19950991 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19950919

i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
RECEIVED
S E P 1 3 1995
ENVIRONMENTAL 6t;!FNCFS
-.
Revisions to Nationwide Permit 26
Vulcan Materials
Rockingham Quarry
Rockingham, North Carolina
Action ID No: 199306254
Prepared for:
Wilmington District Engineer
Corps of Engineers
Department of the Army
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Prepared By:
Marshall Miller & Associates
P.O. Box 848
Bluefield, Virginia 24605
C] 5991
;RS HALL U
soci Es

Joint Form
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Table of Contents
Avoidance and Minimization
Data Forms
Erosion & Sediment Control Plan
Site Photographs
S14PO and USFWS Responses
Vicinity Map
Site Map
Enlarged Area A
Enlarged Area B
Enlarged Area C
Enlarged Area D
Summary of Waters Areas
Summary of Impacts

DEM ID: ACTION ID: 199302654
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide permit r#): 26
' O JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
' Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNING
' CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGENIENT
'DEPARTMENT OF THE ARI?vfY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Box 29535
1 ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL it1AlNAGEIIENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Vulcan Materials Company, C/0 Marshall Miller & Associates
2. Owners Address: P.O. Box 4239, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
' 3. Owners Phone Number (Home): N/A (Work): ( 910) 767-4600
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
' Marshall Miller and Associates, ATTN: Bob Smiley
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH ILAP). County: Richmond
Nearest Town or City: Rockingham
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Existing quarry operation located along
S.R. 1117 between S.R. 1123 and S.R. 1119. See Site Location map - Figure 1.
' 6. Name of Closest Stream/River: Long Branch contributary to Hutchcock Creek
7. River Basin: Pee Dee
' 8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ ] NO [x]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES t.] NO [ ]
If yes, explain. NWP26 referenced in Action 1D
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site: 28.40
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled: 2.61
' Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: 2.61
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only):
relocation, overburden and expanded facilities.
Fill related to road
13. Purpose of proposed work: Expand current quarry operations.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. See Appendix A
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine.F3sheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed orproposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES [x] NO [ ]
RESPONSES FROM 'I Hh USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
[ ]
properties in the permit area which maybe affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [x] NO
RESPONSE FROM THE. SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property? Agriculture and Forest
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? Septic System
71
V?IGAV
ENU. En
rv1 h?{ ?.'A C M P A

1
1

1

1

1

1
1
1
1
1

a
n
N
1

Append& A
HALL LLE
SOLI ES

APPENDIX A
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS AND
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
1
Alternative Analysis
At the onset of the project, three tracts of land were considered as possible
' locations for the new facility. These sites included the chosen site, a tract located to the
southeast of the existing quarry knovoi as the "Chalk Tract", and a parcel of land located
' to the north of the existing quarry. A fatal-flaw analysis was performed on the sites to
determine the most suitable alternative for the proposed facility expansion. The parcel
known as the "Chalk Tract" tract was rejected because the facility would have impacted an
excessive amount of wetlands. The parcel to the north was rejected for two reasons: first,
because the parcel would have been bisected by the relocated Route 1117, the location
would have presented a safety hazard from equipment crossing the highway, and second,
the location would have impacted a greater amount of wetlands than the chosen site.
Avoidance and Minimization
' When the site location had been decided, the delineation of the boundaries of
jurisdictional waters within the site was initiated. As delineation's proceeded, boundaries
of jurisdictional areas were added to the site plans. The identification of these boundaries
was a prime motivation for revising the project plan. Every effort was expended to
minimize and avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters while conforming with the purpose of
the project. Avoidance and minimization of impacts was achieved in 4 of the 5 project
' areas. The changes included:
1. In the quarry expansion north (QEN) area, expansion limits were pulled
' back to avoid identified waters thereby reducing impacts from 0.14 acres
to 0 acres.
2. The overburden disposal (OBD) area was the origin of numerous revisions
to avoid jurisdictional areas. The area along Long Branch was identified
early to be avoided by the project limits. A sediment pond was located in
the southenn portion of the area. When wetlands were identified in that
area, the pond was relocated upgradient thus reducing impacts by 1.0
' acres. Also, when natural drainage was delineated on the north side of the
?:,. 2

' area, plans were designed to avoid impacting the drainage. To compensate
for the loss of disposal area, an alternative site was selected along the rail
' spur that impacted less wetland. These changes resulted in a net decrease
of impacts of over 2 acres.
3. Significant reductions in impacts to wetlands was accomplished in the rail
spur extension (RSE) area. Track alignment was revised and the grade of
the spur was increased from 1% to 2%. These revisions resulted in a
' reduction of impacts from 2.95 acres to 0.28 acres. The changes also
added to the cost of construction of the spur.
4. Filially, an entrance road alternative was chosen in the southern portion of
the project area in lieu of the northern portion and in turn impacts
' approximately 0.5 acre less jurisdictional area.
In Summary, the avoidance and minimizing exercises detailed above resulted in
' reducing impacts from approximately 8.92 acres to approximately 2.61 acres, a reduction
of approximately 70 percent over the original design.

RSHKLL LLE
SOLI ES

Append& B
HALL LLE
SOCI ES
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Roc-ki nah?m C„arry
Applic3nt/O,wmn- V„i an Matori ?l s
Investigator: R. -c? iIov
Date: 4127195
County: Ric}ncre
State: NC
Do Normal Cirrum =cts exist on the site? XYes No Community ID: t-; tg Pr--
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? _Yes X No Transect ID:
?Ls the area a po?--n6al Problem Area? X Yes No Plot ID: 1
(If needed, cxpl:a n on reverse.) Eerrao`ccs vegetation -czrce due to
,EGETATION
of year
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1 Quercus alc? FACU T 9. Acer rub= FAC E
2- Quercus ;tea FACU T 10. Liquidamar styraciflua FACT E
3. LirioderZa-ccz tilio-if FAC T 11. Parthenocissus quinquefolie FAC E
4. Acer rubrLn FAC S 12.
5- Ilex ore-ca FA.C- S 13.
6• Vaccinim Vacillans S I 14. .
7. Vitis roteci folic FAC V I 15.
8. I 16.
emtrit of Dornin-t Spzcies that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 60
emarics: 7 r 7 ti c vegetation par='- is zit
t
HYDROLOGY
?Rt orded Data (Describe in Remar.;cs): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, I -,'Y!, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Pioto27aphs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
ield Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more rL-quire?):
Depth of Surfzct Waee:: n (inches) Oxidized Root Channels in Upp?. 12 inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Fr--'Wate: in Pit: (Inches) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Sanin, Soil: - (Inches) Other (Explain in Remarks)
=1 _-?t located on s -? =lone a_ppreximatelly 20' from edge of beaver pord
Fes? = to -met hydrology' =a=etler
¦
11/
ADP

CLS
:ap Unit Name
cries and Phase): Pacolet Gravelly Sa-c'7jr Lc.=- s
nTnnnmV (SubQroup):
Profile
Description:
Depth
inches) Horizon
Matrix Color
(i4lunsell Moist)
2.5 YR 418
Drainage Class: 15--35%
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type: Yeses _ No
I.Iottle Colors I Mottle
(Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, Etc.
-------------
,C-71c,1 lCaM
r18 I A
iydre soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Fpipedon High Organic Content in Surface La}'er is Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
ins Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Reducing Cordite
Other (Explain
or Low-Ccror.L Colors ain in Remarks
Rrm'rks: Falls to rat hydric soils - ter
ETLAND DETERjiZ?TION
riydrophytic Ve2eeation Present? X Yes No
VJeland Hydrology Present? Yes X No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland: Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Rcm.rks: Fails to =..=-et ssoi is and hyc:--olxy parameters
Er/11/Datatorm.

Apcroved by ti
(Iml uut. YYetland_S 1)etlne2u0n Manual)
rojeet/Site: Date: 41 27
5
anc 19
Applicant/Owner: „_? man rlato_; >> s County: Ric k
Investigator. State: NC
F o Normal Circuisiinces exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: rrc? F =*
Is the site signiaca_ztly disturbed. (Atypical Siru?tion)? _Ye-s X No Transect ID: n
I the area a poten:;al Problem Area? X Yes No Plot ID: 2
(If needed, explain on reverse.) ve;etaticn sc rcee due to
WGETATION
o_ y_-F -
Dominant PL-nt Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Lndimtor St,--uturn
1. Carya Tcce_ntcsa U L T I 9• Collinsori;a ca?densis F. H
Fagus gran fol is FAT T I 10.
Pinus tam FAC T 11.
P4• Fergus gr-aPLifo1; FACIJ S 12. .
If- Ilex opacz F'AM S I 13.
06. Cornus florira F;OJ S 1 14.
7' Polystichtm a=ost? choides FPC H I 15.
08- Panicum ravenel;; F`M H 16.
if ercent of Dom;n, t Spz:.ies that are OPL , F.".CW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 33
emar s: Fails to Lit hydrornytic ve elation criteria
1
L
'IYDROLOGY
r
Re~orded Dat (Desc.,:be in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lee, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
A_-nal Pc=2o --,hs Inundated
' Other Saturated in Upper 12 inc:.es
X No ardw DaL, Available Water ?darks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
-field ObservzEcm: Drainaze Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more
Depth of Su.;w°. W=ter: n (inches) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water-Stained Laves
Depth to Fri: in Pit: - (Inches) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to SaR:rat.'r Soil: - (Inches) Other (Explain in Remarks)
r n" ?oLit locatej on st _? 1-ills de a o: tely 20' from ?rs?. Fails to suet -a'
hydrolo f criteria.
1/ atztorm. Approved by
3/91
.S
p Unit Name
ties and Phasr): Pacollet GravelY z-_ LcZ=S
conomy (Subgroup):
Profile I
Description:
Depth
T
fiches) Horizon
A I
-18
ydric Soil Indicators:
P:istosol
Draina,c Class: 15-35'- r
Field Observations
Confirm Isiapped Type: Yes X No '
Colors Mottle Tt.t? re, Concretions, '
hiatrix Color Mottle Abundance/Contrast Structure, Etc.
(liunsell hioi_st) (lfunsell hioist) - I '
I --- I Tn- .
7.5 ya 414
I Ir
I
- j - I
i I
Histic Epipeaon
Sulfidic Odor
Aauic Moistu-, e Rea i
R,Lcing Condircrs
Gleyed or Low-Ch.cmi Colors
=arks: Fails to zeet hydric soy?
TLAND DETERIH'N.>.TION
=ydrophytic Ve2e : c? Y: eat? Y' X N°
-,land Hydrology P:.s=at? Yes X No
-ydric Soils Pr°.s°nt? Yes No
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface L,ayc. i- S=dy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List t
Listed on Nati°nzl Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain Lri Remarks
. r
r
r
. r
Is this Sampling PCLZt Within a Wetlanc: Y'? r°
I
? c rks: Fails to = any of t-he three parameters
!11/Datatorm.Ltr
1
ApGr.. -^- GJ r:QUS.=.C. JISt'
1

Project/Site: RCC-k; ngh- n=„-ry Date:
Applicant/Owne:: V>> l r?n Mato-; P 1 5 County:
Investigator: E. ; i ?v State:
Do Normal Ciru. st?rces exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID:
Is the sit-- sigai c----dy disturbed (Atypic-,11 Sinaation)? `Yes xNo Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? xYes No Plot ID:
(If need, explain on reverse.) Fe,.;,- v et3ticn ice due to
GETATION
41V195
Ri C:--=,
INC
J-T-(y Fnrac=
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum I Dominant Plant Species Lndicator Stmt.,.-n
1• Liquidc-h,--- styraciflua F?; + T 9- Oamrniza longistylis FFC H
2 Carpinus C--'-OlLniana F_-f T ( 10. Hexastylus vi.rclinicz IdI E
3. Corms florica F 'CJ T 11.
4- Cornus stric`a S 12.
5- Ilex oFEca i- S I 13.
6. Peer rubrnn F:='C S I 14.
7. Lonicera jzp:,z* ca F;C- V I 15.
8' Cornus strict-- Fes'' H 16.
Pc-:.eat of Doni^,nt Series that are OBL, F.,CW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 78
Remarks:
Hyd_m_ts;ytic vegetation crit_-i= are met
1
¦
HYDROLOGY
Re orded DLL, (Des: ribe in Rem?rk-s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Laze, or Tide Gauze Primary Indicatol-5:
Aerial Pcotogr_prs Inundate
Othe: Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No r°.-..order-' Data Av-,ilable Water Masks
Drift LL-es
Sediment Deposits
Field Obse-rvatieas: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more rui ):
Depth of Sur,?.r. V,'vwr: n (inches) Oxidized Root Channels in Up,;--r 12 L:chez
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Fri. in Pit: - (Inches) Local Soil Survey Data
' - FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Sato. -a- Seil: (Inch s) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Rtmarzs: Igo e,ri( eance of wetland trj^olx? wire cheerved. Flat area in stream ox-bow
I BF/11/Datstorm.
Approv
y HQUSACE 3/92

.S
'
p Unit Name Drainage Class:
rigs and Phis°.): P=,.-,,-- cra „.i•, spn 7r?-c
Field Observations
onomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type: Yes -X No
Profile
Desorption:

i
epth
ches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(tifunsell Moist) Mottle Colors
funsell Moist) 111ottle
Abundance/Contrast ons,
Te: re, Concret
SL-uc}ure, Etc.

-18 i
A

I
5 16 I
Y.,
_
_ _ I
I
- j(f? Ira,
I
I I I I
' l I I
I I I I
I i I

(dric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Lave: i- Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aauic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List

Reducing Conditic-s
Listed on National Hydric Soils List t
Gleyed or Low-C o,? Colors Other (Explain in Remarks

Fails to met hydric soil wit°ri?

'.TLAND DETERMINATION
ydrophytic Ve2e1.2:icn :: ent? X Y s No
'eland Hydrology P,e--znt? Yes X No
X
.
ydric Soils Prevent? Yes X No 'N
o
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland: fes
I
erks: Fails to L:_t wetland hy&olcc/ ar-d hydric soil Faramters
1

3F/11/Datstor:...L? ApC::.v: C': r.QUS?C? ,rSG
'

f rojccUSite: ()-rry Date: 412J 9;
pplicant/Owner Vil1 ran ht t 1 c -County: RiG'+X
Investigator: R. G.•; 1 ov SLte: NC
o Normal Circa^st--ces exist on the site? X Yes No Cormunity ID: hDq Fore=.
Rs the site signiticandy disturbed (Atypic_l Siva-tion)? .-Yes X No Transcct 1D: A
Is the area a poLatial Problem Ai--a? X Yes No Plot ID: A
(If needed, explain on reverse.) Ferla-s v::etation scarce due to
iWGETATION
I ':ie c. y
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1. Mquidambar styraciflua FAC + _ T 9. Qaerck albs F GU F
Fagus grarrli folia ciJ T I 10.
3• Qiercus alha T 11.
Fagus grars3ifolia <<Cli S I 12.
Peer rubrLn J • S I 13.
16. Ilex cpaca S I 14.
7. Polystichum ac--cstichoides F H I 15.
Con•nus strict-- F +. g I 16.
.1
Percc, nt of DoMMI-,t SF-.cies that are OPL , F:' CW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 33
cmalk-s:
Fails to re=et hydrop-;ytic ve-=-ta`icn criteria

¦
MROLOGY
F Rtrorded Data (Des: be in Rernaracs): Wetland Hydrolo?y Indicators:
Stream, LLke, or Tide Gauze Primary Indicatcrs:
Aerial Phcto_? accs Inundat--'
Other Saturates in Upper 12 inches
No re order Data ?v?lable Water',;--As
Drift Lives
Sediment Deposits
field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indic: tors (2 or more requi,-t--:):
I Depth of Surfaz W_0 (inches) Oxidized Root Channels in Upu: 12 inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Frei Watz in Pit: - (Inches) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Ne::tral Test
Depth to Satu.:.t---4 Seii: - (Inches) Other (?xplain in Remarks)
marks: . .
f Vegetated fiat. Tb evidence of wetIe-nd hydrology was c served.

11/llatsto=
Approved by
p Unit Name
.ics and Phas--): ^=M1 ai (r t:al ?r C?rCf Zc=
:onomy (Suberoun):
Fails to -mat hydric soil criteria
Profile
Desorption:
epth
fiches)
Horizon 'Matrix Color
(tiiunsell hfoist) Mottle Colors
Diunsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Concre6ors,
Structure, Etc.
-18 A• I 5 ?a 5 6 I -- - i Lc s?

I

• I I I I
idric Soil Indicator:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aouic Moisture R.!2; Ze
R:ducing Condit= s
Gleyed or Low-Chrome. a Colors
1. =2 rks
Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type: Yes X No
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Lay--: E. Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-Other (Explain in Remarks
LAND DETERIUNATION
Ydrophytic Vegetr,cn P: ??t? Y?? X No
e%layd Hydrology P,-_s-=t? Y:s X No
ydric Soils Present? Ye-s X No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetl=^ : Yes x
=--u bs. Fails to teet airy of the t? --ter
BcM/Datatorm-l -=
AGC w C EQUIS?.C-E 3iK'
(1-my (-up, Weuanos lletinescion manust)
Project/Site:
Applicant/Ou,ver.
Investigator:
-Rork;ngh- n„arry
Veil ran 1.tatori al s
p ?-i I oT
Date: 4125 19:,
County: Ricr='r-
St?tt: tC
Do Normal Circu.Ls'a_,ce$ exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID: 'Z-, I,ls--
Is the site sigaiac?_^.;ly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? _Yes -X-No Tra-astct ID: n
Is the area a pottn-al Problem Area? X Yes No Plot ID: 3
Of needed, cxpl" a on reverse.) p? vegetaticn rce due to
VEGETATION
ti rr? o_ y-aa -
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Lndicstor Stra ura
1• Salix sercia C=, S I 9.
2. Rhus glahra 1;1 S f 10. '
f
3. Acer rubr-L= F AC S 11.
4. Rubus allegheniensis I H 12• l
5. Juncus effusis F7 H 13.
6. Solid-ago sue. H I 14.
7. 15.
g ! 16.
Percent of Dornir=t Spies that are OEL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 75
Remarks: M -_'ts t`:e criteria for Vii- ?? crc uc vegetaticn
'dYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in R=r?-q): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
I Strewn, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Puctog;?phs Inundate
Other X Saturtw Lc Upper 12 inches
X No re--ord?l Da'? Available Watt: M -t :!<-s
Drift Lints
Se^:imezt De-.osits
Field Observztioas: X Dra nast Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more r.quir°
Depth of Sur;::-- IrVa0 (inches) Oxidize:: Root Channels in Upu. 12 inches
_Wattr-Stained Leaves
Depth to Frei Vra?: in Pit: (Inches) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neut.al Test
Depth to Saturr:>d Soil: (Inches) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
1/Data
F'-at ad =_c`nt to sire-:i. I t the criteria for wetland hydrolx/
Approves by HQUSACE 3192

Is
Unit Name '
-:es and Phase.): Pacolet Gravely Sandy Icy Drainage Class:
Field Observations
onomy (Subg-roup): Coafirm Mapped Type: Yes No X '
__Profil e
!-.) escrip ti on:

i
ti,
:es)
Horizon hiatrix Color
(lfunsell Moist) Mottle Colors
(hiunsell Moist) Mottle
AbundancelContrast ons,
Te,,t -e, Concret
Structure, Etc.
0 A 1 10 b-L S12 I 7.5 518 30% I S;?r*f, clay
--18 B I
I
5 Y2 411
-
- I
CLy

I I I I I
I I I
1
;dnc Soil Indicators: '
Histosol Concretions '
Histic Epipedoa High Organic Content in Surface Lay,-,- L, Sa dy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x_Aquic Moisture Recime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List '
X Reducing Corditic`s Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Y Gleyed or Low-C or= Colors Other (Explain in Remarks
^a6 s: '
This .is believed to be na in error. rE°ts the criteria for hydric soil..
:TLAND DETERMINATION
ydrephytic Ve2etatien P,.sent? X '1'es No
'edmd Hydrology P.-?? ?t? x Yes No
yd:ic Soils Pr-_.F_-nt? `X Yes No Is this Sampling Poi.-:t Within a Wetland: Y Y NO
en;.:rks:
All three par=ete-rs are net.
1
B: /11/Datatorm.L:.. Appro•, by r_QUSA.CH Sic; '
• 1

1

Uit I h 1", l 1I 1 1
RGU i iNE ,'IFE L• '*"0
(i SE 7 C-CE Wedar.cs ?2iir,e3;;;c:, :;tai; 3i}
Daz
Ap,Nc-n lGwner-. Vu.lc--.n _ Cccn; f: g?? rr>r
Inver; sa c: r. R. Smiley S:at°: NC
Coo Nc, ,,al Cir::'ms;?nces ezis: cn the site? Yes No
Is the Sloe SiSnlllczn-dy CIS'?r"iC (A-,ypiCal Slcuzl;on)? Yes c I rcns2V: ID: 5
r
Is the arzc a potenzi2l r;ccle.m r,rz? es , No Flo: (D: 1
(I` nc°-,ed, explain cn revers Z.) D==nt Season
1
VCGc t:,itGl'V

I
C'crr'r -r.: ?a.-r: 5coc-3 e -c m Ir.?ic_ter Ocrrir.an: r •n <te_tea 5'.--:.- Ir ?:e_:cr
-
1. S`ix sari SIS
CH S.
Z. P?? ., s?? ulata F. O4 SIS 10
3 i; ca a japonica- Fes - V 11.
/ i
5. 13.

7. 15 -
a. 1 s.

Far:rrt c( Ccr-ninant SFQt_i: '.a: arw CcL. FAC;r or FAC
FAC-). 50
R trr L-zy:

Spe Ci es frcm the t ° ar ?-us strat Were missing ai for rotidentifiaole &e to tiEe of y°--r
Tc }r
HYnpni r)(=Y
_F- = K CA --x (Cel ac i?e W•Carxr F:'y:rtic71Ir)'- 1 eator3:
5 7i art. Lea. , ici P.-Mjtrl Ir?:c_.cr3:
_
Aarial r cL^s Ir.at3d
cngr X 5r._tat?d in UFpar i2
Nc r. LC: _Kr beta AV_IL li Mark-3

Fco? Ct7irT?^3:
.. _C.n r-rq-j Par;zrrs in Wat--Ll
5ac=nd ar•f Irx::c7y7 (Z cr rr.crf ri?_: ~!:
Cr^ ' e 5t 'zee. `Yatar. 0
r C :x' F c c t Chnnr.eis .r I''?er 1=!r n
`
Wra^SLxinod Vares
F- a Ws-,=r in F.:: to ? I_:c?! 5w Survrf Cats
FAc-114 1 C-rt
br : t= 5r z a.d 5ca: F) Q^a _
__ C?,?r Gain in F.c-ir
FI .m arcz:
SOILS
Cacn.
A
0-16
C:zir.aSs 0333:
10--m
Mapped as-PxC_ot
(Sar,ss a:= :`alai: c_ravelly sandy
This is 5 ?, -.ez to in error. icy C?s.rvaccr z _ .
C:ar::n {accrly;,er Yes .e
Hydr.c Scu" I s: n:
{a:.. C_ic. Mc' a Cclcrs McCra
`.{ciz:l tur.?ar.c_iC:
?r
- saLy C 1EY
5•Y "5Ic - -
I
I
I- C;[ rl
} i3 c Erip^_'cn
-Sc.'°.cic Cc'cr
nec cn? Ccr i?Cn
Giayx' ar L_^wti-::cr..: Ccicrs
R .m arks :
W EiLf',': D C ETEW I N N TI O N
C.onc:n?cns ..
`Nion drsaric Cc.^ sr in Sur!:es Lsyer in Sar-y cns
_ drvric St-sa?c ry in cars-`Y Sciis
_ listad on ur-? } y? cci13 L st
(js;ad cn
} yc'~c=rc V.;a?cn F:rsir?? Ye:? t`lc (Gr :1-.\ I
We?arc .:r'.:c, F--sar:? (Y.,,,' tic yCLin a We?arF Ye- ( `+c i
!I
Fdi?= a in the ve,?e !Llv_ E soils criteria.

(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecUSite: R.,c?;n ham )„arry Date: 412515,
Applic--Muow•ner. Vl'l ran Matori ?l c County:
Investigator: smi 1 oy SL2te:
r Y-
' Do Normal Circu.^s'=ces exist on the site? Y Yes No Community ID: Mirub Is=b
Is the site sigaihcaatly disturbed (Atypical Sino-ation)? _Yes xNo Transect ID: B
Is the area a potential Problem Area? X Yes No Plot ID: 4
(If need, cxplra on reverse.) Fe_- a =..:s v-etaticn scam due to
t=-P- o: y as 1 -
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indic--tor Stratum Dominant Plant Species InciC?tor Strtum1
1- Ileac opaca F=C- T 9.
2. Quercus rucra F:?M T 10.
3• Rhus glabra U.. S 11.
4. Quercus ni.gr.a F;C S 12.
5. Cornus florin F GU S ( 13.
6. Cyprineace-- Sao -- H I 14.
7. Vitis rotiar3ifol a F?c V 15.
8. I 16.
Percent of Dorn, ,t Species that arc OEL , F.-.CW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 33
Remarks:
Fails ro n----t hyarophyti c vf-etation criteria
3YDROLOGY
Recorded Da_ (D?sc:ibe in Re.:=rks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicator:
Aerial Pl:0to2 _pes Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 iac'es
X No record--' Dau ?vilable Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observztiers: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more requir-
Depth of Su, --?-- WaL°r: n (inches) Oxidized Root Channels in Upc---. 12 Li"-c'--es
Water-Shined Leaves
Depth to Free W2Lzr in Pit: __. (Inches) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to San. =.u Soil: - (Inches) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: -
Cri slcce axve flat. No evice-ace of wetlarri trycrology were observes
11/Datstorm.
3
Approved by
rs
o Unit Name
nes and Phase): Pecclet Gravely &_ jzy T c,:
:onomy (SubgTOUD):
Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Confirm Iriaoped Type: Yes x No
Profile
Desm-iption:
eoth
:hes)
Horizon Matrix Color
(:liunsell Moist) Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast TE.tn.-e, Concretions,
Structure, Etc.
A A I 10 yR 313 7 ice=:
18 B
I
( 5 Yt 518
---
- I
?y lcaz,

I
I I I I
I
edric Soil Indicators:
I:istosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Laye: L Sar.dy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aauic Moisture Re<i_.ae Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Re,ducing Conditiczs Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleye-d or Low-Cc,orn a Colors Other (Explain in Remarks
Fails to meet hydric soil criteria
ND DETERMD\ATION
?:oohytic Ve2etaticn P °sent? ;'es x No
e:Iand Hydrology Pms=t? Yes x No
. d::c Soils Pre ant? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland: es_No
Ncne of the tiirree ^.iaters are present
? /11/Datator.i..Ls Apc:we- b; QUS ?i;_
FC U i iNc'r'/E: L-AND DE R %'1„r i iCN
I Cc / C-2S Iiire:ianes Calinea"c., Ma; afi
F.-c: alt°: iZOG1Cl7 ^= -_ Dale: 3--24--S5

Inves Sa:cr. R. Smiley
Do ?'cr ai Circ r„s-?nc°s ex:s cn t .e site? YS? Ccr; r-?ni:; Imo:
Is t; e site 5igniT-1cantly (r

Yes No
ciS.r.?C? '`,-,ypical S•Iwation)?

i rznsec: IDS:
Is &.e 2,--e a patential F.c?I-Ern Are Yes No Fiat ID: 2 _
(If nee,4ee4, explain cn reverse.) cormr-Tseascn
v C'_ C Al -FI 0 N
Cc r-":_.^- Par'; Scar.e? 11.C.
1. Sa-li ricra c T S.
2. AL--:s sarnilata Fri T to.
3. I i cyst sinense F= S I S 11.
4. Lo iicera japonica r = v 17.
S TrT =ti ens capensi-, F ?,v h 13.
s. Q-x ac?° °_ p h 1 .
7. SOl?CcGO H 1s_

Porcar, cf Cc--=nanc SYr_l.: 2:a CEL FAC,'I cr FAC II
(a?UC-^y rAC•).
p
n arr; atz:: .
Mich of the he bkeoi.Ls st . f s not present
HYDROLOGY
_ F.e c sc Cat= (C!icn__ in .:...._. l; Wadand } ycrcfc;^? Ir?ic?tors:
_S^anrm, Lie, c: i. i Gr_ z Pt ary IrK:catcn:
C'z`ar X Sr,:rc i-d in Up ;.ar 1?
_
X Nc F. ac- sc' Cata nvr_'ic:!a _Wt:irMjrr?
X Cr?c l ^+a

_5,c-r.rCa;as
r C'zarrr?c s: X Cr- rsga Pa^ar sin ti`/e__
5acandarr Inc cr n (2 or R:cra (a
Ctr^ t' Su 1sca Wa:ar 0 G ?1 c---,d Fact c-.Ar.r.-,'i
_ W r, :r-S :-mi n ed C.j a v-"
Cr, - ; Foe Wet-r in F. 4 Gn.; _'.:c-ai `c-"n Sur-,e/ Cas 1
1
FAC•N--A VC-r
C r S r -r, ad 5 c 0 _
cr_i.rz1
C n tf (-' ;1n i n F.
n
SAILS
Mac Ur... Njr:a I
(Series inc r »ci: as Paco' 'et nravelly sandy' loam C:air.aS3 Cass:
nlis is be-li to be in error r ^G C?s.rva?cns ?
iaxcnc-y (?L' cuc): Ccn= -i NSac?et iY;: Yeses NC
PrFte r.. -- - I
Cac Ma. .`x C .c. Mc-ta C Ices ?SCCra iax- :_. C ..
firs -s1 } c -cn C!ur ii "- f.?'•uns-t `.!cis: ,.tLr.-'zr.c:iC_
0-12 S 5Y-R 518 - - sa r•-;
10 ) 413 - - lo=amy sir
. t
.-C Ecll
}is caci Gant. a d C n3
_Pis--C E-.:: cccn Pigh drgar c C-r:t!r, in Sur-.'ace Uyar to S_..:y Sciis
Scic C d c r ?drganic St.-3&;inr, in Sanc`y Sciis
X Ac_c Mcis; •. a R - -. U3ted cn Lccai } ycr c Sciis List II)
X F.ac cnq Ccr`:--,-- ._ _Uv&d cn Nsc_nai F•,-d^c Sciis Lir, i?
x Gi.yx+ er L^w-C.'-=-: C:,ierz _ CC:er (E--- lrn in ner.:aricz)
R.marz3: - -
Se`ii:ent was Ce,--esited in t}is area approximately 10 years ago, therefore, low crcazs in the
upper Mrtions have not he:a sL_`=i cient. tir,.e to develop.. 1 ,e ori. Lla soil is sandy any is lc7
eno cu i in &,ro l to he }1vCt _C .
wETLAr;o o`i =nMI1N'/1', tors
F:y Vcn r - .r.:? Ye? tie .(C `?I (C:?a1
Wet'a:x ..•f'-~ic:i F-,:sar::? : es? tic ct?
cre S_ii: = .r.? ( Nc Is z:is Sm..., Rn
Py
ALI i rzraIQters are r-r giant.
.A pprrrrc cy r:C:_Z?- _.=-
CA .a FC RM
' RCU Ti „c'l/E-:-iA-.*tiD DET ti lI -FIIIC:y
(i SEA CCS Wedzr,c.s

F;c;e?r`i-a• Rock:r?;-?? CL•--_-ry Da._: 3-?`"_-??
Appiic-r,Jowner: Vtilce-i Ccun; f:
_
Inves r2zc, R. Saile,7

Coo Nc,,,zi CircuMS Znces exist cc, the si:e? Yes r?
Ccr ,,Lni-; IC: Fcre-?-t-
Is . ,e site siSnif1car,tly (Atypical Si;Lation)? ps No ir2nsec: ID:

Is z?,e a,-z? z pat=_n?_I i';c?I_.? Arza? es c
t
I ID:
F,o: _--__-

explain cn rzversc.) dormant se---i I
VcC^:,710;4
Cer,-:r._.-- r?lr• Scoce7 er .._m Ir.•_'ic_c_r OCr.-inen• r ,n• ct••ie? S' _-_ Ir?:c?ecr
1. Fats cr=x?folia F:y'Zi 1 9. Gelsemit3n ser rvirens, F? V
2- Q ryx T 10.

3. I_c.•: c:z,ca F?01 SIS 11.
4. Co_ra-,-? flor?da FCC SIS 12-
5 Licd6a;- ar styraciflua F;'E+ SIS 13.
6. Lca; ^=,
wz iancnica
F?C-
V
1
7. Ilex cxca FAri H 1 S. ---
8._Lc c°r? jaxnica F.kr H 18. - -
Per_ar: cf Cc-,-: r.anc S;.e<c:.i t:?a: arm GEL. FACN or FAC II
(a-_c-y FAC i. 22 _-..----
Rrr..i ?.
>L-y r°rtacecus semis w- =re not pr esent cue to time of year.
HY>7r.n,( nr=Y
T. sC Ca :,x (ca 1. a it T. -:7 :! ._?;:. WvdAfd
- c ar I, L---k e, c. %c 1 C a Primary IrX:ca:cn:
AariIli r c:_ :z :: I _Ir._ cat?d
_
Cner Sr.:-tsd in Upror iZ Inc=!,
X f;c P.acc ?c Cata i,vcia=tI _Y/ctr Maria
Cr f: L:-r.-.
_
S.c.nrM Cmpa>r
Ft-;
r _Crirac, P?t::rn:i in We=tn: '
S.ccncu/ Iry':cr z (Z or mcrm rr_
Ca, c' E ^ac? YIatar. Rcat C'anr.- a ir. C. er i= Ire=y
Wt',?r5'.ainerd L?av--z .
`
C r; - :c r a 'YYd--r in F.= G_ ; _'=c? Sc? Surer/ C a L3
FAC-Nrir??
Cr_ L Sr`z x? Sc1: (fry _C? K (F=,'"n in r.
R?r L7I;
No indicators of hydrology vn.re present
SAILS
1 ;.lac Unit Nar-a

y lOc7__
(Ear.as inc F.`:ass): Ailey sz_-!:?-
C:sir.ass Cass:
`.-:d C?_sarwaccr.s }
iaxer.c:-y (Sub(;;cuc): C=..r.rn 'accr_` 7y; e. Yes?:c
P^Fle ,n;
Cac... Cc,C. h{ctya Ccicrs
fir,c^_s} He -cn (.'{u_ (.ML"I!-a `.{cis:! ur. r?rc_iC_r :sue c? _- - =
0--2 0 2.5?a 313 - - F; l tv r', -

A. 7.5 ?a 416
2-10-
F,1jv cl=4
14_-16 E 5??? 5?0 - - g;lty Cl
Hyd; c Sc.7 Inc:catcrs:
Hirc=r Cnnc: accns
_
_
_His?c ?ircvcn Hisrt Gr(;ar::c C:.r art in 5uH,ca L3ycr i : ?e.^=y `ciii
_ Zc::`id'ic Cdcr Grganic 5G'aaxirq in Sanc'y Sciis
_Ac--,'e Mcisr :a P..e-::-:a Lietcd cn L--c--j; } }? c Sci13 L:Jt
_
R AC'cnq Cc(-:!,•„-_ _ L13-,.Gd an 1426--m4 }:ydnc Sciis C:::-:
Giaysd cr l:r.-Ch: c r: Ccicr-s _ GC:ar (E -ia n in Rrr^arri)
R a.rn arts : ,
rro irdic -tors of h,2lric s"; were observed
(C:. )
Hyc',;-c:-fie Vra?cn i=:rjar,? Yes Ne (C.?n)
Wac.'ar.< F--san:? Ya3 r(
Hy_' ie 5 is r iarrl Yes e (s L`a1 5ar.:;.ii.n =ir.: Ye_
Norm of the three Fzra.etsrs are present
A rcvrc Cy -..r.,_ r A - - _ _
i

n

RCUTiyE YIET(aI;D 0E ,R ?NNAFCN
(.SE C2S INedares Caiir,ea;,c , `;Iz,n--:0

1- Rodcirc F-m 3-29--55
Appi1C2---n ./Owner: vulc:n Ccunvl: Rit z
_
Inver-,c:a;C,:R. Smiley S.a?e: NC
Do Nc,,,al Circ ms;?r,ces Exis; cn the site? YES No
rub
Ccr-,,?ni:,? ID: SLnbI=?-
Is e si;= SiSniiCantiy cis;?r?cc {Atypical ?i(l!aIIon)? Yes No
y I ransar ID:
No
IS the ar?Z Z p0Centizi F.c*IE.m r.rez? FIa:ID: 2.
----

Of explain cn rC`?CrEC.) " I
•
Recent s?taticn deceits
VE12 E71"^70 IN
Cc r r- Pr ]r. a I r._ •^ .r
ar_ cr OCr^irtent cc._ _ ?' _ _ Ir?:c::=r
P 7:
l . cry ; X rLa 0= T 9.
Z??x r CE,, SIS 10.
3 Alnr?s err-„1 ata K=01 SIS Ii.
4. LiCL=.t sinense F% S S 1 Z
5.Sa--hUcs Cam-- ----Iensis F.=^,v H 13.

7. 15.
-- -
Per-r.; cf C--_nsnr S, aces ;:; ere CEL FACT/ cr FAC 100
II
(ems '?c:-y rn' C•j.
'
P. •rr: ari-3 : I
Ee- .ecea?s vEgetat?6'n 1_dt-c c e to tire of year a-nd b=ying ty saiirent.
I
HYDROLOGY
Pc Catz (r'^_Ic'=a it ?:
_E--TAe,-., L-cr T--ra Ce
_ C:.`. rr
XNc F.tc-:-*c Gates ;.vcii !t
Crp^ Ws;ar.
F-.- a iYa-!r in F.
Cr,? "Sr_z ?d 5C1:
0 G rIA
11? fir..1
10 0- l
W•dand Hycric;I Irxicatarn:
:cat>d
_ W1;Ir Mark-1
X C, -?z- L'-+s
X S.c :.rtt Caro ria
_Crinscy Pansm.-x in V/aCz.:.?s
Srccntirr inc:cz-._n (Z cr r cra
_Cx-:*-,d Rcct C":anr.ris in V;;er 1Z lrc'rs
S tsi n od L9 a vc-v
' - y Scu Sur.?y Cat3
R.rr arr..
Re---n;, saa=ent dei:osits have raises surface :elevations acprc:<L-ately 12".
SOILS
r ? I
.'Jac V. r: Nara
(Saria3 and Fhasa): Tg3cced as Faccllet cZavelly - ss loam C:air.ap C:333:
This is be-l-i to be in error r +d C`s cr+accr.s
laxcr.crcy (Sv1:q,cuoh Cc..^ -? acccd Tyyc'r Y:3 Nc/
Fr-Gila Cr -
cd:: Ma C_.c. Mc to Czlcr3 MO=A x '._. Cc::.
rive^es) (?ittr.--:1 Mcis;l bur.??neerC 's; cl- - _ -
i
0-12 SED 5)R 516 - - sand' ?=-J'
12-24 A 10 YR 413 - - loamy
i
Hy,'rc _Scz I )ciutcr-3:
1 istc:o!
i3-? c :.riYa-lcn
SdIrCCic Cdcr
-X Ra-:c•cng Ccrc ?cr.3
v Guyed cr law-:`rcr a Ccicrs
C.onc:3ccn3
^Hi?h CItg3ric Czr :r in Sur?ace Layer i S_.. y Scii3
_ otgnnic St 3aXirg in Sandy Scii3
_ Untad cn L--c3i } yd c Scii3 Last
_ Li3~.ad on Naccrni XY-r'c 5ciis L:::.Z
other (E:..Iain in Ranarics)
R amauu:
Soil is h:rie3 by recent d=_cosits.
WALA",'o Cc1 c?M IN;,r0N
H}^' -fe Vo-;a cn r-:e-sar;? ? ., No (C: r--: Wadzrx ?{ icy? F Jsar.:? f Y•s I "Ic
CYC ^c Siia Nc Is t-`:ii Sar;,iirir.rl :?.in a y?e_, ar., Nc l
R ++-.ir?cz
All _ Via;.eters were cres` , prior to sea?Rant deposits.

t
DATA FORM 3
ATYPICAL SITUATIONS
Applicant Application Project
Name: Vulcan Materials Number: _ Name:Rockingham Quarry
Location: Rockingham. NC Plot No. C-2 Date: 3/29/9
A. VEGETATION
1. Type of Alteration: Herbaceous vegetation buried by sediment
2. Effect on Vegetation: Herbaceous stratum is buriedcreated a dryer moisture
3. Previous Vegetation: Tree and shrub species meet criteria for wetland
(Attached documentation)
4. Hydrophytic Vegetation? Yes X _ No -
B. SOILS
1. Type of Alteration: Soil buried by sedimentation
2. Effect on Soils: ---
3. Previous Soils: Original soils are sandy and low chroma
(Attached documentation)
4. Ilydric Soils? Yes X No _
C. HYDROLOGY
1. Type of Alteration: Surface elevations raised by-?e?osits of sedimentation
2. Effect on Hydrology: Increased distance of water table from the surface
3. Previous Hydrology:
4. Wetland Hydrology? Yes X_ No
Characterized by: R Smiley
\1/V/ ?v+? .. ?.uu,..., pia-.....+?.. v.. •....... •/
Project/Sitz: Date: A125Ic;
Applicant/Ovrne: yl, i San ?t? t o, ; a i s 'County: RiInvestigator: St?te: 1C
Do Normal Ciru s' nces exist on the site? Y Yes No Community ID: F,n,hI?
1s the site signihrndy disturbed (Atypical Si.,^,iation)? _Yes X No Transect 1D: Cl
Is the area a pot~nd1 Problem Area? xYes No Plot ID: 3
Of need, explain on reverse.) Fe s ve-etaticn -=ce due to
. t
"''E GETATION o-Z year
-Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Lndicnntor Str..tum
1. Fagus grandifolia -Fr; Il T 9.
2. Mms glabra ivz S I 10. '
03. Cercis czr <ce-,sis
4• Viburnum pn--ii foliuo F OJ
Fi OJ S I
S I 11.
12.
5• Senecio tcoe--i`rm-as FP C-
6• Hexastylus ar-ifolia _-° F,?c H I
H I 13.
14.
7. Euchorbia cam, ??; =a; i FPC H I 15.
8• Ionicera jax-rica FPc- V I 16.
Percent of Dorn;r :t Species that are OEL , FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 28
?Rcmarics:
Fails to rat hydrophy-tic v--,e aticn
criteria
HYDROLOGY
?Re: orded Da_ (Desz-libe in R-.==:<s): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lee, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Fcetog _chs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X No record- D-T A';ailable Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
yield Observe-tioa?: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more
Depth of Surf-k-. Vl=?:: n (inches) Oxidized Root Channels in Up >_: 12 1.1:nes
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Fr-- 1'r'ater in Pit: - (Inches) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Sat-a r:w^ Soil: - (Inches) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Level arc = above stream=, 15' frca top of
/11/ atstorm. n
Aoprovcd by hQUSA(--t
S
-? Unit Name
-:es and Phase): P=gglet Gravely Sz v L ca"s
:nonly (Subgroup):
Drainage Cbss:
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type: Yes _X No
Profile
Description:
?pth
hes) Horizon

Matrix Color
(lfunsell Moist)

Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)

Mottle
AbundancelContrast

TE-,a-re, Concretions,
Strscture, Etc.
10 A . i
I
5)R 518
-
- I
? Lc??

--18
13 I
5 YR 416
I

-

_ Tr-]
c ; l tv
-
I ! I I
_ ? I I I
I I I

-dric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aauic Moisture Regan,
Reducing Conciucrs
Gleyed or Lou-C - = Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer L Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remrks
i
I?
marks:
Yydric soil c--iteria are not net
l-LAND DETERMINATION
,,drephytic Vege??.icn Pre._-nt?
t`lzzd Hydrology P,-_stat?
.dric Soils Presea:?
Yes X N o
Yes No
Y--.s X No
: tea: ks:
None of the three .pararaeters are pres?_=nt -
:r/11/Datatorm.L:r
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetla.*:e: Yes X iro '
App:,, .?. c

(1987 CUE Wetiands L)e ineation Manual)
1Projecusite: -RnckJ nqh- n„pr1y Date: 4125195
AppIicanUOurner V,,, C:;,n M+ tp, i a, s County: Ric}
Investigator: P 4 i 1 - SLte: YC
¦Do Normal Circ•-,zistancts exist on the site? Y Yes No Community ID: Shrr1hl?- n
Is the site signinc--^.ely disturbed (Atypical Sir=lion)? _Yes y No Tramect ID: C
Is the area a potraGal Problem Area? X Yes __No Plot ID: 4
(If needed, ex. l:ia on reverse.) Herbacecus ve?.etation --c--ce due to
f EGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Lncicator SL--atum l
!
1. Quercus alie F?M T 9•
2. Pinus ec"hi_rc-G.a iJrL T I 10.
3. Ilex o.--ca ) r"C- T I 11.
4. Ilex oraca F, C- S I 12.
Fagus grarnifoli a F;?M S I 13.
6. Liquidate s -?yraci flea F`C S ( 14.
7. 1,aAcera jaxzca F - V
15.
Quercus alma FJ g 16.
Percent, of Dori,=t Spies that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 12
Rcmarics:
C--itEiria for hydrochyt ic v-et?tion are not met
r
LOGY
B-Re^:orded D;- (Describe i-n Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, L--'Y:, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial P`c;cc,_c s Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 inches
No re-card--' D__ Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observatiers: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more r 1ui):
Depth of Sur, Wa e:: 0 (inches) Oxidized Root Channels in Up: 12 i caes
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Fr--- `r,•_'wr i. Pit: - (Inches) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Sat r-_: Seil: - (Inches) Other (Explain in Remarks)
4:1 s'cs a _cra-drrately 10' frcc too of ban',
11/ atsrorm.!=n Approve
y hQUSACE 3/92
LS
ip Unit Name
:.Iles and Phase.): Pacolet Gravely Sa-?cy i??
zonomy (Subgroup):
Drainage Class:
Field Obseryations
Confirm Mapped Type: Yes X No
Profile
Description:
)epth
aches) Horizon

illatrix Color
(liunsell Moist)

Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)

