820555_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA .�
Department of Environmental Qual

13Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Sam
RDivision of Water Quality Yz
0 Routine O Complaint O Follow -tie of DWQ ins ection O Follow-uof DSWC review O Other
Dale of Ittspectiott -71.1 Facility Number �S�Z S C,
Time of Inspection !X 24 hr. {hh:mm}
13 Registered E Certified [] Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
eSOS
Farm Name: ,,.,..• ��,� �.� Count
Owner Name: ............. ` .... . !✓ ''f............................. Phone No: .... t ...........2......5 ........................./Z ...............
.......
Facility Contact: .............Y ,�1�.�-�� .. Title: ... Phone No:
..................................................................................................................................................
Mailing Address:........'Z..r�Z..
...ltt#....r�ir��/.......(%.^....3Z.................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: ........ ���c !/i .......A3,*..,.................................................. Integrator: ..... e.4,e /
..........,..... ...... F
4
,t?.�r� .... ' o Z
Certified Operator; .................. Operator Certification Number;...,.
Location of Farm:
.... ...... ................ ..........................................................................................................................................................
. .
Latitude E—-1' Longitude
g
s 4 Desi n =Current Des�gri Current rtDesEgn Current
g�v
.Sruwe CapactEyPppulation
'Paultry�
Capt�ctty Popula#tpnCaftle Cap aettyI'opulatton
�. , .._ ... n.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
❑Dai ry
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean !� d
r
.` 4 .
❑ Other
w ,
V�
❑ Farrow to Feeder
„ .
❑Farrow to Finish
�Total�}eSICi Capacity,
C1 Gilts
£
' =nom r��k
T`otal'SSLW
❑ Boars
�<
r
Neer g i.a Dans 1 Haldittg F+uttdsSu
❑ .-
Subsurface Drains Present 110Lagoon Area I[] Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
i l!'f
Genera!
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ANo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field )qQther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes J No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 5(No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 'Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ,K No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes J@ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback. criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes MrNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ANo
7125197

rFacility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
'Yes ❑ No
Structures (Laeoons,Iioldini! Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
..... .... .................11
Freeboard(ft):..............1..�....................... !/...........................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...........b"ZI^-( LPA4.rQ.t l.........................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in/the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this.visit.
19Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes A No
Yes ❑ No
k'es ❑ No
❑ Yes �(No
........................................
❑ Yes
VNo
4Yes
❑ No
N'Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
kNo
Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
XNo
'Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes )kNo
❑ Yes �No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
.
oev 611-,�;�,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: % 29 15

(� Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency$
"tea mrd ur gra .
Division of Water Quality
d Routine O Complaint Follow --u of DWQ inspection F ow -up of DSWC review 0 Other
: / [Facility Number ,Z !Tia:MteeofInspection
of Inspection ' 3d 24hr. (hh:mm)
D Registered ©Certified 13 Applied for Permit U Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated :....................•.....
Farm Name: �........(.r�R..... County:...........I..P...................................
Owner Name:...... v...�;C ......... ............................ Phone NO: ........................................ ...................................
Facility Contact: Z;/11.... Title: ........................... Phone No: .../�...............................
Mailing Address:.....' C..Z r .��' .7e D.�lYr.........Lf� .............
i ........�..... ../.................................................../...........
Onsite Representative: ...................�e�x.......................................... .... Integrator: ........ 010' ."� Ize.. ......
Certified Operator, ..........--,}•:,,,,, j��', C ............. Operator Certification Number..........................
........................................... ...........-•---
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �' C«
I
Design Current "
Swrne� -y " 'Capacity- Populatior
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean Z
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
12y
Design '&
.P
Poultry ,'Capacity ,Population .Cattle 1
❑ Layer I I Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non-Dairy
Other Ff
Total Design Capacity
L
- w � ,•F� �?' :Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / Holdrn Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ©spray Field Area
g
Yv^5 � 7��E - - hs _ � •Y .��cg:!3£ '4 rs..� .k � - __-- ---W..ec.r _'ms's, <
kms,` fi❑ No Liquid Waste Management System""
.G4n. rn. .T.Dk .c4:,u.3;Pc,h
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancelimprovement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
9yes d No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes A No
Continued on back

Faciliher:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Stru -gyre t Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ��.......................,......�7.................-...._.............................--........
Freeboard (ft): ..........f............
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
�j Yes ❑ No
4] Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
.................................................................
❑ Yesfi�r'ANNo
j� Yes ❑ No
/❑, Yes, N0
13. Do any, of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .. .
16. Do the receiving, crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Oniy
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0_ No.violations or deficiencies. were noted -during this.visit..You.wiil receive no further
correspondence about this.visit.
AYes ❑ No
❑ YesANo
❑ YesAN0
Use drawings of'.faetiity to:better'explain stYuatinns(use additional,' pages'as,necessarv)�
h z�x _
❑ No
,Ayes
Yes
0 N
❑ Yes
No
Yes
❑ No
XYes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments" refer'to quesdon #) ;Explain any".YES answers and/or anv reconnnendateons or any other comments. R
Use drawings of'.faetiity to:better'explain stYuatinns(use additional,' pages'as,necessarv)�
h z�x _
/ �.��..� �r 6.��✓ ,�f y,W�p�i� �� caav,�ir. ,dcJ �yy,,, j .�i�i�
�/, � �.r
-f d�x- 7 f4aL✓ Au4411�
//
�] �� �.t �Tiri��/�"(r c��✓ii �� f�+rie ��/�l /1 •.fir >T�r/ �� °"^ -"`- . a-
,I'�Ti
//"'
7125197
Reviewer/Ins ti {s
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Date:

I
t ,
DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
Or ',y
: DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of MV0 inspection O Follow -un of DSNi'C review O Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
�2... ,s
Time of Inspection : 3 G 24 hr. (hh:mm)
M Registered [3 Certified [3 Applied for Permit © Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: „•.•...•„•
Farm \ame:......� re 'r >�rF�.. S1!--/. itrt.� County:........... R-- P ............................... ................ I......
„rv.J
Owner Name:....,,. Phone �o /d r...,,..
,_ ..1 ....................................... �.........p':. �z
Facility Contact: �� �tr' Title: Phone No
...................................................................................................................................... •...................................................
Nfailing Address:......... rS G...��z ..f.. �u. °� 1. ., ...Cl •rfla!' ..!.r._.�.................................... ..........................
.... f
Onsite Representative........... 7-34-5�__........ .........
Integrator:....�Ax��//j... ..........'`'.e.
Certified Operator;......... '`!.,... Operator Certification Number;......f �� � Z-
Location of Farm: 70/ �� , J�C-d' ,?iG- - or•
....... _-�.:..................................................I......................................................................................................................:.........................................................
�R * ..... r,i�.�...................................................•----.............--.------.......------.............................................................................
Latitude �• �� Longitude �• �°
Design Current Design ` Current Design ' :Current;
Swine , . Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle. Capacity, .Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 *Non -Lay rl 1 ❑ Non-Dairy
Farrow to Wean S a
❑ Farrow to Feeder FEJ Other
❑ Farrow to FinishTotal Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System �., ';� Z”,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is ob.erved. was the conveyance man-made"
❑ Yes
KNo
b. if discharwc is observed. dict it reach Surface Walcr? (If yes. notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[)rNo
c. It dischaq,,e is obwrved, what is the estimated flow in-al/min?
d. Dcvs discharge bypass a lagoon system'! (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
RNO
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
KNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes
($'No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑Yes
No
mai ntenance/improvement?
G Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
I'No
3
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
;Ryes
No
1
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number:- +F -V_— "4
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures !La Qons.11olding Ponds, Flush Pits etc.
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4
lden6fier:
Freeboard(ft): ......... ............................ .................................................. ......
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
O'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
U
Structure 5 Structure 6
........................................................................
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes N"No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? +&Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
C'1'a_cte Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP. or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.... .¢............................................................................................................................................
..
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Dict Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative`!
22. Does record keeping need improvement'
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'!
0-No.violitigns or deficiencies were- rroted-during' this, visit. -. You will receive no f6rtlier
coerespundeba about this.visit
❑ Yes I'No
❑ Yes IV No
❑ Ye§
®'No
❑ Yes
Z Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
X No
Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
IgNo
AU Yes
17 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
.v.,,. .. . .. ,
Cott%imetits,(reFer to questiiits..#)::Explain any, YES answers and/or. any recomritendat6in or-any.,othe�'comments., <
Use dramitgs:ol facrldy;to:better explain situations. (itse'�add�ttunai, pages as necessary} s <
-� •....t$-, y -i. .. "F`...
low JIMA POA r1c
nr/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name . p
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 577

Facitiry Number SZ 5 SS
Division of Environmental Management
animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: 4 -19 - 9 (I
Trme: 102 v
General lnfonnatlon:
Farm Name: e- Ne c j $ass Ravv­County: _ Saw�Sc 1
f
Owner Name: T o c -,VQ . Lia s -V _Phone No<910) SG V - Z 1/ 8
On Site Representative: 0 w� C-4- Integrator. _ �q +roc � J 's Fo :. d } TVC-,
Mailing Address: 2—�4z 5r 8oA 3o& -AA
GI,N+Q" NC •z832S
Physical Address/Location:- 7o l M. C ;w,6" T-5 Maks 4 SR 1739
4D
Latitude:
Latitude•_ ! Longitude:
eration D c ' do : (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swint No. of AnimaJj Type of Poultry No. of Aniasats Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Sow 0 Layer 0 Dairy
©B
C3r'Faed= r'. -Z 50
0Non-i,ayer r+cf
OtherTjpe of Livestock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: 1 (include in the Drawings and Observations the fiwboard of each lagoon)
acil'ty I ert' .
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I foot + 25 year 244 hour storm storage?:
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Is erosion observed?:
Is any discharge observed?
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Doles the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Does the cover crap need improvement?:
( lux the craps which need improvement)
Clop type: Amwge:
Setback Crikrifa
Is a dwelling located withiri 204 feet of waste application?
Is a weII located within 100 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
( 3. 4-)
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
AOI — J'anuar'y 1744
Yes 0
No l'
Yes 0
No Or
Yes 0
No i(
Yes 0
No Q'
Yes 0 No Or
Yes 0 No Er
Yes 0 No 12r
Yes 0 �No Or
Yes 0 No 0'
Yes 0 No '

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes 0 No Gr"'
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes C! No ®r"
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes 0 Noe
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes a" No ❑
Explain any Yes answeas, This res;s-�eyc.�, opch-c-Pu rj indi sf a 1674,* r r, ved
Signature: Date•
FacWty Assesmumt Unit Use Artachsuat: YNeeded
DnAnv,r be '
AOI — January 27,1996
• - .. •. •"�fe�r- �ya`,..r :tea ear- �1 �' �irrj+.R•*,pp,P+%,W'0"r,A4.W�'^t.
iYa•.r--. �..a'w 7.1'�•a. ra ay..7 84 .6

HIGH FREEBOARD NOTIFICATION
DATE/7II-lE : �?/g, &
DWQ Contact :
Name of Person
conte c&ng Dwci- Telephone No.
FART" l Name .1f
County-'�-'"r .--
Facility No.
/r G
Freeboord level of the lrogoon: 2
Conditions of the spray fields:
NA.RRAi]VF: (Include any instructions given to the farmer ct the time of the call)
(A copy of ecch notificotion should be forwarded to the "GAFO BOX' in John Hasty's office
as soon os possible)

HIGH FREEBOARD NOTIFICATION
DATE/TIME
DWQ Gorrract
Nome cJf Person
corrr=c ng DWQ Teiephone No. }
FARM Name:: .-�
County
Facility No. 2-
Freeboard level of the Lagoon:1z
Conditions of the spray fields: __ _ .
NARRATIVE: (Include any instructions given to the former at the time of the call)
(A copy of each notifcation should be forwarded to the 'GAFO BOX' in John Hostys office
CLS soon 05 possible)