Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820640_INSPECTIONS_20171231NORTH CAROLINA Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources • D D Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency Facility Number: 820640 Facility Status: ------- lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Active Permit: AWSB20640 Inactive Or Closed Date: Sampson --------------------------County: Region: ------- Date of Visit: 09/23/2016 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident# Farm Name: S-1 and S-2 Owner Email: Owner: Murphy-Brown LLC Phone: Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398 Physical Address: 2525 Big Farm Ln Faison NC 28341 Facility Status: • Compliant D Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy-Brown LLC D Denied Access Fayetteville 91 0-296-1 BOO Location of Farm: Latitude: 35" 1 0' 23" Longitude: 78• 14' 19" 140 East from Raleigh NC and take exit 338 (Suttontown Rd.) just East of Newton Grove Exit. Take a left off of exit 0.25 mile to Hwy. 1730 and tum Rt. on Preacher Henry Rd. <~nd go 3.8 miles toT-intersection and tum Rt. onto G iddensville Rd. Hwy 1725. Question Areas: • Dischrge & Stream Impacts • Waste Col. Stor, & Treat • Waste Application • Records and Documents • Other Issues Certified Operator: Bradley Devone Herring · Operator Certification Number: 26545 Secondary OIC(s): On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Mike Norris Phone : On-site representative Mike Norris Phone: Primary Inspector: Robert Marble Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary lnspector(s): Inspection Summary: page: Permit: AWS820640 Inspection Date: 09/23/16 Regulated Operations Swine D Swine-Farrow to Wean Waste Structures Type Identifier 1,.,,, Lagoon I~, Owner-Facility: Murphy-Brown LLC Facility Number: 820640 Jnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Design Capacity Current promotions Closed Date 6 ,800 Total Design Capacity: Start Date Total SSlW: Disignated Freeboard 21.00 24 .00 6,600 2,944,400 Observed Freeboard 71.00 60.00 page: 2 Permit AWS820640 Inspection Date: 09/23/16 Discharges & Stream Impacts Owner-Facility: Murphy-Brown LLC lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: Structure Application Field Other a. Was conveyance man-made? b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Facility Number: Reason for Visit: 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setba cks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11 . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Pending? Hydraulic Overload? Frozen Ground? Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)? PAN? Is PAN> 10%/10 lbs .? Total Phosphorus? Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? 820640 Routine Yes NoNa Ne Yes No Na Ne o•oo Yes No Na Ne D D D D D D 0 D D D D page: 3 Owner-Facility : Murphy-Brown LLC Facility Numb er: Permit: AWS820640 Inspection Date: 09/23/16 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Re ason f or V isit: Waste Application Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable a cre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available ? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Checklists? Design? Maps? Lease Agreements? Other? If Other. please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes. check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Weekly Freeboard? Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? Waste Transfers? Weather code? Rainfall? 820640 Routine Yes No Na Ne Com, Wheat, Soybea ns Foresto n loamy sand G ol ds boro lo amy sa nll , 0 to 2 % slopes Norfolk l oamy sand , 0 to 2% sl opes Yes NoNa Ne D D D D 0 D o•oo D D D D D D D p age: 4 Owner-Facility : Murphy-Brown LLC Facility Number: Permit: AWS820640 Inspection Date: 09/23/16 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Records and Documents Stocking? Crop yields? 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field Lagoon I Storage Pond Other If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAVVMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 820640 Routine Yes NoNa Ne D D D Yes NoNa Ne o•oo D D D page: 5 ( Division of Water Resources • D D Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency Facility Number. 820640 Facility Status: -------- lnpsectlon Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Active Pennit: AWS820640 Inactive Or Closed Date: Sampson ---------------------------County: Region: ------- Date of Visit: 11/0512015 Entry Time: 04:00pm E~tit Time: 5:00pm Incident# Fann Name: S-1 and s-2 Owner Email: Owner: Murphy-Brown LLC Phone: Mailing Address: PO Box4B7 Warsaw NC 28398 Physical Address: 2525 Big Farm Ln Faison NC 28341 Facility Status: • Compliant D Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy-Brown LLC 0 Denied Access Fayetteville 91 0-296-1 BOO location of Fann: Latitude: 35 • 1 0' 23" longitude: 78• 14' 19" 140 East from Raleigh NC and take e~tit 338 (Suttontown Rd.) just East of Newton Grove Exit. Take a left off of exit 0.25 mile to Hwy. 1730 and tum Rt. on Preacher Henry Rd. and go 3.8 miles toT-intersection and tum Rl. onto Giddensville Rd. Hwy 1725. Question Areas: • Dischrge & Stream Impacts • Waste Col, Stor, & Treat • Waste Application • Records and Documents • Other Issues Certified Operator: Bradley Devone Herling Operator Certification Number: 26545 Secondary OIC(s): On-Site Representative(s): Nam e Title Phone 24 hour contact name Mike Norris Phone: On-site representative Mike Norris Phone: Primary Inspector: Robert Marble Phone: Inspector Signature: Dale : Secondary lnspectorjs ): Inspection Summary: page: Permit: AWS820640 Inspection Date: 11 /05115 Regulated Operations Swine I 0 Swine-Farrow to Wean Waste Structures Type Identifier I~ Owner-Facility : Murphy-Brown LLC Facility Number: 820640 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Design Capacity Current promotions Closed Date 6,800 Total Design Capacity: Start Date TotalSSLW: Dlsignated Freeboard 21 .00 ' 24 .00 6.800 2,944,400 ObseJVed Freeboard 66.00 55.00 page : 2 Permit AWS820640 Inspection Date: 11/05/15 Discharges & Stream Impacts Owner-Facility: Murphy-Brown LLC lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection 1. Is any discharge obseNed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: Structure Application Field Other a. Was conveyance man-made? b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Facility Number: Reason for Visit: 3. Were there any obseNable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes. check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? Hydraulic Overload? Frozen Ground? Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? PAN? Is PAN> 10%/10 lbs.? Total Phosphorus? Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? 820640 Routine Yes NoNa Na Yes No Nil Ne Ya& NoNa Ne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 page: 3 Owner-Facility: . Murphy-Brown LLC Facility Number: Permit AWS820640 Inspection Date: 11/05/15 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Waste Application Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan{CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre detemni nation? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Pemnit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Checklists? Design? Maps? Lease Agreements? Other? If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Weekly Freeboard? Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? Waste Transfers? Weather code? Rainfall? 820640 Routine Yes No Na Ne Foreston loamy sand Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes Yes NoNa Ne D D D D D D D D D D D D D page: 4 Owner-Facility : Murphy-Brown LLC Facility Number: Permit: AWS820640 Inspection Date: 11/05/15 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Records and Documents Stocking? Crop yields? 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e .. discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field Lagoon I Storage Pond Other If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 820640 Routine Yes No Na Na D D D Yes No Na Ne D D D page: 5 • D Division of Water Resources D Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency Facility Number: 820640 Facility Status: Active Perm~: AVVS820640 -------- tnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for VIsit: Routine County: Sampson Region: ------ Date of Visit: 12116/2014 Entry Time: 03: 15 pm Exit Time: 4:00pm Incident# Farm Name: S-1 and S-2 Owner Email: Owner: Murphy-Brown LLC Phone: Mailing Address: PO Box487 Warsaw NC 28398 Physical Address: 2525 Big Farm Ln Faison NC 28341 Facility Status: • Compliant D Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy-Brown LLC D Denied Access Fayetteville 910-296-1800 Location of Farm: Latitude: 35" 10' 23" Long~ude: 78" 14' 19" 140 East from Raleigh NC and take exit 338 (Suttontown Rd.) just Easl of Newton Grove Exit. Take a left off of exit 0.25 mile to Hwy. 1730 and turn Rt. on Pre<.lcher Henry Rd. and go 3.8 miles toT-intersection and turn Rt. onto Giddensville Rd. Hwy 1725. Question Areas: • Dischrge & Stream Impacts • Waste Col. Stor. & Trettt • Waste Application • Records and Documents • Other Issues Certified Operator: Ronald James Taylor Operator Cerlifietttion Number: 27466 Secondary OIC(s): On-Site Representative(&): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Mike Norris Phone: On-site representative Mike Norris Phone: Primary Inspector: Robert Marble Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary lnspector(s): Inspection Summary: page: 1 Permit: AWS820640 Inspection Date: 12/16/14 Regulated Operations Swine I 0 Swine-Farrow to Wean Waste Structures Type Identifier Owner-Facility : Murphy-Brown LLC Facility Number: 820640 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Design Capacity Current promotions Closed Date 6,800 Total Design Capacity: Start Date Total SSLW: I Disignated Freeboard 21.00 24.00 6,800 2.944.400 Observed Freeboard 49.00 68.00 page: 2 Permit: AWS820640 Inspection Date: 12/16/14 Discharges & Stream Impacts Owner-Facility : Murphy-Brown LLC lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at Structure Application Field Other a. Was conveyance man-made? b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes. notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Facility Number: Reason for Visit: 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or manage d through a waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintena nce or improvement? B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improveme nt? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11 . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes. check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? Hydraulic Overload? Frozen Ground? Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, e tc)? PAN? Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs .? Total Phosphorus? Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? 820640 Routine Yes No N• Ne 0 D D oo•o oo•o o o• o o•oo o•oo Yes No Na Ne Yes No Na Ne o•oo D 0 D 0 D D D D D D 0 page: 3 Owner-Facility: Murphy-Brown LLC Facility Number: Permit: AWS820640 Inspection Date: 12116/14 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Waste Application Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAwrviP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAwrviP readily available? If yes. check the appropriate box below. WUP? Checklists? Design? Maps? Lease Agreements? Other? If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Weekly Freeboard? Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? Waste Transfers? Weather code? Rainfall? 820640 Routine Yes NoNa Ne Com, Wleat, Soybeans Forestcn loamy sand Goldsboro loamy sand. 0 to 2% slopes Norfolk loamy sand. 0 to 2% slopes Yes NoNa Ne D D D D D D D D D D D 0 0 page: 4 Owner-Facility: Murphy-Brown LLC Facility Number: Permit: AWS820640 Inspection Date: 12/16/14 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Records and Documents Stocking? Crop yields? 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? ff yes, check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field Lagoon I Storage Pond Other If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 820640 Routine Yes NoNa Ne D D D Yes No Na Ne D D D page: 5 .· ."' Division of Water Resources • D D Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency Facility Number: 820640 Facility Status: -------- lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Active Permit: AWS820640 Inactive Or Closed Date: Sampson ---------------------------Region: -------County: Data of Visit: 12/12/2013 Entry Time: 06:30 am Exit Time: 9:30am Incident# Farm Name: S-1 and S-2 Owner Email: Owner: Murphy-Brown LLC Phone: Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398 Physical Address: 2525 Big Farm Ln Faison NC 28341 Facility Status: • Compliant D Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy-Brown LLC D Denied Access Fayetteville 910-296-1600 Location of Fann: Latitude: 35 • 1 0' 23" Longitude: 78" 14' 19" 140 East from Raleigh NC and take exit 338 (Su11ontown Rd.) just East of Newton Grove Exit. Take a left off of exit 0.25 mile to Hwy. 1730 and tum Rt. on Preacher Henry Rd. and go 3.8 miles toT-intersection and tum Rt. onto Giddensville Rd. Hwy 1725. Question Areas: • Dischrge & Stream Impacts • Waste Col. Stor. & Treat • Waste Application • Records and Documents • Other Issues Certified Operator: Ronald James Taylor Operator Certification Number: 27466 Secondary OIC(s): On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Mike Norris Phone: On -s ite representative Mike Norris Phone : Primary Inspector: Robert Marble Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary lnspectorjs): Inspection Summary : page: Permit: AWS820640 Inspection Date: 12/12/13 Regulated Operations Swine I 0 Swine-Farrow to Wean Waste Structures Type Identifier Owner-Facility : Murphy-Brown LLC Facility Number: 820640 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Design Capacity Current promotions Total Design Capacity: Closed Date Start Date TotaiSSLW: Disignated Freeboard 21.00 24.00 Observed Freeboard page: 2 -. Permit: AWS820640 Inspection Date: 12/12/13 Owner-Facility : Murphy-Brown LLC lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: Reason for Visit: Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: Structure Application Field Other a. Was conveyance man-made? b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures o n-site that are not properly addressed and/or manage d through a waste management or closure plan? 7 . Do any of t he structures need maintenan ce o r improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack a dequate markers as required by the permit? (Not appl icable t o ro ofed pits, dry stacks and/or w e t stacks) 9 . Does any part of th e w aste man agement s ystem other than the waste structures require m a intenance o r improvement ? Waste Application 10. A re there any required buffers, se tb acks , or compliance alte rnatives t ha t nee d maintenance or imp ro vem e nt? 11 . Is there evidence of incorrect applicatio n ? If ye s , ch eck the appropriate bo x below. Ex cess ive P ending? Hydraulic Overload? F rozen Ground? H e avy metals (Cu, Z n , etc)? PAN? Is PAN> 10%/1 0 lb s.? T otal Phospho ru s? Failure to incorporate m a nure /sludge into b are soil? Outside of acceptable cro p window? Evidence o f wind drift? Application outsid e of application area ? 820640 Routine Yes NoNa Ne Yes NoNa Ne Yes NoNa Ne 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 D ·o page: 3 -. Owner-Facility : Murphy-Brown LLC Facility Number: Permit: AWSB20640 Inspection Date: 12/12/13 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Waste Application Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 CropType4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Checklists? Design? Maps? Lease Agreements? Other? If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Weekly Freeb~ard? Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? Waste Transfers? Weather code? Rainfall? 820640 Routine Yes NoNa Ne Com. Wheat. Soybeans Foreston loa my sand Goldsboro loamy sa nd. 0 to 2% slopes Norfolk loamy sand. 0 to 2% slopes Yes NoNa Ne D D D D D D D D D D D D D page : 4 -. Permit: AWSB20640 Inspection Date: 12/12/13 Owner-Facility : Murphy-Brown LLC lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: Reason for Visit: Records and Documents Stocking? Crop yields? 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permi t? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes , check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sl udge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance : 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes , contact a regional Air Quality rep resentative immediately . 30. Did the facility fa il to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as requ ired by Permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard prob lems. over-application) 31 . Do subsurface tile drai ns exist at the f acility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field Lagoon I Storage Pond Other If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permi t or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to disc uss review/inspection with on -site repres entative? 34. Does the facility requi re a follow-up visit by same agency ? 820640 Routine Ye! NoNa Ne 0 0 0 VOl No Na Ne 0 0 0 page : 5 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time:j()8~ ooa 1,c Departure Timed 08! (Dtz.,,J County: 9/rtM!JtJ) Region: £Po Farm Name: attd S ?-Owner Email: Owner Name: AJ1(J.,4f'1~V' I U£; Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: ------------------------------------------- Facility Contact: -~#};.......:..a...~;ps.--=-AJM\::..-=-..!..5--!t=S· =------Title:---------Phone: lntogrator: AI/ 4iJrry .fJMJt.M Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts l. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? D Oth er: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Certification Number: 2. ? l( ~ Certification Number: Longitude: DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes 0No ~NA ONE DYes 0No ~NA ONE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes , notify DWQ) DYes 0No [fPNA ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part ofthe operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of3 DYes DYes QPNo DNA ONE SJINo DNA ONE 2/4/2011 Continued ,--.p --···! ..... '$.-.' ,I '·- . ,; Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: . . y -' Physical Address: -----------------------------.,.------.:::....-----,--- Facility Contact: _____,.tYJ____;,_;,.I~F';;._· -'-"/tJ~9-fr'...::...:....:..'...S=----~t~eC\':-"-'\l\'-='L_------~~h~ne: L Onsite Representative,:, .....-o--._--r-:-I_J'V_'Vl _ __,_.l,_ 0 _r ___ ....:'U~11..,...-,.,.,-----:·,.;..~ :.:.;..'t\:,..;0;;...._·,__ Integrator: AI! u:n 1 --~Jucwv-. Certified Operator:' J..D""' ~ 7 ·-\1 L Certification Number: .2 ? Y b£ Back-up Operator: ·' .• •r Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge.·observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? D Other: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (Ifyes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Certification Number: Longitude: DYes ~No r DYes 0No DYes 0No d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management ~y~tem? (If yes, notify DWQ ) DYes 0No 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of3 .. DYes QllNo \ DYes 8'JlNo DNA ONE ~NA ONE (SPNA ONE \ [2pNA ONE ' D NA ONE DNA ONE ,.,.., . 114/2011 Continued . . . ~. . . ' ,·, /· jDate oflnspection: 1 rl-1 t• y !Facility Number: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stonn storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: c!)j_ S-:;1.. Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): Slf (, 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? 0 Yes DYes Structure 5 fA No 0 NA 0 No I)}NA Struct6re 6 DYes [frNo DNA D NE DYes ~o DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 0 Yes qJ" No D NA D NE DYes ~No DNA 0 NE 0 Yes ~No DNA ONE 0 Yes I1J No DNA ONE 11. Is there evidence of in correc t land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~No D NA 0 NE D Excessive Pending 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN D PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to In corporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Dnft D Application Outside of Approved Area IWopTyp<('l b~~~4kuts 13. Soil Type(s): _ --·-__ 14. Do the receiving crops differ from th ose designated in theCA WMP'! 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wertable acres determination? 17. Does the fa cility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is th ere a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19 : Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Pennit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all compone nts of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. Owup Ochecklists D Design 0 Maps 0 Lease Agreements Page 2 of3 DYes DYes DYes i No No No DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE 0 Yes LltNo 0 NA D NE 0 Yes OJ No 0 NA D NE DYes rnNo DYes ~No Oother: DYes l1}No DNA ONE DNA ONE 114/1011 Continued ' }! . ' ·;~, .(,;·lr:~·~~~ r=---:-:::-~:--=------z:~-.-~"'....,....-r:=""l ,........---::-:---:-------.'b-:~'-·~---:.--, f' .. ' { •·' ·-.. ]Facili~umber: B~-h'/t? J ]Date oflnspection: "1//, 11 q$ J ~aste 'collection & Treatment , ·{,~. . 1 'i'f~J. ~ 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? 0 Yes . ~· a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ' 0 Yes Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 \ ~· ·. Structure 4 -~ t S~ructure 5 ip No D NA [3 N·E·.· EJNo ~NA ONE Structure 6 .¥':~:.' ~ ; ... Identifier. S1-.. ·$~1 ·'•· "· ''"1.,,.~ r~ ----- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): 73" Observed Freeboard (in): SLf 11 59.K'~~ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addr~ssed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? " I DYes ITrNo DNA 0 NE DYes ~o DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the struc.tures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 1 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? DYes DYes DYes DYes C.!J'No DNA ONE ' ~No DNA ONE ~No DNA ONE LlJNo DNA ONE I II . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? lfyes, check the appropriate bo x belo~. 0 Yes 00 No DNA 0 ~E I D Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PA~ D PAN > 10% or 10 lbs . D Total Phosphorus 0 Fa ilure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area 12. C'olType(•) · C1r t11 LJ~d, S/M.j &Qd\ S 13. Soil Type(s): 5. GA,doA I , 14. Do the receivin g crops differ from tho se designated in the CA WMP ? ' . 15. Does the rece iving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the Ja ci lity fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wetta bl e ac res determination? Page 2 of3 DYes DYes DYes [jhNo I E{lNo ~·No DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DYes rn No DNA D NE D Yes [2J No D NA D NE DYes I::!J'No DNA 0J:-1E DYes ~No DNA ONE I Oother: DYes ~No 214/20 11 Continued o I I Facility Number: BA-6cto I Date of Inspection: ( t 7rlii'Z. 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check 0 Yes the appropriate box(es) below. D Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels D Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes. contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 34. Docs the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? t)Zece.-r/5 rew, ~ I /t 3 jz_ , 5'-fe vr), :J--7{ 2--1/ ( Z-· Revi ewer/Inspector Name: Re vi ew er /In s pec tor S ignature : Page 3 of3 DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes ~No DNA ONE No DNA O N E ~No DNA ONE 0No 119 NA ONE [$)No DNA ONE ~No D N A ONE ~No DNA ONE [lfNo DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA 2/4/2011 i " ' r~, .... -·-, ~----~----------~~~~·~·=-~ I I I Facility· Number: [:(.2-bf(O 1 I I Date oflnspection: ~1'1.'111'1: ~~ I • ,_ < I ~ ~4:-:Ditlthe facility fail to calibrate wastcc application equipment as required by the permi t? ... ,.:,(dl Ye s 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, chec k the appropriate box{es) below. D Failure to complete annual sludge survey D Ye s ' · ·· ,; D Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon 0Failure to develop a POA for slu~ge !evels ' ! List structure(s) and date oftirst survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? DYes 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? DYes "' Other Issues 2X. Did the facility tail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document • < . , attd report mortality rates that were higher than normal? . ... -.. DYes 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? D Yes If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the DYes permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? I fyes, check the appropriate box below. DYes O.Application Field D Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: ------------------------ 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representati ve? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ~ece-t!s rev,'~ 1jl~jz :J:k v , /, ;-7 r 2,'1 I r z ... -----.... DYes DYes ~No 11J-No ~No 0No rf} No ~No ~No f ~No ~No , ~No Reviewer/Inspector Name: Ph one : DNA O N E DNA ONE DNA ONE 1)9 NA O N E , D N A ONE DNA O NE DNA O N E DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE 9;of:J.3 -;1::0lJ Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Da te: ____.:7_:_(2__:/!........./ It_..-___ Page3 of3 21412011 .. Type of Visit: e Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date ofVisit: l16bih1 I Arrival Time:l b9;?f'bll'd Departure Time:ltz~ I County: S/tnttp~ Region: FRtJ ' I Farm Name: s-) and 5-:J-.. Owner Email: Owner Name: MCIA~ ,.~J,(/'1 1 £1(_ Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: __ "'""'T _______________________________________ _ }A ,'"k II ~~JV'l5' Facility Contact: L!1 IVtn •. Title: Phone: ~L-~~~-~~~~------------------ Onsite Representative: Integrator: ,N1 ~(h 'UV"- Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Other: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: 0 Yes 'F1 No DYes 0No DYes 0No d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of3 DYes ~No DYes ~No DNA ONE ;NA ONE NA ONE ~NA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE 2141201 I Continued IF~cility ~umber: Btl -6?o I Waste Collection & Treatment !Date of Inspection: /#¥'' I ] 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stonn storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: St SJ.. Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any ofthe structures observed? (i .e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed ancilor managed through a waste management or closure plan? 0 Yes 0 Yes Structure 5 ~No DNA ONE bNo pNA ONE Structure 6 0 Yes ~No 0 NA 0 NE 0 Yes ~ No D NA D NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public healtb or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? D Yes ta No D NA 0 NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the pennit? 0 Yes {CI No 0 NA 0 NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks , and/or wet stacks) T 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10 . Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? DYes ~No 0NA ONE DYes ~No 0NA ONE II. Is there evidence of incorrect land a pplication? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~N o DNA 0 NE 0 Excessive Pondin g 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn , etc.) D PAN 0 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area 12.cropType(•>' Cor "'t wW S~ 13 . Soil Type(s): Ytb Go 4. !Vo I+ I / ~ 14. Do the receiving crop s differ from those designated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secur e and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land a ppl ication? 18 . Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fa il to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP r eadi ly available? If yes, check the appropriate box. OwuP 0 C hecklists 0 Design D Maps 0 Lease Agreements 0 Yes DYes DYes DYes DYes D Yes 0 Yes ~N o tf1 No ~No 'tf:J No rpNo ~No $No DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE Oother: _________ _ 2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the a ppropriate box below. 0 Y cs ~No 0 NA 0 NE 0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey 22 . Did the faci lity fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes ~No 0 NA 0 NE 23 . If selected, did the faci li ty fail to in stall and maintain ra inbreakers o n irrigation equipment? 0 Yes E:i! No 0 NA D NE Page 2of3 214/1011 Continued I ~ I Facility ~umber: I nate oflnspection: /b/11/ I I 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box( es) below. DYes ~No DYes EfJ No DNA ONE DNA ONE 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey DFailure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist aL the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes CfJ No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes BJ No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ttJ No DNA ONE 0 Application Field D Lagoon/Storage Pond D Other: ------------------------ 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? '?eccJs rev:ewe.J ,.j~j,,, 7/c vt1rf o, /P/;,;,, · Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of3 DYes DNA ONE DYes DNA ONE qlrYt/73--3=¥v Date: Jobt/11 --~.~~-~~-------- Phone: 2/4/2011 Type of Visit e Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergenc~ 0 Other 0 Denied Access J DateofVisit: rrrtot-o-1 ArrivaiTime:ltO}~ DepartureTime: ~I..'QQ:a, I County:~ Region: ~ Farm Name:~ and S-2 Owner Email: ------------'-- Owner Name: M~ -Bvew"'; l1...C. Phone: Mailing Address: ----------------------------------------- Physical Address:----:----=----------------------------------- --~...;;;......,...., ..;;;....,....,._Covvv-_______ Title: ----------:-:-Phone No:--------Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: lntegrato~4y-t3\.0wn,uc_ ]or1 [a_i ICY__________ Operator Certification N umber: ')...1Jf/J:, Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD'D" Longitude: Discharges & Stream Impacts I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? DYes tfJNo Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field D Other a . Was the conveyance man-made? DYes 0No b. Did the disc harge reach waters of the State? (If yes , not ifY DWQ) DYes 0No c. What is the estimated vo lume that reached waters of the State (ga ll ons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes , notifY DWQ) DYes 0No 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other th an from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 DYes ~No DYes f\1 No 11128104 DNA ONE ijiNA ONE jNA ONE gJNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE Continued • • I Facility Number: B5-lf(O I Date of Inspection Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Js storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adeq uate ? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? D Yes ~No DNA ONE DYes D No ~N A ONE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Struct ure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: _ __...5......._.( _____ ....::$==---~--------------------------- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): ---=-+.,.-:+-----:--::---:::---·---------------------------- Observed Freeboard (in): __ lj.L-'1...:...._'·_7' ____ 7.&...;.:1-_11 __ ------------------------ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) DYes EjlNo D NA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~N o D NA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures requ ire maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0 . Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement'! DYes D Yes DYes D Ye s II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box bel ow. DYes 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (C u, Zn , etc.) No D NA O N E No D NA O NE No D NA ONE D NA ONE D NA O NE D PAN D PAN> 10% or I 0 lbs D Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Inc orporate Manure/Sludg e into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area 12. Cr~ptype(s) Ctrr"l vJh4/ ?:7~( 13. Soil type(s) evA--} Nb iJ= 1 f:o 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? DYes .;:0 DNA O NE D Yes No DNA ONE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre de tem1ination ? D Yes ~N o 0 NA 0 NE 17. Docs the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? DYes DNA ONE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes DNA ._-.... -.-~.·-.... :.:. __ .· _::~<~-:·,_. __ <·:::~_;:;.:·-_·· .. ·\:.\_:f.:.:·~-/'':.:_ --,_-. -. __ --' . ~-.. <·:~---:~·_:_~-~--·_,:.:~--~~:.-· .. :_-;_·_:~~---~> Comments.(referr~o que'~tion #): Explain any YES arisw~rs and/or any recommendations or an y~'uthe'f!com'men'ts;·· ~·;if Use (Jrawings Of iicilitf to better explain situations. (use ~:~d(litional pages as necessary): ~~;.·f;j ~cf}'i~J:.·;}'i: . _: .. ~,;.-. ~---c~:;~.-~..-:rf'-'·; :--.=:··-'~,.>----. ' '. ·-;-·.,-·.--_·_ . .:"'' •:. : ~ .-...... ' Reviewer/Inspector Name ~----I Phone: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~---------------- Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 0 Continued Required Records & Documents Dateorlnspection ~ l Facility Number: @ MO I 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box . 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps 0 Other DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA D .NE 2l. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~No DNA 0 NE 0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Annual Certification 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? DYes ~0 DNA ONE 23. If selected , did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? DYes 0No ~NA ONE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? DYes ~No DNA ONE 25 . Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? DYes ~No DNA ONE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? DYes 'No DNA ONE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? DYes $No DNA ONE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? DYes ~No DNA ONE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document DYes ~No DNA ONE and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? DYes ~No DNA ONE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 3 1. Did the facility fail to notifY the regional office of emergency situations as required by DYes ~No DNA ONE General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over applicat ion) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? DYes ~No DNA ONE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? DYes No DNA ONE ~!-:,' •• • ', ~ ' •• • • • .. ~ -~ -. Page 3 of3 12118104 ' ... / Type of Visit e Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit 8 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other D Denied Access DateofVisit: ~0 Arrh·a1Time:I/J.:tQ4-le-I DepartureTime: lfz!.tW.d""'\1 County: I FarmName: -I ) S -~ OwnerEmail: ------------- Owner Name: N\uxp~ -tCnown U C Phone: Mailing Address: ----------------------------------------- Physical Address:------------------------------------____ _ --~....::....