Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820624_INSPECTIONS_20171231NORTH CAROLINA Deparbnent of Environmental Quality Reason for Visit: 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: lt7~ Htl Arrival Time: I ]lJ i) b Departure Time:! rn rj· I County: f,f-.tfSo(J Region: B2:U Farm Name: S' n\ cJg, ,";,-S CIA) fSa.-r>41l Owner Email: Owner Name: Cat' [foV\ 0t'4 t!l-1"--~ i!\e,,c"'r'-Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Phone: Onsite Representative: ll Integrator: ....:J'~· :........::c...::.Jt{L...L. _________ _ Certified Operator: c.. D. Certification Number: fll b Olf 0 Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts l. Is any di scharge observed from any part of the o peration? DYes ~DNA ONE Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application field D Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes 0No ~A ONE b. Did the di scharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) 0 Yes 0No (3'NA ONE c. What is the estimated vo lume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d . Does the di scharge bypass th e wa ste management system? (If yes, noti fy DWR) 0 Yes 0No ~A ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past di scharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there a ny observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a di sc harge? Page 1 of3 0 Yes 0 Yes ctNo DNA ONE ~ DNA ONE 21411015 Continued IFacilit)· Number: lnate of Inspection: /7 ~ /8-I " Waste Collection & Treatment 4}s storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): fJ7 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~NA ONE DYes 0No ~ ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 DYes ~o DNA ONE 0 Yes ~ DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks. and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 0 Yes c:fNo DNA 0 NE 0 Yes ~o D NA 0 NE 0 Yes E1'No DNA 0 NE DYes E:(No DNA ONE ll. Is there evidence of incorrect land app li cati on? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~o 0 NA 0 NE D Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn , etc .) 0 PAN 0 PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 O utside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13 . Soi l Type(s): /v, , (z a I { 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those desi!:,'llated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigat ion desi!:,'ll or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lac k adequate acreage for land application? I 1l. Is there a lac k of properly operating waste app li cation equipment? Required Records & Documents 19 . Did the facility fail to have the Cc rtitlcate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to hav e all components of theCA WMP readi ly available? If yes, check the appropriate box. 0WUP 0 Checklists 0 Dcsit-'11 D Maps 0 Leas e Agreements 0 Yes I::L]..wo DNA 0 Yes ~0 DNA 0 Yes ~ DNA 0 Yes ~0 DNA 0 Yes ~ DNA 0 Yes ~0 DNA 0 Yes [d"No DNA Oother: ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check th e appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~DNA ONE 0 Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysi s 0 Waste T ransfers D Weather Code 0 Rainfall D Stocking D Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspec tions 0 Monthl y and I" Rainfall Inspections D Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain ga uge? 0 Yes Ga'No 0 NA 0 NE 23 . If se lecte d, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes [d"No 0 NA 0 NE Page 2 of3 21412 015 Continued IFacili?' Number: 9'J -GtV IDate oflnspection: 11 ~ / K 24. Did the faci lity fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes ~o D NA 0 NE 2~. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to s ludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. DYes ~o QNA ONE 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Fai lure to develop a POA for s ludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon Li st structure(s) and date offrrst survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? lfyes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30 . Did the faci lity fail to notify the Regional Office of emer gency situations as required by the permit? (i .e ., discharge, fi-eeboard problems, over-applicat ion) 3 I . Do subsurface tile drains exist at the tacility? If yes, check the a ppropriate box below. 0 Application Field D Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representat ive? 34. D oes the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? 0 Yes [!fNo DNA ONE 0 Yes ~0 DNA ONE 0 Yes ~0 DNA O NE 0 Yes ~0 DNA ONE 0 Yes ~0 DNA ONE 0 Yes ~ DNA ONE 0 Yes ~ DNA ONE 0 Yes ~ D NA ONE 0 Yes ~ DNA ONE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). C,a_.{tbt.NVftoV\ -~--g_q-Jb S (.._JJ e-S""""r -'/-JJ -fl Reviewer/Inspector Name: Revi ewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of3 Pho ne:UIJ.._ f:J1~J3J'( Date 17"1 }g 21412 15 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: O'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: lftS Sf'+[ I Arrival Time: I rc lQ 4 I Departure Time: County: ~m RegionlffC..V Farm Name: S /'ILJ a...._v-$o"-' ~~ Owner Email: Owner Name: Cud?: B ~(?Cfl,f Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: · {36-v&J 1~ Title: Onsite Representative: (( · Certified Operator: _.{Jz...........,:..::;· ..:...v-..-_{~t; ____ f3_a; __ r(J,..t,........;::;__.-_+-'------- Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'! Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? D Other: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes. notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Integrator: Certification Number: ff'b tJ I( 0 Certification Number: Longitude: D Yes ~DNA O NE D Yes 0No [3'1JA O NE DYes 0No Ej'NA ONE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notifY DWR) 0 Yes 0No aNA ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'! 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of3 DYes @No DYes 6No DNA ONE DNA ONE 21411015 Cominued [Facility Number: S'Z-b 1-.l{ I I Date of Inspection: 2S A; if 1/B Wask CoUection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) Jess than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural !Teeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 'J-.7 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes~ DNA ONE DYes D No crN'A D NE Structure 5 Structure 6 DYes ~o DNA ONE DYes 0"No DNA D NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or en\ironmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required·by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? DYes DYes ~0 DNA ONE ifNo DNA ONE DYes ~o DNA ONE D Yes 0No 0 NA D NE 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes ~o DNA D NE D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN 0 PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside o f Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): sbo ltr I 3. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility Jack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If ye s, check the appropriate box. Ow uP 0Checklists 0 Design D Maps D Lease Agreements 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~ DNA ONE 0 Yes ~0 DNA ONE DYes [2J'No i DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes {2f'No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes 0'No DNA ONE 00ther: DYes Q1(Jo DNA ONE D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking D Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and l " Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes ~No DNA 0 NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakcrs on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes 0No 0 NA 0 NE Page2of3 21412015 Continued !Facility Number: g;tl-4 ,._:'q I (!>ate of Inspection: )...SA-11.1'1({7 I 24. Bid the fucility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. 0 Yes [!