20040325 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090904

i -
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality

Date of Office Review:
Date of Report:
Date of Field Review: ?- ,
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: a-
Weather Conditions (today & recent): ?,,ul
Directions to Site: in the intersection between Hwy 53 & Hwy 210, N of
of Harrison Creek near Cedar Creek
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20040325
Project Name: Barra Farms
County(ies): Cumberland
Basin & subbasin: Cape Fear Service Area
Nearest Stream: Harrison Creek
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream:
Mitigator Type: Mitigation Bank
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 2360 acres
Stream: 2400 linear feet
Buffer:
utr.Offset:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site:
Associated impacts (if known):
Evaluator's Name(s): ?? 1I
Report for Monitoring Year: 1
Evaluator's Name(s):
and Rd (SR 2041) in Harrison Creek Bay in headwaters
Project History
Event
Event Date
Report Receipt: Monitoring 1211/1998 %J
Report Receipt: Easement 3/23/1999 u
Other 4/7/1999 d
Remediation ,pea-b AtsVaR K,?c?O/1/199
Report Receipt: Monitoring ?,oct ?` 112/1/1999
Planting - Supplemental 2/11/2000
Site Visit - Wetlands 5/11/2000
Report Receipt: Mitigation Plan 12/15/2004
Report Review - Streams 9/26/2008
Report Review - Wetlands 9/26/2008

lnlts) D©

??? ?' SY?? 5 ?C CAS S
Cf re, 2? 4-0 r i Zi.
"Add significant project-related events: reports,
received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
v
20040325-1 548 acres Wetland Multiple Types GK?-
20040325-2 1171 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Multiple Ty ?`„ r
20040325-3 335 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Multiple Typ
20040325-4 306 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Multiple Typ
20040325-5 2400 linear feet Stream Restoration 1
?__- ?-? -?- - ---- - `-max- -?
?-
,pLito? ??cll ?-- Cc?xlct?L_,
Oi v e r+ ' c -?' 0 to U?X o c WCZdIwCJk:tU,.:. 0_k1 L',_ v cis C CXAS?r
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
-6J v-e c oc\ne6- tc _)CA_+ , SVC)
pe -
A.- - VoccO pvv*v vi cL 1ge(-nn rem-owd
+ c 1? ? re l i c, CA ND"Vl .
'V) S c clx- i. - v _ ` ?G-CA,__1> -4- K D LCL,t--
Ck-
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality S
Component: 548 acres Wetland Multiple Types L'f `? C-o-?mpor?ID: 20040325-1
Description: Phase I (restor & enhanc of grouncrwa?er int?erstream flatl: adwater'rip rian ys em)
Location within project: south-central pS
t9Cird
IgGq
)-XOD
2co l
dw\lerz>
(5U"_-tF .
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
saturation within 12" of soil surface for at least 50% of reference Inundated
hydroperiod (model predicts <12% - 44+%)
ro?a
'V) c
6n rt wet?1 ? Saturated in upper 12 inches
.
,
Monitoring report indicates success es No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? es No
nV-e r" ui? -Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? a No
- Sediment deposits
-7Water marks
based on wetland type? a No off;
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
i -; ?9.r? rc r 1 - 4 ?`r7? C> S ( 1es% 3 - H I
Cka

d0 Q> cy.f?Q '6- 24 a-LL <J 2-t `7v 4-

- p owed Success Criteria: t U
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? a No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. a sion, upland areas, etc.):

