19960612 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19960626

Appendix l: Planting Plan and Specifications
The mitigation site will be planted with the appropriate species at the start of a growing
season. A preliminary listing of species is found below; additional species may be selected
after site preparation and will be noted in the As-built Plan: Broyhill Park Mitigation Site
(Attachment 4:). The site will be stabilized with a readily available temporary cover
(Appendix 4: Proposed Seed Mixture for Stabilization). Final plantings maybe delayed
until the start of the next growing season after the site has reached equilibrium thus
ensuring that all plants will flourish in their appropriate microclimat?c setting. The site has
a preliminary planting plan; however it is subject to change upon completion of site
preparation, all changes will be noted in subsequent reports and the as-built plans. The
species listed below are classified according to shade and water tolerance.
Plantings will have three general "forms": 1) littoral bench, 2) transitional areas, and 3)
bottomland ecosystem. The site will be prepared accordingly and be planted as described
below and with all appropriate soil amendments.
Littoral Bench and "Transition Areas:
Water Depth Range
Shaded Areas
Open Areas
Bottomland Ecosystem*:
0"-6"
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Cornus amornum
Juncus effusus
Leersia orvzoides
Saururus cernuus
Juncus effusus
Peltandra virginica
Pontederia cordata
Typha latifolia
Eupatoriadulphus .spp.
Betula nigra
Fraxinus penns_ylvatica
Acer rubrum
*Include species as listed above for herbaceous cover as appropriate.
All marsh % emergent plants will be planted on a 3'x3' spacing. Shrub and tree species will
be planted on a 6'x6' spacing (as to achieve a density of 320 stems per acre). Refer to
accompanying sample planting plans for typical arrangement.
Areas immediately adjacent to the park will be planted with greater diversity and aesthetics
in mind. The more shaded portion will be planted with a combination of Saururus cernuus,
Cephalanthusoccidentalis, Ilea virginica, and Lobellacardlnulls. The areas receiving more
sun will be planted with Typha latifolia, Iris (versicolor and/or pseudacorus), and
Ponlederiacordala.
Streambank Plantings:
Streambanks will be fortified (where necessary) with species that have been identified by
(Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) as appropriate for bank stabilization.
Plantings within the banks and meanders are shown on the attached schematic drawings.
Upland soils lacking the appropriate hydrology may occur immediately adjacent to the
channel, these soils are not anticipated to extend more than 3' from the channel. Plantings
within these uplands will be appropriate for the existing hydrology and soils.
Plant Material Specifications (Adapted from Garbisch 1995)
Balled and Bagged (Woody Plants):
The size of the earthen ball shall be at least as large as specified in the American Standard
for Nursery Stock (1980). Where plants are to be planted in soils that will be saturated
most of the growing season, the bagged root ball shall have a surface diameter that is at
least 1/2 the diameter of the un-pruned drip-line and a depth that is at least 8' per 5' of
tree/shrub height.
If not planted immediately upon delivery to the job site, plants shall be stored in shade and
root balls kept moist through periodic watering until the time of planting.
if growing, the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf sports, leaf damage, leaf
discoloration, chlorosis, leaf wilting or curling, or evidence of insects on the leaves.
Container (Woody and Herbaceous Plants):
The soil within the root ball shall be at field capacity (1/3 atmosphere) or wetter upon
delivery to the job site. Any wilted, dry and/or light weight plants shall be rejected. If not
planted immediately upon delivery to the job site, plants shall be stored in shade and root
balls kept moist through periodic watering until the time of planting.
The container size shall be at least as large as specified. Plants shall not necessarily be
rejected when supplied in containers larger than specified. However, the soil/root masses
shall be the size of the specified container size. If the soil/root masses are substantially
smaller than the specified container size and loose soil exists on the sides and bottom of the
containers, indicating that plants have not been in specified containers long enough to root
into surrounding soil, the plants shall be rejected.
If growing, the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf spots, leaf damage, leaf
discoloration, chlorosis, leaf wilting or curling, or evidence of insects on the leaves.
For trees and shrubs, where spiraling woody roots exist on the outside of the soil/root
mass upon the removal of the plants from the containers, the landscape contractor shall
separate (cutting where necessary) and spread them out (frazzle) prior to planting.
Fiber or Peat Pot (Herbaceous Plants):
If not planted immediately upon delivery to the job site, plants shall be stored in shade and
root masses kept moist through periodic watering until the time of planting.
The plants shall be well-rooted through the sides and bottoms of the pots and firmly
contained therein.
If the plants may be easily removed from the pots by holding the upper portion of the plant
and gently pulling on the pots, the plants shall be rejected.
If growing, the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf spots, leaf damage, leaf
discoloration, chlorosis, leaf wilting or curling, or evidence of insects on the leaves.
The pot sire shall be at least as large as specified. Plants shall not necessarily be rejected
when supplied in pots larger than specified.
The number of plants or stems (culms) per port as specified shall be present at the
minimum, and on the average, or the plants shall be rejected.
Dormant Propap-ule (Herbaceous Plants):
If not planted immediately upon delivery to the job site, the donnant propagules shall be
stored out of direct exposure to the sun and wind and they shall be protected by covering
with straw, peat moss, compost, or other suitable materials and shall be kept moist,
through periodic watering, until the time of planting.
The bodies and shoots associated with the propagules shall have turgor or be rigid to the
touch. If the bodies and/or shoots associated with the propagules are soft or mushy, or
appear rotten or decomposed, the plant materials shall be rejected. Rhizome (stolon)
sections shall provide a minimum of two shoots per section. Or: Rhizome (stolon)
sections containing at least a terminal shoot shall be a minimum of four inches (4') in length
(in order to ensure sufficient stored energy to support the new growth). Rhizome sections
containing shoots that are soft or mushy or otherwise appear rotten shall not be accepted.
Plug (Herbaceous Plants Woody Seedlings, or Rooted Cuttings):
If not planted immediately upon delivery to the job site, the plugs whether in or out of their
growing units shall be stored out of direct exposure to the sun and wind and maintained
moist through periodic watering until the time of planting. If the plugs are not contained in
their growing units upon delivery and will not be planted immediately, they should be
treated as above and their root masses shall be protected by straw or other suitable materials
and maintained moist, through periodic watering, until the time planting.
Plugs shall have solid soil/root masses with the soil in place. Roots shall appear clean and
white in coloration.
If growing, the plants shall appear healthy with no leaf spots, leaf damage, leaf
discoloration, chlorosis, leaf wilting or curling, or evidence of insects on the leaves.
If dormant (herbaceous), new healthy shoots shall be apparent. Plugs containing shoots
that are soft or mushy or otherwise appear rotten shall not be accepted.
If'dormant (woody), stems shall be pliable and exhibit light green to yellowish green
cambium. Plugs containing brittle stems and having unhealthy cambium shall not be
accepted.
Plugs (woody seedlings) shall have widths that are at least to the limb lines of the seedlings
and have depths that are at least one-fourth the heights of the seedlings.
Seed:
Shall be delivered in clean, unopened containers and labeled as to seed origin, purity,
germination percentage, and date of germination testing.
Fertilization
Herbaceous plantings:
Sprang plantings - Use Osmocote 18-6-12, eight to nine month release fertilizer, to be
placed in hole at time of planting. For Dormant propagules, container/fiber pot, or plug
seedlings use about 15 grams (0.5 oz.) per planting.
Woody plantings:
Fall/Winter plantings - Use Osmocote 18-5-11, twelve to fourteen month release fertilizer.
to be placed in hole or in soil fill/amendment mix at planting. Use 30 grams ( I oz.) per 1
quart container, 90 grams (3 oz.) per I gallon container (30 grams per each additional
gallon). Use 15 grams ( I oz.) per unrooted cutting for willow whips.
Soil Amendments:
Soil amendments are required only around tree and shrub plantings, with the exception of
significantly graded areas (where stockpiled wetland topsoil may be used). The
amendment used should be leaf or pine bark compost at rates of one part compost to one
part soil (from planting hole). Fertilizer should be mixed in with soil/amendment mix. No
surface mulch is required where plants are planted at or near original grade.
Appendix 2: Proposed Potential Sources for Plant Material
(additional sources may be proposed prior to installation, for approval by USACOE).
Herbaceous material:
Campbell's Greenhouse Carlton Campbell/Larry Hobbs
2816 Campbell Road
Raleigh, NC. 27606 919-851-1 162
(also has team of experienced installers)
Shrub Material:
Campbell's Greenhouse
281 h Campbell Road
Raleigh, NC. 27606
Carlton Campbell/Larry Hobbs
919- 851-1 162
Fern Valley Famis
1624 Fern Valley Road
Yadkinville, NC. 27055
Broyhill Nurseries
Lenoir, NC.
Specimen ornamental species:
Campbell's Greenhouse
2816 Campbell Road
Raleigh, NC. 27606
Tom Clark
910-463-2412
Carlton Campbell/Larry Hobbs
919-851-1 162
Niche Gardens
1 1 1 1 Dawson Road
Chapel Hill, NC. 27516
Kim Hawkes
919-967-0078
Broyhill Nurseries
Lenoir, NC.
Appendix 3: Water Budget
A water budget is assumed for this site utilizing the Carter equation. The equation is
represented by the following formulation:
P + SWI + GWI = ET + SWO + GWO + S
where, P = Precipitation
SWI = Surface water inflow
GWI = Ground water inflow
ET = Evapotransp oration
SWO = Surface water outflow
GWO = Ground water outflow
S = Change in storage
Basically this indicates that inputs equal outputs, otherwise, there is a change in storage.
The use of this formulation does not include the detailed measured information needed for
a water balance.
The sources of water used in the planning of this wetland are; 1) ground water, 2) surface
water and, 3) precipitation. Ground water is relied on as the main source of water for this
wetland. The target system is an alluvial deposit within a floodplain of a small stream in
the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains and is comprised of layers of permeable
sediments to depths of about 5' and a channel approximately 3' wide. Ground water
moves laterally through the upper layers of the surrounding upland soils until it discharges
into the alluvial deposit and results in subsurface and channel flow within the floodplain.
Indicators of seasonal high water table in the soils in the floodplain are at depths of about
18" below the surface. There appears to be a constant base flow in the channel.
Change in storage within this system is manifested by fluctuations in surface and
subsurface flow (water table) depths. While seasonal change in storage occurs, it is
assumed that the annual change in storage is negligible. This general equilibrium has
resulted in saturated and reducing conditions at about 18" throughout the target site. Due
to the hydraulic gradient created by the inflow and outflow elevations, there is are drier
conditions near the outlet (where the outlet elevation is significantly below the immediate
soil surface elevation) and wetter conditions near the upper portions of the site (little
difference between the surface elevation and the channel elevation).
Two elements will be altered to raise the level of seasonal high water within the target site
to within 12" of the surface. First, the hydraulic gradient will be reduced by raising the
outlet elevation through the use of a weir structure near the present outlet. Second, the
cross-sectional area of subsurface flow will be reduced using subsurface detention
structure in combination with the second, upper weir. This combined alteration will result
in reduced groundwater outflow (GWO) and therefore, increased storage. The elevation
of Surface water outflow (SWO) will be altered within the site, but the volume will be the
same. Ground water outflow may be expressed by Darcy's equation:
Q = K A (dh/dl)
where,
Q = quantity of water per unit time
K = hydraulic conductivity
A = cross-sectional area at right angle to flow direction
dh/dl = hydraulic gradient
The weirs will reduce the hydraulic gradient by reducing the change in ground water
height (making it more nearly level) across the target site. Presently, the change in ground
water height across the site is about 6.1' (from about 1117.6'in upper site to the outlet
pipe invert elevation of about 1111.5'). This will be reduced to about 0._5' between the
upper site and the lower weir elevation.. Additionally, the cross-sectional area of
subsurface flow will be reduced by the subsurface structure along the upper weir. These
alterations will result in a reduction of outflow (lower Q) and, therefore, an increase in
storage, resulting in higher seasonal water tables. Weir elevations are chosen (lower @
1117.0' and upper @ 1118.0') which will give the desired seasonal high water table
elevation of < 12" from the surface.
Concept Sketch
Proposed Saturation Level , Ground Surface
Existing Saturation Level
Top of Weir - 1118.0' Top of Weir - 1117.0'
1120
--------------- 1
Subsurface Detention Component
_ _ _-_? 111(1
Longitudinal Section - NTS Invert 48" RCP 1111.53'
Exaggerated Vertical Scale
Appendix 4: Proposed Seed Mixture for Stabilization
Sl-F_DBED PREPARATION AND SEEDING SPECiFICATiONS - Wetland Area ....o
L E
1. Surface water control measures to be installed according to plan.
2. Areas to be seeded shall be ripped and spread with available topsoil 6" deep. Total seedbed
prepared depth shall be 6" to 8" deep.
3. Loose rocks, roots and other obstructions shall be removed from the surface so that they will not
interfcrc with establishment and maintenance of vegetation. Surface for final seedbed preparation,
at finish grades shown, shall be reasonably smooth.
4. Provide agricultural lime at rate required to bring soil acidity to slightly acid - ph 6, according to
soil test report.
S. Lime and fertilizer shall be applied uniformly and mixed with the soil during seedbed preparation.
6. Apply 0-20-10 commercial fertilizer at the rate of 20 lbs/1000 s.f. for warm season mix (see
schedule).
7. Apply 10-20-10 commercial fertilizer at the rate of 20 lbs/1000 s.f. for cool season mix (see
schedule).
8. Apply 10-10-10 commercial fertilizer at the rate of 20 lbs/1000 s.f. for temporary cover crops. In
addition, provide 15 lbs/1000 s.f. of superphosphate.
9. 'Ihe following is for the warm season mix:
a. All warm grass seed shall be debearded or conditioned by brushing to create a product
nearly the same as debearding. This does not apply to Switchgrass.
b. Disc two times to break-up crop residue and dirt clods prior to seeding.
C. Pack soil to create a firm seedbed with a cultipacker or roller.
d. If a rain shower should fall after the seedbed is prepared but before planting break-up any
crust formation.
C. Seeding shall be installed to a depth of V," utilizing a rangeland drill or conventional grass
drills. It is extremely important that seed not be planted deeper than '" depth. Do not
disc or harrow aficr seeding. This will put the seed too deep. A Brillion seeder will be
` acceptable.
10. Seed in accordance with the following schedule and application rates:
Welland Areas
Dates TYMS Rate
Apr. 1 - Jul. 15 Warm Season Mix
Switchgrass, Cave-in-rock, Alamo 8 pls #/acre or 4 oz./1000 s.f.
Smartwced 2 bulk N/acre or 1 oz./1000 s.f.
and
Japanese Millet or 20 lb/acre or 'A lbs/1000 s.f.
Sorghum Sudan Grass Hybrids
(Mow prior to maturity)
July 16 - Sept. 1 Temporary crop of Japanese Millet or 20 lb/acre or 'h ibs/1000 s.f.
Sorghum Sudan Grass Hybrids
(To be followed by permanent mixture)

