20070351 Ver 1_Application_20070301

-i
~~f ,~ ~ ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
2 Q 0 7 4 3 ~ February 26, 2007
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Reference: Request for 401 Water Quality Certification #3402 and #3374
Weston Woods
Randolph County, Archdale, North Carolina , ~r' ~
ECS Project G-12648 ~ ~% ~ a'
Dear Ms. Karoly:
RECEIVED
Enclosed please find seven copies of the Preconstruction Notification for the Weston Woods
condominium project located in Archdale, North Carolina. The site is an approximate 16.99 acre tract
located between School Road and Interstate 85 in Archdale. The location of the site is depicted on the
attached USGS Topographic Map.
ECS Carolinas, LLP delineated streams and wetlands on the site in May 2006. There 1,574.30 linear
feet of stream channel (Muddy Creek and a tributary to Muddy Creek) and 0.237 acres of
wetlands on the site. Weston Woods, a 53 unit condominium development, will be constructed
on the site. In order to access all areas of the site, a road will be constructed that will cross an
intermittent tributary to Muddy Creek. As shown on the exhibits prepared by Koontz-Bryant, P.C.,
107.27 linear feet of 24" RCP will be placed in the stream. The road will impact 145 linear feet of
intermittent stream and 0.04 acres of wetlands. In addition, a sanitary sewer line will be constructed that
will cross Muddy Creek. This will result in the temporary impact to approximately 20 linear feet of
stream channel.
In order to minimize the impacts to streams and wetlands, the road will cross the intermittent tributary to
Muddy Creek at a 90° angle. In addition, the road will be placed to cross the stream at its narrowest point.
The road crossing will result in only 145 linear feet of stream impact and only 0.04 acres of wetland
impact. Due to the minimal impact, mitigation should not be required and none is proposed.
When developed, the site will contain approximately 26% impervious surfaces (Layout and Utility Plan).
A stormwater pond will be constructed that will meet the City of Archdale's stormwater policy for the
Randleman Lake Watershed (Grading & Stormwater Plan).
This permit application, prepared on behalf of Shugart Management, Inc., requests WQC # 3402 to
authorize the impact to 145 linear feet of stream channel and 0.04 acres of wetlands associated with road
construction and WQC # 3374 to authorize the temporary impact to 20 linear feet of Muddy Creek
associated with the installation of a sanitary sewer line. The impacts to the streams and wetlands are
further described in the attached permit application.
4811 Koger Boulevard • Greensboro, NC 27407 • [phone] • Fax [phone]

Date: December 28, 2006
To: Ms. Denise Poulos
ECS LLP Carolinas
4811 Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Re: Weston Woods
To Whom It May Concern:
We elect to have ECS LLP Carolinas act as our agent in obtaining and processing any and all
required wetlands permits for the aforementioned project.
Sincerely,
SHUGART MANAGEMENT, INC.
Vincent C. Townsend, PE, P S
~, ~+~^ A G.,t ". ~ ;. ~ ~ ) ~ ~. M1 dim xv -.M'Ya'a++ _
k '
t'
i
'
~~
~
s`
S'
(
"
:N
;f
'
}
~ ~
~ i W T v~,'T'. q ,_ f JAS"- '' ~ ' 7' l'.
~
~ ~
6
~' ~~
'
'"~
~
'
?2
(c~r
oti~~a~. R
i
jn
tr~~
a
ert
~
~sd ~a,q~3na ~71
~4
o~
t
r ~~
~
~~~
,
6i ~ ~a~
~6~
7
~ 975'
_

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 7 0 3 5 1
fir any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39, NWP 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), checkhere: ^ ..
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Shugart Management, Ina ;~ ,,,
Mailing Address: 221 Jonestown Road
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104
Attn: Mr. Vince Townsend
Telephone Number: 336-765-9661 Fax Number: 336-765-9768
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Denise M. Poulos
Company Affiliation: ECS Carolinas, LLP
Mailing Address: 4811 Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, North Carolina 27407
Telephone Number: 336-856-7150 Fax Number: 336-856-7160
E-mail Address:_dpoulosna,ecslimited.com
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Weston Woods
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Randolph Nearest Town: Archdale
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Weston Woods
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From High Point: south
on Hwy 311, south on Archdale Road, west on School Road. The site is located south of
School Road and north of Interstate 85.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 035° 53' 52.18" N 079° 58' 11.12" W
6. Property size (acres): 16.99 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Muddy Creek
8. River Basin: Deep/Cape Fear
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site contains a single family residence and undeveloped,
wooded land. The surrounding_properties contain residential and commercial development.
Page 2 of 9

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The site is
bein dg eveloped with Weston Woods, a residential subdivision. A road will be constructed
that will cross a tributary to Muddy Creek. In addition, a sanitary sewer line will be
constructed that will cross Muddy Creek. Trucks, pans, loaders, excavators, trackhoes, etc.
will be used to construct the project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the work is to develop Weston
Woods, a residential subdivision. In order to develop the subdivision, a road will be
constructed that will cross a tributary to Muddy Creek. In addition, a sanitary sewer line will
be constructed that will cross Muddy Creek.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. ECS delineated streams and wetlands at the site in May 2006. No
jurisdictional determination and/or permits have been requested or obtained for this projects.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
We do not anticipate future permit requests for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Approximately 145 linear feet of
stream channel and 0.04 acres of wetlands will be impacted by the construction of a road.
_Approximately 20 linear feet of stream channel will be temporarily impacted by the
construction of a sanitary sewer line
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
#1 pipe/fill forested no adjacent 0.04

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.04
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.237 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acrea e, multi ly length X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
#1 UT Muddy Creek pipe intermittent 4-6 145 0.019
#2 Muddy Creek temp/sewer perennial 10-12 20 0.005

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) Permanent 145 0.019
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) Temporary 20 0.005
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. There are no open water
impacts associated with the project.
Page 4 of 9

Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma ocean, etc.) (acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) NA
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.024
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.040
Open Water Impact (acres): NA
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.064
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 165
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ®uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): dam/embankment
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): stormwater
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: wooded
Size of watershed draining to pond: 10.85 acres Expected pond surface area: 0.166 acres
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. In order to minimize the
impact to the stream and wetland at the road crossing. the road will cross the stream at a 90°
angle. Additionally the stream will be crossed at its narrowest point. This will result in the
impact to only 145 linear feet of stream at the road crossing. Only 0.04 acres will be impacted
by the road crossing. A sanitary sewer line will be constructed that will temporarily impact
Page 5 of 9

approximately 20 linear feet of stream. There 1 574.301inear feet of stream channel on the site.
There are 0.237 acres of wetlands on the site.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm ~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Due to the minimal impacts to streams and wetlands, mitigation should not be reauired
and none is proposed
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrplindex.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Page 6 of 9

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 9

3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
sormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. When developed, the site will contain
~~roximately 26% impervious surfaces (Layout and Utili Plan). A Sormwater pond will be
constructed that will meet the City of Archdale's sormwater policy for the Randleman Lake
Watershed (Grading &Stormwater Plan).
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The development will utilize the public sanitary sewer system.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http:/1h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
project consists of the development of a 53 unit condominium development. The development
will provide housing for residents in the area. It is not anticipated that this project will result in
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality.
type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Enhancement, or Payment into the
appropriate information as identified
Page 8 of 9

XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 9 of 9
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

I~ /hr • • i Yi •
il~a r ~ '~, ~ ~;~ ` ~ ~ rte, ;4%~`• • i,.
,: •,. _
h+ e. ~
Y ` ~ ,i
h -~ i ~~. ' _ r r a ..
'~,%~,~,URt) ~ 1Gt> ~ i . fit, . ~ 1 _ t~; .• •, ~ ~~ r ° ~ ~ ~~ )
'~;~ - ,
i'1ti~ o ... '.s~~ -'1~-'~' ~9r a •.~ •y • • 1f 1;~;.;' j+j'a. i GM 5~(s `°.~-`• ""A'_.`~+`g~""~.~~' ~ ---•_....~,y *„«,i~
,~.. _ ;,
AA '~ M
_ ° ~ +~ ,~, ~: ~ •,...;•-., SITE ~' ', ` , ._._.
4~ t ~•+
~'
-n ~r '. ~ •} • `1 j r i d1
,1 ,
SRC _
` -
!~
r s. n, ` ~'
r .,.'
. J ~ • ` •
_ ,~~ ~~' t'~rf "~'.. ~f~ •_ • . ,~ - rte. ~4 f+.r
• • .
~~ _ '
..,, ~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~
r c ~f
` ,11 ~ \t ~ ~". ~T'i t'°" /1 yf.~~ ~ ~ ' l ~ 1 ~ ~ o: ~ ~~Z~ ter'.
~'e ~ ~ ~' ~
~rJ .U r .~ ~~ 1~~
~° t i'° eft. ~ 1 +1 1 i (`/'` 1 ~~r' /J
• j •O 0 ! t' Y 1 544
;' , ~ .
' ,
- ,.
r T
~° tr S ~ _ . e. i 1~ L . ~ ' ; ~ '7 1 ._ f w ~~
N
SOURCE: FIGURE 1
r r
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SITE LOCATION MAP
HIGH POINT EAST, NC ~ WESTON WOODS
QUADRANGLE SCHOOL ROAD
DATED 1950, REVISED 1982 ~+~ p,~y ~ ARCHDALE, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1 "=2,000' ~.~'Y«.JLJ ~ ~~,c n ~~ n ~ F~ ~ ~1~ ~; ~ ~ ~a c

HeLp
g �F
g� -
:.
r
SITE
4
iH
S
>
-
fi
i
w
,
a
�• app 4
Iil
rl• _
4L r
ir
d
a
,c
i
_t
moi• , .�.^ , F � r ,, .
-4y �
F r
.. +.. y . •ono ,� I4' ,a � tl4 � ," ,.'t-
a Y
N
r a
SOURCE: FIGURE 2
s USDA SOIL SURVEY OF SOIL MAP
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC WESTON WOODS
FROM GIS UP SCHOOL ROAD
ARCHDALE, NORTH CAROLINA
NOT TO SCALE ���� ppl�yy �� � �/� �+
W`iROJ � Vr1�7 ECS PROJECT NO. G-12648

~T /, ~ \ -
-~,'-- .~
R=_x ~ - - - ~u9a~t
F,
._
a~ s # o~ s /
F -- T;. ~4 \ \ / -
-; rc -- i _ -:~. -:SST: ~ _ _ ~^'~'~\ ~~ a r ,m ,» ~ Y
~, ..
,;; . `;a
~ j, "~ r
_ .. ..
\ r Ra,w aiv..
oRARS,
:: ~ _.:. ai .gin ... J ~rmt ""°q' '.gf'^""iMn/~ »~i ;` ~ \°i~<;~ 'S"`,, ' ~ ~8 3
' P
till r - ~ ~ ° ~
~i ~ :' ~ r"ri,- 9 - ~En.. 1~~ ~ R.NO: N.P~Raa - „ " ' .. ci
_ R^
M `-
y ~ + ~
~~ /~'' m Fib 1 - \ M N ~~y~
= B
.r s \~ !
~ ~
F'~~ `\~ _ +°m~ l•i 11 ''»"~. ~i - ~\q~~QaRrr°n R.xom\~. ~ °P Ya~~~S
,~
I t ~,.. ~-._ _ ~,.
~ 1 1. ~ BETE ~ l ~rR~ r»' ! ~ i ! T~"1 \ , - ° 1 `S ' tA~ _.._ .... _
w~ aEn,a I ~ _ ~
-FED- ~. \ ` g
\;' a
I ~ ~ "el~o~ Inn ~ ~ f I i ~ _ ` ~ ~.f~\ ~~ `h--- " ~/ Z ~ O
~ _ >w ~i. ni~ I ~~ ~ 1 ', 1 i rtc I . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~'EEg iv ~ ~ - ~\~. ~k~ "~ rt m 1' ~ W ° O
/ ~rtty na xnir~,ry ~ ~~• ~ - ~ V ~ ~ 4•\ A/~%% __ eMlaYR ¢ U'
1 1 ~/ ~ _ ~ _ ~
I I RarRV oa.. n ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~I ~ .• ~ ,/E,~,~.,F ~ N
i a cnwen.'m: ~ I ~/1 %„~:'~~. BLANKET WET DETENTION POND EASEMENT AGREEMENT o
/ .,...... r Iw ~ /'
i;-z '' ~ ~ ~ '"{'~ ./.~ ~ i ~ rHE rnAxTOL, M RElXR9MO TrRS PuT, Does Hmmr AptWlliml£ AW eRAxT ro ,~ aTr a ~_
~~ I' ~jS ~ I VI ~ ~ ~ . ~ : ~/_ TAB 65 ME R111P02E K MgE54AN0 EtlRA TO PSLIROL, M~[rT4 AW SmM~Q, WOVE A S A0tD55 Z
C~ ' ,. ! ~. ~ ~ ~'\~?' 4asa'"~ ~ps pni Mlo LRRim sAO MiOPLRTV raR nrt PORPo £ aP uAMTAMMC TLrt NET OEIExnON Poxo.
\ ~ TOf{1xFR Mix A4 AlGT1T4 AW P11mLECE4 NELESSMT FOR OOxNENENCE K illl flAR)YMENT OF ¢
- _ , : ~! ~ R'~a~ ~p ~ NIA USE 6 SMO lxlF AW MONi TO EMIER ONl! ADJPxMO lANO4 6 OtANRM Fpt R~GMTS Ax0 F
_ -~, .~~ ~ ~ " :_t ~ I^,~~. ~ ~ ,e,,n NLEOES xEnEM wnxTEO. oecEw,eER lT.ame
t ~ ~' ~ M4 EASEUdT ITSELF COx9414 OF P IEET TM ACCESS » TH
l N~RT~a~ a~o,!~ip; •~ I ~ ' ~ Pu&1C mfM a wAr AxO 2O rEET MWIA E xET OEIENM1xEppx00ETEHTOx adA iROx
I ' Tmi y! 0tANT011 CDVEItAN14 AW AgKE4 WT TO EOEi416OLT ANY SiROOTURE Olt MQ ANY PANNC OR
/ )~ PL ~O~(OIMEit 1NAN SMALL OECORATxE PLW1xlO4) OR OTRTf MPROIEUEMT PERYANEXL IN
l I y~ i Trrc EASEYCNi Kllfnr atAxrto, MTr~wT art APPnOxAa AW THe an snAU xor w~. 6052.001
l i ~ '
l n s ~ v.a 1 ~ 0 AQO, OESTROKD OR Rf10VED TD MANTi~ THE NETNET OEIENTMM PPOW. OTHER ntPRO~EHENTS
~---~------~ _ c3

~~ m~~~r~
~, a
a°rA~'
~+~' '
/.ud
Aeo1°t: ~i
f ~
J'T""w , ~~ e ~I
3'~
`mow R miais<b O
,ems ~ ~ . \ % + t
/ /., ~/
O
~ / I ~ ~
~~~~~ ~~
~~1r I~~.
I~~~~ o
r
I ° ~l
~~ 1'
u _
I ~_ `h'i- ~_~
I I .~9.
r ~ ~ _ _
/'~/,
- `C
P ~
0
t / ' '~®:
O `
r ke..w.,m Imf - -
cwl-raevlAlmr
~.,:~ ~ j
~ ' _
~ ~. _4 ~ I -
,~~~®M \_
1, / ~ :°.~
N~-yea! \
\\ \ •vg \ ~ \'4b. ~\~T T~ ~. wNIroB ~ILDIENG
u_ __ ® ~I~E9NU•tml ~ ~ ~\ \
O \ ~\\ l~h... \ _, e
\ \~ "\~ I ~ vim em non r.w¢
I
No{ ~ ~ \ \ /\ ~AA>wa
I
c
'© \ \
\
,~/
i ® / / ~® `
1l +I~LyOS
_-~
~~
~ ~ttr re.
® ~ \
/ a. / / /
/ ~~ / ~
~~ i w'ry' ,rU..~-~.
l
n ~\
n ~
~ ~
-- ~ ~
.~ ~ \
--,N
TYPICAL I{1NIT BUILDING a r m w
GENERAL NOTES \~
I. rWE K !ENE 9ECIAL UY vEAlllT
x •BRL 9R 613x20!
x. od;o REFERENCE. oe x. vc 3.s; n n Pc
5. U2. CONOW41 UMS~ (L>20uP Rf90EN6At OE.EIW4ENi) ~
s. Aw:ra
9lE ARE 8 CO w ~
~ ~ w 8000 •C
roiuwiu~A aFEE~xI .e 1ACn se •c
O~SDAµ LPEe lZ- YF (E.IlU9K OE SEIBAOCSJ
x. r as
a6'r a IwERS.OUS A..s Ac
uPEFN0u5 COK A2. 8.5x:
e. ~~AVUw AVYBER rsALLOWEO x.. UwTS
r4wcvoxo NU OE Uw 3 uw3
9. BUILNG NENNT. I-eTdIY
0. BEDROOxS:
NaeER of eEdlca4 umrs 3
Nwan aE 3 eEORCC4 vers. w
' ~
~ u Prmoec:
/
\
\'~ '\ M•LLULAnON~ (1 SP . ] UMRI . (T.C 9.50 UMrs)
UNBFR OF RPACE6 REgeRED Ix6 SvACES
LL ~
~
j ~uBER OF YALE9 PI1pw0E0: xl. Sa ES u4~UdEs
c A¢ 9vAa9 k dnLFwA. vLES) AL
7
0m[AS) \• •.

• A. P:~s.a
yeMmR Iz. EmusmucnwE:
mFE15: PYBUC
sevEN: Pusrz
NA1
PUBUC
R
~ ~
C9~r ~ \\ ..
~~FW • FIB.
\ :
E
I3. ALL SAMTARY AnER 91ALL BE 6" vVC PRE ANO D pv.
'A. ALL WAIFAUXE SHALL BE WLRU: wPl (d) RR. 9EE5 ARE I
oreo aN PLAN.
/
`
_
,.A,
lx.r \. ~ 'Am
\~'
r
- s. ALL s.owl zENm s.uu eE 6dr~EORCEO cwcnErz RFE cR~l
~
p1
~
~
~
R
x ~
~. .~ ~ - \ -
_
- -- B.x u
i L
s.
rt69
rtu
ix. san NASiE: a6e-snE wa-w

r
~\® \
\
\
` ,6. 16. uA6B0A3: 1101BOIIAI CU6B-90E BORES

n.
aaL
p
\
~
~ ~ ..
cro i noAo
CO
\ ~ \ ~ \. ~

~ ~ ~
~ \ \`~~ \

~ rw4lrr. c mxo
z0. wNaACr PuwxlASR/dE1ELaPER:
smlcwr YANACEYENr, •c.
\
- ~ ~ \\ ~ ~ _
~~ z~i ra~N raw Row
s -s.uv. Nc mo.
coNTACr: aNC c•RRErr
`
~ ; , \ ., \
~ ~ ~ _ ~
~ _\ SSe-xn axes
rrt
^~
a
~
i
ii
:u
~n
[
\
~ I \ \~a `
-fir J R
srA
m u6oERww6o.
ur
l
.
imcs
e
i
33. A LANOSG•PE 0.AN MM SPEOEfi 9xE5. AµO
LAxWI
\ ~ _ \ \ _\

\
~ I \ \ \ \

\ S
SNw 8E P110110E0 MM Cw6mI1Cnp1 0.
\. RAN FOR NOw MInOIIN Bf PRORDEO
CONS11NCrI0N 0./xIS BY dR¢ POMER OR
0.
\ \\ J
~ ~
_ \
\ \ ANO RLLiN
C
S. UiE C SN6A~1L~vRONOEO Epe AN
\~F, II ~,
~ I'.I
~~ ~ ~~ ~~
~ \~~ ~1 _ \~
---' i 1_/--J :-~ ~-
© / ., ~ / ~ /
© ' - ~ ~ ~ _~
'- ~R~
\\
,~ ~--
~~
~~\ EcSIwG wOwO
x
&3 `5~ 5~
U§
a_
r=
Z a $~'O
Q e erg
~ V a~R
ro~~,~
N s db`~
I- - ~~e-s
Zfi..gi
o~ ~~~n
Y;~ G~~f
~~
0
Q
0
z
0
'H'^
V/
W

SEWER NOTES:
~Y ~ ~ / _ i. SXOwIC Nll R REd11ED N11EK 1:1 dN31 9.OPE TYPICAL B~ E~ N
CANlpT 6E Y•MTAYIFD ANO All APPLICABLE OSXA
® ~/ //' / ~ ~x'~~rP' INfER~w nom!" y 4~~ w~x~u~io c~aE~BS N°"mu~a m~~C eE~wNC. Eu~~r u~rr
® ~ - ~~' / s>L~ „. ~ •oo ~YAANEwnn6n Br a6usnE aB onm srArE APRrom 30' "rA' ~_
. ~' ~ / / iOF~ .. sE6cR ~A.I^"1°'s xu a IOGRD s wEr F6cY nE E06E aE -
~ J / s Evsn~NC vASpQEEAOSIT m eE ~~ ns 9~ionN oN IzrwL srEE* sr z•~ EACC-EA¢
w eonm A4o
:
,Aa
l
Ln . r Id IN Y
L
~
T
~
s.
~Anol sNAU 4EEr drv o< wc4
PGems sPErncAnolrs. µ
3~`
u r
r v9sA I °ELE4°E6,,.

WATFR NOTFC: xx
- •• ml r I • PE6 r-
Y~ - II I
x SB
fe
I. 91~Ow1 vIM6lECig15 wll AE A wow OE a RET OE CnrER W

1. (w~aOrEfl Aw a•awD} REV•6~EO AS SNONN aN oErNL SNEEr
LONNEC6w5 91ALL t£ COPPER. FRw ME NAIDt YAM
3. M .
-tY-
Ae r- •BC
3' SroNE UNDER
RaL rwE cuRe Inl6Nw TYPICAL STET SE~1~
TO

~ 6052.001
E ~~
a.~~AY•~ ANp wsfMLAn04 91N1 MEET Ott 6 wd PWYS
3' 90ENAUt .LONG ONE 90E CF ROw ONtr. wCi~O _ /'~
I 2
Z
s
a
r
0
z
F-

t~~. .i
r ~\
1 ~€5 LF OF'
~ STREAM DtSTURBEC? t!,}
.~ ~ ~~~ ~ u
¢~~
~ ~ ~~~
~ \ ~' w
~ _ ,
\ ..~•-
" ' QUANTITIES OF IMPACT
~ , ~ ~} -, LENGfE# OF STREAM = 145 CF g c
` AREA C}F WETL
., AN4S = Q.04 A
c
1 ~ ~ ~~
C3 ~ °
~ ~ cv
~~ ~ °~
~~
~ ~ ~~ w©~
©~a4 ~ac of z ~ ? ~
3 "" WETLANDS BISTt1RBED ~ u
cr" ~ ~
~~
~ ~ ~a~
N
' H-~ ~a 5
.. ,
~~~~
S ~ ~~~
~ ~ v
~ _..~ .-:
~• ,{
......... `4 '
~.
' ~. ... .._. .~. ....~. ... r
J _...
1 "- 20'
b o Q ~ ~
o zo Qo
~ CV x
so ~~~~~~~~~2~

_ ___
$OE3
~+QO 1+QQ
STQRM 16-16A
~ ~~=4a'
o ~o ao ~zo
f1~
a
("~ U
`/ tl ~
ovxi~"'
~~~
~ ~©o
~ S
~ ~ ~
~- ~~~
LL1

U •~ ~ N ~,
O ~ .,1
D ~ ~ ~
mu Zo~~
Q
o r=zg
H~ z~N
~~ ~~~
p~ ~~,..
o~ m~
~~ g~~
~~
c 4 ow

\ \
~ 1
~ ~ :...ate. _ ...
.. , ,
.,. _ ~
\~ -
;~ ,;
~,
_ ,
... ,'
_ ~ ~
t ~ -
~ ` ,.
i *' ~ d°
I / :i;,
- ~
.r1 - ":/ ~: f ~
+~ a y:.
s ~ ~;%;
~~_..,
`~`
~i
Q u
az
~~~
.s z
U ~
Z ¢°a
LL S
Q flea
t~t"A' ~~~
VJ
t ; ' LY
l
g rn
U ~ u,
2 ~
~'° ~~~ ~
V
~~ ~~~
~~ ~_..
~' Erb ~~~
I!~~~ ~ Z
~ ma Q~g~
~~ ~~~~
~'#~~ ~ ~
H ~ ~
~Zm
c+~
~~ ~~v
ro Ca
'~ ~ 14
..
;.
., ~ f - ~..
~ ~~
~~
ViETI.I:NQS
0 l 50 300 450 rWi ~ a J ~ ~ n r ~ :- ~ {O

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weston Woods Project No: Date: May 31, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Shugart Management, Inc. County: Randolph
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP G-12648 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ^Yes ®No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ^Yes ®No Field Location: View Figure 3 'I
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Urtica dioica
Stinging nettle Herb FAC+
Ulmus rubra
Slippery elm Tree/Sap FAC
Toxicodendron radicans
Poison ivy Vine FAC
Lonicera japonica
Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAC-
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 80%
(excluding FAC-) FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
^ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
^ Aerial Photographs
^ Other

® No Recorded Data

Field Observations

Depth of Surface Water: 0"

Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12"

Depth to Saturated Soil: 8" Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
^ Inundated
®Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
^ Water Marks
®Drift Lines
® Sediment Deposits
^ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
^ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
^ Water-Stained Leaves
^ Local Soil Survey Data
^ FAC-Neutral Test
^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetland s Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weston Woods Project No: Date: May 31, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Shugart Management, Inc. County: Randolph
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP G-12648 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Chewacla loam
Map Symbol: ChA Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ®Yes ^ No
Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ®Yes ^ No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic dystrodepts
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-10" 7.SYR 5/8 lOYR 6/4 20% Loam
0-12" 2.5Y 6/1 5YR 4/6 10% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histosol ^ Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
^ Sulfidic Odor ^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
^ Aquic Moisture Regime ^ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ^ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.
W 1;'I'LANll llET'ERMINATION
_-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®yes ^ No
Hydric Soils Present? ®yes ^ No
Remarks:
The three wetland criteria are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weston Woods Project No: Date: May 31, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Shugart Management, Inc. County: Randolph
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP G12648 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ^Yes ®No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ^Yes ®No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweet gum Tree/Sap FAC+
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privett Tree/Sap FAC
Toxicodendron radicans
Poison ivy Vine FAC
Lonicera japonica
Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAC-
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Virginia creeper Vine FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 80%
(excluding FAC-) FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
^ Str
L
k
Tid
G Wetland Hydrology Indicators
eam,
e or
a
e
auge
^ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators
^ Inundated
^ Other ^ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
^ Water Marks
® No Recorded Data ^ Drift Lines
^ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations ^ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: 0" ^ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
^ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12" ^ Local Soil Survey Data
^ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are not present.
(Wetform) Page 1 oft

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetland s Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weston Woods Project No: Date: May 31, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Shugart Management, Inc. County: Randolph
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP G-12648 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Chewacla loam
Map Symbol: ChA Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ®Yes ^ No
Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ^Yes ®No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic dystrodepts
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Mansell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" lOYR 4/4 0% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histosol ^ Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
^ Sulfidic Odor ^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
^ Aquic Moisture Regime ^ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
^ Reducing Conditions ^ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
^ Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
W E'I'LAN ll llETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ^ No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ^yes ®No
Hydric Soils Present? ^yes ®No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology and hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2