{No ~0 DNA ONE DNA ONE 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Application Field D Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA WMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ·0 Yes ~No 0Yes ·~o DYes ~0 DYes @'No DYes EfNo 0 Yes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~ 0NA 0NA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings offacility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). Gt(ytcJl:f\ -~--f cr~ I' .s [.,_"J(, S~(-t ?j l ,_j ~ o l b Ce~t ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: PhonefUO-#{33-3JJ l{ Date:~~~,~ /{7 Page3of3 21412015 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: @'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: ------------------------------------------- Facility Contact: ~5 g~,d'{ Title: ---~~--=~--------------------Phone: Onsite Representative: /( Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? D Other: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Integrator: Certification Number: j f( Dt{ 0 Certification Number: Longitude: 0Yes ~ DNA ONE DYes 0No [31il'A ONE DYes 0No ~ ONE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No ~A ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of3 DYes efNo D Yes -e::::J No DNA ONE DNA ONE 11412011 Continued IFacility'Number: If~ ,(;J; t{ I nate of Inspection: u ~l6 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~DNA ONE 0 Yes 0 No [!'N/... 0 NE StructureS Structure6 0 Yes [E"1fo 0 NA 0 NE 0 Yes [3'No 0 NA 0 NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application lO. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? DYes ~o DYes (&"No 0 Yes O'No DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE II. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? lfyes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes !:A No 0 NA 0 NE D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): ~~ Sc,v 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation desi6'11 or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. OwuP Ochecklists 0Desi.b'll D Maps 0 Lease Agreements 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~0 DNA ONE DYes (!(No DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes B"No DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE 0 Yes ~0 DNA ONE Oother: DYes ~0 DNA ONE D Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers D Weather Code D Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections D Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes (2(No 0 NA D NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? Pagelof3 D Yes [ZfNo 0 NA 0 NE 21412014 Continued ltoacilityNumber: -6'lf !Date of Inspection: 'i b ~1 f~ I · 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes l!::f'No 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. 0 Yes c:::rN"o 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: DYes 0 Yes QYes QYes DYes DYes ------------------------ 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? DYes 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? DYes 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? DYes ~0 cnNo QA<l'o (d'No [2t"No gNo []f'No @No ~0 DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any otber comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). ~lb~t-l)flt.-c;,-1o-ft{ sr~~s~-IJ.-1-\ s 0-?_L ~ P-3,7 Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of3 Phone: '<33~ 333( Date : ~d~b~=l--l~~~ _ 214/'ZOII ~o,liance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: efRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: IJ lj?f(Js I Arrival Time:t71U o ffl Departure Time:l g'1 /b A I County: J1(Y}1 Region: F{(O Farm Name: 5"ct'\.d 'h r .s'b (.() Fa..v~ Owner Email: Owner Name: ~/..6-, CJoc-c.foof Phone: Mailing Address: PhysicaiAddress: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Facility Contact: -----l.::d.-4o'· ,<..:.IIL::....:~.....:'-..._!_13~~.::;....;.;=Gi;::;___Title: -----------Phone: Onsite Representative: ll Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. rs any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Other: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Integrator: .....!...lY\J....L..{)J...L. ________ • ________________________________ _ Certification Number: err ( O((o Certification Number: Longitude: \ DYes ~NA ONE DYes 0No ~NE DYes 0No o-m-ONE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No ~ ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of3 DYes DYes ~ DNA ONE ~0 DNA ONE 2/412011 Continued J Facility Number: I nate of Inspection: ~fi.P R l5 ·Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes (31'fo 0 NA 0 NE DYes 0No ~ ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 DYes~ DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11 . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes~ DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE DY es ~ DNA ONE 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN 0 PAN> 10% or 10 lbs . 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18 . Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19 . Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. 0WUP Ochecklists D Design 0 Maps 0 Lease Agreements 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes ~DNA ONE D Yes ~DNA ONE DYes gJ..No-D NA ONE DYes 0.No_0NA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE DYes Q--No DNA ONE 00ther: DYes CjNo DNA ONE D Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Wast e Transfers 0 Weather Code D Rainfall D Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rainfall In spections 0 Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23 . If selected, did the facility fai l to in sta ll and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Page 2 of3 DYes D Yes ~ ~ DNA ONE DNA ONE 2/4120ll Continued I Facility Number: !Date of Inspection: J APR I~ I '24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. DYe s ~ D NA ONE 0 Yes EjN"o DNA 0 NE 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Otber Issues 28. Did the facility fai l to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e ., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes [J-NO DNA ONE DYes C}Ntl DNA ONE DYes c:rNo DNA ONE DYes Q-NO" DNA ONE 0 Yes ~DNA ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE 0 Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: ---------------------- 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? C -0~ b ;co·L o 1\ .s (v J J-t~v .ru I Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page3of3 0-"' ~ DYes (31ifo D NA ONE 0 Yes [Zt"No DNA ONE DYes C}rfo DNA ONE r I 3 /' ,.o Phone: L{j~~ ~t{ Date: aAPL~ 1 ~ 214/2014 Reason for Visit: <51foutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emer ency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: ~ . rrival Time: I (f1 ( ¢ J Departure Time:l 7t b {) J CounS_A VVf Regio~ Farm Name: 5 I~C.,{o.._ • l._~W F; v{A. Owner Email: Owner Name: c~~rk T5av--L{; .. f= Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address : ------:-----------:----------+-------------------- Uv·--+; ~ (?;,p '(CJl't·4itle: rr-J\. Phone: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: '( ( -Integrator: ~L-~~--------- Certified Operator: C,-{~ S,~Ach,t- Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge obsetved from a ny part of the operation? Discharge or igina te d at : 0 Structure 0 Appl icatio n Fie ld a. Was the con veyance man-made? 0 Other: b . Did the di sc harge reach waters of the State? (If ye s, not ify DWQ) c . What is the estim a ted volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: DYes ~DNA ONE DYes 0No ~·ONE 0 Ye s 0No ~ONE d. Does the di sc harge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No ffi1[A O NE 2. Is there evidence of a pas t di sc harge from any part of the operatio n? 3. Were there any obsetvable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a disc harge? Page I of3 DYes DYes ~ DNA O NE ~ DNA ONE 1/4/1011 Co ntinued l~acility Number: ~b 6$« I II~ ''{ loateoflnspection:/ Cil< I I Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. Ifyes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure3 Structure 4 Identifi er: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): '""· 32 5. Aie there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures o bserved? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~DNA O NE DYes ~DNA ONE StructureS Structure 6 DYes ~DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8 . Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste s tructures r equire m aintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? DYes~ DNA DYes~-DNA DYes ~-DNA ONE 0 Yes Q}MO 0 NA 0 NE 11. Is there evid ence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes [3-X<(. D NA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen G round 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN 0 PAN> 10% or I 0 Jb s. 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 E v idence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area f3 e r ~vJ~ t:-:cc ~ 12 . Crop Typc(s): 13. Soil Type(s): IV o · a ,v-.. 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack ofproperly operating waste appli cation equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CA WMP readi ly available? If yes, check the appropriate box. DYes ~:DNA D Yes aJ..Ntr · D NA D Yes ~-DNA DYes g.No DNA DYes ~-DNA DYes (]f'No DNA DYes Q-.Wo-DNA O NE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE 0WUP 0Checklists 0 Design D Maps D Lease Agreements 00ther : _________ _ 21. Docs record keeping need improvement? If ye s, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes [LJ-No 0 NA 0 NE 0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analy sis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey 22. Did the fac ility fai l to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes ~o DNA D NE DYes ~o DNA ONE 2 3 . If selected, did the facility fail to in stall and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? Page 2 of3 21412011 Continued IFacmtyNumbe" (k£#{ I !Doteoflnspection/7&• /L/1 14. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pennit? 0 Ye s @-No-0 NA 0 NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with pennit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check 0 Yes ~ D NA 0 NE the appropriate box(es) below. D Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below . 0 Application Field D Lagoon/Storage Pond D Other: DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes 0 Yes ------------------------ 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the pennit orCA WMP ? DYes 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representati ve? DYes 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? DYes ~ DNA ~0 DNA g.-No DNA ~0 DNA [dfio DNA ~ DNA ~ DNA {]}No DNA ~ DNA Comments (refer to question#): Eiplain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better eiplain situations (use additional pages as necessary). S((}d)'t (tpJ~ II -!1-(j c ~(l b ~k--v\ { 1-9-1 ~ Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of3 ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE t· ompliance Inspection Reason for Visi t: ®'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: I slol}l~ I Arrival Time:I07WJQI'\ I Departure Time:lo,~us-;a County: c§tll"psoo Region: F/0 Farm Namc: __ ___;;~::s:a.a.Lllt.Cllo....o!..~ ~::....:.:::~~~:::.....:So:.....oQ::..::W=.-....:~....:~.!!tl..:.:~~----Owner Email: Owner Name: Q_f\ R \ -\-ot0 ~ AR~to_, T Phone: Mailing Address : Physical Address : ------------------------------------------- Title: Phone: Facility Contact: C , ) R-t'I-5 :J3 flg w;IC ( ----------- On site Rcpre sentath·e: SA f1\ £ --~~~----------------------Integrator: IN OE.(!Cf\f)E ttJJ Certified Operator: C,AR 1-lon cf:u.,..c;..{f'+I.~ Certification N umber : S'BtqOL-(0 Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Lon git ude: Discharges and Stream Impa cts I. Is any discharge observed fro m a ny part of the operation ? ffves 0 No DNA O NE Discharge originated at: 0 Struc ture 0 App lication Fi e ld 0 Other: a . Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge n:a ch waters of the St ate? (If yes. no tify DWQ) D Yes 0 No (SYNA O NE 0 Ye s 0 No ~A O NE c. Wh at is the estimated volume that reach ed waters o f th e State (gallons)? d. Doe s the di sc harge bypass the waste management system? (lf yes, notifY DWQ) 0 Ye s 0 No ~A ONE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of th e operation ? 3. We re there any observable adverse impacts or pote ntial ad ve rse impacts to the waters of the State o ther th an from a discharge? Page I of3 0 Yes 0 Yes GJINo DNA ONE ~0 D NA ONE 214120 11 Continued . ' !Facility Number: ~d. !Date of Inspection: s/0 I I I~ r l Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure4 Identifier: ~~ ..-= Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): __.IL..Ci....!..._ __ Observed Freeboard (in): ~ f" 5. Arc there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste managem ent or closure plan? DYes ~No DNA ONE D Yes 0 No [9'NA 0 NE Structure 5 Structure6 0 Yes G{No DNA D NE 0 Yes c:{No DNA 0 NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and tbe situation poses an immediate public bealtb or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not appli cable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes [S(No DNA 0 NE DYes ~o DNA ONE D Yes ~o DNA ONE D Yes Gf'No DNA ONE 0 Excess ive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN 0 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. D Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Ev idence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Approved Area 12.CropType(s): ~tR.C!=-uO~ (H~;..) f""E.sc.ut.. ( i-\~'f\ ~.G. 0· 13 . Soil Type(s): ~o ~ C2oP... R~10 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? Page 2 of3 0 Yes DYes DYes D Yes D Yes D Yes DYes 00ther: D Yes [52{ No DNA ONE g'No DNA ONE [3'No DNA ONE gNo DNA O NE G}'No DNA ONE [3'No DNA ONE u{No DNA O NE 5f'No 11412011 Continued jDate of Inspection: s/Or)l~ I !Facility Number: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes. check the appropriate box(es) below. 0 Yes ~No DYes 5(No DNA ONE DNA ONE D Failure to complete annual sludge survey D Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels D Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility'! If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes 0 No 0 Yes D No DNA ONE ~NA ONE DYes ~Yf"No DNA ONE DYes (Sd'No DNA D NE DYes !;Z(No DNA ONE D Yes I9"No D NA D NE D Application Field D Lagoon/Storage Pond D Other: ------------------------ 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 34. Docs the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of3 DYes gNo DYes ~No DYes [3"No DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE Phone: ct\D · 3 ~D-~cos\ Date: 5 \o\\ \ ").... ' 21411011 ; Operation Review Structure Evaluation 0 Follow-u 0 Referral 0 0 Other Date of Vl•it' ~ ArrivaiTime' 1/0~ Departure Timed lit /tiiJ.. County'~ Reg;on' F12/) Farm Name: ~~tc: ~<) ~ Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: PhysicalAddress: ----------------~-------------------------------------------------------------------- Facility Contact: {!ur/ts ~~cL Title: ~-~. Phone: Onsite Representative: a~.$ &rrc.i(~ Integrator: ~...,.~ Certified Operator: ~ l:f!l::i:,.f--6~,..-~ertificatioo Number: Jf'6t:' Ia Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed trom any part of the operation? Di scharge originated at: D Structure 0 Application Field a. Was the conveyance man-made? D Other: b . Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume tha t reached waters of the State (gallons)? d . Does the discharge bypass the waste management sys tem ? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2 . Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation ? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of3 Longitude: DYes ~0NA ONE DYes 0 No ~ONE DYes 0 No ~ONE D Yes D No [iii: 0 NE DYes ~ DNA ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE 21412011 Continued I Date of lnspectioJ~/ // I I Facility Number: Waste CoUection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus. heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 #I Structure 2 Structure3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc .) 6 . Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes~ DNA ONE 0 Yes D No [g-t(A D NE Structure 5 Structure6 DYes ~ DNA ONE DYes~ DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11 . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes~ DNA ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE D Yes~ DNA ONE DYes~ DNA ONE DY es~ D NA O NE 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 H eavy Metals (Cu , Zn, etc.) D PAN 0 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure t o Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area 12 .CmpType(s) ~ ~~/ 5f'<K) 13.Soi1Type(s): ___ _ 14 . Do the receiving crops differ fro m those des ignated in theCA WMP? 0 Yes ~DNA ONE 0 Yes [31fo DNA 0 NE 0 Yes u;;rr:ro 0 NA 0 NE I 5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application s ite need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to sec ure and/or operate per the irrigation d esign or wettable acres deterrnination? 17 . Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land a pplication'? I 8. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the fa c ility fail to have the Certifi cate of Coverage & Permit r eadily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. owuP O checklists D Design 0 Maps D Lease Agreements 21. Does record kee ping need improve ment? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below. DYes 0 Yes D Yes DYes 00ther: D Yes ~ D NA O NE ~0 D NA ONE 0"No DNA ONE ~0 DNA ONE ~ DNA ONE D Waste Application 0 W eekl y Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste T ransfers D Weather Code 0 Rainfa ll 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey 22. Did the faci lity fail to install and maintain a ra in gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fa il to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigati on equipment? Page 1 of3 DYes ~ 0 Yes 0 No DNA ONE ~ONE 2/411011 Continued jFacility Number: !Date oflnspection: ~ ::z2z I J 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? lfyes, check 0 Yes DNA ONE DNA ONE the appropriate box(es) below. 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below . 0 Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other: DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes ------------------------ 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? DYes 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 0 Yes 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? DYes ~ DNA 0No [B'1iJA ~0 DNA ~0 DNA ~ DNA ~ DNA ~ DNA ~DNA ~DNA Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings offacility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: 1/£7 -1i3 -:-3 ?x?fJ Dat{/jf=//J 114/ZOll Reviewer/Inspector Sioo~~-===~~g~~~;;.:Jp.~~~~~L------------------------­ Page3 of3 2 -oS-2o!O ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit ~ne 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: I!-29-10 I Arrival Time:l/t> ,' oo.,l Departure Time: l;o: ~ I County: ~ { . s. --+•A,. Farm Name: ~ i N C a' r "w /c:c. ~~'"-Owner Email: --------------------------- Region: F/20 Owner Name: Cav /fo"' Bave.. P6?J +-Phone: MailingAddress: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Physical Address:---------------------------------------------------------------- Facility Contact: _L.=-q.....:...._rh_ . ...;_·.::..s___;;i3;;;._Gt_v_...J_i_<....;;.;.i( ___ Title: / ~ • ;y~t:... · PhoneNo: ________________ __ Onsite Representative : -------------------------------------Integrator: __ ....;Ca:.-_t.._' _c.._ ..... _,_· <-__ h __ tl._v_~__;'----------- Certified Operator: ---------------------------------------Operator Certification Number: --------------- Back-up Operator: -------------------------------------Back-up C ertification Number: Location of Farm: ,------, 0 D · D .. Latitude: L__J Longitude: Discharges & Stream Impacts I. Is any di sc harge obse rv ed from any part of th e o pe ratio n? DYes 81(io 0 NA 0 NE Disc ha rge originated at: D Struc ture 0 Applicati o n Field 0 Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. D id th e d ischarge reach waters of the State? (I f yes, noti fy DWQ ) c . Wh at is th e es tim ate d vo lume th at reac hed waters o f th e S tate (gall on s)? d. Does di scharge bypass th e was te manageme nt system ? (If yes, no ti fy DW Q ) 2 . Is there evide nce o f a past di scha rge fr om any pa rt of th e operati o n? 3 . Were th ere a ny adve rse impacts or pote nti al adve rse im pacts to th e Wate rs of the S tate o th e r th an from a disc harge? D Yes 0 No B'NA ONE D Ye s 0No ~A O NE 1 D Ye s 0 No ~ ON E D Yes B'N'o D NA O NE D Yes 81fo D NA O NE 11128104 Continued I Facility Number: B2-b2'll Date of Inspection [7-2 ?-1 0 I Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes DYes ~DNA ~DNA ONE ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:------------------------------------------ Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): ----....,..-------------------------------------- Observed Freeboard (in): ---=31J11;=-.;....;;2;;;;....:(,~ ----------------------------------- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 Yes ~ 0 NA 0 NE 8. Do any of the stucturcs lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes ~DNA ONE DYes ~DNA ONE ll. Is there evidence of incorrect application? lfyes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~ 0 NA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) -~B.~· ~::::r.=-=· M:.:.:..::"-:.!:~::.:~==:..._(.:....:._~_t.....,J'----:,~· ...:f?.-...::.::.::s~c..~i.t~~~0....::G::..r.:...:;~;z'~c..::.::)~,___.lS~~:!.:d::.:...I....:G::::..:..:.--e<J~·"':...._..:..~..:..()_, _> _· _) ____ _ 13. Soil type(s) /loA Rt:t Go .If 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WM P? DYes ~DNA ONE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes ~DNA ONE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? DYes ~D NAD NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? DYes ~DNA ONE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes ~·DNA ONE to question #): El'P'~i~!:~iilY,;•)JE:s answers and/or any re•:ornn•eiitdattifi,ris(o"r··'a ny (Jith,ercoJrnlllleo rin .. ;infio;::,nf facility to better (use additional pages as ne•~essar-y,,::: Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Phone: Cf/(), Y3'3, 33t>O Date: /-2 <J -2.0/ D 12/28104 Continued '" I Facility Number: 82-62.1/l Date ofl nspection k-Z 9 -I 0 I Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components ofthe CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. D WUP D Checklists D Design 0 Maps 0 Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes DYes ~DNA ~DNA ONE ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers D Annual Certification D Rainfall D Stocking D Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections · D Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? -23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notifY the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? DYes~ DYes~ DYes~ DYes~ DYes C3'No DYes ErNo DYes ~ DYes ~ DYes ~ DYes ~ DYes ~ DYes ~ 12/28104 DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ONE Type of Visit -~o~liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit efftoutine 0 Complaint 0 Foll:w up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other D Denied Access DateofVisit: 11-11-0q I ArrivaiTime:l<f,'.2.rA--I DepartureTime: I1.'1>Jh-.l County: Region: piUJ Farm Name: 51 ,..,cl at f"" So vJ hi rr-""""'-Owner Email: ---------------------------- Owner Name: Ca.r I +a"' "&..vc.fi>o 1-Phone: Mailing Address: ----------------------------------------------------- Physical Address: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Facility Contact: Cur+t~ 8o..rwit:Jc_ Title: 7~. sPec.. • • PboneNo: ________________ _ Onsite Representative: -------------------------Integrator: ---=G=o_h-=--P._y-_;,:..... ~_;:....---=.Fa__---=~_;:_-=----- 0 Certified Operator:----------------------------Operator Certification Number: ------------ Back-up Operator: -----------------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD'D" Longitude: Discharges & Stream Impacts l. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes B1fo 0 NA ONE Discharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Ap plication Field 0 Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did th e discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estima ted volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Docs discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes , notifY DWQ) 2 . Is there evidenc e of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3 . Were th ere any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the Sta te oth er than ffom a discharge'' DYes 0No ~A ONE DYes 0No G;;}NA ONE I DYes 0 No B"NA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes ~ DNA ONE 12/28104 Co ntinued !Facility Number:B2 -t,Z4l! Date of Inspection 19'-!]