19950759 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19960903

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
August 7, 1995
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199401238
Mr. John Dorney ip Q F?
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of ?2? 99
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road c<,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Enclosed is the application of Mr. R. D. White, III, for Department of
the Army authorization and a State Water Quality Certification to develop the
proposed "The Rocks Golf Links", which includes an 18 hole golf course and
associated residential development, and will result in impacts to
approximately 3.9 acres of waters and wetlands, off of Copas Road (SR 1191),
adjacent to the Shallotte River, in Shallotte, Brunswick County, North
Carolina. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid
request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our
administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality
certification is required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same law.
A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the certification
has been obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, in most cases, 60 days
after receipt of a request for certification is a reasonable time for State
action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request, or asked for an
extension of time, by October 6, 1995, the District Engineer will deem that
waiver has occurred.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Jeff Richter, Wilmington
Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
ne Wri t
ehiNc?i , Regul ory Branch
EncPrinted on ® Recycled Paper

A.
-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. Bob Stroud
Wilmington Regional office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
`Nilmington Regional Office
Division of Coastal Management
James 3. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
July 20, 1995
:?QIVED
R. D. White III
P. O. Box 352
Shallotte, NC 28459
Dear Mr. White:
?EHNF?
c
I
REGUt I T CR'' 3RAlVC;?
The Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of your application for State
approval for development of your property located off Copas Road (SR 1191), in the Shallotte
community of Brunswick County. North Carolina. It was received on June 26, 1995, and appears to
be adequate for processing at this time. The projected deadline for making a decision is September 9,
1995. An additional 75-day review period is provided by law when such time is necessary to complete
the review. If you have not been notified of a final action by the initial deadline stated above, you
should consider the review period extended. Under those circumstances, this letter will serve as your
notice of an extended review. However, an additional letter will be provided on or about the 75th day.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the
proposed development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" postcard which must be
posted at the property of your proposed development. You should post this notice at a conspicuous
point along your property where it can be observed from a public road. Some examples would be:
Nailing the notice card to a telephone pole or tree along the road right-of-way fronting your property;
or at a point along the road ricrht-of-wav where a private road would lead one into your property.
Failure to post this notice could result in an incomplete application.
A field report has been prepared and is in the process of being circulated to the various state and
federal review agencies for theix comments. If additional information is required based on this review,
the agencies may contact you directly.
Sincerely,' .'
E.F. Brooks
Field Representative III
Enclosure
cc: John Parker
Bob Stroud
Becky King, LPO
David Franklin. COE
Rob MOL11
Jay Houston

1 27 Cardinal Drive Extension. Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: R. D. White III/The Rock Golf Links
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: 569 acre tract, off Copas Road (SR 1191), adjacent to the
Shallotte River, Shallotte community of Brunswick County, North Carolina.
Photo Index - 1989: 191-1,2,3,4 (photo right side) 1984: 9-79,80,81 (left side)
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2190400 Y: 73000
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 7/13/95
Was Applicant Present - yes (Agent & applicant)
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 6/26/95
Office - Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Shallotte
Land Classification From LUP - Rural/Urban Transition/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: ES,CW
(C) Water Dependent: No
(D) Intended Use: Private/Commercial
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - Individual septic tank system for existing homes
Planned - Individual septic tank and/or LPP systems
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Copas Shores Subdivision
Planned - Eighteen hole golf course, clubhouse and
amenities, additional roads and utilities, vehicular bridge.
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
nuFnr,TM LTT T L^T% r1IVITTr V%
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
"404 type" 2.46 acres 1.41 acres
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands

(C) Other Highground disturbance
Highground mitigation
3.9 acres 191 acres
8.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 191 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: YES
M Water Classification: SA, SC-HQW Open: Yes (in SA waters)
PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicants are proposing an 18 hole golf course, clubhouse, and
associated development of 571 single-family residential lots, to include streets and utilities.
. -a Page 2
.
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is a 569 acre tract, located just south of the Town of Shallotte, adjacent to the Shallotte
River, in Brunswick County, North Carolina. The east side of the property is bordered by the Shallotte
River. The property includes, and is oriented around. the existing Copas Shores Subdivision, which
includes Copas Road (SR 1191) and several other existing private residential streets. The property is
outside of the corporate limits of the Town of Shallotte, but within the Town's extraterritorial planning
jurisdiction. The existing roads and out parcels of the already developed Copas Shores Subdivision, are
shown on a map attached to the application. The remaining undeveloped acreage is predominately
wooded uplands. There are areas of mature Longleaf and Loblolly Pine forests, as well as, areas of
mature OakiHickory hardwood forest. There are four existing ponds on the tract. The largest is located
in the south central portion of the tract, and is known as the Mill Pond. State Road 1191 runs across
the dam of Mill Pond Lake, which separates the lake from the inter-tidal marshes of the adjacent river.
There is a connected, tidal canal which runs east-west, along the south side of the lake. The canal is
30 - 40 feet wide, with narrow borders of Smooth Cord-grass (Spartina alterniflora) on either side. The
canal receives overflow from the lake spillway. There is extensive evidence of beaver activity around
this lake. The wetlands within the tract have been delineated and approved by the U. S. Army Corps
of Engineers. Some of the inland wetlands are isolated. but most are associated with drainage corridors,
or existing and remnant ditches. The wetland types vary from Sweet Gum/Red Maple hardwood bottom,
to Pine/Red Bay pocosin, to coastal tidal wetlands along the shoreline of the Shallotte River. Much of
the uplands adjacent to the river consists of high bluff shoreline. In the lower portion of the river
(southern), there are extensive Smooth Cordgrass marshes (Spartina altemiflora) adjacent to the water.
In the upper portions of the river (northern), the adjacent marsh is primarily Black Needle-rush (Juncus
roemarianus), with narrow borders of S. altemiflora adjacent to the open water corridors.
The waters of the Shallotte River are classified SC, from U.S. Hwy 17 to the mouth of the Mill Pond,
and SA, from the mouth of the Mill Pond to the ICWW, by the N. C. Division of Environmental
Management. The lower portions of the Shallotte River are 0
PE1V to the harvest of shellfish. All of the
Shallotte River, in the project area is designated as Primary Nursery Area by the N. C. Division of
:Marine Fisheries.
The applicant is proposing to construct an eighteen hole golf course and clubhouse. with amenities, as
well as, new subdivision streets and utilities which would create the subdivision infrastructure for 571
single-family residential lots. There are five areas within the tract that have been designated for future
multi-family development. Wastewater for the development would be provided by individual septic tank
and/or LPP subsurface sewage systems. Potable water would be provided by the Brunswick County
system. The proposed streets and culvert installations are shown on the project drawings. The
construction of the golf course would involve significant land clearing and soil disturbance during the
landscaping of the fairways, tees, greens, etc.. It would include the excavation of four (4) ponds from
federally regulated wetlands (2.46 acres). Excavated material would be used to landscape upland golf
course features. There are eight (8) golf cart bridges proposed, that would be elevated over wetlands
(totaling 840 ft. Y 8 ft.), and eleven (11) proposed bulkhead/rip rap shoreline stabilization sites. All of
the bulkheads and/or riprap would be located above vIHW and landward of the Corps and/or CAM A
wetland line. New road construction would consist of a 20 feet wide paved travel way, within a 60 ft.
right-of-way. Presumably, utilities would be installed below ground within the right-of-way. Road
construction would include 51 culvert installations and the construction of a vellicular bridge near the
proposed Clubhouse site (Pg. 2 of 9).

Page 3
•
10. AiMCIPATED EMPACTS
The construction of the proposed golf course would disturb approximately 191 acres of land during the
clearing, grading, and landscaping of fairways, greens, and tees, and the construction of roads. The
proposed excavation of four (4) ponds, within federally regulated wetlands would convert 2.46 acres
of pocosin type wetlands to shallow water habitat. Other wetland impacts include the loss of .24 acres
resulting from nine (9) road crossings, and a 1.17 acre wetland loss from golf cart path and fairway fill
sites. The applicant proposes to mitigate for the wetland conversion and loss, by converting 3.9 acres
of uplands, to a planted wetland shelf, adjacent to the pond sites. At build-out, approximately 14 % of
the tract would be converted to impervious surfaces. Although this percentage is' 1/2 of regulatory
allowances for low-density development, as with any development, there would certainly be a
contribution to the accumulative long-term impacts to the water quality of the adjacent watershed.
Submitted by:E.F. Brooks Date: 7/20/95 Office: Wilmington
Slot tJ? AZ 2&U
Wdminykx, .16A Vawka 2w2
?el 910-452-000f
2a.., Jr R.". AZ4 >4
June 15, 1995 JW5%04"
Ed Brooks
Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, N.C. 28405
Re: Submission of "The Rock Golf Links" C
Dear Ed:
Enclosed please find 24 copies of the blueline drawings of "The
Rock" which details all of the proposed interior wetland 404
impacts and dimensions of the various site improvements. As
discussed in the application package Mr. R.D. White, et.al. owns
the 569 acre property and they desire to construct the 18 hole golf
course with clubhouse and amenities plus plat and develop 571
single family residential lots. Mr. White also has 3 multi-family
sections which will remain undeveloped until public sewer becomes
available.
With this CAMA Major submission the sedimentation control plan and
stormwater plans are also being included as vital parts of the
application package.- A summary of 404 wetland impacts is attached
as a reduced 11'x 17" color coded map which helps to illustrate
various locations of specific land use impacts. The $250.00
application fee and a sheet containing riparian land owner names
and address is also attached.
On some adjacent riparian neighbors Mr. White has explained the
project personally and on others he has mailed the attached
"Notification Letter" by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested.
As the return receipts come in Mr. White will forward them to you.
As to CAMA concerns there will be no saltmarsh or estuarine waters
directly filled or excavated. There will be, however, 7 elevated
wooden cart paths over saltmarsh vegetation but in order to reduce
shading impacts they will be at least 6 ft. above the MHW contour.
Also, there are potentially 11 separate locations for
bulkhead/riprap retaining walls all at or above all 404 wetlands
and/or MHW or NWL contours. The purpose of the 2250 L.F. of
bulkheading is to stabilize either existing eroding bluffs or help
prevent sediment from newly constructed fairways from reaching
saltmarsh areas.
10 s
Ed Brooks Page 2
The 404/CAMA wetlands were identified during the Fall of 1993 and
the Corps approved the line in January of 1994. The wetland lines
are illustrated on the attached bluelines. In order to save money,
the 404/CAMA wetland line is used as the MHW contour which Mr.
White recognizes increases his impervious cover ratios.
Finally, the 3.87 acres of "woody" 404 wetlands which will be
impacted with fill or excavation are to be mitigated by a 1:1
replacement by the creation of shallow ponds out of uplands and the
planting of a 40' wide wetland shelf around their perimeters which
will be planted with emergent grass like plant species.
Should you have any other questions, please feel free to contact
Jay Houston or myself at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Rob Moul, M.E.M.
Environmental Consultant
RM/dm
Enclosures: CAMA Application
24 Drawings
cc: R.D. White _
Jay Houston, P.E. --
t
I f7 F- AUt-A VVLf LL IV A,)
4 Form DCM-`1P-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name RID. _11
Address ?• U . Lx 3 S a

c. Street address or secondar
_ 5Z I I q C
d. Is proposed work withia
jurisdiction? k Yes
=A,. GTT
rr e. Name of body of water ire
City 2 w?? o State GtlC creek, sound, bay) -a?t Le.L?o P,-Cj e,
Zip ?. S Day Phone q/0 7,94 -s31 ???N)
Faxr ` 6, 4 t° DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE

b. Authorized Agent:
Name } O L•,S'?-cc rJ E! , a
Address
City v?Q, _ State
Zip Y f S Day Phone ?9 to 7S -? 3 2.
Fax 5 --21 I
c. Project name (if any)
-- ?b r hS K /t e
NOTE. Permit %Q be issued in name of lando%ner(s), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County
Revised 03/95
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
/s..
d
road number
Co Gtr. &R ty limits or planning
_?. No
crest project (e.g. river,
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? zJe,-j Wo,. 1::C
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? - f? 6 /.z Co (E' mw ?s?_
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. `' A V- A A- C? i c -„ ' -
l.aJ . b2 c"..r 5,

c( _ +r4P_ n q / / _,_ - ml
ex'j Li
Form DCM-tiIP-1
' M. Describe existing wastewater treatment facili
i

4.
LA:\D Al
VD WATER t
es.
CI A.R.ACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract `5 C'T c.cv-?5 n. Describe location and type of discharges to wa
te:
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitar
b. Size of individual lot(s) l? oc, wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "was
down" and residential discharges.)
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or f'V /l4
NWL _ + l ? -+=t, a,bow- M14t,J
d.' So
il type(s) acid t xture(s) of tr ct
F,',ve y !Z ! o.
Describe existing drinking water supply source.
9 C,
?-,,Z ? o us em. t o N h ? cx; ? ? ? . G.r
e. Vegetation on tract M % C
y de?
P; w
°
z2,
W - e-
nl S. a?.( -t- to 4,
f. Man-made features now on tract CO y4s SA,.a S

g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
sa.l .?-f .'s, <
i - ,%_ ?/
onservat
on ransitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Is the proposed p?rolj.ect consistent with the applicable
zoning? ? Yes . No
(Attach zoning compliance cerrifrcate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes N?o
If yes, by whom?
5. ADDITIONAL INFOKMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, ther,
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An aerate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligib property?
Yes No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? Yeses No
Coastal (marsh) t S Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? eS
(dnaeh documentation, if available)
5,.,- ,, - d CE) ^E ,4 oPW,,B l
2-4-4 n1la-,
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
» Form -DCM-l`1P-1
site. Include highway or secondary -road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
!- A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
,O/A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name 4-44J,.J L/ s-r-
Address ?w?..., c
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
Name
Address
Phone

v' A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
O ems- r` ,,? `? ?3 2?
?wP?/l? Co Z 194?oa44 -7 3 tI
?A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas. yv /149-
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act. ri /'4
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the day of L. r!E , 19
Print Name
Signature -
Landowner or Authorred Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
L'76CM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
.__k% CM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
M MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
Dorm DCNI-IN P-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major h.
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed 571 : r /
k 13 L C9 If- If Ca, r f1 rn?..,. r,`csi
Number of lots or parcels _S Z,.Z R ¢s; c!¢,-?;`,(
4,-1-5
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre)
pl=l= A<-y-e
Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
-_Yes No
If yes, date submitted 6 -/ S
Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above
received state or local approval?
(Attach appropriate documentation)
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
including roads, ditches, etc. _ 11? t sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent,
611- A "wash down" and residential discharges).
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been subed to the Division of Land
Resources? ?-' yes No
If yes, date submitted - 5 - ?J$
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
5 Al-.u.lt M 1
No . /?
1. Describe proposed drinking water supply source
(e.g. well, community, public system, etc.) m. Will water be impounded? Yes
If yes, how many acres?
X No
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded?
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built-upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking. /'f Z-
l.v S ?- C 5? SCL
Revised 03/95
Applicant or Project Name
Sig tore
C 7
Date
40 Form DCNi-,N1P-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-I. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Eidsting Project
Length Width Depth Depth
Access
channel
(MLw) or (N%I.)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)

:ril,.wl.: t?Yri>?rir?.iY: %ri: •. .M:'y; :4-r{vv li

1. EXCAVATION r o ,,? S
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards j'V h!?=
b. Type of material to a excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? ?Yes No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards c
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area 3o0l
b. Dimensions of disposal area ?ce- ?( s
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
JYes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be avaa for future
maintenance? Yes No
If yes, where? n1 h/bzjed- C*'?
F?m-1 S Cc.'-z Cc P,-,;
Revised 03/95
Porm DCM-Ni F-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes ?1?4o
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes ----No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length oZ a? .J O c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
??SOUQ_ CL-1 I m z., c L, it M 14 c..1
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
D
e.' Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of information) t/ Set ¢ ? S3 aL,0: I'd 4-1
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water Nom C-
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh AVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area 3S X y
(2) Purpose of fill 9 f2 o A 1 _ a, y
G+roSS: o 014 Ld e-
5. GENERAL
a.
How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? d 'Qt-
2. r Qr.1 S - k- d>
f. Type of bulkhead or ripr p material ?Fr>,sS--r.e.
t.,J e o o ??- lac..; rsJ? b
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards-to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap - d -
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material C?2e??•.1 G00,1- .C
i. Source of fill terial
_R5 6
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
Will fill aterial be brought to site?
Yes No
Revised 03195
What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?

c. Will wetlands be cr3ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes I-- No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Name
Applicant orZZ
Signature
Date

Form DCM-,NIP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge ?-1
h. Width of proposed bridge
a. Public Private V
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
7C. .
b. Type of bridge. (construction material) j. Will the proposed bride affect existing water flow?
LO a Yes No
If yes, explain
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge -S
• wr -sc 40? ? •,?.? r=ie,7 .1?.?11_t'?? r?: bs .
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL cL7- ? r a. }. S 4 r fa
e. Will proposed bridge replace anexisting bridge?
Yes 1-- O
If yes ,
• (1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge ?.
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes _L?-No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or N'NL
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
W h
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes
If yes, explain
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yeses No
If yes, explain f3,• 'J g c ?-drs c
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes No Citilo-t hi4..1J J wb
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
2. CULVERTS
Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigati,
potential? Yes -L No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed -!
c. Type of culvert (construction material, s le)
G ?v? G, e
v v^ Zrc a ct„?
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2)' Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
Will proposed culvert reelace an existing culvert?
Yes ??10
If yes,
(1) Length of.existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
-
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) ' s
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culve
require any excavation low the MHW or NWL,,
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubi
yards
b.
C.

i
f. Length of proposed culvert --?,4Lo /-j lreoy 4 w- S
g. Width of proposed culvert 1S - Sec- P/--) d.
h.' Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL s? &C. Q
Will the proposed culverts ffect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvet
require any excavation within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs -L--?er Wetland
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated T
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards :t
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culver
require any higltground excavation?
des No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 34fs
(2) Width of area to be excavated -30/
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards '.:-I cc C- X c.,
7b a-c ? ?? e w? 5 7
/cue
If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
(2) Dimensions spoil disposal area
E •_..-..s 3?z/,Zl-
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
----Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03195
Form DCM-,NIP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes I-' No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes ?No
If yes, give dimension if different from N_ 0..2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
e_??
b. Will the proposed project require the reh
any existing utility lines? If If yes, explain in detail
re- locat- je Lip-
c, Will the proposed project require the coast
any temporary detour structures?
-Yes --!::-No
.If yes,-explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project uire ai
channels? Yes No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
How will excavated or fill material be kel
and erosion controlled?
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ L-Other Wetland
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
. Lca.r.d c
What type of construction equipment will
(for example, dragline, backhoe or I
dredge)? -e-
- h 4 Gf -?a...?
o -?
_ s
/ Z Sv Z. C,
3-C 1 / g
20... cL
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item . above) to be placed on
highground? ?des No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled i
(3) Purpose of fill
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes No
if yes, explain in detail o.o?S C' ; L 115
Revised 03/95
Will wetlands be crossed in transporting ec
to project site? Yes L__L__
No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken ti
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes __t:::'-No
If yes, explain in detail
Applkant or Project Name
S'? /
- , 115 5
Date
r/1mv a llu%A lavf1vV 14M WWI FmnWL6N
f .OL
(SHOWN IN BLACK)
SCALE:1 "=1000'

a

--?- -
=AND MANAGEMENT GROUP It\
U.S.G.S. 1943 8 1990 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
X25
-`\
• ? ice. \ \ ?p _ _ ? \ ??_??
_ q =
bra
`
"7 \1
mss \ z,?? ?;, ^ (¢ _ = I
i
' ?V_ ?yi ...,. ? 1:51, -\/`/'?,^;; ?•• _ ® ;
Gavel ( `? n 10 o I
Avel, Pi-
t S ell j
r5 --- P int Ii
j ,I 'm r iv ;C/ age 7•te? \ _ 9
-Z 26n?
wer . i o may' ?: railg` ?(, p p y nt
Mt Carmel
Trailer
?` ? •: J Park
Trail
?, ,1\ ?I _? j? ?.. ? • r ? Park
.?` r•r 111 _ _???b44111
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC
I
w
BRUNSWICK CO. SCS SURVEY
ip(C'-.Mk , r i =r.2. • ' ?y~ .. 4. a R a- ar ` -C
7.1
70
. -.-? •e : l'.' `?'?...`a" 11791??? ?. w a Bad b
a \0
O t y
„?, sif A
o3a
"''` !•-- ,!'+'F?+ r "?` ','"*•. - `PTO
O '. 7 \ ?-••r s. / -off. _
?r 3a8(?`/' ..?/ as 1 Bab
1-0
? "?J `. ntf ?; '. :c a.?:i rt<1.: 7,(?. 'i.'.a,? •„?? ..• .t_ ...ice ,,h?'t
Sad i B aEP • 'fi't < \ --. •'
ti - •..!_r!!J? „ -c- kIr
0- ? Yw iGOA t\ .. ?
KrB
LO"?•? fJla I dr*.b+ " J?p
-,L•,..^ .:; y '3aBY `„JI
Lo
a. r7
ni `O r ( w•t3aB/!.a 4 ?? OAi..l? 3aa J` BO Y
?_ o?
_O t 1 ?° ; i?ia ,t ai j ?,? z??YBad "L rd -
..
' a a a - } ° <'9
3mS GO
R a q ppJJ?
7m -4
igwS ?•u1' G ?.?RBnB l 'y ,??L 4?. iv.-. s
h a , i Baal
0-1
?Ra C 1L1 Vod L? ?'
Kr5
3,1
--??.._? Ii Lis Bfl • ?,-..
8. 'rn P? _':g?isiwa?y' ,•,-, ..•.
3aB
S as
i Lo ?na. w elLw .?B
\ \ 31 Bab ? ?tY1
Mk .N 3aB f/ Lo ??_ +1••.:ip'i`-?,, 3a8 w C
?'?-J i '"'.` ,rv''+r ,`?' The ? r •? (, r.,, . 7 aA ? ..
IISAI '
i 338??
fill 4?.,c!„•^ 'a' •L•/.'1'O %6'.. •n'i` P:i•4 ? - 2 '?'4f:rv
i
{ LAND k 4ANAGE?-TENT GROUP, INC

LOCATION MAP
a a
• ., a
a e
+

a + ? ?
??e?e?
U
a

LEGEND:
8 ELEVATED CART PATHS (8'X 840' BY 6' HT. ABOVE WETLAND SURFACE)
9 MINOR ROAD CROSSINGS BY FILLING 235'X45' AREA (.24 ACRE)
4 PROPOSED NEW PONDS OUT OF 404 WOODY WETLANDS (2.46 ACRES)
1 VEHICLULAR BRIDGE (52'X30-BY 6' ABOVE WETLAND SURFACE)
_ 4 MITIGATION AREAS OUT OF UPLANDS WITH SURFACE WATER &
0
PLANTED WETLAND SHELF (3.9.ACRES)
W11 BULKHEAD/RIPRAP LOCATIONS POTENTIALLY TOTALING
2250 L.F. ABOVE WETLANDS
- CARTPATH & FAIRWAY FILL IMPACTS (1.17 ACRES)
PREVIOUS NWP/401-PERMIT FOR ROAD CROSSING
e
+ a r7 ?
? ? +
e ? a
? • + a a
• a a
o ??
4
+ a +
?
t y
?\ ? 4

7?/+l?

w1 A
)CK GOLF LINKS" .. `"'
404 WETLAND IMPACTS
SCALE:1 "=800-
40 404/CAMA WETLAND LINE SUBSTITUTED
AS MHW CONTOUR
EW 404 WETLAND IMPACT-3.87 ACRE
4ITIGATION-3.9 ACRES •
--
?t°,?,49?N1f
r 4' RO'S.RT L.
?Q: ItIVyL
.07
?? • JY:l:7 r'7 `;
niunu>'

y ?a a a
? a a
a? a
+ ? a
4 a• /•.' y N
e?
e ? ? e
a ?. / aa. / y y
? ? •? a ;, a -, y
t ? ? 4 ?'
67 ., ? ? ? e
?
' a
• •i ti•
. / a
? 7
JUNE 1995
PREPARED B LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

? rfA
A
1
ti

0

CK GOLF LINKS" 14404 WETLAND IMPACTS ,y
r
SCALE:1 "=800'
i' h i v 4 ? y•' .\
b
b
b a ,
LEGEND:
8 ELEVATED CART PATHS (8'X 840' BY 6' HT ABOVE WETLAND SURFACE)
9 MINOR ROAD CROSSINGS BY FILLING 235'X45 AREA (.24 ACRE)
0- 4 'ROPOSED NEW PONDS OUT OF 404 WOODY WETLANDS (2.46 ACRES)
1 VEHICLULAR BRIDGE (52'X30-BY 6' ABOVE WETLAND SURFACE)
Adk lp-
4 MITIGATION AREAS OUT OF UPLANDS WITH SURFACE WATER &
PLANTED WETLAND SHELF (3.9.ACRES)
Q --11 BULKHEADIRIPRAP LOCATIONS POTENTIALLY TOTALING
2250 L.F. ABOVE WETLANDS
- CARTPATH & FAIRWAY FILL IMPACTS (1.17 ACRES)
_ PQEVIOUS NWP/401 PERMIT FOR ROAD CROSSING
0,.1
11
,,a a
+' ? y a
f u I S a b•
a a
i b
w

b a a a 1? ?
J I
b a
t y i
4 4• ? y t
i b
i' b yb??' • y?
•I• a
4041CAMA WETLAND LINE SUBSTITUTED
AS MHW CONTOUR
EW 404 WETLAND IMPACT-3.87 ACRE
11TIGATION-3.9 ACRES
Q
,11111111, , , , ,
R0 RT L.''•• y
,/1 j1?11111 {1H?1j5`,,\
JUNE 1995
PREPARED B LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

S Y..,fit
sew qr _,&I?
'?! ??'?en .?adaom
9?md aLmzwm? $40c O, inc.
&UGWftM ?P?anatir i & RECEIVED
Cliff Winefordner
Dept. of the Army
Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
At cl)aze 4 c 1521
Vdn&W", .NWA %6dma 2W2
3d'. 910-452-000Y
C.O.E.
Wilmington, N.C. 28402-1890
August 28, 1995
Re: "The Rock Golf Links" Compliance With MOA Criteria
(Action ID #199504547).
Dear Cliff:
99WA O
1..Y A..4 ep. 5'.h
jw5 9fi*4 aw& . -
'it6*W&a, M SW3
Mr. R.D. White, III has asked me to address the MOA concerns noted
within your 8/9/95 CAMA G.P. Acknowledgement Letter. We've had
some very productive on-site meetings with Rudy Scheiner and
Michael Hosey of your staff and Ed Brooks of DCM, as well as
dialogue with DEM's Stormwater and Water Quality staff and the
final design is a reflection and compromise of many of the agency
concerns. Mr. White wanted me to thank you for your staff's
valuable input. What follows is a discussion of the 3 MOA
criterion and "The Rocks" design/ construction scheme to achieve
full compliance.
(A) The Least Damaging Practical Alternatives:
As is illustrated on the "Summary of 404 Wetland Impacts"
color coded map (attached) the major wetland impacts will
occur within pine flat wetlands by 9 proposed road crossings,
4 new shallow irrigation ponds, and fairway land clearing
activities. The golf course development was carefully sited
on the 569 acre property in such a way to cause the loss of
3.87 acres of interior woody wetlands. With a .site this large
only .24 acre will be disturbed for the fill road crossings,
1.17 acres for the mechanized land clearing is fairways, and
2.46 acres is new wetland ponds. Since much of the site had
existing streets, existing home sites, and was previously
platted, the golf course architect and engineer laid out this
land plan as the least damaging alternative.
SEP J 5 1995
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
'np?0 r'N
•P
{
2
(B) Practical Steps to Minimize Wetland Losses:
The goal of the project design was to minimize 404 wetland
loss to less than 4 acres and to prevent any disturbance to
CAMA salt marsh areas. In order to achieve these goals a
series of 8 elevated wooden cart paths will be utilized within
the golf course and one vehicular bridge will minimize damage
to "adjacent" wetlands. Only the pilings will disturb the
wetland surface and they will be raised high enough 41-6'
along grade in order to assure native vegetative cover.
You probably noted that the applicant proposed 11 bulkheaded
locations totalling 2250 L.F. of estuarine shoreline. While
this may seem excessive it should be emphasized that the
bulkhead/stone revetments will only be used to stabilize
eroding shorelines and retain potential siltation and sediment
runoff from land disturbing activities. Each retaining wall
structure will be situated at or above the wetland lines
previously surveyed and contain erosion/siltation activities
on the downslope side of sand fence barriers.
You should also note that the 571 single family residential
lots are platted in such a way to avoid most wetland impacts
and maintain adequate space for a typical home. The applicant
fully realizes that some of the lots may need minor lot line
revisions in order to maximize useable space and he will
establish deed restrictions to educate future lot buyers of
wetland restrictions.
(C) Practical Mitigation/Compensation of Unavoidable Impacts:
As was discussed with your staff the applicant wants to
achieve a "No Net Loss" goal. Therefore, for the 3.87 acres
of interior woody wetlands which will be disturbed, another
3.9 acres of fresh water pond/emergent wetland will be
created. It is anticipated the ponds will be dug to a 6-7 ft.
depth and around their edges a shallow 40 ft. wide emergent
wetland shelf will be established. In addition to volunteer
sedges and rushes a mixture of Pickerel-weed (Pontederia
cordata); Bull Tongue (Sagittaria falcata); and Lizard Tail
(Saururus cernuus) will be planted to help mitigate other
wetland impacts noted above. These ponds will also be
available for stormwater runoff collection from future streets
when elevational grades are appropriate.
%9

3
Should you need further clarification of the MOA criterion, please
feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Rw- ?Y-0-*IA-
Rob Moul, M.E.M.
Environmental Consultant
RM/dm
Enc: Summary of 404 Impacts Map
cc: R.D. White
Ed Brooks, CAMA
Jim Gregson, DEM-Wilmington
John Dorney, DEM-Raleigh

"THE ROCK ELF LINKS"
SUMMARY OF 404 WETLAND IMPACTS
LEGEND:
MR-8 ELEVATED C
9 MINOR ROA
4PROPOSED
1 VEHICLULAI
_ 4 MITIGATION
PLANTED WET
0
wA -11 BULKHEAD,
} 2250 L.F. ABC
CARTPATH &
u- PREVIOUS NV
1 "=800'
AMA WETLAND LINE SUBSTITUTED
4HW. CONTOUR
WETLAND IMPACT-3.87 ACRES
ON-3.9 ACRES
(pl
RO.7 RT
^ q: r U'
14REP
JUNE 1995
MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
0+.?EB--19-' 96 MON 14:04 ID: TEL N0: #324 P@1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Healtn and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Hawes. Secretary
Roger N. ScheCter, Director

DivistoN of coASTAE MANAGEMENT/MAJOR PERIyIITS PROCESSING UNIT
I

TOr
OFFICE Q
FAX #: `1 3 l `? S- `?
FROM: „`?.
# PAGES:
(Indudng rover sheet)
COMMENTS:

P.O. Banc 27687. Rdelgh, Norih Cciolinci 27611.76$7 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An EgUd OppodunifyAffemgtive Action Employer -oft tacyalad/ 10%PcW-cauimerPaper
-FEE-19-996 MON 14:05 ID: TEL NO: #324 P02 1
JAN-09-1996 15:41 FROM EHNR W l L-M REG OFFICE TO LAMA COOPER HLD P.01
w=18rA crnern OT Environment, %"rv
H4atthi and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management.
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govsrrtor
Jonoftn S. Howea. 8scrararY
A. PrvstOn HOWBrd. Jr., P.E., Director -
Mr. IL D. whitr" M • evember x8s1995
Post Ofd Box 352
Obclt OW* Noxth Carolina. 2$459
gtrfs?ect: permit No. $w e OX611
bGk Gaff zAbb
Low Deft SEoxmwater
8100swkk cony
V"r Mr. '4f?hilx::
2%-W34a>uingma #+e&Ad Of'fioo WAYW tb Sto=w Applioatiom for The 3twk Golf Lhft oa rune IS,
1995, wkly fitttlli&i'mttift on November 8, 1993. W mv16w of thoplans"s oadom baia dm mimed
that tbis pn4e4l, u propmd, w91 comply wfth the 8tonnwat4s' Regaladasas set Earth in Title 15A NCAC
21 .1000. We are forwat+ding Permit No. SWB 950618 dated Novamber 29, 1995 to you.
'C'hin possni oba be dhc&o tt+4m thv date of ismlianfe unt8 rescinded and sl>stll be scbjgg to the covAdow
end ]W a dm as s =Vw tbateb.
N my Pam, mWimnmts. or limitations conmbad in this pex'sait em uoaccep4b1c, you have tt t#ght to
Aq" to adiudkAWxy bN&I upon 'WdM l *4459 0111A thi* (30) days Sowing m*lpt of this poXmit.
nh t+aglsM must be its the forms d a arriM prWOR, conforming to Ciaapter 150B of the lgmh Carolina
O NOW StOmtes, and filed with the Ofr= of Ad+ms tfvt r1' S, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC
27611-7"7. Unless such demands are made thus permit shall be ftd gad bindiug.
If you bwe any gncsaiow, or neW uWldonat Mformadon cantcming this matter, plaw contact either Linda
INWS or me at [phone].
s#sue?ly, .
Adkian
*nd OV our Q?t'Y sal?r?or
Mad: h_tWQS1s7r0RMWAT1ri Mg5066118..N
cc: AU4 Lawh [e-mail]
Delaney Aycock, &urawkk Cowaty Uspmdons
Vrd@gA inn Re"d Office JAN 0 81996
(:entrai Fides
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Telephone [phone] PAX 919-733.9879
1SWO Action Employer
TOTFL- P,01
4 ,?....FEB-19-'96 MON 14:05 ID: TEL N0:
e JAN-02-1996 16:32 FF01 EHNR WILM REG OFFICE TO
0

#324 P03
CAMA COOPER ELD P.02 DI+PARTM•'p OF VjVMOXN r IMALm AND NATU-I!UL-1 oURCBs
s TATS OF NORTO CAROLINA
'nMSION pF MMMO1 NUMAY• M,WA,OMMT
STMS
Low DZNSTI.`Y DEvEMPMENT
iSxo2ts of Article 21 of CbAPtet 143, ClenerAStatutos of North C2?rolina as amendtd,
In accordancewith cProv Regulations
and other' applicable Taws, Rules and R+egu
PgitNIISSIQN IS XMMY GRANIM TO
Mr. R. D. White, M, etal•
JU Rnck GO (f Unb
.pmm%Wck County
Fop, THE
ment systems in compl%nee with the pravisi0us
oonstxuction, operation and MWAtename of StOtmwator ><>Deaa? roved Ste wat8x
of 15A NCAG 2 .1000 (hezeafter referred to as thxft e --stonnwater nda") "d the VP
as attaoW ad on Me with W approved by
mawapment plans and specifications, e?a and ppn?s ned a pats of this pe><>?t fe The Rock Golf Links.
tree I?ivision? of l?nvirOmnaeltttal Zugnte
e permit shall be tffeetive from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the following
Th
gWIC1G COtl(rtiogs agd HotWon&
L DESIGN STAN)DAIDS
1. The following bunt upon area Un itaticas are approved for tba8 ?p cQject:
a. The allowable butt upon area per lot is 6,400 Square feet, based ova 571 I.oto. -U$ for
b. The total allowable bui1? upon arm fox the tzaot 141.81 d ft=-W on attachmentz"ANtto the
the :multi fa y axe a:thin tho tract M more p
submittal fo= andom sheet 7 of 0 of the Mwved PbM-
tagc or lot sizes for the Proca must be ma lotainvd at levels at
2. I , overall tract built upon area perc?cr i?iod in the stalamwater rules. These 1"Is are
least as stringent as the low density levels SpoC
summarized below {n Ors stringent leW& may apply in awordaace with the rules):
- EB-19-196 MON 14:06 ID: TEL NO: #324 P04
JAN-02-1996 16=35 FROM EHNR WILM REG OFF71CE TO CAMA COOPER BLA P.03
The Rook Golf Croke
IgCDBIW Storddw?ater Project No. SWS 954618
lamozm irk County. North Ca"Una
i. R. D. White. III do hereby agme to the following items CCMceMUV comments and
requirements v ade by the North Carolina Department Qf Environment. Health
s
Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Manageineat, ?VVat
(NC and
DENI) re$ardi? the Rock Golf Links in Brunswick County. North quality
1) It is understood that infiltrarion may not be feaaable for some multi-
family areas due to water table and soils.
2) The golf cou rise fairways will, not a6 100-200 foot buffers between
impervious areas and the waters of the Shallottc Mver,
3) 12e?ng walls may be constructed in certain wetland areas.
4) It is understood that multi-farngy area "D", adjacent to the Mill Pond.
w411 be allowed as high density as long as a 50-foot buffer of natural
vegetation at a 50-foot strip of wetlands remains.
5) it is understood tlm other f approved engineered 1 not solution ??a?bbe
unless infiltration or
designed with approval granted y the MUM
6) It is understood that multi-family area "C" to acceptable with the
following conditions;
a. Additional natural buffers w111 be provided It is
b. The site will be graded to sheet-flow into wetlands.
understood that collection and concentrated discharges of
runoff are not allowed
c. The built-upon areas will be miniu=ed as much as practicable
7) It is understood that. on an overall basis, the site should utilize
interior fairway ponds as much as possible. the site wdl be graded
away from sensitive waters, natural buffers wM be provided between
impervious surfaces and the waters of the State. and the built-upon
are& wLU be ndulmized to the wKent practicable.
S) All areas designated as future development must be submitted to the
NCDAM for plan approval prior to construction.
0) Deed reaWetions for the lots will be recorded prior to the sale of any
lot.
R. D. WMtet 1U7
State of North Carolina
County of Brunswick
•J •L MArla t . a Notary Public of the State of North Carolina,. County of
grimsid- 61c, here rectify that R. D. White. III personally appeared before me tbde day
and executed the above statement.
Witness MyJ11 ad and notarial a W. this Awl- day of Arjafthw 1995.
STOWMATER
?p'TAR?e
'? .0 G (No blic)
,?,QX 8 u? Nov 0 $1g9s
My s ?-Ifl -,-. ¢ G
-? r
,,. 14#=*.---FED-19-'96 MON 14:07 ID: TEL NO: #324 P05 "M-..W--Wb-b
JAN-02-1996 16:2B FROM EHNR WILM REG OFFICE TO CRIB COOPER BLD P.01
Stato Of 140A Caroliaa
• ' Department of Eavimmnment, Health, vA Ndu al Resources
wilmi%Wv RogionW Of&*
!emus B. Hot, 00mor B9b Jamiwm
J0ft bra lt. 4tewa. &ctn ?sy IGagtaasl 1Vta>adgar
a
FAX COVER SHEET
BATE: NO. OF PAGES
..
Lr P.GSrt -s?
TO: FROM: t' C3 a,
co: C AMA _ CO: FAX #: j Ia - -Is?3` 1:.l, ?J FAX #: _
ct?t?i 2.
RRMARIC$: YOU WOr hUL 1 W +hCp5e
please 2cc Mq ---
127 cardinal Drive Bzuuioa. wnlmia poa, N.C. M0 4S43 • Tvkpboae (910) 39}3900.1rax (910) 3307D01
An 8qual Oppcmunky nttinnni.e Avdvn &WIvyw
?I'ln , ..:•• ., r.r:?r;i i 4?' T!?x1. y..:.n Nt?.7?T: :?]".??:?•+r??y? s .MFR %F{'
?rl* ? ems dt? • ? "?'? •?? ; • .
eegp?tuuz adjudic?oxy he?trg :wt'a(egt?t 'w3tittn.t't3'?`.ds? ?ia?B???
This n um, mug to in 'w Am. trf a written owwon, wn& ming to c*w
, NC
CwnwA statutes, and filed with tha Offlo of Ad>oDinisllM" ficufts, P.O. Drawer 27447
276117447. Unless ilk 40006 00 mode WS permit zhall be final and -Nutt, .
IY you have any quash'Ions, or toed additional nai£orragdon concenft this mean', PUM CO=t e6 Lvt4a
LBwIg or me at [phone].
sincerely,
Dm Adidas
done! Watw Quality Suwvitor
DAIarL• S:1WQSIST0RMWAT\P '1950613-K0v
A)n Lewis
Me" AYwa, BrunmiCk County Inspections
Wtlmiosgtoit weodd Of'ice
Centua MW
Linda Lewis
R.O. Box 29635. Aaleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Fquel Oppwtunky Af6rew6ve AadW En+plover
sail. Fin puu slaatls opnlout of `slol julluaplsat KUutu3-oj2uis ILS 30 luowdolanap polutoossu
puu `osnoggnlo `asanoo 3lo$ oloq 8I uu 2modotd atu sluuollddu aqy :ASS y0af0?Id
(saalum VS ut) saA :uadO AAOH-DS `VS :uoi;eaJisseD aalnAA (A)
SgA :eaaV SJasanN Saeunad (a)
saJou I6i :Paganlsi(l eaaV Ieloy (O)
saaou 6-C uotlu2iltut punai2q iH
sazou 161 aouugtnlstp punor2gftH aaglp (D)
sPut'iIOAA palula2aA-UOM (11)
110CMl v0t'..
saaou Itb•I saaou 9tb•Z sPuullOAk P01101020A (V)
?I LO QF'I"II3 QaD(iaaQ
[VauV] WOLIAl asa(l ZVZIflVH
V/lei - aaanoS
V/AI moisoaa 3o aluH IunuuV paluunlsa (O)
a2pug aulno qQA `satlglln puu spuoa leuoilippu `sailiuautu
put, osnoggnlo `os noo 31og oloq uaalg2!a - pauueld
uoistAtpgnS saaogS sudoD - 2tnlslxa :saanlanalS 3o adSjL (A)
sutalsgs dd-I ao/puu 31uul oildos IunplAipul - pauueld
sautoq 2tnlstxa to3 utalsSs Auul otldas lunpinipul - 2ut4s<xa :luale
utaay aaleesalse? (?)
IuioaaWWOD/aluntad :asll POPualuI
oM :Iuapuada(l aaleAA. (0)
A1D`Sa :paeloAUI (s)0aV (S)
uotluAaasuoD/uoilisuuly uugzn/lmng - df17 utoa3 uoileaul.ssrla pue-I
OIlOUNS - ueld asll Pue'I Dori (V)
:NOLTA H3SaQ MUS
u012ututpAA - ONJJO
96/9Z/9 - paAtaaag uoileagddV : wacl3O02Id ONlIssa00?Id
(luuoriddu 7y lua2V) soA - luasaad IuuailddV seA j
961£i/L - IiSIA OIN 30 SaIeQ :aEn(IH00HId aAlLVOI.LSaANU
vwvD wAi mouvOIZSaANa
8
'L
'9
'S
000£L A 00t,06IZ :X - saleutpa003 auuld OWIS
lapis I30I) 18`08`6L-6 41861 lapis lq2u ologd) b`£`Z`i-i6i :6861 - xapul oloud
•uugOjPD WON `AlunoD 3lo!msunag 3o Altunutuxoo OlloltugS `,IoAr alloltugS
Ogl of luaoufpu `(I6I i 2IS) Puo21 sudOD 330 `local aaou 699 :aIIS Z0af02Id AO NOIZVOOrI Z
s31m'I 3100 )IOOU OU/III OligAk 'Cl '2I :3IVN SANV3IZddV 'I
iuwau A10I.LVOI saAAII (I IM
J.KMW2[f)vmm 'IVZSVO3 3o NOISIAIQ

