20180944 Ver 2_PCN Form Submission_20190912

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20180944
2
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Central Office - [phone] Paul Wcjoski:EADS\pawnjoski
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan - Post -Florence Phase II
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Dawn York
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
9/12/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Atlantic Ocean
Basin
White Oak
Water Classification
SB
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
34.674547
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Carteret
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
76.952633
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
V Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
f- Nationwide Permit (NWP)
* Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Regional General Permit (RGP) Number:
RGP Numbers (for multiple RGPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
198000291 - CAMA (NC Coastal Area Management Act)
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
F Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
O Yes r No r Unknown
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
F Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Carteret County Shore Protection Office
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
P.O. Box4297
Address Line 2
aty
Emerald Isle
Fbstal / Zip Code
28594
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from
State / Rovince / R�gim
North Carolina
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
rYes rNo

3a. Name:
Greg L. Rudolph
3b. Business Name:
Carteret County Shore Protection Office
3c.Address
Street Address
P.O. Box 4297
Address Line 2
City
Emerald Isle
Postal / Zip Cork
28594
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores, and Atlantic Beach
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Bogue Inlet to Atlantic Beach
Address Line 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Atlantic Ocean
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
SB
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
White Oak
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030203010305 and 030203010705
4. Project Description and History
State / Row ce / Region
North Carolina
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
State / Rovince / Region
Country
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Post -Florence Beach Nourishment Project (Phase 1) was completed just over 4 months ago, which included a dune feature and placed 945,446 cubic yards of sand along eastern
Emerald Isle and Indian Beach/Salter Path (5.2 miles). Additionally, +350,000 sea oats were planted along the dune crest (flat top of dune) and the dune slope. The project area is used
as a public recreational beach and serves to protect infrastructure.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
F Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW -0000-00000).
DWR#2018-0944
Project History Upload
20180944 Bogue Banks Master Nourishment Plan and Project 1 - 401 Certification - 08.31.2018.pdf 3.41 MB
bogue banks master permit.91-18-09042018110431.pdf 4.7MB
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)

4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
NA
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
NA
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The Carteret County Master Beach Nourishment Plan employs a regular and recurring cycle of nourishment events to continuously maintain beach profile sand volumes along 7
managed reaches (Bogue Inlet, Emerald Isle West, Emerald Isle Central, Emerald Isle East, Indian Beach/Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores, and Atlantic Beach). Nourishment events would
be implemented according to 25 -year level of protection (LOP) beach profile volumetric triggers, ranging 211-266 cubic yards per foot along various reaches of the approximately 23 -mi
project shoreline. Maintenance of the 25 -year LOP beach profile volumes along the management reaches, which equates to protection for upland structures against a 25 -year storm
event, would involve: 1) regular recurring "maintenance" nourishment events to offset long-term, chronic background erosion (including hotspot erosion), and 2) periodic "storm
response' nourishment events to offset sand losses incurred during hurricanes or major storm events. The individual management reaches are expected to require recurring
maintenance sand placements at varying intervals to offset chronic background erosion. Each individual nourishment event will be unique based on various factors, including storm
related erosion.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase II will take place during the winter 2019/2020 (base project) and winter 2020/2021 (option project) construction windows (November
16 — April 30). Due to funding constraints (currently awaiting award of FEMA reimbursement) and total project volume required to make up for losses from Hurricane Florence, it is
anticipated that construction will require two dredging windows to complete. The total project calls for 4,221,900 cy of material to be placed along 21 miles of oceanfront shoreline,
spanning 10 nourishment reaches in Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores, and Atlantic Beach.
Approximately 5,066,280 cy of beach compatible material is expected be dredged from portions of the Current and Old ODMDS to account for losses (20%) between dredging and
placement. The attached event notification presents an overview of the total project extents, reach locations, reach lengths, volumes, and borrow area location. The "Base" project, to
be constructed during winter 2019/2020, consists of 1,995,000 cy of material to be placed along 9.5 miles of shoreline. The "Option" project, to be constructed during winter 2020/2021,
consists of 2,226,900 cy of material to be placed along 11.5 miles of shoreline. Project plans are provided in Attachment A. Slight adjustments in volume may be made prior to
construction based on bid prices and pre -construction surveys. These adjustments could raise the project volume by up to 20%. These adjustments will be discussed in the pre -
construction meeting with State and Federal agency representatives.
Plans call for a base project to be constructed during the winter 2019/2020 dredging window consisting of 1,995,000 cy of material to be placed along 9.5 miles of shoreline consisting
of four nourishment reaches in Emerald Isle (Reach 2), Salter Path (Reach 7), Pine Knoll Shores (Reach 9), and Atlantic Beach (Reach 10). The average fill density will range from 35 —
40 cy/ft across each of the four reaches however it is expected that the fill density will vary between 25 cy/ft and 50 cy/ft within each reach. The template will consist of a dune of variable
height ranging from 10 ft to 14 ft NAVD88 and variable width generally ranging from 20 ft to 50 ft. In most cases, the landward dune tie in will be constructed to tie in at the dune crest
elevation. In cases where the existing vegetation line is belowthe dune crest, the landward dune tie in will be constructed with a 5:1 back slope down to the existing vegetation elevation.
A seaward 5:1 dune slope will be constructed from the dune crest down to a berm of variable width generally ranging from 45 ft to 90 ft at a variable elevation ranging from 6 to 6.5 ft
NAVD88. A 20:1 berm slope will be constructed down to tie in with the existing ground offshore between elevation -4 and -10 ft NAVD88. Approximately 2,394,000 cy of beach
compatible material is expected be dredged from portions of the Current and Old ODMDS to account for losses between dredging and placement (20%).
The option project will be constructed during the winter 2020/2021 dredging window pending receipt of reimbursement funds from FEMA. The option project consists of 2,226,900 cy of
material to be placed along 11.5 miles of shoreline consisting of six nourishment reaches in
Emerald Isle (Reach 1, Reach 3, Reach 4, and Reach 5) and Indian Beach/Salter Path (Reach 6 and Reach 8). The average fill density will range from 30 — 45 cy/ft across each of the
six reaches however it is expected that the fill density will vary between 25 cy/ft and 50 cy/ft within each reach. The template in Reaches 1, 3, and 4 will consist of a dune of variable
height ranging from 10 ft to 14 ft NAVD88 and variable width generally ranging from 20 ft to 50 ft. In most cases, the landward dune tie in will be constructed to tie in at the dune crest
elevation. In cases where the existing vegetation line is below the dune crest, the landward dune tie in will be constructed with a 5:1 back slope down to the existing vegetation elevation.
A seaward 5:1 dune slope will be constructed down to a berm of variable width generally ranging from 45 ft to 90 ft at a variable elevation ranging from 6 to 6.5 ft NAVD88. A 20:1 berm
slope will be constructed down to tie in with the existing ground offshore between elevation -4 and -10 ft NAVD88. The dune in Reaches 5, 6, and 8 was previously constructed during
the Post -Florence enourishment Project — Phase I (winter 2019). Therefore, these reaches will consist of a berm only extension of variable width generally ranging from 45 ft to 90 ft at a
variable elevation ranging from 6 to 6.5 ft NAVD88.
Approximately 2,672,280 cy of beach compatible material is expected be dredged from portions of the Current and Old ODMDS to account for losses between dredging and placement
(20%). As shown in the attached plans and event notification, Figure 1-2 through Figure 1-5 present typical cross-section and plan views for the areas to be nourished during the Post -
Florence Renourishment Project — Phase II. Figure 1-2 presents typical cross sections for reaches where a dune and berm are to be constructed (Reaches 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10).
Figure 1-3 presents a typical cross section for reaches where only a berm is to be constructed (Reaches 5, 6, and 8). These typical cross section and plan views were developed based
on the newest May 2019 survey data. Slight adjustments in the design template may be made prior to construction based on bid prices and pre -construction surveys. These
adjustments will be discussed in the pre -construction meeting with State and Federal agency representatives.
The Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase II to be performed in Winter 2019/2020 and Winter 2020/2021 will use a hopper dredge to obtain material from the Current and Old
ODMDS where it will then be transported to an offshore temporary mooring and submerged pipeline near the project site. A pre -construction survey of the submerged pipeline crossing
Will be provided to state and federal agencies prior to construction. The hopper dredge will then connect to the pipeline and pump the material from the hopper to the beach where the
sand is spread mechanically by bulldozers. This is the same type of dredging placement operation used during the Phase I project (2019) as well as multiple historical projects (Phase 1
and 2 of the Bogue Banks Beach Nourishment Project (2001/2002 and 2002/2003), Post-Ophelia (2007) and Post -Irene (2013)).
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Bogue Banks Ph2 Add 1 Half - Signed.pdf 26.17MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
(' Yes
Comments
6 No
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary f Approved r Not Verified r Unknown F WA
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
4 Unknown

Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
R Yes O No
7b. If yes, explain.
Nourishment events would be implemented according to 25 -year level of protection (LOP) beach profile volumetric triggers, ranging 211-266 cubic yards per foot along various reaches
of the approximately 23 -mi project shoreline. Maintenance of the 25 -year LOP beach profile volumes along the management reaches, which equates to protection for upland structures
against a 25 -year storm event, would involve: 1) regular recurring "maintenance" nourishment events to offset long-term, chronic background erosion (including hotspot erosion), and 2)
periodic "storm response" nourishment events to offset sand losses incurred during hurricanes or major storm events. The individual management reaches are expected to require
recurring maintenance sand placements at approximate intervals of 3 years (Emerald Isle East), 6 years (Pine Knoll Shores, Indian Beach/Salter Path, Bogue Inlet), and 9 years
(Emerald Isle Central, Emerald Isle West) to offset chronic background erosion. Each individual nourishment event will be unique based on various factors; however, based on current
projections and timelines, the range of days per event could be 50-250 days with most events being 100-150 days.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
F Wetlands ❑ Streams -tributaries
W Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
4. Open Water Impacts
F Buffers
4a. Sited# 4a1. Impact Reason 4b. Impact type 4c. Name of waterbody 4d. Activity type 4e. Waterbody type 4f. Impact area
1 Dredge and fill T Atlantic Ocean Dredging Ocean 773.00
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
773.00
4g. Total open water impacts:
773.00
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.00
4h. Comments:
The borrow area is the same as was used for the Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase I
(spring 2019). The borrow area covers approximately 773 acres, with 218 acres located in the
Current ODMDS in Federal waters and 555 acres located in the Old ODMDS in State waters.
Based on the after dredge survey taken in May 2019, there is approximately 10,772,643 cy of
beach compatible material remaining above -52 ft NAVD88 within the borrow area which is
permitted for a maximum dredge depth of -50 ft NAVD88 with 2 ft allowable overdredge.
Approximately 8,197,365 cy of material is available in the State-owned portion of the borrow area
and approximately 2,575,278 cy of material is available in the BOEM controlled Federal portion
of the borrow area. Figure 1-6 presents the current borrow area bathymetry and available volumes.
It should be noted that the County's BOEM lease agreement allows for the dredging of 2,000,000
cy of material over a 3 -year period that began with the construction of the Post -Florence
Renourishment Project — Phase I in spring 2019. Based on before and after dredge surveys, it is
estimated that only 136,449 cy of material was dredged from Federal waters during the Phase I
project, leaving approximately 1,863,550 cy of material available for use during the Post -Florence
- Phase II project.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase II is a continuation of the first project (Post -
Florence Renourishment Project — Phase 1) completed under the Bogue Banks Master Beach
Nourishment Plan. Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the environmental
effects of implementing the Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan have been evaluated in
an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The Final EIS (FEIS) was distributed to state and
federal agencies and a Record of Decision issued in 2018.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:

Permit conditions include dredge window restrictions, dredge cut depth restrictions, sediment
compatibility, and endangered species takes. Measures will be taken by the engineer and
contractor to meet each of these requirements. Beach construction and use of heavy equipment on
the beach will be limited to the November 16 — April 30 time period for placement of beach
material. Dredging in the borrow area will not exceed -52 ft NAVD88. Plans and specifications
will indicate a maximum dredge depth of -50 ft NAVD88 plus 2 ft allowable overdredge. The
large borrow area, containing ample material, will keep individual dredge cut depths to a
minimum. The maximum dredge cut for the Post -Florence Renourishment Project - Phase I was
approximately 7-8 ft and that is expected to remain for the Phase II project. In addition,
undisturbed areas will be left to allow for recovery of benthic resources. Weekly sediment
sampling will be performed by a third party laboratory analysis to ensure grain size and color are
beach compatible. Daily onsite visual assessment of sediment compatibility will also be conducted
by the contractor.
The County may require relocation trawling for the entire length of the project regardless of
whether the mandatory trawling triggers have been met (i.e. water temperature, lethal take).
Endangered species monitoring will be implemented on both the dredge and the trawler, when
working, for the entire length of the project.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Impacts have been deemed temporary.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) -
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Project area is adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
3. Storrawater Requirements
3a. Select whether a completed stormwater management plan (SMP) is included for review and approval or if calculations are provided to document the project will not cause
degradation of downstream surface waters.*
f Stormwater Management r Antidegradation
Plan Calculations
3b. Stormwater Management Plan
3c. Antidegradation Calculations:
Comments:
Turbidity along the nearshore shall not exceed the turbidity standard of 25 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) as described in 15A NCAC 0268.0200. Temporary longitudinal (shore -
parallel) control dikes shall be constructed of beach fill material as close to the shoreline as practical and in a manner that requires the effluent water to travel a sufficient distance to
minimize turbidity prior to returning to the waters of the Atlantic Ocean The turbidity shall be visually monitored daily and shall be documented in the QC report that it is within the
standard. R the turbidity levels appear to exceed the standard, then a water sample shall be taken 500 feet downstream of the mixing zone. If an exceedance occurs, then operations
should be modified to avoid further exceedance.
The Contractor shall monitor any in -water dredge pipelines used during the construction activities, in order to check for potential leaks, which may emanate from the pipeline couplings.
All dredge and fill activities shall cease if leaks are found. Operations may resume upon appropriate repair of affected couplings, or other cause of the leak.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No

1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
r Yes r No
Comments:*
The following state and federal permits/agreements have been issued for the Bogue Banks Master
Beach Nourishment Plan:
0 The NC Division of Coastal Management issued CAMA Major Permit #91-18 dated
September 4, 2018.
0 USACE Action ID No. SAW -2009-00293 dated November 8, 2018 (50 -yr permit).
0 NMFS issued Biological Opinion SER -2017-18882 dated October 23 2018.
0 BOEM issued Lease Authorization Agreement No. OCS-A 0523 dated February 21, 2019.
(3 -Yr Lease Agreement)
0 FWS Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion Conditions for beach placement will be
instituted.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r- Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in additional development on the oceanfront.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
rYes r- Nor WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r- No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r- No
What Federal Agency is involved?
BOEM, USACE, NMFS, USFWS, USCG
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r- Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
FWS staff, NMFS staff, BOEM staff, Natural Heritage Program, etc.
Consultation Documentation Upload
SER -2017-18882 Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan_final.pdf 1.54MB
Service to FWS Bogue Banks 50 yr plan BA 20171005.pdf 101.79KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*

r Yes r No
Are there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around the project vicinity?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NMFS staff and data sources
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO concurrence
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
FEMA engineered beach designation
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
https://vmw.fema.gov/flood-zones
Miscellaneous
Comments
Event Notification and Dune Planting procedures attached
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
MBNP PostFlorence Phase II Event Notification FINAL.pdf
Attachment B - Typical Dune Planting Procedures.pdf
Signature
*
V By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
7.54MB
71.35KB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Dawn York
Signature
O q�
Date
9/12/2019

Shore Protection Manager
Greg L. Rudolph
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
grudolph@c arteretcountync.gov
September 12, 2019
Division of Water Resources
S410re
protection office
votecttheheach.corn
NC Department of Environmental Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
RE: Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan, Post -Florence Phase II, Carteret County
Authorized Agent Agreement
To Whom it May Concern:
This is to inform you that Moffatt and Nichol is the Authorized Agent for the above -referenced
project. Moffatt and Nichol is authorized to act on behalf of the applicant, Carteret County
Shore Protection office, on and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and
acceptance of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions
attached.
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
We appreciate your review of these materials and proceeding as efficiently as possible. Please
contact me at 252-222-5835 or Dawn York at 910-218-7087 with any questions.
RCessppectf�u l lyy,,j�
Greg "rudi" Rudolph
Shore Protection Manager
Shore Protection Office • P.O. Box 4297 • Emerald Isle, North Carolina 28594
www. protect the beach. com

Permit Class
NEW
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality
and
Coastal Resources Commission
trmt"t
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to Carteret County, PO Box 4297, Emerald Isle, NC 28594
Permit Number
91-18
Authorizing development in Carteret County at Bogue Inlet and Atlantic Ocean, Ocean Beaches from
Bogue Court to Tar Landing Road , as requested in the permittee's application dated 5/25/18 (MP -1 & MP-2/Project #1),
& 4/6/18 (MP -2/50 -yr Project), including attached workplan drawings (84), as referenced in Condition No. 1 below.
This permit, issued on September 4, 2018 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subiect to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Bop,ue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan (BBMBNP)
1) Unless specifically altered herein, all development shall be carried out in accordance with the
attached workplan drawings (84), labeled Typical Plan View Sheets 1-7 of 7, Typical Cross Section
View Pages 1-16 of 16, dated 7/10/14, and Project 1 Plans labeled Sheets 1-61, all dated May 2018
and Received DCM Wilmington 617/18; permit narrative dated Received DCM Wilmington 6/4/18;
and AEC Hazard Notice dated 5/9118.
2) In order to protect threatened and endangered species and to minimize adverse impacts to offshore,
nearshore, intertidal and beach resources, no excavation, fill or beach nourishment activities,
including mobilization and demobilization, shall occur from May 1 to November 15 of any year
without prior approval from the Division of Coastal Management in consultation with the appropriate
resource agency personnel, and subject to Condition No. 3 below.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date.
This permit must be accessible on-site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2021
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEQ and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
7
Fvtc Braxton C. Davis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
in issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signature of Permittee

Carteret County/Bogue Banks Master Plan Permit No. 91-18
Page 2 of 5
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
3) In addition to the timing restrictions referenced in Condition No. 2 above, and in order to protect
threatened and endangered species within the inlet complex, no fill or beach nourishment activities,
including mobilization and demobilization, shall occur from April 1 to April 30 of any year at or
adjacent to Bogue Inlet without prior approval from the Division of Coastal Management, in
consultation with the appropriate resource agency personnel.
4) Excavation for each event shall in no case exceed that shown on the approved project workplan
drawings.
5) All excavation shall take place entirely within the areas indicated on the approved workplan drawings.
6) In order to prevent leakage, dredge pipes shall be routinely inspected. If leakage is found and repairs
cannot be made immediately, pumping of material shall stop until such leaks are fixed.
Beach Nourishment
7) This permit authorizes beach nourishment activities to be carried out in accordance with the projected
intervals and volumes as stated in the application. Any request to carry out additional activities not
referenced in the attached application may require a modification of this permit.
8) Prior to initiating any project shoreline protection activities specified in the BBMBNP, a notification
request shall be submitted to Division of Coastal Management (DCM) for prior approval. This
notification must provide a full and complete project event description, including but limited to,
justification/need for the project and how it correlates with the BBMBNP's assumptions, construction
footprints, construction methods and timeframes, borrow source(s), dredging dimensions, beach
placement amounts and profiles, and- exact reach dimensions/location(s). A cumulative summary of all
events completed to the date of submittal under the BBMBNP must be included in the notification to
keep a historic record over the 50 -year period. The summary must provide a list of all past events that
includes the following: Start/end timeframes, placement footprints, dredging footprints, and volume
amounts. This notification shall also include full documentation demonstrating that the proposed
project's sand source(s) complies with 15A NCAC 07H.0312 (Technical Standards for Beach Fill
Projects), as well as any other applicable rules at the time of submittal. This notification shall be
submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to anticipated initiation of construction. DCM concurrence with
the proposed event shall be obtained prior to the initiation of the authorized activity.
NOTE: The notification requirements of Condition No. 8 have been satisfied through the initial permit
application review process for Project No. 1.
NOTE: The permittee is advised that future event approvals may be subject to additional conditions.
9) Prior to initiation of each beach nourishment activity along each section of beach, the existing mean
high water line shall be surveyed, and a copy of the survey provided to the Division of Coastal
Management.

Carteret Coudy/Bogue Ranks Master Plan Permit No. 91-18
Page 3 of 5
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
NOTE: The permittee is advised that the State of North Carolina claims title to all currently submerged
lands and any future lands that are raised above the mean high water level as a result of this
project.
10) Prior to the initiation of any single event that is considered by the rules of the Coastal Resources
Commission to be a large-scale beach nourishment activity (currently defined as any volume of
sediment greater than 300,000 cubic yards), the permittee shall coordinate with the Division of Coastal
Management to determine if an additional static vegetation line(s) shall be required. Any new static
vegetation line(s) shall be used as the reference point for measuring future oceanfront setbacks. The
static vegetation line, which. is defined as the vegetation line that existed within one year prior to the
onset of initial project construction, shall be established using on -ground observation and survey or
aerial imagery. The static vegetation line(s) shall then be marked and a survey depicting this static
vegetation line(s) shall be submitted to the Division of Coastal Management prior to any large-scale
beach nourishment activities.
11) The seaward nourisbrrnent limit shall be constructed in accordance with approved work plats.
12) Prior to the initiation of any beach nourishment activity on a specific property, easements or similar
legal instruments shall be obtained from the impacted property owner(s).
13) Should excavation operations encounter sand deemed non -compatible with 15A NCAC 07H .0312
(Technical Staudards 1ior L3each Fill Projects), the contractor shall immediately cease operation and
contact the Division of Coastal Management. Operations shall resume after resolution of the issue of
sand compatibility
14) In order to ensure compliance with Condition No. 13, the permittee shall ensure that an inspector is
present during all Teach disposal. activities and immediately report to DCM in the event any
incompatible material is placed on the beach. During operations, material placed on the beach shall be
inspected daily to ensure compatibility.
15) Any sediment sample monitoring, dredging or as -built surveys required by the USACE shall also be
provided to DCM.
16) The permittee shall provide written notification of project completion to DCM within one (1) week upon
completion of each event authorized by this permit.
17) Land-based equipment necessary for beach nourishment work shall be brought to the site through
existing accesses. Should the work result in any damage to existing accesses, the accesses shall be
restored to pre -project conditions immediately upon project completion in that specific area.
NOTE: The permittee is advised that any new access site would require a modification of this permit.
18) Prior to any nourishment activities occurring between April 1 and October 31 of any year, the Division
of Marine Fisheries, Shellfish Sanitation Section shall be notified so that any necessary swimming
advisories may be posted.

