820442_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NUH i H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

MEMORY TRANSMISSION REPORT
TIME 09-28-2007 04:90
TEL NUMBER
NAME
FILE NUMBER 489
DATE 09-28 03:59
TO 1910?933138
DOCUMENT PAGES 002
START TIME 09-28 03:59
END TIME 09-28 04:90
SENT PAGES 002
STATUS OK
FILE NUMBER 489 *** SUCCESSFUL TX NOT ICE ***
NC�El�iR
i=AX TR.ANSMISSiON
DENR
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
VOICE 910-433-3300
Fax: [phone]
To: KrAc.:,, ulc.sf�.-6�c�K
Fax*-. 9/ t _ z 93 . 3 J 3 8'
From: +2:�k� Y7.—v e i S
onto: 9 - 2 s - a 4,o,7
Pages (including cover): .7—
SUW60t: 0¢ S c^, eon Nor�c -F V,a� h•a.�
1Ja _ n/ C
COMMENTS:

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr,, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Colren H. Sullins. Director
Division of water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Nordin
Murphy -Brown, LLC
PO Box 856
Warsaw NC 28398
July It, 2007
�EsCiu non l
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NCGS 143-215 et sec}. & Section 402 of the Clean Water Act
Farm # 10
Facility No. 82-442
Sampson County
Permit No. NCA282442
Dear Mr. Teachey:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES)
permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to N. C. General Statutes 143-215 et seq. and
Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, you have been found to be in violation of your NPDES Permit.
Violation 1: Failure to maintain waste levels in your waste structure(s) in accordance with the facilities
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. (Permit No. NCA2000000 Section V 3.)
On 01/23/2007 waste structure liquid levels were documented at 17 inches of freeboard at lagoon 3510. A level of
19 inches is the maximum level allowed by your permit. Subsequent to the reported high freeboard the Division of
Water Quality requested record documentation to assess the overall management of the waste system.
Correct application of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) is a major component of your nutrient management plan.
According to a review of your records, only about 44 % of your PAN was applied during 2006-2007 complete crop
cycles, including 33% of corn PAN and 20% of soybean PAN. Inadequate management of the nutrient
management plan contributed to high lagoon levels, compounded by high rainfalls.
Required Corrective Action for Violation 1:
At this time, the incident is closed. The Division strongly recommends that you review your facilities and procedures
with the goal of eliminating future high freeboards, which could lead to mandatory review of your Waste Utilization
Plan by a Technical Specialist, Notices of Violation or civil penalties in the future if freeboard noncompliance
remains an issue.
No! Carolina
North Caroline Division of Water Quality/Aquifer Protection Seetion 225 Green St./ Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301 Phone [phone]
FAX [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.siate.nc.us Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. David Nordin
July 11, 2007
Page 2
If you are not aware, you now may pump up to eight (8) inches below the "Stop Pump" mark between June 15 and
October 31 provided that the criteria in NRCS Standard for Waste Treatment Lagoon No. 359 are met.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions
for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy
a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either Joan Schneier,
Environmental Specialist, or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ste hen . Barnhardt
Regi quifer Protection Supervisor
SBltab
cc: APS Central Files
FRO APS Files
Anthony Dial-SVVC, FRO

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleco Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
August 6, 2007
Murphy -Brown LLC
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: Rescinding June, 2007 NOTICE OF VIOLATION
High Freeboard
Farm #10
Permit No- NCA8204.42
Sampson County
Permit No- NCA200000
Dear Mr. Westerbeek:
Upon receiving the daily rainfall for 2006, we agree that chronic rainfall was a major factor contributing to the high
freeboard at the subject facility. In the future Murphy -Brown should send the daily rainfall, not weekly totals for
review by our staff. We have determined the Notice of Violation was sent in error. This letter is to notify you that
the Notice is hereby rescinded. Thank you for bringing this to our attention and if you have any questions
concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Step 1. Barnhardt
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
cc: FRO files
FRO S&WC
APS Central
lvo Carolina
AwAfIrldly
North Carolina Division of water Qua lity•/Aquifer Protection Section 225 Green St.l Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301 Phone [phone]
FAX [phone] Intemet h2o.enr.state.nc.us Customer Service 1- 877-623 -674 8
An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50;6 Recycled/10% POSI Consumer Paper

ee
YOUR t2crrrart 1K �� D �r72� an 4L \(6 ,c- r
NOV rO rlyect
Murphy -Brown LLB
July 18, 2007
Stephen A. Barnhardt
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green St. / Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Dear W. Barnhardt,
PO Drawer 856
2822 Hwy. 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Tel: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
P, CEIVED
JUL 26 W
DN- FA*TrNLLE REGIONALURGE
This letter is being sent in response to a Notice of Violation issued by your office to Farm
# 10, Facility No. 82-442, In Sampson County. The basis of the NOV was a documented, self -
reported, freeboard level of 17" on January 23, 2007. Based on my reading of the letter, the
Division has determined that the freeboard non-compliance was due to inadequate management
of the CAWMP rather than chronic rainfall. I would ask that the Division reconsider this position
based on the following and attached information.
As noted in the Notice, there is no question that the chronic rainfall threshold was met in
the case of this farm, with 45.2", or almost the total yearly rainfall, being recorded in the 7
months leading up to the freeboard issue. Obviously, this amount of rainfall makes lagoon
management more challenging than normal. However, based on a thorough review of the
relevant pumping, freeboard, and rainfall records for Farm #10, 1 must disagree with the assertion
that mismanagement of the waste treatment system on this farm contributed to the freeboard
levels experienced. I ask that the Division review in detail the 2006 Daily Rainfall Record
attached. I have highlighted all days between January 2006 and March 2007 that pumping events
were recorded. Please note that a review of the actual pumping records (previously submitted)
reveals that on many of these days, multiple pumping events occurred, with some days having as
high as 7 events. During this review, it is critical that one understand the site specific soil
conditions of Farm #10 and how these conditions relate to irrigation return interval after rainfall
events. Irrigation return interval can be defined as the period of time it takes for soil moisture on
a farm to reach field capacity (the point at which pore space is available for irrigated effluent),
after being fully saturated (no water holding capacity / pore space). This parameter is used in all
of Murphy -Brown's irrigation capacity reviews. The soil types on Farm #10 are highly
productive from an agronomic standpoint, but are moderately to poorly -drained, which can
complicate land application activities during chronic rainfall periods. Generally, the return
interval after rainfall events is longer than would be seen on sandier soil materials. This effect is
magnified during winter months when freezing temperatures and low evaporation rates are the
rule. While it is impossible to recreate actual soil conditions on every day during this period, if
one looks at the rainfall and application pattern as highlighted, a clear pattern reflecting the return
interval emerges.

Without going into exhaustive commentary, please follow me through the period of June
July 2006 on the Daily Rainfall record sheet as an example of the evaluation explained above.
Farm #10 experienced .94" of rainfall between May 15 and 20, followed by another .30" on May
26. Four days later, on June I and 2, irrigation events occurred. Between the dates of June 3 and
June 15, rainfall occurred on all but two days, followed by no rainfall for 5 days, and .34" of
rainfall on June 20. Irrigation occurred on June 21, 23, and 24, on all of the driest pulls prior to
an additional 2+" of rainfall in the period between Jun 26 and 29. My analysis of the pumping
records shows that the irrigation events occurring during June were limited to the most well
drained irrigation zones due to the frequency of the rainfall events, and had to be halted on June
22, and 25 due to saturated soil conditions resulting from previous irrigation events. The rainfall
and evaporation pattern in June led to a 4 day return interval on average for the month. In July,
rainfall events were more sporadic, and the evaporation rates higher, leading to a 2 to 3 day return
interval, and increased pumping activity. July's efforts resulted in a freeboard reading of 36", or
76.92% of available white freeboard on August 5, 2006. This compares favorably to the 88% of
available white freeboard on August 1, 2005, despite the above average rainfall experienced. I
feel that a month -by -month review of the data will show that irrigation events occurred on almost
every available pumping day when return interval is considered.
In your Notice letter, it is communicated that 44%, 33%, and 20% of available Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) was applied to the wheat, corn, and soybean crop respectively in 2006.
While these numbers are factually correct, I would submit to you that they are irrelevant to the
freeboard compliance discussion for this farm. Farm #10 has 123.54 irrigated acres, with a total
crop PAN requirement of 36,791.02 pounds. During the last three years (2004-2006), this farm
has averaged applying 11,702 lbs. pounds, or 31.8% of available PAN per year. This number,
however, is more indicative of lagoon performance, as evidenced by lagoon analysis records,
water usage, and excess land, than it is an indicator of poor management. In the Murphy -Brown
system, one will consistently find 2 to 3 times more land than is needed from a PAN standpoint,
particularly on wetter sites, as the management of plans is geared more to hydraulic than nutrient
balances. I feel a review of available pumping days versus actual pumping days provides a much
clearer picture of management efficiency in this case.
I am sure the Division is more than capable of following my logic in this evaluation, and
I ask that the data submitted be reviewed in this light. I feel that developing a sense of
appreciation for the hydraulic balance of this farm, particularly in light of the chronic rainfall
event experienced in 2006, and applying it to your review, will result in an appreciation of the
level of management that was applied to this issue. Murphy -Brown is committed to, and I believe
has demonstrated, that it will make every effort to manage in a proactive manner the freeboard
levels on our farms. In 2006, approximately $25,000 was spent on Farm #10 to improve the
drainage, and decrease the irrigation return interval as described above. We feel these efforts
were successful, and we will continue to look for opportunities to further improve the system on
this farm. However, the goal and practice of continued improvement, as required by Murphy -
Brown's ISO14001 Certified EMS, is not always tied to deficiencies in management. We feel
that every reasonable effort was made to manage the freeboard of Farm #10 within the guidelines
of the farms NPDES permit, but these efforts fell short due to the chronic rainfall period
experienced.

I once again ask far r onsi ation of the NOV issued to Farm #10. If there are
additional questions, or aWional ' formation is needed, please contact me at [phone].
Environmental Compliance
Enc.

Arku I phy-Brown ., 2006
Daily Rainfall Record
January
February
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MM
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
I SAT
t
2
3
S
6
7
A4
®
.03
K
.07
A
9
o
ltl
a
11
12
0
13
3a
11
Q
S
O
i
T
�
C)
9
o
fa
o
11
ze
1S
ib
17
1A
19
20
2L
17
13
14
1s
is
17
11
0
0
02�
.H
0
o
,s
0
0
0
o
0
0.
03
22
.05
23
.52,
24
25
21
27
o
21
0
t9
0
td
Q
21
-Dg
22
_cO
23
-to)5
24
d
25
,060
29
'Ca
30
31
24
n
27
Q
21
o
March
April
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
I TUE
ED
THUR
FRJ
SAT
1
a
o
3
o
4
a
1
0
5
/0
J
D
la
11
a()
2
3
,1�
<
p
S
0
1
r
0
a
5 a$
12
o
13
D
14
0
15
o
16
0
17
0
11
0
9
D
to
11
0
12
C)
13
a
t4
C)
t$
0
to
20
1�0
It
, 16
22
27
—10
Z4
2S
IS
(D
If
A
11
C)
11
0
20
C)
21
20
27
o
21
o
29
v
30
Q
1
D
23
24
2S
2fi
2T
:.,z
25
o
o
o
,3
3e
May
June
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THVR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
7
T
3
4
s
6
1
2
3
1/0
7
e
e
l.s6
9
. D ?
10
a
11
o
12
0
12
0
4
Z
5
-1 -
a
3. qO
7
_0q
0
0
9
1 Z,
SO
-1 9
14
15
16
17
la
19
2a
11
R
13
14
15
16
17
D
60
°
13�
0
-'a
d
44
.90
. 2. 5
.
o
21
a
22
0
2]
o
M
a
25
o
26
30
0
in
p
19
0
20
21
ZI
23
6
24
0
T1
b
29
D
30
0
31
o
25
D
2 Ei
1 'r,6
27 28
,'-� . 66
29
.0 �
m
0
Record rainfall daily. If daily rainfall totals 1 inch or greater, initial In box that lagoon integrity has been cheGl(ea.
If precipitation is snow, note as S on date. Fax to LNM at the end of every month.
Retention Period: 3 years T Page 1012 REVISION 3. W8105

Alurphy Brown u,2006
0 1 Daily Rainfall Record
Farm; _ 1 — _
July
August
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
►60N
TUE
I WED
THUR
I FRI
SAT
1
2
1
5
O
v
O
o
o
2
3
4
5
6
T
A
7
!
! �r
+0
A
#
9
p
k0
�}
1i
o
U
d
13
e
11
o
Is
o
13
_(ta
%
Q
1s
Q
16
p
1T
o
,e
o
1$
r6v
is
�s
IT
D
1e
o
19
0
20
0
21
22
20
21
,
22
23
24
24
23
24
25
29
27
2! r
24
ET
!0
29
F1
31
30
31
September
October
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
Mom
TUE
WED
Tl{UR
FRI
SAT
2
1
2
3
4
s
e
7
�s
0
o
0
3
o
5
�1�
li11 D
�*`
7
v
o
d.
e
4
10
11
12
13
11
,.�
10
N
,z
13
14
L0o
15
1+Z
16
°
Es
a
16
17
1e
19
19
25
17
19
ti
f9
Iry
,(
Il
C3.
tx
o
23
o
23
3
24
73
M
27
0
240
117
r
24
23
26
27
2e
2p
7�
]0
29
]D
Tl
0
a
a
6
November
December
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MOM
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
1r�1�\j
2
3
4
1
2
s
t f
�J
9
7
e I+ 1e
1I�It,
! 1 o
9
O
IQ
1+ /T!
l/
3
LJ
4
r J�
s
>
O
r
QAno-
a
O
12
17
.76
14
o-0
73
15
b
7T p �
/S
fe
a
19
d
11
a
12
0
13
14
15
15
t9
zo
21
72
23
24
25
11
19
11
20
21
22
72 ^
26
77
2e
29
39
24
25
26
27
2e
29
30
a
s
0
°°
a.as
p
O
D
11
Record rainfall daily. It daily rainfall totals 1 Inch or greater, Initial In box that lagoon Integrity nas been cnecKea.
If precipitation is snow, note as S on date. Fax to LNM at the end of every month.
Retention Period: 3 years page 2 of 2 REVISION 3: W&US

+.�.aua raa� ,a-�• v r+ as �,,.
Daily Rainfall Record Retention Period: 3 Years
Farm: O Revised: 8/31/06
Page 1 of 2
January
February
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRO
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
I WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
1
2
1
f
5
g
1
2
3
4-7
f"Io
9
9
10
11
12
13
S
6
1
B
9
10
14
1s
16
17
is
19
20
11
12
13
1�
15
16
17
(7
21
" _ q
23
24
25
26
77
IB
19
20
21
22
23
Z/
o
(1
0
0
0
0
0
a
O
26
29
1
30
31
25
26
27 _
20
0
O
o
March
April
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
S
6
T
[y''�f
(fJ�
4
5
6
7
9
9
10
a
9
10
11 jt2
13
14
p
0
O
c)
CD
b
11
12
13
11
15
16
17
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
aC)
1 Cog
a b
10
o
0
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
22
23
24
75
26
27
28
©
D
o
a
o
C
a
()
o
(D
(D
o
ZS
26
27
20
29
30
31
29
30
a
0
.1�
o
o
C)
May
.tune
SUN
IKON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
1
2
3
1
5
1
2
0-
CD
C)
0
o
a
0
6
1
a
9
10
11
12
3 BP
5
6
7
a
9
D
D
D
0
O/-DS
D
C7
C
C---�'
13
14
15
16
17
N
19
10
11
12
13
11
15
16
-3�
6
o
15q110
0
b
d
0
C>
0
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
17
10
19
20
21
22
D
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
o
.a,�
D
27
28
29
30
31
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Record rainfall daily. If daily rainfall totals 4 inch or greater, initial in box that lagoon integrity has been checked and
secondary containment is OK. If precipitation Is snow, note as S on date. Fax to LNM at the end of every month.

WASTE UTILLZATION PLAN
NPDES PERMIT RENEWAL - 2007
REGIONAL OFFICE - APS
❑ ASHEVILLE
FAYE7TEVILLE
❑ MOOREfVILLE
❑ RALEIGH
❑ WASHINGTON
❑ WILMINGTON
❑ WINSTON-SALEM
FARM NO: 2" a

4r
MurphpBrown, LLC 6/19/02, 2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 656
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
Farm
Brown's of Carolina
BOC #10
Sam
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 1200
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
?180 days
Irrigation
RECEIVED /DENRIDWQ
AOUF;R'PRr)TFrTlnN.9ECTION
DEC 2 72006
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner;
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8
MB00107030257

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. if you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste u&zation plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H _0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, W, trans, etc.):
Capacity Typ2 Waste Produced perAnimal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gal/yr
gal/yr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gal/yr
gal/yr
1200
Farrow to Finish
10585 gal/yr
12,702,000 gal/yr
Wean to Feeder
223 gal/yr
galtyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gal/yr
galtyr
Total 12,702,000 gailyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitro en Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 lbstyr
lbstyr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibstyr
lbstyr
1200
Farrow to Finish
26 lbstyr
31,200 lbstyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 lbstyr
lbstyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 lbstyr
lbstyr_
Total 31,200 Ibslr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 123.54
Total N Required 1st Year: 36791.02
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0.00
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 36,791.02
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 31,200.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (5,591,02)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2 of 8 MBW107030258

Reception Area Specifications
'tract Field irrigated Solt 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 4st Crop Lbs N1Ac LhV N Total lbs N
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield Ibs N1Unit Residual lAc Utllited
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NtAc Lbs N TotatibxNl
Code Avolv Yield Ibs MUM Residual lAa Utllited
Total
Lbs NlAc
Total ies N
Utlilzed
10569
1
6,62
Re/Ln
0
June -Set
45.0
4
180
1191.6
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15
117
774.54
297
1966.14
10569
2
6.56
Ra/Ln
O
JuneSe t
45.0
4
180
1180,8
N
Se i-A r
55
2.4
15
117
767,52
297
1948,32
10569
3
5.86
Ra/Ln
O
June -Set
45.0
4
180
1234,8
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15
117
802.62
297
2037.42
10569
4
6.66
Reltn
O
June -Se 1
45.0
4
180
1234.8
N
Sept -Apr
55
2-4
15
117
802.62
297
2037.42
10569
5
6.86
Ralt n
O
June -Set
45.0
4
100
1234.6
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15
117
802.62
297
2037.42
10569
6
6.11
Ra
O
JuneSe t
44.0
4
176
107536
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15
117
714.87
293
1790.23
10569
7
777
Ra
0
June -Sept
44.0
4
176
663,52
N
I Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15
117
441.09
293
1104.61
10569
8
6.15
Ra
O
June -Set
44,0
4
176
1082.4
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15
117
719.55
293
1801.95
10569
9
4.77
Ra
O
June -Set
44.0
4
176
839.52
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15
117
558.09
293
1397.61
10569
10
3.54
Ra
O
June -Set
44.0
4
176
623.04
N
Se t-A r
55
2.4
15
117
414.18
293
1037.22
10569
11 A
7.91
GOAtRa
O
June -Sept
44-5
4
178
1407.98
N
Se t-A r
60
2.4
15
129
1020,39
307
2428.37
10569
lie
3.54
GoA/Ra
0
June -Sept
44.5
4
178
630.12
N
Se I -A r
60
2.4
15
129
456.66
307
1086.78
10569
12A
7,01
GoA/Ln
O
June -Set
45.5
4
182
1275.82
N
Se - r
60
2.4
15
129
90429
311
2180.11
10569
128
4,16
R&INDA
1 O
June -Set
43.0
4
172
715.52
N
Sept -Apr
57.5
2.4
15
123
511.68
295
1227.20
10569
13A
5.25
RalLn
1 O
June -Set
45.0
4
180
945
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15
117
614,25
297
1559.25
10569
13B
2.82
NoA)Ln
O
June -Set
44.0
4
176
496.32
N
Sa t-A r
57.5
2.4
15
123
346,86
299
843,18
10569
14
1.72
GaA
0
June -Set
45.0
4
100
309.6
N
Se 1-Apr
65
2.4
15
141
242.52
321
552.12
10569
15
4,42
RalLn
O
June -Set
45.0
4
180
795.E
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15
117
517.14
297
1312.74
10569
16
7.87
Ln1R8
0
June -Set
45.0
4
180
1416.6
N
Se t-A r 1
55
2.4
15
117
920.79
297
2337.39
10569
17
7.16
RalLn
0
June -Sept
45.0
4
180
1292.4
N
5 i-R r
55
2-4
15
117
840.06
297
2132.46
10569
18
7.01
Ra
0
June -Sept
44.0
4
176
1233.76
N
Se 1-A r
55
2.4
15
1 117
82D.17
293
2053.93
10569
19
4,25
Ra
0
June -Sept
44.0
4
176
748
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15 1
117
497.25
293
124525
10569
20
2.3
Ra
O
June -Set
44.0
4
176
404.8
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15
117
269.10
293
673.90
Totals: 123.54 22032.16 14758.85 36791.02
M B00107030259
3(a) of 8

Reception Area Specifications CORN OPTION: 35 acres maximum per year
Tract Field Irrigated Soll 1st Crop Time.to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acreacle Type Code Apply Yield lbs NlUnil Residual fAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Code Apply Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs NlAc
Total Ibs N
Utilized
10569
1
6.62
RalLn
D
Mar -Jul
125
1,25
15
141,25
935,00
N
Sept -Apr
55
2,4
132
873.84
273.25
1808.92
10569
2
6.56
Ra/Ln
0
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
926.60
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
865.92
273.25
1792.52
10569
3
6.86
RalLn
0
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
968.98
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
905.52
273.25
1874.50
10569
4
6.86
RalLn
D
Mar -Jul
125
1_25
15
141.25
968.98
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
905.52
273.25
1874.50
10569
5
6.86
RalLn
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
968.98
N
Se t•A r
55
2,4
132
905.52
273.25
1874.50
10569
6
6.11
Ra
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
863.04
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
806.52
273.25
1669.56
10569
7
3.77
Ra
D
Mar -Jul 1
125
1,25
15 1
141.25
532.51
N
Sept -Apr
1 55
2.4
132
497,64
273.25
1030.15
10569
8
6,15
Re
0
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
868.69
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
811.8
273.25
1680.49
10569
9
4,77
Ra
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
673.76
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
629.64
273.25
1303.40
10569
10
3.54
Re
D
Mat -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
500.03
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
467.28
273.25
967.31
10569
11A
7.91
GOAIRa
D
Mar -Jul
127.5
1.25
15
144.375
1142.01
N
Sept -Am
60
2.4
144
1139.04
288.375
2281.05
10569
113
3,54
GOA/Ra
❑
Mar -Jul
127.5
1.25
15
144.375
511.09
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
509.76
288,375
1020.85
10569
12A
7.01
GOAILn
D
Mar -Jul
127.5
1.25
15
144,375
1012.07
N
Sept -Apr
60
2A
144
1009,44
288,375
2021.51
10569
12B
4,16
RalNOA
D
Mar -Jul
127.5
1.25
15
144,375
600.60
N
Sept -Apr
57,5
2A
138
574.08
282,375
1174,68
10569
13A
5,25
RalLn
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
741.56
N
Sept -Apr
1 55
2.4
132
693
273.25
1434,56
10569
13B
2,82
NOAILn
D
Mar -Jul
120
1.25
15
135
380.70
N
Sept -Apr
57.5
2.4
138
389.16
273
769.86
10569
14
1,72
GoA
D
Mar -Jul
130
1.25
15
147.5
253.70
N
Sept -Apr
65
2.4
156
268.32
303.5
522.02
10569
15
4A2
Ra1Ln
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
624.33
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
50344
273.25
1207.77
10569
16
7,87
LnlRB
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
1111.64
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
1038.64
273.25
2150.48
10569
17
7,18
RalLn
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
1014.18
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
947.76
273.25
1961.94
10569
18
7.01
Ra
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
990.16
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
925,32
273.25
1915.48
10569
19
4.25
Ra
0
Mar -Jul
125
1,25
15
141.25
600.31
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
561
273.25
1161.31
10569
20
2.3
Re
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141,25
324.88
N
Se t-A r 1
55
2.4
132
303.6
273.25
628.48
7olars; 123.54 17513.84 16611.96
3(b) of 8 MB00107030260

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definateiy interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized_ Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N / bushel
B
Hybrid bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N 1 ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N I ton
D
Corn - Grain
125 lbs N / bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 lbs N 1 ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N I lbs lint
G
Fescue- Grazed
50 lbs N 1 ton
H
Fescue - Hay
50 lbs N / ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs N / acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N 1 acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N 1 cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N / bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N / bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N 1 acre 1 yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations_ Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4 of 8 MB00107030261

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PAN/ r/animat Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
Farrow to Feeder 1
1200 Farrow to Finish 4.1 4920
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 4920 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 24600 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 82 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 196.8 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
'This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm_
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables, Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8
M800107030262

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
_Tract
Hydrant
Type
Crop
in/hr
" inches
10569
1
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
2
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
3
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
4
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
5
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
6
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
7
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
8
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
9
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
10
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
11A
GoA/Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
11 B
GoA/Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
12A
GoA/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
12B
Ra/NoA
O
0.4
1
10569
13A
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
13B
NoA/Ln
O
0.5
1
10569
14
GoA
O
0.4
1
10569
15
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
16
Ln/Ra
O
❑.5
1
10569
17
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
18
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
19
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
20
Ra
O
0.4
1
MB00107030263
6 of 8

Additional Comments:
This plan revision reflects wetted acres by pull rather than by field. _
Note: A maximum of 35 acres of corn may be planted each year on this
farm. If this option is utilized, the times and rates to apply are listed on page _
3(b) of this plan. When wheat follows cam, the rate for wheat is increased by
15 IbsNlac. This is due to the residual N from the soybeans being deducted
from the cam.
MSo0i07030264
7 of 8

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION
Blame of Farm: BOC #10
Owner: Brown's of Carolina
Manager: David Nordin
Owner/Manager Agreement:
Itwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
Signature:
Brown's of Carolina
Name of Manager (if different from owner): David Nordin
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist:
M. Kevin Weston
Affiliation:
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Address:
2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone:
[phone]
Signature:
Date
MB00107030265
8 of 8

Murphy -Brown LLB
Mr. Rawls,
i
i
r
" ; 1 "0 2003
PO Drawer 8 6
2822 Hwy. 2 West
t-
Warsaw, NC
�
Tel: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
The following farms within the Murphy -Brown, LLC system had plan
amendments made to extend pumping windows and add additional PAN where needed.
The plan amendments are attached for each farm.
Farm Name
Sampson Sow Farm
Farm 2096
Farm 3111
Farm 3510
Facilitv Number
82-478
82-715
AWS820340
AWS820442
If there are any questions please let me know.
Regards,
Todd Rowe, CCA
Agronomist
Murphy -Brown, LLC

CAWMP AMENDMENT
Farm 3510
6/23/03
This amendment is intended to provide additional Nitrogen to the com crop.
Tissue analysis was conducted on the corn crop on June 16, 2003. The results of this
analysis indicated the plants to be low in Nitrogen. Upon evaluation of the tissue sample
results and the crop that is planted, it is found that additional Nitrogen is required for the
corn crop. The additional Nitrogen is mainly due to the wet weather conditions that have
been seen so far this growing season. Several processes have caused Nitrogen to be lost
from the soil and restricted uptake by the plant. This additional Nitrogen is for
supplementation of the required PAN in the waste management plan.
Hydrant Supplemental Nitro en per acre(pounds)
I lA 50.5
12A 50.5
13A 49.4
Brown's of Carolina, Owner Date
.l72 � 7
Manager Date
lel3
Technical Specialist Date

7--
X
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
October 10, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Dave Nordin
P. O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
SUBJECT: RESCISSION OF NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
BOC Farm 43510
Facility No. 82-442
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Nordin:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
The Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality has reviewed the additional information
submitted by Brown's of Carolina, Inc. on September 13, 2001 for the subject facility- After consideration of the
information submitted, this Office has determined that the Notice of Deficiency issued on August 20, 2001 should
be rescinded.
The Division of Water quality asks that any information required by the Division be carefully reviewed for
accuracy and authenticity prior to submittal. Please be advised that this letter does not prevent the Division of
Water Quality from taking enforcement action for this or any future violations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter; please do not hesitate to contact Paul Sherman, Environmental
Engineer, or myself at [phone].
Sincerely}__
PR/mps Paul E. Rawls`
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Cc: -Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Wilson Spencer -Sampson Co. NRCS
Central Files -Raleigh
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BUILDING I FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]WWW.F.NR.STATF.NC-USIFNR/
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLEDII0% POST CONSUMER PAPER
DEN TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone] -

FV
r
--------------------------------------------- .........
785 limy. za east -36o
! PO Sox 487
QF CAROL.IN1� Warsaw, NC 2&399 aa87 � 20pr
September 13, 2001
Mr. Paul Sherman
DWQ — Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green St., Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Re: Notice of Deficiency
BOC Farm 3510
Facility # 82-442
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Sherman. -
Brown's of Carolina reported to you on August 1, 2001 that there had been a
minor (less than 10%) over application on hydrants #17 and #18 at Farm 3510.
Upon reviewing the records the wrong PAN analysis had been used for the
April pumping events. A 3.4 PAN analysis was used in the records at the time of the
report. The correct analysis was 3.1 PAN. With the correct analysis, the IRR-2
record shows that there was no over application.
Please find enclosed a copy of the April 2e lagoon analysis and the pumping
records for hydrants #17 and #18.
1 would be happy to answer any questions that you have. I can be reached at
910-296-1800 ext. 217.
Sincerely,
Ar �)
i Z� / / u,
David Nordin
Land & Nutrient Management

*CDA A ronol.
Avisiotl 4300 Reedy Creels Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 (91! 13-2655
Report No: M5 W
Crory r:
Browns of Carolina Inc. ("opius To.- ---
,,1.
r
Atut: R.0, Britt
PO I3ox 487
Waste
1�`arsaly, NC 28398
U71.
na ysis effort
lrlrrrt:
4/26A)I
Sampson County
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID:
A'
P 1l cu Alg s
Fe ,M1 Zrt
Cu R A10 Cl
lil
TOMI 737
83.7 1049 149 32.3 32.2 4.16
0,41 2.28
0.72 1.58
IN -N
lVaste Code:
WIN
ALS
-NQ3
Na M Crl Pb _tI
Se Li P11
.1N C:N Ur11% 1.'ChN, ALEA' ed)
De-wr•ilrl turn :
OR-N
3128
7.42
Skviuc Li kjol III.
!+r'err
I(eCo111[lie 1ld"Itioils:
Nutrients Available for first Crop
I&II000 allotl8
Other Elements 1&0000 gallons
Application 'Ifelbod
A' 11205 K iO Ca 318 S 111e AM A (,'u
R 1110 (11
Na Ni Cd A : ll Se Li
Errig:giun
3.1 1.1 8.4 0.87 ().19 0.19 11,(12 [' 0.02 T
0.01
2.7

'b.R j N' `,
Hydrant: 17
Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: KK
FORM RRR-G
OF CAROLINA
Field No. 5
Field Size(Ac.): 7.57 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10589
785 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC zsage-aaer
Farm Name: 10
Facility #:
Recommended PAN (Ibs.lAcrej: 117
(910) 2S8-1800
Date Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN PAN Applied PAN Applied/Acre
04/06/2001
9:00 AM
100 PM
360
1
285
102600
13,554
3.1
318.06
42.02
04/09/2001
12:00 PM
3:00 PM
180
1
285
51300
6,777
3.1
159.03
21.01
04/10/2001
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
60
1
285
17100
2,259
3.1
53.01
7.00
04/10/2001
4:00 PM
6:00 PM
120
1
285
34200
4,518
3.1
106.02
14.01
04/11/2001
8:00 AM
11:30 AM
210
1
285
59850
7,906
3.1
185.54
24.51
t
Hydrant Total Volume: 265050 Total PAN AppliedlAcre: 108.54
Wednesda„ Septt:mi7er 12, 2001 Operator's Signature _ . ____ __ ___ _ Page 5

f`......... ......'....
- BF�t...iJ11N S �;
Hydrant: 18
y
Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: KK
p yp
FORM IRR-2
OF CAROLINA
Field No. 5
Field 5ize(Ac.): 7.71 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10569
785 Hwy 24 bast
Warsaw, NC 2easa-1<4e7
Farm Name: 10
Facility #:
.
Recommended PAN {IbsfAcre): 11 T
(910) 2964800
Date Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklets Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Xcre
Analysis PAN P N Applied PAN AppliedlAcre
04/09/2001
9:00 AM
3:00 PM
360
1
285
102600
13,307
3.1
318,06
41.25
04/10/2001
8:00 AM
11:00 AM
180
1
285
51300
6,654
3.1
159,03
20.63
1
04111 /2001
8:00 AM
4:00 PM
480
1
285
136800
17,743
3.1
424.08
55.00
Hydrant Total Volume: 290700
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 116.88
%q,3dnesday, September 12, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 7

AIwj
•
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
August 20. 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RE -QUESTED
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Dave Nordin
P. O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
SUB,IF,CT: NOTICE OF DEFICIANCY
BBC Farm #35I0
Facility No_ 82-442
Sampson County
Dear Mr_ Nordin:
William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D_
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
You are hereby notified that; having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the subject animal
waste disposal system pursuant to I SA NCAC 2B .0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H .0217
Pennit.
On August 7, 2001, the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality received written
notification from Brown's of Carolina indicating incidences of PAN rate overapplication for the 2000 winter and
2001 summer pumping season. The review of this notification revealed that the PAN rate for the 2000 winter crop
had been exceeded by 2 and I I pounds, per the CAWNIP for this facility, on pulls #17 and 18, respectively. This
is a violation of'the General Permit issued to this facility under Section II., Operation and 'Maintenance
Requirements, \umber 4., which states: "Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMI'. in no
case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff
during any given application."
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
1. Avoid overapplication of nitrogen either agronomically or hydraulically.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility Iosing its General Permit and being
required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not preivent the Division of Water Quality f,orn taking enforcement
actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the
authority to leery a civil penalty of not more than S257000.00 per day per violation.
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 71Y / sYsTFI_ BUILDING / FAYETTEVILLE. NC 28301-5043
PHONE[phone] FAX [phone]WWW.ENR.5TATE.NC.[1S�F:NR'
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLEDIIo°10 POST CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. Nordin
5-20-01
Pa(ye 2
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please respond to this office by
September 3, 2001. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
M, Paul Sherman
Environmental EnLnneer
Cc: Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Wilson Spencer -Sampson Co. MRCS
Central Files -Raleigh

....
.. ..... ..---------------------- ...................�
785 tivoy. 24 fast ; 72
(}
PO Sox 487 i AUGV C�lj
OF CAR Warsaw, NC 28398-W7
August 1, 2001
Mr. Paul Sherman
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Paul.
I have recently completed a review of the pumping records for the Brown's of Carolina farms.
There are some incidences of over application on individual pulls.
. 2000 Winter pumping over application
by pull:
Farm
Facility No. Coun Hydrant
PAN in WUP
Over application
3510
82-442 Sampson 17
1171bs.
2lbs.
18
117 lbs.
11 lbs.
3111
82-340 Sampson 06
141 lbs.
14 tbs-
07
141 Ibs.
13 Ibs.
08
141 Ibs.
2 lbs.
3 7 28
09-155 Bladen 16
50 tbs.
2.42 lbs.
729, 3093
09-153 Bladen 07
129 tbs,
1.94 lbs.
3094
78-085 Robeson 04B
100 tbs.
5.53 Ibs,
2001 Summer pumping over application by pull:
Faun
Facility No, Count, Hydrant
PAN in V`,IUP
Over application
3514
82-443 Sampson 23A
147 tbs.
6.85 Ibs-
2537, 2538
82-466 Sampson 07A
260 lbs.
2 tbs.
For the Summer 2001 pumping e, new lagoon analysis will be taken in August.
1 would be happy to answer any questions that you have. 1 can be reached at 910-295-1800 ext. 217.
Sincerely,
David Nordin
Land & Nutrient Management

ATLA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
August 20, 2001
CERTIFIED 14IAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Dave Nordin
P. O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIANCY
SOC Farm #3510
Facility No. 82-442
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Nordin:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the subject animal
waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H .0217
Permit.
On August 7, 2001, the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality received written
notification from Brown's of Carolina indicating incidences of PAN rate overapplication for the 2000 winter and
2001 summer pumping season. The review of this notification revealed that the PAN rate for the 2000 winter crop
had been exceeded by 2 and 1 I pounds, per the CAWMP for this facility, on pulls #17 and 18, respectively. This
is a violation of the General Permit issued to this facility under Section H., Operation and Maintenance
Requirements, Number 4., which states: "Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no
case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff
during any given application."
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item(s) be addressed:
l . Avoid overapplication of nitrogen either agronomically or hydraulically.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General Permit and being
required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement
actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the
authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than S25,000.00 per day per violation.
225 GREEIr` STREET - SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BUILDING / FAYErTEVILLE. NC 28301-5043
P14ONE(910)486-1541 FAX[phone] WWW.ENR.STATF:.NC.US/r?NR/
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE.: ACTION EMPLOYER _ 509% RFCYCLED/10% POST CONSUMER PAPFR
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE; 1-877-623-6748

Mr. Nordin
8-20-0 l
Page 2
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please respond to this office by
September 3s 2001.1f you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone]_
Sincerely,
M. Paul Sherman
Environmental Fngineer
Cc: Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Wilson Spencer -Sampson Co. MRCS
Central Files -Raleigh

--- ----- ----------------------- ,
BROWN � \'ti1 785 Dx 484 East
PO Baz 487
OF CAROLINA Warsaw, NC 28398-D487
August 1, 2001
r� nT..
7 200 �
n -
Mr. Paul Sherman
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Paul,
I have recently completed a review of the pumping records for the Brown's of Carolina farms.
There are some incidences of over application on individual pulls.
2000 Winter pumping over application by pull:
Farm
Facility No.
County
Hydrant
PAN in WUP
Over application
3510
82-442
Sampson
17
117lbs.
2lbs.
18
117 lbs.
11 lbs.
3111
82-340
Sampson
06
141 lbs.
14lbs.
07
141 lbs.
13 lbs.
08
141 lbs.
2 lbs.
3728
09-155
Bladen
16
50lbs.
2.42lbs.
729, 3093
09-153
Bladen
07
129 lbs.
1.94 lbs.
3094
78-085
Robeson
04B
100lbs.
5.53lbs.
2001 Summer pumping over application by pull:
Farm
Facility No.
Count o
Hydrant
PAN in WUP
Over application
3514
82-443
Sampson
23A
147lbs.
6-85lbs.
2537, 2538
82466
Sampson
07A
260 lbs.
2 lbs.
For the Summer 2001 pumping a, new lagoon analysis will be taken in August.
I would be happy to answer any questions that you have. I can be reached at 910-296-1800 ext. 217.
Sincerely,
David Nordin
Land & Nutrient Management

---------- ------ -�-----•�-----
BN'� l ,_,' 785 Mwy. 24 EaSt L" 2001- i PO Box 487 Wam2w, NC 28398-W7
September 13, 2001
Mr. Paul Sherman
DWQ — Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green St., Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Re: Notice of Deficiency
BOG Farm 3510
Facility # 82- 42
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Sherman:
Brown's of Carolina reported to you on August 1, 2001 that there had been a
minor (less than 10%) over application on hydrants #17 and #18 at Farm 3510.
Upon reviewing the records the wrong PAN analysis had been used for the
April pumping events. A 3.4 PAN analysis was used in the records at the time of the
report. The correct analysis was 3.1 PAN. With the correct analysis, the IRR-2
record shows that there was no over application.
Please find enclosed a copy of the April 26t' lagoon analysis and the pumping
records for hydrants #17 and #18.
1 would be happy to answer any questions that you have. I can be reached at
910-296-1800 ext. 217.
Sincerely,
44
7&d4--.
David Nordin
Land & Nutrient Management

NWA A ronot
liyision 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 (91E B 2655
Reporl_No: M W
Groaner:
Browns of Carolina lne.
Cof,ies To:
alttw R. 0. Britt
110 Box 487
wstea
Warsaw, NC 28398
<�t
sus PhAnalysisopt
l,,,,nn:
QM/ol
Sampson County
Sample Info.
Laborato .Results arts permillion unlcss.otherwise noted
Sample ID:
A'
P K ca Ag 4
Fc Mra Zaa
Caa
13 Alu cl
70tal 737
83.7 1049 149 32.3 32.2 4.16 0.41 2.28
0.72
1.58
10
IN -N
W'asle rode:
-N114
ALS
-N43
Na Ni (I'd Pb al
Se Ii PII
SS
C:N DAM
328
7,12
Description:
OR-N
5p'IEII' L.I tMll Lit .
Vrea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lhs/1000 gallons
Other Elements MOW Rallons
.application Method
N P305 r<'10 ca t11g S Fe Aft, Zn car
B AM cl
Na
Ni Cd Ph "it Se b
Irrigation
3.1 1.1 8.4 C, 87 0.19 0.19 0.02 T 0.02 T
0.01
2.7

' Bh10WN'�`-,.,
Hydrant: 17
Crop Type: WHEAT Operator: KK
FORM IRR-2
OF CAROLINA
Field No. 5
Field Size(Ac.): 7.67 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10569
T
766 Hwy 24 East
Warsaw, NC 28396A497
Farm Name: 10
Facility #:
Recommended PAN i Ibs,lAcre : 117
[phone]
Date Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre
Analysts PAN PAN Applied PAN AppliedlAcre
04/06/2001
9:00 AM
3:00 PM
360
1
285
102600
13,554
3.1
318.06
42.02
04/09/2001
12:00 PM
3.00 PM
180
1
285
51300
6,777
3.1
159.03
21.01
04/10/2001
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
60
1
285
17100
2,259
3.1
53.01
7.00
04/10/2001
4:00 PM
6:00 PM
120
1
285
34200
4,518
3A
106.02
14.01
04/11/2001
8:00 AM
11:30 AM
210
1
285
59850
7,906
3.1
185.54
24.51
Hydrant Total Volume: 265060 Total PAN Applied/Acre: 108.54
Wednesday, September 12, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 6

' �BR��i11N'S`,i
Hydrant: 18
Crop Type: WHEAT operator: KK
FORM I RR-2
.,,OF CAROLINA '
Field No. 6
Field 5ize(Ac.): 7.71 Certification #
Remit To: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Tract No. 10569
Was wy 24 East
Warssaw, NC28399-Q4a7
Farm Name: 10
Facility #:
Recommended PAN Ibs.lAcre : 117
R ( ti
I910) 296-1800
Dale Start Time
End Time Total Minutes
Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume per Acre
Analysis PAN PAN Applied PAN Applied/Acre
04/09/2001
9:00 AM
1 3:00 PM
360
1
285
102600
13,307
3.1
318.08
41.25
04/1012001
8:00 AM
11:00 AM
180
1
285
51300
6,654
3.1
159.03
20.63
1
04/11/2001
8:00 AM
1 4:00 PM
1 480
1
285
136800
17,743
3.1
424.08
55.00
Hydrant Total Volume: 290700
Total PAN Applied/Acre: 116.88
Wecinesday, September 12, 2001 Operator's Signature Page 7

NORTH CAROL.INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
March 17, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Greg Brown
785 Hwy 24 East
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 27516
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Brown's of Carolina Falco #10
Facility No. 82 - 442
Permit No. AWS820442
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Brown:
On January 31, 2000, you or staff from your farm notified the Fayetteville Regional Office
of the Division of Water Quality, as required by General Permit condition 111.6.e, that the freeboard
level of the lagoon was less than the minimum required by the General Permit. The liquid level of
the lagoon was reported as 17 inches. General Permit condition V.3 states that"The maximum
waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a
minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides
adequate storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus as additional 1 foot of structural
freeboard.".
The Division of Water Quality will take no further action for this reported incident at this
time. However, you are asked to please notify this office in writing within 15 days of receipt of this
letter as to what date the lagoon was lowered to the required freeboard level. This information is
essential in determining if the lagoon was lowered within the specified time frame in which the Plan
of Action (POA) allotted. It will also dose this event out within your file. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
efifery Brown
Environmental Engineer
Cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Central Files
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Wilson Spencer - Sampson Co. NRCS.
v l�lf Tzs
1 _ 0 1 0
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BLo, FAYETTEVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
pHoNE [phone]S41 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLE0110% PO5T-CONSUMER PAPER

SENDER:
I also wish to receive the
■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
following SerVICBS (for an
■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this loins so that we can return this
extra fee):
card to you.
r Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece. or on the track it space does not
C;
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
W ei
■ 'Return Receipt Requested'on the mailpiem below the article number.
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery in
r The Return Receipt Will Show to whom the anicfe was delivered and the date
COrlStllt fpr fee. a
delivered.
postmaster
R
3. Article Addressed to:
4a- Article Number u
5.
Greg Brown
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 27516
t
6. Sign tClrw (Addressee or
PS Form 3811, December`
m
Z 160988 547
4b. Service Type
❑ Registered M Certified
❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured c
❑ Retum Receipt tar Merchandise ❑ COD
7. Date of Z�elrrY" O
8- Addressee's A ress (Only if requested
and fee is paid)
102595-96-6-0229 Domestic Return Receipt
L
W

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Farm # 10
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Brown's of Carolina, Inc.:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTFi CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 RECEIVED
J " # ; 2000
2 u�jlC-LEE
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 82-442
Sampson County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel /J
�h
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
16I7 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

.. FB1- 2-00 WED 6:11 PM BROWN ; FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 2
EMERGENCY PLAN OF ACTION
Date: February 2, 2000
Producer: Brown's of Carolina, Ines
Farm: BOC 14210, 279 31915, 239 24S9 24NF, 94A, 94B, 289
299 30, 915 93A9 93B
The following steps will be used in our plan of action to -lower and maintain the lagoon
loyd at ft abin inentiond fafmi to a led thm pivyi4o 1h9 itruaural stability and retain the
25 year, 24 hour rainfall event.
Step 1: Monitor daily existing spray fields for a time to begin pumping.
Step 2: Monitor daily freshwater use to minimize any waste that will contribute to lagoon levels.
Step 3: Monitor pits for additional storage time in the barns.
Step 4. Evaluate lagoon marker and top of dike elevations with technical specialist to ensure
accurate level determination.
Step S: Read lagoon levels daily by accurate measuring device.
Step f: If the previous steps do not provide satisfactory results, then hauling to another site.