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
average density of 320 characteristic TPA, ind volunteers Species Story TPA/'% cover
through 5 years; softwood species count 10% max toward N 25 TPA, ; Q??
TPA
min 5
h
t
t
i
h
t
2
%
- ?(
;
c
arac
er
ree spec
es, eac
coun
s
0
max
toward TPA CDV2rt? C pQ. ?J 1
Monitoring report indicates success? No !=? ,;V) 2,CbD
Average TPA for entire site (per report): S ??L r`t?ft Gtv\
Observational field data agrees? S
', - e? r)
based on community composition? Yes N'
based on TPA and/or % cover? es No 1, r
"
Vegetation planted on site? es No Gy O --1 LIU 3
j $ -
Date of last planting: ;,2-1 It ®n alp w ?
cy wtv CA-A-b..
?
Vegetation growing successfully? es No ? uc s U° 1Zyrl
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
M? CL.i, M0..
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
Coma o? des Of o??y ?>e? WtUt oa-k(k v cWU0,1> ??uA tale.,
t?o-tike
?-`?`.°?"`??
wL ribs ( sc +r t>u-s,
1n, +-av iG?e .k-w l?
Ytp LL
L-Cacib'),
L? fore,,,A-
{5
-.. ?2QC.
3tr37W A
cvl_k ?
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) f-C? `? ?f (at1 ?ZC4 O? 1 age ofY 8
N
lac, ?n??;z - ?, c Sc?rne rY'4L'L??K (so Coo C-C-
1?o C i- 2 CIC , %-Q-Ck - w1 I10 \ive -?
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria ZEva ues: NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
monitoring report indicates success? o Riparian
Observational field data agrees? o Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this r Non-riparian (drier)
List an y remaining NCWAM issues t address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: s e ful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
-1 "?_ CI C . at3 n r.? \t. (.U- kk ?sD ?& +D Qoj_ an 1 ( -11 C1 9
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 8
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 1171 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Multiple Types Component ID: 20040325-2
Description: Phase II, section I
Location within project: north & south
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
static water table w/in 12" of soil surface for 5% GS (12 days) in Inundated
pine flat/savanna; 12.5% GS (30 days) in bay forest/Carolina bay
durina periods of normal rainfall
Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Saturated in upper 12 inches

Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):

SOILS - Approved Success Criteria:
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
320 TPA @ Yr 3 and/or 260 TPA @ Yr 5; no single vol spec _Species Story TPAP/ cover
>50% of total composition@ Yr 2 or 3; no single vol >50% of
compos may be > 2X height planted spec @ Yr 4 & 5;
replant (w/ same or acceptable replacement spec) any spec
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 3 of 8
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes' No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component: j
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 4 of 8
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 335 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Multiple Types Component ID: 20040325-3
Description: Phase II, section II
Location within project: north-central
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
static water table w/in 12" of soil surface for 5% GS (12 days) in Inundated
pine flat/savanna; 12.5% GS (30 days) in bay forest/Carolina bay Saturated in upper 12 inches
durina periods of normal rainfall
Drift lines
Monitoring report indicates success Yes No
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
i
,

SOILS - Approved Success Criteria:
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
320 TPA @ Yr 3 and/or 260 TPA @ Yr 5; no single vol spec Species Story TPAP1o cover
>50% of total composition@ Yr 2 or 3; no single vol >50% of
compos may be > 2X height planted spec @ Yr 4 & 5;
replant (w/ same or acceptable replacement spec) any spec
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 5 of 8
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques
NCWAM Type on Site:
_ Coastal
_ Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
partially successful unsuccessful
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 6 of 8
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 306 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Multiple Types Component ID: 20040325-4
Description: Phase II, section III
Location within project: central
Ill. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
static water table w/in 12" of soil surface for 5% GS (12 days) in Inundated
pine flat/savanna; 12.5% GS (30 days) in bay forest/Carolina bay
durina periods of normal rainfall
Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Saturated in upper 12 inches

Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):

SOILS - Approved Success Criteria:
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
320 TPA @ Yr 3 and/or 260 TPA @ Yr 5; no single vol spec Species Story TPA/01a cover
>50% of total composition@ Yr 2 or 3; no single vol >50% of
compos may be > 2X height planted spec @ Yr 4 & 5;
replant (w/ same or acceptable replacement spec) any spec
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 7 of 8
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 8 of 8
Driving Directions from 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Raleigh, NC to [6300-6859] Nc Highway 210 S, St... Page 1 of 2
MAPQUEST
Total Travel Estimates: 1 hour 11 minutes / 70.95 miles
A: 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Start out going SOUTHEAST on CRABTREE BLVD
1' toward N RALEIGH BLVD.
1+ 2: Turn RIGHT onto N RALEIGH BLVD.
t' 3: N RALEIGH BLVD becomes ROCK QUARRY RD.
jt?t 4: Merge onto 1-40 E toward ROCKY MOUNT.
Merge onto 1-95 S via EXIT 328A toward
5' BENSON/FAYETTEVILLE.
Take the NC-53/NC-210 exit, EXIT 49, toward
6' FAYETTEVILLE.
7: Turn LEFT onto NC-210/NC-53/CEDAR CREEK
RD.
4't zta 8: Turn LEFT onto NC-210.
9: [6300-6859] NC HIGHWAY 210 S.
Sao
4m
MAPIEST. o 2
2400 it
a
e.
0.1 mi
2.8 mi
0.6 mi
27.4 mi
32.1 mi
0.3 mi
3.1 mi
4.6 m i
0.0 mi
t
02009 MapQuest Inc. Map (beta 02009N AVTEQ of TpteAtlas
B: [6300-6859] NC Highway 210 S, Stedman, NC 28391
Total Travel Estimates: 1 hour 11 minutes / 70.95 miles
http://www.mapquest.com/maps?lc=Raleigh&ls=NC&la=232 I+Crabtree+Blvd&1 z=27604-2260... 9/3/2009
Driving Directions from 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Raleigh, NC to [6300-6859] Nc Highway 210 S, St... Page 2 of 2
MIIAP@L1E3T.e. = JHi m Youngsville p u1 min '
?stepsonville
Wake Forest
43 Sakapahaw Spring Hopp
Rocky Mo'unRolesville PNeuseSnow Ca rnp Sh?sburg
h AHope Farrington q 1- 6 Ion..
`C• o `"Middy px m City"
"SSiIk Hope Bynum "J I h D
1
o r ? Wendell Ba i Ie'r zxf
N, rCity Rlkstxxo: 'A Wilson
?r
Bonlee HollySprings Clayton -
o Q ° "L of r3 C3"t31rc?9o
nHa my S ' tons burg
?Goldston aFuduayvarina h1 icrb o
Bennett -. aFremont .
Srnithffela
Angier oK - Pikeville
Glendon 5anforci a 4 n
c o Broadway Pine Level "patetwn
Tramwa o "
n y Q ` ? Princetr.
pLillingtoq ?Idsboro
Olivia "
aCarthage ? a Mar Mac -
?C meron Erwin
Bupnle elp c n Brogden La Gf^ange
~`
otlass %poutSprings Newt©riGrroue ?
his Ping Pines rC yin
9W
aleon Spivey' C o uttontmvfi'hlountOlive
uthern.Pines Spring Lake ? 0
Aberdeen
ran Ora gg Faison
6Pinebluff Md. iR M Bonnie Dcn 4 o nrr 4
' fay eville ?' Kornegay4
koffman McCain
? D - - - ?lemburg
Cumberland arider-_. q Clinton a Warsaw
Raeford r HopC llls aAutrxvill ° o .
Kenansville
`
*seboro
w °
eulaville
9
Dundarrathq Pa40`n r
Wagram4 " l ?fnolia
a' Te Hill
,Laurel,Hdf
Laurinbu oRed Springs t Pauls g mmon cGarland Chinquapin
r9 i ?
"t+.?xton Buie ia.e
q 2009 MapQuest Inc. Map M? a 0 2009 UapQu6Sf Inc. or ANDS
All rights reserved. Use subject to License/Copyright Map Legend
Directions and maps are informational only. We make no warranties on the accuracy of their content, road conditions
or route usability or expeditiousness. You assume all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers shall not be liable to you
for any loss or delay resulting from your use of MapQuest. Your use of MapQuest means you agree to our Terms of
Use
....._.....
http://www.mapquest.comlmaps? l c=Raleigh& i s=NC& l a=2321 +Crabtree+Blvd& 1 z=27604-2260... 9/3/2009
At
'77c 2, 009 Ilas
9. LJS,DA Farmels r Ice
Ak -
Pointer lat' 34 932575* Ion -78r6801.42* elev 1161t Str-eaming 1111111111 100%
46
W11
rc A
Google..
Eye air 25901 A

