Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19960226 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19960311DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF March 13, 1996 Regulatory Branch Action ID No. 199501535 Mr. John Dorney Division of Environmental Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 RE M CFiVFo F^'?'IR49 ? d 19y6 FN ?S Dear Mr. Dorney: Enclosed is the application of Robert L. Moore for Department of the Army authorization and a State Water Quality Certification to place fill material in approximately 0.5 acre of vegetated wetland and nonvegetated shallow water bottom in the Straits, for the development of the Harkers Point subdivision, off S.R. 1335, in Harkers Island, Carteret County, North Carolina. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations. We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality certification is required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the certification has been obtained or waived. According to our administrative regulations, 60 days is reasonable for State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request, or asked for an extension of time, by May 13, 1996, the District Engineer will deem that waiver has occurred. Questions or comments may be addressed to the undersigned at telephone (910) 251-4636. Sincerely, c?l Je frey H. Richter Project Manager Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Enclosure Copy Furnished (without enclosure): Mr. John Parker Division of Coastal Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Printed on IS Recycled Paper r t?.. 1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.) 2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: adjacent to SR 1335, Brooks Creek and the Straits in the community of Harkers Island, Carteret County Photo Index - 1989: 155-1, P-7 1984: 38-1215, V-17 State Plane Coordinates - X: 2725900 Y: 359500 3. II mnGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F w....? 4 4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 2-8-96 Was Applicant Present - Yes 5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 2-20-96 Office - Morehead City 6. SITE DESCRIPTION: (A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County Land Classification From LUP - Limited Transitional and Conservation (B) AEC(s) Involved: EW, CW & ES (C) Water Dependent: Yes and No (D) Intended Use: Private (E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - Planned - 60,000 gpd wastewater treatment system (F) Type of Structures: Existing - Planned - Future residential development w/associated piers (G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 0' to moderate Source - personnel observation 7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA] DREDGED FILLED OTHER (A) Vegetated Wetlands f 880 ft.2 Spartina alterniflora (B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands t 21000 ft.2 ex.boat basin bottom (C) Other f 5 ac. High ground (land disturbed) (D) Total Area Disturbed: t 5.5 ac. (E) Primary Nursery Area: No (F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes 8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to develop a 28 lot subdivision at a site adjacent to SR 1335, Brooks Creek and the Straits in the community of Harkers Island. FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT: Harkers Point PAGE #2 --------------------------- IVE D RIPTI N• The applicants property is a ± 60 acre tract of land 9• NARr'AT ESC O -• located on the northwestern end of Hackers island anub eCt of histpermit application side of SR 13 immediately south of the Hackers Island Bridge. Th ro osed to be developed into a is a t 28 acre portion of this tract which is p p wag disposal. The subdivision and a 1.5 acre site which is to be used and on thee sou h by Brooks subdivision tract is bordered on the north by the Strait Creek, which is also the entrance channel going into the County's H ground Refugee p rte of the high co and abuts the Harbor on the southeast side. The min majority pries. A dirt drive nsists of woodlands with pine and oak as the domine1t?e owner located to he west of the property and provides access to the adjoining prop the project site. A varying border of coastal and 404 wetlands exists alonbea h shoreline. On the northeast side (fronting the remaining shore0linelshows signs of area exists along a portion of the shoreline. The havin developed. The beach area has the locals in Hackers Island and slight to moderate erosion with o ular10wim beach for been used for many yews asap p along omits lnorthwest ow water the surrounding communities. A ± 150' wide x ± 140' long to - (MLW) basin was excavated into the interior o t Pro revious land owner requested The property line around the late Cl n ct the bas n Onto t e waters of the Straits. A permit a.Dredge and Fill permit to n was issued but it is unclear whether it authorized the coentrance nnection hestablishedc fromg water the wash or is historic photography, there was, however, a in to the Straits. Today, the bulkhead around he basin h the basin haws ogled mouth of deteriorated to the point of being non-functional. bas in to the point where there is only a small trickle of water flow coastal Wetia the basin into border o the Straits during low tide condo a has olunteeoed along he southern shoreline of the ust primarily with spartina altern fl west in and a ± 10' wide border of spartina alterniflora existlocated along the he mouth of the bas of the basin entrance. Scattered clumps of oysters are also basin. Numerous amounts of building and other debris have been deposited along the shoreline of the basin throughout the years. potential as well archaeolo The site has been identified in the past as area with The Harkergsl Point Cemetery has earl residents as having an old cemetery existing on the property. not been maintained in recent years and contains d han garcheological research firm and a of Hackers Island. In 1995, the applicant additional unmarked graves outside of "Phase II study" was performed to identify any prehistoric or historical the the cemetery proper and to examine the site for any P archaeological sites with significant remains that might be eligible theo s nomination have t ano Nnal Register of Historic Places. The results National been has been provided to the Division summarized in a report to the applicant and a copy ,,- ,,;,,,c;,,,, of ArrhivPC and History. Anyone wishing to a . . HARKERS POINT, CARTERET COUNTY PAGE #3 PROTECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 28 acres into a 28 lot subdivision with the typical lot size being f '/z acre in size. Access to the lots will be provided by two paved private roads which will have direct access to the Harkers Island Road (SR 1335). A 60,000 gallon per day tertiary treatment plant with associated subsurface disposal fields is proposed on a ± 1.5 acre site ± 2,000' south of the subdivision site. This wastewater facility will not only service this development but will be available for the future development of the remainder of the property. The wastewater will be transported to the disposal site by the use of individual pump tanks with a force main being installed within the right of way of SR 1335. The 4" PVC force main will buried ± 3' below the existing grade of the roadbed and within the Estuarine Shoreline Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) along an area adjacent to the County's Harbor of Refuge. Early into the development of this project, the applicant consulted with state and federal review agencies concerning the possibilities of re-establishing the marina basin and providing an access channel into the Straits. Because of the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation in the access channel alignment, the applicant abandoned that concept and is now requesting a permit to fill in the basin to the elevation of adjoining uplands. The shoreline of the Straits immediately adjacent to the fill area would be bulkhead at the mean high water line and landward of coastal wetlands. The deteriorated breakwater/bulkhead along the Straits shoreline would also be removed. The basin filling would result in the loss of f 880 ft.2 of spartina alterniflora marsh and ± 2,100 ft.2 of shallow to deep bottom areas within the basin itself. The development of the subdivision will require the grading of ± 3.4 acres in association with the streets and it's right of way. The construction of homesites will be left up to the individual purchaser with the low density stormwater requirements (under Environmental Management Commission rules) limiting the built upon area for each lot to 30%. Grassed swales are to be located between lots 14 and 15 and lots 4 and 5. These swales will provide drainage relief from the proposed road system with the terminal ends being located near the shoreline of the Straits. In addition to the 28 lots, the applicant is proposing to dedicate ± 5.4 acres as a "Common Area", f .97 acres as a cemetery site and a ± .9 acre site for beach access. The proposed beach access site would be dedicated to Carteret County if they are willing to accept and maintain the area. A portion of the beach access site appears to be part of the causeway which was created in the construction of the Harkers Island Bridge. For the most part this causeway area is unsuitable for beach access because of the presence of riprap and coastal wetland vegetation. The remaining beach access site is a sandy beach area. It can also be anticipated that many of the future lot owners will want to construct piers into the Straits and within the Brooks Creek and the access channel leading into the County's Harbor of Refugee. The applicant has positioned the pier alignment on lot 3 to the western property line so that the majority of the beach area on that lot and to the east will be free from obstacles. 46 FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT: BARKERS POINT, CARTERET COUNTY PAGE #4 10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed will result in the development of a 28 acre tract of land into a 28 lot subdivision with associated Common Area. Wetland impacts will be limited to f 880 ft.2 of primarily spartina alterniflora which exist within the human made boat basin and t 21,000 ft.z of estuarine bottom area. The filling would also require approx 1,500 yds3 of upland fill being placed below the mean high water line of the basin. While there will be a loss of estuarine bottom, potential negative water quality impacts from the existing basin would be eliminated. The scattered amount of oysters at the entrance channel could be easily relocated outside the fill area and into the open waters of the Straits. Approximately 3.4 acres will be disturbed in associated with the installation of the road system for the development. Sewage will be pumped off site to a ± 1.5 acre tract of land located south of the project site. The applicant has indicated that the approval for this wastewater treatment plant has not received approval from the Division of Health Services. Potable water will be supplied by individual wells. The applicant has designed the development to comply with the low density stormwater rules with no more than 30% of the individual lots being built upon. Two drainage swales are proposed and will provide drainage from the road towards the Straits. As a result of the archaeological findings, a Phase III evaluation is scheduled for the summer of 1996 on lots 6, 7, 8, and 9. The applicant has indicated that no development would occur on these lots until after the study is completed. It can be anticipated that some of the future lot owners will build piers extending into the navigable waters of the Straits and Brooks Creek. The specific location of the Se piers will be bconsftructedoadthe jacendi? d?h property owners except for lot 3 where pier western property line. It is not he cw ters of that any closure of Brooks Creek are already shellfishing waters As would occur within the Straits and t a result of the interest shown by the locals, the applicant is setting aside ± .97 acres for the Harker's Point Cemetery. They have acknowledged that while the proposed road and development will be private, access to the cemetery by the public will not be prohibited. An approx. .9 acre beach access site is proposed to be given to Carteret County. A portion of this area would appear to be within the causeway area created when the Harkers Island Bridge was constructed. A significant portion of this causeway area is unsuitable for beach access because of previous riprap placement an the existence of wetland vegetation. The remaining beach access area is primarily a sand beach which is separated from the adjacent high ground by a 404 wetland area. As mentioned before, this area has historically been used as a popular beach site for many of the Down East communities and is intensively used during the summer. The construction of future piers along the shoreline will prohibit the use of off-road vehicles from using the beach and will impeded pedestrian access to some degree beyond the dedicated beach access site. 41- . , J. JL.AL Z JM-J t/ A. .i M. i v i i l (To be completed by all applicants) b. City, town, community or landmark Harkers Island 1. APPLICANT a. Landowner: 4 1. . Name R.L. Moore c/o Harris & Associates Address 2105 West Nash Street City Wilson State N. C. Zip 27858 Day Phone (919) 237-6701 Fax (919) 243-8054 b. Authorized Agent: Name HTB Associates. L.L.C. c/o Harris & Associates Address 2105 West Nash Street City Wilson State N. C. Zip 27858 Day Phone (919) 237-6701 Fax (919) 243-8054 c. Project name (if any) Harkers Point N07E.• Permit %Q be issued in name of landowner(s), and/or project name. 2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. c. Street address or secondary road number NCSR 1335 d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? ' x Yes No e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river, creek, sound, bay) Straits 3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE OF PROPOSED PROJECT a. List all development activities you propose (e.g. building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and excavation and/or filling activities. 28 lot subdivision (single family), Fill old marina. Construct bulkhead- Sewer force main installation. b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? New. c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial use? Private use. d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of construction and daily operations of proposed project. If more space is needed, please attach additional pages. To construct 28 lot single familv subdivision. Equipment will include conventional earth moving equipment, bulldozer, backhoe, dump trucks, etc. I . .l. 4. LAND AND WATER CHARACTERISTICS a. Size of entire tract _ 27.96 acres b. Size of individual lot(s) 20, 000 sf and larger. c. Approximate elevation Pf tract above MHW or NWL _ 5 MHW d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract Sandy. e. Vegetation on tract Wooded/oak and pine are predominate spec es. f. Man-made features now on tract Old marina. g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.) Conservation X Transitional(Ci?irMl Developed Community // Rural -?-- Other h. How is the tract zoned by local government? Unzoned. i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning? X Yes No (Aaach Zoning compliance certificate, if applicable) j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? X Yes No If yes, by whom? Archaeological Research Consultants, Inc. (Thomas Hargrove) k. Is the project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a National Register listed or eligible property? Yes X No 1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes No Coastal (marsh) X Other X_ If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes. (Attach documentation, ifavaaaht,) m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities. -Offsite sewage disposal system presentl being reviewed by On-Site Sewage-Branch n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential discharges.) Surface runof through swales in alow-density develop- ment. o. Describe existing drinking water supply source. Individual wells proposed No community source available. 5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In addition to the completed application form, the following items must be submitted: • A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties. If the applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owner claims title, plus written permission from the owner to carry out the project. • An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.) Please note that original drawings are preferred and only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an adequate number of quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat requirements and it miser hP ?,. :-- - • 1 site. Include highway or secondary road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like. • A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary. • A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant further certifies that such notice has been provided. 6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application. The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions contained in the permit. I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies with the State of North Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. Name Carteret County I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, Address Courthouse Sq., Beaufort NC 28516 grant permission to representatives of state and federal Phone (919) 728-8450 review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in Name J. L. Maxwell, Jr. Address 711 Lakeshore Dr., Goldsboro NC Phone (919) 778-5561 Name Holly Hamilton Briggs Address 909 Evans St., Morehead City NC Phone (919) 726-8407 SEE AjYwcr+rntIU( FOZ NCD01- 19 A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates. None. • A check for $250 made payable to the Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the application. • A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. • A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to 10) If the project involves the expenditure of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting comnliance with thr. North f irni;"n connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of the 27534project. -`? I further certify that the information provided in this 28557 application is truthful to the best of my knowledge. This is the 12th day of Feb. 19 96 . Print Name ,,Clyde Harris Signature Landowner or A rized Agent Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed project. X DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information X DCM MP-3 Upland Development DCM MP-4 Structures Information DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts DCM MP-6 Marina Development NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the space provided at the bottom of each form. [ftJ J 1 . OTT . +? EAk."A v H I iviv AND FILL (Except bridges and culverts) Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this proposed project. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or fill activities. All values to be given in feet. Access channel (MLW) or (NWL) Canal Boat basin Boat ramp Rock groin Rock breakwater Other (Excluding shoreline stabilization) 1. EXCAVATION N/A a. Amount of material to be excavated from below MHW or NWL in cubic yards b. Type of material to be excavated c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs) or othet,wetlands? Yes No d. Highground excavation in cubic yards 2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL a. Location of disposal area b. Dimensions of disposal area c. Do you claim title to disposal area? Yes - No If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner. d. Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance? Yes No If yes, where? Average Final Existing TrOJect imnoth Width _ . Depth Depth (marsh), SAVs or other wetlands? Yes No f. Does the disposal include any area in the water? Yes No 3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION a. Type of shoreline stabilization X Bulkhead Riprap b. Length c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL of I d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL 4' e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months Unknown. (Source of information) f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material Wooden bulkhead. -••-y- g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below water level (1) Riprap (2) Bulkhead backfill h. Type of fill material Sand. Source of fill material Unknown to be purchased from properly licensed borrow pit. 4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES (Excluding Shoreline Stabilization) a. Will fill material be brought to site? X Yes No , (1) Amount of material to be placed in the water 150 x 150 x 6' AVG - 5.000 CY (2) Dimensions of fill area 150 x 150 (3) Purpose of fill Fill old upland marina basin. b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands (marsh), SAVs or other wetlands? X Yes No If yes, (1) Dimensions of fill area 150 x 5 (alone south side of basin). (2) Purpose of fill Reclaim old inland marina. 