-0 j I Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes ~o DNA ONE D Yes Gf"N'o D NA 0 NE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:----------------------------------------- Spillway?: DesignedFreeboard(in): ___ """'T. ____________________________________ _ 3 ~ ;, Observed Freeboard (in): --"-""'-=~~----------------------------------- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any ofthc structures observed? (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Arc there structures on-site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? 0 Yes B"No DNA D NE DYes B'No DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? DYes ~o DNA 0 NE 8. Do any of the stucturcs lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application l 0. Are there any required buffers , setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes B'No DNA ONE DYes E3"'No DNA D NE DYes l3'No DNA 0 NE 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes E:f"No 0 NA D NE D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) B'-Y~v...d-{JI"'-"1) 1 F~~C.4 c_ ( Gn:i U 1 S....-..t/ 6..-o.,',..J ( o.s.) 13. Soil type(s) N() A R~ G 0 A 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? DYes ~0 DNA ONE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes B'No DNA ONE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? DYes ifNo DNA D NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: DYes EfNo DNA DYes ErN'o DNA Phone: &j/(J, '/33.333 Date: 9-11-Z-00 CJ ONE ONE 12128104 Continued I Facility Number: 82 -~2'11 Date oflnspection jq-t7-b 11 Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. D WUP D Checklists D Design D Maps D Other DYes E(No DNA ONE DYes ffNo DNA D NE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? lfyes, check the appropriate box below. DYes ~o DNA D NE D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysi s D Waste Transfers D Annual Certification D Rainfall D Stocking D Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rain Inspections D Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? DYes C31Jo DNA ONE .23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? DYes ffNo DNA ONE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? DYes ~0 DNA ONE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? DYes l3"No DNA ONE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? DYes ~0 DNA ONE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? DYes £:3"N'o DNA ONE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? DYes ~0 DNA ONE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document DYes B1.lo DNA ONE and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? DYes B"No DNA ONE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately ~ 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by DYes DNA ONE General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) [31(i'o 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? DYes DNA ONE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? DYes ~ DNA ONE -1 • : ... ~4<' : • ~ --' ,._ • , ' : • ""' • ,' -• • ~ ~ .,_ 12/28104 .. Biu,ts q-oS"-08 R.IL (Facility Number I H IP2'f II 9'15ivision of Water Quality ~2 0 Di\'ision of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit Er'Compllance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit ~utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Den i ed Access Date of Visit: 16'-/ 7 • tJ el Ar r ival Timed /t'J tltJ.tM! Region: r£B Farm Name: .s;;tcAttY. Saw PZl;r-.. Owner Email: ------------- Owner Name: Cav-ffoA.J &:<v-e~c.f.;, ________ _ Phone: Mailing Address: ---------------------------------------- Physical Address:---------------------------------------- Facility Contact: Cu tc-h 1,; 13o..y I...JI (:.. K.. Title: I~ • .Spu:_ ; I PhoneNo: ___________ _ Onsite Representati\'e: Uta\ iMt"l61, 1::. A::. Integrator: Co ~a.y i < Certified Operator: :f "-lii1.C:.S iJoJW h,_c:u.l~::.:.;if.:....<::_e,r....:....._ _____ _ Operator Certification Number: '!~513 2- Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD 'D " Longitude: D OD'D" Swine ID Wean to Fini s h 0 Wean to Fe eder 0 Fe eder to Fini sh lXI Farrow to W can 0 Farrow to Feeder 0 Farrow to Finish 0 Gilts 0 Boars Other ID Other Design Capacity /250 - Discharges & Stream Impacts Current Population 119 $' Wet Poultry 10 Layer Dry Poultry D Lav ers 0 No n-La yers 0 Pullets 0 Turkeys 0 Turkey Poults D Other I . Is any discharge observ ed from an y part of th e o perat io n? Design Current Capacity Population I I Disc harge o ri g in ated a t: 0 S tructure 0 Application Fi e ld D Other a . Was the conveyance man-made? b . Did th e di sc harge reac h waters of the S tate? (If yes, notify DW Q) Design Current Cattle Capacity Population 0 Dairy Cow f 0 Dai rvCalf 0 Dairy Heifc1 ODrv Cow 0 Non-Dairy 0 Beef Stockel 0 BeefFeeder I 0 Beef Brood Cov. ' -. -·---· - Number of Structures: ITJ D Yes ~No DNA O N E DYes 0No ~NA ONE DYe s 0No [&iNA ONE c . Wh at is the e st imated vo lume that reached wa ters of the State (ga llons )? I d . Does di sch arge bypass th e waste managem ent system? {If yes, no tify DW Q) 2. Is th e re eviden ce of a pas t di scharge fro m an y pa rt o f the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impact s or pot enti al ad ve rse impacts to the Waters of the State oth er than from a d isc harge? DYes 0No DYes lXI No DYes ~N o 12118/04 ~NA ONE DNA O NE DNA ONE Continued jFacility Number: ~Z-b2( I Date of Inspection I 8 -!9~el Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes ~No DNA ONE D Yes [!I No D NA 0 NE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:---------------------------------------- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): ----~----------------------------------- 2 ~" Observed Freeboard (in): _ __..;;;~[)=------------------------------------- 5. Arc there any immediate threats to the integ rity of any of the structures observed? DYes (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) ll!J No DNA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or ma~aged DYes through a waste management or closure plan? [BNo DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits , dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Docs any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Arc there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes cyJNo DNA ONE DYes r;i'No 0 NA 0 NE 0 Yes ijill No DNA ONE II . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, c heck the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~o 0 NA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN D PAN > 10% or 10 lbs 0 Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Area 12. Croptype(s) l?er&tld~ {?;;~1 ~, St<g// &i7J.:,v (o,s,) 13. Soil type(s) .tloA Ra< . Go> A I ; 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those des ignated in theCA WMP? I 5. Does the receiving crop and/or land a pplication s ite need improvement? D Yes DYes 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?D Yes 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land applicati on? I 8. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes D Yes r:l9No ~No ~No ~0 ~No Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): Gr.;/)d -I kYi-"£ b~od. . cl I Re<....&>Y'i S . ,, ;'I Goo<l Dp<--YZ<. -/zrv ...l v ~ ~ w, F~v...;(~..,..-- -,e,/!. ••• L- DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ... f.- 1-... Reviewer /Ins pector Name _-g•'t:.-K-..... 12 e," c..i ..r Phone: '11~. Y33.~330 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: rfd~~ Date: S -19-zooB 12128104 Contmued . . . "" I Facility Number: ~2--bz¥1 Date of Inspection 16-i9-~ B] Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. D WUP D Checklists 0 Design D Maps D Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes [gJNo DNA ONE DYes lfJNo 0 NA 0 NE 0 Yes !if) No 0 NA D NE D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers D Annual Certification D Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? DYes liJNo DNA ONE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? DYes ~No DNA ONE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? DYes (11No DNA ONE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? DYes £;'No DNA ONE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? DYes £1No DNA ONE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT ) certification? DYes ~No DNA ONE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? DYes ~No DNA ONE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document DYes !)'No DNA ONE and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? DYes 'IJNo DNA ONE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by DYes OJ No DNA ONE General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? DYes i;BNo DNA ONE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? DYes ~No DNA ONE Page3 of 3 12128104 I Facility Number I II 8 .Di v ision of Water Quality tV" ~2 H~zSt 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation .. 0 Other Age ncy Type of Visit 8 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit 8 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other D Denied Access Departure Time: j9.st:~_,_ I County: ~"':,p.S~<.V Region : rk!o Date of Visit : VD-t>3 -o "71 Arrival Time: l9.~0AH Farm Na me: S/,..u::.(q; r Sow HLv""""- Owne rName: Ctl.+-Jkd B. 6£..--c..lf:. f- Owner E m ai l: -------------- Phone: Mailing Address: ----------------------------------------- Physical Address:------------------------------------____ _ Facility Contact: ~rA$ &rw, (;Jc:; Titlt-: __:./Sv:;;;..;..;..:"-;..:.'-..:./l(...:i,1.;r.i-.......:...· ----Phone No:--------- Onsite Representative: C"V,l, :S &tyi..J :·e:.. K Integrator: -~C_,llw:;..A.:...~;;.;;;;....;;...¥..:..;...;. ~=-_r._.-...;Q..;.I"....;~;.;....., ... S.::..-__ _ Certifi ed Operator:--------------------Opera tor Certification Number: ------- Ba ck-up Operator: --------------------Back -up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD 'D " Longitude: D OD 'D" Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capa city Population Cattle Capacity Population ID Wean to Fini sh I I 0 Wean to Feeder 0 Feeder to Finish 0 Dairy Cow l I I 0 Dairy Calf i I 0 Dairv Heife1 10 Layer 0 Non -Laye r (gl Farrow to W can 12So /2{)~ 0 Fa rrow to Fe eder 0 Farrow to Finish 0 Gi lts 0 Boars 0 Dry Cow 0 Non -Dairy 0 Beef Stocker ! 0 Beef Feeder I 0 Beef Brood Cow ••<•• -·· -· --- Dry Poultry 0 laye rs 0 Non-Layers 0 Pullets 0 Turkeys Other 0 Tu rkey Poults 0 Other ID Other Number of Structures: CZJ : Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any d ischarge observed from any part of th e opemtion? 0 Yes ~No D NA O NE Di scharge originated at: 0 Structure D Appli cati on field 0 Other a. Wa s the conveya nc e man -made? D Yes ~No DNA ONE b. Did the discharge reac h waters of the State? (If yes, no tify DWQ) D Yes ~No D NA O NE c. What is the estimated vo lu me that reached wate rs of the State (gallons)? d . Docs discharge bypass the waste man agement system? (I f yes , notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence o f a past discharge from any part of the operation ? 3. Were there any adverse impact s or potential adverse impacts to the Wa ters of the State other than from a di s c harge? D Yes og No D Yes ~No DYes ~No 12/28104 D NA O NE D NA O NE D NA ONE Continued .. !Facility Number: 32 -~21/ I Date of Inspection V~3~t7 71 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes ~No DNA O NE DYes ltJNo DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:---------------------------------------- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): ---------------------------------------- Observed Freeboard (in): 95 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? DYes (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 12!1 No DNA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed DYes fig No DNA ONE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and tbe situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the penn it? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE 0 Yes lli No DNA 0 NE D Yes ~No DNA ONE II. Is there evidence of incorrect app li cation? If yes, c heck the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~No 0 NA 0 NE 0 Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground D Heavy Metal s (Cu, Zn , etc.) 0 PAN D PAN > 10% or 10 lbs D Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Area 14. Do th e receiving c rops differ from those de signated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application s ite need improvement? D Yes DYes 16 . Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation desi1:,rn or wettable acre dctcnnination?D Yes 17 _ Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land applicat ion? 18 . Is there a lack of prope rl y operating waste app li cation equipment? DYes DYes [i)No liJ No 00No 00No ~N o Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): tlo-1< ; P/~.Jc woYIL ~,.) iNV•-:.S;V L tj rt:.$ .Sl'S. DNA DNA DNA DNA D NA Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: 9/tJ. f..33. 33lJO ON E ONE ONE ONE ONE ... f-- 1-... l<ic.K~ Ke"~ t.s Reviewer/Inspector Signature: f? ;;A.. ~ Date : /0 -0.3-Z.Ot>] -12128104 . "' .... I Facility Number: 1/2. -~¥-1 Required Records & Documents Date of Inspection ~-t:f~ -o 71 19 . Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps 0 Other DYes ~No D NA 0 NE 0 Yes QfNo 0 NA 0 NE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~-No 0 NA O NE 0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Annual Certification 0 Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? DYes IE No DNA ONE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? DYes {11 No DNA ONE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? DYes 00No DNA ONE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required b y the permit? DYes ~No D NA O NE 26. Did the faci li ty fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? DYes ~No DNA O NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? DYes ~No DNA ONE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? DYes ilJNo DNA O NE 29 . Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animal s within 24 hours and/or document DYes l:8JNo DNA O NE and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? DYes !)a No DNA O NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by DYes ~No DNA O NE General Perm it? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/In spector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? DYes liJ No DNA O NE 33. Does facility require a fo ll ow-up visit by same agency? D Yes ~No DNA O NE Additional Comments and/or Drawings: .... 1- 1-..... 12/28104 Type of Visit ~ Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: 1.5'-o~-0~ I Arrh'al Time: l;o;oo.q.-1 Departure Time: ._1 ___ ___,1 County: Sa-.,~""' Region: r~ FarmName: -~~~'~'n~c~l~~ur~V'-~~~o~~~~f;~a~~~~~~------­ Owner Name: __ C_o._v-_1-'t<"--o"""'r-J..;.___...::B~. __ B~v~.fsro± Owner Email: -------------- Phone: (CJto) S9t-/374- Mailing Address: ----------------------------------------- Physical Address:----------------------------------------- Facility Contact: Cuv+rs &.vwt(.,k._ Title: -----------PboneNo: __________ _ Onsite Representati\'e: ----------------------Integrator: C oha H ~ Certified Operator: C ~ l +a 1--J Operator Certification Number: / Z 795 Back-up Operator: --------------------------Back*UP Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: D OD'D" Longitude: Discharges & Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? DYes ~No DNA ONE Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field D Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters ufthe State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part ofthe operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes [X No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes QilNo DNA ONE DYes ~No ON~ ONE 12118104 Continued I Facility Number: ~2..-~ 2 jl I Dateoflnspectiun IS-09-olol Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:----------------------------------------- Spillway?: I Q lr Designed Freeboard (in): __ ...J_:.......L.L ___ ------------------------------- . ,, Observed Freeboard (in): __ __.9-'----'0:::...._ __ -------------------______ ------ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) DYes ~No DNA ONE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? DYes ~No DNA ONE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? DYes r)?l No 0 NA 0 NE DYes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~N o DNA ONE DYes [}lNo DNA D NE 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ~No 0 NA D NE D Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) D PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare So il D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) 13. Soil type(s) } I Whe.B I; /JI4vAvNtud57 &..sat<...,... ,· K~l.,._, rJWJ~c .... ~ Gotdsboro 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes DYes 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination 'i O Yes 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes DYes 15?:1 No DNA ONE 00No DNA ONE ~No DNA ONE ri1 N o DNA ONE !M'No DNA ONE Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer II nspector Signa tore: ~~~~~~~~~~~ Phone: ~~~~---------­ Date: 11118104 Continued [Facility Number: <62. -~2il Required Records & Documents Date of Inspection l5-o9-o~l 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. D WUP 0 Checklists D Design D Maps D Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes (giNo DNA ONE 0 Yes ~No DNA ONE DYes ~No DNA ONE D Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers D Annual Certification D Rainfall D Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rain Inspections D Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakcrs on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notifY the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes 12128104 ~No DNA ONE 1:8'No DNA ONE 0No mJNA ONE 0No ~NA ONE ~No DNA ONE ~No DNA ONE ~No DNA ONE ~No DNA ONE I&JNo DNA ONE l]f'No DNA ONE ll;l No DNA ONE (X No DNA ONE Type of Visit e Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of\'isit: 13 ·II~ I Arrh·al Time: lll ::Jr.,,. I Departure Time: IL..--___ _.1 County: 5-""tl'&M Region: F=Ro Farm Name: S:a c. ftt .c Sow EDrm Owner Email: -------------- Owner Name: btl.cL.f.,l!J 8.. Bs.u.~of- Mailing Address: c/o t?I!~Q.·I). .S:.·.a iC ',·!: Lt(,,ot. K~~u. u c. /;,6,, 11/L Physical Address:-----------------------------------:::::---------,:::_,.., F acili~· Contact: C wf,j 13&ew .e. /( Title : Phone No: Cf1t)-~(, Lf-'f'i't I Onsite Representati\'c: Cvl$ 4•ctr ;;.,/<1 t.tl, 4«e~Jf!ll!cs 6.J4.Integrator: -..::C.:..:•~~.!:!o/~l,s;·t: ___________ _ Certified Operator: ( a.r/f..oq 8acctbof= Operator Certification Number: I? ? C,~ Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm : Latitude: D OD'D" Longitude: Discharges & Strea m Impacts 1. Is any discharge ob served from any part of the operation? DYes ~o DNA ONE Di scharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Application Field D Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. D id the discharge reach waters of th e State? (If y es. notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d . Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes , notify DWQ) 2. Is th ere evidence of a past discharge from any part ofthc op eration ? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? D Yes D No DNA ONE D Yes D No DNA O NE D Yes DNo DNA ONE DYes B"No DNA ONE DYes B'No DNA ONE 12/28/04 Continued [Facility Number: I~ -{,..2'1 Date of Inspection I 3 -I f·OS: I Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes. is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 DYes ~o DNA ONE DYes DNo DNA ONE Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ---·Lt ___ ----------------------------------- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in):------------------------------------------ Observed Freeboard (in): __ 4 ...J'1LLI_"' ___ -------------------------------- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) DYes GJ1ilo 0 NA 0 NE 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed DYes 0'N'o 0 NA D NE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits. dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance/improvement? 0 Yes Q-'No DNA 0 NE DYes £3"No 0 NA 0 NE D Yes G3"'No 0 NA D NE DYes l:a"No DNA ONE 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes ~o DNA D NE 0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) 0 PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil 0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Area ,,'7 t]J. 1'1'1 ,~ /(~o ;)fA>_.~?r ~o 12. Crop type(s) ---"C"""'a:z..c~n~----'So,r::?A:Z;;u=6~,~qt!,L.!S;___~lv.!J.Ir~r~,;ai:...____JW,~ . .a·a~l,t.J.c::.._~!l~,tOeu.uel(.o..•~4=---___!h::J~~.c;~c;~v:..¢('~-&~e:c..ce~":&o~'A.!:4-, _ _.S:a.i!lr:a.•ll&.!:l6wimtic•,__ 13. Soil type(s) Al~cfo//( J /(q,;?5 1 Geld.sbwo 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in theCA WMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes [;}No DYes Q-1<ro 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination! 0 Yes D No 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes 0No DYes ~o ·--.. .., -· . .; --~ --~ ·' ... "' .... ~ . .. -... ,. Comments (refer to question #): ·Explain 'any YES answers and/or any r«.~mmendations or any other comments. Use drawings offacility to.~etter explaill, situations. (use additional pages as ·n~essary):' ·~ .. · ·, --J-.: ...... ' . ', .... DNA ONE DNA ONE DNA ~E DNA B"NE DNA ONE Reviewer/Inspector Name 11'11~,..1' -~ IJr-~"' ' J Phone: ~ 9~&. ·tflf/crf'JJo ~~~~~~~~~--~------~------~ Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ?>t-A_ /1. '-~ Date: 3·11·(1 ~ v 12/28104 Continued \ .. I Facility Number: g ;z -~;)i j Date of Inspection I J -/j•-zJf'""l Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of theCA WMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. 0 ~ 0 C~sts l3L>esign 0 ~ 0 ~ G?Y'es 0No DNA ONE 0'Yes 0No DNA ONE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ~-J ~-'1.1. 0 Yes G-No 0 NA D NE ""-tr-> 1.7 '' ,,~ /.'( •en 0 Wftsh! Apf!lieetion 0 Weekly Fieeb01tl'd D Weste Aaal~·sis D Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers D A:tmual CertJftcafion D-Rain fall D ~teeliiRg--O~p Yitil& 0 129 Minute lnspectlohs 0 Mortthl' aFta I" RsiR IRi~wctiaas D Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit orCA WMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge. freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 1 er. T),~ I'J~W ~rl;l'.·caf~ 0~ c.-t'~~ &..,t,) l'r-,-..,:1-J, .. 6 ,,... h~~,. I ll.SI'~e f.,.,. .... rtr :2-0. PI~D.St ,t)kr~ q I. j": I se"'''l' &,J f'"'S$.·J./t'. ,.,~,·t &t . ,t'IV A Co,.o I' D~ ~ C"Jf7 ~.,{ H, k_,e~ • ., ~ do.~.,., '" F11,.,., DYes 0No DNA ONE DYes QNo DNA ONE DYes 0No DNA G}'tqE DYes 0No DNA G}1qt DYes ~ DNA ONE DYes 0No DNA ~ DYes l!J-No DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes ~0 DNA ONE DYes 13'No DNA ONE DYes [3"No DNA ONE DYes [31-.lo DNA ONE r~u,·~~~"-1 y~f. r4e~ 1211&104 r:nr..,nlii::anr'"• Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit ~outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other D Denied Access ~acility Number 1 &;I H ,,.,. I Date or Visit: I S'/~q.l hime: I 1/: DO I . )O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold I lil'Pennitted liii'Certified [J Conditionally Certified C Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ·---·--·-···-· Fann ~ame: ..... C.~?..:.-~~ ... L~ ..... S. M~!. .... :?.:.~----~--County: ---~p..!.!L ... ·-·······----·---·------· Owner Name: ___ .c_:~---···-~U.LJ? .... S.!'.rY:Jai..c. .......... -.. ·····--·-·· .Phone No: _____ $~~q._::__~-~-~-~----·------·-·-----·-· Mailing Address' .. _'f~ __ f«..!f!:~--tJ_,_(,J;_!clraJ.1 .. __ .AL_ _____ Ii_w_ ____ ----··· :~ .. ey:=~-=~~-;-~:t:;·--··· Tid., ·--~-~----=----a~ No: --------------·· p ··-·------------------------·-····-·······-·-·-··········--·· Integrato __________ c.. ________________________ _ Certified Operator: ··-··---~li.11.~.-----·· -~±·········-··-···-·······-··· Operator Certification Number: ___ [_11!J.$ _______ _ Location ofFann: Swine D Poultry 0 Cattle 0 Horse Latitude .___ ..... I• ... I _ __.I' ._I _ __.I" Longitude Discharges & Stream Jmpacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon 0 Spray Field D Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is obs erved , did it reac h Water of the Stale? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If dis charge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon syslem ? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Wa ters of the State other than from a dis charge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway Structure 1 Structure 2 S tructure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: ·········--·'···················· .............................. -... ··-····--······ .. ······--·········· ................................. _ DYes [!11ilo DYes 0No DYes DNo DYes 0No DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 Structure 6 '?a" Freeboard (in ches): __ .::::~....:~~~:__ __ ------------------------------- 12112103 Continued jFacility Number: ~~ Date of Inspection I S/.:ls M I 5: Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate pnblic health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes , check the appropriate box below. D Excessive Pending D PAN 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground 0 Copper and/or Zinc 12. Crop type ~ 1 So:J~1 J. t; wi"A. tbl,.. 1 fer~, 4}~ 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Odor Issues 17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 19 . Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. +;) 1-... ~st,J,/;d, .fh ~s.c~ ,.,_~;J J,.~,.vt. l,-Jts 4, kor ~+. Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 12112103 DYes []"No DYes riNo DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes &1ifo DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes [!!'No DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 DYes ~0 j Facili~ Number: g,. -~I Date of Inspection I S/.!$7d I Required Records & Document-; 21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Waste Application 0 Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Sampling 24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 25 . Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 28 . Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP? NPDES Pennitted Facilities 30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) 31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 33 . Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? 34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? 35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Stocking Form 0 Crop Yield Form D Rainfall D Inspection After 1" Rain 0 120 Minute Inspections D Annual Certification Form DYes DYes D Yes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes C No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. -s.; J s~fd -.J ~~ s.-r~~ J,~ * ~lte 4:\ .. J ~..J.. -I:""" -~ •(fltecl Q hG~-clcJ r-4~ .. f-r :) l'e~Js, ~k ~< •"'J ~ 14(' 'k> ~1e. 12112103 ~f Ar-;J I 1 ... ~ir.c H·) ~0 ~0 (31:io DNo DNo DNo ONo DNo ONo ~0 DNo 0No ONo ONo DNo r-... Site Requires Immediate Attention: -~-­ Facility No. ~~~---- DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD * .. -. .. ~ <)Q..'"' ""'"1" "S ~ .,. u. ·"'.s DATE: \{ ~ , 1995 Time: }"-oo Farm Name/Owner: S'..., '-\.f\ lQ. H co. e. f-.. "it."' ·Mailing Address: , ~+ . ~ B. o )(. \oe ~ County: "SP.-.r,•" Integrator: · C.o"'-,,.:~ Phone: S"":L· o\o5" On Site Representative: ';) .. "" .. s <$'"-=-\.,.;... Phone: "S''"{-G.'t '"\ Physical Address/Location : \.o' ~ · f"r·-~\..,t,, . Go 'To 'k-~~c..--r~l\. ~ 0"" \<.c..e,."'-Lr ~ ~ n~Gp $ n.,, ...... (\1\d= Type of Operation : Swine 1. Poultry__ Cattle---------------- Design Capacity : \ "L'S o Number of Animals on Site: t 'l.So -=o-w .(;. • ...., DEM Certification Number: ACE.___ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW ______ _ Latitude: __ o __ __ .. Longitude : __ o __ • __ " Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon ~sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) ~or No Actual Freeboard : \ l Ft. __ Inches~ Was any seepage observed from the l~n(s)? Yes o@ Was any erosion o~? Yes or~ Is adequate land available for spray? ~or No Is the cover crop adequate?. Yes r No Crop(s) being utilized : ""-·" ~ ~ \u. a.u o.Vo. .\.. 1 Does the fac ility meet SCS minimum setback criteria ? 200 Feet from Dwelli~? e or No 100 Feet from Wells? Yes o~ Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? es or o · \3 Is an imal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue me: Yes No Is an i mal waste discharged into water~ state by man-made ditch , flushing system, or other similar man -made devices? Yes o~ If Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No ...:~.~ "T <t llfn.~ Additional Comments: 3 ~C.. I ro '-d .. t'\, "Q ~-rn ~ \ \.-s "-c..rc.. \,~eo Inspector Name Signature cc : Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed . event i Pl .. •• :-•tu:: th• CCIII!Pl•t~ ~o::= to the Divi.eion o~ b.Vi.:oz=e,n:al Kanag-=ant at the ad~••• c.: the :-eve:•• •ida of' thi.• f'o=. Name of farm (Please print)-:_,......,. __ -_s_-.:....;..;:"-:....:'::.::·...:./_a....:,_,. __ H;....:....,":..~·.,;;"~.:....F...:";,;_;_r....;-~· ------------- Address: ~.,. 7 B-.-loY.' A C i,'-..,._., cr.::;.. ?c.-3..:l..~ Phone No . : li 1 0 l :>-E> ¥ -~ V /'I ----------------------·------------------~~ coupty: __ ~=5~~~·~~~·~t~~~r~~~----~--------­Far.n location : Latitude and Longitude: 7'? d.! ..!.!:, ·• 11.£" C7' L.£'' (required). Also .• please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified. Type of operation (swine, layer. dairy. etc.) =-""""='..--""'$"~i..:;::</:....:•~.::e_~---.,..------- Design capacity (number of animals): 1 ),.£q f7<,_·~ fe r,...,., fi; ~~ .... Average size of operation· (12 month population avg.) : /;;><.-o s.·.,.f:t· Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres) 1 ,:2 'f. S: •==•••••••••••••••••••=~••••••••••••••••••••=••••••••••••••••z=•••••a•••=••••• T•e~ieal Spaciali•t Carti~ieatic: As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to lSA NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or ~anded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction, operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Manage.>nent and the USDA-Soil Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to lSA NCAC 2H.02l7 and lSA NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following e~ements and the i r corresponding minimum criteria ·ha~een_verified by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste s~orage capacity; adequate quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-yea.r, 24-hour storm. llama of' T•e~i ea l Sp•e ial.i•t ( p 1 ease Print ) ! ___ c=")-u;;.;_r__;f-.-.:...,-=· .S::..__B="-::....;:C!;.:,., ...;..r_...;.w.:__;;...;·c:.=·:...L.;:~::;:_ __ _ Affiliation: C .. • t..5 c'r G c o) Address (Agency): .P r1 t!.·-.f:O Q (l i dfh f.IC ).~ny Phone No . O J ,. $"31'..1 -11 ,lib signature :---+-C-=·,~d"""-a::::...:-::;_:?6::-::::;:. ·.....,;....--=&;,;;j. =:::.r.--;:0::::..::::~==-· _____ _ Date=-~/.. .... -......:../..::: . .S;_---_..._r .... );:-__ •===•••••••••c=••••••••••••••••••••••••••••3•••~•••••••••••••••••••••• ~er/Hanager A~eamant I (we ) understand the operation and main tenance procedu res established in the approved animal waste manag-ement plan for the fann named above and will implement these procedures . I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing design capacity of the was~e trea~ent and storage system or con struction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Manage.TDent before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state e i ther through a man-made conv e y ance or through runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-yea.r, 24-hour storm. The approved plan w i ll be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. S i gnature ~: Ac (if the pproved Envi ronmental 1~-A~ Date: k //tp / 2 £ ,..;-7 I (Please print): J '?SO /J ~·A/c../q /r Date :-~~/:~1~6'----1-/~~:;...._...-­ ship requires notification or a ~w certification is changed) to be submitted to the Division of within 60 days of a title transfer. DEM USE ONLY:ACNEW# _________________ _ JO/ # .fr) ...... C(,'.._h"'. f'" K.et'1.er. fv...~"' fe-f~-~ .... -1-o 6"-t> . All' ,-a )r . if. S ~ , /~ 5 /(eel'\e.r RJ J c> ""~x-. 3 ~:I~~~ ~ ........ ~"' r.yl,r. ... .. ,• II I . .-.~ •