'(6 3O Z '.'Id) alis osnoggnlD posodoid
aT{l at,au a2puq Tuinorgan U Jo uogloTUlsuoo agl puu suoTluqulsug Iranlno IS opnlour pjnom uollorulsuoo
puog Xum jo-lg2u agI unjlrn punoi2 moloq paljulsui aq pjnom soilgT `Xjquurnsara Xum o-Ig$u
I3 09 u uigl?tA `sum lant,ri paned oprm Iaaj OZ u jo lsmoo pjnom uoponrlsuoo puoi moN •ouq. puujlam
VNVD rO/puu sdIOD agl Jo P.Tt,mpuul puu AUIN anoqu paluool oq pjnom duadu ro/puu spuoq)nnq aTjl
3o IPd -salts uoiluzgiquls ougarogs duo du/puaiMnq posodoid (I I) uanala puu `(•Ij g X '13 0t'S fuqulol)
spuullam .nano palunalo aq pjnom jugl `posodwd sa,3puq lruo 31oi? (g) lg2ra aru =U •sainluaj osznoo
3jo2 puuldn aduospuul of posn aq pjnom luualuTU palunt,oxg •(sarou 9V-Z) spuullam Polt,law XIlurapaj
Tuogj spuod (l,) mod ?o uoilt,nt,oxo agl opnlouT pjnom lI • •ola `suaaag `saal `shmxjuj agl jo 2mduospuul
agI 2uunp oouugrnlsrp Iros puu fuuualo puul IuuoT ru2is anlonuT pjnom osanoo jjot agl jo uoilotulsuoo
OU s2uTtAmp Ioaford agl uO umogs aru suollujlulsui lranlno puu slaails pasodoid oqt •TualsXs
founoD xotmsunag aqj Aq papinoid oq pjnom .slum olquloa •suralsXs z2umos aoujrnsgns dare ro/puu
Tm orldos lunpinipur Xq papinozd oq pjnom luowdolanap agl io3 ralt,molst,AA, •Iuowdojanap KIruTUj-illnTu
aanlnj.ioj paluuSTsop uaaq ant,g lugl louil agl uigliM SUM anU are drags •sloj Ieiluapisai KFWUj-ai2ugs
ILS aoJ aaTTlonrlsugPi uorsrnipgns aT{I alt,aro pjnom T{oigm sarlrliln puu slaarls uoisrngpgns mau `st, llam
su `sopmouru glrm `osnoggnlo put, osinoo 3Io2 clog uaalg&a ut, Ionalsuoo of 2msodoid sr luuoilddu ags
•sagrags1d auuuw
jo uoisiniQ •D •N agl kq wiV A.rasanN X.TuW l su palt,u2isop sT uazu loafoid agI ur `.rang alloll "qS
agl JO ITV •gsUi OqS Jo IsaAJUq Oqj oI NadO On ranr21 allojluq agl Jo suoilrod ramol oU •luauuo2vuuW
lt,luowuorrnug jo uoisiAT •D •N agl Xq `AkA&DI agl of puod IIiIN auI jo T{lnoTU agl Tuoa3 `VS P
`puod IpW agl jq glnoTu auI oI LI XmH 'S'fl TuoaJ `DS paIFsst,lo are rani 2i allolTugS aT{lJo sralum aTTL
•sropuaoo.slum undo oqj of luaoufpu u.ToU u oliu •S jo sraproq mouuu ulim ` snuuuuwaoz
snounr) gsru-aIPaoN xoulg gluuTUud si Tjsruug luaoufpu agl °(uragl.Tou) rams agI jo suorl,Tod aaddn agj uI
aalum agI of luaoufpu uzol3rurallu uurl.rt, S) sagsruur ssu.T2proD gjooTUS angsualxa aru crap `(uraglnos)
.rams oqj 3o uorliod iomol agl uI •ouiiaaogs 33nlq T 2iq jo slsisuoo .rams agl of luaoufpu spuuldn zqj
jo T{onW •rani2i ouollugS agI 3o ouilarogs agI 2uolu spuullam luprl Iulsuoo of `uisoood ?iug pag/aura oI
`Tuolloq poomprug oldrw po-d/TUn f) IaamS urOJJ Arun saCUl puullam O%L •sagolip lut,uumi put, &TgSixo ro
`sroppoo a2uum Tjlrm paluioossu are Isour Inq `polulosr are spuullam puului agl jo auroS •sraaU12 jo
sdzoD SuuV •S •n aqj Sq panoiddu puu paluouilop uaag anuq Iourl agI urglim spuullam aTjs 'aVl sigl
punozu Klgnilot, ranuaq jo oouaprna angsualxa ST 0.10%L •Xt,mllyds awl agl urorj mol?rano sanTOOar To uo
ags •apis raglra uo P-IOU TUallu uulw S) ssm2pioD gioows jo srapioq momu gjIm `aprm laaj 017 - 0£
sr luuuo zql •aalel aqj 3o opis glnos aTjl 2uole `Isom-lsua suns gorgm luuuo iuP?I `paloauuoo t, sT araT{s
rams luaoufpu auI jo sagsauur lupil-ialur zqi Tuoaj opl agI solmdos goigm `oV I puod JITH 3o Tuup ap
ssorou sunr I61I PuO2I WIS •puod ITIN agl su umou)l ST puu `lourl agI jo uorl.iod lmluoo glnos aqj ug
poluool sr IsAml ags •Ioug oqj uo spuod ftlsixa ano3 aau araTjs •Isaao3 poompmq Ajr , 0113!H/490 aanl7gur
jo suaru `su llam su `slsaroj aura Allolg(Z puu jual2uo-I aznluur jo suaru are orags •spuuldn popoom
Xlaluururopard sr a2uaiou padolanapun ??umuTUai oqL •uoiluorjddu agl of pagmpt, duur u uo umogs
are `uoisinrpgnS sa.TogS sudoD podolanap Apuaalu agl jo slaored Ino puu spoor 2uglstxa otLL -uoiloipsunf
2uruuuld iuuolWolurlxo symos oqj urglrm Inq `ollofpgS 3o umos oqj jo slrugri al odioo agl jo apislno
ST SIradord aT{s slaarls Iuiluopisai alunud 2urlsixo raglo It,xanas puu (16II 2i S) pt,o21 sudo? sapnloui
gotgtA `uotsinipgnS sarogS sudoZ) 2upsixa aqj `punoat, paluauo sr put, `sapnloui SIradord aT{s raniZl
allolpgS oqj Sq paraproq si Sliodoad oqj jo opis Isuo ags •uurloruD ulroN `,14unoo joimsunrg uT `.Tanrd
ouollugS agl of Iuaoufpt, `allolpgS 3o umos oqI 3o glnos Isnf palt,ool `Iourl aaoV 699 t, si ails Ioafoid ags
NOIJAE[Has3Q sad O2Id -6
Z a2ud
s4uiZ Rog xaog aqL/al!gAA 'Q '2I ' 'f
uol2uiurpM :oo-gjo 96/OZ/L :01UQ s oor
X S '3'a: q PaUtm . qnS
TagsaaIem iuootefpt, oql 3o Sirunb imam agi of s1cmdun uual-2uol oAlIvInmmoov oql of uoljnqujuoo
aq Sl[n wow pTnom aaagl `luamdolanap Sur gjim st, `juamdolanap ?Sjlsuap-mol zoj saouwmoll?
bowIn2ar jo Z/I.st a2 uaoxad sitll g2nogllV •sootpns snotnradun of pavanuoo oq pTnom jowl agl
jo % V I Xla;vugxojddv `Ino-plinq IV -salts puod aqj of luanfpu `3iags pueIiam paluuId ol `spuuldn jo
saroV 6•£ 2uglranuoo Sq `ssol puE uoisranuoo pimpom oql ioj al-egli m of sasodoid juuorTddv oU -salts
IIt3 Sumrpj put, gjrd umo poS moj ssoi Pu'uIlam ODOR LT • I R put' `s2msso13 pVoa (6) autu moaj 2ut,lnsai
saaor VZ' io ssol oql opnloui sjovdmt purljam aagjp •linIq-ug aalvm molpgs of spuullam ocMj utsoood 3o
saaor 9V•Z lianuoo pTnom sputpom paluln2w Slpopaj utqjim `spuod (I,) anon jo uotpneoxa pasodozd
ou -spur Jo u0potulsuoo aql puE `saaI pun `suaa.I,3 `sXUm,i BJ Jo .2utduospuel puE `BUT
2 `2uu olo
P'ui
aqj 2uunp puul 3o sazou 161 Alaivmixoidde grnjsip pTnom osrnoo 31o2 posodozd oql jo uopotulsuoo oqs
SZJVcUM Q2[ZVd[31JLRV '0I
£ and •
s3luiZ 31og xaoU aril/allgt l 'Q 'H '

gi/ Y ffo.uaon
V. J
Ed Brooks
Division of
127 Cardinal
Wilmington,
a
At 6/,Aw Ax 25U
GJIdm , AoWA %6o&' 28402
Jel s1-o-45,2-oo0Y

Coastal Management
Drive Extension
N.C. 2840,5
June 15, 1995
c,
990e& 14
V_96A
90dmixytm," 2W3
Re: Submission of "The Rock Golf Links'! , CAMA:-Maj,ar? A=lication.
Dear Ed:
Enclosed please find 24 copies of the blueline drawings of "The
Rock" which details all of the proposed interior wetland 404
impacts and dimensions of the various site improvements. As
discussed in the application package Mr. R.D. White, et.al. owns
the 569 acre property and they desire to construct the 18 hole golf
course with clubhouse and amenities plus plat and develop 571
single family residential lots. Mr. White also has 3 multi-family
sections which will remain undeveloped until public sewer becomes
available.
With this CAMA Major submission the sedimentation control plan and
stormwater plans are also being included as vital parts of the
application package.' A summary of 404 wetland impacts is attached
as a reduced 11'x17" color coded map which helps to illustrate
various locations of specific land use impacts. The $250.00
application fee and a sheet containing riparian land owner names
and address is also attached.
On some adjacent riparian neighbors Mr. White has explained the
project personally and on others he has mailed the attached
"Notification Letter" by.-Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested.
As the return receipts come in Mr. White will forward them to you.
As to CAMA concerns there..,will be no saltmarsh or estuarine waters
directly filled or excavated.` There will be, however, 7 elevated
wooden cart paths over saltmarsh vegetation but in order to reduce
shading impacts they will be at least 6 ft. above the MHW contour.
Also, there are potentially`-11 separate locations for
bulkhead/riprap retaining walls all'at or-above all 404 wetlands
and/or MHW or NWL contours. The purpose,of the 2250 L.F. of
bulkheading is to stabilize either existing ero'ding,.bluffs or help
prevent sediment from newly constructed fairways tr-om' reaching
saltmarsh areas.

f
Ed Brooks Page 2
The 404/CAMA wetlands ''were identified during the Fall of 1993 and
the Cotps approved the line in January of 1994. The wetland lines
are illustrated on the attached bluelines. In order to save money,
the 404/CAMA wetland line is used as the MHW contour which Mr.
White recognizes increases his impervious cover ratios.
Finally, the 3.87 acres of "woody" 404 wetlands which will be
impacted with fill or excavation are to be mitigated by a 1:1
replacement by the creation of shallow ponds out of uplands and the
planting of a 40' wide wetland shelf around their perimeters which
will be planted with emergent grass like plant species.
Should you have any other questions, please feel free to contact
Jay Houston or myself at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Rob Moul, M.E.M.
Environmental Consultant
RM/dm
Enclosures: CAMA Application
24 Drawings
cc: R.D. White
Jay Houston, P.E.

"T4IE ROCK GOLF LINKS"
Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT ;x
a. Landowner:
b. City, town, community or landmark
c Street address or second a?c road number
Name (L Is proposed work withi -rity limits or planning
jurisdiction? Ylest X' No
Address E• 6), ,??o?C 3 S a 1.
rr e. Name of body of water project (.g. river,
City State creek, sound, bay) ftic L(©L? t2; vim„
Zip Day Phone LID 7s?,c -8F) (H)
FaxC d., t !o ?5 y `22'` c??°?3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
b. Authorized Agent:
Name a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Address y /E A Vj a R?., L if- 6Qo(F 71
City c' to In State !y C T
Zip Z,?Lt5 Day Phone `?to ?s,jj 432- 1?
Fax&y7`_„_5 --21
ll?p
c. Project name (if any) (ham
NOTE. Permit will be issued in name of k idowner(3), mid/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County R &- k .,v- S
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? A-1e,.j (?J o?
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Gz <- (r
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. 1 Ae ., Gep t P Keg,*- .[.-e_.
Revised 03/95
v ._
f
Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract `5 6 g,,S
b. Size of individual lot(s) f G c/rooo
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL - }• 1?k G.bou¢. 1VL4tJ
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
5e-la L -s- T S P
n. Describe location and type of discharges to water
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitar
wastewater, industrial /commercial effluent, "was
down" and residential discharges.)
ry 4-
Soil type(s) ar)d t xture(s) of tr" ct i 'Ne lc:,*- 9,-,J o•
w.¢n.d? ? u 5locv o N? ? , ??
Vegetation on tract M: C
f.
g
h
Describe existing drinking water supply source.
C X ? 5-7-? •.r Co , G.T
v
W -' SO ' a. n/ Sa(-?- ,Wars L.,
Man-made features now on tract Co y4.s 1
What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation ransitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
How is the tract zoned by local',government?
R-/ S ?o Pc? ID
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? des No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, f appQcaable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National, Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligib property?
Yes No '.
1. Are there wetlands on the site? Yes No
Coastal (marsh) 4- S Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? eS
(Attach documentation, if available)
404 S L-, U e o aC C J rt `/7 a, ?S )
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) of
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, ther.
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by II" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
1
Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secobdary --road (SR) ; ;,.; - -
numbers, landmarks, and the like. 6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
- " TO ENTER ON LAND
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necess
XA list of the names and complete-addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that-such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name fie. ?4--1-I roc 4.a,? ?--? 5?`
Address a (?:; ?.?.. l?w?.??s
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.

? ?/F 19 17
s.
v6 _'A list of previous state or federal permits issued for This is the day of
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, Print Name T,?.
permittee, and issuing dates.
D e? ?` 3 a7 Signature
# 114
?o
/ Landowner or Authorized Agent
,.Ar'A check for $250 made payable to the Department of /
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs' of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas. y.tl
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.",
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act. ri /,q
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
CM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
/ISCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
M MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major h.
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that,relate to this
proposed project.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed 571 :, e. a. /
b. Number of lots or parcels - _S 7.Z /2 e=9f;?,(
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) t /-op_ ttiw i+-s

Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
Yes No
If yes, date submitted K_ -12 __215
Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
z c- 7---,..,K Z PP
?.?
V5 7` 9
j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above
received state or local approval? .
(Aaach appropriate documentation)
?Ilt
k.
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed
including roads, ditches, etc. R / ?7 p
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been suubmi ed to the Division of Land
Resources? Yes No
If yes, date submitted
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
? u.lt Ma r f_ ? ot.J ?? e
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built-upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking.
W av- ST C S2. SCGt"4-wc?
Revised 03/95
Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
NoNe-
1. Describe proposed drinking water supply source
(e.g. well, community, public system, etc.)
m. Will water be impounded? Yes No
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded?
Applicant or Project Name
a. ? /
Sig tore
-t rvc- 7, q 9S
Date

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Revised 03/95

..,:?\:
..-:
,a `?':'?:ii;'::::.`,
•'`•::
.
te
.? ,

1. EXCAVATION Poi J s
a. Amount of material to be excavated- from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards N/ ,
b. Type of material to a excavated 'cam N
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? ??Yes No
Lt-D'f (Pr.e s c, T
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards /? 94, Ll c
>a c
1-,P1,2,.. ? P0-
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area 9,t F-
Fe-e- S C-, crr?.._ S
b. Dimensions of disposal area S? ?( s
c. . Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be avai for future
maintenance? Yes hN?o?
If yes, where? AJo
?c?? ? Cc..?tZ C6 j'rLIY i? 2?
-Z •

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes _?/No
f. Does the disposal includ any area°in the water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead ?Riprap
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh AVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If Yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water A)o,.j C
(2) Dimensions of fill area
If Yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area 2 3S X 4 S
o-t_ . ), y 0-
( 2) Purpose of fill 9
Gr?S5 o o lw
b. LengthaA-.50 LA
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
g-b ou-'L' 0.-11 M a-'c L t C+.-bye. lit !d LJ
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
Q
e.* Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
"E' a I '-t p/,,-
(Source of informarion) (/,Sc... a. ? C7:?S Rr tfQ??'61.l
5. GENERAL
a
How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? e 1, ; ., S; !q`
?./ CDC -6<
e, r ow S - r
S7` C. von?? w
f. Type of bulkhead or ripr p materiaryryl Crassur?
(`?.e t..l 80 o r lQc. ,.J w; h1a b.
fL?clk
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap - d
(2) Bulkhead back-fill - O
C.
h. Type of fill material C-/'--??J GDa se--
i. Source of fill terial t..._j?(a--8
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill aterial be brought to site?
? Yes No
What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
wa ? e ba cc ?. o e

Will wetlands be crDssed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Applicant or Proj Name
sgnsture.
7-9 1MS
Date
Revised 03/95
! •
aForm DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public Private vl?