,/ Qn
f Sept 2 Nov. I Cool Season Mix F L E
Recd Canary Grass 12 bulk N/acre or
6 ozJlm) s.f.
Smartwecd 2 bulk #/acre or
1 o7./1000 s.f
Nov. 1 March 31 Temporary Crop of Wheat 40 Ibs/acre
(To be followed by permanent mixture)
11. Contractor shall be required to provide a permanent mixture according to the schedule.
12 Temporary crops must be incorporated prior to seeding of permanent mixtures
IT Cover crops or temporary cops nwst be mowed at proper time w prrvcnt seed heads from
maturing. Wheat may be harvested.
14. Grass mix and temporary covers shall be mulched with straw applied at the rate of 75 lbs to 100
lbs/1000 S.F. Use clean Wheat Straw.
15. If hydroseeded use Virpin Paper. Mulch only.
Note:
Seed and additional information for the wetland mix as well as for other grass areas may be
purchased from, but not limited to:
Sharp Brothers Seed Company
Route 4, Box 237 A
Clinton, Missouri 64735
Phone [phone]
Contact: Jef Hodges
16. Yards and Golf Course lawn areas shall be returned to existing conditions and grass mixtures.
17. Wetlands crossings shall be covered with "Terra Jute" erosion control netting or equal installed per
manufacturer directions.
Local Distributor.
Web Tec, Inc.
P.O. Box 240302
Charlotte, NC 28224
800A39-0027 or 704-552-6722
flv?,
Attachment 3: Pre-construction Meeting Lop- for
Broyhill Park Mitigation Site
Mitigation Designer's Representative Date
Client's Representative I)ate
Installer's Representative Date
Corps of E;ngincers Representative IMe
NOTES:

1
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF December 10, 1996
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199505137 and Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwaters and Isolated
Waters)
Mr. Doug Brinkley \
Broyhill Realty, Incorporated i
Post Office Box 500
Lenoir, North Carolina 28645
Dear Mr. Brinkley:
Reference your June 20, 1996 after-the-fact application for Department of
the Army (DA) authorization to fill approximately 2.83 acres of headwater .
wetlands on Broyhill property (20.628 acres) located off of NC 18
(Wilkesboro Boulevard), in Lenoir, Caldwell County, North Carolina. The
purpose for the fill is to prepare the site for commercial and high density
residential development. In order to offset the loss of the above mentioned
2.83 acres of wetlands, you are proposing compensatory mitigation at onsite
and offsite locations. The onsite mitigation will consist of a 1.13 acre
stormwater pond with a littoral bench. The goal of the onsite mitigative
measures will be to replace the lost filtration and storage functions of the
impacted wetlands. The offsite mitigation site is a 0.8 acre tract located
south of Broyhill Park, along an unnamed tributary to Lower Creek. The intent
of the offsite mitigation is to enhance, restore, and create functional value
within the mitigation wetlands to levels similar to, or greater than, the
original values in both the impact site and the onsite wetlands. This site
will be incorporated into the City of Lenoir's park system. A plan outlining
the mitigation work to occur has been submitted with your application by your
representative, Soil and Environmental Consultants, Incorporated. This
project has been coordinated with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the Federal
Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was
provided, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, for discharges of
dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters.
Your work is authorized by this nationwide permit provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions and provided
you receive a Section 401 water quality certification from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality. You should contact Mr. John Dorney, telephone
[phone], regarding water quality certification. This nationwide permit
does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or
local approval.
HIV' 11V'?
SVN,3Ias 1d 1N3y.?NOb
9 1% 9 3?0
-2-
In addition to the above referenced conditions, the following special
conditions associated with the mitigation plan must be strictly adhered to:
1. The mitigation will be undertaken in accordance with the approved
"Broyhill Park Wetland Mitigation Plan" and the "Broyhill Commercial Site
Wetland Mitigation Plan" produced by Soil and Environmental Consultants
(S&EC). Both documents are dated August 23, 1996. Regardless of the contents
of the above plans, all 3 wetland parameters as set forth by the Corps of
Engineers (COE) 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual must be established to achieve
a successful mitigation project.
2. Final engineering design and specifications for the pond will be submitted
to the COE for review and approval prior to starting mitigation construction.
3. Groundbreaking on the mitigation sites will commence within 120 days of
the date of this permit.
3. Biannual reports outlining the progress of the mitigation will be
submitted to this office for a period of 3 years (commencing with the date of
this permit). The first report will be due 6 months from the date of this
permit.
4. Success will be measured in accordance with criteria outlined in S&EC's
plan and in accordance with the 1987 COE Wetland Delineation Manual as
mentioned in condition #1 above. A final report will be submitted to the COE
requesting concurrence that the mitigation is successful. If it is determined
by the COE that the mitigation has failed at either site, necessary
corrections will be made as agreed upon by Broyhill and the COE.
5. A method to measure the hydrology parameter on the mitigation sites will
be developed. This method must be acceptable to the COE. Information
gathered on the hydrology will then be submitted with the biannual reports.
6. As stated in S&EC's plan, once the two mitigation sites are deemed
successful by the COE, they will be protected from development or manipulation
by a legally binding and recorded conservation easement.
This verification will be valid until the nationwide permit is modified,
reissued or revoked. All the nationwide permits are scheduled to be modified,
reissued or revoked prior to 21 January 1997. It is incumbent upon you to
remain informed of changes to the nationwide permits. We will issue a public
notice announcing the changes when they occur. Furthermore, if you commence
or are under contract to commence this activity before the date the nationwide
permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve months from the date of
the modification or revocation to complete the activity under the present
terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
-3-
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Chapin in our
Asheville Regulatory Field Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Robert W. Johnson
Office Manager
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Enclosure
Z Cop es Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Mr. Chris Huysman
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, J r., Govemor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
?EHNFi
August 20, 1996
Caldwell County
DWQ Project # 960612
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Doug Brinkley
Broyhill Realty, Inc.
P.O. Box 500
Lenoir, NC 28645
Dear Mr. Brinkley:
You have our approval to retain fill material placed in 2.83 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
constructing a commercial and residential development at NC 18 and US 321, as you described in your
application dated 24 June 1996. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number 2671. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit
Number 26 when it is issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as
modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification
and any additional conditions listed below. Additional written DWQ approval is required for the stormwater
pond and a revised mitigation plan which incorporates comments of our letter of 8 August 1996. In addition,
you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but
not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply
Watershed regulations.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the.Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Attachment
cc. Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office
Asheville DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
Sincerely,
lam'
Pre P on Ho ard, Jr. P.E.
960612.1tr
Division of Water Quality - Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James & Hunt, Jr., G ove mor
Jonathan R Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 8, 1996
Mr. Kevin Martin
Soil and Environmental Consultants
244 West Millwork Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Martin:
A / • • R?FA
C7 F= FI
V"
Thank you for submitting the Broyhill Park Wetland Mitigation Plan (Caldwell Co.)
The plan proposes to create 0.2 acres of openwater; create and restore 0.1 acres of littoral
bench; and enhance and restore 0.5 acres of bottomland forests. This compensatory
mitigation is being required by the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE; Action ID
#199505137) as part of an after-the-fact Nationwide Permit 26. I apologize for the delay in
providing comments on the compensatory mitigation plan.
Appropriate hydrology is proposed by installing two weirs at the compensatory
mitigation site. The Water Budget (Appendix 3) and Concept Sketch provide some of the
details on how water storage in the site will be increased. However, Attachment 1: Weir
Design and Specifications was not included with wetland mitigation plan. This information
will need to be submitted before approval of the plan can be granted.
Vegetation
Appendix 1: Planting Plan and Specifications provides details for vegetation
establishment. The section states that the site "will be planted with the appropriate species
at the start of a growing season." Planting woody species in the fall (after a growing
season) will be acceptable. Using cattail (Typha species) is not recommended and this
genus should be deleted from your list of species proposed for open areas. A spikerush
(Eleocharis spp.) could serve as a substitute.
Note that the species listed under the headings 'Shaded Areas' and 'Open Areas' do
not denote all the species proposed for planting. Additional species are provided in the two
paragraphs following the list. These additional species include Itt-,A v1I inica, Lobelia
cardinalis and Iii spp.
Species proposed for the bottomland ecosystem are limited to Betula niera,
Fraxinus nns, lvadca and A-cer rubrum. The COE guidelines (12/8/93) recommend a
minimum of six hardwood species. In addition, red maple (A= rubrum) will become
established naturally and is not usually considered as a restoration or enhancement species.
Environmental Sciences Branch • 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
?EHNR
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 24, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Environmental Sciences B anch
THROUGH: Forrest R. Westa
FROM: Jim Reid ?? W
SUBJECT: Broyhill Realty Inc.
#960612
Caldwell County
?A
F1`Po L'? ???GF
v2?y ??F
y?
Fs
As a result of observations made on July 23, 1996, issuance of
401 Certification for subject project is recommended. The
following individuals met to review the applicant's project:
Hunt Broyhill
Ken Moss
Chris Huysman
Janice Nichols
Steve Chapin
Patrick
Jim Reid
Broyhill Realty
Broyhill Realty
Soil & Environmental
- U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Corps
A private consultant
DWQ
Consultants, Inc.
engineer
Assembled individuals visited the impacted area and the proposed
remediation site.
Attached rating sheet #1 is for the impacted area. Observations
suggested that the impacted area may have been created as by
factors associated with development of the golf course in the
1960s. As a result of the wetland's distance from Lower Creek,
it rated a rather low score of 34. The primary function of the
existing wetland is believed to be water storage.
WL Type - Wet Flat
WL Score - 34
WL Acre - 2.83 (impacted)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

John Dorney
July 24, 1996
Page 2
Rating sheet #2 (assumes that the mitigation area contains some
wetland and is rated before mitigation). It scored 41 points as
it exists.
WL Type - Bog Forest
WL Score - 41
WL Acre - 0.8 (to be created)
Rating sheet #3 covers the same area as sheet 2 but after
mitigation. The area after mitigation (construction of wetlands)
would score 68.
WL Type - Bog Forest
WL Score - 68
WL Acre - 0.8
The after-the-fact permit is required as a result of an honest
mistake. This position is based upon all information which could
be gathered and is based upon Steve Chapin's opinion (resulting
from extensive previous work with Broyhill Realty).
The impacted area was of low value in protecting water quality
(largely due to its remoteness from surface waters, approximately
300 feet). Its primary function was thought to be water storage.
The proposed storm water pond in the area would serve the same
function. The remediation area would be a very high quality wet
land and would also provide pollutant removal. Even though there
would be a net loss of wet land as a result of this project,
there would likely be no adverse impacts to water quality and
issuance of certification is therefore recommended.
MEMORANDUM PRINT NAMES:
Reviewer: TO: JOHN DORNEY WQ SUPV.:
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES BRANCH DATE:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
''-*EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (USE N/A FOR NOT APPLICABLE) *
PERMIT YR:
APPLICANT NAME:
PROJECT TYPE:
COE It :
RCD_FROM _CDA:
REG_OFFICE:
z- C 7 /%
96 PERMIT NO: 0000612
BROYHILL REALTY, INC.
APP
ARO
COUNTY: CALDWELL
PERMIT-TYPE: NW26
DOT #:
DATE FRM CDA: 06/26/96
RIVER_AND_SUB_BASINJ: 0,7i3 STR INDEX NO:
STREAM CLASS : 6/N
WL_REQUESTED:
WL SCORE(#) : ,S&?
MITIGATION?:6/N
MITIGATION-TYPE:
MITIGATION-SIZE: DID YOU REQUEST MORE INFO?: Y/
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED? by N
HAVE PROJECT CHANGES/CONDITIONS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH APPLICANT?: Y/4T-'
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One`ISSUE :ISSUE/COND DENY
COMMENTS:
WL_TYPE: iz!c-
WL_ACR_EST?:CY)/N
WATER IMPACTED BY FILL?: Y 0
CC: Regional Office
Central Files
f
Project nam
County
Name of evaluato
ffljWu

