19950499 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19950516

It14 Ida(tla r (D
,xUM1'er
>?ffitilQt3?t1
i w
Engineering • Planning • Landsnpe A=hkecn m
TO: J DATE: -M j , 17, /qqS?
Lb M -v
PROJECT: PROJECT N ZtMER:
Please find the following items
Transmitted by: Fax Fa--c Number: Pages:
Mail 7 Pick-Up Delivered Overnight 0
For your: 7Appro%'_ LJ?rFOrmation Use RecordsDistribution
Rey ew a Cor rnent F1
Copies Re---"s-"on date Desc~ption

REMARKS:
COPIES TO: BY:
Do-nuZ
I I50 S.C. Maynard Ron d, Suite 100 - Cary, North Carolina 27511 - [phone] F.4X [phone]
JOINT ARMY CORPS AND DEM
401 CERTIFICATION/PDN APPLICATION
For
"Ironwood Phase I"
Rock Springs,
Pitt County, North Carolina
For
Ironwood Development, Inc.
200 Golf Club Wynd
Greenville, N.C. 27834
May 9, 1995
By
W.G. Daniels & Associatos
And
Land Management Group, Inc.
MAY 121995

ILA`, ,
W
mid atanurgr?zt 540fo, J;1C.
At CIAM A 25n
d6in#m,.4o' WA %eokna 28402
Ya6 s>o-4s,2-000Y
9904d 9- d&d
`B'uts Jw?e.
John Dorney
Water Quality Planning
Div. of Environmental Mgmt.
NC Dept of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Dear John:
May 11, 1995
09WA >4
'rtlmi47 ' M ,4 i
Re: Joint 401/PDN Request to Complete the "Ironwood Golf Course
Development", Greenville, N.C.
Dear John:
Enclosed are seven copies of the Joint Application to fill and/or
impact 7.38 acres of headwater woody wetlands located in the new
Ironwood Development located west of Greenville. The golf course
and residential housing project is situated in its first phase
north of N.C. 43 at Rock Springs on old family farmland tracts
totalling 305.1 acres. William Daniels and Associates did a
wonderful landplan along with Lee Travino to avoid the adjacent
wetlands and minimize those wetland impacts which totally removed
wetland functions.
As you can see nearly 70% of the wetland impact will be the
proposed creation of an impounded irrigation lake totalling 4.88
acres. The trees in the stream ravine will be removed but other
hillside species will remain intact. The impacts of the conversion
to aquatic resources will be off-set by a combination of mitigation
techniques which are explained as follows:
(1) A significant amount of household trash and farm refuse was
historically placed into the small headwater tributaries and
todate about 78 tons have been collected and removed off the
site;
(2) Three small ponds will be created out of isolated low
elevation "upland" soils and a 40 ft. wide shallow shelf will
be constructed along the pond perimeters;
John Dorney
Page 2
(3) The 40' pond bank will be stabilized with common freshwater
wetland grasses such as Bulrush, Smartweed, Lizard's Tail,
Wildrice, Duck-potato and Pickerel plant. Other prolific
native plants such as Woolgrass and Cattail would be added
later if others fail to stabilize within 18 months.
(4) As agreed upon with the Army Corps all disturbed stream
corridors (due to junk removal or golf course construction
activities) will be restored up to a 25 ft. buffer from the
stream bank along each side back up the slopes. These areas
will not be filled or piped inorder to allow free wildlife
travel. Also, a mixture of wetland/upland plants of grass and
shrub variety will be transplanted here totalling about 1.1
acres.
(5) The total 1 et nds created and/or enhanced will total a
minimum of 0. 8 acres which equates to a 1:1.5 ratio and
maintains the pirit of the "No Net Loss Concept".
We all, appreciate your timely response and should you have any
questions, please f'el free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
?JC Rob Moul
Environmental Consultant
RM/dm
Enclosures:
cc: Debra Sawyer - Washington, DEM
Henry Wicker, COE
Bill Daniel, P.E.
`?w?umutrn???i
?,?.•,Jti4.••.......•.;9;
?T L. • f,
DLM 1D: ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit ft
JOB FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of E.^.bineer s
Nationwide pern=:ts that require applieatron for Sect_i3:: 401 ce: ¢:fic :tor.
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENCINEM WATER QUALITY PLANNING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington. NC 28402-1890 P.O. Box 29535
AT IN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC -27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO TIM CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7)' COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Ironwood Development. Inc.
2. Owners Address: 200 Golf Club Wvnd. Greenville. N.C- 27834
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): (Work): [phone]
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
William G. Daniel (Project) Rob Moul'(wetlands)
1150 S.E. Maynard Road, Suite 260 P.O. Box 2522
Cary, N.C. 27511 - [phone] Wilmington, N.C. 28402
S. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: Pi i-t- rn„ntU
Nearest Town or City: Greenville, N.C.
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): _ At Rock Springs located .5 mile west
of intersection of US 264 Bypass and NC 43 between Rock Springs and Tar River
6. Name of Closest Stream River. Tar River
7. River Basin: Tar River
S. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS 1, or WS II? YES [ ] NO [x]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ ] NO [)t]
If yes, explain. =,
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
71.8 acres wetlands'on.305.1 acre Farm Tract
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled: 1.67 ac. (wetland areas #1. #2, #3, #5, #7
See chart Dom: N/A
on site plan Flooded-. 4.88 ac. (wetland area # 4
Excavated: .83 ac. (wetland area #6)
Total Impacted: 7.38 acres
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only): The applicant desires
to construct an 18 hole golf course with adjoining residential lots, clubhouse
and amenities for public and semi-private use.
13. Purpose of proposed work: The most immediate need are ponds for irrigation purposes
with a dam breast at #4 and excavation at wetland #6.
14. St: ZZ reasoas why the applicant believes that :iIs activity ranst ba carried wcd=ds. Also, note measures
taken to minir..ize wetland impacts. In order to Ayni d _grrnindwat-er withdrawal the ponds MuSt
be placed in the lowest landscape positions which have hydric soils.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries S:svice
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed orproposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposeproject. Have you done so? . YES [ x] NO[
]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS ANDIOR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You arc required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [x ] NO [ ]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Weiland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property. (attached)
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project. (attached)
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets rzlevz it to the placement of the
delineation line. ( attached )
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy. N/A
E. What island use of surrounding property? Farm/single family resi.dential
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? Pending sewer extension
Owner's Signature Date