Mottle
Abundance/Contrast

Te.: -_, e, Concretions,
S"Tuctur-e, Etc.
0-113 A I 5 YP 518 I - - I S Y? leer
I
I I ? I I
I
I I
I ?
yd. is Soil Indicators:
Eistosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Rt2ime
Reducing Conc":crs
Gleyed or Low-C sor.ns Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Laye.I i- Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on Nation--! Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks
=arks:
Fails to tr ct =i te_ria for hydz is coy _ .
TLA.ND DETER_MDATION
crcphytic Ve?e'ta:icn Fr°r?ent? Y:_s Y No
. vj ad Hydrology P:es t? Yes v 'tip
:•rcric Soils Pr°.-ser,:? Y:s Y No
::..arks:
None of the :=ee parameters are present,
is this Sampling Poi:.t Within a Wetland: Yes Y No I '
?;: /11/Datatorin.Ly.
Apps:..,.. b ? I-:
I'
DATA FCRM
RDU ? itic'1/E_ t- NO CE-,c-,MINATICN
1
i SE-/ CCU ?Ne;ior,:.S ?211f;eni,C:, `:1a,.••

1

F;Cjeze: Rodcircna GL?rry Da:°_: 3-2S-S5
Applicar,tlawner: Vulc-n Ccur„/: R'-6=33
Inves ? c.: R. Smiley _
De
Nc,,,ai C:rc'r; s-2r,ces exist tj-je site? Yes)
Fcrst
?+
Is the SlSnircan;ly (:.:ypicsi Si;uacon)? Ye-?No' i rzns2=: ICS: D
Is the a potenzial r;CClern Are2? eS o F:(3; ID: -_-
W- explain cn reverse.) I)O=t se,:-son
Vt'O^ ;i?Ot1
0_-min_r:: PIr-Scocr? S Ir. is-:cr Ocr.-,ner • -r.: c^.;:.. _-_- Ircc -:-r
1. FEccs c =-?folia F.:!m T 9
n
Z•IL1Cl'C ' ' styracifla -
F_i!
1
10.
3. pxyd -xcn= E orem 1+ T 11.
4. I16-< ccac- F _2C- S I S 1 Z
5. I i c?c?-f Styraclf lu? F-•=C-: S IS 13 .

6. Cu ~c s ? L=ardii F.Z = S IS 1,
7. IleX Craw Fes- H
S. I r; r = V =i ca V 1 g - - - - --

Paman2 c! Ccr r.JnL S?r_?s
CEL FAA""; cr FAC
38
II
n
R ern arzs
:..?........ ? ve7etaticn ] _-6 -:c cL:s-- to time o year
1I
HYDROLOGY

S ar, L .-k_, T J Cr_;z P arflrx::_:crs:

C~er _Srr_:: x1 in U;?rar iC
X HC R ?K CAtA AV2?1L.!I V/i:arMarka

5,?:,.rt Crosi^
F,7d C`_]?rra -r3
- CraaJ51 Par.ara in We
Sr_cncary fnc:czrr3 (Z or mcra
CJr ._?- e! ec?yv WJtar: - (r)
V _C?-?c Rce: C.2r.r.rii to 1_'--er Z fr:e -a
_ w r ir-s :z n od La vr"
Ce^ := r--_!i We-,!r in i^-_ (r.) _'.c:-,1 5Ci Survey C a u
Tn C•,y fl.-c-zi irr.
Ca _ ?r?z sd 5c? 10" (
_ _
_C? ?r (Ez.:7 in in r.?-srx.:
n
u
R >K-- &rk_3?: ?'
This data point is located cn a steepslore 5 r ?bov"e- an iruntixltaa?ec# -flat.

SOILS
! ..lac {,.'nt: 'Nams ^ .
Cr]Ir:3S9 0:733:
I (Sane3 anc chase): ov ,? ?`. cn - ,.
Ccr3 r acoe= tY:er
a;.. C.. tV{cc a C_?crs
Cap= M
(I r.c"e-1) Nc -cn INer 7i ."•^ ;1 (!'•?^s-
- Silty ?? ^ r
0-2 0 2.5?z 3?3 -
2-10 A 7.5??Z 416 - -
silty -=+
- -
10-16 5a 51E
pydre Sul Inc:catcn:
_Xiresol
F.i3-e ITirec'cn
_ SL:"c c Cdcr
CieyeG CC L^C:icr3
_Conc.nEcna c Sciis
High Crta?ic C_r,::rt in Surface C3y'r it :.^-y
_ Orgnnie 5[ erx ne, in Sane`/ Sciis
Li,ted on lr c?i } y- 'e Seii? 1 3:
Listad on flaccnai 1 ydre Sciis U:S
CC nr (E,-,lain in Rer.:ar:c )
R.marx_s:
WETLAt;D DE! t ,MINA iO:'1
}iyc :; -mac Ve;ecn r'eser ? Ye_
Wet'e :c ;^f F^Sar.:1 Is t-4:1
r.c =:--sac.;1 Ya' '{c
!I
R.c::ar'r_s
T Cn°_ G_ `:e ?Lee parG rt°-=- a-re Frezent.

(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
kplicanUOwne-, ject/Site: --4nrkinolka- Q-rry Date: 4?1?5
s County:
'Investigator: r. ??>>?•Y, State:
8)o Normal Circ '?-c s exist on the site? ?c _Yes No Community ID: (Sjcx S
Is the site signi-Ecandy disturod (Atypical Situation)? ____Yes X No Transtct ID: D?
the area a pot`n6J Problem Area? X Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, czpla a on revers.) 1 °Yz? l'S ve ;etation scarce due to
u=-e o: year )
&GETATION
Dominant PL-nt Species Indicator Stratum I Dominant Plant Species L:dicator Str-tu;I
Fagus gran -folia FPOJ T 9. lonicera japonica F:C- V
- Peer run= F.; T I 10. Vitis rotuw,0_1Lfolia -ACC V
Salix rni gra CH T, T I 11. Rlnisrzcii cans riI
?. Sa ix nigra GEL, S 1 12'
Ligustllmi sine.-L=e Fib S I 13.
Solidago Sco - H I 14.
Nyssa sylvatica r - S 1 15.
Rubus alle-_derie_sis LZ 1i I 16.
erc-ent of DomL-_: _?t Sp pies that are OBL , FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 50
,cmark_s: r
Vegetaticn is nF-r?iral for metina the citeria, ha:ever, in the judgement of this investi,ct cri, ,,nen the
herbaceous plants urge, the crit°_ria wLla be net ,
OLOGY
l-Re`aorded Da'` (Dew- ce in Remarks):
Strom, Lk!!, er Tide Gauge
1 Aerial F?cto_ s
Other
Y No re`orc Da= .'.,_iiable
Field Obsrvzriers:
' Depth of Sur r. (inches)
Depth to Fry=: i. Pit: -- (Inches)
' Depth to Sat=_? Scii: 12 (Inches)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicator:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Mches
Water Marks
- x Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
X Draiaage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more ruire ):
Oxidic Root Channels in Upc-_: 12
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
11 marlcs:
1 _ i-,-; rology criteria

/11 atztorm. n Appro`•w by h
S
p Unit Name
nes and Phase): P_ggiet Gravely ?rfy Lca-s Drainage Class:
Field Obs°.rvations
:onomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type: Yes No X
Profile
Description:
2pth
ches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(tifunsell Moist) Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast TExture, Concretions,
Structure, Etc.
0 I 10 tR 411 .10 yr 314 20"-s I Silty cl a-y

?-1"-

A

I 10 yR513 I

5yr518 ? I

150
_
c
s ,c? l`l
14-16 I B I 5 1' 511
I I - I
I
I

;dric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Laye. L, Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Str-,king in Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regin, e Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditicrs Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-C'-:or .:.s Colors Other (Explain in Remarks '
:.:arks: .
1his is hydric soil '

TLkN'D DET=R aNATION ,
drophytic Vegeta::cn Present? X Yes No
'-:land Hydrology Present? v Yes No ,
Soils Pr° ent? v Yt-, No Is this Sampling Pci.:t Within a Wetland: v Yes No

All three ce-ranneters are ure=ant

t
L
?c/11/D Approve-- byr.QUSr.?- ???-
aca
orrn.

\JlV l V Vi LU.1!!LL) Yuaaaw uva• ?rawau...l
Project/Site: -pnckingh_- T„?rry Date: 4126195
,' Applicant/Ovvmer VII C2-- n+a?or4 i County: Rid-m
-Investigator: PL-C-4 i11v State: NC
I )o Normal Circuistances exist on the sire? x Yes No Co=unity ID: _FEE F?--_-
s the site signific:2.ndy disturbed (Atypical Siw-,tion)? `Yes X No Trars°ct ID: F
Is the area a potential Problem Area? x Yes No Plot ID: 1
(If ne°ded, explain on reverse.) QrLC1 . ve;etaticn --c--rce due to
--- t jI o_ ye_a 1
IJEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indjmtor Stratu:n 1
- -
1 • Quercus alter
?2• Quercus rL21a FrIcu.
F 7J. T
T ( 9. P olystric um a9trostichoides FC N
i
10. Loni.cera Japonica FT-C I
'• Liquidc_Th r s-Lyraciflua FIG T 11.
4. 'Ilex opaca F.zOJ S 12.
-
5. - Alnus ser ulaia Fury S 13 .
?6. Quercus nicgra F« S I 14.
7. Quercus al k e F J H 15.
8. Polygonatm bi florin F=C- H 16.
.Percent of Dominant Species that are OEL , F.-'.CW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 40
cmarks:
Hydrophy,ic ve?et?tion criteria are rot met
a
1-M. ROLOGY
V Recorded Da', (Des;:ibe in Remy rc,): Wetland Hydrolo?y Indicators:
-Stream, L,-k!, or Tide Gauze Primary Indicators:
Aerial Fcotc_ra; cs Inundat
Other Saturated in Upper 12 inches
v No rec?or?t: D_!: available Water Marks
Drift Lines

l Sediment Deposits
ield Observadeas: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators. (2 or more reui °o'):
I Depth of Sur-,- ? V 2L---: p (inches) Oxidiz°d Root Channels in Uppz: 12 i:.ches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Fr--- 1y'a? r in Pit: (Inches) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saru,-a:---; Sell: (Inches) Other (E;xDlain in Remarks)
-marks:
3:1 =lc; aatitrately 15' cc tco of cre'.c lank.

