NCS000534_Inspection Report_20120402

STORIGIWATEftUIVISION-CODING-SHEET--
PERMIT NO.
�C`2o- ODD
DOC TYPE
❑FINAL PERMIT
❑ MONITORING INFO
❑ APPLICATION
COMPLIANCE
❑ OTHER
DOC DATE
� 2okZ 0402-
YYYYMMDD
:_. -..,. .: �. ._�� ..«, :.,;- as�:�.�;;,. _ ., .... :. .. .._�-,:xtids:,£ �_�_ _•.ear �ia*s;;nati��a., .+.ti....... - .. _.:�3ii

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
April 2, 2012
Elizabeth Wike
Clear Path Recycling
PO Box 2260
Leland, NC 28451
Subject: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
Clear Path Recycling
NPDES Stormwater Permit-NCS000534
Cumberland County
Dear Ms. Wike:
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On March 26, 2012, I, Hughie White; from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality, conducted a site inspection for the Clear Path Recycling facility located on Cedar Creek
Road in Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina. A copy of the inspection report is attached
for your review. I would like to thank you, Mr. Anthony Hudson, and Mr. Gary Slater for assisting with
this inspection. Stormwater from the facility drains to the Cape Fear River, a Class WS-IV; CA water
located in the Cape Fear River Basin. The site visit and file review revealed that the subject facility is
covered by NPDES Stormwater Permit-NCS000534.
Accordingly, the following observations were noted during the Division of Water Quality
inspection (please see the attached addendum for information about your permit):
1) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) has been developed, recorded, and properly
implemented.
[Yes ■ No El
2) Qualitative Monitoring
Qualitative monitoring has been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements.
es ■ No ❑
Location: 225 Green Street. Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterauality,.oro
An Equal Oppodunity 1 Affirmative Adon Employer
NorthCaroiina
'Naturally

3) Analytical Monitoring
Analytical monitoring has been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements.
[Yes ■ No
Please be advised that violations of the NPDES Permit are subject to a civil penalty assessment of
up to $25,000 per day for each violation. If you or your staff has any questions, comments, or needs
assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit, please do not hesitate to contact me at (910)
433-3308.
Sincerely,
Hughie White
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
cc: Gary Slater, Safety Manager, Clear Path Recycling
FRO -Surface Water Protection
WBS Compliance and Permits Unit

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCS000534 Effective: 05/01/10 Expiration' 04/30/15 Owner: Clear Path Recycling
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Clear Path Recycling
County: Cumberland 3468 Cedar Creek Rd
Region: Fayetteville
Fayetteville NC 28305
Contact Person: Elizabeth Wike Title: Phone:
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 03/26/2012 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:45 AM
Primary Inspector: Hughie White Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): Ex>M �
gW;CWt,,r; Mike I-awyer. Phone: [phone] E5 �
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation 33z9
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: ■ Compliant Q Not Compliant
Question Areas:
N Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCS000534 Owner - Facility: Clear Path Recycling
Inspection Date: 0312612012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The stormwater pollution prevention plan has been developed and implemented- The plan appeared to contain all of the
required permit components. The plan is also being updated annually, as required. The analytical monitoring and
qualitative monitoring is being performed semi-annually, as required. The facility does not meet the threshold for
monitoring from vehicle maintenance areas. Also, analytical results have consistently been below the benchmark values
outlined in the stormwater permit All outfalls were observed during this inspection.
Page: 2

Permit: NCS000534 Owner - Facility: Clear Path Recycling
Inspection Date: 03/2612012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
Q
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?'
■
0
n
n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
[1
n
n .
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
Q
0
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
0
❑
Q
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
n
n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑
D
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
n
n
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
n
n
n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
n
o
n
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
n
n n
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■
Q
❑ C)
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Q
n
■ 11
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ 0 D n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ n n n
# If the facility has representative outfali status, is it properly documented by the Division? n n ■ In
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ ❑ 11 n
Comment:
Page: 3