19950095 Ver 1_Complete File_19950101

#, a•
?- C
iJC 1'erlnII KegUcso-d (l'rovlde.. Nationwide --
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
CORPS F ENGINEES DISTRICT ENGINEER DIWATER QUALITY PLANNING
VISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANC P t1 a
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,t Q -r
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES (j
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Box 29535 ' i ..?" JAN ., 1 11995
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7)'COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name:
2. Owners Address: P.O. Box 293, G enGhnrn, Nr 27402
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work): 91 n/?Ag-49nn
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
Mr. Bill Milikan
Loyal Order of the Moose 685, 4025 Viewmoni- Drive
Greensboro, NC 27406
5. Location of work (MUST A T T A C H MAP). County: r n i i f o r ri
Nearest Town or City: Greensboro
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): 4 n ? 5 v i P wm nn t n_l-,_S R 11 ?.r
Greensboro, NC '27406
6. Name of Closest Stream/River. Hickory Creek
River Basin:
Randleman Dam Watershed
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQNV, ORW, WS I, or ( S II YES [X1 NO [ 1
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this'property? YES [ ] NO [X]
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
1.51 Acre
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled: 0.40 +/- Acre
Drained: 0.00 +/- Acre
Flooded: 0.00+/- Acre
Excavated: 10.55
Total Impacted:. 51
Acre
Acres -? wc,l I
"!"'
12. I)e??.: ?tion of propo"C'd %v'ork (Atwch PLAINS 1/ aa,,mesi__pon- m in------
Relocation of cree
to
control devices close out
13. Puri>osc of proposed work:
Landfill. ds. Also, note measures
es that tiffs activity must be carried out in wetla?t
14. State reasons why the applicantbaRyows or closing out of lan fill.
taken to minimize wetland impacts - impacts-
Proper erosion control measures to minimize o Fisheries Service
endangered or threatened species or critical
15. You are required to contact the U .S. Fish and Wildlife Service SAS) and/or National Marin
proposed for listing NO [XI
?`ES t ]
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed orproject. Have you done so .
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by proposed
/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS
presence of historic
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND rearding
'? Have you done so? YES [ ] NO [ X]
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation edd pro project-7 g
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the pED TO CORPS.
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARD
'17. Additional information required by DEM:
all wetlands, streams. and lakes on the property
A. Wetland delineation map showing acted by project.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be imp
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line. project, attach copy.
D. If a stormwat
er management plan is required for this E. what is land use of surrounding prope- Y?
sal?
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage dispo N/A
Date
owner's Signature
NOTES
15. No I
CONEXAS
SIGN
HRS. 6 LIK
BAYNES
PRIVATE DEMOLITION LANDFILL
NO UNAUTHORIZED DUMPING
APPROVED DISPOSAL MATERIAL :
STUMPS BLACK
BRUSH BUILDING MATERIAL
DIRT TOPSOIL METAL PIPE
DIRT
BRICK PAVING DEBRIS
GENERAL DEMOLITION .
DEBRIS
CONTACT:
WALTER BAYNES
RT. 8 BOX 246A
REIDSVILLE, N.C. 27320
TELE: [phone]
OPEN 7 =a6

16. Side
riprapl
excels
materi;
metho(
17. Guilfor
presid(
any
18. Setbac
mainta
18. Final u
19. Moose
locatior
exiting
20. BOUNI
SCALE: 1 "-2 , 000'
Y)

N Q.
n
U U
l
° z
w
1
U Y
W
?
O Y W
?, w U
Q

CL lY
O w
¢ O
? (n OJ uj
w K p O
- Z
w 11)
W
• 0
?
ZCnW
_ .
tigLwQ

• ? w Q Q
r
c
A .
z L,
o!-Oc
Uw JCJz
- H ? J d
J Q
O z o C
W
(n Z
0 O
-
I-so
N ?_ \
o
N
W \ \
< ELL
1 to U \ a o
w \\ z
oen
U
r Z
cl, -1
0
n r+ \ Q I^ y ' u- \ \ Ozz
W
F- \ Z - Z
O
\ \
al;
set
ow \
M ?\
we AW
w / / ?.1 N (.7 AD" 31f-,Z9-.01 N
Z
N
W
cco
O1 .
a ¢ LLJ
U
Sje rn__ ,\ ?Q Z c
LLJ
LL c
• J - l-,CO N - \r?Q 06
M ' 91UO1
Lij
N w _`

MEMORANDUM PRINT NAMES :
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Reviewer:
T0: john Dorney BRANCH WQ Supv. .:
__
Planning Branch DATE: Z 2??
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
***EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (USE N/A FOR NOT APPLICABLE) "*'
PERMIT YR: 95 PERiyIIT NO: 0000095 COUNTY : GUILFORD
APPLICANT NAME : B&R LANDFILL-LOYAL ORDER OF THE MOOSE 685)
PROjECT'-TYPE : ERS I ON CONTROL PERMIT-TYPE:
C•OE iF : DOT-0
RCD_FROM-CDA : APP DATE-FRM-CDA : O i/ 3 1/ 9 5
REG OFFICE: WSkt-i
RIVER_AND-SUB-BA INN#: 03-OL-(e
STREAM CLASS : C
WL-IMPA -T: : 0"'N
WL-REOUE 'T'ED: 1,5/
WL ?;c:c?RE t $) : LI
MITIGATION?: ®r!
MIT'IGATION_SIZE: IVA
ST'R-INDEX-NO: ) i- 3 Ni O(j Creek
WL TYPE : C?Id '136A ^ T3+o ke. Yeas
A?y')
WL-ACR-EST? : (j/N
WATER IMPACTED BY F 1LL? : am
MITIGATION-TYPE: OF
DID YOU REQUEST MORE INFO ? : Y/9)
1 WE'T'LAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED? : dvi'
HAVE PROJECT' Ci-ANilO/COivDITIONS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH APPLICANT? : tj%N
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSUE iSSUE%COND DEITY
has be??,
COiUYEN'T'S : Pleas e see ca-' ? &A e(A /y? E m 1?en 0;
["??S cu ;sed u? 4) tbQ CLn0?t c0(1+
RECEIVED
FEB 24 19yj
ec: Regional Orrice
Central Fiies

oat,
?- - r GJ
2-?
I..? f f?^rYYn????
6V?) ?

%? ?,?? ) )?1t?.?/'_? `"' Lf'?•f??r.? ?r??.t?l7e? ?1'Ce??•rv?, ??r'?? - ?',,?. ,'1? ,F???
NCDEF1&NR
DEM-WSRO
To: John Dorney
From: Allan Smith 0
Subject: B&B Landfill
Date: 950221
The B&B Landfill in Guilford County applied for the 404/401 Permit to
relocate Hickory Creek (Class C) in order to have more space to place demolition-
vegetation fill. This stream has been heavily impacted because three (3) landfills
are located on this headwater system. One of these landfills is leaching materials
into the stream. The COE has apparently already been involved because of
previous stream relocation.
I have talked with David Barnes of Guilford County Soil and Erosion
Control about the proposed fill. He stated that the County has a $200,000+ suit
against Mr. Baynes (part owner of the landfill) because he has refused to enact
appropriate measures. I then checked with Solid & Hazardous Waste who have
refused to let the landfill expand because of all the problems that exist there.
The S&HW file on B&B Landfill is filled with NOVs and correspondence concerned
with the non-implementation of appropriate actions on the part of the owners.
From what I have seen and heard, this permit definitely should NOT be
approved. There would have to be many conditions in the permit concerning
protection of the wetlands and streams; such as buffers, berms, etc. ; that the
owner apparently would not adhere to. He has already encroached into the
wetlands and has debris very close to the stream.
The only reason given for the owner to relocate the stream is for expansion
of the landfill. The fact that Solid & Hazardous Waste has told the owners NOT to
expand; which they are apparently ignoring; should be reason enough to deny
the permit (since they are not supposed to expand, they should not need to
relocate the stream). Only about an acre of land will be gained by moving the
stream. Also, the I-85 by-pass is scheduled to go through the upper part of the
property in a couple of years which is another project that will degrade the area.
Solid & Hazardous Waste will write us a letter stating that they refuse to let
the landfill expand, if we need it. I've also talked with John Thomas (COE) and
he has stated his concerns with the owner, however, he says he does not have
enough reason to refuse the landfill a permit from the Corps. perspective.
If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at [phone].
A c WETLAND

s
VVI1?e or;
RATI NG

4
SIM
Project name 13 a Land ; 1 Nearest road _y,Ci,) rY10n 't f V(L
County Gu, ) c- WetInd area '• C' acres Wetland width 2 S feet
Name of
evaluator 1 sir, n-ato eil 5G 2 P-4
.? J PF
v. etland location Adla ent Ian(
(withth 1/2
00,Popd car ake or radius)
? o perennial stream
? forested/
, x int?rzt ittant stream
gricultur
within interstream`divide ? a
? imperviou
? other
Dominant:
?'h ex 5 ?N 4 }
? A 7???"YS
1
predominantly organic - humus,
muckor `peat (3)
? redominantly mineral - non-sandy,
predominantly sandy Floodin
r ee0Is.4? g and
ot?c lap±
? semipermane..?.,;
, A7.
flooded or Inunda
3 Hydraulic factors
seasonally f(?odod or inundated
1
F] intermittah flo0 dedor temporary,
u [.,] steep topography f
? d hed' or channelized sur aGe water
t06L wetland width >1 00 feet L] no evident Q loodir g .surface
weer
Wetland type (select one)*
? Bottomland hardwood forest ? Pine savanna
? Headwater forest ? Freshwater marsh
i ? Swamp forest ? Bog/fen
? Wet flat ? Ephemeral wetland
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay a
? Bog forest Other 'Lai n e O PW
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight
Water storage x 4.00 =
Wetland Score
Q Bank/Shoreline stabilization L x 4.00 =
Pollutant removal 3 x 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat ? x 2.00 = 4' S
Aquatic life value I x 4.00
/ Recreation/Education
x 1.00
* Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr/rrrrrrrrlrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr/rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrr!/?
57

?' i (?4 Z

VX'
-
- - --- _ --

F.

?h.
GUILFORD COUNTY
PLANNNG AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
August 24, 1995
?wl?v
Mr. Bill Milikan RECEIVED
Loyal Order of the Moose 685
4025 Viewmont Drive S P t 1995
Greensboro, N.C. 27406
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
"r.,1r!N
Re: Baynes/Mooselodge Landfill/
Grading Permit //90133 (Revised)
Dear Mr. Milikan:
I have just received a copy of the letter dated August 18, 1995 which was sent to you from John Dorney/A. Preston
Howard, Jr. with the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources. The letter basically
approves the 401 Water Quality Certification and allows for stream relocation as discussed on site Wednesday, July
19, 1995.
Based on the approval mentioned above, I am also able to approve the revised Erosion Control/Grading Plan that was
revised and resubmitted by MacConnell and Associates earlier this month.
I am reissuing the grading permit at this time and am sending it to you with this letter. The civil penalty can be
stopped as soon as the erosion control devices are installed according to the new plan.
Please follow the new plan as it relates to erosion control, stream relocation/stabilization, slope requirements,
coverage/stabilization requirements.
If you have any questions, feel free to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
David F. Barnes, CPESC
Soil Erosion Control Chief
/b
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Gary MacConnell, MacConnell and Associates
Mr. John Dorney, N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources/Water Quality Section
Mr. Brent Burch, N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources/Solid Waste Section
Mr. Garris Evans, Guilford County Department of Environmental Health
Mr. Walter Baynes, Baynes Grading Company
Post Office Box 3427 • Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Telephone: [phone]
PO Box 3096
Cary, NC 27519
919-467-1239
March 27, 1995
Mr. John Dorney
NCDEH&NR: Water Quality Planning
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: Project # 95095
B & B Landfill
Dear Mr. Dorney:
1602 Sunrise Road
Cary, NC 27513
Fax [phone]
4P
FN17' OO' FN I99,f
This letter responds to your letter to Mr. Bill Milikan of the Loyal Order of the Moose 685, dated
February 27, 1995. On behalf of Mr. Milikan and Walter Baynes of the B & B Landfill in
Guilford County, we request that the Division of Environmental Management approve the request
for stream relocation and 401 Certification. Since we received your letter, we have been working
with the various governmental agencies related to this request. Based on my conversations with
Mr. Milikan and Mr. Baynes, it is their mutual goal to close out the landfill in an environmentally
sound manner.
The request for relocating the stream will provide long term environmental benefits. The
proposed relocation increases the sinuosity of the creek which helps to reduce erosion, as well as
to improve the habitat for flora and fauna. The relocation will be conducted in an acceptable
manner. We propose to modify our plans to incorporate NCDOT and WRC stream relocation
guidelines. This will provide a more natural habitat than the washed out pond bottom that now
exists.
Relocating the stream also allows for the filling in of the existing excavation. The proposed plan
provides for a minimum 3:1 slope which will reduce erosion and the current hazard which
presently exists with the excavated area. The filled in area will be properly vegetated when
complete and it can then be used as a recreation field.
We have met with Guilford County staff and we understand that with minor modifications, the
previous grading plans are approvable. I have also discussed the situation with members of the
Division of Solid Waste Management (DSWM). A request to expand the landfill to the extent
shown in the stream relocation package will be submitted to the DSWM. It is my understanding
that the authority for construction debris landfills is with the DSWM and no longer with Guilford
County. It is also my understanding that the Army Corps of Engineers does not object to the
relocation, provided there are no objections from other agencies.
MACCONNELL
& ASSOCIATES, P.C.
I am providing copies of this letter to professionals with regulatory agencies of which I have been
in contact, so that we may proceed to resolve all issues in a reasonable time.
Mr. Milikan and Mr. Baynes have expressed their desires to close out the landfill, as soon as
possible. It is our belief that the relocation of the creek is the best bong term environmental
solution. As indicated, we will revise the plans to include NCDQT / WRC guidelines. This will
include the planting of native trees along the creek.
Please call if you have any questions or concerns
Sincerely,
Gary S. MacConnell, P.E.
President
cc: David Barnes
Walter Baynes
Brent Burch
Jan McHargue
Bill Milikan
Allan Smith
John Thomas
John Weigel
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
Regulatory Branch
March 23, 1995
Action ID. 199501469 and Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwaters and Isolated
Waters)
Loyal Order of the Moose 685
Post Office Box 293
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Dear Sirs:
Please reference the field inspections of October 25, 1994, conducted by
Mr. John Thomas of the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office staff on your property
located off of Viewmont Drive, adjacent to Hickory Creek, Greensboro, Guilford
County, North Carolina. The purpose of this inspection was to review plans
provided by Mr. Gary MacConnell of MacConnell & Associates (consultant for the
site) for your proposed stream relocation work associated with your demolition
landfill operation, and to inspect the site for waters and wetlands subject to
Department of the Army permitting authority.
Reference is also made to your permit request received on February 9,
1995, for Department of the Army authorization to discharge fill within the
referenced jurisdictional waters and wetlands associated with your proposed
stream relocation work. Review of your request and previous site inspections
indicates that your proposed work would adversely impact 1.51 acres of
jurisdictional waters and wetlands adjacent to the above headwaters
tributaries of Hickory Creek.
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the Federal
Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was
provided, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, for discharges of
dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters.
Your work is authorized by this nationwide permit provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions and provided
you receive a Section 401 water quality certification from the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM). You should contact Mr. John
Dorney, telephone [phone], regarding water quality certification. This
nationwide permit does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain any
required State on local approval.
This verification will be valid for two years from the date of this
letter unless the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued or revoked.
This verification will remain valid for the two years if, during that period,
the nationwide permit authorization is reissued without modification or the
activity complies with any subsequent modification. If during the two years,
the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended or revoked, or is
modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and
conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced or are
under contract to commence, in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will
remain authorized. This is provided the activity is completed within twelve
months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or
revocation.
Printed on 0 Recycled Paper
-2-
Please be reminded that no excavated or fill materials may be placed in
any waters or wetland areas without prior Federal permit authorization.
Accordingly, you should contact this office for a determination of Department
of the Army permit requirements for any future, proposed impacts in any water
or wetland areas subject to our permitting authority.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions,
please contact Mr. Thomas, Raleigh Regulatory Field office, telephone (919)
876-8441, ext. 25.
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
Copy Furnished (with enclosure):
Mr. Gary S. MacConnell
MacConnell & Associates
1602 Sunrise Road
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
W' John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Regional Office Manager
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
8025 North Point Boulevard
Suite 100
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106
J =a-? =+ =;
AW-1. Hi-:P, FAA I I NF T F I
l
filar 1 l''-=i 1f= : 1E: pJr .:ii P.ij
Ct mi111 »tt )l2
t
t- P 1. ;!!'AI ?- 1. NC, ?,, 0' 11
Hi- F,FHI 1 `? I NI:F TFI {t`=+-? -':{ =+ filar 14''=+5 1f :a fli..i"ii"i'
95o95 2 March 14, 1995
apps "'Ilriar
4; f ' ?., rf>7 ar:?ed w, 1 t 1" es ypior ...-:d _.P
j rF_ve?etae?r:g wi _i ?? ;;P1?; r 7 ;cam
. ,.` - - t r ;31... L ,'?,.,7 r!- 1, .1?:. ... j ... •a` '1•?. ,'r.
1. t
MEMO
TO:
J
DATE:
SUBJECT:

c
1
Q
From:
i

??frNsiAr? `}P,?
.?_ North Carolina Department of Environment,
„ Health, and Natural Resources g? Printed on Recycled Paper
?„M?
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steven J. Levitas, Deputy Secretary
ED FE F1
Division of Environmental Management
Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
FAX:[phone]
FAX TO: )VV/ jcO FAX NUMBER: Z 2?q
FROM:John Dorney, Ecological Assessment Group
PHONE: [phone]
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steven J. Levitas, Deputy Secretary
C>EHNR
Division of Environmental Management
Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
FAX:[phone]
FROM:John Dorney, Ecological Assessment Group
PHONE: [phone]
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET:

1. 07
North Carolina Departme,
Environmer,?, Health, and Na., ;I
r Resources
~ it ?)
A2
Vv" T;:,? ? Sa,err Regional O`: #`ce

il' F'F'; I°I 4
F,+ 1 =i11-1- .1-41=;71 Frk; 1 =+ 1 14 : F=, F, 1. 11, 1 .1 i-7
N C.' l-) 1 I I tu, N H.
T.0 VNi--WS RC:),
.lohra 1)ttrn?y
!J
! r,Irr, • Allan Smith
B&B Landfill
IhiIt., - '150221
i *np B&B andt-111 in Guilford County applied for the 404/401 Permit to
r an- Hit korv Creek (Class C) in order to have more space to place demolition-
?. ;rotntiokl fill. 'this stream has been heavily impacted because three (3) landfills
a p 1, fttF,?i ran this headwater svstem. On(? of these landfills is leaching materials
the stream. ThF C;OE has al.parently {already been in-vrolved because of
I0'••Viotlg ';tr•PAM t'•Hltlt'ation.
I ha o taikeel with David ftaru2s of Guilford Cntanty Soil and Erosion
.)rlrrc,l Httrlttt -h,,- proposed fill. He stated that the County has a $200,000+ suit
Mr Hrty;tl?fi (part owner of the lant.1fill) because he has refused to enact
,lt•11Wr,l,rri,i,- ripitsurrs. 1 then checked with Solid & Hazardous Waste who have
1e* the landfill expand because of all the problems that exist there.
IfV, file Rtt;1 Landfill it filled wit:i NOVs and correspondence concerned
h tl! n( rt•-implt'rrwntatlon of appropriatc actions on the part of the owners.
f'r',,t;, ;ah:?c [ have seen an(i heard, this permit definitely should NOT be
r, •.°!? ] . Pit r•N wotild have to he many t-?ondltions in the permit concerning
1. r4„„ n 4 thy' v.t tlandb arid streams, as buffers, bP.rms, etc. y that tho
v,uuld not adh)re iu. Hc• hAS alreHdV er,crorr?•hed into the
•i>,r,.l; anal ht?r. dii lhri_, verb ,?i,se to r.lle ?itroarn,
?,lil?' rrt1:??.1 !ivF'rl fill 'tle Uw11pr' tG te :he stream is for
'ut!l'ifill. Tho fart illrtt Solid fit llezard,, Js W'IF O haS told the uwr&T";I k
;tt•, Appitrer tl_,, iknor'ing, alp ;uld k)e rAason onouf;h to
,E'+ niit ? sln-e .trt, n',t ?: ippoF ed tc. expand, ±l.l-y Fhould not need to
t ho ?;trowr, ; ()iilti :+b,'lt t an acre f:,f lrirtd will bt, gained by moving the
fl]`_,tt. tttt 1-?;.) t)y -1?Ei?a i5 schedulod to gU Thrmtgl't thl? pper par; ttf tht.
,f ,'t grs is t+notlwr 1)rojKet that will d(rgarado the area.
w, W.'AF,tA V':l writt? tJ5 a letter sta,'iig that thoNr ref\l`i 'el
11. ?'t'e rtl5L, talked with John Thom e? Kr;d
'.i,:t: (I l oli t'r lt, with the h,':+ovor, lit ya`" la- toe,, not have
i+1. 1•t. +„ .,,,f`li ,ta tllk' lim ifill a p(rrill:f_ fr:,111 t l;-
( l )1c+t.. ?ti.? '?'r: •;t?r.!,: ;ir r^i Tl 'E±r'(. 1. ;'tl ?:? lt1 tgl''l thOQ.
I` FF;=,r,,A -iFFI _;F F, 1_'_{li i_,1-?I 1
15
F ?? ?.? ?',/t Jtt ??n ? ?SRFF??i.W w.aMy..,- tlS ww+rl".
° 11F
is .re^?, ? ??*?'.rCr ?,? '? ..ir
At? car tl ?.;r E o„:. W? , Y
, •-.° ? V n M , j(J,nMMo`4 h t4'4 ? C YM.iAt
',? ..?aoa??? tee'
f
t ?r?r?TS ,tC'1i:['f't?Zl1 [ 1w"";r w<
AA-k
N
r?, ..4 w? wf t .N•J .q?+ ,,t.•?.i+. y.. ..?,;:.vl`e 'rwwr
A l • .., ? t VIIrH°.v ? `!11! ?.M M' 7Q?•? ?,?.w1/I'K? ?ywQN?w•
Fph P. T' 1-7,
14 7717
t ttC,l. load v co, ,- rol,
;n C, clrh ? 1_ J _T.,feet
Y-i
.1? Y ! ?"?•fr vW.rw A Ny....
vice.
_ k Mns<
#{C1?3 C1?7C us;,
v.r: •..;?µwr ?+' ham.
f,.

M h`'?j ?? ? j• 4 °1{l?? ! wt.?.?f 4Yh7 ?. q;.? ?? ?
? '„ ?t?? .
?'+ 9;i
'
p?
?L?r. • w
??,•,
,l'S?,Y1W n'?M..r.'?,`?•. .q?. "A. ?±M VDM r.M? ..
5
? .? M'•.,A?p:??
.04
_-
l'.?r?l 0tie
,3i: ii" Lfitr
J. j
i rJl , A t (fir ?l
it
i 7 1.
RA yesyy.
• - " l; 1? _ Fly
v
Ai,
C
Awl Ind Score
ersho-d an] 1 !1c,f p01r't a st,. t''? - thl.;I ' ' ' mild up' ups' QT, o, rodivs
7 /
1
PO Box 3096
Cary, NC 27519
919-467-1239
MACCONNELL
& ASSOCIATES, P.C.
January 25, 1995
Mr. John Dorney
NCDEH&NR: Water Quality Planning
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Dear Mr. Dorney:
1602 Sunrise Road
Cary, NC 27513
Fax [phone]
Please find enclosed with this letter seven copies of an application for a stream relocation (Joint
Form ), under Section 401. This is for the B&B Landfill in Guilford County. Please call if you
have any questions
Sincerely,
Gary S. MacConnell, P.E.
President
cc: Walter Baynes
David Barnes
PO Box 3096
Cary, NC 27519
919-467-1239
May 19, 1995
MACCONNELL
& Assomus, P.C.
'4`1
Mr. John Dorney
G
NCDEH&NR: Water Quality Planning 15? ??S
P.O. Box 29535 ?Qy? a??
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: Project # 95095
B & B Landfill
Dear Mr. Dorney:
1602 Sunrise Road
Cary, NC 27513
Fax [phone]
A meeting was held on April 24, 1995, regarding the above referenced facility. This meeting was
held in Greensboro and included representatives from the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Guilford County, Loyal Order of the Moose 685,
and B&B Landfill. This meeting was productive in that the various agencies that have regulatory
authority over the landfill and those responsible for the operation of the landfill were present.
More importantly, a course of action was agreed upon to resolve permitting and regulatory issues.
This course of action included the following:
• Provide justification for relocating the creek, if this is still desirable.
• Provide plans for the closure of the landfill.
• Provide copies of plans and correspondence to all interested parties (see list of persons
copied).
Mr. William Millikan and Mr. Dean Vickory, of the Loyal Order of the Moose 685 indicated that
they would like to have the creek relocated. Justification for this request is summarized below:
• It would be very costly to move the existing trash to accommodate a 3:1 slope.
• The proposed relocation increases the sinuosity of the stream which is environmentally
desirable.
• The proposed relocation provides for vegetated stream banks of plant species that enhance
wildlife habitat.
• The proposed relocation will provide a natural appearance when complete.
• The relocation allows for a ball field to the rear of the property.
• The proposed procedure for relocating the creek minimizes down stream impacts.
• The proposed vegetation provides a source for nutrient uptake from leachate and helps to
purify any contaminants.
A copy of the revised plans are enclosed with this letter. Please note that detail 4/C-2 shows
requirements for the creek relocation. This detail was developed based on information provided
by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. We waited until we had this information
to resubmit the plans.
We are providing one copy of the plan to you and those individuals copied. If you or anyone else
requires additional sets, please let me know. I look forward to hearing from you regarding this
matter. Your assistance as well as all of the professionals which are involved in this matter is
greatly appreciated.
Please call if you have any questions or concerns
Sincerely, 6
Gary S. MacConnell, P.E.
President
cc: David Barnes
Walter Baynes
Garris Evans
Julian Foscue
Brent Burch
Jan McHargue
Bill Millikan
Allan Smith
John Weigel
e Z/55
4 c?l6?m

(j(4(?E ? YNc
I?Zg4w10
hays

sck ? vx?,Y, -/0 le

b?
-
-
? ?' `'Vr ?`?`? -aM ? we ? r?o? ? ? L yy ? a-?ss ? ?l?s
V!A

11-7
/ ; s

,, - rw
x

_ ..F..
` ` I

'of
- - S , C.,W
f J , vI:?

-
?.? IDS SJ? S

ITS jvqlr) Poo r-I

ra - Tv? o,CV,?? I?y? r.? ?,?? .??So?a vhubd,?,/

To: John Dorney
Through: Steve Mauney
From: Allan Smith V,
Subject: B & B Landfill
Date: 950425
NCDEH8sNR
DEM-WSRO
(Project No. 95095)
RF0F/OFD
p
tilENTq`SCo S
vice'
A meeting was held yesterday to discuss the closing of B & B Landfill in
Guilford County. A list of attendees is attached. The following is a summary of
that meeting.
The question of concern was why the stream had to be relocated in order
for the landfill to close out. Mr. MacConnell, the engineer representing the
landfill, stated that they were concerned with the long term environmental
benefits. However, there were indications that many of the environmental
concerns would not be addressed by relocating the stream.
Solid & Hazardous Waste (S&HW) stated that there would have to be a 50
foot buffer from the stream to the edge of the debris no matter where the stream
is located. Apparently, the Moose Lodge (who owns the land), wanted the area
cleared off to make a baseball field or, in the least, have enough level land that
they could make it more attractive to sell. But it now appears that the Moose
Lodge is desperate to get out any way they can. It was decided that B & B
Landfill would send their reasons for relocation of the stream to you and that your
decision on whether or not to relocate the stream would determine what steps were
to follow.
It is a concern to the involved agencies that Mr. Baynes, who runs the
landfill, continues to ignore local and state regulations concerning landfills. If a
permit is issued for the relocation of the stream and revegetation of the
surrounding area, it is the feeling of the enforcement agencies involved that the
requirements of the permit would not be met and that only more problems would
arise.
It is WSRO's (Water Quality) position that the stream should not be
relocated and that the landfill should be closed out as S&HW deems necessary.
cc: Central Files
WSRO

---- -- --- -
c hhC0
r7- t sOC -- 5/p Cl-1Z3?
Luc Don t - ?Hoo
- ?q!O -7-7l-4lp
?-
44 6 3 73 '7 7
4ea
?i
--r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., G ove mor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
AIT4 X?FA
oil
Oft
?EHNR
February 24, 1997
Guilford County
DWQ Project # 95095
Mr. Bill Milikan
Loyal Order of the Moose
P. O. Box 293
Greensboro, NC 27402
Re: Compliance Inspection of the B and B Landfill Site
Dear Mr. Milikan:
On August 18, 1995 you were issued General Water Quality Certification No. 2671
authorizing 0.5 acres of wetland impacts for the purpose of relocating Hickory Creek and
installing sediment basins needed to close out the demolition landfill on Viewmont Drive
near I-85 south of Greensboro. This certification was issued with the following specific
conditions: the stream shall be relocated as flagged by DWQ staff; alders and willows shall
be planted along the streambanks; wetland fill is limited to west of a line shown on the
modified site plan dated 8/4/'95; the sediment basins and berms shall be restored to their
original grade and planted with wetland trees after landfill closure.
As part of an ongoing compliance monitoring and enforcement program for 401
Water Quality Certifications, Ron Linville from the Division's Winston-Salem Regional
Office and myself made a compliance inspection of the warehouse facility on January 16,
1997. From our inspection it appears that no work has been done on your project. Please
be aware that your Nationwide Permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE)
has likely expired and if so, your 401 Water Quality Certification will have expired also.
You should contact the USACOE Raleigh field office prior to starting work to see if you
need to renew your authorization to impact the wetlands on your project site. Should you
need to reapply for USACOE authorization you will also need to reapply for the 401 Water
Quality Certification.
Your cooperation in adhering to the conditions of your 401 Water Quality
Certification is appreciated. Should you have any questions concerning this matter please
feel free to contact me at [phone] or Ron Linville at [phone].
S' cerely,
eter B. Colwell
Environmental Specialist
cc: Ron Linville, DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
USACOE Raleigh Field Office
John Dorney, DWQ Central Office
File
b&bldfill.95095
Environmental Sciences Branch • 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
401 COMPLIANCE MONITORING
FORM
DWQ Investigator: 6 0 L ! h (/il ?? ( e4we l( DWQ # OAS
Date : Z 1 V417 Time: 10C Regional Office: ??. A? County:
Project Name: 6 L r /1 J (/-//
Permittee: All aoie Lo????t, ?S
Location of Project: P v,
Type of Development Authorized: h(f t4 C 1 I
Type of Permit / Water Quality Certification:
Type of Impact: 31i1°eio,i ('/-// Wetland Type and DWQ Rating: q3

Nearest Stream: Hi?L/Ca%;? C"" k Basin/Sub.:
Distance of Wetland Impact from Nearest Surface Water: It, SG{f
Specific 401 Conditions: ball V140 fui?Oi'?r?y /?i?io?' f? ?vo??, ,Sf 44"7_=
w/llo?-L??; dl, -v, lo?s;1/15,
Is project in compliance with all conditions: Y / N
Comments/ Description: jyd(M wP,%' Aay
5 fir1" ?K' , ld d ?'?ra i r
6(446?( LPCTc?a?? Gi?ev 1'11`7
-? S hi'eq yti '01-1 l0l?G? o!!/ W3 ?Dr?'vt5?dPav4? 0(
1
P L ( y L}l
t et l l a d /
/ 111 ,7 C,4
d
Is there a violation of the 401 Certification authorization ? PD
If so complete the enforcement section on the back of this form and forward copy to
the Central / Regional Office.
Signature: /4 ??'^''& Date: 2I` ??( `-7
DWQ 12/96
ENFORCEMENT
1. Is there a previous history of 404 / 401 activity on the property?
If so, give any details:
Nature of Violation (fill, excavation, etc.):
Acres:
Wetland Rating (if possible):
Significant uses impacted: _
Were downstream uses impacted?
Could the impacts have been avoided or significantly minimized?
Could the activity have been authorized?
Is restoration or mitigation appropriate for the unavoidable impacts?
Staff Recommendations for Future Action:
o,
„l- 9 ) 0 c1,-5
(lllUA'I 1\:It)oI1Ak'I C lit;J I :?): - - _ --_- -- - - --- ------
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide perinits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MAMA _
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,. (I' C?tl I I
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES °'"° ""-?°-----' -'.
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Box 29535
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 r
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Loyal Order nf
2. Owners Address: P O Box 293 (`r PnShnrn III' 27110?
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): • • •
(Work): 91 n/?go-4?nn
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
Mr. Bill Milikan
Loyal Order of the Moose 685, 4025 Viewmont Drive
Greensboro, NC 27406
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: r i • i I f „ r a
Nearest Town or City: Greensboro
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): 4029 v i ewmnn t n,- S A 1 12 5
Greensboro, NC 27406
6. Name of Closest Stream/River. Hickory Creek
7. River Basin
Randleman Dam Watershed
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQ`'V, ORW, WS I, or S II YES [X] NO [ )
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO [X]
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
1.51 Acre
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled: 0.40 +/- Acre
Drained: 0.00 +/- Acre
Flooded: 0.00+/- Acre
Excavated: 0.55+/- Acre
l 51 +/- Acres
Total Impacted:
12. DescriPtion ---
Relocation of creek within for
control devices t° ?l°---sue but
13. purpose of proposed work: A
Landfill. ds. Also, note measures
uti a n f fill-
cs that us activity must becarried of
14. State reasons why the applicant beir?fo w s or c l o s i n g_6
taken to minimize wetland impacts- acts .
Proper erosion control measures to, ?mSiFWs )and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
'rldlif
15. You are required to contact the U.S . Fish and list, W d orpe ro Service for listing endangered or?hreatenyESp c ° NOt[ X]
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally sed ro ect. Have you done so.
habitat to the permit area that may be affected by the s SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS
USFWS AND/OR NMF regarding the presence of historic
RESPONSES FROM THE •
X]
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO
by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [ ] NO [
properties in the pernut area which may be affected
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
'17. Additional information required by •DEM:
A. Wedand delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
d by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
erfortne
C. If delineation was p
C
delineation line. ct, attach copy.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this proje
E. What island use ce s.t..ou riding property? -
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? N/A
?4 Date
Owner's Signature
CONTOURS
CITY uu1 TS ?
NE IN
.
SIGN
BAYNES
VITYLIWITI LIW
IN
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1"-2, 000'
PRIVATE DEMOLITION LANDFILL
NO UNAUTHORIZED DUMPING
APPROVED DISPOSAL MATERIALS:
STUMPS
BRUSH BLOCK
TOPSOIL BUILDING MATERIAL
DIRT METAL PIPE
BRICK PAVING DEBRIS
GENERAL DEMOLITION
DEBRIS
CONTACT:
WALTER BAYNES
RT. 8 BOX 246A
REIDSVILLE, N.C. 27320
TELE: [phone]
NOTES
15. No I
permit
water(
provid
body
siltatic
the
land-d
16. Side 1
riprapr
excels
materi:
metho(
17. Guilfor
presid(
any
18. Setbac
mainta
18. Final u
19. Moose
locatioi
exiting
20. BOUNI
OPEN 7 DAYS A WEEK
HRS. 6 a.m. - 6 p.m.
n.
L? CD
F-
w Y Z
W w
v>
a w w w
o w
a U F w
c7
Q U
cr
`. Z U Q
Z W
C, ? X W
W d' Z
wo W
+ ? • v ?`gUUQ
t T ' O + `+ o
1 F- O ? c
z W, U W w ?. LL
J pz
W ? Q W -
V) O w 0 CL
lY Z O F LL C
W
v z
1 O
V) _ \ \
o su -- -" - - \ \
1 ?
LL
LL C) - U \ ? \ 44
061-
0 0 CO \ I LL
I \ \ \\ \ \ V , \\ ' i;
L.J fez
Z _. ? I J
L?j
n \ Z II Z \ 1 v
1 I tt Z
\ LL
~ \ l M .tz
OUR
cL 3.(f-CY &l oa
m U ¢ V Q \C
CL W
rn U
Z c
m ?
14 W,
3 - l-SO X D? od
Lij
U ?`
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
ED EHNR
February 27, 1995
Mr. Bill Milikan
Loyal Order of the Moose 685
P.O. Box 293
Greensboro, N.C. 27402
FILE COPY
Project # 95095
Dear Mr. Milikan:
The Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality Section has reviewed your plans for the
discharge of fill material into 1.51 acres of waters and/or wetlands located at B & B Landfill in Guilford County
for land fill expansion. Based on this review, we have identified significant uses which would be removed by
this project. These uses are aquatic life, and water storage. Furthermore, insufficient evidence is present in our
files to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands. Therefore, we are moving
toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A NCAC 2B.0109. Until we receive additional
information, we are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and/or the N.C.
Division of Coastal Management place your project on administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting your position that your project must be constructed as
planned and that you have no practicable alternative to placing fill in these waters and/or wetlands. Specifically
can you construct your land fill without moving the stream? We also are concerned about past sediment and
erosion control violations on this property as well as the lack of a permit to expand the landfill. Please address
your planned resolution of these matters as well. Finally if stream relocation is approvable, detailed plans for
this relocation will be needed before approval. Such plans must be received before 401 approval can be given.
Any documentation such as maps and narrative that you can supply to address alternative designs for your
project may be helpful in our review of your 401 Certification. Please respond within two weeks of the date of
this letter by sending a copy of this information to me and one copy to our Mr. Allan Smith at the Winston-
Salem Regional Office at 585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, N.C. 27107. I can be reached at 919-733-
1786 if you have any questions.
Si el ,
Zlific J n R. Dorney
ater Quality Cc, on Program
95095.nty
cc: Winston-Salem DEM Regional Office
Wilmington Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
David Barnes; Guilford County Soil and Erosion Control
Brent Burch; DEHNR-Solid and Hazardous Waste
John Thomas; Raleigh Field Office COE
Gary McConnell; McConnell and Associates
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
PO Box 3096
Cary, NC 27519
919-467-1239
MACCONNELL
& Assomns, P.C.
MFMORANDUM
FROM: Gary S. MacConnell C
TO: Distribution
DATE: 7/19/95
StJBJECT: B & B /Moose Lodge Landfill
1602 Sunrise Road
Cary, NC 27513
Fax [phone]
RECEIVED
'JUt 2 51995
eNVIRONMENTAL'3(' CfS
A meeting was held at the above referenced facility, on July 18, 1995. The purpose of this
meeting was to resolve outstanding permitting issues with respect to the site. Fourteen
individuals were present at the meeting as listed below:
John Dorney, DEM (919/733-1786)
Evan Henkin, DEM (919/733-1786)
David Barnes, Guilford County (910/373-3803)
Stacey Peace, Guilford County (910/373-3175)
Brent Burch, NC Solid Waste (910/771-4600)
Garris Evans, Guilford County (910/373-3771)
Allan Smith, DEM (910/771-4600)
Joe Mickey, NCWRC (910/366-2982)
Shari Bryant, NCWRC (910/449-7625)
Alex Cooper, Cooper & Associates (919/469-1760)
Dean Vickory, Moose Lodge (910/855-6877)
Walter Baynes, Baynes Grading (910/951-2894)
Owen Anderson, NCWRC (919/528-9886)
Gary MacConnell, MacConnell & Associates, P.C. (919/467-1239)
Issues discussed at the meeting are presented below in bullet form for clarity. Any of the
professionals that either disagree or would like to add to these notes are encouraged to do so by
submitting a copy of their comments to all parties involved.
r The meeting was a follow-up to a meeting in Greensboro (approximately two months
ago), and a meeting with Mr. Dorney and Mr. MacConnell approximately one month
ago in Raleigh.
MacConnell reviewed the permitting process associated with this project, which has
been on going for at least the last one and one half years. The COE has issued
conditional approval for stream relocation. The conditions are essentially that State
and local agencies concur with the relocation. The purpose of the meeting was to
come to agreement on the relocation issue. This included location of the rerouted
creek, methods of relocation, and types of vegetative cover used.
Dorney said that a decision on the relocation would be made at the meeting. He
indicated that the decision would be made based on accepted scientific literature, site
conditions, and judgment of the professionals present at the meeting.
?- Burch said that Solid Waste was waiting on DEM to issue a permit. He said that
most of the fill was unpermitted. There must be a 50 foot buffer from the edge of the
fill to the edge of the creek and that some of the fill was within this buffer. If steam is
not relocated, fill must be moved back to maintain this buffer. MacConnell indicated
that efforts have been made and are continuing to be made to obtain proper permits.
** Barnes indicated that the sedimentation and erosion control permit would be issued
following the issuance of the stream relocation permit. Barnes said that sedimentation
and erosion control devices as shown on the plans would need to be installed. If
modifications to the plans are made, sedimentation and erosion control devices should
be similar to those shown on the most recent drawings. He indicated that it is not a
wetland issue from his perspective. He also reiterated Burch's discussion of buffer
requirements.
Mickey and Anderson gave a detailed presentation of stream relocation design which
is designed to maintain a natural environment. Their discussion was quite
enlightening, as they presented techniques which are cost effective, use natural and
waste materials (such as root balls), and enhance species diversification. They also
discussed desirable species for revegitating the area. They agreed to be involved in
the summer/fall when grasses are established and in the spring when it is desirable to
plant woody plants. Upon inspecting the site, Mickey indicated that based on the
existing cover, existing soils, and quality of the stream; root balls would not be
required but that a meandering path for the new creek would be desirable.
t- The watershed is approximately 350 acres and has a Q10 of +/-224 cfs. On the basis
of the size of the watershed, Dorney indicated that the creek could be
permenant-intermittent.
r Vicroy indicated that the Moose Lodge would like to have the landfill closed out.
While they envisioned a future ball field in the area of the current landfill, plans are
uncertain with the proposed highway relocation.
There will be no mining of the sandrock across the creek or disposal of demolition
debris, due to slope and zoning considerations.
Based on the information presented and discussions in the field, MacConnell &
Associates, P.C. would modify and reissue the drawings. Sedimentation and erosion
control devices would remain essentially the same, with minor relocation of slope
drains to accommodate revised final contours. Relocated creek would be similar in
location to that as shown on the most recent drawings. However, toe of slope would
be moved back to a distance of 100 to 150 feet from the edge of the relocated creek.
Due to natural conditions, this dimension would be compromised to a minimum of 50
feet at the upper and lower ends of the creek. The 100 to 150 foot setback would act
as a buffer and wetland to treat any leachate. All parties agreed that this was
acceptable. Following issuance of the relocation stream permit and revised plans,
other regulating agencies would issue appropriate permits. Baynes would install
sedimentation and erosion control devices expeditiously and proceed with the creek
relocation and closure of the landfill. Expected time to close the landfill is
approximately one year.
cc: Attendees
,..? qr
Del Lj i J? ci vn e S
3?ZLr C ?„ E-' Cc c 4?-
/car S ? Upi n/S
nev
9),to-
?+ (3 UJI I) l k?

733-rrl S6
?a3 - 198b
3'73-38o3
I for CC) U%. rn.?i f. kA _ -Et 31 '3 3l 7
f L1
wYcrC? t T q ??7?Y 3 ?3 - 7 71
JFrrl ?b? ??/ - y Sao
AI r V eCl
A4-(Z-)?r ,Irt ,.5- J??.
*4- r-wib r'U
/4/C- C-1 A- c_
-.,;? 9?z
qio- 4W - ?6 25
/p?y'?7 /135
ess-1, c9l'? 2
Ss/aq`3y
P/F - 'r--Z5 - 9p?94

?f? ? -? a vno.S?, ?
? b
?c
4-?j HCI,."
r ?o,\
* X?-e-
Owl."
w;?c
0

9-m-- ?e6,5>-J'Cjv?
Oil
W)05?
?„ ?&rv? dew>;
iii "to 000MA-
WA b?

??, ??m Qn&w i - t?- V)
wa.? UM, - ak i t
so
wkc
?e2 A 0e?. = ,9??-ems u- ?QOC?'m voa?
&VW -b-, Te -C Q vvt? C?-? ovis cly-?
vy?
NW Q* VA
nA, +w ?,.? ? cl11,v? cl?«M?n e?
fmf
6)OT
P8 V\O- Cc»ZA/ C4 Ll1 kC
vcfda,rs, Ld?q I?VS?,
J?O
? 9) Q??4 VJ &4? a Uec y7y- 0?() -± AR L/ Cf--5
'it

?a
4'v;l
,•y?r,,y? v-fxQ a
^? ?,l?S Sen??

rY\O?vro '-p
VIP,
))A m
r?v
W61 lb?r 'd'
Al?
P\,AW.VT.
/-Wli cy)
scy)
cta

1 Vlo?

W Q-A? JP
w `? ?a:eU- b??eld 1?.?-?
pal
cj4-- ??c wll?"
VVO wL joem?k'? QLc.mOss
Fws5
ow(1 wre ?,?'v?c
0
r-8OSS.
MW4- -
co& uv-?
• IL
PO Box 3096
Cary, NC 27519
919-467-1239
MACCONNELL
& ASSOCIATES, P.C.
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Gary S. MacConnell
TO: Distribution
DATE: 7/19/95
SUBJECT: B & B /Moose Lodge Landfill
1602 Sunrise Road
Cary, NC 27513
Fax [phone]
A meeting was held at the above referenced facility, on July 18, 1995. The purpose of this
meeting was to resolve outstanding permitting issues with respect to the site. Fourteen
individuals were present at the meeting as listed below:
John Dorney, DEM (919/733-1786)
Evan Henkin, DEM (919/733-1786)
David Barnes, Guilford County (910/373-3803)
Stacey Peace, Guilford County (910/373-3175)
Brent Burch, NC Solid Waste (910/771-4600)
Gams Evans, Guilford County (910/373-3771)
Allan Smith, DEM (910/771-4600)
Joe Mickey, NCWRC (910/366-2982)
Shari Bryant, NCWRC (910/449-7625)
Alex Cooper, Cooper & Associates (919/469-1760)
Dean Vickory, Moose Lodge (910/855-6877)
Walter Baynes, Baynes Grading (910/951-2894)
Owen Anderson, NCWRC (919/528-9886)
Gary MacConnell, MacConnell & Associates, P. C. (919/467-1239)
Issues discussed at the meeting are presented below in bullet form for clarity. Any of the
professionals that either disagree or would like to add to these notes are encouraged to do so by
submitting a copy of their comments to all parties involved.
The meeting was a follow-up to a meeting in Greensboro (approximately two months
ago), and a meeting with Mr. Dorney and Mr. MacConnell approximately one month
ago in Raleigh.
MacConnell reviewed the permitting process associated with this project, which has
been on going for at least the last one and one half years. The COE has issued
conditional approval for stream relocation. The conditions are essentially that State
and local agencies concur with the relocation. The purpose of the meeting was to

come to agreement on the relocation issue. This included location of the rerouted
creek, methods of relocation, and types of vegetative cover used.
Dorney said that a decision on the relocation would be made at the meeting. He
indicated that the decision would be made based on accepted scientific literature, site
conditions, and judgment of the professionals present at the meeting.
Burch said that Solid Waste was waiting on DEM to issue a permit. He said that
most of the fill was unpermitted. There must be a 50 foot buffer from the edge of the
fill to the edge of the creek and that some of the fill was within this buffer. If steam is
not relocated, fill must be moved back to maintain this buffer. MacConnell indicated
that efforts have been made and are continuing to be made to obtain proper permits.
Barnes indicated that the sedimentation and erosion control permit would be issued
following the issuance of the stream relocation permit. Barnes said that sedimentation
and erosion control devices as shown on the plans would need to be installed. If
modifications to the plans are made, sedimentation and erosion control devices should
be similar to those shown on the most recent drawings. He indicated that it is not a
wetland issue from his perspective. He also reiterated Burch's discussion of buffer
requirements.
r Mickey and Anderson gave a detailed presentation of stream relocation design which
is designed to maintain a natural environment. Their discussion was quite
enlightening, as they presented techniques which are cost effective, use natural and
waste materials (such as root balls), and enhance species diversification. They also
discussed desirable species for revegitating the area. They agreed to be involved in
the summer/fall when grasses are established and in the spring when it is desirable to
plant woody plants. Upon inspecting the site, Mickey indicated that based on the
existing cover, existing soils, and quality of the stream; root balls would not be
required but that a meandering path for the new creek would be desirable.
The watershed is approximately 350 acres and has a QIO of +/-224 cfs. On the basis
of the size of the watershed, Dorney indicated that the creek could be
permenant-intermittent.
r Vicroy indicated that the Moose Lodge would like to have the landfill closed out.
While they envisioned a future ball field in the area of the current landfill, plans are
uncertain with the proposed highway relocation.
There will be no mining of the sandrock across the creek or disposal of demolition
debris, due to slope and zoning considerations.
Based on the information presented and discussions in the field, MacConnell &
Associates, P.C. would modify and reissue the drawings. Sedimentation and erosion
control devices would remain essentially the same, with minor relocation of slope
. IL
drains to accommodate revised final contours. Relocated creek would be similar in
location to that as shown on the most recent drawings. However, toe of slope would
be moved back to a distance of 100 to 150 feet from the edge of the relocated creek.
Due to natural conditions, this dimension would be compromised to a minimum of 50
feet at the upper and lower ends of the creek. The 100 to 150 foot setback would act
as a buffer and wetland to treat any leachate. All parties agreed that this was
acceptable. Following issuance of the relocation stream permit and revised plans,
other regulating agencies would issue appropriate permits. Baynes would install
sedimentation and erosion control devices expeditiously and proceed with the creek
relocation and closure of the landfill. Expected time to close the landfill is
approximately one year.
cc: Attendees
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steven J. Levitas, Deputy Secretary.
I X.;WA
,&4
ID EHNR
Division of Environmental Management
Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
FAX:[phone]
[FAX TO: I Iii ?_?__ mvr 1 FAX NUMBER: X11 --(AS 10 1
J
FROM:John Dorney, Ecological Assessment Group
PHONE: [phone]
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: '3 -?
o Pt U CO-/
11 JA 0 Wo
PO Box 3096
Cary, NC 27519
919-467-1239
MACCONNELL
do ASSOCIATES, P.C.
August 4, 1995
Mr. John Dorney
NCDEH&NR: Water Quality Planning RECEIVED
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 AOG Q 1"5
Re: Project # 95095 EIWjR0N6fN A^L uCIENCEs
B & B Landfill
Dear Mr. Dorney:
1602 Sunrise Road
Cary, NC 27513
Fax [phone]
Please find enclosed with this letter, one copy of revised drawings for the above referenced
project. These revised drawings show a greater distance (100 to 150 feet) from the proposed
relocated creek and the toe of the finished grade of the landfill, than the previous drawings. The
exceptions are at the two ends of the creek, where site conditions make the greater set back
difficult. I believe that these revised drawings accurately reflect the conditions agreed upon in the
field. If you do not agree, please contact me immediately
Your cooperation and assistance are greatly appreciated. Please call me, if you have any
questions.
Sincerel
Y,
Gary S. MacConnell, P.E.
President
cc: David Barnes Julian Foscue Brent Burch
Jan McHargue Walter Baynes Garris Evans
Bill Millikan Allan Smith Owen Anderson
Joe Mickey Stacey Peace Shari Bryant
Dean Vickory
NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone]
FAX COVER
Falls Fake Office
Date 7-- Z & - 9r"
Number of pages Including cover sheet /
To:
,OHey
T'
Phone
Fax Phone
CC:
Jul 26'95 1528 No.004 P.01
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Habitat Conservation Program
P.O. Box 118
Northside, NC 27564
From:
Phone
Fax Phone
919-520-9866
919-528-9836
? Urgent ? For your review ? Reply ASAP Ll Flease comment
h.? vs, Aa vi.&w • d eA* o%F-1 410 1 A-- 4 A-c Munr.e?

4DCICS ? ?r/•S s+n • 14
?/
/
?s ? ?/ q?? •n coroe or.,.?e./
r••
ui? ? ,, '?
s?+++?-
dl?`,?
d
`
hvftjIa/.? (y? ?/ /!ep! vt
/
c?a i s Ac aclde t .o
??? /
? C ?o?Ct. Au. f ???es
7
?
or,
4
0a0 .,.. - -f

JLL-25-1995 1507 FROM DEFN2 Winston-Salem
NC BM 1o owi Pax :919-733 9969
;Skit of N ft C.OMU=
%*nt of-awror0ont,
M. Nc i RMurces
Dlvblorl of 81*OM*rtital Managen
do "M B. Hurd. it.. Gyre
.Jona"n a. HoweL See
A.-Piedw HovN ,Jr,, P
APPROVAL of 401' 7A Qua it
bk as D
LOY& t 40mo 1l00o0e
A Oi. 800 X93
CBieaolbmea6Id- 2M F?? doa
Dear M. bran: eenC?e.
Yoa bm• ear at w Ml
PmlWAOe arm $ am. na sedl
mw Me Moon 1400 dbbe Imd8 at yow
Saudon. wars rs have a
tao IQimnDer 1. 'his oeetmcastao
is. IMNd by the cop of laa&wA*
M& eppMd b My "M The se par
you dm p To'w' p Lift ne..you must ttotll'y W
FW d ft ap ffM *D be vali& you muse !riot
i. ' Beteam be MUX
Wfo:0o 4diem ROSS
waddug days botbre
and wmaws sbaII be
CI - r, to SOW" it,
2. Wsdaud tar hr del
osaanectiog me noel
modiflad alai plane
P:BsAw ]awlifl donor

4. Air baalns we M
wk? wedud MaL
]a addtdw
Yt y?oa do AN-M%* my of the oodtla
brAft Yat aft w1dft 60 an Of ft
send a pafdon wift =ft= to Q
is
.,,aquae CpaoAuNl,?AtAQnalMa ?ttan
TO 89197339959 P.01
Jul 25 195 7:54 P. 02/03
DBE piojeat
nm ardd'APx?JN?L colrn?.rt• ? ? .
00
,. : fir; ; : •. .
? fn. `t?S awes cF' vbeti?tjf ?wa?'o?'i?r'tlar ,?..dr?'. /! "
?emrt ie'4td dasin?'crtt a dead j"25
void kk-16 r Oppltdatlon daDO ° 1 ' °'?
M ek' IM is oovWid by. Q x111`. miter so m '?"q
DOrors ?c?n >n use Nstianalde Paa?tt i tx 2i 'wbm It m app! *u you ;..
d yft Mq.bio requimi to sa a .ygpp OIL
dw = 066 iixW in ft as ai' i .
? ? in the 1?: Mir.-?erif?• •s .
d OM (A:0.771-400): 9W. bei -*:lsast two
s Mw drgW is cut in f arft to ;11t0 6L Auden
q aq`. to 0C& ,M aloe ;tfib- *v*d , in
.. :: be:ii?itc?ul?"areal t? a iiae
sud a uffi m Umica of tht lasted at'Ab" on a
d fi+nma DzaoOoeId:Aa?oumes.
dr smg bps sRlp11 too ieitied. si?dtil e
t1.1he'ir d ate did* be 0AiW i '*.?4nti r?
'DFM pppa?gval;_: ':1?? ??•
I bifm yaa go do. M wi0i
W0.6. hwh 40 L4 he Ae,60
o? tffi cardoei. ybu; t1+18y a? ; ??t?p4i ? .
o slat 3 d.A*ve tw 1 ?r. } I?Ic?bot 4 be irlog.
dot I OWN Nom' MOot?AiW lv ?e
"I. Rdd?l'1. N.G. 2' ,1-744'7.1W400d COM sad
a ? 9'10`733?701? Fi?1C914.7'?''?44d
ployor' 6dl?tiave+l`?'0por
' •t
JLL-25-1995 IS: 08 FROM
Ic AM Mu E MMU
r
DEH R Winston-Salem TO 89197339959 P.02
Fax:919-733r9969 Jul 25 '95 *?:!M P. 03/03
2bb Iemer co&*Ien+e 68 levitw? of ft
of fit Cbm War AvL Zr you hwe aq qu
ca: VBMWM.DkM Cbrps at Doig Me
C"P of Ewww "eip Md OM
VU40004" z M i 491091 l Office
.... Plies
Q*'UMC : MRcQoMAa and A
Oalrlp Andank # RC
Bnd $ Md Hsserd w w,
Dxki xiiii, ftm coma so a

SMA4 avre 7 /

sn ?1 ai It +401
p?eeq 11 phony kbn DOW aft 34786.
y ..

A. lid ?710w ?: F. 1, I r

1 ? ttr ^ tt• ior
.• •ti ,
4' fir,
. •V ??

t
f
k,

..j Yji •

TOTAL P.02
MacConnell & Associates, P.C.
07/20/1995 07:36:15 AM P.1
Facs'0tm`0Ce Cover Sheet
TO: Mr. John Dorney
FROM: Gary S. MacConnell
MacConnell & Associates, P.C.
[phone]
DATE: 07/20/1995
Number of Pages: 4
Message:
Dear Mr. Dorney,
I really appreciate your help in resolving this issue.
comments on the memo, then I'll correct and issue.
Thanks,
Gary S. MacConnell
This fax was created and faxed by SuperFax for Windows.

Please call with any
a
?
t

Ir

r
RacConnell a Associates, P.C.
MEMORANDUM
07/20/1995 07:36:15 AM P.2
FROM: Crary S. MacConnell
TO: Distribution
DATE: 7/19/95
SUBJECT: B & B /Moose Lodge Landfill
A meeting was held at the above referenced facility, on July 18, 1995. The purpose of this
meeting was to resolve outstanding permitting issues with respect to the she. Fourteen
individuals were present at the meeting as listed below:
John Dorney, DEM (9191733-1786)
Evan hIew+ K DEM (9191733-1786)
David Barnes, Guilford County (910/373-3803)
Stacey Peace, Guilford County (910/373-3175)
Brent Bunch, NC Solid Waste (910/7714600)
Gams Evans, Guilford County (910/373-3771)
Allan Smith, DEM (91017714600)
Joe Mickey, NCWRC (9101366-2982)
Shari Bryant, NCWRC (9101449-7625)
Alex Cooper, Cooper & Associates (919/469-1760)
Dean Vicroy, Moose Lodge (910/855-6877)
Walter Baynes, Baynes Grading (9101951-2894)
Owen Anderson, NCWRC (919/528-9886)
Gary MacConnell, MacConnell 8t Associates, P.C. (9191467-1239)
Issues discussed at the meeting are presented below in bulletfbr clarity. Any of the professionals
that either disagree or would like to add to these notes are encouraged to do so by submitting a
copy of their comments to all parties involved.
The meeting was a follow-up to a meeting in Greensboro (approximately two months
ago), and a meeting with Mr. Dorney and Mr. MacConnell approximately one month
ago in Raleigh.
s MacConnell reviewed the permitting process associated with this project, which has
been on going for at least the last one and one half years. The COE has issued
conditional approval for stream relocation. The conditions are essentially that State
and local agencies concur with the relocation. The purpose of the meeting was to
come to agreement on the relocation issue. This included location of the rerouted
creek, methods of relocation, and types of vegetative cover used.
li'
'w •ViliacConnell & Associates, P.C. 07/20/1995 07:36:15 AM P.3
s Dorney said that a decision on the relocation would be made at the meeting. He
indicated that the decision would be made based on accepted scientific literature, site
conditions, and judgment of the professionals present at the meeting.
Burch said that Solid Waste was waiting on DEM to issue a permit. He said that
most of the fill was unpermitted. There must be a 50 foot buffer from the edge of the
fill to the-edge of the creek and that some of the fill was within this buffer, If steam is
not rebcated, fill must be moved back to maintain this buffer. MacConnell indicated
that efforts have been made and are continuing to be made to obtain proper permits.
> Barnes indicated that the sedimentation and erosion control permit would be issued
following the issuance of the stream relocation permit. Barnes said that sedimentation
and erosion control devices as shown on the plans would need to be installed. If
modifications to the plans are made, sedimentation and erosion control devices should
be similar to those shown on the most recent drawings. He indicated that it is not a
wetland issue from his prospective. He also reiterated Burctes discussion of buffer L-,.
requirements.
r Mickey and Anderson gave a detailed presentation of stream relocation design which
is designed to maintain a natural environment. Their discussion was quite
enlightening, as they presented techniques which are cost effective, use natural and
waste materials (such as root balls), and enhance species diversification. They also
discussed desirable species for revegitating the area. They agreed to be involved in
the summerAll when grasses are established and in the spring when it is desirable to
plant woody plants. Upon inspecting the site, Mickey indicated that based on the
existing cover, existing soils, and quality of the stream; root balls would not be
required but that a meandering path for the new creek would be desirable.
*r The watershed is approximately 350 acres and has a Q 10 of +/-224 cfs. On the basis
of the size of the watershed, Dorney indicated that the creek could be
permenant-intermittent.
s Vkroy indicated that the Moose Lodge would like to have the landfill closed out.
While they envisioned it future ball field in the area of the current landfill, plans are
uncertain with the proposed highway relocation.
There will be no mining of the sandrock across the creek or disposal of demolition
debris, due to slopeensiderations.
ti\•,
Based on the information presented and discussions in the field, MacConnell &
Associates, P.C. would modify and reissue the drawings. Sedimentation and erosion
control devices would remain essentially the same, with minor relocation of slope
drains to accommodate revised final contours. Relocated creek would be similar in
location to that as shown on the most recent drawings. However, toe of slope would
be moved back to a distance of 100 to 150 feet ffom the edge of the relocated creek.
' '.RTacConnell & Associates, P.C. 07/20/1995 07:36:15 AM P.4
Due to natural conditions, this dimension would be compromised to a minimum of 50
feet at the upper and lower ends of the creek. The 100 to 150 foot setback would act
as a buffer and wetland to treat any leachate. All parties agreed that this was
acceptable. Following issuance of the relocation stream permit and revised plans,
other regulating agencies would issue appropriate permits. Baynes would install
sedimentation and erosion control devices expeditiously and proceed with the creek
relocation and closure of the landfill. Expected time to close the landfill is
approximately one year.
cc: Attendees
To
Date Time_-__
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M- lC_- --- - of Phone- (? ?_?? J CI
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION
TELEPHONED V PLEASE CALL 1 r/
CALLED TO SEE YOU111 WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOUI I URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
5'
t J
Message - - -.!
- -- -
-
rn

Signed
N.C. Dept. of Environment. Health, and Natural Resources
Dl?l - .
NuvdRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Jun 05'95 17:09 No.003 P.02
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission KN
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
C6r6y R. FuDwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Eric Galamb
DEM 401 Water Quality trtificationm
From: Owen F. Anderson, is mont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Date; June 5, 1995
Subject: Planting Recommendations for Zone B of Creek Relocation
for B and B Landfill, Guildford County, DEM Project
Nv.95095
Staff biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission have reviewed the stream relocation plan and have
discussed the plantings with Mr. Gary McConnell of McConnell and
Ausoeiates, consultant for the applicant. Our comments are
provided in accordance with certain provisions of the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 15 U.S.C.
661-667d) and Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
We concur with the conceptual plan for the stream
relocation. However, we do request that the stream corridor
(Zone B) be planted with the following species and percentages:
tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) 10w
red maple (Ac1er rubrum) lot
river birch (Betula nlgrra) 10w
black gum (Nyasa eylvat,ica) 15W
swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii) 20W
willow oak (Q. phellos) 15V
Shumard oak (Q. ahumardii) 310%r
persimmon (Diaepyros virginlana) 5t
red mulberry (Norus rubra) 5V
The above species should be available from NC Foreat
Service. However the following may be used as substitutions if
.» NC?RC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Jun 05'95 17:10 No.003 P.03
Planting Recommendations 2 June 5, 1995
S & B Creek Relocation
the above species are not available: Green ash (Frapxinua
pennsylvanica) or sycamore (Flatanus occidentalis)for tulip
poplar; red oak (Q. rubra) and cherrybark oak (Q. falcata var.
pagodifolis) instead of willow oak or Shumard oak; overcup oak
(Q. lyrata) or white oak (Q. albs) in equal amounts fax Swamp
chestnut oak; and persimmon or sugarberry (Cel do 1avoigata)
could be used to replace mulberry. if field conditions or plant
availability warrant, modifications could be made to this
schedule by consulting with our office.
We recommend that trees be planted in a random fashion. The
best planting window for survival of seedlings is December
through mid-February,
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project.
if we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at
[phone].
cc: Gary McConnell, McConnell and Associates
Joe Mickey, District 7 Fisherieg Biologist
Larry warlick, District 5 Wildlife Biologist
Shari Bryant, District 6 Fisheries Biologist
.,.NC4RC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone]
FAX COVER
Fails Lake Office
Date G. -
Number of pages including cover sheet 3
To:

Phone
Fax Phone
CC:
Jun 05'95 1709 No.003 P.01
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Habitat Conservation Program
P. O. Box 118
Northside, NC 27864
From:
?G.?r7? ?i?G7?s-er •?
Phone [phone]
Fax Phone [phone]

jo-6 O."D,
c?,???: r do t
.9-,AaA4- Q ",Vd

??
9?A
vccwux-(a

nf?
5IC4 aei
sE??? ? w
Los? hs - (lnl,XeLCP? e494 4%444
AMD

PO Box 3096
Cary, NC 27519
919-467-1239
July 10, 1995
MACCONNELL
& ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Mr. John Dorney lk",
NCDEH&NR: Water Quality Planning F? FO
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 /?tirq cl?S
Re: Project # 95095 Fs
B & B Landfill
Dear Mr. Dorney:
1602 Sunrise Road
Cary, NC 27513
Fax [phone]
This letter serves to confirm our previously scheduled site visit on July 18, at 10:00 A.M. Owen
Anderson and Joe Mickie of the North Carolina Wildfife Resources Commission are planning to
attend, as well as Allen Smith of your regional office. I have coordinated this meeting with
representatives from the Moose Lodge and B & B Landfill. I look forward to meeting with you
and the other individuals mentioned in resolving the creek relocation issue.
Directions to the site are as follows:
From Route 85, take Holden Road Exit, in Greensboro. Take the next right onto
the access road which parallels the highway. Take the first left onto a paved road
which is Viewmont Drive. Go approximately 1/4 mile to the B & B Landfill which
is on the left. We'll meet by the entrance.
Your cooperation and asssistance are greatly appreciated. Please call me, if you have any
questions.
Sincerely, ?j
Gary S. MacConnell, P.E.
President
cc: David Barnes Julian Foscue Brent Burch
Jan McHargue Walter Baynes Garris Evans
Bill Millikan Allan Smith John Weigel
Owen Anderson Joe Mickie

.0,E, Mo
o
(a'o
?K
DATE: (S? f
SUBJECT:
?f- Q

From:
o?
ti M
North Carolina Department of
Health and Natural Resources
Environment,
Printed on Recycled Pepe,
6
s
IFS
and
Dir.
-ough

J
moo SE
LopGE

g¢

i
,I
i
OLD
PO A) b
9ED
I
CONS Rl3CTb'D
- - ? ?3??'LRN,DS
LAnJ.0 LL
1?566,y
LA WPIL L
COOYMCTED
PoNo
Connell & Associates, P.C. 06/07/1995 02:42:12 PM P.2

Owner: Loyal Order of the Moose 685
Facility: B & B Landfill
Project No.: 95095
in regard to the 401 Certification for the above referenced project, it is agreed that
the following conditions will be followed:
s Sedimentation basins will be cleaned out when full and following
significant storm events. Debris and silt will be removed in such a
manner that it does not impact the quality of water in the adjacent creek.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission will be consulted
prior to and during the construction of the relocated creek. Their
recommendations will be incorporated into the construction of the
relocated creek. Mixtures of gasses, shrubs, and trees may vary from
that shown on the plans to accomodate their findings, seasonal
requirements, and readily available species.
For Loyal Order of the Moose 685 (Owner):
Signed
Gam'
Title
Date
For B & B Landfill (Landfill Operator):
Signature
Title
5
Date
YMacCtnnell & Associates, P.C.
06/07/1995 02:42:12 PM P.1
Facsimt"Ce Cover Sheet 1
TO: Eric Galamb
FROM: Gary S. MacConnell
MacConnell & Associates, P.C.
919/467-1239, Fax [phone]
DATE: 06/07/1995
Number of Pages: 2
Message:
Please call if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Ga ry
9}a2.,91s S
Fs
This fax was created and faxed by SuperFax for Windows.
PO Box 3096
Cary, NC 27519
919-467-1239
May 19, 1995
Mr. Eric Galamb
NCDEH&NR: Water Quality Planning
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: Project # 95095
B & B Landfill
Dear Mr. Galamb:
E1VV1R0NME1VTAL SCIENCES
JUN 141995
Please find enclosed with this letter, one original copy of requested certification. This certification
is signed by the owner and operator of the above referenced facility. Per our conversation, this
certification was required prior to your office issuing a 401 certification. I have been in contact
with Mr. Owen Anderson of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC),
regarding the establishment of the new creek . The enclosed certification complies with Mr.
Anderson's memo to you dated June 5, 1995, regarding plant species.
Upon your office's approval of the stream relocation, we will establish a meeting in the field with
representatives from NCWRC, B & B Landfill, and MacConnell & Associates, P.C.. The purpose
of this meeting will be to determine what species of plants are best suited for the site. It will also
provide the opportunity for representatives from the NCWRC to provide technical guidance in the
stream relocation. In speaking with Mr. Anderson, it would also be desirable for the NCWRC to
be involved and monitor the progress of the revegetation of the new creek banks. According to
Mr. Anderson, this will also help the NCWRC to determine which species are best suited for
similar sites on future projects. If you would like to be involved in this field meeting please let me
know.
MACCONNELL
& AssociAns, P.C.
1602 Sunrise Road
Cary, NC 27513
Fax [phone]
RECEIVED
It is my understanding that with your receipt of this letter and enclosed certification, all
requirements and issues regarding 401 certification have been resolved. Your assistance in this
matter is greatly appreciated. Please call if you have any questions or concerns
Sincerely,
Gary acConnell, P.E.
w7
President
cc: Owen Anderson
David Barnes
Walter Baynes
Garris Evans
Julian Foscue
Brent Burch
Jan McHargue
Bill Millikan
Allan Smith
John Weigel
Owner: Loyal Order of the Moose 685
Facility: B & B Landfill
Project No.: 95095
In regard to the 401 Certification for the above referenced project, it is agreed that
the following conditions will be followed:
Sedimentation basins will be cleaned out when full and following
significant storm events. Debris and silt will be removed in such a
manner that it does not impact the quality of water in the adjacent creek.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission will be consulted
prior to and during the construction of the relocated creek. Their
recommendations will be incorporated into the construction of the
relocated creek. Mixtures of grasses, shrubs, and trees may vary from
that shown on the plans to accomodate their findings, seasonal
requirements, and readily available species.
For Loyal Order of the Moose 685 (Owner):
Signed
Title
Date
For B & B Landfill (Landfill Operator):
"&, A
Signature
P
Title
c?
Date
$o
I ALLEN PROPERTIES o Notes
-OQ E ~ ~ ~ 5102 MELODY LANE ~ ~ 1. Soil T e: Enon fine s n loam. ~ YP a dy
99.19 ~ • + ~ GREENSBORO,N.C. ~ 2. All finished slopes are to be 3:1 or flatter.
t _ S~. zoiuE~I ~ 3. Pro is shown on Guilford Count Tax \ PedY Y
- \ 5. , l0, . \ Map 3-183-M-755-N P627 PG72 LOT#1 ~ . WOODS ~
~ 16 ~ J ~ \ - \ , 9, ~ 48 4. Property is currently zoned PI. Owner is
` ~ PROPOSED BYPA l ~ - SS \ s expected to petition property to be
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rezoned Hi-SP. ~ ~
_ ~ ~ ~Z \ ~ r TENNI$COdRT ~ 5. Topographic information is a combination ~ .TENNIS COURT ~ of Greensboro ho
C-2 l ^ 1 ~ p togrammetnc mapping
1 / ~ 1 • Jai ~ with some round refere i _ g nc rig.
k ~ ~ W / ~ OFF-SITE-DRAINAGE , 6. Boundary by others. This map is not ~
l POOL b POO' ~ ~ suitable for sales or conve antes. 1 Y
t ( g ~ _ -I ~ 7. Site information:
l ~ - Total Area: +l-15.11 Acres ~ ~ ,
I t - PROPOSED 6YPASS , ? ~ , Landfill Area: +l- 5.00 Acres
rig Existi Disturbed: +l- 3.00 Acres
1 , - - - ~ ~ Pr sed Disturbed: 2.00 Acres \ ~
100 l DRAfIV #3 FIJI ( ~ ~ ' s J 8. owner: . , 1
- - _ 100' ~ _ ~ ~ Lo al Order of the Moose 685 y
P r re/w / DR N ~ , .Box 2 P.0 93
~a ARKING i ~ I , ~ ~ reensboro N G C 27402
' - / ' W ' - I I I ' ~ 9101299-4200
II / r ~ C ~ ~ - I 9. Operator:
I r ~ / ~ " ~ ~ t ~ - / J ~ a Ba i } . ~ . W Iter ynes
I ~ b ~ ~ ~ DRAIN FI ~ NAI,~ NSTRUCTION ~ - ~ ' ~ Rt. 8, Box 293
l SEP LIMITS OF CO I _ -1 i ~ / Reidsville, NC 27320 •
- - - / ' ~ ; -~-~--~->E- SILT FENCE / _ ~ 9101951-2894
C 2 c / / Y C-1 f ~ 10. Finished grade to be grass.
l ~ ~ DIVERSION DITCH ~ ~ / 11. Soil erosion control devices must be
) 1 / ~ installed initially after the grading permit
I I ~ . ZONE RS 40 ~ SLOPE DRAIN • - ~ ~ ~ ~ / is issued and rough grading starts.
~ r oe, I . " • . I ` ~ Planni and develo merit staff will check n9 P
lill~l~oRO; , GRASSED z~~r ~ TING ~ ~ / I ~ EXIS GRASSF ~ ~ these devices for proper installation and
- I I ZONE PI W ~ 1 N t lance with this fan. A Cert~cate ~
- I ~ I C ~ PROPQSED P #I ~ ~ ~ of P n ~ ~ erforma ce ~nnll be issued. This
7 FI 1RAP . C ~ ~ _ certrficate must be brought to the Guilford
r F~ ~ ~ ~ l / ~ • • • • • • • EXIStING CREEK l I ~ ~a~,nr 9~ ~ o~ County Inspections Division before a
I , ~ .1 - . ~ . _ J lam) ~ DRAM ~1 2 buikimg permit will be issued.
I ~ ~ ~ l ' 12. All erosion control devices are to be
• ~ ~ ~ > - I ~ / RELOCATED CREEK N ` / - r . . ~ C rnstalled in accordance v~nth the approved
~ ^ 9 . ~ ~ c-2 ~ ~ woods
~ I I DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ / ~ ~ ~ lams ~d specifications. An than es P Y 9
~ 1 C ~ tE?~ ~-2 are to be a roved before construction b y PP Y C-2 ,
I I ~ I / C. ~ Guilford Plannin and Develo merit 9 P ,
I f ' ~ 5 . ~ ~ Office of Soil Scientist. Additional ~ , i
I l I - _ ` / t - ~ / / devices ~nnll be r uired rf nece C r eq ssary.
/ / - i N l , 13 ' / / .Fill and waste materials are bean brou ht 9 9
_ 85 -37' / / MII~,dO QbFF 1 ~------r t ~ ~ ~ onto this r and born / / p operty w materials / ~
° 764.35 i ~ I i M' are to be / ~ taken from this site. Borrow ~ /
ACCE ~ ~ ~ ~ L_ ~ ~ / / areas and dump sites are considered to
. / NOTE: CONTOUR 775 DENOTES ~ / r ~ be part of this project.
' 1~ DELINEATED WET LAND J ~ J ~ WOOD / ~ 14. Under the Gwlford County Soil Erosion ~ /
TOTAL: 1.51+1-ACRES / ~ ~ ~ and Sedimentation C ontrol Ordinance
~ ~ ~ 3 ZONE RS 40 i - GATE & FENCE / dA i FILLED: 0.40+!-ACRES TRAILER ~ w J i ~ J ~ ~ Section 19 ~ s ( agent , officals, or other ~ ~ .
• r' r / 10~ - RES - ~ EXISTING LL / ~ DRAINED: 0.00+1 AC / / o~ ~ qualified persons are authorized to
~ ~ r DED: 0.00+1-ACRES J / FL00 $ / ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ pPric~icaily inspect the sites of ~
EXCAVA~`ED:0.55+i-ACRES - / land-distur?~fn activities. 9 Obstructn~,g,
499. g + - RES ONE H ( TOTAL IMPACTED. 0.95 I AC . hampering or interfering with such
Q inspections carries a $500 da civil P~ Y
SCALE 1=100' ' • penalty. The insti ation of this q 9 vil
9CIILf 1=1~' penalty regwres no prior notice.
0 50' 100' -200' 300'
N0. DATE REVISION D BY ESCRIPTION
_ t CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE STl7NG CRIfERW Fblt IAND CLEARt1VG AND INERT (c) Buffer «goirements may be adluaed as ntxassary o (1~ A sign shall be posed at the faa7tty tmttaace sbawmg the CKD
DEBRIS (LClD) LAAIDF'Q.LS inNre adequate prottxaon of public health and the ~t~~~dnttmbaintaseofanemrxget~aadthe t. Obtain plan approval an4otherapplicablepermits" = PRO~kt'T YMIrIC6t ICT • 1 100'
environment. permit nnmbtt: 'The permit ntuttber rcquiremetu is not The followin shin tzitecia shall apply for [.and Clearing and Inert appliable for fata7ida not requiting an intfiridaal permit. 2. Instau sin k;nce, and ~gnrdion tnianoe mrtargt>at the project site as shown ai g g 10. The hta1ity shall meet all requirements d any appl>Gtble G.S. MacCONNELI G.S. MacCONNELL
Debris (Lt:iD) landfills: RE UIItE1MffNfS FOR A LCID I.INDFILL drawings and as directed by the oanYuction manager. zotitng CLOSURE Q psppA,~ DRAWN BY GEt~(ED BY PEAPANENT SEEDING 'I.ABLE 13
FOR LAND QEIRING 3. Clear, grub, acct strip topsoil b Omits retltired to oonstrtrctron. Sbctrpie E.B. COPENHAGEN G.S. MacCONNELL
OPERATIONAL REQUIItEb'~M'S Any person operating or having operated a I.CID landfill for solid and suitade fill material n arses tteargrtated (or sbcltpiks and 6spt>se d wage DEPIItITION (1) Faalities or practices, shall ant belocated inthe lOD-year AND IIVERT DEBRL4 (LCID) L~NDE'Q.ts waste r~sposal or a person who owns land oa whit:h such a la~fill ,~eriats. PERMANENT SEEDINGS
tloodplatn. landfills shill met the u ~ has been, in optxaliort shall dose the site in aocordarrce with Q~~ wit}: perennial grasses and (or) legumes to provide a PLANTS & MIXTURE PLANTING RATE/ACRE PLANTING DATES
Land Clearing and feat Debar (I.CID) the faiowing requirements: 4 Carstruct the temporary sedrntent traps, temporary abpe drains, and the Sttttding disturbed areas with perennia (2) Fatalities or practices shall not cause or contr>bute to the following opaatioml tt~ , dim ~ ~ ~ ne plans. The asps should cor>rain peratertent vegetative cover to lessen SEPT. 30,1994 ver to lessen runoff and soil erosion.
tglottg d grry endangered or threatened species of pitusts, 1 ~p ~ waved and folbwed as (1) 1f the site is tleetned suitable by the North Carolina sPil~ and rock dtedc dams should a planed periodically alay the Ta11 Fescue 10^-150 lbs. Aug. 15 -Oct. 15
. e ~'a0°al P~ Division d Solid waste Maw, compact and cover dna,es. The installation of as erosion otxwd tlevioes should be dictated by fish, or wdtihf fa the foolery. PyRPOSE t~tatg solid waste is plane Atilt ace (1) foot' a more of ~ dam, loci ordinances and Stem regdafora. . (Low Maintenance) Feb. 15 -May 1
(3) Fatalities apcactica shall not result in the datrtst~on a ~ faa7iq ~ ~ those st>fid walla which it is suitable r~ ~ of the tzitial habitat dpdaa~red 5 e>acavafion ~ try trier ~ contrd ~ To lessen soil erosion and permanentl ~N R snd ermanentl stab' _ p y ilize disturbed areas created by Tall Fescue 200 250 lbs. Au 15 -Oct. 15
a~'~ tnodtfird p~ ~ If the ~ is deemed tttaaoihbie ~ Ntxth Carolina ~ ~ oaaatrded " grading of construction sites. sites. g E Waterways and Feb. 15 -May 1
. err threatened sptxies as idenpfied inSO CFR Part 17whrh amt f~~ have been instaNed . h hY ~ft~tx B a°!' Solid mate s6altbe ttt~tin the ~ Division of Solid ~Ntata • remaee and place Lawns (High Maint.) al
• >S ~ ~ ai tfemely a ptactid oto solid waste in an trite a ~ ti. Establish firtistted grades et the eeriest pt>esble tlleb. CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES t amendments and editions. This mttstuid is ~ aPP~ :E APPLIES N Blend of two turf- 200-250 lbs. Au . 15 - 106 51'
~ at the of arwhenthe available for inspection (q) Adegmtesalaovertthall.bettpp6edanaWy. Implement txt>edon aotttaai ttasaoca by g7ding gad 7. Areas to be left domrant for conger Mien 15 days tract be temporarily stabilized , g Oct. 15 :onstruction sites which are not covered b structures t e tall Fescues ~
t• F.nvironment,I3eslih,at~NattualResourca,Drvmoad ~~~mstae.w6i~rerao~sfitst. ~ m ~edaoa'~ tlse of the Yorth Al. bare soil areas on construction s 1 Oberlin active g ~ wi~in7day8• or other erosion control devices. Solid waste 14atiagt:ment, 40 Road, Ralagh, d ~ ~ of Carolina Divisioa d SttYd lYhtite Ma>iagement and L devices. y ~ Feb. 15 -Nay 1 '9 INE~ ~ {903) and tyro or 'Py . .
North caroling 27605 where copies can be obtained at m (5) 1Z0 calendar tips tt~a oomplettna Ga~ard Dtrelopiarnt Q err appl Ieragtlai d rpamu. the C00°h PREPARATION more improved S MacCOc~ ,,'j Kentucky bluegrass °hhau„ »N~~~,
disptsal itll`am of one t1iSp06a1 a[ea S6aR be aoKted w~ ! 9. AN erorion and aederiartlation aarlyd meastaa alnl ba ~pecled vreekly and after varieties (103)
• (4) Facilities a ptatxica shall not damage a dttsttoy as o f ~ tsaa silopcd m aRatr tttln~atx water ~ era ~ be treated to pttetrent fatale damping at eat ~ ~ - >0 rainfall. t+leedad repels slid be made irtimediately. Prepare seedbed by ripping, chiseling frig, chiseling, harrowing or plowing to depth of six (high maintenance)
atta~Ologica< a histtxral sae. toting m a aosaalled tlatmG 'IRe IYtel~Oi t•N ~e the SttC, ~ ~ ~ ~ inches sa as to produce a loose , frig fnttbaaiztoumtxdamao~et~ttt0a~ioaw(visor t0. Atlerareasarefisedbinsftadpwda,grrit+td~ meastxesindud' sift boulders, stumps or debris from the s~ a loose, friable surface. Remove all stones, 'is from the surface which would prohibit germination Tall Fescue 100 lbs. Feb. 15 -Nay 1
Fao7itia otpractica shall nor cause an aiivaae impaa errs ~ ~ " hpy~, err i ttaiisance ~ ~ ante ie stabilized, careen to ere site and renrova art tsrrporary m9 _ titberltmds may bt'xame ittlptooat P~ drvaraiar a„d~p~, Pemienertt vegetation Q or plant growth. and and Auq. 15 -Oct. 15 ac onIIe is e8 • .
a state park raratthn a somsc era, a nay to the aommmhjr~ Fsgblish fiml tllapC !lam u m stapes thtm 3:1 slope fences, aedsrient traps, indaded in the state nature aid historic prtaene. tsae~a o[ mt~lanbi shall be grams andfa arses, as agreed b by the tnwier and es approved by Guinord Kobe or Koh n 20-25 lbs. ~
a,peppp~lmaspra,sttoRw~,orde<ices ~ ,arty. Incorporate into the soil 800 to 1,OOi ~ ~ ea7aed ~ ~ kivt~ pounds of twenty percent (203) superpl .1 800 to 1,000 unds of 10-10-10 fertilizer Po plus 500 Lespedeza (203) superphosphate per acre and two tons of t602 SUD
f aolitia shah not be looted in arty wetland as tldmcd in ° from the site and , theCltanwataAct,Sxtion404(b} to pa~eeraioa. •GdfotdCounryn;udtioast~uuet*a(~f~d(~~7 doloatiti,. lime per acre unless soil t~ rise Road, Cry, NC 21513 unless soil tests indicate that a lower rate of lime Tall Fescue and 50 lbs.
P MAINTENANCE PLAN trove can be used. Barites Lespedeza 60 lbs./acre Nov. 1 - Feb. 1 Pmt OfRCO BOX Cary, NC 27519
(1} It mast be shtnvn that adequate suitable scats an available Proviyoos fix a gtoaodts~.txstt6ideat m c~ia erosion from on a ~ site. witbia ~ wt~ toys or 120 All erosion acct sedimentation coned measures shah be inspected weekly and after for nova, other must be aocompirshed eadt nrnoff _ Ix~~ raudall ~ ~ ~ be rttade immediately to Mulch after seeding with i . 5 tans of c (urscarified) Tel; 919/467-1239 Fay 919461-1239 i 1.5 tans of grain straw per acre and either crimp
~ dtnidae days upon d my d ~Y and aosioa Satrdtra tl>at wit be maintained inckrde: straw into soil or tack with liquid a: with liquid asphalt at 400 gallons per acre or Tall Fescue and 60 lbs. July and August
(8) Iaad Clearing gad Inert Debos landfills shall men ~ prevent ttstltar damage f0 st[dace ~ , mairnain in a emulsified asphalt at 300 gallons per UO~nng ~~.,,.,.,,r'1.ypCptedbJOEYtfof;ates, Carutnrction ErnrancerExn. Irtsped caratrtrction coed surttroe regularly i0 gallons per acre. German yi11e~* o: and
d (8} The fatahry a+~i nt sediment rrom Ieehng the deg ~ ~~s when needed. Sudangrass -r 30 lbs.
(a) Fadlitia or practices shall not tease a tlt5charge f~gGtp~t~l6otaedgccess condition to preve Select seeding mixture and best plant: Itmats into waters d the state that is is vioiadon is ~ . Aa mat shall be Sediment transported to public roads shoo be ronioved tferly. poll except when an opetata duty • .rid best planting dates from Table 13. Tall Fescue 70 lbs. Nov. 1 -Jan. 30
d the ~itements d the National on duty at all timtswhik thela>td6ll rsapenfotpublic use ~ Tr~r: Setif wiN be1e11,~ the trap and the vap will be Reserved - Hydroseeding ! Temporary and 2/ and
Discharge Elimination Syrian (NPDES), tender ~ assiue ngttirements and restore to its original dimensions vtAreri t.0 Teel d setfinerd has accumulated rn the Note : The fertilizer and limr lizer and lime ,rates listed above are not appropriate Ryegrain - 25 lbs.
$enppn 402 of the Clean Water Act, as amaitied. to t aoixptaittx d amot6amed trap The sediment wilt be dispoeed d and the carlainir?eted part of the gravel will be for hydroseeding. ResE pttiven and the spthvay will be maintained seeding. Research is currently being conducted on inq specifications and this space is reserved to Common Bermudagrass 8 lbs. (hulled) April 15 -June 30
Shall not cause a tfsdiarge d o f ~,ratha oonANttion and replaced. The structure vrill be docked for dtirriage embar>k~nt Damages will be hydroseedinq specif scat (b) Faaliaes a ptacnces (g} Aa'as roads shall be d ~ at a mininwrm of 1.0 fool below Ure bw Pont ember fill will be placed furnish the results of he results of the studies. 15-20 lbs. (unhulled) Feb. 1 - Narch 30
dredged materials a fill marmot p~>{y maintained repaired imtnedialely and when strtlerrierrt d. ~ when displaced from ilia state that is in violation of the requirements ~
e water shall be taverttd from the rrotkmg face Ind ii inches above design glide. RrP raP `MIT Reserved -Sodding Setxion 404 of the Clean Water Ad, as arneodcd. (10)Surfx spillway. ~ For spring seedings, use Scarified Les edeza seed. For late fall P and winter seedings, use unscarified seed.
shall not be impounded aver warm. c) Fatalities or practitxs shall not rrtue non-pomt dm enter tars, decomposes a becomes ineffective will Reserved - Preseeded Blankets nkets
( (Il) Solid mate shall not be tiispoatd sin Fence: Any uric wfrch collapses. source llution of waters of the state that violates be replaced irrariediateiy. Remove sediment tlepotrits behind fence "hen sediment Po Annuals such as Millet, Sudangrass and Rye rair. mst be ke t at 10- " g p 12
i assigaedwatatlrialirysmndatds. ~ (~ppenboesitgdsdidwtrxeiap atxtxnulatestoaixindres. Reserved - Bio-engineering Methods of rig Methods of Slope Stabilization maximum height.
the erostan an are ridge and m the flaw areas. Remove (d) wasieinlaudfillswitltadisposalareagcatetthantoo oooot d ~"a P~ ~ by Dnrersian Ditch: Inspxt Ta any Reserved -Shrubs and Ground Covers fc ound Covers for Erosion Control
acres shall be placed a minimtaa of fauftxt above the f~' shalt not t~ sediment when sedirnern acaxrttrlates whereanalttxtiative •
seasonal high water table, eiicept a d ~ la+wa litoit for and stabilization. i ~ • n O Stockpiles: Stodcpilesshanbectrackedkxsedrtre~ti°n Reserved -Establishing Wetlands Veget separation is approved by the D varo ~ ~ ~ s Wetlands Vegetation '
~ Slo Drain: Check and Maintain staMlity d tirictrors. Clean debris from foot of drain. E Vegetative Cover
e Waste in landfills with a disposal area less than two ~ dthe pe Reserved -Maintenance of Vegetative C T3elaaererpioavelimttfa We+ p~penJ' acres shall be placed above the seasonal high .rata ro) Chede la erosion arotxd a blow the rip-rap and dislodged stones.
baoodatl. Outlet Protedron.
table. on site t mm& the Make needed repairs to prevent further aamage
The facility shall meet the Wowing minimum buffer (14)Lachatte stWt be property ~ 9 use Of COrICnt bat maoagcmatt POMM Seeding, fertilizing, and Mulching: Seeded yeas shall be inspected for failure and
requirements:
( necessary repairs shall be made within the same season, if possible. a) 50 feet from the waste boundary to all surface waters (15) Should the Division tiara it ntx~draty, tRd rater or ~ of the state as defined in GS. 143.112 stnf>toe weer ID0°kodn& a bock mA be reg I iee I as
provided for ttoder Rata .0601 of this StXcispow- PROJECT NUMBER ORAWNG NUMBER
(b) 100 feet from the disposal area to property lines. commercial or public buildings, and wells. ,
Y

1 WOOD POSTS TO BE BURIEa A MINIMUM OF 3'-~, 10 -O' MAX. CENTERS , NOTES cm u.irs p•
STEEL POSTS TO BE BURIED A MINq~UM OF 1-0' y~ ~ 15. No land-disturbin activit shall be
820 SLT FENCE ermitted in roximit to a lake or natural • 5,,~ , " ~ p p Y
I 2 INSTALL ~lT FENCE WHERE SHOWN ~ DRAWINGS a ~ watercourse unless a buffer zone is
112 GAGE AND MAINTAIN UNTIL COMPI.Ef10N OF GRAaNG e~0 ~ rovided alon the mar in of the water p 9 9
LINE WIRES ~T. y " bod of sufficient width to confine visible " ~N „(pNl p,IME
> ~ ~ " siltation within the twent -fi ~ y ve percent of
eoo cm urm uic . ~ the buffer zone nearest the
L ' land-disturbing activity.
10 GAGE 16. Side ditches 296 or steeper shall be
0 790 ri~xapped; or seeded and stabilized with
lNE WIRES GI~AVr:~ BACI(F~.l. I excelsior matting (or otter approved
FLOW ~ 91.T FENCE material); or stabilized by any other
-es SITE method approved by the soil scientist.
' ~ 17. Guilford Coun r ulations take E)aS1M6 OOlIT01RS r ,a,, h+ e9
no ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ presidence over conflicts with plans, if
any
1 f OZ. 760 . 18. Setbacks stated in ordinance shall be
w ~ F~1ER FAB~C TO BE o FLTER maintained.
Z BUSED UNDER ; FA~IC VICINITY MAP 18. Final use to be recreation.
GRA E OR AS REQUIRED SCALE: 1 "¦2 ,000' 19. Moose Lodge and' Shelter dimer>sions and
WOOD OR C 8Y THE ENGINEER 1'=100' HO~ZONTAI - kx:ations are approximate based on
. STEEL POST C-2 1=20' VERTICAAI. _ exiting drawings.
2p. gptNlpl~Y PER TAX MA?
1
C-2 NO SCALE ~
,
VIV r
10'_d~ 3 36 -d' MIN. 4 SIGN ~ ,
800 _ FIND C'ONip~iS BAYNES
t705B16 CgiTtN~tS PRIVATE DEM013TION LANDFILL
790 , NO UNAUTHORIZED DUMPING . - APPROVED DISP06AL MATERIALS: ,
. 2X Sl MAX. OPE, LEVEL SECTION - s~aPE ors gT~ CONCETE
- ~ I I BRUSH BLOCK 0
780 " T10PSOIL .BU9.DING MATERIAL p~T METAL PIPE
g~K PAVING DEBRIS
2-~ WASHEa STONE Ni~OT tW:N6tAL 06UOLFTION .
V~ HUMP TO DNERT RUNOFF ~ TO BE USED ROVIDWAY D~RIS CONTACT:
FROM PAVED ROAD wuT~ BA1rNEs
Rr. a Box 2aaA REfDSVA.LE, N.C. 27320
TELE: [phone]
GRAVEL ENTRANCE EXIT: WIDTH - 10.x, FLARED TO 25.0' AT ROAD
-1 .O' B IEI~TH DO Q OPEN 7 DAYS A WEEK
1'=100' HO~ZONTAI GRADE - ?..OZ C-2 HRS. 6 a.m. - 6 p.m.
~ ~ =2D' ~Cn111at~
i
~Q
2 DI51M6 Oa(101lRS
. C-2 NO SCALE
, 790 3
1'THICK ~ . ~ ~ ' _
CLASS g SI ~ ~ MEETING (r z{ 5
. wAS~ 780 5 -d' - STONE STONE
t~FL NCwRC CREEK I t~ECoc~1YloN DETAILS
1 770 ~ YN.
REDIKE SIzE of ~ I a Iz
5 D~ PROPb3EQ LFlIJDf1ZC
4 760 BY N0. DAIE REVISION DES(~IPTI~V
CKD NEf
A PRO~CT MMlll~t PRO~CT ENGIEER COt~EGAiED PUISAC
C_y N1T ~ ~ G.S.MacCONNEl1 G.S. Mac©ONNELL ~
1=10~ HOR~ONTAL DRAWN Err CFEq(EA ri
1'=ZO' VEHI1CAl E.B. COPENHAGEN G.S. MacCONNEIl
FlLTER FAB~C DATE
' UNDER ALL STONE NOTE: O l o FLOW: %?4 1 ~?a + -cis ~0~ --III-I I t I-I 1- F~ow. / _ - SEPT 30,1994
DRAINAGE AREA: 350 AREA: 350 ACRES
- SLOPE: 1.3 DESIGN
SETTLED TOP ~ OVERFl.I - 1 1
ry I ,FOR SETfI.EMENT EART~1 MIN I - - SLOPE
~ SEE . - - ~
HOID DONI _I - - I RDGE I]
- y
d- 2.5 = r ~
2' tu11N. 1 2 (M~ ~ - ~ - , 2 (r~Ax) I .
L'1 SIDE LOW WATER LEVEL ~ 1 CLASSB i ~ I ~
• SLOPE MAX. ' SIpE I ,
z~l o' zone A ZONE B , 1. '1 ' . .
TREE STUMP t 1:1 SDE EMERGENCY BY-PASS AT BENC?S 10-20 FEET 10+ FEET GI=3a o: - nne
3' . - FlLTER FABRIC - . SLOPE WIX. 6" BELON SETfIFD , .I-- is
UNDER ALL STOIC ~ . _ - I + 1602 R
- TOP OF QAM . ZONES A+8 = 30 FEET MIN - Sunrise Dad, Cay, NC 27513 -
. - ~ . a ` - - - Poet OHlce Box 3096, Cary, NC 27519
Notes: 1 .Excavate new creek bed with ends - Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]~
dammed up. Line creek bed with with - fICTER FA6R IC MiRf+F~ Soa o~,
pond bottom stone -and soil Place tree
stum s root end out at ION S C P bends to r 4 CA RELO educe E K CRE 0 erosion(o tional, TION N S C (VERSION
3 - P ~ - 2. Establish creek bed, Zones A and B with ~_2 + . DITCH
_ grass mixture of . N.T.S. C 2 NO SCALE 27 Ib/ocre toll fescue "
18 Ib/ocre red fescue C~1QUA DRMI DRIW DRAIN
3 Ib/acre red top - ORIWAG'E ARFJ1 ACRES 1 2 Z
12 Ib/acre reed canary ross Other s ecies recommen ed by NCWRC.
3. Mulch with ,000 Ib/acre of straw. CHES 18 18 18
4. Use 400-800 Ib/ocre of 10-10-10 fertilizer. 5. In Zone A plant any of the followin Q10 FLQW (CFS 4.2 42
plants (seedlings or rooted cuttings in
diamond pattern, 2 feet sport. EXIS1Nr6
~ ~ Bonk r w rf Wil e s D a low, Solix cottet~~ ' Redstem Dogwood, Comus S~- GROUND ~
DRAINAGE AREA ACAES 8.50 " stolon~fero 8
4.25 4.25 River Alder, Alnus serruloto a ~ 0th r e species recommended by ' ('r2 ~ SCALE
~j ~ NCWRC.
6. In Zone B plant any of the following • ] ~D ] ~Q loots (seedlings) in diamond pattern, I 0
FlITER BASH F
nn~ nee eet apart.--~ ~ t 12'
v.w r%eu rou ie r+cer ruorum River Birch, Betulo nigro w
2M Blockgum, Nysso sylvotico
Other species recommended by
40 40 NCWRC. 7. Open ends of new creek and fill in
1.76 1.76 existing creek after vegetation has r5 [WAAMUM DFP7H (FEM I become established. . TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH _ No= ,,,,A, MAWM KIM
a ~Z 6. Replace plant mortalities in eorly spring, o-: NO scaF
C-2

K _ - _ _ _ -
_ _
-
- - _ _ - _ t
- _ _ -
- _ - _ - _

- _ - - _
_ _
~ ~
~S r
_
5
- _ IIt00
-
0
- - -
S00
Gonstructed CT )
v YP J 8~ ~i%.n'}_
r ~'Ah~*.
seor ~ a6oa 33ea
- - _ I40 - ~ri . - 1200 . -
- - - 400b
_ - - _ ~ .
_ F tom. ~ 3
~ 13I19 -
i ~ lst~ -
~ ~
bdo ~ - ~ _ ~ ~ \ 4584 -
- Aso ~ 3600
1 2200 4800 _ 4800
~
/ ~ \ 7200 12000
200 ~ ~ / \
/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¦ 32000 - - ~ _
\ Under Desi n CT ~ 9 Yp -
~ Under Construction CT ) YP
_ t2oorj -
\ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ - --t----- - - ~ 3300 ~ 3100
- ~ ~ ` 500 - ~ . ~ 0 ~ooo
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t~~~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ 0 ~~~~•N
~ 1 ~ trlN~-" 1 ~ f ~ -
~ T----__ - $QOQ goo _
/ ! 6000
1 ~
y i `
i ~
~ ~ - \ 1ss00
- - - Pro osed C q P Y
zo4oo 19soo
_ ~
8~ ~ UfILTfY IMPACTS
- - ~ I _
EXISTING 26 IlyiPACTS PROPOSED 12 IM ~ 6600 16Q0 ~ POSED 12 IIVIPACTS _
~••~++a t 6000 14200 i~~ 14200
3100 600 r~.~ 600 _ -
~ ~ 8000 11400 ! i 3300 8600 11400
- - _ _ _ _ - r - _k_ - ~ 8600 ~
_ - _ - , _ z . - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ 200 - - - 1600 - _ --1600._..... _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
~ 750 19500 _ _ _ ~ - - ~ 660 17500 19500
17500 - _
14204', - , - 3200 20400 _ ~ ~0401i
3800 15500 15500
- _ _ ~ 1800 2000
i 3200 2000 2000
~ 1500. 12000 12000
~ 1200 ~ 4500 i 4500 - -
~ 1340 3800 3800
1400 4600 4600
900 5800 LEGEKD____ 5800
11800 6600 . _ 6600
6600 7200 7200 ~
500 4000 4000 _ _ ~ ~
700 3200 3200 =~(1STING IMPACTS ~
_ _ 500 1200 1200
22uu OWN OWN Aw-e
4800 6600 WW
3600 PROPOSED UTILITY AVACTS RD 244 A HILLBR00K
RALEIGH. MC 27609
TOTAL EXISTING IMPACTS = 71010; TCTAt PROPOSED INH - - - C)POSED IMPACT'S:317400 •
-
-

Notes
~o h $o o 1. Soil Type: Enon fine sandy loam.
~ i ALLEN PROPERTIES h • ~ ~ I 2. All finished slopes are to be 3:1 or flatter.
~ -O4 E ~ 5102 MELODY LANE ~ 3. Property is shown on Guilford County Tax
99.19' ~ . , ~ GREENSB~O,N.C. \ 3-183-M-755-N 7 L T# 0 Map , P627 PG 2 0 1
t _ $ ZOCdE LI \ WOODS 4. Pro erty is currently zoned PI. Owner is P
~ - _ ~ ~5- _ ~ 10, • I6 3? \ ~ expected to petition property to be
_ g48 PROPOSED BY ~ rezoned Hi-SP.
~ ~ _ PASS. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ 5. Topographic information is a combination
_ \ ~ ~ ~ f Greensboro hoto rammetric ma ping TENNIS ~ ° P g P ~ COURT ~
~ C-2 C-2 ~ t \ TENNIS COURJ„ ~ with some ground referencing.
l . OFF-SITE DRAINAGE 6. Boundary by others. This map is not
i - ' 1 \ , ales or conve ances. ~ .suitable fors y
t . W I POOL ~ . POOL \ 7. Site information:
m I . i ~ Total Area: +/-15.11 Acres
r I _ , ~ _ ' I f ill Area: +l- 5.00 Acres I Landf
l ~ • PROPOSED BYPASS I I I Existing Disturbed: +l- 3.00 Acres
l~ ~ ~ . Proposed Disturbed: .2.00 Acres l
~ l ~ 9, , / / - \ ~ 1 , ` 8. Owner:
~ - ~ DRAIN #3 F ~ \ ~ ; ~ ~ INAL ~ I ~ Lo al Order of the Moose 685 ~ ! ~ Y
100 N ~ RNV 5?, , j - ; / I ~ roo / . - ~ P.O. Box 293
r _ w N o - / DR N - - - - ~ ~ Greensboro, NC 27402
f i PA r 1 ~ , s 910/299-4200
h RKING / ~ ~ ~8 1 / ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 9. 0 rotor: ~ Pe
I W I / : , C / / ' ' ~ ~ ' Walter Baynes
~ of I I ~ g ~ 1 0 / I . ' ~ C Rt. 8, Box 293
I I t I ~ ~2 / ; ~ ~ ~ Reidsville, NC 27320
~ I 1 ~ LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION b F / DRAIN #2 FINAL / - ~ i SHPT C ' ~ 910!951-2894
I , ` ~ Aso Finished rode to be rass. 10. g 9
I / ` 790 SILT FENCE I _ C 2 I _C2 - / / / C-2 1 C / 11. Soil erosion control devices must be
c / _ y~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ " roll after the rrain ermit / ~ ~ installed init y g g p
/ ~ DIVERSION DITCH I 1 P ~ ` ~ . is issued and rough grading starts.
I / I ZONE RS 40 r / I ~ . / Planning and development staff will check
l ~ SLOPE DRAIN i~ ~ ' ~ these devices for proper installation and
~ rErNOlfr o~ I . ~ , GRASSE ~ ` ~ o ~ with this Ian. A "Certificate compliance p
i~r~ l ~ GRASSED ~ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING I / I ~ I ante" will be issued. This
I ~ I W ~ 1 ZONE PI I ~ \ tl~ of Perform ~ ~ r i
~ PROPOSED ~ C ~ ~ ~ N #1 FIN i ~ certficate must be brow ht to the Guilford TRpP . d 9 i_ ~ C ~ ~ 9~t ions Division before a
7 I I ~ 1 ~ ~ County Inspect
r r • • • • • • • EXISTING CREEK ~ , ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ buildi rmit will be issued. l rig pe f DRAIN ; a/Fz
~ _ C rf / C / 12. All erosion control devices are to be i
~ EK f I I / ~ RELOCATED CRE ~ i ~ installed in accordance with the approved d~ f~ 1 ` ~
N ~ woods plans and specifications. Any changes ` /
DRAINAGE EASEME ~ j ~9E--~---~• C 2 ~ f re construction b are to be approved be o y
~ ~ I c / C-2 ' • / Guilford Plannin and Development, C_2 ~ ~ g i I ~ /
9 ~ I ~ $ I / ~ / 5 Office of Soil Scientist. Additional
C , ' l I ~ / ~ ,i . / devices will be required ~ necessary.
r ~ C r 13. Fill and waste materials are being brought
f I X19 onto this property and borow materials
/ i i 1 / MIN,~O' BUFF R TY ~ / ~ / are to be taken from this site. Borrow
N s5-3r ~ c ~ - i I ~ ~ f ~ / ~ areas and dum sites are considered to P
~ 764.35 I ~ i L ~ be part of this project.
ACE ~ ~ C ~ ! ~ / OTES ~ ~ ONTOUR 775 DEN / NOTE. C ~ 14. Under the Guilford Coun Soil Erosion ~ woaD ty ~ ~ I
~ ~ ~ LAND DELINEATED WET J ~ and Sedimentation Control Ordinance / ~
~ ~ ~ + - RES i ~ TAL: 1.51 1 AC / TO ~ (Section 19); agents, officals, or other / ~ J /
0 ~ S / ~ ~ ZONE RS 4 o r FILLED: 0.40+1- ACRE,.. / ~ / ified are authorized to / / ~ ~ Persons
GATE & FENCE / / ~ ~ ~ tl~ ~ DRAINED: 0.00+1-ACRES ~ ~ / / ~6 ~ - eriodically inspect the. sites of ~ p
1 r ~ i r S ~ ~ ~ FLOODED: 0.00+1- ACRE ~ ~ ~ ` turbin activities. Obstructin ~ ~ land-dis g g,
r ~ / / d EXCAVATED: 0.55+1- ACRES ~ ~ / hampering or interfering with such
TED: 0.95+1-ACRES inspections carries a $500 per day civil
• ZONE TOTAL IMPAC 499.2 N 0 penalty. The instigation of this evil
• penalty requires no prior notice.
SCI~.E 1'=100' SCALE 1=1Q0'
• _ ~ BY 0 ~ 100 2 DATE REVISION DESCRIP110N N0, CKD
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PRO~CT MANAGER PRO~CT ENG~ER
rs uiremenu may be adjusted as necessary to (1~ A sign shall be posed at the fac~ity entrttatx showing the r;;RTTERIA FOR LAND CLEARING AND INERT (c) Buff rag SITING oats tecrion of public health and the COntaCtnaIDCandnIImbalntS4COfaIItmiGtgGll~randtb~ t. Obtain plan approval and ether applicable permits. G.S. MacCONNELL G.S. MacCONNELI 1 100'
inSUfe ~ ~ aumba. ThE pEllna number requirement is not site as shown on DEBRIS (LCID) L4yDFII.LS environment. P~ hoot the protect DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
~jpb(e{prfitt7litianotlLQuitinganindividttalpetIDit• 2. Install silt fence, and constructionentrar>celhrou9 The following sitingcriteria shall apply for Land Clearing and Inert a fatdli ~ meet ~ requirements of say appliabie ~ drawings and as directed by the construdiom manager. PERPAa`IENT SEEDING TABLE 13 E.B. COPENHAGEN G.S. MacCONNELL
1Q' Th ry FOR A LCfD LANDFILL PERtaAa`lE Debris (I,CID) landfills: zoning ~Ce, CLOSURE REQIAItF1YIlEM'S
3. Clear rub, and strip topsoil to limits required far constructan. Stodcgle topsol FOR LAND CLEARING n orhavbrgopaatedaLCII)LandfOlforsohd ~ suitable fill material in areas designated fa stod'Pr~ and dim of ~e DEFINITION PERMANENT SEE',DII+GS DATE
OPERATIONAL REQUIRIIVffN'I'S '9ay~o oP~g ~ ~ whidt sorb a landfill shall not be located in the 100-year A~ INERT DEBRIS (LCID} LANDFIILS. waste risposal or a personwho owns materials. r PLANTING DATES SEPT. 30,1994 with perennial grasses and (or) legumes to provide a PLANTS fi MIXTURE PLANTING RATE ACRE
(1) Farlities or practices, ~ ~ dose the site in aceotdattce with shall meet the u rxhasbeea, m sediment traps, man' slope drarru, and the Seeding disturbed areas with perennia floodplam. ~d Cieanng and Inert Debris (LCID) ~ the fo0owin iS 4. Cor>swct the termporary in the T?re t~ sfauld cornam Permanent vegetative cover to lessen r er to lessen runoff and soil erosion.
rational t5: g carrespondin9 diversion ditches as specified f~ Fatalities or vortices shall aot cause or contribute to the following ope is deemed s~b1e ~ North Carolina •I~ ~ r~ check dams strould be placed peradicalb along the Ta11 Fescue 100-150 lbs. Aug. 15 -Oct. 15 ~~~Nau,
ndan tional Shag be approved 1 the site and cover m ~ ditdtes. The installation of alt erosion coMrd devices stauW be dictated by PURPOSE (2) P eyed or threatened speaes of plants, and followed as ( ) taking of arty e g (1) Open P~ Division of Solid Waste Mamgemeat. ~P~ diversion (Low Maintenance} Feb. 15 -May 1 ~ R
fish, or wildlife. sp~f ed for the fars7ity ~ ~ ~ ip ~ ~h ooe (1) foot' or more of ~ drawings, local ordinances and State regulations. 9 Ta11 Fescue 200-250 lbs. Aug. 15 -Oct. 15 rid permanently stabilize disturbed areas created by
which iris aa~uag erosion solid measures To lessen soil erosion and permanently " 'es or radices shall not result in the destruction err The facility shalt oily accept those sold wastes smtable catltipkted earth; , adivlies after all required (3) Fap1rU p (2) 5. Begin excavation and 9md•m9 grading of construction sites . Waterways and Feb. 15 -May 1 ~ ~ sites. ~ AL
adverse modifxataoa of the raitical habitat of mdanga'ed p~nitted to receive. (2) If the site is dtxmed tmsninble by the North Cordaro bare installed and oonstnxted: Lawns (High Maint.} • ~ E APPLIES 106 y~
orthreatenedspexiesasidentifiedmSOCFRPactl?whtdt to~~a~feasble DiviaonafSolid~teMaaa¢meat,remoreandplace (3) ~ waste Or 6. Establish frwshed grades ai the eadiest possible date. CONDITIONS FIEIERE PRACTICE APPLIES u hereby incorporated by reference nttdudmg say d ed as deasdy as pracnal mto tills. solid waste is an apprpved dtspo W sloe faa7rtY v Blend of two turf- 200-250 lbs. Aug. 15 -Oct. 15 l"
neat amendmenu and editions. 'This material is an cempad subseq txwhen the lenient erosion ooptzd mtmsora by grading and 7• A~ ~ be Left dormarn fa krnger tltan 15 days must be tempo?amN stabilized All bare soil areas on construction si onstruction sites which are not covered by structures type tall Fescues Feb. i5 -May 1 "9,p IN~a,.~ ~`~i~+
le for a at ~ ~ ~ 4 ~egpatesoiloovershallbeapphedim~h+ ~P ~ North or other erosion control devices. avaaab lhvmond aaemsis>Gwhit~eva~f~st. seeding in aorocda~ with the prtnrooos d witlrn7days. 90~ and two or ~i yS N~,~~~ devices. ( ) •io M2CC4 ~,®k more improved s~,ea~iasaass~
Farvironment, Health, and Natural Resources, alive area reaches one t sad Carolina Division of Slid Wism r;raent, 4010berlia Road, Raleigh, ~ e of Solid Waste Manag 120 calendar days after oompletton ~1 l~ Gpaford Cotmry ~ Development PREPARATION Kentucky bluegrass
North Carolina 27605 where copies an be obtained at no m ~ a prxmit, the dtsp~ operations. ~ of one ~ ed wcekly and after varieties (10~}
a ~ y Ap erceion ~ sedimentation control measuxes shall be iruped immediatel . edbed b chiselin area shall be oovtred water be SCL9red to fomte g at each beery rirraH - producir?g rainfall. Needed repairs shall be made Y Prspare se y riPP~9 ~ 9~ nq, chiseling, harrowing or plowing to depth of six (high maintenance)
lama or datmy an t. ~ suitable ~ ~ sipped to a6ptr solace (4) The area meat P~ inches sc as to produce a loose, frialr (4) Facilities or practices shall not ge foo manner requ~ the site a loose, friable surface. Remove all stones, is from the surface which would prohibit germination Tall Fescue 100 lbs. Feb. 15 -May 1 '
viral she. ttmoff in a controlled gyp, After areas are filled to finished grade, grorxd cover rs wes establ~d and the boulders, stumps or debris from the su archaealogtcal oc htsw ~ or measues including silt further adios in ordatppptsecxaay p~ ~,q intlicatingtiosnte; site is stabil¢ed, velum to the site and remove all temporary Perth vegetation Q or plant growth. _ ac onne soda es, . . and and Aug. 15 Oct. 15
Fap7ities orpndices shall not arise an advuse impact on ~ become iajntious to the public health, a a auisattce than 3:1 s? fences, sedmrant traps, diversion daa,es, and-slepe•d s by Guilford Kobe or Karl an 20-25 lbs.
reaea Establish final slope grades at ra steeper ~ shall ~ gay a„yor trees, as agreed to by the owner a lion or scenic area, or anY other lands y a state park. to the comID~Y• and stab>'lize vrith vegetative corer a mea'tartirtl Incorporate into the soil 800 to 1, 000 1 800 to 1,000 pounds of 10-10-10 fertilizer plus 500 Lespedeza hate er acre and two tons of 1fi02 Sunrise Road, Cary, NC 27513 (20t) superphosp p
included in the state oatuce and historic prtxar~e. ocde<ices C01~' pounds of twenty percent (20t} superph Adequate emsiottrtwtralmnsarasu°a°~' and methods. unless soil tests indicate that a lower rate of lime Tall Fescue and 50 lbs. Post Office BOX 3096, Cary, NC 27519
notbe located io anywevaad asdefiaedin yes used to sat from f~6 the site dolcraitic lime per acre unless soil to (6) Fatalities shall shall P~ two feet of fetal soil ap~jpp, 'Gmlford County regalatitxis reQttue MAINTENANCE PLAN can be used. Sericea Lespedeza 60 lbs./acre Nov. 1 - Feb. 1 Td: 919/4fi7-1239 Fax: [phone] (llnscarified)
the Clean Water Act, Serxioa 404(b). to prevent rercessive oa e SOas a rid sedimentation control measures shall be inspeGed weekly and after ~ avaaable t~su~~t to resttwi erosion 1.5 tons of grain straw per acre and either crimp
Itmustbeshownd?atadegtiatesaitabl (7) Provisions for ground or ~ All erosion a immediate) to Mulch after seeding with 1.5 tons of g lLahed within 30 vgdupg days rairnall. All needed reparcs shay be made Y for cover, either from oa or off site. must be atxomp ~ landfill each heavy runoff - producing straw in~o soil or tack with li with liquid asphalt at 400 gallons per acre or Tall Fescue and 60 lbs. July and August
of and erosion. StruGrxes ihat will be rrrarrlarned u~lude. quid as alendar days upon campy aaY ~ prevent ~n~ emulsified asphalt at 300 gallons per D gallons per acre. German Mille2r or and Sudangrass - 30 lbs.
g Land Cleating and Inert Debris landfills shall meet the development. construction road surface regrlary, mairnain in a UOwia Sprface an ground toea~of es, ConsUuctiom EntrancelExl: Inspea leavi the site, and tapdress vr~hen needed. O d t rid best planting dates from Table 13.
fo g 8 ThefadlhY~~tysecntedby to fx sediment from n9 ~ Select seeding mixture and best planti not rouse a discharge Of etc. to t ti~uthtxaed access transported to public roads shall be removed IY Tall Fescue 70 lbs. Nov. 1 -Jan. 30
(a) Facilities or ptadices shall chains. berms, fences, l~ attepdant shaA be sew llutaau into waters of the state that is m valarJOrt ~Pt when an opetatortsop duty. Ace and the uap will be Reserved - Hydroseeding and and
Ip p~~ land5ll~ fp[publiCUSe Ty$edi,rrerttTrap: Sediment will bererraved(romthe~~~atedinthe Note: The fertilizer and lime of the requiremenu of the National on duty at all times whore the °Prn u and restore to its p;gir[al dimensions when 1.0 feet of sedmrerd d ~ gravel will be for h droseedin Rese ' ~ and lime rates listed above are not a ro riate Ryegrain 25 lbs. laze. pp p seeding. Research is currently being conducted on
Discharge Islttnmation System (NPDI,S), cadet t0 assure txrmPGaiia'tnth ~ .The sediment wll be disposed of and the cantanurialed Bart Y 9 ing specifications and this space is reserved to Common Bermudagrass 8 lbs. (hulled) April 15 -June 30
2 of the Clean Water Act. as amended. revent tarice of unanthortzed ~p and the spilMmy wrid be mairnained hydroseeding specif icat Section 40 top ~P replaced. The ~ticture will be checked fa damage will be Cp~uction and a minirtium d 1.0 foil below the low poirn of ~ ertibar ~ laced furnish the results of he results of the studies. 15-20 lbs. (unhulleaj Feb. 1 -March 30
Facilities or radices shall not torus a discharge of (q) Aaess toads shoo be of all-weather at orxua, ill p (b) P , repaired imrediately and "'hen settlement of the ertrba ~ from the 1/ For spring seedings, use Scarified Lespedeza seed. For lase fall and
materials or fat material into waters of the ro erly mairttamed. abt>Ye design grade. Rip rap vnll be replaced Reserved -Sodding dredged P P s inches state that is in violation of the regtiiremenu under ce water shall be oirerted (torn the worldig foci: and spilkraY • winter seedings, use unscarified seed.
n 404 of the Clean Water Ad, as amended. (10) Surfs Sedto shall not be impounded over v25[e. ses a beoorries ineffective well Reserved - Preseeded Blankets nkets
Sift Fence: Any fabric which collapses, tears, decompo iris shall not cause non-ppiat p(in'mtet• immediately. Rertave sedimern deposits behindd fence when sediment (c) Facilities or pad 11 Solid waste shag sot be rinposed be replaced Annuals such as Millet, Sudangrass and Ryegrait; must be kept at 10-12"
lion of waters of the state that violates tesvDSairxi[es. Reserved - Bio-engineering Methods of source po0u lards. bnrnin of solid waste is 1' rig Methods of Slope Stabilization maximum height.
assigned water quality star (12) Open g far an erosion on the ridge aril m the flow ~ emove ound Covers for Erosion Control
losive i by the Diversion pitch: Inspect Y Reserved -Shrubs and Ground Covers fo W t in landfills with a disposal area greater than two (13)The rbntzattation of exp ~ sediment i,d,w, sedmrent acamulates to tour inches. (d) as e
shall be laced a minimum of four feet above the faoliry shall sot agreed: St les shall be checked for sedimentation •md lion. Reserved ° Establishing 'Aetlan s Vege ales P Wetlands Vegetation
seasonal high water table, except wherean alternative t of the lower alplpdve limit for Stockpiles odcp (a) ty-five Perna Se PP th in: Ctrecc and Maintain stability of anchors. Clean debris from foot of drain. antion is a roved by the Dtvrston. e m fat>7iry stcudutes. Reserved -Maintenance of Vegetative C f Vegetative Cover
P ~ Slope Dra
(el Waste in landfills with a disposal area less than two ~1 ,~a~~~,a~tforthegasesattheptopertY and disktdged stones. n, arMOrlion Check for erosion around or below the rip-rap
acres shall be placed above -,he seasonal mgn +arer boundary-
table. j needed repairs to prevent further damage. shah be inspected for failure and Lracha , and Mulching: Seeded areas
e facili shall meet the following minimum buffer 14 ) Cmprt p or Seeding, fertilizing, necessary repairs shall be made within the same season, if Possible 9. Th ty use of current best manaB for
fee to shall be properly managed on site i thtou& the (a) 50 Should the Division deem it necessary, g~ • "a' PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER
a 50 feet t from the waste boundary to all surface waters (15) mot~tin or both, may be tcgmmd as ~ defined in G.S. 143.212. rata &
of the state as under Rules.0601 of this Sabcbprovided ro) 100 feet from the disposal area to property lines. provided
or public buildings, and wells.

NorES, NOTES
BURIED A MINIMUM OF 3'-0", 1 WOOD POSTS TO BE ~Q. ~ ~ 15. No land-disturbing activity shall be
10 -0" MAX. CENTERS BURIED AMINIMUM OF 2 0" STEEL POSTS TO BE ~ _ ermitted in roximit to a lake or natural s. ~ P P Y ~3
820 ~ SN.T FEN a watercourse unless a buffer zone is
TALL SILT FENCE WHERE SHOWN ON DRAWINGS I 2 INS . rovided alon the mar in of the water ~ ~ p 9 9
112 GAGE N OF GRADING eio N ~R1E CT, „ ~ body of sufficient width to confine visible IN Nf~MIK pll\.
AND MAINTAIN UNTIL COMPLETIO LINE WIRES ~ • siltation within the twenty-five percent of
° ~I~ the buffer zone nearest the .
800 _ land-disturbing activity. J i
16. Side ditches 2°~ or steeper shall be
790 riprapped; or seeded and stabilized with
10 GAGE excelsior matting (or other approved
G~~R~UE~ I LINE WIRES ~°a 'a,, material); or stabilized by any other 9LT FENCE SITE
BACKFlLL ~ FLOW 780 ~ -e5 method approved by the soil scientist.
~ 17. Guilford County regulations take
E10S11NG CONTOURS ~ ~ ~ s ~ presidence over conflicts with plans, if
~ an y
~ \ \ 18. Setbacks stated in ordinance shall be
maintained.
? OZ. 760 7 w FlLTER FABRIC TO BE w FlLTER VICINITY MAP r 'o 18. Final use to be ecreati n,
~ o BURIED UNDER SCALE: 1°-2,000' 19. Moose Lodge and Shelter dimensions and
z FABRIC GRA E OR AS REQUIRED C locations are approximate based on
WOOD ~ 00' HORIZONTAL BY THE ENGINEER _ 1 1 exiting drawings.
cz , STEEL POST = 0 12
UNDARY PER TAX MAP 20. BO
1
C-2 NO SCALE
820
B10
SIGN
10'-~ FI~SHtll C~ITOI~iS 4 0" BAYNES
36 -0" MIN. Boo ~ RRIVATE DEMOL1T10N LANDFILL
~ NAUTHORIZED DUMPING NO U APPROVED DISPOSAL MATERI
790 " STUMPS CONCETE
BRUSH BLOCK Q •~pgplL .BUILDING MATERIAL
2~ SLOPE, MAX. LEVEL SECTION ~ ~ DIRT METAL PIPE
780 BRICK PAVING DEBRIS
GENERAL DEMOLITION
_ NCDOT 770 DEBRIS CONTACT:
2 WASHED STONE IVERT RUNOFF 6' HUMP TO D ROADWAY WALTER BAYNES
TO BE USED FROM PAYED ROAD RT. S BOX 246A
760 REIDSVILlE, rl.C. 27320 TEL.E 1919) 951-2894
OPEN 7 DAYS A WEEK
• WIDTH - 20.0', FLARED TO 25.0' AT ROAD GRAVEL ENTRANCE EXIT, B HRS. 6 a.m. - 6 p.m.
LENGTH -1 X4.0' Q 1'=100' HO~ZONTAL C-2
GRADE - 2.0~ 1 =20 VERTICAL 820
Boo E10511iG CONTOURS
2
C-2 NO SCALE ~
0
lso canouBS~
'THICK D 1 CLASS B~ 7B0 NCwRf CRFEK
57 WASHED , 5 STDI+IE 'r . IS T r o E7,~ i l-.~ r?EtocA, N D
STOVE >~FDUCE SfzE of
MIN. 1 ~ 12 95 PRoPV,~o LA~~1nF!tc ~
~ Y B
N0. DA1E REVISION DESCRIPTION CKD
5 760 4 l1Ei PRO~CT WWAGER PROTECT BEER
NELL CORREGATm PlAS11C l~ET 1.5 YN G.S.MacCONNELL G.S. MacCON
A
o ~i' C-2 "=100' HO~ZONTAL 1 CHECI(EA BY DRAIN
. `I.r. = EN G.S. MacCONNELL ~ E.B. COPENHAG
1"=20' VERTICAL - DAIS
-l1I-I -III-I11= _ = SEPT 30,1994
FlITER FABRIC noTE: u I o Flow: RLOw: ifs - - - -
UNDER All STONE ~ ~ AREA: ,50 + - ~RAiNA,E / REA: X50 ACRE - - - i I- - /~Illaalo
- - - -I - - -j~- ~
_ - IAA
DESIGN • OVERFILL ~ = I I- SLOPE - I
SETTLED TOP ~ FOR SETTLEMENT EIrIBN~QIIENt 2 EARD~IV - EAl - 1106 5 q
Hau ~ - ; RID{
SEE SCHEDULE _ ~ 9 - - INE
~ I - - { 'PI- ~Il~ii ~ ~ - - I ~ N~
' 25 2' fvIIN. i `i~. ~ „~I~ ~ I - - MacCO - I - ~ HI 1111111 JIf~Jf.G I
2 (MA. `?`?/:rCrylC~ T 2 (MAX) ,l - - l ~~A,SCP I I 1
2:1 SIDE ~~•~i,~lc. LOW WA.ER LEVEL 1 ~ --I II- - $I~E -I
SLOPE MAX. ~ . .30' - -
zo TREE STU?~P (TYP.) 1Q zone A ZONE 8 i~ _ p~ - F T 10+ FEET n - - aC ~IIIIP/ ~7~IC~ ~s1 • • 10 20 EE - -
~ =-i
1:1 SDE EMERGENCY BY-PASS AT BENDS 3 , ~ FlLTER FABR~ SLOPE WIX. 6' BELOW SETTLED ~ nrlse Road C NC 27513 - ( 1602 Su ary,
I~~
UNDER All STONE TOP OF DAM z~ NSA+B = 30 FEET MiN I- = Post Office Box 3096, Cary, NC 27519 ZO E _ _ - - r Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] - /
SLOPE
Notes: ~TONE_ 1. Excavate new creek bed with ends FIL?r~ F,r°If ~ 'd
dammed up. Line creek bed with with (VERSION
pond bottom stone and soil. Place tree C1 N SE TIO OCA REL r 4 REEK tum r end out at n to educe C s ps oot be ds TION SEC N
~~j erosion. DITCH
2. Establish creek bed Zones A and B with ~-2 T.S. 3 N. gross mixture of
G-2 N4 SCALE ~ 27 Ib/acre tall fescue C~IERIA DRNN DRAIN DRAIN
~ X18 Ib/ocre red fescue DRA~IAGE AREA ACRES ? ? ~
~ 3 Ib/acre red top 12 Ib/acre reed canary rass
Other s ecies recommen ed by NCWRC. INCHES 18 18 18 PEE DIAI~IER
3. Mulch with ,000 Ib/acre of straw. Q10 FLOW CFS I 4.2 4.2 ' . 4.2
4. Use 400-800 Ib/acre of 10-10-10 fertilizer. 5. In Zone A plant any of the followin
plants (seedlings or rooted cuttings in EXISTING
diomond pattern, 2 feet opart. GROUND
CRITERIA BASIN BASNV Bonxers Dwarf Willow, Salix cottetii _ Redstem Do wood Cornus SOILS 9 ST~OILS g
DRAINAGE AREA ACRES 8.50 stolonifera River Alder, Alnus serrulota I G-2 NO SCALE
A $ 4,25 4.25 Other species recommended by
DISTURBED AREA GCE 25 NCWRC. 25 6. In Zone B lant an of the followin
I n' p'in in i 9 I 1
,N,.,..r ~~r~ 765(1 7.650 po ~s (seed gs) domond patte 0 ,r
HULK MIN YM umt u.r eet apart.
0,25 0.25 Red Maple, Acer rubrum River Birch, Betulo nigra 'r
-SURFACE-AREA (ACRES) 280 280 Blackgum, Nyssa sylvat co
_RASIN LENGTH (MIL - 40 NCWRC.
] 40 Other species recommended by a 7. Open ends of new creek and fill in ~j -BASIN 1 76 1,76 existing creek after vegetation has TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH ~T NUM*
NO s~ ~ c-z
become established. ~-Q
20 90 a 6. Replace plant mortalities in early spring,