I BH1 l/Dat2t
Approved by EQUSACE 3i92
f?
a Unit Name
and Phase): Fa M_=_t Gravely Sarry Ica= s Draina;e Class:
Field Observations
I
-onomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type: Yes X No
Profile
Description:
zpth
ches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(.Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors
Wunsell Moist) Mottle
AbundanceJContrast TE-,:ure, Concretions,
Stntc'.u-e, Etc.
0_18 A' I 5 516 s< T I
I ? I
I

----,7. T 7
I
I
I I
•;dric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer L Sa dy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Re,21m-e Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 1
Reducing Conditicns Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chror:a Colors Other (Explain in Remarks I
Hydric ?>? criteria are rot mat
' - i
i
TLLND DETEIZ?LF'?.tiTION I
drechytic Vege?tici -Ptsznt? Yes X N0
t,012-rd Hydrology P? nt? Yes X No
c c Soils Pr-°s nt? Yes ., No Is this Sampling Po ^.t within a Wetlz.d: :`-Z v o
I Au
Done of the parameters are presant
5t/11/DataIorW.L_ . ?,GGr C% ^QUSAC J?C= i
(1y61 UUt. Wetlands Delineation manual)
?ProjecUSite: •R r zino_- n,,=rry Date: 4126195
ApplicanUowner. y„ir,an r,a?o_; is County: Rict?r>r
'Investigator: R. c,;?ov State: XC
AIM
Do Normal Circums'= nc- s exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: F•nr!hl S
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? _Yes _x No Tramtct ID: E
IV the area a potential Problem Area? _x Yes No Plot ID: 2
f receded, expla n on reve se.) F.? ?-z = vecetaticn scarce due to
ItEGETATION
> c-F y
YEE-
Doniinant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species h(ic:tor SL iturrl?
1 Pins virginiara L_ T 9. Polygcrati n biflorum K= C_
2. Ilex op3ca FPC- T 10. '
23. Pinus taeca Fx T 11.
4• Nyssa sylvatic= f zC S I 12.
5. Acer rubrum r AC S 13 .
6. Quercus alYa FMi S !
! 14.
7. Acer rubrmi Fti^ H 15.
8. Pinus taeda FAC H 16.
err-cat of Domin?yt Species that are OPL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-).
emar?s:
1-1'ydroplIy`i is vecetaticn criteria are r-e%
`:YDROLOGY
ff_Rtcordtd Data (Describe in Re=;:): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauze Primary Indicators:
A-- "I a_1 Phctog-aphs Inundate
Other Saturate-: in Upper 12 inches
X No recorded D_'- ,=.vailable Water ?,fa.acs
Drift Lints
Sediment Deposits
yield Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

'
Depth of Sur;ar. Water: n
(inches) Secondary Indicators (2 or more r=uirw):
Oxidizsd Root Channels in Upce: 12 inches
Water-Stained heaves
Depth to Fr--- W_-,wr in Pit: - (Inches) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturi_ Soil: _ (Inches) Other (_Explain in Remarks)
?L°. marks: _
2:1 slope, 15' y_rco top of ? no hy(f-rolcgy criteria were observed

11/Datsform.
Approve-_4 by hQUSACE
LS
ao Unit Name
=rtes and Phase-): l c-=.
i_xonomy (Suborouo):
Drainage Class:
Field Obszrvations
Confirm Iriapped Type: Yes X ?io
Profile
Description:
)epffi
;Cbes) Horizon

illatrix Color
(hiunsell Moist)

!Mottle Colors
(lfunsell Moist)

hfottle
Abundance/Contrast

Concretions,
Structure, Etc.
0-18 A I 10 : }R' 5 16 I - - I Sa-?-y ice::]
I

I I
I ( I I

c Soil Indicato-:
iydr:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aouic Moisture Re2ilne
RVducing Conditiccs
Gleyed or Low-Ccrorna Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Laye. in S =dy Soil
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks
I?
_., rar'xs:
This is not a ry-Cric soil
TLA-ND DETER',ML ATION
_rochytic Ve2et_::cr . ;.,sent?
e•1z d Hydrology Pr -szzt?
),dnc Soils Pr-_,?ea:?
X Yes No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetlas:c: Yes X No
Fydric soill an c i-ydrology Faremete-rs are not present
c/11/Datatorm.L J Appr? b; f:QUS-C? 3/92
e
tlJb / t-%jr. YYeLUanm ut:-tmt-iuuii vii uiualj
ProjecUSite: •Rncki nQh1 -, n"-r-y Date: 4127195 .
Applicantffivmc y„_ i , a n Mato ; ? i s Co=ty: Ricizc=12
Investigator: R- sEi or,- SLtt: TC
Do Normal Cir:'u, st?ncrs exist on the site? --y-yes No Co=unity ID: I-Dg Fe=w
Is the site siguinratly distuiaed (Atypical Situation)? _Yes X No Trazsect ID: F
Is the area a poteatial Problem Are?? X Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, ezol?_ a on reverse.) F? s vecetaticn scarce due- to
WEGETATION
=1 _, o_
Yea-
Donainarit Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1 Liricderr3rcn tulioirfera FFC T
2 Carpinus czroliniana FrC. T
F T 11.
Dominant Plant Species L-icicator Skratujn
IR 4. Liriodendren tuiir)irfe-ra FP S 12.
19 5. Magnolia vir r i _niana FF?W S 13.
6. Wooawardia areolata OE, H I 14.
7. Rhus radio--, Zvi V 15.
8. Acer rubrLm. FFC _ H I 16.
- -?_. -- -
_
Percent of DoT ^:mot Spies that are OBL, FACW or FAC -
(excluding FAC ). 87 _
Remarks:
Criteria for hyrrc rs ytic vE?etatic:z is met
w
TYDROLOGY
Recorded D2! (Des :roe in Re=arcs): Wetland Hydrolo?y Indicators:
Stream, Lkc, or Tide Gauze Primary Indicator:
Aerial P:.ctooraocs Inundator
Other __X_Saturate~ 111 Upcer 12 inches
X No re--ord.- D_L, Available Water Marks
Drir"t Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observ26ecs: X Drain- z^ Patte as in Wetlands
Secondary Indicator (2 or more rtqu1*-*
Depth of Sur_ °. Water: n (inches) Ozidlz--,d Root Channels in Up e: 12 iuc*- s
Water-St?ined Leaves
Depth to Frer in Pit: is (Inches) Loca1 Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Sat _ 'r Soil: (Inches) Other (Ezplain In Remarks)
i Remarks:
ion Era-- asscciatw .h. _: =tr:?, hydrology criteria are r ---t
11/ atstorraLin Approves by HQ

Q,S
'at) Unit Name '
ems and Phase): ai - ev SrTM'y Lc?? Drainage Class: 0-2
Field Observations
aonomy (Subgroup): Confirin Mapped Type: Yes_ x _ No
Profile
Description:
Depth
nches)
Horizon 'Matrix Color
(:lMunsell Moist) Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
AbundancelContrast Tom. -ure, Concrelums,
St ucinre, Etc.
C? A I 10 )a 212 I - - I Sa-`-y C-1 ay

6--18
B
I

? 5 2 I
10 Y

- I

-
1C .y S
-
I
I

yd:;c Soil Indicato,n:
tions
C '
Eistosol oncre
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer i= Sazdy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils

y Aauic Moisture Re:ine
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List '
X R-ducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Ccrom2 Colors Other (Explain in Remarks '
e marks:
Meets criteria for hydric sou

ETILLND DETER',fD;ATION
rdrophytic Veget2,:-,n P,-seat? X Yes No
• eda-ad Hydrology rresznt? x Yes No
c:;c Soils Pr--sen:? XYes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland: y Yes c

ALl three peters are present

Er""; 11/Data to rm. L_ ?par??r b; r_Q`v5 .C? ? 5= I

Projecusite: -Rockinah- -rry Date: d
Applicant/Owner. V"i can Ma+or; ?i s -Count),: Pdcr,I
Investigator: R_ 'R-niIcV SLte: 1C
Do Normal Cirumst?rcts exist on the site? _ r?Yes No Commuaity ID: PLne Fermi,
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypic-l Si, ration)? _Yes X No Transtc-C ID: F
Is the area a potVndal Problem Area? x Yes No Plot ID: 2
(If ne-ded, explain on reverse.) Ee_-bar.L vecetation scarce due to
o: aft 1
IjE GETATION
Dommi=t Plant Species Lndicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species LnEc_,tor Stratum
1 Pinus tzez?a F AC T 9. Vitis rot=-difolia F?C V
2 Liriodendron tulioife-ra FPC T 10.
' 3. Peer rubrL-a F T 11.
14. I,iquidashar styraciflua f - S 12.
5. Liriodendron tuliaLfera F ?. S 13.
16. ¢,ercus nigra rid H 14.
r Acer rub= F? H 15.
J
8 Liquidaa}ar styraciflua F? H I 16.
Ptrcent of Dominant Spzcies that are OpL, F'.CW or FAC (excluding FAC-). _1CO -
1
F- marks:
Nature loblolly pine plantation. ci`aria for hydrophytic vegetation is ff-et
'?YDROLOGY
V Rerorded Data (Desc ibe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lzkt, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicato _):
Aerial Ph-otoo, phs Inundated
Other Saturt° i_-: Upper 12 inches
No re?ord? Data 11'?va.ilable Watt: Pdarks
Drift Lints
Sediment De-_esits
field Observations: Drain? 2c P_tttrns in Wetlands
Se?aondary Indic: tors (2 or more rt?quirt. ):
' Depth of Sur,"a-- W'zte:: 0 (inches) Oxidized Root Channels in Upce- 12 inches
Water-SL.n-d Lraves
Depth to Frey Wa?_-r in Pit: - (Inches) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Ne-t,I Test
Depth to Satura:w Soil: - (Inches) Other (Explain in Remarks)
marks:
20% Slor_e a_ rcxi_-ately 30' frcr- -tco jarci. No hydrology indicators , re deserved

l/
Approve;' by HQUSACE 3
LS
ap Unit Name
tries and Phasr): a; ev Sa*x3v Ian
Ltonomy (Sub!-roun):
Profile
Description:
Depth Matrix Color
nches) Horizon 01lunsell Moist)
0-10 A' I 10 yt 513
10-18 B I 10n 516
4ydric Soil Indicators:
Remarks:
I,Iottle Colors
(-Munsell Moist)
Draina;e Clsss: 0--)
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type: YesX_ No
Mottle
AbundancelContrast
Tc:Ue, Concretions,
&rsc-;ure, Etc.
lc
Iistosol
Histic Epipedcn
Sulfidic Odor
Aauic Moisture R!ZiMle
Reducing Corciticcs
Gleyed or Low'-Chrom-a Colors
Fails to iroet h-y-d--i c soil crite. -ia
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Lye: i-7- S2-n6y Soils
Organic Strelkin_ in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks
_ TLA'vrD DETER' fENATION I
ydrophytic Ve3et :icC P:.seat? XY=s No
'Wetland Hydrology Pmseat? Y:s Y No
Hyd: c Soils Pr° ....s°nt? Y:s v N0 Is this Sampling PoL,,,t Within a Wetl ^.c: Y S X
Re r^?rks:
Hydric soil an. hydrology Fcram`iarz- are not present
ADC;v':e C'; r'QUSA.C=
Br"!11/Datatoru..Ly.

Appendbc C
HALL LLE
SOLI ES

L

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
The erosion and sediment control principles for this project are to simply convey
runoff and to collect and treat any sediment laden runoff prior to discharge from the site.
The North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual has been
adhered to and used for guidance during the development of this plan. All structures are
designed based on the 25 year-24 hour storm event.
The main erosion and sediment control structures for this project are rock dams,
conveyance channels, and culverts with outlet protection. Silt fence (Practice 6.62) will be
used in isolated instances where land disturbance is minimal and the time duration is short.
Slope drains (Practice 6.32) will be utilized in the stockpile areas during the active life of
the facility and temporary sediment traps (Practice 6.60) have been included in the design,
in case, the need may arise for a temporary measure during construction.
.Peak Runoff
Runoff is computed using the rational method, Q=CiA where:
Q = Peak rate of runoff in CFS
C = Runoff Coefficient
i = Intensity of rainfall in inches/hour
A = Drainage area in acres
The runoff coefficient, C, for this project was chosen to be 0.50 due to the nature
of mining operations and the disturbance duration. Assuming C = 0.50 throughout all the
design calculations is a conservative measure which adds factor of safety to the drainage
structures.
Considering that the existing drainage patterns are designed to change over nearly
the entire project area, it became difficult to estimate the critical time of concentrations
and subsequently the rainfall intensity. Therefore, a very short time of concentration, 5
minutes, is assumed for all drainage areas. This is another conservative assumption which
adds additional factor of safety.
RSHALL LLE
SOCI ES