---==o~,__~;;..,_..L...JL------Title: -----------Phone No:--------- Onsite Representative: ~~--.------.f-'----------Integrator: M Lkt:ph , 1 ~ f!>t&?u2 Vl ll..C ~'lq(J ~OJ trY.._________ Operator Certification Nu~ber: j7t/(-,~ Facility Contact: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD'D" Longitude: Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is an y di sc harge observed from any part of the operati on? DYes ~No DNA ONE Di scharge originated at: D Struc ture D Application Fie ld D Other a . Was the conv eya nce man-m ade? b . Did the di sc harge reac h wa te rs ofthe State? (If yes, noti fy DWQ) c. What is the es timate d vo lume th at re ached wa ters o f th e State (g allons )? d. Do es discharge bypass th e wast e manage men t system? {If yes, noti fy DWQ) 2. Is th ere e vid ence o f a past discha rg e from any part o f th e operation? 3. Were there any adverse im pacts or poten ti a l advers e impacts to the Waters of the S tate other t han f rom a di sc harge? DYes 0No ~NA ONE DYes 0No ~NA ONE I D Yes 0No ~NA ONE DYes ~N o DNA ONE D Yes ~No DNA O NE 12128/04 Co ntinued I Facility Number: e;c-?Pqg Date of Inspection Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is stornge capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes ~o DNA ONE D Yes D No &J NA D NE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: _ _.:9:::::...._-.k=---__ ....,.b'-..I~E::;L._ _______ ------------------ Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): __ __,,....,........,.-------=-=---;-:-------------------------------!J.UU ., '"' "' Observed Freeboard (in):---+-+-~'--___ ::.._f..:..._fll'-__ ------------------------ 5. Are the re any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? DYes (ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) !{)No DNA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed DYes ~No DNA ONE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes fSINo DNA ONE DYes !!)No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes g;JNo DNA ONE II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes , check the appropriate box below. DYes ~No DNA 0 NE D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorpornte Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area 12. ccoptype(s) ~. ~S~/!s 13. Soil type(s) h,flfi_ ' .-} 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: . EJ:plaio any YES an~.Weritlnid/oiJa~~;r.:i~omnie'il.dilitioils '(ir<liiiiy'fc) ~X plain situations. (use atldiltl~•~:il)Jp~lg~~;,Jirs' ~~~cessia~yj;'::i~·:~{f/P.! DYes li=JNo DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes lf No 0 NA D NE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes No DNA ONE ' ,. I Facility Number: B;Z..-6@ • J Date oflnspection llo(z4/D1 I Requi.-ed Reco.-ds & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Pennit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? lfyes, check the appropriate box. 0 WUP D Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps 0 Other DYes NINo DNA ONE DYes li{JNo DNA ONE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes '>!No 0 NA 0 NE 0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers D Annual Certification D Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? DYes E;fNo DNA ONE -23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? DYes 0No ~NA ONE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pennit? DYes Sf> No DNA ONE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? DYes ~No DNA ONE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? DYes ~No DNA ONE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? DYes 0No ~NA ONE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the pennit orCA WMP? DYes ~No DNA ONE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? DYes ~No DNA ONE 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? DYes EjalNo DNA ONE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by DYes ~No DNA ONE General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? DYes. ~No DNA ONE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? DYes IJJ>No DNA· ONE 11/18104 Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: I tllz..d(fo I Arrival Timed ce:«>a,..., Departure Time: I os: VSi"l County: 5-Aw--~~ Region: /!-t20 r , Farm Name: 5,b w 5 A Owner Email: ------------- Owner Name: Jt1YcPL -Gm..uV\ Phone: ·~ Mailing Address: Physical Address:----------------------------------------- Facility Contact: ~ ~ Title: -----------Phone No:--------- \{ Onsite Representative: ---------,.------------Integrator: _ _.ff:........&.~&.A.r-.;;..,,FP....;/ry~L-.---:.f-,_~ __ ,.... _____ _ ~(J l ~fey__________ Operator Certification Number: ..:27Lj{;{, Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD'D" Longitude: D OD'D" Discharges & Stream Impacts I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Di scharge originated at: D Structure 0 Appli c ation Field D Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters o f the State? (If yes, notifY DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d . Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, noti fY DW Q) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential advers e impac ts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes 0 No ~A ONE DYes 0 No ~NA ONE I DYes 0No 'fNA ONE D Yes ¥1 No DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE 12/18104 Continued t " !Facility Number: G2-bL{O I I I Date oflnspection I it(<VI/D9J I r Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes \l]No DNA ONE DYes 0No jSNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: __ ... s .... · -"""1=---___ .$',._-_·""2:-=-------------------------- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): --~,....-:-.,.---------------------------------------lln t:r L1 Observed Freeboard (in): __ 'T;;_l' _______ J..&.-.J7._"-------------------------- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any ofthe structures observed? (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) DYes ~No DNA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed DYes {iaNo DNA ONE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, a ·nd the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any ofthe structures need maintemince or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes i)aNo DNA D NE DYes ~o DNA ONE DYes t§No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE I I. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes lij No D NA D NE D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) c~t'\ I ,,Jb,J ( S~6an $ 13. Soil type(s) p A 1 G, A 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes DYes 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?D Yes 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: DYes DYes ~No DNA fi3 No DNA ~No DNA lhNo DNA rRNo DNA ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE Pagel of 3 12128104 Continued I I . ~ I Facility Number: 62-6-qol Reguired Records & Documents Date of Inspection ~ 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components ofthe CA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design D Maps D Other DYes ~o DNA ONE DYes ~o DNA ONE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes ~No 0 N A 0 N E 0 Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers D Annual Certification 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking D Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? DYes ~No DNA ONE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? DYes ~No DNA ONE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? DYes [I No DNA ONE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? DYes ()No DNA ONE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? DYes ~No DNA ONE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? DYes 00No DNA ONE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? DYes BNo DNA ONE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document DYes rg}No DNA ONE and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? DYes BNo DNA ONE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by DYes ~No DNA ONE General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? DYes jglJNo DNA ONE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? DYes IZ'tNo DNA ONE Page 3 of 3 11128/04 , li!I'Division of Water Quality I Facility Number I '>?d H l(}_f/911 0 Di\'ision of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit ~Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for VIsit ~outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 other 0 Denied Access - Date of Visit: 1/:l.hb~rrival Time: I h). 0 0 I Departure Time: I I County: ~S/:tl \) Region: f:: RD Farm Name: / / S-/ OwnerEmail: ------------ Owner Name: ff (.-r. • ... n-. <;-1-n..._r/p./(f f:o..;;.;..., fh~!) -~~&\.a..C:......::.....__..:....::( "'--=--<....=---Phone: Mailing Address: -----------------------------------____ _ Physical Address:---------------------------------------- Facility Contact: G re-s c. o._t ( Title: _L_l\l....;.._M ______ _ Onsite Representative: _C:.-:::;1 .......... f~U>.....,.(St---(ru:-=:.-..._(_________ Integrator: ___,th_..;___-_6 ...... __________ _ PhoneNo: _________ _ Certified Operator: -~ ...... =-V'\~-----__ ....~(~..:~.::::;.~~y"=-------Operator Certification Number: _,J.=---]-8-'-f.c.......;:fp::;..fo.=.. __ Back-up Operator:e __ l......:cm..::.u..::::hv.A.c..:..=:..:J_'If---_{J......,:: ... O-....nL....>..Ir._\'-'OQL..llo._____ Back-up Certification Number: ~~ 3~ ~ (J DOD'D" DOD'D" Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ID Wean to Finish I I D Wean to Feeder DoairyCow D Dairy Calf 10 Layer I I D Non-Layet D Feeder to Finish D Dairy Heife1 18Jj::arrow to Wean ::Z,\fco D Farrow to Feeder D Farrow to Fi nish 0Gilts 0Boars 0DryCow 0Non-Dairy l D Beef Stocker i I D Beef Feeder ! D Beef Brood Cow : .. ----·---. Dry Poultry D Layers D Non-Layers D Pullets D Turkeys Other D Turkey Poults OOther 19 Other Number of Structures: [1] Discharges & Stream Impacts I . ls any discharge observed from any part of the operation ? DYes ~No DNA ONE Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field D Other a . Was the conveyance man-made? DYes DNo ~NA ONE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes , notify DW Q) DYes 0No {)NA ONE c. What is the estimated vo lume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? I~ I d . Docs discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes. notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? DYes 0No~A ONE DYes fl_No DNA ONE DYes 0No ~A ONE 12128104 Continued l Facility Number ::T)d.._-ln401 Date of Inspection 11-zJiOJoj- Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) le ss than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes ¥JNo DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: _ __.} ____ -------------------------------- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): ---=A~------------------------------------ ObservedFreeboard(in): __ ~=--=0:;__ ____________________________________ _ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepag e , etc.) DYes ~No DNA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed DYes through a waste management or closure plan? lkJNo DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the s tructures need maintenance o r improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) ~Y es 0No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? DYes ~No DNA ONE Waste Application l 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance a lt ernatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application ? If yes, check th e appropri ate box below . 0 Yes 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc .) ~No ~No DNA ONE DNA ONE 0 PAN 0 PAN> 10% or 10 lb s 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to In corporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 E vide nce of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Area 12 . C rop type(s) -~(_-_N~~-.....:::S>oo.L. _______________________ _ 13. Soil type(s) t::' o 14 . Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? DYes ~No 15 . Does the receiving crop and/or land app li cation site need improvement? DYes ~No 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation d esign or wettable acre dctermination?O Y cs ~No 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? D Yes ~No 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes ~No Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers andlor any recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ' Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/) nspector Signature: 12128104 DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE , I Facility Number: ~~ "'LJik) I Required Records & Documents Date of Inspection !l'2fz.o/o).. I 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have aiJ components of the CA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps 0 Other DYes '¢_No DNA O NE D Yes 'p!J No 0 NA 0 NE 2 1. Docs record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~No 0 NA 0 NE 0 Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers 0 Annual Certification 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking D Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? D Yes ~No DNA ONE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the fa c ility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27 . Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues DYes 0No DYes l&lNo DYes ~0 DYes ~No DYes 0No ~NA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE ~A ONE 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA WMP? DYes ~No DNA ONE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility po se an odor or air quality concern? If yes , contact a regional Air Quality representative immediate ly 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over app lication) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to dis cuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33 . Does facility require a follow-up v isit by same agency? Additional Comments and/or Drawings: ~ (.I,._Jc tt~ , Q-h._ ~ • ~« L.-0 J;:c;"' ~ I<-{ 11 1 O/ 1 DYes DYes DYes DYes D Yes -2>+·. \ \ \cxu t CU tR~ ()Y\ Lo..tClYI . M u cs-0 e 5-fo.. ~ l; ~"" c.ov-e, -... S-h,"c!, ~ ~h( b-ft!Af.m b ... : IJ:,:: . rn ~tfh~ -~(l)l(\ l LLc_ ~~ (\ll.u) Q\.D'\0( I '6m+. ~No ~No ~No ~No ~No -'PlOJ\s ~o ~k. <n J.kw J\':>~U~S b~ ~f(;v-.~ ()g · -0..1 So pia." s -1-o vtJu-f •) f ~ t a. ( u..la. .{ < o_ £1 ...... -f-f._ !,t e 12128104 DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE ... - . -~_yl[u Facility No . ~<::[2, Time In ___ _ Farm Name S -/ Owner Pie~ S+J F~ Jt kJC_ ( "'··<-·· Operator RC-Y\ (~I . Back -up ::T" ~~ :ibv1r • t'lti coc ~ 0 I ·--G~ or Circle : ' / Design Current Wean-Feed Wean-Finish J=pgrf .J:;:j~ c.. £arrow -Wear;l 3 'f ou -. FREEBOARD : Design __ (?+--- Sludge Survey 0~ Crop Yield --~-­ Rain Gauge_·--=-- Soil Test ·v\j ~ Weekly Freeboard r: f__tdo I Wettable Acres l.-----" Daily Rainfall __.. Time Out Date ;.~i JLD Site Rep\.lru)-"--( V lntegrato~~- No. ~t.{ { ,.&, No. -.!.......::::' ~:..,__;:::-~___.!~~:8"--- NPDES Design Current Farrow-Feed Farrow-Finish Gilts I Boars Others Observed __;.. __ )2_0 __ _ Calibration/GPM __ _,_/ ___ _ Waste Transfers ----- Ra in Breaker ~ PLAT~ 1-in Inspections_/ ___ _ Spray/Freeboard Drop ----------------------- Weather Codes __ _ 120 min Inspections __ _ Waste Analysis: Date Nitrogen (N) Date Nitrogen (N) /.] "1/a:s Pull/Field Soil Crop Pan Window II ) '\ J • . " I /"\ /.1 y I V .r I I l J r I .< ([) l 0 Q ·..- Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Reason for Visit ~outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other D Denied Access Date of Visit: l/ola~}O\:J I Arrival Time: lt163 I Departure Time: ._j ___ _.I Coun ··---~~'--.;._-r -Region: f/l-0 Farm Name: _ __;S=-----''------------------Owner Email: ------------:---- Owner Nam~. '€.0\. StJ "Eru ('(\ s""---=~~\\.)___;;;__u ___ _ Phone: Mailing Address: ---------------------------------------- Physical Address:----------------------------------------- Facility Contact: t Title: Phone No: ---....,...------ Onsite Representative:~·.& \g_ (k_t'; ~iA')tb\ JO....._k; ~ \\r oJ>T:t~ator: ---A~r~.-e.==..r!l___..__S{..::......;""---"~=---- Certified Opera to" YQ..V\ "'"t =r1 ~ Operator Cerdfl<atlon Numbe<' .;;J :l:i I I ~ Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD'D" Longitude: Discharges & Stream Impacts I . Is any discharge ob se rved fro m any part of t he o pe ratio n? D Yes ~No DNA ONE Disc harge originated at: D Structure 0 Appli ca tion Fiel d D Othe r a . Was th e conveyance man-made? DYes 0 No i)tNA O N E b. Di d the discharge reac h w aters of t he State? (If yes, noti fy DWQ) DYes 0No D;LNA O NE c . Wh at is the estimate d volume tha t reached waters of the St ate (g all ons )? --1 d. Does di sc harge bypass the waste ma nage ment system? (If yes , notify DWQ) 2 . Is th ere evidence of a past disc harge from any pa rt o f th e ope rati on? 3. Were t h ere any ad ve rse impac ts or poten ti al ad verse impac ts to the Waters of the S tate othe r than from a disc harge? Page 1 of3 D Y es 0 No DYes ,lit No D Yes ~No 12/2810 4 ~A ONE DNA O NE D NA O NE Co ntinued . .. Waste Collection & Treatment Date of Inspection 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a . If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard ? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 0 Yes lijNo DNA 0 NE DYes 0 No j'Sa"NA 0 NE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:-------------------------------------- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): _ __;;_];::;·.;;..l.J.-_;__•· __ ----------------------------------- /JQJ1' Observed Freeboard (in): --<ii~;;or;:....~-G---------------·------------------ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? DYes 5No DNA ONE (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc .) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed a nd/or managed DYes ~No DNA ONE through a waste management or closure plan ? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa~ notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need main tenance or improvement? 0 Yes ~No D NA 0 NE 8 . Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits , dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes .$-No DNA ONE 0Yes~o DNA ONE II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? lfyes, check the appropriate box below. DYes ~No 0 NA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic O ver load 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc .) 0 PAN 0 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside o f Area 12 . Cmp type(s) ~~ r1 \ ~\*'"~ 13 . Soil type{s) '\=Q'f~'S-h¥" 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designate d in th eCA WMP? DYes "'f$No DNA ONE 15 . Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes,..1S) No DNA 0 NE 16 . Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation des ign or wettable acre determination ? 0 Yes f;j. No D NA D NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. rs there a lack of properly operating wa ste application equipment? . . . . t .... ~ . Comments (refer to que!.i.tl io~~~~~ drawings,of facility- Explain any YES answers explain situations. (use ad•ditiOIIIat.pag~!'a!;nc!Cessa.ry): "B~ 5vrt.. -+-~ 4-o.k.... VA~ r'"(.duc.-.l:o ·"'-OY"\ d'X. Jo t\'.';)~duo.-(_ N :-l-~'o~"'- Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature Page 2 of3 DYes 8No DNA ONE DYes bjNo DNA ONE I Facility Number~ -~W Required Records & Documents Date of Inspection I I 0 /.21/NJ I 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? lfyes, check the appropriate box. 0 WUP D Checklists D Design 0 Maps 0 Other DYes _pit No DNA D NE DYes ~No DNA ONE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? lfyes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~No 0 NA D NE 0 Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Annual Certification D Rainfall 0 Stocking D Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus Joss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the tacility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32 . Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33 . Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes Ci(No DNA ONE DYes afNo DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes OO'No DNA ONE DYes rtJ No DNA ONE Additionill Comments aodloi' Drawings:' ,·•r-;J.~t{fl • •;.,'.:;;; ..... ii':c ' . < •>o),~ ~ Page3of3 -bcue. +op dv~ f.) ~enl!..e.. f€1?'1Cva..C. w:ll sud 1 mold..r. Ncltcl s:y,s 0 b ~o"::>;vl'\ ( NeT S2..-ue..) bro~n c....ka"' f!l.)-J-p:pe._ h~s ~r'l -t~f baJ !f.c.cJ;~ dvu~ 'I -e_~ c..l ~ , T 1-vi ~ v Y\ cb.-r m ~~d. ~; t . D P-£" a ~ o '" 1--w ~ -e. 'II: (.c... v a. {t.~ p >f {fi fe.pa.ir~. W:i\ Q.cl"'\.fLR.-t~ Cl>"C.I! (a.~n ''"> c! (Off<' d. a..ppcw-t:~~~J1 ll' ,;,c_h~~ ar;, 12128104 ..... I- Facility No . <t,). Co l/·o Time In----Time Out Date I o(Jhfoc, Farm Name _5=--_J --....,.......,..---------Integrator P ~ J Owner 0 ~ F-Vb 1\J ~ Site Rep----------- Operator f)QV\ f\.1{) f '1:J Y"\Vf No. ~ ~] \ S Back-up----------------No.-------- COC Circle: General or NPDES Design Current Des ign Wean-Feed Farrow-Feed Wean -Finish Farrow-Finish Feed -Finish Gilts I Boars /~ow-Wea~ 3'/uo ~'fo-o Others ~ FREEBOARD: Design --~~lf.L.-''_ Observed <--l \ -'1q\p Sludge Survey ~~:. \l-Calibration/GPM ~ ...... OL..--_"3_9,_/ ___ _ Crop Yield Waste Transfers ___ _ Rain Gauge----=- Soil Test __ ~/_· -v-v/ Rain Breaker __ _ PLAT ____ _ Wettable Acres __ V' __ _ . Weekly Freeboard___ Daily Rainfall .......-1-in Inspections _ _,._,./'""---- Spray/Freeboard Drop ___ -r_-._l '-zs.........__"J_...,_)-(.. ___ ~---''------------- Weather Codes__ 120 min Inspections __ _ Waste Analysis: Date Nitrogen (N) Date Nitrogen (N) 1" c -q~~ i.~ lR l Lo l·""l J.'-4 5l t~ .:J ·s Current 't/n 3/tr ':J../?.b Pull/Field Soil Crop Pan Window ;J. '), ;; .Lj I . '} c y-\' 1 l='or-~..~,..t'Y'o c \A.) ~ Gr .. ( ~l :J -/) -~~~ w ~ Wiv.f. ft~ 1 /' -'llso f\ I ' ~ 13c..o_ 'lit -'"~/, ,-- IJJ'I'fsn 0 tto 31/~ .. '7 I -i.,' ' J I \JtJ<l ShYt.X C' y 0\n qo d 6 I Ltd" f~ I I ·~...-D~ LJ ~A ) /\..I ICY ' ?-z rN !WI 1/1', '-./ \j '/ v 4) lA..S)/J, ') l"1 V}, / V v~ / /I v Type of Visit S Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: I ').../'1 / o5'j Arri\•al Time: I ·~ Joo I Departure Time: I '/:Do I County: 5,~-c:-..._ Region: Ftzo Farm Name: ---------=S:;..._-__;1___________ Owner Email: ------------- Owner Name: p ~; v ~ ~u,._.;~=.;;_,_) _ _.fi._a..=-:.•-=~;..:...;;....s..:;;.._ __ _ Phone: CftO-S1 Z-Z.l Of{ Mailing Address: __ P~O"--....;Rn~qi'~-.....J3~'t..L...:t:t~---------C-(: ..... ~ ~ c... ~e 1 z 8 Ph}·sical Address:---------------------------------------- Facility Contact: _ _.~-.,~~~IC:;ltr•-H.:...J.,..!;~(;..L.( ____ Title: ---------- Onsite Representative: ~ '~'( \-\: L\ Phone No: '110 -Z.Cf."i -3o2...'( Integrator: ____ ....:;P__;;:S:;_;F _______ _ Certified Operator: IA.u ~ 1"'\,(l_ £_ ~.LC....:;~..:..4~,-------Operator Certification Number: 18s-"Tzs;- 2.~L1 /( Back-up Operator: £0,5~ &.\). :6: .-~ Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD'D" Longitude: D OD'D" Swine Design Current Design Current Capacity Population · Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Design C~rrent Capacity Population I I . I~ FD;;:.;L=a;.o..;ye;;.;...r -----l----+----11:. DN~L~~ y IO Wean to Finish 0 Wean to Feeder ' 0 Feeder to Finish 18. Farrow to Wean ~'{0_0 ~0~ 0 Farrow to F ceder I D Farrow to Finish I ' I 0 Gilts I 0 Boars I -·-., -·- Dry Poultry DDairyCow I I D Dairy Calf I D Dairy Heife1 I DDrvCow DNon-Dairy I D Beef Stocker I D Beef Feeder _j D Beef Brood Cow ,.,.. -----. .. -·-· - D Lavers i D Non-Layers D Pullets : D Turkeys Otber D Turkey Poults ' Dother ! --·-··· .. --~ ·-------) Number of Structures: OJ~ Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part ofthe operation? DYes ~o DNA ONE Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field D Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? DYes DNo DNA ONE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes DNo DNA ONE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? I d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? DYes DNo DYes ~No DYes ~No 12/28104 DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE Continued I Facility Number: 8z.--''{0 I Date of Inspection I .Z./ f"/OS't Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes 0No DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: __ ___.::/ ___ --------------------------------- Spillway?: fJfJ Designed Freeboard (in): __ ..:.(_, ___ ------------------------------ Observed Freeboard (in): __ ..::3~~:...._ __ ----------------------------------- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 0 Yes t&l.No DNA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 'Yaste management or closure plan? DYes~ DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) DYes ~o DNA ONE DYes )a.No 0 NA 0 NE 9. Does any part ofthe waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? DYes ~No DNA ONE Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes li!No DNA ONE II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~No 0 NA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Area 12. Croptype(s) -~Co~wrn~, ~w::!...;~~~:+:w•L....-....::.SC:,~'(~~~M-M-...~~------------------ 13. Soil type(s) Fore~ 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? DYes rg_No DNA 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes IS{No DNA 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination!D Yes [SNo DNA 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? DYes 129--No DNA 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes ~No DNA ,._ \\.ut.-·~ ~~3.:,f\c~-t e\t.~'cn--. c;t\~ ~ ~_) \~cO'V'-~~k. ~'t Cl.M!... w~~ ~ ~~ -t4 ~~ 1 ~,tl ~~ ~ ero~.ct) ~""' 1 ll.AA..~ ~ 5~-ed. fk~ C~&o<.+ 1-j US o\oo u-t hov.> -\o ~r-'f ov f -4t..~ ~ t..v ~· f k. Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 12128/04 ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE I -Facility Number: 82--0ct0l Date of Inspection I 2..{ 'lfo5i Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Pennit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. D wu~ 0 ChccklisY 0 DesigrV"O MapvO Other DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes IE..No 0 NA D NE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes. check the appropriate box below. ~Yes D No D NA D NE D Waste Application D Weekly Frecboa~ D Waste AnalysiV D Soil AnalysVD Waste Transfers D Annual Certification- D RainfaH"' ~Stocking ~Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspect~ [8.Monthly and I" Rain Inspections D Weather Code.,..- 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certilication? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notifY the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, trct::'board problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representat ive? 33. Docs facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Ad.ditional C6mments an. dfo_r Drawings: . ' . tjs/o~ ll/t/o'f 9 /lC,{o'l 8 Is-I D'( -=~' / -v/ ()I( ,2. 0 r .s- t • .'/ 1·1- 1·; s-/z..-~j(l'{ !i I >lor~ 'i /l /o'{ 2/'{{o'f I·~ . DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes )(!No DNA ONE DYes IJa,No DNA ONE DYes [i1No DNA ONE DYes jg.No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes ,P!aNo DNA ONE DYes 181 No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE Z-\ • s-to~~ t"e.c.o-n>s, c..~ y;~tJ~ .. o.-J I'',~;"" ~ w'.~~c. +.· ~ doc:.u~~1.·~ ~ ~e.~~'~ -fc.r ""T'4 ~-~.-k .-eec.rn:}c:._ "\>\-ect84 ~""-c..LJch~. ~ ~ $ ~0""""-., ~0~~ ~ bl-e . 12/28104 r r.xl'"':nrnnli:::on~·t:>lnspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit ~utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other D Denied Access I Date of Visit: I S/11/Dq hime: I /u: DO FaciUty Number I g !1. H lo ~ · -'--------------------.....1 lo Not Operational 0 Below Threshold menmtted ~rtified C Conditionally Certified [] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: -······-·-----·-· Farm Name: ..... ..$.1 ___________________ ............... ,____________________________ County: ---~~.0.-·---·----·--·-------·--·-··---· Owner Name: ___ f~l~~-----··----~---.fu~£--------·--------Phone No: ..... ?.f'~.-~I Olf. -·-----·-------·-·-·-· Mailing Address: _____ 'f:'!..: ...... ~ ........ ?..'f:J. .... __________________________ .............. .. ... Gif~.~-J-.!:/.{;_____________ !_~~~-- Facility Contact: ..... I!J..~~! ...... ~!.rl'~± .......................... _ .. Tide: ......................................................... _.... Phone No: -·----·-.. ·-·--................. .. Onsite Representative: .. ~~±t-... · .. --·----~~ t ____ ......................... Integrator: _____ Ifu.:,j~~--... ~-~!-.!.:~------·-----.... - Certified Operator: ______ {1!)~!? ................ f1tttL~---.. ·----·---·-............ Operator Certification Number: ...... P..~ f, ________ _ Location of Farm: Bswine D Poultry D Cattle D Horse Latitude ~......-___.I• '-1 _....~l' L-1 _ __.I" Longitude ~......--___.!• L..l _...~I' L..l _ _.l" II Discharges & Stream Jmpacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: D Lagoon D Spray Field 0 Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made ? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin? d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, noLify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? D Spillway Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Stru cture 4 Structure 5 Identifier: ' Freeboard (inches): ~{). __ ..;.....:; __ _ 12112103 DYes gNo DYes ONo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes [if'No DYes [;tNo DYes gN"o Structure 6 Continued I §cility Number: f-' -hi/D J Date oflnspection I s/ rJ/04-] S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the suuctures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancefunprovement? 11 . Is there evidence of over application? H yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Excessive Ponding D PAN 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground 0 Copper and/or Zinc 12 . Crop type (;,AN J w/..e...+ > ~~ 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Odor Issues 17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement bui lding to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. fAr..-. k.r. rJ Crc(S. ~ R ... -t Da-t. 5i'f-t: ')'"~ t~l sL.u /J Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 12112103 /u.r. J., .. r b~ ~kh ~Jt.l#-f. jiUt ~ Of<lrtd. ( . "'-· ' ~ r\1--~. DYes £3'No DYes [i(No DYes gNo DYes (!(No DYes li(No DYes @No DYes E(No DYes [g"No DYes B'No DYes gNo DYes urNo DYes HNo DYes ifNo DYes [!(No DYes ~0 DYes 9'No DYes [!{No ConJinued ., ··(Facility Number: ~-' -'#ll I Date of Inspection [$'lt1/Hf I Required Records & Documents 21 . Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 23 . Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropri ate box below. 0 Waste Application 0 Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Sampling 24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP? NPDES Permitted Facilities 30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31 -35) 31 . If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? 32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 33. D id the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? 34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? 35 . Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Stocking Form 0 Crop Yield Form 0 Rainfall 0 Inspection After 1 " Rain 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Annual Certification Form DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes ~Yes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes 11!1' No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. -L:~ ~ Ia~ "ll'lteJ ~ -~-~J ~- 12112103 ~0 8"No ~0 ~0 ~0 B'No BNo s"No 9'No ONo EfNo 0'No ef'No [!(No li(No ... 1- ··'. State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Fayetteville Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Andrew McCalL Regional Manager ir]·;l\ ..... ~ -m a a DEHNR DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Water QUality Section Mr. Carl Little Dogwood Farms, Inc. Post Office Box 49 Clinton, N.C. 28328 Dear Mr. Little: August 2, 1995 Subject: Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Inspections Dogwood Farms, Inc •. Facilities Sampson County Thank you for interrupting your busy schedule to assist in the inspections of the Dogwood Farms, Inc. swine facilities in Sampson County August 1, 1995. Attached please find a copy of the inspection forms for the facilities visited. We ask that you forward a copy of the forms to the appropriate growers with the thanks of this office for allowing timely access to their farms. Again, thank you and Mr. Brian Spell for assisting in the inspection process. If you have questions or comments concerning the inspections please do not hesitate to contact me at (910) 486- 1541. Sincerely, g~ Paul E. Rawls Environmental Specialist cc: OEM Facility Assessment Unit Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone 910-486-1541 FAX 910-486-0707 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper Site Requires Immediate Attention : __ Facility No. ----- DMSJON OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: August 1 , l99S Time: G. ~34 Farm Name/Owner: ~~~t:><l ~::. ~~ k"""' "Mallin& Address: V.i;'R~, 1<\ ~h~NC. lil.WR ~~=:~~~---------------------------------------------lnteJraiOr:: Dogwood Farms, Inc. On Site Representative: car] I itt 1 e. Dagwood Farms Phone: (910) 592-2104 ext. 316 Phone~9JO) 592-2104 Physical Address/Location=-----------~------------- Type of Operation : Swine L Poultry_ Cattle--------------- Design Capacity: ,34 oo Number of Animals on Site: _ _.'3.G;4;:~.:0~~~--------- DEM Catification Number : ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW ______ _ Latitude:...,J£ 0 .JJL' ~-Longitude: 18 ° _H_'.!L· Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 2S year 24 hour storm event (approximately 1 Foot+ 7 inches) Yes or No N&~~ Freeboard : l Ft. -..!:!_Inches ·was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)1 Yes or No Was any erosion observed1 Yes or@ Is adequate land available for spray1 Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No (Not Evaluated) Crop(s) being utilized :. ____________________ =------- Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? (ii)or No 100 Feet from Wells7 (jig or No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS BJue Line Stream7 Yes or® Is animal waste land applied or spray irri&ated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or No (Notvaluatec Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system. or .other similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain . Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure , land applied,(Not Evaluated) spny irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)1 Yes or No Additional Comments: This was a very breif inspecticm, a mare thorough inspection wjll he conducted i n the future. Information noted on this inspection was obtafaed from the intergrator or DEM files. If you have ques.tions regarding th i s report please contact Paul Rawls, DEM Water Quality Section at (910) 486-1541. A rpyi~w of wa&te mapagamegt plans or record& wa~ ggt ~OAdu~tad. Inspector Name Signature cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed .