19930919 Ver 1_Complete File_19940120

I I
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
December 9, 1993 I,.~? -
tAIer. AA10., :..
IN HLVLY Htl-tH IU
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199400459 and Nationwide Permit Numbers,, L (Road Crossing) and 26
(Headwaters and Isolated Waters)
Mr. Wayne Hightower
First Oakland Properties, Inc.
2011 Raleigh Boulevard, Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Dear Mr. Hightower:
Reference your application of October 26, 1993, submitted on your behalf
by Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc., for Department of the Army
authorization to discharge fill material within waters of the United States,
impacting a total of 2.45 acres of wetlands (0.33 for road crossings, and 2.12
for lot fills and a pond), adjacent, and above the headwaters of, Bachelor
Branch, for construction of the proposed residential development, known as The
Reserves, on the west side of NC 55, north of Green Level Road, south of
Upchurch, Of? County, North Carolina.
For the purposes of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program,
Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the
Federal Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits (NWP).
Authorization was provided, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
for discharges of dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters
provided:
a. The discharge does not cause the loss of more than 10 acres of waters
of the United States;
b. The permittee notifies the District Engineer if the discharge would
cause the loss of waters of the United States greater than one acre in
accordance with the "Notification" general condition. For discharges in
special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the notification must also include
a delineation of affected specific aquatic sites, including wetlands; and
c. The discharge, including all attendant features, both temporary and
permanent, is part of a single and complete project.
Authorization, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899
and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, was also provided for fills for roads
r `(
-2-
crossing waters of the United States (including wetlands and other special
aquatic sites) provided:
a. The width of the fill is limited to the minimum necessary for the
actual crossing;
b. The fill placed
area of no more than 1/
linear feet of the fill
including wetlands;
C. The crossing is
the restriction of, and
aquatic organisms;
in waters of the United States is limited to a filled
3 acre. Furthermore, no more than a total of 200
for the roadway can occur in special aquatic sites,
culverted, bridged or otherwise designed to prevent
to withstand, expected highflows and the movement of
d. The crossing, including all attendant features, both temporary and
permanent, is part of a single and complete project for crossing of a water of
the United States; and
e. For fills in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the permittee
notifies the District Engineer in accordance with the "Notification" general
condition.
Your work, impacting a total of 2.45 acres of jurisdictional waters, is
authorized by these nationwide permits provided it is accomplished in strict
accordance with the enclosed conditions and provided you receive a Section 401
water quality certification from the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management. You should contact Mr. John Dorney, telephone [phone],
regarding water quality certification. These nationwide permits do not
relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or local
approvals.
This verification will be valid for 2 years from the date of this letter
unless the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued or revoked. Also,
this verification will remain valid for the 2 years if, during that period,
the NWP authorization is reissued without modification or the activity
complies with any subsequent modification of the NWP authorization. If during
the 2 years, the NWP authorization expires or is suspended or revoked, or is
modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and
conditions of the NWP, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under
construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the NWP will
remain authorized provided the activity is completed within 12 months of the
date of the NWP's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary
authority has been exercised on a case-by-case base to modify, suspend or
revoke the authorization.

-3-
above
authorization is valid for the property work would described
to be
please note that this ent projects on this
only, and impacts of subsequ s, regardless of future subdivision
with these impact be addressed to
the atively property. Questions or comments
at telephone
ulatory may be
or considered ownership of cumulatively
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer of my Raleigh Field office reg
[phone], extension 23•
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
Copy Furnished (with enclosure):
Mr. Kevin Martin Inc.
Soil and Environmental consultants,
244 W. Millbrook Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Mike Coughlin
Environmental Engineer
Wake County Community
Development Services
post office Box 550
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
John Dorney
Water Quality Section Management
Division of Environmental North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
post office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes; Secretary
A, Preston Howard, Jr., RE., Director
January 20, 1994
Mr. Wayne Hightower
First Oakland Properties, Inc.
2011 Raleigh Boulevard
Suite 105
Raleigh, N.C. 27604
Dear Mr. Hightower:
Subject: Proposed fill in Wetlands or Waters
Residential development, The Reserve
Wake County
DEM Project # 93919
Upon review of your request for 401 Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in 2.02 acres of wetlands or waters which are
tributary to Bachelor Branch for residential development located at
The Reserve on N.C. 55 in Wake County as described in your submittal
dated 21 October 1993, we have determined that the proposed fill can
be covered by General Water Quality Certification No. 2671. A copy of
the General Certification is attached. This Certification may be used
in qualifying for coverage under Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permit
No. 26. The 0.43 acre wetland on the upper end of the proposed
stormwater pond shall not be flooded or filled.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right
to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be iri
the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. Unless such
demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
1786.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at 919-733-
Sincerely,
0re-sDt'oward Jr. P.E.
93919.1tr
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Mary Fraser; Soil and Environmental Consultants
P.O, Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
MEMO
DATE:
TO:

SUBJECT:
1
C
Cl

lent of Environment,
Sources gg Printed on Recycled Paper
?_-_
01
i
- 1Nb'180dW1
I?
/s/9y

4&V
O (an
AAI)
g-AA
IMPORTANT
To
Date Time
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M
of
Phone
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
Message
Signed
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources

?? 2e sue,, ?-e_ /z,-// y/y3
VUa?y
YL
un1? QJDcN ?ro a?-e-GCS n
kaAAZ- CQ6r-,O cll-?
A -Tr
(z c- 'e0j.
J-2)

??` ? ? ? ? Rte!

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 6, 1993
Mr. Wayne Hightower
First Oakland Properties, Inc.
2011 Raleigh Blvd.
Suite 105
Raleigh, N.C. 27604
Project #93919
Wake County
Dear Mr. Hightower:
LTI.WA
[D EHNR
The Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality Section
has reviewed your plans for wetland fill for 2.45 acres of wetlands at
The Reserve in Wake County for residential roads and lot fill. Based
on this review, we have identified significant uses which would be
removed by this project. These uses are pollutant removal, water
storage and wildlife habitat. Furthermore, insufficient evidence is
present in our files to conclude that your project must be built as
planned in wetlands. Therefore, we are moving toward denial of your
401 Certification. Until we receive additional information, we are
requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and/or the N.C. Division of Coastal Management place your
project on administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting your position that
your project must be constructed as planned and that you have no
practicable alternative to fill of these wetlands. Specifically can
you construct your residential development and pond on nearby uplands?
Any documentation such as maps and narrative which you can supply to
address upland alternatives may be helpful in our review of your 401
Certification. Please respond within two weeks of the date of this
letter by sending a copy of this information to me and one copy to our
Mr. Danny Smith at the Raleigh Regional Office at 3800 Barrett Drive,
Raleigh, N.C. 27609.
Sincerely,
VII-,
o n Dorne
Y
We lands and Tech ical Review Group
93919.na
cc: Raleigh DEM Regional Office
John Parker, Division of Coastal Management
Wilmington Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
Kevin Martin; Soil and Environmental Consultants
Corps of Engineers Field Office
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
r
f
MEMORANDUM PRINT NAMES :
Reviewer:
TO: John Dorney WQ Supv.:
_? '
Planning Branch DATE:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
***EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (USE N/A FOR NOT APPLICABLE) ***
PERMIT YR: 93 PERMIT NO: 0000919 COUNTY: WAKE
APPLICANT NAME: THE RESERVE
PROJECT-TYPE: SUBDIVISION PERMIT-TYPE: NW26/14
COE_#: DOT-#:
RCD_FROM_CDA: APP DATE_FRM_CDA: 10/2/93
REG_OFFICE: RRO RIVER-AND _SUBBASIN } #: 03O
I . L7Gt C h O /i?"i l? ?
STREAM CLASS: STR
cX ?`?u y rsa???
WL_IMPACT? : ?/N 1W -TYPE: ! y, 110
IREQUESTED: WL_ACR_EST? : 1N
WL_
WL_SCORE (#) : WATER IMPACTED BY FILL?: dm
U
HYDRO_CNECT?: 7N MITIGATION?: Y/9I
MITIGATION-TYPE: A// MITI GATION_SIZE:
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: J1, AE/
R.F:t'nMMFNDATION (Circle Onp) : ZSSugd I SUE/C ND DENY
COMMENTS:
t
NOV 2 A 1993
S
;?:WETLAND GROI!'.'
WATER ?lON Y SEC 1 i
cc: Regional Office
Central Files
RECEIVED
NOV 0 3 1993
DEHNR-RAL RO
r
Permit type NW26/14
The Reserve Subdivision
Wake County
On November 15, 1993 I conducted a site visit to the proposed
"The Reserve" subdivision. Predominately, this tract consisted of
gentle rolling topography with mixed pine/hardwoods of variably
mixed stand ages..
The wetlands at this site were well delineated. A significant
portion of the wetlands were channels that conveyed rain event
water and were of relatively low value. However, there are
locations along these channels that were likely more seasonally
inundated. Also, frequent evidence of scouring was often observed
in these habitats..
The wetlands located adjacent to Bachelor Branch, which
transverses the Southern portion of the proposed development, are
of significant greater value. Due to soil composition, the
wetlands located in the Triassic Basin are routinely small and
infrequent. This proposed development contains both isolated
wetlands and hydrologicaly connected wetlands that are located in
the Bachelor Branch flood plain.
The plans provides storm water control through the use of a
retention pond. It is my opinion that several water retention ponds
located along the respective unnamed tributaries to Bachelor Creek
would provide a more effective storm water control system. This
could reduce the stormwater impositions on Bachelor Branch proper,
limit the impact to the flood plain, and reduce alteration of the
ephemeral wetlands which are interspersed through the flood plain.
If you have any questions regarding these comments please call
Danny Smith or Karl Shaffer at the Raleigh Regional Office.

Wetland area
Nearest road,
ze?
Wetland type (select one) o Other
.
o Swamp forest
o Bottomland hardwood forest oo Shoreline ian ;,,X 4e
Stream cl- , ,
• o Carolina bay o Salt marsh •
' o Pocosin o Brackish marsh •
o Pine savannah o Freshwater marsh
• o Wet flat o Bog/Fen •
o Perched o Vernal pool
sum
Water storage 2- •
Bank/Shoreline stabilization 2 x 4.40 -
..:. - "" r •

Pollutant removal •
.. .............. ...... .

Sensitive watershed d •
Z " x 1.50 -
"' - Wetland score.
Dispersal corridor .
Special ecological attributes

tx-
•
Wildlife habitat x 1.50 = •
Aquatic life value
:.:

Recreation/Education
Economic value
3
x 0.25 -
j

Hydrologically connected o Hydrologically Isolated
Wetland area I Z_ - ----_----aC'zWeiland wjdthv, -70
Nearest road - --- -

feet
z t/., cl..
1. -•ti ???;
v,r
wetiand.type.(select.nne?.. ,. _ o Other-__.-- ------------------- •
o Swamp-forest: o Shore * line
,
Bottomland hardwood forest o Stream channel,
• o Carolina bay o Salt marsh •
•
,, Pocosin o Brackish marsh
o Pine savannah o Freshwater marsh
o Wet flat o Bog/Fen
o Perched o Vernal pool, ,
_ ? ? P ? • ? • • • •1•• T • •'?"-t 1 w v • *_IW • r • • ••r PAP r -••rArl • ear f`+ r r IW'R • It P • •I i r.• f •r • •Water storage sum
•
Bank/Shoreline sta5ilization 3 # x 4.00.
40
Pollutant removal 1 °
Sensitive watershed x 1.50 - Wetland score
Dispersal corridor
"
Special ecological attributes
Wildlife habitat ?- > x 1.50 =
Aquatic life value _-3
............... .
RecreatioNEducation
? x 0.25 =
Economic value --
.,,?..-....:.?::.. .. vim, ...-.
. - - ???--- -- ---- -feet
Wetland area _-? ( --- - - -- acrc-:> WC claIld vAdI'll
/ N e a r e s t road -------- -----------
her ?•:«??
a
nne?
•
(select-
o O her
Wet! andA
e -- --- ---- •
, .
- -
.
-
yp
. --- ------
o Swamp-forest: ` o Shoreline
' G Bottomland hardwood forest T ,rr o Stream channel,
.
/ Carolina bay
;. Pocosin ??? oGi`Z'?
v<z_- o
o Salt marsh
Brackish marsh
:) Pine savannah o Freshwater marsh
o Wet flat o Bog/Fen •
o Perched n Vernal pool, .
•rw.9 0 •0 a•1•rn•0 ar w • W-•"••v?*Mv•vr• 4V•wW10rr•
stun 0 :, •9?9, r•r0 Vv •. ••° •°.••••• •
°
Water storage -Z- °
Bank/Shoreline stabilization - x 4.00 -
- •
Pollutant removal - °
Sensitive watershed x 1.50 = W
•
etland score
Dispersal corridor . 2-
Special ecological attributes
Wildlife habitat x 1.50 = •
Aquatic life value -
..............

RecreatioNEducation .

i
l x 0 .Z5
=
c va
ue
Econom
0 0 . . 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 . 0 . . . . . . . . .
0 0 0 0
*>F ydroiogically Isolated
c Hydrologica!ly connected
t'11d11U uic..a
earest road.

i
fi
?;r
nne)
,
e (sefect
Wet! anri
t o Other ----- - ---- •
_ .
.
..
.
yp - __ ----
• o Swamp- fare st-: - o Shoreline
Bottomland hardwood forest'`'s
?
Ce
- o Stream channeh ;
•
' o Carolina bay
'j ?
-
Cv? ?
'L o Salt marsh
Brackish marsh •
'
0 Pocosin f o
o Pine savannah o Freshwater marsh
o Wet flat o Bog/Fen
o Perched., o Vernal pool, ..
' • • i ? } or . • • . • ?1I< «•. *W .' I'•" 4I0 *I * * "I . r f . IP-W 0 r r•
sum f :1% ? r r r • r ?. !'. . ? • . '. 4 *,1' 4 + • •
.
Water storage _ 3
Bank/Shoreline stabilization -0 x 4.00. •
°
Pollutant removal
Sensitive watershed
Z »
> Wetl and score 0
Dispersal corridor
77- •
Special ecological attributes
Wildlife habitat x 1.50 = •
Aquatic life value - ?-
..
................

Recreation/Education .
Economic value x
. . . . .
. . . . . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . . . .0 9 0 0 0 0 0 .
. . . . . .
. 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0
.

c Hydrologically connected 6ydroiogically isolated
? Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
NRCD - DEM
Attn: Mr. J
PO Box 29535
Raleigh, NC
Dear Messrs.
3818 Bland Road ¦ Raleigh, North
U. S. Ar
ohn Dorney Attn: Mr.
6512 Falls
27626 Raleigh, NC
Alsmeyer and Dorney:
OCT 2 g 1993
7 ¦ Fax [phone]
1, 1993
Octo;;L2
W
ETLANDS GR?I{A?gQUJOTY>s t(, ae.,
Eric Alsmeyer
of the Neuse Rd., Suite 105
27615-6846
The purpose of this letter is to request Nationwide Permits 14 and
26, and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the project
to be known as The Reserve. The project is located near Cary, NC
(Wake County) and is bordered to the east by NC 55, and to the
south by Bachelor Branch as shown on the enclosed plans and
vicinity maps. We previously submitted applications for
Fieldstone Phase I and Phase II which currently are and have
always been under completely separate ownership but are adjacent
to this project. All three border Hwy. 55 and Bachelor Branch is
their common property line.
The Corps approved detailed wetland delineation is shown on the
attached map. These delineations have been approved by Mr. Eric
Alsmeyer of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Fill in the wetlands will be required to utilize the property for
a residential subdivision including lots, roads, etc. (see
attached map). Most of the wetlands on the tract do not appear to
be high quality; they consist primarily of channels which seem to
be remnants of old agricultural practices on-site, while a few
other wetlands are small, isolated pockets. The plans have been
configured to minimize wetland impacts to higher value areas
except for the stormwater quality pond which does impact some of
the better wetlands on-site.
It will be necessary to fill 2.12 acres (see
jurisdictional wetlands above headwaters for
proposed facilities utilizing Nationwide 26.
filled under NW 14. An additional .44 acres
flooded for the creation of a stormwater ret,
current Corps and DEM "policy" non-vegetated
map) of
placement of the
0.33 acres will be
of channels will be
ention pond. Based cn
waters of the U.S. to
be inundated by the creation of a lake or other impoundment are
not considered to be adversely impacted, except for the dam area.
Therefore, the .44 acres of channels to be flooded are not
included as acreage impacted under NW 14 or NW 26.
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
To expedite the permitting process and to make "life easier" on
everyone involved, the following individuals/agencies have been
provided with a complete copy of this entire application package:
N.C. Cultural Resources, Karl Schafer (DEM), David Franklin
(Wilmington Corps), USF&WS, and National Marine Fisheries Service.
Please call if you have questions or require further information.
If you intend to perform a site visit please call and we will
arrange for someone to accompany you.
Sincerely,
Kevin C. Martin,
President
cc: David Franklin, US Army Corps, District Engineer
Cultural Resources
Karl Schafer, DEM
NC Cultural Resources
USF&WS
National Marine Fisheries Service
KM/ jb
DEM ID: ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): -1-4 9 A -,-
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notiflcation to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICA71ON SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Wayne Hightower, First Oakland Properties, Inc.
2. Owners Address: 2011 Raleigh Blvd., Suite 105. Ra 1 ai gh . N( 27604
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work): [phone]
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
3818 Bland Road
Raleigh, NC 27609 (919•) 790-9117
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: Wake
Nearest Town or City: Upchurch
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Lo c a t e d- a 1 nu q NC-9-9 j u s t n o . h n f
Bachelor Branch (see attached vicinity map)
6. Name of Closest Stream/River. Bachelor Branch
7. River Basin:
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ ] NO [4
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO fn ]
If yes, explain. No,-but see attached letter.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site: c -9 a r r t-
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
NW14 NW26
Filled: .33 2.12
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: .33 2.12
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1R" X 11" drawings only):
Fill of connected and isolated wetlands and ditches.
For residential development of uplands.
13. Purpose ofproposed wo& Residential development and roadways.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Wetlands must be impacted in o r d e r - t o utilize
uplands. See attached letter.
15. You are requutd to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/orNational Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the Presence or any Federally listed orproposed for listing endangered orthreatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES ] NO [ )
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit am which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [ x] NO [ )
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property? undeveloped/rural residential
F . I f applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? Mu n i c ; n a i G w a n
Agalt's Signature
\1 0?,z
Daze

,kjL
R 0(D
? Hydrologically Isolated
•...•....•.••...........
tt /VegetaFctn
Mitring or at kertt?rz?s

stream rati
:
!- seasonally- p*'.6d :.
o-
. C itttermittaritlp fTtjnded or temporary
surface water
no evident e of flooding or surface water

Wetland type (select one) ? Other ;
? Swamp forest J Shoreline •
Bottomland hardwood forest J Brackish marsh
Carolina bay J Freshwater marsh
? Pocosin J Bog/Fen •
? Pine savannah J Ephemeral wetland
? Wet flat
The rating system cannot be ap plied to salt marshes.
sum
Water storage ?
Bank/Shoreline stabilization, x 4.00 =
Pollutant removal 2 • S
Sensitive watershed x 1
50 -
- •
Travel corridor . 4Vcrlnnd score.

0
' •
•
Special ecological attributes S /;
]
Wildlife habitat - x 1.50 - 7 S
Aquatic life value

Recreation/Education
Economic value ? x 0'25 = ?' 25 •
_
•
•
•
•

Project name_ '? 9-0 ?A Nearest road qwq
s
County \A Wetland area ?"• 21 acres Wetland width 30 g 0 feet
X Hydrologically connected
WV
?0k
.
? Hydrologically connected
Hydrologically isolated '
-manently.
:,
ring orsrzz?s
seasonall}r fl'tpcerl` ;
'
f
Inter mporary
mittritl?+c?d or te
surface wafe><+ _
:
..
] no evidence.: 01 flooding or surface water
:.: .
Wetland type (select one) J Other '
• ? Swamp forest J Shoreline •
Bottomland hardwood forest J Brackish marsh
• ? Carolina bay J Freshwater marsh
? Pocosin J Bog/Fen •
? Pine savannah J Ephemeral wetland
• ? Wet flat
The rating system cannot be applied to salt marshes.
swn
Water storage
Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4
00 =
Pollutant removal .

Sensitive watershed l
T
Z x 1.50 - ?,
-
l
W
d •
ravel corridor ei
an
score .
Special ecological attributes b
Wildlife habitat x 1.50 = -7,5 ' ... LL7
Aquatic life value
Recreation/Education
C x0.25=
Economic value

Projed name RQ lan Nearest road
?l w ??SS
County LZ 1 Wetland area - °, acres Wetland width SO feet
tt anc a
WL
K05

.>:;.;:.:...
Ire#)?ztt # stern raa X seasonall?r flz?odMd.
? s,• . ?,. ??.,:

int
ermittari (1y flo
o' @cj or temporary
surface Water
..:
no evidence of faaactin ;or surface water

Wetland type (select one) ? Other
? Swamp forest J Shoreline •
Bottomland hardwood forest J Brackish marsh
? Carolina bay J Freshwater marsh •
? Pocosin J Bog/Fen •
? Pine savannah J Ephemeral wetland
? Wet flat •
The rating system cannot be applied to salt marshes.

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
EM
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
w
Water storage 2 sum
•
Bank/Shoreline stabilization 3_ -7 x 4.00 = Z
Pollutant removal 7- _ •
•
Sensitive watershed I_ x 1
50 = 1S •
Travel corridor Z . Wed and score.

Special ecological attributes n 4'?; 5 •
Wildlife habitat +- x 1.50 =
Aquatic life value 2-

Recreation/Education

Economic value ? x0.25=
•
-
•
•
•
•
WETLANURATINGWORKSHEET
Project name Nearest road H-4 575,
T
County u1 Jx,'- Wetland area acres Wetland width ~ 10 feet
? Hydrologically connected ? Hydrologically Isolated

T
•
Wetland type (select one) ? Other
? Swamp forest J Shoreline •
Bottomiand hardwood forest :1 Brackish marsh '
? Carolina bay J Freshwater marsh
? Pocosin J Bog/Fen •
? Pine savannah J Ephemeral wetland
? Wet flat
The rating system cannot be applied to salt marshes.
sum
Water storage •
Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 = 3
Pollutant removal 'I r

Sensitive watershed _L_
- x 1.50 = 9,?5 •
W
l
d
Travel corridor 3.5 ? ,5; et
an
score .
•
Special ecological attributes D
Wildlife habitat 4-
x 1
50 =
12 5 7.Z •
•
Aquatic life value . -

Recreation/Education 2-
Economi
v
l x 0.25 = ?, S •
c
a
ue
... ..................... ........... ......................
Project name- 7YL- Q? "'QV4-- Nearest road & ./ $S
County ?, 0JZ1-- Wetland area acres Wetland width ~ SD feet
Hydrologically connected ? Hydrologically Isolated
SITE
r?
?J
N? IS c
r
0?\ ve,
f,.,,st e

X Hydrologically connected
Hydrologically Isolated
tt` Veg;,ei 'Special ecological attributes 0_ 3?>
Wildlife habitat x 1.50 = (D
Aquatic life value ?-
.
Recreation/Education
Economic value 3 x 0.25 - •
Project name-- :71, 9..e S 2.v ry- Nearest road iIw u SS
County W -q, Wetland area , 2-acres Wetland width '?- w feet
vim' n r-vnm
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
COORDINATOR: TIME: DATE: Z / 4 /9 Z COUNTY:
NEAREST TOWN: WATERWAY:•Mky y.?
QUAD: OCATION: jq,W. 'erZt?lI1EC__r)P LI, C,
PRONI:RTY OWNER: (NPNE/AD RESS) PARTY DOING WORK:
n' 11111 Kt? og,-rj2
2-011 T1 ?L'Iklud.
1321 2-.1 6 0 _ -----
.?rI ? U
NAME/ADDRESS)
10 /?.-c
PHON ()g,?- gggg`'- PHONE:(] _)]a2-- //
OTHER IND VIDUALS PRESE'N'T:
IS PROPERTY UNIFORM OR SEPARATE DISCRETE %./ VEGETATIVE: UNITS
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes JZ No (11 no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No,Z (If yes, explain on back)
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE,
TRL•'ES: SPECIES ---% COVER--INDICATOR
UL5TAL= 6C:7P.0 AC'
3. r,-?
4.
5.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS:
1. Cwu+tR1u? >?-IEU.Cd'? - , - ??,G\,?
2.
3.
4.
5.
DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
GROUND COVER: SPECIES-% COVER-INDICATOR
1.
2.
3.
4.
LvP4 lcLi?.4 zlAFZ,uIca. -'9Q - M-Ac-
5.
6.
7.
8.
WOODY VINES:
1.
2.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL. FACK and/or FAC 100
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yea 4 No
Rationale: bow k) A L r-r- S-vle'fx _.? t n n w
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:2 T?'PIC.. 1r1.??.t1Ql1t~111Y
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yea No Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes_? No Gleyed? Yes V No
Matrix Color: ? o'??i 44t-/ Mottle Colors: a S `f 2
Other hydric soil Indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: •t' 1-r W I U Li
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes ? No
Rationale: ?? 2AT? , u w I Y 1-Li 1 -j-c, p tz!' ? Z
`SI01UiIrirAA)`-
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes / No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: AA-L 3 Gf2 t 's tr C.1?1 h-tr T
PHOTOS TA::EN: YES NO AUTHORITY: 10 404 ;1
'404 NONE

JURISDICTION:
ABOVE
HEADWATERS / ISOLATED
ADJACENT ,
_
NWP 11
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yea No ? Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes %.-/ No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 0""
Ust other field "dance of surface inundation or sail antimminn
vM' M rvnm
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD' S_ ?-
COORDINATOR: TIME: DATE: -Z COUNTY: ?,A/A,,Kr
NEAREST TOWN: WATERWAY F ??a
(ZIJAD : LOCATION: PROPERTY OWNER:(N IE/ADDRESS) PARTY DOING WORK:(NAM /ADDRESS)
-- - - -
via %J "_ Ili di k N41 K 'F 'Zky lSkt- /5 +r-C)
F,§E L ro ?,Sui?i14? 11? d'-"Mr, Ift.
20 blvd. i _1 1 13.1-4 I.1.C, 2711_ _
PHONE : ) g 33- gQ?88 PHONE :
2 117
oniER INDIVIDUALS PRLSE NT:
IS PROPERTY UNIFORM OR SEPARATE DISCRETE V VEGETATIVE UNITS
---------------------------------------------------
Do norm environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No _/ (If yes, explain on back)
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE, DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
TREES: SPECIES—% COVER--INDICATOR GROUND COVER: SPECIES-Y. COVER-INDICATOR
2. ?RIGDF,I.?L? .?`T?-1? ..1??..F?C- 1- I-OIUIGFQ/, AwN'CA -
3. F1 I-IU5 "?yED4 -4o ?e rAc- 3.
4. 4.
5.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW,
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes
5.
6.
7.
8.
WOODY VINES:
1.
2.
;Vor FAC ldd7
No
SOILS
Series/phass: r't ?-t-ecl-tIlc Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No t-4,3,_ Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic spipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No=
Matrix Color: 101 4 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil Indicators: -
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: -L I IU ]ter Gt-,-,a a r- a, c1-t si2 A C L g tb S I t.l UPt'e2. rz
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No --V-/ Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water In pit/soil probe hole: 18`?
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No ?
Rationale:v tit 1VICgc 6F: ,c , ? r yL 1 -32 ?1J
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: o IJL1e o ti
PHOTOZ 'TAKEN: YES NO AUT RITY: 10 404 10/404 NONE

JURISDICTION:
ABOVE
HEADWATERSSOLATED
ADJACENT _
NWP #
e
Cem 'c J/
350
r
_ • iil: - -?-?- 414
r
13-1
j' ?)) r i `a if Updhurc
I
X 318 ; - /
4ig
i _ -
= O ?
? \- X1615-1 ; ? / ? - ? ` •'?.
I r - -
171 _ r?? A I r -3001
1600
firer ?V 1/ - 3 (` r 70 ©
a? 11?r
o
c?
1612.
u60
1
o ?f+
JI,
T ?
250
16' NOC
/ it ral
???? 'g 1? lu .• : ? b1? al -.a1 -' ? .
SCALE 1:24 000 - • Z2
2 0
_ 1 MILE
4,0 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET \
-• 1 .5 0 1 KILOMETER
:;• A
1 690 0 INTERIOR_GEOLOGI-l SURVEY RESTON VIRGINIq-1- 78"F213011 693 12040000 FEET 694
69100om.E. 7
WETLAND FLAG IA06
WETLAND FLAG II01
WETLAND FLAG #J01

WETLAND, SURVEY #CL7, SITE A
FLAG # A 56
WETLAND, SURVEY #C18/1, SITE C
WETLAND, SURVEY #C1711, SITE B
'r

WETLAND FLAG IA06

WETLAND FLAG #JO1
II I I , i

WETLAND, SURVEY #CL7, SITE A
FLAG #A56

It ?

WETLAND, SURVEY #C18/1, SITE C
•
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
3818 Bland Road ¦ Raleigh, North D l * ,(919) 790-911' ¦ Fax [phone]
FF,0GT a : :>
NRCD - DEM U.S. Army`C
Attn: Mr. John Dorney Attn: Mr.
PO Box 29535 6512 Falls
Raleigh, NC 27626 Raleigh, NC
Dear Messrs. Alsmeyer and Dorney:
WE d sober 21, 1993
?WATER
Ps of Engineers
Eric Alsmeyer
of the Neuse
27615-6846
Rd., Suite 105
The purpose of this letter is to request Nationwide Permits 14 and
26, and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the project
to be known as The Reserve. The project is located near Cary, NC
(Wake County) and is bordered to the east by NC 55, and to the
south by Bachelor Branch as shown on the enclosed plans and
vicinity maps. We previously submitted applications for
Fieldstone Phase I and Phase II which currently are and have
always been under completely separate ownership but are adjacent
to this project. All three border Hwy. 55 and Bachelor Branch is
their common property line.
The Corps approved detailed wetland delineation is shown on the
attached map. These delineations have been approved by Mr. Eric
Alsmeyer of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Fill in the wetlands will be required to utilize the property for
a residential subdivision including lots, roads, etc. (see
attached map). Most of the wetlands on the tract do not appear to
be high quality; they consist primarily of channels which seem to
be remnants of old agricultural practices on-site, while a few
other wetlands are small, isolated pockets. The plans have been
configured to minimize wetland impacts to higher value areas
except for the stormwater quality pond which does impact some of
the better wetlands on-site.
It will be necessary to fill 2.12 acres (see map) of
jurisdictional wetlands above headwaters for placement of the
proposed facilities utilizing Nationwide 26. 0.33 acres will be
filled under NW 14. An additional .44 acres of channels will be
flooded for the creation of a stormwater retention pond. Based on
current Corps and DEM "policy" non-vegetated waters of the U.S. to
be inundated by the creation of a lake or other impoundment are
not considered to be adversely impacted, except for the dam area.
Therefore, the .44 acres of channels to be flooded are not
included as acreage impacted under NW 14 or NW 26.
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and nn._ign
To expedite the permitting process and to make "life easier" on
everyone involved, the following individuals/agencies have been
provided with a complete copy of this entire application package:
N.C. Cultural Resources, Karl Schafer (DEM), David Franklin
(Wilmington Corps), USF&WS, and National Marine Fisheries Service.
Please call if you have questions or require further information.
If you intend to perform a site visit please call and we will
arrange for someone to accompany you.
Sincerely,
Kevin C. Martin,
President
cc: David Franklin, US Army Corps, District Engineer
Cultural Resources
Karl Schafer, DEM
NC Cultural Resources
USF&WS
National Marine Fisheries Service
KM/jb
•DEM ID: ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): -14 2 A
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT:
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Wayne Hightower, First Oakland Properties, Inc.
2. Owners Address: 2Q11 Raleigh B1 vd . Suite 109, Ra 1 ei ah . NC 27664
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): (Work): ( 919) b 3 3 - 9 9 8 8
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
3818 Bland Road
Raleigh, NC 27609 (919•) 790-9117
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: Wake
Nearest Town or City: Upchurch
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Lo r a t e d a 1 n n cr NC-9-9 j tl a t north of
Bachelor Branch (see attached vicinity map)
6. Name of Closest Stream/R.iver. Bachelor Branch
7. River Basin: Capp Fear
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ ] NO (A
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [) NO 1K ]
If yes, explain. No,-but see attached letter.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site: e 5 a r r e s
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
NW14 NW26
Filled: .33 2.12
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: .33 2.12
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS.8 12" X 11" drawings onift
Fill of connected and isolated wetlands and ditches.
For residential development of uplands.
13. Purpose of'proposedworlc Residential development and roadways.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Wetlands must be impacted in order-to utilize
uplands. See attached letter.
15. You are rewired to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the Presence or any Federally listed orproposed forlisting endangered orthreatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES I ] NO [ ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) Ong the presence of historic
properties in the permit aria which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [ x] NO [ ]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM•
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property? undeveloped/rural-residential
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? M u n; r; n a l sewage
Agelt Is Signature

Date
.Vkj
A a(o

Hydrologically connected
Flood .i:g.and wet -
1 semipernlanently to permanently
flooded ornundatod
OP. V
regularly flooded Cx conveys stornwater
during or after to .. ps

wo
I
01

seasonally flaod?d' ..
-
51 intermittantly flppted or
temporary
Surface water
no evidence t?t°flooding or surface water

Wetland type (select one) ? other
• ? Swamp forest J Shoreline •
Bottomland hardwood forest J Brackish marsh '
• Carolina bay J Freshwater marsh
? Pocosin J Bog/Fen •
? Pine savannah J Ephemeral wetland
• ? Wet flat
The rating system cannot be applied to salt marshes.
Water storage rum •
Bank/Shoreline stabilization

?,
'
x 4.00 =

? '

•
Pollutant removal 2-S
Sensitive watershed
Travel corridor x 1.50 = •
Wetfond score.
Special ecological attributes 0
Wildlife habitat x 1.50 = 1. S ;
Aquatic life value
Recreation/Education
Economic value 1+- 5' x 0.25 = 1 zS •
.........................................................
w
VJV
?0k

Hydrologically connected
Special ecological attributes
Wildlife habitat
Aquatic life value I
Recreation/Education
Economic value --
. ......................
Hydrologically Isolated
?-7
X1.50=11.5
.
x0.25-
'T .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
?w
Projeci name 7T7,-* (fit lo,• Nearest road-.,t SS
County _?I Lg Wetland area '0_7 acres Wetland width So feet
\A L'
Y-05
? Hydrologically Isolated
.::..:.......................
r? Ve?;et??gn'

andwfS .
}oucr
,
5 ..n perm nently tq ernianently
.
MIN
ggde+d or APA..
? k?
N .
I±e,t>larly Qt?c ed MAPPYeys stormwater
duringr ?r>?h?s
.onall? ?iooc?ed4
43.
><tttermi t..... ttgd d or l exrtporary
Surface r. .:... .
zoo evidence ofltodui or surface water

Wetland type (select one) ? Other
? Swamp forest J Shoreline •
Bottomland hardwood forest :1 Brackish marsh '
? Carolina bay J Freshwater marsh
? Pocosin J Bog/Fen •
? Pine savannah J Ephemeral wetland
? Wet flat •
The rating system cannot be applied to salt marshes.
sum
Water storage 2 •
Bank/Shoreline stabilization- x 4.00 =
Pollutant removal ?_.

Sensitive watershed x 1
50 =
Travel corridor Z . Werlond score.

Special ecological attributes in ?5?,5 •
Wildlife habitat +- x 1.50 =
Aquatic life value 2-

Recreation/Education I_ _

Economic value x0.25-
- •

........................ .
.................................
•
•
w
Project name Th-Q- ? Z• Nearest road u W q 5S
County G Wetland area acres Wetland width ~10 feet
? Hydrologically connected
T

Project name . c Nearest road &./ SS
County ? 10,10- Wetland area acres Wetland width - SO feet
•
•
•
•
Wetland type (select one) ? Other
? Swamp forest Shoreline •
Bottomland hardwood forest Brackish marsh '
? Carolina bay J Freshwater marsh
? Pocosin Bog/Fen •
? Pine savannah Ephemeral wetland
? Wet flat
The rating system cannot be applied to salt marshes.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
swn • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • w
Water storage •
Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 = 3
Pollutant removal ?- ?? .
•
Sensitive watershed
Travel corridor 3 .5- x 1.50
?y c - •
?d'etlnnd ,crore.
•
Special ecological attributes
Wildlife habitat +
x 1
50 =
12
_
Aquatic life value
+ . -
-

Recreation/Education 2
Economic value x 0.25 =
• • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 0 • 0 0 • 0 0 • 0 0 0 . . . . . . .

A_ Hydrologically connected ? Hydrologically Isolated
S ATE
B
Grp I'
E
C
,?k vr-
?,?.p.rrN

X Hydrologically connected
? Hydrologically Isolated
Wetland type-(select one) Other (1 0, V\ Vn It
;
? Swamp forest J Shoreline •
? Bottomland hardwood forest J Brackish marsh '
D Carolina bay J Freshwater marsh
? Pocosin Bog/Fen •
? Pine savannah J Ephemeral wetland
? Wet flat
The rating system cannot be applied to salt mars hes.

Water storage Z sum •
Bank/Shoreline stabilization Z x 4
00 -
arm rum
Pollutant removal Z .

Sensitive watershed 1
50 - L
6

Travel corridor
us x
.
- 14'etland sco
I - re
1.
Special ecological attributes
Wildlife habitat ?_- x 1.50 -
Aquatic life value
Recreation/Education I_
Economic value 3 x 0'25 =
. . . . . . . . • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 • • • 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0

Project name- -77 ? So r t t Nearest road ?w H
County W ? S5
Wetland area Z acres Wetland width - ZZ? feet
vN w rvnm
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Lt COUNTY: ?r__
COORDINATOR: TIME: _ DATE: 2/14 /0
NEAREST TOWN: _4n ? WATERWAY:-Mj ,.? ? O ?1?R?FR,d
QUAD: UCATION:?.W-CeftA1K?"_ fJC ? ?!Z ttol-'2*_--
PROPE'RTY OWNER: (N IE/AD RL•-SS) PARTY DOING WORK:(NAME ADDRESS)
j"!!IIIKIv'_ o-ros S ?.C
PHON ()_U1-. ofq & -- PHONE
OTHER CND VIDUALS PRESENT:
IS PROPERTY UNIFORM OR SEPARATE DISCRETE ? VEGETATIVE UNITS
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes tZ No (H no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No tZ (If yes, explain on back)
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE,
TREES: SPECIES---% COVER--INDICATOR
1. 6 - Fp.c.
-2'u?A..
3. zap - t?•4c
4.
5.
SAPLINGS/SHRUBS:
1. GjuwCvxu,--)
2. l?aQu?flgrl6?s?'rwae?uq-.rod -T`??
3.
4.
5.
DRAW LINE ABOVE NON-UOMINANT SPECIES)
GROUND COVER: SPECIES-Y COVER-INDICATOR
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
WOODY VINES:
1.
2.
Percent of dominant spades that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 1i!>0
lathe hydrophytlc vegetation criterion met? Yes ? No
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:2 `r ZIG 1`LQVAZ t-lt~M_r
Is the soil on the hydrla soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No,L Hlstic epipedon present? Yes No _
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes y No
Matrix Color: Mottle Colors: -L ` FC- l
Other hydric soli Indicators:
Is the hydro soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: r -? CNf?h-t,?lS =X3"I I._l-4 VI -r ,•q? ui IL , jPS
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No ? Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes %/ No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: C>f
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes ? No
Rationale: 5.?QATt a V w I -r N i `r?' P ??? tZ
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes / No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: ?t-- 3 G2 .G1A Hrc -
T-PHOTOS TAKEN: YES NO AUTHORITY: 10 404 10 'j 4 NONE_
JURISDICTION: ABOVE HEADWATERS/ ISOLATED ADJACENT NWP #
VAv
M
? RMIm
nNATION METHOD' St_ .?-
ROUTINE ONSITE DETEr
COORDINATOR: TIME: DATE: /j_ft_/cV, COUNTY: W, r,_
NEARGST TOWN: WATERWAY F ??a
QUAD: LOCATION: -.(??Az'
PROPERTY OWNER: (NAMF./ADDRESS) PARTY DOING WORK: (NAME /ADDRESS)
wa N4 LK a1zr3Q:?2kt- 65 rr-C )
F klo_? ?9 aL4? n rep.
20 ,A1?- 4 LI -C, 27?1?1 _
Pt10NE PHONE : (q12> p_- Q117 -
OTHER INDIVIDIIALS PRESE'N'T:
IS PROPERTY UNIFORM OR SEPARATE DISCRETE V VEGETATIVE UNITS
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _V No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No _v (If yes, explain on back)
VEGETATION: (IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE, DRAW LINE ABOVE
TREES: SPECIES ---% COVER--INDICATOR GROUND COVER
2. pi WU6 -T;.r
3. 70 -IFAC.
4.
5.
I- Lolutc.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SAPLINGS/bHRUBS: 6-
1. L1ltirQAH$r?>'ktl?Ctl?-Llr/(r 3??7,- Fid?L' 7.
2. 8.
3- WOODY VINES:
4. 1.
5. 2.
NON-DOMINANT SPECIES)
SPECIES-y COVER-INDICATOR
Aw"J ICA - go9 - FAC
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, an or FAC t(307.
Is the hydrophyNc vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: y C l- iU)Ai\i? cPt? 1tT_•L 1?A[? ate ?/I
SOILS
Series/phass: HALk-t-,&.c k41 t' Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No t4o Undetermined
is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic spipedon present? Yes No ?
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No _L Gleyed? Yes No=
Matrix Color: t c Yft 4 - Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil Indicators: -
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: Me- t M]znrAYb 00 I-O+.1 ci-tg,'2{ Co ?b ? t yp?t2 I Z /?
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No _L Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: > 18
List other field evidence Of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: 44. -1Evtbtioe-r'_ rslC 7-771 „,
11
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: 01.?t_4? o r
PHOTOS TAKEN: YES NO AUT RITY: 10 404 10/404 NONE

JURISDICTION:
ABOVE
HEADWATERSSOLATED
ADJACENT _
NWP It
0 ,
0 CBT;7? 54 ?_ -
95
50
-_ -, _ )
• I 306-
24.
4
L3so = ° _ S
%
I
1 t ° --
o -n? I -Upch
urch• -- -
loo
rr.? x328 - _ - I cr8
- ( - _l?? v ?y ?jlr --
?, ,
TS)
I
•272
00 `J
•??
-
lcao
r 70
42
s.
E
_ -?\\ G?-//• I __-._ _, /////. \ VSo? \•,? X1111.
/ I ?(y / I - •\ 10 \Y ???r • // ? ?r'/ i ? ?? ?1 \ ?\ III--
' ?\ 1 \\.? ? .. ? ?? rah ?Il •
\\ I?\ 1 lblr , •1`I
° . , SCALE 1:24000
1 2 0
° 1 MILE /,'R
co 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
j 1 5 0 1 KILOMETER
,l 0 4? 0!,-, - ? ?_ E Landing F19? ..
1 690 0 INTERIOR -GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESTON -GINIq-I.- 780 2 30n 693 2040000 FEET s94
691o0om.E. -
.,,..._._..,..~..~....~•.......~.....~~,v....,~. _ ~
~y ~.~,~.,..:.~...,,~...~,.~.,~,,,.,,..a,
a _
Ens ~ ~ y
1 ~
4 ,,,01~ ~~a4
~ ~ 4~- _ r ~ , . _ , ~ `r
~ k. . , ~ - x~. -
F _ , 1, - ~
~ ~ r1~.
t ,
d_~_.~.. + 'r '`r r _
~ ,
i ~ . r ~ ~ t r / ~ ~ ~
~ a ~ i

_ _ _
~ / 4war., ...r ~i
j f _ - p,q~ iF l , ~ i
\ , ;c~ h . _ . , i _ , - t~ '7 `
/ L72A~ ~ ~*a ~ ~ ~ ~ i I _ _ _ p ~L - !
~ Ro ~ p.p -~~-r~,~_~~ ~"~i~~ ~ ' t
E ~ .
8 D ' L~ _i.. ...L. ~
~ DOb - ' , --'-L L _ _ O ~ l _ _r_ J
.n - ___--r
i ~ CL5`
'~..J r;oe` eis ' not , h A ~ i ~ ~ ab _ .Bib ~ ~ a, I
~'qc . r.q o ~ 'k~ I _ ~4 n rp~. _ - _ 1 i ~ ~
~~h ~ ~ Boy°ZyA~ ~ ~ - w i i ~ r _ ( ~ i _ _ 1._._, ~ r
.r B 08~~ B 06 _ " c+ 1ST ~ I ~ ` ~ B G', ~ ~ ~ ~ I fL4 ~4 / _ _ f~. ! ~ !
. 99~ , i s TE . i i ~ i f i r ~
B10 r.± BU. ~3 i' cy~ r~_ i ~
Btt~ BiU B;4 ^11 ~ ll J ~~blr _ ~ I i ~ c~- 'I a
- : ~ 4 ~
~ ~ L
E r, CU ' ' i
/ ~ % J i 3 c ,I~~~ ~ " ~ ~ _
v ~^y' _ ~ l I N' s, ~
r ?7 ~ j i ~ ~ ~a ~
Fro=~`D ~ ~ - 1~ ._....m_.~_a_......_~_., _ ,.ANNE LS . y , . -
E _ ~ t 5 y, 1 , ~ C~~ ~ ' ~ a <fL3 ~
v w ~'.Lc ~
o i a.;_>~A ' NWL ? c Mar ~ ` ~ . ~ ~ r j ~7 ~ . ~ t
111ANNE~S ~ ,
- TJ t3E iHpq~? ± ' ~ ' E~ , M ' ~ .
~ ~ ~ I ~ i ~ i ~
~ ~ i f i ~
~ ~3 q~, s . I ~ ~ ~
i
}
~ VF j
f
I
~ ~1 ~ ?f'~~ ~ / ~f r ~
_ ~ RE M~RKEA ~oR~„
~ ~ ~ 3 NoT 2EA5 pER UVJ I~ ~ 3 E A U N ,
• r ¦ • ¦ ¦ I
uris is ion a e an e inea ion
C,
~
Th.s cert_~ies what th,~s copy of this ~.lat accurately
nta ,n of 1 nv~ronme depicts the boundar} of 'the ~urisdicti~, Section 404 of ~ ;
the Clean Water Act as. determined by the undersigned on this
ants nc. t date. Unless there is a chan e in the law or our ublished on~u 9 P
re ulations this determination of Section 404 'urisdiction 9
be relied on r a e t to exceed t o e ROa ma u fo riod no hr e ars 1 n Ba Y P P ,8 Y 38
from this date. This determination was made utilizing the , g 760 2
198% Cor s of En sneers Wetlands Delineatson Manual. Ra el P 9 ~
` - 117 709 9 919
~ names _
~t e (ti..l )
date ~ )
i
~ ASS(-)(
le G1_1.4L 44 _'C
SHE RESERVE WETLANDS III'Gii ~I. G (9 19) 4%34, 1101 NBROOK CIRCLE SUITE C CARP ~l.C. 27511
104 FOUNTAINBROOK

i 4
~ ......q
f i. , .
E03 p~ -
. _ E04 C? - T-+. Y~w~ _
E05 ~4' -~7' L2 C_~~
~(~riC. q pl ~lo n`7j,4 ~ ~Lca~ J
/ lr. - Ir
~_2 GC_40'
. ( ~ ~ ~ E a*r c ~ ~h4~. I~Ar~ 3 - T.._..------ 1 \ r 1 r { r _
X v ~
r BEf 1'J! 0,0~ ~
!'SIN; n r ~ ilf~'sirE ~ M w
i ~ i ; V ~ ~ 1' i fx, i, P
r , p,0(~~ I ~ rA"~- / 1 ~ %
1'1~~ / rye ~ 0~~.. ~ \ \ 1 ~ 1 ~ .
~ i ~ /
i F~.,, T \ f 2a ~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~~11
- ~~'-4 ~ ~ ~ \ _'~".J END ~ 1. i ~ 1 i
i CI3,ta'. E rBE~c:,,~ 0,0~ sirEir ---J
a, ~ h a 1 ~.6 °~~~hc- ~ i ~ ,d ~
_ ~ - E , ~ ~ r ,:i ~VjjCt2i4 j r 1r' / a~ 027 Q
U ~ a , - - ~ R ~p.p • ~ G,v~/ac. I . ~ k" ~ r. ~ a
~ 10D1I A~ ;I ~e -
DO :e -------I / i ~ ~ D r,.
~ ~ ,
I A D0 . . Doi :a pcZAc, ~ '
- \ tip Doze y1s\ ~ rya
~ not ~ 1 p16 \ ob °o, ~ eu~ CL5 / I CLS 5 ~ ...a
,j ~•A~ ~ ~ ~..a'/~ • o2tiAc.. - "ue , ~ ~ /fix ,~~5/ j~ ~ L' CAF-.
Boy -tis~ ~ ~ ~ , ~I
B08~~ ~B06 _.a ~ ~ sr~ B 0., - ~ CL4 L _
- , , Ea -r. s 7E % w • B10 _ BOI ~4 v~~~~
~ ;B' Cod ~ r.
~ $:3 B14 C71 rod 0 . i CLS LS
I 1 :0 J2 • o r ~ END r ~ ~ - ~ _ J _ END^9iB' rLg I c l A~. - -
- L4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~JA \ 4 i . 5E
I f K~ ~ o,~A \ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ 1 ,a , ~ , CU
~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ a ~ ~ 1 / ~ ~ ~ ~ I~. ~ ~ _ ' - A Bi' y a
i t j G G ~ ItC.
I 9 La / Cb ~ C Bl.a ~l~ ~ t
' FcoC>ED ~ ! ~ JP~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a - . . _ t Cn~NNELS ~ e i 8 BC: ~'e' - r 1,~- IAc,
_ u - I ~-r BE 3 '1/8'i 1 6 .B Cl 't f `BEG°9,n f.L3 ~
_ - i _ - s ~ u - i , ~ ~ ,tL2 9 ~
i - ~ _ ~1,~ o.o~AC ~~r~~ NWL t E cI ~ CHANNE
~ ~ / To ~ .iH ~ M.~r. M. -~~a E PgC7 p u ~m ~ 0119':. • U ~ t t ~ .
~ i E ~ M ~6 M ` ~ i ~ ~ M - I
_ / ~ ~M,a i i ~ I ~ b ~ , i ~
' 1 M i ~ Mz~ w2i , , N i i
.von i
.J6
" ~3
~ ~ . - ~l
,a w~ I ~ i \ ~
~ ~
I ~ i
I
~..a_~._., ~ , ~I
.r
7 , ~ ~
3 ~ T ARE M RKEA ~ol~D 3 ~ NO ~E R N I~ E A AS UNpE W ~D I
• •
• uri - • sic ion ,I c, I PAS ~ dT
a e an e inea ~ on
"This cert.~ies that th's co this caat a ~ ~ py of ccurately D
depicts the baundar~~ of 'the urisdicticr, of Section 404 nta r ~ of o nvlronme the Clean rvar.er Act as determined by the undersigned on this
date. Unless there is a than e in the ?aw or our ubl' nC.
fished Cants g P On911 regulations, this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction.
may be re~~ed ,ip~n for a period not to exceed three ears
y Roa Bn . 18 38 from this jatc:. This determination was made utilizing the
198"' Corps or engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." 9 2 60
Ra ei
17 91 790 19 9
(Hamel
t~
(date ;
i
r
i
j THE RESERVE WETLANDS, III'GII J. GI CCE ASSOC*
1e4 .oU...INaaoo. (BROOK CIRCLE SUITE RY 919 469- 110 1
I C C A N C. 27511 l ez

i
1 i
s a
i i
3 i
d
i
f d
3
1
t i i
r
s i~
t
8
i J
d
1
s
i 4
iE
r . j l j
4
t
E 03 BE GC:
q E04 C2 L'l1~PAriY • E05 ~a 4: M"~-~+~ -
CL7' Lc' CL ~ e
A.0[ ~lu'
~ 1~ i
y- ~ LCL40' Y. CL10 ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ / E
s ~ ~ k 'A+r~~~P ~c,,~. \ - _ ~ 1 ~
Y ~ y ' . d' e ~ .i--- _ - / ;
V ~ BE~1Ntc 17~G~ ~
IJ i r % ~ SIT
er ~ f
t r G ~ ~I i \
i . _ ~ EJI ~ n ~ OG~ ~ I '~4 T~~y f _ i" ,1
~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ . l~ ~ ~ t4k , i
' ~ ~ t I ~ ~ ~"l t!
" 1 ~ _ E: r, f'~ rL.a i ti ` , i~ ~ a I ~
~ ~ i ~e I ; .,,yr ` ~ ~ _ ~ ; ~'kl t
' ~ ~ .i-_o~ i
~ I h~ ~ , 1 rt __.__r ~ ti ,
~ i x _.y it ~ 7
- R o D r ~ r--- X00 ~ ~ _ ~I i r i r ~ f
10D11 _ ~ AC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ % a i ~
_ D>~ e u . ~i, ~ ~ . ~a4 - ~ ~ I DO ,aw 1 ~ l L _ 1 ~ ~ ;
I Ac :N r - - _ _ n" ' ~ I r
_ ' DO ~ _ I _ ~ ~ DD"3, ~ I _T
D02' ~ DO1 ~~15 ~ ~I I i ~_a
I 1710 -07 d16 `i ~ ~ I CL9 'i ~ . I ~ ^LS ~ CLS
E ~ 1~-
BOB ~ xB06BD CG9 ! ' ~I, ~ j' /
_ ~ - x f ~i,5 f i - ~ / rya -
~ ~ i 10 , X03 BD1 ~1 , ,-d4 s TE r; s : ` ~ i i i - E ,o~A~
cD~ ~ ~ ~ G;i / E13 B14 "11 603 CCl~ ~ ~ ~ ~Cr ~ _ - -
C J ` "02 ~ 1 ~.LS CLS ~ ,
8 q~ e 9 a _ END( r ~ ~ ,5 :6 ~ ~ _..T... L ENDC9/8' . ~ i v
_ _ r. Bi' 6 a ~ g / L 4 1 ~ ~ Eti;"ta%5
~1'~~`x-D 'S ~ ~ Bt G, . _ . I ~ CU '::24/3 C24; a' ~
7E ~.'+'~Li~ ~ ~°0 0. i { ~ X24%4~ ~ ~ ~ / C24;q,~ I
d i ~v r ~I ( BE!,C?a!4 y.~ ~o~t~ i
.O`GA~, , ti' ~ 8 ~ ~ { V o qq~~ . . I DE ! :9110 03 -Tq.:y ie ~ 5i3 Fl00HANN °:.8 l~~l/ df ~ _9,a~ I i l.4 ~ ,li2C ~
ELS w r, 7~ M2, ~ ~ ~4' ;?V' B[.~ C1 , C1/8` ~a L il, -r B ~ L3
- ~ i ~9~~ ~ l ~ X119, rli0'~ n r c11~ ~ v`.vIA~~ ~1~e-~ ~ ~ .y c~ ~ 1
.r 71~~n, ~s 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ CBE( k ' ~ ~BEGC9~a' l;y,~ Bf ~ LL3 -1~,." ' f CL2 B, li1C
'tw- ~ 0,07' ~ i , NW ~ti ~:..9' ~ ~ Y CHAN M32 i 'e ~ , l „ t ;1/8' ~ a .~Ei' a C9.~
~ ~'M1 1 TO ~ I iNP ~ ~ ' i ~e ~ 1 gCTED ~ MtaM' j Mq. `"'w6 M~ B .~r8,. ~ U6' , ~ l}C A C1 8' f rl;~,~ ~ X1/9 s A l14'~~, 1 ~i ~.ll' " ~ C1/l a
11 ~ I, ~ ~Mi M1`~ w M~' ~ ~1 ~ ~ { y
1 ~ IMA ~ ~ i C2/8` ~ ~ '.1;8~ rl;;_ a ~ j ~EGC2/t0 C2/8'
.i... Mi'Y ~ ~ ~ ~3 q~ M;l i / i i
I o i i
1 y
~ N f;4
i - ~ ~ ~ ~~~1
i ~ ~ ~
I ii ~ ~
4 d
r.. ~ C f ~ ~ ~
.1 L c i ;
/ ; g
~
s 1 D, 3 3~~ N Y~ R k o ~ ~ E M E ~o~D G~~`~ E A EAS UNDER N W ~
• ur - • is is i ona e I A~.T'~ IP
an e ine a ion
i
E
4 ~ "This certifies that this copy of this plat accuratel ~
de acts the bou y " • p ndary of 'the Jurisdiction of Section 404 of nta ~ ~
o nv~ro nme the Clean Water Act as, determined by the undersi ned on this
9 date. Unless there is a change in the law or our ublished
p nts nc. to oneu , regulations, this determination of Section 404 'urisdiction I
ma be rel J y ied upon for a period not to exceed three ears
y Roa B an 18 38 from this date. This determination was made utilizin the (,u~ ""J a
1987 Cor s of n ..g p E gineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. 27 9
R ei a ,
-9117 790 19 9 (name)
(title)
(date)

.

~

L
REV iSJN`,, t ~Nt a SNCE
-is
THE RESERVE WETLANDS H][7GH J GI 6RAWN I •
GI Cc& T S
104 FOUNTAINBROOK C11 IROOK CIRCLE " " ~'SUITE C CARP N.C. 27511 [phone]