MAY 1-2 '95 11:54 MILES S11I7H
To Whom It May Concern:
P.2
Mr. Rob Moul, Land Maragement Group,lnc. (Environmental Consultant) and Mr.
William G. Daniel, P. E. of William G. Daniel & Associates (Project Engineer) are
granted permission to sign Environmental Permit Application Forms on behalf of
the owners of Ironwood.
Sincerely
l(
Ironwood velo/pment,lnc.
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: V=2 MI. LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC
F vvH?F
?0 Rp Michael F. Easley
G Governor
g nr 7 William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
r- Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
4%0000"
MEMO
John Dorney
rom: Bob Zarzecki
)ate: February 18, 2003
3e: DWQ Project No. 02-1885, Bradford Osborne, Pitt County
02-1885 (see attached) was received on 12/09/02 and sent to the WaRO on 12/12/02. WaRO provided comments
sometime after 12/12/02 (comments were not dated) to "Issue n/c". It was then put in my box, presumably to write the
Issue letter, sometime after WaRO comments. I most likely saw WaRO comments to "Issue n/c" and put it in my pile of
projects to write approval letters on. I kept pushing it back to the end of the pile because other higher priority projects
came up. I failed to check the "drop dead" date and as such the project is now past the 60-day review period and would
normally be waived. I found the file today and began to write the "waiver " letter once I realized that it had past 60 days.
In writing the letter I came across the following issues.
Basic facts provided within the PCN: The PCN was submitted by the property owner (possible homebuilder). The PCN
states that no buffers will be impacted and it doesn't appear that any will. The PCN states that they plan to build a "house
with in "MBU lines". Todd sent it to the WaRO stating "proposed impact to wetlands but none are shown on plans". The
"triage check list" also stated (not sure who wrote it), "discuss w/ applicant specifics of impact areas -just how much
needs to be impacted for what specific purpose -no need for impacts just to produce the "green carpet lawn" area". The
PCN stated under "prior project history", "Action ID 199503797 - Requested certification on a larger amount of wetlands
area." It did not provide the "DWQ Project Number".
My review on 2/18/03: 1 found the project location on the USGS and soil survey with the ald of the Pitt Co. web-based
GIS database. I checked Filemaker for any prior projects under the name Osborne. Nothing came up. I then checked for.
any projects under the subdivision name (Ironwood) and found DWQ Project No. 95499 (see attached). Iwent to the lab
and pulled the file. It contained the DWQ Certification issued on August 14, 1995 and the USACE Permit 199503797.
The Certification required, "A deed restriction shall be added to all lots with jurisdictional wetlands to prevent future
wetland fill". It also required that "DEM shall be copied on all mitigation reports including an as built'report after
construction". The file did not contain any such reports. The 1995 "Joint Form" requested 1.67 acres of fill, 4.88 acres of
flooding and 0.83 acres of excavation. The authorization letter gave "approval to placed fill in 7.38 acres of wetlands or
waters". One of the "mitigation techniques" proposed in the 1995 cover letter was "(5) The total wetlands created and/or
enhanced will total a minimum of 10.78 acres". It looks like you circled 10.78" and wrote a note "inc. pond". The
Certification also required no direct discharge of stormwater into the streams.
Does the fact that they failed to provide the "DWQ Project Number" in the "Prior Project History" section of the new PCN
constitute an incomplete application? If so, can we deny the project (or at least request additional information) based on
"no practical alternatives" and the 1995 deed restrictions? If not, please return and I'll write the waiver letter. I apologize
for letting this project slip through.
J\CC
s
l
_AV
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr„ RE., Director
?EHNR
August 14, 1995
Pitt County
DEM Project # 95499
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Ironwood Development Inc. '. .
200 Golf Club Wynd FI LE
Greenville, N.C. 27834
Dear Sirs:
You have our approval to place fill material in 7.38 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose
of constructing a golf course and residential subdivision at Ironwood Development, as you described in
your application dated 9 May 1995. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 2671. This certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 26 when it is issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. A
deed restriction shall be added to all lots with jurisdictional wetlands to prevent future wetland fill.
DEM shall be copied on all mitigation reports including an as built report after construction.
Stormwater shall be directed so as not to directly flow into streams on the property. In addition, you
should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401
of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786.
Si erely,
eston Howard, Jr (.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Washington DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
Rob bioul; Land Management Group
Bill Daniel; William Daniel and Associates
95499.1tr
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
A,) dual opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
February 20, 1995
COMPLIANCE WITH WETLANDS REGULATIONS
In accordance with Title 15 NCAC 2H .0500, the following DEED RESTRICTIONS AND
PROTECTIVE COVENANTS shall be. recorded in the county County Registry prior to the
conveyance of lots. Said Deed Restrictions and Protective Covenants shall apply to name of
subdivision, lot numbers in county County, North Carolina as shown on plans titled of
subdivision plan prepared by name of designer dated date:
"A portion of this lot has been determined to meet the requirements for
designation as a regulatory wetland. Any subsequent fill or alteration of
this wetland shall conform to the requirements of state wetland rules
adopted by the State of North Carolina in force at the time of the
proposed alteration. The intent of the deed restriction is to prevent
additional wetland fill, so the property owner should not assume that a
future application for fill will be. for fill will be approved. The property
owner shall report the , name of the subdivision, in any application
pertaining to said wetland rules. This covenant is intended to ensure
continued compliance with wetland rules adopted by the State of North
Carolina and therefore benefits may be. enforced by the State of North
Carolina. This covenant is to run with the land and shall be binding on
all parties and all persons claiming under them."
Owner's name
address
city, state
Phone: (###) phone no.
(signature)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF COUNTY
1, , a Notary Public of the State of North Carolina, Count}, of county,
hereby certify that owner personally appeared before me this day and executed the above
certification.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this day of , 1995.
(Notary Public)
My commission expires
deedres.mem
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
July 25, 1995
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199503797
Ironwood Development, Incorporated
Attn: William G. Daniel
200 Golf Club Wynd
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
Dear Mr. Daniel:

5W
o.
•OdL MA?11 .
Reference is made to our letter to you dated July 11, 1995, concerning
Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 26 authorization for your proposed
discharge of fill material in 1.67 acres, flooding 4.88 acres, and excavating
0.83 acres of above headwaters 404 wetlands (total wetland impacts 7.38 acres).
The site is located at Ironwood Subdivision Phase I, 0.5 miles west of the
intersection of U.S.264 Bypass and N.C. 43, between Rock Springs and the Tar
River, Pitt County, North Carolina. The proposed 7.38 acres wetlands impacts
are necessary in order to facilitate the construction of an 18 hole golf course
and irrigation ponds.
Reference is also made to a June 7, 1995, letter (copy enclosed) from the
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources (NCDCR) to your agent, Rob Moul,
with Quible & Associates, P.C., which requests additional information necessary
to provide for a determination of effect on the adjacent Camden County Courthouse
which is listed in the National Register of Historic Places.
In accordance with our regulations (33 CFR Part 330) no activity which may
affect properties listed or determined eligible for listing on the Register is
authorized by the Department of the Army nationwide permit until the requirements
of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act have been satisfied.
Accordingly, to ensure compliance with this regulation, you should coordinate
with the State Historic Preservation Office to satisfactorily resolve their
concerns in this matter prior to any work on the property. Copies of all
correspondence regarding this issue should be forwarded to our office.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. Questions or comments may be addressed
to Mr. Henry Wicker, Washington Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone],
extension 2.
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
Printed on ® Recycled Paper
1
-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. David Brook
State Historic Preservation Office
Archives and History
109 East Jones Street
Raleigh North Carolina 27601-2807
Mr John Dorney
W ter Quality Section
ivision of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. David Griffin, District Manager
Elizabeth City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
Quible and Associates, P.C.
Attn: Joseph Lassiter
Post Office Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, North Carolina 27949
Division of Environmental Management
Ecological Assessment Group
August 2, 1995
MEMORANDUM
To: John Dorney
From: Greg Price
Subject: Ironwood Development
Pitt County
Roger Thorpe, Debra Sawyer (WARO), Bill Daniels (project engineer), and I visited
Ironwood Development on July 24, 1995. Bill directed the tour and showed us the
location of the proposed creation of an impounded irrigation lake. The stream to be
impounded is a small, slow moving, unnamed tributary to the Tar River. The stream
appeared not to be teeming with aquatic life.
Roger, Debra, and I saw no problems with the project design and therefore approve of
issuing the 401 Certification. However, a deed restriction clause should be added stating
that homeowners should not develop within a distance of at least 50 feet from the irrigation
impoundment, in order to maintain a substantial buffer around the lake.
IRONWOOD
PPPT COUNTY FORTH CAROLINA
SOILS MAP
CrC
FUTURE PHASE SOUTHWEST OF HC 43.
BBD
oAPNC 9GlE
0 low 9000' ]OW
(M FRY)
1 NW - 1000 R

NrA
'r
DIM" 0 PLA M" • LAPOSCAPE ARClY1EQRIRE
SYMBOL
SOIL
TYPE

z
a
d
Z
0
a
imm
I
(J
w Q
D Q N O o
w ri w o
O or o ? l 0
cD u. w O
z ? U) co
o II
fn W
Z LL Z U) W ZQY
Ll OW O p? Q OwQ v,e J
O o (D m
W Z> Ow O w p W Z
Z!wa w?pg U
P O L
<w y- O y_ J J Q
w aCC ZZ ZOQw
?? :)L) as a 04 (1) Q° ?..
? ?a j
w
U
LLJ
Cc:
Q ..... 0
O ..... x .....
O O ..,
Li
W
0
Q • ?y I
Z - O,
' 0 b
LLI
LLI g,
• y
y O
U 6 '
• o
•
Z
" 0
CZ-
W 0
0 ' r ? 0 ? Oi ?
r r 'r ? ? ?. ? o \? 1
I
a dd
\ N . • \ r Oh B
\ IQ' F
\ 3 Z
u
\ 1T ? . E
it \ u y / . , • . . 0 0
\ O S . O
• 0:
\ \ or f???o • C7
\ 0
!?\\\ Z
\ \ w
\ \ w
Z
Q
2
O
Z
Q
J

IRONWOOD
PITT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
"HANDS MAC'
SCALE: l'- 1000'
I I
t
I
i f '?
zI vJ? , l
0, 00
VIII ? t t, i?
ILLf,?_at(
I 01 P1 AIN
f I I V411t)N !G
1
O'? ?-7J
tar
S
APPROVED BY
ARMY CORPS 01 E NUNI I RS
7/28/92
y
EN6INtERINC PLANNING • IANDSCAPF ARCHf F.rTURF
i ; i;- s--

I I

PROPOSED MITIGATION PLAN
COMPLETE REMOVAL OF JUNK/REFUSE FROM ALL

ND AREAS
- - _4
ABOVE
BEFORE CLEANUP EFFORT PICTURE
,l
BELOW
AFTER REMOVAL AND RESTORATION
OF TRIBUTARY STREAM
LAND h;ANAGEMENT GROUP, INC
TYPICAL VIEW OF AREA #4 TO BE USED FOR IRRIGATION POND

TYPICAL PINE FLATW00
TO BE USED FOR ROADWAYS,
:8
CORRIDORS
LAND MANAG:MENT GROUP, INC

TOP PHOTO I F? -
AREA #1&#2 WHICH CONSISTED OF A JUNK FILLED DITCH TO BE PIPED & FI

1

BOTTOM PHOTO
it
1983 NHAP INFRA-RED PHOTO
k
Q
O
O
O
H
H
L H
a? II
d ti
a
rn
rn
0
o
U
A

I
t
E- MNc.*ocno
? M d'NNO?cO i?C
'JNCD
? ? m N
d
m V) TO
T-
11

S
O I¦ I I
88 / r,...
I'
M
cr) ? cr)
I,
NY
N° /
I (1
C/I
-14
Q ?\
Y ;' / .x 1
00
- ON 'r
ao o L
rl.
i II
N o r ;?
O? Q, ?? %? u?:l I - ! Ih'r MTh fish I ..'\ ???`\ „'f ?fl III,
N?
NO ° I ?i ?` .i 1 II 7 4x1
k
p? ?? I c r ^'rrv? ,f w{}I
NOD •IDI r f. n' 11 l';?I 1.'rd•I
// it 1CV)
1
\ u
.N $ ru ° / `
/N ? o I i . f!:In pa
N? ABt ? II. ? ? rrl
o ? S C)
N
I +
CSn 11 h 1 / II ??
Q` ? f l ??EF. I I ? n
1 N?
? 1 I // / <l? -HI I
% dl o
N Q
/ 111 II
y II 0) M
/ 1 h _ 140
00
/ CO
I
/ (? ?.I r• ?. r I ° ° ?M 11
co ` '? Me { y. o Y
-6 ?? ?
soc C)°
f go,!
M I M
cc)
C04 C
I9 o? ., <-
c ?Y
- -- °
10 ?F -
3t d f °p
\ ~? In? y ?II II
IOC ° $' ?.x t O
p II
co
n IMF} SL I I
?? Q ? ( ?a II to
N? ^ r ?° ?I
M
1.
? ? W hh
' r A 11
% ? Ih
? 11
r / II
I I I N ? // -.'?r R? i I
1
\ II ? OM / ? ? ` II
? 11 ? x / N r
? x
1 1 rl r r _
I I
• 1 I I (l' nt - _` ?? \ ?11' 1'r - ?/ ? ??_ U1fi ?I Irl
,?ro nrt?pp
O
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION WETLAND
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Paoe 1 of 2
Project/Site: Ironwood Tract Date: 10-10-94
Applicant/Owner: William Daniel County: Pitt
Investigator: Rob Moul State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes NO- Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes N Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S pecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Red Maple Tree/Shrub FAC 9. Poison 1vey__ W. Vine FACW
2. Loblolly bay Tree/Shrub FAC- 10. Smilax W. Vine FAC
3. Black willow Shrub FACW 11. Catbriar W. Vine FAC
4. Fettabush Shrub FAC 12.
5. Bitter gallberry Shrub FAC 13.
6. Cinnamon fern G, Cover OBL 14.
7. Netted chain fern G. Cover OBL 15.
8. Royal fern G. Cover OBL 16. _
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-) 100 percent
Remarks:
Greater than 50 percent of dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC.
HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Recorded Data (De be in Remarks): Primary Indicators
-
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ?wom, m,J -Inundated
-Aerial Photographs a C?;& ._bf X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Other -V -Water Marks
No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Y, Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: < 12 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: < 12 (in.)
Remarks:
Primary and secondary hydrology indicators were observed in the field.
arojo 400C.'. d'
O
SUDS Prolect/51te: Ironwood Ira,
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Rains fine sandy loam
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Paleaquults
Profile Description:
Depth
(inches)
0-7
7-12
12 - 16
16 - 41
Drainage Class: Three
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type?
Yes No
Matrix Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Horizon (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
very friable; weak
A 10YR 2/1 - fine granular structure
very friable; weak
EG 10YR 6/2 - med. granular structure
friable; weak fine
BEG 10YR 6/1 medium distinct (10YR 6/8) suban ular block struc
common medium distinct friable; weak medium
BTG 10YR 6/1 10YR 6/8 & 7.5YR 5/8 suban ular block struc
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol
_Histic Epipedon
_Sulfidic Odor
X Aquic Moisture Regime
X Reducing Conditions
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks:
Hydric soil Indicators were observed in the field.
-Concretions
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
-Organic Streaking in Sandy Solis
],Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Solis Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland. Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland line flagged in pink/black ribbon.
Approved
Land Management Group, Inc.
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, N.C. 28402
910-452-0001
. ?- +-oN wac"A
v
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION UPLAND
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator:
Ironwood Tract
William Daniel
Rob Moul
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
G") NQ
Yes N
Yes o
Date: 10-10-94
County: Pitt
State: NC
Community ID: Upland
TransectID:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Loblolly pine Tree FAC 9. Partrigepea __ G. Cover FACU
2. Post oak Shrub FACU 10.
3. Yellow popular Tree FAC 11.
4. Dogwood Shrub FAC 12.
5. Sassafrass Shrub FACU 13.
6. Carolina jessamine W. Vine FACU 14.
7. Wild grape W, Vine FAC 15.
8. Bracken fern G.Cover FACU 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, - - --- -
FACW or FAC -------
(excluding FAC-) 45 percent
Remarks:
Less than 50 percent of the dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
_Stream,Lake, or Tid e Gauge -Inundated
-Aerial Photographs -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Other -Water Marks
-
X No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
_ -Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in,) Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 12 (in,) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 12 (in.)
- -- ---- -- -
Remarks:
No primary or secondary wetland hydrology indicators were observed,

A'VIL.>" rr0 eC tine: IfonWOOtl I rdCi rage z of Z weoang
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Lynchburg fine sandy loam Drainage Class: Three
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Haplohumods Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist)
0-9 Ap 10YR 4/1
9 - 14 BA 10YR 6/4
14 - 22 Btg1 10yr 6/1
22 - 45 Btg2 10YR 6/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol
_Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
-Reducing Conditions
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators were observed in the field,
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
very friable; weak
- med. granular structure
common fine distinct weak fine subangular
10YR 6/2; 10YR6/8 block structure;vr fribi
few fine distinct (10YR 6/6) weak fine subangular
few medium prominant (2.5YR 4/6 block structure; friable
few fine distinct (2.5yr 4/8); common weak fine subangular
medium & course distinct (10YR 6/6) blocky structure; friable
-Concretions
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
-Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
-Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland line flagged in pink/black ribbon.
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
Land Management Group, Inc.
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, N.C. 28402
910-452 -0001
w z a
o dr0 w w0 Y
acs q a?x w , A ?, :.
A A ?:) > U
U) 0 _
U w a woo w?Fa 0 CD
`'? /?' rn
Q A a w x 6-4 P-4 Q ?
w d d d l" / -?i A
d .,.cp to - I,- C'7 c,1.
?t nt o L ca co o
o 0 0 V 0 0 0 o
eo /
r.3 C%2 00 t LO W ? CO
,o
II O LO
f'` u !
R O
rr?
u- _
+ o a
• r I
(j \
I u
+ I = it p O °
i ' u 1 ? o
_ O v OJ ie
u + r
% II O , + a
r
+ i o u O J C •? ? %
CQ
? ?7• ? ? r ? + BR i ?
I
n d 1? .? j i ° +. 0 p r oQ >z
? + r I
? t\ f ,Ip o r+ 0 O
?,?? u