>.;,.;

i predominant
predonlinan
topogra
Or ch

? txi a s,
n (,3)
F
' nor sanay ?r
4'
FIoodingos a,

sprr IR
yf["

seaSol
i

trite
L
feet no 'ev
w
Wetland type (select one)*
.i „pur; it .r
.irface
f
f
? Bottomland hardwood forest
? Pine savanna
? Headwater forest ? Freshwater marsh t
Swamp forest L3 Bog/fen
t ? Ephemeral wetland t
Wet flat
? Pocosin
? Carolina Bay
? Bog forest C] Other
'The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight '
,
n
Ifs Water storage x 4.00 =
Wetland Score
Bank/Shoreline stabilization d_ x 4.00 =
?r Pollutant removal d x 5.00
Wildlife habitat x 2.00 =
Aquatic life value x 4.00
Recreation/Education x 1.00 = { '
' C5)
;
Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius

- ? t
WETLAND _ :RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Vrs?an? l
I Dearest road
wetland area acres Wetland width feet
I
?..:?? tit - t t ?•.
Ilk
Y a ?t,ETLA'NDi' : RATI NG WORpg;KSH E ME ` ?UUlArth 4 V rs ?
Project name / ; _ ;
Nearest road
Count} Wetland area______-- acres Wetland width
„ --
N
eet
a? r ? I j• rt$ ; ? '? Y. 8
[] no eue otti?l = urf?ce ;
Wetland type (select one)*
? Bottomland hardwood forest ? Pine savanna f
? Headwater forest ? Freshwater marsh
? Swamp forest ? Bog/fen
? Wet flat ? Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin
? ? Carolina Bay
l
J? Bog forest ? Other i
*'Me rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
wei
ht '

Water storage

= g
x 4.00

etland Score ,

,
,
/rl -
Bank/Shoreline stabilization ? ? x 4.00
_*
Pollutant removal -
x 5.00
- $

'
Wildlife habitat _
x 2.00 =+.
Aquatic life value c? x 4.00
= l?
7
'
' Recreation/Education ` x 1.00
' G Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 112 mile upstream, upslope, or radius ;

+..° ??fi''3 iF'C ? r ref ??( S [? '((?^;S H ?k?` rOUCth €'rVHCS10I,1 ?.
W
Project name d%<tli+ A-, Nearest road
('Minty Wetland area / acres.Wetland width
Name of evaluato
r..AdJ ac
tirlth
127
11f
ate
?? a ? 4nt '?? • oo "` •e'
s,e` p tope r '
Wet.,( t?h O?feet D n°ev 1G o loo tY
total ara ??? , ' q
fr 8:; ate: s ft
Wetland type (select one)*
? Bottomland hardwood forest ? Pine savanna
1J Headwater forest ? Freshwater marsh
? Swamp forest ? Bog/fen
? Wet flat ? Ephemeral wetland
eet

Pocosin ? Carolina Bay
? Other
Bog forest
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
S fp? weight W
Water storage c3_ x 4.00
Wetland Score
Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00
1
Pollutant removal* x 5.00 GC- '
5 ll
>_,
Wildlife habitat x 2.00
F 7
' -
' Aquatic life value x 4.00
= r/ ;
NI 1 nn
C5 * Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstream, ups lope or radius ,
'11%
Soil & Environmental Consultants,
2//i Wcsi Millhrook Renal N Rakcigh, North C,u-ohn?i 276011 ¦ (919) 8416-5900 ¦ Uix (919) &i6-c) X67
NCDFl-1&NR - DFM
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
Mr Dorney and Mr. Chapin
June 24, 1996
?? You I' °'?w eers
Q0- 14 3) -
, sheville, NC: 2880
c,
i ? f!
R14'.: AFff:R-THE-FACT DA NATIONWIDE 26 PERMIT
Broyhill Industries Property, Lenoir, North Carolina
Action 11) 11199505137
']'Ile purpose of this letter is to request issuance of an after-the-fact Nationwide Permit 26
and 401 Water Quality Certification for the project known as the Broyhill Industries
Driving Range Property. The site is located in Lenoir, Caldwell County, and is owned by
Broyhill Realty; the site is further identified on the attached USGS Topo Quad Vicinity
Map. Broyhill Realty, Inc. has requested the opportunity to submit this application to
resolve any issues relating to the unauthorized clearing and grading of wetland areas on
this site. The project has been discussed )reviously with John Dorney in the of7lice and on-
site with Mr. Chapin.
A total of 2.83 acres of isolated wetlands (determined after clearing and minor grading -
see attached photos) will be impacted by the placement of a commercial and residential
facility and its supporting infrast ucture. The impact site was determined to be isolated
wooded wetlands with open edges (by airphoto interpretation and site review). The
significant functions of these wetlands were likely: 1) storm and flood water retention, 2)
filtration of sediments and other degrading factors, and 3) habitat for wetland-dependent
wildlife and plants. Hydrology for this system is assumed to have been derived primarily
from storm events. Wetland areas prior to disturbance of the site were likely smaller than
they are now. ]'his is mainly due to soil compaction by equipment.
The impact acreage hills within the iimits of Nationwide Permit 26 and the significant
functions of the on-site weiLtnds %yill he replaced by mitigative- measure's The site
development plan calls for the construction of an on-site 1. 13 acre stormwater lake The
lake is intended as an on-site miiig iti\c measure as it is not required by local regulations
On-site mitigative measures v,\-ill replace the lost filtration and storape ]unctions ol'thc
impacted wetland.

Additional mitigation has been required by the USACOE for issuance of this permit. Off-
site mitigation, totaling 0.80 acres, will replace habitat functions as well as enhance
storage and filtration functions at the mitigation site. A copy of the draft mitigation plan is
attached. Mitigative activities for this project total 1.93 acres. The purpose of this
mitigation is not to satisfy any "ratio" requirements. It is to reduce total impact effects so
that they can be authorized under Nationwide Permit 26.
Please call if you have questions or require additional information. If you intend to
perform a site visit please call and we will arrange for a representative to accompany you.
Sincerely,
I1
-is Huysman