1

1
1

.Rock Dam (Practice 6.63)
Rock dams are utilized on the project to treat sediment laden runoff prior to
discharge from the sight. The basin volumes are based on 1800 cubic feet of storage for
each acre of drainage area. (Rock Dams 002 and 003 are exceptions, they are sized based
on disturbed drainage area.) The spillways are sized to pass the 25 year - 24 hour storm.
The embankments have a minimum width of 5 feet with the upstream slope at 2:1 and the
downstream slope at 3:1. Embankments shall be underlain by a 2 foot by 2 foot cutoff
trench. The rock embankment shall be constricted of stone with a minimum d50 = 9" and
the upstream face shall be covered with a NCDOT #57 stone filter layer.
Trap efficiency has been designed so as to prevent short circuits from inlets to
outlets and the detention time is at least 8 hours. The surface area is sized to provide 0.01
acres per CFS of runoff.
.Conveyance Channels (Practice 6.30 and 6.31)
The conveyance channels are sized based on the 25 year - 24 hour storm. The
channel dimensions are evaluated for capacity and velocity (based on the design retardance
class). Then they are evaluated at a retardance class one higher than design to account for
vegetative growth and debris build-up. Once the dimensions are established then the
temporary lining is designed. Channel linings for this project are grass, riprap and one
steep slope channel is grouted riprap. The grass lined ditches have temporary linings of
either jute net, straw with net or synthetic mat. Channel linings are designed using the
Tractive Force Procedure.
-Culverts
The culverts are designed to pass the flow from a 25 year - 24 hour storm. Culvert
designs are based on Manning's "n" values for corrugated metal pipe. The design
procedure consists of computing both the inlet control flow and the pipe control flow to
determine which is the critical parameter. Once the critical parameter determined then the
culvert is sized to prevent overtopping of the inlet embankment by the design storm.
Rock riprap energy dissipators (Practice 6.41) are designed for the pipe outlets to
prevent excessive erosion.
RSHALL UJE
WMM
OMP
SOLI ES

.Temporary Seeding (Practice 6.10)
Temporary seeding is to be applied to all disturbed areas where work is delayed for
a period of more than 30 days but not more than one year.
.Permanent Seeding (Practice 6.11)
Permanent seeding is to be applied on areas which have been brought to final grade
or areas which are rough graded and will not be brought to final grade within a year or
more.
-Vegetative Screen - Trees, Shrubs, Vines and Ground Covers (Practice 6.13)
Trees, shrubs, vines and ground covers shall be used hi areas where a vegetative
screen is necessary. And existing vegetation does not exist.
-Land Grading (Practice 6.02)
All cut and fill slopes in unconsolidated material will be no steeper than 2:1 with a
10 foot horizontal bench at each 30 foot elevation interval. Cut slopes will be fine graded
immediately after rough grading and will be vegetated according to the Vegetation Plan.
As the disposal areas are created, the material shall be placed in even layers and
compacted. Vegetative measures shall be applied according to the Vegetation Plan and
the regulations set forth for temporary and permanent seeding.
-Tree Preservation and Protection (Practice 6.05)
Trees and other vegetation will be preserved as much as possible for their
screening, landscape and erosion protection value.

Appendix D
m;;
jedod jewnsuoo-Isod %p l /peloAoei %04 jeAoldw3 uoi}oy eAIpwj[4y Ap.un}ioddo jonb3 uy
96VZ-CEL-6I6 Xt18 9LOL-££L-616 euoydelel MO-WM DulloJOD LWON •g6iel0d 'mm x0,8
Jli' T 6656
saieioossd pue ioll!W llt'ls LW `Xol!wS qog
SOM lerlua0
AOWOQ ulof .1w
9Og30 ieu0120g Wg(l alllnau XU_q
aogJO Plaid uoiBuiwllM s. ow2ug 3o sdio0
slaaul2ug 3o sdzo0 loi.rlslQ uolfuiurltM :oo
luaunloelly
g d al `pa off uol
`,ClaiaouiS
98LI-££L-6T6 le Xowocl ugop ouogdalai oseald `suoilsonb Xuu aneq noX 3I 'loV lolum uea10 ag13o
i0t7 uollooS aapun luauiafemW IeluaunIOltnug 3o uoisiAlQ OLD JO mainaa a p sololdwoo lawl siq,l,
•i?uueaq e lo3 :Ise noX ssalun 2uipuiq pun leut3 aie suontpuoo sii
Put' uotit'ogiuao SITU 'LbbL-T 19LZ '0'N Viaie-d `Ltl7LZ x09 •0•d `s2uueald anllealsiutuiPV 30 aag:i0
ag1 01 solnleis leiaua0 euiloae0 quoN agi,lo gogt .ialdel0 of suuojuoo goigm uo?lpad uauum e puns
`2uiieal e 10J )ISe OJL •aailal sill aniaoai noX legs olep a pjo sXup 09 ugpim lou isnui noA •?uueoq
Cioieoipnfpe ue ao3 else ,Ceui no,( `uopeoliuao siul 3o suoilipuoo oql Jo ,Cue idooae iou op nox 3I
wofoid
.inoX llim peagt' o2 noX aaojN sliuirad leool .io oleis `leiapal aaglo Niue lag plnols no,( 'uollippe
ul u0pBouploo pagoelle aql ui Palsil suoilipuoo oql moTlol isnui noX `ptlen aq of Ienoidde sigl lod
•uoileoildde mou e sn puos of paiinbol oq ,Ceui noX pue sn Xplou lsnui noX `looload ano.C 32uego noX
JI •uoiieoildde anoX ui poquosop noX legl Opp pue osodlnd all sot ptlen SJU0 St lenoidde sigU
•s.iaaui$ug
to sdao0 aTi .Cq pansst st it ualm qZ iaquinN lluuad aptmuoljuN osn of noX smolle uoiieoggioo
SITU 'TL9Z iaqumrl uopeogiua0 Xiipno lawM le.iaua0 Xq pa.ianoo st lig Sell fell p0P!03P OA-RI
am `uopuoildde anoX 2uimaina.i IOIJV '966i .iaquiaidoS £l polep uoileolldde .moX ui paquosap noX se
61 I i US Pue £Zi i 2IS uaamlaq Li T i 2lS uo Xuena uiel2uploo?l le kuenb 2upsixo ue Duipuedxo 3o
osodind a p loj siolem so spueliam do saloe I9'Z ui leualeui llg 0oeld of leno.idde ino anel noA
sill SeaQ
AdU? 31i?
90I LZ ON `WOO-uolsuiM
6M7 X09 •0'd
saleioossy pue 10111W llegsaew 0/0
o0 sleualeW ueolnA
uotleogtl.ia0 ,Catleno ialuM 10t, JO -IVAO-dddV
16656 # loafoid waa
, iunoO uieg2ugooN
9661 `81 .iaquiaoaQ
?INHEA Cl
v A -
aoloajiQ „3,d ,.ar'PJDMOH uolsaid ,d
XJ04aJo8S 'saMOH •9 UDU10uOr
10UJan0E)„lr„4unH '8 sawor
luaWa6nubW 104uau UOJIAU3 to UOISIAia
saoinosad join joN Pup 408H
'?U8=0ainu] ?o ?uawjj odaa
ouiIoar)O 4PON 10 a?p?S
NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone]
FAX COVER
Falls Lake Office
Date /u 14 -,9s-
Number of pages including cover sheet,
To:
Phone
Fax Phone
CC:
Oct 16'95 15:33 No.006 P.01
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Habitat Conservation Program
P.Q. Box 118
Northside, NC 27564
From:
/'D. VX.0 .l
Phone [phone]
Fax Phone [phone]
NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Oct 16'95 15:34 No.006 P.02
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorncy
Water Quality Planning, DlHN?.-'
FROM: Owen F. Anderson, Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: October 16, 1995
SUBJECT: Revisions to Nationwide Permit 26 and Section 401 Certification Request to fill
wetlands for Vulcan Materials Company, Rockingham Quarry, Richmond
County, North Carolina. DEM ID #95991 Action ii) #199302654
Biologists on the Wildlife Resources Commission staff have reviewed the subject
document and arc familiar with habitat values of the project area. An on-site uivestigation was
conducted with the Superintendent, Ray Thatcher, on October 9, 1995 for the purpose of further
assessing project impacts on aquatic; habitats. Our comments are provided in accordance with
certain provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq.) and the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat, 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and North Carolina
General Statutes (G. S. 113-131 et seq).
Applicant proposes to 6112.61 acres of wetlands in the process of expanding the quarry
pit and relocating facilities. A total of 28.40 acres of waters, including wetlands, arc located on
the project site. The processing plant will be relocated to mine reserves under the plant and the
rail spur will be extended 2700 feet along Long Branch. The entrance road, office and scales will
also be moved and a 50-acre overburden disposal area will be constructed on the east side of
Long Branch. Construction is under way to relocate State Route 1117 around the perimeter of
the site to allow for pit expansion. Asphalt from existing S.R. 1117 and debris from the existing
plant demolition will be buried at Stockpile Area No. 3.
The applicant is requesting a variance from the 100-foot stream buffer currently
maintained under the existing permit for a 400-foot section of rail spur extension due to the
ad'acent sleep slope. No buffers are provided to protect wetlands. Littlc or no buffer to a.
tri?utary to Long Branch is planned for the relocated S.R. 1117, which will cross at least three
small branches. Wetland mitigation is not included in the application.
Long Branch, which flows through the site, joins Hitchcock Creek immediately after
leaving the property. Hitchcock Creek, which suppc>rts large populations of both game and
NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Oct 16'95 15:34 No.006 P.03
Vulcan Materials 2 October 16, 199.5
95991
non game fishes, flows into the Pee Dee River. The shortnose sturgeon (Acipcroser brevirosir:4m),
a federally listed endangered fish species, and smallmouth buffalo (Ietiobns hubalus), a state
listed significantly rare fish species, are found in the Pee Dee River. The Pee Dee provides
excellent recreational fishing, commercial fishing and a spawning grounds for migratory fish
species.
We appreciate the ctI'orts of Vulcan Materials Company, Rockingham Quarry, to reduce
wetland impacts by revising the original plans to avoid some wetlands and minimize impacts to
others. The efforts to create useful wildlife habitat are also commendable. We would like to
encourage the applicant to continue to make efforts to reduce impacts to wetlands and provide
maximum protection to water qu$lity for important downstream habitats.
We request that the following conditions be incorporated into the permit to protect the
wetlands, downstream habitats and fisted species:
Require that the 100-foot buffer be maintained along all areas of Lang Creek except the
400-foot section. The widest feasible buffer along this 400-foot section is recommended
but should not be less than 50 feet, Turbidity should be monitored downstream ofthis
section and additional sedimentation control measures implemented as needed.
2. Implement up-front wetland miti ation at a ratio of 2:1 (created:destroyed) for the 2.61 oto,I
acres of wetland impacts. A toffof 5.22 wetland acres should be created. Wetlands ;>-ss
should be created in areas adjacent to streams or existing wetlands. For recommendations Vol??''"
on establishing wetland vegetation (or wildlife management), contact Ken Knight at (704)
982-1600.
3. Minimize wetland fill. Tem racily disturbed wetland areas should be seeded with
annual, seasonal vegetation millet in spring and summer, wheat or rye in fall) and then
be allowed to revert to natural wetland vegetation.
4. Require that all remaining wetlands and perennial watercourses be protected fry rn
additional impacts. Require the establishment or maintenance of a minimum 50-foot (a
10040ot buffer is reconunended) natural vegetated buffer along wetlands and streams.
5. Implement and strictly maintain a state approved erosion and sedimentation control plan. '
6. Retain the pond, possibly constructed by beavers, at the mouth of Long Branch between
the rail spur and the CSX track. 17iis pond will provide for additional settling of
sediments before the confluence with Hitchcock Creek,
7. Re-establish vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible. Conduct reclamation
concurrent with mining when possible, We also recommend that shallow water ponds,
such as settling basins, be retained or converted to wetlands instead of being filled during
reclamation.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this application. If I can be of
further assistance, please contact me at [phone].
MC/ofn

i
}
I

i
4 I
}
e:

Photograph 2: Conditions at dry
mple point C-1. I

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Photograph 4: View of embankment
point D-1.
??' ' ' ??
Photograph 3: Typical view of sediment deposits.

