20191195 Ver 1_401 Application_20190910

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?
r Yes '- No
ID#*
20191195
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?* O Yes
IS No
Reviewer List:* Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
Select Reviewing Office:* Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Submittal Type:*
401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No
How much is O $240.00
owed?* 0 $570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r New Project
r Pre -Application Submittal
r More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments
r For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r Stream or Buffer Appeal
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Project Contact Information
Name: Paul Stephens
Vft is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Old Statesville Industrial Site
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Mecklenburg
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Old Statesville Industrial Permit (SAW -2019-
8.15M6
0133).pdf
Only pdf or lane files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:
401 Application for Old Statesville Industrial Site.
V By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
o I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
o I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the

"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date: September 6, 2019
Is filled in autorratically.

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2019-0133 Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Old Statesville Industrial Site
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑✓ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Submittal of a NWP 18 with a waiver request for stream impacts greater than 300 LF.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Griffin Industrial
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Mr. Paul Stephens, ECS Southeast LLP
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: SAW -2019-0133
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Old Statesville Road; 35.356140°N, -80.825067°W
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 02527108 & 2503112
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Dixon Branch
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: HUC 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 9: SAW- 2019-0133 Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Old Statesville Industrial Site
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑✓ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Submittal of a N WP 18 with a waiver request for stream impacts greater than 300 LF.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Griffin Industrial
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Mr. Paul Stephens, ECS Southeast LLP
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: SAW -2019-0133
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Old Statesville Road; 35.356140°N, -80.825067°W
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 02527108 & 2503112
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Dixon Branch
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: HUC 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit 9
Regional General Permit 9
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

I i
9i
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service"
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities NC Registered Engineering Firm F-1078
NC Registered Geologists Firm C-406
SC Registered Engineering Firm 3239
September 6, 2019
Mr. David Shaeffer
Project Manager/Geographer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification Application
Request for Nationwide Permit 18, Minor Discharge
Old Statesville Industrial Site — SAW — 2019 - 0133
Old Statesville Road
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49: 7761
Dear Mr. Shaeffer,
Please find the attached Request for Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Nationwide Permit 18
for the Prosperity Ridge Site (SAW — 2019 - 0133). The purpose of the project is to develop an
industrial complex.
Background
This site is located at Old Statesville Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
The purpose of this project is for industrial development. In order to provide the buffer to the
adjacent BP zoned parcel, save tree clearing area, utilize the natural topography on site, and
avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and streams along the northern site boundary, a
stormwater pond, parking lot, and building are proposed to impact an intermittent stream on the
northern portion of the site. Avoidance and minimization of waters of the U.S. was performed to
the greatest extent possible in order for successful implementation of the development. Due to
the impacts to the waters on site exceeding the 300 LF of stream impacts, ECS is requesting
the use of a waiver for authorization for 461 LF of stream impacts.
Site Reconnaissance
ECS met with Mr. David Schaeffer of the USACE on March 15, 2019 to verify the delineation
performed onsite. As part of the verification, Stream A was confirmed to be intermittent and
segmented throughout its reach.
Impacts & Mitigation
Based on the current site layout, the proposed permanent impacts include 461 LF of
jurisdictional stream. Due to the proposed stream impacts exceeding 150 LF of stream, ECS is
proposing that stream mitigation is included as part of the permit application. Mitigation for the
proposed stream impacts will be procured through payment into the N.C. Division of Mitigation
Services (DMS). Additionally, ECS is requesting the use of a waiver for authorization for 461 LF
of stream impacts.
ECS Capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLP • ECS Texas, LLP
www.ecslimited.com

ECS completed an NCSAM form for the stream proposed to be impacted, in which the stream
scored as low for both the USACE and NCDWR-intermittent classifications, respectively. Based
on the information from the NCSAM form and field observations, ECS is proposing mitigation for
the stream at a 1.5 -to -1 ratio. Copies of the forms are included as attachments.
ECS reviewed the Ribits website in an attempt to find stream mitigation credits in the Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County area or within the Catawba watershed. According to the Ribits website,
mitigation credits are available through the NCDMS and credits are available in the Catawba
HUC 03050101. According to the NCDMS website, stream credits are $525.65/credit at the
statewide rate. Based on the NCDMS Credit Reservation letter, stream credits are reserved in
the Catawba, HUC code to meet the mitigation requirement. Please see attached NCSAM Form
and NCDMS Credit Reservation letter.
Closing
On behalf of Griffin Industrial, ECS respectfully requests the use of NWP 18 to authorize the
permanent fill impacts of 461 LF of jurisdictional intermittent stream. The attached permit
application and associated attachments provide details pertaining to the proposed project
impacts.
ECS looks forward to your attention to this request. Please contact me at [phone] or
[e-mail] with questions or if additional information is required.
Sincerely,
Paul M. Stephens IV, E.I. W. Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
Environmental Project Manager Environmental Principal
[e-mail] [e-mail]
843.284.7823 704.409.7744
Attachments: Pre -Construction Notification Application
Appendices
Impact Exhibits
Figures
NCSAM Form
NCDMS In -Lieu Fee Mitigation Acceptance Letter
NHP Letter
SHPO Letter
Mecklenburg County Parcel Info

O�OF W AT f"e
A 1 5 =�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Old Statesville Industrial Site
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Riverbend Old Statesville, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
33672-209; 33678-169
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Griffin Industrial
3d.
Street address:
204 West Newberry Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Bloomfield, CT 06002
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone] x 211 (Main); [phone] (Direct)
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Mr. Scott Bosco
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Griffin Industrial Realty
4d.
Street address:
204 West Newberry Road
4e.
City, state, zip:
Bloomfield, CT 06002
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone] x 211 (Main); [phone] (Direct)
4g.
Fax no.:
N/A
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Mr. Paul Stephens
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
ECS Southeast, LLP
5c.
Street address:
3820 Faber Place Drive, Suite 200
5d.
City, state, zip:
North Charleston, SC 29405
5e.
Telephone no.:
(843) 284 - 7823 (o); [phone] (c)
5f.
Fax no.:
(843) 884 - 7990
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
02527108 (34.991 acres) & 2503112 (8.572 acres)
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.370144 Longitude: -80.778939
1 c.
Property size:
43.56 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Dixon Branch
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c.
River basin:
Catawba River Basin
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of undeveloped, wooded land. The site consists of rolling hills, indicative of the piedmont region. The surrounding properties
consists of single-family residences, commercial properties, Interstates 485 and 77, fields, and wooded land.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.249
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,180
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
See appendices.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See appendices.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Site visit with USACE March 15. SAW - 2019 - 0133
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑X Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): ECS, Mr. David valentine
Agency/Consultant Company: ECS Southeast
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
E] Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Fill
Stream A
INT
Corps
2
461
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
461
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
61
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See appendices.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Disturbance of the stream and wetlands shall be minimized to the extent practicable in order for the proper installation of the fill. The construction
techniques shall be conducted in accordance with NCDENR standards. Temporary and additional erosion control measures shall be maintained
throughout the construction process. Two rows of high hazard silt fence will be placed at the bottom the slopes to help with sediment and erosion
control during the roadway development activities.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
Q Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Q Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
461 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
53%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Stormwater
management plan is designed in accordance to City of Charlotte land development requirements.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Charlotte
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Charlotte
❑x Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
MX Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes Q No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
will be handled by Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Department (CMM) wastewater system.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
See the attached NHP letter for the site. ECS is still awaiting the response letter from the USFWS.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Please see attached NCSHPO response letter. Based on a review of the site plans and photographs, the SHPO reviewed and stated that the Cushion
House (MK1533) does not appear to possess the significance and integrity required for National Register of Historic Places (NRNP) listing.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM Map Service Center GIS viewer and attached figures.
Paul M. Stephens IV
09-06-2019
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP
"Setting the Standard for Service"
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities NC Registered Engineering Firm F-1078
NC Registered Geologists Firm C-406
SC Registered Engineering Firm 3239
Appendices:
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
3d. Explain the purpose of the project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a commercial warehouse building for industrial use for
Griffin, who is a national industrial warehouse developer. The site is located in the City of
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The site currently consists of wooded land and
agricultural fields, but is zoned for industrial use which is ideal for the intended use of the
property.
Griffin performs extensive studies throughout the entire eastern seaboard for new locations, and
Charlotte, NC was determined to be the ideal location to construct the industrial development
due to the market demand. Additionally, commercial properties and industrial campuses are
located surrounding the site, matching the intended use in the area. Requirements for potential
sites that were evaluated included ease of access to highways and Interstates, sufficient
property size for required building configuration and truck traffic flow. The site met these
requirements, and has shown to be the perfect location for Griffin's new development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed development consists of three industrial warehouse buildings, BMP stormwater
ponds, and associated parking lots. Proposed Building One is approximately 136,500 SF and
650'x210', and proposed Buildings Two and Three are approximately 182,000 SF and
260'x700'. Site access will be located off of Old Statesville Road. Site access will be located off
of Old Statesville Road and via the proposed Hucks Road, and the two entrances and exits will
allow for appropriate ingress/egress for traffic flow and emergency vehicle access.
The buildings are proposed as part of a speculative industrial development. Due to the NCDOT
plans to widen Old Statesville Road to a four lane boulevard with direct connection to 1-485, the
proposed site use is consistent with an already industrial zone. The site is currently surrounding
by Carrier Corp to the south, Metromont Industrial Boulevard to the west, and new industrial
buildings to the east, all part of the Industrial character of this area.
Typical materials and machinery will be used on-site during the construction process.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in
designing prosect:
Griffin has designed the buildings in an effort to minimize the footprint needed for successful
tenant space, while also appropriately designing the parking lot to fulfill stormwater loading
concerns and traffic flow through the site. Also, Griffin has identified this site as the optimal
location for the three new facilities with the shared truck court. The building sizes, truck court
configuration, parking lot size and location and trailer parking capability is driven by market
demand and is necessary to lease these facilities. The proposed dimensions are industry
standards based on ideal column spacing and 60 -foot speed bays for staging and shipping
ECS Capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLP • ECS Texas, LLP
www.ecslimited.com