cc: (with enclosures) North Carolina Dept. of Cultural Resources
US Fish & Wildlife Service
DEM ID: ACTION ID: 199505137
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): 26 (A-T-F DA PERMIT)
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: BROYHILL REALTY, INC. ATTN: DOUG BRINKLEY
2. Owners Address: PO BOX 500, LENOIR, NC 28645
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work): 704 / 758-6100
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Ph: 919/846-5900
244 W. MILLBROOK ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27609
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: CALDWELL COUNTY, NC
Nearest Town or City: LENOIR, NC
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): NORTH OF LOWER CREEK, SOUTH OF
NC 18 AND EAST OF US 321. AS PER ATTACHED LENOIR, NC, USGS TOPO QUAD.
6. Name of Closest Stream/River: LOWER CREEK
7. River Basin: CATAWBA RIVER BASIN
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WSI, or WS II?
YES( ) NO(X)
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ( ) NO ( X ) If yes, explain. SEE COVER LETTER AND FILES
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S. including wetlands, located on project site:
2.83 ACRES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S. including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
2.83 ACRES FILLED; AFTER-THE-FACT DA NATIONWIDE 26
'1 U11 LV IV i I.1, . • `-
06:20/19% 13:03 91981469467 FAQ3E 03
12 Vescriptimi of proposed work (Attach PLANS-81/2' X 1a" dr4winge only):
IMPACTS FOR PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND HIGH DENSITY MIDE"AL DEVELOPMENT.
13, Purpose of proposed work:
INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PROPOSED FACILM; INCLUDWG; LOT FILL, PARKING FACILITIES
ANT) ON-SITE STORMWATER POND_ ON-SITE WETLANDS HAVE BERN PREVIOUSLY
D15TURBEO,
14. SLAR reasons why the applic"t believes that t11>6 activity Must be carried out in wetlands. Al(go,
pute treasures taken to mien-dm wetland im ct .
STORMW A WIELANN I MITIGATION 1TO REPLACE SQM_E SIGNIFICANT FUNCTIONS OF
5 RRUIR'ED BY USACOE; SEE ATTACHED DRAFT
IMPACTED
MI'T'IGATION PLAN,
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or Nittional Marine
Fi.9heries Service (NMFS) regarding the prince or any Federally listed or proposed for listing
vndaxigurvd k,r threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
rropowd project. Have you done so? YES ( X ) NO ( )
RESPONSES FROM T14E USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHC7IJI..D BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16, You are required to contact the State Historic PreservaUon Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence
kit historic properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Hove you done
so? YES ( X ) NO ( )
RESPON5F, FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by VEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property,
13. if available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by it conjultant, Include all data sheets relevant to the
placement of delineation litre,
P. If it stormwater management plainis required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surroundJAS ply? CMMERCIAL AND RECREATIONAL
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage 41sposal? SANITARY SEWER
elk
Date
One Sigature
Map I: Site Vicinity Map
Approximate locations of
Broyhill Park Wetland Mitigation Sites
Lenoir, N.C., U.S.G.S. Topo Quad.
Scale 1:24000
\(? .
. n s *SO\
1
,o
,` ? ? 'O I ` L I AIN f)
?r: J o \I -o \? \ •? N ?1
.moo v
m-
41
/lam '``?' ' •?' / ? ???? •? ??, ^ ? ? ??? I ? _ ??%' ? ? - \
can r; •ll. '`? ,,. o'.
/ ,• •` /•'.?i- • c _• /1100
f?) / 1?: •?i ??
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 5®'
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF September 22, 1995
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199505137
Broyhill Realty
Mr. Doug Brinkley
post office Box 500
Lenoir, North Carolina 28645
S ou y
telephone, [phone].
Dear Mr. Brinkley:
This concerns your August 22, 1995 site meeting with Mr. Steve Chapin of
our Asheville Field office to inspect possible unauthorized wetlands clearing
activity recently undertaken on Broyhill Industries property in Lenoir,
Caldwell County, North Carolina. More specifically, the property in question
is located betwer3l NC 18 (Wilkesboro Boulevard) and the Lenoir Golf Club to
the south and is situated in or adjacent to the Lower Creek floodplain. There
are approximately 2.9 acres of jurisdictional wetlands on the tract. The
clearing activity in a wetland area without authorization by a Department of
the Army permit is a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act.
Mr. Chapin's findings indicate that the above mentioned 2.9 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands on the south side of the property have been cleared
and partially graded utilizing heavy equipment (see enclosed wetland data
sheet). After discussing this project with you, it was indicated that the
purpose of the work was to prepare the site for commercial development.
Although you have already been informed, the recent activity in the wetlands
area without a Department of the Army (DA) permit constitutes a violation of
Section 301 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, no additional work should be
undertaken in waters or wetlands on the property.
In resolving this matter, I understand you have requested an opportunity
to apply for an after-the-fact DA permit to complete the preparation of the
site for development. Under separate cover, we are sending you the required
pre-discharge notification application form to be completed and submitted to
this office within 30 days following your receipt of this notice. You should
also contact Mr. John Dorney with the State of North Carolina, telephone (919)
733-1786, to determine water quality certification requirements.
Your cooperation in satisfactorily resolving this matter will be greatly
appreciated. You are reminded that no additional work in the wetlands area
should be done pending the outcome of the submitted permit application.
h ld ou have questions in the interim, please direct them to Mr. Chapin at
Sincerely,
Y?`?l
G. a ne WrChi.e-, ReqBranch

OATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND OEIERMINATION
119197 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
/ ?? S`o S"i ,3 7
C
yep
i
Pf0? 81:1/51te! _ LO /ps ??' • GGi/C ? 'V? i8 g 0 t e-0o data: (9
Applh;unt/Owner .I- u County: C.2
Inve a tiptator: State: AIC
Do IV-)rrrtel Ciroumstances exist on the site? Yes (W-0-) Community ID!
le the alto nignificantiy disturbed (Atypical Situation)? (UO No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Areal Y i-D No Plot ID:
(h1 needed, explain on reverse.)
VEQEt' OMON
1?QClbirt? Plflltt tlnac j?? _ ¢kaWrn Indlestor

3.
-&C

e.??f I J? ? ? f ? AG-

a.S??r?.1c ia??. ? ?_F/SrW-01
Q!9L?L11ftt1.I711t'lt t3oee1e2 StIlltum Indicator
e•-?-
11.
1a.
14.
16.
Is,
Po-,o,*n: of 0"noni 8peclae that are 08L, FACW or FAC
dinp PACs).
f
L

HYDROLOGY
0
Itet.orded bete Wascrtbe In ftemorks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ gtream, Lakii, or Tide Gouge Primary Indioatmi
M0111 Phatogrephe JX Inundated
Other
N
la
d
i Saturated In Upper 12 inohes
o
eoor
ed Veto Ava
lable Water Marko
Drift tines
aedknanl Depoelte
Field 00oorvatlonet Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
esoondiry lfldlestafe IZ or more required)!
Dalai, of auffsa* Wolf! lin.) 0xidl:od Root Channel* In Upper 12 Inches

a Water-¦lolned Loaves
Depth to From watur In Pit-
Iln.1 ? Local loll survey Oats

Depth to esturated to"! - On.) _ FAC-Neutrel Taw
_ Other lexplaln In Remeekei
Aemo rk ik!

sou.a / 99S'a s`/ a 7
rl,1e end phaq•1',_G(/F?v?kcLe drslnsos Clue: .1 v,?_
Meld Obeerveti•
ry,iomy filubprcupla j -Vim/? aVab??+pi1fi Gnfirm NIs1g ' 1 > 1?N No
[i1fi)n-s1hvtL e UP41 None
basufludatj
Color Mottle cadre Mettle 'norstlenf,
flarlto L_ ell. ¦ 1 INkinseff M ¦tl AbuodangetCanusal ALt. •qy eta.
Hytltla !loll Indlt"Ime-
Hl4to•el
Hlottc. Ealp*don
Gulticle Odor
Aqul.o Mnletu?a Pfplme
RfduAnp Condlllame
X Oltyed or Low-Civems Colere
Asn.e?ke1
i`µi , J r, I 1 p "e!-ta -' .
VR
.,.AMA
WETLIM0 DETERMINATIUN
....
Nyd?rtrhytle Vepeutlon Present!
Wi4itm! Hydrology Present?
Hydr1 t 6oNs Prooentl
Renrerke;
s No ICIr010
(prole!
No
No Is Ihle Ss?n0"o Point Within s Well¦ndl No

_ COlTO/auOnf
tgph Ordaniv Conlent In Su?leoe LsyN In as?tdy Some
of aMs d1, -wr•p In S-W Soft
Ufted etr Loeel "ydrte $*Us Utt
C U9144 oft?stlensl Hydrlo Soft 1,101
_ Other It oln In Rini rkol
VIJi DUI ? JJU 1 v. •+l. ??•.? ? ._

r
# too, t yr R"
W
Y= 16. oc
w NC 1M Y

,
ol to

4, _ .? - 1 AIRLT
' ? a?llf alf ? bll?l 10
v
_ ?
' ? NAM AAR 10 1ANR O1?R

?i GoU Club.
INK wm""
1x16 ILL MM0 10 K 0*il/Of
~\ ` . ?uLpN WMW Mao MM OMWW MIM.

4mome tAh"
to In .%
DItM G RANGE PROP UM
BROYMI IxV STRMS, INC.
J?a Low&, swe c>wl"&
pmam" y SITE PLAN
VICD M YAP
N?
i?P
lib/z
I
lyyb 1 4 4 b 1btiJ?UJUr
?? 4
.u•M'
My r ?w ? ?
Y i? W? - w emu
Tom
F.?w w J
? w
RoMr1 FI"4 :r
"P via
Burr Propwaft. b". i
V wA A FI DOW CWAMS ,
Of Lw.1r.
MM M MI M IM '%/ ? j:
i
? ,1 r

l.?Y rh?M' i J .. 1 '? t
lr

7111 .....,..... ........

LmttAr O*W Clue, ho.
wr .r r w.r w

? M
8i.0a1 AaeM Oror
1.41i . 111iJrh? R/11
$0.509 Acres Net

NAM
wo ift rmL DZM

??P 13
BROYHILL PARK WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN
CITY OF LENOIR, CALDWELL COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
SUBMITI'EDCONCURRFN'1'1_l'
WITH A
JOINT APPLICATION FOR NATIONWIN" PERMI'T'S
PREPARED FOR:
BROYHILL REALTY, Inc.
PREPARED BY:
aiV & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
BROYHILL PARK WETLAND murIGATION PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc. (S&FC) has developed and designed this
wetland mitigation plan to satisfy a Corps of Engineers (COE) requirement for issuance of
a Nationwide Permit for the Broyhill Realty Inc. (Client) Highway 18 Commercial Tract.
The + 21 acre project, with 2.83 acres of after-the-fact Nationwide 26 impacts, is located in
Caldwell County, North Carolina. The impact, mitigation and reference ecosystem sites
are all within the Lower Creek drainage basin: as shown on Map 1: Site Vicinity Mal)
(Lenoir NC, USGS, TOPO). Water quality protection, at the impact site, will be afforded
by on-site stormwater retention ponds. The mitigation site is located south of Broyhill Park
and will be incorporated into the City of Lenoir's park system. Creation, restoration and
enhancement activities will occur at this off site mitigation site. In-kind and out-of kind
mitigation will result from the impeding of flow through a depression and the establishment
of a 0.80 acre jurisdictional wetland. The success and progress of the project will be
quantified over a period of three years, reports will be furnished to COE and NC Division
of Environmental Management (NCDEM). Mitigation success will be measured in terms of
herbaceous coverage and woody plant survival. Plant material that is to be added to the site
will be suited for the soils and final hydrology and will be derived from local sources.
Hydrology at the mitigation site will be altered to create the wetland ecosystem.
INTRODUCTION:
Mitigative activities will occur within a depression that will be partially flooded to create a
suitable hydrology for determination as a jurisdictional wetland. The mitigation site, as
described below, is located south of Broyhill Park. The mitigation site is shown in more
detail on the Mitigation Site Man (Map 2:)-, this map has been generated for the purpose of
designing this mitigation plan. In-kind and out-of-kind mitigation will result from the
establishment of a wetland plant propogule base within the 0.80 acre mitigation area.
Mitigation will be deemed a success with the establishment of a bottomland ecosystem
within the area identified on the attached map.
Weirs will be installed to impede flow through this depression and will suitably elevate the
watertable to within 12 inches of the surface for the entire mitigation site. The installation
of the weirs will result in open water habitat where channels and gullies now exist. The
assumptions are based on interpolation of the attached hydrograph, site topography, and
site analysis. Selection of the weir material will be finalized prior to construction. The
structure will likely be constructed of timbers, concrete, or compacted soil.
In-kind mitigation, totaling 0._50 acres, will result from the creation and restoration of a
bottomland ecosystem. This ecosystem will be comprised of a herbaceous layer, shrub
layer and a tree canopy. The plantings are described in more detail in the attached planting
plan.
Out-of-kind mitigation will result from the creation of open water habitat and a littoral
bench within the mitigation site. Out-of-kind mitigation activities total 0.30 acres. No
other practical alternatives would likely create a hydrologic regime necessary to convert the
entire mitigation site to a jurisdictional wetland with less total out-of-kind mitigation. For
example, to create a similar hydrologic regime for the entire site with a riser pipe
configuration would invariably result in a larger flood pool.
The intent of the mitigation is to establish a wetland plant propagule base within
approximately 0.80 acres of non-jurisdictional areas.
No endangered species, archeological resources, or hazardous waste sites will be impacted
by this effort.
IMPAC:I' SITE:
The impact site is located near Lenoir, Caldwell County, North Carolina. The property is
south of Hwy. 18, and entirely in the Lower Creek drainage basin; as shown on the
attached Site Vicinity Map .
The property has been recently cleared; small depressions are vegetated with Juncus
effusus (See Site Photo 1: Current Condition: Impact Site). Previous delineations show
that 2.83 acres of bottomland wetlands were on-site prior to clearing and excavation. The
site development plan calls for the construction of an on-site stormwater retention pond. as
shown in the Joint Application for Nationwide Permits submitted for this property. The
pond is intended as an on-site mitigative measure as it is not required by local regulations.
The impact site is adjacent to a golf course and likely had open areas in the canopy thereby
increasing herbaceous diversity. Vegetation at the impact site is assumed to have consisted
of the species listed below. However, since the site was cleared prior to delineation this list
is a best guess. Bottomland systems in this region, such as the impacted one, are typically
"choked" with Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinenc•e).
No drainages occur within the property. Small depressions on-site were likely inundated
for brief periods after storm events. Hydrology is assumed to be primarily from inundation
after storm events with some influence from lateral side slope seepage. Wetlands at the
impact site were isolated and more than 400 feet from Lower Creek. Soils, in wetland
areas, were determined to be poorly drained Wehadkee Soils. The surrounding geology is
comprised of gneiss, schist, and granitic rocks.
ASSUMED VEGETATION WITHIN THE IMPACTSITE*
Juncus effusus
Pluchea foetida
Platnus occidentalis
Liguidambar styracifl ua
Liriodendron tulipifera
Cornus amomum
Ludwigia spp.
Ligustrum ,?-inence
Lindera benzion
Eupatoriadulphus spp.
Boehmeria cOndrica
Sambucus canadense
Woodwardia spp.
Acer rubrum
Alnus serrulala
*These species are anticipated to have occurred at the impact site prior to clearing and may
regenerate at the mitigation site as volunteers.
MITIGATION SI'Z'E:
The off-site mitigation site is located west of Hwy. 321 and south of Broyhill Park. The
mitigation site is located on an tin-named tributary of Lower Creek and is shown on the Site
Vicinity Man.
The mitigation site (currently not a jurisdictional wetland) is located up-stream of an
abandoned roadbed and has an open canopy with a wooded margin (See Site Photo 2:
Current Condition: Mitigation Site). A concrete headwall directs stream flow through a
culvert under the roadbed. The site is vegetated with wetland species (see listing below);
hydrology indicators and hydric soils are absent within one foot of the surface. Soil were
field identified as Chewacla series, however, the site is mapped as Wehadkee in the
Caldwell County Soil Survey.
The site appears to have historically been a jurisdictional wetland, however, this cannot be
confirmed. The site has hydric soils beneath approximately two feet of coarse sediment; no
assessment of historical hydrology can be made.
Jurisdictional wetlands at the mitigation site arc limited to a small toe slope wetland and an
unvegetated channel. No wetland impact permits will be required for this mitigation.
The mitigation site will be incorporated into the Broyhill Park and will receive all the
maintenance and protection of the park. Furthermore, the mitigation site will be protected
by a permanent conservation easement.
EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN "THE MITIGATION SITE*
Juncus effusus
Plucheu foet ida
Euputoriudulphus spp.
Boehmeriu cylindricu
Sumbucus cunudensis
Woodwurdiu spp.
Ludwigiu spp.
Lmputiens cupensls
Linderu benzion
Acer rubrum
Plutnus occidentulis
Liquidumbur stvruci fl uu
Liriodendron tulipi fern
Morus spp.
Alnusserrulutu
*These species were observed on site (January 1996) and are anticipated to
regenerate on-site as volunteers.
REFERENCE ECOSYSTEM:
The off-site reference ecosystem is a regenerating bottomland within the Lower Creek
basin; it is located behind a shopping mall on Hwy. 18 as shown on the vicinity map.
Within this system soils are Wehadkee, vegetation is dominated by wetland species, and
hydrology is from overland flow and inundation.
The reference ecosystem is not the "best" representation of the impacted wetland, but will
suitably serve as a model for the mitigation wetland. This reference site is entirely wooded
with a dense canopy (Site Photo 3: Reference Ecosystem) whereas the impacted wetlands
were adjacent to the open areas associated with the golf course. However, the reference
ecosystem is suitable for illustrating regional native plant community reactions to saturation
and inundation by a tributary.
The reference ecosystem was selected based on its similarities to the mitigation site and its
close proximity to both the mitigation and impact sites. This ecosystem's hydrology is
derived from saturation and occasional inundation. The intent is to create a similar
hydrology at the mitigation site through an impoundment structure.
I lnderstory and ground cover species which were observed in the reference wetland areas
are:
EXISTING VE'GETA'TION WITHIN REFERENCE SITE*
Juncu.l e.111011N
l:uputoriudulphus spp.
Sumbucus c•unudensis
BoehmeMi cvlindricu
Ligustru?'n slnense
Cornus amomum
Ijmiceru juponicu
Acer rubrum
Plutnus occidentulis
Liquidambar st yraciflua
Liriodendron tulipiferu
*"Thesc species were observed on site (January 1996) and are anticipated to
regenerate at the mitigation site as volunteers.
MI'T'IGATION GOALS AND FUNCTION:
The primary goal is to create a self-sustaining plant propogule base within the area
identified on the attached Mitigation Site Map.
The overall goal is to create a plant propagule base at a site that is currently not a
jurisdictional wetland, and to encourage infill of local, wetland native plant species in
response to the created hydrology. Plant material will be introduced to the site (See
Appendix 1: Planting Specifications and Plan). Propagules from those plants along with
existing site propagules will be relied on for regeneration of the wetland plant community.
The intent of this mitigation is to enhance, restore and create functional value within the
mitigation wetlands to levels similar to, or greater than, the original values in both the
impact site and the on-site wetlands. Additional functional value is sought through the
diversity of wetland types to be enhanced. Some of the functional values of the target
wetland will be; 1) water storage, 2) pollutant removal, 3)wildlife and aquatic life habitat,
and 4) educational value of enhancement process.
The site is designed to interface with the on-site landscaping, the on-site ecosystem and / or
the adjacent native upland plant community. Specific details pertaining to the design and
development of the mitigation site are described in the section titled MITIGATION
SEQUENCE: and Appendix l: Planting Specifications and Plan.
SUCCESS CRITERIA:
Success will be realized when 75% herbaceous coverage is attained and woody plants have
survived for three years. The herbaceous cover must be comprised of at least three of the
introduced or volunteer species. The estimated schedule for achieving 75% coverage is by
the third growing season, however, the site will be monitored until success is achieved.
Coverage is defined as the percent of material alive based on the planted spacing (i.e. T x
3'- forbes spp. and 6'x 6' -shrub spp.), or volunteers within that area. At least 501Yo of the
vegetation must be FACW or OBL.
If after the second growing season coverage is significantly lower than what is expected in
a normal progression to reach 75% by the end of the third season (<1/3 coverage), a plan to
rectify the situation will be prepared and submitted to the Client and the Corps within 30
days of inspection.
Measurement of the success of the mitigation project will be relative to functional values.
Enhancement of the water storage, pollutant removal, wildlife habitat, and educational
aspects of the site may be assumed through successful revegetation with wetland plants.
Additionally, the functional value as a dispersal corridor may be assumed once the plant
community interfaces with adjacent native plant communities.
COMPONENTS OF THE MITIGATION SITE:
Vegetation:
Plant material was and will be selected based on compatibility with microclimatic
conditions. Vegetation selected for this mitigation is included in the attached Planting Plans
and Specification. Additionally, the sources of the plant material are listed in Appendix 2:
Proposed Sources of Plant Material.
Soils:
Soils in the reference ecosystem have been identified as Wehadkee by the soil survey.
After mitigation soils within the mitigation area will likely alter to conditions that would be
classified as Wehadkee. Soil fertility and amendments are further discussed within the
Planting _Plans and Specifications.
HYdro10
Hydrology at the mitigation site will be altered to create a saturated condition. The attached
Water Budget (Appendix 3:) is useful in determining approximate inundation and
saturation limits. Saturation and inundation limits and periods of duration have been
calculated based on assumptions of Darcy's Law (See Appendix 3: Water Budget). Weirs
will be managed to maintain the preferred conditions; all manipulations will be under the
direction of the designer and will be recorded for submittal with progress reports.
Suitable hydrology will be created after two weirs are installed at the mitigation site. Weirs
will be designed to detain baseflow and accommodate stormflow. The weirs will be
constructed of timbers, concrete, and or soil (See Attachment 1: Weir Design and
Specifications). The attached Mitigation Site Man shows the location of the proposed
weirs. The southernmost weir will likely incorporate a subterranean detention structure in
the form of a geotextile fabric lined trench that will be subsequently be re-filled. The intent
of this structure is to impede subsurface flow through the coarse substrate and maintain the
suitable hydrologic regime.
MITIGATION SITE WETLANDTYPES
WETL.ANDTYPE WETLAND SIZE* MITIGATIONTYPE
Openwater 0.20 acres Creation
Littoral Bench 0.10 acres Creation / Restoration
Bottomland Ecosystem 0.50 acres l nhancement / Restoration
*Areas have been approximated; final areas will be generated and appended upon
completion of the weir specifications and final base map.
MITIGATION SEQUENCE:
Mitigation is designed to create a suitable hydrology and plant propogule base for a self-
sustaining wetland ecosystem. Elements for the mitigation of sites are listed below.
Clearing Limits -
Fstablish mitigation site clearing limits. To be performed by Client's surveyor (or other
agent) and shall be clearly marked in the field.
'l'agging -
Mitigation designer shall tag specimen trees / shrubs to remain within clearing limits as well
as any to be removed just outside clearing limits. This will allow trees / shrubs of
particularly high quality to be preserved and will create a more diverse interface with
adjacent plant communities.
Clearing -
The Client shall contract the removal of trees (cut to ground level) within clearing limits via
low-impact logging practices. In order to reduce site disturbance, it is suggested that all
felled trees be cabled out from the upland edge of the sites (no heavy equipment within
wetland areas) or be left within the site to add to available biomass. Other low-impact
logging may be utilized as approved by mitigation designer and within best management
practices for logging in wetlands.
Final Base Map -
The designer will prepare a general base map for the site after clearing which shows relative
elevations within site, establishes reference elevations, and locates all areas to be planted.
Grading-
The designer will review and analyze the site after clearing to determine whether any minor
grading is needed. At the time of plan development an interpolation of topographic data
indicated that some grading may be necessary to establish the watertable within twelve
inches of the surface. Areas that are to be graded will be clearly marked in the field and
will be graded with small machinery.
Erosion Control-
The designer and installer will erect the appropriate erosion control devises in all necessary
areas as to avoid excessive siltation within the constriction area and shall be responsible for
securing all needed land clearing permits.
Weir Installation-
The Client shall contract the construction of weirs, utilizing the attached specifications, at
the sites indicated on the Mitigation Site Map.
Stabilization Plantings-
Immediately mulch and plant bare areas, and stream channels, which resulted from
tree removal utilizing readily available seed mixtures for wetland areas (Appendix 4:
Proposed Seed Mixture for Stabilization ). If season is appropriate (spring) plant
marsh plants (sedges, rushes, etc.), if not, use other appropriate temporary annual
cover. "Three basic approaches are proposed relative to site planting:
1) Establishment of low-growing marsh-type plants within the transition
zones. To be accomplished through a combination of natural succession
and introduced plantings.
2) Establishment of a littoral zone around all open water.
3) Establishment and enhancement of a bottomland system within the
mitigation site. To be. accomplished through a combination of plantings
and succession.
Secondary Evaluation - After clearing, initial cover and transitional plantings, wait
until first growing season to allow plant succession to begin response to site
environmental changes. Evaluate site during mid to late growing season and
develop planting plan to compliment native succession as well as site development
program.
Secondary Planting - Install plant material during next appropriate season (i.e.
woody material in fall, forbes in spring) as per secondary planting plan.
MONITORING AND MANAGEMENI':
The Client will be responsible for all financial aspects of the project and the long-term
maintenance of the mitigation site (after the third growing season). The installer and / or
designer will be responsible for reporting on and assisting with the monitoring,
maintenance, and management of this site until success criteria are met. 131-annual reports
drafted by the designer will be furnished to the Client, COE and DEM. Reports will
contain data pertaining to percent herbaceous coverage and plant survival, and a narrative of
management activities and general project condition. A final report will be prepared upon
the completion of the monitoring period or until success cri teri a are met. It is assumed that
once the site is deemed a success by the appropriate regulatory agency it will be protected
by a conservation easement (Attachment 2: Conservation Easement); in addition, it will
maintain all of the protection afforded to jurisdictional wetlands.
Monitoring and evaluation of sites will include:
Final design and specifications (reflecting any alterations or refinement as a
result of any refinement/changes in impoundment design) will be submitted to
the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) for review prior to construction.
Pre-construction / planting meeting with the installer, Client representative,
designer (S&EC), and the Corps to review the plan and confirm the roles of all
involved parties. A log of this meeting will be appended to this plan (See
Attachment 3: Pre-construction Meeting Log, for Broyhill Park).
Site inspections during the planning, installation and monitoring of the mitigation
site to identify potential depredation and degradation sources; if any are identified, a
plan to rectify the problem(s) will be appended .
Final inspection after all site work is complete, preparation of appropriate
completion of work statement, preparation of brief as-built report, sketch plan,
and documentary photos and submission of that report to the USACOE for
review within 30 days of completion.
Location of original mitigation site limits in the field with markers that can be seen
from upland portions of the site (used in determination of vegetation coverage).
Site inspection early in first growing season.
Site inspection at end of first growing season and preparation of letter of
evaluation, documentary photos, and suggested treatment of any failed areas
and submission to USACOE within 30 days of inspection.
Site inspection during late growing season of second and third years with
documentary photos and letter of evaluation at end of third growing season (to
USACOE, within 30 days of inspection).
Management and maintenance of the site will focus on establishment and protection of the
wetland and will consist of the following:
Removal of undesirable sprouting woody vegetation ((i.e. Chinese privet (by hand,
taking rootstock if possible)) within the systems. To be done in late August -
September of the growing seasons.
Installation of flow dissipaters/channel stabilization / detention measures as
necessary in response to changes in hydrology of watershed as development
occurs.
Re-planting of any bare or sparse spots during season appropriate to plant species
as necessary to achieve success.
Maintaining ground cover and sediment control devices on all up-slope uplands to
prevent sedimentation within the mitigation area (as shown on schematic drawings).
Removal and control of any potentially degrading factors such as destructive
wildlife, humans, domestic animals, and debris.
Map 1: Site Vicinity Map
Approximate locations of Z_-MM,MM.`
Broyhill Park Wetland Mitigation Sites
Lenoir, N.C., U.S.G.S. Topo. Quad.
Scale 1:24000
CFO
CPT ? v? ??
J;I
7 1-24
• o
°? • a Il ?• /?•• ti? ?' ?ti V C
.a _._ , :?? ? , ?, ; .? .? `- ?-__ ) ??° \ `moo ? a -Oa',,.,?•
•. 400
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division, of, Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 18, 1996
Mr. Doug Brinkley
Broyhill Realty
P.O. Box 500
Lenoir, NC 28645
Dear Mr. Brinkley:
Re: Proposed land clearing of wetlands
Lenoir County
DEM # 951062, COE # 199505137
On 22 September 1995 the U.S. Army Corps of ENgineers wrote you a letter and
copied the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) regarding your plan to hill
wetlands for the purpose of commercial fill at Broyhill Industries property in Caldwell
County. If you still plan to pursue this project, the enclosed application needs to be
completed and returned to us with 7 copies of the application, supporting maps and
documentation.
Please call me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
R hn R. Donley
Water Quality Certification Program
cc: Asheville DEM Regional Office
Wilmington Corps of Engineers
Central Files
Steve Chapin, Asheville Field Office COE
9.51062.app
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
September 22, 1995 04v-
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199505137
Broyhill Realty
Mr. Doug Brinkley
Post Office Box 500
Lenoir, North Carolina 28645
Dear Mr. Brinkley:
1?d 6-
C?
tP
? Cj\
VV
This concerns your August 22, 1995 site meeting with Mr. Steve Chapin of
our Asheville Field office to inspect possible unauthorized wetlands clearing
activity recently undertaken on Broyhill Industries property in Lenoir,
Caldwell County, North Carolina. More specifically, the property in question
is located between NC 18 (Wilkesboro Boulevard) and the Lenoir Golf Club to
the south and is situated in or adjacent to the Lower Creek floodplain. There
are approximately 2.9 acres of jurisdictional wetlands on the tract. The
clearing activity in a wetland area without authorization by a Department of
the Army permit is a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act.
Mr. Chapin's findings indicate that the above mentioned .9 acres of`d'
jurisdictional wetlands on the south side of the property have been cleared
and partially graded utilizing heavy equipment (see enclosed wetland data
sheet). After discussing this project with you, it was indicated that the
purpose of the work was to prepare the site for commercial development.
Although you have already been informed, the recent activity in the wetlands
area without a Department of the Army (DA) permit constitutes a violation of
Section 301 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, no additional work should be
undertaken in waters or wetlands on the property.
In resolving this matter, I understand you have requested an opportunity
to apply for an after-the-fact DA permit to complete the preparation of the
site for development. Under separate cover, we are sending you the required
pre-discharge notification application form to be completed and submitted to
this office within 30 days following your receipt of this notice. You should
also contact Mr. John Dorney with the State of North Carolina, telephone (919)
733-1786, to determine water quality certification requirements.
Your cooperation in satisfactorily resolving this matter will be greatly
appreciated. You are reminded that no additional work in the wetlands area
should be done pending the outcome of the submitted permit application.
Should you have questions in the interim, please direct them to Mr. Chapin at
telephone, [phone].
w
SEP 2 91995
9..e... art ;'' r'
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Printed on 0 Recyded Paper
IV -2-

Copies Furnished:
Mr. Mark Calloway
U. S. Attorney
Western District of North Carolina
U. S. Courthouse, Room 306
100 Otis street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2611
Division of Land Resources
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2482
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2482
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Ms. Stephanie Gozlreau
N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
320 South Garden Street
Marion, North Carolina 28752

rr.?n
V'

J
J
-47
II?n
VJ

N
I

Ag a ??? s
I
I
I

a
oooeltl a
9
n
n pp
n
2
i1?11 Z
Z ? ? ? ? a 4 ? ? $
- ? _
K W m
? <
?
?
,yga?^J
yFy{
p
S
<
N< y#
F l a
sQ
?
? ? ?? D O 0 ? ? ??? ??? Z w
3 ? F? ?
?
?
p
y
S

I
i
l3 ?
j \
/ 1
}.

- -?
OOOLICI /?ni 1 I I
•/1 ! 1, 1 i
, ' ?/i' ?
.® l,'I ? I/?\ ?
-\

I •r H ' ',,, ---- ' '? A-? tap
l
,

77 V
71,
Vii

18

'k
i/?••
FZ
/
'
'
? N
1
_"_
..
?,\
?
'
It
?
' 17
1
'
W
/ _/? r( /
. /
A
F
f .
?`?
'
/ ?
6/
_ \
'
\
\ ?
?y ?
4 M
•
I
-`I 111, ,
: 1
''`
q
R
?? \ / / / /?,?
?
,'''(
?
//
//? ,' \; `\ _ ? t
• // °°? >-??_
-•-,
it ,'1
1-,1,• ill 11 ``
? ? ,
BE
/ l 8
va"

\ \ I 1, I? I l

. I ya,p

'
It/
r4 I

jell

e

/ / I /? \ \. - \ l off , ,1: I 1..' 1 ('rl \,'.-1 \ - \ I 1 /

/
/
1 ' I /
% \\ 1 I 1 I I, ?? rl : r , 1

n n - _? ? n n RR

i
Z
Z
Z
I j
W

O
' l s
I (? ' I
O
M
O
U
T.
4
7
1
k
I O
r?
LA
W
?r
a
dwo
\1
Q - ' - - - - - - _ -
? I 1 ? \
10 I \
I I '? I I I
I l .d I + ? ti
I I I I x ?+
I , I
I I I ? I?
III Q W?
I I I, 1 1 • \'? ti ?qq
III, ;1 N
I I I I I
I I i , ; I
I I I I I I
I I I, I I
II+, ,+ d
I I I I I I
/ / I + I i ?ti
I I / / , I
I I 1 / , , 1
I I I I / 1 ??
J I I I I I 1 ? ?. --...
1 rill
II IIII
II IIII
II II11
II 1111
II II
II fl1
I IIII
III IIII
1 1 1 It 1 1 1 1
II! / I/1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I,I
r I l r r r // lllL9000
s

IX
I I 1 1 1 1 / _ .?/////?
! l I 1 III 1 1 J /1"_
I III III I 1 oo i,
!+ I f l l I I \ / 11` 1/ .i o
/11 1 111 I ?, / 11 I1.
/ rl 111 I
/ I+l?lll I
., l r l 1 1 1 I /
l??rrl I /
I?i•irll 1 /i/
! 1 1j , ?
I 1 11 / /1
\ 1 I , / ? rl
1 111
I IIII ? 0 1
I I , I 1 ?1? ?t
I i II I I ? M
I I I 1 /!
I + I 1 I/ ? \
1 I I I ?l l /? ? I I
+ Ilr / \ I I
1 I// / ? I I
1 / m I I I
/ r 111 11'
1? r 111 1
+ r I
r Jr I
I r?r ,
/,/
lilt
I /
Irlr/l V
I !r lI
rrrr ?rl l N
1111 rill , ? ??
1111 1111 1
11111111 1
11111111 ?
11 111111 11
[phone]
/ ? /111 `111111`1
11 1 11 1 \
//?//err r/f
1
1 111?II,II
1 11 11,1
? 11 11j1
/
(1
11 \\ \
`1111 \
\\\\111 1
?\\11\ 1
/ /rl h

L7
04
•
J

Q•
.-
J
I?
?P
O_ •
•
•
1 1
i
•
•
I ?
? {YI
0
W
?tn?l
3
x!19