Photograph 5: Soggy conditions at the toe of the slope below
point D-1.
i

11 Photograph 7: Stream identified in area OBD. 11
i
i
i
1
1
I
NIM"
i
i

Photograph 10: Steep slope on west side of area PEN. 11
t
t

II Photograph 11: Conditions at sample point A-1. II
11 Photograph 12: Conditions at sample point A-2. 11

??? ? ?? '?
emu:
i

{
11 Photograph 17: Upper reaches of waters in drainage labeled G. 11

Appendix E

I

SHALL LLE
SOCI ES
ze • d -luiol

I
United Stags Department of the Interior p
MH ANA VAM SERVICE "":on
ch Ecologim servitft
Past Oflict $o: SJ7t6 '
Raleigh, NMth Carolina t763687026
TO: r, V j+ E _ ?)Y"Jey
l) IttQ?+QK` Yt! ?s? ? 1ri?n?f7'ilti Y+i?
INSTADT7 REPLY
I
pleas excuse this form. late thought you would prefer a speedy reply to a
forxea? letter. This farm SBrvgs to provide U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
recolmlendation pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangaxed Species Act, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 15pp31-1543)[[. ``
Re'
Ptaject Name
D to Of InCOming Letter
Based on our records, there are no I•ederally-listed endaugof
ed or
threatened species which ma,y,.occur ioithin the project impact srea.
j The attached pagela) list'(s) the Federally-listed species which
may occur within the project impact area,
If the proposed projaict will la removing pines greater than or equal
to 30 years of age an pine or pine/bardwood habitat, surveys should
j he conducted for active red-cockaded woodpecker cavity trees in.
appropriate habitat within a 1/2 mile radios of project Douudaries.
If red-cockaded woodpeckors are observed within the proje" area or
active cavity trees found, the project has the potential to
adversely affect the red-cockaded woodpecker, and you should contact
this office for further information.
The Service concurs Met the pcoposzd project is not likely to
adversely affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species,
their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently
proposed for Federal listing under the Endangered Species Act, 2.6
amended.
20'd OTSizZ?50LT
? gt s
Biol sat Date
GONCUttt ????
supervisor bate

0i 04S IuFJd PupiWO09 WONA WHFq:ll cJ;AT-U'-RR
ER
Received
1 Due
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
Junes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
As5ociAT-es
INDUs-r f?IPr L.
Project Location: gLLteFie.LD I VA Z4-&o5--. oe4g
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REVIEW
77. MAR5HALL MILLER i
gULL&F'tecv VIRUINiA
PD, Box, 848
7- /° /"
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
1'A R K
RICHMOND Co. `RocKIN&QAM
Proposed Project:
RacrctNC-,{+AM 4L2AR R Y [ tcoPoSeP F, F -T- Ex4AN S 10 N
We have received the application for the above project from the Ap Ii nt/Division of
Environmental Management/Army Corps of Engineers and our comps are noted
below.
Additional information is needed (maps, photographs, other)
No comment.
We have reviewed the requested information and have no comment.
Signed
Renee Gledhill-Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
State Historic Preservation Office
919/733-4763
I cc:
Date 2
Wayne Wright, ACOE (if comment or need info)
JUN 2.3 1995
2 7 ,lUia 1@95
109 East Jo= Stmt • Raleigh, North Catoiina 27601.2807
I
I
I
I
I

(n
c
y

I
I
I
I

N_.?? ?? o> r
/? - ?0 \ 1\
,39o
' ?? ? ?•.?,. A - % //? ? ? ??,: ? %?-='?-;•'i •'I? ?; "? (?\,?-1 Ali ? ? ? ?_ "?? I? ', i ?A/? '??i? ??ll
,, ?. _ <<sh2?6:? \'??; `` ,% 1 ??• ?? -N' Hil \ zta
zoo
C) v
I
Y
;13 7,
I \ ? ?? I r ? J
BeaulYa
?.ii? ? / ??'? ?? ?/f I?? I_ ??? ? - ??,?? ?loiti?/ l??l of ?'I ?????? `?V??oCe?
--o- - j o ! APPROXIMA TE
STUDY AREA
it ??? ?j i?i?? ??0?? {' A'. 1 / ??; ? / ? o ?,• ? ,?? ? ? ? ? ? -?. _ _ ? ??
r ? ti ?? ?? "1 ?? ?? ? L: ? ?; ? ?? '? ??-E ? ?. u, -fan i , a ?
011.o
\ 1 .10 - III. ?25r -X7?-f,I V?A\ )?? _ ?%. ?•'• G \. ?i?.., / _ _?.
? ?????11,?" ;?? j ??' .Ball ?? ?l' ??.. ? ? 11(,•)))?? ? ? '
/ (XI
.?? ( '` - !• ?i? I 277
C i a
_~?`? I'? ,y//;•i'_7"/ Cordova
\Ch
VULCAN MATERIALS - ROCKINCHAM QUARRY 4
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL. SURVEY TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, 7.5' QUADRANGLE N
ROCKINGHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, 1956, PHOTO REVISED 1982
Prepared by.- 21 000' 0 2, 000'
??' ' ?? SCALE 1:24,000
VICINITY MAP
Figure 1

ea {' a }t i` ; ' 1 I
J ( ? I I ? ?I? i• I:

r( -
r
r
,
,
c
r
Q: r
.ot
H ? ? ? ? y T y
1 ¢j1

w
a
t w 0
<
W f
f '? ? ' Q
:3 J
' a ?
¢
ccQ
E
i, z
/liW
r \
(7 Z
F ?
1 3. t _
i
b! _ J? ..s .•r~ 1?' / )'? ? is ! Fg ?? ?
\ Ali ? } - ? t , ?' .. r ??,? 1 ? ? ?•???' ???
F{ /f tit _ 'J"ir. 'a" t•. ! r/,,.,:' .-* 'A; `... : {` .? • .?+.. .r~'•
• -w t' ,t:- '1?, ,rte. r ? {.
- ti ` r?? t ?t'J l` \? ????oS a ` `d?( 1? ,e : t a r?/, p "'??.r•'^JbF (y,R?? + ?,p- ,? . 1 y M!L•• .+. `rtil+n
`t`
r
57,
r`• r'! 'E \4. v' t y M;f i i..ti \ .` q iftr{ : `} ?{ t '{(11 l! .t`./ 8s°•.. .
-.'? .q . f f. ./ .i :?j / ; ; !?' 1 .r' < .F ra ? ? (`t? ' ?.. ?li t{?&• ? t?.?Y ? y',?s?' i ? .
/t O}tt f l l' iI !? ?7f?1 ' `"?,"` °-t}' ;•,i e` }
63
s ?, O '? yam. • I , ' yn. +n w f
?`? 4 ?,.,G O??µ+`-•?`? ? t'_ ?`? ?jF'.?":` ? ii?9'(, ,?/ ryf ? -.1 _ ?p?111 -.i F•' •rCoJt. ????_ L?', .'•'?;
'I? !'C9-. v tlf l i ;', •! a.: 2?{?a f-. ..1 fU.:?
r w ?! Q:• f tr . ?yf,u vi• s'nilti(i pai".''` r , -? ,? J.'+
J ?.
}`- ? f - ?i?`.? ` .?-.•.. ,a..a;. 3;'?=%ti - ! .; `?•., ? ?? ..:r?r? ? may:
it}t ' ?i ?, ?
l.f` /1 ttpp! ?[rS ''?- 1 ?. - J r? J
1 J ? ,!
O;
1 f / ,
7 l 1 ! .f` ? / s r
t? Of)
`? ? jS r-- = Z z, 4
LLJ
: y
t 'f . s N t rM 4.?h i 1
W t mgr
a _
5
cc
t 1 f 1
LLI
0 0"-
Q Z W Ulf e
M/w
j
V J
?_' Ems„ * Q ?l 4 (Q
cc 55
j ?. X11 ? ?8 JJ
a IL=X p' r 1 S
{ h C nt.` ?lleleae
<a U3 C6
v'o e
1 I
' U
t C _
f f ? v? m O? U . a
C E ?
$f
r
cc
t v?
/ / off.. - ...?.. ? r. ?_
1 C__
.• dy - - .. Q? { , ' X542 .. ,` t?
1i OT.,
?• V 1 /` /
co ¢ j Q
_' `' p !1 c c w ?t w 1
` Wr WQ^LD J '
1 ._ r _. _ r n f LO 0
Ao
.- 1
Vbi`;f ??li`? ?/ Ii ?Ii?..Ii• ?ew^?? _: ?tl ??/ ? ??4'1 - -.?iJ? -.. ?<<ti.,??';. Y
U La
w t a0 LI?, a q "' YI
66 `` E t g ?j R
a, t w N t
16ti?ei99@@s7??!@1t?i?? ?i@! Q' 'D J "s ' Ooc6
(y o CC)
fit
I W co
J
s # 4
CL CL
I i ?-r •-.
%
?e ca,
y
N a? ?
t
i ,
t
I • Y?
' 'L. "'kF``e`??\?1?{, `•i'-?...,,,,,,, '? ? ?'rf 7? ?:, ??P1 ". l`..f ;t+ ; p- f;?? ? LL :?r? / Q, ---?
,'ti 11 y`?" \?\` ` y .tit ?4J 1 1.`"j .`? ` ,?. +`?I1 i •i? ii ?__ ? U.r` ,?• ? ?
\t? y ? ,1 t( / I ? ? Y !? 1tl( 2 1_f? ?l/ tt
?a `\? ?+,?5 '`a / F .t1 ? /i }t y?\'"?.,.?? .n.,...-e Yt ? ji -. 1'y Z ?,.{r?` .?. ?• ... (',
j 4L.
•
tA or,
pp ?y ? % Y
_ r V S
CD# SI
fir, ? pi Z J
W
f f' Q ?, ''a w Q
w, W Q
<J fir. t` t I o. YL.-w `'^ t (? •?. 4 M Q T
l?YQ.o
LIJ CL ol co
J /
w' ar r{ , _ 1 _i ? t
64 d
ce)
0 CC CO
w 01 1
LL 4-' cr)=o
JA z
-` ] W. /., - ??' .? ?.... J? 1'?•,? Sir".- /, rt. -
LLI
4•
95
m a.

I
TABLE 1

Summary of Waters Acres
Area Acreage
'A' 4.36 AC
'l3' 5.75 AC
'C' 15.66 AC
'F' 0.42 AC
'G' 0.38 AC
'l1' 0.42 AC
'J' 0.38 AC
SR 1117 Relocation 1.04 AC
Total 28.41 AC
TABLE 2
Summary of Impacts

Area Acreage
SR 1117 Relocation 1.04 AC
Overburden Placement 0.35 AC
Rail Spur 0.08 AC
Entrance Road 0.44 AC
Stockpile Areas 0.70 AC
Total 2.61 AC
FS",
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Vv v? Printed on Recycled Paper
9- V G'', + t , I`' ? r i
Messg?
??..1
C t
-n -n In -n -n -n Z
m Z
m Z
m Z
m Z
m Z
m Z
m Z
m
r r r r r r c c c c c c c c
(n (1) C/) U) U) Cl) w
m w
m w
m w
m w
m w
m o
m w
m
°
V
V
-04:1
V O
V 00
V 0
V 0
V
Z Z Z Z Z Z
c

p a
0
L

m c
0
-L

m c
0
-L

m c
0
_L

?'' c
0
_L

O
N

O
<c
N o
?O

N
cn
O
N

O
co
N
N

O
cc
N
N

O
ro
N
N

O
cc
?
N

O
?c
?
N

O
a?
cp
0 O O OD O
O o O O O W - O
O O IN CO O O A O

D
'r