NC0024244_Application_20140414

License No. C-0281
CIVIL/SANITARY/ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS
Municipal
Services
SITE PLANNING/SUBDIVISIONS
April 14, 2014
Ron Berry
NCDENR — NPDES Wastewater
512 North Salisbury Street
91h Floor —Archdale Bldg.
Raleigh, NC 27604
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
Engineering
Company, P.A.
SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERING (SUE)
RECEIVED/DENR/f zOIR
APR 1 6 2014
Water Resources
Permitting Section
Reference: City of Albemarle NPDES Permit Renewal — Long Creek WWTP —
NPDES Permit No. 0024244 (Second Submittal)
Dear Mr. Berry:
On behalf of the City of Albemarle I am submitting the additional information you
requested for the Long Creek WWTP NPDES permit renewal application. Included is an
additional copy of the corrected Form 2A, Appendix B, and two copies of the most recent
Solids Management Plan for Long Creek facility. Also included are the three lab reports
for the 2"d species test for Part E of Form 2A. Note that additional pages of Form 2A
have been submitted that signify Test 4, 5, and 6 under the toxicity section.
If you need any additional information during your review of this NPDES Permit Renewal
please contact me at [phone] or [e-mail]
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter
Sind, ;.
Ben Clawson, P.E.
Project Engineer
CC: Michael L. Leonas, Albemarle Public Utilities Director
File
PO Box 97, Garner, North Carolina 27529 [phone] PO Box 349, Boone, NC 28607 [phone]

License No. C-0281
CIVILfSANITARY/ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
Municipal Engineering
Services Company, P.A.
SITE PLANNING] SUBDIVISIONS av V
SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERING (SUE)
April 8, 2014 RECEIVED/DENR/DWR
Ron Berry
NCDENR — NPDES Wastewater APR 9 2014
512 North Salisbury Street
9th Floor —Archdale Bldg. Water Resources
Raleigh, NC 27604 PermiWng won
Reference: City of Albemarle NPDES Permit Renewal — Long Creek WWTP —
NPDES Permit No. 0024244
Dear Mr. Berry:
On behalf of the City of Albemarle I am submitting the attached NPDES Form 2A
Renewal Application for Long Creek WWTP. Along with this submittal is the supporting
documentation for the basic application information as well as supplemental application
information. Appendices have been added for lab data used for the three toxicity tests,
topographic map, process flow schematic, and respective lab data used for the
expanded effluent testing requirements.
Please note that under Part D Volatile Organic Compounds, Acid -Extractable
Compounds, and Base -Neutral Compounds were marked with an asterisk to indicate lab
data used to calculate average daily concentrations and maximum daily concentrations
originated from two different labs. These labs reported the respective pollutants with
differing MDLs, which in turn skewed the averages which are reported within this
submittal. The 2010 and 2011 lab data indicated a higher MDL that the second lab which
furnished the 2013 data which affected the data for Maximum Daily Discharge as well as
data for Average Daily Discharge. Included within the attached submittal are the three
referenced lab reports.
If you have any questions or need additional information during your review of this
NPDES Permit Renewal please contact me at [phone].
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Ben Clawson, P.E.
Project Engineer
CC: Michael L. Leonas, Albemarle Public Utilities Director
File
J Ci ,,"JI
PO Box 97, Garner, North Carolina 27529 [phone] PO Box 349, Boone, NC 28607 [phone]

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP NC 0024244
FORM
2A
NPDES
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: I RIVER BASIN:
Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
NPDES FORM 2A APPLICATION OVERVIEW
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow >_ 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through 13.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
C. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
L.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 1 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek \AtWTP NCO024244
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee i
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
IAll treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP
Mailing Address
Albemarle NC 08002
Contact Person
Brandon PI ler
Title
Chief O eratodORC
Telephone Number
[phone]
Facility Address
1040 Coble Avenue
(not P.O. Box) Albemarle NC 0800'
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Same as above
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number _.
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
® owner ® operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
® facility ® applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NCO024244
UIC Other
RCRA Other
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name
City of Albemarle Collection System
Town of New London Collection S stem
Stanley County Collection System
Total population served
Population Served
15.903 i2010 Census;
600 (2010 Census;
1,230 (Estimated from Flow)
17,733 _
Type of Collection System
Separate Sewer
Separate Sewer
Separate Sewer
Ownership
City of Albemarle
Town of New London
County of Stanley_
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 2 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244 renewal Yadkin — Dee Pee
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12th month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 12mgd
Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
b. Annual average daily flow rate 5.26 MGD 4.98 MGD 6.29 MGD
C. Maximum daily flow rate 16.47 MGD 11.04 MGD 18.81 MGD
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
® Separate sanitary sewer 1(
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? X Yes No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
V. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location: N/A
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge continuous or intermittent?
C. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location: N/A
Number of acres: N/A
Annual average daily volume applied to site:
Is land application continuous or intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
1
NIA
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
X No
Yes X No
Yes No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 3 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
N/A
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
e.
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number t Z
For each treatment works that receives this dischart;e, provide the following:
Name N/A
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number _
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility.
Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection):
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
N/A
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or intermittent?
N/A
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 4 of 22

NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location Albemarle. NC
(City or town, if applicable)
(28001)
(County) (State)
35° 19'27" N 80° 12'56" W
(Latitude) (Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable) N/A
d. Depth below surface (if applicable)
e. Average daily flow rate
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs: N/A
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes G No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Lone Creek — Index # 13-17_31,(Class Cs
b. Name of watershed (if known) Long Creek
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known): Yadkin — Pee Dee River Basin
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute cfs chronic
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable):
fl.
tt.
mgd
No (go to A.9.g.)
mgd
cfs
mg/l of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWfP, NC0024;,_-,
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
® Primary ® Secondary
❑ Advanced Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal
Design SS removal
Design P removal
Design N removal
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
Tertiary Disk Filters
N/A %
N/A _ %
Other %
C. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Chlorine gas
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? Yes ❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number:
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
PARAMETER
I Value Units
Value
Units Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
5.7 S.U.
pH (Maximum)
7.3 S.U.
Flow Rate
18.81
MGD
6.29
MGD
Temperature (Winter)
20
C
5
C
368
Temperature (Summer)
31 C
13
C 531
For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
POLLUTANT
MUMDL
METHOD
Conc.Fumber
Units
CoConc. Units
of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN BOD5
37.1 Mg/1
5.76 ..y.
11
DEMAND (Report one) CBODS
FECAL COLIFORM 2800 Pere/ i00 158.25 Perril00 249 SM9222D
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS) 92 mg/1 22.35 1 n /I 250 SM2540D
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 6 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate >_ 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.S. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
471,000 w/ average weather gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
A Aroject is currently underway to repair some of the collection system that oroved to have the highest levels of 1/1 based
On a resent 1/1 report. The profect budget is 3 million.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within % mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? Yes No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Responsibilities of Contractor:
B.S. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
ine
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
® Yes ❑ No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 7 of 22

I
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
C. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
Citv of Albemarle entered into a SDecial Order of Consent ISOCI with the State of North Carolina.
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
Begin Construction 06/01/2014
End Construction 03/01/2015
Begin Discharge 03/15/2015 / !
Attain Operational Level 03/30/2015
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? ® Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly: An Authorization to Construct AtC has been obtained to perform the construction tasks outlined in the SOC
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on -half years old.
Outfall Number ie
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
POLLUTANT
-
METHOD
MLJMDL
Conc. Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
4.5 mg/I
.74
mg/I
249
EPA 350.1
.045
CHLORINE (TOTAL
48 ug/I
29.29
ug/I
249
HACH
RESIDUAL, TRC)
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
12
mg/I
8.86
mg/I
249
METER
TOTAL KJELDAHL
5.7
mg/I
4.63
mg/I
3
EPA 351.2
.26
NITROGEN (TKN)
16
mg/I
10.93
mg/I
3
EPA 353.2
.80
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE
5.3
mg/I
4.3
mg/I
3
EPA 1664B
2.60
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
5.7
mg/I
2.68
mg/I
12
EPA 365.4
.025
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
220
mg/I
177.67
mg/I
3
SM 254OC-1997
10
(TDS)
OTHER I I
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 8 of 22

r-
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WV\(TP NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
® Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
® Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations. f I
Name and official title �Y ��nae-� L L -S , �1 rYt per, �I�J� lG I If 1 Le
Signature
Telephone number
Date signed
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each ouffall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Ouffall number: (Complete once for each outall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT Number I ANALYTICAL MLM
Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. of METHOD
Units Mass Units
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
0.070
mg/L
0.054
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0059
ARSENIC
0.005
mg/L
0.005
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0054
BERYLLIUM
0.002
mg/L
0.001
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0001
CADMIUM
0.005
mg/L
0.002
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.00036
CHROMIUM
0.056
mg/L
0.046
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0014
COPPER
0.147
mg/L
0.116
mg/L
3
EPA200.81EPA200.7
.0016
LEAD
0.005
mg/L
0.004
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0021
2
MERCURY
11.50
ng/L
11.30
ng/L
EPA1631
.00017
NICKEL
0.010
mg/L
0.008
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0018
SELENIUM
0.005
mg/L
0.003
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.005
SILVER
0.010
mg/L
0.007
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0019
THALLIUM
0.058
mg/L
0.020
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0058
ZINC
0.080
mg/L
0.065
mg/L
3
EPA200.8/EPA200.7
.0038
CYANIDE
0.005
mg/L
0.005
mg/L
3
LQC10-204-00-1-X
.0049
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
86.6
ug/L
53.8
ug/L
3
EPA 420.1/EPA 420.4
30
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
60.00
mg/L
45.367
mg/L
CALC./SM2340B-1997
.14
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 10 of 22

•"
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin - Pee Dee
Outfall number: One (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY
DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
Number ANALYTICAL ML/MDL
Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. Units Mass
Units
of METHOD
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
<50*
ug/L
34.67*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
4.0
ACRYLONITRILE
<50*
ug/L
34.5*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
3.6
BENZENE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.383*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.15
BROMOFORM
<5.0*
ug/L
3.407
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.22
BON
<5.0*
ug/L
3.39*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.17
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.39*
ug1L
3
EPA 624
.17
CHLORODIBROMO-
<5.0*
ug/L
4.667*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.17
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.41*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.23
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.033*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
1.1
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
7.8
ug/L
5.9
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.18
DICHLOROBROMO-
<6.0*
ug/L
4.4*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.17
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.38*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.13
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.403*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.21
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
<5.0*
ug/L
3.403*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.21
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO- <5.0*
ug/L
3.403*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.21
ETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE <5.0*
ug/L
ug/L
3.37*
3.4*
ug/L
ug/L
3
3
EPA 624
EPA 624
.10
.20
CIS - 1,3-DICHLORO-
<5.0*
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.38*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.13
METHYL BROMIDE
<10.0*
ug/L
6.71*
ug1L
3
EPA 624
.14
METHYL CHLORIDE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.38*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.13
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.410*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.23
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
<5.0*
ug/L
3.43*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.28
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
<5.0*
ug1L
3.39*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.17
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.38*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.14
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin - Pee Dee
Outfall number: One (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT Number ANALYTICAL ML/MDL
Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. Units Mass Units of METHOD
Samples
TRICHLOROETHANE
<10.0*
ug/L
0.11-
ug/L
1
3
EPA 624
.12
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.38*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.14
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.38*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.15
VINYL CHLORIDE
<5.0*
ug/L
3.44*
ug/L
3
EPA 624
.32
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
I
I
I i
I
T_
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.167*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.5
2-CHLOROPHENOL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.067*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.2
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.133*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.4
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.3
4,6-DINITRO-0-CRESOL
<50.0*
ug/L
34.3*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
2.9
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
<50.0*
ug/L
34.20*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
2.6
2-NITROPHENOL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.03*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.1
4-NITROPHENOL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.33*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
2.0
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
<30.0*
ug/L
20.60*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.8
PHENOL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.13*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.4
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.03*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.1
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid -extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
L - I
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.13*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.4
ACENAPHTHYLENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.07*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.2
ANTHRACENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.20*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.6
BENZIDINE
<50.0*
ug/L
33.87*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.6
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.3
BENZO(A)PYRENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
3
EPA 625
1.3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 12 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin - Pee Dee
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT Number ANALYTICAL ML/MDL
Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. Units Mass Units of METHOD
Samples
<10.0* ug/L 7.0* ug/L s EPA 625 1.0
FLUORANTHENE
RANT
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
<10.0*
ug1L
7.47*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 2.4
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.3
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
<10.0*
ug/L
7.13*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.4
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
<10.0*
ug/L
7.07*
uglL
3
EPA 625 1.2
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.3
PROPYL) ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
<10.0*
ug/L
7.53*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.7
PHTHALATE
4-13ROMOPHENYL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.00*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.0
PHENYLETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.33*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 2.0
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.00*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.0
4-CHLORPHENYL
<10.0*
ug/L
7.20*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.6
PHENYLETHER
CHRYSENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.33*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 2.0
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.17*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.5
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.70*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 3.1
DIBENZO(A,H)
<10.0*
ug/L
7.43*
ug/L
3 EPA 625 2.3
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.03*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.1
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.03*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.1
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.0*
ug1L
3
EPA 625 1.0
3,3-DICHLORO-
<20.0*
ug/L
14.43*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 3.3
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.37*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 2.1
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.13*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.4
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.47*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 2.4
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.17*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.5
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.30*
ug/L
3
EPA 625 1.9
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 13 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin - Pee Dee
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT Number ANALYTICAL MUMDL
Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. Units Mass Units of METHOD
Samples
FLUORANTHENE <10.0* ug/L 7.37* ug1L EPA 625 2.1
FLUORENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.23*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.7
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.0*
ug/L
EPA 625
EPA 625
1.0
HEXACHLORO-
<10.0*
ug/L
7.07*
ug/L
1.2
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.3
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.03*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.1
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
<10.0*
ug/L
7.40*
ug/L
EPA 625
2.2
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.3
NAPHTHALENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.3
NITROBENZENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.07*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.2
N-NITROSODI-N-
<20.0*
ug/L
13.63*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.5
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
<10.0*
ug/L
7.10*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.3
METHYLAMINE
OSODI-
' PHENY
PHENYLAMINE
<20.0*
ug/L
14.03*
ug/L
EPA 625
2.1
<10.0*
ug/L
7.13*
ug/L
EPA 625
1.4
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
<10.0*
ug/L
7.37*
ug/L
EPA 625
2.1
TRICHLOROBENZENE <20.0* ug/L 13.73* ug/L EPA 625 1.2
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 14 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244 Renewal
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
: RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POT1Ns with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POT1Ns required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
® chronic ® acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half .ears. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number. 4 Test number. 5 Test number: 6
a. Test information.
i - 1
Fathead Minnow / EPA-821- Fathead Minnow / EPA-821- Fathead Minnow / EPA-
Test Species & test method number
R-02-013 R-02-013 821-R-02-013
Age at initiation.of test --17 hours -18 hours -18 hours
Outfall number 1 1 1
10-06-13 , 10-08-13 , & 10- 12-01-13 , 12-03-13 , 12-05- 1-05-14 , 01-07-14 , 01-09-
Dates sample collected
10-13 13 14
Date test started 10-08-13 12-03-13 01-07-14
Duration Seven Days Seven Days Seven Days
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
EPA-821-R-02-013
EPA-821-R-02-013
EPA-821-R-02-013
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
X
X
X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
X
X
X
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 15 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
Test number: 4 Test number: 5 Test number: 6
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected: at DMR sampling location at DMR sampling location at DMR sampling
location
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
X
X
X
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static X X X
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" ortype of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
First Test Series
45%
45%
45%
Second Test Series
67.5%
67.5%
67.5%
Third Test Series
90%
90%
90%
Fourth Test Series
95%
95%
95%
Fifth Test Series
100%
100%
100%
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
6.54
6.84
6.92
Salinity
Temperature
24.9
24.6
24.8
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
7.9 mg1L
8.2 mg/L
8.1 mg/L
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
95%
90%
92.5 %
LCSo
>100 % >100 %
>100 %
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 16 of 22

95% C.I.
Control percent survival 1 100 % 100 % 1 100%
Other (describe) Pass / Fail I Pass I Pass Pass
Other —
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 755D-6 & 7550-22. Page 17 of 22

• FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244
Chronic:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
NOEC
100 %
100 %
100 %
Ic25
>100 %
>100 %
>100 %
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe)
m. Quality ControUQuality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Plant Effluent Only
Plant Effluent Only
Plant Effluent Only
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
/
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation.
Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No
If yes, describe:
i
EA. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / / _ (MM/DDNYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
I
ENO OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 1$ of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAICERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Number of Cl Us.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
i
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: International Automotive Components
Mailing Address: PO Box 580
Albemarle, NC 28002
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Tufting, Dyeing . Finisi „.'Q a, ;oating of Automotive Car et.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Dyed Automotive Carpet
Raw material(s): Nylon Yarn, Polyester/Nylon Substrate Pre -met Acid Dyes UV stabilizers. Anti -microbial and other auxiliary chemicals
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
1,304.000 _ gpd ( X continuous or _ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd f continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits [` Yes No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards [ Yes No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
® Yes G No If yes, describe each episode.
The SIU exceed their permit allocation for Chromium. The LCWWTP also violated their NPDES permit for Chromium durin the same time
frame. Civil penalties were assessed per the Enforcement Response Plan.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REM EDIATI ON/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
Groundwater remediation from abandoned textile mill. Expected to receive this discharge 2ndquarter of 2014 and after
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
Tetrachloroeth lene with a maximum daily flow of .005 MG. Concentration is 7.7 /L discharge based on 3 samples,.
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
Yes No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
® Continuous Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 20 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
PART G. COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system, complete Part G.
G.I. System Map. Provide a map indicating the following: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
a. All CSO discharge points.
b. Sensitive use areas potentially affected by CSOs (e.g., beaches, drinking water supplies, shellfish beds, sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
outstanding natural resource waters).
C. Waters that support threatened and endangered species potentially affected by CSOs.
G.2. System Diagram. Provide a diagram, either in the map provided in G.1 or on a separate drawing, of the combined sewer collection system that
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
C. Locations of in -line and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS:
Complete questions G.3 through G.6 once for each CSO discharge point.
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number N/A
b. Location
(City or town, if applicable)
N/A
(County)
(Latitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable)
(Zip Code)
(State)
(Longitude)
N/A ff.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) N/A ft.
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO?
Rainfall ❑ CSO pollutant concentrations ❑ CSO frequency
CSO flow volume ❑ Receiving water quality
f. How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
GA. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
events (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 21 of 22

r"
r-,
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek WWTP, NCO024244 Renewal Yadkin — Pee Dee
C. Give the average volume per CSO event.
million gallons (— actual or approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
Inches of rainfall
G.S. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water:
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of State Management/River Basin:
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
G.6. CSO Operations.
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused by this CSO (e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
intermittent shell fish bed closings, fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational loss, or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
END OF PART G.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 22 of 22