as Hwy 24 Ewi
PD BM 487
WaMm. NC 2&0644U
Volce: (910) 2WISM
Fax (910) 26" 166
Fax
TOO
�a Fronk
� I
Fam -76 7 Pages)
phones Datm
Re; CW
BROWN'S
■ok,OF CAROLINA
FEB 3 2000
FAYETTEviuE
REG. OFFICE
13 Urgmd 0 For RaMmr © Fkaee Coat E3 Plea" Reply © Please Reaytle
• Comsaelnts:
rr-t0— f1w
• Rage 1
i .a
SL9196ZO16 'ON NJ

OF W A fF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
O� QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
a �
May 1, 2003
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Farm # 10
PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC 28458
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS820442
Farm # 10
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Sampson County
Dear Brown's of Carolina, Inc.:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to
Brown's of Carolina, Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWGI00000. The issuance of
this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS820442 which expired on April
30, 2003.
This approval'shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Farm #10, located in Sampson County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 1200 Farrow to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan ,(CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004: Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this.
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to to
under this t convey rortv rights in either real or personal Rrol2erty.
NLDC®R
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpl#h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone]B3 Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office _
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Sampson County Health Department
Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS820442
NDPU Files

Murphy -Brown, LLC 6/19/02 2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 26398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
G rower(s) :
Farm Name:
Brown's of Carolina
BOC #10
County: Sampson
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 1200
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
The waste_from.your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to_prevent_poilution__
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the Melds where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more ions per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8
P,Q0119210077

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above_ if you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same_
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be fleiable so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production_
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.):
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 galtyr
galtyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 galtyr
aallyr
_1200
Farrow to Finish
105 5 galtyr_
—12,702.0Qa galtyr__
Wean to Feeder
223 galtyr
galtyr
Feeder to Finish
986 galtyr
gatyr
Total 12,702,000 gaUyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibstyr
Ibstyr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibstyr
Ibstyr
1200
Farrow to Finish
26 Ibstyr
31,200 lbs/yr
Wean to Feeder
0,48 Ibstyr
Ibstyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibstyr
Ibstyr
Total 31,200 Ibstyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 123.54
Total N Required 1st Year: 36791.02
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0.00
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 36,791.02
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 31,200.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (5,591.02)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2ofB B00119210078

Reception Area Speaificatlons
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual Me Willed
2nd Crap Time to
Code APPI
2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Yield Ibs NfUnil Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs NIAc
Total rbs N
Utilized
10569
1
6.62
RalLn
O
June-Sapt
45.0
4
180
1191.5
N
Sept -Apr:
55
2.4
15
117
774.54
297
1966.14
10569
2
6.56
Ra/Ln
O
June -Se
45.0
4
160
1180.8
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
15
117
767.52
297
194E-32
10569
3
6.86
RafLn
O
June -Sept
45.0
4
180
1234.8
N
Se t•A r'
55
2,4
15
117
802.62
297
2037.42
'10569
4
6.66
RalLn
O
June -Sept
45.0
4
180
1234.0
N
Sept -Apr'
55
2.4
15
117
802,62
297
2037,42
10569
5
6.86
Ra/Ln
O
June -Set
45.0
4
160
1234.8
N
Se l.A r,
55
2.4
15
117
802.62
297
2037,42
10569
6
6,11
Ra
O
JuneSe t
440
4
176
1075.36
N
Se -A rl
55
2.4
15
117
714.87
293
1790.23
10569
7
3.77
Ra
O
JuneSe t
44 0
4
176
663,52
N
Sept.Aprl
55
2.4
15
117
441.09
293
110461
10569
8
8.15
Ra
O
JuneSe 1
44.0
4
176
1082.4
N
Sept-Aprl
55
2.4
15
117
719.55
293
1801.95
10569
9
4.77
Ra
O
June -Set
44,0
4
176
839.52
N
Se t-A rl
55
2.4
15
117
558.09
293
1397.61
10569
10
3.54
Ra
O
JuneSe t
".0
4
176
523.04
N
Se t-A r'
55
2,4
15
117
414.16
293
1031.22
10569
11 A
7,91
GoA/Ra
O
JuneSe t
44.5
4
178
1407.9E
N
Se t-A C
60
2.4
15
129
1020.39
307
2428.37
10569
11 B
3.54
GoA/Ra
O
Julie -Sept
44.5
4
178
830.12
N
S -A
60
2.4
13
129
456.66
307
1086.78
10569
12A
7.01
GoAfLn
O
June -Set
45.5
4
182
1275,82
N
SeDt-Apri
60
24
15
129
904.29
311
2180.11
10569
1213
4.16
Re/NoA
O
June -Set
43.0
4
172
715.52
N
Se t-A:r
57.5
2.4
15
123
511.68
29$
1227.20
10569
13A
6.25
RaR.n
O
June -Set
45.0
4
180
945
N
Sept -Apt;
55
2.4
15
117
614.25
297
1559,25
10569
1313
282
NOA/Ln
O
June -Sept t
44.0
4
176
496.32
N
Sept -Apr;
57.5
2.4
15
123
346.86
289
843.1E
10569
14
1,72
GoA
O
June -Sept t
45.0
4
180
309.6
N
-Sept-Ape,
65
2.4
15
141
242.52
321
552.12
10569
15
4,42
Ra/Ln
O
June -Sept t
45.0
4
180
795.6
N
Se l-A r'
55
2.4
15
117
517.14
297
1312.74
10569
16
7.87
LnIRa
O
JuneSe
45.0
4
180
1416,e
N
Sept -Apr.
55
2.4
15
117
920.79
297
2337.39
10569
17
7.18
RalLn
O
June -Se
45.0
4
180
1292.4
N
Sept -Apr,
55
2.4
15
117
840.06
297
2132.46
10569
18
7,01
Ra
O
June -Se
44.0
4
176
1233,76
N
Sept -Apr,
55
2.4
15
117
620.17
293
2053.93
10569
19
4.25
Ra
O
June -Sept t
44.0
4
176
748
N
Se t-A r
55
2.4
15
117
497.25
293
1245.25
10569
20
2.3
Ra
O
June -Set
44.0
4
176
404.6
N
S -A r.
55
2.4
15
117
269.10
293
673.911
I
I
I
I
l
Totals: 123.'J4 22032.10
14756.86 36791.02
B00119210079
3(a) of 8

Reception Area Specifleatlons CORN OPTION: 36 acres maximum per year
Tract Field Irrigated Sol] 1st Crop Time to 1st Crap 1st Crop Lbs NfAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acreage Type Code Aovlv Yield Ibs NfUnit Residual /Ac Utilized
2nd Crop Time to
Code Apply
2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Yield lbs NfUnit Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs N1Ac
Total The N
Utilized
10569
1
6.62
RaA n
0
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
935.08
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
873.84
273.25
1808.92
10569
2
6.56
RaA n
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
926.60
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
865.92
273,25
1792.52
10569
3
6.86
Ra/Ln
D
MaTJul
125
1.25
15
141.25
968.98
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
905.52
273.25
1874.50
10569
4
6A6
Ra/Ln
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
960,98
N
Sepl-Apr
55
2.4
132
905.52
273.25
1874.50
10569
5
6.86
Re1Ln
D
Mar -Jul
125
1,25
15
141.25
960.98
N
Se t-A r
55
2.4
132
905.52
273.25
1874,50
10569
6
6,11
Ra
0
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
863.04
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
606.52
273.25
1669.56
10569
7
3.77
Ra
0
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
532.51
N
Se t-A r
55
2.4
132
497.64
273,25
1030.15
10569
8
6A5
Ra
0
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
868.69
N
Se t-A r
55
2.4
132
811.8
273.25
1680.49
10569
9
4.77
Ra
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
673.76
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
629.64
273.25
1303.40
10569
10
3.54
Re
0
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
500.03
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
467.28
273.25
967,31
10569
11 A
7.91
GoAfRa
D
MvJul
127.5
1.25
15
144.375
1147.01
N
Sept-ADr
60
2.4
144
1139.04
288.375
2261.05
10569
11B
3.54
GoAJRa
0
Mar -Jul
127,5
1.25
15
144 375
511.09
N
60
2.4
144
509.76
288.375
1020.65
10569
12A
7,01
GoAJLn
0
Mar -Jul
127.5
1.25
15
144.375
1012.07
_.E!0-Apr
N
Se t-A r
UO
2.4
144
10139.44
288,375
2021.51
10569
12B
4.16
Ra/NoA
D
Mar -Jul
127.5
1.25
15
144,375
600.60
N
Se t-A r
57.5
2.4
138
574,08
282,375
1174.68
10569
13A
5.25
RafLn
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
741.56
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
093
273.25
1434.56
10569
13B
2.82
NoA/Ln
D
Mar -Jul
120
1.25
15
135
380.70
N
Sept -Apr
57.5
2A
136
389.16
273
769.86
10569
14
1.72
GoA
0
Mar -Jul
130
1,25
15
147.5
25170
N
Se -A
65
2.4
156
268.32
303.5
522.02
10569
1$
4.42
Ra4-n
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
441.25
624,33
N
Sept-AprSept-Apr
55
2A
132
583-44
273.25
1207.77
10569
16
7.67
Ln1Ra
0
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
1111.64
N
Sept -Apr
1155
2.4
132
1038.84
273.25
2150.48
10569
17
7,18
RafLn
0
Mar -Jul
126
1.25
15
141.25
1014,10
N
Se t-A r
65
2A
132
947.76
273.25
1961.94
10569
18
7,01
Ra
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
990-16
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
925.32
273.26
1915.48
10569
19
4.25
Ra
D
Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
600.31
N
SeptApT
55
2.4
132
561
273,25
1161.31
10569
20
2.3 1
Ra
D
I Mar -Jul
125
1.25
15
141.25
324,88
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
303.6
273.25
628.48
I
i
4
t
i
i
r
i
I
I
7erefa: 423.5E 47313.94 1
16611.96
3(l,)016
B001192,10030

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e_
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definitely interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October_ Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N / bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs; N / ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 lbs N / bushel
E
Cum - Silage
12 lbs N 1 ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N / lbs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 lbs N 1 ton
H
Fescue- Hay
50 lbs N / ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N / bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs; N I acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 Ibs N / acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N I cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N / bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N I acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding -
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
800119210081
4 of 8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PANT r/animal Farm Total/r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
Farrow to Feeder 1
1200 Farrow to Finish 4.1 4920
Wean to Feeder 0,072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 4920 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 24600 pounds of plant
available -nitrogen to-utflize Assuming-you-appiy'this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass-tiayla fd at'the ----
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 82 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 196 8 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
`This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary sterage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables_ Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
Safe
B00119210082

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract
Hydrant
Type
Crop
in/hr
" inches -
10569
1
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
2
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
3
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
4
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
5
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
6
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
7
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
8
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
9
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
10
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
11A
GoA/Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
11 B
GoA/Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
12A
GoA/Ln
O
0.4
1
— — -0569
10569
13A
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
13B
NoAM
O
0.5
1
10569
14
GoA
O
0.4
1
10569
15
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
16
Ln/Ra
O
0.5
1
10569
17
Ra/Ln
O
0.4
1
10569
18
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
19
Ra
O
0.4
1
10569
20
Ra
O
0.4
1
6 of 8 B00119210083

Additional Comments:
This plan revision reflects wetted acres by pull rather than by field.
Note: A maximum of 33 acres of com may be planted each year on this
farm. If this option is utilized, the times and rates to apply are listed on page
3(b) of this plan. When wheat follows com, the rate for wheat is increased by
15 IbsNiac. This is due to the residual N from the soybeans being deducted
from the com.
7 of 8 B00119210084

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: BOC #10
Owner: Brown's of Carolina
Manager: David Nordin
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. Ilwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
Ilwe understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
--- to -land -apply -the animal waste•described-in-this-nutrient-management-ptan. This -equipment ---
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the faun office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Brown's of Carolina
Signature: ' �. , ,� ' c-,� ��za4 0-711-�
/ Date
Name of Manager (if different from owner): David Nordin
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist:
M. Kevin Weston
Affiliation:
_ _Murphy -Brown, LLC
Address:
2822 HMT24 West, PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone:
910 293,3434
Signature:
fIP r—
Date
8 of 8 B00119211085

"AT
Iqe,
�Ro zi �Y)
rl
41
. .. ..... ... 7; 1
; l,o
'l
-IPl ,N,n�"C' � , - Dtl A:0,.� ­j
A P ;
-iv
_ff
, 20I - Q9
J;" y_,
.... ... ...
91;
'ek
vf
7n
, --
!'
J0" :.jj
�'4�,
-l ,I '
-527Ab 6.
Z
El
UA
A
G.N
tit
low,
;4m
" 4.4
41
W1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal 'Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information an file with�the =_.
Division. PIease review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered. "
Application Date:
6-12-9'7
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
ants Initial
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
I. Farm's name: harm #l0 _
2. Print Land Owner's name: Brown's of Carolina _ ltjt:.
3. Land Owner's Mailing address: _PO Box 487
City: Warsaw NC Zip: 28398
Telephone Number: _910 1W0 2-9 6 —1100
4. County where Farm is located: Sampson
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): SR 1900 approx. 4 miles & of Faison ad end
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Timmy Vinson_
7. Loma ' ame (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Brown' f Carolina C
owa�
82 - 442
RECEIVEU`
U UN 2 5 1997
FAYEMEVILLE
REC. OFFICE
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 1 of 3

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: -"i�1
2. Operation Description. Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
8360 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; z no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
T,YW Qf Swine No. of Animals Type_of Poultry No. of Animals JyVS of Cattle No. _Qf Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish. 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the fam: No. of Animals;,
3. Acreage cleared and available for application ; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP):.6+'1r l • 7
4. Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: 9#Y0566 Cubic Feet (0)
Number of Storage Ponds: D ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
S. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? 49) or NO (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or(fO ) (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, __ `��� �/ Y//✓�'� �lr1W. fbr�] __ (Land Owner's name listed in question 11.2), attest that
this application for Alt S OF 6My�!!4� f-, /2 _ (Farm name listed in question 11.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be re wnetto me as incomaletel
Signature
V.
I,
Date 6 1a ?% _
CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question R.6), attest that this
application for (Farm name listed in question II. I)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I ttttderstand drat if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-GE 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

I
State -if North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (2197)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe _
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford.
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
(910) 4WI541
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Ale ander
Lincoln
Biaden
Richmond
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
' Stanly
Hoke
Scotland
Gaston
Union
Montgomery
Iredell
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance
Rockingham
Alleghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Sur y
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
Wilmington Regional WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Fender
Duplin
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/97 Page 3 of 3

A
-.0
z
FARM 0 10 1200 FWdM TO FMISH
SAMPSCN CCL%=
CAL
Pcif
F-NST COI-LrOL SIREF-7 -P.O. BOX 4S7 - %VARSAM. \,C. '_S,%-(Uc7 OMC_F: r,liq, 1-93 -1 i-S! 0 iAN. 1919j 1-U-4726

ANEVL4L WASTE N ANAGEh-ZNT PLAN CERTMCATION L vR EXISTLNG FEEDLOTS
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the address on the -'
reverse side of this form.
Name of farm (Please print) : Brown's of Carolina, Inc. Farm # / c?
Address: P.O. sox 487
Warsaw, NC 28398 Phone No.: [phone]
County (of arm): SA-m Al
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:>^- O&' � �_ i/' {required). Also, please attach a
copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.) : Su;/At/
Design capacity (number of animals) : /Z cd eS#zy 7?4� 7V r_Md5�
A'ierage size of operation (12 month population avg.): /" 5ew GAewou.► -jv �i�/isff
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres) i5 7
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant
to 15A NCAC 6F .0005,, I certify that the existing animal waste management system for the farm named
above has an animal waste management plan that meets the operation and maintenance standards and
spevifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA - Soil Conservation Service
and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001 - .0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have been
verified by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as applicable: minimum
separations (buffers); adequate quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party);
access or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe
than the 25 - year, 24 - hour storm.
When checked, see reverse side of form for conditions/exceptions.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ jimmy R_yinson
Affiliation (Agency): ror,n' I;
Addres ncy): a N -) a Phone No.: q1 4
Spa iature: `� Date: 2
OK-nerfManager Agreement
i (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
.7,anagement plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
`acilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management
before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste
o n this system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through
n:noff from a storm event less severe that the 25-yeas, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed at the
fa.-m and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District.
Name of Land
Signature:
Name of y
Signature:
Owner (Please Print): w'1%s wAI
Date:
owner
ate:
Itiocc A chznaa in land ownership requires notification or a new cr.;.ification (if the approved pLin is changed) within 60 days of a tiLe transfer.
DEM USE iNLY: ACE#

REGISTRATION FORM FOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS
Department of Environmentp, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
If the animal waste management system for your feedlot operation is
designed to serve m6ke than or equal to 100 head of cattle, 75
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 211.0217 (c) in order to be
deemed permitted by DEM. please print clearlyi
` /�
Earin Name: r�r '?� +r�� '' - � � ��: L•/11.��3- -;<�� - ? 1(9
Mailing Address: _ il!k -
::4C"j 1') { ZIP Z
County: Phone No. 2.53-3�e u
Owner (s) Naive., 0 S i �nveco
Manager(s) Name:
Lessee Name!
Farm Location (Be as speciftic as possible: road namesr direction,
inilepostl etc.)! {,i� 0 15r05t"/4 ar
Latitude/Longitude if known;
Design capacity of animal Waste management system (Number and type
of confined animal (s)) : 1'1. O :'jo , ,-s E'jL" /, Cio•
Average animal population on the farm (Number and type -of animal (s)
raised) � < C, - e e-L �i'
Year
Production Began:- l` 1Z ASCS Tract
No.:
S 7
Type
of Waste Management System Used; rn
Lor'
`4
Acres Available for Land Application of Waste, __Q50 -
Owner (s) Signature (s

t
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Grower(s).
Farm Name:
County:
Production Unit. -
No. of Animal Units:
Type of Waste Facility:
Temporary Storage Period:
Animal Unit Equiv. Live Wt:
Lbs/Animal Unit Near.
Lbs of Plant Avail. N:
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Farm 10
Sampson
Farrow -Finish
1200
Anaerobic Lagoon
180 days
1417
26
31200
This waste utilization plan is based on the following fields, soil types, and crops_ If this
information should change, please contact the Soil Conservation Service or Brown's of
Carolina , Inc. so that a new plan can be written,
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Yield/ lbs NI Acres I Res N Cr I Ibs N
.I la te- %cs
Type
I Code
Ac unit yield__ I lbs Nlac I Required
Apply
10569
1
Ra
O
33
4
10569
1
Ra
N
55
2.4
10569
4
Ra
D
110
1.25
100.00 13200.00
100.00 20.00 11200.00
54.70
7521.25
Total 154.7 31941.25
Available N 31200.00
*Difference
-741.25
A.
Barley (1.6 lb N/bu)
I.
Oats (1.3 lbs N/bu)
B.
Bermuda Grazed (50 lbs N/ton)
J.
Rye (2.4 lbs N/bu)
C.
Bermuda Hay (50 lbs N/ton)
K.
Sm. Grain Grazed (100 lbs Nlac)
D.
Corn Grain (1.25 lbs N/bu)
L.
Sm. Grain Hay (133 lbs N/ac)
E.
Corn Silage (12 lbs Won)
M.
Grain Sorghum (2.5 lbs N/cwt)
F.
Cotton (0.12 lbs N/lbs lint)
N.
Wheat (2.4 lbs N/bu)
G.
Fescue Grazed (50 lbs N/ton)
O.
Soybean (4.0 lbs N/bu)
H.
Fescue Hay (50 lbs N/ton)
* A negative number reflects the total number of lbs of additional N needed to achieve
yields on acreage shown in chart_ A positive number means additional land is required
to utilize the N produced by the animals.
Jun-S
S-ApA
Mar -,duly

This nutrient management plan has been specifically developed for this swine operation.
The plan is based on the soil types, crops to be grown, and method of applicdation for
this particular operation. The waste must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the ammount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops where the
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to
be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing this nutrient management plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environment-
ally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the
nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil
types are important as they have different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste
shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than five tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on to land when the'surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior to planting. Soil incorporation
of waste will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this
type of facility. Annual acreage requirements may be more or less depending upon the
waste analysis report for your waste management facility.
Additional Comments:

Prepared by:
Title. r
Concurred
in by:
Producer
Date: 5- 7-9(-
Date: 3-7- F Ie
I understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This
equipment must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1 -day storm event. I also certify that the waste
will be applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates
which produce no runoff.
Date: 3-- 7- ''C
Date: 3 - %-

1 17:' � o o ;� ,r •l� o r .,+ ti z �'� .r5 • .t. : 4 x
' � / w <•• ?'�:�5 1+ tf` O 1 4�i � .z o � t•.l}t. � al {r V,,�p tlZ
`'-F' i" o ,fr; 5 ..r k ,�� ao w .d,l �;i I o �1�. i•
r � j, q w d9,. }jr 5 ea ir• .-Ar.., '! iP- � _. �s sr''4� �/a.6� c a
+ jC61 iA i.,♦ 1 rf ie� Ijt-_ tv 'y � {'• � jl M1 �i ar gl yr� i �., 1'Q1• J } B°
",4rs TTT � � . e 1• I Q •Y
'r oP .+ ®Ay}�. ( �A'.�„ .1� 5' �� y:.�e��v �' . 7,.5•IF �\ :.0
• iflyy� ,� : Y'�V• � �� �Lt� \.,A 5) � I i pia X'yS�t'�1. �y ;Sr/ . n r 16 s t ! 1 .f � °
�'Y }•' nrrw- Z A w 6l G° rY �/ C Go?''v iF's p'"6yt t •R°�1 r rT' _„ `✓. , _ i
i fie•\ 1 Fz '..'„4""" ¢ i ° � t� t �,<°xt�p ��. � r r''lir' I�ll�t�v',��ry�)�! A� ,r• Q°
eb Ix 1. .,1.Sr(y ...h o P1j,j�'',•,n, !il f pr: z'. I� ,4 . y'i� :'.Erb ��A *5�kkr� •.w rc'.. e
• �.., l.; •,J•, 1' T.•aE +f,A+ ILL) � - 1 ♦I 7 •r ♦ r 1. � �af'Y � ¢
�3 ��t ;` < 1,}2 ,v -r�Q. it \ .1 ,• �tl, '4 r'jyr LVo .}.'i�'� �, �+'��♦�n�-�
'c �, �h�": t ,$ — `��, cx � •tt� Qrq. rtF '§ •) i��wrtlt 5 N
fir" n�' ,k "Ro' . � ){+y°wi � x. ��,1]•�'y+� .:�. i . r�. z Y �� w �rltF..t} 1 .!,
'{f6 >. kt � '�• ; WRIT.. 1>g" 1 � �• � .. ,, r,,^.. J� _- r . .
t t e r�MA
t rt 5 � ��Q �,? '� .t � axrt �yk ,A(.. , G�`�7.�+! • �'`� _ 8.. rs i (` eYl, ra .�"A. 3 y2�. fiknllytfil i
O ` 1. Jr r '�}kua r• t, x{hl ° 1 t Fht�1 � u 6 L�� r rri y 9 ttlt+�p.,rtr_ p.� r
' i6. ��� 6L +vCi �} �IYA �' °J� ',..�tl'dttl "1,.�.'}��s744•. , ,. {F" Y,P ST .•r rt\ '*14"y{71�4r �r`'K�(�`jl ..
1 P , 17„ e .h,,) 1 ,2M M �'„y Yy rs+ � �`•4 r F � vvRR � < r,. �'\\`t! .'.YC: + �:j• KM1yrr�.n to V, r',: y7
_ �r�i ` G1 ivY l�{+L,'ad e = v { ,1e yY�.P 5��1 'l'•{ 1}�lo`yi{f
� � 7 tr t• A :! � �`� �.� r r 3Y � / '�� 6Oy lf��+ x �; `9 'w 1 � \ l/��tlju�
'� p1 y� 'I� Lr�'gT, , � [ jl 77�P� 1 � J S VY +� tilt 1 A � '?•° _ +
4'! v J +}\ 4 ! °A r(.,' y�' T ' �c�y i !d Q. 6 a�, ! 1 +i � i+• D ry f r 1 1 1i" s" 1 w � C
N.' 6 'S '�t ; '}..+lk%_ r_ Y`y�fl�y �rM. .. S. S� V"il r 2r/IT4•, yi 4
lit `•�yJ t,? ryt' S r ai : � . ! C - `, ��� � � ,d r 3 ,y jA. +ri � T S 1 t��a z o -�,
'`. i �,♦ ^.` � ,.y7} i +r f''r Svu ..rs, rY° `� r , i �9 >�f • i o,Y °��� � � � 9 of ;� i '�
o �.�� 4. t r g� t '• 3
lit. �Ir •G�gtiS ff� ���'•C,•1r��+ -' Rs. - Q i ..dt� � $ 1 i�t m z° a�i� �° t � �}}}? 1.., /'/rc"�°—'�
Y' rt a �' P � � 7��+.>s' t e z � _ �. _• 3 � � �` • Y
m Y its
♦ 9 I m I
,,.� '�}q ,� 4 ,�` T1: .5 �•! � Q Ali . Y' + GoP '1, m .,� c a '. 6°P r��' 4'�Ei 4.,1' �.w• � u° ; �r ',�. i �..
J
Q 51 s � ► t , 3 r;
-
' I)• .4:J Z + � �IU' \1' tiny '•m , 1 to`;.
•'4q• �� f �"...: .,;, r4. !a(411 a' ?l. �'S• r t 3 i• ��\
1

............
I

NRCS WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoE; drift, rnatunade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibite&
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either o.xns or has a notarized agreement for use
of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of waste, helsue shall provide a copy of a notarized agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowiag him/her the use of the land for waste application. 1t is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure au update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operatton, increase in the
mupber of animals, method of utilization, or available Iand.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogeu tice&- for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of management. unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. Actual vields may be tlwscd in lieu of realistic yield tables at the
discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that
is eroding at more than 5 tons but less than 10 tons per acres per year provic im,, erais #filter strips are installed where
runou leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Strips)
S. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or dis;:ing after traste application. Waste should not be applied when
there is danger of dri.,'i &rn the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it xvill be soil incvtporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. Wheat applied to copse rvation ailed crops or grassland, the %. aste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occure during a season prone to flooding. (Ste "W?tea(lt,.r and Climate in i`;onh Carolina" for
guidar cc-)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occure off site
or to surlmae Haters and in a method which does not cause dri�l fmin Tile site durFP.2 applsc--16on. No ponding should
occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when (lie sue sac e is froZe.l.
9. Animal waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a nialuler that the crop is not covered with waste
to depth that would prohibit g=owLh. The potential for salt datna t: from. :miinal waste should also be considered.
10, Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring plawed crops on soils with a high potential for
leaclh g. Waste nutrient loading r ates on these soils should be held to a ilrlllttlllltll and a suitable Winter cover crop
planted to tape up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied tL::ll o daw: prier- to planting of a crop or
forages breaking derrnancy,
It. Any new swine facility sited on or eter Octobe- 1, 1995 sllall evinlig- tr•itll the lullowing: The outer perimeter of
the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a conipunet of a -avi le farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residentialm propebound-an/ and from any pereulial streaks or ri\-er utl+er r. than an irriga6cditch or
canal. Anirlal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on ar after October 1, 1993. shall not be applied
close-. than 23 feet to surface water. This distance may be reducela for wat.t•s ihat nee clot perennial provided
adcquate vegetative filter strips are present (See Standarut "9 3 - Filter Stripsl.

NrRCS WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAIN SPECIFICATIONS
(CON- T'INUED)
12. Animal waste shall notbe applied closer than 100 feet froth wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwelling. other than those au-ned by landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other propety and public riglit-of-ways.
15. Animal waste small not be discharged into surface waters, drainageway s or wetlands by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided it has been approved as a land
applications site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates
and in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdowzx facilities, sho«'er:, toilers, sinks, etc.. shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe furs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the yrgetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where cuilsidei•ed appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept crowed a: d accessible. Lagoon berms and structures shouid 1-w in�pectk:d regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge. ~
18. If animal production at the facility is terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and. implementing a "closure
plan' which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollurion and erasion.
19. Waste handling s.:uctures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., *ould be iii,pecte�T on a regular bcsis to prevent brea-kdowas,
leaks, and spills_ A regular mainte iance checklist should be kept oii sik:. ~
20. Aamunal waste can be used in a rotation that includes ve_etalbles acid other c-rups for direst h=an consumption.
However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human cactsuniptiou it -41iotild only be applied preplan with no
fiirthcr applications of anirttal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible permanc:set markers shall be installed to :nary the tap and bottom elevations of the temporary storage
(pttr.:ping vclur ne) of all waste trcat.-nent lagoons. Pumping shall be ntanaercl to maintain the liquid level between
the markers. A marker will be requited to mar: the maxiniuni 11[01•,i_e t•E,It nnt: ti>r waste storage ponds..
22. SoiI tests shall be made every year, and a liquid waste analysis shall he tate;a within 60 da%.s of application
consistent with waste utilization plan. Poultry liner shall l,e tested prier it) application. Soil and waste analysis
ech records sall be kept for five years. -
Dead animals will be disposed of in a ma?uwr drat mc%;ts NC rL tti:tti��n,.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ qio-494-15 1
EitiiFRGEN-CY NWALNAGEIMENT SYSTEM 911
SWCD jo -5 - 3
N-RCS 910 Z 2163
This plan will be implemented in tiie event that wastes from your operation are lealar_g,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does act happen. This plan should be p,oggd in W accessible locatign-for aU a loyees at the
fzcfliZ^. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow --possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of darn.
b. Pump waste to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the Iagoon L-nrnediately.
d_ Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runofr'from waste application field --actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump_
b. Stop irrigation pump_
c. Close valves to elminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

ID. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all Ieaks prior to restarting pumps-
E. Leakage from base or sidewail of lagoon. Omen this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks -possible action,
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump
back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the..extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a fixture rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During rjormal. business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone Y10 6 L5741 After hours, emergency number: 914 7333FiZ Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact Iocation of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the
seriousness of the situation.
b. Tf spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number 911.
c. instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 16 5V z_ 7/&/, local SWCD once phone number
14— 5Y:2 - Z±Yand local MRCS office for adviceltechnical assistance phone number
1/0ZW
4. If none of the above works, call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your, problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.

5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site damage_
jj oO?M rI LL 1 '
antractors Name:
b. Contractors Address: C
c. Contractars Phone: 9f9 - b 3 S- -7
6. Contact the: tec-h�n-ical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a Name: _ d w+rtiy lIia5ori _ L�REc _ &A�IJ
b. Phone: io Z �dA 10 Y 0,7
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the "eu-4 and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.

N101•tality Mana,7eme nt 1'Icthods
{check, whic;l method(s) w,c bcim'; 1lnplcrilclacd)
ID Burial three fe-t bencatki the surface of tine ground within 7-1 hou,s afler
kno► 1cdnc of the death. The burial inust be at lest 300 feet from an\' flo\viW'
strcam or public body of water.
Rendering at a rc;ldcrin�! plant liccnscd undo; G.S. 106-168.7
Complete uicincration
0 In (lic case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and'dcsign
approvcd by the Dcparmicia of A�!riculturc
1.ri Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvace of part of a dcad animal's value without cridan^crinrt
human or animal ltcal(h. (WritLelt approval of the Statc Vct%;ina1'i.m must be
attached)
Insect Control Choddist for Animal Operations
- smircc
c,�ulsc -
w 1IMPs Io C11111rn1 111sccls Siic SlieciCl. I'l-acticcs -
U1111It1 tiysivills
— —
1:11n.11 (;utters
Acciumilation of st►lilts
CJ blush syslclu is tlesi8iml aatl +aht:ralcll
suflieiewly to realilve accimmialetl solills front
Linters ;Is dt:sif;uetl.
G ItcuinVC bi•itlt;ina af;tt:t:uululaletl Solitls ill
11 ist;ltar�t:
LaGuuns :1311t i'ils
* C1.11SI&A solids
_ Mainlaill 1:If;t►nus, scltlitlu l►asins:11111 I)ils wllcre
hest 11rcetlitit; i; ;11111aretlt it) millitil4k: tlx;
cnisiinu of*solith l❑ ;I depth ofno mmt: Illall 6 -
9 iacllcs ewer Intitc t11an 30% of stir fiacc.
7%ccs1il'e V1 ;Ciallive
• t)a1 uyinL vel;el;►iioll
L, Mniut:tirl vcLet:liivc control altln(; flanks of
[;Imvill
lagmwu ;aid other iallietitithi eats to prcveltt
ntxlnllul;Ilinil of t1cc;Iyilli; vt:I;ct;Itivc Iu;lllcr
alum; walel's cill;e ao impoI11uilntall's 1►erijimur.

m
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source ---Cause IIhills W Milrimixe odur- Sile `pccific I'racliccs
F;unlslcud Swine plodllclioll Vegetative or wooded lmffers;
I(ccolitincudcd Best limn; ;eulcrll Ill'MAICcs;
Good judi;mcnl and Cnm1no11 sense
Aairlull hudy surfaces Dirty manure-coverccl annuals X Dry Ilools
^I'lnus' -.III f lkx,a Wei i anni c-ciovered 11nilrs Stoned Hum;
Walerers lroc;itcd over sloped nnors;
Cl FCCClcrs al Ilil;ll end ufsoiid Roars;
Scrape numurc hllilihlp front floors;
0 Underfloor vcrllilafim for drying
M.11111rc Cidleclinn pill Urine; Frcclricnl manure rc itioval by Ilusll, Ili[ rccllari;c ,
• f'.0 li;ll luicruiiial do crnnllositioll or scrape;
0 Underfloor venlilalion
^VC11111.111iH1 Cx1l;nU1 thus • Volatile pses; Fml III; illicliallue;
DIIS[ ' 1i111cicnl air nrnvenlCnl
11111uur sulfiacus • Dust 1W Washlltiwn I1k;l1YCC11 groups ofallllmils;
n Leech addilives;
rl Reeder covers;
xDeed delivery duwnspuul exlendens In fecder-
cuvcrs
FIIINIl lallks Agila[iau of recycled lagoon n Flush 11111h Covers;
licµlid while wilks are iiiliul; it ExIcrul Fill fines iu ucar hulloul ol'ImiLs willi
anti siphon vents
I lush ;;nips Al;ilatiun during, lvaslewaler f=) lliulcrnuur nosh will nndelllunr v,lililaliun
C(rnveyallce
I'il Iccll;ul,c liuinls Agitalion ol'rcc:ycled lagoon 1,xlend rechar(;c lines lu near 11UIIIIIIi ul'pils
liquid while Mils nre filfiur; %vide Anti-siillicul veins
E.if1 itloll • Agitaliun diu-inl; sump tank FI smill) hulk cuvcrs
filling and chawducvu
Owshk drailr colleclwn • Agilaliun iEuriul; wusinvater Cl Box cuvcrs
Or j1111clillll litmes Conveyance
AMOC - I.11mililicr 11, 1176, Page 3

— •F..aaa . .. __ ___--_—�..... ....�-�F.n� �»..._-.._._._.�....�_. r.rr��anni�.ruira�.raew ..._.__......_.-..............._may».-.�-4.. ,..�..•.-ems_-._. -
SolrrcL Cuuse 11MP5 to Mialiluize Odor Site sliecific Practices
l:ntl of drainpipes at • Agitation during waslewafcr lsxicud discharge point of pipes mWerncalgl
Iat;noll conveyance lagoon liquid level
1-agoun san'faccs • Volalile gas emissions; Proper lagoon licpdd capacity;
• Biological mixing; � Correct lagoon stattup procedures;
` Agilaliotl I Minimum surface area-io-volume ratio;
`1 Minilnuul agilalion wherl.prlrllpint;;
Mechanical aeralioll;
n Proven biological additives
hIigatiuo sprinkler
nozzles
Stfuage t;irk or 1-asill
�Iif lact:
lligh pressalrc;tgilaliuu;
+ Wind drilt
■ i'atlial micrul►iul decompos
• Mixing while: lilliug;
• At;ilaiion when cncplying
Irtigale ual dry days Willi little or tin wimi-,
f7 Millin►mu recommended operating; pressure;
'(�f I'mull Intake ticar lagoon liquid surface;
M 111111111 from second -stage lagoon
M Bottom or midlevel loaning;
El Tank covers;
n Bashi surface orals Of soliris;
Cl 1'rovcll biological tuldilives or oxidants
schllinL basin snrlitcc 0 I'amal microbial dccomposi6on; C1 lixteltd drainpipe olidels luulernealh liquid
• Mixing while tilling; level;
• Agitation when emptying L1 Remove sell led solids regulatly
Manure, slurry or Shnlge • Agitalion when spreading; CI Soil injection of slurry/slutlges;
slucader oullcls 0 Volatile gas curissions 1-1 Wash residual ma imm from spreader after use;
n Proven bioingicaI additives or oxill;Iits
llctn:overctl ruaalclre, Volalilt: gas emissions whiles 0 Still injection ofslurry/slutlgcs
shirr), or sludge on field dryillg 0 Soil incorporitfion within •18 airs.;
Sill h-11:cS
Ct Spread in thin uniform lsayt:rs for rapid drying;
Proven biological addifives or oxidants
Deall animals Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses — —
Dealt allioeal disposul • C.ucass ticeomposifion f-1 Conkplelt: covering or t:;Ireasses III Inrrial Ails;
pies 0 Proper lociafiorilcmistruclion of disposal hits
�1116110411Pls • Incullijkle coolIlls IitmI f-1 :;Lxontinry slack burners
Ah•IOC - hluvcniber 11. 1996, Page -I

Snur'ce Cause 11N.11's In M111imixc Odor Siit: Specific I'1'illaim
Standing Witter arnnnd a Improper draimage; Grath: alld lamiscnpc Such Illill waler drallls �-
f-16611ta 0 Microbial dcconlpusition of away front lacilitics
orpaic matter
Alilnurc IrBt.'1:c41 oulo 0 Poorly maititaiacd access walls Nrill access road maintalinlce
publit; roads Motu farm
ilcccss
Addilinnal luformalian : Available From :
Swint; Mamlrc Management ; 02001t IMIMP Packel NCSI 1, (nrinly Isxtcusion Ccntcr
wine f'roducliva 1:arn1 1'ulcillial Odor Sources awl Remcdics ; FIJAE Tilt t Shea NC%I I - I)A Ii
SAvine Production Facilily Manure Management: 1'il Redlarl;c - Loluouu Treatlncal ; EIJA1z 128-88 NCStI - IIAI?
Swint: f'roduclion Facility Manurt: Mauagemetku undedlour l"lnsh - L-19001l'I Matrtlent ; f:IIAI; 129-KII NCtil l - llA F'
Lagoon Dusil;ll and Mallagollem lilr Liveslock Mamu'c Treatment and Slurage ; IsIJAIi 103-83 MC511 - I1A F
Calibration of Mamtrc and Wastt:►viper Application Etluiptnctit ; FAIAIi Fact Shecl IJC%II - IIAI:
Cuuuullinl; 011OrS Goal Swinc 1311i1aliul;s ; 11111-J7 NCSI I - Swine Iixtcrlsititt
Eavirannicalal Assurance Yragrum ; N1'11C Malltral NC Turk 1'rothwas Assoc
f]pliuns Itir Maoagiug Odor ; a repast from dic Swine Odor Task Porce NCSI I Agri Cnlnmunicalicnls
Nuisaftcu Citncerlls in Auinsat Mlulllre Mallal;enlellt: Odors autl Flies ; 111to107, 1995 Coufcrt:llcc 1'1.nceccliligs 1"111611.1 C04111erilUvc I.xlcllSioll
AAIM; - Idiwemlter 11. 1996, I'aUc 5

Facility Number and Name:
Description of Concern
Brown's 82-442, Farm #10
High Freeboards
11/29/99 —15"
2/2/00 = EPOA
2/7/00 = 16"
2115/00 = 18"
INSPECTIONS
6110/98 — Freeboard inadequate
11/3/99 — Freeboard inadequate
Lagoon Levels < 19"
In Out
07/27/99 — 07/31/99
09118/99 — 10/09/99
10/23/99 — 11131/99
01108/00 — 01/15/00
01/29100 — 01104100

• S.. .: - �.`_Xx�IN
�
'��` .wI
^ r G
.�"`D _ha�;_ a
is�-
Hi h Freeboards�tfab
cre _In
Ie. s
Responses
�
���•" tx
ME
Since Hurricanes Dennis and Floyd, Brown}s hass:
-
implemented a number of measures designed to minimize the
potential for future freeboard exceedances and over
application during prolonged or severe wet weather
conditions. These measures include water
conservation,
�_
=; •— ' s
}
which has reduced Brown's total annual water consumption
by approximately 40 percent; hiring new employees;
�r � , - �`���"�;. �• ' ,..,-
enhanced training; lagoon freeboard tracking charts; and the
purchase of additional equipment to maximize utilization of
our sprayfields and avoid land application under marginal or�
_ '.
-
unsuitable conditions. Brown's EMS, which will be ISOWILg
_
_ - =
14000 certified by the end of 2001, will also contribute to
improved freeboard and land application management.`
•-'�lt., * a �s.:i.''"" g �-..�
� .
Current freeboard level on 07/10/01 was 41"
�,p 5 "�'-`R.X'a' {. ��y4 -I"�• •._M1,( rya
�
{- �'`---h{-ac ii -.r•i
�
-
.3R.:j _ "�-� - FrY
.L�. 's.
�
X � �K.t i� •-s-SY �Ws!•�' h 4^LL� .r di.�� i .'d XxISl1�- Y'-� -
'ti.:. iF��-.
�iJ sr
t
�i' d.��aa+f'^i �•,�;S RT' Rai �i- �' ...Pf]�
j � 6r � Y I!T�'i '1?• _ a4:.. i' ��..y ::
b"C+".^ 'y�bsi `�.i 4, � j �
w r
_

Facility Number and Name: Brown's 82-442 Farm #10
S�ubs.�urf
Over Application
Stractural Issues
Description of Concern
= F�= -- ` W
INSPECTIONS
Only structural issues documented
11/3/99 -- Overapplication of PAN
involve lift station on this facility
�J-'t"ZT'Mj� - L 'S��'S'jL'.� J ..
4 r � .L -• r, _.{ � A
�',.M

Response
�";^" �`
- a�
SirtceHurricanes Dennis and Floyd, Brown's
has implemented a number of measures
Many improvements made to liftF
station on this farm, including:
- _
WN
r�
designed to minimize the potential for future
freeboard exceedances and over application
' Addition of tertiary pump for
�R
na
Nw
during prolonged or severe wet weather
conditions. These measures include water
conservaEion which has reduced Brown's total
added risk management
■ Construction of a retaining wall,}�.
s ram„
-'-= :annual
-t
water consumption b approximately 40
percent; hiring new ernployees; enhanced
around this structure
°
®r �=
training; lagoon freeboard tracking charts; and
Fail -safes added to pump control
Fj
s s
R - �
the purchase of additional equipment to
maximize utilization of our sprayfields and
panel
P
x
.
�s
c
to
avoid land application under marginal or
unsuitable conditions. Brown's EMS, which
"
K °
s' C z --`y _ �"S,{1 _ '+sue• Y
will be ISO 14000 certified by the end of 2001 )
will also contribute to improved freeboard and
land application management.
.., ,�� --w - _
�.J
-_
-_ =i 9---
y-
x x ,.
Due to excessive amounts of rainfall from��-
;x zg-
hurricanes Dennis & Floyd and efforts to
prevent discharges the additional water wasSK
�`-
)� '�� ,,.
applied to the land when soil Conditions were
suitable. In order to manage freeboard levels,
- r - ,'�
_ Yx
,ice
land application was accomplished during the
time period when crop uptake of PAN hadK���
�-_ Y , ` �� •_
..
y
alreadyWal-
been met.
h�,��
Had wrong PAN rates on irrigation records
160 instead 132-140 lbs- N/Ac. Over°
a
-
using of
applications were after hurricane floyd as well
as using the wrong rate. Very few over
.t
applications occurred on 1999-2000 winter crop,
No over applications have occurred since then_
" r
Y-.
�4�-C-
�T-.-� 14-�5-•x.3IS�M- -` _ _ ice` •\� f.7. _.
a Li•?�
E Concerns are based upon DWQ records consisting of deficiencies noted in state inspection reports, NOVs, penalty assessments and/or reports submitted to DWQ by the farm. Carefully
review your records to identify the specific concern or concerns and then describe the concern under the appropriate heading together with a reference to the specific record and the date of
the record (i.e., inspection report dated or NOV dated __j. With the exception of "discharges," which cover calendar year 2000, concerns are based on DWQ records for the
calendar years beginning January 1, I996, and ending December 31, 2000.
4

Describe in as much detail as possible how the concern has been addressed, or, if it has not been addressed, the measures the farm intends to undertake to address the concern and a
schedule for completing the measures.
'Concerns are based upon DWQ records consisting of deficiencies noted in state inspection reports, NOVs, penalty assessments and/or reports submitted to DWQ by the farm. Carefully
review your records to identify the specific concern or concerns and then describe the concern under the appropriate heading together with a reference to the specific record and the date of
the record (i.e., inspection report dated or NOV dated _�. With the exception of "discharges," which cover calendar year 2000, concerns are based on DWQ records for the
calendar years beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 2000.
'z Describe in as much detail as possible how the concern has been addressed, or, if it has not been addressed, the measures the farm intends to undertake to address the concern and a schedule for completing the measures.