(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge
h. Width of proposed bridge
i. eii ht of proposed bridge above wetlands
Ste,
b. Type of bridge (construction material) j
V'e. G, i c..rl a.? C,o r.ll?¢.y'e- ? L.l oo? ? ?(a.,-.(.?
c. Water body to be crossed by bridges
4046..,x¢ i ?1:1L1
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 41- 'f- r ?, f??H S r 1??
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
Yes 1'--No
If yes,
l) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes L/rNo
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or N`NL
k.
Will the proposed bride ect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
tulA
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes ?o
If yes, explain
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yeses No
If yes, explain /gr '_14 C f-ar'X e- -Cn. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes CA/0 ..v 4
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95

Form DCNI-NIP-5
2. CULVERTS
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
&, I f; 0(9- r'(eCtS - 5c_ " ?lra
b. Number of culverts proposed -!
c. Type of culvert (construction material, s le)
Piz G ?Jv a' e
v v-
J. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge ^
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigatic
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culver
require any excavation low the MHW or NWL?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
- (2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards _
b.

e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes ---No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
-
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above c.
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert D / /N Z/O 4,o {a,-ds
g. Width of proposed culvert
/.3-
h." Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL 5? ???c
Will the proposed culvert ffect existing water flow?
Yes ?No
If yes, explain
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culver
require any excavation within:
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs ?--?er Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 7?U
(2) Width of area to be excavated T
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards Z ' C C
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation?
des No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 3Z745-
(2) Width of area to be excavated -3c/
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards =E- o :z CDC C, Y,
7`o ac. h?'ewx_ 57"lc Sla?ec
If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
(2) Dimensions of s? H disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
`---yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03195
f 1. i
Form DCM-MP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be'available for future
maintenance? Yes ?No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs or other;wetlands?
Yes ? -
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or, culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be plac below
MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled ??
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
above. c? o Will the proposed project require the construction of
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below any temporary detour structures?
the MHW or NWL? Yes vIVo Yes 1--?No
If yes, give dimension if different from No,::2 If yes; ;explain in detail
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? /Yes No
If yes, explain in detail
rt. ?t.4TLL
d. Will the proposed project uire any work
channels? Yes No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
f. , Will the placement of the proposed bridge-or culvert f.
result in any fill (other than excavatedmaterial
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 1 ZS'y
(2) Width of area to be filled 3S &
(3) Purpose of fill 35-
le=
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than, excavated material
described in Item above) to be placed on
highground? Yes No h
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled J
(3) Purpose of fill w
V cj
4. GENERAL
Yes No
If yes, explain in detail So,- i F ??.S t,
1,5 ( v?T.o
a. Will the project involve any mitigation?
What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)? 4 Gc k-O.e
0 7 Q..,.
Will wetlands be crossed in trl!!porting equipment
to project site? Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes ?No
.. If yes, explain in detail
Applkant or PProject, ame
7
S' nature
?:",. -7, i 91 s
Date
-r-C-0 P/? S 2wL "No -AX-:r
Revised 03/95
r
r
hOCATION. MAP
III
II ?=
II w
SHAL
Ulm
Wa'

LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC
?\ - "1
\ .] ?.?'/// ' 111 a? ?' ^ J]!f• llit ??
k ?
f l ? Jlff< i
a.YrM^`j' u,pTf6 ?J ?' 1? utl ? ? ' f
ux uvc uu uu
u>r ;M; 1117 ?
? ? y iu E lue ?
p? f.Y Mwh FYL J
I?+O? la1dY9
ff 1wdK
4 'SYyM?/
U.S.G.S. 1943A, 1990 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS
.. ?6llotte`
h .,.
1 1

1' \

`
"
t 4 •
!O?

- .?_ . •„

O
O c.
r
r
I 04
96 O

0 _
rn,

?
?
0 O
_ p 1
Q ^ rf 0
a

r
k
?- I

?4 m
147 ` :? ?+
?'.i 1151 °
G ?vel
;ravel x - f?r
:._
o
,
•?
?s age
P
C7 o
wer
ti
CJ
o „

rail r !
Mt Carmel• 1152 ;,P

??. , ' • _ _ • Trailer
Park
7 '
.. railer
Park
•3
7

-rr ? O
G O
? RV,
p 4!11

LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC

BRUNSWICK CO. SCS SURVEY
by K \ U r' f\ 1 /?N t? ??s " s• vi L"A y.. v 1 .
??: . n,'+?k•9?a??°?,'F?-.d. , r 4 r - i? 1 ,,,?" '* 1`1?1? ^
'? . ?? gy?p.. '`'• I' -
1 ? :ar--: "? + • r
Jor k Q ?., LA m r, a:
tLwvill
} Sr .rNdg 9s ?6, r O Baf To 1 sv LA
r `' ?+ 1 a° ` •o"fi "P4`a... z,y? G?. ?' P xc- tR ,.ud'y` ' '? ? ?? &?
Y ?} #'y •y LO ev?r^ `F (TC Vttt.,? Lv, ?4,•,? s •, w' • FA's' ?? t
Ly.
baB
Jlu1 t , x GoA o
r to FCr6 ' L?0 C 1 BO
r _
Lo. ~l td"rF_ N-??,i' w,, c.r+t itel xF??
w Ba •
uas Fo y, r, r '-{ ?? %• .v •` .i .ti '''?, 80 `t''Y *'
ter so
ARMY rr r' `S •?"• n'?1ra .•la •K.L'r r .?~ -. 'r'•?•, ?, ;. > . •` 1
>k•A» n, Lv-S v ?r Y :Ra6 1 r'" adh
tO ?" ? <?'`?.?e'. 3X ? Ba Bid' ?° ? ;?; a, x? Y•?
To ?" rsi? '` Fo ill .Fo .'` aB ?`-• ??. ?' ?` ? ' 1?`," c ?,.
Oh<. .w
Bab : R "r r . R,.• i B .KtB ?.
Tm? K ?a5w s G .?..: R9 ?Q, RaxG "
,B r. m ;Ra& i
?/ •lef ^'rAx, a ,?i s, •i 1146
•? ;? , V rrlli, ??",e?,i G' tta6 Nob ? ?oP ? y i k. ? , .,t, , . ? , 1:
r' a •r'4'ci??; ?-Y:.,. •??i' t . ? ??gn?- ? r.?; " .. p BnB e ? 11a6 ',?fl .
M, Bad 1 ,
?:A, a^ r W
"?N4j xt. ; DA ,r
a
w.
} 11a? + a ?> 7 ,p Bab e8nB
M ,' To `4? ti w .
Mk.. L?'? r, Bab [Y Lo i?. +« r??S y i Ba t
t ^h pt
r, Fqi
k ? 1ue'q" C7 ,?: e
06A,
BaB Bae w : " GoA Bab "??. ?• °`` g ?+ y Hit +?? ti-
a .?
BD Pali ?j 1?So
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC

EXISTING ROADS & OUT PARCELS
.(SHOWN IN BLACK)

LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
i ,r--
Needham, Jernigan, & Associates, Inc.
Environmental Consultants
RoberGN. Needham [phone] Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D. [phone]
3717 Old Fairground Road, Angier, N.C. 27501
16 June 1994
White Investment
P.O. Box 40 11
Shallotte, North Carolina 28549
Dear Mr. White:
On June 8-9, 1994, Needham, Jernigan, & Associates, Inc. (NJ&A) conducted an endangered
and threatened species survey on the White Investment Properties tract. This tract is comprised
of approximately 250 acres located in Brunswick County south of Shallotte, North Carolina
along S.R. 1191. Secondary road 1191 forms the dam for The Millpond lake. The majority of
the acreage surrounds the lake on the northern, western, and southern sides. Most of the
property is dominated by longleaf pine with some patches of loblolly pine. The wetland
drainages on the tract are dominated by mixed oaks with an understory of ericaceous shrubs.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service provided a list of endangered/threatened species for
Brunswick County. The Natural Heritage Program database was checked to determine known
locations in the vicinity for any of the listed species. Preserved specimens of the plants were
reviewed prior to the field survey at the UNC- Wilmington herbarium. The survey consisted of
searching the appropriate habitats on-site as well as off-site areas within a half-mile radius (a
special requirement for the red-cockaded woodpecker). The survey consisted of 6 man-days of
effort.
The Natural Heritage Program has no known locations for any of the listed species in the vicinity
of the property. No appropriate habitat exists on-site for the following listed species: Shortnose
sturgeon, Florida manatee, Piping plover, Loggerhead sea turtle, Green turtle, Leatherback turtle,
Kemp's ridley sea turtle, and Seabeach amaranth. No Bald Eagles or nests were observed on the
property or in the general area. No Wood storks were observed during the field survey. Since
the survey was done during June, it was not surprising that the Arctic peregrine falcon was not
sighted since it is more likely to be seen during the fall migration. No tracks or other evidence of
the Eastern cougar were observed. No evidence of the American alligator was observed on the
property but suitable habitat exists in the form of the millpond and possibly along the edge of the
Shallotte River. The bulk of the field survey effort was spent looking for the three most likely
species: Red-cockaded woodpecker, Rough-leaved loosestrife, and Cooley's meadowrue. Even
though appropriate habitat exists on the tract no evidence of these three species were found.
Based on the information obtained from)the Natural Heritage Program and the field survey,
NJ&A conclude that the proposed work on this tract will not impact any of the listed species.
Sincerely,
Q
Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D.
cc: Rob Moul
Land Management Group
P. O. Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
* *_. 0. it
Needham, Jernigan, & Associates, Inc.
Environmental Consultants
Robert N. Needham [phone] Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D. [phone]
3717 Old Fairground Road, Angier, N.C. 27501
Roy Mintz & White Investment
P.O. Box 352
Shallotte, North Carolina 28549.
Dear Mr. White:
16 June 1994
On June 8-9, 1994, Needham, Jernigan, & Associates, Inc. (NJ&A) conducted an endangered
and threatened species survey on the White Investment and Mintz Properties tract. This tract is
comprised of approximately 350 acres located in Brunswick County south of Shallotte, North
Carolina along S.R. 1191. The majority of the acreage is located on the eastern side of S.R. 1191
and is adjacent to the Shallotte River. Most of the property is dominated by longleaf pine with
some patches of loblolly pine. The wetland drainages on the tract are dominated by mixed oaks
with an understory of ericaceous shrubs.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service provided a list of endangered/threatened species for
Brunswick County. The Natural Heritage Program database was checked to determine known
locations in the vicinity for any of the listed species. Preserved specimens of the plants were
reviewed prior to the field survey at the UNC- Wilmington herbarium. The survey consisted of
searching the appropriate habitats on-site as well as off-site areas within a half-mile radius (a
special requirement for the red-cockaded woodpecker). The survey consisted of 6 man-days of
effort.
The Natural Heritage Program has no known locations for any of the listed species in the vicinity
of the property. No appropriate habitat exists on-site for the following listed species: Shortnose
sturgeon, Florida manatee, ,Piping plover, Loggerhead sea turtle, Green turtle, Leatherback turtle,
Kemp's ridley sea turtle, and Seabeach amaranth. No Bald Eagles or nests were observed on the
property or in the general area. No Wood storks were observed during the field survey. Since
the survey was done during June, it was not surprising that the Arctic peregrine falcon was not
sighted since it is more likely to be seen during the fall migration. No tracks or other evidence of
the Eastern cougar were observed. No evidence of the American alligator was observed on the
property. The bulk of the field survey effort was spent looking for the three most likely species:
Red-cockaded woodpecker, Rough-leaved loosestrife, and Cooley's meadowrue. Even though
appropriate habitat exists on the tract no evidence of these three species were found.
Based on the information obtained from the Natural Heritage Program and the field survey,
NJ&A conclude that the proposed work on this tract will not impact any of the listed species.
Sincerely,
Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D.
cc: Rob Moul
Land Management Group '
P. O. Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
}
Needham, Jernigan,
Enviroi nental
& Associates, Inc.
Consultants
Robert N. Needham [phone] Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D. [phone]
3717 Old Fairground Road, Angier, N.C. 27501
White Investment, R. D. WhiteA Robert White
884 Copas Road
Shallotte, North Carolina 28470
Dear Mr. White:
On June 8-9, 1994, Needham, Jernigan, & Associates, Inc. (NJ&A) conducted an endangered
and threatened species survey on the White Investment Properties tract. This tract is comprised
of approximately 48 acres located in Brunswick County south of Shallotte, North Carolina along
S.R. 1146. Secondary road 1146 eiids at the Shallotte River. The tract is comprised mostly of an
old field which was abandoned many years ago and some forested acreage. Most of the tract is
dominated by longleaf pine with some patches of loblolly pine.
The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service provided a list of endangered/threatened species for
Brunswick County. The Natural Heritage Program database was checked to determine known
locations in the vicinity for any of the listed species. Preserved specimens of the plants were
reviewed prior to the field survey at the UNC- Wilmington herbarium. The survey consisted of
searching the appropriate habitats on-site as well as off-site areas within a half-mile radius (a
special requirement for the red-cockaded woodpecker). The survey consisted of 6 man-days of
effort.
The Natural Heritage Program has no known locations for any of the listed species in the vicinity
of the property. No appropriate habitat exists on-site for the following listed species: Shortnose
sturgeon, Florida manatee,, Piping plover, Loggerhead sea turtle, Green turtle, Leatherback turtle,
Kemp's ridley sea turtle, and Seabeach amaranth. No Bald Eagles or nests were observed on the
property or in the general area. No Wood storks were observed during the field survey. Since
the survey was done during June, it'wa.s;not surprising that the Arctic peregrine falcon was not
sighted since it is more likely to be seen during the fall migration. No tracks or other evidence of
the Eastern cougar were observed. No evidence of the American alligator was observed on the
property. The bulk of the field survey effort was spent looking for the three most likely species:
Red-cockaded woodpecker, Rough-leaved loosestrife, and Cooley's meadowrue. Even though
appropriate habitat exists on the tract no evidence of these three species were found.
D
Based on the information obtained from the Natural Heritage Program and the field survey,
NJ&A conclude that the proposed work on this tract will not impact any of the listed species.
Sincerely,

Leon S. Jernigan, Jr., Ph.D.
cc: Rob Moul
Land Management Group
P. O. Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
`x

4
' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
January 21, 1994
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199401238
Mr. R.D. White III
Post Office Box 352
Shallotte, North Carolina 28459
Dear Mr. White:
Reference is made to,the'survey plat dated December 1993, of your
property located at the end of S.R. 1146, adjacent to the Shallotte River,
approximately 2 miles south of Shallotte, Brunswick County, North Carolina.
The survey plat accurately ,;.eflects the limits of wetlands on the property.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination of the limits of wetlands may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed three years from the date of the survey plat.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, prior Department of the
Army approval is required for the.discharge of dredged or fill material in
waters of the United States, including wetlands.
If you have questions, please contact Mr. Rudolf Schiener, Wilmington
Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
Copies Furnished:
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency - Region IV
Wetlands Regulatory Unit
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365
*3 . Robert L. Moul
Land Management Group, Inc.
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402

G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
State of North Carolina
Department of Ef?vir onment, ?????
Health and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office D Jul 2 1 1995
Division of Coastal Management
...........................
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director ?A
July 20, 1995
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
IRMA,
• r cv?i,
r
Mr. A. Preston Howard. P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
John R. Parker
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
V -e
s
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
R. D. White/The Rock Golf Links
Project Location: off Copas Road (SR 1191) adjacent to the Shallotte River in Brunswick Co.
Proposed Project: An 18 hole golf course, clubhouse, and associated development of 571 single-
family residential lots, to include streets and utilities.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by August 14, 1995. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ed
Brooks at extension 247. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
-F -rte
SIGNED DATE
C7
1A 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Envi.rdnmental Management
Jamu B 'Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A4
AW% 0-ft
E 3 EHNR
February 20, 1996
Brunswick County
DEM Project # 95759
COE #199401238
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. R. D. White III
P.O. Box 352
Shallotte, NC 28459
Dear Mr. White:
You have our approval to place fill material in 3.9 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
developing a residential/golf course community at "The Rock Golf Links", as you described in your
application dated 7 August 1996. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3025.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. Deed
restrictions shall be placed on remaining wetlands to prevent future fill. Additional written DEM
approval is required for the littoral shelves. This plan shall be submitted to DEM before construction
begins. Stormwater shall be directed so as not to flow directly into surface waters or estuarine marshes.
In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send
a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401
of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
ton How , Jr. P. .
Attachment ?
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Wilmington DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
Rob Moul; Land Management Group
Steve Kroeger; DEM
95759.1tr
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

0
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROUNA28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
September 18, 1995
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199401238
Mr. John Parker I?
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Parker:
Reference the application of Mr. R. D e, II, f r a Department of
the Army permit to develop the proposed f e Rocks Golf inks". The proposed
work includes the excavation of 2.46 acre of wetla for the purpose of
creating ponds within a golf course and the ruction of roads and golf
cart paths. Eight golf cart bridges elevated over wetlands are also proposed.
The purpose of the work is to create a golf course and associated residential
development, which will result in impacts to approximately 3.9 acres of
wetlands, located adjacent to the Shallotte River, off of Copas Road (SR
1191), near Shallotte, in Brunswick County, North Carolina.
The Federal agencies have completed review of the proposal as presented
by the application and your field investigation report.
We recommend that the following conditions be included in the State
authorization:
1. All work authorized by this permit must be done in strict compliance with
the permit plans.
2. All excavated materials will be confined landward of the mean high water
(MHW) elevation contour within adequate dikes or other retaining structures to
prevent the spillover of solids into any vegetated wetlands or surrounding
waters.
3. The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials
within waters or vegetated wetlands is not authorized.
4. The fill material will be clean and free of any-pollutants except in trace
quantities. Metal products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will not
be used.
5. The activity will be conducted in a way that prevents a significant
increase in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction-related
discharge. Increases such that the turbidity in the waterbody is 50 NTU's or
less in all rivers not designated as trout waters by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM), 25 NTU's or less in all
saltwater classes and in all lakes and reservoirs, and 10 NTU's or less in
trout waters, are not considered significant.
Printed on ® Recyded Paper
i A
=3
-2-
6. If the permittee discovers any previously unknown historic or
archeological remains while accomplishing the authorized work, he will
immediately notify the Wilmington District Engineer who will initiate the
required State/Federal coordination.
7. If possible, under applicable law, the permittee will incorporate this
permit as part of the documents reflecting title to or interest in the real
property affected.
8. Mitigation to offset the impacts 3.87 acres of woody wetlands resulting
from the proposed project will be the excavation of shallow ponds in high
ground. A 40 foot wide fringe around the perimeter of each pond will be
planted with species of emergent grass.
9. Prior to beginning any work, a detailed mitigation plan will be submitted
to and approved by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the North
Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM), and the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM).
10. Within the wetland mitigation areas, the physical and chemical properties
of the soils will be suitable to support target plant species. Hydrology will
be maintained such that the soils are either saturated within 12 inches of the
surface, or ponded or flooded for at least 12.5 percent of the growing season
under reasonably average climatic conditions. The geomorphology of the area
will be suitable to meet hydrology requirements with regards to contours,
elevation, and drainage/connections with surface waters.
11. The plan will list wetland vegetative species to be planted. The plan
will also describe the numbers of each species to be planted and the planting
plan. Changes in planted species and locations of planted vegetation may be
altered in accordance with onsite field.conditions. Finalization of the
planted species and the locations of each species will be located on a map and
forwarded to the USACE, NCDCM, and NCDEM.
12. Survival rates of each species will be at least 80 percent of the number
planted. Survival rate monitoring will be c#nducted for three years from the
initial planting, and will occur at the beginning and the end of each growing
season. If a.survival rate of less than 80 percent occurs, the species will
be replanted in accordance with the original planting plan, and a new three
year monitoring period will begin.
13. Failure of any of the proposed parameters will result in your arrangement
of a meeting with the USACE, NCDCM, and NCDEM to allow approval of a revised
plan.
14. At the end of a successful three year monitoring period, coordination
with the USACE, NCDCM and NCDEM to ensure that the mitigation areas remain
functional wetlands in perpetuity, of similar or higher quality than the
initial design.
r?
•r
Should you have any questions or comments, please contact me at telephone
[phone].
Sincerely,
Jeff Richter
Special Projects/CAMA
Wilmington Regulatory Field office
copies Furnished:
/Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Ms. L. K. (Mike) Gantt
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section - Region IV 11
Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. Bob Stroud
office Manager
Wilmington Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
probably explains its apparent absence in 1987. By 1989 V. americans was
present in 138 sample plots.
The only floating-leaved species present in 1987 were Nelumbo lutea and
Nympha°ea odorata, however, only N. lutea became established by 1989. In
1987 it was present in 68 plots, but by 1989 it was present in 310 plots. N.
odorata was present in 44 plots in 1987 and in no plots in 1989. In Par Pond, N.
odorata and B. schreberi occur in protected areas such as coves. Water flow
from reactor discharge may prevent these two species from occurring near
discharge points (Grace 1984, unpublished). The extirpation of N. odorata from
L-Lake may have been caused by wave action which uprooted or damaged the
plants.
Perhaps the failure to establish a diverse submersed and floating-leaved