Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820670_INSPECTIONS_20171231NORTH CAROLINA Department of Environmental Quality -. ....--..·-.. _ ...... _..-.. !c·~~~~~~!!!~~~~~~~~~~~ ompliaoce Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: ~utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency Date of Visit:l WtJ: I) I Arrival Time: I / .' [J:> I Departure Time: I J"~ Q () I County:_ 5~ fe:x-Region: Farm Name: ;·gJh,r--..J;; J~.,.J pZz/~ Owner Email: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: 5Jlii~-~ tt"--=' Title: Phone: Oosite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any di sc harge observed from any part of the operation? DYes ~o Discharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Application Fi eld D Other: a . Was the conveyance man-made? DYes 0No b . Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) 0 Yes 0No c. What is th e est im ated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d . Does the discharge bypass the waste management syste m? (If yes, notify DWR) DYes 0No 2. Is there evidence of a past di sc harge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of3 DYes ~No 0 Yes [H. No DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE 214/10 15 Continued 'J !Facility Number: &:CJ:--1? -& 2 Q !Date of Inspection: 12 ~/ J.f~ I 7 Waste CoUection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): 11: Observed Freeboard (in): tJ 5. Arc there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~No DNA ONE D Yes D No D NA D NE Structure 5 Structure 6 fl)-Yes DNo DNA ONE gYes D No DNA D NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? ~Yes D No 0 NA D NE ~ Yes D No D NA 0 NE §-Yes D No 0 NA 0 NE DYes 0 No DNA IZJ-.NE 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below. DYes D No DNA (ig_NE 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu , Zn, etc .) 0 PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Typc(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Docs the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the ~gation design or wettable acres determination? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Page2of3 DYes D No DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes D No DNA ~NE DNA 0 N E DNA ~NE DNA DiNE DNA (5j.NE DNA ~NE DNA 6?J._NE DYes DNo D NA @.N E 214/2014 Continued ,, [Facility Number: ,i I loate of Inspection: I ., • 1 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check theappropriate box(es) below. DYes DNo DYes 0 No DNA ~NE 0 NA f2j-NE 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance : 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify th e Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 3 I . Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 33 . Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/i nspection with an on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? DYes 0 No DNA (2g NE 0 Yes DNo DNA Et) NE 0 Yes DNo DNA f5JNE ("' 0 Yes 0No DNA ~NE 0 Yes DNo DNA (FJ_NE DYes 0No DNA ~E 0 Yes '23No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE 0 Yes J£1-No DNA ONE {i/~(lv (!} Tft·?;-/'1'7~/ UJ .. •.s ~~/ ptf-JJu CU ho> ~,-,~-f>~~ wh..p~ ('cN'_>4 1~ 7 4'fr· ~~-------tr/L f,_v'~ rw~·u:r, t-~7..5 'J)7 -rr-rrr:;.+~ ; 3 ? ~; )_ Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page3 of3 Phone: '7-/IJ-,YO:J-O 61 Date: 12:-/'/~1'? 11411015 Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: @ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Denied Access Date ofVisit: l11l~f!'J I Arrival TimedJ0:15 AH I Departure Time:l/o:soAH I County :5~ Farm Name: Butf-rr l:s roJ totAt Owner Email: Owner Name: St-fl-f(l Ta~ Phone: Mailing Address: PO fux; 141~ E 1\-z.a hefh fowa 7 hlC P>K33) Physical Address: 14 ~ f"a \ \ tJ l£a &ifJ Ln; Ro,e /x} o Facility Contact: S=k..,e_ -Ta"tm Title: (OJ.,z,f; Phone: Region: f:PlJ Onsite Representative: n I{).._ Integrator: -------------- Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts LIs any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Other: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: DYes ~No DYes 0No DYes 0No d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2.ls there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? DYes DYes 0No ~No 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of3 DYes 0No DNA ONE (EJ NA ONE DNA ONE r5a'NA ONE DNA ONE DNA {MNE 11411011 Continued • !Facility Number: $Q. -(/nO lnate oflnspection: (!lOS fl3 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure l Structure 2 Structure3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes 0No ~NA ONE DYes 0No DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 DYes 0 No cg-NA 0 NE ~ Yes 0 No D NA 0 NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? rg) Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 NE DYes 0No ~NA ONE 181 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 NE DYes 0 No I8J NA 0 NE II. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes 0 No 18 NA 0 NE D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN 0 PAN > I 0% or I 0 lbs. D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): "-soil Type(s): Av],f llle I s 14. Do the receiving crops 1ffer from those destgnated m the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Reguired Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. OWUP 0Checklists D Design D Maps D Lease Agreements 21. Does record keeping need improvement? lfyes, check the appropriate box below. DYes 0No ~NA ONE DYes 0No ~NA ONE DYes 0No DNA ~NE DYes 0No DNA IEJNE DYes 0No (2iNA ONE DYes 0No DNA ~NE DYes 0No DNA (2'NE Oother: DYes 0No DNA ~NE D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers D Weather Code D Rainfall D Stocking 0 Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections D Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ~ Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Page 2 of3 DYes 0No ~NA ONE 21412011 Continued '" jFacil1ty Number: q;~ -/t21~ loate of lns~ection: ulm l13 24 . Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? DYes 0No ~NA ONE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with pennit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check DYes 0No i8NA ONE the appropriate box(es) below. 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon Li st structure(s) and date offtrSt survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31 . Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes , check the appropriate box below. 0 Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond D Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA WMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Rev iewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page3 of3 DYes 0No ~NA ONE DYes 0No I)!NA ONE DYes 0No ~NA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes 0No iSa'NA ONE DYes 0No DNA f}iNE DYes 0No DNA fS(1 NE ~Yes 0No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE ore Phone: qi(}{I33..3Joofrrlfirr) 7 Date: Nov £?~40\3 21412011 Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other Date of Visit: lq)!~f 1 4-. I Arrival Time:IUJ~4£AH I Departure Time: I I /'r~ I County: ..5n~ttf!th FarmName: Bu!J&. ~s/u,J Wlh Owner Name: S f.ewn Tatv,., Owner Email: Phone: Mailing Address: po .lrJK ll/1~ . E f h.ab&rfovn WC... cl8.337 ) Physical Address: l4a.. Fall~ L£4"'111he ) f<..orebtra Facility Contact: S+e~ Ttdva, Title: _O:I.L.:...,__Itfr-=-------Phone: Region:.fM Onsite Representative: -.:n:....!· ~fa_::=::::__ _____________ __;_ __ Integrator: .....:.n.!:/!.:tt-:.= _________ _ Certified Operator: nla Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: 0 Structure D Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? D Other: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: DYes ~No DYes 0No DYes 0No d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of3 DYes ~No DYes 0No DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ~E 214/2011 Continued IFacilitrNumber: 1)a... I Date of Inspection: g(t~l ld-. Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stonn storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Arc there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? D Yes D No fid NA D NE D Yes D No 0 NA D NE Structure 5 Structure 6 DYes D No ~NA 0 NE jgYes D No DNA D NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application lO. Are there any required bu!Ters, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? ISJYes D No DNA D NE DYes 0 No ~NA D NE ~ Yes D No D NA D NE DYes D No ~ NA D NE II. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes D No ~NA D NE D Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (C u, Zn. etc.) D PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside o f Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): ...J.A_.v:.....:;\"-~'Y~v..uil~~o..~off........_l£......._ _________________________ _ 14. Do the receiving crops diflcr from those designated in the CA WMP? 15. Docs the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? I 6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the fa c ility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available ? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. OwuP Ochec klists D De sign D Maps 0 Lease Agreements DYes DNo ~NA ONE DYes DNo ~NA ONE DYes DNo DNA ~NE DYes DNo DNA IIfNE DYes DNo 1)4NA ONE DYes DNo DNA lk:fNE DYes 0No DNA ~NE 00ther: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? lfycs, check the appropriate box below. DNA ~NE 0 Yes DNo 0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analys is D Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code D Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 12 0 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspe ctions 0 Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23 . If se lected, did th e fa c ility fail to install and maintain rain breake rs on irrigation equipment? Page1of3 ~Yes D No DNA D NE D Yes D No ~NA 0 NE 214/1011 Continued t!<acillty" Number: q;~ _[p10 loate of IDSJ:!ection: q11~ I!~ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? DYes DNo ~NA ONE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check DYes DNo ~NA ONE the appropriate box(es) below. 