IiV� I
Poinf.r lat 34,9269
AS
-A
,P 2009 T&10 Alias
Image USDA Farm Service Agency
"Iev 116 ft Streaming 1111111111 100%
otA
""Google",
Eve all 7002 1

78°5060° 1 Continue on Page 62 2 78°40'00° 18°35'60° 3 78°30'00° 4
W52'39" 1 78.6333° DPNNj jDUNN aOL SBORO/ 78.665" 76.5833" 78.5000°
35°07'30" MAXWELL °TkI
X V I,yx ? ? f A° nE I 05 S a ??? S J? E R ? \I ?° i A
/ r
Il ' // t/ x_` `9. x tR euuAea n1 a1R / s }f,? V °
.__I ( f (.'?-? d yE HE?BEP H r? ?r? ? Clem t $r f'??A ROw ?San°P,s ? _
r _
1 1 ?Y
_ Jl x UUw ? Eo t / Ex re ?cn°x, ?1\ P \ y? r AxWFU ? AP° I Eu°w ? g0R6€ ` qo ?'.? ir?aKEn?vEer°n E Ap'
?.???(, ?1eD , I? , cemmOrr C
D
/ +°' BRIO it EgB.Rxo \ //_? -tirr'' k '
'mo`o
( y \_ ?f sr - - `k r
.. 1 j I ' ? UN PO ? .. ti? \ ' ?7'^ f \ qD ? «? r ? I ! _ ? r d* ?F??., YMN4 per, ? ° ` B ?? "'?????AAAAAAdddddd ? ' \ K ?I V,?
-1 1 ?\? ' BUS w I ? ? - ? ?' \`?4 \\ y°gpN r? ?? R '`+k? ,,,t.YIr OI' ? _. - ER ST Kr(Ih¢?P9- _ 'PP it l?^ ? ¢ E A0 1
RB
r
,
.? 30195 ? ? $ L 1462' nP!n ?v.- mo lq_ 6 ? 2'5°'; q "6 ? / ? - __ H° kv ?.r„ 'n°
I
WE,
24 - \ o xo { ,
+b' RD Imo/ i A K' °
. ?_,• ? o , r r• ?? I ,, ?'^Tm ?.?? e rggq (?.' . _ S r ? ? c
A E7
?-q
a Ck' eERRr' 3 / ?'?,,,? a 8 °< ? ?? q \ o. c0gh c Iw , a I M
G r Cro d6Algcl
1 / I? of t ? 9 IRRIR A ° ? orq I'% - ? \ ? hl l ? Id _ h, ? q ?E.
95 ? ..a!? d ¢ qo •-? f .1` ? reRl f _ m q0 .. \ e2' qE ?. DMNIN _ k B nrskl
m y i 901'l tt89I w ¢r? I¢\ `BWNING IRD i l ?q. "?R2(N \'. ¢ alV "?°`\?, 0? GROVE A \ - ,. a IbR°AN RD - ?\ N l RB ?Y L? p0 B'?r O W
?? a7 ?? - 03'` (.?c a_ 24 ? ? ??/ 2'l ss` o ? q F° qo ? ? -?I ? I- •?nrvE y'(} B,?rlo ? ?° R :? v 'r
e
o - _ r
r cy _
B I
a'
2'l i X I x
E 1
- ? .. : x o q ? ` N° 0.lrrtPrv RB ? mq, m.. \ ?y e E __ m'' , C .. ? oH¢Ils R '
m Qo 0
YI-
II I"L? z1o r = V, Vend¢r e ?-l ' Y ? ` ? - 7 ?? ?\ , N i" a+om a ?e $ _ `,t
1 1 _ I
? s }},, ( , ? ? ? ?A? ?] ? m5 Bsla - ?? °, ` ^earo°o € / o I _ ? ??" ° }? ,a mrm ?_?? ? ?. 1 o'° ? mtiur9 AO d
R 1 ? qEl I I . qo
L 5J d( `?? s? st¢61nan _ c°e pE °g49rsi rfl° .I q t<E qo
s / ne
N.
n,e CAF n I
b./RD 242 I ty/ RE
?, 1 \ \` :o ,"A H ecE BNI c' _ ° r,' ?24 ?a,ra?
?? k, J R e ° Na 7 - s F l ??,
350006
r E 'K'r.. nrrrn ,v EE r.. __ e . "• "
?„eVl ¢. 1 ?°? J 'r, /'?9y?e 6' t ?1?QOPm " \ i?_ -E'\.? BADE \ 1? .1.,, \ g i .g` `?l W BEV°N° (,,OS ,? ??/__' ? ?? IDBI boor 71 95 R 2'm `-_,. EE eIK[ F Aa M'_ c R.v,i. ?? I PL R? uwoR RB a _? t
p
?210 R " P ` €JB ?8
?? ? ?? s "1 .: :,wn, _? I _ 8 ', ". ?.,. a° m ? ? [I bq0 •-" emit Q ao ? '
, o I i .,I ° t'e,N° N 4' m o S
a _
r 4 'b Ft',ul r d I vI 1 g9' B° ?w rvP n?' ?? 5°p wu..? _ r a
r iGr.fGW'. \ rI Y ? 97F°MAl4 _.lJ' .. _.? -11 W' APO \ j ` \..'?"? x M1lL ¢ 9^? i j?_ V Ili??. I 't.
w u
.R ?iyNC'..r E i , KE a°c 1 ?: .. 't 9 1 ¢ trU
m
r
c
V PB I
BAId? ( ,
16
1tG!}!?? Cv '. s io ov1. •? S 2'm ob ?? vl0 24 ebard °"Oeq opo RB
l
111E,, I
5 ITR RD 242 , `vv
_ r F
B ° `1 \ ' / N'ip` L/.l °GO 9pDA°a,Cl Lo°toul \ 'M _.? I ?`?1..` l I ?.-. !•? Oq, r.... _-.. } /°.Np '( 1 V.
I
"? \ x I ` ? 1 m G
ElEEi CB°PE
?L ?_.?.. ( ,.r a ?- 11 PO gHiS m \ 1 a I 2'P
? ? 4i1
?I
_ .. __. r W R Ro \xJ R y a v1
1 / 87
5 ?:.,?• ?/ / q °2'r e° ?\ C V % \C?_ OIF / 21D NmY'oh'S:. \ l?? } \ N2'
..
34.9167° 34°55 00"
RI, E1,RnNm n. o x
tgRO ER RO mo I -\ ,. ? ? I l ` - - ? Y ..? m \ W RB I - } „ -- \x
7 wogR Ro 2;
ne j _ I
R Ro } , AcR _ ?I' ??? +
iNH°W ° PAY 1 I ` 7 p0 h E{ O ? -__ avk \ \ hmm ?.` _?? 3?0p ' ' ? J, ? ? 1 \ M1S t'.
o -?& B
.
e eq°nurvgreq . , _ eW.
6RIO°E.-
r
• 1 -
NN \
IKE
N / \ RHt'M1 1(E 5 P .. 4e\ F1cDan ?9 t.
E ALA E4?r vqI I.US _ Sµ \.! ham, 1}I' ,..
C y ?' a
o s
v1?
C \ oaoFU ,a., ? - i
"In
EI¢¢R
? -L .. Co " ,wro cu D co _
?UN€ N'C '1'l`I S ,rt"".':- ADEN COQ/f2'_ 210 r S I}j2.A
-WAY-
X m # w cx a mR q{
e
34'50'00" -,
y , y ,. J 7
m ,.
34.e333 ---- -? k ?... ° °
_ ry nlri
J
,
ry
F I, f sT , .? \_ I \ y c?7 -_ Ton Roa RB
r S
Y I r \?_ I I_ y i I w\?,.d _ -\ y ? ,I r?\_ Iyw ?
.
B ? N eh
-IN
c.
r 'Pd B7 M I '_ I ?° f PINE L.GPE - \ I ?, \ r l 1 : e?_ '?.. FijAy ON J /
r
eW2
n
42
i E
PR °'RE » r '•-_? q1a'_. \ ,. E/¢ , -.. may-, I `T".. _ ,? -;`L I . ,n
-
I C mD ? ,,\ ?? 4A, eHrkeri ^? W y_ ? ? 2
?. _ RMFA B
1rF Ammon 1
,
}` - wo
7 I
BpBNES RBNB
? Ill
o . ?B (( r \ 1 2'l ?` cNy i, _ 9 e?F i? d J
9mq ? N
Y" r.
b, k 'yam / TtE 111
i ? Q O\ U li / '` ?? R I I ? ?M I m, ? IIEE C-INl Y Ig SE FON 9p Y( M
_ I i-? Ale
,.
T Ile / 3 fm 1 ?` o f 9 m ?qR _ r 6. , R \l \\ 5 Ii M u J ... J+ 4v.
2 ? EP M I - 1 2'
34"45'00" °---
? H
34.7500° y $ L Ecti 7 I_ .A
t y
/ $I. „ 4 \ r ? , ?, I \ I I ORk R41 y2'
?,In s„`.,y (I Tv wd ,ILn \ _ 53 a J" Ne '•'- f ° pe R4
T ?? ? ice ? e ? ?? v wpa
e _? R T fY\T
, n-
a ? ?--) o R II
FY a \...? mu W
r n ??--jf t \ \ 9°
'FORESi I\
° \ * ff? ° 131 \ m e ?? .2.'4 , SAL ERSL 242
AI(E. 5 ( BL D , EN IAKE$ STATE
n R v
I' / l ? i ASR . I ',. ` ,? ..,. \ ?eklR \rNnT RAL\ysReA ,-
- J0 La s GAME SAND \ < I F 109 T
s I -< ?? A_ I y2' I
. o
NEEI I ><? .`?. ?< 4 / \ 1 ?'WV ` } State`Foresl/
?@ KE i ?I A_?? \
mm --.___ I.,
,
_\ I
'? q} .,,i - v " ?___?? T
SHK \ ? V PII,BDI FRB ?' ` I?, , ?_? I s Pq lr,? 1 ? / R'rIIV ?. L, ,??I M r-,?i y
x ?• _.. ?y? 1 J \ \ Q ` x ' - °M/'N,4YEN _
? ?1/ 1 .. t u , r Le alnq l ?_? ? ans R3?? ioRes La?P ?r I
51 P\? - 1? \ yqE?? Me Park)
e°
SE C. ?. ,... \- 4,.
sew -? - ?? } ?, ne. i '3 - . ? l A. `\ „ `?` ah _- s R° % .
` r
r
34o,10'00" 701
71
46667° Dabho
Smuna 41 r ? _ ? RRw. B n ??? q¢f
87 1 '_ ?/ - L +? _ 1^ ? / ?? _ ?, `.. ? m ' ? I STttDTE r NE
1701 _ _ Itt
z0 2'Y `) +ti ? 5 ? ° w+N \ ? ,SC R \ \ 41 87 701 17
r
410 cExR Ao-N.+l Ffa° '? 7 . ?242
? ??.... ?? fr? q° I ' ?,., - °y Jl B7 ?,pP ? ?. V ?
_ x J ` S ?J_- ` p o 'I,2' 9m 131 B F x?/ ° \ \?_ I Nrp wANZr d ?-? ?T 1___ \? .. ,• 1 r .v
e •4B.? ?lY(fl \Ellin Z--d ? .. - .
Ra ?b.Hei orm E 41 f \ ?? K e
34'3730' j'- '
78°52'30" 78`5000" c AD BOU RN 7! 78°46'66" WHITEVILLE + I
78.8333° Continue on Page 82 78.6667° KILOMETERS 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
74 MILES 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
9661 AON :e100 ,009 = l :81DOS
09-96 :PQfD-Jd (MI' :A8 PeM0040
Z :ajn6ld SPd :48 UMDJQ
DUIj0JD3 41JON 'AlunoZ) puolJagwno
.}D6ijiy4 IDUO1698 JDOJ adDo SUJJDj DJJDg
JUDE] u01
UDId 6ulJOIiuow
U0118.I0djoa
a0IIai0$00a
6Mp•nergllV/L*0L683