5. GENERAL. a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion controlled? Property constructed bulkhead and seedine. b. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example, dragline, backhoe, 'or hydraulic dredge)? Backhoe, trackhoe, dozer, dump trucks. c. Will wetlands be crassed in transporting equipment to project site? Yes X No If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen environmental impacts. I taro. UPLAND DEVELOPMENT F12 3 2 0 IW? YYVY 0 \ •0\N\N\t?N? (Construction and/or land disturbing activities) Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this proposed project. a. Type and number of* buildings, facilities, units or structures proposed 28 single family lots. b. Number of lots or parcels 28 ' c. Density (give the number of residential units and the units per acre) 28 units- [I unit/acre. d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed including roads, ditches, etc. 5 acre maximum. e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins. If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control plan been submitted to the Division of Land Resources? X Yes No If yes, date submitted Concurrently with CAMA 2/16/96 scheduled submittal. f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone, asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces. Marl and asphalt. g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development Permit may alsg.,require a Stormwater Certification. Has a site development plan been submitted to the Division of Environmental Management for review? X Yes No If yes, date submitted Concurrently with LAMA 2/16/96 scheduled submittal. i. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal. Offsite wastewater treatment plant. j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above received state or local approval? In review by (Attach appropriate documentation) on-Site Sewage Bra k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to waters of the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential discharges). Surface runoff. Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g. well, community, public system, etc.) Individual wells. m. Will water be impounded? If yes, how many acres? - n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when was the lot(s) platted and recorded? N/A Clyde Harris Appli nt Projgct N ne 47r Yes X No Harker's Point Major CAMA Permit ^u u L_=w'' i,ys w"%%1s&w.ssseAsib"S"fm HTB Associates, L.L.C. proposes to develop a 27.96 acre parcel of land on the northwestern end of Harkers Island. The proposed Harker's Point single family subdivision will consist of 28 lots. All lots will be either waterfront or water view and will allow for a large common area protecting the integrity of the property leading to the Harker's Point Cemetery and the Maxwell property to the west. The project has additional property to the south which has not had its development planned with the exception of a 60,000 gpd tertiary treatment plant with associated subsurface disposal fields. This system is currently being reviewed by the On-Site Sewage Branch. During the planning process leading to the Major CAMA Permit submittal, several issues came to light and were addressed as follows: Harker's Point Cemetery Harker's Point Cemetery has been an unmaintained cemetery containing the grave sites of many early residents of Harker's Island. Following site evaluations by Mr. John Clauser of the N.C. Department of Archives and History, many of the previously documented sites were located and the proposed boundary of the cemetery was established. Local citizens have indicated their desire to form the Harkers Point Preservation Committee to manage and maintain the historical significance and heritage of this island cemetery. The developer has encouraged and has appreciated the assistance provided by the island residents. While the proposed new roadway construction is to be private, access to the cemetery is a right conceded to the public. The developer will continue to work with the preservation group to restore the cemetery site. Archaeological Findi_nos Following the disclosure of a study conducted by Thomas Loftfield in 1969 which found artifacts along the north shoreline of this tract, Mr. Thomas Hargrove of Archaeological Research Consultants,Inc. was retained to conduct an assessment of the tract His report is attached. Phase III archaeological evaluations are scheduled for this summer on Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9. Filling the Previously Constructed Inland Marina The original plan for this development included interior lots, which were required by local ordinance to have adequate water access. The site has an inland basin marina which, through lack of maintenance, has had its access channel silt-in and the bulkhead has deteriorated. Early discussions with state and federal personnel indicated that with the presence of SAV in the channel alignment, permitting would be difficult to re-dredge to the facility. Since it is not likely that the inland basin would be permitted to be reconstructed, it is desirable to fill the basin and associated wetlands that were created at the boat ramp and re-establish the site to its original grade. blic Use of the Beach Prescriptive use of the beach at the north end of the tract has been a consideration of our design. Lots 1 and 2 are to be water view without riparian rights to construct piers. Lot 3 will be restricted to pier construction along the western property line. The resultine nronertv of 1.00 acres is to he donated to Carteret C'nimty and ncPd fns a mihtir .d % 9 qR n •H P- t ob 41K ,.,111111111 .• Pe Cf) .a r e, -96444 R i s ? N p? N to j 0 t Y? = N 0 m a .. JP AS N A1 D 1 r W N N O N . zZ J, (A N s m "" -4 i4 0 ' -4 i u -1 m ?'/? r ca r n ? a ® ? to d ` 'p Ilr <' n y C c ro ?? O '?K'n•M\\r\r.rMMM? 0000000 - xxxxxxx z mmmmmmm v mmmmmmm m -4 -4 --1 -1 -1 -1 -1 x -dQI(9A WN -+ --1 M z mco ano ?rc)-;cxm mznlmm rc) > M m VI Uw a TI V' vl = x m •-• •-• -v m mnzro'vm -1 S -U z .-. r'U-1z D D f -1 OZ>O m Z a V l V) m -u 0 "U z < z -1 m N .. 3 , ? k 3 3 ?o , ?pat ~ 8^?'" ~ i?1nY? pn :it? N RPM ?? y?p?jj ? ??^ RUN Dj'? to ?t w tl tn C) j, d H?? few ?? ? ??? ? ? ?8??t???????? W 2 W 40 N d !1'r1 ?, oo J4 o " rJ3 o 00 c) Pfl 04:D F m 0014 1 cif 0 0 I" i I, I ti tf rq a Ill 1? o v X0 I ° cu fFF 0 _ _ ? • tiW 00 W M O + J ti 9661 0 ? W ?x I r o ?? r N _ b all tv. . b .01* 09 w ' O R. rim . o 01 ?- / ?: RC / . to . . ti ya -oDzr-n xxm -v --A D<oOO m?mcx mm• -A3om=mr-n - 31-ODpf 7I7?M_,r)-I --AXZMZAODX I,. Cr) D O? D p .• H ii -i CU :c C) rr, C-) ? r or • .?•r 0? inNPP mwmF+v 4MN4 V-A.DM D - -' ,rr n n n n n n nn 6 02 '.4 x ? K% \ ?V 0 cp C) > } U o m "I C cc w N, ?° z x z a (14 tYi .wa z C) W A a a a Z,U? ? ra i 1? ' 0 z w z O cli J c 4 W -:adwco Mti nf 00 LLJ l- CII 00 O V) [Y V) N W W C 2 09 WN < Ld a: Z lu x V) W D U Q a D U w z z f- C7 >;a Z O LLJ n o J w z Q° , N a r, w co n- a w o av r N J In N m q 2.. A .,4 1 i In Z 0 m W M U ? :r F- 01 0 P4 t, f1' .= 'O ll p ro i? a? it l1 W Wa C 01 " LL1 Q W ,) fZj r z = x w z x a° i Q US A p U -.4 Lii L- o M m S19 m J 3 b.bN '33, % LLJ O 0 / m ... i Q- ? ........? ,?? LLJ 0000 ! 00 J O g4'?v` d+ ID o (b N 9N 14 N P , o u" t9 O, ..m ,T . C+! ti F+ O m O B j ,m m' O P m 03 l4 If-nGO• •OD y i ?' ?A A fh ..? 0' K) h n O' m "'m m 071 '? , , ,V, W ca i mD i O 0 IVl m .? 03 ...,. 90 m a m ? --nom 0 -- ti . w 1 , Om N P to 0 i 11) 2 pp 4 ? '1 ), i V Q7 f7 u ? Y 9 o:5 Q n ~ LLJ ' l9N W zo00 m^ o? w -- CC 06 \ (? r O •00 Zt ? o It CD• IIO. i i N 41 Q Lj (Y) 41?0? lu?8N o ?.? ' ° ~ m om Q LLJ P ° m i 143.6 W I? 4. Z o S6' 05' 231 E _ .. ?mw t^°n O O m m. -.....'6 `P LL- Q O O J W, v 'i OD ~J oQ~a?4 EC-? J . O ..... ? 5 _ N cc cc 14 o m o o ° t3 P.., t ?i. I? ?",?a?'??l..r:..l.J 1, j_? ,- z o? ?w ap • V H• tiw ow a vxi _ ?'a '2I?H ?I?Ino 'a c1'idNOx _ Evyaa ', 4ZOT N,LIfis amo vZvnd NOHISaH ' n;'?'o '•. 3AOHddd lOL9-L£Z (6t6) :3NOHd . :NAkYUQ 99OLZ 'O'N 4NOS11M ;SS?2IQQV •??b ???• z': 13381S HSVN 'M SOtZ ; •'•.tiO1SS?••••a??` I?N?IS?tI S1212IVH 30AI0 :,LNaI'IO '.bti/)?'kld,J?j?y??? VNI708VO HDJON 'AlNf10O 138318VO 'ONVISI S83AaVH ?, I' 1 , Li lf%j%/ [ SUH X"'C-TLVH ' l' L dU y • d aa"a waia :• ioaroad 1 y?wYb...r..... •....,...•.rey1y SNVId NOIIVOIlddV IIW83d VNVO 1 NV-Id NIVIN 3080A IT9661 o Z 031 ,OOT - „T :a'-I'daS 800Z 1001 O '09 00T I" 9 ?NpIlO3SSOrOu 334 1" 019 -'A313 3'lOd 1HO11 NI 1191 OV3NXVIB 1SV33Hd ONIISIX3 31JNYIMI 1H•.XS ,OL X a mr6m •Y OVOM 1N1Od SM3mll1 R OVOID ONV1Sl SM3J1M1 N0I103SM201 33IWM1N3 AVIINW 3N015 ,m dog SI- P 09 urm M.1c-*@. Al 6 1 1 I 1 i. 1 11 P? I I II pl pp1 1 I 11 1 / I I , I I P atl OR I.N • r a as a ? ? ?? .;? NOQ?I X1 ? 1 • d • 11 d C . ? fk .t ? k ` f + d e e 3 .IN3I135V3,d9'•? 11!(1 r ? . N.IIM OVtk! 1 musla ? • 4 ? . _ Qr • PROPOSED DEDICATION OF 1.00 AC °-3.38 OF LAND TO CARTERET COUNTY. LOTS 1& 2 RESERVES, THE RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT ELEVATED WALK--3.3' WAYS OVER THE WETLANDS TO THE BEACH AREA IN ACCORDANCE •-3.22 WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. LOT 3 & 4 SHALL WAIVE THE 151 SETBACK TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION •-2.54 OF LOT 3 PIER AS SHOWN. APPROX. AREA =1.00 ACRES I-, • -1n APPROXIMATE MEAN HIGH WATER PIER ALIGNMENT uNE 355 3.45 g -;2,9 O.OB 2000 17,53 3.40 I 5.00 fN_7Y0MF_ 10 024 / O.J2, I0167 • 201 ( 1. _.. .............. L V. AEG-; >?--? O ? P ? ?w 404 4TLANDS uNe - 5 O , ao HARKER'S ISLAND BRIDGE 43.98 *-2.72 .5 x-1.741 I -1.39 40 X YO' SIGtff ravcLE / / / j 30,67 INTERSEMON IRKERS ISLAND ROAD STRAITS VIEW LAVE u" -15' RCP (n? 100' 50' O 100' 200' n FEB 2 O 19. SCALE 1" - 100' PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AREA ""r*'•'•"••moo* •"`s""~ CAMA PERMIT APPL I CAT l ON P PROJECT M: PM707 SHEET " 6 OF 7 LANS ]H[AIRKIERS POINT HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA `,,,111111111///, CAqOCLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED: RDC ?` OQ •••••••?••`? .?y 2105 W. NASH STREET •F?SS/?• ADDRESS .•'Q.? y?• WILSON. N. C. 27858 DRAWN: a SEAL. 13343 PHONE: (919 1 237-6701 DJV % APPROVED: •? STROUD ENGINEERING P.A. RDC ?r •9? ••••.•••• ?Q`r?? HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE: %%% M 1 ) EAD4 9TY, N C. 28557 2/20/96 2v)-Y t- SCALE: 0 ALD D. CULLIP R, P.E. 1 "= 100' LoUid :. y03f02ld DHS SV '3'd 1N I'I'in0 'Q Q I N02i :3'IVD 8 `?????rrrrrrrr? )Z/Z ?.999Z 'D'N ';Lllo QVaH 21 A O?y ` :3J,VQ ZO1 3,Llns 3N0 VZV'Id N02IISSH .......1'•N? 13A02iddd lOL9-L£Z (6l6) :3NOHd w zv?,zv 99OLZ 'D'N 'NOSIIM O:'' :NMtl2iQ 13381S HSVN 'M 5012 :SS32IQQV Z , O •. • . oiss ,.• ya,,. Q3NOIS3Q SIUUVH 30AID :IN31'10 ;'Odd% VN l IOHVD HAON ''X1Nf10D 1383i8VO ' ONVIS I SS?l3.3 AOyVH J,NlOd 'SUr.J'3[UT V H SNdld NO I1dO I lddd 111^ 83d VNVO 133HS 1 I V13Q •0.0 ,9 0 NVNGV30 W ! 0If J, 1.1J] ,0E=„ l :31V3S ZIVIRCI CIVEIHxZllg 1N3NG39N3 ,b H1IM 0'81 O?XZ 1N3NG39N3 ,8/M -,0.0 ,9 0 9X9 d3?vm 9Xb w S1(1N ON`d d3HSdM SONS a3ad38H1 HlIM 03Z I NVA?VO 0 ,8/5 H10-10 d31?I J , 0 I=„ l : 31d OS NOIZOgS CIVOH dd0 031d3d1 0 ?XZ nwnu nkiw-lQ T C?4q ,A V H WHIP/ v i * I .1f'(1L f( 11.1, It 1? II 1 n . DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT 1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.) - 2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: adjacent to SR 1335, Brooks Creek and the Straits in the community of Harkers Island, Carteret County Photo Index - 1989: 155-11 P-7 1984: 38-1215, V-17 State Plane Coordinates - X: 2725900 Y: 359500 RECEIVED 3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F MAR 1 11996 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES .ern 4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 2-8-96 Was Applicant Present - Yes 5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 2-20-96 Office - Morehead City 6. SITE DESCRIPTION: (A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret County Land Classification From LUP - Limited Transitional and Conservation (B) AEC(s) Involved: EW, CW & ES (C) Water Dependent: Yes and No (D) Intended Use: Private (E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - Planned - 60,000 gpd wastewater treatment system (F) Type of Structures: Existing - Planned - Future residential development w/associated piers (G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 0' to moderate Source - personnel observation 7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA] DREDGED FILLED OTHER (A) Vegetated Wetlands ± 880 ft.2 Spartina alterniflora (B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands ± 21000 ft.2 ex.boat basin bottom (C) Other ± 5 ac. High ground (land disturbed) (D) Total Area Disturbed: f 5.5 ac. (E) Primary Nursery Area: No (F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes 8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to develop a 28 lot subdivision at a site adjacent to SR 1335, Brooks Creek and the Straits in the community of Harkers Island. FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT: Harkers Point PAGE #2 9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The applicants property is a ± 60 acre tract of land located on the northwestern end of Harkers Island and on the west side of SR 1335 immediately south of the Harkers Island Bridge. The subject of this permit application is a f 28 acre portion of this tract which is proposed to be developed into a subdivision and a 1.5 acre site which is to be used for sewage disposal. The subdivision tract is bordered on the north by the Straits and on the south by Brooks Creek, which is also the entrance channel going into the County's Harbor of Refugee and abuts the Harbor on the southeast side. The majority of the high ground property consists of woodlands with pine and oak as the dominate species. A dirt drive bisects the property and provides access to the adjoining property owner located to the west of the project site. A varying border of coastal and 404 wetlands exists along the shoreline. On the northeast side (fronting the Straits) a ± 5 to 50' wide sandy beach area exists along a portion of the shoreline. The remaining shoreline shows signs of slight to moderate erosion with an erosion scarp having developed. The beach area has been used for many years as a popular swim beach for the locals in Harkers Island and the surrounding communities. A ± 150' wide x ± 140' long to -9' mean low water (MLV) basin was excavated into the interior of the property along its northwest property line around the late 1960's to early 70's. The previous land owner requested a Dredge and Fill permit to connect the basin into the waters of the Straits. A permit was issued but it is unclear whether it authorized the entrance channel. According to historic photography, there was, however, a water connection established from the basin to the Straits. Today, the bulkhead around the basin has washed away or is deteriorated to the point of being non-functional. The mouth of the basin has shoaled in to the point where there is only a small trickle of water flowing out of the basin into the Straits during low tide conditions. A 6' to 20' border of coastal wetlands vegetated primarily with spartina alterniflora has volunteered along the southern shoreline of the basin and a ± 10' wide border of spartina alterniflora exist along the Straits just west of the basin entrance. Scattered clumps of oysters are also located at the mouth of the basin. Numerous amounts of building and other debris have been deposited along the shoreline of the basin throughout the years. The site has been identified in the past as an area with archaeological potential as well as having an old cemetery existing on the property. The Harkers Point Cemetery has not been maintained in recent years and contains the grave sites of many early residents of Harkers Island. In 1995, the applicant hired an archeological research firm and a "Phase II study" was performed to identify any additional unmarked graves outside of the cemetery proper and to examine the site for any prehistoric or historical archaeological sites with significant remains that might be eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. The results of the survey have been summarized in a report to the applicant and a copy has been provided to the Division of Coastal Management and the Division of Archives and History. Anyone wishing to review the document should contact the Division of Coastal Management's Morehead City office. FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT: HARKERS POINT, CARTERET COUNTY PAGE #3 PROTECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 28 acres into a 28 lot subdivision with the typical lot size being f 1/2 acre in size. Access to the lots will be provided by two paved private roads which will have direct access to the Harkers Island Road (SR 1335). A 60,000 gallon per day tertiary treatment plant with associated subsurface disposal fields is proposed on a ± 1.5 acre site f 2,000' south of the subdivision site. This wastewater facility will not only service this development but will be available for the future development of the remainder of the property. The wastewater will be transported to the disposal site by the use of individual pump tanks with a force main being installed within the right of way of SR 1335. The 4" PVC force main will buried ± 3' below the existing grade of the roadbed and within the Estuarine Shoreline Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) along an area adjacent to the County's Harbor of Refuge. Early into the development of this project, the applicant consulted with state and federal review agencies concerning the possibilities of re-establishing the marina basin and providing an access channel into the Straits. Because of the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation in the access channel alignment, the applicant abandoned that concept and is now requesting a permit to fill in the basin to the elevation of adjoining uplands. The shoreline of the Straits immediately adjacent to the fill area would be bulkhead at the mean high water line and landward of coastal wetlands. The deteriorated breakwater/bulkhead along the Straits shoreline would also be removed. The basin filling would result in the loss of ± 880 ft.2 of spartina alterniflora marsh and ± 2,100 ft.2 of shallow to deep bottom areas within the basin itself. The development of the subdivision will require the grading of ± 3.4 acres in association with the streets and it's right of way. The construction of homesites will be left up to the individual purchaser with the low density stormwater requirements (under Environmental Management Commission rules) limiting the built upon area for each lot to 30%. Grassed swales are to be located between lots 14 and 15 and lots 4 and 5. These swales will provide drainage relief from the proposed road system with the terminal ends being located near the shoreline of the Straits. In addition to the 28 lots, the applicant is proposing to dedicate ± 5.4 acres as a "Common Area", f .97 acres as a cemetery site and a ± .9 acre site for beach access. The proposed beach access site would be dedicated to Carteret County if they are willing to accept and maintain the area. A portion of the beach access site appears to be part of the causeway which was created in the construction of the Harkers Island Bridge. For the most part this causeway area is unsuitable for beach access because of the presence of riprap and coastal wetland vegetation. The remaining beach access site is a sandy beach area. It can also be anticipated that many of the future lot owners will want to construct piers into the Straits and within the Brooks Creek and the access channel leading into the County's Harbor of Refugee. The applicant has positioned the pier alignment on lot 3 to the western property line so that the majority of the beach area on that lot and to the east will be free from obstacles. FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT: HARKERS POINT, CARTERET COUNTY PAGE #4 10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed will result in the development of a 28 acre tract of land into a 28 lot subdivision with associated Common Area. Wetland impacts will be limited to ± 880 ft.z of primarily spartina alterniflora which exist within the human made boat basin and ± 21,000 ft.z of estuarine bottom area. The filling would also require approx 1,500 yds3 of upland fill being placed below the mean high water line of the basin. While there will be a loss of estuarine bottom, potential negative water quality impacts from the existing basin would be eliminated. The scattered amount of oysters at the entrance channel could be easily relocated outside the fill area and into the open waters of the Straits. Approximately 3.4 acres will be disturbed in associated with the installation of the road system for the development. Sewage will be pumped off site to a ± 1.5 acre tract of land located south of the project site. The applicant has indicated that the approval for this wastewater treatment plant has not received approval from the Division of Health Services. Potable water will be supplied by individual wells. The applicant has designed the development to comply with the low density stormwater rules with no more than 30% of the individual lots being built upon. Two drainage swales are proposed and will provide drainage from the road towards the Straits. As a result of the archaeological findings, a Phase III evaluation is scheduled for the summer of 1996 on lots 6, 7, 8, and 9. The applicant has indicated that no development would occur on these lots until after the study is completed. It can be anticipated that some of the future lot owners will build piers extending into the navigable waters of the Straits and Brooks Creek. The specific location of these piers will be left up to the individual property owners except for lot 3 where the pier will be constructed adjacent to the western property line. It is not anticipated that any closure of shellfishing waters would occur within the Straits and the waters of Brooks Creek are already closed. As a result of the interest shown by the locals, the applicant is setting aside ± .97 acres for the Harker's Point Cemetery. They have acknowledged that while the proposed road and development will be private, access to the cemetery by the public will not be prohibited. An approx. .9 acre beach access site is proposed to be given to Carteret County. A portion of this area would appear to be within the causeway area created when the Harkers Island Bridge was constructed. A significant portion of this causeway area is unsuitable for beach access because of previous riprap placement and the existence of wetland vegetation. The remaining beach access area is primarily a sand beach which is separated from the adjacent high ground by a 404 wetland area. As mentioned before, this area has historically been used as a popular beach site for many of the Down East communities and is intensively used during the summer. The construction of future piers along the shoreline will prohibit the use of off-road vehicles from using the beach and will impeded pedestrian access to some degree beyond the dedicated beach access site. PREPARED BY: Charles Jones DATE: February 29, 1996 Form DCM-MP-1 APPLICATIO (To be completed by all applicants) 1. APPLICANT a. Landowner: Name R.L. Moore c/o Harris & Associates Address 2105 West Nash Street City Wilson State N. C. b. City, town, community or landmark Harkers Island c. Street address or secondary road number NCSR 1335 d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? 1 X Yes No e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river, creek, sound, bay) Straits Zip 27858 Day Phone (919) 237-6701 Fax (919) 243-8054 b. Authorized Agent: 3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Name_ HTB Associates, L.L.C. c/o Harris & Associates Address 2105 West Nash Street City Wilson State N. C. Zip 27858 Day Phone (919) 237-6701 Fax (919) 243-8054 c. Project name (if any) Harkers Point NOTE. Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), and/or project name. 2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. a. County Carteret a. List all development activities you propose (e.g. building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and excavation and/or filling activities. 28 lot subdivision (single family),_ Fill old marina. Construct bulkhead. Sewer force main installation. b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? New. c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial use? Private use. d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of construction and daily operations of proposed project. If more space is needed, please attach additional pages. To construct 28 lot single family subdivision. EQUinment will include conventional earth moving equipment, bulldozer, backhoe, dump trucks, etc. Revised 03/95 MiiiiiiAilaw iWi iw+ Form DCM-MP-1 4. LAND AND WATER CHARACTERISTICS a. Size of entire tract 27.96 acres b. Size of individual lot(s) 20, 000 sf and larger. c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or NWL 5 MHW d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract Sandy. e. Vegetation on tract Wooded/oak and pine are Predominate species. f. Man-made features now on tract Old marina. g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.) "A Conservation X Transitiondl zi i1T?1 Developed Community / Rural Other h. How is the tract zoned by local government? Unzoned. i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning? X Yes No (Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable) j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? X Yes No If yes, by whom? Archaeological Research Consultants, Inc. (Thomas Hargrove) k. Is the project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a National Register listed or eligible property? Yes X No 1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes No Coastal (marsh) X Other .. cX If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes. (Anach documentation, if available) m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities. .Offsite sewage disposal system presently being reviewed by On-Site Sewage Branch. n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential discharges.) Surface runoff throuQh_swales in a low-densitv develoP- ment. o. Describe existing drinking water supply source. Individual wells proposed. No community source available. 5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In addition to the completed application form, the following items must be submitted: • A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties. If the applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owner claims title, plus written permission from the owner to carry out the project. • An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.) Please note that original drawings are preferred and only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an adequate number of quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the RPvicpd nvi(s Form DCM-MP-1 site. Include highway or secondary road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like. 6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION • A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary. • A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant further certifies that such notice has been provided. TO ENTER ON LAND I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application. The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions contained in the permit. I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies with the State of North Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. Name Carteret County I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, Address Courthouse SQ. , Beaufort NC 28516 grant permission to representatives of state and federal Phone (919) 728-8450 review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in Name J. L. Maxwell, Jr. Address 711 Lakeshore Dr., Goldsboro NC Phone (919) 778-5561 Name Holly Hamilton Briggs Address_ 909 Evans St., Morehead City NC Phone (919) 726-8407 SF-E- ATTAC4"tmNT For- Nuor • A list•of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates. None. • A check for $250 made payable to the Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the application. • A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. • A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to 10) If the project involves the expenditure of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act. connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of the 27534project. I further certify that the information provided in this 28557 application is truthful to the best of my knowledge. This is the 12th day of Feb. 1996 . Print Name ,elv" Harris- Signature t Landowner orIA rized Agent Li Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed project. X DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information X DCM MP-3 Upland Development DCM MP-4 Structures Information DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts DCM MP-6 Marina Development NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the space provided at the bottom of each form. J!.1 r- ? F E 9 2 0 10,93 ?1?haaaaaAa,??w?aM! ua.;?a nvoc Form DCM-MP-2 EXCAVATION FILL AND (Except bridges and culverts) Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this proposed project. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or fill activities. All values to be given in feet. Average Final Existing Project i-*nQth Width Depth Depth Access channel (MLW) or (NWL) Canal Boat basin Boat ramp Rock groin Rock breakwater Other (Excluding shoreline stabilization) gg. 1. EXCAVATION N/A a. Amount of material to be excavated from below MHW or NWL in cubic yards b. Type of material to be excavated c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs) or othertWetlands? Yes No d. Highground excavation in cubic yards 2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL a. Location of disposal area b. Dimensions of disposal area c. Do you claim title to disposal area? Yes No If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner. d. Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance? Yes No If yes, where? FEB 2 0 1296 Revised 03/95 l?iWwwoar?iarr*arrn?ya?r?I Form DCM-MP-2 e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands (marsh), SAVs or other wetlands? Yes No f. Does the disposal include any area in the water? Yes No 3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION a. Type of shoreline stabilization X Bulkhead Riprap b. Length c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL of d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL 4' e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months Unknown. (Source of information) f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material Wooden bulkhead. g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below water level (1) Riprap (2) Bulkhead backfill h. Type of fill material Sand. i. Source of fill material Unknown, to be purchased from properly licensed borrow pit. 4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES (Excluding Shoreline Stabilization) a. Will fill material be boughirto site? X Yes No If yes, (1) Amount of material to be placed in the water 150 x 150 x 6' AVG = 5.000 CY (2) Dimensions of fill area 150 x 150 (3) Purpose of fill Fill old upland marina basin. b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands (marsh), SAVs or other wetlands? X Yes No If yes, (1) Dimensions of fill area 150 x 5 (along south side of basin). (2) Purpose of fill Reclaim old inland marina. 5. GENERAL. a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion controlled? Property constructed bulkhead and seedine. b. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)? Backhoe, trackhoe, dozer, dump trucks. c. Will wetlands be cr,ssed in transporting equipment to project site? Yes X No If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen environmental impacts. Date Revised 03/95 Vorm DCM-MP-3 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT (Construction and/or land disturbing activities) Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this proposed project. _- a. Type and number'of*buildings, facilities, units or structures proposed 28 single family lots. b. Number of lots or parcels 28 -- c. Density (give the number of residential units and the units per acre) 28 units- [I unit/acre. d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed including roads, ditches, etc. 5 acre maximum. e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins. If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control plan been submitted to the Division of Land Resources? X Yes No If yes, date submitted _Concurrently with CAMA 2/16/96 scheduled submittal. f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone, asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces. Marl and asphalt. g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by impervious and/or built-upon surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for vehicular driveways or parking. 307 MAAIN.UM ForL XNZ1U[DLh4-t_ Le-M C)7o of CW_--ULz0rL-43 Revised 03/95 FEB 2 0 1991 1". ?WUii?Y 0 ? •?YN?N?*AM? h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development Permit may also, require a Stormwater Certification. Has a site development plan been submitted to the Division of Environmental Management for review? X -Yes No If yes, date submitted Concurrently with LAMA 2/16/96 scheduled submittal. i. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal. Offsite wastewater treatment plant. j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above received state or local approval? In review by (Attach appropriate documentation)On-Site Sewage Branch. k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to waters of the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial /commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential discharges). Surface runoff. 1. Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g. well, community, public system, etc.) Individual wells. m. Will water be impounded? If yes, how many acres? _ n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when was the lot(s) platted and recorded? N/A Clyde Harris Appl Ql/li nt ProJ?ct Nr Signature ?IZoI?c? Date Yes X No JOB STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. Hestron Plaza One SHEET NO. OF- Suite 102 MOREHEAD CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 28557 CALCULATED BY DATE (919) 247-7479 CHECKED BY DATE .IA1 C PRODUCT 204-1 4mgk Sheets) 205 1 INdded, ®4m lnc., Groton, Mass. 01471 To Order NONE TOLL FREE 1 800 225 6380 Narrative =WES 2 0 1996 Harker's Point Major CAMA Permit M.i ir.wa.«.»..»...?a•.a?r,*rsta'1r HTB Associates, L.L.C. proposes to develop a 27.96 acre parcel of land on the northwestern end of Harkers Island. The proposed Harker's Point single family subdivision will consist of 28 lots. All lots will be either waterfront or water view and will allow for a large common area protecting the integrity of the property leading to the Harker's Point Cemetery and the Maxwell property to the west. The project has additional property to the south which has not had its development planned with the exception of a 60,000 gpd tertiary treatment plant with associated subsurface disposal fields. This system is currently being reviewed by the On-Site Sewage Branch. During the planning process leading to the Major CAMA Permit submittal, several issues came to light and were addressed as follows: Harker's Point Cemetery Harker's Point Cemetery has been an unmaintained cemetery containing the grave sites of many early residents of Harker's Island. Following site evaluations by Mr. John Clauser of the N.C. Department of Archives and History, many of the previously documented sites were located and the proposed boundary of the cemetery was established. Local citizens have indicated their desire to form the Harkers Point Preservation Committee to manage and maintain the historical significance and heritage of this island cemetery. The developer has encouraged and has appreciated the assistance provided by the island residents. While the proposed new roadway construction is to be private, access to the cemetery is a right conceded to the public. The developer will continue to work with the preservation group to restore the cemetery site. Archaeological Findings Following the disclosure of a study conducted by Thomas Loftfield in 1969 which found artifacts along the north shoreline of this tract, Mr. Thomas Hargrove of Archaeological Research Consultants,Inc. was retained to conduct an assessment of the tract. His report is attached. Phase III archaeological evaluations are scheduled for this summer on Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9. Filling the Previously Constructed Inland Marina The original plan for this development included interior lots, which were required by local ordinance to have adequate water access. The site has an inland basin marina which, through lack of maintenance, has had its access channel silt-in and the bulkhead has deteriorated. Early discussions with state and federal personnel indicated that with the presence of SAV in the channel alignment, permitting would be difficult to re-dredge to the facility. Since it is not likely that the inland basin would be permitted to be reconstructed, it is desirable to fill the basin and associated wetlands that were created at the boat ramp and re-establish the site to its original grade. Public Use of the Beach Prescriptive use of the beach at the north end of the tract has been a consideration of our design. Lots I and 2 are to be water view without riparian rights to construct piers. Lot 3 will be restricted to pier construction along the western property line. The resulting property of 1.00 acres is to be donated to Carteret County and used for a public beach access. FEB-'2,9-96 THU 11:03 M STROK EIVGIPIEERING FAQ NC'. 9l9??7?0'?? F. 1 . / l ! 9I MAX. (Al . ti .dd x r ? State of North Carolina IT Department of Environment, LTWMAI Health and Natural Resources 4 • • Division of Water Quality r Ja mes B. Hunt, J r., Gove mor Jonathan B. Fbwes, secretary ED F= F=i A. Preston F-bward, Jr., P.E., Director • July 24, 1996 Carteret County DWQ Project # 960226 APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Mr. R. L. Moore c/o Harris and Associates 2105 West Nash Street Wilson, NC 27858 Dear Mr. Moore: You have our approval to place fill material in 0.02 acres of wetlands and 0.48 acres of waters for the purpose of developing a residential subdivision and tilling an existing man-made basin at SR 1335, as you described in your application dated 4 March 1996. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this till is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3025. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. 1) That a silt curtain be installed across the nlouth of till' basin and other erosion controls be in place prior to any earth movement in the area. 2) That the filled area be stabilized with vegetation immediately after filling. 3) That all till material be fro n a clean upland source, free from toxic material. 4) That the project he done in such a manner so as to not cause turbidity outside the immediate construction area to exceed 25 NTU. 5) That no groundwater lowering ditches shall be constructed with direct outlets to surface waters. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Adrllinistrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786. Sincerely, n I-Inward, Jr. P.E. Attachment cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office Wilmington DWQ Regional Office Mr. John Dorney Central Files John Parker; DCM 960226.1tr Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone 919-733-1786 FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper q State of North Carolina MAR Arf Department of Environment, 0 4 1996 Health and Natural Resources------ --------------• • Division of Coastal Management A000% 001=% James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Roger N. Schecter, Director February 29, 1996 MEMORANDUM: ____. ... 111 1 ?•. . -. I.,? ?'J .. _ TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director Division of Environmental Management FROM: John R. Parker, Jr. Major Permits Processing Coordinator SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review Applicant: Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.) Project Location: adjacent SR1335, Brooks Creek, and the Straits, in the community of Harkers Island, Carteret Count; Proposed Project: to develop a 28 lot subdivision known as Harkers Point Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by March 21, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Charles Jones at (919) 726-7021. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested. REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed. This agency has no comment on the proposed project. This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are incorporated. See attached. This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments. DATE S? 5 t- P.O. Box 769, 3441 Arendell St., Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 Courier #11-12-09 Telephone 919-726-7021 FAX 919-247-3330 An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper • 4 - !, c C A 3609 HWY 24 (OCEAN) • NEWPORT, NORTH CAROLINA 28570 • (919) 393-8185 • Pax (919) 393-7508 COASTAL FEDERATION March 18, 1996 Roger Schecter, Director NC Division of Coastal Management P.O. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611 Preston Howard, Director NC Division of Environmental Management P.O. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611 Victor D'Amato N.C. Division of Environmental Health On-Site Wastewater Engineering Branch P.O. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611 MQ,q 20 1996 !A1.1 TY r! s aV AF "'rte RE: Public Comments Concerning Harkers Point (HTB Associates, L.L.C.) Major CAMA Permit Application, DEM Stormwater Plan, and Permit Application for Harker's Point Wastewater System (Project No. 95-17) Dear Roger, Preston and Victor: These comments are submitted by the North Carolina Coastal Federation, North Carolina Wildlife Federation, Watermen Aligned for the Environment and Resources; Carteret County Crossroads; Sierra Club, Pamlico-Tar River Foundation and Conservation Ccuncil of North Carolina. These local, regional and statewide groups are commenting on this project because it clearly illustrates why we are losing the battle up and down our coast to protect shellfish waters and our marine fisheries. The applicant proposes in his CAMA permit application to construct 28 residential units, a 60,000 gpd wastewater treatment plant, and "future development," all on four types of soils that the Carteret County Soil Survey classifies as having "severe" limitations for building and wastewater treatment. This large proposed development is being reviewed by a multitude of state agencies in an uncoordinated and piecemeal fashion that ensures that coastal water quality will not be protected. E-mail nccf@coastalnet.coin WWWHome Page:http://www.eastnc.coastal,net.com/nccf/nccf.htm Letter of Comment on Harker's Point March 18, 1996 Page 2 Our organizations have serious concerns with the permit review process for this project. It is failing to achieve a basic goal of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) which is: "to insure that the development and preservation of the land and water resources of the coastal area proceeds in a manner consistent with the capability of the land and water for development, use, or preservation based on ecological considerations. " We believe that CAMA provides both the authority and responsibility to coordinate the permit review process to insure that open and highly productive shellfishing waters immediately next to this site are protected. We encourage each State agency involved in reviewing various aspects of this project to coordinate their review based upon the following considerations: 1) The CAMA permit application was submitted without providing adequate information regarding the applicant's total development plans. In reviewing this permit application, CAMA regulations (T15A NCAC U .0203(c)) require the applicant to disclose detailed information on any development located in or directly impacting an AEC. CAMA also mandates an evaluation of the cumulative impacts of this proposed project (NCGS 113A- 121(a)(10)). The application provides insufficient information to conduct this required analysis. Based on the Coastal Resources Commission rules, the application should contain information on the development plans for the entire acreage besides the 28 residential lots that touch an AEC. More information is needed to figure out the impact that approximately 140 additional residential units (the remaining estimated capacity of the proposed wastewater treatment plant) will have on AEC's located on and by this tract of land. (A subdivision plat submitted to Carteret County Planning Department the day after you received this permit application shows 41 lots on 27.96 acre portion of this property.) It is particularly important that you obtain this information since the site contains soils that are classified as having "severe" building limitations. 2) Wastewater treatment plant efflue itwill lake annroximatelv.15 daYS to_ discharge ink nearby SA waters and will violate SA water quality standards. Based upon the pump test report submitted by the applicant, it will take approximately 15 days for wastewater to move laterally as groundwater from the sewage treatment plant into a nearby deadend tidal creek classified as open shellfishing waters. The two types of course sandy soils at the waste disposal site will provide only minimal removal of bacteria and nutrients in the tertiary treated effluent.' The water quality parameters of greatest concern are nitrate and nitrite. 'According to the Carteret County Soil Survey, the waste disposal area has two types of soils: Leon sand and Mandairin sand. The permeability of Leon is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and moderate to moderately rapid in the weakly cemented subsoil. The soil is not used as cropland because of wetness during winter and spring, droughty in summer, and leaching of plant nutrients. It has "severe" limitations for sewage treatment because of seepage, wetness, and poor filtering. Mandarin sand also has rapid permeability in the surface and subsurface layers and moderate in the subsoil. The available water capacity is low. It also has Letter of Comment on Harker's Point March 18, 1996 Page 3 Even if the treated effluent meets the state groundwater standard for nitrate (10 mg/1), it can be safely assumed that no further denitrophication will occur once the effluent is discharged into the ground. This means that nitrate will leach laterally into the adjacent SA waters at levels that exceed the "Chlorophyll a" standard (15A NCAC 2B.0212(c)(A)) for tidal saltwaters by approximately 1,800%.Z This concentration of nitrate concentration is C exceedingly high, and that quality of effluent will make conditions in the deadend tidal creek ? unsuitable for their classified "best" uses. Therefore, the project violates water quality standards for "Conditions Related to Best Usage" (15A NCAC 2B.0212(b)(2)) and the state's Antidegradation Policy (15A NCAC 2B.0201). We are also extremely concerned about fecal coliform, pathogens and viruses that may be) w p contained in the effluent from this plant. No effluent quality parameters for fecal coliform ?l S are specified in the permit application. Pathogens and viruses are present in tertiary treated `s w ?, wastewater. Given the rapid groundwater movement between the waste disposal site and the \N y adjacent estuary, existing uses of the open shellfishing waters may be threatened by this \oy ? \ project. r 3) Stormwater runoff could violate water quality standards for shellfishing waters but the application contains insufficient information to evaluate compliance with coastal` stormwater regulations. Except for the Carteret County Harbor of Refuge, all of the waters v'' next to this project are open to shellfishing. Stormwater runoff from the proposed OD? development will contain fecal coliform and nutrient levels that exceed state standart-s for ?-\W shellfishing waters. It is impossible to evaluate the adequacy of the stormwater plan without U bra. ??? more detailed plans regarding the project's final buildout. Saltwater and freshwater wetlands a on this site should not be used to calculate the percent of the property covered by impervious 1 1 surfaces. W 4) Filling the open water basin will violate the state's Antidegradation Policy and water ?nG?` ?1 sl?aality,,, t n Ards. State water quality regulations vrohibit the filling of the lagoon located ?. on this property. This basin is connected to estuarine waters and contains "existing uses" , protected by state water quality standards for open SA waters. The site cannot be used fora a i> v marina because of its status as open shellfishing waters. "severe" limitations for sewage treatment because of wetness, poor filtering capacity, and seepage. zAccording to Dr. Richard T. Barber of Duke University Marine Laboratory, field and laboratory studies have found that marine and estuarine phytoplankton will produce about 1 ug/l (microgram per liter) of chlorophyll a from 1 umol/1 (micromole per liter) of nitrate. The groundwater standard is 10 mg/l (milligram/liter) of NO' as nitrogen. To convert the groundwater standard to micromoles of nitrate, first divide by 14 (the atomic weight of nitrogen), then multiply by 1000 to convert millimmoles to micromoles (10/14 = 0.714). 0.714 x 1000 = 714 ug/l chlorophyll from 10 mg/l nitrate as nitrogen. Therefore, wastewater containing 10 mg/1 of nitrate will result in "Chlorophyll a" levels of 714 ug/l in the nearby tidal waters. This level is nearly 1,800% above the water quality standard for tidal waters. Letter of Comment on Harker's Point March 18, 1996 Page 4 5) Waterfront piers fronting on the Straits will impede pedestrian access to the beach. Piers located on lots three through 16 could have docks with four slips each. These piers will impede the traditional and established use of this beach by the public for swimming and fishing. 