19950278 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19950313

IIIz?I%S CL,3
.?c?f\i sacQecF'
yU rh
CWC?-wn ?i?s???
F?n-.d W ?NQR
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
L77;IT
A&47eto
?EHNF1
May 1, 1995
Johnston County
DEM Project # 95278
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Charles Winston
c% Solaris Development Corp.
1 Copley Parkway, Suite 310
Morrisville N.C. 27560y &'OP
Dear Mr. Winston:
You have our approval to impact 8.45 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of developing
a commercial center, golf course and residential development at Sweetwater subdivision, as you
described in your application dated 30 March 1995. After reviewing your application, we have decided
that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 2664, 2732, 2733 and 2671.
These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 12, 14, 18 and 26 when they are
issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification.
Wetland enhancement and water quality measures outlined in the 30 March 1995 letter from Kevin
Martin shall be implemented. Deed restriction (example attached) shall be included on all lots with
jurisdictional wetlands not proposed to be filled. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or
local permits before you go ahead with your project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 30 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401
of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
ton Howard, Jr.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Kevin Martin; Soil and Environmental Consultants 95278.1tr
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
•
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ (919) 846-590O N Fax [phone]
March 30,1995
NC DEHNR, DEM US Army Corps of Engineers
Water Quality Planning Attn: Ms. Jean Manuel
Attn: Mr. John Domey 6512 Falls of the Neuse Road,
4401 Reedy Creek Rd. Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27607 Raleigh, NC 27615-6846 RECEIVED
Dear Mr. Dorney and Ms. Manuel: APR 31995
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
The purpose of this letter is to request a revision to our application for BRANCH
Nationwide Permits 26,14,12 and 18 and a 401 Water Quality Certification for
the project known as the Sweetwater which was submitted on 2/24/95. The
project is bisected by SR 1550 and White Oak Creek in Johnston County, NC as
shown on the enclosed plans and vicinity map. Our original application was
incomplete because it lacked any proposed mitigation and most importantly it
incorrectly identified a road crossing as being qualified for a Nationwide Permit
26 when in reality (because the crossing is below headwaters) it should have
been a Nationwide 14. I realize this may cause the restart of the 30 day permit
processing "clock".
Fill in Waters of the US has been revised accordingly and will be required to
develop the site for golf course and residential community, including padv?ays,
cart paths, parking, and lots. It will be necessary to impact a total .82 a es of
jurisdictional Waters of the US above headwaters for placement of roposed
facilities. In addition to the 4.94 acres to be impacted under NW 26. Other
impacts are 1.78 acres for Nationwide 14 and-.10 acres for below headwaters
Nationwide 18 and 9.33 acres under Nationwide 12. (See attached revised map
for impact location and size.)
The plans for the development have been modified in order to minimize impacts
by 1.54 ac. overall as compared to our original application; upland areas have
been utilized as much as possible. Wetland enhancement on holes 1A, 2B and
7C has been proposed in locations as shown on the attached tables as well, total
acres to be enhanced equal 1.01 ac. For water quality protection/ mitigation the
client is building two stormwater detention ponds and at DEM's request has
agreed to perform shrub and wetland grass/ sedge plantings (1.03 acres) along
the creek where Hole number 5A plays over the creek to reduce warming of
streamwaters.
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
r
To expedite the permitting process and to ease the process for everyone
involved, the following individuals/agencies have been provided with a
complete copy of this entire application package: Danny Smith (DEM Raleigh
Regional Office), David Franklin (Wilmington Corps), USF&WS, and NC Dept
of Cultural Resources.
Detailed plans for the residential pods surrounding the course are close to their
final version but may require future revisions. The client realizes that these
must be addressed prior to construction. It is anticipated that any changes
would require no or only minimal wetland impacts.
If you intend to perform a site visit, please call and we can arrange for someone
to accompany you.
Sincerely,
Kevin C. Martin,
President
cc: (w/enclosures) David Franklin, Wilmington Corps
Danny Smith, DEM' Raleigh Regional Office
USF&WS
Cultural Resources
KCM/jmb
DEM ID: ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): 2 6 , 14 , 12 & 18
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR JOHN DORNEY
Telephone (919) 733,5083
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVWONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Charles Winston c/o Solaris Development Corporation
2. Owners Address: 1 Copley Pkwy., Ste 310. Morrisville, NC 27560
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): (Work): 9191469-1316
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
Inc.
t n: r. even Martin, President
244 W XU-33-b-oak RA
Ralelah. NC 27609 Ph: 919/846-5900
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: Johnston
Nearest Town or City: Between Garner and Clayton
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): W- s t of the i n t e r G P r-t i o n of
S.R. 1550 and 1551. See attached Section of USGS Garner Quad.
6. Name of Closest Stream/River: W h i J-, P- 0;1 k C ""°k
7. River Basin N e-u s P-
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WSI, or WS II?
YES ( ) NO (x)
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ( ) NO (x) If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of wagers of the U.S. including wetlands, located on project site:
Uncertailibu more than 30
11. Number of acres of wagers of the U.S. inag_wetlands, impacted dbbXthe proposed Project:
Filled: 3 7t .'lam .O
Drained:
Excavated: I , I `X ` :s 3
U 1
Total Impacted: u• qy _L_7 a-1-11-
12 Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS78117' X 11" drawings
13. Purpose of proposed work To develope a vi1 acre community including a
golf onurse by maximizing utilization of uplands.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also,
note measures taken to minimize wetland impacts. See attached letter by S& E C.
15. Youaire required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Nfarine
Fisheries Service (NMI) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing
endangered or threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project Have you done so? YES (x ) NO ( )
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding theypresence
of historic properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done
so? ' YES ( x) . NO ( )
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DM-
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the
placement of delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project; attach copy.
E. What island use of surrounding property? Rural residential and/or aaricultural
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? mun i c i n a l
Agent's Signature Date
Table 1
"Reason" for Impact
(Regardless of Permit Type)
Reason
Golf Cart Crossings
Golf Fill
Roads
Stormwater Lakes
Lot Fill
Acreage
0.393 ac.
0.391
4.27
1.11
0.63
WETLAND GOLF COURSE IMPACTS
IM pact # Hole # Impact Type Amount of Impact Permit Type
G-1 1A Culvert Crossing 100' x 20' = 2000 S.F. 26
G-2 1A Planting/Enhancement 13,000 S.F. NA
G-3 2A Clearing 3,100 S.F. NA
G-4 2A Culvert Crossing 20' x 110' = 2,200 S.F. 26
G-5 3A Clearing 2,175 S. F. NA

G-7 5A Planting/Enhancement 45,000 S.F. NA
G-8 5A Bride 10' x 100' NA
G-9 7A Fill 6045 S. F. 26
G-10 7A Clearing 6350 S.F. NA
G-11 7A Clearing 29,450 S.F. NA
G-12 7A Bride 10'x 70' NA
G-13 8A Clearing 9,750 S.F. NA
G-14 8A Bride 10' x 30' NA
G-15 2B Planting/Enhancement 14,880 S.F. NA
G-16 2B Culvert Crossing 45'x25'= 1125 S.F. 26
G-17 2B Planting/Enhancement 13,800 S.F. NA
G-18 3B Lake Excavation 4,175 S.F. 26
G-19 3B Bride 10' x 15' NA
G-20 4B Clearing 54,550 S.F. NA
G-21 5B Clearing 600 S.F. NA
G-22 5B Culvert Pie 5'x 140' = 700 S.F. 26
G-23 6B Culvert Crossing 20'x 10'= 200 S.F. 26
G-24 6B Clearing 2,525 S.F. NA
G-25 7B Bride 10'x265' NA
G-26 7B Clearing 43,550 S.F. NA
G-27 8B Clearing 7,100 S.F. NA
G-28 8B Culvert Crossing 20'X 40'= 800 S.F. 26
G-29 9B Clearing 3,720 S.F. NA
G-30 9B Culvert Crossing 20'X 15'= 300 S.F. 26
G-31 1C Fill Lake 1000 S.F. +/- 26
G-32 1C Pi in /Culvert 500 S.F. +/- 26
G-33 2C Clearing 17,300 S.F. +/- NA
G-34 2C Culvert Crossing 20'X 50'= 1,000 S.F. 26
G-35 3C Clearing 3,550 S.F. NA
G-36 3C Culvert Crossing 25'X 20'= 500 S.F. 26
G-37 4C Clearing 10,700 S.F. NA
G-38 4C Culvert Crossing 20'X 40'= 800 S.F. 26
G-39 5C Culvert Crossing 20' X 30' = 600 S.F. 26
G-40 6C Culvert Crossing 20'X 10'= 200 S.F. 26
G-41 6C Culvert Crossing 20'X 10'= 200 S.F. 26
G-42 6C * Culvert Crossing 20'X 60' = 1200 S.F. 26
G-43 6C Clearing and Fill 17,550 S.F. Clearing,
6650 S.F. Fill NA
26
G-44 7C Planting/Enhancement 2,450 S.F. NA
G-45 7C *Culvert Crossing 20' x 185' = 3,700 S.F. 26
G-46 8C Culvert Crossing 20'x 35'= 700 S.F. 26
G-47 9C Culvert Crossing 20' x 20' = 400 S.F. 26
G-48 9C Clearing 14,725 S.F. NA
G-49 2B NW18 above U13, Fill .1 ac. 18
L-2 Lot Fill 22,800 S.F. 26
L-3 Lot Fill 1,800 S. F. 26
Note: All +/- The Amount
UTILIT
U1 Y EASEMENTS
150LF x 40W =
U2
=
500 x 30'W
U3 300 x 20 W =
U4 150 x 20 W =
U5 120 x 20 W =
U6 200 x 40 W =
U7 170 x 40 W =
U8 250 x 30 W =
U9 300 x 20 W =
U10 120x40W =
U 11 200 x 40 W =
U12 160 x 40 W =
U13 600 x 40 W =
U14 100x100W =
U15 2000 x 40 W =
U16 500 x 40 W =
U17 1100 x 20W =
U18 600x30W =
U19 300 x low_ =
U20 550 x 20 W =
U21 250 x 30 W =
U22 300 x 30 W =
U23 450 x 30 W =
U24 250 x 30 W =
U25 110 x 40 W =
U26 550 x 40 W =
U27 550 x 40 W =
U28 1400 x 30 W =
U29 300 x 30 W =
U30 160 x 30 W =
11,000 SF
7,500 SF
9,000 SF
13,500 SF
7,500 SF
4,400 SF
22,000 SF
22,000 SF
42,000 SF
9,000 SF
4,800 SF
1?
41
X'?-
TOTAL 403,600 SF (NW12)'t
L1 300 x 10 W = 3000 SF 26
Nationwide
Permit #
6,000 SF
15,000 SF
6,000 SF
3,000 SF
2,400 SF
8,000 SF
6,800 SF
7,500 SF
6,000 SF
4,800 SF
8,000 SF
6,400 SF
24,000 SF
10,000 SF
80,000 SF
20,000 SF
22,000 SF
18.000 SF
12
r
?SRQ G
N
ationwide/
Permit #
A 190'LF x 75' W (12' Ht @ 4:1=48LF x 2 + 50' ROW)= 14,250SF _ j t4
-
B 120'LF x 150'W Same as above = 18,000 SF )-(p
c 130'LF x 150'W Same as above = 19,500 SF -)-(o
D I. 160'LF x 150'W Same as above = 24,000 SF
II 80'LF x 35'W 2,800 SF
.
III 35'LF x 17.5'W = 612 SF 2b
E 40'LF x 120'W (18Ht @. 3:1=55LF + 50 ROW) = 4,800 SF Z6
F 50'LF x 80'W (5Ht (a), 3:1= 15LF x 2 + 50 ROW) = 4,000 SF 1'A
G 35'LF x 80'W Same as Above = 2,800 SF
00 SF
6 ?-?
H I 30'LF x 200'W (25Ht @ 3:1 = 75LF x 2 +50 ROW) = ,0 _
Z (
*II
I 200'LF x 30'W
110'LF x 80'W =
(51-It @ 3:1=15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 6,000 SF
8,800 SF o
N
*J PLAN METER = 38;008 SF ?(b
-
K 45'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 =15 x 2 + 50 ROW) =
= 3,600 SF
600 SF
5 1-0
L 70'LF x 80'W Same as above , Z
b
M 30'LF x 80'W Same as above = 2,400 SF -
Z
?
N PLANIMETER (.15") (5Ht @3:1=15 x 2 +50 ROW) = 1,500 SF .
O PLANIlVIETER (1.4") (20Ht @ 4:1 = 80 + 50 ROW) = 14,500 SF
Z?
p PLANUAETER (1.73") (lOHt @ 3:1 = 30 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 17,300 SF
Q PLANDAETER (.51") (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 5,100 SF
Z&?
R. PLANIlVIETER (.25") (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 +50 ROW) 2,500 SF
S
T 15' x 5'
PLANMffiTER (.65") =
(10Ht @ 3:,1= 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 758 SF
6,500 SF
u 38'LF x 80'W (lOHt @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 3,040 SF Z6
V 25'LF x 80'W (10Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 2,000 SF
SF 2-6
W 5'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 D
6
X 5'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 SF -
y 5'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 SF 2(o
z 70'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 3,600 SF t4
AA 110' LF x 80'W (5Ht Q. 3:1 =15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 8.800 SF I q
TOTAL 242,218 SF
* = Storm Water Ponds
„ 9
f
MIMMIMZI
Project name
County_??
Name of evalua
_TLA

15
fs;
?Tl €
el :w
t n ;1itaex?treana cii?-t? ` f
' ky ; rte: k ? U?: t
'N' >'.
.t `
ox?
pr dotllll?arityya:i an UMUS,
m??vck or peat kx
"pr inaptly minaral ?rlorlysandya
rec?o...ii a t?tly r,. dandy
Nearest road 5?K 42::Z2
ores Wetla d width 2--` /f? feet
'Adjaceftt
wh in{4
woi icidY
AN ?
k: T
Nom.,
FA ?z
L Imp

Ll setl lperrmneo?per aitentfy?. y
?
a
d
`
a
..,.•?
::. , sx. .:
=
flo
de Qr Irlurldafe
yd?aulzo factors irr Hal.
fa sonaily:floodecl nor ?nundateo

intermittantiy flooded or ternpora?y
:steep topography

sUt?faC- _ water
?Q ditc??e?i or channelized
( total wetland M th >:100 feet [] rio n y nce of floodit surface
.F..,.1r'VC1t. e.r=..-.?
crrrlirrli!!!rr!!lirli!!!llririirrliiii/liiilriiiiiiiiirilirriiiiri!°rlr?!!!!!lrl??ilrililliirlitrir/lrrirlrrii!lrlrii!!!irlliiillrrirr,:!?:
Wetland type (select one)*

-.. ?? 5° ? Pine savanna
JBottomland hardwood forest
?
Freshwater marsh
? Headwater forest
/fen
? Bo
g
? Swamp forest
? Wet flat `"'?i ? Ephemeral wetland
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay v
? Bog forest ? Other
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight
n
R
Water storage .Z- x 4.00 =
' o

Q Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 = , . . .. z

., 11yetland Score
,
°
_
Pollutant removal * x 5.00 -
?r:
ate" '

,
Wildlife habitat x 2.00 = "?
' Aquatic life value x 4.00 =
!I V
Recreation/Education x 1.00
* Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius
57
Wlandar''?" "" a
4t See-_ =6 f ate
e
#1 TING -:ORKs-i? L?E Val',
R"r
F
WET LAN
Fflurtk / x+ a- • '"u'.Sic•. X ^a ?or ;.S"Aa .,.,22 Project name r? r Gf! Nearest road I Q! 4 County- Wand area acres Wetland widtfeet
bcF I F: -4
Name of evaluator- ate
;may
'd ae" V 4^? ?:
7 r y r Z y Ad}ao?2d ?a-nd s ?e i?., ? ,? > :".•- y+
r etland -It c.at C}I3. rAY: s •? >,B??.s< SJ
K = t r
:mss ;? ,N rs ;: x{?vihin 12?euptram? £pIce ?_
,h'3 .¢:?s x ?>` tx<?a^f .aR'?c t y ?' z? a .r• ia?x .. 3 /...? x
MIN
3?tlado3 1}ce?? s or raait?sg
x onere?lnia3 streal
;orest2c[{natural vegetiQnJ'
an ante ittaii t s t1 can <
?A a€?ricultutfl urbr?/subu
th n ttlt rstred-11 c?tv
ae
} }? impervious surf
LtFer w .stttV j Rr
°..=w ,
F Dominant vvegetattdn y-
IBM'
3«._ \4ku
s ? 5th
^s' • :£•?a ??y?x s?.c
MAN,
-,.?:r ? ? > a -. _'' -? 'fix ? - ".m ??Z r %' ?. ;,?,>.,p ,>' :•;r:;; , ' ?. ??l ? x ? .
',,?` ? ? 'xS?".e> u?W ? yY.. '??@'.N•? ^2 ?. She d ,,. y.:
??3 x & ?}:. mss,-3z ??YsT, st ?- •?s vs •@? c>zs6y . »< x??rx. "?.r ?;sL+as
'•? s'•,6 ?•' ,x .£e z??t?9 / 'yam' ?"?
muCR or, pea s J
?M predominantly, na tion-sandy b ?
d =1 Flooc ing ..aid
mantl ? Tetness ?A?? ? '
predom
' ? semiperii anentfy to permanently
flooded or inundaLec3
ydraulic factors seasonall fiooded or inundated
ir)termittantly flooded or temporary
steep topography surfa? to
ce
'•Q ditched or channeiized =
Y no evidence of flooding or 'surface
total wetland wjdth >100 feet
>£SFrb, a`v - tsa?cd0-ae,..>s..... i l` I.Gt
vriirrrri/iriiiiriir?rririiirirrriirrrrr;.',rrrrrrirr/rr/rrr„ rJ/J;rrrrrrr/rirrririrrrriiirrirrirrrrriirriiir/i?r/iiii/:/,
irirrrr/rrrrrr
Wetland type (select one)*
?v ottomland hardwood forest ? Pine savanna
? Freshwater marsh
f? Headwater forest
? Swamp forest ? Bog/fen
? Wet flat ? Ephemeral wetland
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay
? Bog forest ? Other
l
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight
Water storage x 4.00 = ?? •.
Wetland Score
G=?1 Bank/Shoreline stabilization '' - x 4.00 =
MEM
Pollutant removal * x 5.00
' Wildlife habitat L x 2.00 =
Aquatic life value x 4.00 =
r
Recreation/Education x 1.00
* Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius
:rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrlrrrrrrrrlrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrlrrlrrrrrrrrr:rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ?
57
ya ?
WETS
Project nab
County ?s W
Name of evaluator
ate
?r a f"?. ? ?? £4 1?d' ent land use s ? ? `z' y4
otand location f hire 1/2 mile ups???a pslope,
??.
e
: <,{>
on p(?i7d or lake or radius)
"orl perm ial stream
i ^ forested /natu ?I vegttitt$ z °
on in einjittant strems.ni
ai?icu(tu?"e uI tnfSUt2r3aCi??o 6
hin interstreatl}
impervious su1 t ace
_J other
getation-:.
g . s y Dominant ve w
F a %kt F
V ' ! f
0, IN
1611 series w?? x MIND,
y ?
_ y
. ] predominantly orc;anic - hur??us,
.z muck;` or peat
predomi'aptly. r fal - rion-sandy
y , ] predom Mnt{y sandy Flooding and wetness
semipermariently to permanerltly
i
flooded or inundated
H-vdraulic factors
12S seasonally flooded or inundated
,y steep topography (?] interm ttantfy flooded or tenipor ary
w
Surface viater
Q ditched or channe`ized
h 1D.. total Wetland tiV.iath >100 feet ? no evidence of flooding or surface
F: € v ater
riirirriirrrrriiirrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiiir?irrrri,;;,.,irrrrrrrrirrrrriifii?riiiraiirrrririi:?.,;;rrrriirrriirri.'.rrrriiii?rrrir:;?
a
I Wetland type (select one)*
? Bottomland hardwood forest ? Pine savanna
Headwater forest ? Freshwater marsh
? Swamp forest ? Bog/fen
? Wet flat ? Ephemeral wetland A
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay
? Bog forest ? Other
r *The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
lirrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrriirrrrrrrr?........irrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrri?..rirrrrrriirrir?.iirirrriirrrrrrirrirrrrirrrrrrrrrrirrrrirrrriirrrirrrrrr,
weight
Water storage i % x 4.00 = w .`
Score ,
We
Q Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 =
Pollutant removal x 5.00 1
Wildlife habitat x 2.00 = ? 6 ,
Aquatic life value ? x 4.00
' Recreation/Education x 1.00
S
* Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius ,
:rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr?
3a ? 3? e
F V.
RATING-1-WO KSHEET oUrth
Nearest road W
acres Wetland widti` feet
57
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural :Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., RE., Director
1::> EHNR
July 13, 1995
Johnston County
DEM Project # 95278
401 Water Quality Certification-Sweetwater
Mr. Charles Winston
c/o Solaris Development Corp.
1 Copley Parkway, Suite 310
Morrisville, N.C. 27560
Dear Mr. Winston;
FILE Cup,
On 1 May 1995, DEM issued a 401 Water Quality Certification for the Sweetwater subdivision
near SR 1550 and White Oak Creek in Johnston County. This Certification approved 8.45 acres of
impact to wetland and waters. Upon review of the application, I realized that you only requested 6.82
acres of wetland and water fill beyond the 9.3 acres of wetland impact for the sewer line.
I apologize for the confusion. I can be reached at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Kevin Martin; Soil and Environmental Consultants

95278.rev
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535, Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road ¦ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ¦ [phone] ¦ Fax [phone]
NC DEHNR, DEM
Water Quality Planning
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Dorney and Ms. Manuel:
US Army Corps of Engir
Attn: Ms. Jean Manuel
6512 Falls of the Neuse I
Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27615-6846
?t t35
DENNR RALEIGH REGIONAL J
'`"?--- OFFICE
The purpose of this letter is to request Nationwide Permits 26, and 18 and
a 401 Water Quality Certification for the project known as the Sweetwater. The
project is bisected by SR 1550 and White Oak Creek in Johnston County, NC as
shown on the enclosed plans and vicinity map.
We previously met Jean Manuel on-site on two occasions to review wetland
delienations and discuss impacts. We also discussed this project in the office
with John Dorney and Danny Smith of DEM. Overall the Engineer Architect
and Developer have minimized impacts to high and medium value wetlands to
the greatest extent possible. In fact considering the amount of wetland on-site
they have done on outstanding job in wetland avoidance.
Fill in Waters of the US will be required to develop the site for golf course and
residential community, including roadways, cart paths, parking, and lots. It will be necessary to impact a total of8.-:16acres of jurisdictional Waters of the US above y
headwaters for placement of the proposed facilities. In addition to the 1 acres 1 • y ?°"v
to be impacted under NW 26." Other impacts are 6_4S acres for Nationwide 14
and .10 acres for below headwaters Nationwide 18 and 9.32acres under k
Nationwide 12. (See attached map for impact location and size.)
The plans for the development have been modified in order to minimize impacts
to wetlands; upland areas have been utilized as much as possible.
Site Photo 1 shows the high quality wetland area along White Oak Creek that
has been avoided other than for 1 road crossing. Site Photo 2 and 3 show the
low quality wetland area to be impacted for construction of a storm water pond
(impact area J on map). Site Photo 4 shows the low quality wetland area along
an old sewer line to be impacted by the golf hole 6C (impact area G43). The
location of the Nationwide 18 impact is at impact area G44 and is above the
Soil/Site Evaluation ¦ Mapping and Physical Analysis ¦ Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ¦ Environmental Audits
On-Site Waste Treatment Systems, Evaluation and Design
proposed utility line. Site Photo 5 shows the wetland area in front of the green
of hole 3B to be cleared and played over. This area has potential for being
turned into a freshwater marsh similar to that along White Oak Creek. It
currently is a marginal wetland area of red maple, gum and loblolly pine with
minimal function and Valve. This possibility can be discussed further during
the permit process as potential enhancement.
To expedite the permitting process and to ease the process for everyone
involved, the following individuals/agencies have been provided with a
complete copy of this entire application package: Danny Smith (DEM Raleigh
Regional Office), David Franklin (Wilmington Corps), USF&WS, and NC Dept
of Cultural Resources.
Detailed plans for the residential pods surrounding the course are close to their
final version but may require future revisions. The client realizes that these
must be addressed prior to construction. It is anticipated that any changes
would require no or only minimal wetland impacts.
If you intend to perform a site visit, please call and we can arrange for someone
to accompany you.
Sincerely,

Kevin C. Martin,
President
cc: (w/ enclosures) David Franklin, Wilmington Corps
Danny Smith, DEM Raleigh Regional Office
USF&WS
Cultural Resources
Note: S&EC has already performed an endangered species survey for the Dwarf
Wedge Mussel and submitted it to the USF&WS. They concurred with our
finding of no adverse impact to the mussel (see attached USF&W!5 letter dated
11/23/94). The client has agreed to follow the USF&WS non-binding
recommendations in most areas on the project except where golf holes cross the
creeks. Please note that the known population referred to in their letter is more
than 1 mile downstream of the project site, is in Swift Creek and is down stream
of Austin Pond. The Sweetwater project is upstream of Austin Pond.
KCM/jmb
DEM ID: ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): 2 6 , 14 , 12 & 18
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: Charles Winston C/o Solaris Development Corporation
2. Owners Address: 1 Copley Pkwy., Ste. 310, Morrisville, NC 27560
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work): 919/469-1316
C If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
ttn: r. ev9in ar din Presidenlnc.
24 W Mi lllaroold Rdl
Raleigh, NC 27609 Ph: 919/846-5900
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: T nh n G t an
Nearest Town or City: Between Garner and Clayton
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): West o he i n r G ? .ion ()f
S.R. 1550 and 1551. See attached Section of USGS Garner Quad.
6. Name of Closest Stream/River. White Oak r r Pk
7. River Basin !? v?S
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WSI, or WS II?
YES ( ) NO (x)
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ( ) NO (x) If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S. including wetlands, located on project site:
Uncertain but more than 30
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S. inc d n etlands,i impacted by the propose d roject
,t
Filled: 4.5 b x. 4 5 ? O I
Drained:
Excavated: _
Total Impacted:
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-81/2" X 11" drawings only):
Commercial and Residential Development and Golf Course.
13. Purpose of proposed work To develops a village community including a
golf course try maximizing utilization of uplands.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also,
note measures taken to minimize wetland impacts. See attached letter by S& E C.
15. Youere required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing
endangered or threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project Have you done so? YES (x ) NO ( )
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence
of historic properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done
so? YES ( x) . NO ( )
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the
placement of delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What island use of surrounding property? Rural residential and/or agricultural
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? municipal,
Agent's Signature Date
JUL.-25'94(MON) 16:53 WINSTON HOSPITALITY TEL:[phone] P.002
THE WINSTON GROUP, INC.
P. O. BOX 31826 /RALEIGH, MC 27622 / 2209 CEKTURY DRIVE / SUITE 300
TELEPHONE [phone]
To Whom It May Concern:
I, Charles Winston, owner of approximately 974 acres in Johnston County, hereby
designated Solaris Development Corporation D.B.A. Sunstar Homes to act in my
behalf as my agent to obtain any and all permits from the appropriate government
agencies for the purpose of developing the property into a master planned residential
community, including a "town center" and 27-hole golf course.
This the 24day of July, 1
Charles Winston
THE. STATE OF NORTH C-,kROLrNA
COUNTY OF WAKE
L , a Notary Public for Wake County, ' A446,t,16? North Carolina, certify that Charles Winston personally came before me this day and
acknowledged that he executed the foregoing instrum. ent.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND A+vD SEAL OF OFFICE this JjWday of July,
1994.
Notary Public in and for the
State of North Carolina
My commission expires•

The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
PROJECT NAME/DESCRIPTION: Sweetwater, Johnston County, North Carolina
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
ATTENTION: Ms. jean Benton Manuele FIELD OFFICE: Raleigh
To Whom it May Concern:
I, the contract purchaser and authorized agent of the property owners on the
attached list, hereby designate and authorize Soil and Environmental Consultants,
Inc., to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of wetland delineations,
permit applications, to furnish, upon request, supplemental nj orma 'on in support
of the applications, etc., from this day forward. This the ? day of NLA "`-.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence conc ` ' g the agent for
this project.
KIPS
=
Contract Purchaser 14ame
Title
cc: Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Department of EH & NR
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Planning
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626
Mr. Kevin Martin
Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
KCM/jmb

3
MN
GN
89 MILS 1'30'
27MILS
GRID AND 1973 MAGNETIC NORTH
)ECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
SCALE 1:24 000
1 2 0 1 MILE
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
1 .5 0 1 KILOMETRE
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

f

GARNER, N. C.
NE/4 GARNER 15' GUADRAN6LE
FIGURE 2. TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF 35078-F5-TF-024
SUBJECT PROPERTY
1964
PN(lTnnCNff cr- ? --
Table 1
"Reason" for Impact
(Regardless of Permit Type)
Reason Acreage
Golf Cart Crossings 0.393 ac.
Golf Fill 0.391
Roads 4.596
Stormwater Lakes 2.34
Lot Fill 0.70

WETLAND GOLF COURSE IMPACTS
Impact # Hole # Im act T =ype Amount of Impact Permit Type
G-1 1A Culvert Crossing 100' x 20' = 2000 S. F. ?-(o
G-2 1A Clearing 13,000 S.F. p?
G-3 2A Clearing 3,100 S.F. 1
G-4 2A Culvert Crossing 20' x 110' = 2,200 S.F.
G-5 3A Clearing 2,175 S. F.
G-6 4A Lake Excavation 53,650 S.F. ?1p
G-7 5A Clearing 45,000 S. F.
G-8 5A Bride 10' x 100'
G-9 7A Fill 6045 S.F. Z(n
G-10 7A Clearing 6350 S.F.
G-11 7A Clearing 29,450 S.F. LA A
G-12 7A Bride 10'x 70' N
G-13 8A Clearing 9,750 S.F. f*A
G-14 8A Bride 10' x 30' E\ A
G-15 2B Clearing 14,880 S.F.
G-16 2B Culvert Crossing 45'x25'= 1125 S.F.
G-17 2B Clearing 13,800 S.F.
G-18 3B Lake Excavation 4,175 S.F. (o
G-19 3B Bride 10'x 15' !v &
G-20 4B Clearing 54,550 S.F.
G-21 5B Clearing 600 S.F.
G-22 5B Culvert Pie 5'x 140'= 700 S.F. Zb
G-23 6B Culvert Crossing 20'x 10'= 200 S.F. Z6
G-24 6B Clearing 2,525 S.F. a
G-25 7B Bridge 10' x 265'
G-26 7B Clearing 43,550 S.F.
G-27 8B Clearing 7,100 S.F.
G-28 8B Culvert Crossing 20'X 40'= 800 S.F. l in
G-29 9B Clearing 3,720 S.F.
G-30 9B Culvert Crossing 20'X 15'= 300 S.F. (o
G-31 1C Fill Lake 1000 S.F. +/- --. Z
G-32 1 C Piping/Culvert 500 S.F. (+/-) 'D- (0
G-33 2C Clearing 17,300 S.F. (+/-)
G-34 2C Culvert Crossing 20'X 50'= 1,000 S.F. Z
G-35 3C Clearing 3,550 S.F.
G-36 3C Culvert Crossing 25'X 20'= 500 S.F.
G-37 4C Clearing 10,700 S.F.
G-38 4C Culvert Crossing 20'X 40'= 800 S.F. 2 b
G-39 5C Culvert Crossing 20'X 30'= 600 S.F. Z(o
G-40 6C Culvert Crossing 20'X 10'= 200 S.F. 1(0
G-41 6C Culvert Crossing 20'X 10'= 200 S.F.
G-42 6C * Culvert Crossing 20'X 60'= 1200 S.F,.
Ala
G-43 6C Clearing and Fill 17,550 S.F. Clearing, A
6650 S.F. Fill Z (o
G-44 7C Clearing 2,450 S.F. \
G-45 7C " Culvert Crossing 20'x 185'= 3,700 S.F. ?(o
G-46 8C Culvert Crossing 20'x 35'= 700 S.F. Z
G-47 9C Culvert Crossing 20'x 20'= 400 S.F. 2(0
G-48 9C Clearing 14,725 S.F.
G-49 26 NW18 above U13, Fill .1 ac. Q
L-2 Lot Fill 22,800 S.F. ?(o
L-3 Lot Fill 1,800 S.F. ?(9
Note: All +/-The Amount
Naa(ro?w ?a2
Qec,r t
A 190'LF x 150'W (12' Ht @ 4:1=48LF x 2 + 50' ROW)= 28,500 SF 2. (0
B 120'LF x 150'W Same as above = 18,000 SF
C 130'LF x 150'W Same as above = 19,500 SF 16
D I. 160'LF x 150'W Same as above = 24,000 SF
II. 80'LF x 35'W = 2,800 SF
III 35'LF x 17.5'W = 612 SF 2G
E 40'LF x 120'W (18Ht (d), 3:1=551,17 + 50 ROW) = 4,800 SF 26
F 50'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15LF x 2 + 50 ROW) = 4,000 SF N_
G 35'LF x 80'W Same as Above = 2,800 SF
H I 30'LF x 200'W (25Ht @, 3:1 = 75LF x 2 +50 ROW) = 62,000 SF
*II 200'LF x 30'W = 6,000 SF --G
I 110'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1=15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 8,800 SF 1?
*J PLANIMETER = 38,008 SF 7.-(b
K 45'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 3,600 SF
L 70'LF x 80'W Same as above = 55600 SF
M 30'LF x 80'W Same as above = 2,400 SF ?-?
N PLANIMETER (.15") (5Ht @3:1=15 x 2 +50 ROW) = 1,500 SF (o
O PLANIM ETER (1.4") (20Ht @ 4:1 = 80 + 50 ROW) = 14,500 SF
P PLANRVMTER (1.73") (10Ht @ 3:1 = 30 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 17,300 SF 2(0
Q PLANIMETER (.51") (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 5,100 SF
R. PLANMETER (.25") (5Ht @, 3:1 = 15 x 2 +50 ROW) = 2,500 SF ?-?
S 15' x 5' = 758 SF 2-(0
T PLANIMETER (.65") (101-It @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 6,500 SF
U 38'LF x 80'W (101-ft @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 3,040 SF 2...6
V 25'LF x 80'W (101-it a, 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 2,000 SF Zlo
W 5'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 SF _-?H
X 5'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 SF D-6
Y 5'LF x 80'W (51-It @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 400 SF 2(0
Z 70'LF x 80'W (5Ht @ 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 3,600 SF N
AA 110' LF x 80'W (5Ht nu. 3:1 = 15 x 2 + 50 ROW) = 8.800 SF 14
TOTAL 242,218 SF
* = Storm Water Ponds

UTILITY EASEMENTS
U1 150LF x 40W = 6,000 SF
U2 500 x 30'W = 15,000 SF
U3 300 x 20 W = 6,000 SF
U4 150 x 20 W = 3,000 SF
U5 120 x 20 W = 2,400 SF
U6 200 x 40 W = 8,000 SF
U7 170 x 40 W = 6,800 SF
U8 250 x 30 W = 7,500 SF
U9 300 x 20 W = 6,000 SF
U10 120 x 40 W = 4,800 SF
Ul l 200 x 40 W = 8,000 SF
U12 160 x 40 W = 6,400 SF
U13 600 x 40 W = 24,000 SF
U14 100 x 100 W = 10,000 SF
U15 2000 x 40 W = 80,000 SF
U16 500 x 40 W = 20,000 SF
U17 1100 x 20W = 22,000 SF
U18 600 x 30 W = 18,000 SF
12
L.1 600 x 10 W = 6,000 SF 1- b
U20 550 x 20 W = 11,000 SF
U21 250 x 30 W = 7,500 SF
U22 300 x 30 W = 9,000 SF
U23 450 x 30 W = 13,500 SF
U24 250 x 30 W = 7,500 SF
U25 110 x 40 W = 4,400 SF
U26 550 x 40 W = 22,000 SF
U27 550 x 40 W = 22,000 SF
U28 1400 x 30 W = 42,000 SF
U29 300 x 30 W = 9,000 SF
U30 160 x 30 W = 4,800 SF
V?-
cz "lor?W c?,2
TOTAL 406,600 SF (N W t-j.)
¦
TAKE??
PRIDE INS
United States Department of the Interior AWERICA...??
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE o ?
Ecological Services
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
November 23, 1994
Chris Huysman
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
244 West Millbrook Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
SUBJECT: Dwarf Wedge Mussel Survey in White Oak Creek,
Tributary of Swift Creek, Johnston County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Huysman
Thank you for your letter of November 11, 1994, regarding the
above-referenced project. Based on your survey methodology and
the negative results regarding the presence of the dwarf wedge
mussel (Alasmidon heterodon) in White Oak Creek, it appears
that this proposed project will not impact the dwarf wedge
mussel. However, we do recommend that the applicant adopt the
following precautions for a known population of the dwarf wedge
mussel at the confluence of White Oak Creek and Swift Creek:
1. Leave a natural, woody vegetation buffer extending 50 feet
on either side of the creeks;
2. Provide a 50 foot chemical free buffer zone along the
creeks.
3. Install sedimentation and erosion control barriers 'during
construction activities.
We appreciate your efforts and cooperation in providing our
agency with endangered species information early in the
permitting process. If you have any further questions
regarding this matter, please contact Candace Martino at 919-
856-4520 ext. 30.
Sincerely,
David Horning
Endangered Species Coordinator
ad
B ?c?ar

'Project name SLZZ-7 W, A F'Q Nearest road (1,L D)
County MMIL77162 Wetland areatU4acres Wetland wid+h U LX M feet
d

"C!
.l
•
•
•
U J

Recreation/Education ?- ;<`«: .
x 0.25 -
Economic value
V-
ro(I Ato7
Wetland type (select one) Other Ckh;C4'a V-11 11
? Swamp forest D Shoreline •
? Bottomland hardwood forest Brackish marsh •
? Carolina bay Freshwater marsh •
? Pocosin ? Bog/Fen '
? Pine savannah Ephemeral wetland
Wet flat '
The rating system cannot be applied to salt marshes.
............ • ....... • ....
Water storage ..S0 • • • • • • . • .. ... • ........... .... •
Bank/Shoreline stabilization 'S x 4.00 =
Pollutant removal

? HydrologicaUy connected ? Hydrologically isolated
"Proje-tt -- Ame 511?tZ7'??? Near-- road
County 12tty2STOCN) Wetland areaU" ( acres Wetland width (X>" feet
•
•
•
•
Wetland type (select one) Other 8ja VV\
Swamp forest Shoreline •
? Bottomland hardwood forest Brackish marsh
? Carolina bay ? Freshwater marsh •
? Pocosin Bog/Fen •
? Pine savannah J Ephemeral wetland
Wet flat '
The rating system cannot be applied to salt marshes.
.................. • • • • •.• • .S0 • • . • • • •
Water storage • • •'• • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • w
Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 - •
Pollutant removal
...

..
... ..................

................
..................
.
Sensitive watershed ?-

Travel corridor x 1.50
Wetland score •
.
?
1 •
S
Aquatic life value (-
Recreation/Education
Economic value- x 0.25 =
Special ecological attributes
Wildlife habitat- x 1.50 =
NOT' Irv wmrc -,sstj?5wv---W wam os PwosLq cw N Nas . \ a
? HydrologicaQy connected ? Hydrologically isolated