820590_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

i5 �Y4s 6- �v -res r
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
11 Other Agency
Facility Number: 820590 Facility Status: Active Permit AWS820590 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Sampson Region: Fayetteville
Date of Visit: 0611912018 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident 0
Farm Name: Starling Farm Owner Email:
Owner: M F Starting Phone:
Mailing Address: 6905 Maxwell Rd Autryville NC 283189720
Physical Address: 6905 Maxwell Rd
Facility Status: E Compliant El Not Compliant Integrator.
Autryville NC 28318
willistarling@intersta r.ne
910-567-6430
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 04' Longitude: 78'38'39"
N of Autryvile.Maxwell Rd 1.2 miles east of county line, and just east of Maxwell Cemetery. Grains bins and dry lots are south of MF
Starting house.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Ste Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mf F Starling Phone:
On-site representative Mf F Starling Phone
Primary Inspector: Bill Dunlap Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
inspection Summary:
Pastures and lots in good condition. Rainfall recorded. It was hot and the hogs were shaded up.
page: 1

Permit: AW5820590 Owner - Facility : M F Starting Facility Number: 820590
Inspection Date: 06/19/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine - Farrow to Finish 150 1 88
Total Design Capacity: 150
Total SSLW: 212,550
page: 2

Permit: AWS820590 Owner - Facility : M F Starling Facility Number: 820590
Inspection Date: 06/19/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts
Yes
No Na Na
❑ ®❑ ❑
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[]
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
❑
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Structure
❑
M ❑
❑
Application Field
❑
PAN?
❑
Other
❑
M ❑
❑
a_ Was conveyance man-made?
❑
©❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
` ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑
M ❑
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
i ❑
❑
2_ Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
m ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
®❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
❑ ®❑ ❑
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
❑
PAN?
❑
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure pian?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures requite
❑
® ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
res No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ®❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11 _ Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10°1.!10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS820590 Owner - Facility: M F Starling Facility Number.
820590
19_ Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Inspection Date: 06/19/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crab Grass
Crop Type 2
Millet
Crop Type 3
Smart Grain overseed
Crop Type 4
Maps?
❑
Crop Type 5
Lease Agreements?
❑
Crop Type 6
Other?
❑
Soil Type 1
wagram
Soil Type 2
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
Soil Type 3
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Soil Type 4
Waste Application?
❑
Soil Type 5
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Soil Type 6
Waste Analysis?
❑
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ N ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
Waste Transfers?
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ E ❑
❑
determination?
Stocking?
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ a ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19_ Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS820590 Owner - Facility _ M F Starling Facility Number: 820590
Inspection Date: 06/19/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
i ❑
❑
120 Minute inspections?
[}
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
M ❑
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[❑
0 ❑
[]
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
❑
M ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
❑
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compiiant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
M ❑
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28_ Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
i ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
It Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/lnspeclor fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5