Carteret County/Bogue Banks Master Plan Permit No. 91-18
Page 4 of 5
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
19) Dune disturbance shall be kept to a minimum. Any alteration of existing dunes shall be coordinated with
the Division of Coastal Management as well as the appropriate property owner(s). All disturbed areas
shall be restored to original contours and configuration and shall be revegetated immediately following
project completion in that specific area.
20) Where oceanfront development exists at elevations nearly equal to that of the native beach, a low
protective dune shall be pushed up along the backbench to prevent slurry from draining towards the
development.
21) Once a section. is complete, a]I heavy equipment shall be removed or shifted to -a new section and the .
area graded and dressed to final approved slopes.,
22) This permit does, not authorize any permanent or long-term interference with the public's right of access
and/or usage of all State lands and waters.
23) The authorized project shall not interfere with the public's right to free navigation on all navigable
waters of the United States. No attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use
by the public of all navigable waters at or adjacent to the authorized work for reason other than safety.
24)
25)
.26)
Project No 1 Conditions
E'xcavation.for Project No. 1 shall not exceed -50' NAVD88. (with a maximum 2' overdredge
allowance).
All excavation shall take place entirely within the areas indicated on the attached workplan drawings for
Project No. 1.
In addition to Conditions 24 and 25 above, the pennittee.shall adhere to all permit conditions listed
herein duringconstruction of Project No. 1.
General
27Y. The permittee shall obtain any necessary authorizations or approvals from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers' and N.C. Division:ofWater Resources prior to initiation of any permitted activity. Unless
altered by a specific Condition of this permit, the permittee shall adhere to all conditions on the Federal
approval and 401 certification,
28) Throughout the duration of the permit, should there be significant differences in projected volumetric
thresholds, project scheduling, or other significant changes compared to the assumptions made as.part of
the initial permit application and Environmental Impact Statement, the Division of Coastal Management
reserves the right to reinitiate review through the permit modification process.
29) If, at.any time, the Bogue Banks 50 -year Coastal Storm Damage Reduction (CSDR) Federal Project is
fianded and the permittee chooses -to participate in the CSDR project, the permittee shall notify DCM of
their participation in the federal project. Participation in the CSDR project may require a modification
of this permit.

Carteret County/Bogue Banks Master Plan Permit No. 91-18
Page 5 of 5
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
30) This permit shall not be assigned, transferred, sold, or otherwise disposed of to a third party without the
written approval of the Division of Coastal Management.
31) The permittee and his contractor shall schedule a pre -construction conference with the Division of
Coastal Management and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to the initiation of any activities
authorized by this permit.
32) Unless specifically altered herein, the permittee shall implement all mitigation and monitoring
commitments made in the permit application and the Environmental Impact Statement: .
33) No sand shall be placed on any sand bags .that have .been determined by the Division of Coastal
Management to be subject _to removal under 15A NCAC 07H .0308(a)(2). In order to ensure.
compliance with this- condition, the Division of Coastal Management shall be contacted at (910) 796--
7302 prior to initiation of each event so that Division staff may meet on site with the permittee and/or
contractor.
NOTE: The permittee is advised that the Division of Coastal Management shall regulate the removal -of
existing sandbags and the placement of new sandbags in accordance with 15A NCAC 07H
.0308(a)(2), or in accordance with any variances granted by the N.C. Coastal Resources
Commission.
34) The N.C. Division of Water Resources has assigned the proposed project DWR Project .No. 20180944
and is authorizing under Certification No. WQC004169. Any violation of the Water Quality
Certification 1-1hall also be considered a violation of this CAMA Permit.
NOTE: The permittee's contractor is advised to contact the U.S. Coast Guard at [phone], ext. 108
to discuss operations and appropriate lighting, markers, etc. for all dredge equipment.
..:NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additiorial state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: Should disturbance landward of the first line of stable, natural vegetation exceed 1 acre in area,
= an Erosion acid Sedimentation..Control Plan may be required for this project. This plan must be
filed at least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of any land disturbing activity. Submit this
plan to the Department of Environmental Quality, Land Quality Section, 127 Cardinal :Drive
Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405.
_NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers assigned the proposed project COE Action Id. No. SAW
2009-002.93.
NOTE: An application processing fee of $475 was received by DCM for this project. This fee also
satisfied the Section 401 application processing fee requirements of the Division of Water
Resources for Project No. 1.

ATTACHMENT B
Typical Dune Planting Procedures

Dune Planting Operational Plan
Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase II
Planting Project Schedule:
Dune planting is highly dependent upon weather conditions for new plants and time to allow
newly pumped beach sands to wash free of salts prior to planting starting. This requires a fair
amount of rain to wash the newly placed material to reduce the amount of natural sea salts in the
material when pumped ashore using ocean water.
The daily hours of operation on the beach will begin once the permitted turtle monitor provides
clearance of the beach and specific work footprint locations for the day. The turtle survey
generally finishes at a set time daily (typically by 7:30 am) depending on the locale and local
volunteers, first point of entry on the beach will be 30 minutes after patrols are completed. 8 am
is generally a practical time to show up and expect turtle coordination and communication to be
complete. The day generally lasts 8 to 10 hours, but equipment and personnel will be off the
beach before dusk.
Typical Equipment:
Hand flantiLig 0Aerations
Tractor- John Deere 5085 or equivalent
Wagon — 1,000 -gallon nurse tank with pump
Hoses - Typical 5/8" garden hoses
Pipe - 3/4 inch pipe with water valve
ATV/light-weight pickup truck
Mechanical flantiLig 0Aerations
Tractor - John Deere 5085 or equivalent with mounted water tank
Planter - Mechanical Transplanter 580 (2 row machine)
Typical Daily Routine of Operations:
Once the all clear is given from turtle patrol staff will enter the beach with the equipment planned
to be used for the while day of work. The tractor drives as close to; or in wet sand, by the water,
until reach the planting site (footprint) for the day. Typical driving speed is less than 5 MPH for
public safety. A company 4x4 truck or ATV travels in front of the tractor approximately 100-200
feet ahead of the work vehicles, to shuffle tourists and property from the path of the tractor, and
to look for hazards, such as holes dug by tourist, possible false crawl turtle tracks, escarpments,
etc.
Once adjacent to the work area, the upper dune is accessed using the shortest possible lateral
distance to the dune, to limit creating ruts in soft sand or damaging the slope of the dune face.
Once on the dune with the mechanical transplanter or other hand planting equipment, all
equipment will stay on the dune until operations are finished for the day. The equipment will then
be moved off the beach in the afternoon following the same procedure as entry and exit at the
closest access to the work. All equipment will be stored off beach during periods of weather or
non -planting (night).

If hand planting, the tractor and water wagon will arrive and traverse the beach, as discussed
above, but at the work area, will stop within 20 feet of the toe of the dune, or wherever tourist and
tents allow, but always greater than 20 feet. The watering hoses are then able to be utilized 100
feet to the front of tractor, and 100 feet to the rear of wagon, so basically planting can cover this
200 -foot area, where water can be supplied during planting. This 200 -foot watering step set
continues until complete with a planting footprint. Once complete in that area then the tractor
pulls forward another 200 foot and the process start again. If the water tank runs out of water the
tractor and wagon exit the beach, as it entered, and re -fills and returns the same as previous
ingress and egress. At the end of the day the tractor and water wagon, as well as all other planting
equipment are stored off beach at night.
Mechanical Transplanter Operations:
The transplanter is pulled by the tractor, same as the water tank, down the beach and
mechanically places a plant at a calibrated spacing as the tractor moves forward. The plant
fingers are driven by a rubber flotation tire that rolls on the sand surface and a chain drives the
disk to which plant fingers are attached. These fingers release the plants at a depth of 8 inches and
a shoe pushes the soil back around the plant and closes the hole. The planter has been modified to
drop the fertilizer and water, required at each plant location, at the same time as the plant drops.
The tractor can pull 2 individual planter units at a time and they are spaced on a `tool bar' for the
spacing requirements (21 inches).
The number of passes required to finish each section will vary from location to location,
depending on the depth of the dune. The planter can only be used on flat surface sand, so a typical
planter placement sets of will consist of 6, 12, 18, 24, or 30 rows based on the width of the upper
dune from existing veg to frontal slope. Most places for this project will be 18 to 24 rows.
The speed of the tractor when pulling the transplanter and actively planting is 1.5 to 2 MPH. Most
people can out walk the operation.
The tractor will access the dune crest by direct line, same as stated above in hand planting, so no
damage to the dune is done. If the dune is steep, we may angle up slope to be sure no rutting or
damage is done. If needed, rubber mats can also be used to gain traction without damage to the
dune face in order to access the upper dune. These mats are temporary and are immediately
removed once the equipment is topside of the dune.
The tractor and transplanter will transverse the beach one round trip per day. The tractor and
water barrel will transverse on average three round trips per day to support the higher volume of
planting when using the transplanter.
The typical number of plant set moves in a day would be 2 if used without the mechanical planter
and 5 if used in conjunction or after use of the mechanical planter.

Conservation Measures
1.) No entry onto beach is allowed prior to 8 am. This gives Turtle patrol time to
complete rounds and report and flag any located nest. If no calls are received, or if
the calls indicate nest outside of the planting areas then access to the beach and crews
proceed to the worksite. A work truck proceeds in front of the tractor to check for
nest/crawls and clear tourist and property from the tractor path. Prior to dune access
work crews will walk the entire length of the planned planting worksite to look for
any sign of turtles or false crawls that may not have been reported.
2.) Daily worksites will be indicated with plants from previous days work on one side
and a PVC stick painted red on the other side of the area to be planted for the next
day. This stake will be located at the top of the dune crest. Turtle monitors will thus
know where work will commence the following day and focus on potential turtle
activity in that area.
3.) Point of contact information for the on-site quality control leader and all contractors
will be provided prior to commencement of project construction.
4.) The tractor and water tank will be run in wet sand whenever possible. The only time
that would not happen is when it must be moved at dead high tide. Due to tourist
populations this is almost never done. We can work around those extreme tide
periods by refilling prior to tides or waiting to enter beach until a waning tide.
5.) When possible, trips to and from the beach access points will be eliminated by
accessing water sources directly on the beach. This eliminates trips, beach tracking,
and speeds up the work. This generally requires utility, municipal, and private
homeowner cooperation.
6.) Tire pressures in all equipment are run at the lowest possible setting to reduce PSI
without damaging tires. This not only reduces compaction but also increases traction
for all equipment.
7.) The mechanical transplanter will (can only) be used in the area above the 12 -foot
dune crest. Only relatively flat beach can be planted using this method. The
remaining areas of the dune slope and tie against the existing dune vegetation line
must be hand planted.
8.) Prior to work every day the work crew will walk the entire area to be planted that day
to look for turtle nest. During the planting operation the tractor driver will look for
turtle crawl signs as proceeding forward with the planter.
9.) No mechanical planting work will be performed within 50 ft of any marked turtle
nest or hand planting within 20 ft of any marked turtle nest.

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleieh, North Carolina 27636-3726
October 5, 2017
Mr. Mickey Sugg
Regulatory Division
Wilmington District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1343
Subject: Bogue Banks Master Beach Management Plan
Request for Concurrence and Initiation of Consultation
Carteret County, NC
Action ID No. SAW -2009-00293
Dear Mr. Sugg:
This letter acknowledges the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) September 18,
2017 receipt of your September 12, 2017 letter requesting initiation of formal section 7
consultation under the Endangered Species Act. The consultation concerns the possible
effects of the proposed Bogue Banks Master Beach Management Plan on the West Indian
manatee (Trichechus manatus), piping plover (Charadrius melodus) and piping plover
critical habitat, red knot (Calidris canutus r fa), seabeach amaranth (Awaranthus
pumilus), and the loggerhead (Caretta caretta), leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea),
green (Chelonia mydas), hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata), and Kemp's ridley
(Lepidochelys kempir) sea turtles, and terrestrial critical habitat for loggerhead sea turtles.
The Service reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and provided
comments through the Department of the Interior on June 12, 2017. In addition, the
Service discussed the project by phone and email with the Corps on several dates, most
recently October 2, 2017.
For this project, the Corps is the lead agency and BOEM is a cooperating agency. There
are multiple sand sources proposed, including the old and current Ocean Dredged
Material Disposal Sites (ODMDS), Area Y, 10 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW)
disposal areas, and six upland sand sources (sand mines or borrow pits). Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) sand resources Iocated within the Current ODMDS borrow area

2
are proposed to be dredged for the Bogue Banks project. BOEM's proposed action is to
issue a negotiated agreement authorizing use of the sand resource areas at the request of
the local sponsor (authorized under 43 United States Code (U.S.C.) 1337 (k) (2)). This
action is related to, but unique from, the locality or Corps' proposed action.
The Service has received all of the information necessary to initiate formal consultation,
as outlined in the regulations governing interagency consultations (50 CFR §402.14).
The Service concurs with the Corps' determinations for all species listed in the BA. It is
the Service's opinion that as proposed, the placement of sand may be covered by the
August 28, 2017 Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion (SPBO), with some
clarification of the Terms and Conditions (discussed below). The SPBO may also cover
sand placement as an associated action of sand extraction from the OCS authorized by
BOEM. If the Corps intends that the project be covered under the SPBO, please send a
written request for our agreement. Alternatively, the intention to cover the project under
the SPBO may be outlined in a public notice for the project, to which the Service will
respond.
Term and Condition A.15 of the BO states:
A.15. Only beach compatible fill shall be placed on the beach or in any associated dune
system. Beach compatible fill must be sand that is similar to a native beach in the
vicinity of the site that has not been affected by prior sand placement activity. Beach
compatible fill must be sand comprised solely of natural sediment and shell material,
containing no construction debris, toxic material, large amounts of rock, or other foreign
matter. The beach compatible fill must be similar in both color and grain size distribution
(sand grain frequency, mean and median grain size and sorting coefficient) to the native
material in the Action Area. Beach compatible fill is material that maintains the general
character and functionality of the material occurring on the beach and in the adjacent
dune and coastal system. In general, fill material that meets the requirements of the most
recent version of the North Carolina Technical Standards for Beach Fill (15A NCAC 07H
.0312) is considered compatible.
The Service believes that DEIS and the BA do not adequately describe the Munsell color
of the native beach or the sand material to be placed on the beach. In previous
nourishment activities using the proposed sand sources, dark sand was an issue, as was
elevated temperatures of turtle nests. Large amounts of shell was also an issue for at least
one sand placement event. According to information in your October 2, 2017 email and
phone conversations with Kathy Matthews, the dark sands came from Borrow Areas A1,
A2, B l a, B l b, B 1 c, and B2, which are not currently proposed for this project. However,
Appendix A of the DEIS states that some of the sediment in the ODMDS and Borrow

Area Y are "dark," with little additional description. Munsell color in particular, and
color in general, is not discussed for the majority of the sand sources. Therefore, the
data remain insufficient to assure that the sediment proposed for placement on the beach
(particularly from the ODMDS and Borrow Area Y) will be compatible with respect to
color, as well as percent of shell, fines, or gravel. Section 4.4 states that the majority of
Borrow Area Y is not compatible, and that the sediment is "dark in color." For sediment
characteristics other than color, the Service will defer to the state sediment criteria. There
are no established criteria for color.
Wet sand with a value of less than 5 (for example, hues of 10 YR, 7.5 YR, 5Y or 2.5Y
with a value below 5) would be darker than what the Service considers acceptable for
normal sea turtle incubation, because the darker color may cause higher incubation
temperatures and greatly skew the sex ratio towards female (Mrosovsky et al. 1984,
Mrosovsky & Provancha 1992). We understand that color monitoring of the material
dredged from the navigation channel and the ODMDS has been conducted in the past,
and that the material was found to be compatible. However, at least some of the other
sites currently have relatively unknown compatibility.
Therefore, the Service has the following recommendations to clarify the requirements of
the SPBO.
1. In order to comply with the sediment compatibility Terms and Conditions in the
SPBO, the applicant should provide to the Corps and the Service additional geotechnical
data prior to each sand placement event, including a description of the wet sand Munsell
color of the native beach and of the proposed sand source. Some of the sand sources
appear to have a greater amount of existing geotechnical information, and so the amount
of additional data needed may vary based upon the existing available information.
Generally, a wet sand value of less than 5 should not be considered compatible. We note
that based upon future data on the hue/value/chroma of the native beach, a value of 5 or
higher may also be considered incompatible in comparison.
2. There is a general belief on the part of some agencies that darker -colored materials
often "bleach out" within a few months, and therefore do not pose a compatibility
problem. However, the Service has not seen any studies to support this belief. If
incompatibly -dark sediments are placed in the project area during the life of the permit,
the Service recommends that, among other remedial actions, the sand be monitored for
three years (or until the sand is no longer on the beach, whichever comes first) to
determine the depth to which "bleaching" occurs over the 3 -year period and the effect, if
any, on temperature of sea turtle nests. A study plan should be submitted to the Service
for review and approval before the bleaching and temperature monitoring begins.

If you have any questions or concerns about this consultation or the consultation process
in general, please feel free to contact Kathy Matthews at 919-856-4520, ext. 27 or by e-
mail at <[e-mail] >.
Sincerely,
Peter Benjamin
Field Supervisor
cc:
Ken Riley, NOAA Fisheries, Beaufort
Maria Dunn, NCWRC, Washington
4

CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH NOURISHMENT PLAN
POST -FLORENCE PHASE II EVENT NOTIFICATION
1.0 POST -FLORENCE PHASE II PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.1 Project Overview
The Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase II will take place during the winter 2019/2020
(base project) and winter 2020/2021 (option project) construction windows (November 16 —April
30). Due to funding constraints (currently awaiting award of FEMA reimbursement) and total
project volume required to make up for losses from Hurricane Florence, it is anticipated that
construction will require two dredging windows to complete. The total project calls for 4,221,900
cy of material to be placed along 21 miles of oceanfront shoreline, spanning 10 nourishment
reaches in Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores, and Atlantic Beach.
Approximately 5,066,280 cy of beach compatible material is expected be dredged from portions
of the Current and Old ODMDS to account for losses (20%) between dredging and placement.
Figure 1-1 presents an overview of the total project extents, reach locations, reach lengths,
volumes, and borrow area location. The "Base" project, to be constructed during winter
2019/2020, consists of 1,995,000 cy of material to be placed along 9.5 miles of shoreline. The
"Option" project, to be constructed during winter 2020/2021, consists of 2,226,900 cy of material
to be placed along 11.5 miles of shoreline. Project plans are provided in Attachment A. Slight
adjustments in volume may be made prior to construction based on bid prices and pre -construction
surveys. These adjustments could raise the project volume by up to 20%. These adjustments will
be discussed in the pre -construction meeting with State and Federal agency representatives.
1

CARTERET COUNTY
E,�L L
wZN;-- - ------- ---
.1V
S
U
G
C
Reacti
40 F0
R ch Atlantic
K11011 Beach- A%
6 S 14,900 it
a tndjay'
r
Indian. it --Ow.
meadIck w
vw�r- Sa1w g 0 000 Vy 0fDM
4
ISMP10 c;
25,t
meca r.JAO IN 00
0
too 00Q 0
1,
e�J'Lfla . ' 1
rasa Rea Nd 1S%G " z
4B6,
ev�efa
St
�bOGUE" Read Av
iN it 535 m
K-TiL e r -X e Z04 A5$q$0
p -h
-FOB,
lit) warpat" A ea
1800 -
it
31 0 '3
EAE M c
r-1 w_ , 6)J40 C
ci
O
S LO
4- —
CjV
LV
Base
Fill Reach (201912020)
2
Option Fill Reach (2020/2021)
"
Figure 1-1: Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase 11
(Winter 2019/2020 and Winter 2020/2021)
PI

Table 1-1 and Table 1-2 present a summary of the reach extents and volumes for both the base and
option projects.
Table 1-1: Base Project Summary
Table 1-2: Option Project Summary
BASE PROJECT (WINTER 2019/2020)
Reach Number Reach Name
Reach Extents
Length (ft) Volume (cy) Fill Density (cy/ft)
Reach 2
Bogue Inlet (Emerald Isle)
Whitecap Ct to Janell Ln
9,300
345,000
40
Reach 7
Salter Path
Ocean View Ln to Hoffman Beach Rd
3,800
140,000
40
Reach 9
Pine Knoll Shores
Ocean Glen Condos to Oak Leaf Dr
24,400
990,000
40
Reach 10
JAtlantic Beach
10ak Leaf Drto Beaufort Ave
1 14,900
520,000
35
Table 1-2: Option Project Summary
1.2 Project Template
Plans call for a base project to be constructed during the winter 2019/2020 dredging window
consisting of 1,995,000 cy of material to be placed along 9.5 miles of shoreline consisting of four
nourishment reaches in Emerald Isle (Reach 2), Salter Path (Reach 7), Pine Knoll Shores (Reach
9), and Atlantic Beach (Reach 10). The average fill density will range from 35 — 40 cy/ft across
each of the four reaches however it is expected that the fill density will vary between 25 cy/ft and
50 cy/ft within each reach. The template will consist of a dune of variable height ranging from 10
ft to 14 ft NAVD88 and variable width generally ranging from 20 ft to 50 ft. In most cases, the
landward dune tie in will be constructed to tie in at the dune crest elevation. In cases where the
existing vegetation line is below the dune crest, the landward dune tie in will be constructed with
a 5:1 back slope down to the existing vegetation elevation. A seaward 5:1 dune slope will be
constructed from the dune crest down to a berm of variable width generally ranging from 45 ft to
90 ft at a variable elevation ranging from 6 to 6.5 ft NAVD88. A 20:1 berm slope will be
constructed down to tie in with the existing ground offshore between elevation -4 and -10 ft
NAVD88. Approximately 2,394,000 cy of beach compatible material is expected be dredged from
portions of the Current and Old ODMDS to account for losses between dredging and placement
(20%).
The option project will be constructed during the winter 2020/2021 dredging window pending
receipt of reimbursement funds from FEMA. The option project consists of 2,226,900 cy of
material to be placed along 11.5 miles of shoreline consisting of six nourishment reaches in
Emerald Isle (Reach 1, Reach 3, Reach 4, and Reach 5) and Indian Beach/Salter Path (Reach 6
and Reach 8). The average fill density will range from 30 — 45 cy/ft across each of the six reaches
however it is expected that the fill density will vary between 25 cy/ft and 50 cy/ft within each
reach. The template in Reaches 1, 3, and 4 will consist of a dune of variable height ranging from
10 ft to 14 ft NAVD88 and variable width generally ranging from 20 ft to 50 ft. In most cases, the
3
OPTION PROJECT (WINTER 2020/2021)
Reach Number Reach Name
Reach Extents
Length (ft) Volume (cy) Fill Density (cy/ft)
Reach 1
Bogue Inlet (Emerald Isle)
Bogue Ct to Whitecap Ct
5,545
166,350
30
Reach 3
Emerald Isle West
Janell Ln to Rip Tide Ct
15,750
708,750
45
Reach 4
Emerald Isle Central
Rip Tide Ctto Connie St
11,950
537,750
45
Reach 5
Emerald Isle East
Connie Stto Indian Summer RV Park
16,210
486,300
30
Reach 6
Indian Beach
Indian Summer RV Parkto Ocean View Ln
6,025
180,750
30
Reach 8
Indian Beach/Salter Path
IHoffman Beach Rd to Ocean Glen Condos
1 4,900 1
147,000
30
1.2 Project Template
Plans call for a base project to be constructed during the winter 2019/2020 dredging window
consisting of 1,995,000 cy of material to be placed along 9.5 miles of shoreline consisting of four
nourishment reaches in Emerald Isle (Reach 2), Salter Path (Reach 7), Pine Knoll Shores (Reach
9), and Atlantic Beach (Reach 10). The average fill density will range from 35 — 40 cy/ft across
each of the four reaches however it is expected that the fill density will vary between 25 cy/ft and
50 cy/ft within each reach. The template will consist of a dune of variable height ranging from 10
ft to 14 ft NAVD88 and variable width generally ranging from 20 ft to 50 ft. In most cases, the
landward dune tie in will be constructed to tie in at the dune crest elevation. In cases where the
existing vegetation line is below the dune crest, the landward dune tie in will be constructed with
a 5:1 back slope down to the existing vegetation elevation. A seaward 5:1 dune slope will be
constructed from the dune crest down to a berm of variable width generally ranging from 45 ft to
90 ft at a variable elevation ranging from 6 to 6.5 ft NAVD88. A 20:1 berm slope will be
constructed down to tie in with the existing ground offshore between elevation -4 and -10 ft
NAVD88. Approximately 2,394,000 cy of beach compatible material is expected be dredged from
portions of the Current and Old ODMDS to account for losses between dredging and placement
(20%).
The option project will be constructed during the winter 2020/2021 dredging window pending
receipt of reimbursement funds from FEMA. The option project consists of 2,226,900 cy of
material to be placed along 11.5 miles of shoreline consisting of six nourishment reaches in
Emerald Isle (Reach 1, Reach 3, Reach 4, and Reach 5) and Indian Beach/Salter Path (Reach 6
and Reach 8). The average fill density will range from 30 — 45 cy/ft across each of the six reaches
however it is expected that the fill density will vary between 25 cy/ft and 50 cy/ft within each
reach. The template in Reaches 1, 3, and 4 will consist of a dune of variable height ranging from
10 ft to 14 ft NAVD88 and variable width generally ranging from 20 ft to 50 ft. In most cases, the
3

landward dune tie in will be constructed to tie in at the dune crest elevation. In cases where the
existing vegetation line is below the dune crest, the landward dune tie in will be constructed with
a 5:1 back slope down to the existing vegetation elevation. A seaward 5:1 dune slope will be
constructed down to a berm of variable width generally ranging from 45 ft to 90 ft at a variable
elevation ranging from 6 to 6.5 ft NAVD88. A 20:1 berm slope will be constructed down to tie in
with the existing ground offshore between elevation -4 and -10 ft NAVD88. The dune in Reaches
5, 6, and 8 was previously constructed during the Post -Florence Renourishment Project— Phase I
(winter 2019). Therefore, these reaches will consist of a berm only extension of variable width
generally ranging from 45 ft to 90 ft at a variable elevation ranging from 6 to 6.5 ft NAVD88.
Approximately 2,672,280 cy of beach compatible material is expected be dredged from portions
of the Current and Old ODMDS to account for losses between dredging and placement (20%).
Figure 1-2 through Figure 1-5 present typical cross-section and plan views for the areas to be
nourished during the Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase II. Figure 1-2 presents typical
cross sections for reaches where a dune and berm are to be constructed (Reaches 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9,
and 10). Figure 1-3 presents a typical cross section for reaches where only a berm is to be
constructed (Reaches 5, 6, and 8). These typical cross section and plan views were developed
based on the newest May 2019 survey data. Slight adjustments in the design template may be
made prior to construction based on bid prices and pre -construction surveys. These adjustments
will be discussed in the pre -construction meeting with State and Federal agency representatives.
0

Figure 1-2: Reach 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 Typical Cross Sections
5
20
� DUNE
DISTANCE VARIES
20
❑ISTANCE VAR
IES
LEVEL DUNE
LEVEL DUN
30'-Q" � BERM
WIDTH VARI S � BERM
LE
EL BERM
LE
EL BERM
f
\
H VARIES
WID
H VARIES
---
EL ARIES
RIES
hj
0
FV
z
t
\ \
uwi
t
\ \
0.50'
10
z
J
\
\
10
10 m
m
\
\
EL VARIES
10 ,
�
m
0
m
0
>
EL VARIES
ILL
a
0
>
ILL
/-DESIGN
z
±0.5
FOOT
z
FOOT
z
'w
�
TOLE
AN CE
TOLE
;NCE
z
w
w
i
w
w
w
z
0
1
z
0
ti
M
W EL -2.3
M
W EL -2.3
APPROX
F
APPROX
EXIST. GRA
�'�-
E
i
EXIST. GR
DE�M1`
j
w
i
w
G
Q
-10 -10
-100 0 100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
Figure 1-2: Reach 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 Typical Cross Sections
5
20
� DUNE
DISTANCE VARIES
20
❑ISTANCE VAR
IES
LEVEL DUNE
LEVEL DUN
30'-Q" � BERM
WIDTH VARI S � BERM
LE
EL BERM
LE
EL BERM
f
\
H VARIES
WID
H VARIES
---
EL ARIES
RIES
hj
0
FV
z
t
\ \
uwi
t
\ \
0.50'
z
J
\
\
10
w
\
\
\
EL VARIES
10 ,
�
m
0
EL VARIES
ILL
a
DESIGN
ILL
/-DESIGN
z
±0.5
FOOT
f0.5
FOOT
z
'w
�
TOLE
AN CE
TOLE
;NCE
w
i
z
o
1
t
ti
M
W EL -2.3
M
W EL -2.3
APPROX
F
APPROX
EXIST. GRA
�'�-
E
i
EXIST. GR
DE�M1`
w
Figure 1-2: Reach 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 Typical Cross Sections
5
20
DISTANCE VARIES
20
LEVEL DUNE
30'-Q" � BERM
LE
EL BERM
WID
H VARIES
---
EL ARIES
hj
10
w
\
\
10 ,
�
m
0
EL VARIES
a
DESIGN
ILL
z
±0.5
FOOT
z
�
�
TOLE
AN CE
z
w
i
z
o
t
M
W EL -2.3
APPROX
F
a
EXIST. GR
DE�M1`
w
i
-10 -10
-100 0 100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
Figure 1-2: Reach 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 Typical Cross Sections
5
� DUNE
DISTANCE VARIES
LEVEL DUNE
30'-Q" � BERM
LE
EL BERM
WID
H VARIES
---
EL ARIES
hj
w
\
\
w
EL VARIES
DESIGN
ILL
z
±0.5
FOOT
z
�
�
TOLE
AN CE
M
W EL -2.3
APPROX
EXIST. GR
DE�M1`
Figure 1-2: Reach 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 Typical Cross Sections
5

10
� BERM
DISTANCE VARIES
LEVEL BERM
IDTH VARIES
1D
�
0.50'
10
� ---
—
EL VARIES
DE
IGN FILL
cc
so
TOLERANCE
co
co
M
z
z
wLi
Li
M
W EL —2.3
APPROx
EXIST. GRA
EJ
Lj�
O
D
0
Li
w
LL
Li
w
—1D —10
—100 0 100 200 300
DISTANCE (FEET)
10
� BERM
DISTANCE VARIES
LEVEL BERM
IDTH VARIES
�
0.50'
� ---
—
EL VARIES
DE
IGN FILL
f D.50 FOOT
TOLERANCE
M
W EL +1.5
M
W EL —2.3
APPROx
EXIST. GRA
EJ
Figure 1-3: Reach 5, 6, and 8 Typical Cross Section

1
2 3
4
5
Pr
LANDWARD MLL uMl,
0 J
A3 o " Tysr Oo - ]'%rvPC ] Oo �-zssaou ]ao+oe, ] - T ••' -.. ... .
•,' „"•. 9+8b 'N3ziav r To M
a
0
=a
�h�
wvi¢za SLOPE
N 1
.
+--II
5.1 SLOPE n
--'_-I DUNE -T/4 b—
X20+00 —,C' T]4N 0 ]
eo '„rtNo �5 W e A m__' L w+ P �y D� iu oo �W�_
+—+�xa s�6EaM Ca ESiI �B t.-♦-- r�-�- _ _�_�+`F��-'zo�so°._
W
= Q 9ERM
_
Y ~—I_�_�HP2091 V—F_�_t_�_
K'
)'
—.. —MHW
MEAN HIGH WATER_
---MHry -.- MHW -- MHW W—... MHW .—uNW .-. MUW
MNW _. wI�
w
MNW - MHW NHW Z
-
- 20'. SLOPE
Z NLW—NI —
_ =
—NLW �._ NLW
r �. ...MLW —MLW-t MLW
MEAN LOW WA TER L MEAN TILE LINE uLw
T.
+
- -T ULry —u
J
5 OPE V
H
W MLW— W ..—MLw -.
j1i
J__--___L
L2 2�
— -----
—___----__
------
�5£AWARO
—Lw
__
2
ILL LIMIT
cC�_O
ATLANTIC OCEAN
U w z
O w
b�I'I
17�
I
700I
I
LANDWARD Fl1L LIMIT
]6c+___
+
i
j y
El A
H
S
4
182`00.
�r
E�ST/@_DUNE
vaaSs3
~
UN:EN
A
a�o`y3�
Fa•d
NNw w
20'15LORE
_—
wwa
E° REIV
EMRM
�u..0
NNw,NW NHW NHw MHw—W-L —MHW M— —W�.
—.—
auLw
]a— —T—
MNw—NN—
Hw
w+�-�NMwD
�MEA0.W-
ATER MEAN TIDE LINE
—_—PM�L �NT�F
�I
PPEE�a
�„
A
m
SEAWARD FILL IJMIi — — --
-'
-T11 ANA
---___L__
�__y_.—__—_J_�
E
A
mm
1. SE SHEET C-601 FOR CONSTRUCTION 9—WORN POINT TABLES.
2 SEE SHEETS C-301 THRU C-335 FOR CROSS SECTIONS.
10®0
SCALE: 1"='DO
NeC-123no. -
`.
1
2 3
4
5
Figure 1-4: Reach 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 Typical Plan View

1 2 1 3 1 4 5
----------- IV
CI FRI.
- - - --------
1:
E-1 ILL ".1,
111- J. 4-1 �1­ �11
- -----------
HIGH WATER \
_,-WHW-.._h= HW- -WIW- -MHW- -MHW- -MH- -0- H- -W.1- -,HW-
1 -PE
z
-------------- ----- --- ----- --------------------- ----------
<-----N-
IN L_ 1_1 E LINE
- - - - - - - - - -
a
._=AL
I i I 11N,
Q.,
El
�AHIDIRD FTELI LIMIT
BERM
CREST/
MEIN -.WATER
GERM
Ht
2- SLOPE - - -- - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - - - - - - - - -
I- ILI- M--.- -II -M- -.L.- --­ ML%- -W- -_AW LW��W LW- -­ -ML6- -MLI=.
NEAN _E LINE I BAN LOW WATER
- ----------
3EA-ID FILL UMIT
uo es:
I- SEE -ET C-601 CNNSTRUC-N EA -INE PEINT TAD -
7. SEE SHEETS C-301 THRU C-335 FCR CROSIE SECTIONS =_c RLE: 1"='Oo' n„
Figure 1-5: Reach 5, 6, and 8 Typical Plan View
m

1.3 Borrow Area Overview
The borrow area is the same as was used for the Post -Florence Renourishment Project- Phase I
(spring 2019). The borrow area covers approximately 773 acres, with 218 acres located in the
Current ODMDS in Federal waters and 555 acres located in the Old ODMDS in State waters.
Based on the after dredge survey taken in May 2019, there is approximately 10,772,643 cy of
beach compatible material remaining above -52 ft NAVD88 within the borrow area which is
permitted for a maximum dredge depth of -50 ft NAVD88 with 2 ft allowable overdredge.
Approximately 8,197,365 cy of material is available in the State-owned portion of the borrow area
and approximately 2,575,278 cy of material is available in the BOEM controlled Federal portion
of the borrow area. Figure 1-6 presents the current borrow area bathymetry and available volumes.
It should be noted that the County's BOEM lease agreement allows for the dredging of 2,000,000
cy of material over a 3 -year period that began with the construction of the Post -Florence
Renourishment Project - Phase I in spring 2019. Based on before and after dredge surveys, it is
estimated that only 136,449 cy of material was dredged from Federal waters during the Phase I
project, leaving approximately 1,863,550 cy of material available for use during the Post -Florence
- Phase II project.
(2689873,335251)
= r
Ilk,
r . . . .. . . . . . - - - - - - -
1 �
1 •
1
1
1
1
1 (Leaoi
e__t
(2689859,330753)
-- - - -- = - - - - - -
Legend
State Jurisdiction
1 Federal (BOEM) Jurisdiction
Past -Florence Phase II Borrow Area -
0 500 1,000 2,000 n' e
Feet
May 2019 Elevation (ft NAVD88)
[1-52.7 - -52.0 F -45.9 - A5.0
❑ -38.9 - -38.0
❑ -51 9 - -51.0 i. -449-440
❑ -37.9 - -37.0
❑ -50.9 - -50.0 I_ -43.9-43.0
0-36.9 - -36.0
N -49.9 - -49.0 -42.9 - -42.0
-35.9 - -35.0
048.9- -48.0 L -41.9 - A 1.0
-34.9 - -34.0
0-47.9 - -47.0 ❑ -40.9 - -40.0
0-33-9 - -33.0
0 -46.9 - -46.0 ❑ -39.9 - -39.0
Figure 1-6: Borrow Area Bathymetry and Volumes
E

Again, while the total project placement volume is estimated to be 4,221,900 cy, due to losses
incurred between dredging and placement (20%), it is expected that 5,066,280 cy may be dredged
from the borrow area. Figure 1-7 and Figure 1-8 present the site plan and typical cross sections
for the proposed borrow area located in the Current and Old ODMDS.
10

MOREHEAD GTN
H ARBDR ORMCS—
® ssie
wnoaao�
7
Figure 1-7: Borrow Area Site Plan
PROPOSED BORROW AREA
COOFCINAIE TABLE
callo
BA PRDROSED BORROW AREA
CONTROL POINT
C, 2011 NBRACORE LOCATION
(SEE TECHMICAL SPECIFICATIONS
FOR DATI SII MMARY)
w REMOTE SENSING TIGOET
NOTES
FA EPN�"'Y[:ON TOURS SHOWN IN FEET
REFEREMCEC TO NAVD RR ARE RASED ON
NULT13 N! SUR VE V9 "C"' MEC BY
GEODYNA MICS IN MAY 2019 ANG LAN ONLY BE
CONSIDERED AS INC' CAIRO THE CONDM NS AT
THE TIME OF THE BCHVEY.
2, BORROW AREA COORDINATES ARE NORTH
CAROLINA STATE PLANE. HAD G (FEET).
3. THE NEIN HIGH x'ATER EL—TION ANO MEAN
LDW WATCR CLCVATCN 5ICWN ON THE DREDGE
.ON IS WERE PROVIDED BY CFRTENET
COUNTYANO AR[ N AA TIDAL
D ATVMS AT THE ATLAN (CURE pCH TRIPLE S PIER
AND THE DIME MARINE LRB.
4. OTHER CONTRACTORS MAT BE PRESENT IN
AREAS W4ERE DREDGING OF EPAOH ILL
M ATERIALS IS TC OCCUR. CONTRACTOR 11
RESPONSIBLE FOR COONDINATING IDDITIES
' - - 'Lw SPE CIF'GA¶ONS FOR DATA
SVIAMAP.Y DFTHE ARCHAEOLOGICAL REMOTE
SENS VG AND TARGET IDENTIFICATION STUDY,
III
5-UDY CONCLUDES THAT THE TARGETS
CON`.'ST OF MODERN DEDRIS (WIRE ROPE. PIPE
E-G.l THAT APPEARS TO BE RELATED TO TIE
OCGGC SR ARTIFICIAL REEF SYSTETIE 191CO, NU GULTJEAL
MS BUILT IN
EIS DNICAL ARTIFACTS 'H ERE FOUNDS
6 TIECONTRACTOR SHAL LEAVE UND'STHADEO
HHnns DF -IN DHFDGING PASses W -N
THE ODMDS BOHHDW SIS
J. FOR ODMDS BORROW SITE DREDGE SECTIONS,
TARIE, SEE SHEE- C-105
® O
SCALE: 1"=500' RORIEONTAL
0
11

Figure 1-8: Borrow Area Typical Cross Sections
12
m
ID
P
E'
-
p
MHW. EL +I.S Mi EL -0.9
U
0
1G
10
20
IC�fi■��IS�11����1•�e��a��
-20
-�
- - ESI TING GRANE
40 }
.�A91��i
]i
_ i9�SS�l���
_fi0
EL 51.0
-60
-]0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 50]0 6000
DISTANCE NEST -D EAST (FEET)
7000 SD00 9000 10000
S -CT CN A -A
i
a
pap
=
0FO
19
C
-10
-60
Y
�xB
0
DISTANCE NEST i0 EAST (FEET)
SECTION B-H
$
p
p
SH
d n
la
a
ID
D
0
g
_
-20
a�-aa
Z—Ol
-y �=
-]D o
o rano 1a99 a000 a000 sono eo90 7ao0 a000 oa99 199oa
OISTAUCE N£ST TO EAST (FEET)
-L _
SECTION C -C
�_ m
E
W
Y
Sc— 1-25VERTICAL
-
SCALE: I"=500'Hg ZMTAL
S t 6
C-104
1 2 3 4
5
Figure 1-8: Borrow Area Typical Cross Sections
12
IC�fi■��IS�11����1•�e��a��
���i*�_,�Y9q��Q►Ri
.�A91��i
]i
_ i9�SS�l���
Figure 1-8: Borrow Area Typical Cross Sections
12

1.4 Sediment Compatibility
As discussed, the Post -Florence Renourishment Project— Phase II will use a borrow area within
the Current and Old ODMDS that was previously used for the Post -Florence Renourishment
Project — Phase I_ Sediment analysis was previously performed as part of the development of the
Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan and the borrow area has been proven to contain
compatible material as the Federal portion was used during the Post -Irene Renourishment Project
in 2013 and the Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase I utilized both State and Federal
portions of the borrow area in 2019. Figure 1-9 shows the location of the analyzed vibracores
within the borrow area.
Figure 1-9: Potential Borrow Areas Within the Current and Old ODMDS
Based on analysis of the native beach sediment data from 64 samples (16 transects) investigated
by CSE in 2001, a median grain size of 0.3 mm was selected as the best representation of the native
beach. The native beach characteristics and fill requirements established for the project are
presented in Table 1-3.
13

Table 1-3: Native Beach Characteristics and Rule Parameters
Characteristic
2001 Native
NCAC
Requirements
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Fines (<#230)
Reported: 0%, Assumed: <1%
<1% +5%
< 6%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
Reported at 98.68%
-
-
Granular (>#10 & <#4)
Reported combined at 1.32°/x,
Assumed 0.7% each
0.7%+5%
< 6%
Gravel (>#4)
0.7%+5%
< 6%
Calcium Carbonate
Reported at 15-20%
20%+15%
< 35%
In addition, Moffatt & Nichol conducted a field investigation on May 24, 2018 to estimate the total
number of sediments and shell material greater than or equal to three inches in diameter, observable
on the surface of the beach between mean low water and the frontal dune toe, in a 50,000 square
foot area. Investigations were performed in two locations, one in Atlantic Beach between
Transects 78 and 80 and one in Emerald Isle between Transects 29 and 30. The Atlantic Beach
investigation area has never been nourished and the Emerald Isle investigation area has only been
nourished once. Results of the investigation found 138 pieces of shell material greater than or
equal to three inches in diameter at Atlantic Beach and 211 pieces of shell material greater than or
equal to three inches in diameter at Emerald Isle.
Vibracores within the borrow area were analyzed with respect to parameters as presented in Table
1-3 to determine the quantity and depth to which beach compatible material exists within the
borrow area. Table 1-4 presents the sediment characteristics of the vibracores within the potential
borrow areas. Based on analysis of these vibracores, it is estimated that beach compatible material
exists down to an elevation of —52 ft NAVD88. Thus, plans will specify a dredge depth of -50 ft
NAVD88 with 2 ft of allowable overdredge. Volume calculations indicate 2,575,278 cy of
material exists above —52 ft NAVD88 in the potential borrow area within the Current ODMDS
and 8,197,365 cy of material exists above -52 ft NAVD88 in the potential borrow area within the
Old ODMDS (see Figure 1-6). Therefore, the total volume available from the potential borrow
areas is 10,772,643 cy. While 4,221,900 cy is the expected placement volume, the anticipated
dredge volume could reach 5,066,280 cy due to losses typically incurred between what is dredged
and what is placed (20%).
Weekly sampling will be performed, subject to laboratory analysis, to ensure sediment
compatibility throughout the project.
14

Table 1-4: Sediment Characteristics of ODMDS Borrow Area
Vibrato re
Sample Interval Elev
(ft, NAVD88)
Gravel
Size Class
Granular
g IN T Granu
(wt%)
Sand
I armetri cs
<#230
Descriptive Statistics
Mean (rm) Std. Dev.(phi)
USC
Composition
Organic
(wt%)
Carbonate
-38.2
-43.2
1.16%
134%
97.36%
0.12%
0.27
0.99
SW
0.60
0.12
010
-43.2
-48.2
0.22%
187%
97.62%
029%
0.28
0.93
SW
0.60
0.13
-48.2
-53.2
0.18%
100%
98.57%
025%
0.26
0.82
SP
0.60
0.10
-53.2
-58.2
0.74%
2.56%
96.52%
0.16%
0.33
101
SW
0.60
0.14
-37.6
-39.6
2.70%
4.61%
92.06%
0.63%
0.34
135
SW
0.70
0.16
011
-39.6
-42.6
0.43%
3.32%
95.98%
027%
0.33
107
SW
0.60
0.14
-42.6
-47.6
0.07%
0.84%
98.83%
026%
0.26
0.83
SP
0.60
0.14
-47.6
-52.6
1.93%
148%
96.47%
0.12%
0.29
109
SW
0.60
0.14
-46.6
-51.6
4.59%
6.41%
88.74%
026%
0.45
159
SW
0.70
0.23
012
-51.6
-55.6
1.32%
3.24%
95.23%
0.21%
0.32
1.15
SW
0.80
0.14
-55.6
-60.6
0.34%
109%
68.36%
30.21%
0.20
0.99
SM
3.10
0.18
-60.6
-64.6
0.02%
189%
87.63%
10.46%
0.29
112
SW -SM
170
0.30
013
-47.3
-53.3
0.08%
138%
98.26%
028%
0.29
0.88
SW
0.60
0.12
-53.3 -56.3 0.24% 181-/0 88.22% 9.73% 0.23 101 SW -SM 130
0.16
-56.3
-58.3
0.01-/0
0.26%
35.690
64.04%
0.18
0.79
CL
4.30
0.11
018
-44.1
-50.1
122%
177%
96.48%
0.53%
0.28
110
SW
0.90
0.12
-50.1 -56.1 0.21-/0 2.53% 96.97% 029% 0.28 102 SW 0.60
0.13
-56.1 -62.1 0.09% 170% 79.59% 18.62% 0.20 105 SM 2.00
0.23
019
-36.1
-42.1
0.00%
0.68%
99.24%
0.08%
0.25
0.86
SW
0.60
0.11
-42.1 -48.1 1.69% 118% 97.13% 0.00% 0.29 107 SW 0.60
0.14
-48.1 -53.1 1.63% 128% 96.97% 0.12% 0.32 110 SW 0.70
0.13
-53.1 -55.4 0.00% 0.28% 99.23% 0.49% 0.24 0.73 SP 0.70
0.10
-36.4
-41.4
2.55%
3.35%
93.98%
0.12%
0.35
129
SW
0.60
0.18
020
-41.4
-46.4
128%
2.23%
95.77%
0.72%
0.31
118
SW
0.80
0.21
-46.4
-50.3
2.31-/0
2.38%
94.92%
0.39%
0.30
121
SW
0.60
0.09
-37
-42
0.36%
164%
97.72%
028%
0.30
0.92
SW
0.60
0.16
021
-02
-47
1.77%
3.11-/0
94.66%
0.46%
0.36
124
SW
0.60
0.12
-47
-52
1.66%
176%
96.42%
0.16%
0.31
108
SW
0.70
0.12
-32.7
-37.7
2.14%
2.52%
95.21%
0.13%
0.34
120
SW
0.60
0.16
022
-37.7
-42.7
2.12%
2.95%
94.79%
0.14%
0.31
118
SW
0.40
0.12
-42.7
-47.7
1.58%
121-/0
96.84%
0.37%
0.29
103
SW
0.40
0.12
-47.7
-52.7
1.06%
2.67%
95.87%
0.40%
0.34
102
SW
0.50
0.15
-47.8
-53.8
1.88%
3.50%
94.51%
0.11-/0
0.36
125
SW
0.60
0.13
023
-53.8
-57.8
0.08%
0.80%
9130%
7.82%
0.19
0.70
SP -SM
100
0.08
-57.8 -62.8 0.71-/0 102% 8163% 16.64% 0.27 1.06 SM 1.20
0.24
-62.8 -65 9.13% 16.02% 65.43% 9.42% 0.81 1.90 SW -SM 1.90
0.53
-49.3
-54.2
4.78%
3.50%
86.91%
4.81%
0.24
159
SW -SM
150
0.13
024
-54.2
-56.1
0.32%
0.87%
98.61%
020%
0.26
0.85
SP
0.50
0.10
-56.1 -63.2 1.85% 6.13% 73.39% 18.63% 0.38 163 SM 2.30
0.33
025
42
-48
0.90%
2.86%
95.88%
0.36%
0.33
110
SW
0.50
0.14
48 -54 2.05% 191-/0 95.21% 0.83% 0.33 121 SW 0.50
0.18
-54 -59.9 1.79% 2.86% 95.23% 0.12% 0.32 117 SW 0.90
0.19
-59.9 -61.5 0.00% 107% 92.30% 6.63% 0.18 0.80 SP -SM 160
0.10
-45.7
-50.7
5.01-/0
4.41%
90.21%
0.37%
0.36
162
SW
0.60
0.13
026
-50.7
-55
0.97%
137%
97.45%
0.21%
0.30
0.97
SW
0.40
0.12
-55
-59.5
0.35%
3.75%
75.53%
20.37%
0.23
133
SM
1.50
0.11
-43.6
-47.6
0.56%
2.97%
96.27%
020%
0.40
106
SW
0.50
0.17
027
-47.6
-51.6
0.67%
2.02%
96.96%
0.35%
0.32
1.00
SW
0.50
0.12
-51.6
-56.5
0.16%
135%
98.08%
0.41%
0.29
0.88
SW
0.50
0.12
-56.5
-60.4
0.40%
3.15%
83.73%
12.72%
0.21
115
SM
1.80
0.20
-42.7
-48.7
0.59%
162%
97.70%
0.09%
0.28
0.93
SW
0.50
0.13
028
-48.7
-54.3
0.41-/0
173%
97.70%
0.16%
0.30
0.95
SW
0.50
0.13
-54.3
-55.6
0.35%
187%
74.98%
22.80%
0.27
113
SM
1.70
0.14
-49.1
-52.6
0.15%
122%
98.57%
0.06%
0.29
0.86
SW
0.50
0.12
036
-52.6
-55.3
2.15%
4.31%
88.07%
5.47%
0.27
144
SW
1.50
0.22
-55.3
-60.1
0.00%
0.03%
93.27%
6.70%
0.14
0.34
SW
1.00
0.08
-60.1 -65 2.80% 3.99% 77.78% 15.43% 0.33 166 SM 2.30
0.34
15

1.5 Dune Planting
Dune planting will be conducted on the dune crest and approximately half way down the dune
slope to ensure dune stability over all tidal cycles. Project specifications, similar to what was
implemented during the Phase I project, will include the planting of native sea oats and bitter
panicum on a 24 -inch grid spacing. Due to plant germination and temperature growing
requirements, it is likely that dune planting will not commence until late March during each
construction window. During the turtle nesting window, certified sea turtle volunteers will walk
the beach each morning (before 8 am) before planting begins to identify sea turtle nests and/or
false crawls. Planting buffers of 50 ft (mechanical planting) and 20 ft (hand planting) will be
applied in locations where nests were identified within the project placement area. Typical dune
planting operations are provided in Attachment B and will be coordinated with the State and
Federal resource agencies.
Current guidelines allow for the use of heavy equipment on the beach (tractors, trailers, mechanical
planters, etc.) until April 30th. After April 30th, equipment usage is restricted to light duty vehicles
(ATVs and pick-up trucks), thereby requiring hand planting methods. ATVs are allowed to
traverse the beach on wet sand and park on dry sand below the base of the dune. Pick-up trucks
are only allowed to traverse and park on wet sand below the high tide line (wrack line).
The County wishes to continue consultation with FWS to amend the guidelines to allow the use of
heavy equipment (tractors, trailers with water tanks, and mechanical planters) on the beach after
April 30th in order to significantly reduce the amount of time required to complete the planting.
The County is willing to take on additional conservation measures to ensure the safety of turtle
nests.
1.6 Methods of Construction
The Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase II to be performed in Winter 2019/2020 and
Winter 2020/2021 will use a hopper dredge to obtain material from the Current and Old ODMDS
where it will then be transported to an offshore temporary mooring and submerged pipeline near
the project site. A pre -construction survey of the submerged pipeline crossing will be provided to
state and federal agencies prior to construction. The hopper dredge will then connect to the
pipeline and pump the material from the hopper to the beach where the sand is spread mechanically
by bulldozers. This is the same type of dredging placement operation used during the Phase I
project (2019) as well as multiple historical projects (Phase 1 and 2 of the Bogue Banks Beach
Nourishment Project (2001/2002 and 2002/2003), Post-Ophelia (2007) and Post -Irene (2013)).
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND AGENCY
COORDINATION
The Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase II is a continuation of the first project (Post -
Florence Renourishment Project — Phase I) completed under the Bogue Banks Master Beach
Nourishment Plan. Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the environmental
effects of implementing the Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan have been evaluated in
an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The Final EIS (FEIS) was distributed to state and
federal agencies and a Record of Decision issued in 2018.
1E

The following state and federal permits/agreements have been issued for the Bogue Banks Master
Beach Nourishment Plan:
• The NC Division of Coastal Management issued CAMA Major Permit 991-18 dated
September 4, 2018.
• USACE Action ID No. SAW -2009-00293 dated November 8, 2018 (50 -yr permit).
• NMFS issued Biological Opinion SER -2017-18882 dated October 23 2018.
• BOEM issued Lease Authorization Agreement No. OCS-A 0523 dated February 21, 2019.
(3 -Yr Lease Agreement)
• FWS Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion Conditions for beach placement will be
instituted.
Permit conditions include dredge window restrictions, dredge cut depth restrictions, sediment
compatibility, and endangered species takes. Measures will be taken by the engineer and
contractor to meet each of these requirements. Beach construction and use of heavy equipment on
the beach will be limited to the November 16 — April 30 time period for placement of beach
material. Dredging in the borrow area will not exceed -52 ft NAVD88. Plans and specifications
will indicate a maximum dredge depth of -50 ft NAVD88 plus 2 ft allowable overdredge. The
large borrow area, containing ample material, will keep individual dredge cut depths to a
minimum. The maximum dredge cut for the Post -Florence Renourishment Project - Phase I was
approximately 7-8 ft and that is expected to remain for the Phase II project. In addition,
undisturbed areas will be left to allow for recovery of benthic resources. Weekly sediment
sampling will be performed by a third party laboratory analysis to ensure grain size and color are
beach compatible. Daily onsite visual assessment of sediment compatibility will also be conducted
by the contractor.
The County may require relocation trawling for the entire length of the project regardless of
whether the mandatory trawling triggers have been met (i.e. water temperature, lethal take).
Endangered species monitoring will be implemented on both the dredge and the trawler, when
working, for the entire length of the project. The project specific BO which applies to the 50 -yr
Master Beach Nourishment Plan has the following incidental take statement:
Table 2-1: Incidental Take Statement Over 50 -yr Master Beach Nourishment Plan
Species
Observed Lethal Take
Observed Non -Lethal Take
Green sea turtle
3
0
(all hopper dredging)
Kemp's Ridely sea turtle
4
0
24
30
Loggerhead sea turtle
(23 hopper dredging, 1
(all relocation trawling)
relocation trawling)
Atlantic Sturgeon
11
847
(all hopper dredging)
(all relocation trawling)
A "self imposed" incidental take statement was included in the specifications for the Post -Florence
Renourishment Project — Phase I so as to allow a proportionate amount of takes for a single project
17

as compared to the overall allowable takes for the 50 -yr Master Beach Nourishment Plan (see
Table 2-2). This procedure will also be implemented during the Post -Florence Renourishment
Project — Phase II.
Table 2-2: Proposed Incidental Take Statement for Post -Florence Renourishment
Project — Phase I
Species
Observed Lethal Take
Observed Non -Lethal Take
Green sea turtle
0
0
Kemp's Ridely sea turtle
0
0
Loggerhead sea turtle
1
2
Atlantic Sturgeon
1
30
It should be noted that the non -lethal trawling takes during Phase I exceeded the "self imposed"
project specific and 50 -yr Master Beach Nourishment Plan allowable takes (see Table 2-3).
Consultation with the agencies was initiated immediately upon the first non -lethal take of a Green
sea turtle and trawling was allowed to continue successfully throughout the remainder of the
proj ect.
Table 2-3: Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase I Incidental Takes
Species
Observed Lethal Take
Observed Non -Lethal Take
Green sea turtle
0
5
Kemp's Ridely sea turtle
0
4
Loggerhead sea turtle
0
8
Atlantic Sturgeon
0
11
Leatherback
0
1
Early consultation with BOEM and USACE have confirmed the County will continue with the
project specific BO and incidental take statement. The engineer and contractor will coordinate
monitoring and reporting protocols and points of contact for the Phase II project during the pre -
construction meeting.
3.0 MASTER BEACH NOURISHMENT PLAN STATUS
The Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase I was the first project completed under the
Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan. A continuation of this project is being planned for
the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 construction windows. Figure 3-1 presents an overview of the
volumes and extents of the initial project (Post -Florence Phase I) and planned Phase II project.

Figure 3-1: Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan History
19
r�
r�
r
�1T7TSTI�iiI'STr.T'
■1::LfC.171iiCri" .J17.1a
IMMUNE
iiiiiiiiiiiiii—i!i!
iiiiliiiiiiii!mi! iiiliiiii—i�i!i!!mii�iiiiliiiiiii
aii
ii!!ion i
11110111
ii
—i
11011111
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!
iiiiiiiiiiii
100111101110110
!! iiiiiii
!! ilii!!=
-iiiWIMM
ii
!!
ii i
ii
—!
!!ilii!
iEiiiiiiiE
i
!=!
i
ii!!!i!!!i!iiii!
E=
MMMMMMMI
iiiiiiiiii !!!!�!!
iiiiiiiiii hili!!
iiiiiiiiii
iiia—iiia!
Ei-=i-=iilii
-iiiiiiiii iiiii i
E!!
ii 1111 i!i—ilmiiili!
In
common
EEE.-----hili-!l--ii
Mon
i i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
E i
i
EEEi=
i!
-=
EE----EE!lEEEEE
iEEEE�=EEE�EE^EEEEEEEEEEEEE
------
E---------------
liiili i�i
!ilii! i i
ii ii=liiiiiiiiiiiil!!
ii ii iiiiiiiiiiiiliii
In
ii ii iiiiiiliiiiliiii
.■. Banks Beach■Projects
/ / ■
Figure 3-1: Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan History
19

3.1 Summary of Previous Projects
Post -Florence Renourishment Proiect Phase Iring 2019 Construction)
A 956,000-cy project was designed with the intention to replace the incipient dune and berm lost
during Hurricane Florence along 5.2 miles of beach encompassing three reaches of shoreline in
Emerald Isle and Indian Beach/Salter Path. Emerald Isle East (Reach 1) was planned to receive
615,000 cy of material over 16,400 ft (average of 38 cy/ft) and Indian Beach/Salter Path (Reaches
2 & 3) was planned to receive 182,000 cy of material over 6,100 ft (average of 31 cy/ft) in Reach
2 and 159,000 cy of material over 5,075 ft (average of 32 cy/ft) in Reach 3. The project template
consisted of a dune of variable width at +12 ft NAVD88 with a 1:5 slope down to a berm of
variable width at +6 ft NAVD88 and then a flatter slope of 1:20 out to the existing ground,
landward of the prominent offshore bar. The final project included slightly more material than the
original plan due to changes in the beach during construction as well as the placement of additional
material at the historical hotspot in Reach 1. Emerald Isle East (Reach 1) received a total of
624,945 cy of material over 16,450 ft of beach for an average of 38.0 cy/ft. Indian Beach/Salter
Path (Reaches 2 & 3) received approximately 192,439 cy of material over 6,050 ft of beach in
Reach 2 for an average of 31.8 cy/ft and 158,263 cy of material over 5,100 ft of beach in Reach 3
for an average of 31.0 cy/ft. Table 3-1 and Figure 3-2 summarize the placement locations and
volumes for the Post -Florence Renourishment Project - Phase 1.
Table 3-1: Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase I Volumes
20
Design
Design
Final
Final
Length
Reach
Volume
Density
Volume
Density
(ft)
(cy)
(cy/ft)
(cy)
(cy/ft)
Reach 1(Emerald Isle East)
16,450
615,000
37.4
624,945
38.0
Reach 2 (Indian Beach/Salter Path)
1 6,050
1 182,000
1 30.1
1 192,439
31.8
Reach 3 (Indian Beach/Salter Path)
1 5,100
1 159,000
1 31.2
1 158,263
31.0
Total
1 27,600
1 956,000
1 34.6
1 975,647
35.3
20

INLET
Reach
n $eachl
Ran achf in Salter Path 58
ch 1 lndi Sects 55'
Reach
late Salter 5 49.52 '1 5,400 it
BOGUE," Em rots 3,tAS Trance Oft --t5a 263 cY
INLET Tran1B 450 it 6,05 cYlftl
-192sYltt)
Baty (380 cYlft1 620 .-- (3M1
SBopa _.._._._
�atgt
fed". ONSLO W BAY
,4,
0 1 2 3
oMiles
Old
ODMDS
Borrow
Areas
[ODMDS
rent
Figure 3-2: Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase I Volumes
3.2 Master Plan Volumes and Renourishment Intervals
Based on analytical analysis of background erosion rates and historical storm damage, the Bogue
Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan has allotted 22.6 Mcy of material to mitigate background
erosion and 27.2 Mcy to mitigate storm damage. An additional 1.8 Mcy has been allotted to
account for sea level change. Table 3-2 presents a summary of the volume needs for the Bogue
Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan over a 50 -year timeframe.
Table 3-2: Master Beach Nourishment Plan Volumes
Parameter
50 -yr Volume (Mcy)
Background Erosion
22.6
Storm Damage
27.2
Sea Level Change
1.8
50 -yr Total
51.6
The Post -Florence Renourishment Project — Phase I had a final volume placement of
approximately 975,647 cy of material of which 945,445 cy can be allocated to the storm damage
mitigation allowance and 30,202 cy allocated to background erosion. Current plans call for
4,221,900 cy of material to be placed in the Post -Florence Renourishment Project - Phase II.
Approximately 2,525,355 cy can be attributed to storm damage mitigation and 1,696,545 cy to
background erosion (please recall that a project was being planned prior to Hurricane Florence to
21

mitigate background erosion). Table 3-3 presents the current volume status of the 50 -Year Bogue
Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan.
Table 3-3: Master Beach Nourishment Plan Status
Parameter
Background Erosion (cy)
Storm Damage (cy)
Sea Level Change (cy)
50 -yr Master Plan Allowance
22,600,000
27,200,000
1,800,000
Post -Florence Phase I Volume
30,202
945,445
0
Post -Florence Phase II Volume
1,696,545
2,525,355
0
Volume Remaining
20,873,253
23,729,200
1,800,000
Since the first (Post -Florence Phase I) and second (Post -Florence Phase II) projects under the
Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan are considered a combination of background
erosion and storm mitigation projects, expected to be completed by spring 2021, the projected 3 -
year renourishment intervals established for background erosion in the Bogue Banks Master Beach
Nourishment Plan (see Table 3-4) would likely not be applicable until 2024-2025 (volume
expected during 2019 and partial volume during 2022 are being accounted for in the Post -Florence
project), barring any storm damage events between now and then.
Table 3-4: Renourishment Intervals and Preliminary Projects Based on
Background Erosion*
Year
Management
Reach
Nourishment
Volume (cy)
Nourishment
Project
('r)
2019
686,067
3
2022
1,839,351
6
2025
967,920
9
2028
1,839,351
6
2031
686,067
3
2034
2,121,204
6)9
2037
686,067
3
2040
1,839,351
6
2043
967,920
9
2046
1,839,351
6
2049
686,067
3
2052
2,121,204
6,9
2055
686,067
3
2058
1,839,351
6
2061
967,920
9
2064
1,839,351
6
*Reference Table 1-3 in the 2014 Bogue Banks MBNP for projected volume needs and nourishment cycles of the managed reaches.
22