tier Two
Benchmark
100
15
0.030
0.007
0.067
1
---
6.0 - 9.0
--
Outfall # SWO02:
Sample Date
P
Parameter
Outfall
Status*
TSS
m 11
Non -Polar
O&G m 11
Total Lead
m /I
Total Copper
m ll
Total Zinc
m n
TTO (mgll)
Total Rainfall
in,
pH (s.u.}
09/18/12
5.8
6.3
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
NA
6.00
Normal
02126/13
10
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.80
Tier One
11/17/14
22
<5.0
<0.0050
NA
NA
NA
NA
6.10
Normal
12/17/15
31
<4.5
<0.010
<0.010
0.038
<1
0.30
7.50
Normal
09/01/16
38
<4.5
<0.010
0.010
0.052
<1
0.B5
7.17
Tier One
12/06/16
4.8
<4.3
<0.010
0.0031
0.027
<1
0.35
6.63
Tier Two
Benchmark
100
15
0.030
0.007
0.067
1
---
1 6.0 - 9.0
--
Blum Inc Page 1 of 2 1listorical Summary ol*SW Analyses

J
A
Perfecting motion
1�
January 28, 2016
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
ATTENTION: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 RECEIVED
Subject: Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Reports FEB a g ZA
NPDES Stormwater Permit CENTRAL FILES
Permit NCG030259 DWR SECTION
Blum, Inc.
Lincoln County
To Whom It May Concern:
Please find enclosed the Stormwater Discharge Outfall Monitoring Report for Blum, Inc.
located at 7733 Old Plank Rd. Stanley, NC 28164. The report contains the analytical
results for sampling during Year 3 — Period 2 of the subject permit. As you can see, one
result for one outfall exceeded the benchmark limit for Zinc. As required within the
facility's NPDES permit, Blum has established a Tier One response and has recorded
the response in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. If you have any question
please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Si � ly,
i
J. . Sikes
Environmental, Health, Safety & Security Manager

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Report of Analysis
Blum, Inc.
7733 Old Plank Road
Stanley, NC 28164
Attention: David Sikes
Project Name:2nd Semiannual SW 2015
Lot Number: QL17037
Date Completed:1213012015
04 Lucas O om
Project Manager
LABORATORY
ACCREDITATION
BUREAU ••� x ,ACCR£WIMma_wt v=
This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
The following non -paginated documents are considered part of this report: Chain of Custody Record and Sample Receipt Checklist.
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc_ Page: 1 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SC DHEC No: 32010 NELAC No: E87653 NC DENR No: 329 NC Field Parameters No: 5639
Case Narrative
Blum, Inc.
Lot Number: QL17037
This Report of Analysis contains the analytical result(s) for the sample(s) listed on the Sample Summary following this Case Narrative. The sample
receiving date is documented in the header information associated with each sample.
All results listed in this report relate only to the samples that are contained within this report.
Sample receipt, sample analysis, and data review have been performed in accordance with the most current approved NELAC standards, the
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. ("Shealy") Quality Assurance Management Plan (QAMP), standard operating procedures (SOPS), and Shealy
policies. Any exceptions to the NELAC standards, the QAMP, SOPs or policies are qualified on the results page or discussed below.
If you have any questions regarding this report please contact the Shealy Project Manager listed on the cover page.
Pesticide/PCBs by GC
Sample -003 has been qualified with a "P" for Endosulfan I as the relative percent difference between the two columns exceeded method criteria
for this compound. Per SESI SOP, the lesser of the two values has been reported.
Shealy Enwronmental Services, Inc. Page: 2 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.cam

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Sample Summary
Blum, Inc.
Lot Number: OL17037
Sample Number Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received
001 SW-01 Aqueous 12/17120151007 12/17/2015
002 SW-02 Aqueous 12/17/2015 0937 12/17/2015
003 SW-03 Aqueous 12/17/2015 0900 12/17/2015
(3 samples)
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 3 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Executive Summary
Blum, Inc.