goods. Shared truck courts require ample maneuverability to back trailers into the loading bays.
Employee parking is driven by market and local zoning requirements.
The site is designed as such to minimize the overall parking area impacts. The rear two
buildings have been oriented back to back so that they share a truck court and are partially
screen from the public roadway. The front building is aligned with Old Statesville Road so that
the front of the building faces the roadway and screens the other buildings. The city's
subdivision regulations require a new public roadway traveling north/south between the front
building, Old Statesville, and the two back buildings. Griffin was able to orchestrate the city to
approve an east/west building at the northern property line of the site since a new public
roadway, Hucks Road, will be constructed along the southern property line. Therefore, the only
feasible location for the stormwater detention pond is to the north of site and within the lower
elevation areas, as the topography naturally slopes in that direction. In order to provide the
buffer to the adjacent BP zoned parcel, save tree clearing area, utilize natural topography for
the proposed stormwater pond, and avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and streams along
the northern site boundary, the proposed buildings have been designed on the southern portion
of the site.
The proposed site layout and stormwater management ponds (designed to City of Charlotte
specification and meeting state minimum stormwater requirements) are designed to minimize
impacts to the waters on site. Unless these features are permanently impacted, this property
cannot support industrial development for which it is zoned. Avoidance and minimization of
waters was performed to the greatest extent possible with respect to the waters on-site and the
space needed to allow successful installment of the stormwater detention pond.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through
construction techniques:
Disturbance of the stream and wetlands shall be minimized to the extent practicable in order for
the proper installation of the facility. The construction techniques shall be conducted in
accordance with NCDENR standards. Temporary and additional erosion control measures shall
be maintained throughout the construction process. Silt fencing will be placed at the bottom of
the slopes to deter sediment and erosion control during roadway development activities.
Temporary erosion, sedimentation, and pollution controls will be installed prior to and
maintained during the entire construction duration and until final stabilization is established.
2

MB 64-406
SCALE: 1"=100'
/off°
�\ 'to \ 0 50' 100'
N/F
Q�QII/�J NI 1 \ \
O� gra�%� ) \ \\� 02505102
SWD INVESTMENTS LLC
�� \ ♦ Q\S 0��/ JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "A"- SECTION 1 DB 30510-96
\\� ♦ / c,6 -60 LF MB 64-406 1
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "B" - 543 LF
JURISDICTIONAL 30' POST \
CONSTRUCTION BUFFER
REFER TO GEOTECH REPORT
JURISDICTIONAL 30' POST JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND "A" - 0.249 AC
CONSTRUCTION BUFFER (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) �c
REFER TO GEOTECH REPORT
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "C" - 116 LF
(APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
REFER TO GEOTECH REPORT
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "A"- SECTION 2 //�//
-247 LF I / 1/// j�_ _ _� '90,
1��\I�1�111111 I / // // X95,\�\
_—_—__
_ __-- ---- EX.CULVERT IIo
N/F EX. SPEED LIMIT SIGNS 02505101 I 1
MECKLENBURG COUNTY INV:826.58 UNDER WATER c
� \ I I III III I I I / �/ /// / \\�_— � - —__— �—, ;--_J %\\\ \ \�\ �— •� \I�
C/O REAL ESTATE/FINANCE DEPT INV:827.27 15"RCP f� 1
DB 2940-318
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "A" - SECTION 3
-31 LF 1
EX-
\\\�
TRACT VI I / 1 \
CULVERT
02527109 INV:123.5315"R j 31n
.II I
\ \ I 1 \ \\ \
�, ) SHELBY WEST TAYLOR,
KATHY DARLENE GRAY,
-APPROXIMATE
\\ \\\\ I\�\\\\\\\\ &SANDRAWESTLEARY _
\\ �\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ DB 92.00-635 e^ — — — \ \ \ OF CULVER / / ^h/ I, /
\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\_ ; _ SQN��
TRACT V—i
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "A" - SECTION 4 / \\ — — / / INV:824.22 15"RC / / / I
/ 02527108 / / 2 r r "
\\ \\ \\\ \\\\\ \\\ \ I
-183 LF �/
CLARENCE N. TAYLOR, JR / / INV:827.66 15"RC 3 n . R/W
& SHELBY WEST I
DB 9205-189
8201 10' BELLSOUTH ESMT. / / o
PER DB 7299-335
EX. WATER METER--
-
EX. RESIDENTIAL A/ / / \� ��� _ - - —' � EX. EO
HOME BUILDING
JURISDICTIONAL 30' STREAM BUFFER (TYP.) TRACT IV
02527107 /
SHELBY WEST TAYLOR 1Lf
DB 4999-871
o
GRIFFIN INDUSTRIAL • CHARLOTTE • EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP c�
PN1018332 1 08.27.2019 1 GRIFFIN INDUSTRIAL REALTY LandDes*p.8/27/2019 2:24 PM RAYALEW \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018332\DOCS\CALCS\WETLAND PERMIT PACKAGE\1018332EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP.DWG

N/F
INVESTMENTS
SWDINVESTMENTS LLC
DB. 3051496 V/p41`
MB 64386
N/F
az5o51az
\//\t\\' \ SWD IDB W5111T% LLC /
MB 64d86
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "A" - SECTION 1
5+23.90 CO
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "A" - SECTION 2 JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "B"
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "C"
�� ''t� ■ ,� gas _ � ��� �� � � I
iso
X90\\
� � ,9\ ROPOSED BMP � � � WETLAND A 0.149 AIJ1
37 D27 1
N/F N �1 _ k'� 3M INVESTMENTS LLC
\�— I 02505101 i DB_27931TW$5 ��. ^ .11w mIU \\ \ MECKLENBU RG COUNTY I \ it 1 I ZONED_ I-1
O
' G \ C/O REAL EST E/FINANCE DEPT
DBz9T318
.g =_� Sao IT. f� � \� �� v � 5 4NIF
� �A
�- \
azsoa113 � ���..•-�• �'v` � ,� `n I� � I ' ' ' ' ' I I �� �—= 0�� - ] � 1 � I 1 � �� 'I v
NORHIS INC Q.
DB_ 5721-182
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM 'IN'- SECTION 3
TRACT V
`CLARENCESN,TAYLOR, JR ye '
I. K
DIL G \ 8SHELBY VEST _meq T; 13+07
P Z'I 18' BELL SOUTH ESMT-
/•�I O oB 920.4189
S\ 1 160.0'
— ---- PER oB ]294335
\, ( 82a - = N 1�R
I 1 I I \ TRACTA J I �"
82527109 11 I Z,� / az]-18-285
\ I \\ I iSHELBY WE ST TAYLOR, / - �� r �'' ILDiNC� ' I I II III ROSE K DAVIS
KATHY DARLEN E GRAY, DB _ 954-122
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "A" -SECTION 4 1 asANORAWESrLEARY 1 �� ZONED I /
089208635 jI -' Ar
jl TRACT N r /
02527ID7
SHELBY WEST TAYLOR / _• �r II /
OB 4999-871 /
JURISDICTIONAL 30' STREAM BUFFER I Q I /
• I �I 1 c 2'
1 l 875 650.0'
TCT III 1 W 827-18-286
821 RAazSZZlas f ,� DWANEJwIwAMsoN
I 820_ / \ KATHY DARLEN E GRAY I Q DB 230234139 /
OB 9208635 O ZONEO_I-1 /
N/F I Q
PER DB 7294324
HS-TAMPAT LLC8 Gry I / / ' N� I I _ ' I Q
PROPERTYTAX
DEPARTMENT \ N
08. 17235382 '� - I A 2600, I it I 10' BELL SOUTH ESMT-
z ry BU-LDING I
�� THTEE I r�
JI., v � � � / / / �' 210.0'
I- N I 30'DUKE ENERGYESMT-
I1 11 \ °O 7 0.0' ; PER DB 112614137
8 X76 820 I TRACT I F' 1 311 1 I az7-la-za7
i� — / NOELLOB92 13748 C -PC' + 2.06 II BOB HOLDINGS LLC
I. / 82527185 V_�
O ._ �I O CHAD MICHAELLEBLAN CBs 08.27994665
—•'+T _ _ _ == R °O = L C ZONED-I/
J
802 — -PER MB 22, PG Y I 1 del I /
° r— 804- .—I—ADNOTOPEjpq,/°°
806 - 808)
_ S ROAD
02NIF HUCK
503106 \ / ��1 _ — ^\\ I \ \ • •rl �'I I30'0U 503112 PER OB K261400
11380
EE H.
OLDCASTLE APG SOUTH INC /J \ I ( 02/ �� \ / /
08.NIF
28263H28 TDEVE � \ METROMO DB 4496-559MENT CORP SCALE. 1"--
200'
\ _ - 6 a 38' I
CARRIER CORPORATION TRACT II 0 100, 200'
BTAX DEPARTMENT 99821 —
OB. 70-918 SANDRAVIIEST 2741ST LEARV
DB z79434
— OE 7 il/
GRIFFIN INDUSTRIAL - CHARLOTTE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAP - OVERALL SHEET
PN1018332 1 08.27.2019 1 GRIFFIN INDUSTRIAL REALTY
8/27/2019 2:26 PM RAYALEW \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018332\DOCS\CALCS\WETLAND PERMIT PACKAGE\1018332 PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAP.DWG

a
SWOINVESTMVESTMELLC
aoI 1�I�r
�— oe_sl %
0Y6s Q /
Mesa -as oc'QI�R��
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "A" SECTION 1
—60 LF
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "A"– SECTION
247 LFI
FILL VOLUME BELOW OHWM: —1.85 CY
IMPACT AREA: ,494 SF—
� 1
N/F
azsssluz
SM INVESTMENTS LLC
OB. aW5HY%
MB sa3Us
URISDICTIONAL STREAM "B" —543 LF
JURISDICTIONAL 30' POST
CONSTRUCTION BUFFER
90
fit
DRAWING INFORMATION
SCALE: 1"=100'
6
0 50' 100'
STREAM/WETLAND TABLE
WETLAND/STREAM LABEL
STREAM A – SECTION 2
STREAM A – SECTION 3
STREAM A – SECTION 4
JURISDICTIONAL 30' POST
� / II _ :�• >,, _ 1 � I � // / � \� � � \ -�� �� � \ i \ CONSTRUCTION BUFFER
ROPOSED BMP = _
`. / \ _ \
800
805
1�
I . —78 �0
/li l
79
i l
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "A" – SECTION 3
—31 LF
FILL VOLUME BELOW OHWM: —0.29 CY /
IMPACT AREA: —62 SF BUILPING
• I I \ \ I \\ \ / � FFE 825.42 �
a �A 820 —
N I I I \ \\ JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "A" – SECTION 4' 183 LF
FILL VOLUME BELOW OHWM: —1.22 CY 260.0'/ / TRACT
_
• / / 1 \ I \ 1 IMPACT AREA: ^366 SF I I SHELBYWSTTA,
KATHY OAEN E GRAY,
85ANORAWESTLEARV
� 8
\
-
oeezao-sas
JURISDICTIONAL 30' STREAM BUFFER
I \I / / I •I I ` ` �1 \\\\v' /// /- 700.0'
------------------------- pp
---------------
------------
URISDICTIONAL STREAM "C" —116 LF
r
FILL (CF)
LF
FILL (CY)
49.97
247
1.85
7.77
31
0.29
33.00
183
1.22
N/F
azssslal
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
GO REAL ESTATE/FINANCE OEPH \
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND "A" BB_za 318
0.249 ACRES _
14+73.24 • \ I��
TRACTV \1 �
J I I I I I I I I C AREN CESN TAYLOR, JR � \
&SHELBY NEST
oB ezasls9 \
t � e
A
`10' BELL SOUTH ESMT-
/ PERDB729 5
111",
650.0'
/
—210.0' /
UI�G
ONE /
F-.827.4--2 /
SHELBY WEST TAYLOR
— oe a9e9-8�1
GRIFFIN INDUSTRIAL • CHARLOTTE • PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAP c�
PN1018332 108.27.2019 I GRIFFIN INDUSTRIAL REALTY LandDes*p.8/28/2019 5:35 PM RAYALEW \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018332\DOCS\CALCS\WETLAND PERMIT PACKAGE\1018332PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAP.DWG

R#rr1r�•Caacar coar re - — N i�
Legend ¢ndRd Huntemville
EFS
Project Study Area 1s P
Client:
cA rr Ea We
GLNCM, LLC
Park l
n � G
_ A
Project:
II
,j f OLD STATESVILLE
rrVh+pd INDUSTRIAL SITE
N a¢
�1
? OLD STATESVILLE ROAD
2 CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
Al..a Cr, _ � I-4951n"� � NORTH CAROLINA
Gar :reek Mallard
Praserra n fl���� J�'9h Mallard- Title:
qaC rack
J"��ah Cesar °Rq Regional t'ark SITE LOCATION
N3nh
e" ! pku kt,li rth a MAP
�P u Likerxv
o`�i tri rllaae �6� F+ditnr
µtill a a` 2 u.ff
10, 8 s a 1 in = 1 mile
c �'Ro MECKLENBURG COUNTY
o
a
c�
4
Hornets Ness e` Drawn B Checked B
l�gronal Park aQ �L y' y'
KCF CBD
aha �►r a e� Approved By: Date:
a, �, Rd v� WBF 01/09/2019
�4R
4 -:Gn r•s Hill: L ECS Project No.
w•F �nlf-',onr.:c Ad ��
a &„" � �49:7761- B
° Nevin 3,¢'
0. ar Repional Park FIGURE 1
s ftiR3on
ba Middle RihCDrixalk Dance i €gh

Legend
EFS
Project Study Area �.
IF Jr CIL UP
'�f� i�C; • a ,■ ;j f • Client:
�
—,y r �^ \ i I A `� GLNCM, LLC
V ab •
_ + •� Project:
f �r �� �'/ �, �~ � ��• � � OLD STATESVILLE
' t �• + INDUSTRIAL SITE
H If
f OLD STATESVILLE ROAD
••' — ' + }, �' CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Title:
USGS
te
�+
TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP
DATED: 1986
1' fr' --- - CHARLOTTE, NC
Huntt;rsville
1p
f -. -
n • '� r �I � � �-f�` � � PROJECT STUDY AREA
f r ` • '{ �. Drawn By: Checked By:
w• r
f { • ►� ` KCF CBD
Approved By: Date:
WBF 01/09/2019
* • ' ��R-- ECS Project No.
S _ � 49:7761-B
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000Feet FIGURE 2

Legend -
L 1 Project Study Area
P aE
SOIL MAP UNIT
CeB2 = Cecil sandy clay loam
CeD2 = Cecil sandy clay loam
PaE = Pacolet sandy loam
0 250 500
1,000
C
4.1
4
N t��l
�.
EFS
r� �y
Client:
GLNCM, LLC
Project:
OLD STATESVILLE
INDUSTRIAL SITE
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD
CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Title:
USDA-NRCS
SOIL SURVEY MAP
X -.--
DATED: 1980
MECKLENBURG,NC
SHEET. 4
', Huntal _-o lk
e
PROJECT STUDY AREA
- Drawn By: Checked By:
KCF CBD
Approved By: Date:
WBF 01/09/2019
ECS Project No.
49:7761-B
1,500 2,000 FIGURE 3
Feet

Legend
Project Study Area
Wetland Type
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
- Riverine
PF01A
Iva _
0 250 500
1,000 1,500
N wommmmmi
EF
fly
Client:
GLNCM, LLC
Project:
OLD STATESVILLE
INDUSTRIAL SITE
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD
CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Title
USFWS
NATIONAL WETLANDS
INVENTORY MAP
Hunter:5ville
PROJECT STUDY AREA
Drawn By: Checked By:
KCF CBD
Approved By: Date:
• WBF 01/09/2019
ECS Project No.
49:7761-B
2,000 FIGURE 5
= Feet

Legend
Project Study Area
® Approximate Wetland Location
Stream
Stream A
.357906, -80.826796
-486 If
WATER CLASSIFICATION
Body of Water: Dixon Branch
River Basin: Catawba
Classification: Class C
Buffers: 30 Feet
ECS PERFORMED A WETLAND/STREAM DELINEATION ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2018 AND JANUARY 9, 2019. ECS'S N i
FINDINGS HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE ON MARCH 15, 2019. THIS FIGURE SHOULD BE USED FOR
PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES. ECS RECOMMENDS CONSULTATION WITH A CIVIL ENGINEER TO
CONFIRM THE LOCAL BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. BUFFERS ARE NOT DEPICTED ON THE MAP. SOR"t
Stream B
35.3578 19, -80.824504 Client:
210 If (within PSA) Wetland A
i 1. 35.357673, -80.824093 GLNCM, LLC
0.048 ac.
Project:
OLD STATESVILLE
INDUSTRIAL SITE
OLD STATESVILLE ROAD
Stream C CHARLOTTE
35.357562, -80.824183 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
-94 If NORTH CAROLINA
Title:
WETLANDS AND
WATERS
OF THE US MAP
Huntersvillr I
PROJECT STUDY AREA
• �' '. •;!' •` • r. Drawn By: Checked By:
, KCF CBD
Approved By: Date:
01/09/2019
- L ' WBF rev:04/25/19
ECS Project No.
49:7761-B
0 150 300 600 900 1,200 FIGURE 7
Feet

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
I USACE AID #: NCDWR #: I
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Old Statesville Industrial Site 2. Date of evaluation: 1-9-2019
3. Applicant/owner name: Griffin Industrial 4. Assessor name/organization: ECS Southeast
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: Dixon Branch
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.358111 °N, -80.826845°W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream A 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 150'
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1' ❑Unable to assess channel dep
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 2' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A \1 ❑B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mit) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑l ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
®C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile -assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
❑A ❑A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
❑G
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
o 2❑H
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
Low -tide refugia (pools)
of flood flows through streamside area] ortoo much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
vegetation
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
❑I
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach)
(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
F, N
❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
g E
❑G
Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
o 2❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
Y r
❑I
Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
r
❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
0 2
❑K
Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E
Little or no habitat
""'REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1 la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
®C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Sal amanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
®F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ®No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft INC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Old Statesville Industrial Site Date of Assessment 1-9-2019
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization ECS Southeast
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

ROY COOPER
Govemor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
sea et -y
TIM BALIMGARTNER
Director
Scott Bosco
Griffin Industrial Realty, Inc.
204 West Newberry Road
Bloomfield, CT 06002
NORTH CAROLINA
Envkwunental QuaUty
September 4, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 3/4/2020
Project: Old Statesville Industrial Site County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
Impact
HUC
Catawba 03050101 Warm Stream 461
J
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Paul Stephens, agent
cea::f Q 1E
Sincerely,
J m s. B Stanfill
A e Management Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environrwntal Qpality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.t3976

a ■■N Ray Cooper. Governor
00 0 NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
om ■o NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
E won Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-9055
May 23, 2019
Jenna Dew
ECS Southeast, LLP
1812 Center Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28217
RE. Old Statesville Road Industrial Site, 7761-E
Dear Jenna Dew.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.but lerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
7=:'API'M CNT 0I N.;,- lJ;,.A1, ANI? (:i..P r{.I'i •iF`.:U . ;C:=

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Old Statesville Road Industrial Site
Project No. 7761-E
May 23, 2019
NCNHDE-9055
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present, it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name wner Owner Type
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/content/hely). Data query generated on May 23, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q2 Apr 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Old Statesville Road Industrial Site
Project No. 7761-E
May 23, 2019
NCNHDE-9055
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Group Observation
Date
Vascular Plant 28787 Acmispon helleri Carolina Birdfoot- 2010-08-24
trefoil
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur
:OO1
Vascular Plant 33285 Sceptridium jenmanii Alabama Grape -fern 1936-09
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Element
Occurrence
Rank
E
Hi?
H
Accuracy
i
2 -High
5 -Very
Low
5 -Very
Low
Federal State
Status Status
J&
--- Special
Concern
Vulnerable
--- Endangered
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name caner Owner Type
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation State
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services State
Clark's Creek Nature Preserve Mecklenburg County Local Government
Global State
Rank Rank
G5T3 S3
G3 S2
--- Special G3G4 S2
Concern
Vulnerable
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/content/hely). Data query generated on May 23, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q2 Apr 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-9055: Old Statesville Road Industrial Site
May 23, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Q Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 4 of 4
1:23,263
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
r
11
5
r°
o.
Ps�6
0
sam Raar or
ash�b
s
,renp�
77
a
JOP10,
y!\Rd
eaT
Abyt,rd era'��e
-
1-685•Inn or-.a571ry
Gin Dr
t
8558
,,3v+ife m
-
G>en Pd
Copp �
I.OpS•Inner
- _ _ _
_
�
II DI
_ ;
Foy,
Or
i
fkd
3_'. d0a
c
Varve Davrs
v,
"laps' Ave
D°p`mo
a`
A6rowngo'
Rb.Ae
s
Alten
SP�I'b Fa14
€3
v
P
e
o
its Lake
-
OL"onA'ur(ry/uFe
_
x
m
/
r%,d Kd
stfield
Melmmont Pkwy
4
�A
Wahl.
d 4'
rt
War
Mal North
IB9e
Ft
!
v
Hrcks R7
Fails Ridge Ln
2
r i
rf
I NorMlale-
'
if.Woo O
Comrwn•
W W1 Harl/s dlryl -�77�
za
Pernal
Woade
r(] u r Oo1 R� 5
ol� H
Trvs F
S �0
Cion "
%
Q-A
m
�$
El-eery
lemanrry -
Perwre'N
a
tF
f24
-
Da.
Hendersonc
Crofl
-
`
Hams 0"n""
Circle
_
`"'ye Pkv/ N
21i
a Akron
a O
W. L
"a"',
F.' �
2�
r
8771
E -
SN
a
`11
Oov+mrg GreekG
o;y
May 23, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Q Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 4 of 4
1:23,263
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community

SPATE Q„
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Banos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
July 18, 2019
Evan Bass
Moore & Van Allen
100 North Tryon Street, Suite 4700
Charlotte, NC 28202
[e-mail]
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Chevy
Re: Develop Old Statesville Road Industrial Site, Old Statesville Road & Huck Road, Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, ER 19-1873
Dear Mr. Bass:
Thank you for your email of July 2, 2019, transmitting the requested photographs and site plans. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
The Cashion House (MK1533) does not appear to possess the significance and integrity required for listing on
the National Register of I Iistoric Places. Thus, there will be no historic properties affected by the proposed
development project.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
6931"'Ramona M. Bartos
cc: Jenna Dew, ECS Southeast
David Valentine, ECS Southeast
David Schaeffer, USACE
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

POLARIS 3G
Tut. rials quirk Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
%—L ID CIS ID
02527108 02527108
Addresses located on Property (P—L.L City)
9817 OLD STATESVILLE RD CHARLOTTE INC. 28261 +
Owner Name
Nailing Address
204 W NEWBERRY RD CSD
RIVERBEND OLD
GRIFFIN INDUSTRIAL LLC
STATESVILLE LLC
BLDOMFI ELD CT 06002
N the mailing address
�r
wrong? Request Change
Phot. Date: 04/02/2014
Link T.
Google Street View
Trdseye Mew maintained
by Mecklenburg County
LPga L Desr
NA
Land Area
34.991 AC
Fire District
Hunt—iLle RuraL

01) POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Ouick Tips Report fasues More Map Apps
L2 M22-29
Land Area
Parcel ID
GIS ID
02503112
02SD3112
Address located an Property
(Postal City)
NA
Municipality
Uwner Name
Mailing Address
un'mmrporated
204 WEST NEWVERRY RD
RIVERBAND OLD
C/O GRIFFIN INDUSTRIAL
STATESVILLE LLC
LLC
BLOOMFIELD CT D6002
Is the maiLing address
wrong Request Change
Link Ta
GoogLe Street View
Birdseye View maintained by Mecklenburg County
Legal Desc
L2 M22-29
Land Area
6.572 AC
Eire District
Hnnte-rille Rural
Special District
Fire Service A
Account Type
Non-nc Corp
Municipality
MeckLenhurg County -
un'mmrporated
Land Use
Industrial
Link To
Enter add fe5s/par: mark
4dvanced Search Market Analysis Search Help
40
n.
v
42YrrL 'J i}�li'` 4
t
44
'44F
to
.y ; r� r Streets 0 Hybritl Topo
"F!7
1 4 - dl