LA. %
Additional information, if provided, will appear on the following pages.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

1
` y
es Page 1 of 4
TEST
Laboratory Report
Lab Location R' Lab Location 'C' Lab Location IV
NC/WW CerL1 067 NC/DW CerL* 37731 NC/VW Cent.#: 103 NC/DW Cart.#: 37733 NCANW Cert* 075 NC/DW Cert#: 37721
6701 Conference. Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 6300 Ramada Dr, Suite C2, Clernmons, NG 27012 6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G, VWrnington, NC 28411
Ph: (919) 8344984 Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax [phone]
Project No.: 01 Report Date: 1/12/2012
Project ID: LONG CREEK WWTP; PPA Date Received: 12/30/2011
— Prepared for —
HOLLY OVERCASH
Albemarle WVYTP, City of
P.O. BOX 190
Albemarle, NC 28001
Work Order* 1112-01965
Cust. Code: AL0131
Cust. P-O* 02000380-00 FY 2002
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 EFFLUENT 1213012011 7:36 WW Composite 4+f- 2 deg C
- Ana zed --
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc
Dat
Time Qualifier
-
Ammonia "
- SM 4500 NIi3 F
SS mg1L; 6s N
C
12/30/11
11:45
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P E
1.7 rngfL
C
12/30111
11:00
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
EPA 351.2
&70 mg/L
1111/12
14:00
Nitrate -Nitrite
EPA 353.2
SM, mWL as N
R
1/5/12
15:08
Total Nitrogen Calculation
CALCULATION
1T,00-mg1L
R
1111112
14:00
Total Dissolved Solids ;'
2540C
145 mg1L
C
12/30/11
14:45
Antimony
EPA 200.8
0.029 mg/L
It
116112
12:52
Arsenic
EPA 200.8¢0:005rf1gtl
Ii
116/12
12:52
Beryllium'
EPA 200.8
<0.002 mg/L
R
1/6/12
12:52
Cadmium ,,
EPA 200.8
•-40:002 mg/L
,R
1/6/12
12:52
Chromium
EPA 200.8
."0.056 rng1L
R
116112
12:62
Copper
EPA 200.8
tiw T4 tngid
R
116112
12:52
Lead
EPA 200.8
<O.D .sTog&
.R
116/12
12:52
Nickel r'F
EPA 200.8
: -e'ti:010 -9&-
R
116112
12:52
.
Selenium •�
EPA 200.8
/'--"02 mglL.
R
116112
12:52
Silver
EPA 200.8
mg/L
R
116112
12:52
Thallium /
EPA 200.8
<0.001 mgA-
.R
116/12
12:52
Zinc
EPA 200.8
-16.068 mg/L
R
1I6/12
12:52
TOTAL HARDNESS (WW)
R
0:00
Calcium
EPA 200.8
11.7 mg/L
R
1/9112
11:24
Magnesium
EPA 200.8
3.25 mg/L
R
119/12
11:24
Total Hardness Calculation!
CALL.
42.6 mg/L
R
1/9112
11:24
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 EFFLUENT 12/30/2011 7:41 WW Grab 4 +1- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Oil & Grease,'
Cyanide ✓,-
l
Phenots
VOCs by 624
Method
Results
EPA 1664A
<5.0 mgtL
LQC10-204-00-1-X
<0.005rpgLL
EPA 420.4
44.3 a yrL
EPA 624
Lab Loc
final zed ---
Dat Time Qualifier
7i
114112 14:00
R
114112 10:30
R
1/9/12 9:32
R
1/6/12 13:48

Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Page 2 of 4
NCIWW CerL #: 067
NCIDW Cert. #: 37731
Worts Order * 1112-01965
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 EFFLUENT 12/3012011 7:41 ww Grab 4 +1- 2 deg C
Test Performed
n --
Method Results Lab Loc a zed Time Qualifier
Benzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
1/6112
13:48
crolein
EPA 624
<50 ug/L
R
1/6/12
13,48
Acrylonitrile
EPA 624
<50 ug/L
R
116112
13:48
Bromodichloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
1/6/12
13:48
Bromoform
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
1/6/12
13:48
v4romomethane
EPA 624
<10 uglL
R
116/12
13:48
Dibromomethane
EPA 624
<2 ug/L
R
116112
13:48
arbon tetrachloride
EPA 624
<5 uglL
R
1/6112
13:48
'Ehlorobenzene
Chloroethane
EPA 624
<5 uglL
IZ
1/6112
13:48
EPA 624
<5 uglL
R
1/6112
13:48
— 2-Chlwoethylyvinyl ether
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
116112
13:48
hloreform ✓
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116/12
13:48
2
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116112
13:48
/Chloromethane
Albromochioromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116/12
13:48
1,2-Dichiarobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
II
116/12
13:48
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
1/6M2
13:48
11/,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116/12
13:48
i�1,1-Dlchloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116/12
13:48
1 2-Dichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116/12
13:48
-Dichioroethene
�ts'
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116/12
13:48
1,2-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116112
13:48
�/1,2-Drchloropropane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116/12
13:48
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116/12
13:48
trans4,3-Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116112
13:48
IEthylbenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116112
13:48
Methylene chloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
P,
116112
13:48
%/1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
1/61112
13:48
Tetrachloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116/12
13:48
/toluene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
1/6112
13:48
d1,1,1-Trichloroethane
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
13.48
41,2-Trichloroethane
EPA 624
<6 ugiL
I{
1/6/12
13:48
Trichioroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
116/12
13:48
Trichlorofluoromethane
EPA 624
<5 uglL
R
116112
13:48
Vinyl chloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
1/6112
13:48
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
1/6112
13:48
SVOCs (A&B/N) by 625
EPA 625
R
1/6112
11:00
.4enaphthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116112
11:00
gAcenaphthylene
EPA 625
<10 ug1L
R
116/12
11:00
Anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116N2
11:00
enzidine
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
Zi'
1/6112
11:00
Benzo(a)anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
11.00

Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
{ --TEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Page 3 of 4
NC1WW Cert. #: 067
NC/DW CerL #: 37731
Work Order #_ 1112-01965
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
002 EFFLUENT
12/3012011
7:41 WW
Grab
4 +/-2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc
a?!Fed
Time Qualifier
17"Benzo(b)fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 ug1L
_R
1/6112
11;00
f/enzo(k)fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6M2
11:00
"'6enio(a)pyrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
11:00
VB'enzo(g,h,Qperylene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116112
11:00
1 bu t phthalate
to zy butyl P
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
116112
11:00
`en
� tis(2-c11loroethyl)ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
11:00
(,Af�`is(2-chloroethoxy)methane
EPA 625
<10 u91L
P
1/6112
11:00
CBis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116/12
11:00
VBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6/12
11:00
phenyl ether
EPA625
<10 ugiL
R
1/6/12
11;00
911(Bromophenyl
--"l-Chloronaphthalene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6f12
11:00
4-Chloro 3-methylphenot
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
11:00
✓ 2-Chlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116/12
11:00
w4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
11:00
,,'Chrysene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116112
11:00
/ ibenzo(a,h)anthracene
J D
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116112
11:00
PIDI-n-butyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116112
11:00
4,W-Dichlorobenzidine
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R
116112
11:00
/1,2-Dichiorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116112
11:00
%,A,3-Dlchlorobenzene
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6/12
11:00
V1,4-1)lchlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116112
11:00
Dichlorophenot
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
11:00
Diethyl phthatate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
11:00
44-Dimethylphenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
11.00
Dimethyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
1{
1/6/12
11:00
-f2,4-Dinitrophenol
EPA 625
<60 ug/L
R
116/12
11:00
Z 4-Dinitrotoluene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6/12
11:00
,6 Dinitrotoluene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
.1t
1/6112
11:00
/
octyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug1L
R
116112
11:00
yr��Di-n
d/Fluoranthene
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
11:00
�Fiuorene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
11:00
LIA.xachlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116/12
11:00
✓Aexachlorobutadiene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6112
14:00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116/12
11:00
vAexachloroethane
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
116/12
11:00
'....-"4Jt deno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
116112
11:00
,i-zophorone
EPA 625
410 ugfL
R
116112
11:00
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
R.
1/6/12
11:00
Aaphthalene
EPA 625
<10 ugfL
R
116112
11:00
r nitrobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
N.
If6/12
11:00
�'2-Nitrophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
1/6/12
11:00

• I L
r;
7WTEST
6701 Conference Drive Page a of 4
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] NCNVW CerL # 067
Fax: [phone] NCIDW Cert. : 37731
Laboratory Report
Worm Order #: 1112-01965
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
002 EFFLUENT
12/3012911
7.41 WIN
Grab
4 +1- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc 2itzed
Time Qualifier
4-Nitrophenot
EPA 625
<10 ug1L
R 1/6112
11:00
v4-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
EPA 626
<20 ug/L
R 1/6/12
11:00
/Pentachtorophenot
EPA 625
<30 ug/L
R 116/12
11:00
Aenanthrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 1/6112
11:00
r/Phenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 1/6/12
11:04
rene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 116112
11:00
1,2,4Jr1chlorobenzene
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R 1/6112
11:00
i/2,4,6-Trichlorophenot
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R 1/6112
11:00
.A-Nitrasodimethylamine
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
I{ 1/6112
11:00
-Nitrosodiphenylamine
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R 1/6112
11:00
K2-Diphenythydrazine
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 1/6112
11:00
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
003 EFFLUENT
1WOM011
8:00 WIN
Grab
4 +1- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc tared
Time Qualifier
Low Level Mercury/
EPA 1631
h1.1 ng/L
R 1/11112
5:15
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
004 BLANK
12/30/2011
8:00 WW
Grab
4 +/- 2 deg C
al
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc L)
Time Qualifier
Low Level Mercury
EPA 1631
<1.0 ng/L
R 1111112
5:16
Reviewed by:
for Tritest, Inc.

Page 1 of 4
Laboratory Report
Lab Location R' Lab Location G' Lab Location 'W
NCNM Cert#: 067 NC/DW Cent.*. 37731 NCIWW Cert#: 103 NC/DW Cert#: 37733 NCJW W Cett#. 075 NCIDW CerL# 37721
6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 6300 Ramada Dr, Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012 6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G, Wrimington, NC 28411
Ph: (9/9) 8344984 Fax [phone]i497 Ph: [phone] fax [phone] Mr. [phone] Fax [phone]
Project No.: 01 Report Date: 102011
Project ID: LONG CREEK WWTP; PPA Date Received: 12/14/2010
— Prepared for —
HOLLY OVERCASH
Albemarle WWTP, City of
P. O. BOX 190
Albemarle, NC 28001
No. Sample ID
001 EFFLUENT
Test Performed
Ammonia
Total Phosphorus
otai Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Nitrate -Nitrite
Total Nitrogen Calculation.
Total Dissolved Solids
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
TOTAL HARDNESS (WW)
Calcium
Magnesium
Total Hardness Calculation
Work Order* 1012-00901
Cust Code: AL0131
Gust. P_O.#: 02000380-W FY 2002
Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
12/1412010 7:40 WW Composite 4+/- 2 deg C
Method
Results
Lab Loc
DateyZad
Time Qualifier
SM 4500 NH3 F
13 mglL as hj
C
12121110
9:30
SM 4500 P E
1.4 mgtL
C
12/31/10
8:45
EPA 351.2
5;68 .mg/L
R
12122/10
8:52
EPA 353.2
11.5 mgfL-as' 14
R
12/21/10
13:00
CALCULATION
17.2 rng1L
R
12122110
8.52
2540C
168 mg/L
C
12114/10
15:30
EPA 200.8
0.064 mglL
R
12/16/10
15:15
EPA 200.8
<Q:00Sa mg/L
R
12116110
15:15
EPA 200.8
<0.002 mg/L
R
12116110
16:15
EPA 200.8
<LOOS mall.
R
12/16/10
15:15
EPA 200.8
OM4 mg1L
R
12116110
15:16
EPA 200.8
.0-086 m91L
R
12116/10
15:15
EPA 200.8
<0.005 mg/L
R
12/16/10
15:15
EPA 200.8
<0.010 rrrg/E
R
12/16/10
15:15
EPA 200.8
<Oo.002 moll
R
12116110
15:15
EPA 200.8
<0 01t) Mg1L
R
12/16/10
15:15
EPA 200.8
<0.001 mg/L
R
12/16/10
15:15
EPA 200.8
0.046 mgfL
R
12/16110
15:15
R
0:00
EPA 200.8
9.66 mg1L
R
12/17/10
12:02
EPA 200.8
2.29 mg/L
R
12/17/10
12:02
CALC.
33.5 mg/L
R
12/17110
12:02
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 EFFLUENT 12/1412010 7:50 WW Grab 4 +1- 2 deg C
-- Analyzed - --
Fest Performed Method Results Lab Loc Date Time Qualifier
Oil & Grease
EPA 1664A 5.3 mg/L
R
12116110
13:00
Cyanide
L4Ci0-204-00-44 <0.005 mg/L
R
12/15110
7:40
Phenols
EPA 420.4 26.5 uWL
R
12117110
9:31
VOCs by 624
EPA 624
R
12115/10
14:47

0
IJ WTEST
6701 Conference Drive Page 2 of 4
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] NCANW Cart #: 067
Fax: [phone] NCiDW Cart #: 37731
Laboratory Report
Work Order#: 1012-00901
No. Sample ID
002 EFFLUENT
Date Sampled
12114/2010
Time Sampled Matrix
7:50 WW
Sample Type
Grab
Condition
4 +1- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
ed
Lab Loc Daie� Time Qualifier
Benzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12115110
14:47
Acrolein
EPA 624
<50 ug/L
R
12115110
14:47
Acrylonitrile
EPA 624
<50 ug/L
R
12/15/10
14:47
Bromodichloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug7L
R
12115/10
14:47
Bromoform
EPA 624.
<5 ug/L
R
12115110
14:47
Bromomethane
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
12J15110
14:47
Dibromomethane
EPA 624
<2 ug7L
R
12/15110
14:47
Carbon tetrachloride
EPA 624
<5 ug7L
R
12/15/10
14:47
Chlorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12115/10
14:47
Chioroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12115/10
14:47
,'- '?-Chloroethylvinyl ether
EPA 624
<10 ugtL
R
12115/10
14:47
.:hloroform
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12115/10
14:47
Chloromethans
EPA 624
<5 uglL
R
12/15/10
14:47
Dibromochloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12115/10
14.47
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ugiL
R
12/16110
14.47
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12115/10
14:47
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12115/10
14.47
1,1-Dichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12115/10
14:47
1,2-Dichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12/15/10
14:47
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12 I5110
14,47
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12116/10
14:47
1,2-Dichloropropane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12115110
14:47
cis-4,3-Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12J15110
14.47
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12/15/10
14:47
Ethylbenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12M 6/10
14:47
Methylene chloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12/15110
14:47
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug7L
R
12M5110
14:47
Tetrachloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12115/10
14:47
Toluene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12/15110
14:47
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
12/15110
14:47
1,1,2-Trichioroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12M5/10
14:47
Trichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 uglL
R
12/15110
14:47
Trichlorofluoramethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12/15110
14:47
Vinyl chloride
EPA 624
<5 ug7L
R
12115/10
14:47
- ~• cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
12/15/10
14:47
oVOCs (A&BlN) by 625
EPA 625
R
1PJ17110
12:00
Acenaphthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
12117110
12:00
Acenaphthylene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R,
12117110
12:00
Anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
12J17110
12:00
Benzidine
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
R
12/17/10
12:00
Benzo(a)anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
12J17110
12:00

Telephone: [phone]
Fa)c [phone]
6701 Conferenoe Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Work Order#: 1012-00901
Page 4 of 4
NCNIW Cert #: 067
NCIDW Cert #: 37731
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 EFFLUENT 12/14/2010 7:50 WW Grab 4 +1- 2 deg C
Anal ed —=
Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc Dat Time Qualifier
4-Nitrophenol
EPA 625
<10 uglL
R
12117/10
12:00
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
EPA 625
<20 ug/L.
R
12/17/10
12:00
Pentachiorophenol
EPA 625
<30 ug/L
R
12J17110
12:00
Phenanthrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
12/17/10
12:00
Phenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
12/17/10
12:00
Pyrene
EPA 625
<10 uglL
R
12M7110
12:00
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<20 ug1L
R
12I17/10
12:00
2,4,6Trichlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 uglL
R
12117110
12:00
N-Nitrosod'rmethyiamine
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
12117/10
12:00
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
EPA 625
<20 uglL
R
12117110
12:00
2-Diphenylhydrazine
EPA 625
<10 uglL
R
12/17110
12:00
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
003 EFFLUENT
12JI412010
8:20 W W
Grab
4 +1- 2 deg C
lnalyzed
--
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab LC a
Time Qualifier
Low Level Mercury
EPA 1631
1'1,5 ngfL
R 12//6110
6,17
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
004 BLANK
12/1412010
8:20 WW
Grab
4 +1- 2 deg C
l nalyzed —
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc ate
Time Qualifier
Low Level Mercury
EPA 1631
<1.0 ng/L
R 12M6110
6:17
Reviewed by:
for Tritest, Inc.

tI+<rww.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: LG Effluent Lab Sample I0:011168-01 Received: 09/19/13 11:30
Matrix: Water Sampled:09/18/13 08:05 Work Order. C311168
Project: Misc. Subcontract Sampled By: Client
j Voiawe organic Compounds by GCMS
Analyte rcAS Number]
1,1,1-Trichloroethane [71-55-6]
1,1,2,2rTetradtloroethene [79-34-5]
0,2-Trichloroethane [79-00 51
1,1-Dichloroethane [75-34-31
1,1-DitlNoroethene U5-35-4)
1,2-Dichbrobenzene [95-50-13
1,2-Dichloroethane (107-06-2)
1,2-Dichloropropane [78-87-5)
1,3-D'tchlorobenzenE [541-73-1)
1,4-D-tcfibrobenzene [106-46-7]
2-Chloroed* Vinyl Ether (110-75-81
Acrolein [107-02-8]
Acrylonitrile L107-13-11
Benzene [71-43-2]
Bromodichlommethane [75-27-41
Bromofnrm [75-6-2]
Bromomethane [74-83-91
Carbon-Tetradtbride-(56-23=S]- __._..
Chlorobenzene[108-90-7)
Chloroethane (75-0D-31
Chloroform [67-66-31
Chloromethane [74-87-31
ds-1,3-Didtlompropene [10061-01-51
GPlibromochloromethane [124-a-11
Ethylbenzene L100-41a]
Methylene Chloride (75-09-21
Tetrachloroethene [127-18-4]
Toluene [108-88-31
trans-1,2-91rhloroethene [156.60-5)
trans-1,3-Dichioropmpene [10061-02-6]
Triddoroethene [79-01-61
Vmyl chloride (75-01-41
e ults 11 A
"I OF
MDL POL Batch Method
Analyzed
f Notes
< 0.12
ug/L 1
0.12 1.0 M24051 EPA 624
09/25/13 16:11
REF
< 0.28
ug/L 1
0.28 1.0 3I24051 EPA 624
09125/13 16:11
REF
< 0.14
ug/L 1
0.14 1.0 M24051 EPA 624
09/25/13 16:11
REF
< D.13
ug/L 1
0,13 1.0 3124051 EPA 624
09,125/13 16:11
REF
< 0.21
ug/L 1
0,21 1.0 3124051 EPA 624
09/25/13 16:11
REF
< 0,19
ug/L 1
0.19 1.0 3124051 EPA 624
09/25/13 16:11
REF
< 0.21
ug/L 1
0.21 1.0 3I24051 EPA 624
09/25/13 16:11
REF
< 0.10
ug/L 1
0.10 1.0 3I24051 EPA 624
09/25/13 16:11
REF
< 0.15
ug/L 1
0.15 1.0 3124051 EPA 624
09/25/13 16:11
REF
< 0.19
ug/L 1
D.19 1.0 3124051 EPA 624
09V25113 16:11
REF
ci.
Dtai►l�tCh0Ar,Ir;'nJ Lla
REF
< 4A
7 -�
W1316:11
iJ13 16:11
REF
< 3.5
i/13 16:11
REF
<0.15
i/1316:11
REF
3.2
i/13 16:11
REF
<0.22
(,F� (� p
11 A% tlr1.�' l� Pit"In!,�f�',f' wY,k
V1316:11
REF
< 0.14
5/13 16:11
REF
-1-0:17.. _. _..-.....
G , cif
3113.16ar.._......._.REF._.
< 0.17
i/13 16:11
REF
< 0.23
i/13 16:11
REF
7.9
i/1316*11
REF
< 0.13
i/13 16:11
REF
< 0.20
i/1316:11
REF
4.0
'-up M� A'�fLl"(P,PA
I: V il1(.U4
i/1316.11
REF
< 0.13
nn
i/13 16:11
REF
< 0.23
i/13 16:11
REF
< 0.17
V13 16:11
REF
< 0-14
L'
W13 16:11
REF
<0.21
3/1316*11
REF
< 0.15
ug/L 1
OAS 1.0 3T14051 EPA 624
Wl-zSI13 16:11
REF
< 0.15
ug/L 1
DAS 1.0 3124051 EPA 624
09/25/13 16:11
REF
< 0.32
ug/L 1
0.32 1.0 3I24051 EPA 624
09/25/13 16:11
REF
surrvoafes Results DF
APMeLvI
%Rec
%Rcclimits
Bafr*
Metlfod
Ana ed
6" Notes
4-3romofluorvbenzene 46 1
50.0
92 %
SI-122
3124051
EPA 624
0912511316.'11
REF
Dibromonuaromethane 44 1
50.0
39 Sid
63-117
31240S1
EPA 624
09/15/1316.-11
REF
roluene-d3 47 1
50.0
95 %
67-127
3T24051
EPA 624
0*2511316.•11
REF
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
-
-
Analvte MAS Number]
Results Fltg
Wits
DF
MOIL
POL-
Batch
Analyzed
Ay Notes
1,2,4-Trid;lorobehzene [120-82-1)
< 1.2
ug/L
1
1.2
10
3I25D07
EPA 625
10/02113 13:55
DFM
1,2-Dichlorobenzene [95-50 1]
< 1.1
ug/L
1
1.1
10
3M007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
1,3-Dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)
< 1.1
ug/L
1
1.1
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
1,4-Dichbrobenzene (1.06-46-71
< 1.0
ug/L
1
1.0
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
1-Methylnaphthalene [90-12-0)
< 1.7
ug/L
1
1.7
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol L95-95-41
< 1.0
ug/L
1
1.0
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol[88-06-2)
< 1.1
ug/L
I
IA
10
31250D7
EPA 525
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
FINAL TME reran relates ody to the sample as received'- by the laboratory, and may only be rep. W Liced In full, Page 4 or P.5

s �
www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: LG Effluent Lab Sample ID:C311168-01 Received: 09/19/13 11:30
Matrix: Water Sampled:09118/13 08.05 Work Order. C311168
Project: Misc. Subcontract Sampled By:Client
ISemivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
Analvte WAS Numberl
Results
Bag Units
DE
M 3[_L
POL
Botch
Method
Analyzed
& notes
2,4-Dichlorophenol[120-83-2]
< 1.4
ug/L
i
IA
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
2,4-Dimethylphenoi[105-67-9]
< 1.3
ug/L
1
1.3
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
2,4-DinitWhenol[51-28-51
< 2.6
ug/L
1
2.6
10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
2,4-DinbDbn1uene [121-14-2]
< 2.4
ug/L
1
2.1
10
3125007
EPA 625
10102/13 13:55
DFM
2,6-DinirotD1uene [606-20-2]
< 1.5
ug/L
1
1.5
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
2-Chloronaphthalene [91-58-71
< 1.0
ug/L
1
1.0
10
31250D7
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
2-Chbrophenol[95-57-8]
< 1.2
ug/L
1
1.2
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
2-Methyl-4,64mitrophenoi [534-52-1)
< 2.9
ug/L
1
2.9
10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
2-Methylnaphthalene [91-57-6]
< 1.5
ug/L
1
1.5
10
3I25D07
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
2-Nitrophenol[88-75-5]
< 1.1
ug/L
1
1.1
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
3,T-Dich1lambenzidine [91-94-1)
< 3.3
ug/L
1
3.3
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
4-Bromophenyi-phenyletfier [101-55-3]
< 1.0
ug/L
1
1.0
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
4-Chloro-3-methyiphenol[59-50-71
< 1.5
ug/L
1
1.5
10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
4-Lhlorophenyl-phenylether[7005-72-31
< 1.6
ug/L
1
1.6
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
4-Nitrophenol[100-02-7)
< 2.0
ug/L
1
2.0
10
3125007
EPA 625
1DI02/13 13:55
DFM
Acenaphthene [83-32-91
< 1.4
ugjL
1
1.4
10
3125D07
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Acenaphthylene [208-96-8]
< 1.2
ug/L
1
1.2
10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
'Anthracme-[120=12--7] __..__...__.________...
,__.�._z'Y.6__....._......_._...-
.._u5i---
.----- 1-..... ....
..... 1.b._.----ID`-3I25007-'EPA625-_--ID/02/13'I355_--__DFM.._._
.... - ------ ----.----
Benzidine [92-97-51
< 1.6
ug/L
1
1.6
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Benzo(a)anthracene [56-55-3]
< 1.3
ug/L
1
1.3
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
5wzo(a)pyrene ['50-32-8)
< 1.3
ug/L
1
1.3
10
3125007
EPA 625
10102t13 13:55
DFM
Beruo(b)fluoranthene [205-99-2]
< 1.0
ug/L
1
1.0
1.0
3125007
EPA 625
10102/1313:55
DFM
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene [191-24-2]
< 2.4
ug/L
1
2.4
10
31250D7
EPA 625
1010211313:55
DFM
Benzo(k)xiuolanthene (207-08-9)
< 1.3
ug/L
1
1.3
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
8enzoicacid 165-85-0]
< 1.0
ug/L
1.
1.0
50
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Bis(2-chbroethoky)methane [111-91-1]
-,1.4
ug/L
1
14
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
B':s(2-chioroethyDether [111-44.41
< 1.2
ug/L
1
1.2
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Bis(2-chbrcisopmpyi)ether [108-60-11
< 1.3
ug/L
1
1.3
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
S1s(2-eLhylhexy1)ph0a1ate [117-81-7]
2.6
3 ug/L
1
1.7
5.0
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Butylbenzylphthalare [85-6B-7)
< 2.0
ug/L
1
2.0
1D
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Chrysem [218-01-91
< 2.0
ug/L
1
2.0
10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene [53-70-3)
< 2.3
ug/L
1
2.3
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13.55
DFM
Diethylphthalate [84-66-21
< 2.1
ug/L
1
2.1
10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Dimethylphthalate [131-11-3]
< 1.4
ug/L
1
1.4
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Di-n-butylphthalate [94-74-2]
< 1.5
ug/L
f
1.5
10
3I25D07
EPA 625
10/02%1313:55
DFM
Di n-octylphthalate [117-84-0)
< 3.1
ug/L
1
3.1
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10102/1313:55
DFM
DPiH (as Azobenzene) [103-33-3]
< 1.9
ug/L
1
1-9
10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Fluoranthene [206-44-0)
< 21
ug/L
1
2.1
10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Fluorere(86-73-7]
< 1.7
ug/L
1
1.7
10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Hexachioroben2ene [118-74-1]
< 1.0
ug/L
1
1.0
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Hexachlombutadiene [87-68-3]
< 1.2
ug/L
1
1.2
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Hmachlorocyclopentadiene [77-47-41
< 1.3
ug/L
1
1.3
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Hexachioroethane [67-72-1)
< 1.1
ug/L
i
1.1
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)p}rene [193-39-5]
< 2.2
ug/L
1
2.2
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DR4
isophorone [78-59-1]
< 1.3
ug/L
1
1.3
10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Naphthalene [91-20-3]
< 1.3
ug/L
1
1.3
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Nitrobenzene (98-95-3]
< 1-2
ug/L
1
1.2
10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
N-Nitrosodimethyiamine[62-75-9]
<.1.3
ug/L
1
1.3
10
3I25007
EPA 625
10102/1313:55
DFM
FINAL
THs report relates nrly
to the sample as received by the labaraln: y, and may only be reproduced
in full.
Page 5 0 25

t
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
��G
0
www.encDlabs.com
Description: LG Effluent
Lab Sample ID:C311168-01
Received: 09/19/13 11:30
Matrix: Water
Sampled:09/18/13 08:05
Work Order. C311168
Project Misc. Subcontract
Sampled By.Client
Setnivoladle Organic Compounds by GCMS
Anaivte ICAS Numberl
Results Flag
Units
DF MDL tgl
J}pUh
Method
Analr4ed
By Netts
N-Nitnaso-di-n-propylamine [621-64-7]
< 1.5
ug/L
1 1.5 30
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:S5
DFM
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine
< 2.1
ug/L
1 2.1 10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:S5
DFM
[86-30-6/122-39-4]
Pentachlorophenol[87-86-S]
< 1.8
ug/L
1 1.8 10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Phenanthrene [85-01-8]
< 14
ug/L
1 1.4 10
3I25007
EPA 625
1-0/02/13 13:55
DFM
Phenol(108-95-2]
< 1.4
ug/L
1 1.4 10
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Pyrene [129-00-0]
< 2.1
ug/L
1 2.1 10
3125007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:55
DFM
Siurrowfes
ResvlL P_F
Spike Lv1
% Rec % RecLimits
B3iah
Methatf
Ana ed
gy Notes
2,36-7jibromgahenot
100 1
100
10096 18--157
3125007
EPA 625
1010211313:55
DFM
2-Huorobtpheny4
34 1
50.0
6896 15-139
3123007
EPA 625
1010211313.55
DFM
1-Auotaphenol
49 1
100
49 % 10-104
3125D07
EPA 625
10102113 13.•SS
DFM
Nitmb=ene-d5
32 I
50.0
64 % 16.140
3125007
EPA 625
10/0217313.55
DFM
Phenohd5
42 1
100
42 % 10-83
3I25007
EPA 625
10/02/13 13:5S
DFM
TerpheyY-d14
43 1
50.0
86 % 23-169
377S007
ERA 625
1010211313.55
DFM
Lalsby EPA 200 Series Methods
«. a..
Analute'-iCAS'Nuirilserl
Results Flag
rii """
P_F INID , _PPor-..__._Batch
T4etfiod
1...__.. _......__.
.. AnaAna vzed
- B.-_Y...
Notes .. _...._..
Antimony [7440-36-0]
70.4
ug/L
1 5.9 10.0
3124025
EPA 200.7
09/25/13 13:42
JDH
Arsenic [7440-38-2]
< 5.4
ug/L
1 5.4 10,0
3124025
EPA 2D0.7
09/25/13 13:42
JDH
Beryllium 17440-41-71
< 0.10
ug/L
i 0.10 1.00
3I24025
EPA 200.7
09/25/13 13:42
JDH
Cadmium [7440-43-9]
< 0.360
ug/L
1 0.360 1.00
3I23044
EPA 200.7
09/24/13 13:47
JDH
Calcium [7440-70-2]
17300
ug/L
1 20.0 100
3124025
EPA 200.7
09125/13 13:42
JDH
Chromium [7440-47-31
50.3
ug/L
1 1.4 10.0
3123044
EPA 200.7
09/24/13 13:47
JDH
Copper[7440-50-83
147
ug/L
1 I.60 10.0
3I23044
EPA 200.7
09/24/13 BA7
JDH
Lead [7439-92-1]
< 2A
ug/L
1 2.1 10.0
3I23W
EPA 200.7
09124/13 13:47
JDH
Magnesium [7439-9S-4]
4220
ug/L
1. 23 100
3124025
EPA 20D.7
D9/25!1313:42
JDH
Nickel[7440-02-0]
3.3 J
ug/L
1 1.8 10.0
3124025
EPA 200.7
09/25/13 13.42
JDH
Selenium [7782-49-2.]
< 5.0
ug/L
1 5.0 10.0
3124025
EPA 200.7
09/25/13 13:42
JDH
Silver[7440-22-4j
< 1.9
ug/L
1 1.9 10.0
3123W
EPA 200.7
09/24/13 13:47
JDH
Thallium (7440-28-0]
< 5.8
ug/L
1 5.8 1Q0
3I24025
EPA 200.7
09/25/13 13:42
JDH
Zinc[7440-66-6]
79.7
ug/L
1 3.8 10.0
3I23044
EPA 200.7
09/24/13 13:47
JDH
Meta1S by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods
Anahrte fCASS Numberl
get l Jig
Units
D) MDL wl.
Batch
Method
Anal
Notes
Mercury [7439-97-6]
< 0.170
ug/L
1 0.17D 0,200
3126008
EPA 7470A
09/26/13 14:23
T11)
'Classical Chemistry Parameters
Analvte fCAS Number]
Results am
Units
DF M DL PDL
AgGll
Method
Ambizued
Notes
Ammonia as N (7664-41-7]
0.080 3
mg/L
1 0.D45 0.10
3125001
EPA 350.1
D9125/13 10:15
civ
Cyanide (total) [57-12-51
< 0,0049
mg/L
1 0.0049 D.010
3124004
EPA 9014
09/2511314:11
CIV
Hardness[ECL-0028]
60
mg/L
1 0.14 2.5
3I24025 SM 2340B-1997
09/2S/13 13:42
JDH
Nitrate/Nitrite as N [ECL-0010]
16 D
mg/L
19.5 0.80 2.0
3IM28
EPA 353.2
09124/1318:10
Alb
Phosphorus [7723-14-01
0.91
mg/L
1 0.025 0,10
3I20004
EPA 365.4
09/23113 12:09
clv
Total Dissolved Solids [ECL-01561
220
mg/L
1 10 10
3123039 SM 2540C-1997
D9/25/13 08:35
HMS
Total Kieldahl Nitrogen [ECL-0162]
2.5
mg/L
1 0.26 0.48
3I20003
EPA 351.2
09,123113 10:33
Clv
HNAL
?his rN.vort re`-ates nnly to the sample 55 received by the faboratory, and may Cray
be reproduced
in U1.
Page 6 of 25

www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: LG Effluent Lab Sample ID: C331168-01 Received: 09/19/13 11:30
Matrix: Water Sampled:09/18/1308:05 Work Order.C311168
Project: Misc. Subcontract Sampled By:Ctient
Classical Chemistry Parameters
Analyte rCAS Numbed Resul Fl ya
Units6F
F DL POL
hatch
Method knah7ed
f
Notes
Oil & Grease (HEM) Cc-0D07) < 2.60
mg/L
1 2.60 5.00
3I26001
EPA 1WB 10M/13 09:15
MY
Classical Chemistry Parameters
An 1�yte rCAS Numbed ResWts Ea
Units
OF ham, Pot
Bads
Method Artahged
8V
Note
Phenolics [ECL-0123] c 0.03
mg/L
1 0.03
R23035
- -. _� . 09J24/13 17:57
RMM
FINAL This report retares on v „y the sarnple. as received by the iarbaramry, dnd rray a-'v he reproduced in -ui!, Pe9 e 7 of 25

r
City of Albemarle
Residuals Management Plan
September 2011
Prepared by Municipal Engineering Services Company, P.A.
Based on Information Provided by City of Albemarle

r.
Background
Due to increased concentrations of Copper at the City of Albemarle's application sites the
r ' NCDENR directed Long Creek WWTP staff to halt sludge application at sites that
exceeded the specified metal limit. Once this issue was discovered the City of Albemarle
entered an agreement with the City of Concord in which sludge generated from the Long
Creek WWTP would be routinely hauled to the Concord WWTP for processing and
ultimate disposal.
Peak Flows
The determination of peak flows should be based on strong empirical data. The historical
flow record for the City of Albemarle, as summarized from the monthly report forms
(MR-1) for 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 in Appendix A, yields the following
annual and seasonal peak factors.
Period
ADF
Max Month Avg
Max Day Avg
Max Day
Peakin Factor
2006
Annual
7.41 MGD
9.98 MGD
32.2 MGD
3.23
Summer
6.62 MGD
7.09 MGD
Winter
8.53 MGD
9.98 MGD
2007
Annual
7.39 MGD
10.24 MGD
29.62 MGD
3.18
Summer
6.70 MGD
8.37 MGD
Winter
8.39 MGD
10.24 MGD
2008
Annual
5.52 MGD
7.67 MGD
17.34 MGD
3.23
Summer
5.18 MGD
7.67 MGD
Winter
6.00 MGD
7.09 MGD
2009
Annual
6.08 MGD
9.09 MGD
18.11 MGD
1.99
Summer
5.26 MGD
6.12 MGD
Winter
7.25 MGD
9.09 MGD
2010
Annual
5.71 MGD
9.53 MGD
Not Available
Summer
5.00 MGD
6.01 MGD
Winter
6.69 MGD
9.53 MGD
2011
Annual
* 5.12 MGD
* 6.23 MGD
Not Available
Summer
*5.06 MGD
*6.23 MGD
Winter
*5.25 MGD
*5.81 MGD
*Incomplete Data
The peak flows above are the maximum daily flows, not the peak instantaneous flows.
Typical design for treatment facilities is on the basis of maximum day flows. The peak
day flow during the 6 year period was 32.2 MGD recorded in November 2006. It is
thought this recording is a misnomer due to the placement of the flow measuring device
upstream of the influent screw pump station `B". When high flows inundate the influent

r-
screw pumps the water level at the measuring device leads to inaccurately high readings.
In addition the straightening veins, located upstream of parshall flume, have not be kept
' free of debris.
The reported peak factors vary and some are more than the peaking factor used at the
Albemarle WWTP, which happens to be 2.5. It is thought that this is due to the
previously mentioned issues with the flow measuring device which was upstream of
influent screw pump station `B". The effluent flow metering is modestly influenced by
the equalization in the aeration basins at the WWTP, but this data is thought to be more
telling of the actual flows at the Albemarle WWTP. We will assume a peaking factor of
2.5 which is typical for municipal flows at WWTPs. This assumption results in a peak
flow of 30 MGD for the WWTP at the permitted flow of 12 MGD. It is significant to note
that wastewater flows have been declining over the last decade and historic data indicate
they may have reached an equilibrium point over the last two to three years. Flows over
the last three full calendar years have averaged 5.77 MGD. With low to moderate growth
predictions for the City of Albemarle in the next decade the city's wastewater flows are
not expected to greatly increase in the next ten years.
Using available data for influent BOD at the Long Creek WWTP, the plant has averaged
128.8 mg/L influent BOD from Feb 2003 to Jan 2010. For purposes of estimating solids
generated at the Long Creek WWTP the influent BOD level will be set at 130 mg/L and a
worst case scenario will be set for 225 mg/L. A ratio of 0.25 lbm solids / lbm BOD
influent will be assumed to estimate residual biosolids production at the plant. This will
be looked at for the historically observed BOD levels of 130 mg/L as well as the high end
influent BOD estimate of 225 mg/L. Based on assumptions and calculations included in
Appendix -A the expected sludge production by the City of Albemarle Long Creek
WWTP would be approximately 285 tons/year based on historical data or 1028 tons/year
based on maximum flow and influent BOD assumptions.
Sludge Pumping
The return activated sludge (RAS) pumping and the waste activated sludge (WAS) drain
by gravity from the sludge draw -off boxes at each clarifier. The Long Creek WWTP has
two RAS pumping stations, and each is coupled between two clarifiers. A telescoping
valve at the top of each RAS station is used to divert WAS from all four clarifiers drain to
a "wet -pit" type well. This wet well is designed to hold and periodically pump WAS to
the northern portion of the Long Creek WWTP into a series of sludge thickening tanks.
The WAS pump station is configured in a "wet -pit"/ "dry -pit" configuration and has three
single stage vertical non -clog 4x4 inch Fairbanks Morse Pumps sized for a flowrate of
150 gpm and total dynamic head of 80 ft. Waste sludge is pumped from this pump station
to the thickening tanks through a 6" forcemain.
The RAS is metered before the screw pumps return the settled sludge exiting the
clarifiers to the distributions boxes where the RAS mixes with the influent wastewater
before entering the aeration basins. Each of the two RAS pump stations consists of 2
screw pumps with an available slot for a third screw pump to be added later. The two

r-
RAS screw pump stations have two single flight units each with a 54 inch diameter screw
that operates on a 38 degree incline. The approximate lift for each screw is 21 feet. Each
screw has a speed of approximately 44 rpm with a 50 horsepower motor. The capacity for
each of the two RAS stations is approximately 4.3 MGD. The existing pumps in the RAS
pump station are adequate to continue to return the needed return sludge rates to meet
100% of Average Daily Flow (ADF) and to maintain the sludge age at 20 days in the
aeration basin.
The existing WAS pump station and RAS pump station were planned to handle the
design flows when the WWTP was expanded in mid 1970's to an (ADF) of 16 MGD.
The ADF of 16 MGD correlated to a resultant peak flow of 32 MGD. Knowing this
information both stations are adequate for the rerated ADF of 12 MGD and peak flow of
30 MGD at the Long Creek WWTP. It should be noted that the pumps at the WAS station
are in poor condition and it is recommended that these be replaced within the next five
years. The two RAS stations will each have one screw pump replaced as a result of the
upcoming rehabilitation project, and it is recommended that the second screw at each of
these two RAS stations be replaced within the next ten years.
Sludge Handling
The City of Albemarle's first stages in its sludge handling include two thickeners. The
aforementioned WAS pump station conveys sludge by a 6" forcemain to the original
portion of the WWTP where a pair of 76.5' diameter tanks begin to thicken the waste
sludge. Each of these thickeners has a depth of approximately 12', which equates to a
total volume of approximately 412,000 gallons per thickener. Long Creek WWTP
operators decant from these tanks throughout the week with supernatant going back to the
head of the plant. Downstream from the thickeners are another pair of sludge tanks that
are used in the sludge handling process by the City of Albemarle. A pumping station is
used to convey the thickened waste sludge from the pair of 412,000 gallon thickeners to
the second pair of sludge tanks.
This second pair of sludge tanks each has a diameter of 65' and a depth of approximately
25'. The volume for each of these two tanks is approximately 620,000 gallons. The
original intent of this second pair of sludge tanks were to be used as sludge digesters.
They are currently not being aerated, and the City of Albemarle is working on installing a
system for aeration and mixing to help increase the percent solids leaving the Long Creek
WWTP. Operators at Long Creek WWTP decant from the pair of digesters throughout
the week with the supernatant going back to the head of the plant and eventually back
into Influent Pump Station -A.
The typical design criteria and the operating parameters for sludge digesters are presented
in below in Table 1.

r-
TABLE 1 - AEROBIC DIGESTER OPERATING PARAMETERS
Parameter Criteria
Range Source
Solids Loading
0.1 - 0.3
M&E
pbs VSS/day NO)
0.1
Ten States
Solids Retention (d)
10 - 15
M&E
40-60
EPA 503
Oxygen Requirements
2.3
M&E
(]bs oZ/lb VSS / day)
VSS Reduction (%)
40 - 50
M&E
Mixing (xp/1000FO)
1.0
Ten States
and (cfiW1000Ft3)
20 - 40
M&E
A final pump station is used to convey the final thickened sludge to a tanker truck used to
haul the residual bio-solids from the Long Creek WWTP to the City of Concord WWTP.
Dewatering and Sludge Disposal
The sludge dewatering facilities currently at the Long Creek WWTP consist of three
sludge drying beds, each have an area of approximately 2,080 square feet. The total
square footage of drying beds is approximately 6,240 square feet. It should be noted that
the sludge drying beds are currently being utilized for drying alum sludge, which is
generated at Albemarle's two Water Treatment Plants.
The City of Albemarle also owns a centrifuge system and an accompanying sludge dryer
that were built in 1998. The high operating cost associated with the gas fueled sludge
dryer caused The City of Albemarle to discontinue use of this process soon after it was
installed. Recently the City of Albemarle has looked into examining the feasibility of
refurbishing these two units. Preliminary review lead to the decision to continue to
examine rehabilitating the centrifuge portion, but to leave the gas fueled dryer off-line
due to the high costs associated with operating this particular equipment. The centrifuge
needs new electrical components and reworking of the controls to modernize the
telemetry. The City of Albemarle is examining the best way to proceed in getting the
centrifuge back in working condition and hope to have this accomplished in the next two
years.
City of Albemarle previously made use of a flotation type thickening equipment. This
equipment, located next to the sludge drying beds, worked well up until a major flood in
1997 destroyed most of the electro-mechanical equipment for this unit process. The

r*
damage caused by the flooding in 1997 was severe and the costs associated with repairing
this process were not deemed to be cost beneficial and in part lead to the construction of
'-' the centrifuge.
The current method of Sludge disposal for the City of Albemarle is a cooperative effort
with the City of Concord. The previous method of sludge disposal was at multiple sludge
application sites owned by the City of Albemarle. Recent tests showed heavy metal
concentrations which exceeded the safe level set by NCDENR and resultantly Albemarle
was forced to abandon applying on a large portion of these sights. Long term strategy is
to keep sampling soil conditions on these sights and hopefully return to applying sludge
on these sites in the future when metal concentrations have been reduced through natural
attenuation.
Currently the City of Albemarle hauls all of their residual bio-solids to the City of
Concord for eventual disposal through Concords current system. According to Long
Creek WWTP staff waste sludge is typically thickened to around 3 - 6% solids through
the series of thickening tanks and digester tanks prior to it being hauled to the City of
Concord. The current vehicle used to haul the residual solids is a 5,500 gallon tanker
truck. Long Creek WWTP staff indicates they average between two and three loads per
day that are hauled to Concord. The backup tank truck owned by the City of Albemarle
has a capacity of 6,500 gallons, and can be used should any problems arise with the
primary vehicle. The method of sludge disposal is meant to act as a temporary measure
until the City of Albemarle can determine a more feasible long term solution for its needs
of residual bio-solids disposal.
Sludge Disposal Alternatives
The City of Albemarle plans to evaluate Sludge disposal alternatives in the overall
evaluation of the WWTP and plan to look at the following in detail: land application,
drying, lime stabilization, composting, and continuing to haul to City of Concord
The sludge drying beds at Long Creek WWTP will not provide for the needs of the
facility. The City uses these beds to the maximum extent possible with the current
procedure of drying alum sludge from the water treatment plants. In an effort to maintain
some positive use of these structures the beds will continue to operate suitably. Long
Term this footprint along with that of the flotation thickening equipment would be an
ideal area for location of a new mechanical dewatering device.
Sludge stabilization is a newer technology that municipalities are examining as a solution
to their residual solids handling and disposal. However the choice of going to a Class -A
sludge will be extremely expensive. This transition will necessitate the construction of
enclosed buildings for sludge handling equipment as well as the purchase of pumps,
chemical equipment, possibly conveyors, and storage areas. All this equipment would be
in addition to a mechanical belt press or some other type of sludge press to handle initial
dewatering. Given the costs associated with producing Class -A biosolids, the most cost
effective alternate would be to move toward production of Class-B biosolids.

r--.
Class-B biosolids are more limited in terms of application sites and monitoring
throughout its disposal process, but it is a much more economical goal to meet in terms of
capital and operation outlay by the City of Albemarle. A detailed study is recommended
to examine the cost benefit analysis of the many choices in technology that would be
available to the City of Albemarle to ensure safe and proper long term handling of its
residual solids.
Preliminary estimates of the total costs associated with the hauling method of disposal
show this to be very costly over a 20 year life cycle. The cost of fuel and wear and tear on
the City of Albemarle tank trucks make this less attractive that a more sustainable
method. The fees associated with the sludge acceptance by the City of Concord are
currently $200 per 5,500 gallon load. City of Albemarle estimates an average of 3 loads
per day which makes the approximate yearly cost for just this fraction of the total hauling
cost equal $219,000. It is estimated the additional hauling costs could be as much as
$110,000. This additional cost is based on the assumption of $1 /mile for 165 miles of
travel per day for the tanker truck along with salary and overhead for one employee. The
estimated total for the current hauling option is $329,000. With the current residuals
leaving Albemarle having solids content of approximately 3 — 6% it would greatly benefit
the City of Albemarle to invest in dewatering equipment.
The intrinsic value of dewatering mechanisms is very attractive and would greatly benefit
the City of Albemarle. The dewatering equipment's ability to reduce the high cost of
liquid sludge hauling and or disposal should have a great return on investment. This
would make the purchase of such equipment an ideal solution to the current issues seen
by Albemarle.
In the event that the current sludge application sites to not improve in terms of metal
content and Albemarle still can not apply to these areas it would be suggested that
additional application sites be investigated for long term use by the City of Albemarle.
Recommendation
It is the recommendation of Municipal Engineering Services Company, P.A. that the City
of Albemarle perform a study to examine the best options for its long term sludge
handling and disposal. This study should consider the engineering, environmental, and
economic aspects of sludge handling and sludge disposal, and how current methods could
benefit the Long Creek WWTP. Because sludge handling is one of the more expensive
aspects of operating a WWTP, optimizing this process will improve the City of
Albemarle's ability to comply with regulatory requirements through the most cost
effective method available.

Calculations for Dry Solids Production
225 ppm
BOD concentration (high end assumption)
12,000,000
gal/day
influent wastewater
45,360,000
I/day
influent wastewater
100,080,000
Ibm/day
influent wastewater
22,518
Ibm/day
Influent BOD
5,629.50
Ibm/day
Bio-Solids produced
2,054,768
Ibm/year
Solids produced
1,027.38
tons/year
Solids produced
130 ppm
BOD concentration (Historical Data assumption)
5,770,000
gal/day
influent wastewater
21,810,600
I/day
influent wastewater
48,121,800
Ibm/day
influent wastewater
6,256
Ibm/day
Influent BOD
1,563.96
Ibm/day
Bio-Solids produced
570,845
Ibm/year
Solids produced
285.42
tonsAear
Solids produced
Assumptions
Influnet Plant BOD (Hist. data) = 130mg/I = 130 ppm
Influnet Plant BOD (High End) = 225mg/I = 225 ppm
Solids Production for Process = 0.25 Ibm solids / Ibm BOD influent
Plant flowrate maximum = 12 MGD = Design Capacity
Plant flowrate current Average = 5.77 MGD = Avg Daily Flow from 2008 - 2010
Source
Env. Eng. Ref. Manual, Lindeberg, 2004

RAW SEWAGE
METERING STATI
TO DISTRIBUTION
BOX
SECONDARY
CLARIFIER
SECONDARY
CLARIFIER
LONG CREEK WWTP
PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC
Average Daily Flow: Plant Influent and effluent averaged 6.29 MGD for calendar year 2013.
The average recycle rate at the plant is 63% making the flow entering the aeration basin and
clarifier portion of the treatment process 10.3 MGD.
Influent Pump Station - This station utilizes four (4) screw pumps and one stand-by "dry prime"
type pump. This station is rated for 32 MGD based on one of the 4 screw pumps being out of
service. Influent flow metering is done by a Parshall flume that is upstream of this pump station.
Aeration Basins - The biological treatment portion at the Long Creek WWTP (LCWWTP) takes place
in four (4) partially lined aeration ponds. Each pond is concrete lined at the top portion of the
—�- TO CLARIFIER sloped walls as well as a concrete bottom portion under each of the six (6) aerators that are in
each of the four aeration ponds, which total 24 60-HP aerators that comprises the entire system.
The basins have a depth of approximately 12 'Feet which equates to a volume of roughly 4.2 million
gallons per basin.
— TO CLARIFIER
Clarifiers - The LCWWTP uses 4 80 foot diameter secondary clarifiers.,These units are arranged to
each pair with one of the four aeration ponds. Each clarifier has a depth of 12 feet and an approximate
surface area of 5,027 sq ft. The working volume of each clarifier is approximately 60,319 cu ft.
RAS Pumps - The Return Activated Sludge (RAS) is pumped via two separate screw pump stations that
feed two aeration basins per station. These screw pump stations return the settled sludge from the
clarifiers to a distribution box where the RAS flow meets and mixes with the raw influent wastewater
prior to entering the two aeration basins for each of the two treatment trains. Sluice gates are present
within the distribution box to allow operators to make slight process changes within the activated sludge
process.
WAS Pumps - The Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) is pumped out of the system through a pumping station
that utilizes a wet -pit / dry -pit configuration.
Disinfection - The plant utilizes chlorine gas and a dechlorination agent to properly disinfect its effluent
prior to entering Long Creek. There are two mirrored chlorine contact chambers, each with an estimated
volume of 11,610 cu ft.
Municipal Engineerd,
Services Company, P.A.

r,
-
\
T_
T aisrnisuTioN
3
\
r
v'
Ij
`
/
f
i
I
l
�
,
j
_