Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
310134_Inspection_20190904
Division of Water.Resodrees © O Division of Soil and Water Conservation Facility°Number O Other Agency type of visit: 0-Eompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance leason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up .O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: Farm Name: cd Owner Email: Owner Name: t t % Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Design Current Swine, Capacity ..tfop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars ° Other Discharees and Stream Impacts Title: Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: p` Design ' Current " Wet Poultry Capacity Pop: "Layer Non -La er Design Current _ Dry Ponitry Canacity Pan - Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Design, Current Cottle _'- Capacity •Yop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow ,Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑j Yes ETgo ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes FP o ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes GW0' '_0 NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I "of 3 214120I5 Continued Facifl Number: 3 - Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: 2 Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): _ Observed Freeboard (in): _ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) ❑ Yes Dj—d4 ❑ NA ❑ NE 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ®-Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [>?o ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑filo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? :;010 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �b ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [UWo ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Q�Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes EL1,44 ❑ NA ❑ NE Reauired Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ©�o ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ©-* ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes U W ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: -13 1 Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of -first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: ❑ NA ❑ NE o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes E3-<o ❑ NA NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE ❑ Yes ED R15— ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ©'1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? [:]Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? [:]Yes Z:O/❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? [:]Yes NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional napes as necessarv). Reviewer/Inspector Name: •t Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 6&117 Phone: 1 f o :ZZ -13 ZT Date: 2/4/2015