6) Piers with boat slips will disturb and degrade vital estuary habitat. The shallow estuarine waters surrounding the proposed development contain submerged aquatic vegetation that is vulnerable to damage because of shading from piers and boating activity. Appropriate pie .sites and docking locations should be established as part of the master plan for this project, and not left up to individual homeowners that purchase lots in the subdivision. In conclusion, State permits and authorizations for this project should be denied based upon the concerns identified above. As proposed, the project will result in the violation of state water quality standards. This project is simply too big for this piece of property that is poorly suited for this scale of development. The four types of soils found on the property have "severe" development constraints and adjacent waters are extremely sensitive to pollution. We do realize that this property can accommodate some development. Therefore, we encourage all the State agencies involved in reviewing permit applications for this property to get together and coordinate their reviews so that stormwater runoff, leachate from sewage, and development in public trust areas will not violate state regulatory standards. Please notify us immediately of any actions taken by your agencies regarding this application. We particularly would like to receive any additional information or modifications to the application that may be submitted. Thank you for considering these comments. Sincerely, Todd Miller Executive Director cc: Jonathan Howes, Secretary, DEHNR Dave Moreau, EMC Linda Rimer, Deputy Secretary, DEHNR Pete Peterson, EMC Rick Shiver, DEM Charles Jones, DCM Linda Sewell, DEH Bob Benton, Shellfish Sanitation Bruce Freeman, DMF Interested Press rr) Ali ON M n INVDIdINJIS V JNIJ.dNIWI'Id -1 IId SI .:U•bs Ogg :QNv-j LdM 'l3 'bs OOOIZ :HRJ.dM - "ITA dO d321V rllL3 QNVZJ;dM/H2lJ.VM d/N :H'I8dgO2Id dDNVnSSI IIWHHd QNV d'IgV'IIVAV ELLIS SI `W9U A9 dl AjunoD :]fig QdJ.J IW2Idd 98 Ol Modsip aoujjnsgns gprm Iuuld Iuowluall 4dJ 000`09 :adSOdONd "IVSOdSIQ dO dd?C L rWSOdSIQ a9VMdS SZO£# u011"99J93 juJauaO :ddAJ. `SHA Al saA :U,09'I " HRD 100 *JL-dHD AZI'IVfI -dH LVM 's<OL AIM oI s,09 0011 aqI ul palBABoxa u?sLq OVj X <OSI L, Jo u? Julllij a p apnioul lltm Ioafojd agjL •uoisiAlpgns Iol gZ L dolanap oI sosodoid IuuoilddL oql :NOLLdI'HDSdQ ,LDHfO-dd s?mo-I Lpul-l aaS :QdAONddd d LVQ `SdA Al sat :Q,09'd NV-Id NHJ VMWNOLS IIf15SI :NOIZVQN3wwO3d2I V/N :ZC[rMDVILV .L2[HHS ONI.LVd V/N :dZIS NOI,LVOI.LIW V/N :ddAS NOLLV9LLIW V/N WOLLVOIM W V/N :"03S 'IM SaA :.LSd H3V 'IM ZO'0 :(lHlSafl0HH 'IM WS :ddAS IM SaA :13WNII 'IM uodO :adSO'I3 HO NIIdO* T-ZT-T-S£-TZ :# XdQNI ViVHH.LS VS :SSV'Ia sl!L"IS OU :AQOS S91VM lN3DdfQV NO WV311LS* VOSO£0 :#NISVB SRS QNV HHARI OHM :93L33O `JHH 9661 `b gajvjV :VQ3 WOHA d.LVQ WDQ :VQa WONA (13H V/N :#,LO(l V/N :# H03 Viva :ddAl ZIWHad uoislAlpgnS :daA.L ,LaafO?Id Mod saa)l"H :dI^WVN .L3dfOlda ;aaaJJBJ :AJ.Nf1OD 9ZZ096 :'ON ,LIW?Idd 96 ?IA J:IW?Idd JNIXDV?LL HMIAO 'IVHJNHD HO3 NOLLVViHOJ II QNVrILdM 9661 `£Z PadV :d,LVQ W4 ros QV"OSIAMadRS aM 0 O:HHMdIAHU SNOLLVQNHNNOaaa QNV laodd?I Aav L5 damo 'IVNOI92l2I MdIAaH NOIZVJPIddV J;IW?Iad 2I0 VWV3 J.NM Wd`JVNVW 'IVJ.NHWNO'dMH 30 NOISIAIQ goueag 2uiuuvid Xou.io(I ugof :os N J F- J D_ U D_ Q W N w N Q Z U U Q Z U F- JQ Q ZF-D_J Z D_ S F- F-O?JU w WD..OJZQW w CL -wS S N L1 Q co N N w c Q U J Cr W W Z W W ]C Y •-• U J Q >?S?G? COF- 000QODw USSMLL D_O N cD Z w o F- N M V• Ul lD f-- X F- F- F- F- F- F- F- w wwwwLi ww o wwwwwww .Z. 2222222 N N N N N N N Q O O O .? O O u! 0 A A cli ? II W W CV r- Z U fl; W a E..? = w a a a cdi ,, ? w ? ? A A d A V1 aaazwa Z ® Z O ' W < Q Z O U PC x 0 w ao a+ w w >ksa W I, H J a `Oil ~ wuO X 0c) - r- U'^ . c? o z W N N .-- VI m V) x oo a Q ` w N 2 O ti cl W W E < ?+ X N U Q z V C ?. a z ? 0° ?-. ? Q U Q Z Z Z a 6 H 00 < ? S 3Z N d?H.p? 1 V V4 Vr ?1 3 W ? O w O o f ? z A V M PL? .0 q > o F U Q J N J U N 3 1 0? ., x C L W • a a z it .4 a x W w .. N O t % , N V) Z O F y ° w 1. = w i W x F a Al o v i z W V i W z O t? v, ?d , g a w < Al R ` y, E- V) w > _ A a °?I lta O F, hit U< o O d z .. W E H 04 x MAA) nll l \ .........,_ s .?r?r?r•r•??. Y r) 1YO? ` , U1 M o r, ?w ao ?4 H• V E+ tiW O W xx a? 3 3 3 3 3 3 w ?; ? ?? M ? S oa 3 $ N? a $"? '• ? I MINN Qr'M? n y^? p? Q? ^ ``N?N P M2 N2?S?9;1!?Q{: ????i175??N i ? ?! a s W° Y? > W W W s W W w n+ U x `i x vlCi x c?'i. x? L'C ^ s .. CQ • • & • a i ob ,111111111//t, r ? P. tj p t? ? tw O? ygEr ? C,N ? df ?i ? a ? W ? ' ? i ? ?? _ ?W ?9: - r. ? J W Z Z ? • • C ?,' ? 11ew ' - - ?1: _ ? c-+16?/IIU11111?1 a" W? E U3 q w W U w U t` Vo d' O co d ., Wz? C) x .°aFa a?w OW ?o ?a or wti ?l w W U W I, I nM ,irbLp,•? ? ? ay ,? t I ro •r O • r l ?eN?/?' 'eL' a ` r 7 •: ® ro, z? v . L 0 U 1011, 11 ?•^' r r ? eye , 0 ?I a a W x?9 In i .) oil i? 0 ? o U ?w o a. o o CQ ?CQ E• OF •s W OW ax w v? UU UUU UU u u CD l9 1? 61 t9 l9 M d- CD U m Q' d- I-, d- N Qo d' N N-46l('?l9 UiL6NLo LJ co Qw Qr Q N? U ¢ 01? OLUw LLJWl-Z Q >ZZ? OW I-.I-?x30¢0J2: Qm2:CDULLJ ) O EF- LLJ> Or- OLi1?W 000>¢ I-O-Ucl?m UJzacL ,,11111111 [ul1 ;Y,.•i ,+. 'v ; J c• 0:0 .in •, •? ••.•• d•••.•• O o?HIIt11111??,', o? J a? ? r Bit, ?W • / a ?a 1-1 . a U wkk § `?•. k o LIJ w W N o y Z 0,6 W , • ,Oyu Irz / 2o" Wx2 - W H uj "roc- Lai Lu W W W ?` a--? T O k n 3 Mi 4 , O V-) lLJ W :tz Q 0 W ) o0, O ?'Q 4 i q j ° . 7K AL ??m aba.•• LLLJJVV.? ,, 1, 1 0 EE a o r4 w o U w z I ? ° UI a. o . _. o CQ ?M r• L 2 0 1996 • O N \ I/ P N N O ' N o? r , r W Q r Z L , n r W N M O , I ''W O ? ? ON N W ?0 m ,Q , W r r °[0) co , , 0' O 0 ? a ' , , r , , , mo , i , r 1 r i , , , , m 0 07 ? c0 1 h W a V! ? O L.Lj •?0?'9L T Z n? z Q J a_ J J LL. Q z a U 0 cr z Q z o U A z q z A CL ® O VI z z w I- z U o Q = N U r ? 0 j J ~ J ad w 0c) I w w III IL ct J ? r- Q w ~ - V) (= N N Q U Q 2 (/? U p z z W Z O Q Q [7', J V)J3Z {rr???-- V) <u O Q Lo V) mOO J Q ? =UN3 U w ? Y = V2 z w a ?p LLJ ?J --•.....• 3 J ?l OL.LJ O ?--1 mm 3. 00 to O- 4 09N a 08_ rfl P IO.m' - O P N f o? 0 O m i .0 P m m O 100 , CD a, ko M .y0 m M .yam-.... W , B ? W ww O O o W LMLJ W W t - ) -' O O I?? ? , vl LU ? I • b' v 1 O LU ? I / ; Z Q C) J ?Q r or Q J 0.0 O CIZ 2 V) •, ? . 1 0 ? 00 0 O' iq N ?a 51N ' O O O IP _ . ,r OD N ID 0 m No Om m P O' M , ym . to ON ? U1 ..' O T' Q -O ---------- LLJ OD _j n N N Z w N O L!_1 rWW .. •00 O WLAJ? o CD N o , f? CL L '1 W4oN o to Om . m o g. 05' 23 'E m o 1434 m .... < 01 S_.?• .P. • .._._:.:.....__..... "1_ Z5.5 6Z ? M .9Z ,BZ.LN ?? ............ 51 AEC- o c O , -._.. W rr 1F+i J r Al c ap( IJ; .D > U (D ? ? Ol D ? \ U O W \ y N a U Q A V) J 0 N M N O? W z O x a R r' V z !wl rte, r co m- ?A A ' (,J m .D L (. ,II a? C7 F ti CO I' W W `. a W °z a .a4 cU ti v O ° W ? yA E- W H w 94 w m i W 7 U) `p M co (Al tV ts) S r Aw r m? J I 07 3 (D co N MI M Z E O t? p? O • sr HrY?W+wrrww ww w * s•wwwa ba.Mdd?iiF1 F • U ?7 W ow ax a v? + Z• V + • r • ti '94 •N cURPa •3 •, r, r•? t • s tv-ev-st w • R 64 LF - /S RCP `,` . t t•rrr4r a •? y' <N 50' STONE p ` a•?3 CONSTRUCTION ` z>.>> ?? j / ENTRANCE ;r$qm - INTERSECT/ON y DOE-. ' f _ E' " HARKERS ISLAND ROAD & HARKERS POINT ROAD ?, a Y tr, D A O-OO OO F t --- u 44-17 A- lr-3Y-31* , • t Q EXISTING DIRT R A IT 4 R. °sMer H O D W 'FO EASEMENT ; q IO' X 70• SIGHT qr / TRIANGLE P 91 ? i f k d/ • • * c ) Aa 7 2V * v / i _ - S 1 r ?, X c y. Q. a ; • d r, „ ? i ? ma ! ? // Ojf . r • ? ? ? ? H Y4r EXISTING PRECAST BULKHEAD ? 4 p' Q 8 ^ ; TBM IN LIGHT POLE ELEV. 5.43 MSL +m M1 R? ? SEE ROAD SECTION DETAIL: SHEET 6 OF 6 N MOOR E PROPOSED 4" FORCE MAIN ! 1 I 1 ? • 1 / I 100' 50' O 100' 200' nn I ?T I l y id SCALE 1" - 100' FEB 2 0 FORCE MAIN PLAN "°???"?•'•?????"^••wsntM9!'F II / CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS I 11 HAIRKEOd RS P'nINT 1111111i I' HARKERS ISLAND, CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA % GAR04 ., ? 4% '? •.•••••••.• N •, CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED: ADDRESS 2105 W. NASH STREET RDC :Q ;a gEAI. WILSON. N.C. 27858 DRAWN: ' 3?3 • ?3 ° ? ? • " I'r (919) 237-6701 DJV PHONE APPROVED: ? . STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. RDC HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE: EHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557 2/20/96 PROJECT •: PM707 -7 9 _ _ - - ,/ SCALE SHEET 5 OF 7 RONALD D. CULL HER, P.E. ?-` 1 = 100' PROPOSED DEDICATION OF 1.00 AC OF LAND TO CARTERET COUNTY. LOTS I & 2 RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT ELEVATED WALK- WAYS OVER THE WETLANDS TO THE BEACH AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. LOT 3 & 4 SHALL WAIVE THE 15' SETBACK TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF LOT 3 PIER AS SHOWN. APPROX. AREA =1.00 ACRES APPROXIMATE MEAN HIGH WATER PIER ALIGNMENT LINE -355 a -3 •28 e g -3.45 a 2000 1753 -3.40 I Fm •on 024 0.32. h ?3 ; . 101.67 ° 20I 1 84 E N 3 N- -10,67 --- -- --•- 76' AEA'.. O / 404 W4iLANDS uNe Q? _ ' '$ h O SERV •• ' CONNECTION 5 O -3.38 HARKER'S ISLAND BRIDGE 43.98 '-2.72 58 5 '--3.37 e-3.22 , -1.74 e-2.54 -1.39 ??? f'•I 2655 e-129 N291491YE o.1o. S OD3 .e 2 61 ,7 N6-7J5'-%V J0.67 O ,1? qob /0' x 10, SIG In cccE / it INTERSECTION HARKERS ISLAND ROAD & STRA?S VIEW LANE STA 010000 LF - I5' RCP 100' 50' O 100' 200' SCALE: 1" - 100' FEB20 10 Gam' PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS AREA ?«.,...•..--•••-•"w"" "00. CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS HA IRKEEM S P®INT HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA CA/?o? CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED: ?? .,,....•... f ?i RDC _ .•'F6SS/ 0•.y.9'? ADDRESS 2105 W. NASH STREET :Q.? WILSON. N. C. 27858 DRAWN: SQ SEAL rL PHONE: (919 ) 237-6701 DJV 13343 APPROVED: %•.F Q•.i 4t' g STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. RDC 'po ?'?,?.9•''yr?.?N?.'•QHESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE: • ??i? ?D/p tC?; ,, M 1 ) EAD4 C9TY, N C. 28557 2/20/96 PROJECT PM707 J Zv?`?(a SCALE: SHEET 06 OF 7 0 ALD D. CULLIP R, P.E. ill= 100' HARKERS ISLAND ROAD SCALE: 1"=10' 2x10 TREATED FILTER CAP CLOTH 5'8 ' GALVANIZED WITH THREADED ENDS, /--WASHER AND NUTS c? a In 14x6 WALER / ? `- DEADMAN 6x6 @ 8' 0•C -1 2x1 0 T&G WITH @ 8' 0. C. W/8' EMBEDMENT 4' EMBEDMENT BULKHEAD DETAIL ICH2O199S PROJECT ": PM707 SHEET • 7 OF 7 SCALE: 1"=30' G CI a S 3?3 ' if 13 w 4?z ,9? :• F?Glr1?.•? v I 'L4C D D. GJ ??• '11n1111%?J%% DETAIL SHEET CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS ]H[AL]E K ERS ]JOINT HARKERS ISLAND. CARTERET COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA CLIENT: CLYDE HARRIS DESIGNED: ADDRESS: 2105 W. NASH STREET RDC WILSON. N.C. 27858 DRAWN: DJV PHONE: ( 919 ) 237-6701 APPROVED A\ STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. RDC T HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE: M HEAD CITY, N.C. 28557 2/20/96 9 -7 CALE: RONALD D. CULLI R, P.E. AS SHOWN ROAD SECTION