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey DFailure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? DYes 0No ~NA ONE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? DYes DNo (S}NA ONE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document DYes DNo ~NA ONE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? DYes ~No DNA ONE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative inunediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the DYes permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 0No IS}NA ONE 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes 0No DNA ISJ NE 0 Application Field D Lagoon/Storage Pond D Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? DYes 0No DNA !SfNE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 18J'Yes 0No DNA ONE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? DYes f5lNo DNA ONE AttnJO!ett -{h-PJ wi-t1l o"~jfOt'll fieldr lWi IC[Ja:ns, lne_.own-rr fs po/.,~'1 fil-e_ OJ~ft-fee.. -to tnoi'tf-ah sa (e or-fl'OII}. 'TI)e.(a_pu u;rgho-1PJ Wov/d ha't:.-i-o be_ iDftliJ f'ehv/ff-- fo ..-+~ fo""_,(lfo pred~c-h't::VJ, lhe. lajans or-e.'drt tY neet'y so, No' YYI&" c}ro.Jen'me_ I ttr+ y eor. A fe~v fro IV ho-e bf..-, b., h htj~ 1 ft t) b:?bf far Av1!!J 0((ey, pJIOJ fYlO i /eJ--+-o ownrr q I~ 7/J;)... , Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signatu re : Page3 of3 Phone : qf{)-43Jr33JoWffi'ce} Date: Sert :.1], ~01~ 214120II 0'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: ~Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: llO~'B Ill I Arrival Time: II~ 15"" PH Farm Name: Ovf:ftt :1-s/o,J 'f?k....-, Owner Name: S±ev& }'v", TCrt~.tt, Mailing Address: Departure Timed /~30ffl I County: S GrrfSOJ Owner Email: Phone: Region: f:'l?{) Physical Address: ------------------------------------------- Facility Contact: Sif ~~~ Tatvt!? Title: ------------Phone: Onsite Representative: --'-OI.JI-.IICa ... <'-------------------Integrator: _.!..nu/..:;;Q.:.... _________ _ Certified Operator: nla.... Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Other: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: DYes ~No DYes 0No DYes 0No d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of3 DYes ~No DYes &J-No DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE 21411011 Continued IFacmq; Number: $a--hJO I nate of Inspection: I ol~i/t I "waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any ofthe structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etj) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes 0 No jgNA ONE DYes D No DNA D NE Stru cture 5 Structure 6 D Ye s D No 181 N A D NE ~Yes 0No D N A O NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part ofthe waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? gj Yes D No DNA D NE DYes D No ~ NA D NE 18)Yes 0No DNA ONE D Yes 0 N o DNA ~NE I I. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box bel ow . D Yes D No ts!J NA D NE D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground D Heavy Metal s (C u, Zn , etc.) D PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. D Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Inc orpo rate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence ofWind Drift 0 Application Outs ide of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. soil Type(sJ' A ,tr !lie. l s 14. Do the receiving crop:iffer from those designated in the CA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If ye s , c heck the appropriate box. owup Dchecklists 0Design D Maps D Lease Ab'Te emen ts 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes 0 No ~NA O NE D Yes 0 No ~N A ONE 0 Yes 0 No DNA ~NE 0 Yes 0 N o DNA ~N E DYes 0 No 8]~ BJNE DYes 0 N o D NA [;g NE D Yes 0No D NA !B'NE Oother: DYes 0 N o D NA ~NE D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Anal ys is 0 Wa ste Transfer s D Wea ther Code D Rainfall D Stocking D Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections D Monthl y and I " Rai nfall In s pections D S ludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ~ Yes 0 N o 0 NA D NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equi pment? D Ye s 0 No ~ NA D NE Pagel of3 2/412011 Continued jFac~li!l Number: lSC\.. -~]{2 I Date oflns~ection: lOla,~ lll 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? DYes ~No ~NA ONE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? ffyes, check DYes No ~NA ONE the appropriate box(es) below. D Failure to complete annual sludge survey D Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels D Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance ofthe permit orCA WMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Si~:,'llaturc: Page3of3 DYes 0No ~NA ONE DYes 0No (')a-NA ONE DYes 0No ~NA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes 0No 6}NA ONE DYes 0No DNA ~NE DYes 0No DNA 18J"NE I8J Yes 0No DNA ONE DYes [gJ No DNA ONE Phone: ql(}-~33 ~3300 foffi-e) Date: IO \ad) l ' 214/20// , .. _I I -~ • • .:::.. . • £__,.., ~(ilii!llim~ lia.c 'i'ih~·· ~110. .. ]( [ID;ftftan<lil00€Illf\~~ llti!N?~ Type of Visit "fiJCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit @"Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other D Denied Access Region: f?'Ro Date of Visit: IJal~l(O I ArrivalTime:l J;~~ro P!11 Departure Time:I~~:30Pf1 I County: s-arrrs tb Farm Name: Bvf-f1t J::.s fev.J.. tiu0 Owner Email: ----------- Owner Name: ~Si~..\,f,..l=v~e-Jnu__ ______ -n._,~""'~m:....:.-------Phone: ~(()) ~0J.-11> d.<J Mailing Address: PO @OX I Y f ~ -4.<G'+l ....... o."""""a...;<...>b&rfo..,__,_._,<..:.....-:.....:.." _.;..:.IV ..... c __ 0}8327 Physical Address:---------------------------------------- Facility Contact: S {eve)) Tafvn Title: 0}¥11 fr Pbone No: ~xt$~------ Onsite Representative: ...;..h....,I'""L=-------------Integrator: Gzi {a;z/; f'$; s=.: ~4 fPn/tl_ Certified Operator: ____.b'-'-'-}IJ..""""",........._ _____ -----------Operator Certification Number: ------- Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD'D" Longitude: Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? DYes ~No DNA ONE Discharge originated at: D Structure 0 Application Field D Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 DYes 0No DNA ONE DYes 0No DNA ONE DYes 0No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes fRNo DNA ONE 11128104 Continued fFiiciii'ty Number:~().._ -G, 7() I Date oflnspection ~'diQ.d.lt 0 I Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes 0No ~NA ONE DYes 0No DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:--------------------------------------- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in):--------------------------------------- Observed Freeboard (in):--------------------------------------- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? DYes 0No ~A ONE (ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed t81Yes 0No DNA ONE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? 81Yes 0No DNA ONE DYes 0No RNA ONE DYes 0No ~A ONE DYes 0No DNA ~NE II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes 0 No 'IiaNA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn , etc.) D PAN 0 PAN> 10% or 10 Jbs D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Area 12. Croptype(s) .....!...f'l:....!.}~()._::::::::.... _____________________________ _ 13. soil type(s) Avtryvll le.. 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA WMP? DYes D No gNA ONE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes 0 No gNA D NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?O Yes 0 No 0 NA IStNE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes 0 No DNA ~NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes 0No [&NA ONE Reviewer/Inspector Name Pagel of 3 -~Facility Number:~).._ -fo10 I Date of Inspection 11~§!10 I Reguired Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. D WUP D Checklists D Design D Maps D Other DYes 0No DNA ~E DYes 0No DNA ~NE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes D No DNA ~NE D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers D Annual Certification D Rainfall D Stocking 0 Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rain Inspections D Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ~Yes 0No DNA ONE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? DYes 0No (SdNA ONE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? DYes DNa f£{NA ONE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? DYes DNo ~NA ONE 26. Did th e facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? DYes DNo f){NA ONE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? DYes DNo IXNA ONE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? DYes 0-No DNA ~E 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document DYes and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 0No [SI(NA ONE 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? DYes fiSJ No DNA ONE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notifY the regional office of emergency situations as required by DYes 0No fiaNA ONE General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? f8fYes 0No DNA ONE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? DYes !&"No DNA ONE Page3 of 3 11128104 "'· ~ . ., ... - ~~-liJ'i'in·VJ~IIIIDI li 1:.1 "-&D ·~crilMaml~~ ~~m~J.·~.--.~ @J}m~ Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other D Denied Access Date of Visit: l1.z-17-o"l Arrival Timed03; oo,. _, Departure Time: l l>3 ~/o'> :J County: $"tJ••v'J59 A.1 I I Region: FllO Owner Email: -------------- Owner Name: ~W\At--t B. 1-/ro"'""·c..., f /-Phone: Mailing Address: ----------------------------------------- Ph)·sical Address:------------------------------------____ _ Facility Contact: ______________ Title: ------------PhoneNo: _________ ___ Onsite Representative: -------------------Integrator:---------------- Certified Operator:---------------------Operator Certification Number: -------- Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: r-loD'D" Latitude: L__j Longitude: D OD'D" Design Current Design Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry C~pacity Current Population I I li I§ ~:~~~ayer I ID Wean to Finish D Wean to Feeder ! D Feeder to Finish ' D Farrow to Wean D Farrow to Feeder I I D Farrow to Finish I ' D Gilts I D Boars : -.. -----' Dry Poultry D Layers D Non-Layers D Pullets D Turkeys ID Other !_ D Turkey Poults D Other . --····· -----. --···"------ Other Discharges & Stream Impacts I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at D Structure D Application Field 0 Other a_ Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) Design c'JriJ~t Cattle Capacity PopUJ.ation I! ODairyCow i I D Dairy Calf D Dairy Heife1 D D_!}' Cow f D Non-Dail)' D Beef Stocker I J D Beef Feeder D BeefBrood Cow --- I I I r r ' J Number of Structures: I . J :j:;-·;.· DYes [i]No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes GJNo DNA ONE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ..... _ 2. ls there evidence of a past discharge from any part ofthe operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? DYes 5ll No DYes [})No DYes ~No 11128104 DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE Continued '• !' ., ; i. ·: F I' IFacilityNumber: FZ.-~Q70 I Date oflnspection l12-27· o'-1 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes []No DNA ONE DYes llfNo DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:----------------------------------------- Spillway?: ------------------------------------- Designed Freeboard (in):--------------------------------------- Observed Freeboard (in):--------------------------------------- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? DYes ~No DNA ONE (ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed DYes Ill No DNA ONE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes [81No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~No 0 NA D NE 0 Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN 0 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) -------------------------------------- 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? DYes [l)No DNA ONE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes [3No DNA ONE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ac re determination? DYes 1!1 No D NA D NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? DYes !;}No DNA ONE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes 1;(1 No DNA ONE Date: CJto) ~.13-3-.53-o /.Z -z7-zoo" Page2of3 12118104 Continued :• i; l . .,. I Facility Number: gz. -6701 Date of J nspection l17 · 27 • o '-l Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components ofthe CA WMP readily available? lfyes, check the appropriate box. 0 WUP D Checklists D Design 0 Maps D Other DYes []No DNA ONE DYes ffiNo DNA ONE 21 . Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes []}No DNA 0 NE D Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers D Annual Certification D Rainfall 0 Stocking D Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections D Weather Code :, 22 . Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 24 . Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27 . Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality repre sentative immediately 3 I . Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-s ite representative? 33. Do es facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Poge3of3 DYes GNo D NA O NE DYes Et}No DNA O NE DYes [~l No DNA ONE DYes liZ] No DNA ONE DYes 00No DNA ONE DYes (l1No DNA ONE DYes a:JNo DNA ONE ' DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes [6JNo DNA O NE DYes OJ' No DNA ONE DYes [)No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE 12128/04 e Division of Water Quality 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency ::IF:aci~ityNum~~r j ~2... H (p 70 II Type of Visit e Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: !12 -27-0~~ Arrh·al Time: lu3;oo4 .... ...I Departure Time: lo3 ~icl>IJ County: 5'<)...y>fc iV Region: F£0 I I Owner Email: ----------'------ Owner Name: ~~,u B. ~Ah'~ ~+j= Phone: Mailing Address: ------------------------------------____ _ Physical Address:----------------------------------------- Facility Contact: --------------Title: -----------PhoneNo: _________ _ Onsite Representative: -------------------Integrator:---------------- Certified Operator:--------------------Operator Certification Number: ------- Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD'D" Longitude: D OD'D" Design Current Capacity Population Design Current C~pacity Population Swine Wet Poultry ID Wean to Finish I I 0 Wean to Feeder 0 Feeder to Finish 10 Laver I J I. 0 Farrow to Wean 0 Farrow to Feeder 0 Farrow to Finish 0Gilts 0 Boars -----·-···---···-· -··· Dry Poultry Other D Layers D Non-Layers D Pullets D Turkeys 0 Turkey Poults OOther ID Other .. __, -~-·-·- Discharges & Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Application Field D Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) Cattle ODairyCow D Dairy Calf 0 Dairy Heife1 DDrvCow D Non-Dairv D Beef Stocker D Beef Feeder D Beef Brood Co\\ Design Current Capacity Population ; i I ' ' I I -----. "" Number of Structures: o: ----~ 0 Yes ltJ No 0 NA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes [YI No DNA ONE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters ofthe State (gallons)? d. Docs discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? DYes !¥No DYes []No DYes ~No 12118104 DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE Continued !Facility Number: '8z. -tpzo Date oflnspection !12-?7-&I Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~o DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:------------------------------------------ Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): ------------------------------------------ Observed Freeboard (in):------------·------------------------ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) DYes ~No DNA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~No DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any ofthe structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes !!}No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes ~No D NA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) -------------------------------------- 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA WMP? DYes [l) No DNA ONE 15. Docs the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes {2)No DNA ONE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? DYes ll:] No 0 N~ 0 NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? DYes l:;HNo DNA ONE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes l;(i No DNA ONE C<lmJments.(i,~fer to question #): Explaili any YES answers and/or any drawiligs·:or facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as nec~•sacy.) Reviewer/Inspector Name ! . ~ --~~--~~~~~~~------------------------~~ Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Page2of3 12/28104 Continued I Facility Number: 'Bz. -b 10! Required Records & Documents Date of Inspection lt:z-;n ~o 41 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components ofthe CA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps D Other DYes []'No DNA ONE DYes 12fNo DNA ONE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes [iNo DNA D NE D Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Annual Certification 0 Rainfall D Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and I" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non~ompliance of the permit orCA WMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a reg ional Air Quality representative immediately 3 1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33 . Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Additional Comments and/or Drawings:· .. ·' Page3of3 DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes EjJ No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes 1\Z] No DNA ONE DYes [!I No DNA ONE DYes l;B' No DNA ONE DYes i:pNo DNA ONE DYes IE No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes [JNo DNA ONE DYes [J'No DNA ONE DYes lj61 No DNA ONE ' '~>:, " . ; :; .~.·. : ~;~:.f!~fj_~·:~~~~i~~·.:~:~~: .... f- 11118104 . ~. ' State of North Carolina Department of Environment. Health and Natural Resources FayettevUie Regional Office James B. Hunt. Jr .. Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Andrew McCall. Regional Manager DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Sandy Farm A TIN: Mr. Johnnie Evans c/o Tom Coble Rt. 2, Box 120 Autryville, NC 28318 Dear Mr. Evans: September 6, 1995 SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection Sampson County On july 25, 1995, an inspection of your animal operation was performed by the Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at (910) 486-1541. Sincerely, Ricky Revels Environmental Technician IV RR/bs Enclosure cc: Facility Compliance Group Wochovio Building. Suite 714. Fayetteville. North Carolina 26301·5043 Telephone 91~486-1541 FAX 91~86-0707 Arl Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5(11. recycled/ 10% post·consumer paper ., Site Requires Immediate Attention: Ye. s Facility No. ·z.~-2 G. s/.ov/J 6.4v~ b~~,.,/ DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT f,~/.c.J ~., s-.-~!;oNt<>. ANIMAL FEEDI.DT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: :r~\j 2.5 , 1995 Time: I tD ! '+-~ Farm NameJOwner:_-:::S;.::;a~"'::....;d;;...~::r-...:.P......:-a;;;.:v~""":::=;..JI;.....--=-/-~:I=o'-'~"':..~:N:~..~'~·c.c--....!=/£~vu.....,JJ=.S-~~------- Mailing Address :_c-=-·/,.::O____;n.....:":....;""'..:..:..._.....:~~· hl:::t....:e...:::::.._-.!..:~:L.r_z:::;,,....· -=e.~~A;.;___:;I..:z::.:o~~~A..rl:...:.=..:..c;!!J;y..:.."'.;.:;"~'l <-:.:......,,~· _N_c_· _z.__;;.i"...;;3;_t.::.1! ___ _ County : Sa,.,e$o,.} ·Integrator: ' Phone: _____________ _ On Site Representative: To • .., Cob/(.. C&ai:>h~ dtrNI ) Phone: /9/c) szs-3/kJS pr s~ z-8/5"8 Physical Address/Location: st< tZ.l#P ..f"ir(;tN< B~ Swt>-P Tr«v~l Sou~ Q¥M· _,.....,,;~ ~t'N I~ -l!f DN~ d ; r f. trd . 0::;; 1 Type of Opemion : Swine / Poultry_ Cattle------:---------- Design capacity: 1, '1-oc Number of Animals on Site: -~3;.-=.tJ...=.0_-...:.~...:::.....::0:::......_ ______ _ DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW ______ _ Latitude: 3~ o SS' ~o • Longitude: 7~ o 3Z • 3"1 • Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour stonn event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) @r No Actual Freeboard: 2 Ft. ~Inches Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)'! Yes or No Was any erosion observed'! Yes or No Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate'! Yes or No Crop(s) being utiliz.ed: _ _!o~~oa~:.!..!lo=!;J-:..._ ________________ --::::oo~------ Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellin~ eS r No 100 Feet from Wells? ~or No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or® Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or@ Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices'} Yes o@ If Yes, Please Explain . - Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure , land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)'! Yes or@ Additional Comments: A /t:Js5 p-1' l><u..~d Pc.r"-fi-1-<"~.s is b~;t) SeN-1-+o al/ Par~i<--3 i NVDitlui wi...;c::i-.. w ;tl r=<:.; I.A i r c... --'""e--± ON . ~ """">~C.J vJa.!ik MA.rJ'La Wt,Nf-r ) ~ -rv , Inspector arne Signature cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed .