820690_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Qeparbnent of Environmental Quality
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
NA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N,l(fURAL RESOURCES
-~~----
February 20, 2002 ,./~::~_/ Prestage Farms
P-22 Isolation
POBox438
Clinton NC 28328
Dear Prestage Farms:
t • • ' J ~ ----~ ... ~... ' \. "_.
Subject: Removal of Registtation-
P-22 Isolation
Facility Number 82--690
Sampson County
I
-..J
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217 , and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your fa cility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that leveL Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
Confined Cattle
Hors es
Sheep
Poultry with a liquid waste system
250
100
75
1,000
30,000
If you have questions regarding this Jetter or the status of your operation pl ease call Sonya Avant at
[phone] ext. 57 lor Sieve Le wis [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely,
~.~~· -h Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Sampson Soil and Waler Co nservalion District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
SO% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
t .. ,
DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Fadlit.Y Number $"1---H 'qD
Time of Inspt!C~ion
C Registered pi&ertified []Applied for Permit C Permitted IC Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ........................ ..
Farm Name: ...... P.:: .. ~.7.:: ..... Is.a.Jg,f..j __ ~...................................................... County : ----~~SQ .. ~ .......................................... ..
Owner Na""'' .... !+~~'!:. ............... £~5.·····································-····· Phone No' ........ ,f..CJ..k. .. --:5..TZ.L... ........... -.. ···········-·
Facility Contact: ... ~ ... f!?..~fc?. .. tlT ............ Title: £.,.\l .. ~ .... -¥.......................... Phone No: .................................................. .
Mailing Address: ..... P. .. P ..... B..~ ...... ¥.3.~....................................................... .. ... C..J.t~.l1.:tzn·l; ..... N..C ........................ ~-~ .. ?..1.
Onsitc Representative:$.~€.................................................................................. Intcgrator: .. ~r. .............................................................. ..
Certified Operator~.................................................. ............................................................. Operator Certificatio n Number~ ............................... .' ........ .
Latitude ._I __ _. Longitude
. _ Design Current
:.;,~;Swin~ . -·· ·.·Capacity _Population
Design · Current
Poultry Capacity :Population
· Design c • qu~h . -
Cattle :~ Capil£i~y Population _.
'~ · · 0 Wean to Feeder
~-0 Feeder to Finish
'·~-t;:O:=;-:F-:-arr-o-w-to--:-::W-:-c-·a-n-+----+---~
jg ~:~~aycr I . I I lg ~:~~Dairyl I r
.···y
' -·-' ~ . . --~---
!O Other A ....
~ • A •• D Farrow to Feeder
•· 0 Farrow to Finish
, ' ~Gilts . 2. 3~
·· Total Design Capacity/( ZJ (o 1<-
~====~
,·:. D ~?ars Total SSLWJ t
_<:.N~~b~r of ~goons./ Holding Ponds
<~::~.j.--;.: ' -~~=-____ :-.: ..•. • '. \ -·. : ~ > • : : •••
~~ . .
.__--i-~~' jo Subsurface Drains Present no Lagoon Area jo Spray Field Area I '
10 No Liquid Waste Management Sys tem. . .. (i~£,-::_·:-_~-::::~~:~~·: __ :_;t;<.,
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. ·Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: D Lagoon 0 Spray field D Other
a. If di);charge is observed, \va:-; the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Surfa(·c Water'! (If yes. no tify DWQJ
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated now in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon syst~·m'! (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding pond s) require
maintenan ce/improvement ?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time o f des ign ?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
DYes ~o
DYes "ANo
DYes ONo
0 Ye s ONo
0 Ye s DNo
DYes
DYes
DYes
0 Yes p('No
DYes ~o
Continued on back
I ( I flcility Number: -~~--.?..3..-l
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8 . Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (La~oons and/or Holdin~ Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Saucture 3
-·-'!J..!. .... _.
1 0. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11 . Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
{If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses ao
immediate public bealtb or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13 . Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
StructureS
IS. c:: ;:ess :~~;_::d_~1; ;:~sm:::oti~ D~tn·-·-------·-····-·--
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17 . Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18 . Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
For Certified Facilities Oply
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23 . Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
cc: Division of Water Qua/it)',
DYes ~o
DYes 'pr:fo
DYes ~o
DYes Jtfo
Structure 6
DYes~
DYes ;!{No
DYes ~o
OYes~o
DYes ~o
DYes ~o
DYes ~o
DYes ~o
DYes ~q
0 Yes Jli(No
DYes fid:No
DYes ~o
DYes t(_No
DYes No ·