Lot Number: QL17037
Sample Sample ID
Matrix
Parameter Method
Result Q
Units
Page
001
SW-01
Aqueous
TSS SM 2540D-
30
mg1L
5
001
SW-01
Aqueous
Endosulfan 1 608
0.21
ug/l_
8
001
SW-01
Aqueous
Zinc 6010C
0.038
mg1L
9
002
SW-02
Aqueous
TSS SM 2540D-
31
mg1L
10
002
SW-02
Aqueous
Zinc 6010C
0.038
mg1L
14
003
SW-03
Aqueous
TSS SM 2540D-
97
mg/L
15
003
SW-03
Aqueous
Endosulfan 1 608
0.059 P
ug/L
18
003
SW-03
Aqueous
Zinc 6010C
0.11
mg/L
19
(8 detections)
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 4 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID: QL17037-001
Description: SW-01 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sahtpled:1211712015 1007
Date Received:12J1712015
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (pH - Field) SM 4500-H B-2011 1
1 (TSS) SM 25400-2011 1 12/18/2015 0920 AMM1 92510
1 (SGT- HEM (n) 1664B 1 12/24/2015 1217 JDW 93008
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number mgthog
Result Q PQL
Units
Run
pH - Field
_ _
SM 4500-H B
7.5
su
1
TSS
SM 254OD-20
30 2.0
mg/L
1
SGT - HEM (non -polar material)
1664E
ND 4.3
mg/L
1
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCIMS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 624 624 1 12/21120151327 ALL 92692
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Acrolein
107-02-8
624
ND
5.0
ug/L
1
Acrylonitrile
107-13-1
624
ND
5.0
ug/L
1
Benzene
71-43-2
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
i
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Bromoforin
75-25-2
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
2-Chloroethylvinylether
110-75-8
624
ND
5.0
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
624
ND
i.0
ug/L
t
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
75-71-8
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethe ne
156-59-2
624
ND
1.0
uglL
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
cis- 1, 3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
trans- 1,3-Dichiaropropene
10061-02-6
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
PQL = Practical quantilation lime 8 = Detected in the method dank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of molding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL 3 = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a W'
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 5 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.sttealytab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID: QL1 7037-001
Description: SW-01 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sarnpled:12J1712015 1007
Date Received:12117/2015
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 624 624 1 12/21120151327 ALL 92692
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Tetrachloroelhene
127-18-4
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Toluene
108-88-3
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
71-55-6
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Trir,hlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Run 1
Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery
Llmits
1,2-❑ichloroethane-d4
99
70-130
Toluene-d8
109
70-130
Bromofluorobenzene
106
70-130
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 625 625 1 12/24/2015 1909 JCG 12/19/2015 1527 92612
CAS
Analytical
Parameter . _
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Acenaphthylene
208-96-8
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Anthracene
120-12-7
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Benzidine
92-87-5
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
625
NO
2.0
ug1L
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
i
Benzo(g,hJ)perylene
191-24-2
625
NO
2.0
ug1L
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
101-55-3
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
625
NO
i0
ug/L
1
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
625
ND
2.0
ugJL
1
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
ill 44 4
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
bis (2-Chloro-l-methylethyl) ether
108-60-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
2-Chlorophenot
95-57-8
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
7005-72-3
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Chrysene
21Ml-9
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anlhracene
53-70-3
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantization of compound exceeded the caiibratkon range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result � PQL and - MDL P = The RPD between two GC Columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, atl soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 6 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID: QL17037-001
Description: SW-01 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Salhpled: 12117/2015 1007
Date Received: 1211712015
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch ^�
1 625 625 1 12/24/2015 1909 JCG 12/19/2015 1527 92612
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
MethMethgd
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
3,Y-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
625
ND
10
ug1L
1
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Diethylphthalate
84-55-2
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
4,6-Dinitro-2-melhylphenol
534-52-1
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
625
ND
4.0
ug/L
1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
625
ND
4.0
ug/L
1
Di-n-octylphthalate
117-84-0
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as azobenzene)
103-33-3
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
625
ND
10
ug1L
1
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Fluorene
86-73-7
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Hexachlorocyclopenladiene
77-47A
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
193-39-5
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Isophorone
78-59-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Naphthalene
91-20-3
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
625
ND
4.0
ug/L
1
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
625
ND
10
ug1L
1
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
62-75-9
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
N-N itrosodi-n-propyla mine
621-64-7
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (Diphenylamine)
86-30-6
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
625
ND
10
ug1L
1
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
625
ND
2.0
uglL
1
Phenol
108-95-2
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Pyrene
129-00-0
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,2,4-Trichoorobenzene
120-82-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
POL = Practical quantitahon limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the POL J = Estimated resuh � POL and > MOL P = The RPD between two GC rnfumns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where apphrabie, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a W
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 7 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.sticalylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID:QL17037-001
Description: SW-01 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1211712015 1007
Date Received:1211712015
Surrogate
Run 1 Acceptance
Q % Recovery Limits
2-Fluorobiphenyl
67
37-129
2-Fluorophenol
61
24-127
Nitrobenzene-d5
60
38-127
Phenol-d5
61
28-128
Terphenyl-d 14
63
10-148
2,4,6-Tribromophenoi
72
41-144
Organoch[orine Pesticides and PCBs
Run Prep Method
Anaytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1 608
608 1 12/23/2015 1704 MEM
12/20/2016 1632 92637
2 608
608 1 12/23/2015 1013 MEM
12/20/2015 1632 92637
CAS Analytical
_
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
_Parameter
A1drin
309-00-2 608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Aroclor 1016
12674-11-2 608
ND
0.40
ug1L
2
Aroclor 1221
11104-28-2 608
NO
0.40
ug/L
2
Aroclor 1232
11141-16-5 608
NO
0.40
ug1L
2
Aroclor 1242
53469-21-9 608
NO
0.40
ug1L
2
Aroclor 1248
12672-29-6 608
ND
0.40
ug1L
2
Aroclor 1254
11097-69-1 608
NO
0.40
ug1L
2
Aroclor 1260
11096-82-5 608
ND
0.40
uglL
2
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
58-89-9 608
NO
0.040
ug1L
1
alpha-BHC
319-84-6 608
ND
Q040
ug1L
1
beta-BHC
319-85-7 608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
delta-BHC
319-86-8 608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
Chlordane
57-74-9 608
NO
0,40
ug1L
1
4,4'-DDD
72-54-8 608
NO
0.040
ug1L
1
4,4'-DDE
72-55-9 608
NO
0.040
ug1L
1
4,4'-DDT
50-29-3 608
ND
0.040
ug/L
1
Dieldrin
60-57-1 608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Endosulfan 1
959-98-8 608
0.21
0.040
uglL
1
Endosulfan 11
33213-65-9 608
NO
0.040
ug1L
1
Endosulfan sulfate
1031-07-8 608
ND
0,040
ug1L
1
Endrin
72-20-8 608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Endrin aldehyde
7421-93-4 608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Heptachlor
76-44-8 608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Heptachlor epoxide
1024-57-3 608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Toxaphene
8001-35-2 608
ND
0,40
ug1L
1
Run 1 Acceptance Run 2 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits Q % Recovery Limits
Decachlorobiphenyt
49 20-131 fit
20-131
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
53 26-132 84
26-132
PQL = Practical quantitation limit
B = Detected in the method blank E = Quandiation of compound exceeded the calibration range
H = Out of holding time
ND = Not Detected at or above the PQL
J = Estimated resutt < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
N = Recovery is out of crilena
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a W
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
Page: 8 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID: QL1 7037-001
Description: SW-01 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sarhpled:1211712015 1007
Date Received: 1211712015
ICP-AES
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010C 1 12122/20151645 CJZ 12/21/20151421 92698
CAS
Analytical
Parameter _
_ _ _ Number
Method _
Result Q
POL
Units
Run
Capper
7440-50-8
6010C
ND
0,010
mg1L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010C
ND
0.010
rng/L
1
Zinc
7440-66-6
6010C
0.038
0.020
mg1L
1
PoL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = auantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND - Not detected at or above the POL J = Estimated resu8 < POL and > MDt P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a W
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 9 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID:QL17037-002
Description: SW-02 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1211712015 0937
Date Received: 12l1712015
_ Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (pH - Field) SM 4500-H B-2011 1
1 (TSS) SM 254OD-2011 1 12/21/2015 1228 AMM1 92710
1 (SGT - HEM (n) 1664B 1 12/24/2015 1217 JDW 93008
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q POL
Units
Run
pH - Field
SM 4500-H B
7.5
su
1
TSS
SM 264OD-20
31 3.3
mg1L
1
SGT - HEM (non -polar material)
1664E
NO 4.5
mg1L
1
Volatile Orcianic Compounds bv GC/MS
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1 624
624 1 12121120151350
ALL
92692
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Acrolein
107-02-8
624
NO
5.0
ug/L
1
Acrylonitrile
107-13-1
624
NO
5.0
ug1L
1
Benzene
71-43-2
624
NO
1.0
uglL
1
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
624
NO
2.0
ug1L
i
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
624
ND
1.0
ug1L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
Chioroethane
75-00-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
2-Chloroethylvinylether
1110-75-8
624
ND
5.0
ug1L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
624
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
624
ND
to
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
75-71-8
624
ND
2.0
uglL
1
1.1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
1.2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-59-2
624
NO
1.0
uglL
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1.2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
624
ND
1.0
uglL
1
1,1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
624
ND
1.0
ug1L
1
POL = Practical quariblation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Ouamitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the POL J = Estimated result , POL and , MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, an soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 10 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID: QL17037-002
Description: SW-02 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled1211712015 0937
Date Received: 12I712015
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 624 624 1 12121/20151350 ALL 92692
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
_ Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Teirachloroethene
127-18-4
624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
Toluene
108-88-3
624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
624
ND
1.0
ug1L
1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
71-55 6
624
ND
1.0
ug1L
1
1,1,2-Trchloroethene
79-00-5
624
ND
1.0
ug1L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
624
ND
1.0
ug1L
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
624
ND
1.0
uglL
1
Run 1
Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery
Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
98
70-130
Toluene-d8
105
70-130
Bromofluorobenzene
103
70-130
Semivolatile Oraanic Comuounds by GUMS
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1 625
625 1 12/24/2015 1935 JCG
12/19/2015 1527 92612
CAS
Analytical
_Parameter
Number
^83-32-9
Method _
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Acenaphthene
525
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Acenaphthylene
208-96-8
625
NO
2.0
ug1L
1
Anthracene
120-12-7
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
Senzidine
92-87-5
625
ND
10
ug1L
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
Benzo(g,hJ)perylene
191-24-2
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
625
ND
2.0
uglL
1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
101-55-3
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
bis(2-Chloroethyi)ether
111 44 4
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
bis (2-Chloro-l-methyielhyl) ether
108-60-1
625
NO
2.0
ug1L
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
625
NO
2.0
ug1L
1
2-Chlorophenol
95-57-8
625
NO
2.0
ug1L
1
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
7005-72-3
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Chrysene
218-01-9
625
NO
2.0
ug1L
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
53-70-3
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit 6 = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out o1 cntena
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis uNess flagged with a W
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 1i of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.sheatylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID: QL1 7037-002
Description: SW-02 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sanipled:1211712015 0937
Date Received:1211712015
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GUMS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 625 625 1 12/24/2015 1935 JCG 12/19/2015 1527 92612
Parameter
CAS
Number
Analytical
MOW—
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Diethylphtha late
84 66-2
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
534-52-1
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dinitrotoftiene
121-14-2
625
ND
4.0
ug/L
1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
625
ND
4.0
ug/L
1
Di-n-octylphthalate
117-84-0
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as azobenzene)
103-33-3
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Fluorene
86-73-7
525
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Hexaohlorobutadiene
87-68-3
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
77-47-4
625
ND
10
ug1L
1
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
193-39-5
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
lsophorone
78-59-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Naphthalene
91-20-3
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
625
ND
4.0
ug1L
1
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
625
ND
10
u91L
1
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
62-75-9
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
N-N itrosod i-n-propyla mine
621-64-7
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (Diphenylamine)
86-30-6
625
ND
20
ug/L
1
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Phenol
108-95-2
625
ND
2.0
uglL
1
Pyrene
129-00-0
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
t
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
625
ND
2.0
uglL
t
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
POL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Ouantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding bme
ND = Not detected at or above the POL J = Estimated resuq s POL and - MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a W
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 12 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylob.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory I D: QL1 7037-002
Description: SW-02 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1211712015 0937
Date Received :1211712015
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
2-Fluorobiphenyl
67
37-129
2-Fluorophenol
63
24-127
Nitrobenzene-d5
61
38-127
Phenol-d5
65
28-128
Terphenyl-d 14
67
10-148
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
69
41-144
_ Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs _
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 608 608 1 12/23120151719 MEM 12/20120151632 92537
2 608 608 1 12/23120151026 MEM 12/20/20151632 92637
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
_ Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Aldrin
309-00-2
608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1016
12674-11-2
608
ND
0.40
ug1L
2
Aroclor 1221
11104-28-2
608
ND
0.40
ug/L
2
Aroclor 1232
11141-16-5
608
ND
0.40
ug/L
2
Aroclor 1242
53469-21-9
608
ND
0.40
ug/L
2
Aroclor 1248
12672-29-6
608
ND
0.40
ugJL
2
Aroclor 1254
11097-09-1
508
NO
0.40
ug/L
2
Aroclor 1260
11096-82-5
608
ND
0.40
ug/L
2
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
58-89-9
608
ND
0.040
ug/L
1
alpha-BHC
319-84-6
608
ND
0.040
ug/L
1
beta-BHC
319-85-7
608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
delta-BHC
319-86-8
608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
Chlordane
57-74-9
608
NO
0.40
ug/L
1
4,4'-DDD
72-54-8
608
NO
O.W
ug/L
1
4,4'-DDE
72-55-9
608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
4,4'-DDT
50-29-3
608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
Dieldrin
60-57-1
608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
Endosulfan 1
959-98-8
608
NO
0.040
u91L
1
Endosulfan It
33213-65-9
608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
Endosulfan sulfate
1031-07-8
608
NO
0.040
ugJL
1
Endrin
72-20-8
608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
Endrin aldehyde
7421-93-4
608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
Heptachlor
76-44-8
608
NO
0.040
ug/L
1
Heptachlor epoxide
1024-57-3
608
ND
0.040
ug/L
1
Toxaphene
8001-35-2
608
ND
0.40
ug/L
1
Run 1
Acceptance
Run 2
Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery
Limits Q
% Recovery
Limits
Decachlorobiphenyl
70
20-131
78
20-131
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
58
26-132
91
26-132
PQL = Practical quantitation limit i3 = Detected in the method Wank E = Quantrtatmn of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J - Estimated result - POL and > M DL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a
Shealy Environmental Services. Inc. Page: 13 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax (B03) 791-9111 www.s"alylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID: QL17037-002
Description: SW-02 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sanipled:1211712015 0937
Oate Received:1211712015
ICP-AES
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010C 1 12122/20151649 CJZ 12/21120151421 92698
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
_ _ _ _ _Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Copper
7440-50-8
6010C
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010C
ND
0.010
mglL
1
Zinc
7440-66-6
6010C
0.038
0.020
mglL
1
POL = Practical quanbtation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quarditation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
NO = Not detected at or above the POL J = Estimated result < POL and > M DL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all sail sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a W'
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. I Page: 14 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID: QL17037-003
Description: SW-03 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1211712015 0900
Date Received: 12/1712015
_ Inorganic non-metals _
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (pH - Field) SM 4500-H B-2011 1
1 (fSS) SM 254OD-2011 1 12/20/2015 1601 DMA 92657
1 (SGT - HEM (n) 1664B 1 12124/2015 1217 JDW 93008
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q PQL
Units Run
pH - Field
SM 4500-H B
7.5
su 1
TSS
SM 254OD-20
97 6.1
mg/L 1
SGT - HEM (non -polar material)
1664B
NO 4.5
mg1L 1
Volatile Organic Compounds by GUMS
Run Prep Method T Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 624 624 1 12121120151412 ALL 92592
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method.
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Acrolein
107-02-8
624
ND
5.0
ug/L
1
Acrylonitrile
107-13-1
624
ND
5.0
ug/L
1
Benzene
71-43-2
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Bromodichloromethane
75-274
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Bromotorm
75-25-2
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
624
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
2-Chioroethylvinylether
110-75-8
624
NO
5.0
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
624
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
Dichiorodifluoromethane
75-71-8
624
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35A
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-59-2
624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
cis- 1, 3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
trans- 1, 3- Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Ethylbenzene
100-414
624
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
624
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
PQt = Practical quantitation limit 8 = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitabon of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
NO = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated resutt < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N - Recovery is out of cnieria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W'
Shealy Environmental Services, InC. Page: 15 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID:QL17037-003
Description: SW-03 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sarlip1ed:1211712015 0900
Date Received: 1211712015
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1 624
624 1 12121/20151412 ALL
92692
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4 624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
Toluene
108-88-3 624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1 624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
71-55-6 624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5 624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6 624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
75-69-4 624
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4 624
NO
1.0
u91L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
100 70-130
Toluene-d8
106 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene
107 70-130
Semivolatile Organic_ Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 625 625 1 12/24/2015 2001 JCG 12/19/2015 1527 92612
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
625
ND
2.0
uglL
1
Acenaphthytene
208-96-8
625
ND
2.0
uglL
1
Anthracene
120-12-7
625
ND
2.0
uglL
1
Benzidine
92-87-5
625
ND
10
uglL
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
Senzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
191-24-2
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-06-9
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
101-55-3
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
625
ND
10
ug1L
1
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
bis(2-Chloroethyl)elher
111-44-4
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
bis (2-Chloro-l-methylelhyl) ether
108,60-1
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
625
NO
2.0
uglL
1
2-Chlorophenol
95-57-8
625
NO
2.0
ug1L
1
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
7005-72-3
625
NO
2.0
ug1L
1
Chrysene
218-01-9
625
NO
2.0
u911-
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
53-70-3
625
ND
2.0
ug1L
1
POL = Practical quantitation timit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitabon of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result , POL and? MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicablie, all sod sampie analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W'
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 16 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID:QL77037-003
Description: SW-03 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sarilpled:12l1712015 0900
date Received: 1211712015
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 625 625 1 12I2412015 2001 JCG 12/19/2015 1527 92612
CAS
Analytical
Parameter _
Number
Method
Resuk Q
PQL
Units
Run
1.2-Dichlorobertzene
95-50-1
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1T
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
625
NO
2.0
uglL
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
625
NO
2.0
ugR
1
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
625
ND
10
ug1L
1
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
625
NO
2.0
uglL
1
Diethylphlhalate
84-66-2
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Dimethy! phthalate
131-11-3
625
NO
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
625
NO
10
ug/L
1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
534-52-1
625
NO
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
625
NO
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
625
NO
4.0
ug/L
1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
625
NO
4.0
ug/L
1
Di-n-octylphthalate
117-84-0
625
NO
10
ug/L
1
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as azobenzene)
103-33-3
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
625
NO
10
ug/L
1
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Fluorene
86-73-7
625
NO
2.0
uglL
1
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
625
NO
2,0
ug/L
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
625
NO
2.0
uglL
1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
77-47-4
625
NO
10
uglL
1
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
193-39-5
625
NO
2.0
uglL
1
Isophorone
78-59-1
625
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Naphthalene
91-20-3
625
NO
2.0
uglL
1
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
625
NO
2.0
uglL
1
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
625
NO
4.0
ug/L
1
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
625
NO
10
ug/L
1
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
62-75-9
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
N-Nitrosodi-n-propytamine
621-64-7
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (Diphenylamine)
86-30-6
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Pentachiorophenol
87-86-5
625
NO
10
ug/L
1
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Phenol
108-95-2
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
Pyrene
129-00-0
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
625
NO
2.0
ug/L
1
PQL = Practical quanbletion limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitalion of compound exceeded the Calibration range H = Out of holding Gme
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result c PQL and > MDL P - The RPD between two GG columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a'W
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 17 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID:QL17037-003
Description: SW-03 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sarnpled:1211712015 0900
Date Received: 12A712015
Run 1
Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery
Limits
2-Fluorobiphenyt
65
37-129
2-Fluorophenol
59
24-127
Nitrobenzene-d5
61
38-127
PhenoW5
55
28-128
Terphenyl-d14
65
10-148
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
71
41-144
_ Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs _
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 608
608 1
12/23/2015 1735 MEM 12/20/2015 1632 92637
2 608
608 1
12/23/2015 1039 MEM 12/20/2015 1632 92637
_
CAS Analytical
Number Method
Result Q
POL
Units
Run
_Parameter
Aldrin
309-00-2
608
ND
0.040
uglL
1
Aroclor 1016
12674-11-2
608
ND
0.40
uglL
2
Aroclor 1221
11104-28-2
608
ND
0.40
uglL
2
Aroclor 1232
11141-16-5
608
ND
0.40
uglL
2
Aroclor 1242
53469-21-9
608
ND
0.40
ug1L
2
Aroclor 1248
12672-29-6
608
ND
0.40
uglL
2
Aroclor 1254
11097-69-1
608
ND
0.40
uglL
2
Aroclor 1260
11096-82-5
608
ND
0.40
uglL
2
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
58-89-9
608
ND
0.040
uglL
1
alpha-BHC
319-84-6
608
ND
0.040
uglL
1
beta-BHC
319-85-7
608
ND
0.040
ug/L
1
delta-BHC
319-86-8
608
ND
0.040
uglL
1
Chlordane
57-74-9
608
ND
0.40
ug1L
1
4.4'-DDD
72-54-8
608
ND
0.040
uglL
1
4,4'-DDE
72-55-9
608
ND
0.040
uglL
1
4,4'-DDT
50-29-3
608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Dieldrin
60-57-1
608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Endosulfan I
959-98-8
608
0.059 P
0.040
ug1L
1
Endosulfan It
33213-65-9
608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Endosutfan sulfate
1031-07-8
608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Endrin
72-20-8
608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Endrin aldehyde
7421-93-4
608
ND
0.040
uglL
1
Heptachlor
76-44-8
608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Heptachlor epoxide
1024-57-3
608
ND
0.040
ug1L
1
Toxaphene
8001-35-2
608
ND
0.40
ug1L
1
Run i Acceptance
Run 2 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
Q % Recovery Limits
Decachlorobiphenyl
41 20-131
57 20-131
Tetrachloro-m-xyfene
61 26-132
94 26-132
POL = Practical quantltation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Ouantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the POL J = Estimated result < POL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported an a dry weight basis unless flagged with a' W'
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 180119
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shostylab.com

Client: Blum, Inc. Laboratory ID:0L17037-003
Description: SW-03 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sarnpled:12/1712015 0900
Date Received: 1211712015
ICP-AES
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1 3005A
6010C 1 12/22120151653 CJZ
12121/20151421 92698
CAS Analytical
Parameter
_ Number _Method
Resutt Q PQL
Units
Run
Copper
7440-50-8 6010C
ND 0.010
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1 6010C
ND 0.010
m91L
1
Zinc
7"0-66-6 601CC
0.11 0.020
mg1L
1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
NO = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > M DL P = The R PD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported an a dry weight basis unless flagged with a
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc- Page: 19 of 19
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylob.com

Chain of Custody
and
Miscellaneous Documents
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, $C 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

8
3
GWA I NiPpi=S
Chahi of Custody Record
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Polnt Drve
West Columbia, Soigh Carolina 29172
Telephone No. 803.791-9700 Fax No. 803.791-9111
www.s.h81A1 b.oam
Number 37620
glei+i `
Report Im I
4Gt nt . /j 1�6
saner %
[Printed memo) j� 1 i �+-o c� L • I^'iw.•�'� I`
0=19 Nu.
�.�
JWdrsas
Talephane No,
I?rnalE
Mid PArsmetere {i.e., pH. luirrp, 00) am Ne !anhMd balow
Page
rosy
woe
N�
7Jp Code
PeservauYE►
I.urpres. ,.vacs
& N&W 51 NCI
3, H2$04 6. SodlinThMLfi a
to
ems(
—r
t1
3
�.
i
�
Nudm cI CanwWrs
p
P
6
U
G
►nm: PhMOk G4h•
P1*at r
Numo zNj, ,,,�,.,I �rs+aG 5�.1
i
f
Pimraft Nee acme co WO
j I'
OL17037
G1
V)�-
0 �
�
"
�
�,
P.q fihrnber
I ,
7
6
MatrixNkrnbiw
rfw
alw
Swore ID f Descrtplian
(Canitirars W Orhsara * MOY be
corlriiadanan0�ro)
oalEnclErnt
Mara 2-61.r
Cd1tCEIRrt
Time
linilloyl
10
100
tiu,�rarfio�Caorerm
0 3
FW - 7
be
�O
slay
rvxndlimo$imamwilDriatapprarslraqundfar mWbdTAIL)
5rsrdard a Rush '?imo Sp
semPlu DIG P9SM QGRequiremenisrpeCfly)
t) Romm to Owt b to
PoaslmHssardgenUpcetion
Hmrvd 3Flurnabia o%lr, kr m, ❑pa4an tojocems
1. RedingLd" 1 Sarnoler
Date
Am8
Fiecewou by
Tlrtro
Z Ftslbttiuis u1! Ly
Dale
Time V.
HOMIKud by
E7al?
Time
3. RaBnqu shed by
Onto Irma
7.
Received by
bale
Tlm3
4. RelInquhhPal hk
dale
T bne 4.
_
b4r2r1rry by
Dater
TbYp
T".9Ank _ ..+ [1 N -
N e: All sernples are retaln0d for four weeks born
receipt unless other arrarl ments are made. stmuncon
LAS USF ONLY
laal.narlo oNo E;to
I-W ��'r
Do""M HUW"C (AQ'i 32 rw I
zq�
m
r
Z
C
70
z
m
Z
a
r
Cn
M
C
0
m
U)
Z
0

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Mhmly EnsttemmcnW Service& Inc.
tMev=nt Ntmdu:r.-i1imfmw-41
F%TC I U, I
Reph mD=: W-3015
WClive Dale: W ^.A115
Sample Receipt Checklist (SRC)
Client: Gaoler htspwted byldatexs� Lor 0; CS.1—\
Means of receipt. SES1 ❑ Client ❑ UPS ❑ fata% ❑ ntl-er
7—3-7 I Na A
1. War Custody sc.uh =MWI on thu l:ooicr?
Yes U I No U
I NA 2. If cunt mals wmre presqU, were they intzcY and unbroken?
pH strip r!D, strip ID: \ -- �Z�r\'
Cooler 1DJOliginal tc:nperuti:re upo ip Artc 8 (ccrted) te+mperalure opon ree ip-:
Method: ✓Q T p attuc lauk ❑ Aguimt Bolles 1R C= ID: b IR Gun Ctmection Factor y
Mdhad of wulani: 2 Wet Ice ❑ Blue ice ❑ Dry Ice ❑ None
Yee it?
Teo ❑
htJ4 Yl'�1
j 3. If temperature ©f any cnolcr mcccdad WC, was Prujud Manapcy aotifiod? Phi
notified by SRC, pllom note (circle one), ot$�
(For coolafs tl�eeived via co��nermal courirs, PM& are to be notified
immediately-)
Yes i
o
ILA
4. Is the cmnmercial courier's nackin -Jip attached to this tarns?
Yv; t
No
❑
S. Wcxe �r er cusmdy edures (resin is iectireceivei) followed?
Yes ❑
Na
NA i
Sa Werosauip1csrcfiRqvirhW by client to rcmrncmial courier"
Yes
I o
❑
6. Were sample IDs listed on.the CDC?
Y
a
❑
7. Were sam le IDs Fisted on all sample containers?
Yes
o
❑
$. Wws eollecl:mr date &- tune listerl an the COC?
Y O
❑
9. W 4s COt1;. 4; n (iRlC& tiles'; listed On all salt IC ccadalrrrx?
Yes
❑
10_ Did all aontainG ladle: inforM360D (ID, dates Limo) s�aawith the COC
11. W1xc tcsl4 [o be 2gforiyed listed on the CL3C'
Yes o
Yes o
❑
12. Did all samples arrive in tho '=taints foe each Iesl?
Yes Li : a
❑
13 _ Did all containers arrive in good condition (unbroken, lids on, ctc-)?
Y
No
_
14. Wns adequate sample volume available?
Yo ❑
I No
15. WUfC all samples fcl jVUd Within A 04C holding tinie or 43 hours, whicke-ver
wtl:es first?
YG4
No
16_ Were any samples containers mimin ?
_❑
Yes ❑
N+}
_
17_ Were I114rir uny excess sans tes not listed on COC?
Yes ❑
o
NA ❑
I B. lVere bubbtsz ==1 >`jxm-siaie" (1/V'or Gmm is diameter) in anal VOA vials?
Yes JZ
No[]
NA ❑
19. Were all nwWsiO&G/#lirM nntritalt sa_mplrc rmaived at a Fl of {2?
Ycs
Na
NA
20._Wcrc all c •ruiide and/or sulfide samples received at a pH >12?
' es ❑
Na ❑
NA
21. Urera all applicable NH3n7QWCyanieWpheno1 (-.2UWL) samples 7ee of
nsitisal chlorine?
Na ❑
NA
22. Were collation tcm turns documented on the COC for NC samples?
EYYIM--
lvo ❑
NA
23• Were dime. remarksti eip"ests (l.e. "quested dilutions, MSIM5D designatimss
etc...) oo valy trans cnbM (role the (= into the eommcut slxtiou in UMS?
No
24, Was the quote number used taken E m (he cen�iner label?
Sample Preservation (Masi
bo completed for any stnnpse(s) incarreotly preserved or with headspace.)
Swnple(s) w=received imomntly preserved and were adjusted
aocor(lingly in sam le receiving with 1•l7". IiNO3, HCl, NaOR) using SR'f
'
Sm k4) were mccivrd with bubbles >6 twit Ili diameter.
Sample() wem Tee6vedwith'IRC >o.21rgtL (lr#21 is,No)
SC Dricicing Water Project Sample(s) pH verified to bc>- 2..by Dace:
Satiral s were not received at a pH of < and were A'qtedaccR!qi2&1X usit SRA
SaUVAe labels ied bv; VrrriBexl y: Date:.
Coullneats-
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Dave West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC.
S ALYEmirimmemrbd
Services, Inc, lab vantage Point Olive • West ColutnWa, 5DUth Carolina 29172
Phone-803.791.9700 • Fax 8d36791.9111 - www.shealyla5som
David Sikes .
Blum Inc.
7733 Old P'lzt * Rd.
Stanley, NC 28164
Blum Inc. Facility Stanl+~y, NC
3tormwatcr Qualitahvc MoWtoring Regnu m=1&_ 20, Semi-annual
December 17, 2015
I -None 2-Faint 3-Moduvre 4-Strang
Sw - Pipe 001 outfafi
Color- 2
Odor- 1
Clarity- I
Floating Solids- l
Suspended Solids- I
Foam- 1
Oil Sheen- I
Egtimatnd Rainfall: 0.30 Inches
Estii hated a entl Discharge : 10 Hrs
SW outfall Integrity: Excellent
SW Pipe 002 oatfsll
Color- 2
Odor- 1
Clarity- 1
Floating Solids- 1
Suspended Solids- 1
Foam- I
Oil Sheen- 1
FgtimateJ Rainfall: 030 Inches
Estimated E%,=V Discbarge : 10 Hrs
& W outfall Integrity: Excelled
SW Pipe 003 ou fall
Color- 3
Odor- 1
Clarity- I
Floating Solids-1
Suspended Solids- i
1 oasis I
Oil Sheen-1
Fgtimated Rainfall. 0.30 Inches
Estimated F-veni/ Discharge: 10 Hrs
SW otdfall IDtcgt'ity: EXC41en1
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, $C 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
evrnt

Semi-annual Stormwater_DischarzeMonitorine Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted 0/ f o?O/lo
CERTIFICATE OF CQYFRAGE No. NCG03 D d- ;'- ,
FACILITY NAME
COUNTY ( Ctl
PERSON COLLECTIN SAMPLES ��(; �{ +(kam�_
LABORATORY Lab Cert. #'_ -S2q
on
or
0AC5II
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and MonitoringResults
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 3
RECEPPUERIOD ❑ Jan -June ,July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' month
FER q �P*f ARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW []Trout❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
CENTRAL. F11-5 Other
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
El No discharge this period?2
Outfall No.
.., A,
':bate Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Total Suspended Solids
pH; .
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics5
Benchmarks = :>
_
-
100.mg/L or 50 mg/L.
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.033 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
?
0. 3 D//Ok
30
7.5
N�
N
O.038
N
Call
1
D. l
M
0.03
Nb
NO
Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
a See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
$ Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only'for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics Is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3
WL.

r
Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report, I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan Included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
a3is
N
Title int titl
1 I QK U Jai-W
(Si at ire) (Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the forMgt, "<XX myA", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value In excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
No discharge this period
OuifaH No,
-DateSai»ple
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr) ..
24-hourrainfalI
amount,
inches _..
Non -polar 0&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids.
pH
Benchmarks ->
-
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or So mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 su
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A 6ND EART B MONITORING RESULTS,
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS ZIERIRQUIREENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3. HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NOZ
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME;
Mail an_or in anti one copy of this DMR, ncludina all "No Discharle"reports, within_30 dates of receipt of the lab results (or attend of monitorina period
in the case of No Discharae"..reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MULT SIGN IHIS CER IFI TION FOR ANY INFORMATION R p RTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified.personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly res sibs for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am awa_Wthat thhre ar slgn' nt penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
of
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
i
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3