Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820666_INSPECTIONS_20171231NORTH CAROLINA Qepartment of Environmental Quality Date of Visit:~~/@ Arrival Time:l ]}c?t> jf I Departure Time: I ?/!3tJ/t I County: S"'J1'PilJN Region:F{Zi? Farm Name: Jo \(, f\ f r f{o {k --f=t;-.,---1'7 Owner Email: Owner Name: :::::r Dh"( R Ho'(J e Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: (S c:urw \. JC Title: fl Certified Operator: .S~""{od ..:r; t{¢ 4-e I Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Disch a rges and Stream Impacts I. Is any d ischarge observed fro m any part of the operation? Latitude: Discharge originated at: 0 Stru cture 0 App lication Fie ld a. Was the conveyance man-mad e? 0 Other: b. Did th e d ischarge reach waters of the State? (If yes, noti fy DWR) c. What is th e estimated volume that reached waters of the State (ga llons)? Phone: Integrator: tfl/3 -S Certification Number: .....!.../ZL-JLf...J'f[....;r"L----- Certification Number: Longitude: D Yes~ DNA O NE D Yes 0 No ~O NE D Yes 0 No [3-1JA D NE d . Does the di sc harge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) D Yes 0No Elii"A ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of th e operation? 3. Were there any observab le adverse impacts or potential advers e impacts to the waters of the State other than from a disc harge? Page 1 of3 0 Yes 0 Yes ~0 D NA O N E [d'No D NA O N E 2/41201 5 Continued IFacili'l Number: B~ -loate oflnspection: tj-cvw~ ;51 Waste CoUection & Treatment 4.A's storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) Jess than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): ~ f 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~DNA ONE DYes 0No ~ONE StructureS Structure 6 DYes ~ DNA ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? II. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ~~DNA DYes~ DNA ONE ONE DYes [LJ.No 0 NA 0 NE DYes ~DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE 0 Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN 0 PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area r1{. ( ( c,/f= 12. Crop Type(s): c rs tLt F' 13. Soil Type(s): {A)a Jl/o 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components ofthe CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. 0WUP Ochecklists Onesign 0 Maps D Lease Agreements 21. Does record keeping need improvement? lfyes, check the appropriate box below. DYes ~0 DNA ONE 0 Yes ~0 DNA ONE 0 Yes ~ DNA ONE DYes ffNo DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE 0 Yes 5No DNA ONE 0 Yes ~No DNA ONE 00ther: 0 Yes [1J-1'Jo DNA ONE D Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers D Weather Code 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rainfall inspections D Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? D Yes []}No 0 NA 0 NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? DYes G;}1fo 0 NA 0 NE Pagelof3 214/2015 Continued I Facility Number: e:z -'b 6 I Date oflnspection: c9J1i/VE'/Bl 24 .. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes [l...Nt> 0 NA 0 NE 2':f. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check 0 Yes ~ 0 NA 0 NE the appropriate box(es) below. 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than n ormal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i .e ., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, c heck the appropriate box below. 0 Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA WMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? -6K5t Re viewer/Inspector Name : Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 o/3 QYes 0 Yes DYes DYes DYes 0 Yes 0 Yes DYes DYes ~DNA ONE ~DNA ONE @-NO DNA ONE ~ DNA ONE ~ DNA O NE []}No DNA ONE ~DNA ONE c:fNo DNA ONE ~ DNA ONE 11411015 Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: akoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date ofVisit: ranMiilflb I Arrival Time:VotJcv41 Departure Time:l/lllo dJ County: sl]--tAt Region: Fr'l...i> Farm Name: ::::\~ ~ \(._ll-'( ~ ~ ~iJ""4.1 Owner Email: Owner Name: 1.-( Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: ------------------------------------------- Facility Contact: Oa.(lt.4) M Title:-----------Phone: Onsite Representative: £{ Certified Operator:~ ...,_...,o.:.altc:.w~"'"¥+-+{<.....:.....-'f{,~.......:._,.(X~--------­ Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: 0 Structure D Application Field 0 Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Integrator: J'{ IJ -S Certification Number: 2JJ: <ff --~-~----- Certification Number: Longitude: DYes~ DNA ONE DYes 0No ~A ONE DYes 0No ffNA ONE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes DNo Q14A ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of3 DYes DYes ~0 DNA ONE ~0 DNA ONE 21412011 Continued I FacultY Number: ;[).; -b l £; I @te of Inspection: A 0 Nif t61 Waste Collection & Treatment 4 . Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? 0 Yes ~ DNA ONE Ef'NA ONE a . If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? DYes 0No Structure 1 Sttucture2 Stru cture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? DYes ~o DNA ONE (i.e., large trees, s evere erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a DYes ~o DNA ONE waste man agement or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public bealtb or environmental threat, notify D\VR 7. Do any of th e structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? DYes ~ DNA ONE DYes ~o DNA ONE DYes ffNo DNA ONE D Yes [1"No D NA D NE 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes i2t'No 0 NA 0 NE D Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN 0 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs . D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area 12.cropTypc(s): 8~~ SG,O 1'{~1/r::---ft- 13. Soil Type(s): 14 . Do th e receivi ng crops differ from those des ignated in theCA WMP? 15 . Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination ? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18 . Is there a Jack of properly operating waste application equi pment? Required Records & Documents 19 . Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readi ly available'! 20. Does the facility fail to ha ve all components of the CAWM P readil y available? If yes, check the appropriate b ox . OWUP 0Checklists 0Design 0 Map s 0 Lease Agreements 21. Does re cord keeping need improvement? If yes , check the appropriate box below. DYes (ZJ.-No DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE 0 Yes [Z{No DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE • DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE 00ther: DYes [31lo DNA ONE 0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Anal ysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield D 120 Minute In spections 0 Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? DYes 0 No DNA 0 NE 23. If selected, did th e faci lity fail to install and maintain rai nbreakers on irrigation equipment? DYes ~No DNA 0 NE Page2of3 21412014 Continued l~acmt;Number: &'):: -h b6 I I Date of Inspection: OI6Vif a . I 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? D Yes ~0 DNA ONE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check D Yes ~0 DNA ONE the appropriate box( es) below. 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels D Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? DYes ~0 D NA ONE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? DYes ~0 DNA ONE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document DYes E:{No DNA ONE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? DYes ~0 DNA ONE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the DYes [3'No DNA ONE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes Q"No DNA ONE D Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond D Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA WMP? D Yes [3'No DNA ONE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? DYes GrNo DNA ONE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? DYes [Lt'1'io DNA ONE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or aoy other commentS~'-'·:<::~~,;· Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). '··-,::;,,::;·.\, ··. -7-r-'r -l l-.:. Jo -1 s ( Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page3of3 o.,., ,!Yo~t1 V4/101 . oinpliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: ~outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: IGT?ApJ§ Arrival Time:I]JlSf I Departure Time:l~t2)b P I County: ~-/h Region~·j:;z:i) Farm Name: C) oh!M\1 &J'k: ~ Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: PhysicaiAddress: -------------------------~---------------------------------------------------------- Facility Contact: G..,-4:t•5 \?>o.A.. t-J~ Title: Phone: --------------------- Onsite Representative: __ 1...;..:..{ __________________________________ __ Certified Operator: .2r uh.I.\IA-1 JZ:#ope Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts LIs any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Other: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Integrator: _ ___J(11L!.J:""'(<..L ________ __ Certification Number: '2.3 53 '/ Certification Number: Longitude: DYes ~NA ONE DYes 0No ~A ONE DYes 0No B"J'il'A ONE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No ~A ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of th e State other than from a discharge ? Page I of3 DYes DYes ~0 DNA ONE E]No DNA ONE 21411011 Continued . ~J !Facility Number: . £46 I loate of Inspection:~ 7 &Jr-/SI Waste Collection & Treatment 4.ls storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure2 Structure3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): j {) 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-s ite which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~DNA 0 Yes 0 No [;}N"A Structure 5 Structure 6 ONE O NE DYes ~ DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE If any of questions ~ were answered yes, and tbe situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks , and/or wet stacks) 9. Doe s any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? DYes [31q'O 0 NA 0 NE QYes ~DNA ONE 0 Yes [3--NO 0 NA D NE 0 Yes [B-No 0 NA 0 NE II. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes g.Mo D NA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Hea vy Metals (Cu, Zn , etc.) 0 PAN 0 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total ~hosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evide nce of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): \, 1) ~ft_ g G b flt .dld 13 . Soil Type(s): 14 . Do the receiving crops differ from those de signa te d in theCA WMP ? 15 . Does the receiving crop and/or land application site nee d improvement? 16 . Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation d esign or wettab le acres determination? 17 . Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18 .1s there a lack of properl y operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have th e Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Doe s the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes , check the appropriate box. OWUP 0Checklists 0 Design 0 M a ps 0 Lease Agreements D Yes ~0 D NA D Yes ~0 D NA DYes ~ DNA DYes ~ DNA D Yes ~ DNA 0 Yes ~DNA D Yes 0 DNA Oother: ONE ONE O NE ONE ONE ONE ONE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, c hec k the appropriate box below . D Yes ~: DNA ONE 0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analys is 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code 0 Rainfall D Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections/ 0 Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rai n ga uge? D Yes d No 0 NA 0 NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbrcakcrs on irrigation equipment ? 0 Yes a(No 0 NA 0 NE Page 2 of3 214/201 I Continued !Facility Number: &'Js-b fifJ !Date of lnspection?J:? 24.'!>id the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. $~(1 I DYes DYes D Failure to complete annual sludge survey D Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels D Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? DYes 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? DYes Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document DYes and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? DYes If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the DYes permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below . DYes D Application Field D Lagoon/Storage Pond D Other: ------------------------ 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA WMP? DYes 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? DYes 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? DYes 0 r ·t-f.' ~DNA ~DNA ~0 DNA ~0 DNA [!fNo DNA ~0 DNA [Z{No DNA ~0 DNA r::(No DNA 12(~o DNA 0 No DNA ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ReviewerllnspectorName: ~\ ~ Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ....:.£--=.a.....s.l-:~-W:..~J-L--hf-·~~ ... AA~£.:...:~~L-------------------------­ Page3of3 Phone: lf33 ,._ 3.?J3 f {h~t "=! Date: d f-.=J 214. 014 mpliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: ~ne 0 Complaint 0 FoUow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I ~~!J 0 I Departure Time:l,/t fJ b I County: ~"r:"' Regio7{1!:v Farm Name: ~4 .,(.~ U"l?jd -f' '(P V'-£/\ Owner Email: Owner Name: ~ i "t ~ '!&(At_ Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: ==~=·V=~=i==~===~=~=L~-~-~=~=~=~=====-T-it-le-:-----~-----b-.---------P-b-on_e_: ________________ __ Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: 1{ ~JD Integrator: _..._f'VL~J.Q"""----------- Certified Operator: :::( 4.. ~" 1 f'L lkfR f Certlfi<ation N umberc J J5 f( £ Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? DYes ~DNA ONE Discharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Application F ie ld 0 Other: a . Was the conveyance man-made? DYes 0 No @-HA ONE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No ~ ONE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (ga llons)? ·d. Does the discharge bypass the was te management system? (If yes, noti fy DWQ) D Yes 0 No [J..W. ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation ? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of3 0 Yes 0 Yes ~0 DNA ONE ~0 DNA ONE 21412011 Continued lfacWtyNomber: 8'2: · 6({; I I Date of Jnspe<tio., It &t-Iff Waste Collection & Treatment ,. 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than ad!=quate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): .36 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures o bserved? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? D Yes [)..Wo-·0 NA 0 NE DYes 0No ~ ONE StructureS Structure 6 0 Yes ca No . DNA 0 NE DYes [3.No 0 NA 0 NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? DYes~ DNA ONE DYes~ DNA ONE DYes Q No DNA ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~0 NA D NE 0 Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN D PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludg e into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift f;Jfplication Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): (} f3 'P; . .v1l1 1/ ({? 13 . Soil Type(s): 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site n eed improvement? 16. Did the facility fai l to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wenable acres determination? 17 . Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land appli cation? 18 . Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19 . Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readil y available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily avai lable? If yes, check the appropriate box. Dchecklists DYes ~DNA DYes ~-DNA DYes ~ DNA DYes ~DNA DYes ~-0NA DYes ~DNA DYes [fj.Ko DNA ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE OwuP 0 Design 0 Maps D Lease Agreements O other : / 21. Does r ecord keepin g need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~o 0 NA 0 NE D Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code 0 Rainfall 0Stocking 0 C rop Yield 0120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and l " Rainfall Inspections/ D Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes [::l No 0 NA 0 NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irri gation equipment? 0 Y es ~o 0 NA 0 NE Page2of3 214/2011 Continued IFa<ili'I Nnmbe., t;r};,-CU1 I Date oflnseection' l ¥-H · 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? D Yes ~ 0 NA D NE •' 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. DYes £a.ble-D NA D NE 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey D Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels D Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus lo ss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28 . Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal ? 29 . At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the pennit? (i.e., discharge , freeboard problems, over-application) DYes DYes 0 Yes DYes DYes DYes 31. Do subsurface tile drains ex ist at the facility ? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Application Fieid 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond D Other: ------------------------ 32. Were any additional probl em s noted which cause non-compliance of the penn it or CA WM P? DYes 33. Did the Reviewer/In spector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? DYes 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? DYes ~DNA ~ DNA ~0 DNA {3No DNA (3-'No DNA (3-'N'o DNA [d1'fo DNA [3'No DNA c:rN~ DNA I)--}-!j( ·CJ-t/. f () -t-+, 0 Revi ewer/Inspector Name: Rev iewer/Inspector Signature: Page3 of3 214/2011 ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I /01~.41'\.l Departure Time:l/1!%:"A!'\ l County: c:£~~0(\. Region: ER.o Farm Name: __ ~_,~-...lloo"-"b....._n:..:..n-.3...-'1T--'rl.._..o""'p~t.......__akJ....:.A..:.::R""'rsL,;:~~--- ~bnn""\ ):\op ~ Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Pb)'S ical Address: ------------------------------------------- Title: Phone: Facility Contact: C., 1<3;s:r.::> :BM\.t.J:tc.\( ------------- Onsite Representative: ......;:o~-...:.~..:...:..l""-.....:...::f:..=---------------­ Certified Operator: -;rc>"'f\f'"/ R. \:\opE Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge orig inated at: 0 Structure 0 Appl icat ion Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Other: b . Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Integrator: flh 1R ph1 J3RQ «Ari2 Certification Number: d 3 5 g ¥ Certification Number: Longitude: D Yes ~o DNA ONE DYe s 0 No [9"NA ONE DYes 0 No (Q"NA ONE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notifY DWQ) DYe s 0No ~NA ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any pan of the oper ation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a di scharge? Page I of3 DYes 0 Yes ~0 DNA ONE ~0 DNA ONE 214/2011 Continued I Facility Number: I Date of Inspection: shl Jd... I I Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: #l Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): _ ..... [_;Cj'!.,__ __ Observed Freeboard (in): :} 9 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes u;(No DNA ONE 0 Yes 0 No (i]MA 0 NE Structure 5 Structure 6 DYes ~o DNA ONE DYes u;rNo DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 1 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? DYes ~o DYes ~o DNA ONE DNA ONE DYes ~o DNA ONE 0 Yes [g"No 0 NA 0 NE 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~o 0 NA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground D H eavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN 0 PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Approved Area 12 . Crop Type(s): Q,t.~t!'uO ~ ['StR~-z...~J / S. 6 . 0 \ \'(\-s\\<f...~ ~"\L .Swroro.t.Cl .... ~.\dttJ.t.(t ~«'-t"'-l") 13. Soil Type(s): -~~!..l.I:~...l:::!:~~------------------------.,..------- 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18 . Is there a lac k of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CA WMP readi ly available? If yes, check the appropriate box. 0WUP Ochecklists 0Design 0 Maps 0 Lease Agreements 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes No DNA ONE DYes gNo DNA ONE DYes g"No DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes 0No DNA ONE DYes [);{No DNA ONE 00ther: DYes li'No DNA ONE 0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis 0Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code D Rainfall 0Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthl y and 1" Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes r2{ No 0 NA 0 NE 23 .1fselected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes 0 No ~ NA 0 NE Page 1 of3 1/411011 Continued .. ... I Facility Number: lnate oflnspection: 5~;-,\l"r- 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. DYes B"No 0 NA 0 NE 0 Yes 0 No [g'NA 0 NE 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels D Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? DYes ~0 DNA ONE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? DYes 0No DNA ~E Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document DYes [S?'No DNA ONE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? DYes ~0 DNA ONE lfyes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the DYes ~0 DNA ONE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box. below. DYes ~0 DNA ONE D Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: ------------------------ 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? DYes BNo DNA ONE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 0 Yes gNo DNA ONE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? DYes IQ1' No DNA ONE Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: C\\D-":>o~-L«,s) Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ---=-~OL..f-:~ O~b>o<..\+-< \.:...J-__ _ Page 3 of3 2/412011 Reason for Visit: Date of Visit: DepartureTime:l/,~1 County:~ Region: Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: PhysicaiAddress: ------------------------------------~----------------------------------------------­ Facility Contact: Cuc-±ts ~a_,_ uc k Jitle: ~ ~ AA ~-Phone: Onsite Representative: ~~ Integrator: __ .!.f11~._-......~/S:.::=: _____________ _ Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Imoacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: D Structure 0 Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? D Other: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes , notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: DYes~ DNA ONE DYes 0No ~A ONE DYes 0No ~A ONE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No ~ ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of3 DYes 0 Yes ~0 DNA ONE ~ DNA ONE 2/4/ZOll Continued IFacility.Number: I Date oflnspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) Jess than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: =Itt Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion , seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~o DNA ONE DYes 0No ~ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 DYes ~ DNA ONE 0 Yes @-1fo DNA D NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? DYes ErNo DNA D NE DYes [B"No DNA D NE DYes [kt'No 0 NA D NE DYes ~o DNA ONE ll. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~ DNA D NE D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN 0 PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Approved Area t_~ L&b-ty) I SG-Q 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. owuP Dchecklists 0 Design D Maps D Lease Agreements 21. Does record keeping need improvement? lfyes, check the appropriate box below. DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes @'No DNA ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE Oother: DYes ~DNA ONE D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers D Weather Code 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking D Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections D Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Page 2of3 DYes ~~~ONE D Yes D No [B"T'JA D NE 2141101 I Continued ~acillly 'Nnmbero 8J" -~~ (jlat• of lnspecdon: 7/Jz/11 I 24. Dtd the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? D Yes B""No 0 NA 0 NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check 0 Yes ~ 0 NA 0 NE the appropriate box( es) below. D Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels D Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes ~ DNA ONE 0No DNA ~ ~ DNA ONE ~ DNA ONE ~0 DNA ONE ~0 DNA ONE D Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: -------------------- 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? DYes [3'No DNA ONE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site repre~entative? DYes [9"No DNA ONE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? DYes ~ DNA ONE Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: '7/tJ --f.33 -3337 Page3of3 Date ;Ez/J! 2 '/2011 2-tJ5-ZOIO Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Reason for Visit ~tine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access DateofVisit: 11-zS..;ID I ArrivaJTime:IJo;oo;;J DepartureTime: lto:m;J County: Region: FA!o Farm Name: "J';, h A/It/ 'I MA./L 4_,....""-~ Owner Email: ;r ~ ------------------------ Owner Name: --"'"""'-.-"""""D..:..h.;:....;..;:N'---__,_flr>~p~<--=------------------------Phone: Mailing Address: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Physical Address: ---------------------------------------------------------------_______ _ Facility Contact: C .. -1,5 8~,-wic..k:.. -,--/ ~ , ___:::....:.;_ .. _,., _________ Title: / <-cA-• 7 IZ,....._' PboneNo: _______________ _ Onsite Representative: Curtts. & rwic.k Integrator: _..:::6J::..::....::ha-=~r."""t...;~ C.=--....;f?.-=t:J.r=--"1.5-=---- Certified Operator:-------------------------------------Operator Certification Number: ----------- Back-up Operator: --------------------------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: O OD'D" Longitude: O OO'O" Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? DYes ~DNA ONE Discharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Application Field 0 Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? DYes DNo ~A ONE b. Did the discharge reach waters ofthe State? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes DNo ~ ONE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? I d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No ~A ONE 2. Is there evidence_ of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? DYes B'No DNA ONE DYes B"f(o' DNA ONE 12118/04 Continued '' 1-28 -/t7 Date of Inspection I I I Facility Number: B2-6";, I Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes ~DNA ONE DYes ~o DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ______ ----------------------------------- Spillway?: DesignedFreeboard(in): ________________________________________ _ Observed Freeboard (in): efW 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~o DNA ONE DYes ~o DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any ofthe structures need maintenance or improvement? DYes ~ DNA 0 NE 8. Do any ofthe stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? DYes ~ DNA D NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? DYes ~DNA -ONE Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers. setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes D Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ~DNA ~DNA 0 PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area ONE ONE 12. Crop type(s) -..!:~=...=~...;.'<-:.:d~4..-=--=~....::G::.::n...::; .. ..l.>~<-:.::::):......;.;--=S;:....:.:JU4---=._//_~.=......:.....:.'"...:.-p----!(l:....:o:....:.•_s.:..:, ):....>..j.1 -=S.:..:"':.=.."'.:...:...,.:...e...::;;v;..........~f~t ...::kl=..t:..;;'~-~_v_,:....,4~"#..:....:~-=-ua/...=C5=-- 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA WMP? DYes 0No DNA ONE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes 0No DNA ONE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination!D Yes 0No DNA ONE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: DYes DNo DNA DYes 0No DNA Phone: 'l10·1'33,33t::JO Date: /-28-;zi!J/0 ONE ONE 12/18104 Continued I Facility Number: gz -v6?1 Date of Inspection It-.28-10 I Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLA 1) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notifY the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Additional Comments and/or Drawings: DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DNA ONE DNA ONE ~0 DNA ONE ~ DNA ONE ~ DNA ONE ~ DNA ONE ~ DNA ONE DYes ~o DNA ONE ..... - -... 121281().1 3IH{S /0 -07 -zoo? ivision of Water Quality Facility Number8 2 ��� Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit (3160—mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit outme 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: �County:awa Region: � Farm Name: 1A n Ar u "L� pe_ fat�.S Owner Email: Owner Name: IT -0 1A 4 1+0 Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: cV-1�'t S -18orwyG k Title: e -r . /' Phone No: Onsite Representative: Cat�3 Bat-wl C.K Go Integrator: tx ,-j`c_ Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Back-up Certification Number: Latitude: =U =' =" Longitude: =o =, Design Current Design Current Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Non -La et in Feeder to Finish 3 Z -O 2S E3 ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Other ❑ Other Dry Poultry ❑ Layers ❑ Non -Layers ❑ Pullets ❑ Turkeys ❑ Turkey Poults ❑ Other Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? Cattle Design Current Capacity Population El Dairy Cow ❑ Dairy Calf ❑ Dairy Heifei ❑ Dry Cow ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Beef Stocker ❑ Beef Feeder ❑ Beef Brood Co Number of Structures: FTI b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes E o ❑ NA EINE ❑ Yes ❑ No ETRA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No 3'5A ❑ NE B A EINE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 2'1`o ❑ NA EINE ❑ Yes B<o ❑ NA EINE 12/28/04 Continued I Facility Number: ~Z -~1 Date oflnspection Pf-;6-0 $'1 ~Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stonn storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes ~DNA ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:--------------------------------------- Spillway?: --------------------------------------- DesignedFreeboard(in): ______________________________________ ....,.... Observed Freeboard (in): _ ___../f'----'2----------------------------------- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? DYes ~DNA ONE (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed DYes ~DNA ONE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental tbreat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the pennit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Apolication I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes 91fu DNA ONE DYes 81fo DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE DYes B1'fc> DNA ONE II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? lfyes, check the appropriate box below . 0 Yes GI-M'o DNA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground D Heav y Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN 0 PAN> 10% or 10 lbs 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area 12. Croptype(s) 'Bev-~~(GV~",c...) ) s~ Gra...'N (o.:s.) J sv. ..... a...~ 7 Vll'll/cy ,,.,NI«,/5 13. Soil type(s) -..!.~..!.:::;::...._ ________________________ ----::7""------ 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? DYes No DNA ONE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes ~DNA ONE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre detennination?O Yes Gifu' DNA ONE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? DYes [31(o DNA ONE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes ~ DNA ONE (;00 J/ Exct-lbvl-?~s.J .:.-----G~ c.c.v'--~ra6Yds / Pagel of 3 12/28/04 Continued I Facility Number: g"Z. -~~~~ Date of Inspection 19 -lb ;:&] Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps D Other DYes ~DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~ 0 NA 0 NE 0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Annual Certification 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 24 . Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fai l to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28 . Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP ? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative inun ediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32 . Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Additional Comments and/or ~rawings: D Yes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes D Yes DYes DYes D Yes 12128104 (d1qO DNA ONE Etffo DNA ONE B"fifo DNA ONE !a-No DNA ONE 81fo DNA ONE (31qO DNA ONE l3'NO D NA ONE B1ilO DNA O NE ~DNA O NE ~0 DNA ONE ~DNA ONE ~DNA ONE .... 1-. f-... Type of Visit ~pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit ()-ROutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other D Denied Access Date of Visit: 16-J/-0 B I Arrival Timed ~:'V{"4&t I Departure Time: lb:"',t?M I Couoty: Region: E/2-l:) Farm Name: ::ro ltNt-!1.1 tlof -L Fa YW\. Owner Email: ------------- Owner Name: To~ ,.s/Vi ilo,.P-L Phone: Mailing Address: ----------------------------------------- Physical Address:----------------------------------------- Facility Contact: Cud.·s Bo.rw,.c..K. Title:/~. S:~~<-• ' Phone No: ________ _ Onsite Representative: ------------------Integrator:----------------- Certified Operator:--------------------Operator Certification Number: -------- Back-up Operator: ---------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD'D " Longitude: Discharges & Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? DYes B"'No DNA ONE Discharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Application Field 0 Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part ofthe operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 DYes 0 No ~A ONE DYes 0No ~A ONE I DYes 0 No B"NA ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE DYes Ghfo DNA ONE 11128104 Continued I Facility Number: ~Z.-r;b/p I Date of Inspection 18 -II-o6 I Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes B"fifo DNA ONE DYes Q1qO DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:---------------------------------------- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): -----:7---------------·--------------------LLJ II Observed Freeboard (in): __ _,~e...L---------------------------------------- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes C3"1'fo DNA D NE D Yes Et"1'lo DNA 0 NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 Yes ffio 0 NA 0 NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part ofthe waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0 . Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? 0 Yes [31\lo 0 NA ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~ 0 NA D NE 0 Excessive Ponding D Hydraul ic Overload 0 Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN D PAN > I 0% or 10 lbs D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area , 12. Crop type( s) _....;B~c.;_r..:...."Pt...:..~.;..:d.::....:•:..;::-:.......!..~..=c;.::....:~ ~:...::"'~L--~;-----~...:..::...;:::..._::...::.....:....::.....:..::.....---:::::S::...:'<:.... ...... _-.:...-_"'.:....;· v:..........::-'---......;;..tJ~/_,w_~--=--...:;//...:.::N~;.:::;:;..L.;::=---- 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops diller from tho se designated in the CA WMP? DYes 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes 16 . Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?O Yes 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Pagel of 3 DYes DYes Date: 12/28104 0No DNA ONE 0No DNA ONE 0No DNA ONE 0No DNA ONE 0No DNA ONE Continued • J Facility Number: <l'Z -p~~~ Dateoflnspectioo [8'-11-0B I Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate ofCoverage & Pennit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. D WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps 0 Other 0 Yes B"No 0 NA 0 NE DYes ~ DNA O NE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes B'1'fo DNA D NE D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers D Annual Certification 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and I" Rain In spections 0 Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pennit? 25. Did the facility fai l to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the fa c ility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28 . Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal ? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately . 31 . Did the facility fail to notifY the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ~ • • .. . . ~ . . • . . ....... --.;,· ·-,......... ,.=.! . Ad dltionai:Comments audlor:l)r~wmgs: ~· 41~·';;;,~~;~: ".._~-;.. · · Page3 of 3 DYes ErNo DNA O NE DYes ~ DNA O NE D Yes GJ1qO DNA O NE DYes eNo DNA O NE DYes ~ DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE D Yes ~DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE D Yes ~DNA ONE D Yes [3-No". DNA ONE D Yes ~DNA ONE DYes ~DNA O NE .... -.. ... .. ,.. . ~ -~ .. -:""-~:z 12128104 . I Facility Number [ <12._ If 8 Division of Water Quality / H (p~(p 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ---'. , .. 0 Other Agency . ~: •·':' Type of Visit 8 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other D Denied Access Date of Visit: !flt,,of-ozl ArrivaiTime:l 1": f r 11M I Departure Time: 110;15"" I County: ~'1"~A/ Region: ~M Owner Email: -------------Farm Name: _..;:o::Jj""""o~br.:!Of...,;;_~""t--fh:....:....::.-Ff.....;~=-__._tg....::~o..~tuty\CQ,S"~-----­ Owner Name: _.....;;_)"--o.._h.;;..;...s=-._...:.Hop~~.g_-<.,___ ------------Phone: Mailing Address: ---------------------------------------- Phys ical Address:---------------------------------------- Facility Contact: C\Aeb·s & vw tc. 1<. Title: E.tJv. ~t:. Phone No: --------- Onsite Represen tati ve: G vh ~:s B((., ....JI-L. k. Integ rato r : Co~ Y.f L ~ n.-r S Certified Operator:--------------------Operato r Certification Number: ------- BackAup Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm : Latitude: D OD 'D" Longi tude: D OD 'D" Des ign Current Design Current Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population r.::ID::::;-W-e_a_n-to-Fi-n-ish-,1 ........::__......:......,.....--....;;_ _ ___,1,0 Layer I ~[]~N~o~n~-~La~y~e~r--~----~~----~ Cattle . -.-;{C. · i>esigft . . . Curren·~ - Capacity (»opulatioo 0 Wean to Feeder [! Feeder to Finish 352-0 3'2"/0 i -~. ~·~--~ D Dairy Cow i I 0 Dairy Calf I 0 Dairy Heife1 ' Other 0 Layers 0 Non-Layers 0 Pull ets I 0 Turke}'S 0 Turkey Poults Oother Number of Structures: .~Farrow to Wean 0 Farrow to Feeder 0 Farrow to Finish : 0 Gilt s D Boars --. -.. - Dry Poultry D Dry Cow ! ' D Non-Dairy I 0 Beef Stocker D BeefFeeder 0 Beef Brood Cow I --~--. -----. = ID other - Discharges & Stream Impact s l. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? D Yes ~No DNA O NE Di sc harge originated at: 0 Structure 0 App lication Fi e ld 0 Other a. Was th e conveyance man-made? DYes ~N o DNA O NE b. Did the d ischarge reach waters of the State? (lfycs, notify DWQ) DYes ~No D NA ONE c. What is the estimated vo lume th at rea ched waters of the State (gallons)? d. Doe s di sc harge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past di scharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impa cts to the Waters of the State oth er than from a di scharge? DYes [jJ No DYes ~No D Yes li!J No 12118104 DNA O NE DNA O NE D NA ONE Continued I Facility Number: $2 -~{7"' Date of Inspection w-~1-07 I Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stonn storage plus heavy rainfall) Je ss than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 D Yes [}J No D NA 0 NE DYes MNo DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:------------------------------------------ Spillway?: ------------------------------------------ Designed Freeboard (in): ------------------------------------------L1.9" Observed Freeboard (in): ---7:-.,__-L---------------------------------- 5 . Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/large trees , severe erosion, seepage, etc.) DYes 9iNo DNA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed DYes Ji!No DNA ONE through a waste management or closure plan? Jf any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improve ment? DYes ~No 0 NA 0 NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the wa ste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application l 0 . Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes I!JNo DNA ONE I I. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes ~No DNA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydrauli c Overload D Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN D PAN > 10% or 10 lbs 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptab le Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Area 1 2 . Crop type(s) _B~~L,~.I:::.Aiuii.:LSch~ci<~~~-=(;~._ ... ~)~~~)__,_1 --=.5";:..:M.:.::y/:u..... _· G-=-...-~...:.'..;..• "'-..:..~.=.D...:.::·.S::.:·:..:::)~,y--:.w~A-~,,--=S:::....;...;A~----- 1 3. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP ? DYes ~No DNA ONE 15 . Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement ? DYes l!fNo DNA ONE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation desib'" or wettable acre determination?D Yes (BNo DNA ONE 17 . noes the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18 . Is th ere a lack of properly operating waste application equipment ? DYes @No DNA ONE DYes QNo DNA ONE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): .... - f--.... Reviewer/Inspector Name f<c.t... K<2-v~& Phone: vo. ~.}.3 .3~00 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Kd. /S,b...J Date: /0-0/-zoo 7 11128104 . Continued I Facility Number: <i'Z -ebkl Required Records & Documents Date of Inspection 1/o-Q/-071 19 . Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Pennit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps D Other DYes 11JNo DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes lXJ No D NA 0 NE 0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Annual Certification 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking D Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rain Inspections D Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23 . If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25 . Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33 . Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Additional Comments and/or Drawings: D Yes ~No DNA O NE DYes til No DNA O NE DYes 9iNo D NA O NE D Yes JiJNo DNA ONE D Yes Ji2l No DNA ONE DYes JmNo DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes [j3No DNA ONE DYes Ill No DNA ONE DYes jliNo DNA ONE DYes Ill No DNA ONE DYes [it No DNA ONE • - 1--.... 12/18104 f~l i I Curtis Barwick From: Keith Larick [keith.larick@ncmail.net) Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 9:08AM To: Curtis Barwick Subject: Re: Sludge Survey Exemptions Curtis, I have added the due date of the next sludge s urvey to the spreadsheet. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Keith Curtis Bar:wick wrote: Thank you Keith. I look forward to hearing from you. CURTIS -----Original Message----- From: Keith Larick (mailto:keith.larick@ncmail.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 20 05 5 :35 PM To: Curtis Barwick Subject: Re: Sludge Survey Exemptions Curtis , I got the mailing, and should get to it soon . Keith Cui:cis Barwick wrote: ., /1 {) /') (\(\(';. Keith, Please see the attached list of farms that I am aski ng for exemptions from the annual sludge s urvey . I am sending via USPS the information sheet s fo r each individual farm. I am emailing th is list so that you can reply back after you have finished, with the due date f o r t he next survey (i f granted an extension). This should save you having to send a letter to me about it. Hopefully this will make it easier fo r you . I look forward to hearing from you . Thanks, CURTIS . &\GOON 1 & 3 A G OON #2 O r ~!" •• SLUDGE SURVEY EXEMPTION LIST CURTIS BAR'{VICK 910 590-6314 County# Facility# Farm Name First Name · Last Name County Next Survey Due 26 51 51 51 59 David Collier Farm 28 J & M Hog Farm 41 Spring Meadow Farm Unit 1 46 Sandy Ridge Pork David J & M Hog Farm Whitley Whitley Collier Stephenson Stephenson Cumberland Finish Johnston Johnston Johnston Finish Sow Sow 82 . 42 John 0 Royal: #1-8 JohQ Royal 1 Sampson Finish 82 53 F & W Farms I B - T Farm F & W Farms i Sampson Finish 82 74 Linoard Howard & Son (New Farrr Linoard Howard Sampson Finish 82 98 F&B Farms Harold Frederick & Freddl Butler Sampson Finish 82 132 Sam Hope Farms Samuel J. Hope . Sampson F i nish 82 188 F&W Farms James Faircloth Sampson Finish 82 190 Billy Lockamy Farm Billy Lockamy Sampson Finish 82 202 Simmons Hog Farm Ray Simmons Sampson Finish 82 215 T& T Farms Frederick Thornton Sampson Finish 82 606 Goshen Farms · W. Nelson · Waters Jr i Sampson Finish .;a2~\;·i.·:~J,;~J~sss1Joti.rinY.Tffop.J:fF.~rrilsX~L;~:~):;'/,:0.~i ~:u~.9!1Jt~!.?;;<:::·~·;~)':?d~~~~~:t{ttoP.e;~~:,;~~,~~~·:-·.t ;L·:::::::-';.·:tsiirif)s.on?.-.:Zl F.!!l'~-!v;,~_,_;., .. ·.::;~ .-. ·:., ..... . 82 667 Hall Farm · Coharle Hog Farm Sampson Finish 82 725 C-7 Coharie H'og Farm Sampson Finish 82 61 Knotty Pine Farm Mike Herring Sampson Finish 82 · 315 Bobcat Farms Henry Moore Sampson Sow 82 711 Henry Moore Finisher/Bad Branch Henry Moore Sampson Finish 82 714 SHW Sow Farm LLC SHW Sow Farm LLC Sampson Sow 96 28 Bennie Barwick Finishing Bennie ·Barwick i Wayne Finish •I I ! . 200' 200' 20 0 i 200~ 200' 200' 2 00. 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 ..200 20 0 200 200 200 20C 2 0C 20( Type of Visit G Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Revi ew 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access DateofVisit: IS-b3-a6l ArrimiTimc:Vo:~o AM locparturcTimc: ._l ___ __.l County: -~~S'"N Region: /=.i!!IO FarmName: --~R.. Hop<b Owner Email: -------------- Owner Name: :lck..,,.,:J ~-~------Phone: Mailing Address: ----------------------------------------- Physical Address:----------------------------------------- Facility Contact: _....;::3"":......::o:...;~~N~rv~1-.:.f4=.,p~ ... L----Title: ----------Pbone No: --------- Onsite Rcpresentati\'e: ~6~4~~'-';.J.......,J~-s.."'-LK""------- Certified Operator:-------------------- Integrator: ___ C_o~L......;;.a;;....:v'-''•-'...;:."---------- Operator Certification Number: -------- Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD'D" Longitude: D OD'D" Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population I I 10 Layer I I 0 Dairy Cow 0 Dairy Calf IO Wean to Finish 0 Wean to Feeder 0 Non-Layer ri Feeder to Finish 35'2-o ~5517 0 Dairy Heife1 0 Dry Cow 0 Non-Dairy 0 Beef Stockel 0 Beef Feeder · 0 Beef Brood Cow .. . -- 0 Farrow to Wean 0 Farrow to Feeder 0 Farrow to Finish 0Gilts 0 Bo ars Dry Poultry 0 Layers 0 Non-La ye rs 0 Pullets 0 Turkeys Other 0 Turkey Poults 0 Other Number of Structures: 0: ID Other Discharges & Stream Impacts I . Is any disch arge observed from any part of the operation? DYes ~No DNA ONE Di scharge orig inated at: D Structure 0 Appli cation Field 0 Other a . Was the conveyance man-made? DYes ~No DNA ONE b . Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes . notifY 0\VQ) DYes !)No D NA ONE c . What is the estimated volume th at rea ch ed waters of the Stale (gallons)? I d. Docs discharge bypass the waste management system'! (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there e\'idencc of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? D Yes [)JNo DYes QrNo DYes l!i'No 11128104 DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE Contitrued I Facility Number: i'Z-(p(p(p I Date of Inspection l5"-o3-o~l Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? D Yes [11 No D NA D NE DYes ~No DNA ONE s.Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:----------------------'------------------- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): _ ...... ··'~"-·-.<..._1~·9L..-_11 __ ,, Observed Freeboard (in): -----:._!!1-Z:.·..:..'l ___ ----------------------------------- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) DYes [JNo DNA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed DYes [!No DNA ONE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? DYes [!No DNA ONE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) DYes Q!:1 No DNA ONE 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? DYes ~No DNA ONE Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes ~No DNA ONE 1 L Is there evidence of incorrect application? lfyes, check the appropriate box below. DYes Qg No DNA D NE 0 Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN 0 PAN> 10% or 10 lbs 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area /) . ~·'e'S~c.d) . 12. Croptype(s) C>eYMudes.. C4Va:)ed 511ia.l/(;.cq:A/ Bcr&u.c4.. hay 7 /' 13. Soiltyp<(s) A,.~,·i/1.._ 1 44 •:; Jtla''"'J"' 14. Do the receiving crops di er from those destgnated m the CA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes ~No DYes QfNo 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination! D Yes ~No 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 0 Yes fSi)No DYes O'No 11128104 DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE I Facility Number: 'K Z. -{,fp &I Date of Inspection LS" ~c3-aw I Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. 0 WUP D Checklists D Design 0 Maps D Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes rgNo DNA ONE DYes (5iNo DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers D Annual Certification D Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certitication? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notifY the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? DYes [2gNo DNA ONE DYes IE No DNA ONE DYes QfNo DNA ONE DYes f;j1No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes IXJNo DNA ONE DYes (ENo DNA ONE DYes IXJNo DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE 12128104 Type of Visit e Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access DateofVisit: I ~/II Jt>~ I Arrival Time: I ;: .3C> I Departure Time: ._l ___ _.l County: SeM(U.PtJ Region: Fre..P Farm Name: ---l~~.ab~\-..::!..: .... ~-_.~.11~-.........~\..\~:..:....:•~r~<---------Owner £mail: -------------- owner Name: __ __,D:......._,.,"-!~~~'0~"'~~~---_ ___;J\=\~c.z..:ff"-''oC:........_______ Phone: ~ JO -S'1' ~ -S374 Mailing Address: __ ....:7:-..:..9-=.1=--.....!6.=-..z'"-'z..~i"""c:.~.:.../<.~£~------_ _JoC"""'·..Lt~/P~-1-..:.~.:...""':.,~· ~N..:........:C...=-----:;J 8~~S Physical Address:------------------------------------------ Facility Contact: Phone No: --------- Onsite Representative: _L4,..+,·.J. /ler u1i e../c Integrator: __ lo.C~&>~A~~l.!r:.J;...!c:......._ ________ _ Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: -~j_i:...i=--=(/~if.:...._ __ Back-up Operator: ---'-:r...L&."l..b.!:l.,;h~-R~ _ _.l._-\.=...;o~f'::....-<-=------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D Oo·ou Longitude: D OD'D" Design Current Design Current Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Popul~tion I I li 10 Layer I _I_. ~D~N~on~-~L~a~r~~~--~-~----~·~~~~- Cattle Swine Number of Structures: .• Il.esigo '§~r:t~?~(:i;~\; .· ci:lpa'city Pop Illation , D Wean to F ceder ' ! Ill Feeder to Finish 3s-.2o ,)1Jl/ ) D Farrow to Wean ' D Farrow to Feeder ' I D Farrow to Finish i D Gilts i D Boars I I -----.~ ----.. - ' D Dairy Cow ~ D Dairy Calf " D Dairy Heife1 I. D Dry Cow I; D Non-Dairy !. 0 Beef Stocker ~ D BeefFeeder ' I D Beef Brood Cow t - ID Wean to Finish Dry Poultry Other · D Layers : ! D Non-Layers i D Pullets ' ; D Turkeys I I 0 Turkey Poults ' D Other ------ : f >-.. _. . ·-.. .-:_~:·_' __ ~ .. : [Ll Discharges & Stream Impacts l. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? DYes [)No DNA ONE Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field D Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? DYes 0No DNA ONE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No DNA ONE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No DNA ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? DYes J!INo DNA ONE 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State DYes [fiNo DNA ONE other than from a discharge? ' 12128/04 Continued \:. J Facility Number: S OJ -(,(. (, I Date oflnspection 13/n /o.:.-1 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes rnNo DNA D NE DYes 0No DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: __ ___,..&/_"'"' __ --------------------------------- Spillway?: DesignedFreeboard(in): _.....:;;t)_o_.~....:.._·-_· ----------------------------------- Observed Freeboard (in): _ ___;3=-:C.:....N-------------------------------- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any ofthe structures observed? (ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) DYes !llNo DNA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed DYes ~No DNA ONE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits , dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application · 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks , or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? Iii Yes D No DNA D NE DYes &!No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes OC1No DNA ONE II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below. DYes ~No 0 NA D NE D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Area. 12. Crop type( s) _ ___.../h;.c:J;t'~r:.t.C?:!:Z...!~:Uo:!::.s.......J~>pr:.:::auc."-!s::~c(~.......!$L.i1"'L:!.Ileu/CJ.f~1u,.::J"3...L.o; NC~L;. ~.......c.lf.::z.!~-.r~m!:!Uw:l.~soCZ...........t.h'..La~f~:J~O.L....SL.z.J~wlo!....oiA;....:_ _____ _ 13. Soil type(s) /?u/,.y vjii<J Lna.-?'YNJ 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes li] No DYes [!lNo 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination! D Yes 11] No 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 7-B<:H·c:... !>pd"\-.5 0~ \a. ... ye. 0 Yes [l:itNo DYes ~No DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE s+a...--\.·,~. s 0 ;..-a c!:.. CA. c:..~·.c--~ ~ .. \,A..C.oSl, ~-\c. L r l a. c.~ +Cl a..~~r ~:s -\-L ·,.s prob\~~. Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 12128104 Continued .\ J Facility Number: f.l -tltJ Date of Inspection I 3/IJ z~....s-1 Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. D WUP D Checklists D Design D Maps D Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes , check the appropriate box below. DYes !XlNo DNA ONE D Yes li] No D NA D NE lXI Yes 0No DNA ONE D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers D Annual Certification D Rainfall D Stocking D Crop Yield 00 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections D Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality co ncern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergenc y situations as req uired by General Permit'? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33 . Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ~&ifti&lii:~~mmeots ancU6i-~ri~ilwin s: ...,_,. ~''-'•· --t ._ .. r ·,.~---·C •"·· ,. • · .-• .,.-,. __ ,__,, tt_. ~,.._.., .'.'.•. _g _._,• PI~<L~c.. 6~1'"" .. Y\S p c..:: . .A-',o ~ ~. +o . \ ' Y""'-Lo ....... ·,~o'C, ""'"' Cl.c DYes IK]No DNA ONE DYes DNo DNA ~NE DYes lJ]No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes li)No DNA ONE DYes 0No DNA ONE [8J Yes DNo DNA ONE DYes 00No DNA ONE DYes lXI No DNA ONE DYes [itl No DNA ONE DYes li]No DNA ONE DYes llJNo DNA ONE ~-,. .. ~ . ... . ~ ' ' . 12128/04 'nmnli"'n,.. ... Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit ~outine .0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other D Denied Access I Date or Visit: I S/211 JD(Oil Tune: I , : () 0 Facility Number I l!:Z H /p&,' a.....--------------------.J IO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold l:ilt'Pennitted li:I'Certified C Conditionally Certified [] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: --·---· Farm Name: -······-·----~~~---····-·-···f?.: ............ __ &f.f....................................... County: ...... S..~!!!·------·--·--·-··-·-·--·-·--· :;: NA:.:.~---~~-o-· -:)}~;-------·-· ~r No' __ _2J~--_f~1L ____ ~~-·- • g ... --·-·---............. '.l.f.. __ .. ___ ... -----·-·--·-----... ..!.!.J.J.~ ...... ____ !!l_ ________ :----2l:3 ___ .. Facility Contact: ..... _"J;.h.7 ...... M.fL, ......... ---·-·--Title: ....... ~ ................ _ ................ ___ Phone No: ----------.. ·-----.. .. Onsite Representative: .. ------1~-----.......M.f-'..-----·-·-·----.. Integrator: ---~..i!l..-~-------- Certified Operator: ................... ~~1.. ........... __ 1/:!!f.tt ......... __________ ................. Operator Certification Number: Location of Farm: ffs'wine D Poultry D Cattle D Horse Latitude '---...JI• L..l ----~1· ~-.I _ __.I" Longitude , ~:~~&~~i J I~-_ ........... _ ... II Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at 0 Lagoon D Spray Field D Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? D Spillway Structure 1 Srructure2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: DYes ~o DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 Structure 6 Freeboard (inches): --.::.~_j.L..J,L.:Ir~Jd.s.~~a;~~ ----------------------------------- 12112103 Continued jFacitity Number: f;1. -"' I Date of Inspection l SJJ.I.Il64, 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancefunprovement? II. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Excessive Ponding D PAN 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Copper and/or Zinc 12. Crop type 13. tlesignated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? c) 'This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Odor Issues 17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. -C.o<+l .. -.c. .f.., ,..._L~~I. (},vrr -/~ 1-.ls :~ J.v. ~'k. ~ Sf"'1 ~./J s /..,It ~'t ' ('....t;. t-. '1"' r~J d. ..... 12112103 Date: DYes l:!rNo DYes i!1'No DYes [B"No DYes [!(No DYes ~0 DYes l!fNo DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~No DYes l!if'No DYes ~o·· DYes ~0 DYes [ii'No DYes ~0 Continued I Facility Number: ~A -(,U, I Date of Inspection I Shl# p'fl Required Records & Document.-; 21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [3"\v aste Application 8 Freeboard E1 Waste Analysis [J;Soil Sampling 24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP? l\TPDES Permitted Facilities 30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) 31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? 34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? 35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes , check the appropriate box below. -- D Stocking Form 0 Crop Yield Form D Rainfall D Inspection After 1" Rain D 120 Minute Inspections D Annual Certification Form DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes ~es DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes I II" No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. Yon will receive no further correspondence about this visit. l,:~ /e~rA "'de L-f ~" ~ ~" l-ei-all Ju4;( erf'tJ -fl,. -1-w"> tJr.&.J ~ II /t.,ls ;., &ul6tt. ~-t~~ /-.JC ~""t.. • i ~LI~. 12112/03 UfNo [91Cfo B'No BNo ~0 ~0 ~0 ~0 [Q'iQo DNo (!(No MNo I!(No llmo ~0 1---• , Site Requires Immediate Attention:_& Facility No. ----- DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: "0\ 'I ~0, 1995 Time: lb ', I 0 Farm Name/Owner:_.....,):::::.Jo,oooo..;h_,__n--::--n-'-'1+----'-\-\~p..,r"'--=='e~--J...E~c.w.r...;rh~...>~·-..,----~------ Mailing Address: (2..-\ . LJ ~ o .1 ch 0 ~ C I ~n +-a A • /V · (, -~ cf 3 ~ J: I County: :> c: cr f2 )d 0 · Integrator: c 0 h Ct:: I e Phone: c; I 0 On Site Representative: C v r-:b € r3c. c vv ;c. A. Phone: _____________ _ PhysicaJ Address/Location:_---.,·S'.~-·_,eo............::e.=--._.!A/l~~s+.e~--....._ _____________ _ Type of Operation: Swine 7 Poultry__ Cattle---------------- Design Capacity: ------Number of Animals on Site: -------------- DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW ______ _ Latitude: __ 0 _' _. Longitude:_ 0 _._. Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon ~sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year .24 hour storm (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) C!J;jor No Actual Freeboard: '7 Ft. _lz_Inches Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or@was any erosion observed? Yes or No Is adequate land available fo~ spray? es or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Crop(s) being utilized: C o r--~ .J Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings'? r No 100 Feet from Wells?@ or No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or@ Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or® Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices'? ~or@ If Yes, Please Explain. ·· Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)'? ~or No event Additional Comments: ____________________________ _ Signatu~ ~ cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed. I -• I Site Requires Immediate Attention: ~ Facility No. ----- DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: .r~ ~o, 1995 f~ Time: /016 .-JI-8StJ p .. ,. •:~ Farm Narne/Owner: ____ :JO~h:.LJk~~"'~'l/~-r~TM-~:..------------------Mailing Address: _______ 1 ___ l ___________________ _ County: ___ ~~~----------------------------------lntegrator: ________________ Phone: ______________ _ On Site Representative: Phone: _____________ _ Physical Address/Location:, __________________________ _ Type of Operation : Swine =..7"' Poultry_ Cattle------------------ Design Capacity : ------Number of Animals on Site: -------------- OEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW ______ _ Latitude:_ o _. _· • Longitude :_ o _._ • Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon h~-sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) ~or No ~ Freeboard: 7 Ft. ~Inches Was any seepage observed from the 1 (s)? Yes o~as any erosion observed? Yes or No Is adequate land available for spray? Y ~ or o Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Crop(s) being utilized:: ___ ~~~I'-......1!~~~---------+=~----:---- Does the facility meet SCS minimum· setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellin~, or No · 100 Feet from Wells'? ~r No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue . Line Stream? Yes or@ Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Lme : Yes or@ Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? ®or No If Yes, Please Explain . Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? @or No Additional Comments: ____________________________ _ Signature c/ cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed. ...... -~ ... .. ~ '"'-· .... - =r.:~~ .. l'~-•• r•tU%2l th• camp~•tecl ~oz:a to th• Diviaioa. ot Jtnvi.ro::maa.eal H&a.a~-=-a.e &t: th• a~ ... OD ~ r•ver•• aic!e of th.i• tor.zl. Name of farm (Please print) =-~JP~.:;b.~.,ar;l.l:ll!i.j"'--LJI/$wtJ..,_-~....Jfi~:..C?:;l:I...:~~--------------- Add:ess: Lt. ~ &>< jlaJ r • ci>#., j/c_ .;?f 3:)..QI Phone No. : frtt? .;f¢-tj i if ---------------------------C~unt:y: 5"'-e~,,.. Fa.r.:J location: Latitude and Longitude:~.~~ !...:3.'f£0_ (re<;UiredJ . Also , please accach a copy of a county read map with locacion identified. 'I'y;Je of operation (swine, layer. da.iry, etc.) :~~--"<l.J::,.t~'r..:."'::...:.( ____________ _ Desi~ ca~acity (number of anima1s): ________ ~2~~~~~o ________ ~------------------- Avera~e size of operation· (12 month population avg.) =--~J~)L'~~~O'----~~~-----­ Avera\;'e acreage needed for land application of waste (a-::res) s_-.~~::...:.1.:.~·5'~------ ~·c~ical Specialiat Certification As a tech.''lical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil a.'"ld Water Conse~;ation Commission pursuant to lSA NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or expanded animal waste management system as installed for the fa~ named above has a.'"l animal waste management plan that meets the desi~n. cons~ruction. operation and IDaintena.'"l.ce standards and specifications of the Division of ~~vironmental Management and the USDA-Soil Conserration Serrice ar.c/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conser;ation Commission pursuant to lSA NCAC 2H.0217 and lSA NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following e~ements and their corresponding minimum criteria-~re been_verified by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as applicable : minimum separations (buffers); liners or equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access or ownership of proper waste application equipment: schedule for timing of applications·: application rates; loadinq rates; and the cont=ol of the discharge of pollutants from stor.cwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. Af=iliation: ____ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~------------------~~=-~~~~~~~ Address (Ac;e.'"l.C"£ l : o · l:J Phone No •=.J..&.loL_!-1-..._--"'.....,j~.....,. :::n:..:~r.e~. -~~ -~ -~---•••••• ...... ~:;:: .. ;{~ t/:?uJt::::: .•. owner/~ager Agrecmaa.t I (we) understand ·the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste manage.'llent plan for the fa.r.n named above and will implei:lent these ~rocedures. I (we) know that any additional exparision to the existing design capacity of the waste treat:Inent and storage sys~em or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Mal'1agement before the new an i mals are stocked. I (we) also ~•derstand that there ~st be no dischar\;'e of anL'nal waste from this system to surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through runof= from a sto~ event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed at the fa_~ and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conse~Jation District . Nam. of Land OW::J.er (Please Print) =-~du4c;.'.e.ht._.ja~--:...11~---"'"h:...L.~-",..4~~;..._-----------------­> Date : 3 ·-2 ?'-?9= H-=-ot H&a.agar, if different from owner (Please print): ________________________ _ signa t:ure: Date:----------:-:-~-~­ ~: A c~ange in land ownership requires notification or a new certification (if t~e approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of Enviro~~ental Management within 60 days of a title transfer. D~ USE ONLY:A~~~~------------------ /0 l oeparlnient ·arEnVira.nment. Heotth end Naturol Resources Division of Environmental Management James B. Hunt, Jr .• Govemor Jonathon B. Howes. Secretory A. Preston Howard. Jr .. P.E .• Director CSRT+F!CATION FOR ~~ OR EXPANPED ANIMAL PEEDLOTS INSTRUCTIONS FOR CE:RTIFIO.TION OF ;..PPROVED ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR NE'"..l OR E:XP.~E.O ANIMAL WASTE M.AN;\G~l7 S"!STEMS SERVING P'-EDLOTS In order to be deemed permitted by the Divisi~n of Envirornental Mana~ement (DEM). t:he owner of any new or expanded ·anil:la.l was:e management. system const:ruc:ed after January l. 1994 which is designed to serve greater than or equal to ~he animal populations listed below is required to submit a signed certification for:n to DEl-! betgrp the nEN animals are stocked on the farm. Pasture operations are exempt from the requirement to be cert:ified. 100 head o~ catt~• 75 hcr•- 250 awiAe 1,ooo meep 30,000 birda with a l.~qu~d waste .yatem The certification arust be siqned by the owner. of the feedlot (and manager if different from the owner) and. by any technical specialist designated by the Soil anci Water Conservation Commission pursuant to lSA NCAC 6F • 000 l-. OOOS. A technical specialist must verify by an on-site inspection that all applicable d.esiqn and construction standards and. specifications are met as installed and ~t all applicable operation and. maintenance standards and specifications can be met. · · , · · ..... 1 Althouqh the actual.n~~r of animals at the. facility may vary from time to time, the d.esign capacity of·. the waste han.d.linq system should be used to determine if a farm is subjecc to the certification requirement. For example, if the waste system for a feedlot is."desiqned to handle 300 hogs but the average population will be 200 hogs, then·· the waste manage!nent system requires a certification. ·~ This certification is required by regulations governing animal waste management syste.'"lts adopted by the Enviroru:nental Management Commission (EMC) on December 10, 1992 (Title 1SA NCAC 2H .0217). On the reverse side of this paqe is the certification fo:';1 which ;:rust be submitted to OEM before new animals are stocked on the far::1. Assistance in completing the form can be obtained from one of the local agricultural aqencies su~~ as the soil and water conservation discrict. the USDA-Soil Conservation Ser-.rice, or the N.C. Cooperative Ext: ens ion Ser-.rice. The form should be sent to_: Depar~ent of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management Water Quality Section., Planning Branch P.O. Box 29535 ~ __..) Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535 • ~.?A _ ?hone: 919-733-5083 ------------~~ Steve W. Tedder. Chief Water Quality Section Form ID: A~~Ol94 Date: 1z ;z-, lffl P.O. Box 29535. Rcleigh. North CaroJir, .... , 27626-{)5.:?.S Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Oppom..nity Afflrmcti\te Acti.:ln employer Sl.""'. racyc!ad/ 1 0'1. post-c ~1JTT'Ier pacer ·- .. 4 k �� �� . i ; i _' 1 i� � �� y � � ' � � ' r n L I S r ,1 ;'yt 1 m HAL REGI�TEP.